Public Comments for 01/22/2026 Labor and Commerce - Subcommittee #2
HB20 - Minimum wage; farm laborers or farm employees, temporary foreign workers.
I am writing in support of HB 20. I am a farm operator/manager for a 23-acre vegetable operation and corresponding 500+ acre pasture raised pork, beef, chicken and egg operation. We have 20 employees. Our starting rate for local workers is around $17/hour and our starting rate for H2A is $16/hour. It is my belief that farm workers ARE farmers. Any politician claiming to be helping farmers should be helping farm workers, not just farm owners. Paying above-minimum-wage rates is not an unreasonable amount for farm businesses to be investing into quality skilled labor. In my 15 years of experience as a farmer, I have found that the better wages we are able to offer, the better quality workers we can attract and the better retention we can have. I believe that farm workers deserve fair wages that can support them and their households.
Promotores de Salud (also known as CHWs) working in Virginia's agricultural regions support farmworkers and their families through health education, outreach, and navigation. Their work is strengthened when farmworkers experience economic stability and fair labor standards. This bill helps advance those goals by eliminating minimum wage exemptions for farm laborers and certain temporary foreign workers. Ensuring consistent wage protections across sectors supports household stability, improves health outcomes, and reduces barriers that Promotores de Salud regularly encounter in their work. We support this legislation as a measured step toward more equitable wage standards that reflect the essential role agricultural workers play in Virginia’s economy and communities.
HB27 - Overtime for certain employees; pay for domestic workers, delayed effective date.
HB121 - Surveillance pricing; prohibited, civil penalties.
See attached.
HB130 - Workers' compensation; presumption of certain cancers, sheriffs and deputy sheriffs.
HB238 - Minimum wage and overtime wages; payment, definitions, misclassification of workers, civil actions.
HB260 - Public service companies; prevailing wage rate for underground infrastructure work.
HB275 - Employment prohibition exceptions; apprenticeships program for children 16 years of age or older.
HB312 - Motor vehicle glass repair and replacement; penalties.
HB338 - Building service employees; transition period.
HB339 - Employee protections; wage and hour, health and safety, and mining safety provisions.
HB340 - Migrant labor camp permits; removes expiration date.
HB426 - Workers' compensation; employer's offset in event of recovery.
HB569 - Public works contracts; localities to ensure bid specifications are prevailing wage rate.
Respected Delegates, Thank you for your time today. I am submitting comment on HB 569 Public works contracts; localities to ensure bid specifications are prevailing wage rate. I am Director of Community Development for the City of Buena Vista, one of the state’s smallest cities. I routinely work with grants for construction and public works as defined in this bill. At a time when Buena Vista’s infrastructure is in desperate need of deferred maintenance and reconstruction, and construction costs have increased far faster than inflation, this proposal will significantly drive up costs for essential public works. It burdens construction projects with unrelated socio-economic policy goals, ballooning the cost to our taxpayers of actually getting things done. The requirements of the bill will do two things: increase costs and risks for contractors (employers), and increase the costs and risks for local governments. Costs and risks for contractors: • Direct administrative cost to contractors is added to bottom line of bid, as well as cost of liability risk for noncompliance • Some contractors do not have experience or capacity to handle prevailing wage compliance, resulting in fewer bidders for City projects • § 2.2-4321.3 paragraph H appears to require all subcontractors be registered with eVA, which adds to the complexity and cost for primes • § 2.2-4321.3 paragraph K requires that all employees working on a public contract have at least 4 years of work experience, or be part of a registered apprenticeship. How is this realistic? This penalizes employers and it penalizes young workers trying to enter the field who are not part of a registered apprenticeship. Costs and risks for localities: • Direct administrative cost of more complex procurement documents and process, including wage determinations, and auditing contracted employers. The City of Buena Vista does not currently have staff who are trained in Davis-Bacon wage rule compliance, nor do we have staff with time to perform this compliance work. • Fewer bidders for projects. Buena Vista has direct experience on several contracts within the last 5 years – Federal contracting provisions like Davis-Bacon have driven away contractors interested in performing work and measurably increased the cost of awarded contract. • The City bears some liability for improperly advertised or non-compliant projects I urge Committee members to reject this bill entirely. Thank you.
HB5 - Employment; paid sick leave, civil penalties.
See attached testimony.
Paid sick leave is critically important for everyone's health. It is critical for public health, as we saw during the COVID-19 pandemic. Paid sick days reduce the spread of infections and allow workers the freedom to seek treatment for conditions before they become emergencies. Paid sick leave is also good for the economy, reducing labor turnover, improving productivity, and preventing on-the-job injuries. Mandating paid sick leave will help reduce gender and racial disparities in the workplace. This legislation should be adopted and implemented immediately!
Comments Document
The National Partnership for Women & Families appreciates the opportunity to submit testimony in support of HB 5. HB 5 is an opportunity for Virginia to ensure no worker is forced to choose between their paycheck and caring for themself or their loved ones. We respectfully urge a favorable report on the bill.
Comments Document
To the Chairman as well as Labor and Commerce Subcommittee #2, Attached is my formal written submission on behalf of Main Street Alliance in SUPPORT of HB 5 to implement paid sick days in Virginia. Best, Lauren Bealore National Director of Policy & Programs, Main Street Alliance
VA Association of Personal Care Providers, opposes HB-5 if it is not funded, However, as we discussed with several legislators at Our day on the Hill yesterday Jan 21 if not funded Agency Directed personal care providers would have to pay multiple employees to cover a patient while DMAS reimburses for only 1 employee when services are performed. Since we are a reimbursement driven model, this would create a financial hardship that would lead to agencies shuttering doors; placing employment, and Patient access to care in jeopardy for 100’s of thousands of people across the commonwealth.
oppose without funding for Agency Directed Personal Care
OPPOSE without funding
The VAPCP wants to be a partner in making Va. a better place to work. However, VAPCP cannot support HB-5 without funding. We are a reimbursement driven model, and this would create a financial hardship that would lead to agencies shuttering doors. This would place employees and 100’s of thousands people in jeopardy of employment and care across the commonwealth. We urge this committee to ensure that the commonwealth provides the resources to make HB-5 a reality for the home care industry.
The Virginia Association of Personal Care Providers cannot support HB-5 without funding. Since we are a reimbursement driven model, this would create a financial hardship that would lead to agencies shuttering doors; placing employment, and patient access to care in jeopardy for 100’s of thousands of people across the Commonwealth.
The Virginia Association of Personal Care Providers cannot support HB-5 without funding. Since we are a reimbursement driven model, this would create a financial hardship that would lead to agencies shuttering doors; placing employment, and patient access to care in jeopardy for 100’s of thousands of people across the Commonwealth." THANK YOU!
"The Virginia Association of Personal Care Providers cannot support HB-5 without funding.Since we are a reimbursement driven model, this would create a financial hardship that would lead to agencies shuttering doors; placing employment, and patient access to care in jeopardy for 100’s of thousands of people across the Commonwealth." THANK YOU!
As a provider of Medicaid-funded personal care services, we support the intent of this bill. The continuity and security of our workforce has a direct impact on the continuity and security of the seniors, veterans, and people with disabilities we serve. That being said, home care agencies cannot bill for services we do not provide, and Medicaid rates for Personal Care (T1019) are already too low. (The 2025 Guidehouse Rate Study mandated in 2025 recommended increases of greater than 40%, making it clear that rate relief is already clearly needed.) We, as provider members of the Virginia Association of Personal Care Providers (VAPCP), are asking that the General Assembly recognize the additional gap in funding that this bill in its current form would create and provide the financial support needed to ensure access to care and to recruit and retain high-quality caregivers. Thank you for taking our comments and for your work for the people of Virginia, whom we all serve.
The VAPCP (Virginia Association of Personal Care Providers) wants to be a partner in making Virginia a better place to work. However, VAPCP cannot support HB-5 without funding. Since we are a reimbursement driven model, this would create a financial hardship that would lead to agencies shuttering doors; placing employment, and patient access to care in jeopardy for 100’s of thousands of people across the Commonwealth. We urge this committee to support our caregivers by ensuring that the Commonwealth provides the resources necessary to make HB 5 a reality for the home care industry.
The VAPCP (Virginia Association of Personal Care Providers) wants to be a partner in making Virginia a better place to work. However, VAPCP cannot support HB-5 without funding. Since we are a reimbursement driven model, this would create a financial hardship that would lead to agencies shuttering doors; placing employment, and patient access to care in jeopardy for 100’s of thousands of people across the Commonwealth. We urge this committee to support our caregivers by ensuring that the Commonwealth provides the resources necessary to make HB 5 a reality for the home care industry.
The VAPCP (Virginia Association of Personal Care Providers) wants to be a partner in making Virginia a better place to work. However, VAPCP cannot support HB-5 without funding. Since we are a reimbursement driven model, this would create a financial hardship that would lead to agencies shuttering doors; placing employment, and patient access to care in jeopardy for 100’s of thousands of people across the Commonwealth. We urge this committee to support our caregivers by ensuring that the Commonwealth provides the resources necessary to make HB 5 a reality for the home care industry.
The VAPCP (Virginia Association of Personal Care Providers) wants to be a partner in making Virginia a better place to work. However, VAPCP cannot support HB-5 without funding. Since we are a reimbursement driven model, this would create a financial hardship that would lead to agencies shuttering doors; placing employment, and patient access to care in jeopardy for 100’s of thousands of people across the Commonwealth. We urge this committee to support our caregivers by ensuring that the Commonwealth provides the resources necessary to make HB 5 a reality for the home care industry.
"The Virginia Association of Personal Care Providers cannot support HB-5 without funding.Since we are a reimbursement driven model, this would create a financial hardship that would lead to agencies shuttering doors; placing employment, and patient access to care in jeopardy for 100’s of thousands of people across the Commonwealth." THANK YOU!
"The Virginia Association of Personal Care Providers cannot support HB-5 without funding.Since we are a reimbursement driven model, this would create a financial hardship that would lead to agencies shuttering doors; placing employment, and patient access to care in jeopardy for 100’s of thousands of people across the Commonwealth." THANK YOU!
The Virginia Association of Personal Care Providers cannot support HB-5 without funding.Since we are a reimbursement driven model, this would create a financial hardship that would lead to agencies shuttering doors; placing employment, and patient access to care in jeopardy for 100’s of thousands of people across the Commonwealth." THANK YOU!
"The Virginia Association of Personal Care Providers cannot support HB-5 without funding.Since we are a reimbursement driven model, this would create a financial hardship that would lead to agencies shuttering doors; placing employment, and patient access to care in jeopardy for 100’s of thousands of people across the Commonwealth." THANK YOU!
"The Virginia Association of Personal Care Providers cannot support HB-5 without funding.Since we are a reimbursement driven model, this would create a financial hardship that would lead to agencies shuttering doors; placing employment, and patient access to care in jeopardy for 100’s of thousands of people across the Commonwealth." THANK YOU!
The Virginia Association of Personal Care Providers cannot support HB-5 without funding.Since we are a reimbursement driven model, this would create a financial hardship that would lead to agencies shuttering doors; placing employment, and patient access to care in jeopardy for 100’s of thousands of people across the Commonwealth
The Virginia Association of Personal Care Providers cannot support HB-5 without funding.Since we are a reimbursement driven model, this would create a financial hardship that would lead to agencies shuttering doors; placing employment, and patient access to care in jeopardy for 100’s of thousands of people across the Commonwealth.
The VAPCP (Virginia Association of Personal Care Providers) wants to be a partner in making Virginia a better place to work. However, VAPCP cannot support HB-5 without funding. Since we are a reimbursement driven model, this would create a financial hardship that would lead to agencies shuttering doors; placing employment, and patient access to care in jeopardy for 100’s of thousands of people across the Commonwealth. We urge this committee to support our caregivers by ensuring that the Commonwealth provides the resources necessary to make HB 5 a reality for the home care industry.
The VAPCP (Virginia Association of Personal Care Providers) wants to be a partner in making Virginia a better place to work. However, VAPCP cannot support HB-5 without funding. Since we are a reimbursement driven model, this would create a financial hardship that would lead to agencies shuttering doors; placing employment, and patient access to care in jeopardy for 100’s of thousands of people across the Commonwealth. We urge this committee to support our caregivers by ensuring that the Commonwealth provides the resources necessary to make HB 5 a reality for the home care industry.
The VAPCP (Virginia Association of Personal Care Providers) wants to be a partner in making Virginia a better place to work. However, VAPCP cannot support HB-5 without funding. Since we are a reimbursement driven model, this would create a financial hardship that would lead to agencies shuttering doors; placing employment, and patient access to care in jeopardy for 100’s of thousands of people across the Commonwealth. We urge this committee to support our caregivers by ensuring that the Commonwealth provides the resources necessary to make HB 5 a reality for the home care industry.
"The Virginia Association of Personal Care Providers cannot support HB-5 without funding. Since we are a reimbursement driven model, this would create a financial hardship that would lead to agencies shuttering doors; placing employment, and patient access to care in jeopardy for 100’s of thousands of people across the Commonwealth." THANK YOU!
The Virginia Association of Personal Care Providers cannot support HB-5 without funding. Since we are a reimbursement driven model, this would create a financial hardship that would lead to agencies shuttering doors; placing employment, and patient access to care in jeopardy for 100’s of thousands of people across the Commonwealth. This legislation will negatively impact small agencies that provide jobs for our communities. It has the potential to shut down agencies, eliminate jobs, and take away personal care services that we provide to the elderly. THANK YOU!
The Virginia Association of Personal Care Providers cannot support HB-5 without funding. Since we are a reimbursement driven model, this would create a financial hardship that would lead to agencies shuttering doors; placing employment, and patient access to care in jeopardy for 100’s of thousands of people across the Commonwealth. THANK YOU!
The Virginia Association of Personal Care Providers cannot support HB-5 without funding. Since we are a reimbursement driven model, this would create a financial hardship that would lead to agencies shuttering doors; placing employment, and patient access to care in jeopardy for 100’s of thousands of people across the Commonwealth. THANK YOU!
The Virginia Association of Personal Care Providers cannot support HB-5 without funding. Since we are a reimbursement driven model, this would create a financial hardship that would lead to agencies shuttering doors; placing employment, and patient access to care in jeopardy for 100’s of thousands of people across the Commonwealth. THANK YOU!
"The Virginia Association of Personal Care Providers cannot support HB-5 without funding. Since we are a reimbursement driven model, this would create a financial hardship that would lead to agencies shuttering doors; placing employment, and patient access to care in jeopardy for 100’s of thousands of people across the Commonwealth." THANK YOU!
"The Virginia Association of Personal Care Providers cannot support HB-5 without funding.Since we are a reimbursement driven model, this would create a financial hardship that would lead to agencies shuttering doors; placing employment, and patient access to care in jeopardy for 100’s of thousands of people across the Commonwealth."
The Virginia Association of Personal Care Providers cannot support HB-5 without funding. Since we are a reimbursement driven model, this would create a financial hardship that would lead to agencies shuttering doors; placing employment, and patient access to care in jeopardy for 100’s of thousands of people across the Commonwealth.
The Virginia Association of Personal Care Providers must oppose HB-5 without funding. Personal care providers rely on a largely hourly, direct-care workforce and operate under fixed reimbursement rates set by the Commonwealth. Unlike other industries, providers cannot adjust pricing to absorb new mandates. Without additional funding, a paid sick leave requirement creates immediate and unfunded costs, including paying sick leave while also paying replacement caregivers to ensure continuity of care. These added costs strain already thin margins, limit agencies’ ability to accept new clients, and risk service disruptions for vulnerable Virginians who depend on in-home care to remain safely at home. We urge the General Assembly to advance HB-5 with an understanding of its real-world impact on personal care providers and to ensure that any new mandate is paired with adequate funding so providers can comply while continuing to deliver essential services.
To the delegates in Labor and Commerce Subcommittee #2, As a young, hourly worker, I urge the committee to support HB5. Paid sick leave is a vital part of a functioning society and economy that should extend to all workers, not just salaried ones. Giving workers the ability to rest when sick and, crucially, prevent spreading their illness to their coworkers or clients not only benefits not only workers themselves but also society as a whole. We could prevent a lot of illness and improve overall productivity in the long run by encouraging workers to stay home and rest when sick so they recover faster and prevent spreading contagious disease. Passing HB5 will help support hourly workers make decisions that improve public health and long-term economic productivity. Sincerely, Rebecca Whitten
I strongly support expanding paid sick leave to all employees. We saw with covid that many lower-paid employees were unable to take leave during the pandemic, spreading the contagious illness through our communities due to the perverse incentives built into our labor laws. We should be encouraging people to take care of their family or time off when they are sick with the flu or covid. It is perverse that we have a structure where illness is almost encourage to spread due to the structures our society has implemented around leave in Virginia. Paid sick leave is good for the economy, reducing labor turnover, improving productivity, and preventing on-the-job injuries.
Paid sick leave is one of the most important rights for workers. People are people, they can get sick. Even machines go out of service! Please guarantee paid sick leaves. Thanks
I urge the subcommittee to approve HB5. As we learned during the (still ongoing) COVID-19 pandemic, paid sick leave saves lives. It is not merely a perk or a benefit, but a critical public health measure that reduces disease transmission rates while helping alleviate racial, gender, and income disparities. Paid sick leave is also good for businesses and the economy - improving productivity, reducing workplace injuries, and lowering labor turnover. HB5 is a win-win-win for Virginia's workers, businesses, and public health.
I strongly support this bill because contracted Community Health Workers (CHWs) currently lack basic workplace protections, including access to paid sick leave. As a result, many CHWs—particularly those compensated on a fee-for-service or contract basis—are forced to choose between their health and their income. As is widely acknowledged in our profession, “at times we are just a paycheck away from being our clients.” CHWs are frontline public health workers who bridge systems of care and community need. We work with individuals and families experiencing chronic illness, mental health challenges, housing instability, domestic violence, and economic insecurity. Denying paid sick leave to workers in these roles undermines both worker well-being and public health outcomes. When CHWs cannot afford to take time off to recover from illness or address family emergencies, it increases burnout, turnover, and the risk of harm to the very communities we are trusted to serve. This bill meaningfully addresses these gaps by: Expanding paid sick leave coverage beyond home health workers to all employees, including those employed on fee-for-service arrangements. Ensuring continuity of accrued sick leave during transfers or under successor employers—critical in a workforce characterized by grant-funded and contract-based employment. Recognizing that paid sick leave must also support survivors of domestic abuse, sexual assault, and stalking, aligning labor policy with trauma-informed practice. Establishing clear enforcement mechanisms and penalties, which are essential for accountability and compliance. While limited waivers are permitted for certain health care workers, the bill appropriately balances flexibility with worker protections and includes a delayed effective date to allow employers time to prepare. In short, this legislation affirms that the workers who care for our communities deserve care and protection themselves. Paid sick leave is not a luxury—it is a foundational labor standard that promotes health, stability, and dignity. I urge full support and passage of this bill.