I was rear-ended by a distracted driver while stopped at a stop sign in Virginia. I have lived in many states that allow legal lane splitting (filtering through moving traffic) as well as filtering (proceeding to the stop bar at traffic lights and stop signs). Both offer massive safety margins from rear-end accidents. Distracted driving from drivers looking at phones, texting etc is increasing every month. Allowing motorcyclists to land split and filter increases traffic flow and improves safety for the motorcyclist. Thank you for your time.

Lane filtering should be allowed. It is also safer for motorcyclists as well!

Please pass lane filtering as it would allow for all riders to be more safe, as well as, lower the chance for pedestrian incidents due to accidents.

I think lane filtering when traffic is bad will help motorcycle riders ride safer.

As a motorcyclist who rides regularly in Virginia, I strongly support SB435, which would allow limited and regulated motorcycle lane filtering in the Commonwealth. Anyone who rides in Virginia traffic understands one of the most dangerous situations motorcyclists face: being stopped in traffic with vehicles approaching from behind. Unlike drivers in cars, riders have almost no protection in a rear-end collision. Distracted driving is unfortunately common, and motorcyclists are especially vulnerable when sitting at the back of a line of stopped cars. SB435 provides a practical and carefully limited solution. The bill allows motorcycles to filter between lanes only when traffic is stopped or moving very slowly, and only at low speeds. This is not high-speed lane splitting. It is simply allowing a motorcycle to move carefully past stopped traffic so the rider is not trapped in the most dangerous position on the road. Many people assume lane filtering is reckless, but in reality it is widely practiced around the world and in several U.S. states under controlled conditions. When done at low speeds in congested traffic, it can actually improve safety by reducing the risk of rear-end collisions involving motorcycles. SB435 also sets clear rules so both riders and drivers understand what is allowed. The bill limits filtering to appropriate roadways, establishes speed restrictions, and requires riders to operate with ordinary care. It also includes provisions discouraging drivers from intentionally blocking a motorcycle that is legally filtering, which helps prevent road-rage situations. In addition to improving safety, lane filtering can also help reduce congestion slightly by allowing motorcycles—which take up far less space than cars—to move through stopped traffic rather than contributing to the backlog. Most importantly, SB435 recognizes a simple reality: motorcycles are different from cars. The risks riders face are different, and traffic laws should reflect that reality when reasonable safety improvements are available. As a Virginia rider who shares the road with thousands of drivers every day, I believe SB435 is a thoughtful and measured step toward improving safety for motorcyclists while maintaining clear rules for everyone on the road. I respectfully urge the Virginia legislature to support SB435.

Lane filtering is long overdue in the DMV. As an "old timer" rider who's been riding motorcycles and driving cars in the DMV for over 27 years, I wish I could adequately explain the frustration I feel when driving my motorcycle in traffic with cars. I could take up less space in traffic and make the turn before waiting for the light to change. I could save time on my commute. I could avoid the distracted driver who is on their phone while approaching me from behind at a light. These things are taken for granted in California, for example, where I've also lived. There both lane splitting and filtering are legal and understood and accepted. I don't understand what the opposition is to this bill except selfishness on the part of people who drive cars and don't actually have experience with motorcycles feeling some kind of resentment over motorcyclists "getting there first" or " cutting in front."

Please do your part to have this approved. I am supportive of the bill to legalize the lane filtering by motorcyclist. This would be a significant improvement for motorcycle navigation in cities and or congested areas allowing those who ride motorcycles a safer and quicker way to commute or travel in these situations.

I support passage of S.B. 435, an act to permit lane filtering by motorcyclists in the state of Virginia. I own an expensive motorcycle with an air cooled engine. Under current law, when traffic is stopped for extended periods of time, I must pull off to the shoulder and turn off my motorcycle. I risk overheating and ruining the engine if I do not.

As a resident and property owner in Wythe County with years of riding experience across the country, I strongly support SB435. Lane filtering is a vital safety tool that removes motorcyclists from the 'crumple zone' of distracted drivers at stoplights, where we are most vulnerable to life-altering rear-end collisions. I particularly support the provision that makes intentionally impeding a lawful filtering motorcycle a traffic infraction punishable by a $300 fine. This penalty, combined with the bill's mandate for a statewide education campaign, is essential for ensuring that Virginia's roads remain civil and that safety measures are respected by all motorists. This is a common-sense, data-backed update that protects Virginia riders without compromising traffic flow.

Dear Members of the Transportation Committee, I am writing to express my support for SB 435, which would allow controlled motorcycle lane filtering in Virginia. Lane filtering is a proven safety measure used in many places around the world. Allowing motorcyclists to move past stopped or very slow traffic significantly reduces the risk of rear-end collisions, which are one of the most common and dangerous accidents involving motorcycles. SB 435 is written with reasonable safety limits, allowing filtering only when traffic is stopped or moving slowly and limiting motorcycle speed while passing. This approach improves safety for riders while keeping traffic predictable for all road users. Motorcycles take up less space on the road and contribute to reduced congestion. Allowing safe lane filtering helps traffic move more efficiently and protects vulnerable road users. I respectfully ask you to support SB 435 and help make Virginia’s roads safer for motorcyclists and drivers alike. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Niklas Norfolk, Virginia

This is an efficient upgrade on traffic flow.. and environmental impact.. Please support this legislature,.

This law will save lives.

PASS IT!

As a motorcycle rider please consider our safety and vote yes on allowing us to lane filter. With the amount of distracted drivers it is much safer for us to be able to go between cars at slow speeds than to be exposed to being rear ended. This bill will save many lives and prevent many more injuries caused by distracted and careless drivers.

This bill provides safe lane filtering and is a very necessary bill to pass for motorcycles who commute on highways and interstates.

Dear Sir/Ma'am, I'm writing today in support of Virginia S.B. 435, introduced by Sen. Lamont Bagby (D) that would amend the Virginia Code to legalize lane filtering by two-wheeled motorcyclists. Specifically, I support the legislation that would allow operators of two-wheeled motorcycles to overtake another vehicle that is stopped or traveling less than 10 miles per hour in the same lane, or on the shoulder. Thank you, Ken Kusano

Virginia S.B. 435 is a commonsense, evidence-based update to the Commonwealth's traffic laws that would make roads safer for everyone. Lane filtering — allowing motorcyclists to carefully move through stopped or near-stopped traffic at low speeds — has been studied extensively in states like Utah, Montana, and California that have already adopted similar legislation. The data consistently shows that lane filtering reduces rear-end collisions involving motorcyclists, which are among the most dangerous and common accidents motorcycles face in congested traffic. When a motorcyclist is permitted to move to the front of a traffic queue rather than sitting stationary between cars, the risk of being struck from behind drops dramatically. The 20 mph cap on the motorcyclist's speed and the 10 mph threshold for surrounding traffic ensures this is a controlled, low-risk maneuver rather than a license for reckless behavior. Beyond safety, S.B. 435 offers meaningful quality-of-life and environmental benefits. Motorcycles that sit idling in stop-and-go traffic overheat more quickly than cars, putting additional wear on the engine and increasing discomfort for the rider — particularly in Virginia's hot summers. Allowing lane filtering also provides a modest but real reduction in overall traffic congestion, since each motorcycle that moves to the front of a queue effectively removes one vehicle from the bottleneck. Countries across Europe and much of Asia have permitted lane filtering for decades with strong safety records, and the growing body of American state-level experience reinforces that conclusion. Senator Bagby's bill is targeted legislation that brings Virginia in line with modern traffic safety thinking while protecting both motorcyclists and the drivers around them. As a recreational motorcyclist and motorcycle commuter, I support this legislation.

Please allow motorcycle lane filtering in Virginia.

I am an older, avid motorcyclist with a good deal of riding experience. The 'lane filtering' option under consideration here in the Commonwealth, currently available to riders in a number of other states, has proven to be a viable, safe, effective way to improve safety and the flow of traffic. I'll admit, when I saw this issue surface years ago, it seemed ill conceived and dangerous. Over time, I've come to understand and appreciate just the opposite. I've had the opportunity to take advantage of it in other states and believe me, it is a lifesaver - in more ways than one. On two wheels, stopped or just creeping along in traffic is not only exhausting but very dangerous. There is literally no place to escape should it become necessary. Between cell phones, complicated and option laden cars and otherwise distracted drivers, giving motorcyclists the option to move along would be both welcome and a significant safety enhancement. Thank you for your consideration, Ron Hood

I support SB 435, which would allow lane filtering by two wheeled motorcycles in Virginia. As a long time motorcyclist, I have always been concerned with being struck from behind (rear end collision) when sitting stationary in a line of stopped or slow moving traffic. This bill would give motorcyclist the option to slowly move forward between lanes of stopped or slowly moving traffic, which would dramatically decrease the probability of being struck from behind by an approaching vehicle that does not see the relatively smaller and stationary motorcycle.

I'll keep this short and to the point: lane filtering is not the evil Pandora's Box it's made out to be by detractors. The vast majority of negativity somes from hearsay, anecdotal evidence, and a fear of change or "cutting in line". Correctly implemented with a proper legal framework as 435 proposes, lane filtering (not to be confused with the California free for all of lane splitting), can be shown scientifically through data driven means to meaningfully reduce the rate if catastrophic injuries to motorcyclists. I believe good legislation is written based on fact and clear intent. Being an engineer in life critical safety, I do not think it worth taking my word for it, but instead look at the data itself: Rowland, J., et al. (2015). Motorcycle Lane-Splitting and Safety in California. UC Berkeley Safe Transportation Research & Education Center (SafeTREC), University of California, Berkeley. Analysis of ~6,000 motorcycle crashes. Found lane-splitting riders had lower rates of head and torso injury and were less likely to be rear-ended when traffic was slow or stopped. Safety outcomes were favorable when speed differentials were moderate (≈ ≤15 mph over traffic flow). Hurt, H.H., Ouellet, J.V., & Thom, D.R. (1981). Motorcycle Accident Cause Factors and Identification of Countermeasures (The Hurt Report). University of Southern California Traffic Safety Center. Found rear-end collisions are a significant motorcycle crash type. Highlighted vulnerability of motorcycles when stopped in traffic, indirectly supporting filtering as a rear-end mitigation strategy. Rice, T., et al. (2016). Lane Splitting in California: Traffic and Safety Impacts. UC Berkeley Safe Transportation Research & Education Center. Follow-up policy-oriented evaluation. Concluded lane splitting in congested traffic did not increase overall crash risk and may reduce injury severity. Ride to Work (Literature Review). Motorcycle Lane Splitting: A Comprehensive Review of Safety Data and Literature. Ride to Work. Compilation of academic and transportation research. Concluded low-speed lane filtering reduces rear-end crash exposure and does not show increased severe injury rates. Policy Position Statement on Lane Splitting. American Motorcyclist Association (AMA). Official support for legal lane splitting/filtering under controlled, reasonable-speed conditions. Position references SafeTREC findings and broader safety literature. French Lane Filtering Trial (CEREMA Evaluation, 2016–2021). Conducted by CEREMA (French Center for Studies and Expertise on Risks, Environment, Mobility, and Urban Planning). Mixed findings: some increase in reported crashes in trial zones, but not necessarily in severity. Ie the context here is to limit the allowed speeds and times filtering may be allowed. There may be a slight increase in minor scrapes or incidents with a reduction in actual deaths, especially when filtering is new or not well controlled. Highlighted importance of speed limits and clear legal structure. I hope meaningful discourse and analysis on this matter will prevail over long held and irrational fears and stigma. Thank you.

I support this legislation which would allow lane filtering for motorcycles in Virginia. When done safely, in accordance with the parameters of the legislation, it will make riding safer and allow limited traffic to continue moving when traffic is stalled on our bridges and highways. Thanks for your consideration in this matter.

show them the FortNine - “If motorcycle lane filtering bothers you - watch this” video, I can’t explain it any clearer than that.

100% in support of this bill. I lived in CA where is legal and it was extremely beneficial in moving traffic.

As an avid motorcyclist and motorcycle commuter, lane filtering would allow me to move out of the way in the time I feel most vulnerable when sitting vulnerable at a traffic light or exposed to a potential rear end collision when coming into a traffic backup. When I've ridden in California with legal filtering, I've always been impressed with how quickly motorcycles can actually flow through traffic without impacting the traffic flow of four wheeled (plus) vehicles.

I am a motorcyclist and I do not support lane splitting. There were 583 motorcycle fatalities in 2023 in the state of California, a state that is always held to belief that lane splitting is safer. Even though lane splitting is one of the stated causes of motorcycle fatalities. How on earth anyone can believe that motorcycles traveling between cars with huge blind spots is safe is beyond me. And don’t even get me started on the aggressive drivers, both 2 wheel and 4 wheel in the state of Virginia. Our roads are so antiquated, without nearly enough lanes to handle the huge number of vehicles crowding our roads. So traffic is a nightmare. Tempers are already near explosive. And you just want to give motorcycles special treatment to just cut in line? So the cars and motorcycles in the front aren’t going to drag race off the line to try to stay ahead of these motorcycles? Probably getting killed in the process because our traffic lights are a joke and everyone runs red lights. Becauee this state can’t even time their lights so that traffic could actually move. No, as soon as one light turns green, the next one turns red. Every time. And then the motorcycles are just going to magically merge in once traffic starts moving again? I ride a motorcycle probably 80 percent of my driving time and I think this is the dumbest and most unsafe idea I have ever heard. This idea that motorcycles should get special treatment is ridiculous. They are a vehicle just like any other and should have to follow the same rules as everyone else. Please vote down this bill before you have blood on your hands.

The number of distracted car drivers on the road is alarming and with how often there is very slow/ stop & go traffic in the area I am always on high alert to make sure I am not at risk of being rear-ended by a car not paying attention. Lane filtering will save lives and allow motorcycle riders to be in-between cars at low speeds in dangerous situations and limit the opportunities for potential accidents. Thank you for your consideration

I am writing in strong support of SB435. This bill authorizes low‑speed motorcycle lane filtering—a narrowly defined, safety‑focused maneuver that has been successfully implemented in multiple U.S. states and internationally. SB435 is a practical, data‑driven improvement to Virginia’s traffic safety framework. 1. SB435 reduces the most common crash type for motorcyclists. Rear‑end collisions in congested traffic are a leading cause of injuries for riders. Allowing motorcycles to filter forward at low speeds significantly reduces the time riders spend stopped between vehicles, which is when they are most vulnerable. States such as California, Utah, and Montana have adopted similar policies with no increase in crash rates and, in many cases, measurable reductions in rear‑end incidents. 2. SB435 improves overall traffic flow for all road users. Motorcycles occupy minimal space. Allowing them to move through slow or stopped traffic removes them from queues rather than adding to them. This improves throughput in high‑volume corridors without requiring new infrastructure or funding. 3. SB435 is tightly limited and responsibly drafted. The bill restricts filtering to low‑speed, controlled conditions. It does not authorize high‑speed lane splitting or any form of aggressive maneuvering. Riders remain fully subject to all existing enforcement standards. The bill’s structure mirrors proven, safe implementations in other jurisdictions. 4. SB435 aligns with Virginia’s transportation and environmental goals. Encouraging safe motorcycle use reduces emissions, reduces parking demand, and lowers wear on road surfaces. This is a low‑cost, high‑impact modernization that supports multimodal transportation without imposing new burdens on drivers or agencies. 5. SB435 reflects real‑world behavior and improves predictability. In congested areas, some riders already filter informally to avoid being struck from behind. Legalizing and defining the practice creates clear expectations for riders, drivers, and law enforcement, improving safety and consistency for everyone. For these reasons, I respectfully urge the House to advance SB435. It is a measured, evidence‑supported policy that enhances safety, efficiency, and mobility for all Virginians.

Please support SB435. As a long time motorcyclist, and commuter from Prince William County into Washington DC, I've experienced many close calls from motorists who are not paying attention and have almost rear ended my motorcycle in traffic. Being able to filter when traffic stops is much safer for the motorcyclist and the cars. It frees up space on the highway for the cars, and allow the motorcyclist to keep moving which is important when the air temps are in the 90's.

Honorable members of the committee, please pass this bill! I have been a licensed motorcyclist for more than 20 years, and have ridden in more than a dozen US states plus four foreign countries. I learned to ride in California, which is well-known as the state most permissive of both lane splitting and lane filtering. I have since ridden in Colorado & Arizona, where the rules are much like this bill being debated today. I can say without a doubt that these laws work to the benefit of all roadway users. They also require educating the driving public. When filtering is legal, and when it is understood by riders and drivers alike, everyone wins. For drivers, it effectively removes the motorcycle from traffic flows, relieving congestion and giving everyone on the road a more relaxed trip. For riders, the same applies but more importantly, it is SAFER. Crash data compiled across multiple jurisdictions indicates a reduced severity of injuries (both head and spine) and an overall lower fatality rate when filtering is permitted. I can also tell you, as a rider, by FAR the scariest place to be is at the tail end of stopped traffic, hoping the car approaching from behind sees you. Permitting filtering makes it legal for me to never be in that spot again. The studies also make the point that speed differentials should be kept low, so the 20MPH maximum for filtering motorcycles, as proposed in this bill, should remain and not be removed or modified. Having ridden extensively in Europe, where drivers are generally more aware of motorbikes sharing the roadways, I can also say: Please educate Virginia drivers. After passing this law, a campaign of awareness is needed to inform drivers 1) to be aware it is now legal, and therefore should be expected & anticipated, and 2) that riders aren't "cheating" or "breaking the law" - we're being safer for ourselves while relieving traffic congestion for everyone else! Someday I hope to see the practice here in Virginia that is common in California, where slow-moving traffic tends toward one side of the lane, keeping room for safe filtering by motorcyclists. Thank you for allowing me to submit these comments today. I sincerely hope the committee takes them to heart & passes this bill.

I have been riding motorcycles for much of my 65 years. The last 30 years have been principally on the roads. In those years I have been the victim of a rear end collision twice in states that prohibit lane filtering . SB435 would greatly reduce the likelihood of suffering that in Virginia. I urge the committee to recommend to the house passage of SB435.

I was rear-ended by a distracted driver while stopped at a stop sign in Virginia. I have lived in many states that allow legal lane splitting (filtering through moving traffic) as well as filtering (proceeding to the stop bar at traffic lights and stop signs). Both offer massive safety margins from rear-end accidents. Distracted driving from drivers looking at phones, texting etc is increasing every month. Allowing motorcyclists to land split and filter increases traffic flow and improves safety for the motorcyclist. Thank you for your time.

Dear Members of the Committee, I am writing to express my support for Senate Bill 435, introduced by Lamont Bagby, which would allow limited and controlled motorcycle lane filtering in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Lane filtering, when performed at low speeds and under clear restrictions, is a proven safety measure. Allowing motorcyclists to move past stopped or slow-moving traffic helps reduce the risk of rear-end collisions—one of the most dangerous scenarios for riders. This bill takes a thoughtful and cautious approach by limiting filtering to situations. These guardrails strike an appropriate balance between improving rider safety and maintaining predictable behavior on the road for all users. Additionally, the bill’s provision discouraging drivers from intentionally blocking motorcycles helps promote respectful and cooperative roadway interactions. Motorcyclists are vulnerable road users, and policies that acknowledge their unique risks and operating characteristics help create a safer transportation system for everyone. SB435 represents a reasonable, safety-focused step forward. Thank you for your consideration of this legislation. Sincerely, Luke Mason

Lane filtering the practice of a motorcyclist riding slowly between lanes of stopped or slow-moving traffic should be legalized because it improves safety, reduces congestion, and benefits the overall transportation system when properly regulated. safety is the strongest argument for legalization. Rear-end collisions are one of the most common types of crashes involving motorcycles, especially in heavy traffic. When a motorcycle remains stationary in a line of cars, it is vulnerable to being struck from behind by inattentive drivers. Lane filtering allows riders to move out of this danger zone and position themselves ahead of traffic at intersections. Research from regions where lane filtering is legal has shown that, when done at low speeds and under controlled conditions, it does not increase crash rates and may even reduce certain types of injuries.lane filtering reduces traffic congestion. Motorcycles take up far less space than cars. When riders filter forward instead of occupying a full lane in traffic, they effectively remove themselves from the queue. This creates slightly more room for cars and can help traffic flow more smoothly. While the individual impact may seem small, widespread motorcycle use combined with filtering can contribute to overall efficiency in urban transportation systems.

I am writing to express my adamant support of Virginia SB 435 for Lane Filtering. I have lived in Virginia for 66 years and ridden a motorcycle there for 53 of those years. As an old guy, I'm not in much of a hurry and don't use my motorcycles for commuting or getting to places on time, . They are for the joy of the ride only. I have also ridden in California and Arizona for extend periods for the same reasons, i.e., the enjoyment of the ride. Part of enjoyment is feeling safe and secure. And while lane filtering at first felt dangerous and reckless, once I got used to filtering between long lines of traffic in California congestion, I came to realize how much more secure it was. When there were wide spaces between congested lanes, I could roll through with plenty of room on both sides, often making it to the front. From the front, usually at a traffic light, I naturally accelerated a little quicker than the cars to the next congested area. That kept me in front of and away from the constant snarl and unpredictability of the shifting traffic behind me. (When lanes of vehicles were too tight, I wouldn't try to work my way through.) Once acclimated, I started to recognize filtering through traffic was the safest traffic riding I have ever done. I missed it as I left California into states without the legislation. Please consider that endorsement of responsible lane splitting from a lifelong Virginia resident when considering your decision on SB435. And thank you for having the awareness of the likeminded motorcyclists to have even brought the bill up for consideration. Regards, Tom Curtis Waynesboro, VA

Support for SB 435: A Common-Sense Approach to Roadway Safety To the Honorable Members of the House Transportation Committee, I am writing to express my strong support for Senate Bill 435, which seeks to legalize motorcycle "lane filtering" under strictly defined, low-speed conditions. Contrary to common misconceptions that equate filtering with reckless "lane splitting," SB 435 is a measured safety initiative designed to protect Virginia’s vulnerable road users while improving traffic efficiency for everyone. 1. Safety First: Preventing the "Sandwich" Effect The primary goal of SB 435 is to prevent rear-end collisions. For a motorcyclist, a "fender bender" that might merely dent a car's bumper can be fatal. The Danger: In stop-and-go traffic, distracted drivers often fail to see the narrow profile of a motorcycle stopped ahead of them. The Solution: By allowing riders to move between slow or stopped vehicles, they are no longer the "crumple zone" for a distracted driver. A 2015 UC Berkeley study found that lane-filtering riders were significantly less likely to suffer head or torso injuries compared to those who stayed in the lane and were struck from behind. 2. Easing Congestion for All Motorists When a motorcycle filters to the front of a line at a red light, it effectively "disappears" from the traffic queue. Reduced Footprint: Instead of occupying the same space as a full-sized sedan, the motorcycle utilizes the unused space between lanes. Better Throughput: Because motorcycles typically accelerate faster than cars, they move through the intersection and away from the group without delaying the vehicles behind them. This clears the lane for more cars to pass through each green light cycle. 3. Understanding the Guardrails of SB 435 SB 435 is not a "free-for-all." It is a highly regulated maneuver that only applies when: The surrounding traffic is stopped or moving at 10 mph or less. The motorcycle does not exceed 20 mph. There are at least two lanes of travel in the same direction. These limits ensure that the speed differential is low, giving both riders and drivers ample time to react. Furthermore, the bill includes a $300 penalty for motorists who intentionally impede a rider, alongside a mandate for a DMV-led public education campaign to ensure all Virginians understand the new rules. 4. Joining a Growing National Trend Virginia would not be an outlier. Montana, Utah, and Arizona have all successfully implemented similar filtering laws in recent years, recognizing that modern traffic demands modern solutions. These states have seen that when the public is educated, filtering becomes a routine, non-confrontational part of the commute. PLEASE - PLEASE - PLEASE SB 435 is about more than just rider convenience; it is a proactive step toward a safer, more efficient transportation network in the Commonwealth. It protects lives by removing riders from the path of distracted drivers and helps alleviate the gridlock that plagues our major corridors. I urge you to support SB 435 and help make Virginia’s roads safer for all who share them.

Lane filtering is key to addressing an issue that is responsible for 6% of motorcycle fatalities- stopped motorcycles being rear ended by vehicles in stopped traffic. I was rear ended in stopped traffic in 2019 by a distracted driver and was lucky to walk away from the accident. I recognize that lane filtering will need to be responsibly used by motorcyclists and hope that the implementation will lead to more commuters opting for 2 wheels.

Please support SB435. I've been riding motorcycles all my life (I'm 70) and I believe this bill will reduce the risk motorcycles face of being rear-ended in slowly moving traffic. That has happened to me and would not have happened if I could have lane filtered the car in front of me. Since that accident I do lane filter if necessary to avoid being rear-ended and that has saved me on a number of occasions, but I could have been ticketed for it. Plus motorcycles get great gas-mileage and are much cheaper to maintain and operate. This would encourage more people to use them for commuting purposes as I do every day.

Allowing lane splitting by motorcycles just makes sense. Motorcycles are harder to notice, so being in stop-and-go traffic presents a hazard to the motorcyclist. Coming to a full stop may require tilting the bike and putting a foot down. Removing the motorcyle from the main flow of traffic makes more room available for other vehicles. The experience of states that allow lane splitting show it is not a safety hazard.

I have been a motorcyclist for over 55 years. I have been an air traffic controller for over 50 years in various facilities. I continue to do both to this day. I wish to express my support for motorcycle lane filtering (S.B. 435) because, as we say in air traffic control, it is safe, orderly and expeditious. Thank you. FDG

I support, please approve. AMA charter life member. 665820.

As a motorcyclist for more than 20 yrs and traveling on highways & Interstates getting this S.B. 435 passed could prevent accidents to the motorcyclists in heavy slow traffic which vehicle motorists tend to follow extremely close and could rear end the motorcyclist causing injuries. I have been rear ended while at a complete stop and the driver behind me said he thought I was moving and knocked me off my motorcycle. For me if this becomes legalize, I most likely to use the shoulder since I ride a full size touring motorcycle and with the wide fairing would be uncomfortable passing between two vehicles.

I am writing to urge the passing of this bill SB435. I am a lifelong motorcyclist and 72 years of age and a member of the American motorcyclist association. I feel the bill would create an environment that would foster the saving of fuel and promote smoother traffic flow. I am in total agreement with this being done responsibly and within the confines of the law and bill. Done properly I think it’s a win-win for everyone involved. I especially appreciate the portion of the bill that makes it illegal for a car operator to impede the motorcycle path of travel. I think public awareness through the media would be critical on this so that people understand the .bill and its nuances. Done properly in a safe, legal and responsible manner ,lane filtering will have a positive effect on traffic, flow and the saving of resources. Thank you very much for bringing this to the forefront and once again, I urge the passing of this bill for all parties concerned.

I strongly recommend approving legislation to improve motorcyclist safety and reducing traffic impacts on our communities. As a motorcyclist, I try to maximize use of EZ Pass to reduce congestion and save on fuel and tolls versus the standard lanes. However, the flow isn't always the way I'm going or on/off ramps don't align with my entry/exit needs. So then I'm back in the standard lanes, taking up as much room as a car while being exposed to greater risk of being hit. Also, EZ Pass lanes aren't available in all areas with congestion. For this reason, I am reaching out to request that you approve this bill allowing for lane filtering, also known as lane splitting. There are many misconceptions about this practice, but numerous studies have shown its ability to reduce congestion and improve rider safety - two things desperately needed as return to office has further strained our infrastructure! https://americanmotorcyclist.com/rights/ama-board-position-statements/lane-splitting/ Numerous states have legalized lane filtering in recent years, please help do the same here in Virginia! Thank you, Dan Jasper Stafford

I am asking for your support and approval of SB435, the bill that would allow motorcycle lane filtering. Lane filtering has been endorsed by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) in the National Agenda for Motorcycle Safety (2000) and the state of New South Wales, Australia study conducted between 2015 and 2017. The European Association of Motorcycle Manufacturers endorsed lane filtering in their 2009 "Motorcycle In Depth Study" and lane filtering is a common (and safe) practice in most European countries. The Motorcycle Industry Council, representing over 500 manufacturers, distributors, dealers and retailers endorses lane filtering, as do the American Motorcyclists Association (AMA), the Motorcycle Riders Foundation (MRF), ABATE of Virginia and the Virginia Coalition of Motorcyclists (VCOM). Lane filtering is currently allowed in Arizona, California, Colorado, Minnesota, Montana and Utah. I have been riding my entire adult life and off-road as a child. I have lived in California where Lane Filtering is legal and Japan where it is widely practiced and accepted although not legally authorized nor banned. As any rider can tell you the amount of distracted drivers is unnerving. And Intersections are a bastion for distracted drivers putting motorcyclists at extreme risk. Please pass SB435 to make Virginia safer for Motorcyclists!

Lane filtering should be allowed. It is also safer for motorcyclists as well!

Dear Members of the House Transportation Committee, My name is Taurik Haddad and I am a Virginia resident in Midlothian and an experienced motorcyclist. I am writing to strongly support SB 435, which would allow controlled motorcycle lane filtering in the Commonwealth. Motorcyclists face unique safety risks in traffic, particularly when vehicles are stopped or moving slowly. One of the most common and dangerous crash scenarios for riders is being rear-ended while stopped in traffic. Unlike occupants of cars, motorcyclists have little protection in these situations, and the consequences can be severe. Lane filtering directly addresses this risk. Allowing motorcycles to move slowly between lanes when traffic is stopped or crawling enables riders to remove themselves from the most dangerous position in traffic, the back of a queue where distracted drivers may fail to stop in time. SB 435 is carefully written with clear safety limits. It only permits filtering when surrounding vehicles are traveling under 10 mph and requires the motorcycle to travel no faster than 20 mph while overtaking. These restrictions ensure the maneuver remains controlled, predictable, and focused on safety rather than speed. States that have adopted similar laws have seen positive safety outcomes and smoother traffic flow. Responsible riders already practice extreme caution in congested traffic; SB 435 simply provides a clear legal framework that prioritizes safety for everyone on the road. As a Virginia motorcyclist, I strongly encourage the committee to advance SB 435. This bill is a practical, safety-focused step that recognizes the realities riders face on our roads every day. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Taurik Haddad Midlothian, Virginia

I am a Virginia resident and avid motorcyclist and I strongly support the bill to allow lane filtering. This is not only more safe for motorcyclists, but also helps reduce traffic congestion and vehicle engine emissions. Please vote yes for SB435. Thank you!

I spent several years in Northern California where it is legal to lane split. I am in full support of this bill as it provides a significant safety improvement for motorcyclists (see Hurt Report) without introducing the risk of openly allowing lane splitting in free flowing traffic such as that in California. Due to increased congestion on highways in Virginia, motorcycle riders more and more frequently find themselves sitting at a standstill where they can easily be rear ended by an automobile. Even a small tap can knock a motorcycle over creating the possibility of significant injury to the rider. In addition, high heat in the summer is made more intense by the pavement and riders in protective gear, without air flow created by movement, become more susceptible to heat exhaustion making their ride even more dangerous. Properly implemented and managed, this bill will provide a safer riding environment for motorcyclists and can also reduce congestion for all drivers depending on the number of motorcyclists on the road taking advantage of this privilege.

I respectfully urge support for Virginia Senate Bill 435, which would authorize motorcycles to lane filter through stopped or slow-moving traffic under defined low-speed conditions. This change is a practical, safety-focused update to Virginia’s traffic laws and is backed by evidence from transportation research. Reduces rear-end collision risk for riders. Multiple studies—including research by the University of California and traffic safety organizations—show that riders who pass between slow or stopped vehicles are less likely to be rear-ended, one of the most dangerous types of crashes for motorcyclists due to their lack of physical protection. Lower injury severity in observed cases. Data from analyses of thousands of motorcycle crashes indicate that riders who engaged in lane filtering or splitting in similar conditions were less likely to suffer head, torso, or fatal injuries compared to those who stayed stationary in traffic. Practices in other jurisdictions support safety and predictability. In California—where responsible lane filtering/splitting has been studied and regulated—transportation research found no increased risk of injury overall when lane filtering is performed at controlled speeds and within clear guidelines, and concluded that it does not inherently pose greater danger than riding within a lane. Improves traffic flow without harming other road users. When done responsibly, lane filtering allows motorcycles to occupy otherwise unused roadway gaps, reducing congestion and idle times in heavy traffic. This can have ancillary benefits for all motorists and even reduce fuel consumption. Addressing perceived negatives: clear guidelines mitigate risks. Concerns about close proximity to other vehicles and visibility are largely tied to lack of regulation and public education, not the practice itself. A major component of S.B. 435 is a statewide education campaign to inform drivers about lawful and safe filtering behavior, which evidence suggests is key to predictable, safe use. In summary, legalizing lane filtering with reasonable speed and safety limits—as S.B. 435 proposes—is supported by transportation research showing reduced exposure to dangerous rear-end collisions, neutral or positive effects on traffic flow, and safe adoption in other regions. I respectfully ask for your support of this bill to modernize Virginia’s traffic laws and protect our Commonwealth’s riders and drivers alike.

I support this version of lane filtering. I have been rear ended sitting at a traffic light by a distracted driver twice. In each case the driver said they didn’t see me. In each case, had I been able to filter between cars this would have provided “protection” from this occurring. When done responsibly this alleviates risk of these accidents that are on the rise with increased distractions. In addition, with increased traffic in the area, being able to filter ahead of traffic jams (that are stopped) would provide a tangible benefit to riding motorcycles and dealing with the weather and risks that occur regularly . This alleviates traffic backups by eliminating the additional motorcycle jams and helps to alleviate the overall traffic backup. While not a reason to say everyone else does it, there are numerous studies from other states and countries that indicate this increases motorcycle safety (as this is submitted). Lane splitting (not the same as lane filtering) is not what’s up for debate and should be a separate concern in that moving between vehicles that are moving at speed is risky; that should be specifically identified as NOT what this is promoting.

Yes to Senate Bill 435 Dear Transportation Policy Meeting Attendees, I have been riding motorcycles for 50 years here in Virginia. I always feel a bit intimidated when in heavy traffic with cars/trucks all around me approaching a traffic light intersection. Lane filtering would allow me to filter to the front and proceed much more safely and efficiently benefitting me and all the vehicles around me. The safety aspects are enhanced for all drivers. Please pass this bill and allow lane filtering for motorcycles to keep us all safer on the road. I have experienced this in California and it seems to work very well. Thank you, Brian Carlton

California does it, so why can't we? Let's stop getting left in the dust and bring the state of Virginia into the 21st century.

I am writing to express my strong support for the legalization of motorcycle lane filtering in Virginia, as currently proposed in [reference SB 435 if applicable]. As a motorcyclist, my primary concern is safety. Motorcyclists are uniquely vulnerable at intersections and in heavy stop-and-go traffic. When we are trapped between vehicles, we become sitting targets for inattentive drivers who may fail to see us, leading to high-impact, preventable rear-end collisions. I want to be clear about what I am advocating for: Lane filtering is not lane splitting. I am not asking for the ability to weave through fast-moving highway traffic. I am asking for the right to move safely to the front of a line of stationary or slow-moving traffic (10 mph or less). This practice provides three distinct benefits: Improved Rider Safety: It removes the motorcyclist from the "impact zone" between vehicles, preventing the tragic and common rear-end accidents that occur at red lights. Enhanced Visibility: When a rider is at the front of the queue, they are clearly visible to drivers, rather than being hidden in a blind spot. Reduced Congestion: By utilizing space that would otherwise go unused, motorcyclists can subtly improve traffic flow for all road users. This is a common-sense, evidence-based safety measure that has been successfully implemented in other jurisdictions without compromising public safety. I urge you to support legislation that modernizes our traffic laws to reflect these realities and protects Virginia’s riders.

I support lane filtering for motorcyclists in Virginia

I have been a motorcyclist for over 30 years and would love to see this bill passed. Sitting in Traffic on 495/95, 66, Rt 50 in 90 plus degrees is tough. I always wear a jacket and the heat sometimes is unbearable sitting in all this traffic. Thank you for allowing us to use the HOT lanes for free, I use these in the summer but, sometime I have to use the local lanes and going down 95 one can be on that highway when the HOT lanes are in the opposite direction. Please pass this law, it works in California, it would work here.

I support this bill, as a 20+ year rider there has been several times on I 81 and I 95 that traffic was stop and go or moving slowly and during summer months myself and motorcycle became dangerously overheated. This would allow motorcyclist to continue riding and prevent overheating. Also my wife was hit by a young driver at a stop light going 50 mph while he was on his phone. Thankfully she was only mildly injured due to her Subaru’s features. If this would have been me or a motorcyclist we would have been killed. Motorcycles should be able to move up at stop lights to prevent getting rear ended. This also helps the flow of traffic. Please consider passing this to ensure the safety of our motorcycle community.

As an experience motorcyclist, I fully support the legislation to make safe filtering legals for motorcyclists. In hot summer days or cold ones, being stuck in traffic jams isn't safe. Many instances I witnessed car pulling dangerously close to the back of my bike. Also sometimes at low speed crawling traffic, it would be a lot safer to be able to filter lanes safely instead of standing as a seating duck to be rear-ended. Thank you for your attention.

Good morning, I am writing in support of SB435. Allowing slow speed filtering will greatly increase the safety of motorcyclist in traffic and at intersections. As a rider, being at the tail end of a traffic slow down on the interstate or a busy road or being the last vehicle in line at a traffic light is the scariest situation. Far too many distracted drivers that seem to face no consequences plow into vehicles every day. What would be a minor to moderate collision for cars is deathly serious for motorcyclists. One argument I hear is that it is too hard to enforce the limits and motorcyclists will abuse this and start lane splitting at speed. Those people are likely going to break the laws anyway.

I agree with this common sense legislation. Motorcyclist using caution and follow the law should be allowed to lane filter. By note allowing this process motorcyclist are placed in precarious and often dangerous scenarios due to their low visibility , resulting in motorist possibly rear ending the motorcyclist.

Please support this bill - it allows for safer riding and helps a little with the crazy traffic here.

Chairman Reid and members of the subcommittee. I have nearly 50 years of motorcycle riding experience, including 39 years riding on Virginia roads. Today I average 20,000 miles per year. Motorcycling is my primary means of transportation, and many of the miles I travel are in support of charitable causes throughout the Commonwealth and across the country. As both a motorcyclist and a commercial driver’s license holder, I am particularly mindful of safe vehicle operation and roadway responsibility. 10 years ago here in Richmond, while stopped in highway traffic, I was rear-ended and had no legal option to move out of the way. Senate Bill 435 provides a controlled safety option for riders to mitigate similar risk and operate within the law. I understand the concerns raised by the Virginia State Police, and I share the belief that safety and responsible riding must come first. The structure of SB 435—clear speed limits, controlled conditions, and defined circumstances—provides law enforcement with clear standards while still allowing riders a safer option when traffic is stopped. This is a safety evolution in how we manage traffic risk—not a special privilege for motorcyclists. I respectfully ask for your support of Senate Bill 435. Thank you for your time.

I am writing in support of legalizing lane filtering for motorcyclists in Virginia. I lived and rode in Sydney, Australia, where lane filtering is legal and regulated. From direct experience, I saw how it improved traffic flow and increased safety for riders without creating chaos or confusion. It functioned as a normal, expected part of traffic behavior. Lane filtering, when done at low speeds and under clear guidelines, reduces congestion for everyone. Motorcycles take up less space than cars. Allowing them to move carefully between stopped or slow moving vehicles at lights or in traffic prevents unnecessary buildup and improves the overall efficiency of intersections. Safety is a major concern for motorcyclists, especially the risk of being rear ended while stopped in traffic. Motorcycles are smaller and less visible. Being the last vehicle in a line of cars at a red light puts riders in a vulnerable position. Lane filtering allows riders to move out of that danger zone and position themselves more safely at the front of traffic. There is also a practical safety component related to heat. Motorcyclists sit directly above their engines, often wearing protective gear. In high temperatures, being trapped between vehicles and exposed to exhaust heat can contribute to overheating and fatigue. Allowing riders to filter forward reduces that exposure and improves rider alertness. In places like New South Wales, Australia, where lane filtering has been legal for years under defined speed limits and conditions, public education and clear rules have made it predictable and manageable. It is not a free for all. It is a structured, low speed maneuver with guardrails in place. Legalization would also allow Virginia to establish clear boundaries and education around the practice. States such as California and Utah have already implemented forms of lane splitting or lane filtering. Virginia has the opportunity to follow evidence based policy that prioritizes safety and traffic efficiency. Motorcyclists are a small percentage of vehicles on the road, but they are disproportionately vulnerable. Legalizing lane filtering with reasonable speed limits, education campaigns, and enforcement standards would improve safety outcomes for riders while benefiting overall traffic flow. As someone who has ridden in both systems, I strongly encourage Virginia lawmakers to consider the real world safety and efficiency benefits that come from regulating and legalizing lane filtering. Thank you for your consideration.

I am asking for your support and approval of SB435, the bill that would allow motorcycle lane filtering. Lane filtering has been endorsed by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) in the National Agenda for Motorcycle Safety (2000) and the state of New South Wales, Australia study conducted between 2015 and 2017. The European Association of Motorcycle Manufacturers endorsed lane filtering in their 2009 "Motorcycle In Depth Study" and lane filtering is a common (and safe) practice in most European countries. The Motorcycle Industry Council, representing over 500 manufacturers, distributors, dealers and retailers endorses lane filtering, as do the American Motorcyclists Association (AMA), the Motorcycle Riders Foundation (MRF), ABATE of Virginia and the Virginia Coalition of Motorcyclists (VCOM). Lane filtering is currently allowed in Arizona, California, Colorado, Minnesota, Montana and Utah. Thank you for your consideration of this bill that will contribute to safer motorcycling in Virginia. Respectfully, John Bilotta Virginia State Rep, Motorcycle Riders Foundation

I strongly support passage of SB435, the Virginia lane-filtering bill. Lane filtering is a commonsense, evidence-based policy that improves safety for motorcyclists without reducing safety for other road users. Multiple traffic-safety studies from the United States and abroad show that allowing motorcycles to filter forward at low speeds reduces rear-end collisions—the most common and dangerous type of motorcycle crash in congested traffic. When motorcycles are permitted to move out of stop-and-go traffic, they are far less likely to be struck by inattentive or distracted drivers approaching from behind. Lane filtering also addresses a fundamental safety issue unique to motorcycles: vulnerability when boxed in by surrounding vehicles. Unlike cars, motorcycles lack crumple zones and protective cages, and riders rely heavily on situational awareness and escape options to avoid crashes. When a motorcyclist is trapped between cars, their ability to respond to sudden lane changes, abrupt stops, or distracted drivers is severely limited. SB435 would allow riders to safely reposition themselves away from these hazards rather than forcing them to remain stationary in a dangerous environment. Importantly, lane filtering is not reckless behavior—it is a controlled, low-speed maneuver already legal and widely practiced in many U.S. states and most of the developed world. Jurisdictions that permit lane filtering have not seen increases in overall crash rates or injuries; in fact, the data consistently show improved outcomes for motorcyclists. SB435 reflects this reality by allowing lane filtering under clearly defined conditions that prioritize safety, predictability, and shared responsibility on Virginia’s roads. Passing SB435 would align Virginia with modern traffic safety practices, reduce preventable motorcycle injuries, and acknowledge the real-world dynamics of mixed traffic. This bill is about giving riders safer options—not special privileges—and about reducing crashes before they happen.

Please pass lane filtering as it would allow for all riders to be more safe, as well as, lower the chance for pedestrian incidents due to accidents.

I am writing in support of SB435 as a Virginia resident and as a motorcycle rider for 25 years, and as one who once opposed lane filtering because it seemed to me to be counterintuitive that it could be safer. However, studies have demonstrated that lane filtering is, in fact, safer and, therefore, is good public policy which improves safe road usage for all. SB435 should become law of the Commonwealth. Thank you. Danielle White Henrico County

I support this bill to legalize lane filtering, allowing riders to move between cars at low speeds. It’s already legal and working in five other states, including California, Utah, Arizona, and Colorado. Studies show it can dramatically reduce rear-end collisions and improve overall rider safety (Independent research from UC Berkeley shows lane‑filtering riders are nearly 50 % less likely to be struck from behind). This is about giving us a safer option when we need it most. Lawmakers in support of this bill are not asking for chaos. We're asking for a commonsense change, one that’s data-backed, clearly defined, and easy to implement.

I am strongly in support of this bill. Motorcycle lane filtering is a means of keeping motorcyclists safe on the roadways. Last June, a motorcycle rider from Midlothian was stopped in traffic on I-64 in Hampton and was struck from the rear by an SUV weighing over 7,000 lbs. He sadly passed from his injuries. Lane filtering under the terms of this bill will empower motorcyclists with a legal means of avoiding such a fate. Instead of having to sit exposed placing faith in the abilities and attention of the driver of a many thousand pound vehicle, this bill enables motorcyclists a proactive measure to improve their safety by allowing them to slowly maneuver forward through traffic. As a secondary benefit, this reduces congestion on the roadways and for those with air-cooled motorcycles, it prevents overheating while idle and the possibility of a breakdown in the middle of traffic.

I am for this bill as it prevents bikes from being just another person taking space in line at a traffic light or stop sign. It also allows those of us on air cooled bikes to stay moving in heavy traffic and prevent our main means of transportation from overheating, stalling and making traffic already worse with a break down.

I whole heartedly believe this bill will bring several improvements to traffic safety and accident prevent. Lane splitting has reduced the number if motorcycle related accidents rather significantly in other states in the last few years, especially in traffic incidents where a motorcyclist is rear ended at a stop light. I ask that anyone reading this consider if it was their children on a bike, hit by an inattentive driver, how they'd want this bill handled. The possibility of abuse of this bill is undeniable, but isn't that true for every bill? People find a way to make anything at all suit their needs and desires, so don't let that stop YOU from preventing more of our brothers and sisters, sons and daughters, loved ones and even strangers from losing their lives or being gravely injured when a safer alternative already exists.

I support lane filtering for motorcycles because it makes everyone safer and helps reduce congestion. It has been implemented in many places and is proven to be a benefit. Motorcyclists are at lower risk of being rear ended while waiting at a light, and every motorcycle that filters up is one less vehicle waiting in line for the light, allowing everyone else to move one vehicle closer.

Please make this int laws i have been an accident riding with my daughter due to someone not paying attention and running into us at a red light. Thanks

I support SB435 because allowing responsible lane filtering for motorcycles is a practical, safety-focused update to Virginia’s traffic laws. Lane filtering helps reduce congestion, decreases the risk of rear-end collisions for riders, and improves overall traffic flow. Many other states and countries have implemented similar measures successfully. This bill provides clear guidelines and accountability, promoting safer roadways for both motorcyclists and drivers. It’s a sensible step forward that reflects modern traffic realities.

I support SB435 because allowing responsible lane filtering for motorcycles just makes sense. It helps reduce traffic congestion, lowers the risk of rear-end collisions for riders stuck in stop-and-go traffic, and aligns Virginia with many other states that have safely implemented similar laws. The bill’s clear rules, penalties for misuse, and delayed effective date show a thoughtful, balanced approach that prioritizes safety while giving everyone time to adjust. It’s a practical update that benefits riders and drivers alike.

This proposed bill will make intersections and heavy traffic situations safer for motorcyclists. Drivers often do not see motorcyclists, especially when driving distracted, and this can result in cars rear ending stopped motorcycles at red lights or in traffic. As motorcyclists, our best defense against this is to lane filter in order to put space between ourselves and cars approaching the intersection. Beyond the safety benefits, lane filtering also improves traffic flow. Lane filtering allows motorcycles to take advantage of otherwise unused space on the road, freeing space for cars when traffic is heavy. This bill benefits all road users in Virginia and makes the road a safer place.

Lane filtering is often misunderstood, but real-world data from regions where it is legal consistently show it improves safety for motorcyclists while having neutral—or even positive—effects on traffic flow. First, lane filtering reduces the risk of rear-end collisions. Motorcyclists stopped in traffic are especially vulnerable because they lack the protective structure of a car. Allowing them to move between lanes to the front removes them from the most common and dangerous crash scenario: being struck from behind by an inattentive driver. Studies from transportation agencies in places where filtering is permitted have found lower injury rates for riders who filter compared to those who remain stationary. Second, lane filtering does not negatively affect drivers. When done at low speeds and within clear guidelines, it does not slow cars down or disrupt traffic patterns. Motorcycles take up very little space, and when they filter forward, they actually reduce the number of vehicles sitting in the main traffic queue. Every motorcycle that moves ahead is one less vehicle contributing to congestion behind. Finally, lane filtering can improve overall traffic efficiency. Because motorcycles occupy less road space than cars, allowing them to move forward instead of waiting in line decreases traffic density and can slightly shorten wait times for everyone. In places where filtering is legal, drivers typically adapt quickly, and the practice becomes predictable and orderly. In short, lane filtering is not about giving motorcyclists special treatment—it’s a practical safety measure that reduces crash risk, does not harm drivers, and can even help traffic flow more smoothly for all road users.

I am writing in support of SB435. I believe there is an important distinction between lane filtering vs lane splitting that people deciding on this matter should be aware of since they're two very different terms that a non-motorcyclist might not be familiar with and confused about. Lane filtering allows safer options for both the motorcyclist and motorist while at a stop light or slow moving traffic. Lane splitting is driving between lanes at normal-higher speed. limiting a motorcyclist of safe options can be the difference between life & death.

I am writing in support of Virginia SB 435 to allow lane filtering for motorcycles. Motorcyclists face increased risk in slow or stopped traffic, where rear-end collisions are especially dangerous due to the lack of physical protection. These risks are amplified by distracted driving and limited visibility, particularly when a motorcycle is stationary and boxed in by vehicles. I am a relatively new rider, and I learned this risk firsthand when traffic slowed and a driver approaching from behind did not see me until the last moment. With cars stopped in front of me and no safe way to move, I was at serious risk of being struck from behind. Situations like this place motorcyclists in danger through no fault of their own. Lane filtering would provide a safer option in these scenarios by allowing motorcyclists to move forward at low speeds and reposition themselves out of the rear-impact zone. This practice is not about aggressive riding or bypassing traffic, but about reducing exposure to one of the most severe crash risks motorcyclists face. SB 435 would give riders a defined, regulated way to protect themselves in high-risk traffic conditions while maintaining predictable behavior for other road users. For these reasons, I respectfully urge support for Virginia SB 435.

I am writing in support of Senate Bill 435 (SB 435) Lane filtering; motorcycles, penalty, delayed effective date. I am writing as a Virginia District resident and motorcyclist to respectfully urge you to support legislation that would allow motorcycle lane filtering in the Commonwealth. Lane filtering—allowing motorcycles to move slowly between stopped or slow-moving traffic—has been shown to improve rider safety by reducing rear-end collisions, which are one of the most common and dangerous crashes for motorcyclists. It also helps ease traffic congestion and reduces unnecessary idling, benefiting all road users. This practice is already legal in several other states and countries, where it has been implemented with clear guidelines and positive safety outcomes. When done at low speeds and in appropriate conditions, lane filtering is a practical, common-sense solution that makes our roads safer and more efficient without negatively impacting drivers. As someone who cares deeply about road safety and responsible transportation policy, I hope you will consider supporting this bill. It would be a meaningful step toward protecting vulnerable road users while modernizing Virginia’s traffic laws. Thank you for your time and for your service to our great Commonwealth.

I was rear-ended by a distracted driver while stopped at a stop sign in Virginia. I have lived in many states that allow legal lane splitting (filtering through moving traffic) as well as filtering (proceeding to the stop bar at traffic lights and stop signs). Both offer massive safety margins from rear-end accidents. Distracted driving from drivers looking at phones, texting etc is increasing every month. Allowing motorcyclists to land split and filter increases traffic flow and improves safety for the motorcyclist. Thank you for your time.

Lane filtering should be allowed. It is also safer for motorcyclists as well!

Please pass lane filtering as it would allow for all riders to be more safe, as well as, lower the chance for pedestrian incidents due to accidents.

I was rear-ended by a distracted driver while stopped at a stop sign in Virginia. I have lived in many states that allow legal lane splitting (filtering through moving traffic) as well as filtering (proceeding to the stop bar at traffic lights and stop signs). Both offer massive safety margins from rear-end accidents. Distracted driving from drivers looking at phones, texting etc is increasing every month. Allowing motorcyclists to land split and filter increases traffic flow and improves safety for the motorcyclist. Thank you for your time.

Lane filtering should be allowed. It is also safer for motorcyclists as well!

Please pass lane filtering as it would allow for all riders to be more safe, as well as, lower the chance for pedestrian incidents due to accidents.