Td1 diabetes support Serenity

Please pass this important bill

A middle school hallway erupts after a shoving match. Two students are involved. The behavior is identical. But when administrators start sorting out discipline, the focus quickly shifts from what happened to who the students are. One family files a complaint citing a protected characteristic. The other does not. Suddenly the same incident carries different consequences. Parents accuse the school of bias. Lawyers get involved. Trust in the system evaporates. That is how HB 53 backfires. I oppose this bill because it moves school discipline away from objective behavior and toward subjective identity-based determinations. Bullying should be addressed firmly and consistently based on conduct. HB 53 instead embeds “actual or perceived” membership in protected groups into the legal definition of bullying, making discipline dependent on how students are classified and how they "feel" rather than how they behave. For schools, this creates real risk. Administrators are forced into guessing motives, interpreting perceptions, and weighing identities. That invites grievances, uneven enforcement, and litigation. It also pressures schools to overcorrect or under-enforce, neither of which protects students. Ironically, this approach can undermine the very equity it claims to promote. When students see similar behavior punished differently, resentment grows. When rules feel political rather than fair, credibility collapses. And when vague standards are written into law, courts are more likely to strike them down, weakening future civil rights protections instead of strengthening them. Students deserve safe schools governed by clear, behavior-based rules that apply equally to everyone. HB 53 replaces clarity with confusion and fairness with hierarchy, which is why I strongly oppose it.

THIS letter is for the delegate I am a student of charlottesville high school in the grade 11 my name is YAIR i am writing in support of HB 836, for the reason my family is afraid of ice raids in schools for immigrant and citizens students.I believe we should not be afraid of learning of studying and our right to school many parents send their childs with fear to school and families are scared of going to work even small necessities like shopping groceries to feed their families and is inhuman to detain kids of school and i opened my opinion to (HB 836) support.

I strongly oppose HB 53. As a retired public-school educator and a current school board member, I am troubled by the shift of discipline decisions away from conduct-based judgment and local discretion and toward identity-based definitions, mandatory processes, and state-controlled reporting systems. If enacted, the board would remain fully accountable for school safety and outcomes but with less authority and more compliance obligations. I am especially concerned about redefining the definition of bullying and trying to objectively determine what qualifies as a “power imbalance.” This could shift discipline analysis from what happened to who a student is perceived to be, increasing subjectivity and making consistent enforcement more difficult. I foresee a resultant surge of complaints and appeals, along with increased claims of unequal discipline or viewpoint discrimination, with fewer clear standards to stand on.

Td1 diabetes support Serenity

Please pass this important bill

1374 keep VMI the historical state college HB 333 do not reach the liberal viewpoint of Jan 6 Hb56 give funds for family members

HB478 This testimony is in favor of the enactment of a Fine Arts Seal of Excellence on high school diplomas. In considering the Fine Arts Seal of Excellence on a diploma, a lot is to be considered. Guidelines and criteria should reflect the dedication students have given to the Fine Arts Program of their school district to receive such an honor. This honor would be not only an encouragement to the dedication and participation of the programs that really compliment the educational experience students receive academically, This recognition would not only serve to encourage the students participating and dedicating themselves, but also be a lighthouse to beacon prospective students to participate in such programs. We have long known the value of such programs to improve academic improvement, aid in responsibility through punctuality and taking ownership of being a part of team effort. These skills are valuable and carry young people into adulthood and through the rest of their lives. To recognize their significant dedication to such programs for most of their formidable high school years will I believe shape stronger intellect and success in our future graduates. Please deeply consider the positive impact this will have on future graduates when approving this measure. Respectfully, Mrs. O’Neill

Please pass this important bill

I am submitting this testimony on behalf of the League of Women Voters of Virginia, a nonpartisan organization dedicated to promoting informed civic participation and equitable public policy. I am also a parent of a child enrolled in Richmond Public Schools. The League of Women Voters of Virginia has long supported policies that promote equity, accountability, and adequacy in public education funding. HB 92 advances these principles by strengthening the Standards of Quality through the establishment of an At-Risk Program and by providing targeted, flexible funding to better support students with additional educational needs, including students who are educationally at risk, students with disabilities, and English language learners. By recognizing that different student populations require different levels of support, HB 92 takes a data-informed approach to addressing disparities that exist across school divisions. The bill’s emphasis on transparency and reporting further aligns with the League’s commitment to responsible stewardship of public funds and to ensuring that state investments are used effectively to improve all student outcomes. As a parent in Richmond, I see the real-world impact of uneven resources on students and educators. Policies that more accurately reflect student needs help strengthen schools, support teachers, and benefit entire communities. For these reasons, the League of Women Voters of Virginia respectfully urges the Committee to support HB 92 and report it favorably.

Please pass this important bill

The American public education system has been disrupted for decades. The inconsistent system of lower standards and expectations for students is not working. Same with the constant lack of accountability for students’ behavior in classrooms. Now Harvard is teaching remedial classes. Family must be responsible for their children’s education.

On behalf of Virginia First Cities Coalition's 17 historic cities, we support HB178. This bill provides extra protections for the identities of students who participate in programming led by Student Support Agencies that have contracts for services for students. Requiring these non-profit organizations to register and maintain status as a certified student support agency and additional protocols for the use and collection of data will keep student data safe. Additional oversight by the DOE will add needed protections for vulnerable students.

Strong, coordinated student support systems are essential to improving academic performance, attendance, and overall student success. When schools and partner agencies collaborate and share information appropriately, they are better able to identify concerns early and implement timely interventions before challenges escalate. This level of collaboration helps create a supportive environment for students and families by ensuring access to the right services and resources when they are most needed. At the same time, data sharing can be complex due to consent requirements and privacy regulations. While these protections are necessary, they can present barriers to coordination among agencies. It is important that we continue working within these guidelines while strengthening communication and developing clear processes that allow us to support students effectively. We all share the same goal: student achievement and well-being. Establishing structured systems, maintaining consistent communication, and fostering strong cross-agency partnerships allow us to better address absenteeism, provide instructional and remediation support, and offer tutoring or additional interventions as needed. When staff across organizations work together, we create a stronger network of support for students, families, and school personnel, ultimately leading to improved outcomes for everyone involved.

I strongly support this bill, which would allow agencies to receive school attendance and grade data directly from schools in a timely manner. Earlier access to this information would enable agencies to identify challenges sooner and provide meaningful interventions when they can have the greatest impact. Under the current process, agencies must contact each individual school at the end of the month, which significantly delays support and limits our ability to help students improve their outcomes. This bill promotes efficiency, early intervention, and better results for students.

ForKids is among many student support agencies, also known as community based organizations, which endeavor to positively impact student success in school both for attendance and academics. This bill dramatically increases organizations' ability to be more impactful partners with school systems by providing data through authenticated systems in real time. Timeliness of supports and/or interventions offered to students and families by student support agencies through security verified data sharing equals more students in Virginia meeting and exceeding expectations. Varied and multiple supports are warranted at times as evidenced by the success of the MTSS framework and implementation in schools. This bill gives school systems and families vetted, fully informed partners to address the nationwide attendance issue and potential subsequent achievement challenges that occur when instructional days are missed.

https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB38 Violates Constitution as aimed at minorities, also singling them out for being "mental" which can be a source of bullying. https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB96 Waste, fraud and abuse program. No affordability in where people who are working 2 jobs to pay for their kids, should have to pay for others who make more than they do. https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB178 This should not be used to buy votes. That's exactly what it is.

HB 253 may sound harmless, but it gives up too much control in exchange for very little benefit. At its core, this bill hands authority over teacher licensure to an interstate compact run outside Virginia. Once we join, key decisions about who qualifies to teach in our schools can be made by a multistate commission rather than by the General Assembly, the Board of Education, or local school divisions. That is a loss of accountability to Virginia parents and taxpayers. The promise of “mobility” also masks a real risk: lower or uneven standards. Virginia could be required to accept licenses from states with different or weaker requirements, limiting our ability to maintain state-specific expectations for preparation, content knowledge, and classroom readiness. Just as important, this bill does not fix the real problem. Teachers are leaving because of working conditions, discipline issues, administrative overload, and lack of respect, not because it is too hard to move between states. HB 253 moves teachers around instead of fixing why they are leaving in the first place. Once Virginia joins an interstate compact, it is hard to undo. Rules can change over time without another vote of the General Assembly, leaving school boards stuck with policies they did not approve and cannot easily change. Teacher shortages deserve serious solutions. Giving up local control is not one of them. That is why HB 253 should be opposed.

I am writing to voice my strong support for HB 298 as a social worker in Richmond, VA, who works with at-risk and challenged youth. I have seen firsthand how exclusionary and punitive discipline, such as suspension and expulsion, can unintentionally exacerbate the very challenges schools are trying to mitigate. Removing students from the school setting often disconnects them from supportive relationships, interrupts academic progress, and often reinforces maladaptive behavioral patterns. Further, punitive policies disproportionately impact students from marginalized, underresourced communities. Traditional exclusionary practices may solve the problem in the short term (ie, stopping the behavior and/or its impact on others), but they often contribute to long-term negative outcomes, such as academic and social disengagement as well as increased contact with the juvenile legal system. HB298 represents a meaningful shift toward a relational, trauma-informed model that focuses on repairing harm, building trust and strengthening school communities. Evidence-based restorative approaches create structured opportunities for students to take accountability, understand the impact of their behavior, and make amends. Many students who struggle with problem behaviors and are at risk of traditional exclusionary practices bring adverse childhood experiences, chronic stress and unmet mental/physical health needs into the classroom. Punitive responses can exacerbate these stressors, while restorative approaches provide space for communication, problem-solving and skill-building. When implemented with fidelity and adequate training/resources, restorative practices can reduce repeat disciplinary incidents and foster a stronger, more cohesive school climate. Please support HB298 and help ensure that Virginia's school disciplinary policies reflect what a multitude of research and practice consistently show -- students thrive when they are held accountable within supportive, relationship-centered systems.

I oppose HB 298. As a school board member, I believe strongly that local decisions provide the best outcomes for our students. I've seen dedicated administrators and educators work to provide the support that students need to be successful and remain in the classroom, but when a line is crossed, there needs to be safety and accountability so that the learning environment of the entire class is not negatively impacted. The data does not support that these practices are successful in reducing inappropriate student behavior, in fact, there is much evidence to the contrary. We already have multiple tiers of response to behaviors in place, and these always include collaboration with families and many layers of support staff. Many of our educators say that lack of discipline is one of the reasons they choose to leave the profession. Our teachers need to know that they have our support and that we will keep them safe. Students need to have high expectations. Restorative practices may work beautifully in some situations, and they can be part of the toolbox as appropriate, but they do not work for all. Local divisions need the authority in their professional capacity to make those decisions. I'm sure extra training will be mandated for staff if this bill is passed, adding yet another layer of responsibility to teachers and staff who are already at capacity. It may well be another unfunded mandate too. Our school budgets cannot continue to fund all of these additional requirements. It is not necessary to address this at the level of state legislation. Allow our capable and trained school administrators the freedom to provide the best response based upon each unique child and situation. This is necessary to keep a safe and supportive learning environment for our classroom teachers and students. Please vote no on HB 298

School systems that excuse student’s poor behaviors are a disgrace. Teachers are not supposed to teach their students manners and standards. The home is responsible for these things. Teachers should never take the place of the parents, guardians, or foster parents. Again, the breakdown of civilization is excusing the foundation of the home! The public school systems has enabled students more than ever before. Metal detectors, cell phones , laptops, iPads, and restorative practices are useless. These are temporary bandaids that don’t work and allow the same effect to keep occurring. Low expectations and little consequences are major factors behind these policies. Code of Conduct handbooks are not followed consistently and are for show. Many of the liberal policies exacerbate the problems. Fact! The students crave constant structure and need limitations.

Hello, I am student of Charlottesville high school. my name is Nargis Haidary. I support the HB 836 student. Every student should feel safe at school and I want to support my classmates. I think we should support each other because we protect human rights, prevent the separation of families, and maintain the safety and stability of communities.

My name is Carissa Henry, and I’m commenting on behalf of the Transformative Changes Black Youth Mental Health Collaborative. Through the Safe & Restorative Schools Learning Tour, legislators, youth, and community partners didn’t just hear about restorative practices — they experienced them through collaboration that acknowledged harm and focused on repair instead of punishment. Young people shared what happens when schools don’t have consistent tools: a student who reported bullying was nearly pulled into a fight instead of being heard; a fourteen-year-old made a mistake and was treated like a criminal rather than a child; another student shut down emotionally and was moved from office to office instead of being met with care. When schools respond with exclusion, silence, or criminalization, the harm deepens. When they respond with care, accountability, and support, students stay connected and can repair harm.That’s why the current “consider” language is not strong enough. When restorative practices are optional, implementation becomes inconsistent — and inconsistency is exactly how racial, disability, and discipline disparities persist from one school division to the next. House Bill 298 was meant to create a baseline of evidence-based practice with safety protections and state support. This bill doesn’t remove discipline; it improves it. And students across Virginia deserve more than optional care. I urge you to strengthen and support HB 298.

Helpful in comparing what is happening around the country. see pg. 2 Recommended Citation Schreiber, A., Miller, B., Dressler, K. (2022). An Introduction to Restorative Practices. National Center for School Safety. https://www.nc2s.org/resource/an-introduction-to-restorative-practices

VASSP has some concerns regarding HB298. While we appreciate the feedback we have received from Delegate McQuinn's office, the concerns still linger. These are listed below. -Is there any data to support the assumption that these practices are successful in reducing the instances of student behavior that require disciplinary action? -How do you define "connection to the community", as listed in the bill? -How is section v (determines responses through a collaborative process that involves students, families, educators and community members) going to be supervised? How will there be enough time to involve all these stakeholders on a regular basis? This could take hours each week, depending on the school and the situation. -the training that will be required to implement this type of practice is going to be extensive, which adds another responsibility to teachers and staff. -we are still concerned that this bill will limit the ability of school administrators to provide a safe learning environment.

I strongly support HB 298 because I believe Virginia’s schools need discipline systems that truly help students learn, grow, and feel safe. For too long, school discipline has relied on exclusionary practices like suspension and removal from the classroom. These approaches may seem effective in the moment, but they often fail to address the real causes of student behavior. Instead of creating change, they push students out of learning environments and leave underlying issues unresolved. Restorative approaches offer a proven alternative that promotes accountability, repairs harm, and strengthens safety and belonging without removing students from the classroom. I know from personal experience that exclusionary discipline does not lead to positive outcomes. As a student, I was removed from the classroom multiple times as a form of discipline. While I was sent away, nothing was done to help me understand or resolve the challenges I was facing. When I returned to class, the same problems were still there. Within a week or two, I would be removed again for the same exact behavior. This created a recurring cycle that disrupted my education without providing any real support or solution. HB 298 establishes a clear framework for the statewide use of evidence-based restorative disciplinary practices. This bill shifts school discipline away from exclusionary punishment and toward approaches that keep students engaged in learning while addressing harm at its root. Restorative practices focus on responsibility, reflection, and repairing relationships, which leads to lasting improvement rather than repeated punishment. By moving away from exclusionary discipline and toward restorative, evidence-based approaches, HB 298 helps break harmful cycles like the ones I and many other students in Virginia have experienced. It represents a necessary step toward a more equitable, effective, and supportive school discipline system for students across Virginia.

Personal Statement — CEO, Kids On First Foundation In Support of Restorative Discipline and HB 298 As the CEO of Kids On First Foundation, my work centers on one simple belief: every young person deserves to be seen, supported, and given a fair opportunity to grow—both in the classroom and in life. Through our programs, we work with students from diverse communities across Virginia, many of whom have faced systemic barriers that extend far beyond school walls. Too often, I have witnessed how exclusionary discipline removes students from learning environments at the very moment they need connection, structure, and support the most. Virginia’s current discipline system continues to rely heavily on practices that isolate students rather than address the root causes of behavior. These policies do not impact all students equally. Black students and students with disabilities are disproportionately disciplined for subjective, non-violent behaviors, resulting in lost instructional time and strained relationships between families and schools. When students feel pushed out instead of guided forward, trust erodes—and the opportunity to build resilience, accountability, and belonging is lost. At Kids On First, we believe discipline should be rooted in growth, restoration, and community—not exclusion. Young people thrive when they are given space to reflect, repair harm, and remain engaged in meaningful learning experiences. Restorative practices align directly with what we see working in youth development and mentorship programs every day: students respond positively when they feel heard, respected, and connected. HB 298 represents a meaningful step toward a more equitable and effective approach to school discipline across Virginia. By establishing a clear statutory framework for evidence-based restorative practices, this legislation promotes accountability while prioritizing safety, belonging, and long-term student success. Instead of pushing students further away from opportunity, restorative approaches strengthen school climate, reduce conflict, and keep students connected to the learning environments that help them grow. As a youth advocate and organizational leader committed to empowering the next generation, I strongly support efforts that keep students engaged, valued, and supported. Our schools should be places where young people learn not only academics, but also responsibility, empathy, and resilience. HB 298 moves Virginia closer to that vision—one where discipline becomes a pathway to growth rather than a barrier to opportunity. Sincerely, Sherron Cerny CEO, Kids On First Foundation

VOTE YES: I’m in support of HB298 because suspensions are not just ineffective—they are harmful. I’ve seen this with young children who are still learning emotional regulation, and with older students who may be carrying stress, disabilities, or trauma. When these students are sent home instead of supported, it doesn’t teach the skills they were missing. It teaches them that school is a place where they can be removed when they’re overwhelmed. This is exactly what Dr. Ross Greene’s work shows: kids do well if they can, and challenging behavior is a sign of lagging skills, not a reason for exclusion. When we respond with support and collaborative problem‑solving, students learn the skills they need to do better. When we respond with suspension, they don’t. HB298 takes a balanced, research‑based approach by requiring at least one evidence‑based restorative practice before excluding a student. This keeps kids connected, helps repair harm, and builds real skills. All students—from early elementary through high school—deserve support, not punishment that causes lasting harm. I urge you to support HB298.

Public Comment in Support of HB298- VOTE YES I’m writing in strong support of HB298 because suspensions in early elementary school are not just ineffective—they are traumatic. Young children who are still learning how to regulate their emotions and communicate their needs are being removed from school instead of being supported. I’ve seen how this harms kids, especially our most vulnerable students, including those with disabilities, those experiencing stress at home, and those who already struggle to feel safe and connected at school. Suspending a five‑, six‑, or seven‑year‑old doesn’t teach them the skills they were missing. It teaches them that school is a place where they can be sent away when they’re overwhelmed. Many children come back more anxious, more dysregulated, and less trusting of the adults who are supposed to help them. That is not a path toward better behavior or better learning. HB298 takes a reasonable, research‑based approach by requiring schools to try at least one evidence‑based restorative practice before excluding a child, except in the most serious situations. Restorative practices help children repair harm, understand what went wrong, and build the skills they need to do better next time—without pushing them out of the classroom. Our youngest learners deserve support, not punishment that leaves lasting emotional scars. HB298 is a necessary step toward safer, more compassionate, and more effective school environments. I urge you to support this bill.

It is time to break the School to Prison Pipeline. Too often police are called to schools over minor issues that could be handled in better ways. Very often when students act out there are other issues occurring and the behavior is triggered by someone else's act. An arrest and prison sentence ruins a child's life - not just in preventing them from achieving future goals, but in the destruction of self worth. Where restorative behavioral practices have been implemented, research has shown a sharp decrease in future behavior problems. This leads to students finishing their education and becoming active, positive members of society, instead of ending up in jail for increasingly severe issues.

I strongly support HB298, a bill that takes a necessary and evidence-based step toward dismantling the school-to-prison pipeline by centering restoration, accountability, and child development instead of exclusion and punishment. As a former special education teacher, I saw firsthand how traditional disciplinary systems fail children, especially students with disabilities, trauma histories, learning differences, and unmet behavioral health needs. Too often, suspension and expulsion were used not because they were effective, but because they were familiar. Those exclusions did not address harm, build skills, or promote safety. They removed children from learning environments and set them on trajectories toward system involvement. HB298 recognizes what educators, families, and researchers have long known: children’s behavior is communication, and accountability must be paired with understanding, support, and repair. By requiring schools to first implement evidence-based restorative disciplinary practices, this bill keeps students connected to school while still addressing harm responsibly. I am especially encouraged that HB298: *Grounds discipline in the science of children’s social, emotional, and cognitive development *Emphasizes healing, relationship repair, and community involvement *Requires data collection and public reporting, ensuring accountability and continuous improvement *Supports educators through guidance, professional development, and technical assistance From a survivor-led justice perspective, we know punishment does not create safety, connection does. HB298 does not eliminate accountability; it strengthens it by making discipline child centered, trauma-informed, and humane. This bill affirms a simple but powerful truth: children should not be pushed out of school for struggling to survive systems that were never designed for them. I urge the Committee to support HB298 and invest in schools that interrupt harm rather than reproduce it.

Restorative discipline approaches are more effective in helping students stay in the learning environment in a way that allows all students to learn, when compared with traditional punitive measures such as suspension or expulsion. This is especially important for students who are neurodivergent or have other cognitive differences, as well as for students of color who are disproportionately likely to be disciplined more severely than white students. This is a good step in the direction of making our educational system more just and beneficial.

1229 while hard to understand the context got a thumbs up from fellow autistics. That’s good enough for me. And 298 I’ve been getting voters’ attention about for weeks. I wish we had both these bills when I was a student.

HB 298 would force schools to use restorative discipline before they can suspend or expel students in most cases. That sounds reasonable until you look at the evidence. This approach has already been tried in major school districts across the country, and it has not worked. Districts like Oakland and New York City saw suspensions go down, but classroom disruption, teacher frustration, and safety concerns go up. A RAND Corporation study found no meaningful improvement in school climate and, in some cases, worse academic outcomes. Lower discipline numbers looked good on paper, but behavior did not improve. HB 298 repeats the same mistake by mandating a process instead of trusting school leaders to use judgment. It delays consequences, weakens authority, and sends the message that serious misbehavior is negotiable. Virginia should learn from failed experiments elsewhere, not lock them into law.

I support this legislation. As a former school board member and Alternative Dispute Resolution practitioner I see how Restorative Justice improves accountability and helps to restore relationships.

HB 298 strengthens school discipline statewide by: Standardizing restorative discipline practices through codifying the Virginia Department of Education’s Model Guidance for Positive, Preventative Codes of Student Conduct and Alternatives to Suspension Requiring schools to use restorative practices first—before suspension, expulsion, or exclusion—except in cases involving serious offenses or defined aggravating circumstances Improving accountability and transparency by directing VDOE to collect and publicly report data on restorative practice use and add restorative indicators to the Student Behavioral Administrative and Response Survey Ensuring consistent and equitable implementation through statewide guidelines, professional development, and technical assistance Reducing exclusionary discipline by repairing harm, strengthening relationships, and maintaining accountability through evidence-based restorative interventions

For HB298, I'd like to express strong support for this. As a former teacher, I know the value of a restorative approach to harm in schools. As a nonprofit leader now, I know the importance of building into systems, particularly schools, approaches to harm that move individuals toward repair and not retribution.

Greetings Chair and Members of the Committee, On behalf of Transformative Changes, I write in strong support of House Bill 298, patroned by Delegate McQuinn. Transformative Changes’ mission is rooted in advancing healing-centered, community-led solutions that create safe, supportive, and equitable systems for young people, and our advocacy for restorative discipline is grounded in both lived experience and data. Through our Safe and Restorative Schools Learning Tour and our work with the Black Youth Mental Health Collaborative, we engage directly with students, families, educators, and practitioners across Virginia who are experiencing the harms of exclusionary discipline. We consistently hear that suspensions and expulsions, particularly for Black students and students with disabilities, remove students from learning without addressing the root causes of behavior or making schools safer. Statewide data make clear why a different approach is needed. According to statewide data, across many Virginia school divisions, Black students and students with disabilities are punished far more often than their peers for similar behavior: - In Lancaster County, students with disabilities are suspended more than twice as often as other students, and Black students are suspended about twice as often as non-Black students. - In Richmond City, students with disabilities are suspended well over twice as often as students without disabilities, and Black students are suspended nearly twice as often as their peers. - In Chesapeake City, students with disabilities are suspended roughly twice as often as students without disabilities. - In Franklin City, Black students are suspended more than twice as often as non-Black students. - Similar patterns appear in Newport News, Hopewell, Petersburg, Norfolk, Portsmouth, and Sussex County, where Black students and/or students with disabilities are one-and-a-half to two times more likely to be suspended than other students in the same schools. These disparities are not simply about student behavior; they reflect how schools respond to behavior. Exclusion removes students, but it does not repair harm, build accountability, or prevent future incidents. House Bill 298 offers a proven, evidence-based solution. By prioritizing restorative discipline practices, the bill shifts the focus from punishment to accountability, responsibility, and repair. Restorative practices require students to understand the impact of their actions, take responsibility, and actively work to repair harm while keeping them connected to their school community. This approach improves school climate, reduces repeat incidents, and addresses the very disparities reflected in the data. The bill also ensures accountability at the system level by requiring the Department of Education to track outcomes, report publicly on effectiveness, and provide training and technical assistance so restorative practices are implemented with support, consistency, and integrity. House Bill 298 reflects what communities, research, and lived experience all affirm: safe schools are built when accountability and healing go hand in hand. We respectfully urge your support for this bill as a meaningful step toward safer, more equitable learning environments for students across the Commonwealth. Thank you for your leadership and consideration. In care and solidarity, Carissa Henry Co-Executive Director Transformative Changes

Please pass this important bill

I strongly support HB461. Staffing shortages have led to elementary self‑contained special education classrooms with age gaps of 5–7 years (K–4, K–5, K–6) in divisions across Virginia, including FCPS. IDEA requires placements with age‑appropriate peers unless a student’s needs clearly require otherwise, and it does not allow placement decisions based on staffing convenience. HB461 sets a reasonable guardrail while still allowing IEP teams to make exceptions when appropriate. This bill keeps decisions focused on student needs, not system limitations. Please support HB461.

School districts of all sizes in Virginia face special education staffing shortages, which is resulting in self-contained classroom age ranges as large as K-6. This places significant strain on teachers expected to cover seven grade levels of curriculum at once. IDEA requires that each child’s educational placement be individually determined and aligned with age-appropriate peers unless a student’s specific needs clearly require otherwise, and it does not allow for efficiency or staffing alone to determine placement. This bill prevents the routine use of wide age ranges as a default driven by system capacity, while preserving the flexibility of IDEA’s individualized decision-making by maintaining the ability of IEP teams to make exceptions to the age range requirement when it is educationally appropriate. Pennsylvania and New York, which mirror Virginia’s mix of rural, suburban, and urban districts, successfully maintain this age range requirement with similar flexibility. This bill sets the same reasonable guardrail, ensuring placements are driven by student need rather than system limitations. I urge you to support it.

The Arc of Northern Virginia is strongly in support of HB461 and HB1331. The greatest thing we can do to drive up long term independence and drive down long term costs for people with lifelong disabilities is offer high quality, inclusive education. Both bills take critical steps in that direction. HB461 works to ensure students with similar ages are learning together, an important step in ensuring people with a full range of disabilities are used to working and learning with peers and receiving the side benefit of peer to peer mentoring and support. This is far less likely to happen with students far apart in age. HB1331 simply bring Virginia into compliance with more than 30 years of accessibility law by ensuring schools know where they are not accessible, and can therefore plan to address it. We're generations past it being the norm or understandable for people with disabilities to be told they buildings where they go to learn are not set up to welcome them.

I am the mother of a nonverbal autistic son in elementary school. For children like my son, placement matters, not just academically, but emotionally, socially, and developmentally. This bill sets a common-sense safeguard: young children with disabilities should not be placed in classrooms where the age range is so wide that it undermines learning, safety, or dignity. A six year old does not belong in a classroom with much older students simply because of a disability. Research and lived experience tell us that younger children learn best alongside peers who are close in age. Large age gaps can increase anxiety, limit meaningful social interaction, and reduce access to age appropriate instruction and play, especially for nonverbal students who already face communication barriers. Importantly, this bill does not remove flexibility. It preserves the authority of the IEP team- parents, educators, and specialists to make individualized decisions when an exception is truly in a child’s best interest. This is not about limiting options. It is about protecting our youngest and most vulnerable students, promoting inclusion, and ensuring placements are developmentally appropriate. I urge you to support this bill for equity, for dignity, and for children like my son who cannot speak for themselves.

This bill sounds helpful, but it actually makes special education disputes more complicated, slower, and more centralized. Instead of fixing problems early at the school or division level, it creates a new, state-designed dispute system with multiple tiers, mandatory mediation pressure, expanded oversight, surveys, training requirements, and four new regional ombudsman offices. That means more paperwork, more process, and more people involved before a student’s needs are resolved. Mediation can be useful when both sides freely agree to it. This bill pushes mediation as the preferred path, even in cases where parents or schools may need a clear decision quickly. For families seeking timely services, that can mean delays rather than solutions. It also blurs the role of ombudsmen. Ombuds are supposed to be neutral helpers. This bill turns them into monitors and compliance enforcers, which can undermine trust and make disputes more adversarial, not less. Finally, the bill shifts authority away from local schools and boards and into state offices, without showing that existing processes have failed or that these changes will improve outcomes for students. It builds a larger system without proving it will work better. In short, the bill adds layers of bureaucracy, slows decision-making, and risks turning support services into enforcement mechanisms—all while pulling time and resources away from students who need help now.

The American public education system has been disrupted for decades. The inconsistent system of lower standards and expectations for students is not working. Same with the constant lack of accountability for students’ behavior in classrooms. Now Harvard is teaching remedial classes. Family must be responsible for their children’s education.

I am in support of removing the provision requiring SOL tests to count for 10% of a student's grade. Students are already required to earn 5 verified credits to graduate from high school, which shows that Virginia high school students already meet rigorous requirements to graduate. Additionally, local school districts should have the autonomy to establish their own final assessment and course grading guidelines in line with cognitive science and educational research.

The American public education system has been disrupted for decades. The inconsistent system of lower standards and expectations for students is not working. Same with the constant lack of accountability for students’ behavior in classrooms. Now Harvard is teaching remedial classes. Family must be responsible for their children’s education.

On behalf of the Virginia Young Democrats Disability Caucus, we'd like to express our full support and endorsement for HB 495. This bill includes several measures to prevent and reduce violence in schools. This includes encouragement to make anonymous reporting systems for threats of violence, access to a crisis center for students, and that bus drivers will be required to have the same mental health training that teachers receive. Students benefit from easily accessible support systems and trusted adults. This bill is about prevention, support, and safety for students and adults in educational environments.

Students are more likely to seek help or share concerns when they feel safe and protected. An anonymous reporting system provides an additional, accessible way for students to speak up about mental health concerns for themselves or their peers without fear of stigma or retaliation. When paired with mental health awareness training, this approach helps schools respond earlier, more effectively, and with greater care. These tools can make a meaningful difference in identifying concerns and connecting students to support before situations escalate.

Please follow ADA guidelines regarding diabetes care in school.

The Virginia Council of Administartors of Special Education has expressed opposition to the introduced version of HB497 because it mandated an unnecessary reporting of data by school divisions. We have provided draft substitute language that would ask the VDOE to collect data from existing sources and report to the committee by Nov. 2026. We have not seen the substitute as finally crafted so cannot comment and cannot be there due to a legal obligation. We respect Del. Guzman's concerns in special education ineligibility determinations and hope that any final HB497 does not add a reporting burden for localities.

I oppose this bill because it turns normal special education decisions and disagreements into state reports and public data, creating pressure to over-identify students and treat professional judgment as failure. It adds bureaucracy and public dashboards without improving services, timelines, or support for students. More reporting does not mean better outcomes, and this approach risks harming the very students it claims to help.

Please pass this important bill

Please pass this important bill

This is an inclusive bill, a well-thought out bill that has ensures the interest of our present, and in our children, our future. Not only is there nothing wrong with teaching honest history and the truth, it is imperative that we do. We can and should talk about the the impact of erasure or distortion of truth behind painful history like the Genocide in Darfur, the Armenian, Rwandan, Indigenous, and black and African American genocides (and of course the colonization of Palestine and ongoing genocide there), but I also want to talk about the importance of sharing truth in the beauty and richness behind the history and heritage of those who surround us. This will hopefully ensure that our children’s experiences and identities are seen and heard authentically. We shouldn’t rob our kids of the education that others around the world are already learning… A society built on honest and comprehensive history and education is an asset - it strengthens the bonds between communities and makes the pillars of ancestry and truth on which generations stand confidently, unshakable. Zeina Ashrawi Hutchison

Comment of Philip Farah in favor of HB 614 Feb 10, 2026 I am Philip Farah, cofounder and Chair of Palestinian Christian Alliance for Peace. I urge you to vote for HB614. This will help to reverse Youngkin's attempt to whitewash the American historical experience. Virginia, like the rest of America was built on land usurped from indigenous peoples. the cruel oppression of slaves working in the fields, and immigrants from all ethnicities working in the mines. Immigrants from Pacific Islands, South America, Africa, the Arab World, as well as Europe, have all made great contributions to America and are part of the rich cultural heritage of Virginia. All of us ought to see our history portrayed accurately in our school curricula. No special interests should be allowed to erase or distort the historical experience of any of the communities that make us who we are.

This is a very important bill as it allows for women and marginalized communities to learn about their contributions to our history, culture and society. We have been getting a very distorted view of our history, and it has been a hindrance to learning. When students don’t see anyone like themselves being represented, they are unable to relate. Our shared history should not be relegated to a special month, or day once a year. It should be part of the curriculum. I urge everyone to vote yes to this bill, as it is long overdue.

I am Philip Farah, cofounder and Chair of Palestinian Christian Alliance for Peace. I urge you to vote for HB614. This will help to reverse Youngkin's attempt to whitewash the American historical experience. Virginia, like the rest of America was built on land usurped from indigenous peoples. the cruel oppression of slaves working in the fields, and immigrants from all ethnicities working in the mines. Immigrants from Pacific Islands, South America, Africa, the Arab World, as well as Europe, have all made great contributions to America and are part of the rich cultural heritage of Virginia. All of us ought to see our history portrayed accurately in our school curricula. No special interests should be allowed to erase or distort the historical experience of any of the communities that make us who we are.

I am writing to ask you to vote YES on HB614 – “History and social science standards and instruction; historically marginalized communities,” which will ensure comprehensive, accurate, and inclusive education in public elementary and secondary schools. Being That we are physically in the capital of the former confederacy and just up the Hill from the Devils Half Acre where hundreds of thousands of human beings were bought and sold like cattle and subjected to unimaginable horrors - how can we in good conscience not take an honest, accurate look at history? This should not even be in question - but unfortunately the last four years has seen a systematic erosion of any honest historical evaluation. I am a first generation American, my parents immigrants and refugees from WWII Germany. From early childhood I was exposed to the hard truths and histories of my ancestral homeland. I was not overwhelmed by guilt from this education rather I learned to recognize the signs, apply the knowledge gained and take on the responsibility to confront these horrors head on and keep them from happening again. Never again is never again for anyone. Unfortunately history has the bad habit of repeating itself for those who look away from it. I

HB614 would go a long way towards reintegrating Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) into our schools and correcting the recent assault on education. It provides students with more comprehensive account of history, rather than a selective narrative. No history can be perfect. This bill simply creates a framework so our educational professionals can resist political & cultural pressures to erase or ignore significant history. It gives teachers and school boards substantial latitude to tailor history instruction according to local realities and communities. It calls for the content to be “age-appropriate” and “historically accurate”. It suggests that we integrate history across the curriculum and avoid isolating the content to a single month or observance.

I am writing in support of HB 614. We live in an age of misinformation and bombardment of false ideas spread by those with the most money and power. This bill ensures that students receive a full and honest account of history, rather than a selective narrative. By learning about the struggles and contributions of diverse communities, students gain a better understanding of the world around them making them informed, well-rounded responsible citizens. The bill also promotes equity in education by ensuring that no group’s history or contributions are marginalized or erased, reinforcing the principle that every student deserves to see themselves represented in history. Importantly, when students see their experiences reflected in coursework, educational outcomes improve.

I am writing to ask you to vote YES on HB614 – “History and social science standards and instruction; historically marginalized communities,” which will ensure comprehensive, accurate, and inclusive education in public elementary and secondary schools. It would do so by requiring “instructional materials and standards in history and social science to include the contributions, perspectives, and experiences of historically marginalized communities, including racial and ethnic minorities; immigrants and refugees; women... in order to affirm such communities and promote a more holistic understanding of history.” The General Assembly should pass HB614 for the following reasons: Promotes Accurate and Complete Historical Education - HB614 ensures that students receive a full and honest account of history, rather than a selective narrative. Including diverse perspectives leads to greater historical accuracy, deeper understanding, and improved critical thinking. Strengthens Civic Literacy and Democratic Values - By learning about the struggles and contributions of diverse communities, students gain a better understanding of human rights, democracy, civil rights, social justice, and constitutional development, preparing them to become informed and responsible citizens. Improves Student Engagement and Academic Outcomes - Research consistently shows that inclusive curricula improve student engagement, motivation, and academic performance, particularly among historically underserved student populations. When students see their experiences reflected in coursework, educational outcomes improve. Supports Equal Opportunity and Educational Equity - The bill promotes equity in education by ensuring that no group’s history or contributions are marginalized or erased, reinforcing the principle that every student deserves to see themselves represented in history. Prepares Students for a Diverse Workforce and Society - Modern workplaces and communities are increasingly diverse. HB614 helps students develop cultural competence, empathy, and communication skills, all of which are essential for professional success and civic harmony. Aligns Virginia with National Educational Best Practices - Many states and professional education organizations support inclusive curriculum standards. HB614 aligns Virginia with best practices in education, ensuring that the Commonwealth remains competitive, modern, and forward-looking. Based on all the above, I urge you to vote YES for HB614!

I watched with dismay as the Youngkin administration undid all of the hard work done to include the voices and experiences of minorities and marginalized populations in the teaching of history in Virginia. As a former teacher and counselor I strongly support HB614 and the inclusion of minority and marginalized voices in US and world history. It is often said that the writing of history gets done by the winners; what gets ignored is the experience of those who have to live with the consequences of what the powerful do. But reality includes the stories of both, and the future is a function of both. It we want our children to understand history so that they can make good decisions as citizens of our country, they have to know the whole history, not just selected parts of it. I urge you to support HB614. Kathy Drinkard, Springfield, VA

I am writing to ask you to vote YES on HB614 – “History and social science standards and instruction; historically marginalized communities,” which will ensure comprehensive, accurate, and inclusive education in public elementary and secondary schools. It has never been more important that the next generation receives a full and honest account of history, rather than a narrative selected by whatever political party happens to be in power in any given year. Learning about the very real, valid, and historically verifiable struggles and contributions of diverse communities, students gain a better understanding of human rights, democracy, civil rights, social justice, and constitutional development, preparing them to become informed and responsible citizens. The legacy of the ground on which we stand here in Richmond, Virginia - the capitol of the Confederacy, is a prime example of why the history of every person who has ever walked this earth matters. I live on the other side of Shockhoe Bottom in Church Hill, where I can see the Devil's Half Acre from my window. On this site, thousands of human beings were bought and sold like animals because of the color of their skin 200 years after the indigenous stewards of the land were slaughtered by the European colonizers that planted a flag and called the land theirs. Yet there are textbooks in circulation today that do not honestly acknowledge these facts. As an adult, I have had to unlearn what I was taught about these people's stories and re-learn the truth. This bill promotes equity in education by ensuring that no group’s history or contributions are marginalized or erased, reinforcing the principle that every student deserves to see themselves represented in history. This bill is aligned with Virginia and National educational best practices, and will help students develop cultural competence, empathy, and communication skills, all of which are essential for professional success and civic harmony. I urge you to vote YES for HB614

As a Jewish educator in Del. Rasoul's district i strongly SUPPORT this bill. This inclusive approach to education is what we need in the school system and is an important corrective to the censorship we've seen in the past four years. Please vote Yes for this bill.

Please vote YES on HB614. – “History and social science standards and instruction; historically marginalized communities.” This bill would go a long way towards reintegrating Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) into our schools and correcting the four-year assault on education perpetrated by the Youngkin administration. In fact, if adopted, it would go even further and have a major effect on providing students with a full and honest account of history, rather than a selective narrative. Including diverse perspectives leads to greater historical accuracy, deeper understanding, and improved critical thinking. This bill is more comprehensive than similar legislation proposed this year in that its mandate includes the contributions, perspectives, and experiences of all historically marginalized communities. It provides a list of some of these communities and then goes on to allow for the addition of other groups as appropriate. It further calls for the content to be “age-appropriate” and “historically accurate”. It suggests that we integrate history across the curriculum and avoid isolating the content to a single month or observance. The bill promotes equity in education by ensuring that no group’s history or contributions are marginalized or erased. This reinforces the principle that every student deserves to see themselves represented in history. This bill is truly groundbreaking in its potential to provide all students with a complete, accurate, and inclusive history that prepares them to be a fully engaged citizen in a complex world. I urge you to vote “Yes” on HB614!

Hello, As a mother of two Henrico County Public School students, I am writing to ask you to vote YES on HB614 – “History and social science standards and instruction; historically marginalized communities,” which will ensure comprehensive, accurate, and inclusive education in public elementary and secondary schools. It would do so by requiring “instructional materials and standards in history and social science to include the contributions, perspectives, and experiences of historically marginalized communities, including racial and ethnic minorities; immigrants and refugees; women... in order to affirm such communities and promote a more holistic understanding of history.” The General Assembly should pass HB614 for the following reasons: Promotes Accurate and Complete Historical Education - HB614 ensures that students receive a full and honest account of history, rather than a selective narrative. Including diverse perspectives leads to greater historical accuracy, deeper understanding, and improved critical thinking. Strengthens Civic Literacy and Democratic Values - By learning about the struggles and contributions of diverse communities, students gain a better understanding of human rights, democracy, civil rights, social justice, and constitutional development, preparing them to become informed and responsible citizens. Improves Student Engagement and Academic Outcomes - Research consistently shows that inclusive curricula improve student engagement, motivation, and academic performance, particularly among historically underserved student populations. When students see their experiences reflected in coursework, educational outcomes improve. Supports Equal Opportunity and Educational Equity - The bill promotes equity in education by ensuring that no group’s history or contributions are marginalized or erased, reinforcing the principle that every student deserves to see themselves represented in history. These are but a few among many important reasons students deserve to be taught completely and with honesty about. Anything less than this is a detriment to our youth. With sincere thanks, Elisa & Neal Bilyue

Please vote YES on Delegate Rasoul’s HB614 which will ensure comprehensive, accurate, and inclusive education in public elementary and secondary schools. HB614 aligns Virginia with National Educational Best Practices . Many states and professional education organizations support inclusive curriculum standards.

I urge you to vote YES on HB614 – “History and social science standards and instruction; historically marginalized communities,” which will ensure comprehensive, accurate, and inclusive education in public elementary and secondary schools. This bill would do so by requiring “instructional materials and standards in history and social science to include the contributions, perspectives, and experiences of historically marginalized communities, including racial and ethnic minorities; immigrants and refugees; women...in order to affirm such communities and promote a more holistic understanding of history.” ALL students deserve a full and honest account of history, rather than a selective narrative.

Please pass HB614. It is critical that our students receive an honest telling of history in their civics courses so that they grow to be engaged citizens. Importantly, students from underrepresented groups should see themselves in the curriculum to foster greater belonging and positive identity development. As a counselor and educator, I know the research shows this predicts better educational outcomes across the board. Please support HB614.

I’m writing in support of HB614. It promotes accurate and complete historical education & ensures a better understanding of human rights, democracy, civil rights, social justice, and constitutional development. My own personal experience with my three children is an improvement in their engagement when they saw their experiences reflected accurately in the coursework. What I really liked about this bill is it ensures no group’s history or contributions are marginalized or erased. In an increasingly global workforce, this bill will ensure students are developing skills necessary for professional success. It is essential to align Virginia with National Educational Best Practices and promote an inclusive curricula.

I oppose this bill.

I am writing to ask the K-12 Subcommittee of the House of Delegates Education Committee to vote YES on HB614 – “History and social science standards and instruction; historically marginalized communities.” which will ensure comprehensive, accurate, and inclusive education in public elementary and secondary schools. It would do so by requiring “instructional materials and standards in history and social science to include the contributions, perspectives, and experiences of historically marginalized communities, including racial and ethnic minorities; immigrants and refugees; women... in order to affirm such communities and promote a more holistic understanding of history.” The General Assembly should pass HB614 for the following reasons: 1. Promotes Accurate and Complete Historical Education - HB614 ensures that students receive a full and honest account of history, rather than a selective narrative. Including diverse perspectives leads to greater historical accuracy, deeper understanding, and improved critical thinking. 2. Strengthens Civic Literacy and Democratic Values - By learning about the struggles and contributions of diverse communities, students gain a better understanding of human rights, democracy, civil rights, social justice, and constitutional development, preparing them to become informed and responsible citizens. 3. Improves Student Engagement and Academic Outcomes - Research consistently shows that inclusive curricula improve student engagement, motivation, and academic performance, particularly among historically underserved student populations. When students see their experiences reflected in coursework, educational outcomes improve. 4. Supports Equal Opportunity and Educational Equity - The bill promotes equity in education by ensuring that no group’s history or contributions are marginalized or erased, reinforcing the principle that every student deserves to see themselves represented in history. 5. Prepares Students for a Diverse Workforce and Society - Modern workplaces and communities are increasingly diverse. HB614 helps students develop cultural competence, empathy, and communication skills, all of which are essential for professional success and civic harmony. 6. Aligns Virginia with National Educational Best Practices - Many states and professional education organizations support inclusive curriculum standards. HB614 aligns Virginia with best practices in education, ensuring that the Commonwealth remains competitive, modern, and forward-looking. Based on all the above, I urge you to vote YES for HB614! Sincerely, Paul Noursi Vienna, VA 703-255-4150

HB 614 moves history education away from teaching facts, evidence, and critical thinking and toward state-mandated affirmation of identity and perspective. Instead of asking schools to teach history fully and honestly, it requires instruction to promote approved viewpoints chosen by the Board of Education. That is a fundamental shift. History should help students analyze what happened and why. Once the state tells teachers which groups must be “affirmed” and how, classrooms become ideological spaces, not places of inquiry. Teachers are pressured to follow a script rather than encourage debate, and students learn which answers are safe instead of how to think critically. Today’s majority does not control tomorrow’s curriculum. The same law used now to enforce one worldview can later be used to enforce another. Parents and educators who support this bill today could soon find themselves bound by a curriculum they fundamentally oppose. HB 614 politicizes history, chills honest discussion, and hands lasting control of curriculum to whichever political faction holds power. That weakens education for everyone.

I oppose HB 614. It is entirely about embedding ideological content throughout the curriculum. It focuses on divisive identity politics and deliberately drags the public schools into political quagmire, rather than a single-minded focus on rigorous academics, which should be the guiding principle of all education policy. Please vote no on this divisive and unnecessary legislation.

I opposed DEI, SEL, and other forms of discrimination in our education systems. It is shameful public education system continues to lower standards and expectations for some students. Students and teachers need to be rewarded for their hard work without focusing on their race, gender, religion, or economic status. Diversity and inclusion Please judge human beings by their character and actions. DEI is a Marxist ideology and we have witnessed the failures. We don’t need to have a religion or race month to justify the incredible sacrifices, accomplishments and achievements of everyone in the world. It is disgraceful to recognize and celebrate one group over the other. No wonder many parents don’t want to send their children to public schools anymore.

I strongly oppose this bill.

Please add a reference to May as Jewish American Heritage Month. The GA has been great of late about recognizing May for the Jewish community and celebrating all of the historic contributions to Virginia. Thank you kindly.

Please follow ADA guidelines regarding diabetes care in school.

It is important to support children with diabetes in all areas of school life. It is just as important to have a plan for inclusiveness for children with diabetes as it is for children with a nut allergy.

Please pass this important bill

I oppose SB656 because the current VA Code already allows flexibility when needed. Increasing class size limits risks lowering instructional quality, increasing teacher workload, and harming beginning music students who need individual attention.

Please do not increase class size

Please pass this important bill

Dear Members of the Virginia Legislative Committee, I am writing to express my strong support for HB 686, which directs the Board of Education to develop guidance on best practices for open school enrollment policies. As a parent of a child with special needs, I have experienced firsthand the challenges of finding an educational environment that meets my child’s unique requirements. This bill represents a critical step toward ensuring families like mine have greater flexibility and access to the right educational settings. HB 686 addresses a pressing need by empowering the Board of Education to provide clear, actionable guidance to local school divisions on implementing open enrollment policies. This will allow parents to seek schools outside their assigned zones that better suit their children’s academic, social, or specialized needs. For families with students requiring specific programs or accommodations, such as those for special needs, this flexibility can be transformative. It ensures that a child is not confined to a single school simply due to geographic boundaries, but rather can attend a school equipped to foster their growth and success. Additionally, the bill promotes equity by creating opportunities for students from diverse backgrounds to access high-quality education. Open enrollment policies, when guided by best practices, can help balance resources and opportunities across districts, ensuring that every child—regardless of zip code—has a chance to thrive. This is particularly meaningful for parents like me, who have struggled to find a school with the necessary support systems for a child with special needs. Without the option to choose, we are often left with limited solutions that may not fully address our children’s educational or developmental goals. On a personal level, having education choice would have made a significant difference for my family. Navigating the current system has been challenging, as we’ve been restricted to schools that, while well-intentioned, were not always the best fit for my child’s specific needs. The ability to enroll in a school with tailored programs or specialized staff could have alleviated years of frustration and provided my child with a more supportive learning environment from the start. In conclusion, I urge your support for HB 686. This bill offers a pathway to greater educational choice and equity, directly impacting families like mine who seek the best possible opportunities for our children. By establishing best practices for open enrollment, Virginia can lead the way in ensuring that every student has access to an education that meets their individual needs. Thank you for considering this vital legislation.

This bill makes important reforms to remove political interference in the operations of the boards of public higher education institutions, strengthens institutional governance by including faculty, staff, and students as voting members of the boards, and requires boards to adopt policies that support and advance shared governance and ensure the key role of the faculty over curriculum, academic progress, and student assessment. I urge you to vote "yes" on this bill.

This bill makes important reforms to remove political interference in the operations of the boards of public higher education institutions, strengthens institutional governance by including faculty, staff, and students as voting members of the boards, and requires boards to adopt policies that support and advance shared governance and ensure the key role of the faculty over curriculum, academic progress, and student assessment. I urge you to vote "yes" on this bill. Thank you.

This bill makes important reforms to remove political interference in the operations of the boards of public higher education institutions, strengthens institutional governance by including faculty, staff, and students as voting members of the boards, and requires boards to adopt policies that support and advance shared governance and ensure the key role of the faculty over curriculum, academic progress, and student assessment. I urge you to vote "yes" on this bill.

HB780 (text below from Faculty Senate email sent earlier today) This bill makes important reforms to remove political interference in the operations of the boards of public higher education institutions, strengthens institutional governance by including faculty, staff, and students as voting members of the boards, and requires boards to adopt policies that support and advance shared governance and ensure the key role of the faculty over curriculum, academic progress, and student assessment. I urge you to vote "yes" on this bill.

This bill makes important reforms to remove political interference in the operations of the boards of public higher education institutions, strengthens institutional governance by including faculty, staff, and students as voting members of the boards, and requires boards to adopt policies that support and advance shared governance and ensure the key role of the faculty over curriculum, academic progress, and student assessment. I urge you to vote "yes" on this bill.

The bill advances crucial reforms that limit political influence on the governance of public higher education boards. It also strengthens oversight by granting faculty, staff, and students voting representation, and it obligates boards to establish policies that foster meaningful shared governance and affirm the faculty’s primary authority over curriculum, academic progress, and student assessment. I urge you to cast a “yes” vote on this legislation.

This bill makes important reforms to remove political interference in the operations of the boards of public higher education institutions, strengthens institutional governance by including faculty, staff, and students as voting members of the boards, and requires boards to adopt policies that support and advance shared governance and ensure the key role of the faculty over curriculum, academic progress, and student assessment. I urge you to vote "yes" on this bill.

This bill makes important reforms to remove political interference in the operations of the boards of public higher education institutions, strengthens institutional governance by including faculty, staff, and students as voting members of the boards, and requires boards to adopt policies that support and advance shared governance and ensure the key role of the faculty over curriculum, academic progress, and student assessment. I urge you to vote "yes" on this bill.

I am writing regarding Bill 780 and urge you to vote “YES” on this legislation. Over the past four years, institutions of higher education have experienced increased politicization within their governing boards, undermining effective and independent governance. This bill makes important reforms to reduce political interference in the governance of institutions of higher education. It strengthens institutional governance by including faculty, staff, and students as voting members of governing boards. Furthermore, the bill requires boards to adopt policies that support and advance shared governance. I support these efforts to ensure academic freedom, including faculty primacy over the curriculum, as well as the protection of freedom of expression.

This bill makes important reforms to remove political interference in the operations of the boards of public higher education institutions, strengthens institutional governance by including faculty, staff, and students as voting members of the boards, and requires boards to adopt policies that support and advance shared governance and ensure the key role of the faculty over curriculum, academic progress, and student assessment. I urge you to vote "yes" on this bill.

On behalf of George Mason's undergraduate Student Government, we want to share our formal support for HB780, sponsored by Delegate Katrina Callsen. In recent years, Virginia's public universities have been shaken by crises of confidence in our Boards of Visitors. Students don’t feel that Boards are focused on the institutions they’re meant to prioritize, and have put ideology over education. Boards have seen students and the programs they rely on as targets, not partners. This hurts students, but it hurts the Commonwealth too. When students lose confidence in the Boards governing their institutions, it means students don’t participate as much, it closes off opportunities, and means that critical student needs aren’t met, and sometimes aren’t even recognized. This means universities don’t return as much value to the taxpayer as they do when students have confidence in university governance, because that trust opens the door to better cooperation, stronger participation, and respect to students as a key stakeholder for universities HB780 supports this by granting students, as well as faculty and staff,an elected representative to vote on the Board of Visitors. It bridges the student-governance gap, while maintaining the oversight and primary stakeholder role of Virginia’s elected officials, especially from the General Assembly. It also sets and clarifies better goals for institutions that protect First Amendment freedoms, the bedrock of academic innovation. HB780 recognizes that taxpayers who pay into institutions deserve the primary voice in governance, but that tuition payers - students - also deserve a say in how they’re governed, and rebuilding trust and confidence helps everyone.

I am writing to urge a vote in favor of HB780. This bill makes important changes to policy that can protect universities from political interference, strengthen institutional governance by including faculty, staff, and students as voting members of the boards, and require adoption of policies supporting shared governance and ensure the critical role of faculty insight regarding curriculum, academic progress, and student assessment. I write in my capacity as a parent and citizen of Virginia who will in the very near future send my high school student to one of the state’s institutions of higher learning and is concerned about the negative impacts of diminishing faculty governance throughout higher education and its potential harm to the future education of my son. I have seen this first hand as I am also faculty, and I am certain some members of the subcommittee are aware of the ongoing issues at ODU that can clearly be traced to a lack of adherence to principles of faculty governance, but I do not provide this comment as a representative ODU in any way.

Governing boards of Virginia universities have become overwhelming politicized as we have seen in recent years. Not only are individual appointees often partisan but often (even usually) lack knowledge of pedagogical understanding that directly influences curricula design and student success. Members of university governing boards can be easily swayed by power politics and have little contact with faculty, the backbone of any university, those individuals with terminal degrees from some of the finest institutions in the world who have been hired with Virginia taxpayer dollars to educate at the highest levels. Given the current structure of the governing boards in Virginia colleges and universities, the voices of the faculty cannot be heard or are heard only second-hand. I write to ask that you support HB780 which would amend current procedure to include faculty, staff, and students as voting members on the governing boards of Virginia universities. This change would bring much needed checks and balances on political interference and administrative fiat that is detrimental to the mission of educating students at Virginia institutions of higher education. A broadening of the composition of Virginia governing boards at Virginia colleges and universities will enhance the dissemination of knowledge about university issues and offer greater potential for the understanding that comes from listening to multiple perspectives. The HB780 proposed change will thus augment wise and informed decision making which is critical to the health of Virginia colleges and universities and to student success. The opinions expressed here are my own personal opinions and do not pretend to speak on behalf of VAC Agency #65 (Old Dominion University) nor any other official entity or Virginia college or university. However, I would like to underscore that I am a lifelong Virginia resident with roots going back to 1643 and as such I consider myself a most concerned citizen with a family history vested in Virginia’s wellbeing.

HB780 strengthens higher education governance by including faculty, staff, and students as voting members of Boards of Visitors. As a current faculty representative to a board and someone who studies effective governance practices, I urge you to vote "yes" on this bill.

I proudly write to you in support of HB780 in my individual capacity as an education policy student at George Mason University. HB780 is a brilliant, comprehensive bill that will improve higher education governance by, among other changes, equitably and responsibly elevating the importance of students' needs and perspectives within their institution of higher education's (IHE) governing boards, making them full members of those boards. This includes not just the right of voting but the authority to participate fully in parliamentary procedure and the responsibility to be duly oriented for the role as other members are. At George Mason University, students live on campus. We eat at dining halls and restaurants and may purchase groceries at on-campus convenience stores. We utilize recreation facilities, health service offices, vaccine clinics, libraries, and other on-campus services. Students may even acquire health insurance from their IHE. These services are funded by general operations appropriations from the General Assembly and from tuition. As tuition-payers, students have a financial stake in their IHE as they pay the higher education equivalent of taxation: a mandatory financial payment that is returned to us in value through the services, academic and otherwise, provided to us. It is a common practice for such services to have student advisory boards and other mechanisms for students to relay feedback. This is structurally insufficient. As we honor the 250th anniversary of our nation's founding, I kindly remind the General Assembly of a maxim our founders held dear: no taxation without representation. I have heard it characterized that students are merely clients of a service provided and thus should have no relation to the governance of that service. The analogy posed to me was that a consumer of Hershey's chocolate bars would be misguided to demand a seat on Hershey's corporate board. However, that analogy misunderstands both the relationship of students to their institutions of higher education and the public charge of those institutions' boards. Students do not exist solely as the clientele of an IHE. Our relationship is deeper than just a recipient of the education provided. Modern institutions of higher education, particularly those with a high residential population, are functionally equivalent to municipalities. Around the commonwealth, students have the right to vote for county officials who govern how local tax revenue is spent and what laws they are subject to as residents of a locality. Thus, students should be represented in the governance of how their IHE’s revenue is spent and what policies they are subject to as students. The General Assembly rightly and naturally expects a return on investment for higher education appropriations by its institution. And thus, governing boards are codified as under the control of the General Assembly. HB780, by providing students the right to be represented by one of their peers through an appropriate appointment and confirmation process that engages students, the legislature, and the governor's office, best proves a mechanism to ensure students have representation and can participate in securing that return on investment for their education outcomes and the General Assembly’s interests.

My name is Walt Heinecke, I am associate professor of education and have been teaching at a Virginia public for 30 years in research, statistics and evaluation. I have served on the faculty senate. We at the American Association of University Professors at UVA urge you to support HB 780, HB 1069 and HB1473 on Monday. HB 780 which serves as a hub for the other bills is the most exemplary bill I have seen in higher education in Virginia. It fixes the problem we encountered at UVA and other publics by addressing university control over legal counsel, it allows for staggering terms for BOV members prohibiting the one party domination of BOVs., It clarifies appointment processes that maintain the oversight of the GA, It has much needed language on the mandatory appointment of faculty, staff and student voting members on BOVs a much needed improvement for authentic shared Governance. We suggest you roll Del. Laufer's bill into this bill as it has a more democratic process of faculty, staff & student member selection to maintain the independence of constituent voice. Allowing the BOVs to pick from multiple names is a nominations not an election. The removal of professors section in HB 780 comports with AAUP national best practices essential for shared governance and exemplary not found in any other proposed bill. Unlike any other bill it includes a requirement for BOVs to define and implement shared governance that will improve the quality of decision making at our universities, an AAUP national standard. The bill, like HB 1473, has language to protect free speech and first amendment rights of faculty, staff and students. that have proven to be essential in the current era. You might think about rolling Del. Schmidt's 1473 bill into this bill strengthening this aspect of HB 780. These three bills 780, 1069, 1473 considered as a whole are exactly what is needed to bring balance and improve our institutions of higher education. If you want to strengthen and improve our institutions, I urge you to support all three bills. I speak from being on the front lines of the crisis experienced at UVA last year and teaching for 30 years. The other bills concerning BOV reform are not as comprehensive as 780 and associated bills. You have an opportunity here to really make dramatic improvements in our system of higher education. Please support HB 780, HB 1069 and HB 1473 on Monday and advance them. The bills will improve shared governance without which there can be no academic freedom and we need academic freedom now more than ever as our universities are under siege. Thank you.

I am a student at George Mason University. GMU has recently been subject to much strife due to the political biases of our former Boards of Visitors. This problem had been common among many other Virginia universities as well. HB780 will prevent this in the future, ensuring stability for Virginian schools and allowing our universities to be focused on education rather than partisan politics. Virginians will benefit from our educational institutions being focused on our needs and what will benefit our students rather than being beholden to whatever issue the current party in power cares about at any given moment. Please pass HB780 to protect Virginian education.

This bill makes important reforms to remove political interference in the operations of the boards of public higher education institutions, strengthens institutional governance by including faculty, staff, and students as voting members of the boards, and requires boards to adopt policies that support and advance shared governance and ensure the key role of the faculty over curriculum, academic progress, and student assessment. I urge you to vote "yes" on this bill.

Thank you so much for considering my input on HB780, especially regarding proposals to address board compositions and appointments, as well as to articulate board members' responsibilities in the area of shared governance and academic freedom. As I understand it, HB780 seeks critical reforms to how the boards of public higher education institutions in Virginia function, significantly strengthens institutional governance by including faculty, staff, and students as voting members of boards, and requires boards to adopt policies that support and advance shared governance and academic freedom. Doing so will ensure members of the faculty retain primary responsibility over curriculum (including assignments, assessments and modalities of instruction), given the significant role curriculum plays in supporting student success. These are issues of great urgency at Old Dominion University, where the current administration and BOV have violated their own policies regarding shared governance, as well as faculty members' academic freedom, in the rushed and ill-conceived mandates associated with the "Forward Focused Digital Transformation Initiative" (FFDTI). The Executive Committee of the ODU Faculty Senate recently shared a press release (dated January 21, 2026) with our regional delegates, as well as with the Governor's office, describing the ongoing crisis. If faculty and students had voting membership rights on the ODU Board of Visitors, the current regrettable state of affairs at ODU could surely have been eased, if not completely avoided. Our unfortunate situation highlights the compelling need for legislation such as HB780. I strongly support HB780 and urge you to give its passage your most serious consideration. Thank you for your service to our Commonwealth. I am writing to you in my capacity as a resident of Norfolk, VA, and as a citizen actively engaged in the democratic process. The opinions I expressed are mine alone and do not necessarily represent the views of other individuals, of Old Dominion University or any other entity or group.

This past year has seen terrible political interference at UVA and other Virginia schools. We need this bill to make critical reforms to keep politics out of the operations of the Board of Visitors of our public higher education institutions. This bill will strengthen institutional governance by including faculty, staff, and students as voting members of the boards. It will also require boards to adopt policies that promote shared governance and make sure the faculty have a key role in the curriculum, academic progress, and student assessment. Please vote yes on this bill!

I write as a Full Professor at University of Virginia. Though my support from bill 780 comes from my experience of the past eight months of administrative upheaval, political intrigue, and flagrant dishonesty at UVA, I speak on behalf of myself and not as a representative of the institution. This bill makes important reforms to remove political interference in the operations of the boards of public higher education institutions, strengthens institutional governance by including faculty, staff, and students as voting members of the boards, and requires boards to adopt policies that support and advance shared governance and ensure the key role of the faculty over curriculum, academic progress, and student assessment. I urge you to vote yes on this bill.

Please vote "yes" on HB780. The shared governance crisis at Old Dominion University* could have been averted with more careful and balanced selection of BOV members. Our universities cannot remain academically or intellectually sound without this codification. Faculty and students must have a voice in the management of curricula and academic affairs; this right should not be treated as an optional courtesy that may be extended by some but not all presidents and Boards of Visitors. *the opinions expressed here are my own personal opinions and do not pretend to speak on behalf of VAC Agency #65 (Old Dominion University) nor any other official entity.

This bill makes important reforms to remove political interference in the operations of the boards of public higher education institutions, strengthens institutional governance by including faculty, staff, and students as voting members of the boards, and requires boards to adopt policies that support and advance shared governance and ensure the key role of the faculty over curriculum, academic progress, and student assessment. I urge you to vote "yes" on this bill.

This bill makes important reforms to remove political interference in the operations of the boards of public higher education institutions, strengthens institutional governance by including faculty, staff, and students as voting members of the boards, and requires boards to adopt policies that support and advance shared governance and ensure the key role of the faculty over curriculum, academic progress, and student assessment. I urge you to vote "yes" on this bill.

As a faculty member serving the state of Virginia, I am extremely concerned about how Boards have become political agents to suppress learning and interfere with students' right to learn as well as faculty rights to teach. This bill makes important reforms to remove political interference in the operations of the boards of public higher education institutions, strengthens institutional governance by including faculty, staff, and students as voting members of the boards, and requires boards to adopt policies that support and advance shared governance and ensure the key role of the faculty over curriculum, academic progress, and student assessment. I urge you to vote "yes" on this bill.

HB780 makes important reforms to remove political interference in the operations of the boards of public higher education institutions, strengthens institutional governance by including faculty, staff, and students as voting members of the boards, and requires boards to adopt policies that support and advance shared governance and ensure the key role of the faculty over curriculum, academic progress, and student assessment. Some members of the subcommittee may be in receipt of a press release sent by the executive committee of the ODU Faculty Senate to regional delegates describing an ongoing crisis of leadership and shared governance. If the faculty had voting membership rights on the board of visitors, this crisis could have been mitigated or altogether avoided. I urge you to vote "yes" on HB780. **the opinions expressed here are my own personal opinions and do not pretend to speak on behalf of VAC Agency #65 (Old Dominion University) nor any other official entity.**

Members of the Subcommittee, I write to voice strong support for HB 780, which Delegate Callsen is sponsoring, and which parallels provisions in SB 381, sponsored by Senator Surovell. I am a member of the Advisory Council for Wahoos4UVA and author of the “Constitutional Imperatives” Substack essay entitled, “Undoing Irresolvable Conflicts of Interest and Unshackling University Counsel at UVA and All Virginia’s Public Universities.” The essay is available here: https://richardmarks66.substack.com/p/undoing-irresolvable-conflicts-of. (You may already have seen it.) It has been cited with favor by Wahoos4UVA, and the link distributed to Wahoos4UVA’s mailing list. You are well aware that Virginia's previous Attorney General prevented UVA’s University Counsel from defending against the federal government’s attack on the University's academic freedom. UVA’s Board of Visitors also failed to attempt a defense. These experiences teach the need to specify in legislation that boards of visitors at all Virginia’s public universities have a fiduciary duty to preserve and defend the institution’s academic freedom. Defense of academic freedom and freedom of speech must be part of each institution’s core mission and mission statement. HB 780 and SB 381 specify this requisite of corporate governance. This clarification is an essential complement to provisions in HB 780 and SB 381 specifying that counsel at Virginia’s public universities owe their duty of loyalty to their respective institutions, rather than to some undifferentiated, vague, and hence unknowable general duty to the people of the Commonwealth at large. If we at Wahoos4UVA can help advance this legislation and its companion bill in the Senate, please call upon us. You have our vigorous support for this legislation.

Dear Members of the Subcommittee, I write in strong support of HB 780, legislation that introduces vital reforms to modernize the governance of Virginia’s public higher education institutions. By insulating governing boards from short-term political volatility and centering the expertise of those who live and work within our campus communities, this bill helps ensure that Virginia’s colleges and universities remain stable, competitive, and firmly focused on their educational mission. Key Pillars of Reform Institutional Stability By extending governing board terms from four to six years, HB 780 promotes continuity, institutional memory, and thoughtful leadership. This reform mitigates the “pendulum effect” caused by frequent turnover and enables boards to engage in more effective long-term strategic, academic, and financial planning. Meaningful Shared Governance Requiring the inclusion of faculty, staff, and students as full voting members reflects a common-sense modernization of board composition. These voices bring essential, on-the-ground perspectives to decision-making, ensuring that policies are informed by the realities of teaching, learning, research, and campus operations. This strengthens board deliberations and leads to more durable and effective outcomes. Commitment to Neutrality and Academic Freedom HB 780 appropriately codifies the duty of governing boards to uphold ideological and partisan neutrality. By affirming academic freedom and freedom of speech as core governance responsibilities, the bill protects the integrity of academic programs, safeguards institutional reputation, and preserves public trust in the value of a Virginia degree. Accountability and Transparency Through improved appointment procedures, clarified duties for legal counsel, and strengthened expectations for collective board responsibility, the bill establishes a more robust system of checks and balances. These provisions ensure governing boards act in the best interests of their institutions and the Commonwealth, rather than reflecting any single political agenda. Conclusion The reforms advanced by HB 780 are not merely administrative adjustments they are essential to preserving the excellence, credibility, and long-term vitality of Virginia’s public higher education system. By aligning board composition and responsibilities with nationally recognized best practices in shared governance, this legislation fosters trust, transparency, and academic excellence. I respectfully urge you to report HB 780 out of subcommittee with a “YES” vote. Sincerely, Dirk Burruss Professor, Reynolds Community College

I am writing to urge your support for this bill, which introduces vital reforms to protect public higher education from political interference. By granting faculty, staff, and students voting seats on governing boards, this legislation strengthens institutional oversight and codifies the principles of shared governance. Most importantly, it ensures that faculty maintain primary authority over curriculum and academic standards. Please vote 'yes' to protect the integrity of our institutions.

Hello, I am student of Charlottesville high school. my name is Nargis Haidary. I support the HB 836 student. Every student should feel safe at school and I want to support my classmates. I think we should support each other because we protect human rights, prevent the separation of families, and maintain the safety and stability of communities.

Chair and Members of the Subcommittee: My name is Anne Kelsey, and I am a Senior Policy Analyst at the Young Center for Immigrant Children’s Rights. The Young Center protects and advances the rights and best interests of immigrant children and advocates for an immigration system that treats children as children first. The Young Center urges the Subcommittee to support HB 836. Every child deserves to feel safe and supported at school, regardless of immigration status. Yet in January 2025, the federal administration rescinded its sensitive locations policy that kept immigration enforcement away from schools, churches, and hospitals. This change has resulted in increased ICE enforcement and presence near schools, leading to direct harm to children, families, and communities. Across the country, and in Virginia, we see rising absenteeism, declining participation in school activities, and pervasive fear and anxiety. It is not only undocumented or uncertainly documented children that are affected, but all children who see their family, friends, and community under attack. Considering these serious and ongoing harms, it is critical that Virginia act to protect their students and their schools. In addition to important privacy protections and state-wide uniform procedures, HB 836 would codify the constitutional right to a free public education regardless of immigration or citizenship status into state law. Plyler v. Doe, the Supreme Court decision from 1982 that affirms this right, is under attack by anti-immigrant advocates and legislators across the country. Thus, it is important that Virginia act now to clearly affirm and codify the right to a free public education for all children.

I am a student at Charlottesville High School writing in support of HB-836. This bill is important to pass because of the effect ICE will have on students. With the constant fear of ICE when attending schools, illegal and even legal students might not benefit from the same education as everyone else. Every student should feel safe in schools, whether or not they are legal. School should be a safe space of education and growth, rather than a place someone is scared to go. Because of this fear, many students don't attend classes or miss long periods of school. Every kid deserves an education, as they are the foundation of our future. This is true for every child in America, a citizen or not. I urge you to vote in favor of HB-836.

I'm a student at Charlottesville high school and I'm supporting this bill and our school needs more money to support their students and help students with what stuff they need to have.

We are students from Charlottesville High School and we are in a class right now with students from 8 different countries, cultures, and backgrounds. We feel safe in our school because there is no ICE presence and we have teachers we trust. Even though some students bully, we still feel safe. We understand not all students in Virginia feel this safe, and if ICE were in schools then students will stop coming. If students stop coming, then when the next election happens, it won't matter because they will have missed so much. And then they will not have degrees or jobs. They are humans like us. Hate is not the way to go forward. Please vote for HB836 and tell your colleagues to do the same. Abdulazeez, Mohammad, Heidan , Alinoti

I am writing in support of SB 836. I am the Language Justice Coordinator at Richmond Public Schools and work with multilingual/immigrant families every day. This bill is important because it would guarantee the right to a free public education for all children across the commonwealth. A child's right to learn should never be dictated by their birthplace. Education is a cornerstone of our society, and especially in Virginia. For that reason, schools need to be safe havens for our children. They should not have to worry about their safety or immigration status while trying to learn. Codifying these protection sends the message that we value children first in Virginia. We cannot be leaders in education when our most vulnerable students aren't protected. Please stand on the side of justice, compassion, and progress for the future of Virginia.

Chair and Members of the Subcommittee: My name is Ryan Durazo, and I am a Supervising Attorney with Ayuda’s Children’s Program. Ayuda is a nonprofit organization that provides legal, social, and language access services to immigrant communities across the Commonwealth of Virginia. Every day, Ayuda works alongside immigrant children and families who are seeking safety, stability, and dignity. We strongly urge the Subcommittee to support HB 836. HB 836 is urgently needed to ensure that Virginia’s public schools remain safe, welcoming spaces for all students, regardless of their actual or perceived immigration status. I would like to share the story of “Daniel,” a young person we represent, whose experience illustrates why HB 836 is necessary. Daniel is a freshman in high school; with the help of Ayuda and state services, he was receiving a fresh start after a traumatic childhood; when we read the horrific details of the abuse his parents inflicted on him aloud in court, even the judge cried. Daniel’s story was on the verge of being one of hope; he’d been engaging in music therapy and has a notebook full of songs he is excited to share. However, because of his county’s 287(g) agreement, all that changed last fall; Daniel had been receiving therapeutic services in foster care for just under a month when he had a non-violent disciplinary issue at school; his school resource officer, in coordination with the county sheriff, used this incident as an excuse to call ICE on Daniel. ICE came to Daniel’s foster home, and using deceptive and intimidating tactics, and information they had obtained through the 287(g) agreement, took Daniel away in handcuffs and within a matter of hours, transported him across state lines where he couldn’t be reached. All this, despite Daniel having legal protection from deportation, which rarely matters to ICE. As of today, we are still fighting for Daniel’s release. He spent Christmas in detention because of a sheriff and school resource officer who were enabled by 287(g) to act as immigration enforcement based on Daniel’s perceived immigration status. Daniel’s case is not an isolated incident. Across the state, we have seen how collaboration between local law enforcement, school personnel, and federal immigration authorities erodes trust, discourages school attendance, and traumatizes and retraumatizes children, some of whom, like Daniel, are already survivors of abuse, abandonment, or neglect. HB836 provides a clear solution: protecting student privacy, prohibiting discrimination and intimidation based on immigration status, establishing uniform rules for law-enforcement interactions in schools, and providing clear enforcement mechanisms for families. These protections are essential to restoring trust, stabilizing enrollment, and ensuring that children can learn without fear. Research and local data show that immigration enforcement activity in and around schools leads to increased absenteeism, declining enrollment (particularly among multilingual learners) and significant harm to student well-being and academic outcomes. On behalf of Ayuda and the children and families we serve, we urge you to vote yes on HB 836. Virginia’s schools must be places of learning and healing, not fear. Young people like Daniel deserve nothing less. Thank you for the opportunity to submit this testimony and for your consideration. Respectfully submitted, Ryan Durazo

Good afternoon, Chair and members of the committee. My name is Dr. Jennifer Blackwell, and I am the Director of Multilingual Learner Success for Richmond Public Schools, and I am speaking in support of HB 836. Since early 2025, changes in federal enforcement have removed the protections that used to keep immigration enforcement out of our school zones. The impact in our schools was immediate. We saw rising absenteeism and declining enrollment, specifically among our multilingual learners and our newcomer students. When families fear that dropping their child off at school could lead to family separation, they keep their children home. And we know that children cannot learn if they are not at school. We know that children cannot learn if they are living in fear! Currently, Virginia has no state-level protections, leading to inconsistent responses across divisions. In Richmond Public Schools, we have taken a proactive approach to ensuring the safety of our students by reviewing and revising our school board policies, by training multiple RPS stakeholders on student privacy and student rights, and by providing family and community resources, but even with all of the work we’ve done to communicate safety and love as a school division, it still does not feel like enough! The inconsistency between what school divisions have been able to create and the lack of protections that currently exist breeds fear. Nothing breaks your heart more than knowing that your 5th-grade multilingual learner student, who won the science fair, won’t be at the ceremony and celebration after school because his parents are fearful of showing up to school. Nothing breaks your heart more than seeing a high school senior seriously contemplate dropping out of school, now that they have to work to support their family because their father was publicly detained at the school bus stop. HB 836 is the solution. It strengthens student privacy and strictly limits when schools can collect or share immigration-related information. It ensures that our schools remain safe havens focused on education, not enforcement. By passing this bill, you guarantee that every child in the Commonwealth can learn without fear. I urge you to vote yes on HB 836.

I oppose this bill because it takes a protection that already exists under federal law and turns it into a sweeping liability trap for schools. No child should ever be denied a public education based on immigration status. That is already settled law. What this bill does instead is force school boards, principals, teachers, and even school resource officers into legal and constitutional decisions they are not trained to make, while exposing them to lawsuits for vague, subjective violations based on “perceived” status. This bill does not strengthen education. It expands legal risk, invites litigation, and pulls schools into immigration enforcement conflicts that belong in the courts, not the classroom. It replaces clarity with fear and discretion with rigid rules, making schools less safe and less focused on teaching. Protecting students does not require turning educators into legal gatekeepers or making schools targets for civil lawsuits. We can uphold the right to education without undermining local governance, law enforcement coordination, or common sense. That is why I oppose this bill.

HB478 This testimony is in favor of the enactment of a Fine Arts Seal of Excellence on high school diplomas. In considering the Fine Arts Seal of Excellence on a diploma, a lot is to be considered. Guidelines and criteria should reflect the dedication students have given to the Fine Arts Program of their school district to receive such an honor. This honor would be not only an encouragement to the dedication and participation of the programs that really compliment the educational experience students receive academically, This recognition would not only serve to encourage the students participating and dedicating themselves, but also be a lighthouse to beacon prospective students to participate in such programs. We have long known the value of such programs to improve academic improvement, aid in responsibility through punctuality and taking ownership of being a part of team effort. These skills are valuable and carry young people into adulthood and through the rest of their lives. To recognize their significant dedication to such programs for most of their formidable high school years will I believe shape stronger intellect and success in our future graduates. Please deeply consider the positive impact this will have on future graduates when approving this measure. Respectfully, Mrs. O’Neill

HB 894 crosses an important line. While protecting students from bullying matters, this bill extends state mandates into private schools, treating them like public institutions. Families choose private schools for their values, culture, and governance. HB 894 undermines that choice by imposing one-size-fits-all rules on schools that vary widely in size, mission, and capacity. The bill’s 24-hour written notification requirement sounds reasonable, but in practice it can force schools to act before facts are known, escalating conflict and increasing legal risk. Instead of thoughtful resolution, administrators are pushed toward compliance-driven responses. Most private schools already prohibit bullying, notify parents, and handle issues responsibly. This bill assumes failure where trust and discretion already exist, and replaces them with liability and regulation. The bigger concern is precedent. Once the state dictates conduct policies in private schools, it becomes easier to mandate discipline practices, speech rules, or curriculum next. HB 894 doesn’t improve student safety—it expands government control, limits flexibility, and weakens parental choice.

Federal law already guarantees every child access to a free public education regardless of immigration status. That protection is settled. HB 912 does not add new rights for students. Instead, it layers on new mandates, new training requirements, and a new civil cause of action that exposes school divisions to lawsuits for subjective, after-the-fact claims. The bill forces schools to police “actual or perceived” immigration status, a vague standard that invites confusion and litigation even when staff act in good faith. It also requires school administrators to manage law enforcement access decisions, placing educators in the middle of legal determinations they are not trained or equipped to make. Most concerning, HB 912 expands liability without improving instruction, safety, or student outcomes. It increases paperwork, compliance costs, and legal exposure while distracting schools from academics, discipline, and student achievement. Schools should not become enforcement bodies for social policy debates, nor should teachers and administrators operate under constant threat of lawsuits for actions unrelated to education. HB 912 solves no gap in the law, but it creates real operational and legal problems for local school boards. For those reasons, HB 912 should not advance.

HB478 This testimony is in favor of the enactment of a Fine Arts Seal of Excellence on high school diplomas. In considering the Fine Arts Seal of Excellence on a diploma, a lot is to be considered. Guidelines and criteria should reflect the dedication students have given to the Fine Arts Program of their school district to receive such an honor. This honor would be not only an encouragement to the dedication and participation of the programs that really compliment the educational experience students receive academically, This recognition would not only serve to encourage the students participating and dedicating themselves, but also be a lighthouse to beacon prospective students to participate in such programs. We have long known the value of such programs to improve academic improvement, aid in responsibility through punctuality and taking ownership of being a part of team effort. These skills are valuable and carry young people into adulthood and through the rest of their lives. To recognize their significant dedication to such programs for most of their formidable high school years will I believe shape stronger intellect and success in our future graduates. Please deeply consider the positive impact this will have on future graduates when approving this measure. Respectfully, Mrs. O’Neill

I strongly oppose HB 913. This bill would force the Superintendent of Public Instruction to roll back years of policy decisions and reinstate DEI and equity programs that were previously removed for good reason. Instead of letting education leaders evaluate what works and what doesn’t, HB 913 mandates a political rewind driven by ideology, not outcomes. It also raises serious legal concerns. Many of the programs and resources this bill seeks to restore promoted race-based frameworks that risk violating Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race in federally funded programs. Reinstating them exposes school divisions and the state to unnecessary legal risk. HB 913 further undermines local control. These resources were often used to pressure school boards on curriculum, training, and policies that divided communities and sidelined parents. Bringing them back from the top down reopens conflicts schools are trying to move past. Education policy should focus on academic excellence, equal treatment under the law, and transparency, not mandated ideological programs that risk legal violations. That’s why I strongly oppose HB 913.

ABSOLUTELY NO TO HB 359

Comments Document

As a former Apprentice School Instructor from Newport News Shipbuilding and 7-Year Night School Teacher of Newport News Public Schools, I encourage you all to vote YES in support of HB1023. It is so important that those of us who did not take the traditional route of pursuing a degree in Elementary or Secondary Education, yet we still possess the Subject Matter Expertise, the earned career professional experience, as well as related courses that will strengthen our ability to serve as CTE Adjunct Instructors, Professors, and Teachers, while filling a critical need of identifying skilled and knowledgeable educators throughout the Commonwealth, who chooses Teaching as a second career path. Please vote YES! Thank you,

Comments Document

I think it is extremely valuable to bring in industry experts to the classroom. Students can see an accurate, up-to-date snapshot of the industry. In my experience, when I work with schools to bring special guests, it adds a lot of insight for the students, builds bridges from eduction to the work force, helps students learn how to converse with relevant industry-specific language as well as technology, keep informed of industry trends, can learn a path for themselves to enter the industry/industries post-education, picture more of a future for themselves, and/or add clarify for their future goals, and gain so many more skills/knowledge that transfers into the education environment. Furthermore, adding the Diploma seal for excellence in fine arts adds to those opportunities. It allows arts students' work to be seen, recognized, and for those who wish to pursue these fields or contribute to them in some way of the future, this starts their journey towards excellence, mastery, and/or skill acquisition. Without the diploma, students may not have the ability nor motivation to add that extra class, take a summer opportunity, etc. We can set ourselves apart from other states who do not have this option and help students have a leg up when applying to higher education institutions or other professional opportunities. Please see the attached document sighting studies, professional articles, and more with the benefits of students participating more in arts programs in schools.

I am strongly in support of workers and students having a voting member on their university Boards of Visitors. Boards regularly make decisions that impact affordability and the educational experience for students. For example, at Virginia Tech, where I work, recent BoV decisions have ended projects to build more housing for students (a primary concern for Blacksburg) and raised fees. It's only right that they should have a say in how the university runs.

My name is Walt Heinecke, I am associate professor of education and have been teaching at a Virginia public for 30 years in research, statistics and evaluation. I have served on the faculty senate. We at the American Association of University Professors at UVA urge you to support HB 780, HB 1069 and HB1473 on Monday. HB 780 which serves as a hub for the other bills is the most exemplary bill I have seen in higher education in Virginia. It fixes the problem we encountered at UVA and other publics by addressing university control over legal counsel, it allows for staggering terms for BOV members prohibiting the one party domination of BOVs., It clarifies appointment processes that maintain the oversight of the GA, It has much needed language on the mandatory appointment of faculty, staff and student voting members on BOVs a much needed improvement for authentic shared Governance. We suggest you roll Del. Laufer's bill into this bill as it has a more democratic process of faculty, staff & student member selection to maintain the independence of constituent voice. Allowing the BOVs to pick from multiple names is a nominations not an election. The removal of professors section in HB 780 comports with AAUP national best practices essential for shared governance and exemplary not found in any other proposed bill. Unlike any other bill it includes a requirement for BOVs to define and implement shared governance that will improve the quality of decision making at our universities, an AAUP national standard. The bill, like HB 1473, has language to protect free speech and first amendment rights of faculty, staff and students. that have proven to be essential in the current era. You might think about rolling Del. Schmidt's 1473 bill into this bill strengthening this aspect of HB 780. These three bills 780, 1069, 1473 considered as a whole are exactly what is needed to bring balance and improve our institutions of higher education. If you want to strengthen and improve our institutions, I urge you to support all three bills. I speak from being on the front lines of the crisis experienced at UVA last year and teaching for 30 years. The other bills concerning BOV reform are not as comprehensive as 780 and associated bills. You have an opportunity here to really make dramatic improvements in our system of higher education. Please support HB 780, HB 1069 and HB 1473 on Monday and advance them. The bills will improve shared governance without which there can be no academic freedom and we need academic freedom now more than ever as our universities are under siege. Thank you.

The rushed and illegitimate presidential search at UVA this past year highlights the necessity of shared governance with the faculty. This bill mandates faculty, staff voting representatives on the Board of Visitors to give them a voice in university governance. It also ensures that those faculty and staff representatives are chosen by their peers rather than cherry-picked by the BOV. This is imperative for a fair representation at our institutions of higher education. Please vote yes for this bill!

I am fully supportive of limiting AI in our schools. Recent reports indicate that there are few guard rails on these technologies for our students in our schools. AI is a consumer product and not a public good- I do not trust that the industry is putting any limitations or protections on their own products and until we know for sure, I am in favor of limiting access in our schools.

Good morning, Fairfax County Public Schools Parents for Intentional Technology was formed to encourage intentional and evidence based utilization of technology tools in education. The Brookings Institution recently (Jan 2026) released a premortem research report on AI in education. It's conclusion states "At this point in its trajectory, the risks of utilizing generative AI in children’s education overshadow its benefits." Decisions made for our students at critical phases of development and learning should not be made based on the current hype cycle of a new technology. Recent history teaches us that slow, deliberate and intentional implementation of tested technologies is prudent. Starting in 2012 and amplified by the covid pandemic, the vast majority of students were accessing instruction by means of a school issued computer or tablet. Recent research shows us that the more money that a school invests in technology, the lower the achievement of their students. According to a UNESCO report in 2023, there is very little independent evidence that educational technologies are benefiting our students. Uninformed and unregulated use of AI chatbots in education is irresponsible. There is no evidence to suggest it is an appropriate tool for learning. We must not be making educational decisions based on the marketing messages of technology companies. Fairfax County Public Schools Parents for Intentional Technology is asking you to please follow the guidance of the Brookings Institution - the current risks of utilizing generative AI in our classrooms outweighs any potential benefits. Please pass HB1186

I am an educator who has been in the classroom for 25 years. Since AI has been introduced, I have seen a huge increase in students ability to cheat. They use ChatGPT to find answers to test and writing assignments - from short answer to essays. By using AI to do the thinking for them, students have essentially become numb to the excitement of learning. They have little to no experience of what it is like to struggle in order to learn a new concept and the satisfaction of finally achieving accomplishment. They have also lost the ability to come up with original ideas. There is basically no critical thinking, analysis, or evaluation taking place in the classroom when AI is present. Students must be engaged with real-life learning experiences and simulations for learning to be impactful. For these reasons, I urge the House Committee to pass HB1186.

I've been teaching in Virginia's public schools for over thirty years. I have not seen much that is as bad for student learning as AI tools are. It is not that these tools do not have the potential for good. Obviously they do. It is that overwhelmingly, students do not use tech tools in an ideal way. They do not use tech tools to enhance their learning. Students laugh at the way adults think they will use a new tech tool. They use these tools to circumvent work. It's human nature -- but even more so for a young person. The prefrontal cortex is not fully developed in young people. Our kids are simply not capable of using powerful tools like this in consistently productive ways. First of all, we have been down this road before. We once encouraged students to bring their own phones and other devices to school. We know now that was such a disaster that we have banned phones in school. We will be dealing with that learning loss for years. However, we learned our lesson with smartphones in the classroom. We have the power to avoid this same mistake when it comes to AI tools. Second, one of the things we (teachers) hear about every new tech tool is that we (schools) have to teach students how to use them, because they are part of life, and they will be seeing these tools in the work world and so on. However, AI tools are very easy to use. That's the point of them. You don't need any training to use them -- just ask whatever is on your mind (or whatever problem your teacher has given you), and the problem is solved. It might not be correct, and the student will have learned either nothing or the wrong thing, but the assignment will be done. We do not need to train students on how to use these tools. We need to train students on how to think and solve problems on their own. Third, one need only read the peer-reviewed science that exists on this topic to realize the broken thinking that is pushing for AI use in schools. The 2025 M.I.T. study entitled, "Your Brain on ChatGPT" is a staggering indictment of the effect of AI tools on cognition. Wess Trabelsi of the Ulster (NY) Board of Cooperative Educational Services has done a meta-analysis of peer-reviewed studies of the effects of AI tools in education. The results make it clear that any benefits to AI use in the classroom pale in comparison to the burdens inflicted on student learning. It would be irresponsible to know what is in these studies and not do what we can to prevent the certain damage to student learning that will accompany AI use in schools. Please support HB1186. Thank you.

As a business owner, tech developer, Virginia resident, and most importantly, a father, I rise in support of HB1186. A 2025 study from Microsoft & Carnegie Mellon shows that knowledge workers who use chatbots suffer from decreased critical thinking and a “deterioration of cognitive faculties.” If adults are negatively harmed, we should not gamble with our most valuable resource—our children. We have been told that as our world becomes more reliant on technology, we need to be trained in it ever earlier. But paradoxically, we are getting worse at tech. Over the past decade scores have actually fallen on the ICILS (an international digital literacy test), not improved. I see more and more applicants for jobs with fewer real hard skills and less diligence, fortitude, and resilience. It is absolutely critical that we no longer pander to the wants and lies of Big Tech, but rather place our children’s needs as the guiding principle for crafting rigorous educational standards with great care and discernment. Historically, Virginia has produced some of the brightest minds in our country. Though we may not always agree on everything, it is through lively debate and an exchange of ideas that we have excelled. Virginia students should not be required to outsource their thinking to entertainment bots, sold as "artificial intelligence." Focus on the real aim of education: human intelligence and avoid the risk of destroying the cognitive potential of an entire generation. Thank you.

My name is Faith Colson, and I am representing myself in support of House Bill 1195. I am the survivor of sexual abuse, perpetrated by my high school teacher when I was a minor. He methodically groomed me to trust him, to see him as a mentor and shoulder to cry on. Then one day he kissed me, and within weeks, he sexually assaulted me inside the school building. The next day, I went to school, including to his class. I was still his student, and he still had power over me. He told me he was afraid of going to jail, and I knew his life was in my hands. He had spent months convincing me he loved me, and I thought it was my duty to protect him. Sadly, it took me 4 years to leave him, and another 13 years to report him. Becoming a mother showed me how wrong he was, how he took my vulnerability and trust and used it against me to violate me and take my innocence. In my adulthood, I was able to get help, to seek therapy, and I’m proud to report that I have a stable life with love and hope in it. But this will forever have an impact on me, and some students do not recover. The worst part of my abuse was finding out years later that other adults saw warning signs and did not respond appropriately. He should have never been in the classroom before he abused me. It was completely preventable. People who commit sexual misconduct often evade criminal convictions, meaning that there is no criminal paper trail to warn the next school district. That is why defining sexual misconduct and making sure that it is not concealed is so vital—if someone harms a student in one district, they could do so again at the next one, and that hiring district needs to know the substantiated misconduct history in order to protect their students. Raising the standard of care in this way protects students and promotes school safety. Most teachers would never harm a student, but those who do can create a lifetime of destruction. It’s estimated that 10-17% of students will experience sexual misconduct before graduating high school, and this bill can help to prevent that. Please vote yes. Thank you.

As a Virginia Beach resident, I strongly oppose House Bill 1374 and am concerned by the Delegate’s decision to support it. I am neither a graduate of the Virginia Military Institute (VMI) nor the parent of a VMI student ; however, I greatly admire the institution and its long-standing mission. I have worked in public education for over 30 years at both the PreK–12 and collegiate levels, and I know from experience that the most effective leadership comes from those closest to the institution and its unique culture. The proposal to shift governance of VMI to another Virginia state college is unwise.

In 2018 in Loudoun County, a nonspeaking child named Gigi was secluded in a makeshift room created with classroom furniture. In 2019, Fairfax County made national news for the misuse and misreporting of restraint and seclusion. In June 2019, Governor Northam signed Gigi’s Law, requiring the Virginia Department of Education to create regulations to limit restraint and seclusion. HB 1229 codifies these regulations—making them consistent statewide, enforceable, and not subject to change or rollback through regulation alone. This remains urgent. Recently in Virginia Beach, an 11-year-old was reportedly secluded for more than two hours in a similar makeshift space, repeatedly injuring himself, in an incident that may have contributed to his death. We would support a full ban on seclusion, as FCPS has done and Virginia Beach SEAC is now calling for, but in the meantime - Codifying these regulations as they are will protect students, support staff, and ensure consistent accountability. We urge you to support this bill.

Public Comment in Support of HB1229- VOTE YES! I’m writing in support of HB1229 because Virginia’s students deserve consistent, enforceable protections when it comes to the use of seclusion and restraint in schools. These practices carry real physical and emotional risks, especially for young children and for students with disabilities. The Board of Education’s existing regulations were created for a reason—they set clear limits, require documentation, and emphasize prevention and de‑escalation. Codifying these protections in law ensures they cannot be weakened, ignored, or inconsistently applied across divisions. Families need to know that when a child is in crisis, the response will follow evidence‑based standards focused on safety, dignity, and de‑escalation. Without these safeguards in statute, students—particularly our most vulnerable learners—are at greater risk of harm. HB1229 strengthens accountability and transparency by making these protections part of the law rather than leaving them solely to regulation. This bill does not prevent schools from responding to emergencies. It simply ensures that any use of seclusion or restraint is governed by clear, statewide rules designed to protect children and guide staff toward safer, more effective practices. For the well‑being of students and the peace of mind of families, I urge you to support HB1229.

According to data for 2024-2025 posted on the Virginia Department of Education website, 66 school divisions (of 131) did not restrain any students, and 104 did not seclude any students. What can be learned from the schools that didn't find it necessary to restrain and/or seclude students? This bill seems to be based on existing VDOE regulations, which rely on outdated behaviorism approaches. A more preventative approach would focus on trauma-informed, neurodiversity affirming, neurodevelopmentally appropriate, brain science aligned practices that recognize the impact of stress on brain functioning and differentiate between intended (chosen) behaviors and stress reactions (fight, flight, freeze, fawn), since different responses are required. It is disturbing that the bill presumes that a child with a disability may be likely to “require” restraint and seclusion.

1229 while hard to understand the context got a thumbs up from fellow autistics. That’s good enough for me. And 298 I’ve been getting voters’ attention about for weeks. I wish we had both these bills when I was a student.

I support this bill because it draws a firm, necessary line between protecting students and harming them. HB 1229 does not ban schools from intervening in emergencies. It preserves the ability of staff to act when a student or others are in immediate danger. What it does is make sure that those interventions are rare, clearly justified, humane, and transparent. For too long, restraint and seclusion have lived in a gray area where practices varied widely from school to school, parents were sometimes notified late or not at all, and students, particularly students with disabilities, bore the risk. This bill replaces that uncertainty with clear rules, strong safeguards, and real accountability. It prioritizes: De-escalation over force Safety over convenience Transparency over discretion Support over punishment Just as important, it protects educators by setting clear standards and training expectations, rather than leaving them exposed to inconsistent policies or after-the-fact scrutiny. At its core, this bill says something simple but powerful: Emergency measures should never become routine, and safety should never come at the cost of dignity. That is a principle worth supporting.

Please count the passing score received on the expedited retake and exclude the score received on the assessment taken during the regular assessment administration period, The stress placed on students and schools in Virginia related to the Standards of Learning is absurd. We are not providing adequate opportunities for success. We are placing measures that are entirely too restrictive in measuring students’ and schools’ success. Not every student’s test taking abilities are an accurate measure of what they have learned. We have repeatedly learned this across the United States. Let’s pass smart policies that take past research into account. The current policies for implementation of SOL scores are not the best way possible. We need to establish greater flexibility and allowing the expedited retake to be counted as passing is one appropriate way to do so.

I am the parent of a Virginia student who managed Type 1 Diabetes throughout his school years. We encountered inconsistent emergency protocols, varying procedures between schools, and uncertainty about who was trained to respond in a crisis. Virginia’s diabetes-related school code is 27 years old and no longer aligns with current standards of care. SB122/HB 1301 provides clarity and safeguards that will protect students across the Commonwealth. I respectfully urge you to support this bill.

I believe the current law to be restrictive of school staff members' ability to monitor T1D students and/or help intervene in emergency situations. The current law should be updated to reflect the realities of the current technology and best practices to keep students safe.

This is an economic issue as well as a health, safety and human rights issue. If children’s diabetes isn’t managed properly at school, they can’t maximize their academic potential. If parents don’t have faith in the school’s ability to keep their child safe and healthy, they are not only emotionally distraught but distracted at work. I know this from personal experience and having to work part-time because my son’s elementary school could not fully accommodate his needs. Please pass this bill. Thank you.

This will help a little girl I love dearly very much at school. Being 10 is hard enough , having diabetes and being 10 is even harder. She needs as much support, backed up by information, to feel safe at school.

I support the bill as a teacher and a type 1 diabetic.

As a mother of a T1D in first grade, I ask that you support this bill. It is a constant struggle getting schools on board with the changing needs. Treatment has advanced and the laws supporting these students need to keep up. Thank you for your time and support. Megan Atkinson, Hanover County resident

I highly encourage you to pass bill HB1301 in support of Va’s children living with Type One Diabetes. The current Bill is far out of date and our children, including mine deserve to have the best care possible especially when attending school.

Please support this bill. We must support students’ medical care for those with diabetes in the educational setting. As a substitute teacher, I feel passionately about this. These students need the toolbox to do their “jobs” as well as possible. It is an absolute travesty that the United States has the tools available but has not yet provided them to children. With all of the bills that are passed, this one seems to be a no brainer. Please support our diabetic children!

In support of House Bill 1301 My name is Treina Owen and this my son Karson Owen, 14. We both live with type one diabetes. I was diagnosed 30 years ago and blind due to diabetic retinopathy and Karson, diagnosed 6 years ago next month. Our daughter, Kamryn is 24 and was diagnosed at 5 years old. I support this bill because there have been many changes within the past 27 years and the code should reflect those changes. Imagine Kamryn going to the nurse’s office to receive an insulin injection through a syringe as well as a finger prick to test her blood sugar for every snack and meal she ate at school and the nurse calling each time to discuss. Imagine a her not being able to go on a school field trip unless the school nurse or parent can attend. Now, the real emergency is when the school nurse is out of school for the day with no back up to the back up. Imagine Kamryn getting picked on saying she’s the nurse’s pet because she leaves class early for lunch and gets to cut the line to get her lunch first, all while missing instruction time. That is what we experienced starting 2006. Fast forward to 2020 when Karson was diagnosed. There was no one-week stay in the hospital like his sister, just a next day Dr visit. There was a short time on injections with an insulin pen while we waited for his insulin pump and continuous glucose monitor. These two life-saving technological advances, along with his cellphone and smart watch all work together via Bluetooth. Karson’s insulin pump can deliver basal units all day long and he can either manually bolus on his insulin pump or his cellphone insulin pump app. This means there is no need for insulin administration from a syringe through a school nurse. Thankfully, with all of this technology, anyone with the follow capabilities on remote devices can monitor, on multiple devices, multiple users simultaneously. If you could see my phone I’m personally following 4, to include myself on my phone, watch, and iPad. We are able to text our son about important blood sugar events throughout the day. These items are his life line. This same remote technology can be beneficial in our schools and on our school buses, where they are the closest to our children during school hours. Karson attends a speciality center and rides a regular school bus then a hub bus, to and from school which is a 1 1/2 ride. That is a long ride and he sometimes falls asleep. His bus drivers could monitor and be alerted of blood sugar emergencies to and from school in the event he isn’t just asleep. With remote devices in the school system and on school buses like iPads, cell phones, and other compatible devices with a follow app, an emergency can be detected, alerted, treated, and even prevented. Lives can be saved. Thank you for your time, effort, and consideration. Treina Owen and the rest of my family (to include 3 T1Ds and 1 T2D that uses remote follow technology)

In support of House Bill 1301 My name is Treina Owen and this my son Karson Owen, 14. We both live with type one diabetes. I was diagnosed 30 years ago and blind due to diabetic retinopathy and Karson, diagnosed 6 years ago next month. Our daughter, Kamryn is 24 and was diagnosed at 5 years old. I support this bill because there have been many changes within the past 27 years and the code should reflect those changes. Imagine Kamryn going to the nurse’s office to receive an insulin injection through a syringe as well as a finger prick to test her blood sugar for every snack and meal she ate at school and the nurse calling each time to discuss. Imagine a her not being able to go on a school field trip unless the school nurse or parent can attend. Now, the real emergency is when the school nurse is out of school for the day with no back up to the back up. Imagine Kamryn getting picked on saying she’s the nurse’s pet because she leaves class early for lunch and gets to cut the line to get her lunch first, all while missing instruction time. That is what we experienced starting 2006. Fast forward to 2020 when Karson was diagnosed. There was no one-week stay in the hospital like his sister, just a next day Dr visit. There was a short time on injections with an insulin pen while we waited for his insulin pump and continuous glucose monitor. These two life-saving technological advances, along with his cellphone and smart watch all work together via Bluetooth. Karson’s insulin pump can deliver basal units all day long and he can either manually bolus on his insulin pump or his cellphone insulin pump app. This means there is no need for insulin administration from a syringe through a school nurse. Thankfully, with all of this technology, anyone with the follow capabilities on remote devices can monitor, on multiple devices, multiple users simultaneously. If you could see my phone I’m personally following 4, to include myself on my phone, watch, and iPad. We are able to text our son about important blood sugar events throughout the day. These items are his life line. This same remote technology can be beneficial in our schools and on our school buses, where they are the closest to our children during school hours. Karson attends a speciality center and rides a regular school bus then a hub bus, to and from school which is a 1 1/2 ride. That is a long ride and he sometimes falls asleep. His bus drivers could monitor and be alerted of blood sugar emergencies to and from school in the event he isn’t just asleep. With remote devices in the school system and on school buses like iPads, cell phones, and other compatible devices with a follow app, an emergency can be detected, alerted, treated, and even prevented. Lives can be saved. Thank you for your time, effort, and consideration. Treina Owen and the rest of my family (to include 3 T1Ds and 1 T2D that uses remote follow technology)

Please support this bill! It will help my sister and many others like her to feel and be more safe in their schools

It is crucial that children with Type 1 Diabetes be provided the kind of support in public schools that HB 1301 requires.

I am a retired school health nurse. In my practice over more than 20 years I was closely involved in the planning, implementing, and training of school staff and school health aids for care of students with complex health care needs, including a number of students with T1D. I am also the great aunt of a current Fairfax county student with T1D. It is essential for allignment with current technology and safe diabetes management for HB1301 to pass- it is way past time to update the language in the Code of Virginia regarding diabetes care and assure the safety of our students. Please dont miss this chance to get it right and support students' success in school and in life.

I am writing to urgently request your support for HB1301. This bill is critical for the safety and equity of students with Type 1 Diabetes in Virginia schools. Our Deep Personal Connection ~ Type 1 Diabetes impacts my entire family: I have Type 1, and my daughter was diagnosed at just 3 years old. ~ Additionally, my sister and my niece also live with Type 1 Diabetes. ~ We understand intimately that this condition requires constant vigilance and immediate action. The Rising Need ~ The incidence rate of Type 1 Diabetes has been on the rise in recent years, meaning more Virginia students than ever require support during the school day. ~ Schools must be equipped to handle this growing population safely and effectively. The Medical Necessity ~ My daughter, like many students, relies on an insulin pump. When a pump fails, blood sugar starts to spike to dangerous levels almost immediately. ~ A failed pump must be replaced instantly to maintain safety. Relying on backup methods (like injections without precise calculation tools) is extremely risky and disruptive. ~ We are fortunate that my wife and I work from home and we live only 1/2 mile from school, allowing us to intervene. However, this is not possible for most working families. The Solution HB1301 Provides ~ Current regulations often prevent willing staff from assisting with device replacements, forcing parents to leave work or risk their child's health. This creates a barrier to the "Free Appropriate Public Education" guaranteed by IDEA and Section 504. ~ HB1301 simply makes it possible for school staff who are willing to change devices to do so. ~ My daughter is now in 6th grade, and there are staff members ready and eager to help be part of her care team. This bill would finally allow them to support her fully. Please vote yes on HB1301 to ensure our schools can legally support the staff willing to keep our children safe.

Please support HB1301

Type 1 Diabetes is a long term chronic illness and caring for my Type 1 son is an all consuming job. Updating and provided the school with better technology and management abilities is critical to all children with Type 1 diabetes. Without the ability for the school nurse to monitor my son's blood sugars via the Dexcom app, I was calling the school on average 1 time a day. Some days, I talked to the nurse 4 to 5 times a day. My son is in 6th grade now and was diagnosed at age 4 (before starting school). Many times the teacher were unaware of his low blood sugars. I remember calling the school when he as in kindergarten to check on him because his blood sugar were in the low 50s and the nurse did NOT know he was low, nor was she near him to help him and the teachers were also unaware because they did not hear his alarms going off. The amazing nurse literally ran to the playground with the medical supplies to find him and help him. That was the day that I knew I couldn't trust the traditional system the schools had in place (listening for his alarms to go off and then helping him). So much as IMPROVED in diabetes technology to help all diabetics manage their chronic illness and school should be using all technology out there. Our nurse has been allowed to follow my son's blood sugar reading for the last year and half and it has been amazing! The nurse has been able to see patterns in his blood sugars and help him treat his lows and highs before they become a problem and he can stay in class and learn. I now trust in the school systems ability to properly care for my son.

Please provide assistance to our children with type 1 diabetes. I have a 6 year old with type one diabetes and the need for assistance is critical. Fear schools can not properly manage my daughter’s diabetes when I am not with her is a real concern. Thank you for your time.

We need this on behalf of ALL TD1 parents and children.

I urge you to support HB 1301. This bill will update outdated language and include definitions to better suit the changing technology that most T1Ds use, allowing them to stay safer in schools. The bill simply allows willing and trained school staff to insert insulin pumps, which is as simple as attaching a sticker and following along with simple guide on a phone app. This is a much safer alternative to having to fall back on manual injections of insulin, which has no safeguards in place for over dosing amounts that could be lethal. I appreciate your consideration and support of this bill, which will allow Type 1 Diabetics a safer day at school, to allow less distractions and provide them a chance to focus on learning instead of worrying about their health.

As a father of a Type 1 diabetic in middle school, I greatly support HB1301 and the positive impact it will make on the many lives of children who struggle with this disease every day, in and out of school. We have seen firsthand how important dedicated care and support of type 1 children help them to grow and learn as every other child in school.

This bill is integral to our communities all over the Commonwealth. Please pass this bill into law and protect our children!

I’m writing about my son, Logan. He has Type 1 diabetes and uses a pump and CGM. Every day at school, his safety depends on staff paying attention—but they aren’t. They test him only when he’s already high, dismiss the results, and sometimes refuse to help him learn if his blood sugar is off. At one point, they even suggested homeschooling instead of providing proper support. Logan eats, plays, and learns like any other kid, but managing his diabetes is not optional. He needs: • Immediate access to his pump, CGM, snacks, and supplies. • Trained staff who can assist, including giving glucagon in emergencies. • A care plan that is actually followed, not just filed away. Right now, the law on paper—like HB624 and HB1301—says schools must protect kids with diabetes. The reality? Logan is left unsafe, unsupported, and struggling just to stay alive and learn. That gap between law and practice is dangerous. I’m asking you to make sure legislation doesn’t just exist on paper. Schools must be held accountable to follow diabetes care plans so that students like Logan can be safe, independent when able, and fully included in school life. Logan is capable, smart, and wants to learn. He shouldn’t have to fight for basic safety every single day. Your support can make sure no kid has to face this at school.

I am the parent of a 10 year old boy in 5th grade and I support this bill so that my son and other children with T1D are safe and healthy and school staff are trained in diabetic care. Without these trainings, our children are at risk of complications from high or low numbers which can be life-threatening.

Please support T1D care in schools.

I am a nurse and a Type 1 Diabetic mom of a 5 year old kindergartener. This bill is extremely important to ensure the safest options are used to manage Type 1 Diabetic children everyday at school. Insulin pumps and continuous glucose monitors are life saving devices and they need to be replaced ASAP when they malfunction or fall off at school. If an insulin pump cannot be replaced, a child must then depend on manual injections that require an aide or RN to calculate a dose that must be 100% correct 100% of the time. This creates room for human error with this potentially lethal medication our children need to survive. Insulin pumps are by far the safest option because of the safeguards they have in place when it calculates and dispenses insulin into our children based on metrics discussed with their medical providers. Not replacing the continuous glucose monitors ASAP also creates room for medical emergencies and possible fatalities when signs and symptoms of low or high glucose are missed, especially in our most vulnerable children who are young and are dependent on adults for their care. My son cannot identify signs or symptoms yet of low or high glucose, and he doesn't show noticeable outward signs either. The continuous glucose monitor keeps him alive by relaying his glucose numbers in real time to the adults who take care of him. Finger pricking a few times a day at school if a continuous glucose monitor cannot be replaced, puts his life in jeopardy. Both devices are replaced every single day by caretakers at home, who are not licensed nurses or providers. Mature grade school children can replace them on their own. As a RN myself, alongside the fact that my son goes to a school that doesn't have a RN on site most days, I believe restricting these simple tasks to only RN's in school is not sensible and puts our children in danger if they cannot get these devices replaced ASAP. I am expressing my strong support for HB1301, which will strengthen protections for students with Type 1 Diabetes in Virginia schools. It is imperative that code written 27 years ago is updated to reflect the diabetes management students rely on today, restoring the intent of Virginia’s 1999 Safe at School Act, which was enacted to increase access to medically necessary diabetes care when a nurse is not present. This bill ensures clear guidance, safety, and collaboration so that students receive the care they need to stay safe and thrive in the classroom. On behalf of Virginia students with Type 1 Diabetes, thank you for voicing your support Sincerely, Lauren Hatcher 6113 Oakengate Way, Centreville, VA 20120, USA

Please support Hb1031 to support T1D care in schools. Thank you!

Our children deserve to be monitored at school in the event of an urgent low. Is exhausting sitting around while trying to work full-time monitor numbers all day and calling the school every time she is high our way.. medical accommodations in the school system is outdated and needs to be updated to reflect technology and the ability to help our children get taken out the classroom less for nurse visits and for parents to be confident that the school system is looking out for the best interest of these children.

Diabetes management through CGM while at school is crucial. A nurse or teacher should know when a student is going low in order to take proper action.

I am in support of HP 1301 I am in favor of changing diabetes care for children in our school I believe it important to keep up and change as technology improves the lives and health for the children Don’t get left behind while others are updating care at home and in other school systems Thank you D Thorpe

I am in support of HP 1301 I am in favor of changing diabetes care for children in our school I believe it important to keep up and change as technology improves the lives and health for the children Don’t get left behind while others are updating care at home and in other school systems Thank you D Thorpe

Please consider passing this bill. Children with diabetes need support in their school, available at any time during the day. There needs to be a plan in place to ensure any insulin needs are not being misconstrued as behavior issues. To also ensure that the medical condition is dealt with whenever necessary to ensure the child has a safe place in the school. Safety is the number one concern in schools end it is a responsibility of the teachers in administration in that school to keep each and every child safe, including children with diabetes

An update to accommodations for children with diabetes is vital! As medical treatments, medical devices and care have evolved, the law needs to reflect those changes and allow for proper accommodations!

Schools need a system that protects and empowers nurses to use modern diabetes tools and provide consistent support to children who depend on them. The technology is there. The data is there. What is missing are the clear rights, protections, and expectations that allow school nurses to safely monitor glucose data and intervene when a child needs help. HB1301 is a win-win for everyone.

I am writing to express my strong support for HB1301, introduced by Senator Jeremy McPike, which strengthens legal protections for students with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) in Virginia schools. T1D is a chronic, life-threatening autoimmune disease with no cure that requires 24/7 glucose monitoring and insulin delivery to prevent dangerous blood sugar swings that can cause seizures, coma, or death. Schools are federally obligated to provide this care in the absence of the parent, ensuring students with T1D are safe and have equal access to education. HB1301 updates and consolidates already existing Virginia Codes into one designated section. It ensures that diabetes care decisions remain with medical professionals and parents—not schools. Schools may determine “how” to implement a student’s medical plan, but not “if” they will implement it. This bill prevents schools from ignoring legal obligations and ensures equal access to care by updating outdated policies that have caused confusion and inconsistency in diabetes management for decades. I urge you to support HB1301 to protect students with T1D, create clear guidelines for parents, providers, and schools to ensure all children receive the care they need to stay safe, in class, and learning in ALL Virginia schools. Thank you for your time and consideration.

Language directing school nurses to access prescribers directly for clarification and questions per the Nurse Practice Act.

It is imperative that this bill be passed for the health and welfare of students with T1D. Children spend much of their lives in school and as such the importance of the diabetes care that they receive while in school should be stressed. Two of my own children with T1D had different experiences due to the caregivers at the elementary school they attended. My first child’s experience was positive as there was an RN at the school everyday and she had taken care of many children with T1D. My second child’s experience was much different. The nurse retired and a”clinic attendant” with no health care experience was hired. I spent many hours in person and on the phone with her until she was comfortable with caring for my child.

I am a support of HB1301 It is of urgency that we need to make a change in how we support children with type one diabetes in our schools. We need to modernize the care at school. Let’s not get left behind. Our main goal is to help children have the best education possible with the support of the school system to have diabetes support so they can maintain their health as they are away from their home for the majority of the day. Cheryl Thomas

Please support HB 1301. My 12 year old son in Fairfax County carries and uses diabetes supplies, self-checks glucose levels, and uses smart devices for care management on school property and buses. His right to this self care should be passed into law. These are basic tools he uses to manage his glucose levels and stay healthy.

My grandson Jack was diagnosed with Type 1 diabetes at the age of one. I vividly remember the first day he went to school and the anxiety his parents felt leaving him in the hands of the school to administer his insulin. Those first months were not easy, and it became apparent to my son and daughter-in-law that the management of Type 1 diabetes care for children in school was a little outdated. Knowing the stress that diabetes places on a family, I would urge you to pass Bill 1301 so that parents can feel more confident in the knowledge that their child’s diabetic needs will be adequately provided for with updated management care and guidelines. Thank you.

We are a little over three years into having an elementary-aged child with type one diabetes. For the well-being and safety of my son, and other children, who have no choice in having type one diabetes, please consider updating HB1301-Thomas to make diabetes management in public schools more accessible.

I am writing in support of this bill. Please vote yes on updating standards for diabetes care training in our public schools. Our child with type 1 diabetes was nearly killed twice due to lack of training and education. Insulin is so lethal that it requires two nurses to administer in a hospital environment. Modern training would enable self-care with improved safety as is common with automated insulin delivery (AID) systems on the market today. These systems have proven to improve health and lower blood glucose without increasing the risk of severe low or highs. The training is essential to enabling an equal opportunity for children with type 1 diabetes to attend our quality public schools and not face the impossible challenge between ensuring your child will be alive at the end of the day vs. enduring the financial devastation of private school tuition. Please vote yes to protect our children!!

I strongly support the improvements this bill supports if passed.

I am a parent of a child with type one diabetes. I support this bill because as a parent and former elementary school teacher, I have seen the challenges kids face when schools deny accommodations deemed necessary by their endocrinologist. One night I was awakened by a severe low blood sugar alert from my son's glucose monitor to my phone. I ran to his room and found him on the floor having a seizure. My husband called 911 while I frantically searched through my son's go-bag for his emergency glucagon. Thanks to his glucose monitor and phone app, we were able to respond quickly, and he recovered. You see, his monitor and his phone are life-saving devices. Having them with him at school is essential. They have alerted me more times than I can count. These kids have the same right to a quality education as anyone else, and they deserve the appropriate medical accommodations so they can be safe and successful in school.

As somebody who this bill may have allowed to stay enrolled in public education as a child, I am asking you to please vote yes on updating standards for diabetes care training in our public schools.

As a parent of a child with Type 1 Disbetes for the past 6 years, I do anything I can do to support initiatives to help those with this disease. I wholeheartedly support this bill and would love to see it passed!

As the parent of a middle school aged Type 1 Diabetic, I urge you to support HB 1301. This bill will update outdated language and include definitions to better suit the changing technology that most T1Ds use, allowing them to stay safer in schools. The bill simply allows willing and trained school staff to insert insulin pumps, which is as simple as attaching a sticker and following along with simple guide on a phone app. This is a much safer alternative to having to fall back on manual injections of insulin, which has no safeguards in place for over dosing amounts that could be lethal. When the school does not allow trained and willing staff to replace pumps, it requires parents to leave work to go to the school to apply something that takes less than 5 minutes. While my job can be flexible, often it is not and this is a major disruption when the school is 45 minutes away from my job. Imagine when a parent has less flexibility, and the impossible choice between losing a job by leaving to take care of their child or staying and risking their health. When a pump wearing type 1 diabetic’s pump fails, they have no baseline insulin on board which means they can reach critically high blood sugar levels in a few hours. I appreciate your consideration and support of this bill, which will allow Type 1 Diabetics a safer day at school, to allow less distractions and provide them a chance to focus on learning instead of worrying about their health.

My 10 yr old daughter was diagnosed with Type 1 diabetes last year in April 2025. Laws and guidelines in schools for Type 1 diabetes desperately need updating since they were last updated almost 30 years ago. Thank you for considering this for the safety of my daughter and all Type 1 students in Virginia.

I am the parent of a Virginia public school student with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D). Please support this bill that will update the law to meet current standards of care so that Virginia children with T1D can remain safe and healthy in school. Technology continues to advance in diabetes care and our laws must keep up with the times so that these technologies can remain in place. Thank you for your consideration.

As the parent of a middle school aged Type 1 Diabetic, I urge you to support HB 1301. This bill will update outdated language and include definitions to better suit the changing technology that most T1Ds use, allowing them to stay safer in schools. The bill simply allows willing and trained school staff to insert insulin pumps, which is as simple as attaching a sticker and following along with simple guide on a phone app. This is a much safer alternative to having to fall back on manual injections of insulin, which has no safeguards in place for over dosing amounts that could be lethal. I appreciate your consideration and support of this bill, which will allow Type 1 Diabetics a safer day at school, to allow less distractions and provide them a chance to focus on learning instead of worrying about their health.

Hello, I still stand strongly with the bill- Students with Diabetes in Virginia Public Schools! It is so important to our children facing this disease. Having the school system be a part of it is even better with more eyes on their diabetes journey. I hope the Senate will unanimously will pass this piece of legislation for the sake of our children. Thank you for your time! Mary Benek

Thank you for your support of HB1301. Our 10-year-old granddaughter was diagnosed with type one diabetes last year and it has been a challenge for her and all of our family to adapt. We are thankful that her elementary school nurse is also type one diabetic and knows how to support her at school. The bill will ensure that our granddaughter will continue to have support at school for her diabetes while she continues her education in middle school next year and then later in high school.

This needed for all students to receive free and appointed public education.

I support HB1301 because we need to support all children and their various needs in public schools.

I fully support access to life saving medicine for ALL children and I encourage you to FUND and support speaking on behalf of ALL children.

Please vote and support of HB 1301 to keep our children who have insulin independent diabetes safe at school. At this point in time, better licensure and training is required in order to administer diabetes care to my animals than it is to my child. As a result, my child was given a life-threatening overdose of insulin during her second grade year at a public school. As a result, we had to move her to a private school for her safety. This bankrupted us. Please vote yes.

Please, do the Type 1 Families justice in passing this Bill. Our children rely on us, whom rely on you, to be our voices in Legislation.

As a Virginia and Fairfax County parent of a student who uses a wheelchair, I strongly support this bill. Accessibility is not theoretical for our family - it directly affects my son’s ability to participate in school and school-related activities. My son Spencer, a 10th grader, was a proud member of the Langley High School Varsity tennis team and helped win the Class 6 state championship. Yet at multiple high school tennis facilities, he encountered gates that were too narrow for his wheelchair. In some cases, he had to remove his wheels just to get onto the courts. That is not equal access. We have also experienced accessibility gaps at major school events, including graduation at DAR Constitution Hall, where accessible seating is extremely limited (only 14 total accessible seats for families) and difficult to navigate. These moments should be celebrations, not logistical challenges. Parents of children with disabilities are exhausted! We are constantly advocating, troubleshooting, and negotiating access one barrier at a time. That is not a workable or equitable system. This bill would shift the burden off families and toward a proactive, systematic review and planning process where it belongs. Requiring every school division to review and report accessibility barriers is a practical and necessary step. What gets measured gets fixed. A statewide summary and a funded plan will help ensure accessibility does not depend on a particular school, facility, or zip code. Students with disabilities deserve full and equal access to their education and school community. This bill moves Virginia closer to fulfilling that promise.

Accessibility in schools is a concern across the Commonwealth. The VDOE report on this from June 2021 stated that 22% of schools across the Commonwealth are not in compliance with the ADA. In Region 4, where FCPS is located, a staggering 30% of school buildings are not ADA-compliant. In fact, the only region of the state with more schools out of compliance than Northern Virginia is Region 1, Central VA. Here is just a small sampling of accessibility barriers SEPTA members have faced: Lack of access to accessible parking spots - many are located either in the bus loop or in the kiss and ride line, making them inaccessible during arrival and dismissal, when families need them most; Lack of playground accessibility & adapted equipment - especially for those who use mobility devices; Missing or broken Automatic door buttons; Broken or difficult-to-access elevators. Identifying accessibility barriers in our schools is crucial to supporting our students’ access to a free and appropriate public education. We urge you to support this bill.

The Americans with Disabilities Act requires state and local governments, including school districts with 50 or more employees to develop a transition plan for their compliance with the ADA. These transition plans were required to be completed by July 1992. State and local governments were also required to develop a self-evaluation of programs and services by January 1993. The transition plans included a comprehensive review of structures to determine accessibility and a timeline to bring inaccessible buildings, features, and grounds into compliance. A timeline to address needs was a required part of the plan. Most governments also included cost estimates in their plans. All new buildings designed after 1992 were required to be built according to federal accessibility requirements. After the initial 1992 plan was developed, governments were required to periodically update their plan. The 1993 self-evaluation of programs and services was required so that modifications to policies, practices and procedures could be made to ensure inclusion and access. The evaluation also reviewed programs and services to determine how effective communication such as interpreting and alternate formats of material would be provided. As House Bill 2278 was being considered and passed in 2025, VACIL recommended to the bill’s patron and subsequently to the school districts that the 1992 transition plans and the 1993 self-evaluations and subsequent updates be reviewed to determine what may not have yet been addressed. A review of these documents could have been a good starting point to accomplish the review required by last year’s legislation. The 17 Virginia Centers for Independent Living offered assistance to school districts in the development of their report required by the last year’s legislation. Some school districts did engage with the Center for Independent Living in their community for this assistance. Many of the needs of students with disabilities are addressed by their individualized education programs (IEP) or 504 Plans. However, the requirements for access, modifications, and effective communication exist not only for students but parents, educators, and others with disabilities. HB1331 provides yet another notice and opportunity for school districts to review their buildings, grounds, and policies and to address issues that continue to restrict physical, program and communication access to students and others with disabilities.

The Arc of Northern Virginia is strongly in support of HB461 and HB1331. The greatest thing we can do to drive up long term independence and drive down long term costs for people with lifelong disabilities is offer high quality, inclusive education. Both bills take critical steps in that direction. HB461 works to ensure students with similar ages are learning together, an important step in ensuring people with a full range of disabilities are used to working and learning with peers and receiving the side benefit of peer to peer mentoring and support. This is far less likely to happen with students far apart in age. HB1331 simply bring Virginia into compliance with more than 30 years of accessibility law by ensuring schools know where they are not accessible, and can therefore plan to address it. We're generations past it being the norm or understandable for people with disabilities to be told they buildings where they go to learn are not set up to welcome them.

I oppose HB 1345 due to the additional regulations and significant budget impact it will impose on school divisions. As a school board member in Orange County, I have seen our own employees perform this work admirably. We have in-house state-licensed Master HVAC technicians. Why would we need to restrict inspections to a more expensive and specially certified engineer? Especially in rural counties like Orange, this could shrink the workforce, significantly increase costs, and make it harder to meet inspection timelines. Where is the clear evidence that this disruption to our already outstanding process actually results in improved safety? Additionally, the additional testing requirements for radon and moisture will result in yet another unfunded mandate that our school division simply cannot absorb. Not every area of VA has the same radon and moisture risks. This bill forces uniform testing anyway and is a one-size-fits-all example of expensive state micromanagement. Please allow localities the flexibility to prioritize the actual issues within our own schools. Passage of HB 1345 will increase costs, reduce local control, complicate staffing, and create inspection delays - all without actually achieving better outcomes for students. Please vote no on HB 1345.

Virginia Progressives was pleased to help find bi-partisan support for this proposal at its first introduction and we look forward to seeing key features that were removed at the Governor's desk last year added back. Securing an environment conducive to learning and to healthy development during the significant time children spend in school remains a top priority for us. Uniform testing and reporting for key pollutants will help empower communities to make progress toward this goal.

My name is Alison Kaplan and I am a School Counselor in the city of Richmond. In March of 2024, RPS preformed air quality tests at the behest of concerned staff members. Upon noticing the mention of asbestos several times throughout the report for my building, I began researching federal guidelines as they pertain to asbestos in schools (AHERA). I uncovered numerous violations, and discovered that the district was 15 years out of compliance. A major concern was that there were materials within our school that had been deemed friable years prior, but had yet to be remedied. Friable asbestos materials can release particles into the air that pose serious health risks. After a calendar year of advocacy, the remediation work was finally completed. However, we still remained well out of compliance with other regulations outlined in AHERA, so my advocacy continued. Concerns intensified this August, when we learned that the school auditorium had an extreme outbreak of mold over the summer. We had not yet received the required Air Quality Report Update that should have been completed following the asbestos remediation in March of 2025, nor did we receive one upon our return to the building this school year. Once again, my colleagues and I advocated for the health and wellness of ourselves and students. When an air quality test was completed, it was determined that our auditorium was unsafe for reentry, and it was subsequently closed for the first month of the school year while contractors worked to fix the issue. We have since learned that remediation efforts will be ongoing for the foreseeable future until an HVAC unit is able to replaced, as the current unit is not suitable for the space it serves. Throughout remediation efforts for mold, moisture, air quality, and asbestos, work was preformed throughout the school day. This compromised of cleaning, tile replacement, painting, and mold abatement. Staff and student noted harsh smells throughout the building daily. Many chose to wear masks, or complained of headaches or nausea. HB 1345 is important to me for many reasons. No public school staff member should be expected to serve as the building liaison for air quality and safety. It is expected that school districts maintain ongoing efforts to ensure a healthy school environment. Even with AHERA in place, my colleagues and I still found ourselves searching for answers and requesting documents and reports that effect our health. Educators are already overburdened with the tasks that fall within our actual job descriptions, and advocating for a healthy building over the course of two years adds undue stress. HB 1345 would ensure that this information is readily available to the public. HB 1345 would offer educators and parents some assurance that while we understand that work must be completed, we are not being inundated with harsh air containments, paint vapors, and cleaning chemicals. Any educator who works within a 75-year-old building can attest to how crucial this is. HB 1345 would ensure that engineers certified to preform testing would inspect our HVAC systems – avoiding issues like we have in our auditorium. Finally, HB 1345 would present districts with clear directives regarding plans for mold testing, moisture testing, and the removal of hazardous substances so that educators will not have to bear the burden of advocating for this commonsense testing to take place. Thank you for you time and support of HB 1345.

HB 1345 may sound like a simple health and safety bill, but it creates real problems for school boards. First, it unnecessarily limits who can perform required HVAC inspections. The bill removes state-licensed Master HVAC technicians and restricts inspections to a much smaller group of specially certified engineers. That shrinks the workforce, especially in rural areas, drives up costs, and makes it harder for divisions to meet inspection timelines without any clear evidence that safety improves. Second, the bill adds new testing requirements, including radon and moisture testing, without providing funding. These are expensive evaluations, and the cost will fall entirely on local school boards, pulling dollars away from classrooms and other safety needs. Third, HB 1345 imposes one-size-fits-all mandates that ignore local conditions. Radon and moisture risks vary widely across Virginia, yet the bill forces uniform testing regardless of actual risk or prior results, reducing local flexibility to prioritize real problems. Finally, this is another example of state micromanagement. The state dictates technical requirements, but local boards remain responsible for paying the bills and managing the facilities. Bottom line: HB 1345 increases costs, reduces local control, and creates staffing bottlenecks without guaranteeing better outcomes for students. Good safety policy should be practical and flexible, not rigid and unfunded.

To Our Honorable Delegates, We are members of the VMI Parent Council and currently have a VMI Keydet, '28. It has been a pleasure to act as the liaison between parents, the Institute, and Corp of Cadets. Our son has grown by being held to uncompromising standards, placed in leadership roles, and required to live honorably under pressure. The Institute doesn't simply educate students--it forms them. This type of educational growth is a result of the VMI traditions that have been in place for more than a century. These traditions have been preserved through the institute's structure and guidance of its Board of Visitors. If changes must be made in restructuring the Board, it is a necessity for the Board to maintain a minimum of nine alumni. It is very difficult to replicate this long view accountability without a personal stake in the Institute. Thank you for your consideration.

I am a proud VMI graduate of the class of 1983. I was born and raised in Richmond, VA. I STRONGLY oppose HB1374 in its entirety! I STRONGLY oppose any measure to shut down or otherwise change this historic institution. The graduates of the Virginia Military Institute play an essential leadership role in guiding our U.S. military.

Opposition to HB1374 based on its failure to include Virginia Tech. The HB 1374 Patron justified the original draft bill and its amended version on the speculation that VMI has not sufficiently separated itself from Lost Cause elements and specifically, the names of structures on VMI’s post. Virginia Tech has at least four structures named after Confederate soldiers and/ or politicians on its campus: Lane Hall, McBryde Hall, Patton Hall, and Vawter Hall. The Vawter Hall at VSU was renamed due to Vawter’s identification as a Confederate yet Virginia Tech keeps its Vawter Hall, named after the same Vawter, without legislative attention or scrutiny. Not including Virginia Tech in HB1374 is blatantly hypocritical and legislatively disingenuous.

My grandson graduated from VMI in May 2022 with a degree in Mechanical Engineering. While he was at VMI, I attended almost every home football game and provided a tailgate event for him and his Brother Rats (BR). The BRs included males, females, black, white, and yellow cadets. The cadets often asked me questions about the time I attended VMI (I graduated in 1970). In 1970 we were integrated but all males. We had many interesting discussions. During one tailgate, I asked my grandson's room-mate about racism at VMI. My grandson roomed with a black cadet for three years. The room-mate told me that he had never experienced any racism at VMI since everyone was treated equally and fairly. However, he did expand his experience by stating that once he left the VMI post, he experienced discrimation in Lexington and other parts of the local area but never at VMI. The females in attendance told me they had never experienced any sexual assults while at VMI. Virginia State University may be a great institution. However, the programs at VMI and VSU are completely different. By putting VMI under VSU, VSU will need to become familiar with VMI (over 160 miles away). Thus, this will take time and divert the VSU Board of Visitiors away from the governance of VSU. Both schools will suffer. VMI has been very successful in the past. More Rhodes Scholars per graduates of any school in Virginia. VMI has had 11 Rhodes SCholars (UVA has had 57 but is 15x the size of VMI). All cadets must meet physical requirements as well as academic courses. VMI cadets must live in barracks with no option to living someplace else. VMI has an honor system that does not allow for lying, cheating, etc. If you violate that honor, you are expelled. I am also a graduate of UVA (masters and PhD from the Engineering School). UVA has issues also. (I know this from my connections at UVA). The governor has appointed new members of the VMI Board of Visitors (as well as UVA's Board of Visitors). Give the new Board an opportunity. Vote against HB1374.

I write this letter as a proud alumnus of the Virginia Military Institute and the parent of a current VMI cadet. Pending before the Virginia legislature is House Bill 1374, a bill that threatens VMI’s independence and mission. The bill dissolves VMI’s independent Board of Visitors and transfers authority and property to another institution’s governing board. HB 1374 offers no justification for such measures. Even with one, this would be an extreme step — permanently changing how VMI is governed in state law without identifying a specific failure it is meant to fix. This is not good stewardship. It is an unwarranted and irresponsible transfer of power. HB 1374 ignores a basic reality: institutions work best when their governing boards understand and are aligned with the institute’s mission. Virginia State University is a public university that serves an important mission, but it is not a military college. Its board was created to oversee VSU — not to assume control of a fundamentally different institution. VMI exists for a specialized purpose: to educate leaders of character and prepare them for public service — including military service — through a demanding system of discipline, physical challenge, and leadership training. Strong state leadership matters to every Virginian, and that is what is at stake. VMI is a state treasure that produces public servants — including military officers and civic leaders — at scale. At a moment of deep domestic polarization and a dangerous global security environment, Virginia needs citizen-soldiers and civic leaders of integrity, courage, and selfless service. VMI does not merely teach skills; it forms character. The bill risks weakening those outcomes while distracting VSU’s board from the institution it was created to govern. If HB 1374 is about reforming VMI’s governance, Virginia should want no part of it. HB 1374. Stephen Johnson Burke, Virginia

Members of the House Education Committee, I am writing to strongly oppose HB 1374. This bill represents unnecessary legislative overreach into higher education governance and undermines long-standing institutional autonomy without demonstrating a clear problem that warrants statutory intervention. It creates new obligations and expectations without evidence of need, effectiveness, or benefit to students of VMI, VSU, or the Commonwealth. HB 1374 has generated significant opposition because it advances a solution in search of a problem and risks unintended consequences for Virginia’s higher education system. Policy changes of this magnitude should be driven by demonstrated need, not politics, and should respect existing governance structures that are already accountable to the Commonwealth. For these reasons and so many others that you've already heard, I urge you to vote NO on HB 1374. Respectfully, S. Thomson

I am writing to the legislature on house bill 1374. I am shocked that a school that has represented Virginia in her darkest hours is under attack by this bill. Throughout history VMI has stood steadfast to the values of Virginia. Engraved on VMI's parapet is quote that EVERY cadet memorizes. "Attached to their native state, proud of her fame, and ready in every time of deepest peril to vindicate her honor or defend her rights. " JTL Preston. Here I am 50 years later, after a career as a US Marine and President of a fortune 500 company and I can still repeat those words today. How can anyone from Virginia doubt the quality of this school. I cannot express how dissapointed I am to have to write this letter.

Honorable Delegates, I respectfully object to HB 1374. This is another anti Virginia heritage effort that is motivated by the mistaken belief that Virginia's secession in 1861 was motivated by the preservation of slavery. The truth is it was President Lincoln's call for 75,000 troops to invade the cotton states. Two votes were taken in April 1861 regarding secession. The first vote on April 4th defeated secession. Two weeks later on April 17th that vote was reversed. Certainly the status of slavery did not change, what changed was the call to invade the cotton states by Lincoln. At the time Virginia seceded there were as many slave states in the Union as in the Confederacy. Neither side went to war to end slavery as evidenced by both the Corwin Amendment and Crittenden-Johnson Resolution. It's also true that slavery continued in the Union after the last Virginia forces surrendered.

I respectfully disagree and oppose HB 1374. I am a VMI graduate, Class of 1977. I have also attended Northern Illinois University for my MBA, and currently teach freshman engineering courses at the University of North Carolina Charlotte where I am also the Director of the Lee College of Engineering Leadership Academy. I provide this background to illustrate that I have real world background and experience in understanding the differences between colleges such as those under VSUBOV and VMI. VMI cadets learn far more than just the excellent range of academics. They are emerged in rigorous discipline, dedication and teamwork through focused physical and mental challenges. They live with honor, integrity and accountability, traits too often overlooked elsewhere. And they form a bond with each other unlike any I have seen anywhere in 4 years in the U.S. Air Force, 37 years in industry and 4 years in education. A very wise technician told me as a young engineer that no job is too great for the one who does not have to do it. To think of VMI as just another college to govern reflects a complete lack of understanding of not only the curriculum integrated with the cadet disciplined lifestyle, but also a lack of awareness of the incredible leaders and citizens the Institute has produced who contribute so much to this country, and what it took to make them who they are. Not having experienced VMI as a cadet, or not having been immersed into what makes VMI what it is and should continue to be, will not provide a good foundation of what impact and ripple effect Board decisions actually have. The Virginia Military Institute should remain under the VMI Board of Visitors and not be placed under the Virginia State University Board of Visitors. Thank you for reading this comment. Please consider it based on many years of experience and lessons learned.

As an alumnus of the Virginia Military Institute, Class of 1994, I respectfully but firmly object to HB1374. VMI is not simply another public college. It is a leadership crucible that has, for generations, produced officers, public servants, engineers, analysts, and national‑security professionals whose impact far exceeds the size of the Corps. I am one of them. My career in Special Operations Civil Affairs, intelligence analysis, and later in AI‑enabled modernization for the Department of Defense was built on the foundation VMI provided: disciplined leadership, moral accountability, and the ability to operate under pressure with clarity and purpose. These are not abstract values — they are operational competencies that shaped my service and continue to shape my work in national security today. This bill proposes to dissolve VMI’s Board of Visitors and transfer governance to another institution with a fundamentally different mission, culture, and operational model. That is not a minor administrative adjustment. It is a structural overhaul that would undermine the very conditions that allow VMI to produce the leaders Virginia and the nation rely on. VMI’s governance model is not accidental. It is integral to the adversarial‑leadership system, the Honor Code, the military structure, and the 24/7 developmental environment that distinguishes the Institute from every other college in the Commonwealth. Replacing its governing body with one designed for a traditional university risks diluting or dismantling the mechanisms that make VMI effective. You cannot preserve the outcomes while altering the structure that produces them. I fully support accountability, transparency, and continuous improvement. But HB1374 does not strengthen VMI — it destabilizes it. It does not address specific concerns with targeted reforms — it replaces an entire governance framework with one that has no historical, cultural, or operational alignment with the Institute’s mission. The Commonwealth should not jeopardize an institution that has, for more than 186 years, produced leaders who serve in uniform, in government, in industry, and in communities across Virginia and the nation. VMI’s alumni network includes generals, diplomats, engineers, entrepreneurs, and analysts whose contributions are measurable and enduring. The Institute’s governance should be improved where necessary, but not replaced wholesale in a way that threatens its identity and effectiveness. I urge the General Assembly to reject HB1374 and pursue reforms that strengthen VMI rather than dismantle the structures that make it a uniquely valuable asset to Virginia and the nation.

I am writing in strong opposition to this bill that would change the governance structure of the US’s oldest senior military institution and transfer it to VSU. The missions and the natures of these 2 universities are so vastly different and there is absolutely no logic behind this proposal. It seems like it is a blatant attempt to steal from VMI’s endowment- money donated largely by alumni to the institution. That is deceptive. The new VMI BOV has already been appointed by Governor Spanberger. I believe she has chosen carefully and trust that they will continue to move VMI forward. If there were really a need to change the governance, a more obvious choice would be Virginia Tech, which, with its large Corps of Cadet program, clearly is a better fit for structure of a military institute.

As a VMI Alumni - Class of 1971, I am writing to urge you to oppose House Bill 1374 as well as House Bill 1377 which questions the continued state funding of VMI. VMI has clearly excelled as one of the most prestigious educational institutions in America for many, many years and continues to produce highly capable, honest, and dependable graduates who serve America well throughout the country. When I matriculated at VMI in September 1967, I was a shy, sheltered young Army brat who wanted to follow in his father's footsteps. I learned very quickly that VMI is not an easy place to attend for young people who are seeking a college education. It is an extremely challenging environment for all cadets because it demands much more from a student than educational growth. It also demands involvement in the Corps of Cadets which includes personal growth within a military system where integrity, endurance and excellence are demanded and cultivated. No, VMI is not for everyone, however those who are committed to accept the challenge will find a rich reward in personal development that lasts a lifetime. This is why so many VMI Alumni are successful throughout the world following graduation - they are prepared to face the challenges that lie ahead. After graduating from VMI in 1971 I went on to complete a 37-year career in community banking in Connecticut rising to a senior level at two banks while also serving my community in various volunteer capacities. VMI prepared me to do that. That's why I strongly believe VMI's Board of Visitors is uniquely prepared to administer this special educational opportunity and, therefore, should be permitted - even encouraged - to continue to lead VMI into the future. Thank you for this opportunity to contribute my thoughts to this discussion.

Honorable Delegates, I am reaching out to you with concern pertaining to the recently proposed Virginia House Bill 1374. This proposal, if enacted, would be of immense detriment to the unique, proven education the Virginia Military Institute provides. This bill would also prove to diminish the interests and future prosperity of the United States, and the commonwealth of Virginia, by lessening the education and development of current cadets and all future generations who are inspired to pursue the VMI experience. As a 1991 VMI graduate, I fully recognize all my life’s achievements were built upon the foundation of character, integrity, perseverance, disciple and leadership forged by the fire and steel of the VMI experience. Let me be perfectly clear, VMI offers a highly unique education that goes far beyond the classroom. VMI instills life’s lessons about self, personal honor, teamwork, leadership, selflessness, perseverance, and integrity. The results and success are tangible - citizen soldiers who have forged an indelible and positive mark both here in the United States and around the globe. Please, do not allow the politicization of one of America’s national treasures – the Virginia Military Institute. Fund and support VMI’s mission 100%.

Hello, I am writing on behalf of. VMI - a terrific institution ! VMI provides a solid education to our up and coming citizens. VMI instills in its cadets a life long commitment to our country and our community. Many of the graduates serve in active duty military - risking their lives to protect our country. Let’s let VMI remain the institution it is known for! VMI and its alums will continue to hold itself accountable for positive changes as needs arise. I am the proud mother of two VMI graduates and remain in touch with their roommates. As a Bostonian I got to know and respect the Institute , its mission and its results in providing quality education and values in its graduates. Thank you for letting me share my thoughts. Consuelo O’Connell Donohue RN

VMI has historically supplemented the Commonwealth with leaders of all shapes and sizes, colors and creeds. That must not change if Virginia and more broadly the United States of America wishes to have excellent citizen soldiers, men and women of character to defend her from threats foreign and domestic. I have read the bill and am disappointed that Representative Feggans sees so little of the Institute, that he would attempt to make a drastic change such as the transfer of authority from the Board of Visitors to VSU. Rep. Feggans represents my district in Virginia Beach, so let me tell you sir that while VMI is not without its faults like any other college, it has a right to exist in its own unique way. I question why VSU was selected instead of a school closer to VMI such as Virginia Tech. What are the reasons for this? Is this a personal vendetta against the Institute or is this a grounded and logical pursuit of better education. Please elaborate on your position. And consider ours.

What the state of Virginia and its representatives are trying to do to the OLDEST MILITARY COLLEGE in th USA is disgusting. My son attended VMI and graduated with Distinction in 2006. Currently serving in the States Marine Corps with the rank of Lt. Colonel. His education and experience at VMI have provided him with so much more than a regular college could provide. He and his fellow BRs are connected in ways you can’t understand. They worked as a unit while at VMI and continue to work towards goals that help everyone, not just a few.

I’d like to express my strong opposition to HB 1374, which proposes removing the governing board of the Virginia Military Institute (VMI). I believe this bill is a harmful idea that could have lasting, negative consequences for both the institution and the Commonwealth as a whole. VMI is one of Virginia’s oldest and most prestigious institutions, with a proud history of developing leaders in military service, public service, and beyond. The governing board plays a critical role in overseeing the long-term vision of the school and ensuring that VMI continues to operate in line with its mission and core values. By removing this board, we would be centralizing power and cutting out an important layer of oversight and strategic decision-making. What’s more, this bill risks politicizing the future of VMI. The board provides a balance of decision-making that is independent of short-term political pressures, allowing the institution to make the best decisions for its students and alumni, not based on shifting political winds. This could undermine the school’s ability to maintain its high standards of academic and leadership development. While I understand there may be concerns about how VMI operates, simply removing the board doesn’t solve anything. Instead of dismantling a key part of the institution’s structure, we should be looking for ways to engage with the board to improve transparency, inclusivity, and accountability. VMI has a long history of reforming itself when necessary, and there are better ways to address concerns without taking such a drastic and destabilizing step. In conclusion, HB 1374 is a step in the wrong direction. It risks undermining the long-term success of VMI, harming its ability to fulfill its vital role in developing leaders for our state and country. I urge you to oppose this bill and instead support efforts that keep VMI’s autonomy intact while ensuring it can continue to evolve in a positive direction.

My name is Brian Ugalde, from Fredericksburg VA. I am writing to oppose HB1374 Feggans on the dissolution of the VMI Board of Visitors and governing by VSU. While I myself have not attended the school as a Cadet, I am well aware of VMI's honor code over the past 10 years from involving with fundraisers from classes and individuals at VMI supporting the nonprofit Operation Enduring Warrior. I have gotten a different kind of unique experience from a school that isn't your ordinary college. Every time I have been to post for any of the fundraisers or Unity Events, everyone (cadets and faculty) have been absolutely welcoming and thankful for coming. The same can be said when just visiting post to see everyone, whether Cadets i have worked and endured alongside with, or being introduced to their peers, and further witnessing the character of other Cadets who have spoken at the 4 Commencements I've attended. VMI has a way of making all its students and faculty truly accountable, something missing from most colleges. It is evident in how I have always seen the Cadets present themselves, around post and at athletic games. I don't understand the point of VSU governing over VMI. I don't know of any logical connections or relationships, so in the end it seems all about political control and making VMI lose its identity beyond the military prep that sets it apart from any other college in Virginia. Thank you for your consideration

Ladies and Gentlemen of the House Education Committee As a proud graduate of the Virginia Military Institute I am writing this to express my strong opposition to this ludicrous HB1374 which if passed would strip VMI of its independent governance and place VMI under the control of Virginia State University. I remind the Committee that Petersburg where Virginia State is located some160 miles from Lexington where VMI is located. These institutions are completely opposite in their make-up and educational character. The BOV of Virginia State has its own unique problems to solve without taking on the governance of VMI. VMI has a 6 yr. graduation rate of 77% verses a 41-45% for Va. State. The 4yr rate is 74% VMI verses 26-28%. 1st yr. retention rate is 82% for VMI verses 62-71% Va. State. VMI"s BOV manages a 800 million dollar endowment verses 100 million for Va. State. VMI ranks 9th among Va. public colleges in retention. VMI has had 11 Rhodes Scholars. 97% of VMI graduates are employed or attending graduate school within 5 months of graduation. VMI graduates have served this nation and this Commonwealth well producing Statesmen, Generals, CEO's and other public servants. Without my VMI education that installed in me Honesty, Dedication, Responsibility, and Integrity, I am sure I would not have pursued my military career as a Army Reserves Officer or become the President of the Construction Company for which I worked. Please support the Virginia Military Institute and to oppose HB1374. VMI has never failed Virginia, don't fail VMI now. With all due respect, I am, Col Louis S Kiger, PE Colonel U.S. Army Reserves Retired VMI class of 1961

“You may be whatever you resolve to be” is a timeless truth at VMI, embracing all cadets regardless of race or gender. The resilience and grit required to endure at VMI—from Rat year through graduation—empower individuals to become strong civic, business, and military leaders. This transformation over four years is something I have had the privilege to experience personally, and witness in my friends and children. The young men and women who take on leadership roles and graduate from VMI are truly inspirational. I encourage you to speak with the Class of 2026 cadet leaders to hear their perspectives on the value of VMI and its contributions to the Commonwealth of Virginia. Thank you.

Honorable Delegates: I am writing to you as an out-of-state alumnus of the VMI Class of 1974. I am strongly opposed to transferring governance of VMI to the Board of Visitors to Virginia State University. As a former VMI Alumni Association liaison to the VMI BOV Military Affairs Committee from 2006 until 2017, I had the opportunity to meet and discuss the military side (with emphasis of all the armed services' ROTC programs) of VMI with the Committee and BOV members. I observed then and remain firmly convinced that the VMI BOV is uniquely qualified through its wise and experienced VMI alumni and The Adjutant General of Virginia (ex-officio) to progressively and continuously monitor VMI's military, academic, and athletic programs, and the character development of the young men and women who have chosen to embrace a life a service to the Nation, the Commonwealth of Virginia, and their communities. This proposed legislation is an ill-advised attempt to fix a governance problem that does not exist.

Please reject HB1374 in its entirety. One, this bill neglects any consideration or assessment whatsoever for the VMI Cadets and the VSU Students and their interests as two separate schools with separate missions. Two, if the rationale for this bill is so substantial for VMI, why is UVA’s Board not also included? Why is GMU’s Board not also included? This bills failure to include UVA and GMU to also come under the Board of VSU is hypocritical. Three, permitting this bill or any future bill like it sets an extremely dangerous precedent for all state supported colleges and universities, resulting in a diminishment in the reliability, value, and stability of all colleges and universities in Virginia should each school’s board be constantly under consideration for eradication and placement under another school’s board. UVA could fall under JMU; W&M under UVA-Wise; GMU under Longwood…there are no limits to how destructive this can become to Virginia and its college students. Fourth, this bill is a direct attempt to weaken, diminish, and/ or hijack an inherent power and duty of the Governor.

Honorable Delegate, I respectfully object to HB1374 currently before the House Committee. Thank you

I have worked at VMI for almost 15 years now. I love VMI because it represents honor. I know cadets won't lie to me. I know cadets won't cheat. I know cadets won't treat me with disrespect. This is what VMI is to me. Our Honor Court and Inspector General offices ensure cadets are doing what is right by the highest moral standards not based on who is in power. I have been heavily involved with both of these offices working with cadets to diagnose cheating or disrespectful behavior. These offices protect victims. While we are not perfect, our main mission is to create honorable cadets. While we have sexist and racist cadets and faculty/staff here, these people do not define us. Those of us who oppose sexism and racism can stand against it, and we do not get ostracized for it. I fully support VMI's mission and am convinced the overwhelming message this committee will hear is about integrity. Please do not disregard the minority voice though. Those who criticize the Institute need to be heard so that we can keep making changes. Like all people and organizations, we need to strive to get better. If we don't listen to criticism, we will stagnate.

I am writing to you as a concerned parent and proud supporter of our nation’s military traditions. My son is a 2nd cadet at the Virginia Military Institute (VMI), the nation’s oldest state-supported military college, where he is receiving an exceptional education and rigorous training ,VMI is currently under threat from a politically motivated attack by Virginia Democrats, including the new governor, which jeopardizes its independence, funding, and very existence as a state institution. I urge you to intervene by nationalizing VMI thereby safeguarding its legacy and ensuring its continued contribution to America’s defense. Virginia Democrats target military college’s funding after anti-DEI push” (published January 20, 2026), Democrats in the Virginia legislature have launched an effort that could ultimately end VMI’s status as a state-funded university. This includes proposals to subject VMI to a state inquiry over its handling of historical issues related to racism and sexism, and potentially place it under the supervision or merger with another Virginia public university—likely Virginia State University (VSU). Such moves appear to be a direct response to VMI’s recent anti-DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) initiatives, which align with broader conservative efforts to prioritize merit, discipline, and tradition over politically driven agendas. T This assault on VMI is not grounded in educational or fiscal merit but is a transparent political vendetta. VMI boasts impressive performance metrics that far outpace those of the proposed supervising institution. With a 77% six-year graduation rate, approximately 74% four-year graduation rate, and an 81-82% first-year retention rate, VMI ranks ninth among Virginia’s public colleges in retention. Moreover, it manages an $800 million endowment, demonstrating fiscal responsibility and long-term sustainability. contrast, the Other institutions in question have a four-year graduation rate of only 26-28%, a six-year rate of 41-45%, a first-year retention rate of 62-71%, and a mere $100 million endowment. Forcing VMI—a proven leader in military education—under the oversight of a lower-performing university defies logic and serves only ideological purposes. It risks diluting VMI’s unique culture of excellence, which has produced leaders, including generals, CEOs, and public servants who have strengthened our nation. • Preserve VMI’s storied traditions, dating back to 1839, including its role in training citizen-soldiers who embody American values of resilience, integrity, and patriotism. • Enhance federal military preparedness by expanding access to high-caliber officer training, potentially integrating VMI cadets into ROTC or direct commissioning programs under Department of Defense oversight. • Counteract the erosion of merit-based institutions amid cultural shifts, signaling a commitment to excellence over equity mandates that have proven ineffective elsewhere. • Provide VMI with stable federal funding, allowing it to continue its high graduation and retention rates while contributing to a stronger, more unified military force. Thank you for your attention to this critical matter. I am available at your convenience to discuss further or provide additional information Michael Falcone

I am writing to object against the proposed House Bill 1374. I graduated VMI in May of 2024 and attribute my knowledge and success to VMI. I wasn't fully aware of VMI when I was recruited to wrestle there in high school, I knew it involved the military and was known to be a tough environment but nevertheless I took a leap of faith and decided to commit to going to VMI the following Fall. Upon arrival I was thrown into this new world and structure unlike anything I had ever seen. People from all over the country broken down all to the same level and forced to become brothers and sisters to go through the journey that VMI offers. It was the most difficult, intense, humbling experience I could have ever gone through, and I am all the better for it. Our collective experience there as built some of the strongest friendships you will ever see. I talk to my friends from VMI every day and call frequently. Those bonds will never be broken because of what we all went through, which is why VMI is so different from any other college in the country. This school is so unique and different from any other college in the nation which only the individuals who have gone there have any idea what it takes and requires to get through. To think of VMI being overseen by a group of individuals who are not alumni and currently are located 160 miles away is ridiculous. I urge you to reconsider your decision on this bill as it would lead to the end of VMI and transform it into another ordinary college. Thank you for your time.

Honorable Delegates, I respectfully object to HB 1374. I graduated from VMI in 1992 and can fully attribute my time there to a successful military career of over 20 years and a continued successful career serving the government as a GS for the Department of Homeland Security. VMI is an honored and cherished institution recognized not only in Virginia, but throughout the world. The mark of the Institute's graduates has been seen for nearly 200 years and have had significant impact on the growth, prosperity and security of our nation. The task of governance for VMI belongs with its elected and uniquely qualified Board of Visitors and not an 'outside' body. Thank you for your consideration in this matter.

Honorable Delegates, I would like to thank your for hearing the comments regarding HB1374 and HB1377. I am a parent of a current VMI Keydet, '27. During the 3 years he has been at the institute he has grown from a immature and naive high schooler into a young man of strong character, honor and leadership. There is not another higher learning institute in the Commonwealth that can provide the unique experience of VMI. Most students at public universities spend their free time partying, playing video games and hanging out. Those that attend VMI are looking for a higher purpose greater than the individual. The RAT experience bonds these young men and women together in a way that most of us will never understand. When my son matriculated it was impressive to see the diversity at VMI. There are students of all races, religions, sexual orientation and physical abilities. The one thing they all have in common is the desire to be at VMI. They choose the more difficult path because they are looking for the shared experience no other college can offer. The institute continues to evolve and improve. Its graduates contribute greatly to our communities, our Commonwealth and our Country. The value of VMI has been imprinted on the fabric of our state and country. VMI must be allowed to operate independently and its mission must not be jeopardized by the threat of partisan political agendas. There is always room for improvement and VMI is no different. I believe the internal discipline and self regulation of the institute are of the highest standard and will continue to improve the VMI experience for all of the current and future Keydets. I respectfully ask forthe committe to vote NO on the proposed legislation. RahVirginiaMil!!! warm regards, Mr. Robert C. Land

My name is Jack Thornton. I am VMI Class of 2000 and am the current Commonwealth's Attorney for Northampton County...and I am appalled at the legislation proposed by Del. Feggans and Del. Helmer, neither of whom have had the privilege of attending VMI. For 188 years, the Virginia Military Institute has served Virginia, and the United States, in peacetime and in wartime, and has produced Citizen-Soldiers in the tradition of Lucius Quinctius Cincinnatus. It is simply a new wave of iconoclastic behavior seeking to erase tradition and history. It is also interesting that the Delegate wishes to deliver the governance to an institution that is also fiscally unhealthy. This bill is shameful. I urge the committee to vote this bill down.

As a VMI Class of 2004 Alumnus, speaking on the Institute from Miami, Florida, as a civilian. VMI taught me, and re-engrained in me the importance of inclusion and equality and how to work with people from all corners, races, backgrounds, and personalities. VMI is a Brotherhood and Sisterhood that teaches discipline and teamwork starting in the Rat Line. Everyone no matter who you are is treated equally and for 6 months you are built up as a group to do incredible things. The next 3 years of your Cadetship are then spent learning and training how to contribute and, Do The Right Thing, for the rest of your days and bring the VMI mission to the world. As General George C. Marshall, VMI 1945, stated correctly so many years ago, "THE CITIZEN-SOLDIER IS THE GUARANTEE AGAINST THE MISUE OF POWER." There are over 15,000 Citizen-Soldiers throughout our wonderful country and world, both in the military and preforming civilian services acting on behalf of the institute, as Citizen-Soldiers trained to DO THE RIGHT THING. Thank you, Maurice Pipkin '04

The NAACP supports HB22, HB 468 and HB1374

My name is Jessica, and I am a proud resident of the Commonwealth of Virginia. My husband is a graduate of VMI Class of 2013. I am writing to you to express my strong opposition to HB1374 and HB1377, two bills that threaten the independence, legacy, and future of VMI. I urge you to vote against these measures and protect one of Virginia’s most enduring and valuable assets. HB1374, introduced by Delegate Michael B. Feggans, which seeks to repeal the provisions establishing VMI’s independent Board of Visitors and transfer governance to the Board of Visitors of Virginia State University (VSU). This proposal represents a direct assault on VMI’s autonomy and unique identity. Founded in 1839, VMI is the oldest state-supported military college in the United States, with a storied history of producing principled leaders, including generals, governors, and public servants. Its rigorous military training, honor code, and emphasis on character development are unparalleled and have contributed immensely to Virginia’s heritage and national defense. Transferring control would dilute VMI’s core military ethos and standards. VSU’s board is not equipped to oversee a military institution like VMI, and such a merger could jeopardize accreditation, alumni support, and the institute’s ability to maintain its high-caliber programs. This is not about collaboration or efficiency; it is a misguided attempt to undermine an institution that has stood the test of time. HB1377, introduced by Delegate Dan I. Helmer, establishes a “Virginia Military Institute Advisory Task Force” to study VMI’s governance and funding, with an eye toward potentially placing it under another state institution or altering its independence. While framed as a mere review, this bill is a precursor to the same destructive outcomes proposed in HB1374. It stems from political retaliation against VMI’s Board of Visitors for their recent decision to eliminate Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives, which they deemed incompatible with the institute’s merit-based culture. Punishing VMI for prioritizing excellence over ideological mandates sets a dangerous precedent for all state institutions. If we allow task forces like this to weaponize funding and governance as tools for political conformity, we erode the principles of academic freedom and institutional integrity that make Virginia’s higher education system strong. As the wife of a VMI alumnus, I can attest to the transformative power of its system. The challenges he faced there built resilience, discipline, and leadership skills that have served him well in civilian life. VMI’s graduates have fought in every major American conflict since its founding, earning more Medals of Honor per capita than any other college. Weakening or absorbing VMI into another entity would not only dishonor this legacy but also deprive future generations of Virginians of a world-class military education. Moreover, this move appears motivated by partisan grievances rather than genuine concern for improvement—evidenced by the timing following VMI’s anti-DEI vote and the broader pattern of legislative actions targeting institutions that resist certain agendas. Virginia deserves better than to see its historic treasures dismantled for short-term political gain. I respectfully ask you to oppose HB1374 and HB1377 in committee and on the floor. Let us preserve VMI’s independence so it can continue to produce the leaders our Commonwealth and country need.

Honorable Delegates, I respectfully object to HB 1374 currently before Committee. This bill is an act of aggression and will cause greater division among Virginians than any perceived benefit to the Commonwealth.

I am writing to voice my strong opposition to HB 1374. I am a resident of Lexington, VA , relocating from NC two years ago. I am so proud to live in this community where VMI cadets, employees, and alumni are immersed in city events, our churches, and our local establishments. We participate in many public events at VMI and the pride of seeing these upstanding men and women do their work cannot be adequately described in this short narrative. Equally compelling is witnessing how the cadets interact with the young children in town - and how these kids look up to the cadets. This is our future, one that as I grow older I sometimes fear, but when I see these men and women coming out of VMI….. I am assured they will make our country a far better place. I implore you to stop HB1374, please do not harm this jewel of Virginia. As citizens of Virginia we should be immensely proud to have a place like VMI, immensely proud that our state is contributing to the creation of future leaders with proven track records. We certainly should not be looking to diminish, or do away with something so very precious. Thank you for the opportunity to share my views on this. I stand with VMI and I hope you will as well.

I am writing to formally convey my opposition regarding the bills presently under consideration by the General Assembly that address matters related to Virginia Military Institute. Bills 22, 1374, and 1377 appear to have been introduced as a response to the Board of Visitors' 2025 decision not to renew Major General Wins’s contract. The recent actions by the Virginia legislature, accompanied by a new gubernatorial administration, indicate an intention to implement reforms at VMI. It is my perspective that these bills are intended to reconfigure VMI and reduce the existing authority of its Board of Visitors, following their decision to appoint a new superintendent. Bill 1374, in particular, has significant implications, proposing the dissolution of VMI’s independent Board of Visitors and the transfer of oversight, management, and control to the Virginia State University Board of Visitors. This would result in a notable shift in governance to an entity associated with the Petersburg area institution. VMI’s distinctive culture has endured previous examinations and critiques of its practices and organizational character. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a advocate for gender equality, authored the majority opinion in United States v. Virginia, which led to the invalidation of VMI’s male-only admissions policy. Her work centered on ensuring women had the opportunity to attend VMI, recognizing the institution’s unique traditions, exceptional education and leadership development. Given VMI's unique nature, it frequently attracts legislative attention aimed at altering its culture. The current initiatives reflect ongoing interest in reforming the institute, specifically following decisions made by its leadership. I am concerned that neither Bill 1374 nor the related proposals will provide meaningful benefit to VMI or to the Commonwealth; rather, they seem motivated by political considerations. These measures may ultimately fail to serve the long-term interests of Virginia and its student body. I urge a careful reassessment of these actions to determine whether they genuinely promote the advancement of VMI. I respectfully suggest working collaboratively with the Board of Visitors instead of seeking structural changes in response to disagreements with their decisions.

We are writing as out-of-state parents of a VMI Cadet to express our opposition to HB1374 and HB1377. VMI offers an exceptional educational experience that extends beyond the traditional college curriculum. We have witnessed significant growth in our son, who has developed qualities such as self-discipline, teamwork, and community engagement during his time at VMI. The institution's strict honor code serves as a commendable standard for society. The Cadets we have encountered exemplify outstanding character and leadership. While VMI shares some historical associations with the Confederacy, there is substantial evidence of progress and a strong emphasis on forward-looking values. It is concerning that this issue has become partisan; In our experience, VMI does not favor any particular political party. Cadets are taught to collaborate with individuals from diverse racial, ethnic, and national backgrounds, and the academy’s model of servant leadership benefits both commissioning and non-commissioning graduates, preparing them to contribute positively to society. It is vital that VMI retains its self-governance. Assigning management responsibilities to another Virginia university located elsewhere in the state would challenge the effective management, understanding, and administration of VMI's distinctive structure. We urge you to consider the broader significance of VMI, both for the Commonwealth of Virginia and the nation, by maintaining independent governance and opposing HB1374. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, William and Colleen Dougherty

VMI provides a rigorous educational experience for students searching for and craving the demands of mental, emotional, physical and academic standards. VMI was the ONLY choice for my son coming from Nashville TN. He knew that the demands he was seeking and the structure VMI requires would afford him the leadership training he wanted and needed. The training he received in his rat year allowed him to save a life when he came on an auto accident. He has blossomed in an all inclusive environment the is steeped in history. VMI has produced countless military and citizen soldiers contributing to state and national governments as well as metal of honor recipients and a Nobel prize recipient. We all want to be a part of something bigger than ourselves and VMI gives that to anyone and everyone wishing for it. There has been a force trying to undermine the good that comes from VMI and I am unsure why. There has been bad press, and many have chosen to believe the press rather than going to the source and ask students, faculty and staff. Is VMI perfect? No. There is no academic institution that is. But it has so much more to offer then what the public has been lead to believe. I would challenge anyone to spend a day on post and truly listen to the students. They know what they are doing is hard and I would go as far as to say they don't like it, but they know what they are doing is worth it because it is bigger than what they could do on their own. They choose a harder college experience to give to the commonwealth, the state and most of all their country. I respectfully request that you oppose this bill and all other countermeasures that seek to shut down, alter, or hinder the good work that is VMI.

VMI provides a rigorous educational experience for students searching for and craving the demands of mental, emotional, physical and academic standards. VMI was the ONLY choice for my son coming from Nashville TN. He knew that the demands he was seeking and the structure VMI requires would afford him the leadership training he wanted and needed. The training he received in his rat year allowed him to save a life when he came on an auto accident. He has blossomed in an all inclusive environment the is steeped in history. VMI has produced countless military and citizen soldiers contributing to state and national governments as well as metal of honor recipients and a Nobel prize recipient. We all want to be a part of something bigger than ourselves and VMI gives that to anyone and everyone wishing for it. There has been a force trying to undermine the good that comes from VMI and I am unsure why. There has been bad press, and many have chosen to believe the press rather than going to the source and ask students, faculty and staff. Is VMI perfect? No. There is no academic institution that is. But it has so much more to offer then what the public has been lead to believe. I would challenge anyone to spend a day on post and truly listen to the students. They know what they are doing is hard and I would go as far as to say they don't like it, but they know what they are doing is worth it because it is bigger than what they could do on their own. They choose a harder college experience to give to the commonwealth, the state and most of all their country. I respectfully request that you oppose this bill and all other countermeasures that seek to shut down, alter, or hinder the good work that is VMI.

Please do not change the governance and structure of VMI. I am writing to you from Nashville Tennessee as the parent of a recent VMI graduate and a former member of the VMI Parents Council. I am a life-long Democrat; I am not a veteran (nor is my wife). Our son was drawn to VMI because of its strong Honor Code and dedication to a disciplined lifestyle in all aspects. In my opinion the Board of Visitors structure provides adequate oversight of the Institute. If the State of VA wants to exercise more oversight of VMI or the B. of Visitors, that seems appropriate. Do not dissolve the Board. VMI has several 'masters' it needs to be submissive to: the military branches and Dept of Defense, The Fed Dept of Education, the VA state National Guard and Military Departments, and several other state agencies. It can be difficult governance that the Board of Visitors - with alum and military veterans - is more than capable to handle. I would not be writing to you today if I did not LOVE VMI. it creates so many great graduates that go on to benefit the State of VA. I see VMI as a goose that lays golden eggs for the state, its employers, and the Federal Government. Contact the large employers in your district & ask them if they hire VMI grads. -and- do they want to hire MORE VMI grads. I think they will all say that they would hire as many VMI grads as they can get. I am among hundreds of out-of-state families who fell in love with VMI and the surrounding area. Young men and women from out of state want to go to VMI. This represents important out-of-state tuition and many out-of-state graduates stay in VA to become high income earning VA taxpayers and high quality citizens. As noted before, do not get rid of this goose that gives VA golden eggs! More oversight? sure. Change the funding mechanisms? Your call - I'm not in VA. Water down VMI? Abolish VMI? that would be foolhardy.

If I am reading this correctly, the bill basically dissolves the BOV of VMI and moves the governance of VMI to Virginia State University. I don’t understand how this is in the best interest of VMI or the Commonwealth of Va. What is it about VMI that has everyone so up in arms ? I am a 1975 graduate of VMI, matriculating from Chase City, Va. - and I think the first African American was in the class of 1972. That was over 50 years ago. And I never saw or heard of any discrimination against blacks or any other ethnic group. Women were admitted later and I think VMI handled that well, but there was an adjustment period that admittedly was not as smooth as it was with the all male corps. Most of the people on the Board of Visitors themselves suffered through the VMI experience, having been freshmen themselves- going thru all the trials and tribulations unique to the VMI experience. So they have a deep understanding gained thru personal sacrifice of what it means to be a VMI Cadet and more importantly, a VMI graduate. So they are the folks the alumni, families, and friends of VMI trust the most to provide governance for the school. I understand that former governor Ralph Northam, a VMI grad himself has been appointed to the BOV. While he alienated many VMI alumni with his treatment of VMI, right or wrong, I would rather see the VMI BOV remain intact with Gov. Northam a member than turning over governance to VSU. Taking decision making authority for one college with board members who experienced the rigors of the VMI education to another serves no purpose to me. If you want to investigate VMI to satisfy yourselves that it treats everyone fairly with equal opportunity- knock yourselves out. But as a 73 year old alumnus who stood in ranks alongside people of various ethnic backgrounds and life experiences, I worry about what will become of VMI. I was on the Board of Trustees for 8 years and I have been witness to an evolving VMI that continues to produce a very quality product in the young men and women it sends out into the world. I would hate for that to be lost as it would be bad for the U.S.A. and the Commonwealth of Va. Do what you must regarding changes/ refinements to the protocols and policies regarding VMI, put anybody you deem appropriate on the BOV at VMI- but I beg you to keep the existing structures in place and make use of as many VMI graduates as possible- who know beyond question how to keep the spirit of the place alive and the alumni committed to eternal support. If you do this the U.S.A. and Virginia will be better off for it. Thank you very much for allowing me to respectfully submit this for your consideration. Luther C. Daniels, Jr. VMI 75 Lawrenceville, Ga.

The Darden family would like to acknowledge we oppose bill HB1374. The Board of Visitors should not be stripped of its independent governance and given to a school two hours away and knows nothing about Virginia Military Institutes mission.

I'm writing to oppose HB1374. Transferring the governance of VMI to Virginia State University is not a good idea. The institutions are totally different and trying to govern them both with the same board doesn't make any sense.

I am writing in vehement opposition to HB 1374. Dissolution of a governing body occurs when that body has a total lack of intuitional control. Where is the evidence that this condition exists? What new diligent and independent studies have been performed that form a basis for the allegations of continued and institutional pervasive discrimination and prove that the previous report and its recommendations were completely and totally ignored? In absence of such evidence, there is no legitimate basis for dissolution. The new BOV has just gotten started; why dissolve this BOV when they have not had the opportunity to execute their duties? This is a dangerous bill that sets a dangerous precedent, giving fuel to revenge-seeking legislative branches and executive branches to capriciously take baseless punitive actions against colleges, which directly harms no one other than the students currently attending and scheduled to attend. This bill is an embarrassment to the Commonwealth and is a poorly veiled attempt to continue the petty sniping that defines today's political environment at all levels. Nobody wins with this bill, while the cadets, current and future, are the ones to suffer the consequences of its passage.

I am a high school student in Alaska. Most of my family is from Virginia. I plan to go to VMI in a couple years. I oppose these bills HB1374 and HB1377. They would destroy VMI.

My name is Dr. Richard Lockridge from Lebanon, Virginia. I graduated from VMI in 1980. I can say candidly that if I had not graduated from VMI, I would not have had the doors of opportunity open to me for obtaining neither a BS in Pharmacy at then the Medical College of Virginia nor a Doctor of Pharmacy degree at UNC at Chapel Hill. I concur with the many written comments against HB1374 and HB1377. VMI is steeped in the history of our Commonwealth and America. It has had the likes of George C. Marshall, Jr. and many other citizen-soldiers to matriculate and graduate from VMI. VMI is known around the world not because of the Institution, located in Lexington, but because of the men and women it graduates who succeed in not only the military as honorable officers but also in the private sector as leaders and forward-thinking individuals. External oversight of this unique public institution would be an all-out assault on the Liberty of academic freedom. The goal of our Commonwealth should always be one to protect such institutions of higher learning-not to infringe upon them.

My name is Tom Gnecco and I am a resident of Washington, D.C. and a 1992 graduate of the Virginia Military Institute. I writing to register my support for V.M.I. and objection to house bills 1377 and 1374. I was raised in Virginia and fortunate enough to have matriculated at V.M.I. in August 1988. The moral values, work ethic, empathy, health habits and sense of service that I learned at V.M.I. are something I carry with me every day. The engineering education I received gave me the technical foundation to start a 35 year career in commercial construction during which I have led the building of hundreds of homes for senior citizens, affordable housing, and the transformation of blighted urban areas. The leadership skills and character I developed during my four years at V.M.I. have enabled me to make a positive impact on my community and country. What I found in the late 1980’s and early 1990’s at V.M.I. was a level of diversity, honor, accountability and cohesion that I have not seen in too many other organizations, public or private, in America. This ranged from an African American Honor Court President, to a cadet battalion commander from Taiwan and a kid from the hills of southwest Virginia rooming with a Jewish cadet from Maryland, and a refugee from Vietnam who had arrived in the U.S. only four years before matriculating at V.M.I. and became my study partner, my son’s godfather and an Army Colonel. These are just a few examples. Virginia has a wonderful system of higher education with diverse choices for its citizens. My mother, my wife and our oldest son have all benefited from their graduation from one of Virginia’s public higher educational institutions. Each of us had our own unique experiences and have embarked on careers with a strong sense of service, making positive contributions to our society in different ways. One only needs to read the headlines in the newspaper each day and see what is happening at the executive level of our Federal government to see that our country has a desperate need for leaders of high moral fiber, who possess a selfless sense of honor, empathy and commitment to serving others. Virginia is made strong by its diverse system of higher education, which educates women and men and prepares them to better Virginia and our nation. Virginia should continue to support V.M.I. and all of its institutions of higher learning, and continue the tradition of democracy by allowing the V.M.I. Board of Visitors to continue governing the school. While I don’t get back to Lexington very much, I am very appreciative of the education I received at V.M.I. and very supportive of the opportunities it should be given to provide for future generations of men and women. Tom Gnecco Washington, D.C. 1 February 2026

To the Virginia House of Delegates Education Committee Kindly consider my personal experiences as a VMI cadet and 1980 alumni as you deliberate HB1374, which I respectfully oppose. The Institute continues to develop graduates over 186 years in all fields of endeavor, military, business, sports, religious leaders serving their communities, our Nation and even abroad in conflicts and peacetime (Gen. Marshall plan, Peace Prize recipient 1953). This must be allowed to continue as a service to our State with appropriate oversight by VMI staff, Board of Visitors and the Legislature. In 1976 I chose the more difficult path of VMI over the larger land grant universities in the State. VMI’s tuition was lower and an ROTC scholarship helped my family to defray 50% of the expenses. My performing lawn work, paper route, and after school mall job just did supplement my parent’s savings for tuition even then. Having talked with Richmond alums I felt the structured living environment would keep me on the straight and narrow path. The big schools would have been fun, perhaps at the distraction of academics. Allow me to share just one personal experiences how the culture of VMI helped me through my cadet years and decades hence. “VMI takes care of its own” My freshman (Rat) year at Thanksgiving break I suffered a broken leg in a car accident at home. After surgery my first question, they tell me, to the surgeon was when could I return to school, finish the term and exams. I wasn’t able to walk until January. I was not deterred. My father drove to Lexington to inquire if I could continue academically. The Chemistry department chair, Colonel Smart said not to worry that ' VMI takes care of its own.' He had already assembled assignments from all my professors and my books were on his desk. I finished my semester coursework from a St. Mary’s hospital bed. After Christmas, we accepted the Colonel’s hospitality to stay in his house on Post for two weeks, where I took my final exams to complete the semester. Colonel Smart delivered me to barracks when the Corps returned, crutches in hand, and I hobbled to classes and meals over the spring semester. I was not going to be deterred from being with my Brother Rats and all that the first year had in store for us. Four years later in 1976, I was selected a cadet captain and then graduated with a BS in Chemistry. I am 68 years old and this is still a personal story I hesitate to share. It is not so much about my dilemma at the time, rather if not for the good graces of a small college, of professors who know each cadet with small instructor-to-student ratios, and an institutional ethos where they develop and look after their own. I don’t know in a major university with hundreds of students in freshmen classes if I could have experienced the same kindness by a single professor nor an institutional mindset to support a student in serious need. It means everything to push yourself further than you thought you could go, academically, physically, mentally. My VMI experience gave me confidence to face challenges every day afterwards in my business life or raising and supporting a family and community. I urge you to consider the 186 years legacy of unique cadet education and Institute service to our Commonwealth and continue as a Legislature to support VMI fully. Respectfully, Stephen M. Andrews, PhD

My name is Dr. Matthew Sievert. I am an Associate Professor of Physics at New Mexico State University. I was born in Lexington, VA and grew up in Midlothian, VA. My dad graduated from VMI in 1979, and I graduated from VCU in 2006 and 2007 with BS and MS degrees, respectively. Afterwards I taught at Virginia Union University and J. Sargeant Reynolds Community College (Parham Rd. campus) in Richmond, VA from 2008 - 2010. I received my Ph.D. from the Ohio State University in 2014. Although I am no longer a VA resident, I am writing to you today to stress the tremendous benefits which VMI as an institution accords to the greater Lexington area and to the state of Virginia. My parents met at VMI, where my mother was a financial aid assistant while my dad was in school. My mom's family has lived in neighboring Buena Vista, VA for decades. We all grew up seeing the investment of VMI in the community and having a deep personal connection to it. Dissolving the VMI Board of Visitors and imposing external oversight of an institution of higher learning like VMI would be a shocking attack on academic freedom -- something I would expect from Ron DeSantis in Florida, not from a Democratic-led administration and legislature in Virginia. At a time when the Trump administration is waging open warfare against institutions of higher learning and against the infrastructure of higher learning itself, I look to Democrats to call out that political infringement on academic freedom for the attack on democracy it is. As a professor, I am fighting every day to preserve my profession, its integrity, and its place in society. It would be tremendously disappointing if the Spanberger administration and its allies in the State Legislature instead use this opportunity to redouble attacks against academic freedom. It doesn't matter whether the institution is NMSU or UVA or VMI: academic freedom is an essential tenet of all higher education. If you attack academic freedom at VMI, you will further harm academic freedom for everyone. As a lifelong Democrat, I'm begging you: don't be like the Trump administration. Stand up for academic freedom for *all* institutions of higher learning. VMI is a pillar of its local community and a tremendous asset for the state. Please don't strip away its autonomy and subjugate it to an outside entity.

I graduated from VMI in 1971 and retired from the USAF in 1999. HB1374 isn’t meaningful reform; it’s an unprecedented governance takeover that dissolves VMI’s independent Board of Visitors without the kind of demonstrated misconduct that would justify such an extreme step. Real oversight already exists—improve board performance through appointments, benchmarks, audits, and accountability—rather than eliminating the board altogether. Transferring VMI to Virginia State University’s board also fails basic governance logic: VMI is a mission-specific, full-time military college whose outcomes depend on a distinct culture of discipline, leadership formation, and honor that requires mission-aligned stewardship, not governance optimized for a different institution. Finally, one board attempting to govern two materially different institutions invites divided attention, slower decisions, and instability for cadets, faculty, donors, and accreditation-facing accountability—creating predictable dilution and dysfunction rather than improvement.

I oppose this bill in the strongest terms possible. It is such a naked attempt to politically restructure the direction of VMI governance by handing the controls over to people with no history, understanding, or stake in the past present or future of the VMI Corps. Regardless of if you believe the current administration and BOV are sufficiently energetic in solving the issues this bill purports to solve, the decision to place the Institute under VSU, a school halfway across the state with no connection to the material realities in Lexington, is clearly nothing more than a political decision. Never mine that the Governor has recently appointed a number of new members to the BOV, a move which could be expected to address many of the concerns expressed in this bill. VMI is a unique institution and a unique educational experience. It cannot be hand waved as being just like any other school in the state. It must be held up as an education for those who wish to be challenged and forged in the fires of discomfort and brotherhood to become their best selves, and to be prepared for a lifetime of service. VMI graduates have served throughout the history of the institute as warriors, statesmen, public servants, and business leaders for their local communities, the State of Virginia, and the United States. I urge everyone to reject this bill in its entirety.

I am writing in opposition to HB1374. After 22 years in the Marines and more than 20 years in industry, my time at VMI stands out as having been absolutely essential to my success in life. The VMI Experience remains the single best personal and leadership development experience of my life. It taught me more about myself and others in those four years than I learned anywhere else. As Rats, all society’s false labels were stripped away, leaving us only each other. We were taught humility, discipline (most importantly, self-discipline), and teamwork. We were taught how to be servant leaders from, literally, the bottom up. VMI’s strict honor code fostered a deep sense of personal integrity and responsibility that we carry to this day. It instilled in us a great respect for our history and traditions and for the thousands of VMI alumni who have well served – and continue to serve - their States and our Nation over the last 186 years. It also taught us how to persevere and to fight for what’s right. There simply is no replacement for the VMI Experience. In my life, I have had the distinct honor to serve in two great Corps – the VMI Corps of Cadets and the US Marine Corps. I take equal pride in both, but must give VMI full credit for my success as a Marine. The VMI Experience is truly unique, and just as truly, proven to develop the servant leaders our States and Nation so desperately need. HB1374 would destroy that Experience, and every legislator who supports the passage of this bill will share in the shame of that destruction. Please do not shame yourself. Please defeat HB1374!

I oppose Bill HB1374 which seeks to provide an oversight council to review VMI policies and procedures. As the girlfriend, fiancee, wife (Army-9 years) for 51 years and widow (9 years) of retired U.S. Army Maj Larry Sonstein, a proud graduate of the VMI Class of 1966, I have watched the multiple layers of changes made at Virginia Military Institute. I am a very proud “Sister Rat”, graduate of Southern Seminary, Buena Vista, VA. (Yes, it has been 60 years since that wonderful graduation day on June 12, 1966!) From the 1968 integration of the Corps with five African Americans matriculated with our first Black cadets graduating in 1972, to 1997 when the Institute accepted their first women into the Corps, as the United States evolved through various Civil Rights challenges VMI was there to adapt. It is worth noting today African American students make up 13% of the overall Officer Corps students with women comprising about 8 percent of the cadet Corps. While remaining faithful to its mission, the Institute has evolved in recruiting and admitting diverse students into the Corps. A nationally respected institution with a proven record of excellence, it is my understanding VMI is ranked as the #4 public liberal arts colleges in the nation and consistently produces leaders of character and competence in both the military and civil environment.. I have witnessed the closeness of the Corps as Larry helped host a VMI gathering while stationed in Frankfurt, Germany (1974-75). Brother Rats came from various locations in Europe to join in the reunion celebration. That was the first time I remember meeting Air Force ‘66 BR “Johnny” Jumper, who later became the 17th Chief of Staff of the Air Force (2001-2005). As needed over the years VMI has implemented substantial reforms to its policies and values, through preventative investigations and disciplinary procedures. There is no reason to change the financial nor state education funding for VMI. Submitted by: Margaret “Peggie” Sonstein of Geneva, Ohio.

Oppose HB1377 and HB1374! Save the Institute! As the mom of an 18 year old son who has chosen Virginia Military Institute (VMI) as his number one college option I am dismayed at the bills put forth to destroy this unique institution and limit my son’s military-focused college choice in Virginia. VMI is an asset to our country and Virginia by forming young, courageous leaders who choose to serve in the military at a rate of 50 percent. My son wants to serve as a U.S. Marine Officer following college and the education and preparation he would receive at VMI would be exactly what he needs to succeed. My son is seeking a college experience centered on discipline, leadership and the highest moral code solely offered at VMI. It is a crime to deny our nation’s men and women this singular experience as they seek to be strong contributors to our country, communities, armed forces and private enterprise. I am proud our son has chosen VMI–to be part of something bigger than himself. It is a selfless path to become engaged in this immersive leadership model intent on transformation while testing his inner strength. If VMI is preserved, he will be called to achieve the highest standards of rigorous academics, discipline, athletics and character. Attending VMI is a unique experience offered in Virginia and the nation, as the nation’s oldest state-supported military college. Through its almost 200 year old tradition–VMI creates citizen soldiers. If the institute is allowed to continue we know our son and all of his brother rats will be better for it. VMI’s success measures-4 year graduation rates, percentage of grads who serve in armed forces, projected job success and income following graduation are just some of the measures setting VMI above other Virginia colleges and universities. The thought of dissolving the VMI Board of Visitors and having VMI governed by Virginia State University–a university with abysmal outcomes—is proof of the intent of these bills—to destroy VMI and all it stands for. Vote against HB1377 and HB1377 and any others surfacing to destroy the culture offered by VMI. Cheri Hinshelwood

Dear Legislators Please change HB1374 to keep the VMI Board of Visitors in place as the appropriate governance model for the Institute. VMI continues to be a premier leadership institute and unique military college that Virginia should be proud of and continue to support. I entered in the fall of 1978 to challenge myself and experience something like my father and grandfather had when they went to the United States Military Academy at West Point in 1953 and 1920 respectively. I was a peaceful child of the 60’s and did not see myself in the military but wanted to become a citizen soldier ready to serve the nation if needed but pursuing a civilian career as an engineer. I met the best classmates, professors, military leaders, and a long list of visitors, distinguished alumni, and other national and world leaders there. I have great respect for all of them, and every brother rat remains a great and trusted friend. The academics were tough and the corps of cadets ran day to day life instilling a sense of discipline and structure unmatched in this nation. I chose to go on active duty in the Army as it was my grandfather’s dying wish my First Class (senior) year. VMI had instilled a sense of service in me and a care for people that filled me with confidence that I could serve and do it well. I met the best leaders in the Army from VMI. At one point I thought that I was just being biased. There were other good leaders but invariably I would hear of or interact with a leader who really cared for his people, their success, and the success of the organization who turned out the be VMI alumni. Those I was entrusted to lead would hear I was from VMI and often tell me of other great VMI leaders they worked with. It made me proud of Virginia and of VMI. There was nothing better than leading in the Army. The four year obligation went by and I didn’t even notice it as I was enjoying everything VMI prepared me. In my 6th year of service at the rank of Captain, I was able to get an assignment in the 82nd Airborne Division in the decorated and storied 307th Engineer Battalion (Airborne). Lieutenant Colonol Bob Flowers, VMI ‘69, and the Executive Officer was Major Carl Strock, VMI ‘70. They rebuilt that battalion to be a powerhouse in the Division and we - along with the rest of the Division - were ready to fight and win anywhere in the world with 18 hours notice. Both of them were tough but loved as leaders and each went on to be the top engineer in the Army as Chief of Engineers, a three star position. There were several other VMI officers there as well and almost all of them went on to be selected as general officers. You should all be proud of Virginia’s impact and reach in the services and now a large collection of three letter agencies. You have a massive impact on the security of our nation and the longest period of relative peace on earth ever recorded from the time of General George Catlett Marshall, Jr to now. MG Cedric Wins did an excellent job as Superintendent and saved VMI during troubling times. He was mentored by two of my friends at VMI retired General Darren McDew and Darryl Horne. I followed his career and saw him at many of my brother rat’s promotions, assumptions of command, and other events. He served at a critical time and did very well. All great leaders all as close as could be and as strong as they could be because of VMI. Please preserve this valuable asset for Virginia and our nation.

As a proud alumna of VMI and a 1stLt in the USMC, I am writing to express my firm opposition to HB1374. Choosing VMI was the most consequential decision of my life-a choice I have never regretted. The Institutes academic and military rigors forged a foundation of leadership that I rely on daily in my military career. VMI consistently achieves premier state and national rankings, reflecting its status as a cornerstone of higher education in the Commonwealth. No other Institution is as singularly focused on instilling the values of honor, integrity, and selfless service. Founded in 1839 as the nation's first state-supported military college, VMI has produced 11 Rhodes Scholars and commissioned thousands of officers into every branch of the Armed Forces, while countless other alumni go on to serve in the highest levels of the federal and civilian sectors. The empirical data does not support the dissolution of VMI's independent BOV. For the 2024-2025 AY, the Institute maintained a 74% four-year graduation rate, a 77% six-year graduation rate, 81% retention rate, and a 50% commissioning rate. These metrics demonstrate exceptional operational and educational success. There is no justifiable reason to dismantle a high-performing governing body and transfer its authority to another institution. VMI's unique "citizen-soldier" mission requires specialized, dedicated oversight. As a "Rat," I memorized the Inscription on the Parapet: that we must be "ready in every time of deepest peril to vindicate her honor and defend her rights." Though I was a lifelong resident of Pennsylvania before attending VMI, I took this mandate to heart and strive daily to live by the values I learned as a resident of your Commonwealth. Today, my peers and senior officers are consistently impressed by the VMI reputation - a standard of excellence recognized nationwide. Transferring governance risks diluting this vital mission and creating unnecessary instability at a time when the nation requires the caliber of leaders only VMI can produce. I urge you to vote no on HB1374 to preserve the integrity and independence of VMI. Thank you for taking your time to hear from VMI alumni. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of War.

I write as a VMI alumnus to oppose HB 1374. VMI is not a conventional university. It is a military college with a distinctive educational model—one built on an integrated system of academic rigor, military discipline, and an honor code treated not as a slogan but as a daily practice with real consequences. Effective governance of such an institution requires specialized knowledge and mission-specific expertise. Transferring oversight to Virginia State University's Board of Visitors would sever the institutional knowledge, alumni engagement, and educational focus that VMI's current governance provides. A board unfamiliar with VMI's model cannot effectively steward it—not because of any deficiency in VSU's leadership, but because the missions are fundamentally different. I would also ask the committee to consider what VMI actually produces. In 1961—during an era of overt segregation—the all‑male, largely white VMI Corps elected Jonathan Daniels as its valedictorian. Daniels later became a civil‑rights activist and gave his life defending a Black woman from a shotgun blast in Alabama. He is now recognized as a saint in the Episcopal Church. That was the starting point. This is the kind of leadership and courage VMI helps forge—on the battlefield and in civilian life—and the culture has improved substantially in the 65 years since. VMI's contributions to Virginia are significant: thousands of Virginians are employed by alumni-owned or alumni-led businesses, more VMI alumni live in Virginia than any other state, and roughly half return after military service. This is not an institution failing the Commonwealth—it is one that has served it for nearly two centuries and continues to produce leaders of character. I respectfully urge the committee to oppose this bill. Respectfully, Tom Shaffner VMI 2008

I am not sure where to begin, but I have been disheartened by this recent House Bill and another Bill being proposed that seem to call into question the integrity of Virginia Military Institute. My son is a 2nd class (Junior) who enrolled at VMI to not only receive a degree in Civil Engineering but also to represent the Institute as a VMI starting wrestler. I was unfamiliar with the Institute prior to my son's exploration of universities, but my husband kept encouraging our son to put VMI at the top of his list. While our son, Patrick , was recruited by the US Naval Academy (and received an appointment) and the US Coast Guard Academy, once Patrick had an official visit at VMI, he felt like it was "home". VMI's positive reputation stood out to my husband and to our son. VMI has challenged Patrick in the most positive of ways. VMI has offered the structure and discipline that fit his lifestyle and has built a resiliency that he would not have been able to find through an ordinary education at other institutions. He has had the privilege of being taught by some of the best professors, learned with a cohort of dedicated students, and worked alongside great teammates for great coaches. Patrick has chosen not to commission into the military but has been exposed to the trials of those who do and has a new appreciation for those fellow cadets who are making that choice. Even though he will not be commissioning, he has continued to find the value of the regimental system and the rigor of VMI's education.VMI is not a perfect institution but neither is JMU where our oldest went or VT where our youngest is slated to go in the Fall. All are places where horizons are broadened, ideals are challenged, growth is achieved, and responsible citizens are molded. VMI does all of that to the highest degree with the impetus put on the individual to do the necessary work. Everything earned nothing given! Patrick understands that notion not only from the classroom but because of the class system. VMI afforded Patrick a mentor to guide, support and yet prod him to be the best he could be. He is able to take pride in his accomplishments because he knows what it took to achieve them. I am not sure what concerns are prompting these discussions around VMI but I can tell you that I joined the Parent Council for the Institution because I believe in the ideals set forth, the structure and support, and the unrivaled educational and employment opportunities offered. I sincerely hope that before judgements are made about VMI, that this committee and others will consider the thousands of stories that reflect the positivity produced from a VMI education. VMI should remain a State supported university as it benefits our state and our nation. VMI should remain independent from other universities as it is “no ordinary college” and should never be asked to be. I urge you to vote "NO" on HB1374 as it undermines the very essence of the Institute by placing it's authority under a college of which there is no comparison.

I urge the committee to reject HB1374. It is unprecedented to place a college or university in the Commonwealth under another college or university's BoV. It is especially harmful to place a high performing institution like VMI under a BoV who's university is not performing to the same or higher level. The Governor has appointed 5 new members to VMI's 15-member BoV . There is no need to shift governance to another board. I am a 1980 graduate of VMI. I served 22 years in the United States Marine Corps and retired as a Lieutenant Colonel. My family hales from Indiana and New Hampshire. Both parents served in the US Army in WWII and my forebears were Union soldiers in Indiana and New Hampshire regiments. My Great Grandfather was wounded at Cold Harbor. I assure you the Virginia Military Institute is not a hot bed of treason, racism, sexism or fascism. The long history of the Institute producing Citizen-Soldier leaders for the Commonwealth and the nation stands as direct testimony to the excellence and honor instilled in every Cadet. Respectfully Submitted, Daniel J. Conn LtCol., USMC(Ret)

I am writing in opposition to HB1377 and HB1374. My wife and I were born and raised on the Eastern Shore of Virginia. I am a third-generation graduate of VMI class of 1999. We don't live in Virginia anymore, but we do have two sons who plan to attend VMI. My older son has already been appointed for next year and wants to accept, but these bills 1377 and 1374 are giving him pause. My other son, 2 years younger, is even more determined to go to VMI and then into the military. I don't follow Virginia politics much but considering VMI successful metrics these bills seem utterly pointless, absurd, punitive, and politically vindictive. VMI boasts some of the best outcomes in Virginia: 4.5-Star Best College by Money magazine (2025)—the highest rating of all Virginia public colleges; 97% of graduates are employed or attending graduate school within 5 months of graduation; No. 2 Best Value Colleges in Virginia (2025); No. 4 Best public liberal arts college in the nation, ranked only behind the nation’s federal military academies (Source: 2026 Best Colleges, U.S. News & World Report); nearly 80% graduation rate (compare that to the average graduation rate of all Virginia public universities of 37%); average military commissioning rate of 50% or more per year, which means that VMI produces close to 200 officers for our military every year. But more important than metrics are the intangibles that VMI offers to kids who do NOT want to do "ordinary". VMI takes young men and women, who have a higher calling and a desire for structure and service, and teaches them leadership, discipline, teamwork, and honor. VMI has had some rocky issues in the past, but VMI has made significant progress in addressing and eliminating harassment and uncivil behavior—challenges faced on campuses nationwide. Such conduct has no place at VMI. But those past issues do not warrant continued political targeting. The leadership training and honor system shaped who I am today, and I want my two boys to be able to have a similar VMI experience.

I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed bills HB 1374 regarding the Virginia Military Institute (VMI). As the parent of both a VMI graduate and a current cadet, I am deeply concerned that these legislative efforts represent a political maneuver that unfairly targets the Institute and its students. The data does not support the logic of placing another institution in a position of oversight or priority over VMI. VMI maintains a 77% six-year graduation rate, a four-year graduation rate of approximately74%, and a first-year retention rate of 81-82%, which ranks 9th among Virginia public colleges. Furthermore, VMI manages an $800 million endowment. In contrast, the other institution mentioned has a four-year graduation rate of 26-28%, a six-year rate of 41-45%, a first-year retention rate of 62-71%, and a $100 million endowment. Given these figures, this bill appears to be a political attack rather than a decision based on educational or fiscal merit.

Subject: Regarding HB 1377, HB 1374, and the Value of the Virginia Military Institute I am writing as a Virginian who values the role our public institutions play in serving the Commonwealth. My nephew will enter the Virginia Military Institute as a cadet in the fall of 2026, and I am proud of his decision and the commitment it reflects to education, service, and leadership. I understand the House of Delegates is considering two bills—HB 1377 and HB 1374—that question the value of a VMI education. I appreciate that legislators are examining how institutions serve the Commonwealth, and I respect the importance of thoughtful oversight in public education. As these bills are evaluated, I hope careful consideration is given to VMI’s long-standing and measurable impact on Virginia. VMI produces graduates who serve the Commonwealth in many walks of life—including the military, public safety, engineering, medicine, business, and public service. Alumni contribute significantly to Virginia’s workforce and leadership, and thousands of Virginians are employed by businesses that are owned or led by VMI alumni. The Institute’s distinctive educational model develops discipline, resilience, and character—qualities that translate directly into effective leadership, ethical decision-making, and long-term civic contribution. These outcomes benefit not only individual graduates, but communities across the Commonwealth. Importantly, more VMI alumni live in Virginia than in any other state, and historically about 50 percent of cadets who commission into the military return to Virginia following their service. This reflects VMI’s enduring role in preparing leaders who choose to invest their skills and experience back into the Commonwealth. As the General Assembly considers HB 1377 and HB 1374, I respectfully ask that these demonstrated outcomes and long-term benefits be fully weighed. VMI represents a historic partnership with Virginia that continues to yield lasting returns. Thank you for your service and for your thoughtful consideration of this issue. Respectfully, Julia Tucker Lloyd [City/County, Virginia] --- Note for VMI Leadership: As a future VMI family, I want to express my gratitude for the Institute’s commitment to forming disciplined, principled leaders who serve Virginia with honor. Many Virginians value VMI deeply and remain confident in its mission, legacy, and continued contribution to the Commonwealth.

VMI One of the oldest and most prestigious military academies. It delivered some of Virginias bravest and brightest. The idea of closing it is beyond absurd. Please put aside petty politics and realize the history and value of this institution. Do not allow it to be scuttled.

I’m Bob Hawthorne LtCol USAF Retd. I’ve served teaching in Virginia prior to active duty in hopewell Va the active to go to Vietnam until discovery I was an English history major at vmi and wrote on project blue book and given two years to write a two volume history of the foreign technology division in Vietnam Vmi produces many citizen soldiers. Ralph Costen ; Costen floor Glen allen who donated the wood floors vmi basketball bldg. Neil Steverson judge Henrico abd revojng judge across Virginia Also produces national leaders like head of the joint chiefs of staff General Caine and ambassador waltz to the president. For me my last job was protocol for President Clinton’s inauguration Putting vmi under vsu is like putting West Point under them. This is not a good natch. If you are doing this because of Maj Gen wins - a great guy remember most military are rotated every four years - they salute smartly - thank the General for allowing them to serve and live on. The vmi determined it was time to move on and selected a new superintendent It’s time to move on. ; Continue VMI’s funding ; recognize VMI’s. Board of vistors In the past this general assembly has delegates who are vmi graduated. So will the future George Patton attended vmi one year ; george marshall was a graduate and national leader Marshall hall at vmi is a museum now. His statue is in front of one of the barracks arches. Three young ladies I interviewed while at my reunion were going to be Virginia school teachers in physics and mathematics. Only 52 percent go on active duty or va guards. Many school teachers. Keep vmi. It’s a Virginia treasure

Dear Senator/Delegate, I am writing to express my strong opposition to House Bills 1377 and 1374 and to urge you to protect the Virginia Military Institute and its mission. I am a proud alumnus of the Virginia Military Institute, and I believe deeply in the value of a VMI education—not only for its graduates, but for the Commonwealth of Virginia as a whole. VMI has a long and distinguished history of producing leaders of character, individuals with high moral standards, a strong sense of duty, and the leadership abilities needed to serve Virginia and the nation in both military and civilian roles. VMI’s unique educational model is not easily replicated. Its rigorous academic environment, coupled with the Institute’s emphasis on discipline, accountability, and leadership development, has consistently produced graduates who contribute meaningfully to public service, business, engineering, education, and the armed forces. This tradition is a significant asset to Virginia and should be preserved and protected. I am concerned that HB 1377 and HB 1374 risk undermining VMI’s ability to carry out its mission and preserve the distinctive qualities that make it successful. Rather than strengthening higher education in Virginia, these measures could erode an institution that has served the Commonwealth with honor for more than 180 years. I respectfully ask that you oppose HB 1377 and HB 1374 and support policies that allow VMI to continue educating future leaders in a manner consistent with its founding principles and proven mission. Thank you for your time, your service, and your consideration of my perspective. I appreciate your commitment to the Commonwealth and hope you will stand in support of the Virginia Military Institute. Respectfully, Reuben Trant, P.E. VMI Class of 2002 COL, USA

I respectfully oppose HB1374. This legislation proposes a fundamental restructuring of Virginia Military Institute’s governance by dissolving its independent Board of Visitors and placing the Institute under the supervision, management, and control of the Board of Visitors of Virginia State University. In my view, this change is unnecessary, disruptive, and not supported by any clear operational or financial justification. VMI has operated successfully for generations as an independent public institution with its own governing board, similar to every other major public college and university in the Commonwealth. If concerns exist regarding performance, accountability, or outcomes, those issues can and should be addressed through existing oversight mechanisms. Eliminating an institution’s independent governance structure is an extreme step that should only be taken when there is clear evidence of failure. I do not see that evidence here. Placing VMI under the control of another university’s board also raises practical concerns. The two institutions have distinct missions, cultures, and operating models. Consolidating their governance risks diluting focus, creating administrative complications, and introducing unnecessary instability for students, faculty, alumni, and donors. It is difficult to see how this arrangement would improve educational outcomes or reduce costs for taxpayers. Additionally, transferring VMI’s property, contracts, and legal authority to another institution creates long-term uncertainty about accountability and stewardship of public and donated assets. Such changes should not be made without a compelling and transparent case that demonstrates clear benefits to the Commonwealth. At a time when Virginia faces significant priorities related to workforce development, affordability, and infrastructure, restructuring the governance of a stable, functioning institution does not appear to be a productive use of legislative time or taxpayer resources. On a personal note, my family is actively considering sending our children to VMI based on our experience with alumni who are friends, colleagues, and outstanding citizens across Virginia. The leadership, discipline, and character we consistently see in its graduates are a strong reflection of the Institute’s value to the Commonwealth. That legacy deserves stability and support, not unnecessary upheaval. For these reasons, I encourage the General Assembly to reject HB1374. Thank you for your time and consideration.

My daughter attended VMI, and it was the greatest education and life experience anyone could have gotten. And while I’ve read a number of articles and speeches recently, from personal experience, all I can say is that I felt better that she was at VMI than any other place. As a parent and a voter, I’d ask politicians from both sides of the aisle to stop politicizing Virginia colleges for political gains. Virginia has probably the best university system in the country, and its students and communities would be better served if the leaders of Virginia let its colleges serve their respective missions.

Oppose any and all efforts to close down VMI which Generals Patton, Marshall and Caine attended

VMI is essential to national security. I oppose any measure to shut it down or otherwise change this historic institution. The graduates of VMI play an essential leadership role in guiding our military.

Hi, Opposing HB 1374. Looks like erasing history. Let's not do that. Mary

I oppose this initiative. I support Virginia Military Institute (VMI) for its outstanding contribution to our nation and our national security.

I oppose HB1374 because it dismantles the long-standing independent governance of the Virginia Military Institute without a clear operational or educational justification. VMI has a unique military mission that requires specialized oversight, and transferring control to the Board of Visitors of an entirely different institution risks diluting that mission and creating administrative instability. This bill replaces a governance structure that has served the Commonwealth effectively for generations and appears to be a politically driven solution rather than a mission-focused one. For these reasons, HB1374 is unnecessary, disruptive, and not in the best interest of VMI or Virginia. Thank you for your service, Sharon Wiltshire 17453 Pouncey Tract Td Rockville, VA 23146

Institutions built on honor deserve stewardship, not politics. As a proud alumnus of Virginia Military Institute, Class of 1998, and former Class Historian, I am deeply concerned by HB1374 and what it represents for the future of the Institute. VMI has, for nearly two centuries, produced citizen-soldiers and leaders who serve honorably in the military, public service, and private industry. My own family reflects that legacy, my grandfather (Class of 1944C), my uncle (Class of 1978), my cousin (Class of 1997), and I all chose VMI because it develops discipline, accountability, resilience, and service before self. The strength of the Institute lies in its demanding system, one that holds cadets to shared hardship and shared standards. VMI’s success has never depended on exclusion. We should, and do, embrace cadets from all walks of life, regardless of race, background, or gender. What unites cadets is not identity, but commitment to character, honor, and personal responsibility. At the heart of VMI stands the Honor Code: “A cadet will not lie, cheat, or steal, nor tolerate those who do.” This uncompromising standard is the diamond of the Institute. It demands integrity not only for oneself, but accountability to the entire Corps. In a time when trust in institutions and leadership often feels fragile, such clarity of principle is increasingly rare and increasingly necessary. With specific regard to HB1374, the proposal to strip VMI of its Board of Visitors and fold governance under another institution is not reform; it reads as punitive political retaliation against a historic school whose mission and traditions deserve stewardship, not dismantling. Such action disregards VMI’s proven record, ignores the voices of its alumni and cadets, and risks weakening an institution that has long served the Commonwealth and the nation with distinction. VMI should continue to evolve while remaining open to all who meet its standards, but it must not become the target of political revenge or short-sighted policymaking. To undermine VMI in this way would reflect a profound misunderstanding of its purpose, its contributions, and the enduring value of honor-based leadership in our society. Very respectfully, Mr. David A. Bates ’98 Yorktown, Virginia

As a cadet at VMI, I can confidently say that I don't know what I would have done or would be doing without VMI. I've had many discussions with my brother rats in the past couple of weeks about the possible outcomes of these bills, many of which blown out of proportion. The question, 'What would you do if not VMI?' has come up many times, and every time, I had no answer. I genuinely don't know, even as I write this now, but VMI has been the core of who I am for a long time. My father attended this institute back in the 90s, and in every way, he was my inspiration for coming here. And in turn, I have inspired my brother and my cousin to come here, and while they are not here yet, I pray to God they will get that opportunity. In writing this, I recognize that it's hard to describe the feelings one gets while being here, but know that even though it's hard, and tiring, and most days suck, there is no place that I would rather be. To whoever reads this, thank you for your time. God Bless Rah Virginia Mil

Opposition to House Bill 1374 I respectfully submit my opposition to HB 1374 as a retired Marine and as the parent of a young man who plans to attend the Virginia Military Institute. My wife and I are both retired Marines. Over the course of our combined careers, we served under civilian leadership and within institutions that depended on clear missions, stable governance, and thoughtful oversight. We value accountability and transparency, and we also understand how important continuity and trust are to organizations tasked with developing future leaders. VMI holds a unique place in the Commonwealth. Its purpose is clear, its standards are demanding, and its graduates consistently go on to serve Virginia and the nation in military, public, and civilian roles. The Institute already operates under multiple layers of oversight and review. From my perspective, HB 1374 does not meaningfully improve that oversight and instead introduces additional uncertainty into an institution that relies on stability to fulfill its mission. My concern is not rooted in resistance to change. Institutions should evolve, and VMI has done so over time. However, durable improvement is most effective when it is deliberate, informed, and collaborative. Sudden or recurring changes to governance structures risk unintended consequences, including impacts on leadership continuity, faculty retention, and cadet confidence. As a parent, I want my son to enter an environment that is challenging, disciplined, and steady—one where the focus remains on character development, leadership, and service rather than ongoing structural debate. As a veteran, I recognize how critical institutional confidence is to morale and effectiveness. I respectfully ask that HB 1374 not move forward and that VMI be allowed to continue its work under a governance framework that emphasizes stability, experience, and long-term stewardship. The Commonwealth benefits when its institutions are strengthened through careful engagement rather than frequent legislative intervention. Thank you for your consideration.

Assembly members, VMI is truly grateful for all the support the Commonwealth has provided over the years and have taken great pride in supporting the Commonwealth. So it comes as a great surprise that there are two bills being presented that question the value of the VMI education. I am appreciative of the legislatures examine the Commonwealth’s higher education as a whole. As you already know, VMI produces graduates who serve the Commonwealth in many walks of life—in the military, public safety, engineering, medicine, business, and public service. Our alumni contribute significantly to Virginia’s workforce and leadership. Thousands of Virginians are employed by VMI alumni-owned/led businesses. The Institute’s model develops discipline, resilience, and character—qualities that benefit the Commonwealth.” And moreover, more VMI alumni live in Virginia than any other state in the nation, with 50% typically returning following a commission in the military. Let me share how VMI has played a huge role in my life. Besides a 1st class education, VMI instilled a work ethic and courage in me that has forged my professional, personal and spiritual life. The lessons learned and the emphasis put on honor and strength in adversity is unmatched anywhere. Members of the Assemby, I am writing to share the true value of VMI and I hope you will see how much VMI as a school and its alumnae contribute each and every day to the success of this State. No other college is as laser-focused on instilling the values of honor, integrity, character, and responsibility for serving others in its students. VMI garners top state and national rankings—some of the highest in the Commonwealth. Lt. Gen. David Furness ’87, superintendent, said it best,…“Addressing and eliminating harassment and any form of uncivil behavior—challenges faced on campuses nationwide—remains one of our highest priorities. Such conduct has no place at VMI and will not be tolerated.” Thank you for taking the time to truly listen and understand the passion that alumni feel about this special and historic school. We trust that you will listen closely and take the words of the alumni and the track record of the past 180yrs into consideration when placing your vote. Respectfully, James Dameron VMI Class of ‘95

I have witnessed three years of life at VMI through my son, and offer these insights on how this school excels in leadership qualities. VMI uses a mentoring system called the “Dyke” system which pairs a first-year cadet “Rat” with a senior. This provides guidance, support, and accountability during the intense first-year training period. The Dyke acts as a mentor (big brother/sister) and role model for the Rat, and helps the Rat navigate the demands of life at VMI, teaching traditions, rules, and expectations of the Institute. Dyke from "deck out" refers to the assistance the first-class cadet provides the Rat in putting on and adjusting the white-strapped ceremonial uniforms. Rats assist their Dykes with tasks like keeping their room clean, folding laundry, and uniform/equipment care. Despite the menial tasks, the relationship creates lasting bonds with Dykes providing a haven for their Rats in the barracks. A Dyke maintains this relationship beyond just this first year. As parents we got to know his Dyke’s parents, and built a relationship with them. The Dykeline is a lineage of mentorship, where the senior mentors a freshman, who in turn will one day mentor a future Rat, passing down the culture of the institution. After his Dyke’s graduation, my son attended his wedding, and met what is called his Grand-Dyke and Great-Grand-Dyke. The Dyke system provides opportunities for leadership, for mentoring, and for teaching a Rat how to follow which is extremely important in the military. After understanding this Dyke system I approached my schoolmates at USNA with a proposal to introduce this system at Annapolis. During my plebe year at USNA we had no mentor of any kind. VMI’s program is also superior to USNA and the Marine Corps for fitness, discipline, and good order. In the Corps, VMI-graduate officers stood out as outstanding. VMI simply stands out as superior in leadership compared to the federal academies. Similarly in Boy Scouts, there are four phases of development for a Scout. First, a scout learns how to follow as a Cub Scout and Scout Patrol member. Before one can become a good leader, they must be a good follower, which skill is essential for future leaders to learn. Second, a scout learns how to lead a patrol leader and troop. Third, a scout learns how to mentor other troop leaders as an Assistant Junior Scout Master. VMI follows this exact time-tested and proven method, developed by Lt. Gen. Robert Baden-Powell. Each cadet at VMI follows this same carefully planned course to learn how to follow, lead, and mentor. There is one final phase to leadership, the legacy phase, which occurs when a person has completed service in the US military, our institutions of defense and war, and civic community organizations. We, alumni of these institutions, lead our posterity by advocating for our way of life, rule of law, and those things that preserve our society, to leave a lasting legacy to endure for future generations. We are obligated and bound by duty to the Almighty Creator to ensure that our United States, and the Virginia Military Institute, remain strong, and a place that defends life and liberty under His watchful eye. I make an appeal to the Virginia General Assembly to continue support of VMI. It is essential that this institution remains independent of other universities in Virginia, and that it continues to support the endeavors of the United States of America.

My name is Seth Enterline. I am a Christian, husband, father and proud army veteran of 19 years. I currently live in Gainesville, GA where I work as an orthopedic trauma physician assistant at a level 1 trauma center. I have seen 5 overseas combat tours and served through the COVID pandemic. I am reaching out to you as a bit of a "Hail Mary". My alma mater, the Virginia Military Institute faces certain struggles ahead with VA HB 1377 and HB 1374. With the transition of leadership in the Governor's office as well as the legislation, it does seem that the school is under attack. I realize that there are party lines, but I am begging of you to bring national attention that is non-partisan to this issue. VMI has a history that is not perfect, but many have periods of their life that they may look back on with regret. VMI's strength today is one that is free of a past routed in division, anger and hate. VMI is a strong institution that produces proud officers of every branch of our military. I myself am a proud 19 year army veteran, I work in healthcare, and I continue to serve my country. I understand there may be hesitancy, but VMI truly is a national asset. More cadets are commissioned into the Army, Air Force and Navy at VMI than any other ROTC program in the country. They are second only to the service academies. I understand that much of the scrutiny VMI faces may be connected to the firing of MG Winns, the Institutes' previous Superintendent. I can tell you that firing rocked me to my core. MG Winns was an incredible leader that I believe was going to lead VMI into a future where many could finally begin to focus on that future rather than a controversial past. However, as an Alumni of the Institute I was not privy to why that decision was made, nor do my personal feelings in any way change how I feel about the Institute and what it offers to this nation. The current Superintendent, LTG Furness is an honorable man who is just as poised and positioned to lead VMI to that same future. If there is an issue with the Board of Visitors that did fire MG Winns, this has been corrected with GOV Spanberger appointing new members onto the VMI BOV. Please speak up for those cadets who cannot fight this fight. Please do not support VA HB 1377 and HB 1374. I simply ask that you think of what this great institute has provide to our nation. Men like Jonathan Myrick Daniels a martyr who died supporting civil rights reform, Gen. George C. Marshall, 7 Medal of Honor recipients and 11 Rhodes Scholars. Yes, they were at one time on the wrong side of history, but anything celebrated of that terrible time in our nation's history is only to highlight the bravery of scared young men who fought and died with their brothers, not because of a belief, but because they found themselves in a war maybe they understood and maybe they didn't, but they knew that those on their right and left depended on them. VMI is depending on men of character like you now to stand on her left and right, supporting her in a time of need. History will judge us all not on what has passed before us, but what we do to stop atrocities in our present. Respectfully, Seth E. Enterline, PA-C, CAQ-OS, MBA 540-272-5486 Seth.e.enterline@gmail.com

Greetings, We are writing to share our strong opposition to House Bills HB1374 and HB1377 that would, respectively, aim to dissolve VMI's board of visitors/transfer governance to the board of visitors at Virginia State University and scrutinize whether VMI should remain a state-sponsored institution. At the center of this political posturing is a corps of bright, modern, driven, tough, resilient young people from many different economic, cultural and racial backgrounds. These young people CHOSE a path less traveled and voluntarily agreed to have their college years reflect a military-style regimen focused on reliance upon one another, grit, determination, uncomfortable situations, early wake-ups, demanding physical challenges, military commitments, honor, integrity, a rigorous academic schedule, and shared suffering. They do not deserve to be political pawns. My wife and I are graduates of Virginia Tech. Our oldest son is a 3rd-class cadet at VMI and is contracted with the Air Force with the dream of one day becoming a pilot. During our college search process, we visited many campuses and participated in numerous overnight tours, including Virginia Tech. VMI, and it was not even close, rose to the top of the list based upon the professionalism, appearance, communication, organization, inclusiveness and camaraderie felt and seen from the minute we arrived on post. This place is special, if it has been a while, or if you have never visited VMI, you should, you will be impressed with each cadet and faculty member with whom you interact. Selecting a college is all about finding the right fit. No one is forced to attend VMI, but for those who choose to attend, it is clearly a place to become the best versions of themselves. Each time we talk with our son, we continue to be impressed with the opportunities VMI is affording him and the personal growth he is experiencing. His love for The Institute was apparent when he recently sat on an alumni panel at his high school. His former teachers and administrators were impressed with his depth, poise, and maturity, and he has inspired other students to attend VMI in the future. VMI has been shaping leaders for the Commonwealth, the Nation, and the World for 186 years. Let this tradition continue. Please consider the cadets, faculty, staff, Lexington-area business owners, federal/state military readiness, proud parents/guardians, proud grandparents, proud siblings, and others when considering the merit of the House Bills. The consequences of the actions associated with the language in these bills would be catastrophic and a true tragedy for the Commonwealth. I am a native Virginian, born and raised in Richmond. I would like to imagine that our elected officials would not be so short-sighted as to potentially shutter a prestigious state institution for short-term political "gains". We urge you to oppose House Bills HB1374 and HB1377. Thank you for your time and consideration. Respectfully, Robbie and Beth Ann Bell

I am a proud VMI parent to a 4th year Cadet. VMI helps prepare the young women and men to be ready for real-world challenges, to stand tall and push forward. It teaches discipline and accountability, something that you will not see in any other institution. The commadarie there is like nothing I have ever seen, no discrimination, no labeling, just bonds formed during their transformation to becoming a cadet to graduation. I have seen what VMI has done with my son so far and it is phenomenal! I oppose HB1374 and plead that you all do the same. Leave VMI alone and let them continue to put out citizen soldiers that are doing great things not only in our country but around the world!

To Whom It May Concern: I am writing today to oppose Bill HB 1374 which proposes to establish an oversight committee for VMI. My nephew is a freshman there and I had the opportunity to visit the school in October 2025. VMI is an excellent institution that is affordable which produces young men and women of quality, integrity and dedication to serve the Commonwealth of Virginia and perhaps eventually in the U.S. Military. Graduates of this school go on to serve at all levels of government as well as many branches of the military. Do not change/disrupt or put at risk the opportunities these young men & women currently have to obtain the education and training at this excellent institution. Our government and our military benefits greatly from these cadets and it would be counter intuitive to obstruct the work being done to create such fine and dedicated young adults. More institutions should follow in their steps by teaching love of country and service to others. I respectfully request that you vote "No" for bill HB 1374. Sincerely, Gavin McFarland Uncle of Cadet Jacob McFarland

I am a proud 1984 graduate of VMI and then served in Army for three years after graduation It was the second best decision that I ever made and I obnoxiously tell people about VMI every chance I get. That said I realize that VMI is not now was not without its problems. We held onto Confederate customs for too long and for the wrong reasons. Today one of my Brother Rats told me that he experienced racism while he was at VMI and I am so saddened by that. I am sure he was not alone. There have been racists at VMI I hope it is OK to say, but, VMI while not without its faults is a great institution that produces many wonderful people. The system has worked and will work in the future. The shared suffering equalized us and created trusting friendships that last for years and cross generations. I would ask you to be curious, ask questions and listen. We are not a mini West Point, we are not a ROTC program, we graduate Citizen Soldiers.

I oppose Bill HB1374 which seeks to provide an oversight council to review VMI policies and procedures. I have a nephew who currently attends VMI and the quality of education and discipline that is being taught are exceptional. VMI provides young men and women of caliber the opportunity to work hard with an additional focus on citizenship, morality and honesty to become good citizens and perhaps soldiers for our country. This bill is unnecessary - just attend the school's events and you will get a sense of the community, faith and integrity that is instilled in these young adults. Do not put VMI at risk of losing what it does best.... creating men and women of character and integrity. The world and especially our Beloved Country needs more VMI's. Sincerely, Tara Cullen-McFarland Aunt of current VMI Freshman J. McFarland

Dear Members of the Committee, We are grateful for the Commonwealth's past support of Virginia Military Institute (VMI) and for the opportunity to share perspectives on its clear value to Virginia, and how it is arguably the best college in the state. VMI produces graduates who serve the Commonwealth in many walks of life—in the military, public safety, engineering, medicine, business, and public service. Our alumni contribute significantly to Virginia’s workforce and leadership; thousands of Virginians are employed by VMI alumni-owned or -led businesses. The Institute’s unique model develops discipline, resilience, and character—qualities that benefit the Commonwealth long-term. More VMI alumni live in Virginia than in any other state, with roughly 50% typically returning after completing a military commission. Going to VMI was the best decision of my life, and every other alum I know, regardless of their background, feels exactly the same way. The leadership training, rigorous academics, and single-sanction honor code shaped who I am today, instilling values of honor, integrity, and responsibility for serving others that have guided my career and life. No other college is as laser-focused on these qualities. VMI garners top state and national rankings—consistently ranked as the #4 public liberal arts college in the nation by U.S. News & World Report in recent years (including the 2026 edition), the highest in the Commonwealth. It has produced thousands of commissioned officers for the U.S. Armed Forces (more than any ROTC program outside federal service academies), including nearly 300 who reached general or flag officer rank, countless business leaders, and professionals across fields. VMI alumni are deeply invested in the success of the Commonwealth through military service, business, and public service. As Lt. Gen. David Furness ’87, VMI’s superintendent, has stated: “Addressing and eliminating harassment and any form of uncivil behavior—challenges faced on campuses nationwide—remains one of our highest priorities. Such conduct has no place at VMI and will not be tolerated.” I know from my experience and ongoing connections that VMI provides a safe and inclusive environment at an even higher standard than many if not all other colleges and universities in the state and nation. I’m here to share the real value VMI provides and hope the General Assembly will consider the full picture of VMI’s contributions. Thank you for taking the time to hear from alumni. We simply ask that VMI’s long record of service and impact be part of the conversation, as we want to remain a strong part of Virginia’s success for many years to come. Significant changes to the long-proven system and mission of VMI would be a giant loss to the Commonwealth and rob future generations from having the amazing experience that so many more have had before them. Respectfully submitted, Sam Hunter VMI Class of 2015

I have wandered far from my home and from the state which gave me advancement in my education. I would urge the state of Virginia to work with and not dictate to the Virginia Military Institute. If we look at the history in more recent times, we can see that while changes have come slowly, once instituted VMI has shown an exemplary ability to make new requirements part of their ongoing mission. Whatever changes may come, I urge you all to consider working with and not dictating to the institute. I was born and raised in New Jersey, yet I have visited Virginia almost as often as my home state since graduating. My immeadiate family lives in New Jersey and Rhode Island, yet my wife and I have gone out of our way to visit Virginia even from our distant location. The Virginia Military Institute has had a profound impact on my life and the way I live it. I strive to live each day as I was taught in that time when I dwelt in your state. I attempted to move there shortly after graduating, I would likely visit less and think less of your fine commonwealth if you were to change your relationship with my school. Thank you for your consideration.. John H Kostisin VMI Class of "81

I would like to attend, and to provide written comments. Happy to speak if desired.

I stand in support of VMI. The proposed bill I think is a political witch hunt designed to abolish this treasured educational institution based on hearsay, inuendo, misrepresenations, and outright lies. The General Assembly will awaken the outrage of not only the state and nation, but the world in general as yet another attempt to scuttle our history, customs, and traditions with cancel culture. Shame on the authors of this bill seeking to undermine a Great Institution whose graduates' contributions to the State and Nation are too numerous to list in this missive. JW Simms, Midlothian, VA

Do Not support this bill

I graduated from VMI in 1993 and served 32 years in the Defense Intelligence Agency, deploying five times overseas to Kosovo (x2), Iraq (x2), and Afghanistan (x1). I am but one of many VMI alumni who has served our nation and was willing to pay the ultimate price to defend our Constitution. The proposed bill to eliminate VMI's independent Board of Visitors and subordinate the Institute to Virginia State University's board threatens a proven national asset. Since 1839, VMI has produced citizen-soldiers who serve America across military, government, local/state leadership, and private sectors. VMI alumni include General George C. Marshall (Class of 1901), WWII Army Chief of Staff, architect of the Marshall Plan, Nobel Peace Prize winner, Secretary of State, and Secretary of Defense—whose leadership helped win the war and rebuild Europe. Jonathan Daniels (Class of 1961), an Episcopal seminarian and civil rights martyr, sacrificed his life in 1965 shielding a young African American girl from gunfire in Alabama, embodying selfless service and moral courage recognized by the Episcopal Church. Today, General Dan Caine (Class of 1990), current Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, leads the nation's military as principal advisor to the President—continuing VMI's legacy of top-level defense leadership. VMI boasts seven Medal of Honor recipients—the nation's highest military award for valor—plus 11 Rhodes Scholars and one Nobel Prize winner (Marshall, Peace Prize 1953). With over 285 general/flag officers, governors, secretaries, CEOs, and countless community leaders, VMI's independent governance has fostered excellence without interference. VMI has produced leaders from all races, both genders, and all classes of American society. First African American cadets entered in 1968, with graduates starting in 1972; women joined the Corps in 1997, now comprising about 8% and achieving milestones like the first female regimental commander. From diverse socioeconomic backgrounds, these alumni, including trailblazers like the first African American superintendent, Maj. Gen. Cedric Wins, excel in uniform and civilian life, united by VMI's merit-based, character-driven mission that blends differences to enrich leadership. I believe this proposed legislation is based on bad faith. Calling for the dissolution of the board risks undermining VMI's unique mission. We are a better Nation and People because of VMI. Preserve VMI's autonomy—America needs its citizen-soldiers more than ever.

As a constituent, a former colleague in Virginia government, and a member of the VMI Class of 1974, I am writing to express my profound opposition to HB 1374. My opposition is rooted in nearly half a century of service to this Commonwealth—service that I attribute directly to the foundation laid at the Virginia Military Institute. I served 35 years in the Virginia National Guard and 11 years within Virginia state government. I am a living example of the "citizen-soldier" model that VMI was designed to produce: a leader prepared to defend the nation in uniform and serve the public in civil office. HB 1374 threatens the very essence of this education by dissolving VMI’s independent Board of Visitors. Transferring governance to an institution with a fundamentally different mission and culture is not an "administrative update"—it is a dismantling of an institution that has successfully served Virginia for 186 years. I urge you to consider the long-term impact of this bills on our state’s leadership pipeline. Please vote "No" on HB 1374. I am available to discuss the practical implications of this legislation with you or your staff at any time. Mike Coleman mjcolmn74@gmail.com

I did not graduate from the Institute, but I did complete the Rat Line and spent three summers in Barracks in Lexington, Virginia. While I was there, a semi‑popular article circulated in which the City Sheriff compared the Keydets to “trained killers.” There has always been someone willing to discredit the Institute, but watching the Commonwealth and its officials stand on that same ground has been especially disheartening. By the time I was twelve, I had realized that multiple learning disabilities would make attending UVA or the Naval Academy nearly impossible. So I convinced myself that VMI was the next best path. I wanted to be an engineer, and everyone in my hometown, Richmond, talked about VMI’s Civil Engineering program as one of the best anywhere. I didn’t go there to become a “trained killer.” And no one I knew went there to antagonize anyone for being different. On day one, everyone becomes one body. I had six roommates, and our room was the original chapel. My closest roommate owned Muslim scriptures and grew up in Section 8 housing in Atlanta. I grew up on a cattle farm in Goochland. We were nothing alike, yet we were thick as thieves on any given Friday night. That was the reality of the Institute. I didn’t graduate from VMI, but I did graduate from a Virginia school with a strong set of values and a recognizable honor code. Because of my time at VMI—because I tried, because I finished my first year—I received two job offers, both from alumni. I honestly believe that the Institute opened those doors for me, even without a degree in hand. That’s why it’s hard to understand how non‑alumni can claim that VMI fosters a hostile environment of inequality. On the first day, everyone is equal. No one is special. Nor should they be. We were Rats not Racist. I am not a Trained Killer; I am a construction worker. If you serve the Commonwealth, as over 60% of the Alumni do every day, then I'm sure you already know this, and we know that this is an agenda not by party lines but of a generated rhetoric that could be made of NSU, VSU, UVA, VT, W & M, ODU, and really any State school in America, where two economies collide. On the first day, everyone is equal. Can an NSU student say that he had the same experience?

House Bill 1374 center on the practical, fiscal, and cultural implications of shifting oversight of the Virginia Military Institute (VMI) to Virginia State University (VSU): • Financial Concerns: There many scholarships and financial commitments made by alumni and friends of VMI based on grant agreements. VSU could simply ignore those previous agreements and disperse the funds however they direct. • Geographic and Practical Barriers: The two institutions are located roughly 160 miles apart (Lexington and Petersburg). this distance makes effective oversight by a single board impractical and burdensome. • Mission Mismatch: Placing a military college under the governance of a historically Black university (HBCU) with a fundamentally different educational mission will inevitably dilute or alter the unique military culture and "adversarial" leadership model central to VMI's identity. • Timing and Reform Progress: VMI Superintendent Lt. Gen. David Furness argued that the bill ignores significant progress already made; he noted that 34 out of 38 recommended reforms from a 2021 equity audit have already been completed. • Precedent for State Overreach: This sets a dangerous precedent where any public institution could have its independent board dissolved and governance reassigned if it becomes politically inconvenient for the General Assembly.

To whom it may concern, VMI is a great special place that deserves to governed by those who truly understand the mission. VMI has changed me for the better, and VMI should continue to do the same for so many future leaders. Best, C. Hunter Martin VMI ‘19

As a student at VT and the proud grandson of a VMI graduate who is no longer with us, I wholeheartedly oppose the passage of these bills (HB 1374 and HB 1377). There is no place for these radical changes to one of our prestigious senior military institutes. VMI is an elite and historical institution that has been and continues to be a cornerstone of our nation and military. It is absolutely imperative that this institution remains funded and independent of VSU control. Why VSU in the first place? If anything, maybe the other senior military institute in Virginia? This is a completely nonsensical and appalling use of the Virginia state government. At least my grandfather did not have to bear witness to the degradation of his alma mater.

I am writing to respectfully urge you to oppose HB 1374. This bill pose serious risks not only to the Virginia Military Institute (VMI) and Virginia State University (VSU), but also to Virginia’s reputation, economic stability, and long-standing commitment to supporting public higher education. VMI and VSU each serve unique missions that strengthen our Commonwealth. Both institutions produce leaders, support economic development in their surrounding regions, and uphold traditions that attract students nationwide. Efforts that undermine their autonomy, funding, or operational effectiveness jeopardize their ability to continue contributing to Virginia in meaningful ways. HB 1374 would create unnecessary instability, hinder recruitment, and weaken the educational and leadership training environments that make these institutions exceptional. VMI and VSU provide diverse, high-quality pathways for students, and imposing politically driven mandates risks damaging that progress. This bill also threaten to diminish Virginia’s national standing by signaling that our higher education system is vulnerable to intrusive and disruptive policy changes. Preserving the strength and independence of our public institutions should be a priority. I urge you to reject HB 1374 to protect the students, faculty, alumni, and communities who rely on VMI and VSU, and to maintain Virginia’s reputation as a leader in higher education. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Jill Brishke

There may not be sufficient words to describe how dangerous and short-sighted the passage of this bill would be. The Virginia Military Institute is unlike any educational institution in the commonwealth, and that is a good thing. Difficulties endured while living as a cadet build strength, resilience, fraternity, and wisdom. These are values that are much more difficult to instill at a normal school where comfort and leisure are some of the primary focuses. It is no secret that many people have strong objections to what they believe VMI stands for. I would challenge these people to go meet cadets and alumni, as many as possible. Don't buy the words of newspaper articles, all written with an agenda one way or the other. Speak to real life people and witness their character and their habits. See what the Virginia Military Institute produces both in our nation's military, and in our communities. There will always be some bad apples with any group of humans, but I am confident in my belief that our state and our country are stronger because of the people molded at VMI. Turning the governance of this place over to VSU would be one of the poorest choices the Virginia government has ever made. Virginia State University produces functioning members of society yes, but their product is not VMI's product. The values, processes, and measures of success of the two places are incredibly different. Metaphors to describe this potential governance are endless. I would dare to say that VSU governance of VMI would be similar to a fine jewelry store being placed in charge of a lumber mill. No doubt the two businesses produce valuable and necessary goods, but the leadership of the jewelry store have no experience or knowledge of what it takes to successfully run a lumber mill. My criticism of this bill (and I assume this is true for many others) is not meant to be an attack on VSU, that University is the least of my concern. My concern is that in the effort to make a loud political statement in an ever more polarized nation, the current Virginia government will be attacking and weakening a factory of strong moral character, without which our military and our communities will be much weaker. In the first year at VMI, cadets are required to remember a quote from one of the school's founders. The final line of the quote describes VMI alumni, and it reads: "Attached to their native state, proud of her fame, and ready in every time of deepest peril, to vindicate her honor or defend her rights." Regardless of political alliance, please consider the product of the Virginia Military Institute and its impact on our state and nation before considering the passage of this bill. Very respectfully, Brad-Edward R. Davis VMI Class of 2021

I write in formal opposition to House Bill 1374. HB1374 targets a single public institution, Virginia Military Institute, for extraordinary intervention without evidence of failure. It undermines established principles of higher-education governance and risks eroding a mission that is demonstrably effective. Virginia Military Institute is not an ordinary public university. It is the Commonwealth’s only full-time public military college, with a mission centered on leadership, character, discipline, and service. That mission necessarily requires a governance structure and institutional culture different from civilian institutions. HB1374 would impose changes that misunderstand this distinct purpose and apply civilian assumptions to a military educational model. Critically, VMI has already undergone significant state oversight and investigation, resulting in documented reforms to policies, leadership practices, and cadet support systems. To single out VMI for additional legislative intervention, after compliance has occurred, creates a moving standard of legitimacy that is neither fair nor consistently applied across Virginia’s public institutions. HB1374 also sets a troubling precedent. If the General Assembly can restructure governance or condition funding for one institution based on political disagreement rather than performance metrics, no public university’s autonomy is secure. This risks politicizing higher education oversight and weakening the long-standing model in which boards of visitors, not legislators, are responsible for institutional governance. From a public value perspective, VMI delivers strong returns. It consistently ranks among the top public liberal arts colleges, produces leaders for the military and civilian sectors, and contributes directly to state and national security interests. These outcomes argue for stability and continuity, not disruption. Finally, reform and tradition are not mutually exclusive. VMI’s Honor Code and leadership system are not obstacles to progress; they are the mechanisms through which ethical accountability is taught and enforced. Undermining these systems through legislative micromanagement risks damaging the very outcomes the Commonwealth expects from the Institute. Virginia State University's four-year graduation rate is approximately 28 percent, placing it among the lowest-performing in the state and well below national averages on this fundamental indicator of student achievement. VSU has struggled historically with performance benchmarks used by the State Council of Higher Education for Virginia (SCHEV), including enrollment projections, degree awards, and administrative performance measures. In past performance assessments, VSU fell short on multiple SCHEV targets, reflecting broader institutional challenges. The bill should be rejected in favor of consistent, fair, and mission-aware governance across all Virginia public institutions. Laura F. Poe, Ph.D.

This attachment serves as my commentary in opposition to HB 1374. According to the Sponsor of this bill, the proposal “reflects a belief that when patterns of governance issues arise, a review and potential adjustment of oversight structure is appropriate”. The push behind HB 1374 is rooted more in political and cultural disagreements about governance, accountability, and institutional direction than in a series of new, substantiated legal findings against VMI. Legislators reference past, resolved matters routinely, but they do so absent anything to prove unresolved, public lawsuits in any way justifying their claim of current systemic failure. I am greatly concerned about the basis for this push, the motivation behind it, and the precedent it sets with VMI being the only college or university in our country's history who is faced with veiled punitive measures by way of this bill. That should make you all pause and ask yourself - is this the right thing to do, or can we engage other, less extreme measures? Please review my attachment. I have always been a proud Democrat, so clearly this issue is not a party line issue for me. My father graduated from VMI in 1968, is on the Board of International Studies, and is still a guest speaker from time to time. My nephew is a 2nd year, and my world - my son - is a 3rd year. After he "broke out" and I was able to see him, I saw a different person. He was a man; he walked with purpose and spoke with confidence. He opened doors for others and made it a point to greet as many people as he could. He holds the honor code close to the vest, and it guides him daily. And he's not the only one. The new Superintendent deserves a chance to make a difference. There are many who are optimistic, and some cautiously so - and that's okay! But those who are convinced that VMI is rooted in racism because of the Battle of New Market (and because of the 2021 administrative finding involving race) don't understand what happened at the Battle of New Market and how it contributed to the bonds and brotherhood of the BRs at the time and strengthened that foundation forever. Some may say I sound sympathetic to the South, but again, they lack understanding. Because that couldn't be further from the truth.

It is a shame that a VMI graduate AND a West Point graduate would bring shame to all of us that went thru 4 years of an amazing program. I have always given West Point, the benefit of the doubt when they had real problems within the Corps and the politicians questioned the value of the Point to the Country. The same is going on with the Virginia Legislators. I would suggest that a few from the Senate and Delegate take a few minutes and invite a Cadet(s) to Richmond and talk to them. I am sure the Cadets would like to meet with them. In this way the legislators could better make an informed decision and my bet is they will be impresses and kill this foolish bill. Sal Vitale a proud member of VMI Class 1961.

I am a member of the Virginia Military Institute (VMI) Class of 1996, a citizen of Virginia, and am here stating my opposition to HB 1374. There is no reason to dissolve the VMI Board of Visitors, nor to burden Virginia State University (VSU) Board of Visitors with the function of overseeing VMI. While a very successful academic institution, because of its unique mission VMI is a unique experience unlike other schools. It has a mission of producing citizen-soldiers who will serve their communities, the Commonwealth, the nation, and the world, as such. While I know less about VSU because I did not attend that university, it too has a unique mission as well from what I can see. It’s objective is producing scholars who, according to their mission statement from their website become “lifelong learners who are well equipped to serve their communities as informed citizens, globally competitive leaders, and highly effective, ethical professionals.” While both schools are dedicated to producing men and women of learning, character, and community service, as almost all colleges are, the means, as well as the end result of each, are functionally very different. They are also both valuable. We need both types of options in Virginia. Each college will appeal to young men and women seeking different experiences most fitting to their goals and their individual personalities and interests. If VMI falls under a Board of Visitors from a school not completely dedicated to the system VMI has to offer you will ruin the experience, and water down, if not destroy, the benefits to be derived for the young men and women who seek that VMI experience. Further, by burdening the VSU Board of Visitors with the running of a school that is so very different from itself, you will distract it from focusing on ensuring VSU is managing its affairs in the best way for VSU’s unique system and desired outcomes for its students. You cannot place VMI under the supervision of a Board of Visitors from VSU without reducing the effectiveness of both. VMI is successful because it is a different type of school experience than VSU. Likewise, VSU is successful because it is a different type of school experience than VMI. What would the point of VMI be if it weren’t for the military lifestyle experience? How effective would VSU education method be at producing the type of scholars they produce if they were started adopting a military lifestyle? Having the option of each type of college experience to all young men and women provides a greater opportunity for Virginia’s sons and daughters to find the place where they can thrive. Combining them in any manner, including placing VMI under the VSU Board of Visitors will reduce the uniqueness, and thus effectiveness, of each. Such a decision would also reduce the diversity of education style options available to young men and women of all backgrounds in Virginia (and across the nation) seeking a unique college experience that fits their needs and best prepares them to serve their communities.

I oppose HB1374. Democrats and Socialists continue to destroy our civilization by lowering standards and expectations. I stand with VMI on keeping the military school.

I stand in opposition to House Bill 1374. As a proud member of the Class of 2024, I support the Virginia Military Institute, it's mission, and the values that it instills in each cadet - the values of honor, discipline, respect, and selfless service. These values are taught from day one, and are not only enforced and upheld by VMI's administration - but by each and every cadet that attends the Institute. Any cadet that does not uphold or enforce these values is held accountable by their peers and by the VMI administration. This is why VMI is the last school in the Nation with a truly functioning (and thriving) single-sanction Honor System; this system, and the value of Honor, is one that cadets hold dearly. A value that every cadet is proud to call their own, and a value that prevails throughout their time at VMI and their lives afterwards. As a member of the VMI Honor Court during my cadetship, I can affirm with confidence that this system - and the VMI system - is indiscriminatory. It does not consider one's race, gender, or background, but judges each cadet based on their character. The VMI bond is one that is not easily broken, because it is established on the core of the individual - their character, and how they conduct themselves. As a female graduate of the Virginia Military Institute, I share in the bond of the VMI diploma no less than any of my male counterparts. This bond is prevailing, and my Brother Rats are, and always will be, there for me - in times of joy, and in my times of greatest need. In conclusion, I strongly oppose House Bill 1374. I stand with Virginia Military Institute, and wouldn't be the woman I am today without my alma mater.

Now there are parents questioning if their child has made the best decision for themselves. Not because of race issues but because the state is trying to “shut them down” due to not knowing how the system even works at VMI. They hear things with no evidence to back anything up. So now the entire state of VMI rests in the hands of people who have no idea of what goes on inside that institution. If it only takes one person to cry the blues about how bad a place is and then people who have no idea about the place start passing bills to break that place down then we do not live in a democratic state. Let The People vote on this not people who don’t know anything about VMI except the Confederacy. That place has spent decades tearing that biased opinion down just for it to be raised up again and again. Listen to the Cadets that are there now and how they are fighting for the school they love. Listen to the prospective students that want to come there because they know it’s an outstanding Institute. In the coming years the ramifications of this one political stent, that’s all this is, the number of enrolling students is going to plumet. Is that what is wanted?? The numbers for this incoming year have been off the chart. Kids go to VMI because it’s one of the best military institutes out there. Please do not pass these bills in the House.

Good Evening. I'm a 1980 Alumnus of VMI, Distinguished Graduate, Retired Army Officer, and currently Senior Program Manager for a medium sized defense contractor. I have read HB1374 and am perplexed by its purpose. A College Board of Visitors purpose is to serves as a governing or advisory body that facilitates the long-term health of the school by defining its mission, overseeing budgets, setting policies, and fostering external relations. Primary responsibilities include (1) Governance and Oversight, (2) Strategic Planning, (3) Serving as Ambassadors for the School, (4) Developing Resources, and (5) Provides advice on ways to enhance curriculum and provide opportunities for students. To achieve these objectives, a College Board of Visitors typically consists of Alumni, Business Leaders, and/or Political Appointees. In this context, we need to look at the missions of VMI and VSU. VMI is one of the most distinguished military colleges in the United States, and perhaps the world, with a focus on training military leaders, which means teaching and enforcing the highest standards of discipline and treating all cadets equally, regardless of race, creed, color, sex, or religious beliefs. VMI offers a large range of majors and is ranked as one of the finest schools in the United States by multiple sources. Similarly, VSU is one of the premier Historically Black College and Universities in the United States, offering various undergraduate and graduate programs in fields such as business, nursing, and criminal justice. I have personal experience with HBCUs when I serve as my Company's Program Manager for our DOD Mentor Protege Program - they are excellent schools. Both VMI and VSU Boards are appointed by the Governor of Virginia and are composed as stated above. However, looking solely at the information above, it is struggle to determine how the Board of VSU can effectively serve as the Board for VMI, much less do justice for either schools. The schools an their missions, histories, and academic focus are significantly different, as well as they are located in different parts of the State, some 160 miles apart. The VMI Board includes the former Governor of Virginia, the State Adjutant General, a Navy Rear Admiral, and three other distinguished Retired Officers. The VSU Board, while very highly qualified for the mission of VSU, has only one member, General Via, with any appreciable military experience. What HB1374 proposes is to have one Board try and serve two geographically separated schools, each with vastly different missions, student bodies, academic focuses, and rich histories. This is perplexing as the likely result will be both schools suffer, not for lack of trying by the VSU Board, because they will try, but they do not have the VMI specific experience and expertise an will be doing double duty. The best analogy of the end result of such a decision will be similar to the fate of the Roman Army at Cannae - they had two commanders who took turns being in command. The arrangement proposed in HB1374 is bad legislation as it will only hurt both VMI an VSU. An equally interesting question is why this legislation was proposed. While most VMI Alumni disagreed with the way the Board treated MG Winns, Lt. Gen. Furness, VMI 1987, has been incredibly impressive, as his testimony to the House demonstrates. The proposed legislation fails the logic test and will only hurt both schools - I highly recommend it die in committee.

Though much is taken, Much abides; and though We are not now that strength which in old days Moved earth and heaven; that which we are, we are; One equal temper of heroic hearts, Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield. - Ulysses by Lord Tennyson I stand with VMI. Like every long standing institution in this country, VMI is not immune from a complicated past and VMI has certainly made every effort in the last few years to show the country and world that it is not defined by a statue or the words of one man of history but rather the enduring mission of producing citizen soldiers of discipline, integrity and honor. I firmly believe, as I would imagine most everyone else in the commonwealth that academic independence is critical to the functioning’s of an institution of higher learning to meet its stated mission. The past is the past but the reality is VMI is inherently good. It’s a beacon of values of a time gone by that our culture today indicts as out of style or old fashioned. The fact is, VMIs core principles are of chivalristic legend that identify with the greatest philosophies and cultures across the planet. A code of honor and duty that our world desperately needs now more than ever before. Like everyone, individuals sin. And VMI I’d wager more than most colleges takes every effort to police its own, but that does not detract from what makes VMI good. This level of accountability of yourself and others I learned at VMI has led me to an almost decade long career in law enforcement for the city of Charlottesville as a police officer and the Commonwealth with the Virginia State Police as a Trooper. No other college could ever understand this level of self accountability because it’s one VMI fostered for itself over its hundreds of years. VMI changed my life. VMI opened doors for me I never thought possible and taught me how to be a man of honor, civility, compassion and grit. Times will change, statues may come down, others will go up, but barracks is barracks and rats will all be rats. Rats, rats with ranks, rats with rings, rats with diplomas and rats with whatever career you have in service of the state and country. We are tied forever by brother rat spirit and we must all stand with VMI and never say die. With my upmost respects, please re consider this motion before your committee and the state assembly and let VMI continue to chart its own course in service to the Commonwealth. Michael Flury ‘17 RVM

I am writing to express my strong opposition to HB1374 which would place the Virginia Military Institute under the governance or oversight of another public educational institution. VMI occupies a unique and historic role within the Commonwealth. Its mission, leadership structure, and governing board were deliberately designed to support a rigorous military -styled lifestyle and educational system which helps to provide exceptional citizen-soldiers to both the Commonwealth and the nation as a whole. Altering that structure by subordinating VMI to another school would fundamentally change the character of the Institute and weaken the governance model that has guided it for more than 180 years. I respectfully urge you to oppose this legislation.

I’m a VMI Class of ‘81 graduate. VMI offers a very unique educational experience. It stands alone in the State of Virginia as the great States only Military school. In order to preserve the Institutes unique form of education, VMI must have its own oversight and leadership. The BOV must remain intact as it is. VMI has produced some of greatest leaders in the State and Country because of its unique system developing citizen soldiers. VA and the Country stand to loose one of greatest institutions ever created designed to build future leaders with integrity, honesty, discipline, and knowledge. Don’t screw it up, the State of VA and our Country need VMI.

I adamantly oppose HB1374. VMI has a unique education system that consistently produces quality young leaders that have strong personal honor, academic excellence, and discipline. These results cannot be administered from afar by another college board that has no idea what it takes to run such a challenging academic Institution. Please respect the integrity of VMI's mission.

I have read the other comments. I would like to add my observations with respect to national security which I do not believe has been addressed in the other comments. As a nation, we are confronted with threats from the likes of Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea. In the second world war, we faced threats from the Axis powers, including Germany and Japan. General George Marshall is generally credited with being the architect of victory in that conflict. Can VMI today produce leaders like General Marshall? Look no further than to General Dan Caine. General Caine as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff was the guiding force behind Operation Midnight Hammer which defanged the Iran nuclear threat. More recently he was the planner and coordinator for the removal of Maduro from Venezuela. I note that Delegate Feggans is a 20 year Air Force veteran. It would be foolhardy in the extreme to destroy an asset such as VMI which produces leaders like Generals Marshall and Caine. I do not understand why this is not apparent to Delegate Feggans. Most sincerely, Eldridge Blanton VMI '62

In 1999, I graduated from Stafford Senior High School, as the oldest of nine children and the son of a Cuban American woman who had left Castro's Cuba in 1966. My father, a now-retired Prince William County Police Officer, had enlisted in the Marine Corps for four years from 1976-1980. I wanted to go to school and neither had any experience with a four-year college. Moreover, my dad had told me I owed my country a debt for the freedoms we enjoyed. My mother's experience losing everything to Communism made me believe it. I knew three things when I graduated from high school: I wanted to go to college, I wanted to join the Marines, and VMI would help me do both. Fortunately, I was able to interview with Senator Charles Colgan, who was a firm supporter of the Institute, and he wrote me a letter of recommendation to VMI. Thanks to his recommendation, I was accepted and paid my first year through a state cadetship. Later I secured an NROTC scholarship for the Marine Corps. I can't speak to what others learned at VMI, but what I learned (quickly) was that VMI was fundamentally an egalitarian place. No one cared if you were rich, poor, white, black, Cuban, Thai, Filipino, Greek, Kenyan (I for one had a Filipino and Greek roommate and my Kenyan brother rat became a VMI Rhodes Scholar) because we all knew that at VMI if you worked hard, maintained your integrity, and were a good person, you would be treated fairly by the system and your classmates. VMI gave me a superb education, confidence, and discipline. It also taught me that once I was a VMI graduate, I would stand on the shoulders of giants and would owe it to those who went before me to serve and uphold the honor of the Institute. This sentiment I learned at VMI stayed with me. After graduating from VMI, I served 23 years in the Marine Corps (and counting), served in Iraq, graduated from the University of Georgia School of Law, and am currently barred as an attorney in Louisiana and Georgia. I could have never done this without God's grace and VMI. I do not vote in Virginia, but I must speak up to oppose this bill. VMI has earned the right by sweat of the cadets who are there now and the blood, sweat, tears, and treasure of its alumni to stand on equal footing with the other storied colleges and universities of the Commonwealth. Moreover, the people of Virginia deserve the continuation of this storied Institution. VMI is not a political football and the Virginia General Assembly should reject any approach to VMI that would cast it as anything but a jewel in the crown of the Commonwealth. Rather, Virginia legislators should see this bill as an opportunity to further serve the citizens of Virginia by renewing its commitment to staunch support of the one-of-a-kind military education that VMI offers and continue to invest in this bastion of higher education and noble human pursuits that has delivered the Commonwealth and the Country compounding returns for nearly two centuries.

We stand with VMI. VMI has a saying Don't Do Ordinary. That is exactly what my daughter wanted and search for. She is now a 4th Classman and thriving. VMI is a great asset to Virginia from the exceptional young men and women they produce. From living by the honor code and making each other accountable, to the high standard of education, makes these graduates highly sought after. Anyone who knows a VMI graduate speaks highly of these individuals. I would ask that you kill this bill. As parents we stand behind all of our daughters to prepare them for a successful life. The choice my daughter made to attend VMI could not have made us prouder. I would encourage anyone that supports this bill to really do research to see how VMI works. The different levels of support and resources available for my daughter from her Brother Rats to 1st Classman, Cadre, Cadet Equality Staff, faculty, administration, coaches, team mates, and even the local community is beyond precedence. My daughter throughout her years in school from K-12 faced different levels of sexism, racism, and bulling. She will unequivocally tell you that the support system at VMI is like no where else. Please keep funding and BOV in place with VMI.

I am writing in strong opposition to HB1374 and HB1377. VMI is a powerfully positive establishment for local, state, and national communities alike—transferring the governance to an entirely separation institution (one with a very different geography, history, and set of priorities) seems entirely nonsensical. There does not appear to be any positive benefit from a move like this. Instead, this feels like a veiled attempt to disestablish the Institute altogether, which would be a massive disservice to all those who benefit from: 1) the education the cadets receive; 2) the upstanding morals, behavior, and community engagement of those cadets (during their attendance and post-graduation); and 3) the mere existence of an establishment that preaches and upholds the values core to our State and our Nation. Please consider the multitude of comments in opposition to these moves, and recognize that there are certainly an order of magnitude more that cannot find or access this comment form, and kill these bills, especially the transfer of governance specified in HB1374.

To Whom This May Concern: I am writing to express my strong opposition to any proposal that would fundamentally alter the governance structure of the Virginia Military Institute. Such a change would undermine the Institute’s historic mission, its proven leadership model, and the traditions that have shaped generations of graduates. Efforts to reorganize VMI’s governance appear to be driven by misunderstanding, misplaced criticism, envy, spite, or motivations unrelated to the Institute’s actual performance and contributions. Rather than improving VMI, these proposals risk weakening an institution that has served the Commonwealth and the nation with distinction for more than a century and a half. VMI’s unique system—built on honor, discipline, and academic rigor—has produced leaders across military, public service, engineering, and countless other fields. Altering its governance in a way that disregards its history and purpose would be a disservice to current cadets, alumni, and the Commonwealth. I respectfully urge decision‑makers to respect the integrity of VMI’s mission and to reject any changes that would compromise the institution’s identity or effectiveness. Sincerely, John Paul Goode

I am not in favor of this bill we need to keep VMI as a state run school because the school teaches its cadets good values to live by.

1374 keep VMI the historical state college HB 333 do not reach the liberal viewpoint of Jan 6 Hb56 give funds for family members

I am writing to express my strong opposition to HB1374 and HB1377. These bills are clearly meant to attack one of the most unique and exceptional institutions in our nation. I am confident that VMI would prove its value and demonstrate recent improvements through the assessment proposed by HB1377, but find it an unnecessary distraction. In regards to HB1374, I find it absurd to strip a well-established and thriving institution of its BOV to be replaced by another institution’s BOV. Especially one which has minimal penetration or experience with a military ROTC program. If VSU BOV possesses perspectives and ideas that can benefit VMI, this should be engaged as a joint collaboration between boards, not as a government mandated takeover. In fact all Virginia public universities should be collaborating through the work of SCHEV as outlined in its intended purpose. (Virginia § 23.1-200) VMI consistently produces mature and well prepared men and women, many who go on to accomplish great things in service to their communities and their nation. This is done through a rigorous system that breaks students down to the same foundational level, regardless of gender, race, nationality, or whatever other identifier applies. From this foundation, cadets are built up into structured and disciplined individuals who respect authority, support each other well, and handle adversity with wisdom and self-control, something our world desperately needs more of right now. Cadets learn to value the most basic privileges as they are earned through time and opportunities to demonstrate excellence. From the first day at VMI, students are engaged in an intensive student leadership structure where cadets are given training and opportunity to teach, mentor, and lead other cadets, all under the guidance and oversight of staff leaders. VMI is a place where you will be corrected for disregarding rules, shirking responsibilities, and disrespecting others. Will there be mistakes along the way? Absolutely, as is true of any human being or human created organization. There are also clearly established resources to report wrongdoing and have issues addressed. Cadets learn through consistent and fairly applied consequences that inappropriate behavior is not tolerated. In recent years I have witnessed the VMI system in action through my involvement as the parent of a VMI cadet. I have seen a tight network of staff, alumni, parents, and cadets going above and beyond to support and encourage ALL of the student body. Students of all genders, races, and ethnicities are embraced into the “VMI family” and minority cadets are clearly leading their fellow cadets in official and unofficial ways, as can be witnessed by simply visiting VMI for a parade and seeing the diversity in the cadet leadership. The 2025 internal climate survey shows large gains in reform initiatives since the 2021 investigation that has been cited as an indicator of needed reform. To be specific 38 of the 42 recommendations stemming from the 2021 investigation have been completed. Why would our state choose to attack an organization with an outstanding mission and history of success as they are actively making impressive strides to grow and address concerns? VMI will not be a fit for everyone, but the students who accept the challenge, persevere, and graduate from VMI, enter the world drastically more prepared for any situation life may throw at them. I urge our state representatives to vote No to these bills.

I am writing in support of the Virginia Military Institute. I ask that you oppose HB 1374 and the dissolution of the VMI Board of Visitors. This change is simply not warranted. I am a 1975 graduate of VMI and live in Lexington, VA. As a volunteer, I interact with VMI Cadets and staff essentially on a weekly basis. I see no evidence to claims that the Board of Visitors are not properly carrying out their responsibilities as the oversight Board of VMI. Just the opposite….I routinely see first-hand the VMI Administration and the VMI Board of Visitors working as a team to accomplish noteworthy goals to the benefit of the Corps of Cadets and the Commonwealth. VMI is a very diverse group of young women and men. I remind you that our current Regimental Commander (highest rank within the Corps of Cadets) is an African-American. Our First Class (Senior) President is an African-American. Additionally, VMI’s “Three-Legged Stool Award” is a prestigious honor given annually to the top VMI cadet-athlete who best exemplifies excellence in academics, athletics, and military discipline. This award was presented to a female 4 of the last 5 years. At VMI, nothing is given…..everything is earned. VMI is arguably the most challenging university in the country. VMI emphasizes that success, privileges, and respect are secured through intense effort, sacrifice, and the challenging "Rat Line" experience. It reflects a culture where cadets must earn their place through discipline and merit. VMI is No Ordinary College. VMI continues to produce leaders and individuals whose lives reflect the integrity, fairness, and appreciation for the value of hard work that is instilled at the Institute. Some of our graduates who are currently leaders of our nation include General Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (the nation's highest ranking military officer), and Michael Waltz, the United States Ambassador to the United Nations. Additionally, during this current school year, and for the second year in a row, the VMI Cadet Ranger Challenge Team won the bronze medal at Exercise Cambrian Patrol (ECP), the British Army’s premier patrolling event held in the country of Wales which included competition from around the globe. The list goes on….. VMI remains committed to developing educated leaders based on the principles of Integrity, Honor, Responsibility, and Accountability. I believe VMI is doing an excellent job. I am confident in this statement because (as mentioned) I interact on a routine basis with the young women and men of the Corps of Cadets who are living examples of these Principles. VMI continues to instill in all graduates a life of responsibility in service to something greater than themselves. VMI is a treasure to be cherished by our Commonwealth and our Nation. In closing, I ask that you oppose HB 1374. Respectfully,

I am writing in unequivocal opposition to House Bill 1374. This bill is not reform—it is legislative overreach. Dissolving a duly established Board of Visitors and transferring governance authority to a state university system is a blatant consolidation of power that undermines institutional independence, sound governance, and public trust. Boards of Visitors exist precisely to prevent this kind of political interference. House Bill 1374 sends a clear message: if the General Assembly disapproves of a board’s decisions, it may simply abolish it. That precedent is dangerous, reckless, and fundamentally incompatible with responsible government. This legislation threatens donor confidence, destabilizes leadership, and erodes the academic independence that Virginia’s higher education system depends on. It replaces accountability with control and governance with coercion. The General Assembly should not be in the business of dissolving governing bodies to impose ideological or political outcomes. If this bill passes, no public institution in the Commonwealth will be insulated from similar retaliation. I strongly urge you to vote NO on House Bill 1374. Virginians expect their elected officials to protect institutional integrity—not weaken it through power grabs masquerading as reform. This bill should be rejected outright.

I am a graduate of the Virginia Military Institute and a retired United States Marine with twenty years of service. I strongly oppose House Bill 1374. Virginia Military Institute exists to produce leaders. Not only military leaders, but civic leaders who serve the Commonwealth and the nation across every profession. VMI graduates become officers, yes, but also lawyers, doctors, engineers, educators, business leaders, and elected officials. The common thread is leadership grounded in discipline, accountability, and service to something greater than oneself. That outcome is not accidental. It is the product of a distinct mission, culture, and governance model deliberately designed to develop leaders of character. Dissolving the VMI Board of Visitors and placing governance of the Institute under the Virginia State University Board of Visitors breaks that model. It separates leadership development from leadership accountability and places a military institute under a governance structure that was never designed to oversee one. VMI has produced leaders across the full civic spectrum. Alumni include figures such as Jonathan M. Daniels, who gave his life in service to civil rights in sacrifice of another, and even former Governor Ralph Northam. I do not agree with Governor Northam’s politics, worldview, or record, but even he is a product of the leadership discipline VMI instills. That is the point. VMI does not manufacture ideology. It produces leaders capable of assuming responsibility, regardless of where they ultimately land politically. HB 1374 misunderstands what makes VMI effective. Leadership development requires clarity of mission, unity of command, and governance that understands the demands placed on those being formed. Subordinating VMI to the governance of another university dilutes accountability, distracts oversight, and risks politicizing an institution whose purpose is leadership, not trend following. There are legitimate debates to be had about higher education in Virginia. This bill is not part of that solution. HB 1374 weakens a proven leadership institution by imposing a governance structure never designed for it. Help solve skyrocketing tuition rates, increased job creation in our local communities, and focus your anger on the affordability crisis you campaigned on, without squandering our taxes. We are all behind those objectives. I urge the House Education Committee to reject HB 1374 and preserve the independent governance that allows the Virginia Military Institute to continue producing leaders for the Commonwealth and the nation.

I have downloaded and read HB1374 and am sharing my thoughts on VMI and the bill in the attached letter. Thank you for your time and consideration.

I am writing not only as a Virginia citizen, but as a parent. My son is currently a 2nd Class cadet at the Virginia Military Institute, and I strongly oppose House Bill 1374, which would dissolve VMI’s Board of Visitors and transfer its governance to Virginia State University. My son worked incredibly hard to earn his place at VMI. Like every cadet, he has endured the rigors of the Rat Line, met demanding academic and physical standards, and committed himself to a system built on discipline, accountability, and honor. VMI is not simply a college, it is a place that intentionally develops leaders of strong moral character, respect, and service. I have seen that transformation firsthand in my own child as well as so many others. VMI commissions many officers into the United States military and has done so for generations. Its mission, traditions, and governance structure exist for a reason. The Board of Visitors is essential to preserving the unique military framework that prepares cadets for leadership in both military and civilian life. Dissolving that board threatens the very foundation that makes VMI effective and respected. Transferring governance to Virginia State University ignores the fundamental differences between the two institutions. Each serves an important but distinct role within the Commonwealth. Combining governance does not promote improvement, it risks undermining VMI’s mission, disrupting cadet life, and politicizing an institution that should remain focused on leadership development and service to the nation. This bill also sends a troubling message to cadets and families who have invested so much in VMI. It suggests that the hard work, sacrifice, and commitment of these young men and women can be disregarded through legislative overreach rather than addressed through thoughtful, constructive reform. As a parent, I want my son (and every cadet) to graduate from an institution that is stable, respected, and allowed to uphold its mission. I respectfully urge you to oppose House Bill 1374 and to protect the independence, history, and purpose of the Virginia Military Institute.

I oppose this bill proposing the removal of the VMI Board of Visitors and placing governance of VMI under the Virginia State University Board of Visitors. I feel that VMI has the right to its own Board of Visitors. VMI is a unique school. My father (class of '44) was grateful for VMI. He felt that VMI made him the man he became. My father and all of his classmates were sent to the Pacific at the end of their second-class year, in 1943. They were willing, as reserve soldiers, to fight for their country. Many never came home. My father loved this school so much that he endowed an athletic scholarship with a $100,000 life insurance policy. Can we please continue to have a school that produces the likes of George C. Marshall and Daniel Caine along with alumni (such as my own father) who feel that VMI made them better and stronger. VMI has a place as a public Virginia school. Please stop treating VMI it like an ugly stepchild!

I respectfully urge the House Education Committee to dismiss House Bill 1374, which calls for the dissolution of the Virginia Military Institute Board of Visitors and transfers governance of VMI to the Virginia State University Board of Visitors. VMI is a unique public institution with a distinct mission, structure, and culture rooted in nearly two centuries of service to the Commonwealth and the nation. Its governance model is specifically designed to support its military, academic, and leadership development mission. Eliminating VMI’s independent Board of Visitors would undermine the Institute’s ability to effectively oversee its operations, preserve its standards, and fulfill its statutory purpose. While both VMI and Virginia State University are valued public institutions, they serve fundamentally different missions and student populations. Consolidating governance would not enhance accountability or effectiveness; rather, it would create unnecessary complexity, dilute institutional focus, and set a concerning precedent for state interference in the governance of Virginia’s public higher education institutions. VMI has demonstrated its capacity to evolve responsibly while remaining anchored in its core values of honor, leadership, and integrity. Continued independent governance, paired with appropriate legislative oversight, is the most effective way to ensure the Institute’s long-term success and service to the Commonwealth. For these reasons, I strongly encourage the Committee to dismiss House Bill 1374.

The board of visitors is doing a fine job and no state intervention is required. Been affiliated with VMI for over 30 years. The Institute does not need your help.

I am writing to ask you to fight for the VMI family, and families around our commonwealth, families from all areas of the United States and from other countries as well who have a son(s) or daughter(s) who has been positively impacted by this expectational school. VMI is a cadet run institution; which includes the Alumni, and that the power should remain with VMI Alumni instead of a school without any affiliation or experience to VMI. VMI is a wonderful tool used to grow extraordinary men and women who graduate and serve in our world with honor and training and resolve that is unmatched. Our son is a 1st (senior) at VMI. He visited several colleges after high school and when he stepped on "post" (campus) he said, it felt like home and he was drawn to the brother/sisterhood that VMI is proud to be known for. He has strived personally to keep a 4.0 despite the rigors of the military aspect and being a part (co-captain) of the boxing team as well as many other responsibilities he has gained due to rank promotions and other VMI tradition responsibilities. He entered the rat line in 2022 as a boy and will graduate this Spring with honors as a responsible young man who has grown in character, discipline, brotherhood, ability to overcome many hardships, integrity, upholding honor for himself and sharing it with his brother/sister rats all 4 years. The beautiful diversity of cadets coming in is seen yet unified as all are treated as one corps, one family, to be treated equally, and grow each cadet with an honor code and traditions that is a testimony to the past alumni who have gone before. This school, it's traditions, the VMI family bonds, the HARD that anyone who enters the rat line CHOOSES for themselves(no one is forced to attend), grows each cadet male and female and I cannot be more proud of the young man our son has become. God used the discipline and hardships and unity in the corps along with the citizen soldier training and exceptional academics, and honor code, the whole unordinary VMI experience that WE CHOSE, that my son sought after and thrived in, made him the exceptional, thoughtful, respectful, independant, well rounded, man of dedication and character that he is today. VMI has: 1. Equal standards are equity VMI’s strength is that every cadet is held to the same expectations. That model produces discipline, leadership, and resilience — regardless of background. Lowering or altering standards doesn’t create equity. It creates different outcomes. 2. VMI is a choice No one is assigned to VMI. Students choose it fully informed of the rigor. Equity includes respecting student choice — including choosing a demanding, military-style education. 3. Proven results for the Commonwealth VMI consistently produces military officers, engineers, business leaders, public servants, and educators who serve Virginia and the nation. If the goal is opportunity and impact, VMI is already succeeding. PLease rally with us, the VMI family, past, present and future to keep this school what it is and what is has been without changing it to appease lesser goals that others can find at other institutions of their choosing. No one is forced to attend VMI, we want it to remain an option for those young men and women who want the HARD, mixed with the beauty of family building each other to overcome more than they ever imagined they could with resilience, who thrive in the hard, are set apart for more than an ordinary college experience.

I respectfully and strongly oppose HB1374. My son is currently class of 2027 and shares our belief that Virginia Military Institute is a great institution. He was drawn to the academic and physical rigor which VMI requires. VMI successfully provides the environment for cadets to strengthen and develop. I view HB1374 as an effort to interfere and harm VMI and thus respectfully and strongly oppose HB1374.

As a proud alumnus of the Virginia Military Institute, I strongly oppose House Bill 1374. This proposal undermines the autonomy, mission, and long-standing governance structure of the Commonwealth’s most distinctive public institution. VMI’s Board of Visitors exists to provide focused oversight that understands and protects the Institute’s unique military system, honor code, and leadership-based educational model. Placing VMI under the governance of another university’s board—one with a fundamentally different mission and culture—would erode the specialized stewardship required to maintain what makes VMI effective and exceptional. This bill is not about improving governance or accountability; it is about dismantling institutional independence without evidence that such a drastic measure is warranted. VMI has mechanisms for oversight, reform, and transparency, and those should be strengthened where needed—not replaced by a governance structure ill-suited to the Institute’s purpose. Singling out VMI for first a funding review followed by dissolution of it's BOV raises concerns about fairness and politicization rather than sound oversight, especially when comparable institutions are not subject to the same scrutiny. I find it disturbing someone thinks VSU's BOV could hold a candle to VMI's alum-heavy BOV when governing the Institute. As an alumnus, I believe the strength of VMI lies in its clarity of mission and dedicated governance. House Bills 1374 & 1377 threaten both. I urge lawmakers to reject this legislation and preserve VMI’s independent Board of Visitors so the Institute can continue producing leaders who serve Virginia and the United States with honor.

I am writing to respectfully oppose HB1374. As a VMI Class of 2023 alum and citizen of Virginia, I am deeply concerned with the idea of transferring governance of VMI to being under VSU. VMI is a historical institution that has provided our nation with some of the best leaders in the military, public, and private sectors. VMI is a unique institution designed to provide more than higher education, but to breed the next generation of leaders. VMI needs to remain independent in order to continue its mission to build leaders that our state, nation, and world need. VSU does not understand what VMI is or what it provides to our state. VMI needs to be governed by a body that understands and wholeheartedly supports VMI's mission to produce leaders. VSU does not understand the VMI Corps of Cadets, the VMI Honor Code or any of the other core aspects that make VMI unique. With VMI falling under the supervision of VSU, everything unique about VMI would disappear. It would turn into another "higher education" institution that provides little more than a bachelor's degree. VMI provides its cadets with the resources to succeed no matter what path they choose. VMI will do its best at continuing its mission when it is governed by its own alumni and given the proper support it needs from Virginia's elected officials. Virginia is lucky to have a historic institution that is producing leaders within its borders. Virginia is lucky to be home to a school willing to challenge its students and provide them with adversity to make them stronger and better prepared to lead our state and nation. Virginia should continue to offer its support to VMI so that our commonwealth can continue to reap the benefits of VMI and what it provides. Future generations do not deserve to be robbed of the benefits, education, and camaraderie that VMI provides to its cadets, alumni, and their families.

Comments Document

Opposition to HB1374 **To the Members of the Virginia House of Delegates:** I write as a proud member of a generational VMI family to express my strong opposition to HB1374. My father (1988), my older brother (2018), myself (2019), and my younger brother (2022) have all graduated from VMI. All four of us are serving or have served as commissioned officers in the United States Marine Corps and Navy. Our family's experience demonstrates VMI's consistent ability to produce leaders of character who serve our nation with distinction. **VMI's Board of Visitors Must Remain Independent** The fundamental flaw in HB1374 is its potential to undermine VMI's independent governance. VMI is no ordinary college—it is a specialized military institution rooted in deep understanding of its unique mission: "to produce educated, honorable men and women, prepared for the varied work of civil life... and ready as citizen-soldiers to defend their country in time of national peril." Any attempt to place VMI's governance under another institution's oversight, particularly one not sharing VMI's military mission or culture, misunderstands what makes the Institute successful. The current Board of Visitors has overseen remarkable achievements. According to VMI's Office of Institutional Effectiveness (Summer 2025): - 76% six-year graduation rate, consistently outperforming peer institutions - 81% first-year retention rate, exceeding the 80% target - 50.5% commissioning rate (Class of 2025) **The Risk of HB1374** This bill creates unnecessary uncertainty that will undermine cadet morale and damage the alumni network that is fundamental to VMI's success. VMI's alumni association provides more than 30% of the Institute's operating budget through private donations, directly reducing taxpayer burden. More importantly, alumni provide scholarships and career opportunities that transform cadets' lives. I personally received alumni-funded scholarships to play soccer and study chemistry— forever grateful for their contributions and support. This network also opens doors for recent graduates that would otherwise remain closed. Undermining VMI's independent governance by questioning the Institute's future will erode alumni confidence and threaten this irreplaceable support system. If Virginia's General Assembly believes systemic issues exist in state higher education, why target VMI—a small, exceptionally successful institution with unparalleled alumni support—rather than examining the entire system? **Conclusion** My family's generations of service represent what VMI provides to Virginia and America. VMI's current Board of Visitors has overseen consistent success. There is no evidence supporting the need for HB1374's proposed task force. I strongly urge you to reject HB1374 and reaffirm Virginia's commitment to VMI's independent governance. Respectfully, Cecilia Keppeler Lieutenant, United States Navy VMI Class of 2019

Please oppose proposed Bill HB1374. I am the Grandmother of a VMI graduate. I know firsthand what my Grandson learned and experienced at VMI and how it helped shape the man he is today. It also helped him see the value of working as a team and, as a result, he formed lifelong friendships. The values and integrity of my Grandson and his classmates are a testament to the quality of school VMI is. Why would you want to change a school that produces upstanding citizens?

I am writing as a concerned Virginia resident and a current Halifax County District 1 School Board Representative; to express my strong opposition to House Bill 1374. This issue is deeply personal to my family. My husband is a proud graduate of the Virginia Military Institute, Class of 2002, and my son is currently a third-year cadet at VMI. Our family has witnessed firsthand the positive impact that VMI’s mission, traditions, and leadership training have had on young men and women preparing to serve our Commonwealth and our nation. House Bill 1374 threatens to alter the structure and spirit of an institution that has produced generations of disciplined, honorable, and service-minded leaders. I believe this bill risks undermining the very foundation that makes VMI unique and successful. I respectfully urge you to oppose House Bill 1374 and to stand with the many Virginia families, alumni, and cadets who care deeply about preserving VMI’s legacy and mission. Thank you for your time, your service, and your consideration of my concerns. I would appreciate knowing your position on this matter. Sincerely, Stacy Runion

SUBMISSION: In Opposition to 1374 – Protecting the VMI Leadership Model My name is Jackson Castleberry (VMI Class of 2002), and I submit these comments as a proud Virginian, a former U.S. Navy Intelligence Officer, and a business leader with 15 years of experience at Google. Throughout my career—from the high-stakes environment of military intelligence to the complex platform architecture of global technology—I have learned a fundamental truth: Organizations behave exactly as they are designed. I am writing to express my deep concern regarding the current proposals for the Virginia Military Institute and what could jeopardize an outstanding institution and dilute the contributions to society. VMI is one of the last institutions in America maintaining a single-sanction honor code without "severity clauses." This creates a culture of absolute accountability. At a time when public trust in leadership is at a nadir, VMI’s design produces graduates of the highest character precisely because the standard is uncompromising. VMI is consistently ranked among the top schools in the nation because its model works. It produces a disproportionate number of leaders for the U.S. Military, the Commonwealth’s government, and the global business community. To dismantle this model is to surrender Virginia’s competitive advantage in leadership development. VMI is not a relic; it is a functional, high-output engine for civic and military virtue. In an era where "core values" are often just slogans, VMI delivers them as a tangible product. I urge the subcommittee to reject any proposal that compromises the governance & unique rigors of the Institute. We do not need fewer VMI graduates in the world; we need more. Protect the design & governance structure that produces the leaders our Commonwealth and country desperately require.

Please allow me to introduce myself, I'm Joe Brown. I matriculated from Tennessee and now live in Chattanooga. I am a graduate of VMI, and entered with the Class of 1977. I stepped away from VMI after my sophomore year at VMI, and attended the University of Tennessee for 1 year. The upstanding Volunteer nation accepted me with open arms and I made some really long lasting friends. However, after my 1 year at UT, I realized that my personality and inner-self would best be served through the VMI experience. Thus, I reapplied to VMI, and the Institute was most forgiving and allowed my return. I dare say, I don't know if the Institute was in any better shape upon my return, but I was most fortunate to make the return. There is a saying, "You don't know what you don't know". Unless you have been nurtured by VMI, endured VMI, and lived VMI, you have no idea of VMI's life long positive intriguing affects it instills on the Cadet and hopefully a fortuitous Graduate. For well over a century the Commonwealth of Virginia and the United States have greatly benefited from the epic mission of Citizen/Soldiers trained and educated by the Virginia Military Institute . VMI has provided very dedicated and successful military leaders and civilian leaders in a an array of professions. VMI remains an Institution of very high standards, built upon VMI's three foundation pillars, Honor, Truth and Duty. VMI trains and molds Cadets through a very challenging academic and physical experience that instills a mindset of perseverance, no matter the severity of condition(s) facing each Cadet. Compared to all the other Virginia colleges and universities, the underlying enormous success of the "VMI experience", is the Class Structure within the Corps of Cadets. The close living quarters in Barracks, with sparse conditions and strict rules, they foster comradery among the 4 different cadet classes; freshman year [Rat/4th Class]; sophomore year [3rd Class]; junior year {2nd Class}; senior year {1st Class}. The 1st Class is the all important class that takes responsibility by leading the entire Corps. The 1st Class takes on the ultimate role of mentoring and nurturing the entire Corps to uphold all the Institute's numerous valuable traditions and implementing possible changes are best for the Institute's future. For over a century the Corps of Cadets has maintained the resolve to assure that the Institute traditions remain into the next century supported by VMI's foundation of Honor, Truth and Duty. All this said, the Board of Visitors (BOV) is a most important aspect of the Institute's direction and administrative protocol. VMI is absolutely nothing like any other Virginia civilian college or university. The Virginia civilian college/university missions, living conditions, training routines and class structures are very unique and very different compared to that of VMI. VMI needs the special and intricate administrative protocol it maintains from the unique appointments (VMI graduates) and Institute knowledge of the appointed Board of Visitors. Please keep the Board of Visitors structure intact at VMI. With much sincerity and thank you, Joe Brown '77 joebrown321@gmail.com

I strongly oppose the dissolution of the VMI Board of Visitors and replacing the governance of VMI under the Virginia State University Board of Visitors.

I am writing to respectfully oppose the proposed bill (HB1374) that, if passed, would repeal the statutory Board of Visitors of the Virginia Military Institute (VMI) and transfer governance of VMI to the Board of Visitors of Virginia State University. Throughout 186 years, VMI has demonstrated a proven ability to provide graduates of honor and distinction to serve the Commonwealth and the country. The contributions that their graduates make to society far outweighs the enrollment size and the limited public funds allocated to VMI. As recent examples, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the US Ambassador to the United Nations and the Governor of Virginia from 2018-2022 were all VMI graduates. Each of them stated that their VMI experience played a major role in their success. As one of the elite state-supported colleges and universities in Virginia (UVA, William & Mary and Virginia Tech are the others), it has been consistent in providing a quality education conducted in a military environment. Over the 186 years, VMI has continued to adjust its academics and policies to meet the requirements of a changing world. However, throughout this process, they have maintained the high standards of honor, discipline, rigorous military structure, respect for others and service to the Commonwealth and the Country. One of the ways that VMI has continued to succeed is because it has maintained a strong and effective Board of Visitors. The Board has always consisted of moral, successful leaders who had proven themselves in their professions, whether it be military officers, corporate executives, business owners, educators, engineers, doctors or persons in political service. As an example, the Governor of Virginia from 2018-2022, Ralph Northam, is a member of the VMI Board of Visitors. VMI is known worldwide as an educational institution that provides outstanding graduates who make positive contributions to society. It is critical that VMI keeps its Board of Visitors to ensure future successes.

HB1374 is so ridiculous, it stands as proof that the democrat party in todays form, is not credible and can not be trusted to lead our beloved commonwealth which I have lived in for all of my 55 years. Common sense and a non political view is all that an adult should need to see that VMI stands out as model of what a real formal education can be. Certainly it should be about a lot more than outcome based education. Millions of our students and young adults can’t find a job now because the college they attended only yielded a worthless generic degree and a mountain of debt. If you want help VSU, look into how VMI operates every day. Based on honor, personal accountability and what I believe to be the best return on investment Virginians could ask for. The most recent data shows job placement out of VMI to be higher than VSU, and the average salary for these jobs to be double that of VSU. I am a very proud professional firefighter with 28 years of service to others in my home town. But I was much more proud to see my only son take on the VMI experience and emerge with a meaningful education, work ethic and a skill set sought after by every organization. I had to refinance my home to send him there, but I still consider it the best money I ever spent.

My name is Michael Keenan Entsminger of Midlothian, Virginia. I am a career educator in the Commonwealth of Virginia, a National Board Certified Teacher, and a 2002 graduate of the Virginia Military Institute. I am deeply concerned with both HB 1374 and HB 1377, as both bills threaten to dismantle one of the most distinguished military colleges in the nation. I was born and raised in Clifton Forge, Virginia (just 30 miles from Lexington). When I was a rising senior at Alleghany High School, I knew that VMI was the right fit for me because it would provide me with the opportunity to receive an excellent education with an immersed military experience that demanded honor, integrity, and discipline. My time at VMI was both challenging and rewarding. It was one of the best decisions that I have made in my life. I started teaching upon graduation in 2002 and completed a master’s degree while teaching full-time. My experience inside and outside of the classroom at VMI inspired me to become an educator, attend graduate school, and to carry out the mission of VMI. I have been teaching for twenty-four years and I feel that I have a very unique perspective. I have primarily taught at the secondary high school level throughout my career and I have lost count of how many of my students have gone on to attend and graduate from VMI. These young men and women have gone on to achieve greatness in the military, public, and private sectors. Anytime I have had a student inquire about attending VMI, I explain the challenges that they will face but I also inform them of how much VMI graduates give back to their communities. The young men and women that are graduating from VMI give me hope for the future. These young graduates are leading the next generation from the shoulders. These young leaders are not clutching to VMI’s role in the Civil War. As a social studies teacher, I understand the history of VMI better than most. Yes, many VMI graduates fought for the Confederacy in the American Civil War. The same can be said for West Point and other military colleges that existed in the 1860s. The claim that VMI and its graduates are promoting a “Lost Cause” ideology to prospective cadets is not accurate. Similarly, the proposal that another college’s board of visitors should control decisions and governance at VMI could be detrimental to the future growth and development of these young citizen soldiers. I cannot imagine a scenario where VMI graduates would propose that West Point be investigated and defunded by the federal government. Nor could I ever imagine a scenario where a VMI graduate would propose that the VMI Board of Visitors should take control of any other state supported college in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Politicians on both sides of the aisle in the General Assembly must understand that VMI is one of the last institutions in the country that offers a unique military education; one that embraces honor, integrity, and discipline. VMI cannot change its history but it most certainly has made impressive strides to become a more inclusive institution in my lifetime. Young men and women in the Commonwealth deserve the opportunities that VMI has to offer and to take a road less traveled in higher education. Respectfully, M. Keenan Entsminger (NBCT) Virginia Military Institute Class of 2002

  I do not understand any logic or reason for this bill.  Every college in the Commonwealth has its own Board of Visitors.  The programs at VSU and VMI are completely different.  Attending VMI is not an "ordinary" education.  Every student (cadet) must meet physical standards, must wear uniforms, march in parades, etc.  In addition, VMI has an Honor Code that has one sanction -- dismissal from VMI.  Cadets do not tolerate anyone who violates the Honor Code.  It is not for everyone.  How can the Board of Visitors at VSU "govern" VMI when the programs are completely different? The only reason I can think why HB1374 was created is the fact that the VMI Board of Visitors did not renew MG Wins' contract, mostly over DEI issues.  I was very impressed by MG Wins and many of the actions he took at VMI.   Please do not punish VMI for the action of the Board of Visitors.  Already, the Governor, I believe, has resolved that issue with a new Board of Visitors. I am a graduate of both VMI and UVA (Master and PhD from the School of Engineering and Science). In fact, this is very similar to the situation at the UVA.  The UVA Board of Visitors, like with VMI's Board, had President Jim Ryan resign, mostly over DEI.  The big difference was the MG Wins contract was about to expire while President Ryan was still on his contract as President.  If VMI goes under VSU because theVMI Board of Visitors "cannot govern" (according to this bill's patron) and the situation at UVA is identical, why does UVA continues to have its own Board of Visitors and not fall under Virginia Tech or some other Commonwealth college? This bill has NOTHING to improve the educational experience of VMI cadet. It is all about politics. This bill should be killed and all the members of the General Assembly go to VMI and see for themselves the VMI system. Everyone in the General Assembly should watch this YouTube done by a VMI graduate (who is not White). Take the 20 minutes out and listen -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iidy4GoYP3I. Hopefully you see the similarities between VMI and UVA and how the leaders of those institutes were forced to leave their posts.  In addition, as mentioned before, VSU has a completely different educational system. Please treat all the colleges in the Commonwealth fairly and vote against HR174.  This bill appears to be a political attack rather than a decision based on educational or success of its educational philosophy.

I am a graduate of the VMI class of 1977. I served in the Army ROTC unit and commandants staff at VMI from 1983 until 1986. I was on the VMI adjunct faculty from 2015 until 2025. I know VMI as a former cadet, alumni, and faculty member. I cannot think of any reason why placing VMI governance under any other body would be a good idea. What good leadership or management principle is being served by stripping governance from a board that has guided VMI in producing uncounted leaders and servants to the commonwealth and nation for over 100 years and assigning it to another body that has no clue of the principles and elements that has created that success? A move such as this reeks of malfeasances. There better ways to destroy VMI if that is the purpose of this bill.

I oppose HB1374. I'm a lifelong Virginian and a proud graduate of VMI Class of 1980. Transferring governance from the current VMI BOV to the BOV of Virginia State University does not make sense and would be detrimental to both schools. It would distract the Board of VSU from its main, purposeful focus and would be unfair to have a VMI managed by a totally new group without any carryover experience. The current VMI BOV members have all been selected by the Governor of Virginia and been approved by Virginia Legislature. Virginians are overwhelmingly proud of VMI and its unique purpose and achievements.

I am writing as a parent of a cadet at Virginia Military Institute and a lifelong resident of Virginia. I am opposed to bill HB1377 and HB1374 and respectfully ask that you reject both of these proposals. Under the leadership of Superintendent Maj. Gen. Wins and now, Lt. Gen. Furness, VMI has worked hard to reform policies and assuredly address concerns of racism and sexism. The Institute has modified practices and ended traditions that were inappropriate and at odds with a modern and diverse world-class military institute. Those efforts are not only to satisfy the General Assembly, but to assure that VMI remains an outstanding military college with a wonderfully diverse corps of young men and women. Our son chose VMI for its esteemed Civil Engineering program and for his interest in military history. We toured the college and were greatly impressed by everything about VMI. As a family, we prayerfully considered other offers our son received from colleges across Virginia. But VMI won our hearts. There was simply no comparison among other schools. VMI is a standout and irreplaceable institution. There is an uncommon bond and camaraderie among cadets that cannot be manufactured or found on a more typical college campus. We've witnessed it during our visits to Post, and in spending time with our cadet and his Brother Rats. As did our son, each student accepted the extraordinary challenge of joining the rat line. This diverse group of young men and women trained and pressed on through grueling physical and mental challenges. Through this training, cadets form unbreakable bonds and become One Corps. Those bonds continue long after graduation and are the roots of lifelong friendship. Those bonds form the network of support for which VMI alumni are renowned. Time and history have shown that the practices and techniques VMI utilizes are proven to develop great character and discipline. Cadets become distinguished and exemplary soldiers and leaders in military and civil service. It would be a travesty to undermine and unravel its programs and cadet training by defunding it or placing it under the governance of any other college. I hope you value VMI's remarkable, and steady contribution to military and civil service and leadership in our nation. I am shocked by this proposal, My family is praying you will do what's right and acknowledge the undeniable strengths and uniqueness of VMI. This Institute has stellar faculty, staff, and volunteers across Post and the Lexington community. Lexington churches and businesses partner with VMI and serve cadets and families in countless ways. A hit to VMI is a hit to the people of the Lexington community and Rockbridge County who love and help take care of our cadets. They welcome us like family when we visit. Please, do not do this and inflict such a careless blow to the VMI community. Work with VMI's amazing leadership and staff, who work tirelessly in service to cadets and families. Please reject HB1377 and HB1374 Respectfully submitted, CP

I am opposed to placing the governance of the Virginia Military Institute under the board of Virginia State University. Such an action would jeopardize the unique and enduring missions of both institutions and weaken the focus of their respective oversight bodies. Both have deep and proud roots in the Commonwealth, and both demand the focused attention of the dedicated men and women appointed to their boards. Virginia has been a national and international leader in education since colonial times. Over the centuries, it has developed a range of educational institutions that offer different kinds of experiences to different kinds of students. Both VMI and VSU have provided hundreds of military officers to serve the United States, and both institutions should be permitted to continue that service to the nation through their distinctive, different ways. I am a 1973 VMI graduate who served 27 years in the US Army, working with or serving under officers from all sources of commissioning. Some were Virginia State University graduates, and they were easily the equal or better of any other officer. Doing anything like this bill proposes would diminish VSU’s ability to attract, retain, and graduate such men and women. I hope you will reconsider this bill and decide it does not advance the educational needs of Virginians or of the country as a whole. Michael Burke Lieutenant Colonel, US Army, retired

Madam Governor, Please let it be known that your attempt to devalue the Virginia Military Institute, it's current cadets and alumni and the overall experience that VMI provides, is not something that serves Virginians or Americans across our great country. As a VMI graduate and member of the class of 1981, I implore you to take a closer look at the the VMI experience and the excellent option it provides students who may be looking for something more than just a academic diploma. The challenge that the VMI experience provides is simply different than that of other regional universities. Shouldn't Virginia offer your constituants a diverse set of options for growth and development; or should every educational option in Virginia be watered down to look exactly the same? Virginians deserve more. Virginians and Americans across this great country deserve something better. Give VMI the support that it needs to continue it's proud tradition of creating and shaping American leadership across Virginia and the world. Best regards, John L. Reed

I strongly oppose House Bill 1374. The Virginia Military Institute is one of the greatest schools in Virginia and its graduates are viewed in that eye across the state. While we recognize there is room for improvement, dissolving the Board of Visitors is only going to weaken VMI's position to improve itself. I can say with firsthand knowledge as a 2002 graduate of VMI and the father of a current third classmen, VMI is not the same school it was 25 years ago. It is a positive atmosphere that teaches values that are largely lacking in today's society. Moving forward with the provisions of House Bill 1374 would be a mistake for Virginia and its citizens.

I respectfully ask that you oppose this bill. As an alumnus of VMI this bill will fundamentally change the culture at the school. The mission of VMI is to provide the citizens of this state and nation with honorable and service driven men and women. Please oppose this bill.

I strongly oppose House Bill 1374 and urge the House Education Committee to reject this proposal. HB 1374 would fundamentally alter the governance of the Virginia Military Institute in a manner that is unnecessary, disruptive, and harmful to its mission. VMI’s distinctive role in preparing graduates for both military service and civilian leadership requires governance that is fully aligned with that dual purpose. VMI is not a conventional public university. Its military system, honor code, and residential leadership model are designed to develop leaders of character—individuals prepared to assume responsibility in the armed forces, in government, in industry, and in their communities. The Board of Visitors provides mission-aligned oversight that understands this balance and ensures that academic rigor, leadership development, and ethical formation remain fully integrated. VMI’s effectiveness in producing honorable military officers and capable civilian leaders is directly tied to its governance structure. Transferring authority to an external board with a different institutional mission risks diluting accountability and weakening the clarity of purpose that has defined VMI’s success for generations. Effective governance depends on mission alignment, especially for an institution charged with preparing leaders for positions of profound responsibility. Concerns regarding campus culture or conduct should be addressed through leadership, oversight, and continuous improvement—not by dismantling a governance model that has enabled VMI to serve Virginia and the nation so effectively. The Superintendent and Board have clearly stated that harassment and uncivil behavior are incompatible with VMI’s values and will not be tolerated. As a VMI graduate, I have seen firsthand how this governance structure supports the Institute’s mission. The leadership system overseen by the Board prepared me for service as a naval officer and for leadership roles in civilian industry and academia. That consistency of mission—from cadet life to professional service—is not accidental; it is the result of focused, mission-aligned oversight. VMI graduates have long served the Commonwealth with distinction—on the battlefield, in public office, in engineering and industry, in education, and in local communities. Preserving a governance structure that understands and protects this mission is essential. I respectfully urge the committee to oppose HB 1374 and allow VMI to continue fulfilling its vital role in forming leaders of honor for both military and civilian service.

I’m writing to respectfully ask that you vote no on the proposed House bill HB1374. Here’s why Virginia Military Institute is special to us: We followed our nephew, Cole, throughout his four years at VMI, which included his first year in 2020—the “COVID” year. I would spend countless hours browsing the VMI Flickr page to catch a glimpse of him on the Rat Line and learned what being a VMI Cadet involved. We cheered him from the sidelines at the parade field and baseball field. The stories he shared about his time there, though tough, were also quite funny. He and his fellow cadets and teammates genuinely formed a remarkable bond. In fact, his upcoming wedding party is mostly made up of VMI alumni. The pride I felt watching him grow over those four years was truly overwhelming. He NEEDED VMI—the structure, the brotherhood, the discipline, and everything VMI offered. When Cole committed to VMI, our son Gabe dismissed any notion of following in his cousin’s footsteps. Gabe, an only child, has always looked up to Cole, who acts more like a big brother. A type 1 diabetic since age nine, Gabe understood that the military guidelines at VMI would prevent his acceptance. In the summer before his senior year, VMI baseball reached out to Gabe and arranged a visit. He knew VMI was his first choice, but it was a process to get admitted and prove he could handle it physically. Months later, thanks to efforts from Cole, VMI baseball, Gabe’s doctor, the post infirmary, and the VMI Commandant’s and Superintendent’s support, Gabe received the call that he was admitted and offered an athletic scholarship. VMI wasn’t required to put in such efforts to admit the first Type 1 diabetic, but they did. The environment at VMI is tough, demanding, and challenging, but he welcomes every adversity to demonstrate his strength and resilience. Gabe has always thrived in disciplined environments. He chose VMI because of its discipline and core values. I believe he wouldn’t be as successful at any other school. Gabe completed the Rat Line just a few days ago and celebrated this achievement with his brother Rats and upperclassmen cadets. He is also doing very well academically, finishing his first semester — arguably the most difficult — with a 3.35 GPA. The discipline, work ethic, and integrity instilled in cadets are unique to those who choose the extraordinary path of studying at VMI, and the characteristics fostered at VMI produce outstanding citizens not found in typical colleges. Those unfamiliar with VMI might not recognize the value. When visiting Post, you will see the camaraderie among cadets, be greeted by respectful, polite young men and women, and witness the impressive discipline and hard work the corps puts in every day. There are many more stories from others that VMI has benefited, affected, trained, taught, and ultimately guided to become service-minded, respectful, resilient, and respected individuals. Like so many others, we are a proud VMI family. Please don’t deny my son the opportunity to wear his cousin’s #9 jersey and proudly be called a VMI alumnus.

in regards to HB1374, the Board of Visitors for VMI was established in 1839 and has provided guidance and governance successfully since that time. It makes zero since to have this Governance of one of eight senior military colleges in the United States to a HBCU that knows nothing about military Institutes or running one. Over 50% of these young men and women commission every year into the armed forces. leave the governance of this institution to the Board that has successfully operated since 1839. thank you.

Please oppose HB 1374 in its proposed format. As the parent of a 3rd class cadet at VMI, we will be negatively impacted by this proposal in its current format. I am concerned specifically with regards to the strike-through of Virginia Military Institute in § 23.1-907 paragraph J, &, most importantly, the amendments of Chapter 27, Articles 1 & 2, & all paragraphs contained therein. This proposal is detrimental to the needs & missions of both Virginia State University (VSU) & Virginia Military Institute (VMI). Out of 39 public universities and colleges in the Commonwealth, only VMI is being identified as having its governing board dissolved, & this bill provides no explanation, motivation, or justification for this. Further, it is being proposed that the governing board of VSU, a college that is over two and a half hours away from VMI, and with wholly different vision & mission is to assume governance of the Institute, again, with no explanation, motivation, or justification given. This proposal is not only deleterious to VMI, but is perhaps even more deleterious to VSU. The University is a historically black university, the first of its kind to be fully publicly funded by the Commonwealth. VSU has a unique mission & is a jewel in the crown of the Commonwealth's higher educational system. The Institute is one of only six federally recognized senior military colleges in the nation. VMI, too, has a unique mission and is also a jewel in the crown of the Commonwealth's higher educational system. While these two universities may have some overlap in their missions, their unique characters require entirely different visions. Both universities will suffer by having VSU's Board govern both. Many are the challenges that face higher education, & for the health and success of an institution, it is imperative that the members of the board have a firm handle on & familiarity with the needs of the students, faculty, & community. It would distract the governing board of VSU from achieving its own mission to have to acquaint itself with the needs of VMI. Incredibly talented & qualified candidates for the board for VSU who could steer it into achieving its mission could find themselves unqualified because they would also lack the military background & expertise essential to governing VMI. How could the VSU board be intimately familiar with the needs of the cadets, military staff, faculty, & community of VMI without taking away from their time & focus on VSU. They would be stretched thin, with travel, research, & communication. How can they appreciate the complexities of the financial needs of a military institute without immersing themselves there? If they did provide VMI the attention it needs, how can they provide VSU the attention it deserves? This proposal is a raw deal for both VSU & VMI. It is harmful to students at VSU who will be neglected by its board's distraction & absence, & it is harmful to VMI because it denies them the opportunity afforded to all 38 other Virginia universities to be governed by its own board. This would surely damage both institutions, which damages the Commonwealth. People like my son come from across the nation & countless countries to receive the top-notch unique military education at VMI, & deserve to have their own governance, just like the students at VSU, who come from all over the commonwealth, every state, & worldwide to receive the student-centered education at VSU. Thanks for opposing HB 1374.

Dear Members of the House Education Committee, Opposition to HB 1374 – Preserve VMI’s Independent Board of Visitors I respectfully oppose House Bill 1374, which would dissolve the Virginia Military Institute Board of Visitors and place governance under another university’s board. Such a move would threaten the independence that allows VMI to maintain its highly specialized mission of developing citizen soldiers grounded in honor, discipline, and public service. My son, now a Fourth Classman (Freshman), has thrived within this distinctive environment. The leadership development, accountability, and sense of purpose he has gained through VMI’s self-governed system are what make it so effective. I have watched his growth in awe during his time in the Rat Line which just concluded with Breakout this past week. The current Board of Visitors—composed of dedicated alumni, educators, and civic leaders—understands these traditions and responsibilities deeply. I understand that as an Out-of-State parent I don’t carry any weight in this vote/fight but I also thought I offer a unique perspective which is why I am writing to you. VMI attracted my son from South Florida for all the reasons stated above. Please allow VMI to continue under its established governance structure so it can preserve the standards, traditions, and outcomes that make it a national model of leadership education. Sincerely, Michael Miraglia Pinecrest, Florida Parent of Leonard Miraglia, VMI Class of 2029

Dear Members of the House Education Committee, I am writing as a Virginia resident and as someone deeply involved in the lives of VMI cadets through community mentorship and faith-based leadership education. For more than a decade, my family has served as a host family for VMI cadets, and my husband teaches a weekly Bible-based Sunday School class focused on leadership, ethics, and navigating current events. Through this close, ongoing involvement, we have worked with cadets from a wide range of racial, cultural, geographic, and socioeconomic backgrounds. From my years of direct experience with cadets, I have observed firsthand how the Board of Visitors' independent governance has enabled thoughtful policy adaptations over the past decade. These changes—such as enhanced support for cadet well-being, greater emphasis on inclusive environments, and flexibility in addressing personal hardships—help today's cadets build resilience while upholding VMI's rigorous standards. Far from "softening" the experience, these policies support diverse cadets in thriving under the institute's demanding military, academic, and honor systems, producing well-rounded citizen-leaders. Any shift in oversight away from this dedicated, mission-focused board risks disrupting these effective systems that currently serve cadets so well and contribute to their personal and professional development. Speaking from the perspective of someone who witnesses the human outcomes of this institution every week, I firmly believe that VMI’s independent governance is vital to its continued success. For these reasons, I respectfully oppose HB 1374 and urge you to preserve VMI’s current governance structure. Thank you for your time and consideration of this important matter.

My Name is Seth Enterline. I am a 2006 graduate of the Virginia Military Institute. I am blessed to have married my high school sweetheart Jamie and we have 2 children. I currently live in GA, but still consider myself a lifelong Virginian. I am a 19 year Army Veteran and an Orthopedic Trauma Physician Assistant at a level one trauma center here in North GA. Outside of my faith I believe that VMI has been a guiding light in my life. Through its unique mission, vision and history it has filled me with passion and a purpose to serve in all aspects of my life. I feel that this embodiment of service that VMI provides will be obstructed through passing governance to another institution. Self governance holds leaders accountable, brings pride and forces sustainable change. I have seen the negative impact of allowing a unique state military college, the University of North GA, to be governed by a larger state education governance. In North GA the University of North GA has in some part lost what made it unique. While it may make more money, there are multiple campuses where much of the student body doesn’t even recognize that their university is one of the six senior military colleges in this country. I have had the privilege of deploying to support front line Warriors through providing medical care 5 times now. My life has been devoted to service to my family and others. This started with a unique spartan experience at VMI, that can only be appreciated and maintained through self governance.

To Whom it May Concern, I am 1LT David A. Fiorillo. I am currently stationed overseas with the United States Army. I received my education and commission from The Virginia Military Institute (VMI). The Institute is second to none in its ability to grow and develop the leaders of this nation. The integrity and honor it cultivates in the Corps of Cadets is unmatched, allowing the future leaders of this nation to uphold those same values in their respective positions. I have found myself in many strenuous situations where, had I not possessed the experience and fortitude VMI instilled in me, I surely would have failed. This background of high honor and integrity has helped me empower the Soldiers and families under my leadership, allowing them to remain strong and unified while stationed overseas, where issues can be exacerbated. In short, the Virginia Military Institute needs to remain its own governing body, as delegated under Article VII of the Virginia Constitution, to continue allowing this great institution to determine its own destiny. I implore whoever reads this to research VMI's contributions to this nation and the leaders it has produced. Very Respectfully, 1LT David A. Fiorillo

My name is Sharon Tucker, and I am the proud mother of a Virginia Military Institute (VMI) cadet, who will be graduating in the Class of 2028. I write in opposition to HB 1374, which would dissolve the VMI Board of Visitors and place governance of VMI under the Virginia State University Board of Visitors. VMI has been such a blessing to my son, and as his mother, to me as well. He is so happy there! The friends that he has made there will last a lifetime, and the mentorship program that they have (when my son was a first-year "Rat") provided my son with the sort of big brother that he never had (since my son is an only child). Perhaps most importantly of all, it has helped to build such character, integrity, and discipline in him. He so often talks about VMI's "Honor Code," and he takes it very seriously. And I have no doubt that even after he leaves VMI, the lessons that he learned from following the school's Honor Code will benefit him enormously (not only in his future career endeavors, but in his personal relationships as well). However, aside from what my son has, and will continue to, gain personally from being a student at VMI, the man that he is becoming will benefit society as well. I truly believe that the gifts that he has to offer will be, in large part, attributable to his time at VMI. While that might seem like an exaggeration, if you could see what I see, you would believe it as well.

I oppose HB1374 regarding VMI’s governance. I can not identify a benefit to dissolving VMI’s Board of Visitors (BOV) only to place its governance under a BOV of another educational system. First of all, VMI is a unique and valuable institution that other educational institutions can not relate to. The VMI alumni who support the Corps of Cadets and the BOV sustain their support of the institute because they know the high caliber of graduates that VMI prepares and ultimately places in our armed forces and our communities. Pulling the BOV from VMI and placing it under the umbrella of another educational system may cause a reluctance of alumni to continue their support of the Cadets out of a fear that their resources normally received by VMI would go to an unintended and unfamiliar educational system. If I am being completely transparent, the idea of dissolving VMI’s BOV seems more of a punitive intent rather than a step in any positive direction for the institute and supportive of the entire Corps of Cadets. Placing the BOV under a different educational program displaces VMI’s governance, disrupts support for the entire Corps of Cadets, potentially takes away financial support specifically provided to support VMI and ultimately negatively impacts all cadets regardless of race, gender, sex or nationality. A BOV of any academic system holds a great deal of responsibility and having a BOV over VMI from any other institution not directly connected to the institute seems irresponsible and potentially damaging to the integrity and well being of the Corps of Cadets.

I am writing in opposition to HB1374. I offer my perspective as a parent of a current cadet at the VMI. Our son chose to attend VMI over multiple other college acceptances because he sought an education defined by rigor, discipline, and personal accountability—not merely the pursuit of a degree. He wanted the challenge of becoming the best person and citizen he can be, and believes VMI’s environment will prepare him for a life of service and leadership. VMI is intentionally demanding. It requires cadets to prioritize their responsibilities, manage adversity, and maintain high standards every day. Cadets who choose VMI, choose the “Don’t Do Ordinary” path because they know this environment will test them in ways that more traditional colleges would not. In observing our son’s friends and peers at other colleges, I have seen how easy it can be for them to drift without structure, clear priorities, or a defined plan after graduation. VMI does not permit that. It instills purpose, discipline, leadership, and accountability—qualities that are incredibly valuable in both military and civilian life. Our son intends to commission in the United States Navy upon graduation. He is pursuing this path motivated by a commitment to service to our country. The experiences he’s had thus far at VMI have already strengthened his character, sharpened his focus, and reinforced his sense of duty in ways that I believe will certainly prepare him to lead responsibly as a naval officer. VMI is not intended to be the right choice for every student, nor should it be. Its value lies precisely in its distinctive mission and demanding environment. HB 1374 risks weakening that mission by introducing governance instability without clear evidence that such measures are necessary. Without fail, every recent VMI graduate I have met is poised, confident, and mature, and I have personally witnessed remarkable transformations from Rat Line to graduation. Nowhere else in Virginia have I seen a college consistently producing this caliber of graduates across the board. For these reasons, I respectfully urge the General Assembly to oppose HB 1374 and to allow the Virginia Military Institute to continue fulfilling its longstanding role in developing leaders of character and preparing principled graduates who serve the Commonwealth of Virginia and the nation. Respectfully submitted,

I do NOT stand with HB1374. It would be a disgrace to transfer the Board of Visitors from VMI to VSU. VMI has a 60% commision into the Armed Forces. Does VSU commsion any officers into the Armed Forces? Also, VMI has a 186-year storied history as well. I personally know several people who attend VMI, and they chose to attend VMI because of the rigorous academics, the small school size, they enjoy not being Ordinary and being different than their peers, and taking the hard road, while most of their peers chose regular schools to attend and not have the high title of being VMI students and being VMI alumni when they graduate. It would be a disgrace to the state of Virginia if this bill passes. I do NOT Stand with Bill HB1374. Respectfully, Joseph St.John

Transferring the governance of VMI (my alma mater) to VSU would be like transferring the governance of the Virginia House of Delegates to the Virginia Senate. Naturally, neither transfer would work. Just as Virginia's Senate and House are structured and function differently, so too are VMI and VSU. I respectfully ask all committee House members to vote against HB 1374 (and HB 1377).

I am writing to you today to stand in opposition to HB 1374 to shift leadership of VMI to another body other than the VMI Board of Visitors. As a 1982 graduate of VMI I have had a military and professional lifetime of seeing the impact that VMI has had on me and on my fellow alumni. I arrived at VMI an 18 year old kid who thought he wanted to be an engineer and serve his country in the Army! The next 4 years prepared me in ways that I cannot imagine having been able to accomplish anywhere and anyway else. It was hard. Just hard! But I learned how to overcome obstacles not of my making, as well as obstacles of my own doing! It was hard. But while it was not always a pleasant situation to be in... I learned that that 18 year old kid could overcome and adapt to any situation... and succeed. That there was no barrier too tall or wide or deep that could not be dealt with. That continues to this day as I navigate the world of manufacturing and construction! Now there are 2 worlds that take a lot of intestinal fortitude in which to thrive! I know where I got that fortitude- it was at VMI. Please vot to preserve that institution for generations to come. We need it. Thank you.

I am writing to strongly urge you to oppose House Bill 1374, which seeks to dissolve the Board of Visitors of the Virginia Military Institute (VMI) and transfer its governance to the Board of Visitors of Virginia State University (VSU). While I respect the educational mission of VSU as a public historically Black land-grant university, placing VMI under the control of a separate institution’s board is structurally unsound and detrimental to VMI’s unique mission. VMI is a 186-year-old institution with a specialized military-structure pedagogy that differs significantly from traditional public universities. The 2024-2025 statistical data highlights these distinct differences: Mission & Culture: VMI is a 100% residential military college where all cadets participate in ROTC and live under a strict honor code. VSU operates as a traditional, comprehensive public university. Scale & Faculty Ratio: VMI has an intimate, small-scale academic environment, with roughly 1,500 cadets and a 10:1 student-to-faculty ratio. VSU is a larger institution with over 5,000 undergraduates. Admissions & Student Profile: VMI’s applicant profile requires a specialized, competitive selection process suited for a military lifestyle, differing from VSU’s mission as a comprehensive state institution. Forcing a governance structure, 163 miles away in Petersburg, that is not intimately familiar with the daily rigors of a military academy will inevitably damage the specific, "strict military structure" the bill ironically claims to preserve. VMI’s Board of Visitors is best positioned to maintain the school's specialized, nationally ranked, liberal arts military education. I urge you to reject this unnecessary disruption of a storied Virginia institution and vote against HB1374.

As a 2014 graduate of VMI and a 2020 graduate of VSU, I write in respectful opposition to this bill. VMI has been a long standing institution credited with producing great military and foreign policy leaders like Secretary of Defense and State George Marshall, CJCS General Caine, Ambassador Waltz, Air Force Chief of Staff General Jumper, CENTCOM Commander General Peay, Secretary of the Army Ryan McCarthy, and so many more.  VMI has done exceptionally well with governing itself and moving the institution into the 21st Century. VSU is also an excellent institution; I went there to earn my Masters degree in Economics. However, VSU does not specialize in providing and administering a comprehensive military education. Another practical problem with this bill is that VSU is nearly 3hours away from VMI, so how is VSU going to run this institution from afar.  I ask for your reconsideration and please do not vote in favor of HB1374.  

Each school brings diversity in education to 4-year public colleges in Virginia. As such, each school should be governed by their respective Board of Visitors. Thus, this bill should not be passed.

You are out of your mind. VMI has an extreme high educational and military acceptance rate and creates some of the finest citizen soldiers the military will ever see. It’s over 150+ years of solid acceptance & graduates and you wanna tear it apart to give to a cheap, poor school; not even affiliated with VMI. It’s horrific!

Please vote NO to HB 1374. VMI is a unique military college and putting them under the the governance of VSU or any other college's board of visitors is simply a power play. The constituents of Virginia see this for what it is.

Mr. Regan’s Molly and I are parents of a current Virginia Military Institute Cadet. He just broke out on Saturday and earned (never given) his cadetship. The pride he felt in his growth mentally , physically, and academically was nothing short of extraordinary. VMI is known for turning out honorable and disciplined leaders in both the military and private industry. Our son, Jack, chose to go to VMI because he did not want to go to any ordinary college. His goal is to commission in the United States Navy and serve our country. The value the Virginia Military Institute provides is undoubtedly shown in the honor and discipline of its graduates. No other college or university in the state has done or could do what VMI does. As parents of an honorable and disciplined young man, we ask you to please not let this Institution become ordinary. Respectfully, George and Molly Christ 14922 Cedar Creek Hills Ct Montpelier, Va 23192

This bill should be opposed by the GA. This bill is overly selective and hypocrital because the Boards of UVA and George Mason University, both of which experienced far greater political intrigue than VMI, are not included. Dissolving the Boards of UVA and GMU and transferring all Board matters for UVA and GMU to the Board of Virginia State University must be included in an amended version of this bill.

I respectfully oppose HB 1374. Simply put - shifting the Institute's governance from its own board of visitors to that of another school would harm the Institute, its students, and its future students. Thank you, Henry Meredith, VMI Class of 2015

I strongly oppose this bill. VMI is far too unique to be outsourced like this. It’s military values do not align with the mission of VSU. Both missions are equally important but they are mutually exclusive of one another. Outsourcing this board to VSU would lose the mission of VMI since it opened its doors. We do not need two of the same universities. Their differences help provide many important facets in higher education and having VSU manage VMI would dilute the very differences that make them both impactful in their own ways.

Please kill this bill in committee. The dissolution of the VMI Board of Visitors will do nothing to improve educational opportunities at VMI. The mission of Virginia State is very different from the mission of VMI. This bill is solely retribution for actions by the VMI Board of Visitors under pressure from the Trump and Youngkin administrations. With new leadership in Richmond, and new backbone to stand up for the VMI cadets while ignoring Washington, DC, any problem with the VMI Board of Visitors will go away. We need VMI. As a long time resident of the Commonwealth, I am proud of the strides VMI has made to embrace a future that is equitable to all while keeping expenses for earning a 4 year college degree low. We get our monies worth from VMI. Fix the VMI Board, don’t scrap it.

I strongly oppose HB1374. VMI is a unique institution that requires a dedicated governing body to oversee it. Outsourcing that role to the board of VSU would ultimately destroy the school.

I respectfully express my opposition to HB1374, which would place VMI's governance under a new Board of Visitors with significant mission-related differences to VMI. I believe the actions outlined in this bill would harm not only VMI, but the entire state of Virginia as well. VMI is a tremendous institution. As a recent VMI graduate, I found VMI to be a place where people from all different walks of life could come together under a common spirit of service, dedication, and excellence. Therefore, it is my hope that you take these words to heart when voting on VMI's future. Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback on HB1374.

As a proud graduate of the class of 1997 of the Virginia Military Institute, I would like you to vote NO on HB1374, Governance of the Virginia Military Institute. The Institute has produced proud and honorable citizen soldiers since its founding in 1839. You do not need a task force to determine their value; merely look at the leaders in the military, business, and government sectors. I ask you to visit the Institute and meet with the leaders in the Corps of Cadets, and you would understand the importance of their decision to attend and why they decided they "don't do ordinary."

As the parent of an out of state cadet that graduated in engineering in 2024, I oppose HB1374. When our son was looking at colleges across Virginia and other states, one of the first things that we noticed was that every person, cadet, staff, etc, all said hello as we walked around the campus on our own. This was THE MOST FRIENDLY AND POLITE schools we had visited. The honor and integrity really shined in every aspect of the school. The academics are fabulous and my son got a job almost immediately in Virginia. When employers meet cadets, they see the difference these cadets bring to their organizations right away. They are polite, dedicated, honorable and support VA and communities across the US and abroad. VMI has been a proud part of Virginia since its inception. An education at VMI is essential to our communities and should continue to operate and have its own leadership and trustees to guide it in the principles of tomorrow. Each Virginia college and university is unique with its history, culture, traditions, and value to students and communities. This allows each educational institution to bring its strengths and shine to each individual student. Each, rightly so, must have their own appointed members of their boards that is focused on safeguarding the unique strengths of each institution and ensuring the school maintains high standards. Again, I oppose HB1374.

VMI stands as one of the most consequential institutions in the history of the United States and unquestionably one of the Commonwealth of Virginia’s greatest assets. For generations, the Institute has forged leaders of extraordinary caliber—individuals whose integrity, discipline, and commitment to service have shaped both our state and our nation. Today, VMI continues to develop men and women of exceptional moral character, academic excellence, and unwavering dedication to public service at a level unmatched by any other college or university in Virginia. No academic institution is without imperfections, yet the recent politically motivated attacks on VMI’s character collapse under scrutiny—particularly when measured against its peers within Virginia and across the country. Any effort to defund or dismantle this storied institution would inflict profound and lasting harm on the Commonwealth and the nation. I urge all who value excellence, service, and the future of Virginia to reject this legislation and stand firmly with VMI. The Institute continues to outperform its counterparts in preparing principled, resilient leaders ready to meet the challenges of today and those yet to come.

Repealing VMIs board of visitors legal status is a blatantly punitive response to disagreement with some recent changes. VMI is difficult school to understand if you haven’t experienced it and the board of visitors at VSU will not have that understanding. This bill will cripple an institution that brought our nation and commonwealth citizen/soldiers like USAF Gen Jumper, civil rights activist Jonathan Daniels, Governor Northam, and many more. I recognize that VMI has had some missteps within its history, as do all institutions throughout the country as none are perfect. However, VMI is nationally ranked as #4 for liberal arts colleges and #1 for liberal arts programs with ROTC. In Virginia, VMI is #3 for college/university with highest alumni salary potential. No doubt, VMI is different and it is difficult - and we still need that. Removing their autonomy will irrevocably change that in ways that cannot anticipate but are likely to be to the detriment of the Institute and its cadets. Respectively, Zach Tharp VMI class of 2009

I am writing in strong opposition to this punitive partisan piece of garbage legislation. There is absolutely no logical basis for the idea of eliminating the VMI BOV and placing VMI under the governance of the VSU BOV. There is no time in the history of the Commonwealth where any school of higher education has been stripped of its BOV and placed under the governance of another school's BOV. Even in a case where a school may have fallen into severe academic or financial problems has this kind of action been taken. Certainly, a school that has the academic standards, performance, and stellar reputation of providing graduates who have contributed greatly to both the Commonwealth and the Nation like that of VMI would the thought of placing VMI under the governance of VSU not be viewed as just plain stupid. Unless of course the whole goal is to ruin the oldest and most respected Senior Military College in the United States then it is obviously just partisan politics and honor, integrity, and common sense be damned. Delegate Feggans should be ashamed of even giving this idea a thought given his 20 years of service in the USAF. He should at the very least pull this legislation from committee and if not, the committee should reject it unanimously.

I am a proud VMI Alumni (1985) and I wanted to take this opportunity to share with the committee how my VMI experience had a huge impact on me and my life, and how not a day goes by that I don't rely on the skills and life lessons VMI taught me, and where I get to network with VMI aquaintences, both personal and professional that live and work in the State where they went to college. I can say without a doubt some of the best friends I have in this world are from the relationships I made at VMI during the four years I was there. I believe this to be true for the many VMI men that I know and we all look back on those years at VMI with such fond memories and many life long friends. VMI is not the easiest place to go to college when you factor in the military training, the academics and extracurricular activities (sports) and not everyone that matriculates decides to stay and graduate. But whether you are there for one year or four years their system of providing an awesome education, unique opportunities for cadets to play on Division 1 sports teams and other extracurricular activities, while in a disciplined military setting. Very similar to the US Military Academies. The close relationships you make at VMI help you get through the tough parts of the VMI experience (freshman Rat Line, rigorous academic and miltary training schedules and strict disciplinary and honor systems). These relationships I believe made me a better person and better friend. You learn humility, respect, honoe, compassion, gratefulness and above all you do not lie, cheat or steal or tolerate those who do. I have tried to live my life using the lessons I learned and I am proud to say I lay my head down every night and give thanks for the things I have been blessed to have in my life but I can also sleep easier knowing that I treat people like I would like to be treated and that I will always approach every situation in the right and honorable way whether someone is looking or not. Professionally VMI taught me many leadership and life lessons that I firmly believe has helped me achieve what I would consider professional success for me and my family. Most every day at VMI we did not have time to lay around and not do much. Each day you had to learn to get up with a purpose because VMI had your day packed with academic, military and extracurricular activities. You had to learn if you didn't succeed the first time you learned from your mistakes and you tried again until you succedded. You learned, because VMI demanded so much of your time, that you had to work harder than anyone else to be sure you achieved your goal. And lastly the military environment we were in required you to take on responsibility by serving in some of the military rank positions in the corps of cadets. It is lessons like these that helped my career. I developed a strong work ethic, was very determined, knew how to lead people, and conducted my professional career treating people honorably and respectfully.

Good Afternoon, I'm a proud mom of William Longacher, class of 2024 VMI. He is now serving in the USCG Cutter Seneca. VMI transformed him into the man he is today. It's a very unique school and not for everybody but that's what makes it special. It does have a very diverse student body and the cadets respect and look out for one another. I do not understand why it would be even considered to fall under the supervision of another school. The school, faculty, and students govern just fine and if the rules are violated, proper consequences follow. I have 4 children, 3 of which attend or attended VA schools. VMI is by far has the most school spirited alumni who look out for one another. Please do not destroy this gem of a school. VMI is a special place that served my son and his fellow classmates and made them into the fine men and women they are today. Virginia should be proud to have such a fine institution turning out upstanding men and women. Thank you for your time. Proud VMI Mom, Amy Longacher

To whom it may concern, I am writing to oppose HB1377 and HB 1374. VMI is a academically strong school which produces young women and men of integrity . It provides strong leaders for our nation and the State of Virginia. I do not see the logic to these bills. Thank you for your consideration

-HB 1374 bill correction to my testimony previously- I write you as a Navy Veteran, and proud parent of a cadet at the Virginia Military Institute, I am writing to express my strong opposition to bill HB1374. My son's journey at VMI has been transformative, and it is crucial to highlight the immense value this institution brings to its cadets and, consequently, to our society. VMI is not just a college; it is a crucible where young men and women are forged into future leaders. The rigorous academic and military training instills in them not only intelligence and discipline but also the moral fortitude necessary to lead with integrity. At VMI, my son has developed key qualities such as resilience, accountability, and a sense of duty—traits that are essential in today's world. The changes my son has undergone during his time at VMI have been remarkable. He has gained confidence, honed his leadership skills, and embraced values that will guide him throughout his life. The mentorship from esteemed faculty and the camaraderie among cadets foster an environment where excellence is not just encouraged but expected. I implore you to consider the long-term repercussions of these bills. Diminishing the foundational principles upon which VMI stands would not only impact the cadets but also our military and society as a whole. Future leaders must be equipped with the grit and ethical grounding that VMI so effectively provides. In conclusion, I stand in strong support of the Virginia Military Institute and urge you to oppose HB1374. The future leaders shaped within its walls are vital to upholding the morals and values that our society holds dear. Thank you for your consideration. Very Respectfully, Kelly Freel 757-600-9394 Parent of Cadet: Andrew Lindquist

I am a 1966 graduate of the Virginia Military Institute (VMI). Originally from California, I traveled cross country by train from Los Angeles to Roanoke in 1962 to attend VMI - sight unseen. I have never for a moment regretted my college selection. VMI gave me everything I hoped to find in my college experience - a superb education, demanding physical development, and emotional resilience shaped by an Honor System I have cherished all my life. I went on to serve almost 30 years as an officer in the US Army, with assignments in Germany, Korea and combat in Vietnam. I am very aware of the scrutiny under which VMI has fallen - some of it quite deserved, but I believe with all my heart that VMI has become a better institution as a result. While I was disappointed in the Board of Visitors for not renewing General Wins' contract, there is a new Board now and a new Superintendent. Let them do their work and monitor their progress. VMI is a unique national institution that is a credit to the Commonwealth. We are all struggling with the partisan divide and culture wars in which our country is presently immersed. VMI has made great progress negotiating these troubled waters. Give the new Board and the new Superintendent a chance to finish the job. The country needs men and women of honor, grit and selflessness perhaps now more than ever. VMI has always produced graduates with these qualities. It is essential to the Commonwealth and the Nation that they be allowed to continue.

I write you as a Navy Veteran, and proud parent of a cadet at the Virginia Military Institute, I am writing to express my strong opposition to bill HB1377. My son's journey at VMI has been transformative, and it is crucial to highlight the immense value this institution brings to its cadets and, consequently, to our society. VMI is not just a college; it is a crucible where young men and women are forged into future leaders. The rigorous academic and military training instills in them not only intelligence and discipline but also the moral fortitude necessary to lead with integrity. At VMI, my son has developed key qualities such as resilience, accountability, and a sense of duty—traits that are essential in today's world. The changes my son has undergone during his time at VMI have been remarkable. He has gained confidence, honed his leadership skills, and embraced values that will guide him throughout his life. The mentorship from esteemed faculty and the camaraderie among cadets foster an environment where excellence is not just encouraged but expected. I implore you to consider the long-term repercussions of these bills. Diminishing the foundational principles upon which VMI stands would not only impact the cadets but also our military and society as a whole. Future leaders must be equipped with the grit and ethical grounding that VMI so effectively provides. In conclusion, I stand in strong support of the Virginia Military Institute and urge you to oppose HB1377. The future leaders shaped within its walls are vital to upholding the morals and values that our society holds dear. Thank you for your consideration. Very Respectfully, Kelly Freel 757-600-9394 Parent of Cadet: Andrew Lindquist

In all questions touching public education, prudence counsels that we proceed by reason, not by resentment; by measured reform, not by sudden transposition. A college is not governed well by novelty alone, but by a steady accountability fitted to its particular ends. VMI, whatever its defects or controversies, is by law and tradition a distinct institution with a peculiar discipline and a singular charge—one which requires close, undivided attention and governance framed for its mission.  To transfer that charge wholesale to the Visitors of another university—whose own obligations are already weighty—risks diminishing the oversight of both, not improving either. Such an arrangement may also invite perpetual contest, for it unites under one board two institutions of different history, constituency, and practical administration, thereby multiplying distractions where unity of purpose is most required. If the General Assembly concludes that VMI’s governance has fallen short of the Commonwealth’s expectations, the remedy most consonant with republican good order is plain: refine the institute’s own governance—its composition, its standards of conduct, its transparency, and its checks—rather than dissolve it and append its authority to another body. Reform should be direct, proportional, and intelligible to the public, so that responsibility may be clearly traced and faithfully enforced. With due respect to Virginia State University—an institution of great public value—this bill would place upon its Visitors an additional stewardship not naturally incident to their present trust. Such a burden, imposed without the consent of those governed and without a demonstrated administrative necessity, seems to me an experiment of doubtful issue. I therefore urge the Committee to withhold this bill, and instead to pursue any needed accountability at VMI through targeted, institution-specific measures that strengthen oversight without confusing it.

To the Virginia House of Delegates Education Committee Kindly consider my personal experiences as a VMI cadet and 1980 alumni as you deliberate HB1374, which I respectfully oppose. The Institute continues to develop graduates over 186 years in all fields of endeavor, military, business, sports, religious leaders serving their communities, our Nation and even abroad in conflicts and peacetime (Gen. Marshall plan, Peace Prize recipient 1953). This must be allowed to continue as a service to our State with appropriate oversight by VMI staff, Board of Visitors and the Legislature. In 1976 I chose the more difficult path of VMI over the larger land grant universities in the State. Partly for financial reasons, as VMI’s tuition was lower and an ROTC scholarship helped my family to defray 50% of the expenses. My performing lawn work, paper route, and after school mall job just did supplement my parent’s savings for tuition even then. Having talked with Richmond alums I felt the structured living environment would keep me on the straight and narrow path. The big schools would have been fun, perhaps at the distraction of academics. Allow me to share just one personal experience how the culture of VMI helped me through my cadet years and decades hence. “VMI takes care of its own” My freshman (Rat) year at Thanksgiving break I suffered a broken leg in a car accident at home. After surgery my first question, they tell me, to the surgeon was when could I return to school, finish the term and exams. I wasn’t able to walk until January. I was not deterred. My father drove to Lexington and meeting the Chemistry dept. chair, he asked about my academics. Colonel Smart said not to worry. VMI takes care of its own. He had already assembled assignments from all my professors and my books were on the desk brought by a cadet orderly. I finished my semester from St. Mary’s hospital bed. After Christmas day, we accepted the Colonel’s hospitality to stay in his house on Post, where I took a final exam daily to complete the semester. Colonel Smart delivered me to barracks when the Corps returned, crutches in hand, and I hobbled to classes and meals over the spring semester. I was not going to be deterred from being with my Brother Rats and all that the first year had in store for us. Four years later in 1976, I was selected a cadet captain and then graduated with a BS in Chemistry. I am 68 years old and this was a difficult period in my life to recall and share even today. Surely I would have lost a first year of college elsewhere, if not for the good graces of a small college, of professors who knew each cadet well, and an institutional ethos where they develop and look after their own. It means everything to push yourself further than you thought you could go, academically, physically, mentally. My VMI experience gave me confidence to face challenges every day afterwards in my business life or raising and supporting a family and community. I urge you to consider the 186 years legacy of unique cadet education and Institute service to our Commonwealth and continue as a Legislature to support VMI fully. Respectfully, Stephen M. Andrews, PhD

I am submitting this comment in opposition to the House Bill 1377. I believe VMI above all others in the Commonwealth provides the most egalitarian environment in which all who accept its challenges have the opportunity to grow both academically as well in leadership skills. Moreover, this institution arguably provides its cadets the best "value add" for their money of any school in the state of Virginia. It is the most challenging school in the state, but is the most rewarding. VMI has represented in the past and for years to come, an amazing return on investment for the Commonwealth.

I am writing to express my opposition to HB 1374. I do not understand why this is even being considered as an option. What credentials does VSU have to make them the representatives of the BOV for VMI? VMI already operates under significant oversight and has demonstrated its willingness to examine and make changes for improvement in its practices. I am a concerned parent of a current student at VMI. My child chose VMI fully aware of its rigorous academic expectations, demanding military structure and emphasis on discipline, leadership and personal responsibility. I entrusted VMI with my child’s education because of its proven record, its clear mission and the specialized governing structure necessary for a military college. VMI is not the right choice for every student. It’s not the right choice for most students but for those that choose it, it offers an exceptional education built on accountability, resilience and service. Again, I would ask what is your intention with this change in the structure of the Board of Visitors? I respectfully urge you to oppose HB 1374 and to support policies that strengthen this institution. Thank you for your time and consideration.

As an alumnus, I am writing to express my firm opposition to HB 1374. This legislation, which seeks to dissolve the Virginia Military Institute’s Board of Visitors and transfer governance to Virginia State University, fundamentally misapprehends the unique requirements of a military college. VMI’s mission is built upon the "Citizen-Soldier" philosophy—a specialized educational model that produces leaders prepared for the highest levels of both military and civil service. This mission requires a governing board with deep, specialized knowledge of military education, the Honor Code, and the unique administrative needs of a corps of cadets. The idea of the “Citizen-Soldier” and the idea of service above self were the reasons I personally decided to service on active duty within the United States Navy. I never intended to join the US Armed Forces but because of the values instilled by VMI, I answered the call to service. VMI has provided the Commonwealth with an unmatched return on investment. Its alumni serve as the backbone of our local governments, as civil engineers, and as officers in the Armed Forces who protect our national security. To place this institution under the oversight of a board with a fundamentally different mission—regardless of that board’s own merits—risks eroding the very discipline and tradition that makes a VMI degree valuable. I urge the committee to protect VMI’s institutional independence and report "No" on HB 1374.

I strongly oppose HB1374 that would dissolve VMI's Board of Visitors (BOV) and assign governance of VMI to the BOV of Virginia State University. It would make absolutely no sense to do so. Just as it wouldn't make sense to place Virginia Tech under UVA's BOV or vice versa, or JMU under Old Dominion's board or vice versa, and so on. Each college and university in Virginia is unique with its own history, culture, traditions, and value to the commonwealth. Having so many varied colleges and universities is one of Virginia's greatest strengths. Each has duly appointed members of their BOV that is focused on safeguarding the unique strengths of each institution and ensuring the school maintains its high standards and value to Virginians. With so many excellent choices, our youth have a broad opportunity to find their niche that aligns with their desires for higher education. If Delegate Feggans or anyone else in elected office has an issue with how VMI is governed, or how any other college or university is governed, they should work within the commonwealth's existing legal and political structure to advocate for changes to the makeup of the school's governing body they believe are warranted. To align any college or university under a BOV of another school is impractical, counterproductive and would erode the very strength each institution provides our commonwealth.

Members of the House, I write to you as a 2022 graduate of VMI with a degree in Civil Engineering. Throughout high school, I was smart, but no doubt lazy student. Upon my first year at VMI I quickly learned that I would not be able to sleepwalk my way through college. I firmly believe that had I not had the structure that VMI offers, I would not have graduated. Through hard work and perseverance, I was able to graduate on time and get a wonderful job with a terrific company before I graduated. I do not believe that there is another school in this country that should be in charge of VMI. No other school knows how to do more with less than VMI. VMI has been able to run itself as an exemplary model of military education for 186 years, and although it made missteps in that time, as did our entire state and country, it has made the necessary changes to continue to exist as an independent institution for another 186 years. For evidence of the level of graduates that VMI produces, one only needs to look at the countries from around the world that send their future military leaders here for training. VMI is an asset to Lexington, Virginia, The United States, and the world. In Pace Decus, In Bello Praesidium.

I strongly oppose this measure and would like to advocate for it not being passed. VMI is on of if not the most unique public college in the state due to its rigorous academic, physical and lifestyle demands. In order for it to be properly ran and advocated for, the BOV must be made up of individuals familiar with the system and the unique challenges cadets face that those attending an ordinary 4 year school are not familiar with.

Dear Honorable Members of the Virginia General Assembly, I write in strong support of the Virginia Military Institute and in affirmation of keeping its Board of Visitors in Lexington, where VMI’s mission, culture, and accountability have been forged for generations. VMI is not merely a state-supported military college; it is a living institution of character, discipline, and unity. For nearly two centuries, it has brought together young men and women from different countries, states, backgrounds, and experiences. Every year, VMI takes a disparate group of teenagers and shapes them into one Corps—bound not by uniformity of origin, but by a shared commitment to honor, service, and excellence under the VMI regimen. That regimen is VMI’s great equalizer. It does not erase differences; it refines them into strength. Cadets arrive diverse in thought, geography, culture, and life experience, yet they graduate having learned to lead together, endure together, and serve something greater than themselves. This is inclusion with purpose—diversity forged through shared sacrifice and common standards. The Board of Visitors, historically based in Lexington, plays a critical role in preserving this balance. Its proximity to the Institute ensures informed governance, firsthand accountability, and continuity with VMI’s unique educational model. To remove or destabilize that connection during a time of national uncertainty would risk weakening the very structure that has allowed VMI to adapt while remaining faithful to its mission. History speaks powerfully here. VMI has educated leaders whose impact shaped not only Virginia, but the world. General of the Army George C. Marshall—architect of victory in World War II and namesake of the Marshall Plan—was a VMI graduate whose leadership reflected the Institute’s core values: integrity, selfless service, and moral courage. He is but one among countless military officers, public servants, engineers, educators, and civic leaders who have carried VMI’s lessons into every corner of our nation. Even though I was not able to serve in the military due to a sports injury, I still benefitted greatly from the VMI model of leadership. I have leaned on that training in every aspect of civilian life. I have been able to stand tall as a healthcare professional, leading and encouraging my colleagues through COVID and the resulting challenges. I have also thrived as a pastor of a small church, navigating the trials that come with that territory. I have also raised two daughters, passing integrity, tenacity, and strength on to them. In times of challenge, institutions of character should be strengthened, not unsettled. Supporting VMI and retaining its Board of Visitors in Lexington is not resistance to progress—it is confidence in a proven system that produces leaders of principle in an increasingly divided world. I respectfully request that you stand with Virginia Military Institute, its leadership, its cadets, and its mission. By doing so, you affirm Virginia’s commitment to unity, excellence, and the preparation of future leaders who understand that true diversity thrives when discipline, respect, and shared purpose lead the way. Thank you for your thoughtful consideration and continued service to the Commonwealth. Respectfully, Timothy L. Hayes VMI class of ‘91 VCU class of ’94, Pharmacy

I am submitting this comment in opposition to House Bill 1374, which proposes transferring governance of the Virginia Military Institute (VMI) to the Board of Visitors of Virginia State University. I write as a VMI graduate and a constituent of the Commonwealth. VMI is a unique institution with a mission distinct from any other public university in Virginia. Its military structure, rigorous academic program, and emphasis on character development have produced generations of principled leaders who serve Virginia and the nation in countless ways. The Institute’s long-standing tradition of honor, discipline, and accountability is integral to its ability to develop these leaders. While it is important to recognize that parts of VMI’s history reflected values that no longer align with modern standards, that chapter has ended. The VMI of today prepares men and women for leadership through a demanding but supportive environment that fosters integrity, resilience, and service. Placing governance under a board whose mission is designed for a very different type of institution risks undermining VMI’s autonomy and unique purpose. I am concerned that HB 1374 would create unnecessary disruption, politicize the governance of an institution that has a proven track record, and send a message that diminishes VMI’s value to the Commonwealth. Efforts to restructure governance in this way risk weakening an institution that consistently produces leaders equipped to navigate complexity, uphold ethical standards, and serve with distinction. For these reasons, I respectfully urge the Committee to oppose HB 1374 and to continue supporting VMI’s independent governance, which is essential for maintaining its mission, tradition, and the development of principled leaders for Virginia and the nation.

I firmly oppose Bill 1374, which proposes to dissolve the VMI Board of Visitors and transfer governance to the Virginia State University Board of Visitors. As an out-of-state parent, I have access to numerous excellent state schools in Pennsylvania that would have been a better fit for our bill. However, we chose VMI due to its unique focus on a strong military core of values. In addition, VMI has a higher graduation rate, retention rate, and better earnings outcome than a VSU graduate. It is crucial to recognize that VMI and VSU serve different purposes and have separate missions. Therefore, they should be governed separately. I have not heard of any similar legislation being proposed to other Virginia institutions. What is the purpose of dissolving VMI’s BOV? As a parent of a current cadet who recently completed the rat line, I am deeply impressed by the discipline and commitment of the cadet lifestyle. This discipline has positively impacted our son’s academic performance, leadership abilities, athletics, and the forming of unbreakable bonds with his brother rats. His maturity growth is truly remarkable! Please oppose this bill.

Dear Representatives, I am the wife of a Class of 2015 graduate of VMI and a graduate of a Virginia public university, UVA, myself. I have experienced the VMI community first as the partner of a current student then as the wife of a graduate. VMI is a wonderful and unique educational institution that provides an incredibly valuable experience that goes beyond the typical educational institution. The benefits of this VMI experience go well into the years beyond graduation. Stripping VMI of its own self governance by having another college's board in control would diminish these strengths and uniqueness. Do not take this statement of support for VMI, as ignoring or disregarding the serious allegations of racism that have come from recent investigations and the institutions historical ties to the Confederacy. My own university, like many institutions (educational or other types) located within the southern states have to reckon with their historical roots to slavery, the Confederacy, and the long term effects of systemic racism. There are many effective ways for VMI to address and work towards these concerns highlighted in investigations, but stripping the institution from self governance is not the answer. The University of Virginia recently had to fight against political interference and doing the same to another Virginia public institution is not the solution. This dissolution of the VMI board would set a terrible precedent within our state. It would also weaken the valuable and unique aspects of VMI culture, especially it's structure as a military institution. VMI is a part of a network of other educational institutions that are preparing their students for participation in the United States military, that make it necessary to create an environment that is different from an educational institution whose core aim is purely academic. Having another academic institution without the large military component, have oversight over another educational institution with this military component would most likely weaken the effectiveness of its culture and instruction that make VMI graduates valuable members in all branches of our country's armed forces. Military aspect aside, uniqueness is a key part of every higher educational instituion's culture. It's the reason why high school juniors pour over brochures, attend college tours, and meet with alumni to get a feel for the unique traditions, culture, and values of the college. All Virginia public higher educational institutions offer incredible academics, but they all have their own unique culture and values. It's these unique combination of tradition, heritage, value, systems, and culture of a college that make it's educational experience and alumni distinct. Not better than one or the other, but distinct and often the key reason why an individual chooses to attend that college. For example, when it was time for my husband to start the college admissions process, he sat his parents down and informed them that he would only be applying to VMI. He wanted an experience that he couldn't receive at any other college in Virginia. He wanted the VMI experience, only. It would be wrong for any college to have control over another college. Please do not pass this bill, it is a detriment to a valuable college that is key to the entirety of the landscape of Virginia public higher education. It would take away an option for students like my husband who are seeking an experience only VMI can provide.

As a Doctor I regret to inform you that I have diagnosed you as rhetaarded. Not only because of this bill, but because you asked for my pronouns when filling out this comment form. You will turn Virginia into California or Minnesota. Although I'm sure that's what you fucking idiots want.

I am a graduate of the VMI Class of 1975 and I respectfully oppose this bill. It would be disingenuous to think that an outside board could effectively govern VMI. While I cannot honestly say that I have always agreed with every action taken by the Board of Visitors, I will state unequivocably that they have always been an effective guiding force keeping the interests of the cadets, alumni, faculty and people of the State of Virginia at the forefront in making policy decisions. Nearly every member of my graduating class has achieved a measure of success in life and I am proud to have them as life long friends and brother rats. I know the same can be said for each and every other graduating class. Systemic racism and antisemitism have not existed and do not exist at VMI. The ratline is the great equalizer. When you go through this indoctrination process, no one cares what color you are, where you came from or what you did in life. You are just brother rats just trying collectively to get through the process. My class has a number of members who have risen to the top ranks of military and government position, a number of corporate CEO's, some very successful physicians and without exception all are high quality honorable individuals. I believe any effort to change the governance of VMI is politically misguided and this bill should never see the light of day. Respectfully John Plunkett - VMI Class of 1975

I was born and raised in Richmond and write as a 2004 graduate of the Virginia Military Institute, a former U.S. Army officer with combat service in Iraq, and a lifelong "citizen‑soldier" shaped by VMI’s uniquely demanding and effective educational model. I submit this testimony to reaffirm the profound value of VMI’s mission and to oppose House Bills 1374 and 1377, which would politicize and weaken one of the Commonwealth’s most successful leadership institutions. A defining—and sometimes misunderstood—strength of VMI is its system of equal application. Every cadet, regardless of socioeconomic background, race, religion, or creed, is held to the same uncompromising standards. From the first day, superficial differences lose relevance. What matters is character, integrity, resilience, and performance. Through shared adversity, cadets learn to value one another for who they are—not where they come from. No institution in Virginia, and few in the nation, provide a more demanding or effective environment for developing disciplined, principled, and morally grounded leaders. VMI’s effectiveness is evident in the long and extraordinary list of achievements of its alumni—governors, Presidential cabinet secretaries, Rhodes Scholars, Medal of Honor recipients, Nobel Peace and Pulitzer Prize winners, university presidents, CEOs, and more than 285 general and flag officers. Its value is equally reflected in measurable outcomes: VMI is rated a 5‑star Money Magazine college, with exceptional affordability, graduation rates, and median early‑career earnings of $77,000; Payscale ranks VMI among the top institutions nationwide for return on investment. Few colleges deliver this combination of character development, leadership preparation and economic value. Virginia should be proud of this legacy and seek to retain and attract its graduates—not diminish or destabilize the institution through shortsighted legislation. Personally, VMI instilled in me the discipline, perseverance, and integrity that shaped my service as an Army officer, strengthened my performance in a top‑tier MBA program, and enabled my success in the finance profession. These outcomes were not accidental. They were forged in a character‑building crucible that only VMI provides. While accountability in public institutions is essential, HB 1374 and HB 1377 introduce mandates that would compromise the political neutrality of VMI’s Board and disrupt the organizational structure fundamental to its mission. Legislation should not erode a proven system—one that has served the Commonwealth for generations by producing leaders of unmatched capability and integrity. Despite the stated intentions, the practical effect of these bills is clear: they would undermine VMI’s distinctive and highly effective model. Any objective evaluation recognizes that VMI’s system is differentiated and more effective by all relative measures of consequence. Efforts to reshape its governance or training framework for political aims also jeopardize outcomes that no other institution can replicate. VMI is not merely a college; it is a leadership institution with a record unmatched in Virginia and respected nationwide. Its traditions, rigor, and commitment to equal treatment remain essential to preparing principled leaders for the future. For these reasons, I respectfully urge you to withdraw these measures and protect the mission that has served Virginia—and the nation—with distinction.

Please do not put VMI under the governance of Virginia State or any other institution. VMI has evolved and embraced many changes. The Institute continues to produce tough, loyal, strong young people. My husband is a graduate of the class of ‘72.

I am a resident of Ashburn with a Daughter at Virginia Military Institute (VMI) as a Junior (and in the US Army ROTC) and would like to voice my displeasure to proposed legislation in HB1374 and the damage this would cause if passed. My spouse and I are both Veterans of the US Navy, and Federal Govt civil servants for over 23 years, serving our Country all over the World. The future leaders that are formed at VMI are unmatched outside of the Service Academies. While there is indeed deep history and tradition at VMI, this has evolved over time and is rooted in deep respect for the corps of cadets that come from all walks of life, from all corners of our great nation, and from all backgrounds. VMI from my own eyes and experience through our Daughter over these past 3 years is nothing short of excellence. I have never been more proud of my Daughter and her "Brother Rats", and the Institute that oversees all of this through the structure set at VMI and the Cadet Code of Conduct. As I have no doubt you have been hearing a great deal about these proposals regarding VMI, might I lend a recommendation to spend a day at VMI with the Corps before making your mind up on HB1374 and HB1377. Don't take anyone's word, go and see and experience for yourself. One day, let alone one hour at VMI will fill you with deep pride for our great Commonwealth of Virginia and the Great Nation we fight for each and every day. VMI is a critical part of this protection as it forms our next generation of Leaders, in uniform and out. It is an honor to have VMI as part of Virginia's contribution to the protection of this American experiment. All Virginians should be proud of what VMI does for our future Leaders, and how it treats the Cadets while they are in Lexington. Was it not this same honor that had VMI marching at the front of the Governors inauguration parade just this past weekend? Sincerely, Karl Knoedler

I am a parent of a current Virginia Military Institute cadet—a young person who chose VMI because of its mission of service, discipline, and leadership in service to the Commonwealth. HB 1374 places that mission—and my child’s education—at risk. VMI is not a generic public university. It is a distinct institution with a singular purpose, one that has produced generations of leaders who serve Virginia and our nation with honor. The proposal to dissolve VMI’s independent Board of Visitors and transfer governance to another institution with a fundamentally different mission is very concerning. No other Virginia college is governed this way. Doing so would irreparably alter VMI’s identity and set a precedent that any institution may lose its autonomy when it becomes politically inconvenient. My child—and thousands like them—are not abstractions in a policy debate. They are students who have already committed to serve, to lead, and to uphold the values of the Commonwealth. They deserve stability, fairness, and confidence that the state they serve will not dismantle the institution they chose in good faith. I respectfully ask you to oppose HB 1374 and support a veto of this bill. Protect VMI. Protect its students. Protect the principle that Virginia’s institutions are judged by facts and outcomes—not politics.

Please keep VMI and VSU separate. Both institutions function effectively on their own. VMI is a jewel in the crown of Virginia and doesn't need to be combined with any other institution.

I write in opposition to HB 1374. I did not attend VMI but served on the BOV for 4 years while serving as the Assistant Adjutant General for the Virginia National Guard. As a female, I cautiously listened to the business of the board for any concerns regarding discrimination - intentional or unintentional by the institute, cadre or cadets. What I found was an overwhelming concern for our precious young men and women in their experience while attending VMI. When concerns or issues were discussed, they were thoroughly researched and acted upon for the utmost care and well-being of the cadets. There is no need to try and alter the treasure we have in this fine institution! Every person I have ever met that had an experience at VMI has been of the highest caliber. It would be a travesty to try and lessen the construct and design that has been forged and honed over the years. Instead, VMI should be recognized and celebrated for what they offer the Commonwealth.

Dear Delegate Feggans: I’m curious as to the purpose of your bill? How will moving the governance of the Virginia Military Institute benefit the cadets of the VMI and or the students of VSU? To me as a proud 1970 graduate of VMI the missions of the two schools are vastly different. Like every other college and university in the commonwealth, the VMI has both strengths and weaknesses. And there are always areas for improvement. When you look at the success rate of the recent graduates and those of us who are “long in the tooth” you will see that the boards of visitors of VMI have governed the college in the best interest of the cadets, faculty, staff and the commonwealth of Virginia.

I graduated from VMI in 1971. I was the 3rd generation of my family to attend The Institute. Bill 1374 is one that makes no logical sense to me. VMI is a unique institution that has produced leaders in all areas of the state of Virginia and the United States. The BOV at VMI has one focus and that is the integrity and honor of VMI. There is no way a BOV from another institution, that has absolutely no connection to VMI can do the job needed to preserve the outstanding record that VMI has produced, and more importantly still produces. If there is any question about it, go meet and speak with current cadets. I find this bill to be completely illogical and misplaced.

As a lifelong Virginian , I am proud of the contributions of Virginia Military Institute to the Commonwealth of Virginia and to the United States and to the world at large. Fifty percent of its graduates are commissioned as officers and serve in the armed forces all over the world. Alums represent their school and our state admirably everywhere they go and in all that they do. Notable alums include Zachary Taylor, 12th President of the United States , George S Patton, George C Marshall, John Jumper, Michael Waltz, Mel Brooks, Dabney Coleman, and Dan Caine , current Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the United States, just to name a few. To think even for a second that a school that produces graduate such as these is incapable of governing itself is absolutely ludicrous. To place VMI under the auspices of VSU makes absolutely no sense if you compare the statistics of each school. VSU has an average SAT score of 910 and VMI‘s average SAT score is 1215, VSU ‘s average GPA is 2.85 and VMI‘s average GPA is 3.59, VSU’s admission rate is 89.1 % and VMI’s admission rate is 71.2%. VSU’s graduation rate is 49.4 % and VMI‘s four year graduation rate is 63% and increases for fifth or six year students. VSU has an employment rate of 68%. VMI‘s employment rate is 97% . The two schools are not comparable at all educationally or even in the return on investment that the Commonwealth reaps from its tax dollars. I don’t know what the motives are of the delegate who introduced this Bill or of the motives when choosing VSU to possible govern VMI, but VMI’s success and contributions to the world at large are undeniable. Our tax dollars sent to VMI come back to us ten-fold and have for generations.

How do you create unity, integrity, and high performance? Ask Virginia Military School (VMI)—they have the formula. You take young men and women from diverse backgrounds and put them through a rigorous training program. You enforce integrity—not to lie, cheat, or steal, or to tolerate others that do. You expect the best from them—not mediocracy. You have upper classmen and women, that have gone through the same experience, provide guidance and support. As they meet the goals of the challenging training program, they start building confidence in themselves and start seeing the benefits of integrity and high performance. In addition, because they have to struggle and work through the training as a team, they create lifelong bonds. They have learned that everyone is the same—it does not matter gender, race, or creed—and that by working together they can achieve so much more than one individual. Should this not be the model of every school? Why am I a staunch defender of this school? Because I am a proud mother of a VMI graduate, and, because I was so impressed with the young men and women of VMI, I served four years on the VMI Parent’s Council. I have seen the results of VMI manifested in the successes and achievements of my son and his classmates. Therefore, I am requesting that you support an institution that uses a formula that develops excellence, leadership, equity, and integrity in our young men and women by striking down Bill HB1374 and allowing VMI’s Board of Visitors, who understand this formula, to continue its mission. Thank you.

As a VMI alumnus, I am writing to express my support for House Bill 1374. I have nothing against the "I", and I met a lot of good people there, but I believe this legislation is a positive step to ensure VMI remains accountable to the Commonwealth and aligned with modern democratic values. My support is rooted in three primary concerns: 1. Realigning the "Citizen-Soldier" Ideal: VMI’s mission is to produce leaders integrated into civilian society. However, there is an increasing perception that the culture now prioritizes the development of an elitist class of military and federal careerists. Strengthening oversight through HB 1374 will ensure VMI returns to its core purpose of developing diverse leaders from all and for all sectors. 2. The Necessity of Civilian Governance: A fundamental principle of our American society is civilian control over military and quasi-military institutions. As a state-supported school, VMI must not operate in a vacuum. Enhanced civilian governance ensures the Institute evolves in a way that reflects the ethics and expectations of the taxpayers who fund it. 3. Historical Accountability and State Sovereignty: In the 1860s, VMI’s transition to an active combatant against the United States fundamentally altered its relationship with the US and the concept of autonomy. As a ward of the state, VMI’s operations must be contingent upon submission to the democratic oversight of the General Assembly. Respectfully,

Sirs- I write to you has a VMI 69 grad, former Infantry Captain and combat vet of the 101st Airborne. I wish to echo the narrative of Mr Sellers of Powhatan. I could not put this better myself, as this proposal is absolutely senseless and will do unimaginable harm. What do you propose to accomplish in this boneheaded act? Is this some kind of retribution for some unknown offense? Pray tell. Are you out to get untold numbers of military officers and business leaders all over the USA? Shame on you!

I submit this comment in reference to House Bill 1374, which proposes changes to the governance structure of the Virginia Military Institute. I write as a graduate of VMI to share how the Institute’s mission, culture, and leadership framework contributed decisively to my personal and professional development. VMI played a foundational role in shaping my life. Through the generosity of an alumni donor, I was able to attend VMI at no personal financial cost through the Institute Scholars program. Without that support, I would not have been able to pursue an undergraduate education. The Institute’s governance and stewardship made possible an experience that transformed my character, education, and career. At VMI, I was formed by a culture that emphasized honor, integrity, and accountability. The single-sanction Honor System was central to this experience and taught me that ethical conduct is non-negotiable. These values have remained core to my identity and leadership philosophy long after graduation. The Institute also provided an academically rigorous education, particularly in the sciences, that prepared me exceptionally well for medical school and residency. Only later did I fully appreciate how VMI had taught me to think critically and master complex material, rather than simply perform well on tests. This educational approach set me apart professionally and has benefited every organization I have served. VMI’s leadership development model—rooted in the Corps’ rank structure and class system—was especially impactful. I was entrusted with responsibility for others early in life and allowed to learn leadership through experience, reflection, and accountability in a structured environment. This prepared me to lead effectively in the Army and in medicine, without having to make early leadership mistakes when consequences would have been far greater. Beyond academics and leadership, VMI fostered resilience, discipline, and perseverance. I learned to perform under stress, to continue forward when circumstances were difficult, and to accept discomfort in pursuit of meaningful goals. The Institute also instilled lifelong habits of physical fitness and personal discipline, as well as an appreciation for simplicity, delayed gratification, and service above self. The bonds formed at VMI—with my Brother Rats and fellow alumni—created a sense of family and belonging that has endured for decades. These relationships reinforce accountability and service long after graduation and reflect the strength of the Institute’s culture and governance. VMI is not a perfect institution, and continued efforts to address misconduct and improve campus climate are both necessary and appropriate. However, VMI is fundamentally a strong and effective institution whose governance structure has supported its unique mission of developing citizen-soldiers and principled leaders. I respectfully urge careful consideration of how proposed governance changes under HB 1374 may affect the Institute’s ability to carry out that mission. My experience stands as one example of the profound positive impact VMI has when its leadership, culture, and governance remain aligned with its core values.

Why would you transfer governance of VMI to a board of a school that is financially struggling. Seems the board of Virginia State University isn't capable of managing their own affairs so why think they could of a school they nothing about. Besides VMI doesn't need help

Any BOV should be held accountable for decisions made regarding to the institution in its charge. To dissolve rather than make a move to properly restore and or revitalize VMIs current BOV is not a positive move in this citizens opinion as it reflects a perception that current leaders have a no confidence vote from the majority of its students, alumni and citizenry. I believe any question of the integrity and makeup of the current BOV actually contains sentiments to the contrary. Political climates shift every few years and VMI has certainly been tested and challenged in recent years, as would be expected of a school that thrives in these types of situations. In my view, VMI continues to make morally guided decisions that are most effective, current and truly reflective of the grand institution that is now and always has been since its founding. As a proud parent of a recent 2024 VMI graduate I can personally attest to the highest standards being held at VMI, this in comparison to other state funded colleges or universities I have sent my children to in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Let VMI operate at the discretion and hands of those who have benefitted from its lessons and discipline past and present, as well as those most interested and invested in the 21st century mission of VMI as it stands today too. What has passed should be retired to the dustbin of history. Let VMI move forward under its own power and authority. To dissolve and move current BOV decisions to a geographically detached and non-military institution likely unaware of even the most basic elements of a VMI experience and education would be a mistake. Please vote no on this bill and work with the current BOV as slated. Schedule a visit to see for yourself what a great institution it is today, this prior to making any decision to dissolve the current body at hand. Let VMI guard and direct its own course, as it has for over 150 years. While true that it’s resistance to whims, trends and fashion has offered slower progress in many ways, this could also be depicted as caution and reserve in seeking to continue in traditions that its citizens value. Change has come. VMI has been moved. Governance has happened. Political climates have risen and fallen but yet VMI still succeeds even with faults that are reflective of our society as a whole. VMI has always been first in the Commonwealth in equipping top quality and moral citizenry and servants to this Commonwealth. Let this fact remain. Let this truth be sustained.

The VMI Board of Visitors is a crucial part of VMI. The board of visitors provides key insights to the importance of the VMI experience and the cadet run corps of cadets. VMI is a unique place that needs a board of visitors of VMI alumni who understand the importance of a VMI education. VMI is a unique place that needs oversight from a board composed of alumni.

To the Esteemed Members of the House Committee, I am writing to express my strong opposition to House Bill 1374, which calls for the dissolution of the Virginia Military Institute (VMI) Board of Visitors and seeks to place the governance of VMI under the Board of Visitors of Virginia State University. While I am not a graduate of the Institute myself, I am the proud parent of three VMI alumni. I have witnessed firsthand the profound and positive impact of VMI's unique educational environment. The demanding regimental system, which is unlike any other in the nation, was instrumental in the development of my three sons, preparing them to be successful and honorable adults. The value of the VMI experience is clearly demonstrated in their chosen paths. Two of my sons are currently serving our nation in the U.S. Armed Services, one as a Marine Corps officer and the other as a Green Beret in the Army. My third son is a successful Data Scientist in the private sector. Their success is a direct testament to VMI's ability to forge leaders of character, discipline, and intellect, prepared to serve as "Citizen Soldiers" in all walks of life, whether in uniform or as civilians. This unique and effective model of education is dependent on a governance structure that understands and is fully committed to VMI's specific mission. The independence of the VMI Board of Visitors is essential for the Institute to continue its 186-year tradition of producing leaders for the Commonwealth and the nation. Placing its governance under a different institution, with a different mission and culture, would fundamentally endanger the very system that makes VMI an invaluable asset. I respectfully urge you to oppose this legislation. To ensure VMI can continue to produce successful citizen-soldiers, its governance must remain independent and dedicated to its singular mission. Thank you for your time and consideration of this important matter. Sincerely, Drew B. Miller LtCol USMC (Ret.) Virginia Beach, VA

I am writing to strongly oppose the dissolution of the VMI Board of Visitors (BOV) and the placement of VMI under the governance of Virginia State University. As a 1974 graduate of VMI, I am a strong supporter of VMI's mission, goals and values. VMI is a major reason why I was successful in my adult life as a 28-year Air Force veteran who retired as a Colonel. VMI should continue to function as it is today. The BOV should remain and function in the best interest of college which focuses on developing great citizens for the Commonwealth and the Nation. VMI's reputation is so high that students attend from around the world to experience its traditions and values. In addition, my wife and I have established an academic scholarship at VMI to support students. If this bill, or others like it, passes the General Assembly, we will have to think twice about our continued financial support to VMI because it would not have full control of its destiny. Pause/Stop the bill now!

I am writing as a proud parent of a Virginia Military Institute graduate, Class of 2017, to oppose HB1374 and to express my strong support for the continued state funding of VMI and for the preservation of its current governance structure, including the VMI Board of Visitors. My son’s experience at VMI was formative in ways that extend far beyond academic achievement. VMI instilled in him the core values of loyalty, integrity, and self-discipline—principles that have not faded with time, but instead have deepened as he has grown into adulthood. The Honor Code, in particular, has remained a constant guide in his life, shaping the way he approaches fatherhood, his professional career, and his leadership responsibilities. It is not merely a rule he once followed as a cadet; it is a standard he continues to live by. VMI’s emphasis on character development and ethical leadership sets it apart from other institutions of higher education. While many colleges speak about values, VMI requires cadets to practice them daily under conditions that demand accountability, resilience, and moral clarity. This rigorous environment produces graduates who understand that leadership is inseparable from responsibility and integrity. For my son, these lessons have become a lifelong application of the foundation laid during his years at VMI. Beyond my personal experience, VMI is exemplary in several important ways: Leadership Development: VMI intentionally develops leaders through a structured system that places real responsibility on cadets early, preparing them to lead under pressure. Service to the Commonwealth and Nation: VMI graduates serve Virginia and the United States in the military, public service, healthcare, engineering, education, and business, contributing far beyond the campus gates. Academic Rigor Combined with Discipline: VMI’s demanding academic programs, paired with its military structure, cultivate time management, perseverance, and excellence. Return on Investment for Taxpayers: VMI consistently produces high-impact graduates at a cost that represents strong stewardship of public funds. Distinct Mission: VMI offers an educational model that is fundamentally different from other public colleges in Virginia. Eliminating or diluting that mission would reduce, not expand, educational choice within the Commonwealth. The VMI Board of Visitors plays a critical role in safeguarding the Institute’s mission, traditions, and accountability. Stability in governance is essential to preserving the qualities that have made VMI successful for nearly two centuries. Undermining that structure risks eroding the very attributes that make VMI a unique and valuable public institution. For these reasons, I respectfully urge the Commonwealth to continue its financial support of the Virginia Military Institute and to retain the VMI Board of Visitors. VMI is not only an institution of higher learning—it is a proven leader-development institution that produces citizens of character who strengthen Virginia and the nation for generations. Thank you for your time and consideration. Respectfully, Parent of a VMI Graduate, Class of 2017

I opposed the bill HB1374 | Feggans | Virginia Military Institute; governance. VMI is a unique institution. The institute has produced many top leaders and the hundred plus years it has been in existence, but I am sure you are already aware of that. I would like to bring to light what the institute does for the less famous cadets from a parental standpoint and from the standpoint of what these cadets contribute to their communities in their everyday lives. My son began his career at VMI as a slightly less mature, nerdy band kid. He did not have a lot of confidence or strength. He struggled through the ratline and there were times when we weren't sure if he was going to be able to assimilate. We did not always understand the VMI process during that time, but we embraced it and we let yhe process play out. It was not easy. There were many struggles along the way, but, nothing worthy in life comes easy. He learned to find the mental fortitude to get through whatever obstacle stood in front of him, he learned to work with people who he didn't agree with (which is better than our current political parties), and he learned to be a leader who steps up when there is a need. This weekend, he could have stayed home in his warm house with his wife and his dog, yet he volunteered to go out and help along with VDOT to ensure that the roads were cleared and passable for emergency vehicles and those who had to be on the roads. I begged him not to put himself in harm's Way, but he said, "They are counting on me." That is the epitome of VMI. This is just one small example of one Cadet in everyday life that can impact the life of many others. The VMI board of visitors understands this. They understand the process. VSU's leadership could never understand this. People outside the bubble do not understand the process, and they don't see how it touches their lives everyday. Put politics aside and realize what they are doing is for the greater good.

This bill is one of the most senseless, misguided pieces of proposed legislation I have ever seen. It should be obvious to anyone in their right mind that this is a joke of an idea, fueled by a misguided attempt at some sort of payback or using VMI as a punching bag, making it out to be something it is not in order to slay an imaginary dragon. I graduated in 2021, and watching the witch hunt over the past few years has been one of the most disgusting displays of empty, chest beating politics that accomplishes nothing whatsoever I have ever seen. Going after an institution of higher learning that actually attempts to instill honor and produces high quality, educated leaders for the private and public sectors with a unique experience and skillset is shooting this country and state in its own foot. I would finish by just requesting that any supporters of this legislation to please just look at the facts and numbers, and consider the legitimate reputations of each college as opposed to what a smear campaign would have you believe. Please do not just listen to what any mouthpiece that stands to gain reputation by pushing legislation has to say, and observe the accomplishments and testimony of our graduates and those who know them.

I am writing to express my strong opposition to HB 1374. I am a voter and VMI graduate, class of 2007. I am also a veteran, have served in Iraq and Afghanistan, and a father. Our children need options in higher education. VMI offers what many young women and men are searching for, something different. They want responsibility and accountability. They want to be tested physically, mentally, and psychologically. This is starkly different than any other institution of higher education. While the Commonwealth should always seek efficiency, the dissolution of the VMI Board of Visitors in favor of VSU governance is a logistical and cultural mismatch. Both VMI and VSU are 'jewels' of Virginia higher education precisely because of their unique, specialized missions. Subsuming one under the other threatens the integrity of both institutions. I urge the Committee to table this indefinitely.

Hello, I just want to share the story and the accomplishments of my son who is a junior/ second classmen currently at VMI. I also have a son at another State University and there is no comparison of the amazing platform of VMI. My cadet has completely thrived at the school and has made friendships with all nationalities, and religions, and economic backgrounds. He has an incredible major and already has had incredible opportunities with internships and jobs. He has a love now for travel and education, beautiful thing. He is also your next marine. I am a parent that came down here from New York to study social work and completely are for the good and the value of each individual. As involved as my son is at VMI, I have never seen any racial or sexist divide. I have embraced this school and fully am at awe of the students that come from VMI. I know first hand, I would do anything for my other son to set his goals as high as these men and women do and not worry about all the absolute crazy behaviors that have been seen. Thank you, much care always!

As a graduate of the VIrginia Military Institute and a career government employee for nearly 4 decades, I am astounded that the Virginia Assembly would introduce House Bills 1374 and 1377, both needlessly attacking VMI, one of the most successful and prestigious colleges in the state of VIrginia. For 187 years, VMI has produced citizen soldiers who have excelled in all walks of life, from business leaders to statesmen, public servants and military professionals. Her alumnus have included Rhodes scholars, Medal of Honor recipients and numerous alumnus of distinction, including the likes of Nobel Peace Prize recipient General George Marshall, the US Army Chief of Staff in WWII; Rear Admiral Richard Byrd, legendary polar explorer and Medal of Honor recipient; US Supreme Court Justice Tom C. Clark; US Air Force Chief of Staff, General John Jumper; current Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Dan Caine, and hundreds of other successful graduates serving their towns, states and country in various capacities. VMI graduates can be found in every element of society, from the medical community and business fields to public service and community outreach programs. VMI alumnus lead the way among Virginia residents in terms of leadership and fortitude. VMI has indeed a storied history, having been historically connected to the Confederacy during the American civil war. However, as history shows, VMI has evolved and changed dramatically over the ensuing 160 years, striving to show the world she is a 21st century model of excellence and acceptance. VMI has not only accepted, but excelled in ensuring it's students represent the face of America without regard to race, religion, sexual preference, country of origin, gender or ideology. All are welcome to apply and those found academically and physically fit enough to enter are all given the chance to become future graduates of this fine institute. VMI has proven itself time and time again to be a leader among institutions of higher education, ranking number 2 in the best value in education in Virginia. VMI was ranked the 4th best liberal arts college in the entire nation and was rated the highest scores available for any public university in VIrginia by Money magazine. Defunding VMI or worse, placing VMI's proven and valuable governance under VSU, a small, virtually unknown HBC outside of Virginia, would not only serve to quash VMI's productivity and pattern of excellence, but appears wholly driven by political ideology and worse, anger against the American values that VMI has adopted over the years. Excellence in character; love of nation; pursuit of justice; respect for others, and most importantly, honor above self are the very values that VMI instills in her graduates. Please vote down these house bills. Their passage would have no positive effect on improving life at VMI or improving the brilliant education VMI already provides her students. In short, these bills would simply serve to erode what is clearly one of the finest higher institutes of learning currently available to anyone pursuing college in the state of VIrginia.

HR 1374, as proposed, raises concerns about the potential impact of extreme legislative agendas concerning our state’s higher education. VMI is a respected institution, and any suggestion to transfer its oversight and management to another organization should be carefully evaluated by examining the underlying rationale for such a proposal. As a proud alumnus and retired Marine Corps infantry officer, I was both surprised and disappointed that the legislature put this forward and believe this measure is even remotely necessary. In 2026, the US News & World Report recognized VMI as a leading public liberal arts institution, ranking it as the number four public liberal arts school in the nation. Given this context, one must inquire about the rationale behind the legislature's decision to consider this action necessary, unless influenced by personal factors. The structure of this bill suggests a potential intention to introduce external influence by the legislature on VMI leadership. Essentially, the bill appears to tie funding to compliance with certain requirements. Such an approach might be justified were VMI a failing or struggling institution; however, this is not the case. By all measurable indicators, VMI is clearly performing and is producing outstanding leaders. I respectfully suggest that this bill be evaluated objectively, as it appears to reflect an attempt to alter a well-established institution based on personal interests rather than prioritizing what is best for Virginia or VMI.

I respectfully oppose HB1374. As a parent of a cadet at the Virginia Military Institute, I am deeply concerned that this bill unfairly singles out VMI for a politically driven review that no other public institution is subjected to. VMI is not an ordinary college—its unique mission is precisely why my son chose to attend. For 186 years, VMI has served an irreplaceable role in developing model citizen-soldiers through rigorous academics, military training, discipline, character development, and its deeply rooted Honor Code. Throughout its long history, VMI has produced generations of distinguished leaders—both public and military—who have served the Commonwealth and the nation with honor. Treating VMI as interchangeable with conventional universities fundamentally misunderstands both its purpose and its value. Additionally, HB1374 risks politicizing a military institution while disregarding the substantial reforms already implemented under existing state oversight. For these reasons, I strongly urge the rejection of HB1374.

Comments Document

Please find attached my comments regarding the proposal to remove the Board of Visitors at VMI and transfer oversight authority to VSU. I respectfully oppose this measure and recommend that the legislature reject this bill. David Johnson 123 Castlebar drive Fredericksburg, VA 22406

As a proud VMI alumnus, I must speak out against House Bill 1374, which would dissolve the VMI Board of Visitors and place governance under the Virginia State University Board of Visitors. This bill, now in the House Education Committee, threatens an institution that has honorably served Virginia for over 185 years. My path to VMI was earned through hard work: I secured a Division I lacrosse scholarship and in-state tuition while paying my own way. VMI transformed me. It taught that integrity and character are non-negotiable—no matter the pressure. Discipline and relentless effort can achieve anything. Most importantly, the brotherhood forged in shared adversity is a lifelong bond stronger than most relationships. These weren't just words; they were lived every day in VMI's rigorous environment. VMI's impact goes beyond personal stories. Lt. Gen. David Furness '87 testified on January 23, 2026, affirming the Institute's mission: producing leaders of honor, integrity, and service to something greater. In response to bills questioning VMI's value, the VMI Alumni Agencies are mobilizing—with a full-page ad in the Richmond Times-Dispatch showcasing enduring success metrics. VMI isn't just a college; it's a cornerstone of Virginia's military and leadership heritage. Over the past six years, however, politics has intruded, pushing DEI initiatives that sometimes prioritize ideology over VMI's traditions of merit and resilience. This has disrupted the proven process of earning a VMI degree. Politics should stay out of this state military college. Rather than dismantling its independent governance, we should preserve autonomy to keep it a beacon of excellence, free from partisan interference. Why introduce this bill, Delegate Michael B. Feggans? VMI has consistently proven its worth through alumni who serve Virginia and the nation with distinction. Dissolving the Board risks undermining this legacy without evidence of failure. Virginians deserve policies that strengthen institutions, not weaken them. I'm deeply grateful for my hard-earned time at VMI—it changed my life. I urge the House Education Committee to reject HB 1374 and pursue constructive dialogue that respects VMI's mission. Protect what works so future cadets can experience the same opportunities. Review the VMI Alumni Agencies' ad and Lt. Gen. Furness's testimony for the full picture. Thank you for considering this perspective.

As a military veteran, Virginia resident, and mother of a female 2nd class cadet, I STRONGLY OPPOSE the dismantling of the Virginia Military Institute BOV and moving the VMI BOV to another institution. VMI uniquely instills cadets with lifelong leadership, service, and character attributes that its graduates bring to their communities and workplaces across Virginia and the nation. I have been consistently impressed with VMI’s adherence to making the school accessible to all people and their unwavering dedication to ensuring cadets uphold the highest standards of honor, leadership, and commitment to not only our nation, but to themselves and their fellow cadets. My cadet has grown as a disciplined leader in ways that I am confident is unique to VMI’s operating ethos. VMI stands unique among all Virginia higher education institutions as an unparalleled university, and graduates bring these unique leadership attributes to the military, government, and private industry upon graduation. This is evidenced by the remarkable success rate of VMI graduates throughout history through present times. I can only assume that this initiative is a personal-driven vendetta, as it makes no sense to the majority of people involved in the success of this institution. The issues identified as the basis of this initiative are antiquated and baseless. This proposed legislation is distracting VMI and the cadets from doing what matters…building leaders and succeeding. Again, as a Virginia voter, I urge you to retract this wildly unpopular proposed legislation.

In defense of the Virginia Military Institute, I am writing as a retired U.S. Air Force Colonel and proud graduate of the VMI Class of 1986. I respectfully seek your support across state lines regarding stopping Virginia House Bill 1374. HB 1374 calls for the dissolution of the VMI Board of Visitors and places governance of VMI under the Virginia State University Board of Visitors. This legislation sets a concerning precedent, as it could be used in any state across the USA to politically challenge a state-sponsored institution of higher education. VMI provides educational services that are unique and not duplicated elsewhere in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Since 2021, under the oversight of the State Council of Higher Education for Virginia (SCHEV), VMI has implemented substantial reforms to its policies, values, and preventative, investigative, and disciplinary procedures. These changes address conduct that could be perceived or classified as racist, sexist, misogynistic, or as sexual harassment or sexual assault. VMI has also taken deliberate steps to distance itself from the promotion of the Confederacy in the context of the American Civil War. HB 1374 appears intended to punish VMI by insinuating that it celebrates the Confederacy. History cannot be changed, nor should it be ignored, but it should be taught responsibly. VMI has demonstrated good-faith efforts to evolve while remaining faithful to its mission. VMI has been successful in recruiting and admitting a more diverse student body and should continue to receive public funding as a state-sponsored institution of higher education.

As a professor and department head at Virginia Military Institute, I write to offer my strong opposition to this bill. It has been the honor of my life to be part of this remarkable institution. In my thirty-eight years at VMI, I have been privileged to teach the exceptional young people who have chosen to take on the rigors of VMI. I have taught at three other well-respected universities, but no other student body has impressed me as the Corps of Cadets has. They live each day in accordance with a single-sanction Honor System that governs all aspects of their lives, even as they as they participate in a demanding program that integrates academics, physical training, and military discipline. No other college or university in the Commonwealth offers an experience like this one. This comprehensive program produces well-educated, honorable, graduates with a strong devotion to service. If you listen to those who know the institution, students, and alumni well, you will appreciate the great importance of continuing to support this outstanding institution and its current system of governance.

To whom it may concern, This proposed bill is a terrible idea and absolutely is punitive in nature despite claims otherwise. You do not strip a school of their governing body unless they have done something you deem “incorrect.” Doing this will result in VMI losing the unique qualities that this school has that separate it from other public institutions in our Commonwealth. While it is not a school I attended, or wanted to attend, for those that choose it as the location for their secondary education, it helps mold and shape them into wonderful citizen/military leaders. Changing the board of visitors to fall under a different board - even one as good as VSU - will undermine the unique qualities and nature of the Institute. I urge that this bill not proceed.

Subject: Opposition to Proposed Changes to VMI’s Governance Structure Honorable Virginia House Representatives, I am writing as a proud graduate of the Virginia Military Institute, Class of 1980, having just celebrated my 45th reunion this past October with my brother rats. I urge you to oppose the proposed legislation that would alter VMI’s independent governance structure. VMI is not simply another state institution. It is a one‑of‑a‑kind college whose mission, culture, and standards are unlike anything found elsewhere in Virginia or the nation. George C. Marshall—one of our most distinguished alumni—believed deeply in VMI’s ability to produce citizen‑soldiers prepared to serve both in uniform and in civilian life. That legacy continues today, and it is inseparable from the Institute’s unique system of leadership, accountability, and self‑governance. The Honor Code alone sets VMI apart. It is the only place I have ever been where I could leave a $20, $50, or even $100 bill on my desk and know with absolute certainty that it would be there when I returned. That level of integrity is not accidental—it is cultivated through a culture and governance model that has worked for generations. VMI is “no ordinary school,” and it cannot be governed as if it were. Its distinct mission requires an independent Board of Visitors that understands the Institute’s traditions, its responsibilities, and the expectations placed upon its graduates. To dilute or restructure that governance is to weaken the very qualities that make VMI a national treasure. Virginia should take pride in having such an institution and should be doing everything in its power to support and preserve it—not diminish its autonomy. The Commonwealth owes this to its citizens, its history, and the nation as a whole. I respectfully ask you to vote against this bill and to stand with those who value VMI’s unique and irreplaceable role in American education. Respectfully, Steven R. Roberts VMI Class of 1980 9106442032 Robenter@aol.com

To the Members of the Board of Visitors and the House Education Committee, I respectfully submit this statement in opposition to HB 1374, which calls for the dissolution of the Virginia Military Institute Board of Visitors and the transfer of VMI’s governance to the Virginia State University Board of Visitors. VMI is a unique public institution within the Commonwealth, established with a distinct statutory mission, military structure, and educational model that differs fundamentally from other public universities. The VMI Board of Visitors exists to provide governance that is specifically aligned with this mission and with the responsibilities inherent in operating a senior military college. Dissolving this board would sever the direct accountability and institutional knowledge necessary to effectively oversee VMI. Transferring governance authority to the Board of Visitors of another institution—one with its own separate mission, obligations, and operational priorities—undermines sound governance principles. Oversight bodies function best when they are singularly focused on the institution they govern. Reassigning VMI’s governance risks diluting oversight, disrupting continuity, and impairing the Board’s ability to fulfill its fiduciary and supervisory responsibilities to the Commonwealth. The dissolution of an institution-specific governing board is a serious measure with long-term consequences, and the proposed action introduces uncertainty that could negatively affect cadets, faculty, alumni, and public trust in the Institute. For these reasons, I respectfully oppose HB 1374 and urge careful consideration of the implications of dissolving the VMI Board of Visitors and removing governance from an institution uniquely structured to serve the Commonwealth of Virginia. Respectfully,

I am a single mother of a current Cadet at VMI. Prior to my son making the decision to attend VMI we both started researching and asking multiple veterans across all military branches. My son found top buisness leaders around the world, graduated from VMI. We both found every veteran and current enlisted praised VMI. Most often we heard, all of my best leaders went to VMI or besides one of the Acadamies, VMI is the best. Since attending VMI, my son has met and become friends with Cadets from all over the world. He has grown and is still growing into a man of honor and integrity. His brothers look up to them and he now helps guide them as they are starting to head out own their own. I am thankful for my son's dyke, as he still helps my son with rides, and a placecto stay when needed. When I mention and explain the dyke system to people, they love it. This school is unique, setting standards and expectations that set it apart, it is the reason my son chose to attend VMI. I have heardvseveral Cadets say that they know that they would not be as successful at a regular college. VMI is absolutely a benefit to Virginia, and to those that chose to attend, trust the process and to live up to the high standards. Is it tough? Of course it is, it is what sets it apart, raises the value. If it were easy I know my son would not be attending. VMI has been around a long time and through several different changes in society and culture, they work hard to balance tradition and being revelant to today. They are very capable of governing themselves, and why would you pull funding from a college held in such high esteem? This is not logical at all.

I am vehemently opposed to the passage of HB 1374. VMI and VSU have completely different missions. Neither can govern the other successfully. One will fundamentally change the other in profoundly negative ways that accrues no benefit to the Commonwealth of Virginia at large or the students that choose to attend either. Each entity must remain stand alone for each to survive as the unique educational institutions they are and were intended to be.

I am strongly opposed to the current Virginia General Assembly bills to defund VMI, dissolve the VMI Board of Visitors, and move VMI governance under Virginia State University. Specifically, this concerns especially proposed HB1374. I am a proud VMI graduate from the Class of 1977 and I think, no… I know, that this would be a travesty and huge mistake. For 186 years VMI has produced a long line of strong, honorable citizen-soldier leaders who have admirably served this country in times of war and peace. The state legislature would do well to very carefully consider what these bills would actually be doing to the state and the country. I can honestly say that my VMI experience truly changed my life, both in terms of my military and civilian service. A VMI education is unlike any other college education a young man or woman can get, and that includes the service academies. I know that for one, I’m certainly a better person for it. To deny the opportunity of a VMI education, the way it functions now, to anyone who wants it would be a terrible shame. I’m hopeful that our state legislators will think long and hard about this before considering any further action.

Transfer of Assets: All existing contracts, rules, property, rights, and duties of VMI's current Board of Visitors would be transferred to the VSU Board of Visitors upon the bill's effective date (p. 5) I believe this appears to be a breach of commitments that VMI made. For example the scholarship for Dave William, VMI class of 1991, who died in the Pentagon on September 11th. The scholarship for Mike Clegg Scholarship, VMI Class of 1988, a first responder who died during Covid. The scholarship for my late wife. How can VSU provide appropriate governance when for Virginia schools the General and Flag Officer (GFO) Counts • Virginia Military Institute (VMI): Has produced nearly 300 general and flag officers throughout its history. As of early 2026, recent records cite counts between 293 and 300. • Virginia Tech: Has produced 97 generals and admirals as of historically tracked records. • Virginia State University (VSU): Notable for producing several general officers, including its first female brigadier general, though its total count is significantly lower than VMI or Virginia Tech. It appears VSU does not have the population to provide governance for a public military school.

My name is Tim Hipp, and I am here to provide testimony in opposition to House Bill 1374, which proposes to alter the governance structure of the Virginia Military Institute. I speak not as a political actor, but as a parent with deep, long-term investment in VMI. I have one child who has graduated from VMI, one currently enrolled, and three more who plan to attend. This means I have observed VMI’s culture not as an abstraction, but as a lived system that shapes young men and women over time. The core issue with HB 1374 is not administrative efficiency or oversight. It is culture. Institutions are not interchangeable. Governance is not neutral. Culture is not transferable by statute. VMI exists for a singular purpose: to form leaders through a military system of discipline, honor, hierarchy, and accountability. Every element of its governance is designed to protect and reinforce that system. The Board of Visitors at VMI is not merely a managerial body; it is a cultural steward. Its role is to preserve an institutional ecosystem that is intentionally demanding, uncomfortable, and formative. By contrast, Virginia State University is a civilian public university with a fundamentally different mission, structure, and culture. That difference is not a criticism. It is a fact. VSU’s governance is oriented toward a traditional civilian academic model; one designed around access, flexibility, and conventional student life. VMI’s governance exists to protect a total immersion leadership system that intentionally limits flexibility in order to cultivate responsibility, resilience, and ethical command. Placing VMI under the governance of an institution that does not share—and has never operated within—that culture is not reform. It is misalignment. Culture cannot be overseen effectively by those who do not live within it, understand its logic, or accept its necessity. The military model VMI employs depends on continuity, clarity of authority, and resistance to short-term political or cultural pressure. Weakening that chain at the governance level will inevitably weaken it everywhere else. This bill would dissolve nearly two centuries of governance continuity and replace it with a structure that lacks direct accountability to VMI’s mission. That is not modernization. It is institutional erosion. Leadership is not produced by consensus governance. Honor is not shaped by external supervision. Discipline does not survive when its guardians are structurally distant from its practice. If the Commonwealth wishes to improve VMI, the appropriate path is engagement, oversight, and accountability within its existing governance framework, not the removal of that framework altogether. HB 1374 does not correct a failure of governance. It redefines governance without regard for culture, and in doing so, it risks dismantling one of the most effective leadership institutions in the Commonwealth. I urge you to oppose this bill not to preserve tradition for tradition’s sake, but to protect a proven system whose outcomes speak louder than ideology. Thank you for the opportunity to provide this testimony.

I am writing to respectfully express my opposition to House Bill 1374 , and to share my strong support for the Virginia Military Institute and its enduring mission. Virginia Military Institute is one of the Commonwealth’s most distinguished institutions, with a long-standing tradition of excellence in leadership development, academic rigor, and service. For over 180 years, VMI has educated citizen-soldiers who go on to serve Virginia and the nation with integrity, discipline, and a deep sense of responsibility. Its unique adversative model, emphasis on character development, and commitment to producing ethical leaders are qualities that set VMI apart from other institutions of higher learning. VMI plays a vital role not only in educating future military and civilian leaders, but also in preserving a culture of accountability, honor, and public service. The Institute’s graduates consistently contribute to the Commonwealth through military service, public leadership, engineering, education, and countless other fields. This legacy is something Virginians can take pride in and should continue to protect. My concern with House Bill 1374 is that it risks undermining the autonomy, traditions, and proven educational model that have made VMI successful for generations. I believe that decisions affecting VMI should be made with careful consideration of its unique mission and history, and with respect for the institution’s ability to uphold high standards while continuing to evolve responsibly. I appreciate your time and thoughtful consideration of this perspective. I respectfully urge you to oppose House Bill 1374 and to continue supporting Virginia Military Institute as a cornerstone of leadership, service, and excellence in the Commonwealth.

I am writing to express my opposition to HB 1374. VMI is excellent school that has demonstrated the ability to govern itself throughout its history. I believe the idea of disbanding the VMI BOV is an example of politically motivated backlash that is neither objective or practical. Please spare my alma mater from the whims of back-and-forth partisan divide that so ills our nation and state.

Chairman, Members of the Committee: My name is Martin Fentress Jr. I am a proud parent of a cadet at the Virginia Military Institute, Parents Council member, and a Senior Naval Officer who has intentionally targeted VMI graduates for future Naval Aviation officers because I believe VMI is one of our nation’s premier leadership laboratories — producing officers of character, discipline, and grit. I strongly oppose HB 1374, which would dissolve the Virginia Military Institute Board of Visitors and transfer governance authority to the Board of Visitors of Virginia State University (VSU) — a public historically black college and university (HBCU). This structural overhaul goes far beyond academic governance reform. It represents an unwarranted political intrusion into the independent governance of a unique public institution that serves a critical national defense and leadership mission. This proposal comes at a time when VMI’s Board is fulfilling its statutory responsibilities — setting policy, overseeing budgets, and appointing a Superintendent. That Board, for nearly two centuries, has governed VMI’s distinctive regimental system and mission. Protecting that governance autonomy matters for the Corps, the Commonwealth, and the nation’s defense industrial base. What is less frequently discussed in the legislative debate is the political context undergirding this bill. Last year, Senator Jennifer Carroll-Foy — herself a VMI alumna and Virginia State University graduate — was accused by a U.S. Congressman of improperly attempting to influence the VMI Board’s decision about extending the contract of VMI’s Superintendent, Major General Cedric Wins, by threatening to jeopardize funding if the board did not comply. This allegation touches the very issue before this body: politicians seeking to wield budgetary power to dictate institutional governance decisions that should be left to the Board under our laws. Senator Carroll-Foy denied these allegations, yet the controversy illustrates how political motives, not institutional best interests, are driving efforts to restructure VMI’s governance. The fact that she is both a VMI graduate and a Virginia State University graduate — the very institution poised to assume authority over VMI under this bill — raises questions of conflict and political expediency that deserve scrutiny by this committee. VMI isn’t just another university; it’s a unique military leadership incubator that has served America for 186 years. Its regimental system teaches leadership, accountability, and service in a manner unmatched by traditional higher education institutions. For thousands of families like mine, the institute’s traditions and mission are not political talking points — they are core to the character development of our future military officers. I respectfully urge this committee to reject HB 1374 as an overreach that weaponizes governance changes for political ends, undermines institutional autonomy, and disserves the cadets and families committed to VMI’s mission.

I am a resident of western Caroline County (Chilesburg voting district), a lifelong Virginian and a VMI supporter. I am sending my disapproval of House Bill 1374. While I did not attend the college, my father (’58), uncle (’55) and most recently my son (’18) are proud graduates of The Institute. I have been visiting Lexington and the VMI campus (Post) for over 50 years. My father and uncle were able to attend VMI though a “state cadetship” which paid for their education and required service to Virginia upon graduation. My father worked for the VA Department of Highways out of college and retired after 32 years of service. A college education and job were hard to come by for his blue collar family from Covington. When I was young, I thought all colleges were like VMI – small in size, students in uniforms who marched to eat at the cafeteria and who lived in rooms with beds they raised up during the day and down at night. I soon found out through friends that other colleges were not like VMI. VMI offered no frills and physical challenges but in return graduates received an excellent education, life lessons learned and opportunities post graduation either through military service or civilian work. When I searched for a college in 1986, I landed at Virginia Tech and realized my state was full of options for students looking to further their education. Small and big campuses, diverse courses of study, Historically Black Colleges, single sex colleges and one of (2) state supported military colleges in America – VMI. I have friends who were able to attend the college that fit their needs thanks to these choices. More recently, VMI was the perfect fit for my son. From the age of 8 he made it his goal to serve in the military and wanted to attend VMI to prepare him for his career. He was also exposed to the VMI way throughout his childhood and knew upfront what challenges he would face as a Cadet. He worked hard in school and on the track which helped him gain early admission. His time at VMI was, as predicted, full of challenges but way more rewards. I am proud to say he met his goals – graduation and currently serves as a Captain in the US Army. During his time as a cadet, I had the honor to be on the Parents Council for 2 years. My time there allowed me to learn more about the college I grew up visiting and help serve the students who worked so hard to succeed there. A school that was founded in 1839 has obviously seen a lot of changes in the world. It is my opinion (as a lifelong supporter, parent and Parent Council member) that VMI has lived up to its core principals from being founded in 1839: honor, integrity, character and service; aiming to develop citizen-soldiers who for four years lived under a strict honor code – “a cadet does not lie, cheat, steal or tolerate those who do.” My father’s favorite quote to recite and live by was etched in the arch of the building he walked through every day while on Post – “You may be whatever you resolve to be”. This quote, the honor code, the rigorous physical and educational challenges that VMI students endure help create great Virginians and Americans. Please let young Americans continue to have an out-of-the ordinary college choice (an option to “one size fits all” education) and support VMI and its current Board of Visitors structure. Being different should be embraced; not punished.

I am writing to voice my support of the Virginia Military Institute (VMI) and my strong opposition to HB 1377 and HB 1374. VMI is an extraordinary, mission-driven, outcome-focused institution that is life-altering for its cadets and graduates. Please quickly dispatch with both HB 1377 and HB 1374.

I am writing to express my disagreement with HB 1374. It would be a mistake to change the governance of VMI to another institution, regardless of what institution it is. VMI has a proud history of self governance that has led to 187 years of producing leaders for our commonwealth and our nation. Although VMI has been a hotbed of media attention over the last 10 years, removing its self governance is a step too far and not a way to help effect real oversight of VMI. As an alumni, I can attest to the high levels of leadership that VMI taught me… under its current governance structure. Changing that structure I fear would cause unrepairable damage to VMI and its core mission of raising up leaders.

As a proud VMI alumnus, I respectfully disagree with HB1374. If the BOV for VSU has a few members who are alumni and understand the experience of attending the university, then the same should be the case for VMI, with their own BOV consisting of at least some with real experience and understanding. Each school is unique in mission, and deserves representation without needing either to oversee or govern the other. VMI is well ranked among National Liberal Arts colleges and Public liberal arts colleges as it currently stands, and every Virginia school deserves to have its own BOV committed to them.

My name is Brentton Fentress. I am a Second Class Cadet (Junior) at the Virginia Military Institute, and I currently serve as the Hotel Company First Sergeant. I respectfully submit this testimony in opposition to House Bill 1374. House Bill 1374 proposes a fundamental change to VMI’s governance structure. While oversight and accountability are appropriate for any public institution, this bill does not improve accountability — instead, it undermines the very system that has made VMI successful for more than 180 years. VMI is not a typical public university. It is a senior military college with a singular mission: to produce citizen-soldiers and leaders of character through a demanding regimental system. That mission depends on unity of command, clarity of authority, and institutional continuity. HB 1374 disrupts that balance by removing governance from leaders specifically charged with preserving VMI’s unique military mission and culture. As a cadet leader responsible for the discipline, welfare, and development of others, I can say with confidence: structure matters. The regimental system works precisely because expectations are clear, standards are uniform, and leadership is accountable. VMI’s governance mirrors that reality. Weakening or diffusing it does not improve outcomes — it erodes them. The premise underlying HB 1374 appears to be that VMI is an institution defined by discrimination or exclusion. That premise is factually incorrect. From the moment a cadet matriculates, every individual is treated the same — same haircut, same uniform, same standards, same ratline. The ratline exists for two reasons: -To transform civilians into disciplined, ethical cadets -To forge a class that is unified for life That process does not divide — it binds. I have personally witnessed and lived the “Brother Rat Spirit,” where cadets and alumni support one another without regard to race, sex, religion, or background. That is not rhetoric; it is reality. VMI produces graduates who commission into the armed forces, serve in public office, lead businesses, and contribute meaningfully to the Commonwealth. Graduation rates, commissioning outcomes, and alumni service reflect an institution that is working, not failing. HB 1374 does not correct a deficiency. It targets a governance model because the institution itself is misunderstood. VMI is an easy target because it embraces traditional values, enforces discipline, and evaluates cadets based on merit and performance — not immutable characteristics. I respectfully urge the committee to reject House Bill 1374 and allow VMI to continue fulfilling its mission with the governance structure that has proven effective, accountable, and worthy of the Commonwealth’s trust. Thank you for the opportunity to share my insight.

HB1374’s degradation of the VMI Mission: BLUF: HB1374 eliminates VMI’s independent governance and places the Institute under the Board of Visitors of another university (Virginia State University), which has a fundamentally different objective, mission, and institutional culture than VMI. While this bill to some extent attempts to put forth an illusion of preserving the VMI mission, this shift will ultimately undermine the standards of the institution as this “foreign” board will determine how the standards, discipline, admissions, and culture are interpreted and enforced over time. As an alumnus of VMI, I believe that HB1374 will be detrimental to VMI’s mission and I oppose HB1374 along with any effort to dissolve VMI’s independent governance. The rigor of VMI was not incidental to my experience but rather essential. The discipline, standards, and expectations of the Institute molded me into a better man, a Naval Officer capable of leading under pressure, and a husband and father grounded in duty, integrity, and selflessness, and values that brought me closer to Christ. That transformation is not unique to me, but reflected across generations of VMI graduates who serve the Commonwealth and the nation with distinction. HB1374 fundamentally alters the structure that makes those outcomes possible. While the bill repeats VMI’s mission language, governance and not statutory phrasing determines how standards are enforced, how discipline is applied, how admissions criteria are shaped, and how institutional culture evolves over time. Transferring authority over VMI to the board of another institution with a fundamentally different mission and institutional culture introduces a serious risk of long-term dilution of rigor, merit-based standards, and military character. From my lived experience, VMI was not divided by race or gender. Rather, it was a school unified by shared hardship and purpose. Cadets were judged by performance and character, not identity. That merit-based environment is precisely why VMI produces resilient leaders. I am deeply concerned that shifting governance to a board whose priorities may be shaped by external political frameworks, rather than the unique requirements of a senior military college, will gradually pressure VMI toward admissions, discipline, and policy decisions that emphasize ideology over excellence. The allegations driving these bills deserve attention and proportion. Misconduct should always be addressed. But portraying VMI as systemically broken does not reflect the experience of most cadets or alumni. Every large institution will have individual failures; dismantling the governance of one of Virginia’s most effective leadership institutions in response to selective narratives is not responsible reform, it is political overreach with long-term consequences for future cadets. VMI’s effectiveness depends on clarity of mission, rigor of standards, and governance aligned with its unique purpose. Weakening that structure will not improve outcomes; it will erode them gradually and irreversibly. I urge you to reject HB1374 and preserve VMI’s independent governance while pursuing any necessary improvements through measured, constructive reform, not structural dismantling.

I oppose HB 1374 as a mom of a VMI cadet and an Army veteran. My son worked tirelessly to earn a place at VMI and on the swim team. Dissolving the Board of Visitors threatens the stability of an institution that builds discipline, leadership, and service to Virginia.

I respectfully oppose HB 1374 and request that it be voted down. I am the parent of a current VMI cadet and active member of the VMI community. I have had the opportunity to interact with many current cadets, alumni, and aspiring cadets. VMI is committed to developing these young men and women into strong leaders and persons of honor regardless of religion, race, or gender. The VMI student body represents the best of the best. It would take one visit to the school to see the incredible character of these cadets and to dispel any false claims about inequality. These honorable men and women have a proven record of going on to serve their country as military leaders, business owners, and exceptional members of their communities. My son has excelled in every way as a cadet at VMI. His academic success, work ethic, and drive are a direct result of VMI’s formula to create disciplined, honorable citizens – all while managing the demands of military training. The BOV at VMI has been instrumental over the years in making sure that formula is maintained, but also integrating measures for a changing landscape. They have been successful at doing so as only members of the VMI community can. I respectfully request that the BOV be maintained by VMI.

Speaking on HB1374 the VMI current BOV needs to continue to govern the Institute. Our son has wanted to be in the Navy since he was 6 years old. As he continued to grow up and got to high school VMI really wasn't on his radar. We told him hey just go to one of the overnight open houses and see what you think. When he got home he said "That's the one". He got his acceptance letter and there has never been one day where he said he wanted to leave. He is now a Second Classman and still loves it. His friends here back at home have more respect for him just because he is at VMI. VMI has done an amazing job at creating an environment where students thrive and become leaders that this country deserves. Handing that responsibility over to another institution who does not have the same fundamentals would be a disservice to cadets yet to come to VMI. Please reconsider this bill and do not let another institution's BOV oversee VMI. Keep BOV at VMI like it currently is. Thank you!

I am writing to voice my strong opposition to House Bill 1374. As a parent of two students who have chosen the Virginia Military Institute for its unique educational model, I am deeply concerned about any legislation that would undermine the Institute’s mission, structure, or ability to operate as intended. My older son is currently a sophomore at VMI, and the transformation he has experienced there is remarkable. He selected VMI not simply for its military connection, but for the discipline, structure, and accountability that define daily life on post. The Institute has challenged him academically, physically, and personally. He has learned to manage the demands of an engineering degree, athletic commitments, military duties, and academic preparation with a level of maturity and focus that far exceeds what we saw at other colleges we visited. VMI’s environment has pushed him to grow in ways that a traditional campus simply could not. Our younger son, a high school senior, has also accepted an offer to attend VMI. He plans to pursue a military career after graduation, and VMI’s rigorous academic programs, leadership development, and structured environment align perfectly with his goals. For students like him, those who thrive under high expectations and clear standards, VMI provides an opportunity that is unmatched. House Bill 1374 threatens to disrupt an institution that serves a very specific and important purpose. VMI is not designed to mirror a typical college, nor should it be. Its demanding environment is intentional, and it is precisely what allows students to develop discipline, resilience, and leadership. Forcing the Institute to conform to models that do not reflect its mission would diminish the experience for current cadets and limit opportunities for future ones. Those who have spent time at VMI understand the professionalism, respect, and accountability that guide its culture. Efforts to reshape or restrict the Institute based on misconceptions or incomplete narratives risk harming the very students who benefit most from its structure. I respectfully urge you to reconsider any action that would weaken or fundamentally alter VMI. For students who seek a disciplined, purpose‑driven education, there is no substitute for what the Institute provides. Thank you for your time and consideration.

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on HB 1374. The Governance of VMI should remain with the VMI Board of Visitors, especially as appointed my our Governor. No other path of governance makes sense. VMI is a special institution as are all of our wonderful colleges and universities in Virginia. VMI was the right one for me and I am a proud graduate (1994) that needed VMI and I have excelled in life as a result. This opportunity to find the right school for each individual is one of the amazing aspects of our Commonwealth. I look forward to that opportunity for our future generations so they may find the same success I have by the path most appropriate for them.

I’m writing about HB1374 because the Virginia Military Institute has been everything to my family since my grandfather enrolled back in 1958. What he got from VMI wasn’t just classes - it was the kind of character that let him serve honorably in the armed forces and then come back to Virginia to work for the Department of Transportation, building and fixing things that help people every day across the state. Those lessons - loyalty, duty, honor, putting service before yourself - stayed with him forever. He lived them out, and he passed them on to the rest of us. That’s why my brother chose VMI too. He went there, graduated, and now he’s a captain in the Army, dedicating his life to the same kind of service our grandfather showed. Because of VMI, our family has generations shaped by a real sense of responsibility and commitment to something bigger. It’s changed who we are, and it’s done the same for so many others. I know HB1374 would change how VMI is governed, taking away its own Board of Visitors and moving control somewhere else. From where I sit, as someone whose family has seen firsthand what VMI does right, that worries me a lot. This institution has stood strong for nearly 200 years, producing people who serve Virginia and the country with integrity. It needs to keep its independence and the state’s support so it can keep doing that for the next generations. Thank you for hearing my family’s story. VMI has meant the world to us, and I hope you’ll help protect it by opposing HB1374.

I am a proud alumnus class of 1993 as well as my son class of 2024 of the Virginia Military Institute, I feel a responsibility to speak out against HB1374, a bill that threatens the very foundation of what has made VMI a nationally respected institution for more than 185 years. This legislation is not a minor administrative adjustment—it is a direct intrusion into the governance, stability, and long‑term mission of the Institute. VMI’s mission is clear…to produce honorable, resilient, and service‑minded citizen‑soldiers through a rigorous system of academic excellence, military discipline, and personal accountability. That mission has endured wars, political shifts, and societal change because VMI has been governed by leaders who understand its unique culture and who protect its independence. HB1374 undermines that independence. VMI’s strength has always come from its ability to operate above political agendas. The bill’s restructuring of governance invites political influence into decisions that should be based solely on what is best for cadets and the mission. VMI is not a political tool. It is a leadership laboratory. Allowing political winds to dictate its governance jeopardizes the integrity of that environment. The Institute’s governance model has produced generations of military officers, public servants, engineers, educators, and business leaders. The Board of Visitors—composed of individuals who understand VMI’s traditions, challenges, and responsibilities—has guided the Institute through crises and modernization without compromising its core values. HB1374 disregards this proven track record and replaces it with a structure that risks instability and short‑term decision‑making. The Rat Line, the Honor Code, the class system, and the military framework all depend on consistent leadership and institutional continuity. HB1374 introduces uncertainty at a time when VMI needs focus and unity. Cadets deserve an environment where leaders are empowered to make decisions based on experience, not political pressure. Honor. Duty. Self‑discipline. Leadership. These are not outdated concepts. They are exactly what Virginia and the nation need more of now than ever. HB1374 does nothing to strengthen these values; instead, it risks diluting them by placing VMI’s governance in the hands of individuals who may not fully understand or support the Institute’s mission. As an alumnus, I stand firmly against HB1374 because it threatens the independence, stability, and mission of the Virginia Military Institute. VMI has produced leaders for nearly two centuries not because it bends to political pressure, but because it remains steadfast in its purpose. If the Commonwealth truly wants VMI to continue producing citizen‑soldiers of character, it should strengthen the Institute…not attempt to control it. VMI’s mission is worth defending and will continue to make the Commonwealth proud of the honorable men and women that it produces. HB1374 moves us in the wrong direction. This bill should be dead on arrival.

I am a proud member of the VMI Class of 1981. I matriculated from EC Glass High School in Lynchburg, Virginia. I find the mere suggestion that the Virginia Military Institute should be under the governance of the Board of Director (Visitors) of the Virginia State University a complete insult and absolutely unnecessary. Has the Virginia State University distinguished itself above and beyond the achievements of the VMI? Has the Virginia State University produced the number and quality of citizen soldiers produced by VMI? Are other organizations being subjected to the same political attacks? How will the governance change at UVA, VCU, Virginia Tech and others. I attended VMI for 4 1/2 years and I was never a party to, nor did I witness racism, harassment or discrimination of any cadet. I witnessed hard work, honor, accountability and discipline. Over my 45 years since leaving VMI, I have seen distinguished men and women appointed to the VMI Board of Visitors. These have been and will continue to be men and women that have proven themselves in society and care only about insuring a safe, disciplined and honorable environment for the men and women that currently attend the VMI. To suggest that VMI needs to be governed by a completely separate Board from a completely separate organization is insulting, completely ridiculous and reeks of political stunts and showmanship. Do you think the citizens of Virginia are stupid? They recognize that this is nothing more than a misguided attempt to punish the Virginia Military Institute for not continuing with the woke and unproven practice of DEI that the US Supreme Court itself has ruled is unconstitutional. I am completely against this travesty and do not support this effort for one second.

I strongly oppose House Bill 1374 for several reasons. First, I am not aware of any precedent in Virginia—and have found no clear examples nationally—where the Commonwealth has dissolved the governing board of a public university and transferred control to the Board of Visitors of an entirely separate, unrelated institution. While states have intervened directly in university governance in extraordinary circumstances, those actions have historically involved state oversight or temporary receivership, not the wholesale transfer of authority to another school. This approach is highly unusual, raises obvious conflict-of-interest concerns, and creates unequal treatment among public institutions. Second, this bill appears disconnected from the underlying facts. Based on publicly available reporting, Virginia Military Institute is not an outlier in incidents involving racial misconduct, sexual harassment, or stalking, and in many categories reports rates that are comparable to or lower than peer institutions. VMI also performs competitively in graduation and retention metrics. Yet it is the only public institution facing this extraordinary and punitive governance action, while others with similar or worse indicators are not. That disparity undermines confidence that this bill is evidence-based or proportionate. Third, House Bill 1374 fails to account for VMI’s unique mission. As a senior military college with a mandatory military structure, barracks system, and honor framework, VMI is fundamentally different from traditional civilian universities. Placing it under the governance of an unrelated institution with a different mission, culture, and incentives risks diluting or undermining the very characteristics that define its educational model and public purpose. Fourth, this legislation risks real and immediate harm to the Commonwealth. Numerous stakeholders have raised concerns that such an unprecedented disruption of governance will negatively affect recruitment, retention, donor confidence, and institutional reputation. These are not abstract concerns; they directly impact cadets, families, alumni, and Virginia’s ability to sustain a respected leadership-producing institution. Finally, and most concerning, House Bill 1374 establishes a dangerous precedent. It creates a mechanism by which the governing body of any public educational institution could be dissolved if it falls out of political favor, with control reassigned rather than reformed. Regardless of which party holds power, this represents a fundamental shift in how public universities are treated in Virginia. Disagreements over culture or policy should be addressed through transparent oversight, accountability, and reform—not through unprecedented structural punishment that threatens institutional independence and stability statewide. For these reasons, I urge rejection of House Bill 1374.

I would like to express my opposition for HB1374. I was raised in Annandale, VA, as part of a family that has lived in Virginia since the early 1700s. I am a proud 3rd generation, and 6th member of my family to graduate from VMI, and there is no greater proof of the value of VMI to the State and our Nation than for me to look across the opportunities it has offered me, my family and fellow Alumni to serve as Citizen Soldiers. My Grandfather graduated in 1915, and went on to serve a dedicated career in the US Army Air Corps, and the US Air Force, retiring as a Major General. His contributions to our nation's defense, as an expert in ordinance, assisted in our victory in WWII. My Father (LTC) graduated in 1950B, and dedicated his career in the Air Force to the design, development and perfection of laser and TV-guided munitions, which still act as a cornerstone of our ability to defend our freedom and interests abroad. In the 35 years since my own graduation in 1991, I dedicated 20 years to the development and fielding of advanced command and control systems for our warfighters, before transitioning to a corporate executive role in the environmental services industry for our Country. Through my experiences as a Rat, and the 4 years at VMI, I was uniquely prepared to navigate the challenges that life has presented to me, including my ability to endure 10-months of cancer treatment, while never missing a day of work. VMI taught me where my personal limits were, and how to push past them in times of challenge or adversity, and that gift has enabled me to lead teams throughout my career with a level of calm and levity that has earned greater trust and responsibility. VMI has, and continues to create leaders for our Country. Leaders who go on to serve in various capacities, from the military, to political positions, to private sector business; from educational roles to religious or community service leaders. No mater where VMI graduates reside, they consistently offer value to their organizations, and perform at the highest levels, with a foundation rooted in honor and integrity. I implore you to not advance this bill, as it is both unnecessary, and a clear attack on a valuable asset to the Commonwealth. VMI remains a rare and incredibly value added institution in our Country, and the Commonwealth should be protecting it with pride, rather than questioning it's contributions to our Nation's freedom, attacking it, or attempting to destroy it. Respectfully, Richard C Coupland, III '91 Phoenix, AZ

I am a VMI graduate of the class of 1997. I am writing to oppose both HB1374 and HB1377 in their entirety. This legislation and the planned subsequent actions are of political nature, and clearly the authors of both know little to nothing about the history, purpose, and success of the Institute. VMI has produced generals, doctors, lawyers, executives, writers, and many other successful leaders. The institute instills honor, integrity, and courage into each of its graduates, both male and female, from all walks of life. Attending 4 years at VMI is unlike any other experience available to a high school student, especially those in the state of Virginia. I grew up in Chesterfield County, attended Manchester High School, and my parents dropped me off for matriculation in August of 1993 as a young man of 18 who was still a boy in many respects. I walked out of VMI 4 years later as a man with purpose, who learned valuable life lessons in accountability, perseverance, and critical thinking which have served me well in the 32 years since I left. I am currently serving as SVP/CTO for a Fortune 80 company based here just outside of Richmond, and I would have not achieved the success I have in my career without the valuable lessons learned at VMI. The idea that VMI is no longer relevant or worthy of state funding is frankly laughable; the world needs VMI and its graduates more now than ever. Every graduate walks away with the core values of Cincinnatus, memorialized by a statue on VMI's post. It serves as a clear reminder of the sacrifice and duty expected of all VMI graduates, which many of us demonstrate every day in our varied professions across the country. The concept of dissolving the BoV and shifting governance to VSU also lacks any serious credibility and shows a clear lack of understanding of the values and purpose of VMI. VSU boasts an overall graduation rate in the bottom 20% of all universities nationally. While it has an Army ROTC program, it lacks the deep integration, depth of programming, and historical significance that VMI maintains. It is estimated VSU has only graduated and commissioned 1,600 cadets in its history, roughly the total number of cadets attending VMI in a given year. Meanwhile, VMI has produced more generals than any other ROTC unit in the country. Moving governance to VSU would be the equivalent of asking your plumber to fix an electrical issue, and would signal the beginning of the end for VMI. We should call out these two bills for what they are; direct attacks against the history of the Institute and the values and education it instills in its graduates. I am not a history buff, nor do I glorify the symbology of the civil war. Are changes needed at VMI? Likely, yes. Are there severe and systemic structural issues at VMI that require total overhaul? Likely, no. Change is progressive and slower for some than others, but these bills were not crafted for that purpose. These bills were crafted to strike a crippling blow from which VMI would likely be unable to recover. It is imperative that we not let that happen because we need every single graduate available to help lead us into the future. It's values and mission have persisted for nearly 187 years, and for the betterment of our society it is critical that it continue.

I am registering my vehement opposition to HB 1374. This bill would I feel be a first step to destroying the institute which has been a valuable resource for the commonwealth of Virginia and the nation at large. VMI graduates have served the nation and commonwealth in peace and war for almost two hundred years. If this institution is destroyed its loss would be incalculable to the nation and would cause all the enemies of freedom and democracy in the world to rejoice. I know that many petitioners here have mentioned the many great characters that VMI can claim as graduates. I will mention only one that I think has been missed. His name was Jonathan Daniel’s and he is a martyr and saint in the episcopal church. He has a statue at the Washington National cathedral in Washington DC. He was a hero of the civil rights movement who gave his life for that movement being murdered in Alabama saving Ruby Sales from a white supremacist. The reverend Dr. Martin Luther King jr. himself said “that Jonathan Daniel’s committed one of the most heroic Christian deeds that he had ever heard of in his ministry” He was not a Virginian but a New Englander from Keene NH. I myself attended VMI from the state of Pennsylvania. It has been the great honor of my life to have attended VMI. I work everyday to live up to its ideals of duty and honor to my community my state and my country. The commonwealth has benefited greatly from attracting cadets from all over the United States and even overseas in many cases. I knew many cadets who were from all walks of life and many countries military schools send their best students to VMI to be educated. I thank you for your time and I hope you quash this misguided bill as no good can come from it.

We do NOT support HB1374. Our son graduated from the Virginia Military Institute and it was amazing to watch the transformation of a young boy into a responsible, disciplined and stalwart young man. The principles of the Institute have transformed young boys into men for over a century. It is only in recent history that this school has become a political football for those using it for their own means. This Institute is exactly what we need in the state of Virginia and the United States today. Leave VMI as is.

I strongly oppose House Bill 1374, which calls for the dissolution of the Virginia Military Institute’s Board of Visitors and places governance of VMI under the Virginia State University Board of Visitors. VMI is a constitutionally established institution with a unique mission, culture, and governance structure that has existed for more than 180 years. The Board of Visitors was intentionally designed to preserve VMI’s military system, academic rigor, and leadership development model. Dissolving this board undermines the institutional independence necessary for VMI to fulfill its distinct public mission. House Bill 1374 sets a dangerous precedent by allowing political intervention to override long-standing governance structures without evidence of financial mismanagement, accreditation failure, or legal noncompliance. Disagreements over institutional culture or philosophy do not constitute legitimate grounds for dismantling an entire governing body. Such action threatens academic freedom, institutional stability, and donor confidence—not only at VMI, but across all public colleges in the Commonwealth. Placing VMI under the Virginia State University Board of Visitors is inappropriate and impractical. VSU and VMI have fundamentally different missions, governance needs, operational structures, and student populations. A board tasked with overseeing a civilian, historically Black university is neither structured nor resourced to govern a senior military college. This consolidation risks eroding VMI’s military system, compromising ROTC and commissioning pathways, and weakening national defense partnerships. Furthermore, HB 1374 disregards the constitutional framework that protects VMI’s governance and opens the door to future legislative overreach into independent public institutions. Governance decisions of this magnitude should be grounded in objective performance failures—not ideological dissatisfaction. Reform, when necessary, should be pursued through lawful oversight, targeted policy changes, and board appointments—not through institutional dismantling. The dissolution of VMI’s Board of Visitors is an extreme and unjustified response that would cause irreversible harm to one of Virginia’s most respected public institutions. For these reasons, House Bill 1374 should be rejected.

I oppose HB1374 because it threatens the mission, independence, and long-term viability of the Virginia Military Institute. My name is Kevin Consedine. I am a graduate of the Virginia Military Institute, Class of 2001, and I currently serve as an active-duty Colonel and Brigade Commander in the United States Army. I have served multiple combat tours in Iraq and Afghanistan. I am writing to share my personal experience and why these bills matter to me. I was not raised in Virginia and had no prior connection to VMI. I chose the Institute because of its reputation for producing leaders of character. The four years I spent there were the most formative of my life. VMI taught me selfless service, discipline, and commitment to something greater than myself. Those lessons prepared me to lead Soldiers in combat and continue to guide me today as a husband of 24 years and the father of two teenagers. HB1374 would dissolve VMI’s independent Board of Visitors and place the Institute under the control of another university with a different mission and governance structure. VMI’s success is inseparable from its independence and its unique leadership model. Subordinating it to another institution would fundamentally change what VMI is and why it works. It would not improve the Institute—it would weaken it. Today, the national propensity to serve in the military is at historic lows. As a result, institutions like VMI are not merely state-supported colleges; they are national assets that should be preserved and expanded upon, not destabilized or dismantled. The cadets who pass through VMI will become the officers, engineers, teachers, and civic leaders our country will rely on in the decades ahead. I respectfully ask you to oppose HB1374 and to support the mission of the Virginia Military Institute and the young men and women who choose to challenge themselves there.

1 am a single mother who worked hard to pay for my son's education at VMI. To hear that yet another full scholarship cadet is complaining about the institute is a slap in our face. We have respected VMI our entire lives and understood that the experience is a process that is not easily achieved. My son finished with a degree in mechanical engineering and two minors math and physics. My son had straight A's until VMI. That's the point the Institutes rigorous academics prepared him to pass the federal exam for engineering the first semester of his first year (senior). The pass rate is between 94-100%. The institute is designed to push you to your best abilities not to settle for average The institute should be a shining example to all state colleges as cadets are 100% employed with higher then average incomes- higher incomes higher tax base to Virginia It's a tough experience but it prepares students for the real life challenges of adult and work life Employers love hiring VMI graduates because they know they are disciplined and ready for the career of which they studied VMI should set the standard and not be over seen by any school as the results have been proven by the graduates and the fine careers both private sector and military of which they've achieved post graduation Prepared through the process and high academic standards of VMI No committee nor state school has the criteria to oversee VMI as the national respect (International as well) is not comparable to what VMI has achieved

I am opposed to HB 1374. I am a 2005 VMI grad. I went to VMI all the way from the Los Angeles area where I was born and raised with dreams of becoming an Air Force pilot (I didn't get into USAFA, so that stereotype about VMI cadets is accurate, at least in my case). I was only a few weeks into the Ratline when 9/11 happened. From that point, I knew VMI was not only preparing me to serve, but serve in time of war. VMI was a flawed experience in many ways. When I graduated in 2005, I swore I would never go back to Lexington for any reason. Being a Jewish cadet from California, I was exposed to anti-semitism for the first time. I was a rat for the Halloween where cadets dressed up as SS Officers whipping cadets dressed as Jews. I had a Tac Officer call me a "Heathen" for displaying my Grandmother's menorah over Chanukah. I learned a lot of lessons at VMI that I didn't understand until I left. When I first arrived in Iraq, the first thing I did was set-up my wall locker similar to how I would have as a cadet. The familiarity brought me a little comfort in an uncomfortable time. Being comfortable being uncomfortable is one of the valuable lessons I took from VMI. Another thing I learned is that racism, anti-semitism, and sexism is not exclusive to VMI the way I thought when I only had a privileged LA suburb and VMI to compare. VMI's imperfections prepared me for the world's imperfections. That doesn't mean that those problems are acceptable or that we shouldn't constantly strive for better. I'm not satisfied with where VMI is at, but I want to help it be the best it can be rather than cut bait. I could tell you more about how my VMI roommate was the best man at my wedding or how I still keep up with my thesis advisor from the Institute.... Instead I'll just tell you that I'm back in Lexington, at VMI, and why. When VMI selected Maj Gen Wins as Superintendent and began seriously addressing some of the problems at the school, I wanted to be a part of the solution. This led me back to VMI to serve as a football coach (my wife, also Retired Air Force, is a pistol coach). VMI's status as an NCAA Division I school makes it home to roughly 500 cadet-athletes (1/3 of the Corps). Over 60% of VMI's African-American cadets are Cadet Athletes. Most of these young men and women would not find scholarships at larger, in-state schools. It's worth mentioning that as a coach, I still see athletes who are the first in their family to attend college. If you're familiar with VMI football, you'll probably know that my time as a coach is hopefully not defined by wins and losses. Rather it's the cadets who persevere through the program and ultimately make our world a better place. One of our young men is a cadet-athlete who is living proudly as a neurodivergent person. He's on track to graduate with a degree, is beloved by his class, and was also freshman all-conference... Another is from a disadvantaged part of Richmond, but not only excels in football but was elected class president. I can understand frustration with how the Board of Visitors (BoV) handled General Wins' contract. Still, I promise you the leadership at VMI is committed to making VMI the inclusive and honorable place it has shown it can be. For the cadets who truly need it, the VMI experience cannot be replicated with an augmented corps at Va Tech or other similar solution. Please preserve VMI's ability to navigate its own future with a BoV that is dedicated solely to the Institute

I am the third generation of my family to graduate from VMI, and attending the Institute was the best decision of my life. VMI instills in its cadets values such as honor and discipline—qualities that this country is currently in desperate need of. VMI deserves to be governed by a Board that is connected to the school and its proud history. This bill is nothing but political retribution, and an insult to many Virginians and alumni across the country. I strongly oppose this bill and ask you to vote against it.

I oppose this bill. Where is the data to show VMI has more incidences of assault, racism or sexism than any other college in Virginia? In fact, I think the data shows VMI is pretty low compared to other colleges in Virginia. So what is the basis for this bill? I have not seen evidence to support that anyone at VMI worships Stonewall Jackson or the confederacy. As a parent of a VMI cadet I have been to the school many times in the last two years. I have seen many females and minorities in leadership positions. The current leadership has females and minorities. My cadet went there to further not just their education but their character and leadership skills. The cadets must rise to many different challenges and therefore developing within themselves commitment, respect, and leadership just to name a few. I know the college I attended was solely based on academics. I wish I had learned some of the life lessons VMI teaches at a much younger age. I am confident my cadet will graduate VMI and be a positive role model for all people and will lead well.

As a Virginia resident and mother of a VMI graduate I do not support HB 1374. Here are some of my reasons for why 1. VMI and VSU Serve Completely Different Missions VMI is a senior military college with a structured corps of cadets, mandatory military-style discipline, and an immersive training model unlike any other institution in Virginia. VSU is a traditional public university with a civilian student body. These models cannot be governed by identical policies without compromising what makes VMI successful. 2. HB 1374 Threatens the Military Structure That Defines VMI VMI’s nationally recognized system—military discipline, the Honor Code, barracks life, and leadership development—is essential for producing officers, leaders, and public servants. A bill that forces it into policy frameworks designed for non-military institutions undermines the structure that has existed since 1839. 3. HB 1374 Could Harm Recruitment, Retention, and Reputation Cadets choose VMI for its rigorous, unique environment. If state legislation disrupts or dilutes that environment, VMI risks losing applicants, ROTC candidates, and donors who value the institute’s distinctiveness. 4. VMI Produces Commissioned Officers at Rates Unlike VSU VMI is one of the nation’s top producers of Army and Marine Corps officers among non-federal military colleges. VSU does not have a comparable military mission, and the Commonwealth benefits from VMI’s contributions to national defense and civic leadership. 5. Comparing VMI to VSU Is Inaccurate and Harmful VMI is not simply another public university; it is a military institution regulated and accredited within a specialized framework. VSU serves an equally important but different purpose as Virginia’s first state-supported HBCU. Each school should be supported according to its mission—not forced into uniformity under misguided legislation. 6. HB 1374 Could Damage VMI’s National Standing VMI consistently ranks for leadership, engineering, STEM, and military readiness. Any attempt to restructure or regulate it like a typical university jeopardizes these achievements and diminishes Virginia’s national reputation for excellence in military education. For these reasons, I strongly urge you to vote NO on House Bill 1374. VMI and VSU are both valuable to the Commonwealth, but they are not interchangeable. Legislation should strengthen institutions—not weaken them by forcing inappropriate comparisons or mandates.

I am writing as a Virginia constituent to respectfully urge you not to support House Bills 1377 and HB 1374. My son is a 2/C cadet who will soon commission into the United States Army, and our family deeply values Virginia’s strong tradition of supporting military members, veterans, and those preparing to serve. Because of this, I am especially concerned about how these bills may affect cadets, military readiness, and the quality of education and training for future officers. Virginia should continue to prioritize unit cohesion, leadership development, critical thinking, and operational readiness for cadets of all races, genders, and nationalities. I respectfully ask that you listen directly to current cadets and military families, who are living the real-world impact of these decisions. These issues should not be driven by politics. Instead, decisions should remain focused on what best supports education, discipline, readiness, and the mission effectiveness of those preparing to serve our country. Virginia has long stood as a state that honors and supports its military community. I hope you will uphold that tradition by opposing HB 1377 and HB 1374 and ensuring that policies affecting cadets and service members remain practical, nonpartisan, and mission-focused. Thank you for your time, your service, and your consideration. I would appreciate knowing your position on these bills. Sincerely, A concerned Virginia parent and constituent

I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed bills HB 1374 and HB 1377 regarding the Virginia Military Institute (VMI). As the parent a current cadet, I am deeply concerned that these legislative efforts represent a political maneuver that unfairly targets the Institute and its students. The data does not support the logic of placing another institution in a position of oversight or priority over VMI. VMI maintains a 77% six-year graduation rate, a four-year graduation rate of approximately 74%, and a first-year retention rate of 81-82%, which ranks 9th among Virginia public colleges. Furthermore, VMI manages an $800 million endowment. In contrast, the other institution mentioned has a four-year graduation rate of 26-28%, a six-year rate of 41-45%, a first-year retention rate of 62-71%, and a $100 million endowment. Given these figures, these bills appear to be a political attack rather than a decision based on educational or fiscal merit. These recurring attacks following shifts in political leadership are detrimental to the cadets who work tirelessly and deserve stability. VMI has operated in good faith under both previous and current administrations, and these bills feel like a direct punishment for recent leadership decisions made by the Board of Visitors.

I am writing to express my strong disapproval of HB 1374 and ask that this bill or any others that take action to place the governance of the Virginia Military Institute under Virginia State University or any other entity be removed from consideration. As a graduate of VMI and the father of a son who is looking to go to VMI, I can say with certainty that if approved, this bill will hurt an institution that has served Virginia and the United States since its founding in 1839. VMI, as we all know, is unique and requires a Board who knows the nuances of VMI in order to govern and make decisions that is best for the Cadets who want a different path for college. For 187 years, VMI graduates have given back to Virginia and our nation through military service, industry and in more ways than any other school in our country similar in size. Placing VMI under any other board would jeopardize its mission.

Am opposed to this bill. Let VMI handle its own affairs, and I firmly believe that it will do what is right and will perform what is best for the students, the organization, and the nation. My son learned about character, sacrifice, honor, integrity and the value of camaraderie from this great institution. It should stay that way.

I am a 2011 graduate of VMI and I vehemently oppose HB1374. This proposed bill is nothing more than a partisan attack on VMI and is extremely short sighted. The author of this bill knows it and all of the other representatives supporting this bill know it as well. It is shameful that our representatives think that it is prudent to waste time ordering the governance of VMI to be shifted under a separate and completely different institution of higher learning in Virginia. VMI provides an extremely valuable service to the Virginia Commonwealth and nation at large, which is unmatched, producing the absolute finest military and civilian leaders from every single graduating class over its 187-year history. The challenging experiences of the Ratline are unmatched by any other institution in the Commonwealth and all across America. If every single college-aged young man and woman could experience the VMI experience, our nation would be in a much better place than where we are now. Please put aside your partisan and childish behavior and look at the enormous benefits VMI provides to our nation. The VMI BOV must stay so that the school can remain and produce the finest sons and daughters our nation can muster. No other institution is like VMI and could possibly run VMI like VMI can. You cannot understand unless you lived the VMI experience. Continuing forward with this bill would be a travesty and would result in VMI’s demise. Please throw this bill away and focus on more Important things.

Dissolving the VMI Board of Visitors and placing governance under VSU does not make any logical sense. As a parent of a 2024 graduate and alumni of another Virginia college I have seen first hand how well VMI is managed and the results are far ahead of other Virginia colleges including VSU. To place governance to another organization would only be determinantal to the continued success of VMI

I respectfully oppose HB1374. I matriculated at VMI in 2003, when women were still relatively new to the Corps. We faced unique challenges, but those experiences built resilience, discipline, and a deep commitment to service. After graduating, I went on to serve honorably in the United States Air Force, carrying forward the values VMI instilled in me. Over the years, I have maintained a strong relationship with my Brother Rats and with the Institute. I have only seen continued improvement. VMI adapts to changing times — from COVID‑19 to evolving academic needs — while remaining true to its mission of producing educated, honorable leaders for Virginia and the nation. HB1374 would dismantle the governance structure that enables VMI to fulfill that mission. The Board of Visitors is uniquely equipped to oversee a military college with a distinct model and statutory responsibilities. Replacing it with an unrelated board would undermine an institution that has served the Commonwealth for more than 185 years. VMI graduates strengthen Virginia’s workforce, government, military, and civic life. The Institute provides clear, measurable public benefit. For these reasons, I urge the committee to oppose HB1374.

I write to oppose HB1374 in the strongest way possible. The bill is ill conceived and will be of no benefit to the country, the Commonwealth, the Alumni, or the Institute.

I write to oppose HB1374 in the strongest way possible. The bill is ill conceived and will be of no benefit to the country, the Commonwealth, the Alumni, or the Institute.

I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed bills HB 1374 and HB 1377 regarding the Virginia Military Institute (VMI). As the parent of both a VMI graduate and a current cadet, I am deeply concerned that these legislative efforts represent a political maneuver that unfairly targets the Institute and its students. The data does not support the logic of placing another institution in a position of oversight or priority over VMI. VMI maintains a 77% six-year graduation rate, a four-year graduation rate of approximately74%, and a first-year retention rate of 81-82%, which ranks 9th among Virginia public colleges. Furthermore, VMI manages an $800 million endowment. In contrast, the other institution mentioned has a four-year graduation rate of 26-28%, a six-year rate of 41-45%, a first-year retention rate of 62-71%, and a $100 million endowment. Given these figures, these bills appear to be a political attack rather than a decision based on educational or fiscal merit.

I am shocked to see a suggestion that VMI's BOV be taken over by VSU. The two universities and BOVs could not be more different. VMI is nationally recognized as a military school that builds military and industry leaders. And while VSU has esteemed graduates they are very different cultures. VMI has a student run honor system. VMI incorporates service and physical fitness into the college experience. In addition the academic rigour is at the highest possible level . Students at VMI do not lie, cheat or steal and do not tolerate anyone who does. They swear that and live it! I am not sure what the writer of this proposal thinks VSU can do to benefit VMI, but VMI is moving forward with a diverse student population that is so well respected and honored that Americas allies send students to learn from them. VMI needs a board of visitors that continues to push forward growing the diverse student population and building the bonds of all Cadets so they will grow into citizens supporting their communities and the nation in service. Thank you.

Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on this proposed bill. As the mother of a Virginia Military Institute class of 2024 graduate and friend to many other parents of former and current cadets, I stand in solid opposition to Virginia House Bill 1374. VMI is already subject to extensive oversight through its Board of Visitors, accreditation requirements, state reviews, and prior studies and reports. I firmly believe that creating an advisory task force is both ineffective and irresponsible as it will not promote meaningful progress at VMI. An additional task force risks duplicating existing efforts, delaying action, and creating uncertainty for current cadets and families, without clear evidence that it will result in better outcomes. Most importantly, VMI is, by design, not an ordinary college, and adding it to the purview of another dissimilar institution inherently risks the specialized curriculum and superior citizen soldiers that it produces. While the responsibility of ensuring that VMI is a place where all cadets are treated with dignity and respect is paramount, and oversight and accountability belong in the hands of those who appreciate and respect the legacy of this institution to allow the Institute to continue to live up to its stated values. VMI should not continue to be treated as a political football, subjecting its staff and cadets to instability and unrest that are counter to the educational mission. Cadets commit fully to VMI’s rigorous environment that is challenge enough and anchors their success. Reform, when needed, should be focused, timely and grounded in VMI’s unique mission rather than open-ended reassessment of its status as a state-supported institution. If there are specific issues that require attention, those concerns should be addressed directly through existing governance and accountability mechanisms, with clear expectations and measurable outcomes. A task force that revisits fundamental questions about VMI’s existence and funding does not offer that clarity. I sincerely urge members of the General Assembly to oppose HB 1374 and instead support targeted, constructive actions that strengthen VMI while ensuring it continues to serve the Commonwealth and its cadets with integrity.

I am opposed to this bill. I graduated from VMI. I learned so much while there. The academics were top notch. The Honor System is a part of my life. In graduate school I learned that having attended the best military college set me up for success. I had developed the discipline to be successful there and later in my dual careers of teaching and serving in the Va Army National Guard. VMI STILL HAS A ROLE IN OUR SOCIETY TODAY!

Do not endorse this bill. VMI is not a subsidiary. Leave it alone!

I am a member of the VMI class of 1990, and my oldest son is from the Class of 2016. I vehemently oppose HB1374, transferring governance of VMI to the Board of VSU. VMI provides a service to the Commonwealth which is unmatched, producing the finest military and civilian leaders from each graduating class over its 187-year history. This proposal is a careless effort and partisan-based attack, unsupported by any data or sound reasoning. VSU is an unrelated institution with a vastly different history and mission. This is an unnecessary and irresponsible piece of legislature.

I urge anyone in the VA political arena to go to VMI for 3 days. Witness what this institution offers, witness the leaders that are there. Witness the ones that are in the making. Isn’t that what we what? Aren’t the superior leaders that institutions such as this produce, the same ones you want commanding our military and leading the troops in what could be deadly combat? Able to make momentary decisions that could save lives? If you have issues with the environment of VMI, present concerns and deal with the said issues at hand. Do not shut down an exceptional historical top-notch school, that produces some of the finest visionary leaders this generation has to offer. Leave VMI alone, stop all the political games you're playing. RAHVAMIl

I write to offer the strongest possible opposition to HB 1347, which would dissolve VMI’s Board of Visitors and transfer governance to another institution’s board, and to HB 1377, which would create a Virginia Military Institute Advisory Task Force (Task Force) as an advisory commission to determine whether VMI should continue to be a state-sponsored institution of higher education. I write from the perspective of a proud citizen of the Commonwealth, retired Navy Captain, former Department of Defense Senior Executive Ethics Attorney, member of the VMI Parent Council, and proud parent of a Cadet in the Class of 2028. Effective oversight of VMI depends on a board that understands the Institute’s unique system and objectives. Maintaining an independent Board of Visitors ensures clear accountability to the Commonwealth, preserves institutional integrity, and avoids governance consolidation that could introduce competing priorities without demonstrated benefit. Like our Federal military academies, VMI continuously evaluates itself and pursues improvement across every aspect of a unique program to develop our Nation's civilian and military leaders. VMI has demonstrated commitment and success in strengthening the Institute while preserving this core mission. An objective quantitative and qualitative assessment of VMI shows just how successful VMI has been in developing community, business, and military leaders of the highest character. I encourage our Governor and every member of our Commonwealth’s House of Delegates to visit Lexington and talk to Cadets, and also engage with alumni in Virginia and beyond. A traditional state university, even one like VA Tech with a corps of cadets, cannot produce, at scale, the leaders of sterling character that VMI has consistently delivered. Our Commonwealth and our Nation need VMI!

As a VMI alumnus, I am deeply concerned about HB1374. VMI has endured for generations not in spite of scrutiny, but because of its unwavering commitment to producing leaders of selfless service and honorable character. To remove VMI’s autonomy and place it under the authority of an unrelated institution is a direct affront to the unique values and traditions the Institute instills. VMI is not an ordinary college. Its commandants, staff, barracks, uniforms, and ratline create a system that shapes cadets in ways that cannot be understood without direct experience. Virginia State University, while a fine institution, does not operate within this system, and therefore cannot appropriately oversee decisions critical to VMI’s mission. As someone who has pledged service to the Commonwealth through the Institute, I feel insulted that the state would not afford VMI the respect and independence it has earned over its entire history. I urge you to oppose HB1374 and preserve the autonomy of an institution that has faithfully served Virginia for nearly two centuries.

I strongly disagree with the intent behind the bill. The institute has always been a standard of excellence in academics and moral character and confining the institute to adhere to a board of visitors that has no ties is ridiculous. Virginia State University board of visitors does not, and will not, understand the pride and history of the school and will completely undermine the mission of the institute. Allow the institute to be led and ran by it’s own members that understand and will carry out the mission. Ensure that the board is of good moral character so that the mission is carried out with honor. This action to remove the current board of visitors and allow the Virginia State Board of visitors to take command is not the solution a will ruin the legacy of the institute.

Dear Members of the House Education Committee, I am writing in strong opposition to HB 1374. It is unnecessary to dissolve the Virginia Military Institute (VMI) Board of Visitors, and a proposed structural merger with the Virginia State University (VSU) is unsupported by data or reasoning. I urge the Virginia House of Delegates to strike the amendments to Chapter 27, while retaining 23.1-2706 C if applicable. According to a 2024 study by the Join Legislative Audit and Review Commission, VSU University is one of only 3 public institutions in the state of Virginia that shows any “viability risks.” VMI was not one of the institutions found to pose a viability risk, and enrollment trends were comparable between the schools. Moreover, VMI boasts a substantially higher graduation rate. VMI is also ranked #65 nationally in the National Liberal Arts Colleges list and #4 in the Top Public Schools List, both from the U.S. News and World Report Best Colleges report, and it consistently ranks high in other rankings and in ROI on degrees. These rankings list VMI above many other state four-year public institutions in Virginia, including VSU. With these metrics in mind, the proposed resolution fails to clarify why the Virginia State University Board would be better qualified at governance. Moreover, Virginia State University and Virginia Military Institute have different student bodies, missions, and histories, and they are not geographically close, making a merger suboptimal for either institution. The bill also does not explain why potential changes to leadership and policies at VMI cannot be accomplished via the Governor’s authority to appoint new board members. Why must the VMI Board of Visitors be dissolved rather than simply having its membership reconstituted via existing practices? The governor has already changed the makeup of the BOV and can exert influence through this existing process. While I appreciate the bill’s continued commitment to the military structure of VMI and a call for efforts to reduce sexual violence in the military, it is otherwise an unnecessary piece of legislation that threatens an important, historical institution of higher learning.

I write in opposition to Virginia House Bill 1374 as the mother of a current Virginia Military Institute cadet. My son earned his place at VMI through hard work, discipline, and commitment. Like many, I fully supported his choice of VMI because of its distinct mission, culture, and leadership development model—one that is intentionally different from any other public institution in the Commonwealth. I do not see how transferring VMI’s governance to another university would strengthen that mission or address the real challenges the Institute faces. VMI absolutely must be held accountable when it falls short of its stated values, and there should be no tolerance for discrimination, harassment, or misconduct of any kind. However, HB 1374 does not appear to offer a clear, constructive path toward meaningful reform. Instead, it risks creating administrative disruption, uncertainty for cadets and families, and long-term harm to an institution that has served Virginia for generations. Structural change alone does not guarantee cultural change. What VMI needs is focused leadership, oversight, and accountability that preserves its unique purpose while ensuring it lives up to the standards it claims to uphold. This bill does not demonstrate how transferring governance would achieve those outcomes. As a parent with current cadet, I am deeply concerned about the impact this proposal could have on the education, stability, and future of students who are already fully committed to the Institute. I urge lawmakers to reject HB 1374 and instead pursue solutions that support reform without dismantling what makes VMI distinct. Thank you for the opportunity to share my perspective.

As a sister, wife, and mother of VMI cadets, I’ve seen firsthand what Virginia Military Institute makes possible. My brother came to the U.S. as an immigrant and was told college wasn’t an option. VMI gave him a chance that led to service as a Navy officer and now to senior leadership serving the Commonwealth. My husband was told the same. At VMI, he earned an excellent education while competing as a Division I baseball player. He went on to become a serial entrepreneur and inventor of a life-saving device protected by U.S. and international patents. My son thrived in the disciplined, structured environment at VMI—one where he may not have succeeded elsewhere. He is now a Navy officer and recently earned a combat ribbon on deployment in the Middle East. For over 150 years, VMI has produced leaders who serve—over 285 general and flag officers, Medal of Honor recipients, entrepreneurs, and public servants. VMI’s Army ROTC produces more officers than any other program in the US. At a time when strong leadership is desperately needed, VMI remains a proven pathway for opportunity, service, and impact. The reason they have strong alumni and endowment is because the alumni realize the successful impact VMI made on their lives. In a hyper-politicized environment, the true casualties are not a political group, but the future: young people stripped of extraordinary leadership opportunities and a military deprived of the exceptional officers it urgently needs. I hope those shaping our future will take time to understand what this institution has meant and continues to mean for so many.

January 24, 2026 Dear House Education Committee Members, I am the proud parent of a recent Virginia Military Institute (VMI) graduate. VMI is known as the institute, no ordinary college, is what they like to say. People don’t fully understand what it is to attend VMI. Students have responsibilities outside of academics, they are responsible for guarding the institute, shining their shoes, and making sure their roommates are up in time for breakfast roll call (BRC). VMI teaches their Cadets to support one another and their Honor Code is second to none. Roommates are assigned and no one knows until they move in on matriculation day who they will be living with for the next year. They have uniform inspections often and even if their uniform is in perfect order but their roommate’s is not, they are reprimanded for not supporting their fellow cadet (“brother rat”) to be their best. Virginia has many fantastic public colleges and universities. Virginia State University (VSU) is one of them and their slogan is “Greater Happens Here” inspiring a student to be their best. No institute of higher education in Virginia makes it a priority, other than VMI, to foster unity, instill the values of honesty, fairness, respect, inclusiveness, humility, patience, kindness, and a sense of community. Philosophically, Virginia State University and VMI could not be more different. Both schools are well respected but VSU celebrates individual student success and reinforces a sense of pride. VMI develops young men and women into citizen soldiers, emphasizing selfless service, discipline, and a unified cadet experience “One Corps, One VMI”. VMI is unique and should be allowed to continue to govern itself without any oversight from Virginia State University. For the reasons stated, I ask that you do not report and oppose HB 1374. Thank you for your consideration.

Virginia House Bill 1374 is a direct assault on the integrity, independence, and mission of the Virginia Military Institute (VMI)—one of the Commonwealth’s most distinguished institutions. Under the pretext of “modern oversight” and “inclusivity,” this legislation would dismantle the self-governance that has defined VMI since its founding in 1839. It treats the Institute not as a proud and evolving academy, but as a suspect institution deserving ideological correction from Richmond bureaucrats.HB1374’s premise is that VMI cannot be trusted to reform itself. Yet in recent years, the Institute has already shown it can modernize while preserving its values of honor, discipline, and service. The bill ignores that progress, assuming political supervision can succeed where leadership and tradition already thrive. This reflects a deeper problem: a belief that government knows better than the institution it seeks to “fix.”The most alarming feature of HB1374 is the level of political intrusion it invites. By granting broad new powers to state-appointed overseers, it effectively subjects VMI’s internal culture, curriculum, and leadership to ideological review. Framed as “equity and inclusion,” these provisions open the door to partisan enforcement and bureaucratic micromanagement. VMI’s military-style model—which unites cadets under a common code of honor—depends on shared standards, not identity-based distinctions. Recasting that model through political mandates risks weakening the unity and rigor that make VMI unique.This bill also undermines academic freedom. Once legislators begin defining institutional values and cultural expectations, higher education becomes a political instrument rather than an intellectual one. What starts as oversight could easily become censorship, with future lawmakers imposing their own agendas on colleges and military academies alike. HB1374 sets that dangerous precedent—one that erodes trust between the Commonwealth and its public institutions.What this proposal truly signals is a lack of faith in VMI’s people—its cadets, faculty, and alumni. From New Market to the modern battlefield, graduates have exemplified courage and service. To imply that their alma mater is incapable of self-governance insults that legacy. The Institute has never been perfect, but its ability to evolve without abandoning its mission is precisely what has sustained it for nearly two centuries.HB1374 is not about accountability; it is about control. It seeks to make VMI conform to current political fashions instead of allowing it to continue serving as a model of discipline and integrity. Reform should come from within—guided by the Institute’s own leaders and alumni who understand its mission—not imposed from above through legislative interference.VMI has always stood for producing citizen-soldiers who lead with honor, courage, and service to the Commonwealth and the nation. That mission is too important to be rewritten by politics. The General Assembly should reject this bill and reaffirm its commitment to keeping Virginia’s military institutions independent, principled, and free from partisan intrusion.

I do not support HB1374. The bill proposes to dissolve the existing Board of Visitors of the Virginia Military Institute and transfer governance authority to the Board of Visitors of Virginia State University. This represents an unprecedented restructuring of higher‑education governance in the Commonwealth. Such a transfer would eliminate VMI’s independent governing body, disregard the institution’s unique mission and operational requirements, and place two fundamentally different institutions—each with distinct histories, cultures, and academic models—under a single board. No other public institution in Virginia is subjected to this type of consolidation, and no evidence has been presented to justify such an extreme measure. HB1374 would also create significant instability for VMI’s accreditation, leadership continuity, faculty recruitment, and long‑term planning. The bill introduces uncertainty that could harm cadet enrollment and undermine confidence among alumni, donors, and military partners. For these reasons, I do not support HB1374 and urge the General Assembly to maintain VMI’s established governance structure, which has served the Commonwealth for generations.

I oppose this wholeheartedly. If this wasn’t a real proposition I’d be laughing because it makes no sense. You are either jealous because you never got accepted into the school, or think you are better than everyone that’s gone. Nonetheless, it’s obvious you don’t know what you’re doing and someone is forcing you to do this as a political attack against a school you’ve only heard about and never been to. This being passed would have implications that you don’t understand. Michael Feggans, I’m sorry if you got your feelings hurt by an alum but you look like a joke and should fix the oceanfront first before you start another project. I’m glad to know that your true colors are shown and that you only served to be able to get into politics.

I’d like to be a voice in favor of maintaining VMI’s status as a state school. VMI is a well- respected school guiding and molding our country’s next leaders- in military and in civilian businesses and ventures. The discipline, adaptability and resilience that each and every cadet proves of themselves is what sets them apart- and is why they tend to be successful leaders among us. My son and all the corp (past and present) work and have worked very hard, pushed themselves beyond limits on a daily basis- to accomplishments that have grown them into more effective, educated leaders. They’ve pushed to make their way through the Institute and have earned their place of respect. They work With the community giving back in ways that are valued. They invite the local Community of Lexington and the surrounding area to be part of special events, parades, performances, holiday celebrations and are actively present for parades and special Ceremonies and events throughout the entire year. This is local and state wide. Many would not be able to attend VMI if it were not a state school. This has helped Open the door of possibility for so many who dare to achieve higher and do the hard work thereafter. This college experience is about taking a heavy load of classes, having ROTC and a very active schedule of physical fitness demands, continuous practicing of marching and parades and formations, learning the military life and all the expectations that go with that, maintaining strict uniform care for all Of their varying uniforms, presence as support at the athletic games and roles in leadership among the corp. All while living a very “humbled” existence of life in the barracks- without most of the basic comforts college students from standard colleges enjoy, or take for granted. I’m proud of my son and the very difficult path he chose to embrace and is conquering as a cadet. And I’ve seen how VMI’s structure and discipline have helped change and focus many young men and women of the corp. they’ve found new purpose and confidence in themselves and continue to strive for more and achieve new goals and standards for themselves. We need more leaders who have strong voices and presence. And this is what VMI produces. State funding is needed for VMI to maintain its legacy of creating the leaders of our future. I hope you understand the importance of keeping the VMI spirit and mission alive and thriving going forward for another 186 years and beyond. Thank you for standing for them.

The classroom or School Is not place for religion to be shared. No crosses, no Ten Commandments, no ideology of personal religious beliefs. It crosses a line and disrespects so many of either different religions than Christianity, some who aren’t religious at all. forcing religion down people’s throats to push own personal agendas is wrong. On every level. Pushing this country and our children to be Christians when the actual actions of these people are anything BUT the teachings of Christianity is wrong. It’s the ultimate hypocrisy and has no place in schools. We need leaders who stand for ALL. And thus needs to be rejected 100%.

The classroom or School Is not place for religion to be shared. No crosses, no Ten Commandments, no ideology of personal religious beliefs. It crosses a line and disrespects so many of either different religions than Christianity, some who aren’t religious at all. forcing religion down people’s throats to push own personal agendas is wrong. On every level. Pushing this country and our children to be Christians when the actual actions of these people are anything BUT the teachings of Christianity is wrong. It’s the ultimate hypocrisy and has no place in schools. We need leaders who stand for ALL. And thus needs to be rejected 100%.

I respectfully and absolutely oppose HB1374, This bill would put VMI under the control of Virginia State University wherein Virginia State University is located over a hundred miles away. Although Del. Feggans states that this legislation focuses on governance and not punishment, it appears that Del. Feggans has not provided any explanation on how this is focusing on governance. With lack of any explanation, this wholeheartedly gives an appearance of punishment. As reported by the Wichita Eagle, Del. Feggans is concerned that the current governance at VMI does not meet Virginia's higher education standards, so this implies that Viriginia State University has higher education standards than VMI. I ask the question: In what regards does Virginia State University have higher education standards? This House Bill is just whimsical and capricious. I ponder as to why even VMI was invited to the Inauguration Parade?

I am writing in complete opposition of this bill. This bill calls for the dissolution of the VMI board of visitors and governance of the institute fall under the BOV of Virginia State University. This bill can only be perceived as deliberate retribution against the oldest state sponsored military college in the nation. Despite the fact that the Commonwealth of Virginia fought on the wrong side during the civil war, VMI continues to be persecuted by the same political actors, smearing the reputations of cadets and graduates who have served the Commonwealth and the nation with honor throughout the Institute’s history - including the Virginians who died in battle on behalf of the commonwealth. Please vote NO on this political and utterly vindictive legislation.

Delegate Feggans, I do not support HB 1374. Your intent creates a direct and distracting friction with the intent of the Governor to stabilize each board for Virginia’s colleges and universities. Removing a Board does not appear to meet the Governor’s intent. VSU is an excellent civilian university but lacks sufficient and relevant experience with any military oriented activity. The VSU Board would be required to split its attention between two significantly different colleges between two distant locations. This bill has the high potential to detrimentally impact both schools with the students of each school suffering the most significant consequences from a disjointed management structure.

Virginia Military Institute shaped me into a disciplined, resilient, and accountable person in ways that extend far beyond academics. The rigor of the VMI system taught me time management, leadership under pressure, and the importance of personal responsibility. Living within a structured environment pushed me to grow mentally and emotionally, even when conditions were uncomfortable. The shared hardships at VMI built lifelong bonds and a deep sense of mutual respect among cadets. The Board of Visitors plays a critical role in preserving these traditions, standards, and the unique mission that makes VMI distinct. Removing the Board of Visitors would undermine the governance structure that ensures accountability while protecting VMI’s identity. Transferring oversight to Virginia State University would dilute VMI’s military-focused culture and compromise its specialized educational model. VMI is not just another public university, and treating it as one ignores the purpose it was founded to serve. Such a move would erode alumni trust, cadet morale, and the institutional integrity that has been built over generations. Ultimately, weakening VMI’s governance would diminish an experience that has proven transformative for countless graduates, including myself. Some of the finest individuals of our country, Supreme Court Justices, Noble Prize Winners, Chairmen’s of the Joint Chiefs of Staff would be rocking in their grave.

I am an Alumnus of VMI and a retired U.S. Army Colonel. Growing up in Radford, VA, I can honestly say that VMI shaped my success. VMI governance needs to remain within the purview of an independent VMI Board of Visitors. The VMI experience is unique, and not one that can reasonably be overseen by another civilian university. The Governor has the ability to shape the BOV to her liking, and is doing that. Political vengeance is unnecessary. I believe this bill will effectively end the majority of Alumni donations, and decrease the quality of the education, experience and ability to create future leaders. I also believe that just the introduction of this bill, and the apprehension over VMI’s future, will already negatively impact enrollment this coming Fall semester. VMI’s reputation goes beyond Virginia. Politicians and Military members from other countries know of and respect the leadership and quality that VMI produces; I have personally experienced this. This reputation will not survive with the changes that this bill demands.

As a Virginia Beach resident, I strongly oppose House Bill 1374 and am concerned by the Delegate’s decision to support it. I am neither a graduate of the Virginia Military Institute (VMI) nor the parent of a VMI student ; however, I greatly admire the institution and its long-standing mission. I have worked in public education for over 30 years at both the PreK–12 and collegiate levels, and I know from experience that the most effective leadership comes from those closest to the institution and its unique culture. The proposal to shift governance of VMI to another Virginia state college is unwise.

I'm a 1990 Graduate of VMI and a 20 year veteran of the US Navy. My VMI education prepared me well for both my military and civilian careers, and the experience probably was the single greatest influence in shaping the man I am today. My son graduated from VMI in 2019 and is currently serving in the US Army, VMI had a similar effect on him and as a father I can thing of few things that made me prouder than the day he walked across the graduation stage. VMI is not perfect and unfortunately has made errors in past years. However I'm more than confident that the Institute is in good hands under the BoV members appointed by Governor Spanberger. They deserve the chance to oversee the Institute and make needed changes without political interference or excessive, biased oversight. I oppose any attempt to restrict VMI public funding or diminish the authority of its BoV.

I strongly disagree with this bill. VMI is a unique and powerful school and excels at creating leaders in all areas of life.

VMI is a unique, life changing institution. To disrupt this great school would be a shame. To disband VMI's BOV and move governance under another school would be a major mistake and disservice. VMI is unique and unlike any other regular university, and governance that doesn't understand VMI's model and mission would fail miserably. Your proposed bill gets it backwards. VMI boasts one of the highest returns on investment (ROI) of any school in the country. Most schools fail when it comes to providing an economic return. If anything, other schools should be placed under VMI's governance and learn a few things about how to improve their mediocre education and standards. VMI dramatically changed my life for the positive. I left the Midwest to attend VMI because of its stellar reputation, rigorous academics and physically challenging environment. It enabled me to become a highly effective Naval officer, a successful entrepreneur and CEO that built large companies and created jobs for thousands of people. VMI not only provides a world class education, but it also instills strong personal skills and attributes, such as grit, determination, honor, creativity and a civic minded duty, rarely found at most colleges. Other schools should be learning from VMI. I am opposed to this attempt to alter VMI's governance. VMI is a premier, world class institution of which Virginia should be proud.

As a resident of Virginia Beach and the parent of a Virginia Military Institute (VMI) "Rat," I am writing to express my profound opposition to HB1374. This bill, which proposes to dissolve the VMI Board of Visitors and transfer its governance to another institution, represents an existential threat to the mission of VMI and the future of the young men and women who serve in its Corps of Cadets. VMI is one of only five Senior Military Colleges in the United States. Its core values —defined by the Rat Line, the strict Honor Code, and a rigorous military structure—are a highly specialized educational model. This model requires oversight from a board that intimately understands these unique traditions and the specific demands placed upon the students. A college must be allowed to oversee itself because no outside institution can truly grasp the intricacies of its specific culture. Moving the governance of a military institute to a non-military university board would effectively dismantle the unique leadership pipeline that has served the Commonwealth and our nation for nearly two centuries. Governance without cultural understanding is not oversight; it is a recipe for the destruction of the Institute’s core identity. VMI provided my son an opportunity when other Virginia colleges would not. He fell in love with the small class sizes, the accessibility of professors, and a sense of brotherhood that unites cadets of every background. He worked tirelessly to meet VMI’s physical standards, adopting a personal creed that stems around brotherhood and service. Currently, a "dark cloud" hangs over the Post. The milestones and traditions my son has worked so hard to earn are being overshadowed by the uncertainty and instability created by this legislation. If VMI’s independent governance is stripped away, Virginia loses a vital pathway for students who thrive in this disciplined, merit-based environment. I respectfully ask our leaders to protect the integrity of this historic institution. Please oppose HB1374 and allow VMI to maintain the self-governance necessary to fulfill its unique and vital mission.

Good afternoon, Del. Feggans, I am writing in response to House Bill 1377 and House Bill 1374 regarding the Virginia Military Institute which proposes the creation of a Virginia Military Institute Advisory Task Force to reassess VMI’s status as a state-sponsored institution and its continued receipt of public funding along with the dissolution of the VMI Board of Visitors which places governance of VMI under the Virginia State University Board of Visitors. I write as a proud mother of a 3rd class VMI cadet that has earned his place at VMI through hard work, discipline and dedication. He has thrived in the VMI culture, brotherhood, structure and leadership opportunities. As a Marine Corps scholarship recipient, he plans on serving his country as a future Marine Corps aviator. For my family, and for many others across the Commonwealth, VMI represents opportunity, service, and the formation of character. It is not simply another public college; it is a unique institution with a distinct mission that has served Virginia and the nation for 186 years. VMI is consistently ranked 4th among public colleges in the U.S. placing it just behind the federal service academies. VMI maintains a 77% six-year graduation rate and a first-year retention rate of 82%. VMI consistently commissions more than 50% of its graduates in the U.S. Armed Forces each year which equates to over 170 new officers annually. VMI has produced nearly 300 generals, 7 medal of honor recipients and more than 80 Distinguished Service Cross/Navy Cross recipients throughout its history, a number that exceeds any other ROTC program in the United States. As you consider these House Bills and associated legislation, I respectfully urge you to weigh VMI’s demonstrated value to Virginia and the country. VMI demonstrates that it delivers return on the Commonwealth’s investment – in leadership development, public service, military commissioning, and civic contribution. VMI is a worthy school, and it welcomes a serious review that should strengthen its legitimacy, not weaken it. Respectfully, January Gilley

I am a Sophomore at the Virginia Military Institute and I am against the bill HB 1374. I came to VMI to become a better individual and I was attracted to VMI's rigorous academic and military environment. VMI has positively impacted me as a person and as a woman. It has offered me many academic and leadership opportunities that I would not have been able to experience at any other school. Its discipline oriented system has increased my self discipline, and time management skills. It has made me more resilient and aware leader that will be ready to lead others in the civilian world. If VMI disappears or is merged into another college, that action would destroy my future, all that I have worked towards in my life and towards my diploma and it would destroy VMI's legacy. VMI's rigorous honor system raises honorable men and women of character ready to serve the country in the military and private sector. As a student who has worked so hard to get into this college and has worked tirelessly to stay here, I plead with you to not dissolve the board of visitors and let the VMI legacy continue. I am opposed any bill that would destroy VMI and the value of a VMI diploma.

I respectfully oppose HB 1374. I am not a graduate of the Institute but am a very proud grandparent of a 3rd class Cadet. As a lifelong Virginia resident, I was unaware of the impact that Virginia Military Institute has on their students and alumni prior to my grandson's matriculation. The life lessons that are already ingrained in my grandson will serve him well as he commissions into the Marine Corps. This is the life journey he chose as a Cadet at VMI, not because of family legacy or outside pressure but the cultivated desire to serve his country and his fellow citizens that he learned at VMI. Do not try to change what works at VMI but be an advocate for the Institute to make it stronger.

I urge rejection of this proposal / just the signal if would send to current and prospective cadets would be harmful to VMI . This is a school so different in mission and how it is run and the issues it has it would be very hard and time consuming to run without deep knowledge of VMI that the mistakes that would be made would be many and impactful

Honorable delegates and members of the committee reviewing this bill- I have been fortunate to have a long relationship with, and graduate from VMI. The men and women I have met, and continue to meet impress me as graduates and citizens of the commonwealth, the United States and the world. I was challenged in every aspect of the four years, and I rely on this experience in times good and bad. I work in local government, and the lessons learned of ethics and the treatment of others have uniquely prepared me to work as a civil servant, doing what is right for the people even when it is hard. The last few years have been a challenging time for VMI and (rightfully) questioning its relationship with the confederacy and the history of Virginia. VMI has its faults, as any institution does. This bill calls into question the progress that has been made, the track VMI is on and its new leadership. The Institute continues to produce men and women of character, prepared for the varied work of military and civilian life. I write this remembering a lesson I learned at VMI- transparency, truth and honor will never fail you, and you must lean on those values in challenging situations. In the hands of our new board, I believe this will continue to be true. VMI is in great hands with LtGen Furness, along with the recently added BOV members. With new leadership, this bill wrongfully calls our new governors appointments into question, in addition to the work done by former superintendent MG Wins. This bill will not allow VMI to continue progressing on the right path, bettering VMI graduates and the state. Very Respectfully, Allen McCown VMI Class of 2011

VMI changed my life, I am Strongly opposed to this HB1374. This bill is terrible and in no way needed. An action of this nature would weaken VMI in many ways and not strength it.

To whom it may concern, I am no longer a resident of Virginia, however I regularly serve the people of Virginia as a nurse in Sullivan County TN. I am a proud VMI alumni and would not be where I am today without VMI If you transfer governance of the institute to an outside party, you present the opportunity to change everything about the place, to further weaken and remove the things that make it such a unique school. I am merely trying to appeal to your common sense. An institution like VMI should have minimal outside influence in its governance.

I strongly oppose HB 1374. This bill is nothing more than short sighted political malice. VMI is a significant source of public and private sector leaders all over the globe. VMI is unique and must remain unique and governed by a group of similar caliber and uniqueness.

I respectfully oppose House Bill HB 1374 regarding the governance of the Virginia Military Institute. VMI is unique because of its Honor Code, which is the strictest in the nation and central to the Institute’s identity, credibility, and national reputation. The Honor Code is not symbolic. It is absolute, rigorously enforced, and foundational to the character and discipline of its cadets. The caliber of individuals VMI produces is reflected in measurable outcomes. VMI maintains one of the highest graduation and retention rates in the Commonwealth, with more than three-quarters of cadets completing their degrees within six years, compared to significantly lower rates at Virginia State University. Additionally, over 97 percent of VMI graduates are employed, enrolled in graduate school, or commissioned into military service within months of graduation. These outcomes are rooted in VMI’s uncompromising standards and culture of accountability. Placing VMI under another institution’s governance structure, particularly one without an equivalent honor system or record of outcomes, would fundamentally diminish what makes VMI distinct. Such a change risks eroding decades of earned trust, leadership development, and institutional excellence built on the nation’s most rigorous Honor Code.

Dear Members of the House Education Committee, I am writing in strong opposition to HB 1374, which calls for the dissolution of the Virginia Military Institute Board of Visitors and would place governance of VMI under the Virginia State University Board of Visitors. I am a recent graduate of VMI, Class of 2025, with a Bachelor of Arts in Economics and Business. As an alumnus, I believe it is imperative that VMI be led by individuals who truly understand what it means to experience this institution firsthand. There is no other place on earth that has the same rigor, challenges, or culture as VMI. The adversative system is unlike any other educational model, and its impact on cadet life is profound. While VMI, like any institution, should always improve and evolve, it must be overseen by leaders who understand how the system works and how decisions affect the development, morale, and success of cadets. VMI has produced some of the nation’s most respected leaders and thinkers, including a Nobel Prize winner, a Pulitzer Prize winner, seven Medal of Honor recipients, eleven Rhodes Scholars, countless generals and flag officers, members of Congress, state senators, members of presidential cabinets, the current Acting Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, the current Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, An Alabama governor, aTexas governor, and two Virginia governors. Most recently, Governor Ralph Northam—himself a VMI alumnus—was appointed to the Board of Visitors. This small school in the heart of Virginia consistently produces leaders who serve at the highest levels of government, military, and civil society. VMI should continue to be governed by a Board of Visitors composed of these individuals who still know the Inscription on the Parapet by Col. John Thomas Lewis Preston word-for-word, who remember the smell of cannon fire during evening colors, who will never forget the feeling of the stoop as they assumed the front leaning rest, who understand its mission, its culture, and its unique role in developing citizen-soldiers and civic leaders. For these reasons, I respectfully urge you to oppose HB 1374 and preserve VMI’s independent governance. Thank you for your time and consideration. Very Respectfully, Walker Garner VMI Class of 2025

I respectfully oppose HB1374. Moving the governance of VMI to another entity has no merit or reasoning and should be wholly rejected. I write to you as a proud mother of two cadets, one a recent VMI graduate, Class of 2025, the other current freshman at The Institute. Thank you, Emily Garner

Representatives of Virginia, I respectfully oppose the proposed legislation in bill 1374 to dissolve the Virginia Military Institute Board of Visitors. As a proud Alumn, I have seen first hand the developmental potential VMI has for young men and women of all backgrounds. The strength of the VMI corps comes from a shared experience through the ratline, where each and every student learns that with the support of their peers, anything is possible. This shared experience requires only two things: that you believe you & your peers are capable of great things, and you have the desire to seek them out. I have seen what effect this experience has had on myself, in my close friends, in my siblings, and even in those I did not know personally. I have seen the effects of this experience in action where the women and men of VMI represent these, and countless other ideals and encourage others to continuously pursue them also. VMI ultimately teaches its' Cadets that each day is a constant decision to look at yesterday's shortcomings, and choose to be better today than we were then. Removing the BOV and placing the school under the authority of other collegiate organizations removes the ability for these opportunities to be cultivated and encouraged in this melting pot of education. The VMI experience cannot be pursued alone, and it cannot be created by another institution lacking the corps' history of personal sacrifice and depth of character. The VMI experience exists because the individual becomes the corps, and the corps is reflected in each individual. If everyone was identical, the corps would stagnate and no longer have the background to grow or challenge or support itself to push all its members towards excellence. Without the independence provided by VMI's very own Board of Visitors, Virginia would lose a very important asset for her citizens. An asset that unites and strengthens Virginia and the US as a whole by creating the quality of character recognized by so many across our nation. I encourage and sincerely ask all Virginia representatives seeking to vote on this Bill, to journey to VMI as an open minded and curious citizen, rather than with any, good or bad, preconceptions. I encourage you to walk amongst the Cadets, their families, the Lexington community, and see the people behind the uniforms and the parades. You will see the pride, the late hours of studying, the dedication, perseverance and most importantly the unity amongst the entire VMI community. These qualities of our Cadets are cultivated through the legacy of those who walked the Post before, and is upheld by those who will walk long after. Organizations seeking to absorb VMI will not accurately capture or sustain this caliber of Virginia's character. The decision to dissolve the Board of Visitors and place VMI under another college board is more accurately a decision on whether or not ideals such as those of the Corps are worth preserving within the youth of Virginia. I urge you to look deeper at the costs that removing this independence and autonomy would have upon the opportunities for these students' development into the young adults we need in Virginia and in the world around us. Thank you for your time and consideration, and I look forward to seeing you on Post with our VMI family.

First of all, thank you for the opportunity to voice opinions regarding HB1374. I'm not quite sure about the premise of this particular legislative effort, but I must say it seems extremely short sighted regarding higher education and frankly vindictive. Please do not support such an effort as it will have ramifications well beyond the Virginia Military Institute.

I want to offer a personal perspective as a current cadet and someone whose life was fundamentally shaped by VMI. When I arrived at VMI, I was an immature young man with a lot to learn about discipline, responsibility, and respect for others and for myself. The Institute challenged me in ways no other experience ever had. It demanded accountability, honor, and service, not as abstract ideas, but as daily expectations. These values are something that are rarely taught in current society, and a differentiating factor between VMI and other state colleges. Through that process, VMI helped turn me from a boy into a respectful, honorable man. The values instilled at VMI; self-discipline, integrity, resilience, and commitment to something greater than oneself, have stayed with me long after graduation. Those values guide how I conduct myself in my career, in my community, and in my civic life. I know many fellow cadets who would say the same. Like any institution, VMI is not perfect and should always be open to thoughtful improvement. But I am deeply concerned that HB 1374 could undermine an institution that has served the Commonwealth and the nation with distinction for generations. I respectfully ask that you consider the voices of current cadets whose lives have been positively shaped by VMI. Any evaluation of the Institute should be balanced, fair, and grounded in an appreciation of its mission and its long-standing contribution to Virginia. While some may have bad things to say - their conduct and disciplinary record at the Institute should be factored in, as many feel resentment and hatred towards VMI due to them not adhering to the rules and the system in place. At VMI, I've had the opportunity to collaborate with a diverse student body with a common goal. For example, I am a member of the One Corps Committee, which has the goal of fostering community and unity throughout the Corps. I have a Taiwanese military exchange student living in my small room for the spring semester. I have the privilege of being under the leadership of a diverse array of people - men, women, African American, LGBTQ, and anything else you could think of. I see a difference in maturity, intellect, exposure to diversity, integrity, and drive to succeed when I interact with my peers who chose to attend other colleges in VA. VMI truly is not what it is depicted as by emotion-driven individuals who have never stepped foot on campus nor have the grit to endure the system that shapes the nations leaders. Thank you for your time and for your service to the Commonwealth. I appreciate your consideration of my perspective.

I strongly oppose HB1374. Virginia Military Institute is a fine institution the produces educated and honorable citizens. Eliminating VMI’s Board of Visitors and allowing another state college to govern VMI would only weaken the unique educational experience and undermine VMI's core mission.

Please maintain the Virginia Military Institute governance in tact and DO NOT put it under Virginia State University Board of Visitors. Since the nature of VMI is unique and should be remain so, it makes no sense to ask a group of people who have nothing to do with the school or an understanding of its value to govern it. Each college and university has its own governing body, why would it be any different for VMI who is so beautifully unique? It appears this is a political decision and seems to be a way to force the destruction of an institution that has served Virginia and Virginians for so many years. PLEASE don't let this happen. Embrace the special nature of this school, embrace the opportunities it brings to our state and our students and allow it to continue to serve us. My son has flourished under the foundations set by VMI. You are trying to change something that is working well for what end? Don't let politics harm our young people - PLEASE.

VMI is an outstanding school! I know many, many VMI grads, they are if the highest quality individuals I’ve ever met. Why try “fix” something that isn’t broken !?

This simply not right. The institution is well known for producing excellent education. It gives our Students the ability to choose how they want to learn. In addition based on safety, and especially women’s safety at Universities, VMI has a culture that encourages and promotes an honor code, this honor code is upheld by all students against their piers. It promotes a great place to learn, and is possibly why the school ranks as one of the top rated Liberal Arts Universities in the Country. Please don’t allow the school to lose its traditions especially its honor code by falling under another jurisdiction other than the State.

I strongly opposed this "bill". Your shortsightedness and malice in proposing this not only seeks to destroy a well respected and highly institution, but imperil an important source of military and private sector leaders.

I strongly oppose HB1374. To imply that any one college board should control another is in and of itself offensive. Each college is unique and has different needs and realities based on lived experience and structure, mission and vision, and student needs. Would the Commonwealth suggest that the Richmond City School Board control the K-12 education in Arlington? That Arlington control Roanoke? That Roanoke control Williamsburg? Of course not. So why would that be even considered for a college or university? Taking this a step further – IF one did believe in such cross-control, should the controlling board not be the board overseeing the more successful and lauded of the two schools? One only needs to look at the official DOE scorecards for VMI and VSU to see this bill for what it is – a political performance based in bias and theatrics meant to belittle VMI and shame them for perceived political “crimes”. From the U.S. Department of Education College Scorecard (collegescorecard.ed.gov) --- Graduation Rate: VMI 80% | VSU 48% ---- Median Earnings of former students who received federal aid 10 years after entering college: VMI $77,369 | VSU $45,543 ---- Students who return after their first year: VMI 83% | VSU 72% ---- SAT Critical Reading: VMI 530-640 | VSU 420-543 ---- SAT Math: VMI 510-620 | VSU 380-510 Additionally, the text includes: “C. The Institute shall continue to demonstrate its commitment to contributing to the elimination of sexual violence in the military and shall develop reasonable policies and procedures to demonstrate such continued commitment.” Are all colleges and universities facing a bill to address the same issues on their grounds? Have the proponents of this bill read Annual Fire, Safety and Security reports for each college and university? Is VMI the ‘top offender’ amongst Commonwealth institutions? These reports are readily available online from schools and if concern for sexual violence victims is truly important to proponents of the bill, I encourage them to look at other schools reporting numbers and hold them to the same standard and have similar bills put forth regarding their policies and procedures. If the answer to the above questions is NO, how can anything other than anti-VMI bias be seen in this bill, even looking at just that one item?

I strongly opposed HB1374 and HB1377. VMI is an exceptional Institution that brings well educated citizen soldiers to our Virginia Militia. These bills are not designed to improve on the mission of the school . I ask that the Education Committee members vote resounding NOs to these bills.

To whomever this may concern for HB-1374, I am a 2nd class cadet (Junior) in the Virginia Military Institute Corps of Cadets. I hold rank as a Platoon Sergeant in Band Company and I am projected to commission in the United States Air Force in May of 2027. I will attempt to express briefly how this institute has influenced and changed my character for the better. During my first year, I was faced with many physical and mental challenges that forced me to step up and out of my comfort zone. I grew substantially in my resilience to adverse conditions in various ways. Little did I know that this would prepare me for the traumatic events which would lead to my brother and best friend taking his life the following year. The series of events and decisions which foreshadowed this tragic outcome were horrible. I had to make the difficult decision to stay home and support my family. Upon hearing of this, the Commandant, Col Havird, personally spoke with me and encouraged me to take all the time I needed. Institute leadership were profoundly supportive; further, my fellow cadets and closest friends were there for me in ways I never would have expected. Upon my return this past August, I was welcomed with open arms and empowered to pick up right where I left off. Our new Superintendent, Lieutenant General Furness, has already had a profound impact on my cadetship despite him just being appointed. Just within this month, General Furness invited a friend, who had extensive experience with trauma, to provide the Corps a seminar on how to cope with trauma in healthy ways and even leverage it as a leader to better support people through the dark trenches of their own trauma. General Furness even showed extreme vulnerability with the Corps by sharing his own trauma in his service to family and country. Although unbeknownst to the superintendent, this seminar and his testimony impacted me greatly and showed me how deeply he cared for our wellbeing as cadets and future leaders of this nation. I know for a fact that the Superintendent, Commandant, and other key leadership of the Corps have absolutely zero tolerance for racism or sexism. This institute, in no manner, has encouraged or systematically enforced discrimination in any form. There are no rules, practices, or traditions carried out that prohibit or isolate anyone on the basis of race, creed, gender, or sexuality. On the contrary, there is extensive training and strictly enforced rules in place against acts and behavior pertaining to discrimination. I could easily continue with countless other examples of the positive influence this institute, its leadership, and my fellow cadets have had on myself and my family; however, I am limited by a word count. I invite anyone voting on this bill to come to the institute and speak personally with the countless faculty and cadets positively impacted by VMI. Each individual this bill will affect has a rich background rooted in experience, cultural and ethnic identity, religious and personal beliefs, and the like. The institute has influenced us all in unique ways which deserve to be considered when making decisions that will directly change our way of life. There are many willing to share their stories if only asked. Thank you for your time in considering my story. Very respectfully, Cadet Joseph Reynolds '27 Band Company 2nd Platoon Sergeant DET880 AFROTC Training Group Commander Computer and Information Science

I have family and friends as well as co-workers to which several I have hired through the years! All these men and women were of the highest quality people i have ever had the privilege to associate . Change has occurred at VMI over the last 25 years but never to the extent of outside oversight to what is being sought. VMI is. Military school! Needs to governed as such. All Virginia’s have respect for this unique institution ! Please consider this when approaching this subject!

My name is Paul Oppedisano. I am a 2018 graduate of the Virginia Military Institute and an active duty officer in the United States Air Force. I respectfully disagree with the propositions contained within this legislation and urge the committee to dismiss Michael Feggans’ proposal to dissolve VMI’s board of visitors. VMI is a unique institution that provides a unique service to this country. Half of all alumni of the Virginia Military Institute go on to commission into the U.S. Armed Forces, while the other half serve this country as upstanding citizens within government, medical, legal, and other civilian sectors. In order for the Institute to continue to produce leaders who are prepared for the ever-changing landscape within our nation, VMI’s board of visitors requires agency in its decision making process. Stripping VMI of its agency would open the door to degrading and deteriorating its capability to produce high caliber civil-servants, like it has done over the last 186 years. HB1374 simply should not make it out of committee.

I am writing to voice my opposition of this bill. Any institution should have a board that has a vested interest in the school itself. Having an unrelated party make decisions for VMI and its future is a huge mistake. VMI has produced some of the nation’s best leaders and continues to develop young men and women across all walks of life. I am greatly disappointed that VMI has been singled out by this bill. I vehemently oppose this bill and the rationale behind it.

I respectfully oppose HB 1377. I write to you as a constituent and as the wife of a Virginia Military Institute graduate. From the outside, VMI may appear simply as a college or military institution, but from within a family shaped by its values, it is so much more. I have seen firsthand the kind of men and women VMI produces, and the lasting impact its principles have long after graduation. VMI teaches strength, not just physical or mental toughness, but strength of character. It teaches respect for others, the value of hard work, personal accountability, and the importance of honesty even when it is difficult. These are not abstract ideals; they are expectations that are lived daily and carried into families, workplaces, and communities across Virginia and beyond. In a time when integrity, discipline, and personal responsibility are increasingly undervalued, institutions like VMI are more important than ever. Its single-sanction honor system and unwavering commitment to ethical leadership set it apart in a way few institutions can claim. VMI does not simply educate students—it forms leaders who understand service, sacrifice, and the responsibility they owe to others. For nearly two centuries, VMI has adapted to a changing world while holding fast to its core mission: producing honorable leaders who contribute meaningfully to society. Reducing or eliminating its funding through HB 1377 would undermine an institution that consistently delivers exceptional value to the Commonwealth. The loss would not only be financial—it would be cultural and generational. As a wife, a constituent, and someone who believes deeply in the need for institutions that instill strong values and honest leadership, I urge you to oppose HB 1377 and continue supporting the Virginia Military Institute. Thank you for your time and consideration. Respectfully, Jennifer Skrzypek, Penn State Alumni and proud VMI Wife. Henrico, VA

I strongly oppose this bill. I have friends and family members who have attended VMI and have seen the leadership, discipline and moral values that the institution represents and instills in cadets and future leaders of both military and civilian futures. It would be reprehensible and a moral disservice to do away with this outstanding institution.

I strongly oppose HB 1374 and HB 1377, which represent partisan assaults on one of Virginia's most influential and beneficial institutions, the Virginia Military Institute (VMI). These bills threaten to undermine an organization that has positively shaped not only the Commonwealth but the nation as a whole through its rigorous focus on leadership, discipline, and service. As a former VMI cadet, I experienced an environment unlike any other—before or since—where personal merit and character were paramount. During my time as a rat and later as a cadet, backgrounds, socioeconomic status, or other superficial traits held no sway; what mattered was individual honor, integrity, and performance. This unique culture fostered personal growth and equipped me with invaluable tools for success that no ordinary college could have provided. VMI's emphasis on excellence has produced generations of leaders who contribute to Virginia's economy, military, and civic life, bolstering our state's reputation and prosperity. The claims underpinning these bills appear politically motivated, using VMI as a sacrificial lamb to score points rather than addressing a real issue. Proposing to dissolve VMI's independent board of visitors and transfer governance to Virginia State University (HB 1374), or establishing a task force to potentially strip state sponsorship (HB 1377), demonstrates a lack of understanding of VMI's proven model and its enduring benefits to the Commonwealth. Such changes risk diluting the institute's core mission without evidence of improvement. I urge lawmakers to withdraw these bills from consideration and preserve VMI's autonomy, ensuring it continues to thrive as a pillar of Virginia's educational landscape.

There is no clearer sign of government overreach than the attempt to insert itself into an Institution founded on principles of discipline, integrity, and honor — principles that both the world and the current state administration have too often failed to uphold themselves. Furthermore, an Institution that produces both military and civilian leaders. No one — neither family, friends, outsiders, nor even the staff at VMI — can ever fully understand VMI. It is a privilege and an honor that only those who have experienced and lived it can truly claim. I say this with utmost sincerity and urgency: there cannot exist one single board that supervises and dictates the actions of two Institutions of such fundamentally different missions, culture, and caliber of students. To do so would be a disservice to both schools, and to each and every individual who chooses to go to either one.

I strongly oppose this new bill. There is no justifiable reason for Virginia Military Institute to be investigated. VMI upholds exceptionally high academic, ethical, and leadership standards and already operates under extensive oversight. This proposed bill is unnecessary and unfairly targets an institution with a proven record of excellence and accountability.

I respectfully oppose HB 1374. Having carefully read through the proposed bill, I cannot determine any advantage of combining the Board of two very unique, yet vastly different, academic institutions. Should I be wrong and there is advantage to combining these Boards, I would recommend that we combine the Boards of all universities in the Commonwealth. I was very pleased to read the language inserted in the bill recognizing that “The Institute shall continue to demonstrate its commitment to contributing to the elimination of sexual violence in the military”. As a VMI alum and 30 year Navy veteran, I fully concur that VMI “continues” to demonstrate this mission in earnest and with integrity.

As a third generation VMI alumnus with family history back to 1930 i strongly oppose HB 1374, this bill stands as a slap in the face to both institutions VMI and VSU. There is no merit to strip VMI of its BOV just because the Delegate from VB doesn't agree with its Decisions.

VMI is both independent and unique, with a 187-year history of excellence within the Commonwealth and our nation. It enjoys a unique and stellar reputation in educational, military, and civilian sectors. It is one of a small handful of Senior Military Colleges in the country. It has new leadership and has evolved into a top-quality, diverse, and solidly reliable institute of higher education. It's unique nature sets it apart from other state institutions and its graduates' contributions far outweigh expected outcomes for similar civilian schools. The Board of VMI is comprised of experienced leaders including alumni who know and understand the unique aspects of VMI and the dynamics that drive its successes. To subordinate VMI to another college's Board that is different in every aspect is illogical and destructive. Leave VMI the way it is and let the new leadership guide the school into the future. This particular bill makes no sense whatsoever.

I respectfully oppose HB1374. It is shocking that Mr. Feggans would waste the valuable time of other state Delegates to consider this outrageous proposal.

House Bill - 1374. I respectfully request this bill to be voted down My name is Lori Losi and my son is a cadet at the Virginia Military Institute. He chose VMI because the Institute offers a unique, challenging, and highly structured four-year experience that builds unparalleled discipline, leadership, and character through a combination of rigorous military training and academics. As the VMI Parents Council Recruiting Committee Chairperson, I have spoken with hundreds of prospective cadets and their families by phone and in person over the past three years. Consistently, these students and parents express strong enthusiasm for VMI’s academic rigor, physical demands, and leadership development model. Their interest is rooted in VMI’s clearly defined mission, culture, and governance structure, which they view as integral to the Institute’s identity and success. For these reasons, Virginia Military Institute should retain governance through its own Board of Visitors. VMI’s unique military and academic model requires mission-specific oversight by a governing body singularly focused on the Institute’s purpose. Maintaining an independent Board of Visitors ensures clear accountability to the Commonwealth, preserves institutional integrity, and avoids governance consolidation that could introduce competing priorities without demonstrated benefit. From both a governance and stakeholder perspective, retaining VMI’s existing structure reflects prudent stewardship and respect for the factors that continue to attract high-caliber students to serve Virginia. Thank you for your consideration

I write as a member of the VMI faculty to share my perspective on HB 1374, and on the importance of independent governance for the Institute. In my years at VMI, I have seen firsthand how the Institute’s distinctive educational model shapes students into disciplined, thoughtful, and responsible leaders. VMI’s academic standards are rigorous and comparable to those of Virginia’s leading public institutions. Our cadets simultaneously manage rigorous academics and a demanding military experience. Having taught at other institutions in the Commonwealth, I can attest that this combination of educational and military training produces some of the best educated, resilient, honorable, effective citizen-leaders in the Commonwealth and the nation. This bill, which would dissolve VMI’s Board of Visitors and transfer governance to another institution’s board, raises serious concerns. VMI’s mission, culture, and governance needs are highly specialized. Effective oversight depends on a board that understands the Institute’s unique system and objectives. Altering governance in this manner risks continuity, cadet and faculty recruitment and retention, long-term planning, without offering evidence that such a change would promote VMI’s mission of producing honorable citizen-leaders. Like any effective institution, VMI must continue to evaluate itself and pursue improvement. As a faculty member, I have seen genuine efforts to adapt and strengthen the Institute while preserving its core mission. I respectfully urge the legislature to recognize VMI’s demonstrated value to the Commonwealth and to approach this bill with careful consideration of its potential long-term consequences. Thank you for the opportunity to provide these comments.

I respectfully oppose HB1374. I thought this bill was a joke or maybe a typo at first. What does VSU have to do with VMI? Does anyone at VSU even know what VMI is? How a structured and disciplined school functions? Uniforms and grooming standards? Physical fitness? Militaristic way of life? In terms of prestigiousness, Virginia State University is not even in the same universe as Virginia Military Institute. When you tell someone you're from VMI they show clear impression, captivation and desire to ask more. No one even knows what VSU is. "Hey nice to meet you, where'd you go to school"? "VSU." "Ok." To transfer the governance of the highest caliber institution this country has to offer to the level of VSU is just outright offensive. RVM 1-9

I am the father of five daughters, the oldest is VMI class 2003, and the youngest is VMI class 2028. VMI provides cadets a unique opportunity to become the ethical, moral, and outstanding citizen soldiers our country really needs now. Every time I am on post, I look at Gen. Marshall's statue and think to myself, which VMI graduate will be the next Gen. Marshall. Therefore, I am greatly opposed to each and every piece of legislation that would effectively destroy VMI.

This proposal (dissolution of the VMI Board of Visitors, and placing it under the VSU Board) can only be the product of a misinformed or confused mind. While VMI may have issues, destroying a valuable institution rather than improving it is insanity. This proposal should be voted down immediately and unanimously.

I strongly oppose HB 1374 how can you give power to another organization that has no clue about VMI and is across the state. This bill needs to be done away with just like HB 1377. I mean honestly what sense does it make for Virginia State to control VMI.

I believe that VMI’s board should remain with VMI, I believe that they have her best interests at heart and treat the school as a place the educate the youth of America rather than a business transaction between their students like many colleges in America operate. I respectfully request that this motion be shot down. Thank you for your time.

I am a proud graduate (and former employee) of the Virginia Military Institute (VMI). I was a wayward young man who was incredibly fortunate to have a VMI alumnus in my life during high school (my parents age), who, along with his wonderful wife, gently persuaded me to consider attending VMI. His reasons that resonated with me included self-discipline, intentional difficulty/tremendous challenge (mentally and physically), inclusive camaraderie, a strong alumni network and community and, honor above self (Cadets are not to lie, cheat, steal, nor tolerate those who do). This fine, kind gentlemen attributed, in a great way, his personal and professional success to the lessons learned at VMI. Many decades removed now myself, I can safely say it has played out the same way throughout my adult life, and I am ever so (and increasingly) grateful. A step further, I would, without reservation, easily and comfortably send a son or daughter to VMI (I hope one of my own do choose to attend) and can sincerely recommend that anyone else do so as well. To those questioning the perpetuation of this Institution, I ask, how and to what extent have you engaged, directly, with the outstanding (but not always perfect) young men and women who have chosen a road less traveled? How often and to what extent have you engaged, directly, with the outstanding (but not always perfect) faculty and staff who work extremely hard in support of these remarkable young people who have chosen such a unique path? I'm quite confident doing so would engender strong affinity for both (and in turn, VMI). Our country's need for leaders of character in all walks of life is not yet sated. VMI has done an outstanding job of graduating, throughout its history, just that.

I oppose HB 1374. If Del. Feggans thinks that dissolving the VMI BOV and putting it under the VSU BOV is a good idea, then he needs to come to VMI, talk to the cadets and staff himself and explain his reasoning.

I strongly oppose HB1374. The legislation does not provide any justification of the proposed change. With the recently hired superintendent and new Board of Visitor members appointed by Governor Spanberger, think it is premature to look at this dramatic change. Finally, why anyone would want to transfer governance of VMI from a board which has over an 80% graduation rate to a board with less than a 50% graduation rate is ridiculous.

I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposal to transfer the Virginia Military Institute’s Board of Visitors to Virginia State University. VMI is a unique institution with a distinct mission, governance structure, and historical role within the Commonwealth. Its Board of Visitors has been intentionally designed to reflect and support that mission, ensuring continuity, accountability, and an understanding of the Institute’s military and educational framework. Transferring oversight to VSU would undermine VMI’s autonomy and compromise the governance model that has guided the Institute for nearly two centuries. This proposal risks politicizing an institution whose strength lies in its independence, tradition, and clear chain of governance. VMI and VSU serve different purposes, constituencies, and educational models. While both institutions are valuable to Virginia, their governance should remain separate and tailored to their respective missions. I urge you to reconsider this proposal and to preserve VMI’s existing Board of Visitors structure. Maintaining independent oversight is essential to protecting the Institute’s integrity, effectiveness, and long-standing contributions to the Commonwealth. Thank you for your time and consideration.

I strongly oppose the proposed Bill, HB1374 sponsored by Delegate Feggans to remove VMI Board of Visitors. As a citizen of Virginia Beach, Navy Spouse of 25 years, and parent to VMI Cadet, I strongly urge you to vote "NO" to any and all changes to funding and or governance of Virgina Military Institute.

Respectfully oppose HB1374. Moving governance to another entity that is even further removed from VMI makes no sense.

I strongly oppose HB1374. I also strongly oppose HB1377.

I respectfully oppose HB 1374 sponsored by Del Feggans. The VMI Board of Visitors is wholly capable of providing governance and direction for the Institute and all members of the BOV thoughtfully consider, discuss, and implement policies for the Institute. They understand the mission of the Institute to produce leaders of character willing to serve their communities. Transferring control of VMI to another college BOV not only places VMI in an untenable position, it also unfairly burdens the BOV of the other college. This bill does not best serve the interests of the Commonwealth, VSU, or VMI.

I strongly oppose this bill. The governor already appoints members to the VMI board as well as other boards. The VMI board members are of different backgrounds, alumni and non-alumni. They should be trusted to make decisions without undo political influence.

Dear Members of the Virginia House of Delegates, I write to express my opposition to House Bill 1374 and to the proposed transfer of governance authority over the Virginia Military Institute (VMI) to Virginia State University Board of Visitors. VMI occupies a unique and historic role within the Commonwealth. Founded in 1839, it is neither a conventional public university nor simply a military training program, but a distinct institution with a narrowly defined mission centered on leadership development, discipline, and citizen-soldiership. That mission has been preserved through an independent governance structure specifically designed to balance academic rigor, military training, and institutional accountability. Transferring governance of VMI to Virginia State University would undermine this carefully calibrated structure. VSU is a respected institution with its own mission, culture, and priorities, but those priorities are fundamentally different from VMI’s. Consolidating governance would not enhance oversight or equity; instead, it risks diluting VMI’s mission, politicizing its leadership, and introducing administrative conflicts that serve neither institution well. Good governance requires alignment between an institution’s purpose and its governing body. VMI’s Board of Visitors exists to provide that alignment. If there are concerns about transparency, accountability, or compliance with state law, those concerns should be addressed directly through targeted reforms—not through a wholesale restructuring that effectively removes VMI’s institutional autonomy. Moreover, this proposal sets a troubling precedent. If the Commonwealth begins reassigning governance of specialized institutions based on political or symbolic considerations rather than functional governance needs, no institution’s independence is secure. Stability in higher education governance is essential for long-term planning, donor confidence, alumni engagement, and institutional effectiveness. VMI can and should continue to evolve, but that evolution must occur within a governance framework that understands and respects its unique mission. HB 1374 does not meet that standard. I respectfully urge you to oppose this bill and to pursue any necessary reforms through means that preserve VMI’s independence while ensuring accountability to the Commonwealth it serves. Thank you for your time and consideration.

My granddaughter is engaged to a senior at VMI. I cannot begin to describe the tremendous level of excellence that I have observed upon each of my numerous visits to this campus. The level of patriotism, character, and unselfish desire to serve others stand out within the cadets there. It would be a shame for our country to lose what currently prevails at VMI. We have so few schools of this stalwart nature, so I encourage you to act judiciously with any changes.

I oppose this bill. I am a 3rd generation graduate of VMI. I saw first hand how VMI shaped my brother, my brother-in-law, my father, my uncle, and my grandfather. This led me to attend myself which turned out to be the best decision I’ve ever made. It led me to meeting my wife who also graduated from VMI. The Institute produces some of the best men and women in our country. They continue to move through the ranks in the military and in civilian life. They are taught so many valuable things that they carry with them everyday. To rip this school apart would not only hurt the alumni, it would hurt the world. I urge you all to not let this happen.

This is insane. I strongly oppose the dissolution of the VMI Board of Visitors. If the VMI BoV is dissolved, I think placing the school under the governance of VSU is objectively the wrong choice. Virginia Tech is half the physical distance from VMI and has a corps of cadets of similar size and structure; why on earth would VT not be the only BoV to consider for this (unnecessary) proposition? It seems to me that both HB 1374 and HB 1377 are bills proposed to push petty agendas with no direct knowledge or interaction with the communities or organizations they will affect.

I oppose this bill. I am a VMI graduate and earned an engineering degree. I went on to receive a PHD in engineering. I worked in education as a professor for the state of Virginia for 40 years. I served the commonwealth joyfully. VMI’s mission of educating men and women of integrity with leadership potential is very valid in our current society. This mission should be governed by the current structure. Guidance from the state legislature can be provided by thoughtful appointments to the BOV. Dissolving the BOV and putting VMI under another will create unnecessary bureaucratic levels of oversight. It will be more efficient to make changes if needed with the current structure. This proposal bill and its purpose is a detriment to lasting changes which can be accomplished with the current structure. I am opposed to this bill

The bill proposing an advisory task force for VMI feels less like support and more like unnecessary interference. Virginia Military Institute has a long-standing mission built on discipline, honor, leadership, and service—values that have shaped generations of leaders who serve the Commonwealth and the nation. Rather than creating new layers of oversight that risk politicizing the Institute, we should be protecting VMI’s autonomy, traditions, and proven governance. Reform, when needed, should come from within and be rooted in respect for the Institute’s culture—not imposed by external bodies with shifting political agendas. Supporting VMI means trusting its mission, defending its values, and ensuring it has the resources to continue producing leaders of character. This bill moves us in the opposite direction.

I strongly oppose House Bill 1374 and House Bill 1377, introduced in the 2026 session. These bills represent the most aggressive challenge to the Institute’s autonomy and state-sponsored status in nearly a century. These bills are not merely "structural adjustments," but a politically motivated dismantling of a unique educational model that has served the Commonwealth and the nation with unparalleled distinction since 1839. VMI was founded on a simple yet revolutionary premise: that the best leaders are those trained in a rigorous military environment who then return to civilian life to build, lead, and serve their communities. Over nearly two centuries, this model has produced a staggering roster of success. VMI has produced: George C. Marshall (Class of 1901): The architect of victory in WWII and the Marshall Plan, and the only career officer in the U.S. Army to ever receive the Nobel Peace Prize; Seven Medal of Honor recipients: Representing the highest levels of valor in combat; Nearly 300 General and Flag Officers: More than any other Senior Military College. Since the integration of women in 1997, female cadets have not only met the Institute’s standards but have excelled, proving that the VMI system is about character, not gender. Graduates like Kelly Sullivan (Class of 2001), a member of the first class of women, have gone on to senior executive roles in the private sector, demonstrating that the "adversarial" system of VMI builds a resilience that is highly sought after in the 21st-century global economy. The primary driver behind HB 1374 and 1377 is a political narrative that suggests VMI is a stagnant, exclusionary relic of the "Lost Cause." However, the data and the current cadet experience suggest a very different reality. The political rhetoric often ignores the fact that VMI has undergone significant reform. Today's Corps of Cadets is more diverse and inclusive than at any point in its history. The 2021 special investigative report, while critical, sparked a series of internal reforms that the current administration—under leaders like Lt. Gen. David Furness—has continued to implement. HB 1377’s call to re-evaluate the "duplication" of services at VMI misses the point of its unique pedagogy. A VMI education is not just about a degree in Engineering or International Studies; it is about the way that degree is earned. The cost-to-benefit ratio for the Commonwealth is actually highly favorable when one considers the rate at which VMI graduates enter high-demand fields like defense, cybersecurity, and public service within Virginia. Virginia House Bills 1374 and 1377 represent a shortsighted attempt to solve cultural tensions through legislative demolition. VMI has spent 186 years evolving from a small state arsenal into a world-class leadership laboratory. Its graduates have led the nation through world wars, civil rights struggles, and technological revolutions. To strip VMI of its governance or its state support would be a self-inflicted wound for the Commonwealth, removing a vital source of disciplined, ethical, and service-oriented leaders at a time when they are needed most. The General Assembly should focus on supporting the Institute's continued evolution rather than seeking its dissolution.

The person who sponsored and introduced this bill has to be out of his mind. This is a legitimate waste of taxpayer money to spend the time considering this bill, even in committee. There is no legitimate reason for this bill. There is also no legitimate reason why a no name college in one of the worst cities in Virginia should have control of the BOV of a school that is not only older but far more prestigious. This reeks of political pandering to a new leader to gain favor with her administration.

I oppose HB 1374. VMI, UVA and GMU have all been political footballs this past year. This bill is a political statement based on ignorance of VMI's mission to produce honorable leaders of integrity through its unique system. Why not choose nearby JMU or UVA to take over governance? Choosing VSU is purely political theater, and I am ashamed that the bill was even written. Virginia residents are exhausted by the political divisiveness in our country, and this bill is an example of a power grab by the left (the right did it as well) as soon as they gained power in Virginia. This moderate, independent voter is fed up and I hope you won't waste more than a few minutes in making this ill-conceived bill go away. VMI's cadets don't need or deserve this distraction and poor example of "leadership."

I am a proud alum of VMI, class of 2020. VMI is unique in many ways and has produced countless leaders in all walks of life. The foundational structure of VMI as it has existed is what allows VMI to continue its mission and to do so effectively. Fundamentally altering the structure of the executive leadership will have a trickle down effect, severely watering down the effectiveness of the Institute and its mission, thus reducing the quality of the leaders it produces. I humbly request that this bill be reconsidered to allow VMI to continue in its current form to continue contributing leaders to our state and nation, and to remain a beacon of strength and honor in our state.

HB1374 is a profoundly ill-advised and ill-considered bill. It would not solve any governance issues at VMI because there are no governance issues (fraud, waste, abuse, failure to follow federal or state law, etc.). To the extent the Governor of the incoming Democratic majority are unhappy with the Board's legitimate decisions, the Governor and the incoming Democratic majority will have the opportunity to appoint Board members more to their liking as vacancies open up during Governor Spanberger's tenure. This is the nature of boards. This process has provided adequate stability and oversight to Virginia's institutes of higher education for decades. This bill would create governance issues at VMI and most likely VSU as well as a single board tries to govern too wildly different institutions over 200 miles apart. This is a profoundly unserious bill at a time when Virginia and its institutions of higher education are facing serious problems and need serious leadership.

Placing one university under the governorship of another university is the same as destroying the first. There is no crisis to warrant such a drastic shift. This concept makes no more sense than placing UVA under the VMI BOV. If that doesnt make sense, neither does placing VMI under UVA make any sense.

I strongly disagree with HB1374. I believe it is incredibly important to note that each college in Virginia has its own distinct mission, and VMI's Board of Visitors governs a military college with a specialized focus on service and leadership development. Replacing the BOV with a board designed for a vastly different institution disregards these responsibilities and risks undermining what ultimately makes VMI and its cadets successful. Ensuring that the best possible candidates serve on the BOV is the way to improve VMI, not replacing the BOV with a board that does not meet the needs of this particular type of school. For nearly 15 years, I have had the privilege of working at VMI, and it is without question an irreplaceable institution that serves both the Commonwealth and the nation with distinction. There is no other school like it in Virginia. While other colleges may incorporate military elements, the VMI experience is unique and cannot be replicated. The work continues at VMI to improve policies and ensure cadets are prepared to be citizens of the world who are understanding, compassionate, and able to work together. And because of that continued work to improve itself, VMI remains a very special place that crafts leaders of the highest caliber. Politics aside (and for what it is worth, I am a Democrat), eliminating the BOV and bringing control of the institute under VSU's board would not strengthen VMI in the least. VMI needs board members who understand the importance and value of the VMI experience as a whole, as well as the work being done to continue building on and improving it for all cadets. Thank you for your time and consideration.

I strongly oppose this bill. VMI is a unique institution that supports and develops young adults into strong leaders. It should remain under its own separate Board of Visitors and not under a Virginia State board. Respectfully, Joyia Rinker

I strongly oppose any proposal to eliminate the Virginia Military Institute’s independent Board of Visitors and place VMI under the control of another university system’s board. As a 2017 VMI graduate, I can personally attest that VMI’s success is inseparable from its unique governance structure and mission. VMI is not a traditional public university, and it should not be governed like one. Its independent Board of Visitors exists precisely because the Institute’s military, leadership-based educational model requires specialized oversight, institutional continuity, and a deep understanding of its mission, culture, and traditions. Centralizing that authority under the Virginia State University Board of Visitors would fundamentally weaken what makes VMI effective. The education, leadership development, and lifelong professional network I gained at VMI were the direct result of an institution that is focused, disciplined, and mission-driven. That focus is protected by a Board of Visitors dedicated solely to VMI’s success and accountability to the Commonwealth. Removing that independence would not improve outcomes — it would dilute them. VMI has served Virginia with distinction for nearly two centuries by producing leaders of character across the military, public service, and private sector. Preserving its independent governance is essential to maintaining that record. I strongly urge opposition to any effort that would undermine VMI’s autonomy and the proven model that has served the Commonwealth so well.

I am writing to urge you to vote "no" on this legislation, as there is absolutely no need for this. As a current VMI employee, the child of a proud alumnus, and someone who has known hundreds of VMI alumni over many decades, I can tell you that VMI is a state and national treasure, each year producing graduates who work tirelessly to make the world a better place. When my father came to VMI, he was the first member of his family to go to college. He graduated with a degree in civil engineering and after a brief period of service in the U.S. Army, he began his career in the highway construction industry. In 2002, the company he founded, Lanford Brothers, was recognized with the Virginia Small Business of the Year Award. He also established a national scholarship to benefit the children of workers killed in highway construction zones. None of this would have happened without VMI: To the end of his life, he maintained that the values of honesty, integrity, and service to others that he learned at VMI were foundational to his success. Dad is not alone; there are thousands of VMI alumni in Virginia and across the country who are contributing to the betterment of their communities, states, and the nation, thanks to the timeless education in leadership they received at VMI. I have had the honor of working at VMI since 2012, and I can assure you I have never seen or heard of anything even remotely racist or sexist on post. I see cadets striving to become better each day, and staff and faculty working tirelessly to support them. Again, I urge you to vote "no" on this legislation. It is simply not needed.

As a constituent, husband, dad, business owner, active volunteer in the community and graduate of VMI, I wholeheartedly and emphatically oppose this bill. Whether as educators, soldiers, public servants, entrepreneurs, politicians, clergy, community leaders, physicians, corporate employees or stay-at-home parents, VMI graduates have a proven track record of excellence—not only within their respective professions, but within their communities. They are individuals committed to carrying forward the flag of civility and progress for the benefit of the greater good. They are quick to place others above themselves. If VMI stands as a holdout for anything, it is honor and integrity. It remains one of the only institutions in the nation with a single-sanction honor system. Where others may hesitate to uphold the highest standards, VMI and its leadership do not waver. The path toward unity, mutual respect, and civility as a nation cannot advance without integrity at its core; sadly, a waning value in our modern age. Without it, society will fall. The most important aspects of life are often the most difficult to achieve—and even more difficult to preserve. As a 186-year-old institution steeped in history and tradition, VMI has repeatedly answered the call to adapt to a rapidly changing modern world while preserving its most vital mission: producing leaders and contributors who do not merely fill gaps in society or the workforce, but who inspire progress and catalyze meaningful change for the good of all. VMI instills the enduring principle of giving more than one receives, in service to the common wealth of others. There is no institution like VMI to step in and fill the gap with the proposed deletion this, small but mighty incubator of our greatest citizens. The proposed dismantling will leave an irreplaceable void in the quality of leaders and contributors that enter society every year. Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. Respectfully, R. Caleb Boyer, VMI c/o 2011

I am concerned about HB 1374, which would dissolve the Virginia Military Institute’s Board of Visitors and place VMI under the governance of another institution’s board. While all public universities serve the Commonwealth, they do so with different missions and models—and VMI is intentionally different. VMI’s BOV exists to govern a military college with a highly specialized mission focused on discipline, leadership development, and the Corps of Cadets experience. Replacing that structure with one designed for a different institution overlooks those unique responsibilities and risks weakening what makes VMI effective. This feels less like thoughtful oversight and more like a one-size-fits-all approach that doesn’t fit. VMI deserves governance that understands its purpose, respects its traditions, and supports an institution that has served Virginia (and our nation) with distinction for generations.

I Oppose bill HB1374 VMI is not like VCU and shouldn’t be treated as such we have produced many great military leaders and great people I know alumni from the 70s and they tell me how VMI helped them and turned them into a great military leaders.

I strongly oppose House Bill 1374. The concept of moving the governance of Virginia Military Institute (VMI) to another Virginia state college is absurd. This is clearly a politically motivated bill sponsored by Delegate Feggans that defies logic. As a Virginia Beach resident and constituent I am extremely disappointed.

I reject HB1374 and efforts to place VMI's governance in any other institution. The governor has appointment authority, which directly impacts the governor's ability to restructure the board to ensure compliance with state policies. I fail to understand why current regulatory and governance measures provide insufficient oversight. This potential move jeopardizes the institution's mission and may lead to a decline in quality.

I strongly oppose this bill. VMI has a proud and well-deserved history of providing superb graduates whom history has shown make a significant impact in both the military and civilian world. Dissolving VMI's Board of Visitors and trying to blend VMI in another State college would only serve to dilute the VMI education and its overall mission.

I oppose HB 1374 because dissolving the Virginia Military Institute’s Board of Visitors and shifting its governance undermines nearly two centuries of dedicated leadership and institutional stewardship. VMI produces graduates who are consistently successful in the military, public service, business, and their communities — and that track record is tied directly to an honor-based system and a governance structure that understands the school’s unique mission. Respectfully, Frank Hargrove III VMI Class of 2015

While I served 14 years in the military, I had numerous leaders though those years. I will say that the best leaders came from VMI. Not only where they very knowledgeable in history, tactics, and many other aspects of military life but they also were the most fair and balanced individuals. When things got tough they always remained composed, professional and genuinely a strong backbone. VMI produces amazing men and women that are some of the best people, I have ever met. I have worked and looked up to just about every person that is a product of VMI. They were a driving factor in my military career because I never wanted to let my leadership down. I realized the type of great people they produced and decided that since I wasn't able to go to college there as an adult that I wanted to work there. I have spent over 5 years there. I have worked directly with the cadets and leadership. I served as a police officer as well a coach on the campus and really enjoyed working with the cadets. In the 5 years of working here I have noticed the VMI of 1864 is in the corner gathering dust. It's time that we look at the product VMI of today is polished and shiny, a beacon of hope. The current leaders and those of the recent years have moved VMI in a great direction and will continue to move in the right direction. Please leave this great institution alone as it serves more than just Virginia but our great nation.

I write in opposition to HB 1374. VMI, VSU, and all other institutions of higher education in Virginia share the common mission of educating students, but each institution pursues this mission in its own characteristic way and hence should be governed by its own Board of Visitors. To propose that two institutions be placed under the "supervision, management, and control" of one board is a disservice to both institutions and to the members of the board. The members of VSU community deserve to have a Board of Visitiors that is committed to serving them without the distractions of the concerns of another institution. The same is true for the members of the VT, UVA, VCU, JMU, VMI, etc., communities. Please continue the practice of each institution being governed by its own Board of Visitors.

Respectfully I oppose this bill. Efforts to improve the VMI BOV should not be the dissolution of that organization but rather an intelligent and nonpartisan process to select and approve members to the board. This may be asking too much in the current political environment of our day, so I challenge you to try and rise above this acrimonious situation and simply do better. Respectfully submitted, Paul T. Kastner

I oppose HB 1374. This proposed legislation makes no sense logically and makes me question if the individual proposing it did any real research. VSU's graduation rate compared to VMI's is a stark contrast which anyone can easily research. VSU's 6-year graduation rate is roughly 41% while VMI's is around 80%. The 4-year graduation rate for VSU is a measly 27% while VMI boasts nearly 70%. VSU is also not a military school, so what knowledge would the VSU board members have in regards to governing VMI? VMI's board members understand how this institution operates and needs to operate to be successful. If our board of visitors is dissolved and governance transferred to inexperienced hands I feel this institute will take a sharp turn for the worse.

My name is Mr. Joseph Bahadoor and I work here at VMI. I ask you to consider pulling this bill for this reason: I have been here for 3 school years and seen first hand how us the students and I are affected by the BOV and the leaders here at VMI. I have seen the transition from Mr. Wins to Mr. Furness. While I don't agree with how some of the BOV decisions went down. I ask you to consider this: Are you on site daily to see what goes on? Are you putting the STUDENTS first here? What does this serve purpose for? Is this in reaction for Mr. Wins being let go NOT FIRED from being the president of this College? Please I ask you to take time and understand the decision of putting real life decisions in the hands of other people that are NOT on the ground here daily to see what is going on! This does not just affect people like me who work here! This affects the Students and this is a COLLEGE first! So I ask you to put the students first here! I Thank You! Mr. Joseph Bahadoor

HB1374 should be struck down immediately. Virginia Military Institute is a nationally respected institution with a proven record of excellence. VMI is ranked the #4 public liberal arts college in the nation and consistently produces leaders of character and competence. Virginia State University does not rank anywhere near VMI and is currently the lowest-ranked Virginia university in the U.S. News Regional Universities South list. An institution that struggles to govern itself should not be advising or influencing a highly successful one. VMI graduates more generals than any ROTC program and, outside the federal academies, more Army generals than any other college. More than half of its graduates serve in the military. Its model works. There is no demonstrated problem this bill solves. HB1374 is unnecessary and should be rejected.

VMI's board of visitors, senior staff and key leadership does an outstanding job of running VMI and should remain in place. Placing VMI under the leadership of another state school makes no sense. VMI is consistently among the most fiscally responsible schools in the nation, always meets SWAM goals, deals with discipline fairly and produces a product unlike any other in the nation. Leadership at VMI enabled the school to rank among the top 5 in the state and top 100 in the nation annually in terms of graduate employment rates, graduate satisfaction, starting salaries, return on investment and mid-career salaries. Current leadership at VMI fosters an environment free of favoritism, racism and sexism. The Institutes record in areas of discipline and disciplinary issues is the best in the Commonwealth and the VMI Post is arguably the safest campus in America. This is due in no small part to the environment of civility, honor, and respect for good conduct created by VMI's current leadership structure. I urge our delegates to avoid "fixing something that isn't broke". Allow VMI leadership to continue to do it's job.

VMI has a longstanding tradition of producing both military and civilian leaders. Some of the militarys highest ranking officers are VMI graduates. Some of the largest companies in this country are lead by VMI graduates. There is not a better academic institution in this state let alone the country that does a better job of producing men and women for leadership. Introducing a bill like this is not only disrespectful and distasteful but it will cripple our country’s efforts to produce leaders to defend this nation. How can a school like VSU, who only commissioned 7 graduates into the Army last year know the first thing about how VMI operates? VMI had over 170 commission into the armed services last year. Imagine if the roles were reversed and the VSU board was dissolved and their leadership path was given to VMI. What does VMI know about how to lead and guide an HCBU? I respectfully ask that this baseless attack on VMI be stopped and this bill withdrawn.

To Whom It May Concern, I respectfully oppose any effort to restructure the Virginia Military Institute’s Board of Visitors to mirror that of Virginia State University. While both institutions serve the Commonwealth, they have fundamentally different missions, cultures, and educational models. VMI’s unique military system requires governance by individuals who understand and respect its demanding structure, traditions, and leadership-focused mission. Applying a governance model designed for a traditional civilian university to a military college risks undermining what makes VMI effective. Decisions about discipline, training, and institutional standards should be made by a board aligned with VMI’s purpose, not by one shaped for a completely different type of institution. Changing the Board of Visitors in this way would not improve VMI—it would weaken its ability to operate as intended. I urge you to preserve governance that reflects VMI’s unique role and continues to serve cadets and the Commonwealth effectively. Sincerely, Caleb Patterson

By any measure, VMI is a much more successful and highly regarded academic institution than is VSU. The idea of dissolving the VMI BOV and having the VSU BOV govern both schools is ridiculous. Based on their respective track records, it would make more sense to dissolve the VSU BOV and have the VMI BOV govern VSU!

I have worked for VMI for 15 years very Proudly. I've never heard of something so ridiculous as HB1374 & I 100% reject it and I ask you to do the same. VMI is a great school and should continue to operate with current leadership and BOV. Thank-you!

I would encourage you to actually look at the outcomes that VMI produces. The top four institution in the commonwealth; the only public institution in the commonwealth with a six figure return on investment for EVERY degree over a students lifetime (directly from SCHEV). This isn’t a question of all the right that VMI does, but a complete disregard for all the things that VMI contributes to the commonwealth, our country and our military. VMI is the top producer of second lieutenants in the army second only to West Point; but VMI officers are retained higher than all senior military institutions combined, including West Point. Is VMI perfect, no. But they are the perfect example of what all institutions should strive for. Outcomes, 97% job placement after graduation, an honor code that is unparalleled, and most importantly cadets who WANT what is offered. I encourage you to come to post, meet cadets, and see for yourself. Referencing a report from 1928 shows the lack of effort that was put into even understanding this institution. Another investigation is not needed; a merge of leadership is even worse and it will degrade everything the institution represents and offers. Progress has been made and the new leadership is eager to make change. Give the institute a chance to continue to prove themselves, to heal, and to continue to prove their value to this state. All these threats end up hurting not just the institution but Virginia as a whole. You claim you want students to come to our schools but your actions directly refute that. We should be united not divisive and the two bills pertaining to VMI are nothing but divisive.

I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed bills HB 1374 and HB 1377 regarding the Virginia Military Institute (VMI). As the parent of a current cadet, I am deeply concerned that these legislative efforts represent a political maneuver that unfairly targets the Institute and its students. The data does not support the logic of placing another institution in a position of oversight or priority over VMI. VMI maintains a 77% six-year graduation rate, a four-year graduation rate of approximately74%, and a first-year retention rate of 81-82%, which ranks 9th among Virginia public colleges. Furthermore, VMI manages an $800 million endowment. In contrast, the other institution mentioned has a four-year graduation rate of 26-28%, a six-year rate of 41-45%, a first-year retention rate of 62-71%, and a $100 million endowment. Given these figures, these bills appear to be a political attack rather than a decision based on educational or fiscal merit. These recurring attacks following shifts in political leadership are detrimental to the cadets who work tirelessly and deserve stability. VMI has operated in good faith under both previous and current administrations, and these bills feel like a direct punishment for recent leadership decisions made by the Board of Visitors.

This is ridiculous. 1. VMI is fine, leave it alone. 2. What does VSU know about running a military school. 3. This is a self serving bill for a minority of people on a mission. 4. 186 years of success and many high alum in important positions relates to success, leave us alone

Leave VMI alone. I write as a U.S. Navy service member, and the father of a current VMI cadet. He has earned his place at VMI through hard work, discipline, and dedication. For my family, and for many others across the Commonwealth, VMI represents opportunity, service, and the formation of character. It is not simply another public college; it is a unique institution with a distinct mission that has served Virginia and the nation well. Studies in a rigorous, tradition-rich environment that has shaped leaders for generations. I was deeply troubled to learn from a recent Washington Post article (“Virginia Democrats target military college’s funding after anti-DEI push,” January 20, 2026) about efforts led by Governor Abigail Spanberger and other Democrats to establish a task force that could question VMI’s relevance in today’s world and potentially jeopardize its state funding. This proposal, which includes a state inquiry into whether VMI has adequately addressed its historical issues with racism and sexism, threatens to undermine the institution’s status as a state-supported university. As a parent investing in my son’s future, I fear this could disrupt his education and that of every current cadet, casting uncertainty over their academic paths, scholarships, and career opportunities. VMI has long been a cornerstone of Virginia’s higher education system, producing distinguished alumni who serve our state and nation in the military, business, public service, and beyond. While acknowledging the institution’s past challenges, VMI has made significant strides in fostering an inclusive environment, including reforms following previous investigations. These efforts demonstrate a commitment to progress without abandoning the core values of discipline, honor, and leadership that define VMI. Dismantling or defunding such a vital program would not only harm the cadets who have chosen this path but also deprive Virginia of a unique resource for developing resilient, principled leaders. I urge you to oppose this task force and any measures that could endanger VMI’s funding or independence. Please advocate for preserving VMI as it stands today—a state-funded military college that continues to evolve while upholding its mission. The futures of dedicated young people like my son depend on it, and I believe maintaining VMI’s role benefits all Virginians. So I ask, just leave VMI alone.

I respectfully, but fervently oppose HB1374. Virginia Military Institute should be left under its own governance and SHOULD NOT be transferred to any other school. My son is a freshman cadet at VMI and chose this school because he knew it would help shape and develop him to be the best and most productive version of himself. He knew the path at VMI is rigorous and hard, easy does not produce the kind of man he wants to push himself to become. The Commonwealth of Virginia must respect the diverse needs of its college students, and VMI fills the need for students, such as my son and so many others, who want look back on their college experience and be proud of what they accomplished, knowing they fought through tests and trials that few others can or did. Clearly VMI is not for everyone, that is okay. Virginia has many wonderful schools to suit a wide range of needs. Please do not strip this opportunity for greatness from the students who have chosen the extraordinary. They do not want a diluted, watered down version; they want the rigor, academically, intellectually, physically and emotionally. VMI has a long history of sending leaders into the world. Leaders in service and industry. It's reputation as a top ranked school speaks to the success of its structure and programs. Rather than tear it down, I would think Virginia's leaders would celebrate the school and proudly promote it, not use it as a tool for political vindictiveness. I urge the committee to do the right, and reasonable thing, reject this Bill.

VMI should not ever be governed by VSU. Please don’t do this.

This bill should be struck down immediately and given no consideration. Virginia Military Institute is a highly respected and prestigious institution. VMI is the #4 public liberal arts college/university in the nation. What a devastation to have one of the best universities in the nation governed by the worst in VA. The lowest-ranked Virginia university in U.S. News & World Report's 2026 Regional Universities South list is Virginia State University. VSU’s inability to properly govern its own university should be automatically disqualifying for consideration in advising, governing, or influencing any other university. Legislators should applaud the success of VMI and its students. VMI graduates more generals than any ROTC program and, outside of federal academies, more Army generals than any other U.S. college. More than half of all graduates serve in our military. VMI has a successful model of military and academic integration to produce some of our nation’s finest. There is no need for this bill.

My name is Martin Fentress and my son is a cadet at the Virginia Military Institute. He chose VMI—and we chose to support him—because of its singular promise: to forge young men and women into citizen-soldiers of exceptional character, discipline, and honor through a uniquely challenging environment. I am writing to respectfully but firmly voice my deep opposition to House Bill 1374. While I understand and respect the General Assembly's role in overseeing our public universities, this bill is not an act of responsible oversight. It is a reckless and punitive measure that threatens to destroy a valuable Virginia institution and sets a dangerous precedent for every public college in our Commonwealth. My argument against this bill rests on three core principles: 1. This Bill Is a Radical Overreach, Not a Solution. This is the most extreme and heavy-handed action a legislature can take against a public university, short of defunding it entirely. It seeks to resolve a political and cultural dispute by dissolving a 185-year-old governance structure and handing it to another institution. Instead, this bill uses a sledgehammer where a scalpel is required. It sends a chilling message: "If you disagree with the prevailing political majority, your very existence can be erased and handed to a rival." This political weaponization of university governance is a threat to the academic independence that all great institutions require. 2. An Outside Board Cannot Steward a Unique Mission. Virginia State University is a fine institution with its own proud history and vital mission. Its mission is not VMI's mission. VSU's board is composed of leaders suited to governing a traditional civilian university. They have no experience with, or inherent understanding of, the regimental system, the rat line, or the all-encompassing military lifestyle that defines VMI. The bill claims it will preserve VMI's military structure, but how can it? The very soul of VMI is its board's deep, personal connection to that specific military and academic model. An outside board, no matter how well-intentioned, will inevitably govern based on its own experience. They will be tempted to smooth the sharp edges and flatten the demanding culture that is the entire point of VMI. They will not know how to protect what they do not understand. In seeking to "fix" VMI, this bill will break the very machine that makes it effective. 3. It Punishes the Cadets and Guarantees Instability. My son and his fellow cadets are thriving in a demanding system. They are learning to lead, follow, and live with integrity. They willingly chose this difficult path. This bill insults their choice. It tells them that the institution they have poured their sweat and character into is so fundamentally broken that it cannot be trusted to govern itself. What will this do to the morale of the Corps? What will it do to the value of a VMI diploma, now overseen by a board with a different focus? This action guarantees years of chaos, resentment, and litigation. You will be trading a functioning, if contentious, institution for a fractured and demoralized one. I urge you, do not take this irreversible step. Reject this bill. Do not demolish the leadership of one of Virginia's most iconic institutions. Trust in a process of reform and collaboration, not hostile takeover. My son and his fellow cadets chose VMI for its promise of structure and honor. They deserve stability from their state leaders, not chaos.

VMI is a great school. Do not change its governance We need it to stay as is. It has great historical significance for the commonwealth,

I am writing to respectfully oppose HB1374 that would repeal the statutory Board of Visitors of the Virginia Military Institute (VMI) and transfer governance of VMI to the Board of Visitors of Virginia State University. VMI occupies a unique and historic role within the Commonwealth’s system of higher education. Founded in 1839, it is the nation’s oldest state-supported military college and operates under a mission, culture, and governance model unlike any other public institution in Virginia. Its citizen-soldier tradition, adversative education system, and military command structure require specialized oversight by a board singularly focused on that mission. VMI’s alumni network is a critical component of its success and service to the Commonwealth. Graduates of VMI have gone on to serve Virginia and the nation with distinction in the armed forces, public service, education, engineering, business, and civic leadership. This enduring record is not incidental; it is the direct result of an institutional model preserved and guided by a dedicated Board of Visitors that understands VMI’s mission and holds it accountable to high standards of character, leadership, and service. The proposed transfer of governance would risk eroding the trust and engagement of this alumni community. VMI alumni provide substantial financial support, mentorship, recruiting assistance, and professional networks that directly benefit cadets and reduce long-term burdens on the Commonwealth. That support is built on confidence in VMI’s independent governance and mission integrity. Placing the Institute under the authority of an unrelated board would weaken alumni confidence, diminish engagement, and ultimately harm VMI’s ability to fulfill its public mission. From a governance standpoint, this proposal also undermines sound higher education policy. Boards of Visitors exist to provide focused fiduciary and strategic oversight. Transferring VMI to the governance of a board whose primary responsibility is another institution - one with a different mission, student population, and operational structure - would dilute accountability and create unavoidable conflicts in priorities and expertise. Finally, this legislation sets a troubling precedent across Virginia’s public higher education system. Concerns regarding institutional performance or culture should be addressed through existing oversight mechanisms, targeted reforms, or appointments to the appropriate board - not through the dissolution of an institution’s governing body. For these reasons, I respectfully urge the Committee to reject HB1374 and to preserve VMI’s independent Board of Visitors. Doing so safeguards institutional integrity, honors the Commonwealth’s long-standing governance principles, and ensures that VMI and its alumni can continue to serve Virginia with distinction. Respectfully submitted.

Good Morning Members of the committee, Thank you so much for the opportunity to speak this morning. I was signed up this morning to speak and was on at 7:30 AM, but I had another meeting I needed to attend. I am in full support of HB1383 to provide alternatives for individuals to obtain CTE licensure. We want to emphasize the importance of licensure for teachers, however it is becoming more difficult for individuals in the field to career change to teach our youth on the application of skills due to the number of courses they must obtain before they can teach. These are individuals that have spent many years in the field and are considered experts, so having them take numerous courses to teach is quite cumbersome. We are in support of this bill because we believe there can be some flexibility for these individuals to obtain licensure. As we continue to expand pathways and opportunities for students, expanding the opportunities for individuals to obtain licensure is critical. Than you for your time. George C. Hummer Frederick County Public Schools.

Discrepancy in VDOE Licensure Requirements Regarding Curriculum and Instruction Course Completion through Virginia Community College System (VCCS) Purpose: This memorandum addresses a critical inconsistency in the Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) licensure requirements concerning the acceptance of the Curriculum and Instruction course completed through the Virginia Community College System (VCCS). We respectfully request clarification and revision of the policy to align with the Code of Virginia and ensure equitable pathways to licensure for technical professionals. Issue: Our division recently encountered a significant obstacle in the licensure process for a Registered Nurse (RN) who completed the required Curriculum and Instruction course through the VCCS. Despite completing a Curriculum and Instruction course that we believed met the requirements for the VDOE license, her licensure application was rejected. The sole reason cited was that the Curriculum and Instruction course must be completed through a four-year institution, not a community college. It has come to our attention that the VDOE recognizes the EducateVA program, a VCCS workforce credential, as meeting the Curriculum and Instruction requirement. However, the RN in question completed her Curriculum and Instruction course through the for-credit side of the community college, not the workforce credential program. This distinction presents several critical issues: Lack of Transparency and Clarity: The VDOE's distinction between workforce credential and for-credit community college courses regarding this specific licensure requirement is not clearly and prominently posted on the VDOE licensure website or in published guidelines. This creates confusion and misleads applicants who rely on the information provided. Inconsistency with Code of Virginia: Our review of the Code of Virginia does not reveal any explicit requirement that the Curriculum and Instruction course for technical professional licensure must be completed at a four-year institution. Arbitrary Distinction: The distinction between workforce and for-credit community college courses, when the content of the Curriculum and Instruction course is substantially similar, appears arbitrary and lacks instructional justification. The rigor and content of the for-credit Curriculum and Instruction course, when taken in totality, should adequately meet the needs of technical professionals seeking licensure. Impact on Technical Professionals: This policy disproportionately affects technical professionals, such as RNs, who often pursue coursework through community colleges due to accessibility and affordability. The unclear distinction between workforce and for-credit courses adds another layer of complexity and potential misinterpretation. Proposed Solution: We propose the following actions: Clarify and Publicize Policy: The VDOE should immediately clarify and prominently publish the specific requirement regarding the Curriculum and Instruction course, clearly outlining the distinction between workforce credential and for-credit community college courses. Align with Code of Virginia: If no explicit requirement exists in the Code of Virginia, the VDOE should revise its policy to accept the Curriculum and Instruction course completed through the for-credit side of the VCCS, provided the content meets established standards.

Please see attached

I strongly support CTE licensure because it plays a critical role in preparing students for success beyond high school. Career and Technical Education provides hands-on learning that connects classroom instruction with real-world skills, helping students explore career paths, gain industry certifications, and enter the workforce with confidence. Allowing CTE professionals—many of whom bring years of valuable industry experience—to earn licensure ensures that students learn from experts who understand both the technical and professional demands of their fields. This strengthens our schools’ ability to meet workforce needs and builds stronger partnerships between education and industry. By supporting CTE licensure, we open doors for more qualified individuals to teach, address educator shortages in high-demand areas, and create meaningful opportunities for students who thrive through applied learning. CTE is essential to developing the next generation of skilled workers, innovators, and community leaders.

Passage of this bill will clarify in state code the General Assembly's authoritative confirmation power and improve the calendar for appointments to serve on the boards of higher education institutions. It also will help to remove partisanship and political interest from these boards decision making, requiring that their duty be to the mission of the institution and to the public good.

I am strongly in support of workers and students having a voting member on their university Boards of Visitors. Boards regularly make decisions that impact affordability and the educational experience for students. For example, at Virginia Tech, where I work, recent BoV decisions have ended projects to build more housing for students (a primary concern for Blacksburg) and raised fees. It's only right that they should have a say in how the university runs.

I am writing to ask you to vote YES on HB1473 – “Public institutions of higher education; students and campus; restrictions on student speech; limitations,” which will further enshrine the constitutional rights to free speech and freedom of assembly for students, faculty, and staff on college campuses. Students have, both historically and contemporarily, been one of the leading forces for social change using first amendment rights. Protests such as those against the Vietnam War and apartheid, and rallies advocating for civil rights and for divestment, have shaped the national conversation paving the way for positive political and social change. Over the past two years, student protests have been met with a repressive response from university administrators and the state’s Attorney General’s office. During the Spring of 2024, the Virginia public university response to non-violent, anti-genocide demonstrations exposed students to excessive police violence. Over 125 Virginia students, faculty, and staff were arrested across four universities and at least three students had their diplomas withheld in retaliation for participating in pro-Palestine anti-genocide protests. This crackdown on first amendment speech has been justified by university executives under the guise of “time, place, and manner” restrictions. While the provision exists to give universities discretion in protecting free speech and simultaneously preserving the core functions of academic institutions, its ambiguity has allowed it to be weaponized to crack down on disfavorable speech. This bill amends the “time, place, and manner” exemption to be less ambiguous. It would do so by amending § 23.1-401 of the Code of Virginia so universities may only apply “time, place, and manner” restrictions to prevent “a material and substantial disruption… to a safe educational environment”, while also requiring the University to report such justifications to the General Assembly. HB1473 limits the ability of governments and university officials to suppress or punish free speech in public colleges and universities across the Commonwealth. It is vital that we protect the role of all college and university students in seeking out the truth and challenging injustice and systems of oppression through their first amendment rights. I urge you to vote YES on HB1473.

Oppose HB1473. While I respect and support students’ First Amendment right to free speech and peaceful expression, college campuses must first and foremost remain safe and welcoming environments for all students. Universities need the ability to set reasonable time, place, and manner guidelines so students can attend class, learn, and earn their degrees without disruption. The widespread campus unrest of the 2023–24 academic year demonstrated how quickly learning environments can become destabilized. In the aftermath of that year, national survey data showed that 40% of Jewish undergraduate students felt the need to hide their Jewish identity on campus [ BSG-Hillel Survey, May 2024]. In Virginia, we have made meaningful progress since then, and I believe HB1473 risks undermining the balance that has helped campuses move toward greater safety, access, and belonging for all students.

I am writing in full support of HB1473 (Schmidt) which is extremely important to protect free speech during peaceful protests and otherwise. VCU, UVA, and Virginia Tech also used unreasonable means of silencing free speech during protests in 2024. At VCU this included calling in additional police, teargas, and arrests of nonviolent protesters. Bringing the police in with their violent measures is what brought violence to the protests. VCU students were arrested for protesting a genocide. Then in 2025 unreasonable arbitrary restrictions were placed on students. Diplomas were withheld for several weeks for at least 2 students. Rules were capricious and the restrictions and rules kept changing and were being driven by those who would suppress speech. The Del. Herring's House Select Committee on Maintaining Campus Safety and First Amendment Expression was conducted in a very unfair manner giving guaranteed to university administration and police and forcing students protesters to speak first come, first served during public comment. This fall William & Mary targeted students peacefully protesting the genocide with invasive investigations and sanctioned them for protesting a genocide. I know two of these students and they have been given unnecessary sanctions for speaking out in. peaceful protest. Del. Schmidt's bill will give some guardrails for our first amendment rights on college campuses. This is at a time where every day the federal government puts citizens and immigrants alike in the crosshairs of a violent armed ICE and silence people who disagree. In our state where the words "Sic semper tyrannis" are on our flag, we must honor the constitutional rights of our citizens and encourage free expression at our institutes of higher learning. Please support HB1437.

Please vote YES on HB1473 and protect students' First Amendment right to peacefully protest.

My name is Walt Heinecke, I am associate professor of education and have been teaching at a Virginia public for 30 years in research, statistics and evaluation. I have served on the faculty senate. We at the American Association of University Professors at UVA urge you to support HB 780, HB 1069 and HB1473 on Monday. HB 780 which serves as a hub for the other bills is the most exemplary bill I have seen in higher education in Virginia. It fixes the problem we encountered at UVA and other publics by addressing university control over legal counsel, it allows for staggering terms for BOV members prohibiting the one party domination of BOVs., It clarifies appointment processes that maintain the oversight of the GA, It has much needed language on the mandatory appointment of faculty, staff and student voting members on BOVs a much needed improvement for authentic shared Governance. We suggest you roll Del. Laufer's bill into this bill as it has a more democratic process of faculty, staff & student member selection to maintain the independence of constituent voice. Allowing the BOVs to pick from multiple names is a nominations not an election. The removal of professors section in HB 780 comports with AAUP national best practices essential for shared governance and exemplary not found in any other proposed bill. Unlike any other bill it includes a requirement for BOVs to define and implement shared governance that will improve the quality of decision making at our universities, an AAUP national standard. The bill, like HB 1473, has language to protect free speech and first amendment rights of faculty, staff and students. that have proven to be essential in the current era. You might think about rolling Del. Schmidt's 1473 bill into this bill strengthening this aspect of HB 780. These three bills 780, 1069, 1473 considered as a whole are exactly what is needed to bring balance and improve our institutions of higher education. If you want to strengthen and improve our institutions, I urge you to support all three bills. I speak from being on the front lines of the crisis experienced at UVA last year and teaching for 30 years. The other bills concerning BOV reform are not as comprehensive as 780 and associated bills. You have an opportunity here to really make dramatic improvements in our system of higher education. Please support HB 780, HB 1069 and HB 1473 on Monday and advance them. The bills will improve shared governance without which there can be no academic freedom and we need academic freedom now more than ever as our universities are under siege. Thank you.

I urge the passing of HB1473. As a professor, I am appalled by the treatment of students and faculty by administrators for peacefully protesting against a Genocide. We must protect the free speech rights of students, and this bill would prevent unnecessary crackdowns on students. I strongly support this Bill. Alex Hilert, Ph.D., LPC

Students have every right to protest and display their views. The students targeted in April 2024 at the VCU Encampment, and The 2025 gathering a year later on the same lawn faced so much because of the suppression of VCU. The reason they have been supressed is because they are Pro Palestinian, Palestinian themselves or Anti-Zionist Jewish allies. Several students have families in Gaza. They wanted their university (VCU) to stop funding israeli bombs/weapons and in general the israeli government who is inflicting genocide, despite a ceasefire in October 2025. STILL students get supressed. Even though all 3 individuals at VCU got their degrees, the supression they faced was blantantly discriminitory based on one of and/or all of these factors: Race, Religion or political affiliation. Please support these students standing up in support for free speech.

Our 1st Amendment rights have been under attack in the current political climate, so it is important to reinforce our Constitutional rights with bills like HB1473. We cannot allow overreach by universities to infringe on the 1st Amendment rights of students and faculty for the sake of political expedience. Please vote yes on this bill!

Please vote no in HB 1473. Colleges and universities must have the authority to set reasonable rules for protesters that do not violate first amendment rights. This bill would strip them from doing that and put students, faculty, and community member members at risk. Thank you.

I am an attorney who practiced government law for nearly forty years. HB1473 would not eliminate or unduly curtail the necessary authority of colleges and universities to regulate the time, place and manner of speech by students and others on campus. It would, however, place guardrails around such regulation to protect the constitution rights of students and the open exchange of ideas that our learning institutions should foster. In the last several years we have seen harsh penalties and violence inflicted on peaceful protesters, particularly those calling for a ceasefire in Gaza and equal rights for Palestinians. Some of the participants in these demonstrations were of Palestinian decent, many were Jewish and most were neither. However, the demonstrators were falsely accused by many of being antisemitic, and on November 16, 2023, the Attorney General sent a ridiculous letter to Presidents and Board members at state colleges and universities claiming that protesters were calling for a second Holocaust. Clarifying the protections for freedom of speech on campuses in state law, as would HB1473, is essential to protect our students and the learning experience provided by the open exchange of thoughts and opinions, especially in times of emotional turbulence. Looking back at campus activism over the last several decades, we might observe that student activists were pretty much on the right side of history. They were right about the civil rights movement, they were right to call for an end to the Vietnam war and they were right to call for increased focus on environmental protection. Assure that students have the right to speak and be heard. Please support HB1473.