I travel almost 400 miles to see my LO. 6 hours to drive and 2 hrs to visit. Limited contact during visits. It is so important to our family to have face to face contact. It improves mental health and overall physical wellbeing. Extending visits and appropriate additional contact would increase that I believe. They spend almost 23 hours a day locked down so it’s imperative to allow for additional contact during visits. Phone And kiosks get jammed when they come out to allow everyone time but it’s so limited. Increased contact and visitation hours are a very healthy way to improve our relationships and for them when they return to their pod.

NAACP Virginia State Conference supports hb173

Visitation and contact with family is a vital part of rehabilitation for inmates. I am writing in support of the two bills that make visitation a more accessible, and easier, process for family. I also believe that restricting visitation as a punitive measure is uncalled for. My husband and I are currently experiencing this, DOC removed his visitation for a year (without any institutional charges) because he spoke to a fellow inmate in the background of a video visit. In addition, I would be travelling over 3000 miles to visit in person and the facility would allow me to visit for just three hours. The three hours in an exception to the standard two, but there is no reasonable reason to make visitation so difficult for family and friends. I understand changes were introduced during covid, but we are no longer dealing with a pandemic, so why have these changes remained? Please consider passing these bills and allowing inmates and family to benefit from easier access to visitation.

Dear Members of the General Assembly, I write in strong support of HB173, HB296, and HB1246 based on my lived experience and years of witnessing how powerful visitation can be when it is treated with humanity and consistency. Family connection stabilizes incarcerated individuals, improves behavior, and gives people hope. Visitation is not a luxury; it is a critical part of rehabilitation. Unfortunately, current practices often work against that purpose. On December 6, 2025, my visit at Buckingham Correctional Center was denied, along with three other women, because our jeans were said to be “too tight,” even though visitors wearing nearly identical clothing had been allowed in earlier that same day. One woman had driven nearly six hours and was still denied an in-person visit. This type of inconsistent enforcement discourages families and erodes trust. I have also had a visit stopped because of a one-inch crack in my car window during the middle of summer, in nearly 90-degree heat. Instead of focusing on safety or reasonable solutions, the visit was terminated. Experiences like this make families feel punished rather than supported. What hurts most is that I remember when visitation brought real family unity. I grew up visiting my father during times when DOC hosted family days. We could go out on the yard, eat hamburgers and hotdogs, play cards, and run around in the field. Those moments mattered. They created connection, motivation, and hope. I looked forward to those visits because they felt human. Now, visits feel stripped of that purpose. There is no movement, no access to nourishment, and even using the bathroom can risk ending a visit. Families are expected to sit for hours without basic accommodations. Where is the family unity in that? HB173, HB296, and HB1246 move Virginia toward fairness, consistency, and dignity. They recognize that families are not a threat to safety, but a vital part of rehabilitation. I respectfully urge you to support all three bills. Their passage would help restore trust, humanity, and the true rehabilitative power of family connection in Virginia’s correctional system.

HB173 and HB296 represent common sense and humane visitation policies. Strong connections to the outside world are demonstrably vital to reentry success. HB1041 is another obvious gain for everyone concerned, returning citizens, their loved ones, and tax paying citizens of the Commonwealth. HB553 is another no brainer that deserves full support.

I write in strong support of HB296, HB173, and HB1246 as an individual directly affected by Virginia’s visitation policies. I am a long distance visitor who must travel hundreds of miles and coordinate interstate and international travel in order to maintain contact with an incarcerated family member. I am also a parent and a spouse, and the responsibility for planning, funding, and navigating visitation falls primarily on me. My husband is my children’s stepfather and supports them at home while I manage the logistics and emotional labour of maintaining family connection through a complex and inconsistent system. Virginia is nationally recognised for reducing recidivism, with a three year re incarceration rate of approximately 17.6 percent, the lowest in the country. Research consistently shows that maintaining family connections during incarceration is one of the strongest predictors of successful reentry. Individuals who receive visits are significantly less likely to reoffend, with reductions in reconviction rates exceeding 30 percent in some studies. Protecting visitation is therefore not only compassionate policy but a sound public safety strategy. In Virginia, approximately one in fourteen children will experience parental incarceration before age eighteen. As a parent, I experience firsthand how visitation policies affect not only the incarcerated individual but the family member who must absorb the financial costs, travel demands, and administrative barriers in order to keep that connection alive. National data shows fewer than half of incarcerated parents receive in person visits with their children, despite in person contact being the most effective way to preserve meaningful relationships. When visits are shortened or cancelled after significant travel, the burden and impact fall directly on the caregiver who has made those sacrifices. HB173 directly addresses these realities by recognising long distance visitors, minor children, and infrequent visitors, and by establishing a minimum two hour visit. For someone in my position, a short or unpredictable visit does not justify the extensive planning, expense, and disruption required. Limiting suspension of visitation to situations involving a direct and substantial safety threat provides essential protection against arbitrary denials that currently occur without explanation or appeal. HB296 addresses the lack of consistent and clearly communicated visitation rules that I and others must navigate. Requirements often vary by facility or change without notice, creating unnecessary stress and uncertainty. Clear standards improve compliance, reduce conflict, and support staff while ensuring visitors are treated with dignity. HB1246 ensures these reforms are implemented through transparency, data collection, and oversight. Advancing HB296, HB173, and HB1246 affirms Virginia’s commitment to public safety, rehabilitation, and the family members who carry the responsibility of maintaining connection under difficult circumstances.

Good Morning, the House Of Delegates, I am a member of the Valley Justice Coalition and we support these four (4) bills : HB173, HB296, HB533 and HB1041. These bills are well needed in the Department of Correction for the detained individuals and families in order to maintain a productive re entry to the communities. Please, vote yes. Thank you. Ms Stover

I am a member of the Valley Justice Coalition and I support this bill. Visitation has dropped by 92% since before the pandemic. Staying in touch with family and friends is vital to successful reentry. Please vote yes for this bill.

I am writing to oppose the current slate of firearm restriction bills before the General Assembly. While these proposals are framed as public safety measures, in practice they disproportionately harm marginalized Virginians — including racial minorities, LGBTQ+ individuals (especially trans people), immigrants, and low-income residents — who often face higher risks of targeted violence and slower or unequal police response. These bills add costs, delays, and bureaucratic hurdles to exercising a fundamental right. Increased fees, mandatory waiting periods, feature bans, and expanded disqualifications fall hardest on people with limited financial resources, unstable work schedules, or justified concerns about their personal safety. For many vulnerable individuals, the ability to lawfully and promptly acquire a firearm is not about ideology, but about self-defense. History shows that restrictive gun laws are most aggressively enforced in minority communities, amplifying disparities in arrests, prosecution, and legal exposure — even when no harm has occurred. Expanding civil liability, criminal penalties, and subjective risk standards increases that risk. Public safety should not come at the expense of civil rights or equal access to self-protection. Policies that price people out of their rights or delay lawful self-defense do not address the root causes of violence and instead leave the most vulnerable less safe. I respectfully urge you to oppose these bills and support approaches that protect both public safety and the rights of all Virginians, regardless of income, identity, or background. Thank you for your time and consideration.

Dear Delegates, I write in strong support of House Bill 296. My son-in-law is incarcerated within the VA Department of Corrections. My daughter has personally experienced repeated denials of visitation at Virginia state prisons when trying to visit her husband. On multiple occasions, she was told there was an “anomaly” on the body scanner; when she offered to be searched, staff refused. When she asked for clarification, she was disrespected by staff and cursed at (told her that they didn't have to tell her sh*t) My 11-year-old granddaughter was also denied visitation to see her father because one of the staff members did not like her pants. The officer claimed they were orange and it wasn't allowed, however, her pants were peach colored sweatpants. My daughter drives four hours each way to visit her husband, only to be offered a video visit with no explanation. Across multiple facilities, what is acceptable attire at one prison is not accepted at another, creating confusion and inconsistency for families. HB296 addresses these issues by requiring clear, publicly posted dress codes, standardized procedures, and accountability when visits are denied. It ensures families can maintain meaningful contact, which is critical for rehabilitation and family stability. I respectfully urge you to vote in favor of HB296. Sincerely, Thomas Brust

I am writing in support of Virginia House Bill 361. My perspective comes from personal experience. My loved one has been incarcerated within the Virginia Department of Corrections for 17 years. During that time, he has spent long periods confined under conditions and policies that offered no opportunity to earn sentence credits — despite consistent effort, good behavior, and personal growth. HB 361 is not about excusing past mistakes. It is about fairness. Time served is time lived, and individuals should not be denied earned sentence credits simply because of when their incarceration occurred or circumstances beyond their control. After 17 years, I have seen how denying earned credits deepens hopelessness while recognizing effort encourages accountability and rehabilitation. I respectfully urge you to support HB 361 and help ensure Virginia’s sentencing system reflects fairness, humanity, and modern justice principles.

I strongly support HB173 and its effort to establish humane, evidence-based visitation standards in Virginia correctional facilities. Under current VDOC practice, most in-person visits last two hours, seated across a small table, with physical contact limited to one hug and one kiss. There are no shared activities, games, or child-friendly accommodations, which makes meaningful family interaction difficult, especially for married couples and children. These conditions do not promote rehabilitation or family stability. The body scanner process is also deeply problematic, particularly for women. Menstruation, clotting, or feminine hygiene products can register as “anomalies,” resulting in visitors being denied entry, pressured to accept a strip search, diverted to a shortened on-site video visit, or forced to wait for supervisory review. Any delay reduces the already limited visit time and is not restored. This process is invasive, humiliating, and disproportionately affects women without clear evidence that it improves safety. VDOC often justifies restrictive visitation policies as necessary to prevent contraband. However, drugs continue to enter facilities regardless of visitation rules. During the two years when in-person visits were suspended after COVID, overdoses and drug-related deaths still occurred. This strongly suggests that visitation is not the primary source of contraband. Limiting family contact has not solved this problem, but it has caused real harm to incarcerated individuals and their families. I also support HB173’s provision that visitation privileges may be suspended only for conduct during visitation that poses a direct and substantial threat to safety or security. Family visitation should not be used as leverage or punishment for unrelated or minor institutional infractions. Maintaining family connections supports mental health, institutional stability, and successful reentry. The bill’s requirement for extended visitation for long-distance visitors is especially important. Families traveling 150 miles or more invest significant time and money for visits that currently offer minimal meaningful interaction. Providing additional access is reasonable and humane. Finally, the pilot program and data-collection requirements in HB173 are critical. Decisions about visitation should be guided by evidence, not assumptions. Transparency and reporting will allow lawmakers to evaluate operational, staffing, and safety impacts honestly. HB173 balances safety with human dignity and reflects what research and experience show: strong family connections reduce harm and support rehabilitation. I urge the General Assembly to advance this bill.

FOIA reports from VADOC show that visitation has dropped 92% when compared to pre-COVID visitation. The department has chosen to use enhanced sanctions to punish by taking away in person visits for YEARS for charges that had nothing to do with visitation! This bill will put a stop to that. Contact with family and friends is vital for successful reentry. The Valley Justice Coalition Supports this bill. Please vote YES.

Maintaining the "sacred bond" of family is essential for the psychological well-being of both incarcerated individuals and their children. HB173 protects in-person visitation rights and prevents them from being used as a tool for arbitrary punishment, ensuring that bridges to the community remain intact. S4JR supports this bill because we know that true public safety is built by strengthening family connections, not by severing them for administrative convenience.

Simply unconstitutional. Only a tyrant would agree with this. A waste of time and money for no benefit.

My thoughts on HB173: (HB173) is a great bill to present. Ever since Covid, visitation in DOC has declined tremendously for (3) reasons. (1) The online visiting process. This process is discouraging to many of our family members because a lot of men and women have elderly parents that are not computer savvy. Before, all inmates had to do was turn in a visitors list and that was that, but now everything is online and a lengthy waiting process. (2) The restroom process is very inhumane. If a visitor has to use the restroom, they have to leave out of the visitation room and walk back to the front entrance instead of being allowed to use the restroom in the visitation room. After being scanned and patted down, visitors should not be subjected to the same process just to use the restroom. (3) There are no food machines in the visitation room. Family members are traveling hours away, some with health issues that require them to eat something over a course of time. Not having food machines discourages family members from not wanting to visit their loved ones. Sitting for hours with no food or drink is very discouraging. DOC should want to encourage family bonding instead of discouraging family bonding. Creating an atmosphere of joy, respect, and peace strengthens that family bond, but neglecting those elements creates separation between the incarcerated and their loved ones. These visitation issues, along with many others, affect the incarcerated mentally.

I support this bill. As an incarcerated individual I understand how visitation is part of rehabilitation, hope, and imperative to social growth. Virginia DOC visitation has been stripped continuously over the years. Instead of taking incarcerated individuals out of prison mentally for a little while it now brings people’s loved ones into prison. Visitation is an important part of rehabilitation and should be treated as such. When people take their time to come see a loved one, that time should be considerate especially when coming from a distance. It should be treated as a program because it supports a part of mental health and social growth.

I have had visitors travel from as far as England (11 hours on a plane) and Arkansas (11 hours on the road) and each was only allowed 2 hours with me. I felt it was inherently unfair that we weren't given more time together after traveling from such a distance. Also, with me being 11 years charge-free, I feel there should be some sort of incentive for guys like myself. Give people a reason to want to do better.

This bill affects me personally because in 20 years I've had 2 visits and mostly people didn’t want to drive to see me for 1 hour after driving 8 hours and that has damaged my mental health a lot of the years. It makes me feel worthless a lot of the time - like I’m not worth a family member coming to visit me. Then finding out that it is unfair to them to have to drive all those hours for a 1 hour visit and having to leave as fast as they got here. This bill will help men and women like myself know that their family loves them by having a meaningful chance to sit down and talk and eat and tell stories to help get through the tough days and weeks that lie ahead. I believe this bill is worth passing, to give families and loved ones a chance to show their love, because visiting someone at their lowest and most troublesome times says a lot about how you really care for that person.

I support this bill because my own family has to travel over 12 hours to visit me. Allowing them to stay longer and or visit for multiple days would encourage family bonds.

The provisions within HB173 are particularly crucial in establishing a framework for reasonable and consistent visitation, which is a vital conduit for maintaining these essential connections. This is especially pertinent for individuals with families residing at a distance and, critically, for ensuring children can sustain relationships with their incarcerated parents. Such interactions provide invaluable positive support systems, mitigating feelings of isolation and despair, and fostering a sense of accountability and hope for the future. Crucially, these enduring ties are a powerful deterrent to recidivism, offering a stable foundation and network upon release that is essential for reintegration into society. The legislative intent behind this bill is clear: to champion greater accountability within the justice system, cultivate stronger family units, and pave a more successful pathway for reentry. These collective benefits extend far beyond the incarcerated population, contributing substantively to the overall health, stability, and prosperity of the entire Commonwealth. Therefore, I strongly advocate for the passage of House Bill 173.

I'm a formerly incarcerated juvenile lifer supporting HB 318

VACFSY IS IN SUPPORT OF THESE BILLS

Please see the attached testimony on behalf of the Campaign for the Fair Sentencing of Youth in support of HB318.

My son was sentenced to life with no parole at 17 and he has served 28 years and this bill is a more meaningful opportunity for him as well as the other juvenile lifers! I respectfully asked for your support on this bill.

I oppose House Bill 318. I agree with an earlier comment opposing the bill, which said, "This bill seems unnecessarily risky. Would this bill inadvertently result in inmates serving life sentences for murder being released even though there is no consensus on the parole board that they are rehabilitated? Va. Code § 53.1-134.1 says 'four or more' members of the parole board need to vote to grant parole in order to parole an inmate. That makes sense today, because there are 5 parole board members. But this bill would expand the board to 10 parole board members. So only 4 members of the board would have to think that an inmate is rehabilitated, to release an inmate, even if other parole board members reasonably believe the inmate is a threat to the public. Va. Code § 53.1-134.1 should be amended to say 'eight or more' rather than 'four or more' members of the parole board need to vote to release an inmate serving a life sentence. This bill may also unduly restrict the parole board's ability to consider relevant factors, by saying that it can't deny parole based on 'the nature of the offense' -- even though there are some cases, like a pattern of behavior (serial killers, serial rapists), where the nature of the offense may show a continuing danger to the public. The bill also says the board can't deny parole based on factors outside the inmate's 'demonstrated ability to change.' But what if the inmate is a threat for reasons he can't change, or there is no way to demonstrate he is able to change, even if he possibly could change with enough effort or willingness to undergo treatment? Unfortunately, such a dangerous inmate may still need to be kept incarcerated until the end of his sentence, to keep him from harming innocent people. That language about 'the nature of the offense' and 'demonstrated ability to change' needs to be revised or qualified to protect against threats to innocent people."

Good morning, Chair and members of the Committee, My name is Sarah Moore, and I live in Appomattox County. I am the Vice President and Co‑Founder of Bridges Beyond Bars, an organization that supports families and returning citizens across the Commonwealth. I also speak as a wife, a mother, and someone who has spent years walking alongside families who are trying to navigate a system that often feels impenetrable and inconsistent. I am here today in strong support of HB318, because this bill addresses three critical gaps that directly affect public trust, public safety, and the futures of people who have worked tirelessly to change their lives. First, HB318 strengthens the Virginia Parole Board by expanding its membership and requiring a balance of professional expertise, prosecution, defense, mental health, reentry, and victim services. This is not just structural reform; it is a commitment to informed, trauma‑aware, and community‑centered decision‑making. When the Board reflects the full spectrum of experience, its decisions become more credible, more consistent, and more just. Second, HB318 requires the Board to provide individuals with their full investigative file at least 30 days before deliberation. For the families I work with, this is transformative. Too often, people go before the Board without ever seeing the information being used to determine their future. Transparency is not a luxury; it is a constitutional value. When people understand what is in their file, they can correct inaccuracies, prepare meaningfully, and engage in a process that respects their humanity. Third, and most importantly to me, HB318 ensures a meaningful opportunity for release for people who entered the system as children. The bill outlines clear factors the Board must consider, including adolescent development, trauma, demonstrated growth, and the realities of who a person has become after years of rehabilitation. This is not leniency. It is alignment with science, with Supreme Court precedent, and with our shared belief that children are capable of profound change. In my work with families across Virginia, including my own, as my husband entered the system as a child, I have seen how the lack of transparency and the absence of juvenile‑specific considerations affect real people who have spent years working to change their lives. His story is not unique; it is one of many. And it is precisely why this legislation matters. HB318 recognizes that who a person was at 15 or 16 is not who they are at 35 or 40, and that our policies must reflect that truth. HB318 is not about guaranteeing release. It is about guaranteeing fairness. It is about ensuring that decisions are made with full information, professional expertise, and an understanding of human development. It is about honoring the dignity of every person while still respecting the experiences of victims and survivors. For these reasons, and on behalf of the families and returning citizens we serve, I respectfully urge you to support HB318. Thank you for your time and your commitment to justice in our Commonwealth. Warm Regards, Sarah Moore Vice President & Co-founder Bridges Beyond Bars Uplifting Justice-Impacted Individuals & Strengthening Communities

I am writing to oppose the current slate of firearm restriction bills before the General Assembly. While these proposals are framed as public safety measures, in practice they disproportionately harm marginalized Virginians — including racial minorities, LGBTQ+ individuals (especially trans people), immigrants, and low-income residents — who often face higher risks of targeted violence and slower or unequal police response. These bills add costs, delays, and bureaucratic hurdles to exercising a fundamental right. Increased fees, mandatory waiting periods, feature bans, and expanded disqualifications fall hardest on people with limited financial resources, unstable work schedules, or justified concerns about their personal safety. For many vulnerable individuals, the ability to lawfully and promptly acquire a firearm is not about ideology, but about self-defense. History shows that restrictive gun laws are most aggressively enforced in minority communities, amplifying disparities in arrests, prosecution, and legal exposure — even when no harm has occurred. Expanding civil liability, criminal penalties, and subjective risk standards increases that risk. Public safety should not come at the expense of civil rights or equal access to self-protection. Policies that price people out of their rights or delay lawful self-defense do not address the root causes of violence and instead leave the most vulnerable less safe. I respectfully urge you to oppose these bills and support approaches that protect both public safety and the rights of all Virginians, regardless of income, identity, or background. Thank you for your time and consideration.

I am writing to express my strong support for House Bill 318. Virginia’s parole system is in need of reform. The state’s parole approval rate is extremely low, leaving many individuals with little opportunity for second chances, even when they have demonstrated rehabilitation and personal growth. This system does not adequately recognize the potential for people to reintegrate successfully into society, and it can contribute to unnecessary incarceration and strain on the correctional system. HB 318 would increase transparency, fairness, and accountability in the parole process. By requiring clear criteria for parole decisions, published reporting on outcomes, and individualized explanations for denials, this bill ensures that decisions are based on rehabilitation, conduct, and readiness for reentry—not arbitrary or inconsistent factors. Importantly, HB 318 also addresses juvenile parole, mandating that the Parole Board meaningfully consider age, maturity, and evidence of rehabilitation. Young people who have committed offenses should have a fair opportunity to demonstrate growth and reintegrate safely, rather than being indefinitely denied based solely on the nature of their offense. This legislation represents a balanced, evidence-based approach that protects public safety while also providing individuals the opportunity to rebuild their lives. Supporting HB 318 is a step toward a more just, humane, and effective criminal justice system in Virginia. Please vote in favor of HB318.

None of this helps affordability or the regular consumer.

Start allowing people parole it's that simple we cannot have parole if no one is able to be parole out .

I have had many years of experience demonstrating the need for reform of our current parole system, including the steps outlined in Delegate Hope's bill. This has included appointment as a member of the Governor's Commission on Parole Review in 2015, work with Delegate Sickles and others on prior proposed legislative reforms, representation in parole hearings, and co-counsel to the class of parole-eligible inmates raising constitutional claims in Burnette v. Fahey, 687 F.3d 171 (4th Cir. 2012). Our Commission's 2015 report specifically recommended (at pp. 37-39) similar amendments "to increase the Parole Board's expertise, independence, and diversity." We included references to the work of the American Law Institute and others to support this reform. My experience has also confirmed the need to have strong protections against removal of Parole Board members by the Governor, in order to ensure that they make these difficult decisions based on an independent evaluation of the factors relevant to parole (including serious consideration of how the inmate may have demonstrated the capacity for change after many years of incarceration). In my experience, the current obstacles to the ability of Board members to do this because of the ability of the Governor to fire them have been bipartisan in nature. Finally, my experience demonstrates the need for the reforms in this bill to ensure "a meaningful opportunity for release," to require the Board to articulate contemporaneous reasons for denying parole and steps necessary for rehabilitation, and to put a stop to the rubber stamping of parole denials year after year based on nothing other than the "serious nature and circumstances of the crime" -- which was generally committed now 35 years ago or more (i.e., before the abolition of parole for offenses committed after 1994). In the Burnette case, we documented how these offenders were sentenced during a period of time in which (as later-Justice Scalia once noted) sentencing judges had imposed very long sentences with the expectation that many would later receive parole. Yet the parole grant rate declined from 42% in 1989 to from 2.1% to 3.7% between 2002 and 2008. The tragic effect of this de facto elimination of any meaningful opportunity for parole has been continued incarceration of many offenders for longer than they would have served for the same offense under the ostensibly "tough on crime" sentencing guidelines applicable under the no-parole law after 1995. In our report for the Governor's Parole Review Commission (at pp. 48-50), we described this last problem in greater detail.

This bill seems unnecessarily risky. Would this bill inadvertently result in inmates serving life sentences for murder being released even though there is no consensus on the parole board that they are rehabilitated? Va. Code § 53.1-134.1 says "four or more" members of the parole board need to vote to grant parole in order to parole an inmate. That makes sense today, because there are 5 parole board members. But this bill would expand the board to 10 parole board members. So only 4 members of the board would have to think that an inmate is rehabilitated, to release an inmate, even if other parole board members reasonably believe the inmate is a threat to the public. Va. Code § 53.1-134.1 should be amended to say "eight or more" rather than "four or more" members of the parole board need to vote to release an inmate serving a life sentence. This bill may also unduly restrict the parole board's ability to consider relevant factors, by saying that it can't deny parole based on "the nature of the offense" -- even though there are some cases, like a pattern of behavior (serial killers, serial rapists), where the nature of the offense may show a continuing danger to the public. The bill also says the board can't deny parole based on factors outside the inmate's "demonstrated ability to change." But what if the inmate is a threat for reasons he can't change, or there is no way to demonstrate he is able to change, even if he possibly could change with enough effort or willingness to undergo treatment? Unfortunately, such a dangerous inmate may still need to be kept incarcerated until the end of his sentence, to keep him from harming innocent people. That language about "the nature of the offense" and "demonstrated ability to change" needs to be revised or qualified to protect against threats to innocent people.

I urge you to vote in favor of these bills, all of which have a common interest -- to protect Virginia residents from unconstitutional action by Federal authorities that are charged with protecting the population. The bills are : HB 650, 1260, 1262, 1264, 1265, 1438, 1440, 1441, 1442, 1482, 1492. My family knows a naturalized U.S. citizen from El Salvador who came to the United States because he married a U.S. citizen. He was arrested in Pennsylvania and held for three days, because they thought he might be an undocumented alien based on racial/ethnic profiling. He had to hire a lawyer to get out. Virginia law enforcement must not cooperate with Federal security forces that are carrying out such unconstitutional activities. My name is Julie Schechter Torres. I am a member of Temple Rodef Shalom. Our houses of worship must be safe from activities by law enforcement. Our schools must be safe for children. I know a 9-year-old child who is legally present in the United States but didn't want to go to school for days after ICE went to her ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. Children are not a threat. If ICE is focusing on criminals - as they say they are - they are in the wrong place. Going there to capture adults is once again using children as "bait". I have lived in countries where criminals stop cars and kidnap people. There is no way to know that law enforcement authorities are who they say they are if they wear masks and don't show identification. There is no reason someone carrying out legal law enforcement activities should need to hide who they are or what they are doing. Masking is just a means of covering up unlawful action. Please pass these bills to protect Virginians.

I am wanting to write in support of HB 650, HB 1260, HB 1265, HB 1438. These bills would work towards truly and wellbeing of helping the community that lives here within the Commonwealth. The behavior and actions of federal officers are dangerous as they are spreading fear and harm that directly work against the trust and wellbeing of many immigrants and other people of color that are present here. Many of those who are directly impacted as they are less likely to feel safe to contact emergency services for life saving care, going to the store for groceries, taking children to school, going to court for things even like protective orders that could help promote their safety- to just name a few. People deserve the ability to live with dignity and safety and these bills would take the necessary steps to helping promote public safety for all.

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills protect sensitive spaces such as courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places, and hospitals from intimidation by federal immigration enforcement. They strengthen public trust and improve accountability by restricting law enforcement officers from obscuring their identities. I oppose HB1459, which would force state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would seriously damage public trust in local law enforcement.

I have watched the news and live feeds from Minneapolis, and today I watched testimonies of violations, physical abuse and murder by ICE. It is hard to not see we are in a Constitutional and humanitarian crisis at a scale I never thought could happen here. Please do not bring this to VA. As Virginia is the birthplace of our Constitution, can we make the choice to refuse this standing army, search and seizures? the beatings and destruction of property and disruption of freedom peace and commerce ICE and similar agencies leave in their wake? We are not being protected by them, but living in terror of them. The trust is gone. And, every decent law enforcement officer carries the massive burden of association with these violent, incompetent, sadistic, rogue, racist hypocrites. Ice must be abolished NOW. Humane reform to immigration law, the justice system, detention conditions (including medical care, oversight without notice, access to lawyers without being shipped out, family visits, and provisions for the safety of people who trusted our country as asylum seekers .) As for actual ,violent criminals- we have a system in place and none of this is necessary if we have trust between communities and law enforcement. Ice needs to be scrapped first for something new - for the people, with the consent of the people , to take its place. What are they but roving patrols racial profiling? I am PROUD of our civil rights legacy in our state. We can take a stand and refuse funding and quartering. We should all be able to look to law enforcement as heroes- the people we could call for help. Every act by ICE... The stalking in the streets, the threats to peaceful protestors and Constitutional recorders, and the fear so many goo community members, citizens snd non-citizens live with every day does not even feel like our country. To think we spend this massive amount of money to torment people working hard and doing their best? I'd rather the money go to give a family a shot at the American Dream, instead of paying someone to try to turn guns on them for pay. Our immigrants- They are our heart. They love this country and its promise. They are strong and brave and they work hard and have strong families and faith. They are full of love and share art, culture, dance, music, food and traditions, a love for community many of us can learn from. It is a terrible thing to not embrace and love these people who give so much and ask for so little. I cannot understand how these people are treated like an object to kick, hold down, choke, gun down, jail or murder, without so much as looking at paperwork. Please end this now, for the love of God. If you do not abolish ICE, remove funding and contracts and don't allow masks or lack of badges. Help prosecute when THEY are the violent criminals. But really, get them out and keep them out. Let our own trained police officers handle the crime. Thank you.

I am a resident in the city of Richmond and I demand the restriction and removal of ICE agents from our communities. I support the bills put forth that seek to limit the access and activities of immigration and law enforcement agents. Thank you

My name is Lillian Komarow. I am a resident of District 12. I am submitting this testimony in support of HB 1441, HB 1440, HB 1442, HB 650, HB 1260, HB 1262, HB 1265, HB 1438, HB 1482, and HB 1492. I am also writing in opposition to HB 1459. I grew up in the extremely diverse Northern Virginia area and I know that immigrants are a huge part of what makes Virginia the beautiful melting pot that it is. I know that immigrants have a wide array of reasons to come to Virginia, but ultimately my personal experience has shown me that immigrants want to live and work in peace. They contribute to Virginia in many positive ways economically and culturally– not that that should be a requirement to be treated humanely. Even if I did not have this background, I would know that the terror we are seeing ICE indiscriminately inflict on undocumented immigrants and US citizens alike across the country is abhorrent. It is imperative that Virginia citizens are able to freely access community services without fear of harassment from federal agents. Across the country we are seeing ICE and CBP agents deliberately terrorize families simply trying to take their children to school or to the doctor. There have been stories on the news of domestic violence victims being too afraid of ICE terrorization to show up to their court dates. Ultimately the actions of ICE are deterring people from accessing important services, and this creates ripple effects into the community by making us ALL less safe. Please protect Virginia citizens by passing HB 1440, HB 650, HB 1260, through. The Commonwealth has both the right and the duty to ensure free and fair election for its citizens. Elections cannot be free and fair when people are afraid of being detained at polling places solely due to their appearance. ICE agents’ presence at polling places would be nothing short of voter intimidation. Please protect the sanctity of our elections by passing HB 1442 through. The responsibility of local and state law enforcement should be to protect and serve Virginia citizens, not waste our resources and create mistrust by collaborating with increasingly hostile federal immigration operations. In addition to sapping limited state and local resources, collaboration blurs accountability for racial profiling and other abusive tactics federal agents take, and opens Virginia police departments up to lawsuits. Both law enforcement leaders and crime victim advocacy organizations alike have spoken out against Virginia law enforcement participating in immigration enforcement, citing eroded trust between police and victims, and even described instances of domestic violence and sexual assault survivors being unwilling to seek assistance. Please pass HB 1442 to prevent this mistrust and wasting of resources, as well as HB 1262 so that Virginians can trust that they are not falling into a trap when seeking immigration assistance services, HB 1264 so that Virginia citizens know they have an Accountability Commission keeping watch on federal agents conducting military style operations in the Commonwealth, and HB 1482 so that federal agents can further be held accountable by not concealing their identity. For the purpose of protecting Virginians, our resources, and our right to free and fair elections, I respectfully urge this committee to support HB 1441, HB 1440, HB 1442, HB 650, HB 1260, HB 1262, HB 1265, HB 1438, HB 1482, and HB 1492 and oppose HB 1459.

For over a decade, federal policy has limited immigration enforcement in “sensitive locations” like schools and health care facilities. That commonsense safeguard was rescinded in January 2025. Since then, we’ve seen the real‑world harm: there are schools shutting down after Border Patrol tackled students and staff, chronic absenteeism as families fear sending their children to school, a family seeking care for their young daughter detained in a clinic parking lot, and families separated at courthouses while trying to attend their legal proceedings. These incidents show what happens when enforcement reaches places where children and families should feel safe. HB 1260 is a straightforward bill that protects the safety and wellbeing of students, families, and school communities. It doesn’t change immigration law or limit federal authority. It simply ensures that when immigration agents appear on a school campus, schools respond with transparency, notice, and due process—so learning doesn’t stop because fear takes over. We know that surprise enforcement near schools ripples far beyond one family. Students stop attending. Parents pull back from teachers. Staff don’t know how to respond. Working directly with immigrant children every day, my colleagues and I have seen firsthand the negative effects of children feeling unsafe while attending school. Many have expressed not wanting to attend school, struggling to focus, and feeling scared in a place they should feel safe in. HB 1260 addresses this clearly and responsibly. HB 1440 extends these same commonsense protections to all “protected areas”—hospitals, preschools, public colleges, and offices of Commonwealth’s Attorneys. It prevents staff from granting access to nonpublic areas for immigration enforcement. This ensures that Virginians living their everyday lives can access essential services without hesitation or fear. And finally, HB 650 brings this same principle to courthouses by prohibiting certain civil arrests in these settings, so Virginians can safely appear in court, participate in proceedings, and support loved ones without fear. Now more than ever before, we must ensure due process is uninterrupted and protected for all living in Virginia. Together, these bills uphold constitutional norms, reduce confusion, and keep children and families safe in the places they must be able to trust. For these reasons, I respectfully urge the Committee to advance HB 1260, HB 1440, and HB 650. Thank you

As a Virginian voter and constituent, I’m urging the House Subcommittee to pass all of the bills that aim to limit ICE’s reach in Virginia. Immigration agents are acting like masked thugs, roaming the streets, harassing innocent Americans, and escalating tensions in ways that put people’s lives at risk. The murders of Alex Pretti and Renee Good in Minnesota, Keith Porter in California and countless violations against people of color being held against their will in ICE custody should alarm every American who cares about justice, due process, and public safety, regardless of political party. It’s part of a deeply troubling pattern of unchecked violence and abuse by federal immigration agents against our communities, including U.S. citizens. More than half of voters in the nation disapprove of how ICE is enforcing immigration laws. Even law enforcement leaders are sounding the alarm, criticizing ICE for using tactics that “unnecessarily endanger the lives of both law enforcement officers and the community” and committing acts that are “against not only legal law, but the moral law.” The state of Virginia has the opportunity to follow in the footsteps of Illinois, Oregon amd other states where they’ve restricted ICE enforcement against vulnerable communities. We all have the right to be safe, regardless of whether one is a citizen or not.

Dear Virginia House of Delegates, I am writing in support of all bills in this Block 1 subcommittee (HB650; HB1260; HB1262; HB1264; HB1265; HB1438; HB1440; HB1441; HB1442; HB1453; HB1459; HB1482; and HB1492). Each bill has the same underlying principles, in my view, that undergird each one and is worthy of widespread support and consideration. 1) Greater accountability for any abuses of power - something our government is supposedly predicated upon from its foundations of checks and balances. 2) Respect of human dignity - lest we forget another person's humanity and spiral into forms of depravity experienced on widespread scale even within our lifetimes, our parents' lifetimes, or our grandparents' lifetimes, anytime dehumanization becomes the norm and public opinion becomes apathetic we ought to have sirens blaring warning signals. As a conflict prevention and response professional, I have thorough knowledge of human rights abuses at widespread scale at the hands of unchecked power -- the enslavement of Africans and brutality of the chattel slave trade and its legacy of abuses through the Jim Crow Era onward, the forced disappearances of Argentina and Chile, the Holocaust, forced kidnappings and assimilations of First Nations and Native American children at Indian Boarding Schools in Canada and the United States, and more. These bills hold that some places ought to be preserved to honor the humanity in our neighbors, even those who may be undocumented - polling places, courthouses, schools. These bills provide guardrails that Virginia needs to both maintain the humanity of all people, even those who are undocumented. It serves to safeguard the hearts and minds of those citizens and legal residents who have been continuously profiled based on their perceived or actual national origin, and provides more psychological safety for those in our communities who are being targeted from the national stage to local actors dispatched from ICE who have done nothing unlawful. These forcible, unchecked, and brute forces of strength have brought about unnecessary and widespread fear, school absences, medical inattention for fear of being targeted in public, and traumatic experiences for young children and youth. Virginia House of Delegates must provide a healthy check and balance and honor its constituents. Vote in support of these bills. Sincerely, Jena Kitchen

We support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB4141, HB1442 AND HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces such as courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This legislation is intended to strengthen the public trust in our civic places and to improve accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure the identity of members of law enforcement. We are particularly mindful of comments suggesting that ICE members might surround polling places in our November 2026 elections. The presence of masked individuals in any of Virginia’s polling places would interfere with the electoral process at all levels and discourage people from freely exercising their right to vote. The intimidation of voters has no place in this Commonwealth. The Silver Team for Democracy is a group of senior citizens registered to vote in Virginia.

I support this bill and am in favor of the increased safety it will provide for our communities and for my neighbors. I support banning face coverings for federal officers, restricting immigration enforcement officers to 40 feet from polling places, and prohibiting immigration enforcement from schools, hospitals and other above mentioned safe spaces. Limits need to be placed on rogue federal agents, due process upheld and American communities protected.

I am a resident of Alexandria, VA House District 5. I am writing in support of bills in support of HB650, HB1260, HB 1262, HB 1264, HB1265, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, HB1482, and HB1492. These bills are a critical way that we Virginian's can ensure the safety of our communities from Federal overreach. HB650, HB1440, and HB1442 would protect areas that were traditionally not targeted for immigration enforcement. These places, schools, hospitals, courts, places of worship, are critical in ensuring the safety and wellbeing of our community. Right now, families regardless of their immigration status are afraid to leave their houses in order to attend church, go to school, get medical care, or attend important court hearings because they are rightfully worried they will be unjustly detained by ICE due to the color of their skin, the language they speak, or their accent. These bills would help restore access to these Virginians. HB1442 is especially important, as it stops enforcement of immigration laws within 40 feet of polling locations. Given statements by the administration on using ICE around polling places, this bill is critical to ensuring the integrity of our elections. HB1438, HB1441, and HB1482 are critical in building public trust with state and local law enforcement. Currently, federal immigration agents do not identify themselves and wear masks. This causes not only fear in the community and obstruct accountability for these agents, but it makes communities distrust any person wearing camo or who looks like law enforcement as it is difficult to tell who is a federal agent and who is our local law enforcement. These bills also work to prohibit local/state law enforcement to enforce federal immigration law without a judicial warrant. This takes the burden off of local law enforcement in determining what type of warrant they must honor and how they should interact with federal immigration authorities. Finally, HB1260 ensures that schools across the Commonwealth understand and have a plan to interact with immigration enforcement. This bill instructs schools to limit immigration authorities from entering nonpublic areas without a judicial warrant, again restoring to children their ability to attend school without fear. This bill also removes the responsibility and burden from local school boards in determining when and how they should respond to federal immigration authorities, and protects them from being targeted by the administration. In totality, these bills protect Virginians and work to return to them their rights to due process and their sense of safety and dignity that have been taken by the administration.

Any even mildly engaged Virginian ought be alarmed at the slow civil war being carried out on the people of Minneapolis. That is why I fully support HB1264 and HB1482 as critical societal checks on the administration's unfettered military force. Additionally, I support HB650/HB1260 (aren't these the same bill?), HB1265, HB1438, HB1440, and HB1441 for creating safe places and walling off our own government and enforcement agencies from this radical influence. Lastly, steps taken in HB1442 could become extremely important to protecting our democracy as the administration would spiritually invert the Second and Third Enforcement Acts, using the same federal authority that stopped the KKK from harassing black voters in 1870 to instead perform the same kind of intimidation on brown voters in 2026. I oppose HB1459's mandate of cooperation with ICE to snatch untried people out of custody, circumvent the consequences of convicted people by our own justice system, or enact additional punitive measures post incarceration. There is additional alarming language that might imply "going after the families". If state and local PD have a case where they want to cooperate, they already can do so. This bill removes that choice and puts it into a provably untrustworthy institution. I generally support HB1262 and HB1492 for cracking down on bad actors that would take advantage of these troubling times. However, I question the necessity of HB1492: while the long imagined scenario is extremely troubling, we have already seen what evils actual ICE officers are capable of, and how low the bar for entry is. Would this actually help? I mislike HB1453, which goes against our rights as American citizens and good Samaritans to non-violently oppose the actions of federal terrorists.

It would be wrong for the Commonwealth to provide additional assistance to federal immigration enforcement while those federal officers obscure their identities, flout the nation's laws and harass and detain citizens. Do not permit these same federal officers into our schools, hospitals or state offices without authorization.

My name is Yonah Walter. I am a resident of District 10. I am writing in support of bills which enhance public trust in our law enforcement and respect civil rights in our communities. I am a volunteer with the Virginia chapter of Jews United for Justice, but I speak as the great-grandson of immigrants who came as chain migrants with the help of the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS), and as someone inculcated with strong Jewish values including a bedrock principle of respect for all. The American promise of "liberty and justice for all" was a strong call for my family, but to now hear our government speak so coldly about immigrants - let alone to see how our government has mistreated those they even suspect of being immigrants - has disappointed me greatly. The shooting deaths by ICE of nearly a dozen Americans in just the last few months, and the immoral and self-serving rush by the government to blame the victims in those shootings, demands we act to curb these abuses and keep our government in check. We need accountability from government agents, which includes the right to know who purports to represent us and act on our behalf in law enforcement. We need to protect access to public spaces like courthouses and (perhaps especially) polling places. We need to vigorously protect the right of people to move freely without fear of harassment or assault by law enforcement. We need to restore trust in our government. I respectfully urge this committee to support the following: HB650 HB1260 HB1262 HB1264 HB1265 HB1438 HB1440 HB1441 HB1442 HB1482 HB1492

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills protect sensitive spaces such as courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places, and hospitals from intimidation by federal immigration enforcement. They strengthen public trust and improve accountability by restricting law enforcement officers from obscuring their identities. I oppose HB1459, which would force state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would seriously damage public trust in local law enforcement.

My name is Paula Roney. I am a resident of District 3. I am submitting this testimony in support of HB650, HB1260, HB 1262, HB 1264, HB1265, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, HB1482, and HB1492. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This would strengthen public trust and improve accountability. As a long time Virginia public school educator, a grandchild of immigrants who came to this country to escape persecution, and a member of Jews United for Justice, I know the importance of welcoming immigrants to our country. I’ve worked with many students who came to the United States, often on their own, to escape harrowing circumstances. It is vital that they, and all other people are able to attend school, receive medical treatment and be able to access the legal system without fear. Therefore it is critical that our Commonwealth protects access to these vital community services. I respectfully urge this committee to support these bills. Thank you.

My name is Susan Kohn. I am a resident of District 15. I am submitting this testimony in support of HB 650,1260, 1262,1264,1265,1438,1440,1441,1453,1492 and in opposition of HB 1459 and 1482. As a pediatrician I am horrified to see my immigrant patients and their families living in fear. I work with children through a non-profit organization that helps to provide access to medical and dental care in Fairfax County. We see hardworking families who are afraid to access health care or even to send their children to school. They worry when someone leaves the house. Will they come back from work, the grocery store, court or school- or be taken by ICE? How can they continue to provide for their children? The children and teens I see were brought to the United States for a better life. Many experienced violence, political upheaval and uncertainty or severe poverty in their countries of origin, which led their parents to seek a place of safety, where they could thrive. My grandparents came to this country in the face of pogroms that terrorized our families in Eastern Europe. They worked hard, as our current immigrants do, to make a future for their children. Our Jewish sacred texts obligate us to care for the stranger and treat all with respect and kindness. They are part of the fabric of a great society. Our neighbors must be able to testify in court if they have been victimized or if they have requested asylum, without the fear of being deported when they show up. All Virginians, whether they are citizens or not, must have the right to access schools, hospitals, places of worship and polling places without fear of intimidation or deportation. All must be able to clearly see the identity of law enforcement personnel and have their day in court with proper representation if accused. Local police should be doing the work of maintaining safety for all residents- not helping ICE deport people without due process. As a Virginian I believe we have a duty to protect those who are most vulnerable in our community. At this time it is our immigrant neighbors who need our help. I respectfully urge this committee to support HB 650, 1260, 1262, 1264, 1265,1438, 1440, 1441,1442, 1453,1492 and oppose HB1459 and HB1482.

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

My comment refers to all bills on the agenda. The Commonwealth of Virginia must take any and all legal action to prevent ICE from terrorizing any Virginia individual or community. This includes all people who come to this country seeking a better life for themselves and their families, just as the many millions before them have done throughout America’s history.

I am writing in support of HB650. This bill serves to protect all community members in sensitive spaces. No member of our community should live in fear of arrest when they are required to appear in court. If the Commonwealth is requiring a member of the community to appear in court, then the Commonwealth should be responsible for providing for that person's safety; including safety from arrest. Furthermore, given the recent unprecedented attacks seen by DHS and ICE against the most vulnerable members of our community, it is even more imperative that we provide an additional layer of safety in these sensitive spaces. Failing to do so leaves these individuals at significantly increased risk for detainment and arrest, when they are simply following the will and order of the Commonwealth. As a constituent I strongly support the measures put forth in this bill, and ask that the House of Delegates do the same.

We want public safety, not public abductions and executions. We have learned that ICE does not respect rule of law or human rights, so support these bills to keep Virginians safe. Every child deserves an education. Every child deserves to be safe at school. Every sick or injured person deserves medical care. So keep ICE out of our school, hospitals, and courthouses. No judicial warrant should mean no entry- and limit what civil arrests can take place in courthouses. We want police to protect, not persecute. So eliminate 287g agreements in Virginia. Allow our local law enforcement to do their job of keeping communities safe, instead of doing ICE's dirty work for them. We want rule of law, not rule by masked mobs. Do not allow law enforcement to cover their faces. That's not community policing- that's KKK tactics. We want free and fair elections, not a return to Jim Crow era intimidation at the polls. Citizens are not safe from ICE, either. Do not allow the federal government to use "immigration enforcement" as a rouse to silence eligible voters through fear and profiling. Support: HB650 - Callsen HB1260 - Shin HB1262 - Glass HB1264 - Shin HB1265 - Glass HB1438 - Guzman HB1440 - Lopez HB1441 - Lopez HB1442 - Lopez HB1453 - Williams HB1459 - Zehr HB1482 - Schmidt HB1492 - Shin

Like many Americans, I have become increasingly alarmed by the immigration enforcement tactics being employed by ICE. While I agree that individuals who are here illegally can and should, in some cases, be deported - ICE is terrorizing immigrant communities in a way that is completely unacceptable and, frankly, un-American. I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482, which would help protect our immigrant communities from terrorization by ICE agents. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. Thank you, Zachary West Constituent from Alexandria

It is essential that we take steps to protect Virginia’s communities and especially in sensitive spaces - our kids, the sick, faith communities. We must protect courtrooms and the rule of law and polling places to allow for free and fair elections. ICE is a threat to our democracy and our safety and that of our neighbors. Please do all that you can to preserve the needed checks and balances and protect our democracy!

I’m very concerned with the overreaching of ICE. They have terrorized communities, broken apart families, disrupted children’s education, wrongfully detained people and even murdered American citizens. Please keep all safeguards in place to protect our citizens. Warrants should be in place before they come after people. ICE agents should follow the same laws and training that police officers are required to. ICE should not be allowed to wait outside or enter courthouses. They should not be wearing masks. This is leading to more dangerous escalations as we have seen in Minneapolis. Please vote to protect the rights of our people, maintain a safe community, and honor the laws and Constitution of our once great country. Please listen to your constituents. We are a country of immigrants and we are all humans. Do what is right.

As a long time resident of Virginia, I have watched the horrific attack on our immigrant population by our federal government. I write to encourage support of these bills to provide additional state protections to our local immigrant communities. It is the moral thing to do. Thank you. Stephanie Elms Alexandria VA

Please support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. Please oppose HB1459. I have taught English to immigrants (both adults and children) here in Roanoke for 15 years. They come from all over the world, speak all different languages, and practice all different religions. They are some of the most grateful, respectful, hard working, generous people I've met. They are a gift and a blessing to my community. All of them want to become legal citizens and contribute to our society. The undocumented ones are here out of desperation and our immigration system makes it impossible for them to be here legally while being safe from the danger of their home countries. I fear for their safety since ICE is unconstitutionally invading people's homes, detaining people without warrants, detaining people who have no criminal record, and have detained legal immigrants and even U.S. citizens. ICE is operating carelessly and irresponsibly. Please protect my immigrant neighbors, students, and friends. Thank you.

I strongly support every bill that limits federal immigration enforcement overreach. Virginia Majority stands in solidarity with immigrant communities across Virginia. We believe that all people, regardless of race, class, or immigration status, deserve to live with dignity, safety, and access to fundamental rights. I support policies that limit federal immigration enforcement overreach, protect access to courts and essential services, and prevent local resources from being used to separate families and criminalize our neighbors. Virginia must lead in protecting immigrant rights by establishing clear boundaries on immigration enforcement activities in our communities, ensuring safe access to schools, healthcare, courthouses, and other essential spaces, and maintaining the trust between local officials and the communities they serve. These policies have my support and are measures that would affirm Virginia’s commitment to being a place where all residents can participate fully in civic life without fear.

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

SUPPORT: HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, HB1482, HB1492. OPPOSE: HB1459 Our communities deserve protection from the overreach of the federal government. At a minimum, this means putting strong boundaries on the activity of federal immigration officers and requiring them to follow existing laws and those that are enacted by this general assembly. We need to protect sensitive spaces like schools, courtrooms, places of worship, hospitals and polling places from ICE/CBP intimidation. All officers - including local law enforcement - should be prohibited from wearing masks or face coverings and ID should be required. In addition, local law enforcement should be prohibited from entering agreements with federal immigration officers and judicial warrants for enforcement should be required. Currently our communities are less safe. We need to stop the unchecked abusive activity by ICE/CBP.

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

I am a pro bono immigration attorney and court watcher, and forme rly a DOJ employee and I know first hand about the overreach of ICE in its detaining people who rather than being the worst of the worst, are actually the best of the best that America has to offer. I represent youngsters who have achieved Special Immigrant Juvenile status and they are still being dragged off the streets. Immigrants are the fabric of our society. We all either are immigrants or trace our roots to immigrants unless we are Native Americans, For those who are illegal because the US makes it is next to impossible to come here illegally from countries inhabited by people of color, they benefit our country, and now we are openly banning those people and giving preference to whites falsely labeled as victims of racism. The system is inverted. We should be thankful for all immigrants. . Instead, the Trump regime treats them - nif they are people of color - like they aren't even human. It's despicable, and it needs to be stopped. Practices that used to be unheard of - going into churches and schools and courthouses and private homes, warrantless, to drag immigrants away from their families and into detention - are commonplace. And inhumane. And much is unconstitutional. We cannot become the next Minneapolis. God bless their response to the invading terrorists. We'll do the same if we have to. But you can prevent it or at least mitigrate the damage. The steps you can take are to use your legislative authority to create protections for the immigrants in our state. You can and must support protection that at least attempts to reign in ICE, among other legislative goals: HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would, among other policies, protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. And they would prevent local law enforcement to work with federal immigrant officers in their terrorizing of immigrants. As we devolve into authoritarism, I am begging you to slow down the march, doing what you can do to protect Virginians. Hopefully, state legislators all over the country, not just blue states, will do the same and protect americans - citizens and non-citizens - from the gross abuses of the law and the lack of humanity of this regime. I know I will continue to fight the regime but Virginians need the help of their legislators in this monumental task. Thank you.

I am in support for HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers; restricts face coverings and requires identification of law enforcement; and prohibits state/local law enforcement from entering agreements with federal immigration officers; requires judicial warrants for enforcement of immigration; I oppose HB1459, misleadingly titled "The Ice-free Communities Act". Requires that when VA law enforcement is holding someone in custody and receives an immigration detainer, they must notify ICE/CBP of the date and time of the detainee's expected release.

HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

This is an opportunity for the Commonwealth to respect and protect the riaghts of ALL Virginia citizens. I strongly I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482.

When someone is following the law and attending court -coming or going - they should not have to fear being civically arrested. And those pursuing civil arrest should not be allowed into the building unless they have a JUDICIAL warrant that would need to be reviewed by a court officer or attorney. We are seeing this across the country with non-citizens who are following court orders to get their green cards legally and with those immigrants protected by the laws of asylum. I support VA on HB650 which also has a companion bill in the Senate.

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. Mary Bennett Alexandria Resident I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement. Mary Bennett Alexandria Resident

My name is Rachel Waldstein. I am a resident of District #1. I am submitting this testimony in support of the following bills: • HB 650 Callsen Courthouses • HB 1260 Shin Public elementary/secondary schools, etc; federal immigration investigation and enforcement activities • HB 1262 Glass Va Consumer Protection Act • HB 1264 Shin Virginia Accountability Commission • HB 1265 Glass Courthouses • HB 1438 Guzman 287g • HB 1440 Lopez Protected Areas • HB 1441 Lopez 287g • HB 1442 Lopez Polling Place Protections • HB 1482 Schmidt facemasks • HB 1492 Shin Impersonating federal law enforcement officer I oppose the following bills: • HB 1453 Williams Approaching a first responder with specified intent after a warning; penalty • HB 1459 Zehr Ice-Free Communities Act; notification to federal immigration authorities of pending release of certain prisoners from custody I am a member of Congregation Etz Hayim in Arlington and spent a large part of my career representing the U.S. government in the protection of human rights around the world. I support HB 650, 1260, 1262, 1264, 1265, 1438, 1440, 1441, 1442, 1482, and 1492 based on my Jewish values and my life’s work. Jewish tradition and law recognize the equality and dignity of all people and respect their right to life, bodily integrity, health, housing, education, and due process. The Jewish people have been refugees many times in the past and have often experienced mistreatment by authoritarian governments. It is thus my duty to stand in support of marginalized communities and against government abuses. Law enforcement authorities should not deprive anyone--even those in this country illegally--of life, liberty, or property without following established legal procedures that respect their rights. Since the Federal government has abdicated its responsibilities before the law and Constitution, it is up to the States to uphold national and international human rights law. Passing the above listed bills will make our communities to be safer and will give Commonwealth officials a legal basis to push back on Federal law enforcement officials who break the law. I strongly believe HB 650, 1260, 1262, 1264, 1265, 1438, 1440, 1441, 1442, 1482, and 1492 will improve the lives of all Virginians by allowing us to return our focus to strengthening our economy, education and healthcare systems, and by returning a sense of humanity to our Commonwealth. I oppose HB 1453 and 1459, which I believe will create more fear in our communities and impede Virginians’ ability to express their First Amendment rights. I respectfully urge this committee to support HB 650, 1260, 1262, 1264, 1265, 1438, 1440, 1441, 1442, 1482, and 1492 and to oppose HB 1453 and 1459.

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places, and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

I strongly support the following bills and urge the committee members to pass them on so they can make their way to the House in order to be discussed by all the Delegates: HB1492, HB1482, HB1453, HB1442, HB1441, HB1440, HB1438, HB1265, HB1264, HB1262, HB1260, and HB650. These bills provide much needed limits on ICE agents, and life-saving protections for tens of thousands of people in our commonwealth. Please do the right thing and keep these bills alive and moving through our legislative system.

Bills HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482 have my support and I think they are needed in these times. Courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals should be safe places for al and free from heavy handed ICE tactics.. I oppose HB1459 -- ICE should not get any help from law-abiding Virginia forces.

Support HB 650 1260 1262 1264 1265 1438 1440 1441 1442 1482

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

Regarding proposed bills HB650, HB1260, HB 1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, HB1482: As an alarmed citizen I urge the Safety committee to advance the urgently needed provisions in these bills to help rein in the increasingly extreme and unlawful activities of CBP and ICE.

My name is Margaret Power. I have been a voting resident of District 6 for 37 years. I am submitting this testimony in support of most of the bills pending for your action today. I am the great-granddaughter of immigrants escaping poverty, famine, and persecution in their native land and striving to afford the ‘chain migration’ that re-united them with their families. I am the great-niece of German Jews who were denied entry and were murdered in Hitler’s camps. I am the daughter-in-law of an American Jewish woman, who, as a 13-year-old, escaped Poland and crossed a remote stretch of our northern border without documents during the Hitler years when America turned away refugees. I am the grandmother of two talented, bi-lingual and totally adorable Americans who are nearly as brown as their naturalized father, a Colombian-born doctor. I fear their own government will harm them. Or kill them. Truly- I cannot believe that a time has come in which it is not insane for me to have such fears. I belong to Temple Rodef Shalom in Falls church, where, in collaboration with other faith communities, we have long organized sustained support and services for new refugees, predominantly Afghan friends of the US. As Chairman Simon knows, our community actively advocates for inclusive and just public policy here in Richmond and in the nation’s capital. I respectfully urge you to send these bills forward and to advocate for their passage; collectively, they protect Virginians from violent abuses of federal power, they ensure that some of our essential public services- schools, hospitals and the courts- can be accessed by all; they preserve the sovereignty of the Commonwealth with respect to our law enforcement roles, while assuring federal-state-local collaboration with respect to removing criminals from our midst. As a package, they reinforce the rule of law, including protection of our constitutional rights; they reduce the likelihood of violence in our public spaces; they offer our neighbors - and my grandchildren- better protection by requiring federal immigration agents follow the same transparency standards as state and local law enforcement, and they restore some measure of confidence that we citizens are also unlikely to be kidnapped, injured or murdered so long as we are Virginians. I oppose passage of HB 1453, as it limits our right to free expression, and I also oppose HB1459, which is unnecessary because the Governor’s executive order allows federal-state cooperation with respect to convicted criminals, and, if read to add instances in which individuals can be delivered to DHS, would breach the boundaries established by HB 650 which I strongly support. I respectfully urge this subcommittee to support HB#650, HB#1260,HB#1262,HB#1264,HB#1265, HB#1438, B1440,HB1441,HB1442,HB1482, AND HB1492

I support all these bills which, to my reading of them, extend protections of the law to people attending court appointments so that they cannot be detained by immigration enforcement authorities (or people impersonating immigration enforcement authorities). I support requiring law enforcement officials to not wear masks and to have visible identification, and also not to engage in immigration enforcement activities. I also support bills which protect schools, churches, and private workplaces from immigration enforcement activities, and require judicial warrants (warrants signed by a judge) for any immigration enforcement operation. I would like to see bills requiring due process for any persons detained, including but not limited to access to a lawyer, ability to make phone calls, and right to be treated with dignity and humanity.

see attached.

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would extend protection to sensitive civic spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers using easily obtained administrative warrants, strengthen public trust and accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity and require that all federal, state and local law enforcement agents are clearly identified by badge and agency, and restrict state and local law enforcement from entering into agreements that require that they act as immigration enforcement officers. There has been ample video footage and court rulings that show that CBP and ICE have exercised excessive force in many of our nation's cities and towns. We need laws that will help to keep Virginians safe.

Writing as a concerned Virginia resident and parent. I support passage of any bill that limits or prevents ICE from acting lawlessly as they have been around any protected spaces. Our neighbors, children and communities should be able to safely conduct business and learn without fear of ICE grabbing them, possibly causing long term trauma from over aggressive tactics to settle what is a civil matter. I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442 and HB1482. I oppose HB1459 to work with ICE in any capacity due to their cruelty.

I fully support every bill that safeguards and protects our immigrant neighbors from the lawless, cruel, immoral and shameful acts committed by federal agents and DHS.

My name is Cindy Denton-Ade . I am a resident of Burke, District 10 . I am submitting testimony in support of bills HB 650, 1260 ,1262 ,1264, 1265,1438,1440,1441,1442,1448,1482,1492. I am a member of Temple B’nai Shalom. All of my Grandparents were immigrants from other counties: the Ukraine, Belarus. If not for the welcoming policies of the United States when they immigrated, they would have been surely been all killed in the Holocaust. My very lovely handyman, who comes from Columbia and is a citizen, was fearful about driving to D.C. Because he felt he would be targeted by ICE. This is not right! Jewish values promote welcoming and protecting the stranger. These bills will go a long way to do just. Virginia, my chosen home, has taken many positive actions since Governor Spanberger has taken office. Let these bills be an addition to actions we can be proud of in protecting immigrants men, women, and children.

Hello, We support the bills that were checked off above to decrease the power & tyranny of ICE. We don't want law-abiding VA citizens exercising their civil rights to be assaulted, injured, or killed. Also, please OPPOSE HB 1459. Unfortunately, if passed, this will give ICE an edge in harassing and arresting our immigrant neighbors. Third, do any of these bills disallow ICE facilities from either opening or operating in VA? If not, is there a way to introduce this language in one of the proposed bills? Thank you! Ana & David Shannon

As a concerned resident of Alexandria who cares deeply about my neighbors, I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I strongly oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

To Va State Legislators, The Trump regime is terrorizing our communities across the US with brutal Immigration enforcement campaigns designed to test the limits of Executive power and the nation’s willingness to stand up against Trump’s Power grab. Masked federal agents are teargassing babies and pastors, Kidnapping neighbors and shipping them off to what will soon be known as American Concentration Camps. To make matters worse these thugs are Killing innocent people right in front of our own eyes. This is outrageous. This pattern of unchecked violence and abuse by Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the Border Patrol, and other federal law enforcement agencies must end. And surely these types of operations by such thugs have NO PLACE IN our state of VIRGINIA! As state legislators, YOU can rein in this type of lawlessness and protect Virginians from these types of unconstitutional actions and keep us all safe from these thugs! We support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills above would protect sensitive spaces like cortrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. Simply put, Passage of these bills will strengthen public trust and improve accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. We oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement. Please work together and vote to Pass HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. Keeping our Virginians safe and protected is your number one job! AND OPPOSE HB 1459 to keep us safe and to build public trust in law enforcement! Your constituents, James and Elizabeth Dolan Arlington, Va. 02/04/2026

HB 650 Clearly seeks to obstruct enforcement of federal law. OPPOSE HB 1260 Clearly seeks to obstruct enforcement of federal law. OPPOSE HB 1264 Clearly seeks to obstruct enforcement of federal law by attempting to intimidate federal law enforcement officers. OPPOSE. HB 1265 Clearly seeks to obstruct enforcement of federal law. OPPOSE HB 1438 Creates division between federal, state, and local law enforcement. Blatantly covers for illegals. OPPOSE HB 1440 Blatantly covers for illegals. OPPOSE HB 1441 Creates division between federal, state, and local law enforcement. Blatantly covers for illegals. OPPOSE HB 1442 If Illegals aren’t supposed to vote, why would this bill be needed? OPPOSE HB 1482 Clearly seeks to obstruct enforcement law enforcement by intimidating them. In some instances, their identity needs to be protected to prevent retribution. OPPOSE HB 1492 This is already a violation of federal law and is unnecessary. See 18 USC SS 912 and SS 913. OPPOSE

Hello, My name is Tyneshia Griffin and I am constituent in Kimberly Pope Adams's District 82. I am in strong support of HB1492, HB482, HB1441, HB1440, HB1438, HB1265, and HB650. These bills are urgently needed to protect immigrant communities and all communities in the state from racially motivated, state-sanctioned, community-based violence being executed by federal agents, local law enforcement affiliating with federal agencies, and citizens who may be motivated to violently target immigrants in the Commonwealth to also stoke fear, shame, panic, and harm on their of their own volition. In my area, ICE has invaded public spaces, kidnapping folks from bus stations for example, making it less safe for members of my community, including myself access transportation, feel safe to move about in our community, and safe free detainment and incarceration. I do not depend on transit solely, but when I need it, it is incredibly helpful for helping me get around the area safely and cheaply. Seniors with no transportation support, folks getting to and from work, students going to school, and folks looking for temporary shelter deserve access to safe public transit, streets, schools, faith centers, workplaces, courthouse, neighborhoods - throughout their entire community. My neighbors and I deserve to be treated with dignity and protected from community-violence and detainment in inhumane jails/camps and these bills provide for that and a failure to pass them fails to complete these responsibilities by leaders and the state. Protect Virginians, protect immigrant communities now.

My name is Karen Menichelli, and I have resided in Arlington, VA, for over 40 years, currently living in House District 1. I have cherished the diverse and welcoming nature of my community and feel enriched by the many immigrants from around the world who have decided to make their lives here. I am worried for my neighbors given the unnecessarily reckless and cruel practices of our federal immigration officers exhibited in cities like Portland, OR, and Minneapolis, WI. I don’t want those behaviors, which sow mistrust and waste resources, brought to Virginia. I want to protect the humanity, dignity, and safety of our immigrant neighbors and allow free access to important community services without fear of harassment or harm from federal agents. Therefore, I strongly support the above indicated cluster of bills under consideration by the Public Safety Subcommittee and urge the subcommittee to champion these bills and send strong versions to the full House for a vote.

My name is Ricki Henschel. I am a resident of District 3. I am submitting this testimony on behalf of Jews United for Justice in support of all of the following bills: HB 650, HB1260, HB1262, HB1264, HB1265, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, HB1482, and HB1492. JUFJ organizes Jewish Virginians and allies in support of local campaigns for social, racial, and economic justice. Judaism teaches that we are all made in the image of God. The Bible is clear that we are to welcome the stranger, as this is mentioned more times than any other obligation in the Bible. The assault on and kidnapping of individuals by ICE, pulled from their cars, their homes, their places of work, as if they were violent criminals, is directly in opposition of Jewish values, and should not be happening in our state. . The vast majority of those arrested are not individuals who have committed any crime, and many are in the process of obtaining legal status. We also know that citizens are also being taken because they fit the profile. The ICE raids and deportation machine are harming people indiscriminately: Parents, children, and students are being swept up as they attend routine immigration check-ins and court hearings, go to work, and run their errands. In my community, children are scared to go to school, and parents are concerned about taking their children to school, including those who with legal status, as the reality is that ICE is sweeping up individuals based on skin color and accents. Asking for papers and documentation and creating a reality where people feel they have to always have their papers on them everywhere they go, is reminiscent of every society that has been overtaken by autocracy. In addition, as an individual who has experienced sexual violence, it is no surprise that many in our community are afraid to go to our courts or access services. Everyone should be able to live with safety and dignity – including going to court without fear. Enabling law enforcement to be masked adds to the trauma being created. In addition, state and local police need to be seen as those protecting our communities, not as part of the federal work of ICE. And most recently, the threat of having ICE at polling places has been introduced. This must not be allowed in Virginia. Many citizens fit ICE’s profile, and they will be harassed and maybe too frightened to go to the polls. This can not be allowed. I respectfully urge this committee to support each of these bills that control the methods and manner in which ICE operates within our borders–HB 650, HB1260, HB1262, HB1264, HB1265, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, HB1482, and HB1492. We have the right to require them to follow our laws and the US Constitution. We must welcome the stranger.

I am a resident of Virginia state district 39. We have seen our fair share of unidentified, masked men who have harassed and intimidated our citizens. Please move these bills forward. I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

I am writing to encourage the passage of all possible legal remedies to protect our immigrant neighbors from indiscriminant and inhumane enforcement of federal immigration law, especially HB 1438 and HB 650. The first is particularly important to prevent local and state law enforcement from being distracted from their fundamental responsibility to protect the people of the Commonwealth and enforce its laws. Moreover, our state and local law enforcement officers should not have their respect in the community undermined by cooperation with federal agencies that have, under the current administration, displayedegregious disregard for the human and constitutional rights of people living in the United States, for due process, and ordinary procedures for investigating charges of misconduct. HB 650 is equally significant. People should not be afraid of participating in court proceedings by the prospect of arrests unrelated to those proceedings and should be fully protected from arrest without the due process enumerated in this bill.

It is clear to me that the actions of ICE and CBP are not simply aimed at carrying out immigration laws; these federal agencies are rapidly being turned into a paramilitary force whose purposes are intimidation and provocation. Virginians will not tolerate exposure of sensitive paces to their tactics, or collaboration with them by state and local law enforcement. Consequently, I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, HB1482, and I oppose HB1459.

I am a resident of Reston, VA. I am a US Army veteran and Federal retiree with almost 30 years of service to the US. My father’s side of my family immigrated to this country from England sometime in the 1630s. My mother’s side of the family immigrated from Scotland in the late 1750s. To the best of my knowledge, they were undocumented. I believe strongly that I have a right to stay in this country. I have met, heard about, read about, and studied people who have been here longer than my family, and some who have come very recently. If we examine the accomplishments and potential of these folks who arrived before or after my family, none are less deserving of a right to be here. As you study our history and our culture, one realizes that the contributions of immigrants are what makes this country so unique and wonderful. It isn’t how big our Army is, it’s the fact that you can find a taco truck, an Ethiopian restaurant, pottery from Poland, and fashion from France on the same block. It’s in the fact that nearly 100 languages are spoken as mother tongues in Fairfax County Schools. It’s in knowing that this country was built on the backs of African slaves and immigrants from every continent in the world, and the cultures of those immigrants have mixed into the most wonderful stew that we are allowed to enjoy every day. Now, let’s get real. Undocumented people can’t vote, aren’t eligible for benefits, and pay taxes into our system. They work very hard for low wages. Immigrants, much less those who are undocumented, commit crimes at SIGNIFICANTLY lower rates than white men. In short, immigrants are a net gain for our society. The images and stories we are seeing regarding ICE and CBP untrained, unprofessional paramilitary wreaking havoc in Minneapolis is like watching footage from another country. I keep asking myself how we got here, while unfortunately, people of color are saying it has been this way all along. Given that we weren’t aware of the total number of people ICE and CBP killed until they murdered two white people, I am concluding they must be correct. In 2025/26, 40 people have died at the hands of ICE. That is 40 too many. I am in favor of any legislation that hinders the ability of ICE to murder more people regardless of race, color, gender, age, national origin, religion, sexual preference, genetic information, immigration status, or whether or not they are exercising their 1st, 2nd, 4th, or 14th Amendment rights. I am in favor of any legislation that allows immigrants a path to citizenship. While a small minority of people may disagree with me, this is NOT a white nation, and I am against any legislation that tries to turn it into one — even if it is couched in pretty language like “protecting our ‘heritage,’ or ‘our women.’” Please pass any legislation that treats our immigrant population in accordance with human rights, human dignity, civic sense, and common decency. Thank you.

(This plea concerns all House and Senate bills that would provide greater protections for our immigrant population and stop government overreach by DHS and ICE.) Letter of Support for Policies Protecting Immigrants Dear Governor Spanberger, Virginia Delegates, and Virginia Senators, As a citizen who sees all humans as treasured and worthy of respect, I ask you, Governor Spanberger and all Virginia delegates and senators, to support all ICE OUT bills, specifically the following bills to benefit the lives of all citizens and provide specific protections for our immigrant community: HB 660 | HB 836 | HB 911 | HB 1161 | HB 1260 | HB 1265 | HB 1438 | HB 1440 | HB 1441 | HB 1442 | HB 1482 | HB 1492 SB 351 | SB 352 | SB 446 | SB 783 | What each of us has witnessed in California, Washington State, Chicago, North Carolina, and Minneapolis to include traumatization of targeted people and onlookers, great injury, and execution style killings must not become business as usual in Virginia. Please regard the humanity in each person across our Commonwealth and support the passage of these bills. Thank you, Mary Lib Morgan 12401 Dutton Road | Apt 2409 | Midlothian, VA 23113 (804) 928-2057

I am writing in strong support of each of the indicated bills that aim to protect immigrants, and those perceived as immigrants, from the threat and violence perpetuated by ICE. As a Social Worker that works across the Central Virginia region, I have seen my neighbors and clients directly harmed by ICE. Families have been torn apart, resulting in physical, psychological, and financial harm. Furthermore, the threat of ICE has prevented communities I care about from safely accessing healthcare, basic needs, public spaces, and even school. These policies would take an important step to protect the rights and livelihoods of all Virginians, and they would affirm our commonwealth's commitment to ensuring its residents have safe and fair access to participating in civic life.

As a longtime Virginia resident and a person of faith, I am alarmed by ICE's and the DHS's recent gross misconduct, including murdering U.S. citizen. Therefore: I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

I support any bill that abolishes ICE. We need to go back to a civilized nation. At the moment we are not one. Killing innocent Americans for demonstrating their first amendment rights. We need to stop rounding up people for the color of their skin. This is not a Wild West rodeo. Our government has violated numerous constitutional laws by not doing lawful procedures. We promised after the concentration camps where Japanese citizens were detained that America would not do that again. Again America has broken its promise to its citizens. They are removing people who are not criminals and people seeking a better life. Some as they appear for court hearings that they needed to do to become citizens. Let’s go back to a civilized country and start respecting both law and order and stop quotas on human beings. You are helping Americans and the world lose any respect left for America and its government. The three murders that gunned down Renee Good and Alex Pretti had YEARS on the CBP or ICE before those killings. It was like watching a firing squad executing people for no reason. Just being around people that were trigger happy and had no training from years ago. I have watched children have guns held up to their faces. CHILDREN. You are taught to never draw your weapon as a fear tactic or a control technique. It’s common knowledge. Let’s make real immigration laws that help people become American. These immigrants pay more into our treasury than Trump did for three years only paying $750 each year. Or Amazon that paid no taxes. The immigrants contribute to our country and economy unlike billionaires and corporations. Actually we have subsidized Elon more than any taxes he has paid. He has caused more harm to America and Americans safety than any immigrant. Stop this funding of this illegal under trained private police that is not protecting Americans but killing them. I question how anyone who supports this can even say they are Christian. From the brutality of humans in detention, lack of medical care, food that I would only put in my compost bin, to breaking up families, the abuse and murder I have seen and the rounding up by skin color. You do know Jesus was a dark skin Palestinian don’t you? So guess he would be rounded up if he was around today. I have never been so ashamed to be an American and I’m 72 years old. But I know it wasn’t me that made the decisions it was you. That gives me some peace. Find your soul, remember again why we were given the statue of liberty or let’s donate it to a country worthy of that beacon of light. We are distinguishing its significance. I hope you also were able to see the monks marching for peace. They are true humans with love and kindness to all. I am grateful to see so many people touched by them and their journey. In solidarity, Cindy Johnston

I am writing in support of the bills checked above. The bills I would protect immigrants from illegal and abusive practices by ICE and Border Patrol. As events in Minnesota have tragically illustrated, all of us, citizen or not, immigrant or not, legal or not, need protection from these federal agents. Enact these bills to protect sensitive spaces, unmask and identify federal agents, require judicial warrants for immigration, and prohibit state and local law enforcement from entering cooperative agreements with federal immigration officers.,

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement

I would like to lend my support to the passage of these bills. However, I would like to go further. Under no circumstances should any member of the government, police force or Sheriff’s Office cooperate with ICE or Border Control. BUT given that ICE will disobey the laws anyway, I want them out of Virginia entirely, and ideally, dismantled completely.

Please vote in favor of protecting our immigrants from ICE harm!

I support these bills. I volunteer with hospice patients and see how the fear of ICE is affecting our much needed and legal caregivers who fear leaving home to go to their clients. One has been disappeared. I hear from my high school grandchildren the concerns at their schools. This is not how we should be living in the USA.

SUPPORT: HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, HB1482, HB1492. OPPOSE: HB1459 Our communities deserve protection from the overreach of the federal government by putting boundaries on the activity of federal immigration law enforcement officers. We need to protect sensitive spaces like schools, courtrooms, places of worship, hospitals and polling places from ICE/CBP intimidation. All officers should be prohibited from wearing masks or face coverings and ID should be required. In addition, local law enforcement should be prohibited from entering agreements with federal immigration officers and judicial warrants for enforcement should be required. Currently our communities are less safe. We need to stop the unchecked abusive activity by ICE/CBP.

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

I support these 7 bills that protect sensitive spaces from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust in VA. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust. Thank you.

I am a long time citizen of Henrico and I am horrified at what is happening with ICE and border patrol in my country now. I hardly recognize this country or the Republican party any more. I am asking all of my reps to do whatever you can to defund ICE and to make them take their masks off, to get much better training and to have signed warrants whenever they are looking for specific people. Finally they should not be allowed to go in schools or houses of worship. Thankyou.

I am deeply concerned about our state and the rest of the country. Immigration enforcement has affected our economy, our well being and our neighbors. Children should not have to live in fear. I am descended from German and Irish immigrants. In their name I submit these comments. Everyone deserves to feel safe in their community. I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. Accountability is important to restoring trust. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement. Please protect Virginians. Protect our children. Protect our communities. Thank you.

I believe it is critical to protect Virginians from excessive and brutal immigration enforcement. To that end, I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement and would not serve the interests of the state of Virginia. Thank you for your consideration. Laura Bloodgood

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I do not support face coverings or lack of ID for any law enforcement I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

I SUPPORT all bills EXCEPT HB1459 I OPPOSE HB1459

I am a resident of state house district 4, state senate district 9, and am a citizen, yet have had multiple people in my life affected by the dramatic changes in immigration action by this administration. I believe it is important that even if we do deport or question immigrants who are not here legally, all of the actions of federal agents and law enforcement must follow or constitutional protections. That is the foundation of who we are as a country before anything else. And this overreach asks affects the vulnerable and our civic institutions when places like schools, hospitals and courthouses are regularly raided with scary, anonymous soldiers. Please vote to limit the overreach and provide commenters reforms. Thank you, Matt Goldstein

I want the legislators to support the above designated bills and any bill that will cut funding, decrease, limit or completely shut down community and law enforcement support for ICE.

Bills: HB1265 (Glass) and HB650 (Callsen) Position: SUPPORT Courthouses must function as neutral, accessible spaces where individuals can participate in legal proceedings without fear of unrelated civil enforcement actions. HB1265 and HB650 are essential to preserving access to justice and due process in the Commonwealth by prohibiting civil arrests in courthouses and establishing enforceable protections. Legal and empirical research demonstrates that the threat of civil arrest—particularly immigration enforcement—in or around courthouses has a documented chilling effect on court participation. Individuals who fear arrest are less likely to appear for hearings, serve as witnesses, comply with court orders, or seek protective relief, undermining both due process and judicial efficiency (Eagly, 2019; Kohli et al., 2011). In Virginia, these impacts are especially acute in General District and Juvenile & Domestic Relations Courts, where survivors seek protective orders, parents appear in custody matters, and tenants and workers pursue basic legal remedies. When individuals avoid court out of fear, cases are delayed or dismissed, warrants may issue for failure to appear, and victims and witnesses are effectively silenced. This does not enhance public safety—it weakens it. Virginia’s court system depends on voluntary participation to function effectively. Research shows that enforcement activity in civic spaces erodes trust in legal institutions and reduces cooperation with courts and law enforcement, particularly in immigrant communities (Eagly, 2019). This erosion directly conflicts with the Commonwealth’s interest in efficient case resolution and community safety. Importantly, prohibiting civil arrests in courthouses does not prevent lawful enforcement elsewhere. Instead, it draws a clear boundary that protects the integrity of court proceedings. Jurisdictions that separate civil enforcement from courthouse activity report improved court appearance rates and increased willingness of victims and witnesses to engage with the justice system (Kohli et al., 2011). HB1265 and HB650 reinforce courthouse neutrality, strengthen due process, and support public safety by ensuring that access to justice is not conditioned on a person’s immigration status or vulnerability to civil enforcement. I respectfully urge the committee to report both bills favorably and protect our neighbors here in Virginia. Eagly, I. V. (2019). Immigration enforcement and access to justice. UCLA Law Review, 66, 100–170. Kohli, A., Markowitz, P. L., & Chavez, L. (2011). Secure Communities by the numbers: An analysis of demographics and due process. Chief Justice Earl Warren Institute on Law and Social Policy.

The United Church of Christ Justice and Witness Action Network – Virginia supports HB650. As people of faith, we are deeply disturbed by the abuse of basic human rights and the constitutional violations being perpetrated in our communities by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents. ICE is terrorizing our immigrant population, the vast majority of whom are NOT criminals. The way arrests are being carried out creates an atmosphere of distrust between residents and local law enforcement officials. Targeting of individuals at courthouses is especially egregious, because if immigrants fear that showing up in court may result in detention and possible deportation, our justice system itself becomes compromised. People are afraid to show up for routine legal hearings. Victims are afraid to report crimes, witnesses won’t show up to testify – leading to further erosion of public safety and creation of a climate of fear that destabilizes our entire community. Our courthouses should be safe spaces that are off limits to ICE. We urge you to vote yes on HB650 to protect everyone’s access to Virginia’s judicial system.

I strongly support all the proposed legislation for protecting my neighbors and community, providing civil causes of action, placing a 9/1/26 termination date on existing local ICE agreements. We should not be using our tax dollars and other resources to assist a law-breaking federal government that is pardoning drug traffickers, killing and detaining legal residents and citizens, and promising protection for its agents who violate our Constitutional rights. Thank you.

The Virginia State Conference supports HB 650 HB 221 HB 1265

Tahirih Justice Center respectfully supports HB 650. Please see submitted attachment.

I am a sworn law enforcement officer in the Commonwealth of Virginia and I respectfully submit this testimony in opposition to House Bill 650. While the bill is framed as limiting “civil arrests” in courthouses, its language makes clear that it is specifically directed at civil administrative warrants issued on behalf of state or federal agencies for civil immigration purposes, including enforcement actions by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The bill also defines that “arrest under civil process” and “civil arrest” do not include arrests for contempt of court or other lawful enforcement of court orders. HB 650 is constitutionally problematic. Federal immigration enforcement is a matter of national sovereignty governed by the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution. State laws cannot nullify or impede lawful federal immigration authority. By attempting to restrict civil administrative arrests in courthouses, this legislation invites legal conflict and potential litigation, placing Virginia in opposition to the federal government while offering no clear public safety benefit. Beyond its federal implications, the bill raises broader operational and public safety concerns. Its sweeping language could unintentionally prevent the enforcement of other civil orders or warrants issued under state law, including family court protective orders, civil detainers, or court-issued arrest warrants for violations of civil mandates. In practice, law enforcement officers may face confusion or hesitation, unsure whether executing a legitimate civil warrant in a courthouse could expose them to legal penalties. This could undermine compliance with court orders, delay justice, and place both officers and the public at risk. Courthouses are public spaces where justice is administered. Limiting the ability of law enforcement to enforce valid civil process—even inadvertently—compromises the rule of law. Civil enforcement, whether for immigration purposes or other judicially authorized civil orders, serves an essential public safety function. HB 650 imposes barriers that could chill enforcement, create unnecessary legal exposure for officers, and obstruct timely execution of lawful court orders. While the intent of the bill may be to limit certain federal civil enforcement actions, the broad language and lack of clarity expose Virginia law enforcement to operational ambiguity, unintended legal conflicts, and public safety risks. Any reforms aimed at regulating civil enforcement should be carefully tailored to avoid interfering with federal authority or lawful state civil processes and to ensure officers can execute their duties without fear of unintended liability. For these reasons, I respectfully urge the members of this committee to oppose House Bill 650. The legislation is constitutionally vulnerable, operationally problematic, and risks undermining both the enforcement of lawful civil orders and public safety in Virginia.

In 2021, my elderly stepmother shot through a closed door during an argument with my elderly father, striking him in the back and paralyzing him. My father has spent the past five years in extreme physical agony, unable to walk, paying caretakers out of pocket to hoist him in and out of bed, unable to care for himself. The lack of movement in his life has led to horrific bed sores, which become bone infections, which lead to extended hospital stays and a horrible quality of life. All this because my stepmother was allowed to have a gun. There are countless stories like this of the bullet's aftermath: of the lifelong physical and mental damage that comes from guns. It has been a horrific five years, full of physical pain and mental anguish for our entire family. I wouldn't wish this on anyone. The bills before you now will not only save lives, they will spare whole swaths of our neighborhoods from needing to deal with these horrors. One bullet, lodged in my father's spine, didn't kill him. Instead, it has shattered the life he had, his ability to work and care for himself, and his family. Each bullet we allow in our communities has the ability to do the same. His care has bankrupted him personally, and now he relies on state care and Medicaid, an avoidable burden on taxpayers. There are numerous reasons guns have no place in our society, and I hope my father's story is just one that helps make change. Please support all bills that make guns harder to access, harder to keep. Please do everything you can to keep guns out of the hands of our society. Thank you for the great work you are doing to keep Virginians safe.

I am writing to oppose the current slate of firearm restriction bills before the General Assembly. While these proposals are framed as public safety measures, in practice they disproportionately harm marginalized Virginians — including racial minorities, LGBTQ+ individuals (especially trans people), immigrants, and low-income residents — who often face higher risks of targeted violence and slower or unequal police response. These bills add costs, delays, and bureaucratic hurdles to exercising a fundamental right. Increased fees, mandatory waiting periods, feature bans, and expanded disqualifications fall hardest on people with limited financial resources, unstable work schedules, or justified concerns about their personal safety. For many vulnerable individuals, the ability to lawfully and promptly acquire a firearm is not about ideology, but about self-defense. History shows that restrictive gun laws are most aggressively enforced in minority communities, amplifying disparities in arrests, prosecution, and legal exposure — even when no harm has occurred. Expanding civil liability, criminal penalties, and subjective risk standards increases that risk. Public safety should not come at the expense of civil rights or equal access to self-protection. Policies that price people out of their rights or delay lawful self-defense do not address the root causes of violence and instead leave the most vulnerable less safe. I respectfully urge you to oppose these bills and support approaches that protect both public safety and the rights of all Virginians, regardless of income, identity, or background. Thank you for your time and consideration.

As a pediatrician I have long been appalled that firearms are the number one cause of death of our children- and having lived thru both mass shootings in Pittsburgh and Buffalo, I immersed myself in the data to understand the problem- we know FIrearm licensing , and concealed carry licensing that incorporates safe storage training saves lives. We know that the access to assault weapons so easily , especially in people with prior threats or concerning obsessions is a reason for most of our mass shootings in America. We know that in domestic violence access to firearms , even in dating relationships , is why women continue to die even with protective orders in place. As a physician I strongly feel concealed carry , especially assault weapons has no place in hospitals , colleges , schools and public buildings. In Virginia we can have laws that really protect people without infringing on the right of sane citizens to own guns. Brief waiting periods, safe storage education for all gun owners, safe storage requirements for all gun owners and a strong emergency protective order system will save many lives and I urge you to support them.

I am writing to oppose the current slate of firearm restriction bills before the General Assembly. While these proposals are framed as public safety measures, in practice they disproportionately harm marginalized Virginians — including racial minorities, LGBTQ+ individuals (especially trans people), immigrants, and low-income residents — who often face higher risks of targeted violence and slower or unequal police response. These bills add costs, delays, and bureaucratic hurdles to exercising a fundamental right. Increased fees, mandatory waiting periods, feature bans, and expanded disqualifications fall hardest on people with limited financial resources, unstable work schedules, or justified concerns about their personal safety. For many vulnerable individuals, the ability to lawfully and promptly acquire a firearm is not about ideology, but about self-defense. History shows that restrictive gun laws are most aggressively enforced in minority communities, amplifying disparities in arrests, prosecution, and legal exposure — even when no harm has occurred. Expanding civil liability, criminal penalties, and subjective risk standards increases that risk. Public safety should not come at the expense of civil rights or equal access to self-protection. Policies that price people out of their rights or delay lawful self-defense do not address the root causes of violence and instead leave the most vulnerable less safe. I respectfully urge you to oppose these bills and support approaches that protect both public safety and the rights of all Virginians, regardless of income, identity, or background. Thank you for your time and consideration.

Oppose all gun control. Why are you assaulting the rights of law abiding Virginians while lowering punishments for violent criminals. This shows that you are not doing this for safety purposes. You are doing this because you have contempt for the Constitution.

PLEASE VOTE NO, THESE ORGANAZATIONS ADMINISTER THE BEST TRAINING

Oppose bills attacking 2nd Amendment rights.

Under this proposal, it appears that I can establish and operate a "class" on firearm (pistol) safety and then issue a piece of paper showing satisfactory completion. This language is too loose. I'd rather have a nationally recognized entity like the NRA be specifically listed as opposed to some guy down the street.

I oppose all of these bills to limit my second amendment freedoms.

HB 916 School administrators have enough work to do educating students and do not need to become nannys for parents as provided for under this bill. There is no real problem to solve here and this legislation is unnecessary. OPPOSE. HB 1015 The penalty under this bill, for a misdemeanor, takes away a person's civil right to keep and bear arms. Maybe for a felony conviction, but not this. It would set a bad precedent. OPPOSE. HB 1427 I support this bill. Restricting handgun purchases to one / 30 days hasn't solved any problem and really only impacts law abiding citizens. Criminals don't care about restrictions on legal purchases. OPPOSE. HB 1525 A person under 21 years old and over 18 is considered and adult who can vote, and be drafted. They have rights under the U.S. Constitution like anyone else and transporting arms for any otherwise legal purpose should not be a crime. "Assault" firearms are not clearly defined and the broad definition is subject to political whims. The term itself is political language that doesn't belong in the law. Finally, any firearm is not capable of a crime as an inanimate object. Criminals are capable and we already have plenty of laws to address them.

The Brady Campaign to End Gun Violence supports these bills.

HB 916 - Support - lets any recognized firearms training agency for concealed permit qualification HB 1015 - Oppose - This bill prohibits a person convicted of a misdemeanor assault and battery hate crime from being able to possess firearms. Misdemeanors should never take away a person's civil rights. The bill is unconstitutional under the U.S. Supreme Court's New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen decision. HB 1427 - Oppose - This bill repeals the unconstitutional One Handgun a Month law.

Forum: I urge you to oppose HB1015 and HB1525 as both of these Bills unconstitutionally infringes on a persons guaranteed Rights. HB1015 has already been proven unconstitutional by the SCOTUS. I support HB1427 as it is removes an already unconstitutionally law approved by a government intent on controlling a persons guaranteed right. There is nothing in the Constitution that stipulates a quantity or value on how a person chooses to exercise their rights. HB916 should not restrict or hinder the exercise of a persons 2ndA right. The Bill as written now should not be restrictive such that it controls the actions of the person when they need to use the 2ndA the most. A person should not be restricted on when, how, where they need to protect themselves or others such that they are pressed to NOT exercising their 2ndA rights. If you make it so very difficult to exercise a persons guaranteed rights that are protected, then that person will consider it a hindrance, whereas the criminal element does not care or even considers the control mechanism of the law. V/R, Mr. Charters

We need machine guns and abortions for satanic spawn

I support this bill because rights come with responsibilities. Virginia should set strong minimum standards for carrying concealed guns in public to ensure that people who are too dangerous or irresponsible to carry guns in our communities are blocked from doing so.

Shall not be infringed. It’s literally the second thing our founding fathers drafted. Please stop. All of it. Recant your bills and leave our freedoms alone.

HB916: This bill seems confused on a few fronts and should not be passed because confusion leads to more costs and lawsuits for the state. First, the calling out of NRA and USCCA classes ought to be preserved, because some people do not know where to start to find their training. The law does not give them special permissions, rather they are one of many options listed. In fact, the law is quite contradictory on this matter because in other sections it still calls them out as the good certifiers that they are. Second, gun rights are enshrined in both our state and federal constitution, and the criteria is "shall not be infringed." The reason it is so is so that disabled people and women have a fair shot at self defense: guns are the great leveller. That means that three pages of legalese determining whether the person can have a handgun is not valid and subjects the state to lawsuits , especially post Bruen.

Members of the Virginia House Safety Subcommittee I am writing to express my strong support for HB916 in the 2026 session. As a shooting sports enthusiast with over 60 years of experience, and as both an NRA Range Safety Officer and a United States Marine Corps–certified Range Safety Officer, I strongly believe this bill reflects a responsible and practical approach to public safety. HB916 ensures that individuals seeking a concealed handgun permit receive proper training in safe handling, lawful self-defense, legal responsibilities, and secure firearm storage. It also improves access to quality safety education by allowing qualified instructors beyond just a few organizations to provide this training across the Commonwealth. This is a balanced, common-sense bill that promotes safety, education, and accountability while respecting the rights of lawful citizens. I respectfully urge you to support HB916. Thank you for your time and service to the Commonwealth.

Fire arms are our founding father right given to us and need to be left to us as Virginian

HB916, please support this bill. HB1015, please oppose this bill, Misdemeanors should never take away a person’s civil rights. The bill is unconstitutional under the U.S. Supreme Court’s New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen decision. HB1427, please support, this bill repeals the unconstitutional One Handgun a Month law. HB1525, please oppose this bill, the Second Amendment doesn't begin at age 21, it should be applicable to all adults. All adults should have the right to Keep and Bear Arms.

HB105 (Tran) Misdemeanors should never strip someone of their civil rights, and this bill does just that, making it unconstitutional under the U.S. Supreme court's NYSRPA v. Bruen decision. HB 1427 (Griffin): no citizen should be prohibited to exercising his or her constitutional right just one time per month. What's next? We can only purchase one book per month or write one blog post one time per month. Are you going to allow us to protest just one time per month? You can't limit our right to keep and bear arms. Besides, other states with these laws show no credible evidence that the reduce gun crimes. Most guns used in crimes are stolen anyway. HB916 (Lopez): It is unconstitutional to require someone to earn their civil rights through testing or skill. We did this to blacks, requiring them to pass unfair tests in order to vote. Will you make people take tests to vote or to speak freely? What other amendment is treated this way? The answer is none. HB 1525 (McGuire): This bill unconstitutionally denies adults their Second Amendment Rights? What will you do next? Will you require someone to be 21 to have Miranda Rights? Will you have to be 21 to have the right to refuse to quarter soldiers?

All these bills are just a power grab utter nonsense and will cost you the faith many Virginians

As a 2nd Amendment constituent, I oppose all of the above bills!

Please Protect Our 2nd Amendment Rights. Thank you.

As usual, your Demokrap proposed bills are all unconstitutional! I AM ADAMANTLY OPPOSED TO ALL UNCONSTITUTIONAL , ANTI-GUN BILLS!!!

According to Article II, Section 7 of the Constitution of Virginia, the oath of office for a Virginia state delegate is: "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge all the duties incumbent upon me as ...................., according to the best of my ability (so help me God)". Seriously, what part of “…shall not be infringed.” is so confusing?? Do your job, stop supporting unconstitutional gun control schemes and be true to the US and Virginia Constitutions.

I am speaking on behalf of both myself, and all the LEGAL GUN OWNERS; THAT WILL NOT UNDERSTAND WHY THEY EITHER CANNOT BUY A FIREARM OR GET A LEGAL FIREARM CONFISCATED FOR A PERCIEVED WRONG. If the slew of gun bills that are being voted on are passed; there will be not only a flight toward back alley guns, and an effect of creating standing criminals out of everyday people by virtue of making legal guns illegal, along with magazines and other components. These bills are a direct attack by trying to go around the second amendment instead of a direct ban, these bills and laws would criminalize actions, and ownership but would NOTHING to stop actual criminals who neither follow law nor direction; what is to stop them from just doing what they do with their guns? Since the legal leaders of my state of residence have decided that my owning of my legal firearms is both an affront and a problem for the democratic machine; i will simplify this; I am not giving up my guns, nor am i turning in my magazines over 10 rounds, nor will i submit to both tyranny and edicts such as "do as i say, not as i do" since the larger majority of wealthy democrats have the money (take from my tax dollars) to provide for private security teams to protect them; I will provide my own security, for my own person with my firearms; i will not surrender my guns or my mags any part of my hardware. A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. NOW WHAT PART OF THIS IS HARD TO UNDERSTAND?

We do not need higher taxes and more antigun laws. Anyone pushing the disarmament agenda should be investigated for corruption and treason.

Please stop infringing on our rights. Time and time again, gun laws have failed to prevent crime because criminals simply do not obey them. These laws only burden law-abiding citizens while doing little to address real criminal behavior.

I am for hb916. I would support this whether they were federal employees or not if they lost their job through no fault of their own. Am against hb1015 because one shouldn’t lose their firearm rights because of a minor crime, I am for hb1427. This is a very annoying law that does little to prevent crime. When buying guns one often needs to buy more than one at a time for a hunting party, for instance or moving to a new residence. I am against gb1525. Anyone who is old enough to go to war should be able to buy a gun. The term “assault firearm” or “assault weapon” is a political term - not a military one.

There was nothing wrong with gun ownership before these bills were made up.YOU ARE NO MAKING LEGAL GUN OWNERS CRIMINALS. YOU NEED TO GO AFTER THE CRIMINALS NOT LEGAL GUN OWNERS.. NOT ONE LEGAL GUN COMMITTED A CRIME THIS PAST YEAR IN VIRGINIA. STOP SCREWING LEGAL GUN OWNERS.

Please support 1427 and go against the others. Law abiding citizens have the right to purchase anything we should want . A butcher knife could be consider a weapon but we are allowed to buy and have those. However; these bill say that we are.not allow to own orpurchase the other. Law abiding citizens are not your problem. Look somewhere else to find the problem with crime. Another example is cars. Over 60000 people die or killed in accidents involving cars. However you are not banning those. Cars have been use in mass killings as well. I could go on and on. We have a right to bear arms. The constitution does not have restrictions in it.

As a constituent, I urge you to OPPOSE: HB 1525, Delegate McGuire, removes the right of young adults to have a handgun or an “assault firearm,” unless used for lawful self-defense or defense of another while in the home or property of parents, grandparents, or guardians. For young adults, 18 to 20-years-old, this bill is unconstitutional. My son (under 21) is currently employed as a licensed armed security officer protecting people such as yourself and others in the community. He paid for training to acquire the required certifications to pursue a career path he was interested in, and you are attempting to not only infringe on his second amendment rights you are injuring his employment and livelihood. We teach our kids to grow up, follow the rules, find something you are passionate about and pursue that, and along the way if you can help out your community then do that. Continuously government officials who claim to be trying to help keep putting obstacles out in the way of our young people. You must oppose this bill! HB 1015, Delegate Tran, prohibits a person convicted of a misdemeanor assault and battery hate crime from being able to possess firearms. Misdemeanors should never take away a person’s civil rights. The bill is unconstitutional under the U.S. Supreme Court’s New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen decision.

My wife and I oppose HB 916, 1015, 1427, and 1525

Article 1 Section 13 of the Virginia Constitution states: "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; that standing armies, in time of peace, should be avoided as dangerous to liberty;" Virginia is very clear on this being a right of individual Virginians. Just as the United States Constitution states similiar regarding the right of the people to keep and bear arms not being infringed. I am writing to implore you to vote against HB1015 and HB 1525, and to SUPPORT HB 1427. HB1015 is just all around a terrible idea. It refers to misdimeanors and opens the door for future misdimeanors being reason for stripping us of our rights. Also Hate Crime is the most overly used and poorly attributed term ever conceived. You do not commit assault and battery on someone because you like them, you do it because you hate them. Vote NO HB1525 is removing young adults rights simply because of their age and not because they've done anything wrong. This is just not right. Vote NO HB916 the current requirements require showing proper gun saftey and usage. Why do we need more. We do not give literacy or IQ test for voting or being a Journalist, nor for the free exercise of any other right. Why are we trying to add more requirements. Vote NO As for HB1427 there's not much point to limiting Virginia citizens to one handgun a month considering most crimes commited with firearms are not committed same day or even the same month of purchase, they are commited years later. As for buying a bunch and transferring them illegally and strawman purchases, those are already illegal. Please enforce consequences for breaking those laws instead.

Any bill that is being considered that infringes upon any Virginians second amendment rights should immediately be removed. These bills do nothing but strip legal gun owners of their rights. There have been numerous studies that show gun bans do not end gun violence. How about hammering down on criminals and the mentally ill? They are the problem, not an inanimate object in a legal, law abiding citizens hands.

HB 916-I urge you to oppose this bill. The current concealed handgun permit training requirements are adequate as is demonstrated by the dearth of incidents involving DHP holders. Further, eliminating the requirement that instructors be approved by the NRA or the USSCA opens the door for less competent instructors. HB 1015-I urge you to oppose this bill, constitutional rights should never be removed due to a misdemeanor crime. Further, the bill is a blatant violation of the Supreme Court's Bruen ruling. HB 1525-I urge you to oppose this bill. This bill unconstitutionally denies young adults, who are considered old enough to serve in the military, of their constitutional rights. HB 1427-I urge you to support this bill, as it will repeal a bill that was searching for a nonexistent problem to be solved. Thank you for your consideration.

All of these gun control bills will only hurt law abiding gun owners, not the criminals, who don’t give 2 turds about a law!!!!! THESE LAWS ARE FEDERALLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND NOT TO MENTION THEY ALSO GO AGAINST OUR VIRGINIA CONSTITUTION!!! “WE THE PEOPLE HAVE THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS AND SHALL NOT BE I FRINGED” IS IN BOTH OF THE CONSTITUTIONS!!!!And for all of you democrats think it’s a safety issue, ARE SO WRONG, You think safety is getting rid of a god given right that is BACKED BY BOTH OUR CONSTITUTIONS. YOU ALL, JUST KEEP PUTTING THE PEOPLE THAT COMMIT THE CRIMES BACK OUT ON THE STREET, THAT JUST KEEP COMMITTING THE CRIMES OVER AND OVER AGAIN!!! No matter how many times they get arrested. HOW ABOUT HOLDING THOSE PEOPLE ACCOUNTABLE FOR THIER ACTIONS. AND NOT PUNISHING ALL US PEOPLE WHO HAVE NOT COMMITTED A CRIME OR ANYTHING WRONG , LIKE WE ARE THE ONES THAT HAVE A PROBLEM!!!!!!!! There are more law abiding guns owners than criminals, so If Guns were the problem, why aren’t there more issues, or let alone the calapse of this country. So all I ask for, is all of you to ACTUALLY SIT BACK AND THINK, OF THE RIGHT THING. And ask yourself , WHAT IS THE REAL PROBLEM?

All unconditional

Unconditional

I urge all committee members to vote against any and all bills that further restrict our 2nd Amendment rights and uphold legislation that preserves or restores those rights. The 2nd Amendment is foundational to our inherent rights, and no less a right than any other codified right within our U. S. Constitution.

Every time Virginia legislators consider limiting our 2A rights you do so in violation of your Oath of Office, the IS Constitution and the Virginia Constitution. Do anything other than fervently opposing any 2A limiting proposals is tantamount to TREASON . Simple as that. SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED! There’s zero ambiguity in those words!

These are simply put treason. I do not know how it is where you are but people of the forgotten southwest Virginia raise their children with understanding and training about firearms. All Richmond does is turn a blind eye to the hard working people of this area. You think you can simply take a God given right away. Who do you think you are you don't represent me . You can trust 16 year olds with an automobile that kills a lot more people per year. You (TRY) to impose your will for your donors, so you can please them. I know some of this doesn't pertain to some of these bills here but while I am here why does 10 rounds in a magazine mean so much to you'll? Guess it's cause every town just regergitates your talking points for you to fall in line so you get your perks. You think all the counties doing the 2a sanctuary would be a sign that your ideas are not wanted.

I urge you to OPPOSE HB916 (Lopez). Concealed Handgun Permits in themselves are unconstitutional and adding a competency test will only further infringe on the rights of the people of Virginia. Virginia should be a constitutional/permit-less carry state for both open carry and concealed carry. Having to pay to excerise a right, ceases to be a right, but a privilege. "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED". Thank you for your time!

To whom it may concern, I humbly and respectfully request that any and all forms of gun control legislation be completely dropped. If guns were an issue, we would have had thousands of dead people by now....but we do not. Law abiding citizens are not going around shooting people. Crime is low because we have firearms to protect ourselves and criminals don't won't to take a chance on us to find out that we will defend ourselves. GUN FREE zones are the problem. They invite those with evil intentions....because they know there will NOT be a good guy there with a gun to STOP them. The courts, the U.S. Constitution, and the Virginia Constitution is on the side of law abiding citizens when it comes to the Second Amendment. Any gun control law is INFRINGEMENT and UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Are you actually going to put hundreds of thousands of Virginians in jail? Not sure how you will get all your new tax money this way! Not one person I have talked with says they are going to comply with these laws. Law Enforcement says they will not enforce any unconstitutional law as well. Are you really trying to start a war? Do you not understand that thousands of people right here in Virginia are willing to die for their second amendment rights? Without the second amendment, we can not ensure any of our other rights. That's why we have the 2nd Amendment anyway. Have you even read the Constitution? Do you not understand history? This is not California and it never will be. You can pass a law if you want to.....but it will be challenged to the fullest extent on every level. Stop wasting your time on stupid things and help make Virginia affordable and a great place to live. The more stupid laws you make.....the less people are going to want to come make their home in Virginia. All you're going to do is destroy this state. You swore an oath to uphold our rights. Did you lie to your fellow citizens? If you fail in your task to uphold the Constitution and PROTECT the second amendment, it is TREASON on your part. Take a look at the Virginia state flag and remind yourself what that symbol actually means. Do you even know? I ask you to do your research, study history, and learn why Virginia and its law abiding citizens must always be armed....and yes, that includes WITH AR-15 rifles with 30 round magazines. These are common, everyday use firearms. If you are scared of them or don't like the way they look. Buy one for yourself. Get educated. Go to the range and shoot them. Learn and understand why the Constitution wants YOU to have the right to bear arms. It's not us against you. We are all in this together. You won't be in office forever, but one day you may need a firearm to defend yourself or your family from a criminal or Tyranny. Thank you for your time.

Anti-constitutional bills should be struck down, along with the massive tax hike Democrats are pushing on us. Expect citizens to respond in the next election, and in the courts.

As a constituent of the Commonwealth of VA, the proposed bills HB1015, HB1525, HB916 effects the lives of every day law abiding gun owners. I oppose the bills listed and am imploring a vote of no.

I oppose HB916. Putting more roadblocks in the way of citizens who are trying to exercise their rights does nothing to prevent crime. I oppose HB1015. No misdemeanor conviction should result in the loss of a right protected by the Constitution. I oppose HB1525. Young adults are adults. They have the right to keep and bear arms just like every other adult American citizen. I support HB1427. American citizens' right to acquire arms is not subject to the interest-balancing test used to justify handgun rationing. "One Handgun a Month" must be relegated to the dustbin of history.

I appose all anti gun unconstitutional bills. The bill of rights says the second amendment. A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Shall not be infringed stands by our fore fathers. It's a God given right. So you do not have any rights to infringe on. The second amendment.

Oppose HB916: I can not recall any situation where a concealed carry holder misused his firearm. This is a bill looking for a problem that does not exist. This will add costs and time that most people do not have to obtain a CHP. The purpose of this bill is to lower the number of people that want to carry concealed. Oppose HB1015: Again this is a bill looking for a problem that does not exist. Hate crime legislation is meaningless. Any crime committed by a criminal against an innocent person is a hate crime. Strictly and harshly punish the perpetrators for any crimes committed against others. Hate crime laws tend to unfairly target one group of people over other groups. Hate crime laws tend to get more and more vague over time. Support HB1427: Allow people to buy more than one gun a month. Oppose HB1525: 18 year olds are considered adults. 18 year olds can join the military and use weapons that most civilians do not have access to. If you don't trust 18-20 year olds to be able to exercise their 2nd Amendment rights, then they should not be able to vote. What needs to be done is to make hunter/gun safety classes mandatory in high school.

ALL These Gun Control Bills are Unconstitutional and Will Be Struck Down By The Courts And Will Not Be Complied With

Please do not pass any additional anti-Second Amendment legislation.

Each of these bills is unconstitutional in their own way. Stop distorting the constitution through absurd and emotional "feel good" legislation attempts on behalf of special interest gun control organizations funded by $$ coming from foreign countries like George Soros and sons and US universities, like Johns Hopkins which is in MARYLAND, and their affiliates like Moms Demand Action, not run by moms. Leave Virginia and the second amendment alone.

In each of the gun control bills reaching the Virginia legislature for 2026, I find that there are 2 questions that need to be answered by lawmakers that are repeatedly glanced over and not addressed., almost as if lawmakers fear the answer: 1) How do these bills prevent crime or make the public safer when those committing crimes *do not* check current gun laws to ensure they are in compliance? Each of these bills only affects the common citizen. 2) Why is it so important for Virginia lawmakers to ensure the common citizen is unable to defend themselves, in light of lawmakers, at the same time, reducing heinous crime sentences and hampering law enforcement activities? Every locality that chooses these draconian type of gun bills turns into a hellscape, which in turn, increases crime and the exodus rate of the common citizen (e.g., California, New York and Illinois). These bills are not an address to "public safety" and only serve to remove the ability of the common citizen to say "no". Please address the 2 questions I have presented, and for the record, I adamantly oppose all of these gun restriction bills. Every leader around the globe who attempts to disarm the average citizen has no good intention in mind. Randy Roe Staunton, VA

If you would like to pursue this line of infringement on 2nd ammendment, please take the proper course of action. The only legal way to enact and enforce these proposed infringements on the 2nd ammendment to propose a constitutional ammendment to abolish the 2nd ammendment. If you are able to accomplish this and it is ratified, I will of course support the voice of America. Then you may re-introduce the subject legislation and you have my full support with the backing of the ammended Constitution. "...the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" DEFINITION OF INFRINGE: "to wrongly limit or restrict (something, such as another person's rights)" I cannot believe the VA constituancy elected officials that do not understand english. No matter how you want to reconcile your actions in your "political mind," you know in your "right mind" that you are indeed wrongly restricting the RIGHT granted to US Citizens by the Constitution.

The fact that there are any bills concerning any of our constitutional rights are an affront to my faithful citizenship to the Commonwealth of Virginia and The United States over the last 66 years. If you do not strictly adhere to the constitution which you swore under oath to protect and defend, then I will continue to fight against you in word and financial deeds.

I OPPOSE this bill!!

Regarding HB 1015 and 1525 as well as a lifetime Citizen of the Commonwealth of Virginia and as your constituent, I strongly Oppose the above Bills and any and all Bills that violate the Second Amendments of the United States Constitution as well as Article 1Section 13 of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Virginia. I ask that you Vote no on any such Bills.

Any laws that infringe on anyone’s Constitutional rights granted by the Second Amendment are acts of tyranny. Your agenda does not represent all your constituents, therefore you should not support any of these bills.

I am opposed to any and all anti gun legislation. Out 2nd amendment is a right that you can not or will be allowed to to take away!

Regarding HB916 - As a concealed carry permit holder, while this bill seems agreeable on the surface (who wouldn't want better trained citizens?), this same language has been used in other states (such as NY) to restrict the rights of law abiding, peaceful, rational citizens. For that reason I do not support this bill. Regarding HB1015 - This strips people of their constitutional rights. There are far too many possibilities for hate crimes to occur that do not actually meet with real hate crimes, especially for misdemeanors. Therefore, I do not support this bill.

I oppose HB916, HB1015, HB1525 because they unconstitutionally infringe Second Amendment rights I favor HB1427 as it repeals a previous unconstitutional infringement of Second Amendment rights Key words of The Second Amendment “shall not be infringed “

I support HB 1427. I am opposed to the remaining three bills (916, 1015, and 1525)

I oppose this bill.

I SUPPORT THIS BILL

I oppose this bill

I am against these proposed bills to impededany sort of restriction on the carry of firearms, banning any sort of accessory, type or feature of a firearm, or any law that adds additional penalties, burdens, fees, or taxes on firearms. The punishment the law abiding citizen with burdensome laws and infringe upon their constitutional rights. The 2nd ammendment is very clear in "shall not be infringed," yet these bills infringe on the freedom of people to bear arms. The propososers of these bills know they're illegal bills and are not constitutional. Virginia has long been a beacon of freedom, and was instrumental in in the American Revolution to secure that freedom. It is disguisting seeing its politicians try to forcibly take that freedom away from its people. I am opposed to these bills and urge the legislature to throw them out, with prejudice.

As a pediatrician I have long been appalled that firearms are the number one cause of death of our children- and having lived thru both mass shootings in Pittsburgh and Buffalo, I immersed myself in the data to understand the problem- we know FIrearm licensing , and concealed carry licensing that incorporates safe storage training saves lives. We know that the access to assault weapons so easily , especially in people with prior threats or concerning obsessions is a reason for most of our mass shootings in America. We know that in domestic violence access to firearms , even in dating relationships , is why women continue to die even with protective orders in place. As a physician I strongly feel concealed carry , especially assault weapons has no place in hospitals , colleges , schools and public buildings. In Virginia we can have laws that really protect people without infringing on the right of sane citizens to own guns. Brief waiting periods, safe storage education for all gun owners, safe storage requirements for all gun owners and a strong emergency protective order system will save many lives and I urge you to support them.

I agree with VCDL.

When did our state government decide that they do not have to follow our Constitution of the United States of America? The 2nd Amendment is an individual right under the Constitution that states clearly that it shall not be infringed on which in simple terms means that no government official or group has the ability to take a person's right to keep and bear arms in the United States of America. This Amendment was so important to our forefathers that it is the second thing they wrote to establish that the government does not have the ability to take your right to defend yourself against all enemies and this includes a tyrannical state government that doesn't understand plain text that our country was founded on. It doesn't matter what others opinions or feelings on the subject of the right to bear arms is because it is my right and not their's that we are talking about at this time. As a society of individuals in our country that have never agreed on things of this nature since the invention of the modern firearm we have to look no farther than our own Constitution to see that this is not a collective right of certain people that agree or disagree with the principle of firearms but infact a Constitutional right of an individual to determine there views of their personal right to bear arms. With the world in the state it is in at our present time this Constitutional right is needed more then ever because we are facing people that think that the can completely ignore the Constitution and its not even on a national level but a state level. This is also a truly sad moment of our state that is the founding place for our country as it exists from the time that we settled in this new land of an unknown world at the time but to disrespect our founding Document that started it all on top of it is the worst thing that could happen in our state for these elected officials to look at the Bill of Rights and say to themselves that those Amendment are not worth following because I have a different opinion, belief or feeling on that Amendment that I am personally going to take the individual right of every person in Virginia just because I don't want to follow these Amendments as they are written. Do you understand how this is being a tyrannical government just like the British were when they were trying to control the entire population at the time that we had the Revolution in this great land to start this great country. When people say that the 2nd Amendment is dated and need to be revised but can see the actual beauty in how our forefathers predicted that this Amendment would be necessary throughout time to even to the year 2026 were we have a government that is looking at this exact Amendment and saying no we don't have to follow that anymore because we have all these people that don't like the fact that a free person of the United States of America can purchase anything that has to do with their ability to not only protect themselves in self defense but also to protect themselves from the tyrannical government that is before us today. I'm sorry but as a person that has no affiliation to a political party or any other organization on this subject in our country I believe in our Constitution and the Amendments that were written in the Bill of Rights to protect myself, my family and my friends from people that think that they know what is best for everyone in our country on the basis that they either think they are smarter, richer or elected.

I stand strongly with the VCDL on these proposed laws. VA has always been a bipartisan state on gun issues, and although the second amendment has may purposes- it must be preserved to protect the citizens of this state. Overreaching federal law enforcement, and all threats domestic and foreign are kept in line by responsible firearm ownership. Gun control also impacts lower income groups, impoverished populations, and people of color disproportionately. We must preserve the 2nd amendment.

In 2021, my elderly stepmother shot through a closed door during an argument with my elderly father, striking him in the back and paralyzing him. My father has spent the past five years in extreme physical agony, unable to walk, paying caretakers out of pocket to hoist him in and out of bed, unable to care for himself. The lack of movement in his life has led to horrific bed sores, which become bone infections, which lead to extended hospital stays and a horrible quality of life. All this because my stepmother was allowed to have a gun. There are countless stories like this of the bullet's aftermath: of the lifelong physical and mental damage that comes from guns. It has been a horrific five years, full of physical pain and mental anguish for our entire family. I wouldn't wish this on anyone. The bills before you now will not only save lives, they will spare whole swaths of our neighborhoods from needing to deal with these horrors. One bullet, lodged in my father's spine, didn't kill him. Instead, it has shattered the life he had, his ability to work and care for himself, and his family. Each bullet we allow in our communities has the ability to do the same. His care has bankrupted him personally, and now he relies on state care and Medicaid, an avoidable burden on taxpayers. There are numerous reasons guns have no place in our society, and I hope my father's story is just one that helps make change. Please support all bills that make guns harder to access, harder to keep. Please do everything you can to keep guns out of the hands of our society. Thank you for the great work you are doing to keep Virginians safe.

I respectfully submit this comment in opposition to HB110, HB21, HB217, HB229, HB24, HB623, HB626, HB700, HB871, and HB916. These proposals represent a sweeping expansion of firearm regulation that raises serious constitutional concerns under both the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 13 of the Virginia Constitution. Recent Supreme Court precedent makes clear that firearm regulations must be consistent with the nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation. Broad restrictions on commonly owned firearms, magazines, permitting, carry, storage, commerce, and industry liability extend well beyond that tradition and place undue burdens on law abiding Virginians. Several proposals also seek to impose increased taxation of firearms, ammunition, and accessories such as the proposed $500 tax on suppressors. These proposals are nothing more than a means of discouraging lawful ownership. Using taxation to create financial barriers to the exercise of a constitutional right is deeply concerning and disproportionately impacts lower income Virginians. Constitutional rights should not be accessible only to those who can afford significant additional fees or penalties. Many of these bills do not meaningfully target criminal misuse, but instead regulate the conduct of responsible citizens who already comply with existing laws. Measures such as expanded prohibitions, waiting periods, altered permitting standards, reciprocal permit limitations, storage penalties, civil liability expansion, forfeiture hurdles, location based carry bans, and punitive taxation risk criminalizing otherwise lawful behavior while doing nothing to address violent crime or its underlying causes. I respectfully urge the General Assembly to reject these proposals in their entirety. Virginians should not be asked to surrender constitutional rights through cumulative restrictions, financial barriers, or regulatory complexity that would never be tolerated if applied to any other enumerated right. Public safety and constitutional liberty are not mutually exclusive, and legislation that undermines one in the name of the other ultimately serves neither. The Commonwealth can and must pursue solutions that respect both the Constitution and the Virginians it exists to serve.

I am writing to oppose the current slate of firearm restriction bills before the General Assembly. While these proposals are framed as public safety measures, in practice they disproportionately harm marginalized Virginians — including racial minorities, LGBTQ+ individuals (especially trans people), immigrants, and low-income residents — who often face higher risks of targeted violence and slower or unequal police response. These bills add costs, delays, and bureaucratic hurdles to exercising a fundamental right. Increased fees, mandatory waiting periods, feature bans, and expanded disqualifications fall hardest on people with limited financial resources, unstable work schedules, or justified concerns about their personal safety. For many vulnerable individuals, the ability to lawfully and promptly acquire a firearm is not about ideology, but about self-defense. History shows that restrictive gun laws are most aggressively enforced in minority communities, amplifying disparities in arrests, prosecution, and legal exposure — even when no harm has occurred. Expanding civil liability, criminal penalties, and subjective risk standards increases that risk. Public safety should not come at the expense of civil rights or equal access to self-protection. Policies that price people out of their rights or delay lawful self-defense do not address the root causes of violence and instead leave the most vulnerable less safe. I respectfully urge you to oppose these bills and support approaches that protect both public safety and the rights of all Virginians, regardless of income, identity, or background. Thank you for your time and consideration.

Delegate Cia Price, please eliminate bill HB969. It is nothing more than spending taxpayer money to create a state bureaucracy that exists to create more headaches for law abiding gun owners. Total waste of time and money.

Dear Delegate Price: Please strike your bill HB969 that focuses on spending our taxpayer money to create a state bureaucracy that exists to create more headaches for law abiding gun owners.

I am in opposition to bill HB969, which creates a Gun Violence Prevention Center. I see it as an avenue to infringement on gun rights. Thank you.

I am providing an opposition statement to HB969. It seems to me that this Violence Prevention Program would be throwing money at creating more bureaucracy and targeting lawful gun owners. This is unnecessary and targets law-abiding citizens. Please vote in opposition to HB969. Thank you for your consideration.

I do not agree with forming another group within the government to monitor and control guns in Virginia. All Virginians want safety concerning guns, but adding another layer of government is not the way to achieve this. Please rescind HB 969 and view other alternatives of existing areas in which gun safety can be achieved. Thank you for your service, Denise Bowman

Though they tend to get less public attention than gun-related murders, suicides have long accounted for the majority of U.S. gun deaths. In 2023, 58% of all gun-related deaths in the U.S. were suicides (27,300), while 38% were murders (17,927). The remaining gun deaths that year involved law enforcement (604), were accidental (463) or had undetermined circumstances (434), according to CDC data... so murder, people not trying to die intentionally, as sad as it is, falls to less than 18,000 annually. Rifles, including AR-15s, were involved in 511 murders in 2023. In comparison, according to the National Safety Council in 2023, there were 125,700 accidental death in the home. 32,000 of those were caused by falls. So factually, gravity kills more people than firearms. Let's ban gravity. Remember, before they took the wedding rings, the Nazis first took the guns.

I am a volunteer with Moms Demand Action and also serve as a member of the Virginia Community Violence Coalition. I wholeheartedly support this bill.

I support this bill because by centralizing our research and streamlining inter-agency coordination, we ensure that every dollar spent and every program launched is actually saving lives.

I respectfully submit this comment in opposition to House Bill 969 due to concerns regarding fiscal responsibility, effectiveness, and the appropriate use of taxpayer funds. While firearm violence is a serious issue, HB 969 establishes a new statewide center without addressing the fundamental limitation that undermines its potential effectiveness: the quality and completeness of underlying data. The bill does not require improvements to data collection at the source, such as police incident reports, court records, or hospital reporting. Without stronger and more consistent inputs, a centralized center risks aggregating incomplete or inconsistent information rather than producing actionable insight. Additionally, the Commonwealth already maintains multiple agencies and programs with overlapping responsibilities related to public health surveillance, criminal justice analysis, and violence prevention. HB 969 does not clearly define how this new entity would provide unique value beyond existing structures, nor does it explain why strengthening current systems would be less effective than creating a new administrative body. This raises concerns about duplication of effort and unnecessary expansion of government. The fiscal implications of HB 969 are also concerning. Available fiscal analyses indicate that establishing and operating the proposed center would require millions of dollars in initial and ongoing funding. However, the bill does not establish clear performance metrics, cost-benefit requirements, or sunset provisions to ensure continued funding is justified by measurable outcomes. Taxpayers would be committing to a permanent expenditure without sufficient accountability for results. At the same time, Virginia faces pressing challenges with well-documented and immediate impacts on residents, including shortages in education and behavioral health services, infrastructure maintenance backlogs, court system delays, and staffing challenges in public safety and social services. Directing limited public funds toward a new research and coordination center diverts resources from these higher-impact needs. In its current form, HB 969 risks becoming a symbolic initiative rather than an effective one. Without mandatory data improvements, enforceable interagency participation, or requirements that findings drive policy and budget decisions, the primary outputs are likely to be reports and administrative activity rather than measurable reductions in violence. For these reasons, I urge the General Assembly to reconsider HB 969 and instead focus on strengthening existing institutions, improving frontline data quality, and investing in proven, outcome-driven services that directly benefit Virginians.

Strongly support this bill, Virginia citizens need to be disarmed from all these guns and firearms. We need to put these center in each corner like how DC had liquor their stores in every corner. Citizens need not to have firearms, fruits and vegetables are better self defense.

I am against these proposed bills to impededany sort of restriction on the carry of firearms, banning any sort of accessory, type or feature of a firearm, or any law that adds additional penalties, burdens, fees, or taxes on firearms. The punishment the law abiding citizen with burdensome laws and infringe upon their constitutional rights. The 2nd ammendment is very clear in "shall not be infringed," yet these bills infringe on the freedom of people to bear arms. The propososers of these bills know they're illegal bills and are not constitutional. Virginia has long been a beacon of freedom, and was instrumental in in the American Revolution to secure that freedom. It is disguisting seeing its politicians try to forcibly take that freedom away from its people. I am opposed to these bills and urge the legislature to throw them out, with prejudice.

HELL TO THE NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! HELLER SAYS THIS IS COMPLETELY UNCONSTITUTIONAL!!!!!!!!!!

The gun bills are problematic for all of Virginia ..Every race will be affected.Dem Repub.Etc. It is plain to see in the form of complaints that democrat gun owners did not expect this.A moderate admin was expected.Now they realize the vote outcome was an extreme swing to the left bordering on communist traits..We may disagree or support some bills but there is common agreement that the gun bills are over each to the max..Join VCDL ,Gun owners of America, write your legislator..The problem iis just not gun bills .It is other dumb ideas such as a dog walking tax.That come from Richmond..Ideas that are empty in substance. And produce a lot of gibberish confused words..

I am writing as a concerned military member stationed in your district regarding the ongoing debate about proposed firearms legislation. As someone deeply committed to both public safety and constitutional liberties, I want to respectfully express my strong belief in the continued importance of the Second Amendment and share why I feel proposed restrictions could have unintended consequences. Recent events in Minneapolis, Minnesota have highlighted intense tensions around law-enforcement interactions and individual rights. On January 7, 2026, Renée Good, a 37-year-old citizen, was fatally shot by a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent during a federal enforcement operation in Minneapolis. Independent reporting indicates that the agent fired multiple shots at her vehicle, and eyewitness accounts have raised questions about whether those actions were justified. Later, on January 24, 2026, federal agents shot and killed 37-year-old Alex Jeffrey Pretti, an intensive care nurse at the Minneapolis VA hospital. Pretti’s death occurred amid a federal immigration operation, and while Department of Homeland Security officials contend he approached officers with a firearm, video footage and local accounts show him filming agents with a cellphone before he was pepper-sprayed, pinned to the ground, and shot multiple times. These incidents have sparked widespread protests and raised difficult questions about the use of force, accountability, and community safety. They also underscore the complexity of real-world encounters between armed individuals and law enforcement — whether federal agents or private citizens — and how quickly such situations can escalate. For many Americans, the Second Amendment serves as more than a constitutional phrase: it represents a safeguard for personal defense, protection of loved ones, and a check on potential abuses of power. As policymakers consider new regulations that could further restrict lawful firearm ownership, I urge careful consideration of the broader implications. Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens may not prevent tragic events like those in Minnesota, especially when questions remain about how force was applied and whether existing policies and training were sufficient. Rather than broad legislative restrictions, I encourage: Strengthened enforcement of current laws to ensure that responsible gun owners aren’t unduly affected; Investment in community safety and law-enforcement training to de-escalate tense encounters before they turn deadly; Support for mental health services and conflict resolution programs that address underlying causes of violence; Enhanced transparency and accountability for all use-of-force incidents, whether involving federal agents or private citizens. The Second Amendment is an integral part of our constitutional framework. I believe that any legislative approach should respect that framework while promoting public safety in ways that do not diminish the rights of responsible citizens. Thank you for your service and for considering the diverse viewpoints of your constituents. I hope you will weigh these concerns carefully as you engage with ongoing legislative discussions.

With the exception of HB1303, HB229, HB871, and HB1300 I reject these bills as common sense gun law as written. Several are patently unconstitutional and a waste of committee time as they will be overturned on issuance. To my democratic friends, we do agree to common sense laws, but adding state licenses to federal tax plays is unacceptable. HB19, remove "or an offense substantially similar" as it vague and could not be reasonably enforced. HB21 does not provide a reasonable method to determine straw buyers. This is an enforcement issue and should be changed to fund LEO records reviews to identify and pursue straw buyers. HB40, material type and detectability should be irrelevant. While I support serialization of all components, 2A rights should not be infringed in place of enforcement methods. HB93 doesn't make sense. We want a prohibited person to get rid of firearms and LEOs can already apply for a warrant if they think prohibited persons still have firearms. If the law currently doesn't provide a window for prohibited persons to get rid of firearms we should focus on that aspect. HB110 remove the unattended motor vehicle may subject to removal clause and I am ok with this bill. HB217 anyone who uses the term "assault firearm" has no business writing legislation on firearms. This is a meaningless term. Magazine capacity, by itself, has no realistic baring on firearm lethality. 3-10 round vs 1-30 round mag with minimal practice is a 2-3 sec difference. HB626 creates complexity and vagueness where all we need are posted signs to prevent carry. HB702 is there really a police station that would turn you away if you wanted to turn in a weapon? This seems like unnecessary use of funds. HB969 is already covered by DOH, we do not need a new center bill to execute this work. Just increase their budget for this line item. HB1359 is the bill I reject the most. We already have federal background checks and do not need an additional tax/time delay to use our 2A rights. In general, I wish our democratic representatives to work with our republican representatives to find common sense and compromise. Focus on the bad guys with guns as the majority of Virginians respectfully and appropriately manage their firearms. The polls show where the common ground is and both sides ignore this in the search for whatever rationale they use to put forth bills and vote. You are making it harder than it needs to be, ignoring the will of the people, and failing to faithfully represent the majority.

Please vote no to any bill restricting the freedom offered to us through our beautiful consititution! This bill restricts our personal freedom.

These bills violate Article I Section 13 of the Virginia Bill Of Rights. They also violation the Supreme Law of the land, our US Constitution. We have the right to keep and bear arms, and this an obvious attack on our rights.

Maybe the legislators will realize of how there infringing on citizens rights..The problem is the Democrat mindset.It is a deep-rooted disturbing system .The system is invoked in most Democrats.A system that started years ago.Created to manipulate laws,create new laws They seek to shape history in there own manner. Micromanage citizens lives through penalties for not complying.The simplest thing such as not paying for a car registration on time invokes a penalty.The U.S has become a penalized society .This was not the founders idea of a system..England did this ..Dictators , fascists, monarchs do this. And we see this in the gun bills introduced in session.A legal firearm today will be confiscated and be illegal tomorrow.It is amazing to see to see legislators copy other dictators systems and be proud of there accomplishment..Citizens will buy into this form of rights suppression.This happened during the American revolution ..Citizens become dependent on gov. to manage there life.Sad to see. This will remain on record and hopefully citizens 30 ,50 years from now,read this and learn about infringement of rights created by the authors of these bills..You , citizen can apply this to all Bill infringing ideas...

Why would you give Noncitzens have rights to anything? We do not need more illegals with guns. We have lost a lot of people in this country due to illegals. If they are not legal citizens of Virginia they do not get any rights. They need to apply for citizenship first before any rights should be given. Common sense. Also Our gun rights are set by the Constitution. You trying to change our rights is not ok with any of us and you know it. We have the Right to bare arms. To try to make any changes to that is not ok. Stop impeding on our rights and Actually help the Citizens of Virginia Not the illegals. Let ICE do their jobs and stop with the drama. Use COMMON SENSE.

The statements here are a permanent record.Of how citizens opposed oppressive infringing behavior by legislators creating bad laws.Infringing on citizens rights.May future generations read this and oppose any bad law that is oppressive to citizens and the constitution. If you do not believe look at other countries of past that oppressed there citizens rights.God Bless

Good afternoon I write to this committee today to show my concern over these unconstitutional bills that lay before you. Every bill that is being proposed does nothing to save one Va citizens life. These bills are about control. This nation was founded on principals to keep governing officials and tyrannical measures off the shores of America. Guns are not the problem, we have a problem of the heart when it comes to humanity. The tool does not change the outcome. We have seen time and time again where nations have stripped the rights of citizens only to still use issues with gangs, drugs and government corruption. With the 1st amendment we are allowed to speak against our government and others who seek to destroy our constitutional republic. The second amendment is what keeps the rest of our right in tact. By limiting the types of firearms and or magazines we are allowed to own you are taking our fundamental liberties as Americans away. Many of you from the larger cites and or other less rural areas don’t understand that semi auto firearms allow us to hunt coyotes that harm the live stock of the farmers in our areas. They are also need in some instances when there are more than 2-3 attackers in a home invasion. Just because some of you didn’t not grow up with guns and or hunting doesn’t meant you legislate it away from those us who use firearms for sport and protection. I grew up in a family that mostly only hunted deer and squirrels but as I got older and really understood what the 2nd amendment was for I quickly have changed my families out look on firearms and there importance in the American household. Mental illness is where politicians need to spend their efforts but neither the state or federal level wants to tackle that. If you fix the mental health crisis and gang crisis in our nation there’s no reason for individuals to resort to violence that takes innocent life.

Giving up your right to the 2nd amendment For those who think that the 2nd Amendment does not matter then read giving up the right to protect yourself from unlawful may again lead to this!!!!!! Disarmament of the German Jews The Holocaust warns us of the deadly consequences of antisemitism and hatred, dehumanization and apathy left unchallenged those who perished in Nazi death camps The disarmament of the German Jews started in 1933, initially limited to local areas. A major target was Berlin, where large-scale raids in search for weaponry took place. Starting in 1936, the Gestapo prohibited German police officers from giving firearms licenses to Jews. In November 1938, the Verordnung gegen den Waffenbesitz der Juden prohibited the possession of firearms and bladed weapons by Jews. The legal foundations that the Nazi Party later used for the purpose of disarming the Jews were already laid during the Weimar Republic. Starting with the Reichsgesetz über Schusswaffen und Munition (Reich law on firearms and ammunition), enacted on 12 April 1928, weapon purchase permits were introduced, which only allowed "authorized persons" the purchase and possession of firearms. Mandatory registration of weapons was introduced, which gave the government the opportunity of accessing weapon owner and their weapons at any given time. Manufacture and sale of weapons was only permitted if authorized so. The purpose was to ensure that firearms were only issued to "reliable individuals". Starting in 1930, bladed weapons were also regulated. The carrying of weapons in public now required a weapons permit Immediately following the "Machtergreifung" in 1933, the weapon laws of the Weimar Republic were used to disarm Jews, or to use the excuse of "searching for weapons" as a justification for raids and searches of homes. Because the weapons law of 1928 gave the police the authority to issue or withdraw weapon permits, Jewish weapon owners were disarmed through warrants issued by the police. For instance, the president of the police of Breslau enacted an order on 21 April 1933 which stated that Jews had to give their weapons and shooting permits to the police immediately. After the Jewish population was judged as not to be trusted, no weapon permits were issued to them The weapons law was also used for searches of homes and raids. The preface for that was the allegation that the victims of these searches stored large amounts of weapons and ammunition. A prominent example is Albert Einstein, whose summer residence in Caputh, near the Schwielowsee was searched in spring 1933. The only item found there was a bread knife. Raids, for instance on 4 April 1933 at the Scheunenviertel in Berlin, also took place. Not only many weapons were found, but also a lot of publications that included criticism of Nazi Germany. Sometimes, Jews without residence permits were also found and arrested. Starting in 1935, the Gestapo prevented the issue of weapon permits and weapon purchase permits to Jews. The police authorities were the executing authorities and had to comply with the orders issued by the Gestapo. The self-defense of Jews was abolished, and they were subjected to the arbitrariness and terror of the police authorities, without the need to introduce a new law for this. Nazi Germany from 1941 to 1945. For all groups persecuted by Nazi Germany

Dear Members of the House Committee, Thank you for the time and effort you give to reviewing legislation that impacts the safety of our Commonwealth. I am writing as a law-abiding Virginia resident who cares deeply about public safety and about protecting the constitutional rights of responsible citizens. My concern with the firearm bills currently before this committee is not rooted in politics, but in whether these proposals truly make our communities safer or instead place additional burdens on citizens who are not the source of violent crime. Respectfully, I ask the committee to consider the following: Public safety is ultimately about people, not objects. Acts of violence are committed by individuals who choose to harm others. Laws that focus primarily on regulating firearms owned by responsible citizens do not address the behavior of those intent on committing crimes. These proposals largely affect law-abiding Virginians. Criminals, by definition, do not follow firearm laws. Restrictions on possession, transfer, or technical features primarily impact citizens who already comply with the law and use firearms responsibly for self-defense. The Supreme Court has affirmed individual firearm rights. In District of Columbia v. Heller, the Court recognized an individual right to possess firearms for lawful purposes such as self-defense. More recently, NYSRPA v. Bruen held that firearm regulations must be consistent with the nation’s historical tradition. Many modern restrictions raise serious constitutional questions under this standard. The public safety benefit of these measures is unclear. Research and court findings show mixed or inconclusive evidence that bans or feature-based restrictions reduce violent crime. Meanwhile, illegal markets, theft, and repeat offenders remain largely unaffected. True public safety solutions focus on violent behavior. Enforcing existing laws, addressing repeat violent offenders, improving mental health resources, and targeting illegal firearm use would more directly improve safety without limiting the rights of responsible citizens. I believe most Virginians want safer communities and effective solutions that address violence at its source. I respectfully ask this committee to consider whether these bills accomplish that goal, or whether they risk limiting constitutional rights without meaningfully improving public safety. Thank you for your time, your service, and your consideration. Respectfully, Ron Lowman Virginia Resident

As a pediatrician I have long been appalled that firearms are the number one cause of death of our children- and having lived thru both mass shootings in Pittsburgh and Buffalo, I immersed myself in the data to understand the problem- we know FIrearm licensing , and concealed carry licensing that incorporates safe storage training saves lives. We know that the access to assault weapons so easily , especially in people with prior threats or concerning obsessions is a reason for most of our mass shootings in America. We know that in domestic violence access to firearms , even in dating relationships , is why women continue to die even with protective orders in place. As a physician I strongly feel concealed carry , especially assault weapons has no place in hospitals , colleges , schools and public buildings. In Virginia we can have laws that really protect people without infringing on the right of sane citizens to own guns. Brief waiting periods, safe storage education for all gun owners, safe storage requirements for all gun owners and a strong emergency protective order system will save many lives and I urge you to support them.

If a nation's government becomes so oppressive and tyrannical, we have the right to fight it. Our guns provide us with self defense against tyranny, evil, and malice. Our forefathers knew this and that is the very reason for the second amendment. It shall not be infringed!

Our freedom was won with illegal and unregistered firearms. Please look to VCDL and G.O.A. for guidance on second amendment issues.

I appose these bills.

When our founding fathers wrote the Declaration of Independence and Constitution, they had just won their independence from a tyrannical system. The 2nd Amendment was right at the top behind freedom of speech because it’s THAT important. As elected representatives of the greater Commonwealth you MUST vote NO on any new legislation that will restrict law abiding citizens from exercising their rights under the US Constitution. It states “Shall not be infringed…” which means any rule or law attempting to be enforced or passed is in direct violation of our country’s constitutional rights. Enough is enough. NO on all these bills. Radical tyranny must be met with vigilance from FREE people. Do the right thing.

Please OPPOSE: HB 19 (McClure) requires forfeiture of firearm rights for a “dating relationship” misdemeanor. HB 21 (Helmer) allows civil lawsuits against firearm manufacturers and sellers for crimes committed with their products. HB 40 (Simon) outlaws unfinished frames and receivers unless serialized. HB 93 (Bennett-Parker) forces firearm surrender under protective orders in a way that could disarm innocent family members. HB 110 (Laufer) imposes a civil penalty and towing if a handgun is left in an unattended vehicle. HB 217 (Helmer) bans commonly owned firearms and standard-capacity magazines made after July 1, 2026. HB 229 (Hernandez) prohibits firearms and many knives in medical facilities. HB 626 (Callsen) restricts firearms on college campuses without lawful cause. HB 702 (Cole) establishes a firearm "turn-in and destroy" program funded by taxpayers. HB 871 (Downey) mandates specific storage requirements and biometric safes in homes with minors. HB 969 (Price) creates a state gun violence prevention agency focused solely on firearms. HB 1359 (Hope) creates a costly permit-to-purchase scheme with fingerprints, training requirements, and a de facto handgun registry.  All of these are infringements on Americans' Second Amendment Civil Rights and will not address their stated intent

Gov Spangenberger received support from Virginia Police benevolent association, claims she was a federal law enforcement officer.But cuts ties with immigration enforcement . To place detainers and notify federal authorities of criminals being released from detainment.The claim of supporting law enforcement and doing the opposite when it comes detainer notification is hypocrisy..Same deal with firearms owners..

Our Bill of Rights are the Laws Of We The People for the Government State and Federal to abide by. Not for the Governments to use and change the definitions to meet their agenda to make Conservative Christians into criminals. Any and all anti gun regulations, restrictions or bans against law abiding America Citizen the Rights to bare Arms shall not infringed and will not be permanent. An act of the legislature which is repugnant to the Constitution is void. Marbury v. Madison, 1803. A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed". It protects an individual's right to possess firearms for lawful purposes, such as self-defense in the home, as confirmed by the Supreme Court in 2008.

I support this bill.

I retired from the military after 26 years of service. I could have chose any state to settle. However I chose Virginia. Taking our right away or any part of it to bear arms is unconstitutional. What is an assault weapon. The Ar platform is just a semiautomatic rifle. Law abiding citizens use these for sport and hunting nuisance animals such as coyotes etc. Speed limits are what they are yet people buy sports cars that double or triple speed limits. That is the great thing about America we live free. I’m not against gun reform; but let’s use common sense gun reform. Make gun owners have guns stored in locked safes. Let’s look into mental health. These two things will prevent firearms from getting into the wrong hands. My belief is that criminals will always get guns because they don’t follow law. Why are we punishing law abiding citizens? If these bills amongst others I will be deciding to relocate and support a state that stand behind the second amendment I so longed to protect and preserve. God bless Virginia.

The same politicians whom plan to penalize citizens for lawfully owned firearms by making them illegal.Plan on reducing mandatory minimum sentences and bail for criminals. makes sense..Semi auto ban,magazine ban,penalties and more for honest citizens

The qualify immunity bill if can give scitizen rights to sue the judiciary for illegal gun control bills

The 14 bills manufactured with only one thought behind them .Passing the bills at all costs.Sacrificing citizens rights with down the road illegality which is what oslegal today.Oh we will pick and choose what to grandfather. In other words firearms are legal now but we will do you a favor citizen and grandfather them in when we make them illegal. Big egos and ideas that don't work.

I oppose these bills.

I agree with the VCDL on these bills

I adamantly oppose all of these bills and their overreach. You going to take the bulk of Virginia citizens and make them criminals by the stroke of a pen.

11 percent tax,500 dollar suppressors, what happened to the promise of lower costs..Did anyone offer a gun bill to lower concealed permit fees?

Stop harassing citizens you need to stop the criminals instead of letting them free and trying to keep us from protecting ourselves. Over and over you stand against your people . I do not understand.

Why can you not vote for a pro gun bill? Why are law abiding citizens penalized for owning firearms?

The legislators took an oath to serve it's citizens.The actions taken creating the gun laws create penalties for the citizens of Virginia.Is this protecting and serving citizens...?

I am writing as a Virginia resident to express my strong opposition to all proposed anti-gun bills and to respectfully remind you of the constitutional limits placed on the General Assembly with respect to the right to keep and bear arms. Article I, Section 13 of the Virginia Constitution is explicit and unambiguous: “The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” This language is not conditional, qualified, or ambiguous. It is a direct limitation on GOVERNMENT power and reflects the understanding that the militia consists of “the body of the people,” not a select or state-controlled class. Likewise, the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution affirms that this right “shall not be infringed.” As a state, Virginia is bound by both its own Constitution and the U.S. Constitution. Legislation that criminalizes or restricts the ownership, possession, transfer of commonly owned firearms or standard magazines, or restricts where a person may carry or how to store their firearm, directly conflicts with both. I respectfully urge you to uphold your oath to support and defend the Constitutions of Virginia and the United States. Virginians expect their elected officials to respect enumerated rights, even when doing so is politically inconvenient. Thank you for your time and for your service to the Commonwealth. Respectfully, Sean Fredericksburg, VA.

Citizens of Virginia, do not give up..I. They love to see citizens defeated.Thy thrive on misery .The chaotic bills are a reflection of there own self.Miserable spoiled and confused.

Ban magazines,semi autos,and more. you don't comply your penalized..It is disgusting to see law abiding citizens being placed in this position.And the legislators using law enforcement as there tool to enforce the penalty side..This shows how the Democrats will use ,abuse anything and body whom stands in there way..To get to there power goal..Throughout history dictatorships have done the same thing to there citizens .

It’s my belief that blanket bans based solely upon firearm features rather than measures that tackle the cause of gun violence, poverty, domestic abuse, substance abuse, mental illness will not meaningfully make Virginians safer; and merely cover up systemic issues. These feature laws also criminalize millions of law abiding Virginians, redirecting law enforcement resources away from solving said systemic issues and having them chase down arbitrary invented infractions. Instead of fostering a sense of responsibility and openness with the firearms community which could help law enforcement recognize potential crisises before they occur, by criminalizing a majority of firearms from the last 50 years, you enclose criminal and lawful citizen together under the same umbrella . In summary, I am not opposed to the these laws because I am indifferent to the suffering caused by gun violence, I am opposed because I believe that laws based on features of firearms rather than the circumstances which created the violence does a disservice to those victims, their families, and to the community at large.

This is a waste of resources and another government to waste taxpayer money

These bills the Virginia Democrat 2026 general assembly will infringe on people's God given rights, look at the statistics gun laws cause more deaths by causing law abiding citizens to jump through hoops.especially the bill which requires a VA resident to obtain a permit to rent, purchase a firearm, that bill alone will cost people their lives and if it passes the blood on the hands of the general assembly. The bills which Sadaam are passing are unnecessary measures, and a total slap in the face to all people in Virginia. Abigail promised tax breaks but then she did a 360 reversal and proposed 150 percent pay raise for her and her constituents, 15 percent sales tax on many services and goods. It was extremely reckless for the governor of 2026 to end state police corporation with ICE, NOW these bills will further infringe on Virginians rights. It makes absolutely no sense to enable criminals by taking away the minimum sentence requirement, so the general assembly is pro criminal and doesn't care about Virginians. If these bills are passed then what I've stated is true. Police are already underrated, pass these bills and you further jeopardize Virginians safety and well being. Most likely will be taken to the supreme Court

Please scrap these gun control billsbills. These bills restrict current and future safe and lawful gun owners access to their current and any future firearms while limiting their ability to protect themselves and their families in the commonwealth. Second amendment restrictions in the name of safety dont make us safer in all communities of the commonwealth. Most all the states that have more second amendment restrictions on firearms have more crime statistically. Disadvantaged neighborhoods are more at risk of drug pusher/gang violence with the flow of drugs to all the cities and towns in the US today. Making more gun free zones makes it better for those with criminal intentions to commit crimes. These state government restrictions on our 2nd amendment rights can result in legal challenges in the commonwealth. These bills will raise the cost of ownership and will slowly but surely whittle away all of our ability to afford the protections all of us enjoy now

NO to all firearms bills, laws, and unjust documentation. You are warned, we will fight until we have no breath left. This is the line. We will organize, and fight tyranny. This is Virginia! SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS.

This is NOT why I voted for Spanberger. I have lost my faith in my own party. It's a shame to say I will have to vote as my husband suggested, with the republican party. I have been bleeding heart blue since I was 18. This state that I love is slowly dying with these crazy laws! I'm blue, but I believe in our constitution. Abigail is a LIAR! Figures the CIAs pet would lie to us. I can't believe how embarrassing it is that it only took 2 days to show her colors. I feel duped!

I proudly served for 30 years with the New York State Police retiring and moving to Virginia in 2017. I attained the rank of Major and my last assignment was leading a state wide narcotics and weapons task force. The majority of my career was spent in criminal investigations including homicide, major crimes and counterterrorism. Based on my experience, these proposed pieces of legislation will do nothing to curb crime and will make law abiding citizens less safe. A common sense proposal to increase the penalty for using a gun in a crime was defeated in committee on a party line vote. What a missed opportunity to protect the citizens of Virginia. Criminals by definition will follow none of these laws if enacted and will only be emboldened. Additionally, most if not all of these proposals fly in the face of the U.S. Constitution and Supreme Court decisions in the Heller and Bruen cases. I urge you to vote against any bill which strips the rights of law abiding citizens from exercising their God given right to self defense and does nothing to address the root causes of violence.

We strongly oppose every bill against the 2nd amendment. SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED UPON. You will force action with these unjust laws. Be warned

We strongly oppose All of the bills and tax increases this governor is pushing. She ran as a moderate, And has lied about everything she stood for. We will not stand for unconstitutional Bills, This is the line in the sand. Virginia is the state where our great constitution Was written, It's disgusting to see all of you taking a piss all over the Constitution of the United States of America. You should all be ashamed of yourselves.

I have just moved to VA from Florida where I fought very hard to put the socialism and communism to the dust bin of history there. I will fight with my last breath the garbage you people are trying to do here in Virginia. All of you disgust me, look forward to debating many of you in the future. Enjoy the win while you can, real conservatives are coming with lawyers and organization.

SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!! VOTE NO TO ALL FIREARMS LAWS, OR WE WILL VOTE YOU OUT. NO TO ALL TAX INCREASES. NO TO RAISING YOUR MONEY FOR HOUSING, AND PAY! SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS! DONT MAKE US USE OUR RIGHTS AGAINST TYRANNY, TYRANTS

My name is Jennifer Earley, Alexandria VA, a member of Moms Demand Action and we support these bills.

I vehemently oppose all anti second amendment bills. I urge you to reconsider your support of these bills and remember your oaths to the Virginia State Constitution and US Constitution. Though I doubt that will happen. Thus they will be challenged in a court of law and very highly likely to be found unconstitutional, and therefore, unenforceable.

The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution states that “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” This language establishes an individual right, a conclusion affirmed by the Supreme Court in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) and reaffirmed in McDonald v. Chicago (2010). While the government retains authority to enact certain regulations, broad or restrictive anti-gun laws that substantially burden law-abiding citizens exceed constitutional limits and undermine the intent of the Amendment. At its core, the Second Amendment exists to protect fundamental liberties, including self-defense. The right to bear arms is not contingent upon government permission but is recognized as pre-existing and inherent. Laws that impose excessive restrictions—such as blanket bans on commonly owned firearms or arbitrary licensing regimes—effectively nullify this right for ordinary citizens, contradicting both the text and historical understanding of the Constitution. The Supreme Court has emphasized that firearms “in common use” for lawful purposes cannot be prohibited, making sweeping bans constitutionally suspect. Beyond constitutional concerns, strict anti-gun laws often fail to achieve their stated public safety goals. Criminals, by definition, do not comply with gun laws. As a result, restrictive legislation disproportionately affects responsible gun owners while leaving violent offenders largely undeterred. Numerous jurisdictions with stringent gun control measures continue to experience high rates of gun violence, suggesting that such policies address symptoms rather than root causes such as gang activity, drug trafficking, and repeat violent offenders. Additionally, overly restrictive gun laws can weaken personal and community safety. Firearms are frequently used defensively, often without a shot being fired, to deter crime and protect lives. Limiting access to lawful self-defense tools may leave vulnerable populations—particularly those in high-crime or rural areas—less able to protect themselves when law enforcement response times are delayed or unavailable. Anti-gun laws also raise concerns about unequal enforcement and civil liberties. Complex regulatory frameworks can result in arbitrary or discriminatory application, exposing citizens to severe penalties for minor or unintentional violations. This undermines public trust in the legal system and diverts resources away from prosecuting serious violent crime. A more effective approach to public safety respects constitutional boundaries while focusing on evidence-based solutions: enforcing existing laws, targeting violent offenders, improving mental health interventions, and strengthening community-based crime prevention. Protecting constitutional rights and promoting public safety are not mutually exclusive; in fact, they are best achieved together. In conclusion, anti-gun laws are unconstitutional because they infringe upon a fundamental right explicitly protected by the Second Amendment. They are also ineffective as public policy, burdening lawful citizens while failing to address the underlying drivers of violence. A constitutional, balanced approach is both legally sound and more likely to produce lasting improvements in public safety.

I oppose this bill. I stand with VCDL on each of these bills.

With due respect to those who reportedly represent the people of this fine state, As a Veteran of the United States Navy I swore an oath to protect and uphold to Constitution of the United States! That’s oath has no expiration. I fully support the right and responsibility of a free people to the right to bear arms. Any member of political office who truly represents the American people who are in fact their constituents should also fully support and defend the right of a free people to bear arms. All the proposed bills being reviewed today are an infringement on those rights and will do nothing to make the lives of good people better. They will only restrict the freedom of law, abiding citizens, while doing nothing to prevent crime as the definition of a criminal is an individual who does not follow or respect the rule of law. As a veteran who served this great country, I am very much ashamed of the direction that politicians have gone in, trying to restrict the freedoms and the quality of life that myself and other members of the military fought to uphold so it is with all due respect that I strongly encourage these these bills to be rejected. Thank you for the opportunity to serve and express my views. Mr Jeffrey Nortman. Franklin county.

All of these measures will cost a large amount of money to fund and enforce. This goes against the message the governor ran on of affordability for the state and living in it. This will also only affect people who already abide by the laws the state has in place. Criminals will not abide by these laws. Criminals will continue to disobey the law, and will possibly put legal gun owners at risk when they cannot defend themselves. If we are going to charge gun manufacturers for crimes committed by individuals using their products, we need to do the same with the spirits industry involving cases where a drunk driver kills someone, after they have left a bar.

I stand with VCDL on all bills

I support the points the VCDL makes. Delegate Helmer is a liar and a coward. Delegate Cole is a coward that blocks people because he cannot handle Logic pointing how he is dishonest and ignorant.

As a concerned Virginia resident, I am deeply concerned with the bills introduced regarding firearm legislation. These bills I feel are only hurting law abiding citizens and will not help with gun violence by criminals. It seems like the laws that have been introduced to punish criminals have been voted down but laws that will hurt the average legal Virginian continue to advance. I would ask that you please consider to vote no on these introduced bills. Thank you.

I strongly oppose any of the bills that infringe on the 2nd amendment. The only people that these bill affect are law abiding citizens. Criminals and ill willed people don’t get their guns legally. Why should I be punished for never committing a crime? More gun control makes our state that more unsafe and will not solve any of the issues that the patrons of the bills are wanting to solve. Taking more rights away from law abiding citizens is just a way to reward the criminals. Thank you for your time Steve Bennett Spotsylvania county

I respectfully request you oppose these unreasonable and overly restrictive anti-gun bills which are unnecessary and violate or 2nd Amendment rights. Gun owners are responsible citizens. We already have laws that adequately address crimes and harmful actions by people. We need to remember that people conduct these crimes, not inanimate objects. Heavy automobiles kill people regularly but we don’t try to outlaw them. Virginia needs to remain a state that respects the rights of our responsible citizens. Thanks

I oppose all of these. I have been a gun owner for over 20 years. I've never broken a law aside from a moving violation. Why should I have to give up a constitutional right. When this state now wants to protect others who have broken the law. I can not believe we have elected a man who wished harm on someone else and their children. He is the one who shouldn't have a gun. Anything can be an assault weapon , should we next limit cars to not go over 65 mph? Someone could hurt a lot of people with those too. My point is the problem is the people, not the guns.

As a concealed carry weapons owner I oppose each of these bills, except 1303. Do not take away the 2A rights of legal gun owners. People cause harm, not the equipment used to do it. We have a right to defend our homes and families; and many rely on gaming with our guns to feed our families (although I’m sure you will find a way to tax that too!)

As a concealed carry weapons owner I oppose each of these bills, except 1303. Do not take away the 2A rights of legal gun owners. People cause harm, not the equipment used to do it. We have a right to defend our homes and families; and many rely on gaming with our guns to feed our families (although I’m sure you will find a way to tax that too!)

As a concealed carry weapons owner I oppose each of these bills, except 1303. Do not take away the 2A rights of legal gun owners. People cause harm, not the equipment used to do it. We have a right to defend our homes and families; and many rely on gaming with our guns to feed our families (although I’m sure you will find a way to tax that too!)

I would encourage the members of this committee, and most particularly the sponsors of the bills being considered, to reflect upon what their goals are when evaluating these items. If thoughts of “safety” come to mind, I would then encourage members to consider matters which address criminal behavior(sentencing guidelines, support for law enforcement, etc). Arbitrarily setting magazine capacity limits, withdrawing concealed carry permit reciprocity, or establishing a purchase permit system does not protect the general public from criminals who do not follow these laws. Setting magazine capacity limits to make the world safer is like trying to limit greenhouse gas emissions by enacting gas tank volume limits. Mr Helmer appears to like to tout his military service, particularly when speaking about his bills. As a fellow veteran I find this repugnant, and it makes me question his frame of reference. Anyone who has been in the military understands that merely having served(a great and noble act regardless) does not equate into automatically being an expert in firearms. Most particularly in how their regulation in the continental US affects things like violent crime. Over my career in law-enforcement, I’ve seen firsthand the regard criminals have for the law, as well as the way they capitalize when others are handicapped by it. Enacting barriers to make it more difficult to lawfully obtain firearms, or banning ones that are very commonly owned(and turning untold amounts of people into criminals overnight) will not make anyone safer. Through this evaluation, one could easily begin to suspect that claims of making things safer by nature of this legislation are at a minimum ill-informed, if not completely disingenuous. While the former could be explained by possible good intentions driven by emotion or misunderstanding, the latter is naturally of more sinister nature. Such an accusation cannot be made lightly, but it must be considered when examining the facts. Thus I call on the members of this committee to do a thorough self reflection on what their goals are, and how the bills being considered will affect law abiding Virginians.

As a concealed carry weapons owner I oppose each of these bills, except 1303. Do not take away the 2A rights of legal gun owners. People cause harm, not the equipment used to do it. We have a right to defend our homes and families; and many rely on gaming with our guns to feed our families (although I’m sure you will find a way to tax that too!)

I'm a volunteer with Moms Demand Action and I support these bills. Thank you to the patrons.

I am a longterm resident and homeowner in the commonwealth of Virginia. I am a wife, a mother, and a teacher. I also am an advocate for our constitutional rights, especially the second amendment. I open carry often and have had my conceal carry permit for over 5 years. I have read the laws and stayed as up to date on the topic as I can. It seems these days that people are making decisions based on emotions rather than logic. “Shall not be infringed” is clear as clear can be. If that’s not clear enough, look at the cities and states with the strictest gun laws. Those are the most violent areas with the greatest rate of criminal activity. Emotional decisions come with the gravest outcomes. Look at the countries throughout the world fighting for their lives. They are the ones who have lost their right to bear arms. Do not dig our own grave by ignoring our constitutional rights. It is your duty to uphold the constitution, not let your emotions drive you to treason. Respect the constitution and respect the second amendment in its entirety. Nothing less. Thank you.

I STRONGLY OPPOSE ALL OF THESE BILLS. I agree with VCDL stance on all of these bills. They are unconstitutional!

I strongly oppose all of these bills except for HB1303. These proposed changes will do nothing to make our Commonwealth safer, if anything it will become more dangerous for all. HB217 is an egregious attempt at violating our constitutionally protected right. Using the justification that other states have enacted similar laws is a weak argument since these bans do not pass review using the Bruen standard established by the US Supreme Court. The bills fail the two part test required by Bruen. The first part requires looking at whether the conduct is covered by the plain text of the second amendment. Which these bills are blatantly unconstitutional, since it would impede our ability to keep and bear arms. The second part requires historical analogues of founding era laws restricting ownership of commonly owned arms. Of which, there are no laws from that era to outright ban entire classes of firearms. Furthermore, the state should not waste millions of taxpayer dollars that will inevitably be exhausted attempting to defend a set of unconstitutional laws that the courts will rule in favor of we the people of the commonwealth of Virginia in the end.

These bills should all be opposed. Refer to the opinion issued by the Attorney General on why HB217 and HB1359 are unconstitutional and would not survive scrutiny by the Supreme Court based on the Bruen decision. HB217 bans firearms which are in “common use” and constitutionally protected. HB1359 should not require a license to exercise a constitutionally protected right. This is true whether to speak freely, protest, be free from search and seizure, or keep and bare arms. https://www.oag.state.va.us/files/Opinions/2026/26-001-Webert-issued.pdf HB40 is masquerading as “ghost gun” bill but bans historic and antique firearms which may be hundreds of years old and made before serial numbers were even conceived. Requiring antique firearms to be serialized will destroy both history and their value. Additionally this bill will ban the home production of personal firearms, of which Virginia has a rich history. There is no “history and tradition” of banning firearm manufacturing for personal use, and this bill will or stand up to constitutional scrutiny.

HB19 Misdemeanors should never take away a civil right. OPPOSE HB21 This bill allows one of the most highly regulated industries, the firearms industry, to be sued civilly for a variety of already illegal actions. No way to foresee what the actions of a third party might be; good or bad. OPPOSE. HB40 Specifying the material from which a firearm is constructed doesn't contribute to public safety. OPPOSE. HB 110 . It’s still a crime to burglarize an automobile so why not targe the burglar? The car owner should not be at fault even if a criminal opens an unlocked car door to steal a firearm. It is the criminal who is solely to blame. OPPOSE. HB 217 VA has no problem to solve and this solution doesn't make VA measurably safer targeting law abiding owners. The U.S. Supreme Court has said in both DC v Heller, and recently The New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v Bruen, that any firearm 'in common use' is protected by the Second Amendment. The guns and magazines targeted by this bill are among the most common guns and magazines in the United States, making this bill unconstitutional. OPPOSE. HB 702 This is a waste of money as there is no measure of success. If a person wants to sell their guns there are plenty of qualified buyers that will pay the market price. OPPOSE. HB 969 Additional government bureaucracy that has an ill-defined mission and no measure of success. Funded by law abiding citizens rather than felons. Also, guns are incapable of violence. OPPOSE. HB 1359 We have instant background check and by all accounts it works fine with little delay in the process. We don’t need additional bureaucracy in the middle. Further, we don’t need permits for any other basic rights guaranteed by the US and VA constitutions, why this one? Don’t our constitutions keep the government’s hands off? OPPOSE.

Dear Legislators While I am fairly sure all of these bills were created with the thought of public safety but one will never be able to legislate morality. Many of these bills take law abiding citizens and turn them into felons..I do not support any of these bills as they are a clear violation of the second amendment which id remind you of the oath you swore to uphold that constitution.

I oppose any bill that limits a Virginian’s ability to exercise their 2nd Amendment rights. They only affect law abiding citizens.

I agree with the VCDL on these bills!

The creators of these bills. Have backgrounds in Law,Finance,etc. They are wordy long meaningless statements. Often contradicting one another.Serving to confuse the citizen firearm owner on what is lawful,not lawful,what is legal,illegal..Where can I carry a firearm and not carry..This is a tactic that legislators use with all bills,laws, Example, The reciprocity bill. Reciprocity is harmless ..The Creator of this bill saw something and decided to make a harmless entity.into a big deal..This is the mentality of the design plan of all of the anti gun bills. The creator of the reciprocity bill does not understand, not willing to understand the benefits of reciprocity. It is the same with all creators of the bad bills..Create wordy legalese mumbo jumbo.That sounds intellectual at first read but are actually hollow words.The end goal is to ban firearms which cannot be done outright but make it difficult enough so citizens will not bother owning a firearm..The founders kept the law simple because they knew the common man had to understand there rights .But as you can see lawyers judicial system complicated it with addendums to the addendum so the common man no longer understands the law and has to be confused on what lawful or not..

These bill are yet another example of government overreach. The constitution of the United States of America is very clear. "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, SHALL NOT be infringed." These bills are in clear violation of our rights and will only affect law abiding citizens, not criminals who they're supposedly supposed to affect. I urge you to stand up for what is right and stand up for the oath you took to uphold our constitution.

I object to bills HB 21, 40, 969, and especially 217, 1359 on the basis that they are unconstitutional and do not represent the best interests of the law abiding citizens of the Commonwealth of Virginia. While the remaining bills with the exception of hb 1300 and 1303 have their own issues, I wish to focus my comments on the most significant infringements to both the second amendment as well as to our own state constitution. Starting with HB 1359, this bill as written effectively bans individuals who do not currently own firearms from being able to in the future. The current language of the bill bans rentals, which are commonly used for training and educational purposes, but also requires live fire training before a permit may be issued. Even with this issue resolved, the process laid out for the application and obtaining of a permit to purchase a firearm is an undue and unreasonable burden. In cases where urgency is required because someone justifiably believes themselves to be in danger there would not be time for the full process. Additionally, this process would limit firearms purchases to only those individuals with the time and resources to be able to afford expensive training courses. A single mother working multiple jobs to support her family may not have the time or money to spare for this process but still has a right to defend herself and her family. Furthermore, similar laws have already been struck down by the US Supreme Court in other states, see New York Rifle and Pistol Association vs Bruen. These are but a few of the issues with this bill. HB 217's ban on certain firearms and magazines would not only be unconstitutional, with similar bans on items in common use having been struck down in other states, but also would do little to reduce crime. According to commonly available statistics, use of these weapons in criminal activity accounts for an almost negligible fraction of overall crime involving firearms. HB 21 creates an absurd precedent that would allow for law abiding businesses to be sued for crimes committed by outside individuals. As written, this would be equivalent to someone suing an auto parts store for selling seat covers found in a vehicle that was used in a DUI incident. Furthermore, this unfairly impacts small, family own businesses who may now have the same amount of resources to fight spurious lawsuits this bill would allow. Many of these businesses are heavily involved in educating and training law abiding citizens on firearms safety. Especially in combination with bill 1359, the disappearance of these businesses would make proper training incredibly difficult to obtain. HB 40 would ban individuals from manufacturing their own firearms, a right that has always existed. The current wording of this bill also creates a potential for severe overreach with the wording around materials that could be made in to firearms. The phrasing "may readily be completed, assembled, or otherwise converted to function as a frame or receiver" is overly vague and could be construed to include raw materials such as sheet metal, etc. HB 969 does not directly infringe upon the rights of the citizens of the Commonwealth as the above bills do, but is a solution looking for a problem. Violent crime in general is already extensively studied, and the creation of a Gun Violence Prevention Center would only waste taxpayer funds to create a policy center with an incentive to come up with ways and reasons for future infringements.

I side with the VCDL’s position on these gun bills. I oppose all gun control efforts. As a Federally Licensed Dealer, all of these bills will either make my costs higher or end all or most commerce in the Firearms Industry. Individually: HB19- misdemeanors should not remove firearms rights HB21 - this bill will skyrocket liability insurance and effectively end all firearm business in Virginia. Advertising alone could be used in spurious lawsuits. Dealers already have more regulation than necessary. Additionally, there is no exemption for LE or Military or agency sales. HB40 - since PMF (privately made firearms) are legal and their numbers are unknown, this is unenforceable. There are no serials on the prior produced units. As a Dealer, I will not touch these for both liability and federal excise tax. As a gunsmith, we will not work on these already. I will not take these in as I do not want my credentials marked on these units. Bruen requires a historical review- citizens have always been able to produce their own firearms in America. HB93 This bill is poorly written and will bar often lawful ownership from access to firearms should another person in the household be convicted. HB110 victims of crimes should not be penalized for thefts or attacks. Stop limiting carry in buildings and the firearms will not get stolen. HB217 - this bill is why the 2nd Amendment exists. This bill will NOT meet the Bruen test, This Bill is substantially different than MD’s ban as compared to in the senate meeting, This bill will effectively ban 90% of the most common firearms and magazines. In Virginia it is estimated that 75% of the magazines already here will be prohibited- there are millions of these magazines. The arbitrary “features” ban represents an abuse of power. This bill will also undermine commerce in Virginia. HB229 disarming law abiding citizens creates a higher risk of attack in places where often mentally unstable individuals and criminals congregate. HB626 adults in college should not be disarmed for seeking higher education HB702 creates a slush fund that should not destroy otherwise valuable property which could be lawfully sold to dealers. This bill encourages waste. HB871 bruen decision requirements will not be met by this bill- Americans can conduct their homes as they see fit. Also, most owners already have safes that are often better than the cheap biometric ones. HB969 - these organizations not only represent a waste of time, money, and resources, they historically only undermine commerce while using taxpayer funds to work against the interests of the people. This is a slush fund. HB 1303 45 days is plenty as it is. A right delayed is a right denied. HB1359 permitting will not survive the bruen test. We should not have to get a background check before getting a background check to buy a gun. This bill potentially also creates a 45day to 2 month lag in business that could end many retailers business in virginia. This bill is unconstitutional.

We The People of Virginia would like to remind you that the 2nd Amendment CLEARLY states, "Shall Not be Infringed" yet you continually attempt to Infringe on the 2nd Amendment which is CLEARLY a BLATANT and Willful VIOLATION of the 2nd Amendment. We The People will not stand for the violation of our rights. Need we remind you of your oaths off office and to the Constitution....If you violate our rights you will be held liable. Do not pass these bills. Sic Semper Tyrannis.

I do not want my taxes to fund yet another agency. Rather, let our law enforcement organizations enforce the laws already established.

HB 969, Delegate Price, creates a state agency named the Virginia Gun Violence Prevention Center. The Center would only be targeting violence committed using firearms and ignoring the root causes of crime, as well as all the other ways violence is inflicted on victims – knives, blunt objects, hands and feet, etc. Half of violent crimes are not committed with a firearm! The term “Gun Violence” in the name of the agency gives away the true agenda: “gun violence” is a term coined by the gun-control lobby to blame guns, which are inanimate objects, and not the criminals that misuse guns. If a police officer shoots someone, the officer gets the blame, not his gun. But, if a criminal shoots someone, the gun gets the blame and not the criminal. No one says, “tire iron violence” or “hand and feet violence.” Instead, it is just called “violence.” But there is a disarmament agenda with firearms and “gun violence” is just an excuse to go after firearms with more useless gun control. HB 1303, Delegate Ware, sets 90 days as the maximum number of days that the Virginia State Police can take when processing a non-resident concealed handgun permit. If the permit has not yet been approved after 90 days, then the permit is issued at that point. If the applicant is later found to be disqualified, the permit is revoked, and the applicant has to return it. Currently there is no limit and people have had to wait well over 6 to 8 months to get a permit issued! In fact, in June of 2021 the State Police had this on their website: "DUE TO A HIGH VOLUME OF APPLICATIONS, THE CURRENT PROCESSING TIME FOR NONRESIDENT CONCEALED HANDGUN PERMITS IS 5 TO 6 MONTHS." No other state that issues non-resident permits has an unlimited time to do so! The maximum time for other states to issue a non-resident permit runs from 14 days to 90 days. As a reference, residents pay a maximum of $50 and the permit must be issued in 45 days. The non-resident permit fee is $100. 90 days is more than sufficient for the State Police to issue a non-resident permit. Currently the State Police are issuing non-resident permits in less than 90 days, but it is important to set some kind of limit. HB 1359, Delegate Hope, requires a person to have a permit to purchase a firearm (“permit”), which is good for 5 years. To qualify for a permit, the applicant must have had his fingerprints taken and have had firearms training within the last two years. The training must be approved by the Department of Criminal Justice Services and include live fire of at least 10 rounds. Persons under 21-years-old cannot apply for a permit and are thus prohibited from buying firearms. A person renting a gun, persons with dual residency, and out of state residents purchasing long guns must have a permit. In a private sale, the purchaser must have a verified permit. The State Police can charge whatever fee they feel covers their cost in processing the permit application and can take as long as 45 days to issue the permit. Local law enforcement will be notified that you have been issued or denied a permit. This bill adds new misdemeanor prohibitors from getting a permit. The bill also removes the exemption from One Handgun a Month by CHP holders. This bill will get innocent people killed, as it will take at least two months

I've been working in healthcare for up to 40 some years and say the biggest issue that we have this truck related to death and alcohol-related deaths, I see more stabbings than I do gunshots. As a proud Jewish American I also am against this abandoning and outlawing of certain firearms due to their style and look and how they are fed. I'm also against the magazine restriction that y'all want to put in place. I'm also against wanting to raise the tax rate on purchasing firearms and ammunition. Reason being my grandfather had his firearms/weapons taken away from him in Germany and was told the government would keep them safe and fed... this was not the case has later on they were rounded up and stuck in camps and had no means to protect themselves when they came through and pulled them from their homes and their families. I never got to meet him or an uncle of mine. I did not want to have a government tell me what I can and can't have to protect my family and loved ones when the biggest issue we have right now here in America is law enforcement going door to door ripping families apart and deporting them and the current drug epidemic we have in our country. If you really support and care about the safety and lives of the American people and The Virginian residence you allow them to have and use what they think is best to protect them and their families.

While each bill is presented as a discrete public-safety measure, taken together they represent an overbroad and legally fragile expansion of firearm regulation that exposes the Commonwealth to constitutional, fiscal, and enforcement risks without a demonstrated link to reduced violent crime. 1. Constitutional vulnerability and litigation risk Several proposals regulate possession, transfer, manufacture, or availability of arms and components that are in common lawful use or impose liability standards untethered from criminal intent. This places the Commonwealth on unstable ground under modern Second Amendment jurisprudence, which requires historical analogues and narrow tailoring. Enacting multiple overlapping restrictions increases the likelihood that a single successful challenge could invalidate broad portions of the framework, wasting legislative effort and public funds. 2. Overcriminalization of lawful conduct Bills addressing storage, vehicle possession, transfers, and manufacturing sweep broadly enough to penalize responsible, non-violent citizens for technical or situational violations. This diverts law-enforcement resources away from violent offenders and undermines respect for the law by treating lawful ownership as presumptively suspect rather than protected conduct. 3. Enforcement ambiguity and regulatory incoherence The combined effect is a patchwork of prohibitions, civil penalties, and standards that are difficult for citizens to understand and for law enforcement to apply consistently. Vague or expansive definitions—particularly regarding firearm components, classifications, and “responsible conduct” standards—invite selective enforcement and uneven application across jurisdictions, raising due-process and equal-protection concerns. 4. Civil liability expansion without fault Imposing novel civil liability on firearm industry participants for downstream criminal misuse departs from established principles of proximate cause. Such provisions risk collapsing lawful commerce through litigation pressure rather than adjudicated wrongdoing, exposing the Commonwealth to economic harm and predictable constitutional challenges. 5. Weak alignment with public-safety outcomes The proposals do not meaningfully address repeat violent offenders, illegal trafficking networks, or prosecutorial follow-through—areas with the strongest evidence of impact on gun violence. Programs such as buy-backs and new administrative centers risk becoming symbolic expenditures with limited measurable return. 6. Disparate impact and equity concerns Complex compliance regimes disproportionately burden lower-income and rural residents who lack ready access to legal counsel, storage infrastructure, or permitting resources, resulting in inequitable enforcement outcomes without corresponding public-safety benefits. Conclusion If the General Assembly’s objective is violence reduction, these bills should be rejected or substantially narrowed in favor of constitutionally durable measures focused on violent-crime enforcement and due-process protections. As drafted, the package increases legal exposure, enforcement confusion, and public distrust while offering minimal demonstrable benefit.

I do not support any further restrictions on our second amendment rights. It is a right given to us by God and guaranteed by the VA and US constitution. This constant attack on our second amendment rights is an illegal immoral nuisance and it seems to me an attack on the people who enjoy using their second amendment rights. These bills do nothing to make us safer. I further note that while allowing far more latitude for criminal behavior in sentencing this legislative body seems intent on disarming innocent civilians making them more vulnerable to the criminals being released. One additional point. Several of these bills would make almost all modern firearms illegal with out any grandfather clause, thus immediately making people who have done nothing wrong liable for criminal prosecution. This further leads me to to believe that this is a veiled attack on people that this legislative body doesn’t like vs an attempt at public safety.

I stand in firm opposition to these bills, which both infringe upon my protected rights, and squander taxpayer money both in defending against the inevitable lawsuits that will follow in their wake should they pass, and in establishing state sponsored programs that will accomplish virtually nothing, save to take a slap at the faces of lawful gun owners and supporters of the Constitution, both state and federal. These various bill cannot withstand the strict scrutiny standard that the Supreme Court has established with regard to second amendment issues. They will tie up resources better spent elsewhere in protracted court battles that will inevitably end with such legislation being overturned. Virginia does not have an "assault weapons" problem, nor a problem with ownership of standard capacity magazines, that is those holding more than ten rounds. There is likewise no pressing issue with infractions of existing laws by legal firearms owners, particularly concealed carry permit holders. Thus, there is no need to call for any additional licensing, notwithstanding the demonstrable fact that criminal elements of the population would ignore such requirements, regardless of the penalties. Then there is the matter of the takings clause, as thousands, of not tens of thousands of Virginians would have the value of their property destroyed, or have their property taken without recompense. Barring any grandfathering of already owned firearms and magazines, this places the state in an even more precarious legal position. Finally these laws smack of being ex post facto in nature, turning otherwise law abiding citizens into criminals overnight, simply for continuing in the possession, or in activities that were entirely legal previously. These laws appear to be nothing short of punitive in nature, intended not to improve public safety, but to cause maximum pain towards political opponents and defenders of liberty.

What is being presented today supports a decline of freedom for law abiding citizens. Criminals dont follow laws therefore these carry zero weight on the people who would choose to abuse our rights and freedoms. These laws will restrict law abiding citizens of their right to protect ourselves, our families, and our property. These bills also go against the constitutions 2nd amendment for us to bear arms and it states "it shall NOT be infringed". As this legislation seeks to make it harder for law abiding citizens to practice their 2nd amendment rights and decrease law abiding citizens freedoms you same people are trying to limit minimum sentences for some of the worst criminals. I ask you.... Why do your actions work against law abiding Virginians, to limit our recourse against those who would do us harm and at the same time work to assit criminals? Your allegiance is logically and morally askew.

I agree with the VCDL on these bills!

Restricting free ownership and bearing of firearms is blatantly unconstitutional. “Shall not be infringed” does not come with any “except for” situations. Any American citizen should have the ability to own and carry any firearm they wish without any restriction as the Constitution intends. Morality cannot be legislated and individual freedom is of the highest priority. Citizens should have the freedom (and they do, per the constitution) to have the firearm of their choosing with a magazine size of their choosing as well. As the state motto is “Sic Semper Tyrannis” this nation was built on refusing tyranny from government oppressors. Most of the proposed bills already have Supreme Court precedent as being unconstitutional. The right thing to do is immediately withdraw every firearm related bill from consideration immediately.

As a Virginian and US Marine Corps veteran, I urge you to OPPOSE "gun control" bills in your committee. An "assault weapons" ban, arbitrary magazine restrictions, "reasonable standards" for firearms businesses, a "permit to purchase," and others, do nothing to address crime in the Commonwealth. Bills like these only target law-abiding firearm owners and businesses. I request that you instead pursue legislation that HOLDS CRIMINALS ACCOUNTABLE for their crimes and establishes substantial penalties for criminal activity, NOT legislation that targets law-abiding citizens. I urge you to OPPOSE gun control in your committee and support our Constitutional right to keep and bear arms.

All of these bills infringe on my 2nd Amendment rights. I'm a retired Chesterfield County Police Officer and I see nothing that these bills can do to lower "gun crime". What needs to be done is to pass laws that will go after the criminals that misuse firearms. All of these bills along with their companions in the senate will only reduce the availability of firearms that the good law-abiding citizens of the Commonwealth want to own. HB21 will shut down the firearm and firearm accessory business here. As a retired police officer an AR-15 is an excellent firearm to own for the shooting sports and self defense along with other lawful activities. If I could carry one in my patrol car, I should be able to have access to one at home as well. I should also be able to purchase them in the future along with standard capacity magazines. Oppose HB217! HB1359 is totally unnecessary. I've lived in Virginia for almost 40 years and I see no point in this law. This is a back door registration that I'm sure will extend to having to have this permit to purchase ammunition, accessories, and firearm possession in the future. It will add more expense to trying to buy a firearm. The infringements that this bill if it becomes law will be unlimited. You want people to be properly trained with firearms but these bills will keep people away from that goal. As a police officer I carried a Glock with a 15 round standard capacity magazine, a Remington 870, and an Armalite AR-15 with 30 round standard capacity magazines. As a citizen of this Commonwealth I should have the same ability to have those firearms at my disposal as well. My fellow gun owners should have the same options. All firearms are dangerous to use. All firearms can be considered "weapons of war". I received firearm training from father when I was young, then more training in the Marine Corps, then even more training with the police department. Having worked at a shooting range, many gun owners came to practice to become proficient in handling firearms. These laws will prevent citizens from participating in their 2nd Amendment rights.

I stand with the VCDL and GOA. The proposed bills are tyrannical, these bills make it only harder on law abiding citizens. All gun laws are infringements on the Second Amendment. Just Remembering History” On April 21, 1775, Virginia’s Royal Governor, Lord Dunmore, ordered British marines to seize gunpowder from the Williamsburg powder magazine to prevent a colonial uprising. This "Gunpowder Incident" enraged colonists, leading to militia mobilization under Patrick Henry, forcing a payment for the powder and accelerating Virginia's march toward revolution. “

Please vote yes for all the gun sense bills. The time is now to make our communities safer! Every single one of these bills respects the second amendment. Moms Demand Action also respects the second amendment.

I do not support any bill that restricts my ability to keep and bear a firearm. Assault weapon bans, and other restrictions are unconstitutional under the original US Constitution and further under the Bruen decision. These bills will be defeated in court. Having the AG spend my tax payer dollar to defend a tyrannical law is not what an affordable Virginia means to me. Wife and I have donated lots of $ to gun rights groups to fight this now and in the courts. Please honor your VA and US constitutional duties.

My name is Gayatri Manoharan, I am a Fairfax Co resident and a Moms Demand Action volunteer. I support the bills listed above. Thank you to the patrons.

Responsible gun ownership is on the rise among Virginians of all diverse backgrounds, sexual orientations, and political affiliations. This is not the time to restrict access to firearm ownership, especially in light of recent events in which the federal government has displayed attacks on First and Second Amendment rights. Passing of all of these bills would only further distrust in our government and leadership across all communities. This would only strip law-abiding Virginians of their ability to control their own safety and that of their families and communities. I oppose all bills that restrict access to commonly owned firearms, invade personal privacy and data, or impose unreasonable financial burdens on the ability to exercise our Second Amendment rights. Remember our state motto.

This bill creates a center within the Department of Criminal Justice Services that would gather research, strategies, and best practices for Community Violence Intervention Programs and grant funds for community-based programs. We SUPPORT this bill as CVIs have proven to be incredibly effective in deterring gun violence.

I oppose all the anti-2nd amendment bills being considered. These bills will limit and in some cases strip me of my Constitutional right to keep and bear arms, especially if there is no grandfather clause included in the bills

HB19- I Vote/stand AGAINST this bill to add random "intimate partners" into the mix HB21 - I Vote/stand AGAINST this bill, we do not hold any other industry to this standard its discriminatory to hold the firearms community to it. HB40 - I Vote/stand AGAINST this bill as there is already federal law relating to serializing firearms. HB93 - I Vote/stand AGAINST this bill as it could endanger the family or other inhabitants of a home by leaving them defenseless HB217 - I Vote/stand AGAINST this bill in its entirety, Heller and Bruen decisions by the SCOTUS are VERY clear in the protections of "in common use" the sheer "desire" for this bill shows the fact these arms are in common use. HB701 - I Vote/stand AGAINST this bill, the state should be force to SELL not destroy the firearms, thus creating revenue for the state and removing another tax burden from its citizens. HB871 - I Vote/stand AGAINST this bill, the state already has laws in place to deal with this for minors (endangerment) the government has NO place making decisions inside a citizens home. HB969 - I Vote/stand AGAINST this bill, as the legislature refuses to keep minimum sentence requirements for violent criminals, a prevention fund is a moot point HB1303 - I Vote/stand FOR this bill, if the state police cna not accomplish this task in 90 days there is a clear lack of competency in the agency. HB1359 - I Vote/stand AGAINST this bill, no other constitutional right is EVER subject to a fee for the state. This is nothing more than a play to extort citizens and create a gun registry to be used for unknown purposes.

I respectfully oppose Virginia House Bills HB19, HB21, HB40, HB93, HB110, HB217, HB229, HB626, HB702, HB871, HB969, HB1300, HB1303, and HB1359 for the following reasons: 1. Undermining Fundamental Rights Without Clear Justification Several of these bills (e.g., HB19, HB21, HB40, HB93, HB217, HB1359) impose new and expansive restrictions on the purchase, possession, transfer, manufacture, and sale of firearms and related items. These proposals, including potential bans on commonly owned semi-automatic firearms and requirements for civil liability standards on lawful businesses, risk infringing on Virginians’ constitutional rights without clear evidence that they will reduce violent crime or improve public safety. Laws regulating firearms must be narrowly tailored, respect due process, and align with constitutional protections; sweeping and punitive restrictions do not meet that standard. 2. Overly Broad Criminal Penalties and Civil Liabilities Bills such as HB21 create standards of “responsible conduct” with vague criteria that could expose lawful industry members to civil liability for nearly any outcome. This creates unreasonable legal risk for businesses operating within existing federal and state laws and could chill lawful commerce. Ambiguous legal standards harm predictability and fairness in our legal system. 3. Expansion of Regulatory Burdens Without Demonstrated Benefit Provisions in bills like HB110 (unattended firearm in vehicle civil penalty), HB229 (health data collection duties), and HB871 (storage or related provisions) extend regulatory reach into areas that are already covered by existing law or established best practices. Imposing new penalties or requirements without strong data showing a public benefit contributes to unnecessary complexity in the legal code and may divert law-enforcement resources from more impactful public-safety priorities. 4. Risk of Unintended Consequences for Law-Abiding Citizens Many of these bills expand what qualifies as prohibited conduct or expand definitions of prohibited persons in ways that risk penalizing individuals who have not demonstrated a threat to public safety. For example, expanding liability or prohibitions based on association with an industry, ownership of lawful equipment, or civil data-reporting burdens can cast too wide a net and punish responsible citizens. Public policy must balance safety with fairness in application. 5. Lack of Clear Evidence Supporting Policy Changes Committees are reviewing many of these measures early in the session, and there is not yet a robust public record of bipartisan evaluation or impact analyses demonstrating that these bills will achieve stated policy goals more effectively than existing law. Responsible governance requires empirical support for expanding penalties and regulations — especially where constitutional rights are implicated. In conclusion, while Virginians are committed to public safety, effective legislation must be evidence-based, constitutional, and carefully scaled to address specific harms. These bills, as currently drafted, create broad regulatory frameworks, new criminal liabilities, and unclear standards that threaten individual liberties, burden lawful commerce, and could redirect enforcement resources without clear benefit. For these reasons, I urge legislators to reconsider, substantially revise, or reject these proposals.

I support and agree with the VCDL on these bills.

The semi auto magazine bill would turn thousands of LAW ABIDING citizens into law breakers. Is that the role of legislators. What was once legal and then make it illegal with the stroke of a pen. Government system does not work like that.A million gun owners Democrat and Republican will be affected. Time finance,paying taxes into local, state economy, training wasted because of a legislative elected power grab. 11 percent tax on ammo,500 dollar suppressors. The new admin claims to want to end discrimination for citizens. And lower costs ..Yet again legal firearm owners are placed in a class of discrimination..Protect every other right but the rights of firearm ownership. Why is it that that every new anti firearm law placed the burden on a law abiding citizen? The concealed permit bill restricting other states and Virginia will have the negative effect of the reciprocating state rescinding reciprocity.This is a good program .Yet it is a ridiculous bill that the author has no clue of what they have created. Why were ex ,retired police officers exempt from these bad bills?Policing is a hard job . But ex or retired police means relegated to citizen status. The flurry of bills is a result of the giddy power effect of I can do this because I can. Discriminating and favoring certain classes is a civil infraction and illegal . This is what is happening right now.All who favor the gun bills .Think..Of the discrimination against firearm owners . And then decide thank you

I agree with the VCDL on these bills.

I oppose all of these bills. The focus of these bills is criminalizing ordinary law abiding citizens while not enforcing harsher punishments for actual criminals.

I stand with the Virginia Citizens Defense League on these bills.

I oppose these bills. HB 217 and HB 1359, in particular, are egregiously unconstitutional and contrary to clear U.S. Supreme Court precedent. It is difficult to overstate the shocking breadth of HB 217. It bans the most popular civilian rifles in the United States. It also bans the standard magazines for essentially all modern handguns. Approximately 45% of Virginian adults have firearms in their household. Given that this law impacts nearly all modern handgun magazines (as well as standard magazines for many of the most popular rifles), it is likely that 20-30% of Virginians, if not more, possess arms that would be banned under this law. Criminalizing the conduct and lifestyle of 20-30% of all Commonwealth citizens is not reasonable, is not moderate, and certainly does not represent common sense. It is also clearly unconstitutional under the U.S. Supreme Court's decisions in District of Columbia v. Heller and New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, which forbid bans on arms in common use. Finally, there is no evidence that these laws would reduce crime or promote safety. Regarding HB 1359, the law's unconstitutionality is self-evident. It forbids anyone from exercising their most basic Second Amendment rights unless they go through an expensive and lengthy permitting process--apparently on a repeated basis. The Commonwealth could not constitutionally forbid all citizens from buying books unless they first go through lengthy, costly, and intrusive permitting processes. It can no more do the same for constitutionally protected arms under the Second Amendment.

I oppose HB 969. Creating a new bureaucracy focused exclusively on firearms risks misdiagnosing violence as an object-based problem rather than addressing criminal behavior, mental health, and repeat violent offenders.

So frist of all how can a lying governor who has went against everything she promised in her campaign . Trying to take our guns away this is va so good luck with that we have this thing called the second amendment an our rights shouldn’t be fringed upon. Then they all gonna double there pay that’s why she’s goin to raise taxes in the state to pay for that. People won’t move to Va company’s won’t move to Va with taxes the highest in the us. She needs to be removed from office as she didn’t not comply with the promises she’s has done. If she’s all about having illegals here let them live with her an the rest of her crew. Nobody else wants them here. Every thing our great president is doin she is undermining them. Va we can’t let her go on we need governor youngkin back in office for good he made Va great

I’m a left-wing voter. You won the House and Senate because of Trump’s lawlessness—not because I wanted assault weapon bans, not because I wanted 10-round magazine limits, not because I wanted biometric safe mandates. You do not have a mandate on guns. If you pass any of these bills without grandfather clauses, you will turn law-abiding citizens into criminals for items they purchased legally. I will never vote Democratic again, and I will march. At a moment when we may need to resist actual tyranny, you’re ensuring only the right remains armed. This is political malpractice.

I support Bill HB1303. I oppose bills HB19, HB21, HB40, HB93, HB110, HB217, HB229, HB626, HB702, HB871, HB969, HB1300, and HB1359.

I oppose these bills. They are clearly modeled after failed policies and have no track record of “saving lives” . Criminals and the like will simply go to one of the surrounding states to get whatever they want. Where is the logic in taking someone’s firearm they have owned for decades when they have no criminal history? How did a ten round magazine limit save the students at Virginia Tech? Couple this with your soft on crime approach to dealing with actual criminals and your outrageous plans to increase taxation in what is already one of the most overtaxed states in the country,and you will not only increase violence and victims, you will reduce quality of life in the Commonwealth.

I oppose these bills. They are clearly modeled after failed policies and have no track record of “saving lives” . Criminals and the like will simply go to one of the surrounding states to get whatever they want. Where is the logic in taking someone’s firearm they have owned for decades when they have no criminal history? How did a ten round magazine limit save the students at Virginia Tech? Couple this with your soft on crime approach to dealing with actual criminals and your outrageous plans to increase taxation in what is already one of the most overtaxed states in the country,and you will not only increase violence and victims, you will reduce quality of life in the Commonwealth.

Please see attached PDF with comments showing opposition to each of the proposed anti gun legislation.

Any bill that would remove the ability of a citizen to protect himself from threats both foreign or domestic is in stark contrast to the spirit in which the founding fathers wrote the 2nd Amendment to the US Constitution. The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

I am writing to express my outrage and disbelief at the level of government over reach being exhibited by the newly eleccted Virginia Assembly. The idea that jewish implants from New Jersey to muslims from Bangladesh, funded by outside sources think they can simply erase Americas consitutional rights at the stroke of a pen is outrageous. Maybe the assemblys time would be better spent making sure that Virginia is represented by real Virginians by barring foreign born actors from elections.

This bill creates a center within the Department of Criminal Justice Services that would gather research, strategies, and best practices for Community Violence Intervention Programs and grant funds for community-based programs. We SUPPORT this bill as CVIs have proven to be incredibly effective in deterring gun violence.

I am a responsible person and have spent 26 years in the U.S. Navy. I do not want my rights infringed upon. I enjoy target shooting as a hobby. You politicians need to go after criminals with guns. Right bills that effect crimes that people do with guns. Leave law abiding tax paying citizens alone. R, Tom Hofsiss Virginia Beach USN Retired.

CONSTUTION STATES NO RETRO ACTIVE LAWS, WHERE ARE THE LAW 0N HE REAL PROBLEM NOT PHONY BILLS THAT ONLY EFFECT THE LEGAL STATUS OF LAWEN ABIDING CITIZENS!

2A not to be infringed

These proposed gun control bills are the epitome of government overreach. They're completely unconstitutional and I heavily urge you all to vote no on every single one of these! Representation of what this state wants as a whole should be at the front of your minds. Not simply what the few small districts with the big population centers have been lead to believe will help gun violence. These laws will do nothing whatsoever to curb crime, as criminals dont care what the law states . Thank you for listening.

✅ Safe Child Access Prevention, HB871, Del. Downey (D): This bill will create penalties for gun owners whose gun is illegally used by a minor. We SUPPORT keeping guns out of the hands of kids. ✅ Expanding ERPO Petitioners, HB901, Del. Sullivan (D): This bill will expand risk orders to include family/household members and certain licensed mental health practitioners to the list of those who can petition the courts. We SUPPORT this bill as we acknowledge that those closest to a person can often be the ones who are able to spot causes for concern. ✅ Security for Firearms Dealers, HB907, Del. Shin (D): This bill will require dealers in firearms to enact certain security measures. We SUPPORT this bill as it should help to deter “smash and grab” incidents. ✅ Virginia Gun Violence Prevention Center, HB969, Del. Price (D): This bill creates a center within the Department of Criminal Justice Services that would gather research, strategies, and best practices for Community Violence Intervention Programs and grant funds for community-based programs. We SUPPORT this bill as CVIs have proven to be incredibly effective in deterring gun violence. ✅ Disarm Hate, HB1015, Del. Tran (D): This bill will not allow anyone convicted of a hate crime to own a gun, We SUPPORT this bill as we believe that hate has no place in our state and want to protect minority communities in our commonwealth. ✅ Firearm Purchaser Licensing, HB1359, Del. Hope (D): This bill will require individuals to obtain a license before buying a firearm. We SUPPORT this bill as it would reduce gun violence by ensuring only eligible, vetted individuals can purchase firearms, and it would also help to prevent impulsive or high-risk purchases.

I am writing to express strong support for each of these bills ( HB 1359, 21, 19, 969,871, 93, 40) I am a child and adolescent psychiatrist who has spent years serving children, families, and communities in northern VA. Creating safer gun laws does not infringe on the Second Amendment rights of responsible gun owners. Instead, these policies help ensure gun ownership rights are exercised responsibly, protect children and families from preventable harm, and help law enforcement enforce existing laws effectively. Public health research shows that secure, unloaded, and locked storage significantly lowers risks of unintentional injury, suicide attempts, and impulsive use of firearms by unauthorized persons — particularly children and adolescents. Acknowledging that firearm violence is a public safety issue and being able to provide data-driven strategies via more research can help communities in implementing effective violence intervention programs and support evidence-based decision-making. HB 1359 and 21 promote responsible gun ownership by adding consistency/accountability to the purchase process. This reinforces the idea that industry actors should be partners in community safety. Measures to protect survivors and help ensure accountability in situations where the risk of gun-related harm is demonstrably elevated are critical. For physicians like myself who work in the aftermath of violence, these steps represent pragmatic, evidence-informed measures that can reduce trauma and save lives across our Commonwealth.

As a fellow Virginian, I urge you to please OPPOSE "gun control" bills in your committee. Concepts like an "assault weapons" ban, arbitrary magazine restrictions, "reasonable standards" for firearms businesses, and a "permit to purchase," just to name a few, do nothing to address crime in the Commonwealth. Criminals do not abide by the law, and bills like these only target law-abiding firearm owners and businesses. The General Assembly should instead pursue legislation that holds criminals accountable for their crimes, not legislation that creates new criminals overnight for lawful purchases. Again, I urge you to OPPOSE gun control in your committee. Thank you for all that you do for Virginia.

As a mother of a 2 year old and a 5 year old and with 10 years of experience teaching elementary school in Virginia Public schools, I STRONGLY STRONGLY support each of these bills (HB19, HB21, HB40, HB93, HB871, HB969, HB1359). Each of these bills are common-sense, data driven policies that WILL reduce the number of innocent lives taken by gun violence each year in Virginia. None of these are an infringement on 2nd amendment rights, but rather a protection of all Virginian's rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, which this gun violence epidemic threatens daily. Passing each of these bills is the first step in the right direction to keeping Virginians safer. I do not want to live in a world where I think about school shootings every day and wonder if my child's school will be next. I do not want to live in a country where gun violence is the leading cause of death in children. I do not want us to be resigned and desensitized to the truth of that last sentence, as it seems that so many of us are. We can fix this, our legislators have the opportunity to begin working to fix this right now by passing these bills. Enhancing background checks(HB1359), closing the dating partner loophole(HB19) and requiring perpetrators of domestic violence to surrender their weapon once convicted (HB93) ensures that those with a history of inflicting violence onto other humans have a harder time accessing lethal weapons. Prohibiting ghost guns (HB40) also makes it harder for those with ill intentions to get around the afore-mentioned policies by building untraceable guns. Secure storage(HB871) is such a common sense solution and enforcing this does nothing to take away guns from responsible gun owners but simply helps to ensure that minors and others who are legally prohibited from accessing a firearm cannot gain access to one. I also support holding the firearm industry accountable (HB21) and Establishing the Virginia Gun Violence Prevention Center (HB 969) to expand research and education on this topic to help inform the state's decisions to further reduce gun violence and implement gun violence intervention measures to help make our communities safer. Bottom line is, as a mother, this is the #1 issue that keeps me awake at night and I cannot stress my support for these bills enough. Passing these bills will result in fewer deaths by gun violence in Virginia, and failure to do so would result in more deaths. I urge our legislators to do right by all Virginians by passing these life-saving bills.

All of these bills are unconstitutional infringements of the right to keep and bear arms as guaranteed by the Second Amendment and the Constitution of Virginia. Supporting any of them requires that you violate your oath of office. With respect to the "permit to purchase" scheme, what other enumerated right requires a permit to exercise? Persons who have reached the age of eighteen may marry, enter into contracts, join the military and be deployed to hazardous duty, and a host of other things. But may not purchase a handgun? If one is mature enough any of those things one is mature enough for all.

I urge all Delegates to vote AGAINST all these anti-gun/2A bills. -The current laws on the books aren't enforced. -No one should lose their gun rights over a misdemeanor conviction. -Guns & magazines of all types that are in 'common use' are to be allowed to be owned & purchased by no prohibitive persons. ie SCOTUS Heller decision. -Thus the majority of these bills are unconstitutional & not injunction with the meaning & history of the US Constitution. They also violate VA's Constitution. -No one needs a license to purchase a firearm. They already have to go through a background check through the FBI NICS system. Fingerprints are not needed & overkill. Guns can be legally sold, stolen, lost, etc. Guns are already expensive & requiring another fee to do repetitive checks is unreasonable & unaffordable to some. -I've had a VA CHP since 2003 & has been renewed every 5 years as required. I've taken many training classes over the years & been to ranges countless times. I know what I'm doing & shouldn't be required to take some 'other' course to prove I can fire 10 rounds safely. It's ridiculous! -So called 'assault rifles' account for less then 5% of all homicides each year. These rifles & their equivalents are not the problem or is magazine capacity. . Criminals aren't going to obey any gun laws, so how can a person defend themselves against multiple intruders with 30 round magazines each & the defender only have 10 rounds. The defender will lose their life & possibly their entire family as no criminal is going to wait for a defender 'wait to reload'. -Reciprocity is very important to VA CHP holders & for CCW holders from other states. Not allowing reciprocity with other states because of some arbitrary requirement they lack puts VA CHP holder's lives in DANGER. -You cannot retroactively punish citizens who purchased any gun or magazine LEGALLY. This is acceptable. Please enforce the laws on the books, prosecute those criminals, & if convicted keeo them in prison. More laws solve nothing & are 'feel good' measures. -Guns are tools just like a knife or a bat. They can be used to save lives or take them. It's the individual that makes these decisions, not the tools. 99% of gun owners in VA are law abiding & VA CHP holders are the safest group in VA according to VSP. -Homicides across the nation are down to their lowest levels since 1900. None of these are needed & will only hurt law abiding citizens. -Please stop the constant attack on gun rights by VA Democrats in the General Assembly. It's every 2 years & never ends. End it now! -Focus on much more important of issues than adding to your pile of gun laws. Which the tax payers in VA will have for as these laws will have numerous lawsuits fighting against them. Many have already been declared by SCOTUS. -The Second Amendment is a RIGHT & was given to us by our creator. Why is this continuously ignored? No other right is under constant attack as the 2A, especially in VA. -Stop blaming tools & fix the real problem. Bad people & our society. for starters!

I support HB1359, HB21, HB19, HB969, HB871, HB93, HB40, as all these measures will keep our communities in Virginia safer. For HB1359: The Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions concluded that firearm purchaser licensing laws “are associated with lower rates of diversions of firearms for use in crime, homicide, mass shootings, suicide, and shootings by police” (https://publichealth.jhu.edu/center-for-gun-violence-solutions/solutions/permit-to-purchase-firearm-purchaser-licensing). HB21 is a commonsense law that will create standards we can hold the gun industry accountable for, just as citizens would want to hold any industry accountable. For HB19: According to Everytown Research’s analysis of data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, more than 70 women are shot and killed by an intimate partner every month in the US (https://everytownresearch.org/report/guns-and-violence-against-women/). A partner can include a dating partner, so expanding the definition of "family or household member” is essential. Creating a gun violence prevention center through HB969 will help allocate resources to the projects that will save the most lives. Guns kill nearly 130 people every day, according to Everytown Research’s analysis of data from the CDC (https://everytownresearch.org/report/gun-violence-in-america/). Also, gun violence affects many more than the people killed. A 2019 survey found that a third of US adults said fear of mass shootings stops them from going to certain places and events (https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2019/08/fear-mass-shooting). The economic benefit alone—if not the safety benefit—of curbing gun violence should provide sufficient motivation to pass this bill. Enacting HB871 would align with recommendations from the American Academy of Pediatrics to protect children (https://www.aap.org/en/advocacy/state-advocacy/safe-storage-of-firearms). Also, one study estimated that safe storage could save up to 251 children’s lives per year (https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2733158). HB93 will help keep survivors of domestic violence safer. A 2017 study found a 9.7% lower intimate partner homicide rate when states prohibited firearm possession among people subject to restraining orders related to intimate partner violence (https://doi.org/10.7326/M16-2849). Keeping firearms out of the home of those who harmed intimate partners will provide further protection. HB40 would help protect the public by making it harder for people prohibited from lawful firearm possession to get their hands on guns. A Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions report says, “Data from the Baltimore Police Department demonstrate that ghost guns are primarily recovered from individuals who were prohibited from lawful firearm possession including, underage youth, individuals with felony convictions, and those with violent criminal histories that prohibit gun ownership” (https://publichealth.jhu.edu/center-for-gun-violence-solutions/2025/the-supreme-court-upholds-regulations-on-ghost-guns). Lastly, public safety laws such as these are designed to protect the public. Saving lives is more important than upholding an individual desire to purchase a gun as quickly as possible or access it at home without having to unlock it. These laws would not create an undue burden on law-abiding citizens. And even if there is an extra step—say, to purchase a gun—wouldn’t that be worth saving even one child’s life?

The Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” The Second Amendment, just as the whole of the Bill of Rights, is a God-given right affirmed by the United States Constitution. The Bill of Rights is intended to protect individual liberties from government encroachment. Not the other way around. A legislative desire to enact Second Amendment infringements runs afoul of any Constitutional application. Every one of these anti-Second Amendment bills constitutes an outright infringement, in one form or another, on an individual’s right to keep and bear Arms. To claim otherwise is either woefully ignorant or deliberately deceitful. The Second Amendment's imperative, "shall not be infringed,” is free from ambiguity or pretense without exception and is an unqualified command despite assertions to the contrary. No permit was required of me to exercise my freedom of speech, here, in order to comment (redress my grievance) on these proposed bills that reek of oppression. The same applies to the Second Amendment and other protected rights. As to “gun violence,” no gun ever served time in prison for committing a crime. Besides, the Second Amendment is no more contingent upon rates of crime than the First Amendment is subject to rates of literacy. Responsibilities may come with the exercise of Constitutionally-affirmed rights, but not infringements. None of these bills should see the light of day or remotely be considered. So let it be written, so let it be done.

As a US military veteran who has also been a victim of violent criminal use of a firearm, I appreciate the numerous sacrifices that have been made throughout the years to preserve our God given rights from frivolous political tinkering that fail to provide significant increases in public safety in exchange for undue infringement upon our citizens’ rights and liberties without certifiable evidence of the intended results. As an example, I provide the following report to show why lawful citizens 2A rights should not be infringed for any notional do gooder political brownie points to just “do something.” The following 11 year old probably wouldn’t be with us today if some of these current gun control measures being considered in Richmond were in effect in her state. “ 11 YR OLD SHOOTS ILLEGALS thanks FOX NEWS for reporting it. BUTTE , MONTANA Shotgun preteen vs. Illegal alien Home Invaders...Two illegal aliens, Ralphel Resindez, 23, and Enrico Garza, 26, probably believed they would easily overpower home-alone 11-year-old Patricia Harrington after her father had left their two-story home. It seems the two crooks never learned two things: 1) they were in Montana and 2) Patricia had been a clay-shooting champion since she was nine. Patricia was in her upstairs room when the two men broke through the front door of the house. She quickly ran to her father's room and grabbed his 12-gauge Mossberg 500 shotgun. Resindez was the first to get up to the second floor only to be the first to catch a near point blank blast of buckshot from the 11-year-old's knee-crouch aim. He suffered fatal wounds to his abdomen and genitals. When Garza ran to the foot of the stairs, he took a blast to the left shoulder and staggered out into the ...street where he bled to death before medical help could arrive. It was found out later that Resindez was armed with a stolen 45-caliber handgun he took from another home invasion robbery. That victim, 50-year-old David 0'Burien, was not so lucky. He died from stab wounds to the chest.Ever wonder why good stuff never makes NBC, CBS, PBS, MSNBC, CNN, or ABC news........? An 11 year old girl, properly trained, defended her home, and herself......against two murderous, illegal immigrants.......and she wins. She is still alive. Now THAT is Gun Control! Thought for the day.... Calling an illegal alien an 'undocumented immigrant' is like calling a drug dealer an 'unlicensed pharmacist.' I like this kind of E-mail! American citizens defending themselves and their homes”

I am proud to say that 2 cities on the Peninsula - Newport News and Hampton have established offices in their Public Safety Depts to work with trusted community partners on gun violence prevention, intervention and strategic planning. It is high time that VA State Legislature establish a statewide gun violence prevention center. We must be coordinated in our efforts to collect research, best practices and data-drive strategies to implement firearm violence intervention alongside community-based programs who have been doing the boots on the ground work to reduce violence in our communities. With state leadership and support our Hampton Roads cities and beyond can truly make a difference with HB969 finally in place.

I stand with the VCDL on these bills.

The right to keep and bear arms SHALL not be infringed. These laws all in their rhetoric and restrictions seek to unduly limit and abridge the constitutional right of the American Citizens who reside in Virginia. None of these proposals have merit and the members of this legislature know they do not.

I oppose the bills as I do not think they are a solution to the problems facing us today. Further, they will cost the commonwealth more legal resources and expenses.

HB217 (Helmer) — OPPOSE I oppose HB217. This bill bans the future importation, sale, manufacture, purchase, and transfer of so-called “assault firearms,” and it also restricts certain ammunition feeding devices based on manufacture date/capacity. These are arms and components commonly owned by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes, which places them squarely within the protection recognized in Heller and subject to Bruen’s history-and-tradition test. Broad category bans do not target criminals; they burden only the compliant and invite years of expensive litigation. Virginia should pursue violent-crime enforcement and mental-health interventions—not bans on commonly owned firearms and standard magazines. HB19 (McClure) — OPPOSE I oppose HB19. This bill imposes a broad firearm disability based on a misdemeanor assault-and-battery conviction involving an expanded set of relationships, including “intimate partner,” and then bars purchase/possession/transport for a defined period. That is a serious deprivation of a fundamental constitutional right without the kind of historically grounded analogue required under Bruen. It also risks sweeping in non-dangerous conduct (including cases arising from contentious domestic disputes), while doing little to stop violent criminals who already ignore weapons laws. Virginia should focus on punishing violent misuse of firearms and enforcing existing laws—not creating new, broad disarmament categories for otherwise law-abiding citizens. HB21 (Helmer) — OPPOSE I oppose HB21. This bill creates sweeping “standards of responsible conduct” for firearm industry members and then exposes lawful businesses to expansive civil liability theories (including public nuisance-style claims). The practical effect is to chill lawful commerce and constrain the supply of constitutionally protected arms through litigation pressure rather than democratic process—an indirect burden on the right to keep and bear arms that Bruen does not permit. Criminals do not buy guns through lawful channels and won’t be deterred by civil lawsuits against retailers and manufacturers. This proposal targets constitutionally protected conduct instead of violent offenders. HB40 (Simon) — OPPOSE I oppose HB40. This bill criminalizes broad categories of firearms, frames/receivers, and parts based on serialization status—including possession prohibitions that take effect later—while also restricting transfers. It risks criminalizing ordinary Virginians for paperwork/technicalities rather than misconduct, and it directly burdens the ability of law-abiding people to acquire and possess arms that are in common use. We should prosecute prohibited possessors and violent criminals, not create new possession crimes aimed at people who are otherwise lawful.

Hello Today, January 29, 2026 is my BIRTHDAY, I AM 46 YEARS OLD TODAY. I was born in 1980 in Byrn Mawr, PA to a WW2 and Korean war Vet named William S Lindsay and my mother Mary Lindsay. Because of my upbringing, and the constant talk about History and other topics; i was raised with healthy understanding of both Guns, engines and Cars. When i became old enough; i served my country for 8 years in Submarines before leaving the navy for civilian work in submarine repair. During my life, i have owned many rifles, pistols, and shotguns. I have target shot, carried defensively and on two occassions in my life-i had both need of a firearm and the firearm was with me to provide defensive effect. I think sometimes about what would have happened if i had lived in a state that did not permit me to have firearms or limited my choices with beauraucratic hurdles? In both instances i might not be alive to retell the story. Simply put; both times-the mere presence of having a firearm detured or otherwise changed the outcome of me being robbed or carjacked. Now-Va democrats would rather have me become a victim or a deceased casulty than admit that having a legal firearm with a substantial number of rounds in the magazine is the ultimate deterant to crime. I would point out to anyone listening that those 27 words mean more than people think they do; A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”. This is not just the quintessential AMERICAN IDEA, BUT AN IDEA THAT HAS PROVEN TIME AND AGAIN THAT WE ARE STRONGER WITH OUR GUNS THAN WITHOUT. IF we allow these bills to pass, then we as Americans are surrendering to the theory that our Amendments are little more than suggestions, and that the founding fathers didn't really mean for us to follow them. I SAY AGAIN; A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”. WHAT PART OF THIS IS HARD TO UNDERSTAND? THE END

I do not want my 2nd amendment rights taken away. I am a law abiden citizen who wants to feel safe. I can't believe my representives want to take my safety away. This is only happening after the Governors election. You now will be increasing our taxes, lowering our safety while catering to illegals. This State which I love is being destroyed by this liberal platform

As a lifelong resident of Virginia. I have enjoyed the shooting sports, even as far back as on the rifle team in high school. Also, as a retired law enforcement officer of over 30+ years. I am saddened to see our general assembly doing nothing more than a knee-jerk feel good effort to restrict law abiding citizens. let’s bring back and strictly enforce. If you commit a violent crime with a firearm you will serve a minimum of five years in a penitentiary there’s are all saying, and I have seen it before criminals do not care at all what laws that are past restricting firearms, they will continue to be just that lawbreaking individuals who do not care.

I oppose all of the checked bills. Most of them are wildly unconstitutional, and none of them will make a single person safer.

I am writing to express my strong opposition to the anti-gun bills scheduled for consideration in your subcommittee meeting on January 29, 2026. As a law-abiding citizen who values the rights enshrined in the United States Constitution, particularly the Second Amendment, I urge you to vote against these measures that infringe upon the fundamental right to keep and bear arms. The Second Amendment guarantees the right of the people to keep and bear arms, a right that shall not be infringed. These bills, including but not limited to HB19, HB21, HB40, HB93, HB110, HB217, HB229, HB702, HB871, HB969, and HB1359, represent direct assaults on this constitutional protection. They impose unnecessary restrictions on firearm ownership, possession, and transfer that disproportionately burden responsible gun owners while doing nothing to address the root causes of crime. It is a well-established fact that criminals, by definition, do not obey laws. Measures like bans on certain firearms (HB217), mandatory storage requirements (HB871), prohibitions on unserialized firearms (HB40), and penalties for leaving firearms in vehicles (HB110) will only disarm law-abiding citizens who follow the rules. These individuals are not the source of violent crime; rather, they are often the ones who rely on their Second Amendment rights for self-defense, hunting, and sport. Criminals will continue to acquire and use firearms illegally, unaffected by these new regulations, leaving ordinary Virginians more vulnerable. History and data show that gun control laws do not reduce crime rates but instead empower those who operate outside the law. For example, cities with strict gun laws often experience higher rates of violent crime compared to areas where law-abiding citizens can more freely exercise their rights. These bills will create more "gun-free" zones and bureaucratic hurdles that criminals ignore, effectively turning law-abiding citizens into easier targets. I respectfully request that you reject these infringement on our constitutional rights and focus instead on policies that target actual criminal behavior, such as enforcing existing laws against violent offenders and supporting mental health initiatives. Protecting the Second Amendment is essential to preserving our freedoms and ensuring public safety for all Virginians. Thank you for your time and consideration. I hope you will vote NO on these anti-Second Amendment bills. Sincerely, Bailey Pratt

In reviewing these various bills it seems that many of them disregard the Constitution that was sworn to be upheld. Additionally several have already been ruled on in various courts across the country. They serve to divide constituents especially those who vote rather than provide civil discourse and leadership. They further fail to address larger issues that plague our society. Punishing those who abide by the law and creating penalties for innocent civilians is conceptually flawed. I urge you all to reexamine the methods behind these bills and abandon them at this point. Work toward the greater good and try something that hasn’t already failed repeatedly. Truly focus on serving this great Commonwealth. It will serve all of us better in the future.

HB1303, I support. The remaining bills are unnecessary and bureaucratic. You are creating bills meant to solve statistically insignificant events. HB1359 and HB217 are particularly objectionable. Requiring a "purchaser license" infringes on the right to bear arms and is a complete duplication of existing background checks. The assault firearm definition is unconstitutional and will not stand up to legal challenge. Our tax dollars and attorney general resources will be wasted on such an obviously flawed legislation. Gun buy back programs are have proven to be a waste of tax payer dollars with no impact on gun crime statistics. HB110 is very heavy handed. Just because someone could detect a weapon in a private motor vehicle should not make that vehicle subject to confiscation by the state nor a penalty applied to the firearm owner. This is totally a way to punish firearm owners without solving any real gun violence crimes that you, as legislators, could better focus your time and effort on. Focus on enforcing existing laws and not letting habitual criminals get away with warnings or light sentencing for their crimes. That is the common sense approach. We have more than enough laws, we do not need more ways to trap law abiding citizens and our merchants with this slew of bills.

Dear Members of the Virginia House Public Safety Firearms Subcommittee: I am writing to express my deep concerns regarding several of the bills currently on the docket at today’s meeting that I believe impose overly restrictive and chilling effects on the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding Virginians. As someone with over six decades of active participation in shooting sports, I feel compelled to share my perspective based on extensive experience in the responsible exercise of these constitutional rights. For more than 60 years, I have been a devoted participant in shooting sports across various disciplines. Throughout this time, I have witnessed firsthand how responsible gun ownership and proper safety training create a culture of respect for firearms and the rights they represent. I am both an NRA Certified Range Safety Officer and a United States Marine Corps Certified Range Safety Officer, credentials that reflect my commitment to the highest standards of firearm safety and education. In these roles, I have dedicated countless hours to ensuring that shooters of all skill levels understand and practice safe firearm handling. Much of the proposed legislation before your committee, in my view, risks discouraging lawful participation in shooting sports and responsible firearm ownership without demonstrably addressing criminal misuse. Overly broad restrictions often burden those who already comply with the law, while doing little to deter individuals who disregard it entirely. I respectfully urge the Subcommittee to carefully consider whether these measures strike the appropriate balance between public safety and the constitutional rights of law-abiding Virginians. Shooting sports have been an integral part of American culture and Virginia's heritage. They teach discipline, responsibility, focus, and respect. These are values that strengthen our communities. Overly burdensome regulations such as those on the docket today do not distinguish between those who respect the law and those who do not; instead, they disproportionately affect those of us who have demonstrated decades of safe and responsible firearm use. I urge this committee to carefully consider the unintended consequences of legislation that may seem reasonable in theory but proves impractical or unjust in application. The rights protected by the Second Amendment are fundamental, and any restrictions placed upon them must be narrowly tailored, clearly justified, and respectful of Virginia's long tradition of responsible gun ownership. I thank you for allowing me to submit this written response and for providing the opportunity for citizens to voice their concerns on these important matters. More importantly, I thank each of you for your service to the Commonwealth of Virginia. The work you do on behalf of our citizens is vital to our democracy, and I appreciate your willingness to consider all perspectives as you deliberate on these critical issues. Respectfully submitted, George Mather, Jr. 6212 Sudley Church Court Fairfax Station, VA 22039 Email: mather.george.6212@gmail.com Mobile: 1.703.598.8848

The bills under consideration are only going to affect those who have no intention of breaking the law. Coupled with the other bills lessening the penalties for many violent crimes, these will do nothing to prevent crime. Criminals do not follow the law. That is a textbook definition. We have plenty of laws to deal with those who perpetrate crimes. What is needed is to deal with the existing criminals. Stop what leads these people to break the law to begin with. Punish those who commit violent crimes firmly. Stop the revolving door justice that keeps them on the streets committing more crimes. Making the law abiding public defenseless while turning more violent criminals loose makes no sense. Police forces are not bodyguards! All that can be expected after calling 911 is the victim being taken to a hospital, or possibly the morgue, and an investigation, hopefully followed by an arrest. The only person that can hope to defend themselves from these violent criminals is the victim. It would be better to provide a system for more self defense classes for the public. Better help for the victims of violent crime. And fitting punishment for those who have broken the law. None of the proposed bills will do that. I hope that the Constitutional rights of the public will be considered over feel good measures. I thank you for your time in reading my comments and hope you will consider these points in voting on the proposed bills.

I urge committee members to vote against these bills, many of which infringe on our God-given rights as Americans, and some of which are already unconstitutional under existing rulings by the Supreme Court of the United States. Respectfully, a lifelong Virginian.

Hi, My name is Catherine Shultz and I’m writing this as a woman that survived almost being strangled to death, then stalked for 2 years. I was in fear of my life and I bought my first firearm and trained. My personal defense weapon saved my life and I didn’t have to pull the trigger. A piece of paper does nothing to protect survivors but I stand with VCDL & am co director of Women for Gun Rights in Va. I’m also disabled and an amputee & I can’t run from danger but I can use my firearm to protect myself. People don’t seem to understand that educating oneself vs restricting mags etc… they affect people like me and it shows me that the “gun safety” laws are simply a psychological bandage & does nothing to protect women like myself. Thank you, Catherine Shultz Women for gun rights

To the legislators; Not one of the proposed HBs should be approved. The authors of the proposed bills lack experience or insight into gun ownership or general safety of the public. Not one of these bills can be proven to save lives or stop criminal acts. What I do see is the potential for a level of state bureaucrats to create new jobs for their buddies. Let’s monitor who has a gun or who has too many bullets in their magazine. Whose family member is related to someone involved with domestic violence. This sounds like the state boys and girls are out to get their hands into Virginians pocket's again. Vote no for everyone of these HBs.

Shall not be infringed was and still is very clear. The bill of rights was written to limit the government. Please stop infringing on my god given rights.

HB19 Misdemeanors should never take away a civil right. HB21 A firearm accessory seller could not know they were selling a accessory to a prohibited person. A car parts store cannot be sued if they sell a seat cover for a car used in a bank robbery. HB40 This bill is unconstitutional, there is no analog in history or traditions of firearms with any such limitations when the Bill of Rights was adopted. Homemade guns have been legal since before the US existed. HB93 If a husband and wife co-own a shotgun and the husband gets a protective order issued against him, the wife would no longer have access to that shotgun. That punishes and needlessly endangers her life. HB110 Car owner should not be at fault for a criminal stealing a firearm. It is the criminal who is solely to blame. This bill could put a handgun in the possession of a tow truck driver that is a convicted felon. HB217 U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in both DC v Heller, and The New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v Bruen, that any firearm “in common use” is protected by the Second Amendment. Guns and magazines targeted by this bill are among the most common in the US, making this bill unconstitutional. HB229 Disarming visitors and guests, including CHP holders, violates their right to protect themselves. A U.S. District Court in the 2nd Circuit has restrained enforcement of just such a law for being unconstitutional under New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v Bruen Supreme Court ruling. HB626 Students have a right to self-defense. HB702 Destroying a functional, and possibly valuable firearms is a waste of money. State could offset costs by selling firearms to gun dealers through an auction. This program is a “turn in” and not a “give-back” program. HB871 Biometric safes are more expensive and can be unreliable when being used under stress and require batteries to work. There are other locking mechanisms that are just as secure. HB969 Center would only target violence committed using firearms and ignoring root causes of crime, as well as all the other ways violence is inflicted on victims – knives, blunt objects, hands and feet, etc. Half of violent crimes are not committed with a firearm. Term “Gun Violence” gives away true agenda: “gun violence” is a term coined by gun-control lobby to blame guns, which are inanimate objects, and not criminals that misuse guns. If a police officer shoots someone, officer gets blame, not his gun. If a criminal shoots someone, gun gets blame, not criminal. No one says, “tire iron violence” or “hand and feet violence.” It is just called “violence.” But there is a disarmament agenda with firearms and “gun violence” is just an excuse to go after firearms with more gun control. HB1300 Oppose HB1303 Oppose HB1359 Bill will get innocent people killed, it will take at least two months before a person can purchase a first firearm.  If they are purchasing that firearm for urgent self-defense, that is simply too long.  Price to get a permit, likely in hundreds of dollars, will be prohibitive for poor people and is equivalent of a poll tax.  And even with all hoops to get a permit, even citizens with a CHP will be limited to one handgun a month.  Local law-enforcement will be handed a registry of gun owners. And gun rentals at shooting ranges will not be possible for people who have not yet got their permit or are visiting from out of state or from another country.

My entire life I have taken great pride and stewardship in being a law abiding citizen of a great country. A very large part of my patriotism is the freedom and trust the founders of the nation gave me in the Second Amendment of the US constitution and Section 13 of the Virginia Bill of Rights. The anti-gun bills that have been introduced in Virginia show me that the supporters of these bills have zero regard for the Constitution, my rights as a lawful citizen and my rights to be able to defend myself and others from violent crime. The supporters of these bills have lost all sense of who the good guys are and who the bad guys are. I see this when early release is granted to hundreds of violent felons, many of which then go on to reoffend and violently prey on the very people you are supposed to protect, all for nothing more than some misdirected attempt at virtue signaling. I see this when prosecutors do not pursue charges against violent offenders in a misdirected attempt at virtue signaling. I see this when legislative efforts focus on the law-abiding and do nothing to violent felons who will not bother to be hindered by any gun laws. I see this when legislators talk about “gun violence” and do nothing about the underlying problem of “violence” and how to reduce it. I see this when I see news stories of repeat violent offenders who have been arrested for dozens of violent crimes, including murder, who end up killing someone yet again due to some form of “catch and release”. The laws are in place to remove violent felons, whether or not they use firearms, from society and prevent them from preying on your law-abiding constituents. Please use them. I urge opposition to HB19, HB21, HB40, HB93, HB110, HB217, HB229, HB626, HB702, HB871, HB969 and HB1359. I urge support for HB1300 and HB1303.

I oppose all legislation which seeks to undermine our Constitutionally protected 2nd Amendment. Therefore, I would encourage all members to vote against these bills with a resounding NO!

As a life long Virginia resident and lawful firearms owner, I speak for myself and millions of other Virginians in saying that all of us strongly oppose any bill being introduced that restricts and infringes upon our Second Amendment rights that are guaranteed by the constitution of Virginia and of the United States. These gun control bills have been drafted under the guise of safety and crime prevention, while simultaneously doing the opposite and only increasing further resistance in both crime and safety. For decades, Virginia has been a pro-2A state where generations of families have been born into and raised on safe and responsible gun ownership. Hunting, personal protection, or simply being an enthusiast does not make someone a criminal or implies criminal intent because of the technology behind modern firearms has far surpassed the firearms of our grandfathers’s generation. Manufacturing methods and technology is ever changing, but our natural rights as law abiding citizens should never be hung in the balance and toyed with as privileges. I implore the General Assembly to please review these bills with logic, with reason, and with the hope that our state government will not make a mockery of the Second Amendment to further a political agenda not based upon fact, but upon incessant fear mongering and disarmament of the people.

Team, All of these bills infringe my rights guaranteed by the 2nd Amendment. Especially egregious are 217 banning weapons and magazines that are in common use. Secondly, is 969 creating another state agency to use up taxpayer money when what should be done is simply enforce the laws that are currently on the books. Do not allow liberal DA's and judges to release violent criminals back onto our streets, they must be held accountable for their crimes. Finally, 1359 creating some type of permit simply to be able to buy a weapon which will create a weapon registry. The current procedures of checking the buyer's background through both federal and state databases is more than sufficient. Thank you. Roger R. Scott

Name: Brad Toohill Location: Loudoun County, Virginia I strongly oppose the following bills. These proposals punish law-abiding Virginians, undermine due process, and infringe on constitutionally protected rights while failing to address violent crime. Criminals do not follow gun laws—these bills target citizens who already do. HB 19 (McClure) This bill allows permanent loss of firearm rights based on vague “dating relationship” misdemeanors. Fundamental rights should not be stripped without clear standards and robust due process. HB 21 (Helmer) Holding firearm manufacturers and sellers liable for crimes they did not commit is unjust and dangerous. This policy attacks lawful commerce instead of criminal behavior. HB 40 (Simon) Criminalizing unfinished frames and receivers turns peaceful hobbyists into felons without evidence of crime reduction. This is regulation without results. HB 93 (Bennett-Parker) Forced firearm surrender under protective orders risks disarming innocent family members. Rights should not be suspended by accusation alone. HB 110 (Laufer) Penalizing lawful gun owners for storing a handgun in a vehicle is excessive and punitive. This bill targets responsible citizens, not criminals. HB 217 (Helmer) This bill bans commonly owned firearms and standard-capacity magazines that are clearly protected as arms in common use. It is unconstitutional and ineffective. HB 229 (Hernandez) Blanket bans on firearms and knives in medical facilities leave lawful citizens defenseless and create confusion without improving safety. HB 626 (Callsen) Disarming adults on college campuses does not enhance safety. Law-abiding individuals should not lose their right to self-defense based on location. HB 702 (Cole) Taxpayer-funded firearm turn-in and destroy programs waste public funds and show no measurable impact on crime. HB 871 (Downey) Mandated storage methods and biometric safes intrude into private homes and impose unnecessary costs on families. HB 969 (Price) Creating a new state agency focused solely on firearms expands bureaucracy while ignoring repeat offenders and enforcement failures. HB 1359 (Hope) This permit-to-purchase scheme creates delays, costs, fingerprinting, and a de facto registry. It burdens lawful ownership and disproportionately harms low-income Virginians. Virginia should focus on enforcing existing laws and prosecuting violent offenders—not restricting the rights of responsible citizens.

I urge you to oppose all of the proposed bills. None of these bills will have meaningful impact on crime committed with fire arms. The only honest way to reduce crime committed with firearms is to enforce mandatory and harsh penalties on criminals who use guns to commit crimes. Once has to realize that guns can only commit a crime in the hands of a criminal. The criminal, not the tool is the problem that needs to be addressed. A case in point: England has super strong regulations on guns. Was that effective? Did the crime rates really drop ? No, crime rates didn't drop all that much. Eliminating firearms just shifted the criminals over to using knives as their weapon of choice. These proposed regulations seem to be more aimed at annoying firearm owners, as opposed to solving any real problems. While I want to vote Democratic, these essentially useless regulations are making me seriously reconsider which party I will support in the future. Please put regulations in place to SOLVE problems, not these silly things that only provide talking points. Never forget, RESULTS are what voters want.

The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence supports these bills.

Not one of these bills will make anyone safer, but rather strip the rights of law abiding citizens of which pose no threat. Maybe try enforcing or increasing the penalties for laws against murder or violent felonies that are already in place? The problem isn't guns. It's the mentally ill people who misuse them. Making good people criminals for simply owning common firearms or magazines will not make a difference to people who have no regard for law.

All these bills infringe on citizens AMENDMENT RIGHT we the people been lied to BY OUR Government OFFICIALS & mainly democratic officials ABIGAIL SPANBERGER is one of them

My name is Teresa Gancsos and I am with the Richmond chapter of Moms Demand Action and we support these bills. Thank you for your attention in this matter. Teresa Gancsos

As a fellow Virginian, I urge you to please OPPOSE "gun control" bills in your committee. Concepts like an "assault weapons" ban, arbitrary magazine restrictions, "reasonable standards" for firearms businesses, and a "permit to purchase," just to name a few, do nothing to address crime in the Commonwealth. Criminals do not abide by the law, and bills like these only target law-abiding firearm owners and businesses. The General Assembly should instead pursue legislation that holds criminals accountable for their crimes, not legislation that creates new criminals overnight for lawful purchases. Again, I urge you to OPPOSE gun control in your committee.

My family and I OPPOSE all these insidious, un-Constitutional anti-2A Bills you're proposing.

Dear Legislators, You have been elected to a position for the purpose of representing citizens in VA. You have taken an oath to the state and U.S. Constitution. It is not your place to push radical agendas or ideologies that clearly oppose those Constitutions. The 2nd Amendment clearly states that it “SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED”. Whether you agree or disagree with it is not important. Whether you appreciate firearms or hate and fear them, is not important. What is important, is that you respect my Constitutional right to own them, carry them, use them, transport them, have immediate access to them, decide for myself how I will store them in my own home. It is NOT your place to infringe upon these rights in any way. The very reason for the 2nd Amendment is for citizens to be able to repel, remove, and defend against a tyrannical government. Don’t be a tyrannical government. Remember and honor your oaths. Put aside the partisanship. Sincerely, One of millions of gun owners

All these proposed are laws are just awful. The right of self-preservation is a fundamental human right and having the best tools for self-preservation furthers that fundamental human right. Without those tools, you degrade the most important human right in the world, the right to live and live free. Suing gun dealers and manufacturers will prevent the public from acquiring guns. Banning large swaths of arms and accessories prevent the public from defending themselves with the best tool possible. All these proposed laws are bad. Bad for Virginians and bad for human rights. HB 19 (McClure) requires forfeiture of firearm rights for a “dating relationship” misdemeanor. HB 21 (Helmer) allows civil lawsuits against firearm manufacturers and sellers for crimes committed with their products. HB 40 (Simon) outlaws unfinished frames and receivers unless serialized. HB 93 (Bennett-Parker) forces firearm surrender under protective orders in a way that could disarm innocent family members. HB 110 (Laufer) imposes a civil penalty and towing if a handgun is left in an unattended vehicle. HB 217 (Helmer) bans commonly owned firearms and standard-capacity magazines made after July 1, 2026. HB 229 (Hernandez) prohibits firearms and many knives in medical facilities. HB 626 (Callsen) restricts firearms on college campuses without lawful cause. HB 702 (Cole) establishes a firearm "turn-in and destroy" program funded by taxpayers. HB 871 (Downey) mandates specific storage requirements and biometric safes in homes with minors. HB 969 (Price) creates a state gun violence prevention agency focused solely on firearms. HB 1359 (Hope) creates a costly permit-to-purchase scheme with fingerprints, training requirements, and a de facto handgun registry.

My name is Cossie Scott a lifelong Virginia resident. This is my first time speaking here. I strongly oppose HB19, HB21, HB40, HB93, HB110, HB217, HB229, HB626, HB702, HB871, HB969, HB1300, HB1359 I do support HB1303 45% of Virginia homes own guns lawfully. Nationally, 93% of the guns associated with crime are obtained illegally. So how are any of these regulations moving the needle in illegal gun trafficking? Or attacking the root cause of violent crime? Furthermore, the majority of the average gun related crime occurs in 9 districts in Virginia (Richmond and Hampton Roads). So you are proposing punishing the entire state and every law biding gun owner for an “illegal” gun problem in Hampton and Richmond. Not to mention 63% of the gun related deaths in Virginia are suicide related. That means that all of these bills listed are not scientifically proven with sound data, but emotionally charged by political gun grabbing rhetoric and is saturated with slippery slope informal fallacies with proposed changes being made without analytical data to suggest we have a need to change. Why do we not first address Richmond and Hampton locally before pushing your unfounded ideology on the rest of the commonwealth. Gun laws do not solve for the human condition problem in those 9 districts. We would be better served spending our time, and tax dollars, addressing the poverty problem that drives violent crime, rather than trying to make law biding citizens criminals.

I’ve been a lifelong Democrat because I believe deeply in protecting working people, expanding access to healthcare, safeguarding civil rights, and investing in strong public institutions, but I’ve never fully aligned with my party on gun control. To me, supporting the Second Amendment isn’t about ideology or partisanship — it’s about personal responsibility, self-reliance, and the belief that law-abiding citizens should have the right to protect themselves and their families. I value evidence-based policy, and I worry that many proposed gun laws primarily burden responsible owners while doing little to address the root causes of violence like poverty, mental health gaps, and systemic inequality. I want safer communities, but I believe that comes from smarter enforcement, education, and prevention rather than broad restrictions that limit constitutional rights. Holding these views sometimes puts me at odds with fellow Democrats, but I see it as proof that political identity doesn’t have to mean agreeing with every plank of the platform — it means thinking critically and standing by the principles you believe in. Please vote no to any gun restrictions that are being presented.

I support these bills as indicated above.

The attachment contains my comments on the proposed bills.

Nearly half of all households in the Commonwealth own a firearm and yet Virginia has one of the lowest gun related death rates in the nation (5.6 per 100,000). Not only are you trying to solve an issue that doesn't exist, you're sacrificing your constiunts to pander towards national politics.

As a law abiding gun owner and retired military Virginia Citizen I vehemently oppose any law that opposes our Constitutional Right via the Second Amendment. All of the bills you are considering meet this criteria. Please cease and desist any band all actions that would infringe on my rights…those that our Founding Fathers of whom many were from our Great Commonwealth, believed to be self-evident. Very respectfully, Shannon J. Cornelius, USA/USAF (Ret)

I strongly urge voting against the following bills as all of them will cause undue hardship on legal gun owners, go against the spirit of the US 2nd amendment, will place firearm manufacturers in legal jeopardy solely because their products may have been used in an unlawful fashion (same as suing Ford for getting a speeding ticket). HB 19 (McClure) requires forfeiture of firearm rights for a “dating relationship” misdemeanor. HB 21 (Helmer) allows civil lawsuits against firearm manufacturers and sellers for crimes committed with their products. HB 40 (Simon) outlaws unfinished frames and receivers unless serialized. HB 93 (Bennett-Parker) forces firearm surrender under protective orders in a way that could disarm innocent family members. HB 110 (Laufer) imposes a civil penalty and towing if a handgun is left in an unattended vehicle. HB 217 (Helmer) bans commonly owned firearms and standard-capacity magazines made after July 1, 2026. HB 229 (Hernandez) prohibits firearms and many knives in medical facilities. HB 626 (Callsen) restricts firearms on college campuses without lawful cause. HB 702 (Cole) establishes a firearm "turn-in and destroy" program funded by taxpayers. HB 871 (Downey) mandates specific storage requirements and biometric safes in homes with minors. HB 969 (Price) creates a state gun violence prevention agency focused solely on firearms. HB 1359 (Hope) creates a costly permit-to-purchase scheme with fingerprints, training requirements, and a de facto handgun registry. Thank you,

I oppose the passage of these bills. HB 19, 21, 40, 93, 110, 217, 229, 626, 702, 871, 969, 1359.

The Right to Keep and Bear Arms shall not be infringed. Stop writing and putting Unconstitutional Legislation in the Virginia Code. That covers just about everything I have seen the Democratic Majority propose as new legislation. Want to live in a communist paradise - Move to Cuba - They do not get Snow and sleet there, and you will have someone to give you instructions on how to live your life.

Just to let you know, I am an independent in every sense of the word. I tend to lean left on many issues but on the subject of the second amendment I am a firm believer. I don’t think we need these new restrictions being proposed. The topic is so complex and polar I don’t know how to convince you all of the folly of this legislation except to say many of us are single issue voters regardless of how we feel about certain social issues. I know many democrats in this state who regularly use these weapons that are the subject for future restrictions or outright banning. I will try to touch on a few issues. Assault weapons and high capacity magazine are the current boogie man of the anti gun lobby and have been since the 1990s. This was originally a deliberate attempt to confuse modern civilian semiautomatic weapons with their more dangerous fully automatic assault military versions as a prelude to ban handguns. The term assault weapon is a purely political term that has no universal meaning and it was chosen to instill fear and confusion in the public’s mind. I ask you to review these laws and ask yourself which one of these features makes these weapons more dangerous than other rifles. Is a pistol grip, bayonet lug, or similar feature what makes a rifle dangerous? Or is it caliber, muzzle energy, and rate of fire? If public safety is the true goal why doesn’t this legislation address these factors instead of cosmetics? I will tell you why. Because the average hunting rifle is more powerful than an ar-15 by a wide margin. These are not overpowered rifles as some would have you believe. It’s a semiautomatic version of an intermediate powered rifle - part way between the power of a pistol and a full power hunting rifle. Did you know even Great Britain has no restrictions on weapons with military style features? Their ban is on the caliber and rate of fire. You can even have a semiautomatic uzi there witt a 50 round magazine as long as it is chambered in 22lr. Silencers have very few restrictions there as well because they protect hearing and help minimize noise pollution. Let’s talk about the legality as well. Most of these restrictions are unconstitutional because the weapons and features are in common use. It’s unconstitutional to ban any weapon that is in common use as per DC vs Heller and Brien. If the state court doesn’t overturn these unconstitutional restrictions the Supreme Court will. I will end this conversation by saying our founding fathers faced the same issues we do. At that time most governments restricted civilian arms because they wanted to remain in power. They reasoned through their dealings with Great Britain that an armed population could never be slaves to any tyrannical government or foreign power. This may sound like a tired old saying that is often made fun of. I have heard people saying things like deer don’t need bullet proof vests and you can’t fight against a government without f-16s but is this really true? The ar-15 for instance is not powerful enough to take down a large elk humanly so the bullet proof vest comment is just plain silly. That cartridge is commonly used in other rifles as a varmint round. As far as f-16s are concerned, the Taliban sure kicked us out of their country with nothing more than small arms and guerrilla tactics. Civilian resistance movements rarely fight pitch battles with tanks and fighter jets. They use hit and run tactics combined with numbers to wear the enemy down.

Dear Committee Members, I urge you to reject the blatantly unconditional and egregious anti Second Amendment bills before you. This will do nothing to curb crime, and you know that, but will make criminals out of your political opponents, as well as many of your constituents. Scencerly, Sal DeGennaro

PLEASE PROTECT OUR GUN RIGHTS AND DO NOT DEGRADE VIRGINIANS' SECOND AMENDMENT GUARANTEED RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS!

IT IS VERY FRUSTRATING TO LIVE IN A SOCIETY IN WHICH THOSE WHO ARE ELECTED TO REPRESENT ME IMMEDIATELY STEP IN AND COME UP WITH LAWS IN AN ATTEMPT TO FRAME ME AS A CRIMINAL FOR EXERCISING MY RIGHTS. IN NO WAY HAVE I BROKEN ANY EXISTING LAWS, NOR DO I OWN ANY ITEM CURRENTLY CONSIDERED ILLEGAL. THAT THESE "REPRESENTATIVES" CAN, WITH THE STROKE OF A PEN, PENALIZE ME, MAKES ME WONDER JUST WHO THEY "REPRESENT". WE DO NOT NEED MORE LAWS TO "LESSEN CRIME", WE NEED TO ENFORCE THE ONES ALREADY ON THE BOOKS. PLEASE LEAVE YOUR LAW-ABIDING CITIZENS ALONE.

Our Second Amendment is clear and succinct: "... the right of the People to keep an bear arms shall not be infringed." What I see is an example of the government overstepping its bounds under the illusion of public safety. Many of the measures including assault weapons, magazine capacities, and "ghost guns" are based on buzz words that strike fear because people do not understand them. Let us embark on a few definitions: Infringe: "act so as to limit or undermine (something); encroach on" -Oxford Dictionary. Synonyms include Erode, Impair, and Weaken. ANY legislation that limits impairs, or weakens a citizen's right to own and carry weapons is, by definiton, infringement, and therefore a violation of our beautiful country's constitution. Ghost Gun: the ATF classifies the part of the weapon containing the trigger assembly as a "firearm," colloquially called a Lower Receiver. It is possible to manufacture this part and therefore build a weapon that has no serial number and is unregistered with the police department. This takes skill and specialized, expensive tooling; these firearms sound scary, but are by and large produced by hobbyists, not killers. Assault Weapons (HB217): The limiting, reduction, and impairment of the size of magazine that one can purchase, keep, and carry is simply a violation of the 2nd amendment. Storage (HB871): The State government has no business inside my home and how my weapons are stored. I learned to handle guns at 7 years of age, children can learn. If I lock my weapons as this bill requires, I can no longer access them in an emergency. Its safer to gun-proof my children than child-proof my guns. Permit to purchase (HB1359): We do not need a permit to exercise our first amendment rights. We do not have permits to secure our rights against inappropriate search and seizure, the 4th amendment. We also do not have permits to protect ourselves from cruel and unusual punishment. No other right enumerated in the Bill of Rights requires a permit, why do we treat the 2nd amendment differently? We already strip this right from convicted criminals, we have background checks, leave us law-abiding gunowners alone. I understand these bills have good intentions. We want to see our communities safe, healthy, and thriving, and have our neighbors and friends go about their days without fear. But let us not succumb to fear to such an extent that we throw away our freedom for the illusion of heightened safety. Let's look at California, llinois, and New York, who have the strictest policies in the nation, yet rising rates of violent crimes, and instantly the illusion is dispelled. These measures do not increase safety. What they do accomplish is an erosion of freedom, disarmament of law-abiding citizens, and violation of our country's constitution. I ask you please, as your neighbor and constituent, vote NO to these measures.

This bill would create a new state bureaucracy called the "Virginia Gun Violence Prevention Center," focused exclusively on violence involving firearms while ignoring the broader and more complex causes of crime and violence. By singling out one tool rather than addressing criminal behavior, HB 969 advances a misleading and politically driven narrative that blames inanimate objects instead of the individuals who misuse them. Violence is a human problem, not a hardware problem. Criminal acts are committed by people, using a wide range of weapons and methods. A substantial portion of violent crime in Virginia involves knives, blunt objects, physical assault, and other means. Focusing exclusively on firearms distorts reality and diverts resources away from meaningful crime prevention strategies. The term "gun violence" itself reflects an ideological agenda rather than an evidence-based approach to public safety. We do not speak of "car violence," "knife violence," or "fist violence." When a crime occurs, responsibility rests with the offender, not the tool. Yet HB 969 institutionalizes a framework that treats firearms as the problem and gun owners as suspects. This bill would also waste taxpayer dollars by creating an entirely new agency with overlapping functions that are already performed by existing law enforcement and public safety institutions. Rather than focus on what we already have, HB 969 expands administrative overhead and political advocacy under the guise of research and prevention. Experience in other states shows that similar "gun violence prevention" offices often become vehicles for promoting restrictive gun control policies rather than neutral analysis. These agencies routinely generate reports and recommendations designed to justify further regulation, regardless of their actual effectiveness. HB 969 therefore represents a stepping stone toward broader disarmament policies. By embedding anti-gun ideology into state government, it creates a permanent institutional platform for lobbying against the Second Amendment from within the government itself.

I disagree with any and all laws pertaining to our gun rights and any law that infringes our right to own,sell, trade or gift. These amendments are a total outreach of our constitutional rights and we the people will not stand for it.

These bill do nothing to address criminals and only affects law abiding gun owners. As a black man I feel they are racist as well. Vote NO to all of these bills.

I stand with Gun Owners of America and the Virginia Citizens Defense League in opposing any attempt to restrict law abiding Virginians 2nd amendment rights. These bills will do nothing to stop crime and only serve to limit the rights of the people to exercise their 2nd amendment rights. As a constituent, I urge you to OPPOSE these gun bills: HB 19, Misdemeanors should never take away a civil right. HB 21, This bill is designed to have a chilling effect on all aspects of the firearms industry. HB 40, This bill is unconstitutional, as there was no analog in the history or traditions of firearms with any such limitations at the time the Bill of Rights was adopted. Homemade guns have been legal since before the United States existed. HB 93, This disctriminates against people in the same household and also discriminates against young people who are legally allowed to own fire arms. HB 110, Punish criminals who do this, not the law abiding citizens. HB 217, The U.S. Supreme Court has said in both DC v Heller, and recently The New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v Bruen, that any firearm “in common use” is protected by the Second Amendment. The guns and magazines targeted by this bill are among the most common guns and magazines in the United States, making this bill unconstitutional. There are conservatively estimated to be over 20 million AR-15s and 700 million magazines that hold more than 10 rounds in civilian hands. HB 229, Disarming visitors and guests, including concealed handgun permit holders, at such facilities violates their right to protect themselves in an emergency. A U.S. District Court in the 2nd Circuit has restrained enforcement of just such a law for being unconstitutional under New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v Bruen Supreme Court ruling. HB 626, A solution in search of a problem. Higher education students are adults and have a right to self-defense. HB 702, The name of the program implies that the Commonwealth gives firearms to citizens and now wants citizens to give them back. That is not the case. The State does not give us our rights and does not own our property. HB 871, Biometric safes are more expensive than non-biometric safes and often times more unreliable when being used under stress, This discriminates against those people who are poor and still have a right to self protection. HB 969, we do not need to grow the state bureaucracy to study violent crime when most violent crime does not involve firearms. HB 1359, please find me a constitutional right that you have to get a permit for. There is not one and we should not be limiting the rights of the people by require a permit to exercise their 2nd amendment rights. I SUPPORT the following bill: HB 1303, 90 days is more than sufficient for the State Police to issue a non-resident permit. There is no reason that this should take longer than this.

I’m against all these worthless anti-gun / anti-freedom bills that will do nothing to reduce crime, but will only serve to reduce the freedoms of law abiding citizens. Please retract them and do something good for Virginians. Thank you.

Virginia opposes all these illegal unconstitutional bills. The second amendment is a right not a privilege.! I oppose these bills as an individual taxpayer.

I do not support these bills.

HB21 This bill seeks to punish law-abiding hardworking gun manufacturers and those they employ, either directly or indirectly, by making them conspirators in crimes committed using guns. Besides it being unconstitutional, this law is also discriminatory in that it does not impose the same laws against car manufacturers whose autos and trucks are used in the commission of crimes and a plethora of other legal products used in the commission crime. HB-217 is arbitrary and capricious in that there is no such objective definition or standard for what constitutes a “standard magazine capacity” and/ or firearm. HB-702. This is misuse of public funds. It represents an ideological or charitable function that should be funded like other charities - voluntary contribution. As such it should require the same federal approvals as any other authorized charity. HB-1359. This is textbook 2A infringement prohibited by the US Constitution. Infringe is defined by Meriam-Webster dictionary as “to encroach upon in a way that violates law or the rights of another”. Imposition of taxes, requisite training, purchase delays, etc constitute infringement. Time and public funds are better spent funding law enforcement and executive offices to enforce civil and criminal laws that directly affect or deter criminal activities.

I oppose any and all restrictions on our God given and Constitutionally protected Right to keep and bear arms. None of this nonsense passes constitutional muster. And will have the effect of making the lives Of law abiding citizens less safe while you are Lowering penalties for real crime and turning Law abiding citizens into criminals... These bills are nothing more than a government power grab. What part of "Shall NOT be infringed " do you not Understand??

All bills with the exception of HB 1303 are unconstitutional and I do NOT support them.

I oppose these bills

When did our state government decide that they do not have to follow our Constitution of the United States of America? The 2nd Amendment is an individual right under the Constitution that states clearly that it shall not be infringed on which in simple terms means that no government official or group has the ability to take a person's right to keep and bear arms in the United States of America. This Amendment was so important to our forefathers that it is the second thing they wrote to establish that the government does not have the ability to take your right to defend yourself against all enemies and this includes a tyrannical state government that doesn't understand plain text that our country was founded on. It doesn't matter what others opinions or feelings on the subject of the right to bear arms is because it is my right and not their's that we are talking about at this time. As a society of individuals in our country that have never agreed on things of this nature since the invention of the modern firearm we have to look no farther than our own Constitution to see that this is not a collective right of certain people that agree or disagree with the principle of firearms but infact a Constitutional right of an individual to determine there views of their personal right to bear arms. With the world in the state it is in at our present time this Constitutional right is needed more then ever because we are facing people that think that the can completely ignore the Constitution and its not even on a national level but a state level. This is also a truly sad moment of our state that is the founding place for our country as it exists from the time that we settled in this new land of an unknown world at the time but to disrespect our founding Document that started it all on top of it is the worst thing that could happen in our state for these elected officials to look at the Bill of Rights and say to themselves that those Amendment are not worth following because I have a different opinion, belief or feeling on that Amendment that I am personally going to take the individual right of every person in Virginia just because I don't want to follow these Amendments as they are written. Do you understand how this is being a tyrannical government just like the British were when they were trying to control the entire population at the time that we had the Revolution in this great land to start this great country. When people say that the 2nd Amendment is dated and need to be revised but can see the actual beauty in how our forefathers predicted that this Amendment would be necessary throughout time to even to the year 2026 were we have a government that is looking at this exact Amendment and saying no we don't have to follow that anymore because we have all these people that don't like the fact that a free person of the United States of America can purchase anything that has to do with their ability to not only protect themselves in self defense but also to protect themselves from the tyrannical government that is before us today. I'm sorry but as a person that has no affiliation to a political party or any other organization on this subject in our country I believe in our Constitution and the Amendments that were written in the Bill of Rights to protect myself, my family and my friends from people that think that they know what is best for everyone in our country on the basis that they either think they are smarter, richer or elected.

I oppose every gun-control bill pending before this committee because they are prohibited by both the United States and Virginia Constitutions. The Second Amendment provides that “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” In District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), the Supreme Court held that this language protects an individual right to possess firearms for lawful purposes such as self-defense, independent of militia service. The Court emphasized that the Amendment protects arms “in common use” by law-abiding citizens and forbids bans on entire classes of such arms. In McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010), the Court reaffirmed that this right is fully incorporated against the states, binding Virginia to the same constitutional limits as Congress. Virginia’s Constitution independently protects this right, stating in Article I, Section 13 that “the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” In New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen (2022), the Supreme Court rejected interest-balancing tests and adopted a text-history-tradition standard: if the Second Amendment’s text covers the conduct, it is presumptively protected, and the government must show the regulation is consistent with the Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation. Modern policy goals, crime statistics, or legislative preferences are insufficient. Many pending bills restrict semi-automatic rifles, including AR-style firearms that are owned by millions of Americans and commonly used for lawful purposes such as self-defense, sport shooting, and hunting. Under Heller, arms in common use cannot be banned, and the “dangerous and unusual” exception does not apply. There is no historical tradition of banning commonly owned firearms based on rate of fire, operating mechanism, or cosmetic features, and under Bruen the absence of such historical analogues is dispositive. Other bills ban magazines over ten rounds, which are standard components of many commonly owned handguns and rifles. Because magazines are integral to firearm function, such bans operate as functional prohibitions on protected firearms. There is no Founding-era or Reconstruction-era tradition of limiting ammunition capacity, making these bans unconstitutional under Bruen. Permit-to-purchase schemes likewise unconstitutionally burden a fundamental right by converting it into a government-granted privilege. The right to keep arms necessarily includes the right to acquire them, and fees, training mandates, biometric requirements, and processing delays disproportionately burden citizens and lack historical justification. These schemes invite arbitrary enforcement and indirect suppression of a constitutional right. While public safety is a legitimate concern, the Supreme Court has made clear that constitutional rights cannot be traded away through legislative cost-benefit analysis. Regulations unsupported by historical tradition fail regardless of asserted benefits. For these reasons, the pending gun-control bills before this committee are inconsistent with both the United States and Virginia Constitutions and should be rejected.

Please no more gun bans

These proposed actions would increase the amount of money that is already taken from us in taxes. They make no sense, as we have a 2.3 billion surplus. These actions only hurt Virginians. The democrat party ran on affordability, and these bills do just the opposite. The taxes on firearms, and the banning of them and accessories have already proven to do nothing but punish law abiding citizens. CRIMINALS DONT FOLLOW LAWS! Reducing manditory sentecing for rape and other horrible crimes only make us less safe. Combined with TRYING to disarm us and helping criminals you out us at risk, and rob us of our rights and money. You all should be ashamed of yourselves for being bought off. You all remind me of our flag. You are acting like tyrants. You talk of affordability, yet you are trying to take more of our money. The people will not stand for tour unconstitutional actions. You may have control for the next two years, but your political careers will be destroyed. Tou have become radical tyrants. You hate the other side so much, that you are willing to destroy us. Shame on all of you. The pendulum always swings back, and you are just guaranteeing it will swing so far back that you will wish you never did this. The destruction of our constitution, and your petty attacks are not worth the backlash that will come when the people rise up against what you believe in.

Leave my second amendment rights alone and worry about all the criminals both legal and illegal. Don't screw with law-abiding citizens who work and pay your salary

Hello, I agree and stand with the opinions of the Virginia Citizens Defense League and Gun Owners of America on these troubling bills. The right to keep and bear ares enshrined as a God given right in both the US (2nd amendment) and Virginia (article 1, section 13) Constitutions. Please do not legislate millions of peaceful, law abiding Virginians into criminals with the stroke of a pen.

Please Protect Our 2nd Amendment Rights. Thank You.

Please don’t support any Bills that restrict or infringe on my 2nd Amendment rights.

To whom it may concern, It is important to recognize that criminals, by definition, disregard existing laws and are unlikely to be deterred by the introduction of new legislation. Consequently, the implementation of additional laws often impacts only law-abiding citizens, placing new restrictions or obligations upon those who already comply with legal standards. The focus, therefore, should not be on drafting further statutes but rather on ensuring the consistent and effective enforcement of the laws currently in place. By allocating resources toward upholding existing regulations, society can enhance public safety, maintain fairness, and uphold the integrity of the justice system without unnecessarily burdening responsible citizens. Respectfully, Mr. Jones

You were elected as a protest against the President. You definitely weren't elected to cancel Virginians constitutional rights. I'm sure your big donors outside of Virginia will be happy. But last time you tried this 90 of 95 counties, Cities and Town revolted against you. Plus once your donor lists are published by the influential VCDL and the lawsuits start. The people will find out who you actually serve. Unless you represent Arlington or Fairfax all democratic seats will be in jeopardy for the next election. Finally: You take an oath to honor the constitution when you get the privilege to serve the people. Someone who immediately violates their oath has no honor and can never be trusted with authority. People will remember that when it's time to vote again. I know I will. I used to be a Democrat and donor. But I will never vote for a Democrat again.

Please consider this by destroying the constitutional rights of the people of Virginia. You also will eventually come to the repercussions of your decisions, ie court action and loss of tax payer money etc.Now the 2nd amendment to the constitution in short says “SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED ,basically no laws are to go against the constitution and also as per article 6 clause two of the constitution. Thank you and think wisely because your constituents as whole do not want this. Second Amendment Right to Bear Arms A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Amdt2.1Overview of Second Amendment, Right to Bear Arms Amdt2.2Historical Background on Second Amendment Amdt2.3Early Second Amendment Jurisprudence Amdt2.4Heller and Individual Right to Firearms Amdt2.5Post-Heller Issues and Application of Second Amendment to States Amdt2.6Bruen and Concealed-Carry Licenses Amdt2.7Rahimi and Applying the Second Amendment Bruen Standard

Not one of you liberals submitted a bill to address the real evil that is using a gun. So all of these bills are designed to punish legal law abiding gun owners and protect the real criminals. Im78 years old and have owned and bought guns from the age of 15 when I purchased my first gun with money earned from a paper route. NOT ONE OF THE GUNS I'VE OWNED EVER HARMED ANYONE. IT'S AN INANIMATE OBJECT

As a veteran, I am against any so called gun control legislation that has not demonstrably proven to improve public safety while only minimally impacting individuals’ God given rights and liberties. It is unconscionable to think that elected leaders would even think about passing legislation that infringed upon individual rights merely for purposes of “doing something” without having weighed the impact on law abiding citizens and the innumerable sacrifices made to sustain and protect those rights and liberties through the years. Having served myself and also been the victim of illegal firearm use I staunchly support the 2A rights and individuals’ right to self-defense. Each person’s situation and experiences are different and they deserve to exercise their rights and liberties in a way that accommodates those circumstances, experiences, limitations, etc. So called “assault weapons” (a misnomer in itself) may have features and appearances that some persons find scary or intimidating but, to someone possessing that firearm for their own, individual law purposes, most all of those features actually improve the performance or safety related to the use of that same firearm. All semi-automatic firearms, regardless of how they might LOOK to a casual or uninformed observer basically function the same. Stocks, forearm, bipods, scopes, rails, magazines, etc. do not alter the fundamental intended purpose of this “tool.” I certainly understand those who do not appreciate firearms, in general, or who might actually be scared by their existence or appearance. But our 2A and self defense rights should never be indescribably infringed upon merely for these type reasons. There are very good reasons our fore fathers were adamant about including these inalienable rights as foundational principles in our founding documents. These foundational principles are as relevant today as they were at our founding. Anyone who is arrogant enough to think that they have studied and researched and experienced as much as the founding father scholars and thinkers should reconsider their actions carefully before indiscriminately treading upon one of our sacred rights and liberties without certifiable proof of the amount of public safety that would be realized by their actions. Anything less goes against the solemn oath you have sworn to uphold.

I oppose this bill, honor your oath

I agree with the VCDL on these bills.

Opposite any gun laws. They will not stop any crime. Try enforcing the laws we already.

These sorts of draconian proposals severely restrict the ability of law-abiding citizens to effectively defend themselves against threats of violence. None of the proposed measures which have been inflicted on the citizenry of other states have made one iota of difference in crime levels. They HAVE however restricted law-abiding citizens from exercising their Constitutional rights via the 2nd Amendment. Vote now to cease this onslaught on the rights of law-abiding Virginians. Gun violence is perpetrated by CRIMINALS, so focus on the criminal prosecutions. Limiting the rights of law-abiding Virginians is tantamount to fascism. And as always, "When seconds count, the police are just minutes away!". That's what you are saying to Virginians. If I cannot be trusted to defend myself legally, then you cannot be trusted to run the Commonwealth.

These legislations violate many sections of the Virginia Constitution not just the U.S. Constitution. Legislations like these does nothing to prevent, curtail, deter or otherwise stop crimes or acts of violence. These legislations do not hold criminals that cannot legally possess, purchase or own firearms accountable for their possession, use or handling of a firearm. These legislations do not keep firearms out of the hands of criminals. Cliché but true rhetoric (Criminals will get guns and magazines and commit crimes regardless of the laws. These legislations are immoral, unethical and down right oppressive and serve no purpose other than to infringe upon rights and deny rights. Reminder: - 18, 19 and 20 year old men and women are entrusted in the operation, use, carry and implementation of the following in the service of our country as Servicemembers, Coast Guardsmen, National Guardsmen and Air National Guardsmen and Reservists as well as law enforcement: Semi-automatic Pistols with high capacity magazines, Semi- Automatic Rifles with 30 round magazines, machine guns, rockets, tanks, missiles, rocket Launchers etc and yet Virginia Legislators want to strip away the rights of civilians of that age group of their right to own and bear arms. That is hypocritical and it undermines the Constitution. Our nation foundation and freedom was earned through the blood and sweat of young 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20 year old men from the Revolutionary War for our independence and that of our 17 year old to 20 year old war fighters today standing tall and maintaining our soon to be 250 years of being a Constitutional Republic and our Freedom. Do not allow the stripping of the rights of these military aged men and women that serve and defend our nation, our freedom and our Constitutions. Do not insult them or slap them in the face or turn your backs on them. Fight for them because at some point we have fought and we have sacrificed for you and these young men and women will too. Any legislation that denies and deprives this age group the use, ownership while expecting them to serve in our country and have them carry, operate and use them in the defense of our nation and potentially die, be seriously injured or maimed is diabolical and is disgraceful. Magazine capacity restrictions: (Do not limit or stop the intent of criminals or those intent on committing any act of violence. We have seen the demonstrated and factual extreme actions/tactics that have been used for example: Using a vehicle to run into crowds, Vehicle Born Improvised Explosive Devises (VBIED), Improvised Explosive Devices (IED), mass stabbings, gas attacks and chemical warfare, fire, and more Constitution of Virginia - Article I. Bill of Rights Sections 1,2, 9,10,11. These legislations below, restrict the right to self- defense. Legal gun owners are not committing crimes and do not intend to committ crimes. These legislations are not about accountability for criminals. They are written to suppress and take away the rights of law abiding citizens and ro take away a means of self-defense. These legislations do not create a safer Virginia. HB110, HB1359, HB969, HB871, HB702, HB24, HB21, HB700, HB229, HB217, HB110, HB93, HB19, Example: - HB700: Denies and delays the access to firearms in an emergency situation where a victim of stalking or domestic abuse are in imminent danger. V/R Raymond Carter SFC(Retired)

I strongly oppose this bill

All of these bills are intolerable infringements of the right to keep and bear arms as guaranteed by the Second Amendment and the Constitution of Virginia. Supporting these bills is a violation of your oaths of office. In addition, as should be evident, these bills will only affect law-abiding gun owners, the very people least likely to offend. Criminals, by definition, do not obey the law. They are unlikely to obey these.

Please do not consider any anti-gun bills. Any potential law that goes against our Constitution is wrong and should not be acknowledged. We shouldn't have to pay for our rights. No innocent person should be penalized for a criminal's actions. A gun's capacity is irrelevant. If a person comments a REAL crime, they should be convected and sentenced accordingly. A right should be lost only through certain major criminal actions, not some fool's option of potential. No manufacturer should be responsible for how their product is used. The one responsible is the one in possession of said product, even if it was stolen. Our last Governor understood this. Our new Governor and her political party desperately needs to. We have seen the failures of worthless states like California, Maryland, New York and others. We don't need to be another one. No law will ever stop a crime. The law should provide proper penalties or real crimes. No law should be made for the sole purpose of controlling and wielding power over the citizens of this State or our country.

I am opposed to HB19, HB21, HB40, HB93, HB110, HB217, HB229, HB626, HB702, HB871, HB969, and HB1359, I support HB 1300 and HB1303.

My father was born in Romania in 1933 and as a child lived under the fascism of socialism. The first thing the fascist socialists did was to confiscate guns. Nearly 400,000 Jews were slaughtered by the socialists after having been disarmed in Romania. Now socialists have taken power in Virginia by running as "moderates" and immediately showing their true selves once safely elected. Democrats, like their brethren Nazis, seek to disarm and enslave the general population. I oppose any legislation which punishes law-abiding citizens from protecting themself, their family, and their property. I oppose any legislation which punishes a citizen for potentially being robbed, as if the thief is not the problem-- the victim is treated as the criminal. I oppose any legislation which allows accusations to remove the rights of others. If I accuse every member of government of being a child abuser, are you forced to remain away from your child(ren)? I oppose Nazis and Democrats for the same reasons.

As a fellow Virginian, I urge you to please OPPOSE "gun control" bills in your committee. Concepts like an "assault weapons" ban, arbitrary magazine restrictions, "reasonable standards" for firearms businesses, and a "permit to purchase," just to name a few, do nothing to address crime in the Commonwealth. Criminals do not abide by the law, and bills like these only target law-abiding firearm owners and businesses. The General Assembly should instead pursue legislation that holds criminals accountable for their crimes, not legislation that creates new criminals overnight for lawful purchases. Again, I urge you to OPPOSE gun control in your committee. I support HB 1303 by Delegate Ware. Thank you for all that you do for Virginia.

Disarming the population is not a viable means to promote public safety. It is the duty of the individual to protect themselves from physical harm that may occur by criminal activity. It is not the responsibility of politicians or police. That is why bills like HB 19, HB 21, HB 40, HB 93, HB 229, HB 1359 are unconstitutional and put the general public in more danger as violent criminals will take advantage of unarmed civilians. HB 110 and HB 702 will promote criminal use of firearms as the firearms will be taken away from the registered owners' possession which greatly increases the likelihood the firearm will end up on the black market for resale where violent criminals obtain their weapons. HB 871 will also be ineffective as gun violence prevention means while again adding a monetary burden and serious disadvantage to law a biding citizens in the immediate face of danger. The people of Virginia do not support these policies that waste the time of politicians and money of the tax payer.

I oppose all of these unconstitutional bills.

HB 19 (McClure) requires forfeiture of firearm rights for a “dating relationship” misdemeanor. HB 21 (Helmer) allows civil lawsuits against firearm manufacturers and sellers for crimes committed with their products. HB 40 (Simon) outlaws unfinished frames and receivers unless serialized. HB 93 (Bennett-Parker) forces firearm surrender under protective orders in a way that could disarm innocent family members. HB 110 (Laufer) imposes a civil penalty and towing if a handgun is left in an unattended vehicle. HB 217 (Helmer) bans commonly owned firearms and standard-capacity magazines made after July 1, 2026. HB 229 (Hernandez) prohibits firearms and many knives in medical facilities. HB 626 (Callsen) restricts firearms on college campuses without lawful cause. HB 702 (Cole) establishes a firearm "turn-in and destroy" program funded by taxpayers. HB 871 (Downey) mandates specific storage requirements and biometric safes in homes with minors. HB 969 (Price) creates a state gun violence prevention agency focused solely on firearms. HB 1359 (Hope) creates a costly permit-to-purchase scheme with fingerprints, training requirements, and a de facto handgun registry. ALL of these bills are Unconstitutional and will cause Lawsuits and MASS NON COMPLIANCE

I oppose all these bills!

As a fellow virginian I am very disappointed in these outrageous bills proposed. They do nothing to stop criminals cause they don't follow rules or laws anyways it just hurts people trying to protect themselves from being hurt or God forbid something worse. I have lived in virginia my whole life and love this state but i also love the 2nd amendment and freedom to bear arms so please take in consideration myself and thousands of other virginian's that love the 2nd amendment and the state of Virginia and strike down these outrageous bills. Thank you for your time god bless the 2nd amendment and the state of Virginia!

All these bills are an infringement on our constitutional second amendment rights!

You ran as a middle of the road moderate ticket, and wanted to bring everyone together. all these bills go against that and alienate half of the state. You want bi partisan support? Well to get that you can not be going after law abiding citizens and take away a constitutionally protected right.

Hello, as a true Virginian whose family goes back to the founding of this state, country and fought in the revolutionary war. The anti gun bills being pushed on us are completely unconstitutional. My ancestors would be rolling in their graves right now knowing what you all are trying to do to our personal liberties, freedom and property. All of the anti gun legislation being pushed is not only unconstitutional but against previous Supreme Court rulings. You plan to turn over half of your state into criminals overnight for legally purchased items. So not only are you infringing on the 2nd Amendment but now on our 5th Amendment. 12 months in jail! Sounds like an 8th Amendment violation. True Virginians do not want these unconstitutional laws placed on us. Virginia is where freedom was won and not taken! I urge you all to vote against these unconstitutional bills. We are not California or New York. Our friends in Northern Virginia do not speak for all of Virginia anymore. My kindness regards. True Virginian.

These bills are ill-advised “solutions” in desperate search of largely non-existent problems. The 2nd amendment was quite clear. “Shall not be infringed” means exactly those words. These bills will only make law-abiding citizens less safe. Please actually consider your constituents safety instead of your partisan talking points.

I urge a vote against this, and any gun related bill, that would arguably restrict gun rights, or increase the cost of having,/buying firearms or ammunition, or create any kind of registry of such, of law abiding citizens of Virginia. Most of these bills would do nothing for saving lives, and criminals will not abide by them.

These anti-Second Amendment legislations violate the Second Amendment freedoms guaranteed by the United States Constitution and Virginia Constitution. These bills will not make Virginians safer. but will put us at risk for predatory criminals. Also, the Second Amendment wpuld protect us from a tyranical government. Who protects us from you? Do you so crave power that you must disatm us? Why do you hate fireams?

I oppose these bills. Limiting our right to defend ourselves will not reduce crime or make anyone safer, except violent criminals.

Dear Committee Chair, I am writing to respectfully urge you to OPPOSE these bills. These proposals place unconstitutional burdens on law-abiding citizens while failing to address the root causes of criminal misuse of firearms. Measures such as taxpayer-funded gun turn-in and destruction programs, knife and firearm bans at medical facilities, and magazine capacity restrictions unfairly target responsible gun owners in my community without demonstrable public safety benefits. I ask that you vote “NO” on this legislation and instead support policies that enforce existing laws and address criminal behavior, rather than restricting the rights of lawful citizens. Thank you for your time and consideration. Respectfully, Jan

My family and I hope you will reconsider all of these unconstitutional and tyrannical bills that seek to limit the God given right of citizens to defend themselves. Supporting these unconstitutional. bills as the Governor simultaneously supports the actions of Mr. Petti as a legal firearms owner, is indeed hypocrisy.

Good Morning. I respectfully oppose the following House Bills, which collectively place excessive burdens on law-abiding Virginians while offering little evidence of meaningful reductions in violent crime. These proposals raise serious concerns related to constitutional rights, due process, public safety, and cost. HB 19 (McClure) requires forfeiture of firearm rights for certain misdemeanors involving a broadly defined “dating relationship.” This imposes severe constitutional consequences without felony-level due process protections and relies on vague definitions prone to misuse. HB 21 (Helmer) allows civil lawsuits against firearm manufacturers and sellers for crimes committed with their products. This abandons long-standing liability principles by holding lawful businesses responsible for third-party criminal acts, increasing costs and reducing lawful access without improving public safety. HB 40 (Simon) criminalizes unfinished frames and receivers unless serialized, burdening lawful hobbyists and small manufacturers despite a lack of evidence that such items meaningfully drive crime. HB 93 (Bennett-Parker) mandates firearm surrender under protective orders in ways that may disarm innocent family members who are not accused of wrongdoing, undermining due process and property rights in shared households. HB 110 (Laufer) penalizes and allows towing of vehicles when a handgun is left unattended, even if secured. This may discourage lawful compliance with firearm-restricted locations by eliminating practical storage options. HB 217 (Helmer) bans commonly owned firearms and standard-capacity magazines manufactured after July 1, 2026. Such bans target arms in common lawful use and raise serious constitutional concerns while failing to address criminal misuse of existing firearms. HB 229 (Hernandez) prohibits firearms and many knives in medical facilities, removing lawful self-defense options from patients, visitors, and staff, including permit holders who have already undergone background checks. HB 626 (Callsen) restricts lawful firearm possession on college campuses, treating adult students and faculty as if they forfeit constitutional rights despite documented safety concerns and delayed emergency response times. HB 702 (Cole) establishes a taxpayer-funded firearm turn-in and destroy program with no demonstrated impact on violent crime, diverting resources from proven enforcement and prevention strategies. HB 871 (Downey) mandates specific storage methods and biometric safes in homes with minors, imposing costly, one-size-fits-all requirements that intrude into private homes and may delay access in emergencies. HB 969 (Price) creates a new state agency focused solely on firearms while ignoring broader contributors to violence such as repeat offenders, mental health access, and community-based interventions. HB 1359 (Hope) establishes a costly permit-to-purchase system with fingerprints, training mandates, and a de facto registry, creating delays and barriers to exercising a constitutional right without clear public safety benefits. Conclusion: Taken together, these bills represent a sweeping expansion of government control over lawful firearm ownership. They burden responsible citizens, weaken due process, and prioritize symbolic regulation over effective crime reduction. I urge the General Assembly to reject these measures and focus on enforcing existing laws and addressing violent criminal behavior.

Forum: These Bills are an attack on the lawful Citizen and will not stop the criminal element from doing harm. This has been proven time and time again. The intent of these Bills is to discourage the Citizenry from exercising their rights as protected by the US Constitution and the VA Constitution. These documents are explicit that our rights are being protected and not being given to us by the Govt. It is the Govt responsibility to protect our Bill of Rights and not to subvert them at the Federal and Local level. These bills seek to create a list and registry as forbidden by law. The declaration that all guns that are semi-automatic are "assault weapons" is absurd. The look of a gun does not define it as an assault weapon. These Bills have been stricken down by the highest court(s) in the land time and time again. The only reason for these bills is too attack the lawful citizen and will not do anything to stop the aggressor in his/her intent to do harm. There is significant history that illustrates that an armed populace in society is a peaceful and secure society. I respectfully oppose these Bills that attack the fundamental Bill of Rights that the Federal and State Constitutions protect. V/R, Mr. Charters

I stand with the VCDL and GOA. The proposed bills are tyrannical, these bills make it only harder on law abiding citizens. All gun laws are infringements on the Second Amendment. Just Remembering History” On April 21, 1775, Virginia’s Royal Governor, Lord Dunmore, ordered British marines to seize gunpowder from the Williamsburg powder magazine to prevent a colonial uprising. This "Gunpowder Incident" enraged colonists, leading to militia mobilization under Patrick Henry, forcing a payment for the powder and accelerating Virginia's march toward revolution. “

I oppose these bills because they are unconstitutional!!

I urge you not oppose all of these bills.

All of these bills pushing further gun control only hurt law abiding citizens and punish them for the actions of criminals. Further they aim to disarm potential victims in a lame attempt to establish “common sense” gun control that is anything but. California, Chicago, New York are the model for many of these bills and the evidence is clear that they are not effective and even harmful. If a criminal stole a car and drove it into a crowd of people, you wouldn’t hold the car’s owner responsible. You wouldn’t hold the vehicle’s manufacturer responsible. You wouldn’t pass a law that requires safe storage of vehicles. If someone exhibited a “red flag” you wouldn’t take aware their location driver’s license with no due process or investigation. We don’t do any of that because “common sense” says that it’s ridiculous. The difference between cars and firearms however is there is no Second Amendment for cars, which means that these laws make even less sense and are directly unconstitutional.

All of the aforementioned bills are a substantial attack the God given rights & the 2nd Amendment. These in fact are the opposite of good governance. How does the aforementioned reduce the size & scope of government? How does the aforementioned lead to affordability? There are no statistics that show a benefit to society! Furthermore the aforementioned will only lead to a higher government cost to the citizens while squashing the rights of the citizens!

As a single woman and trained gun owner, I object to any kind of restrictions against my rights as protected by the 2nd amendment. My safety and those of women like me depends on having unrestricted access to the purchase and ownership of a "great equalizer". The next training facility is over an hour from my house, and another I use is more than two hours away. If I cannot leave my gun unattended in the car, I cannot even take a break on my way to or from the range? And since when have taxpayers given you permission and a mandate to use our hard-earned tax money to "buy back" something you haven't bought in the first place? These programs have shown to be a proven failure in other communities. Please vote no.

As a resident of York County I am opposed to the bills listed above and wish for them to be rejected by this committee.

As a Virginian, I am completely opposed to HB19, HB21, HB40, HB93, HB110, HB217, HB229, HB626, HB702, HB871, HB969, and HB1359. Similar ideas have been tried in the past in other states, and have been proven not to reduce any crime, but only serve to unnecessarily burden law-abiding citizens in the lawful exercise of their Second-Amendment rights. If "common sense" were used to try to reduce violent crime, it would be completely obvious that inanimate objects, can, by themselves, do nothing. The sole responsibility lies in the hands of the person who commits the crime, not in what object they chose to use in the perpetration of the crime. The focus of "public safety" initiatives should be keeping violent criminals off the streets, not limiting citizens of their Constitutionally -protected rights. I do not appreciate my tax dollars being used to advance this agenda, and then being further used to try to defend it in the inevitable litigation of these infringements on Virginian's rights. Thank you for your time.

All Anti-Gun bills are Unconstitutional and Impede Citizens' right to Self Defense. We, the residents of the Commonwealth of Virginia OPPOSE any and all of these and will fight each and every one of themthem

As a fellow Virginian, I urge you to please OPPOSE "gun control" bills in your committee. Concepts like an "assault weapons" ban, arbitrary magazine restrictions, "reasonable standards" for firearms businesses, and a "permit to purchase," just to name a few, do nothing to address crime in the Commonwealth. Criminals do not abide by the law, and bills like these only target law-abiding firearm owners and businesses. The General Assembly should instead pursue legislation that holds criminals accountable for their crimes, not legislation that creates new criminals overnight for lawful purchases. Many of the bills proposed have already been declared unconstitutional by multiple Supreme Court decisions. Most others are likely to be struct down in future court proceedings. Again, I urge you to OPPOSE gun control in your committee. Thank you for all that you do for Virginia. Respectfully, Mark Salamone

Unconstitutional. What part of shall not be infringed is misunderstood?

I firmly oppose any laws or policies that infringe upon my Second Amendment rights. I believe the right to keep and bear arms is a fundamental constitutional protection, and I do not support legislation that restricts law‑abiding citizens from exercising that right. Tucker Ophof Bristow, VA 20136

I strongly oppose this bill. HB 969

Stop all bills restricting our Second Amendment rights.

I appose this bill.

My name is Cole Zerrenner, and I am a registered voter residing in Ashburn, Loudoun County, Virginia. I respectfully submit this written testimony in opposition to the following bills scheduled before the House Public Safety – Firearms Subcommittee: HB19, HB21, HB40, HB93, HB110, HB217, HB229, HB626, HB702, HB871, HB969, HB1300, HB1303, and HB1359. I oppose these bills because, taken individually and collectively, they impose additional restrictions and penalties on law-abiding citizens while failing to meaningfully address criminal misuse of firearms or the underlying causes of violence. Many of these proposals expand prohibitions, create new compliance burdens, or rely on vague standards that raise concerns regarding due process, inconsistent enforcement, and unintended consequences. Several of the bills before the subcommittee emphasize preemptive restrictions or broad prohibitions rather than focusing on enforcement of existing laws, accountability for criminal conduct, or effective mental health interventions. Policies that reduce procedural safeguards or delay the exercise of constitutional rights risk undermining public confidence without clear evidence of improved public safety outcomes. I respectfully urge the subcommittee to consider whether these measures meaningfully target criminal behavior or instead primarily impact responsible Virginians who already comply with the law. Public safety is best served through targeted enforcement, due process protections, and policies that address root causes rather than symbolic or duplicative restrictions. Thank you for the opportunity to submit written testimony for the public record and for your consideration of my views. Respectfully submitted, Cole Zerrenner Ashburn, Loudoun County, Virginia

First and foremost, I fully support any comments made by Virginia Citizens Defense League, The NRA, and Gun Owners of America in regard to support for the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. As a fellow Virginian, I urge you to please OPPOSE "gun control" bills in your committee. Concepts like an "assault weapons" ban, arbitrary magazine restrictions, "reasonable standards" for firearms businesses, and a "permit to purchase," just to name a few, do nothing to address crime in the Commonwealth. Criminals do not abide by the law, and bills like these only target law-abiding firearm owners and businesses. The General Assembly should instead pursue legislation that holds criminals accountable for their crimes, not legislation that creates new criminals overnight for lawful purchases. A lot of these proposed bills are unconstitutional and may even be a civil rights violation due to the fact that they most certainly will disproportionally have a negative effect on minorities, women, and people of lower income and certainly violating an 18–20 year-old persons 2nd Amendment right to own and bear arms. If they have to work and pay taxes and be held accountable as an adult you can't legally deny them any rights under the constitution. Many of these proposed bills have already successfully been challenged at the U.S. Supreme court in rulings supporting the 2nd amendment. Examples cases- v Heller and v Bruen, so you are intentionally trying to pass bills that will not hold up in court and wasting valuable taxpayer money to pursue these bills. Again, I urge you to OPPOSE gun control in your committee. Thank you for all that you do for Virginia. Sincerely, Chris McDorman

Why I Oppose Each Bill below: HB 19 – Opposition: Punishes a non‑violent misdemeanor unrelated to firearms. Violates: Heller (2008); Hayes (4th Cir. 2009) – proportionality; Bruen (2022) – no historical basis for such a blanket ban. HB 21 – Opposition: Imposes strict liability for third‑party crimes, chilling lawful commerce. Violates: Heller (2008); Printz (1997) – cannot commandeer private actors; Bruen (2022) – no historic analogue. HB 40 – Opposition: Criminalizes already‑lawful homemade components and deprives property without compensation. Violates: Heller (2008); Miller (1939) – regulation must have a reasonable safety link; Bruen (2022); Lucas (1992) – takings. HB 93 – Opposition: Overbroad removal punishes lawful spouses and 18‑20‑year‑olds who may already possess firearms. Violates: Heller (2008); McDonald (2010); Bruen (2022) – age‑restriction lacks history; Carpenter (2018) – vague “if officer believes” standard violates due process. HB 110 – Opposition: Penalizes mere visibility and treats the gun as property that can be seized without due process. Violates: Heller (2008); Jones (2012) – towing = unlawful seizure; Bruen (2022) – no historic precedent. HB 217 – Opposition: Bars weapons in common lawful use and imposes capacity limits without historical support. Violates: Heller (2008); Bruen (2022); Miller v. Bonta (9th Cir. 2021). HB 229 – Opposition: Prevents lawful armed visitors in public medical settings without a narrow justification. Violates: Heller (2008); Bruen (2022); Katz (1967) – potential Fourth‑Amendment search issues. HB 626 – Opposition: Denies adult students the right to self‑defense on public campuses. Violates: Heller (2008); Bruen (2022); Washington v. Davis (1976) – lacks rational basis. HB 702 – Opposition: Authorizes confiscation/destruction of lawfully owned property without compensation or due process. Violates: Heller (2008); Kelo (2005) – takings require just compensation; Bruen (2022) - no historic precedent. HB 871 – Opposition: Expensive, tech‑exclusive requirement makes lawful loaded storage impracticable. Violates: Heller (2008); Bruen (2022); Willowbrook v. Olech (2000) – overinclusive impact on owners with minors. HB 969 – Opposition: Single‑issue agency risks viewpoint discrimination and may enable firearm‑specific regulations lacking constitutional footing. Violates: Heller (2008); Bruen (2022); Mathews v. Eldridge (1976) – inadequate procedural due process. HB 1359 – Opposition: Creates costly, time‑consuming barriers that effectively deny the right to acquire firearms for lawful purposes. Violates: Heller (2008); Bruen (2022); McDonald (2010); Harper v. Virginia State Board of Elections (1966) – fee structure resembles a poll tax. The Virginia Constitution’s Article I § 16 protects an individual’s right to keep and bear arms, and the state Supreme Court requires any limitation to be narrowly tailored, historically grounded, and consistent with due‑process (§ 13) and takings (§ 14) protections. The bills listed: HB 19, 93, 110, 871 (mandatory surrenders/penalties); HB 21, 40, 1359 (civil‑liability or costly licensing); HB 217, 229, 626, 702 (bans on common‑use firearms or accessories); and HB 969 (a gun‑only state agency)—all impose restrictions without a clear historical analogue, over‑reach permissible regulation, and create undue financial or procedural burdens. Consequently, they conflict with Virginia’s constitutional guarantees.

I SUPPORT HB1303. A right delayed is a right denied. I OPPOSE HB19: Misdemeanors should not remove rights. I OPPOSE HB21: How could a firearm accessory seller reasonably know if they were selling a gun sling to a prohibited person? Should a car parts store be sued if they sold a seat cover for a car used in a bank robbery? I OPPOSE HB40: Even a chunk of aluminum, if sold to the public to become a frame or receiver once completed, must be serialized under this bill. The bill doesn’t grandfather existing homemade firearms. This bill is unconstitutional under Bruen. Homemade guns have been legal since before the United States existed. I OPPOSE HB93: There are multiple problems with the bill as written. If a husband and wife co-own a shotgun for home defense, for example, and the husband gets a protective order issued against him, the wife would no longer have access to that co-owned shotgun. That punishes the wife and needlessly endangers her life. Also, a person 18-20yo can legally possess rifles, shotguns, and handguns. Others right can not be removed because of the actions of another. I OPPOSE HB110: The car owner should not be at fault even if a criminal opens an unlocked car door to steal a firearm. It is the criminal who is solely to blame. I OPPOSE HB217: The U.S. Supreme Court has said in both DC v Heller, and recently in Bruen, that any firearm “in common use” is protected by the 2A. The guns and magazines targeted by this bill are among the most common guns and magazines in the US & VA, making this bill unconstitutional. I OPPOSE HB229: Disarming visitors and guests, including concealed handgun permit holders, at such facilities violates their right to protect themselves in an emergency. A U.S. District Court in the 2nd Circuit has restrained enforcement of just such a law for being unconstitutional under Bruen. I OPPOSE HB626: A solution in search of a problem. Higher education students and staff are adults and have a right to self-defense. I OPPOSE HB702: Destroying what might be perfectly functional, and possibly quite valuable, firearms is a waste of money. The State could offset any costs by selling the firearms to licensed gun dealers through an auction. This program is a “turn in” and not a “give-back” program, the government never owned them. I OPPOSE HB871: Biometric safes are more expensive than non-biometric safes. Biometric safes can be unreliable when being used under stress and they also require batteries to work. There are plenty of other locking mechanisms for safes that are more secure. I OPPOSE HB969: The Center would only be targeting violence committed using firearms and ignoring the root causes of crime, as well as all the other ways violence is inflicted on victims – knives, blunt objects, hands and feet, etc. Half of violent crimes are not committed with a firearm! I OPPOSE HB1359: This bill WILL get innocent people killed, as it will take at least two months before a person can purchase their first firearm. If they are purchasing that firearm for urgent self-defense, that is simply too long. The price to get a permit, is not equitable. Even citizens with CHPs will be limited to one handgun a month. Local law-enforcement will be handed a registry of gun owners. And gun rentals at shooting ranges will not be possible for people who have not yet got their permit or are visiting from out of state or from another country. It is sickening to see this bill even proposed.

Disarming the law-abiding, tax-paying citizenry of the Commonwealth is going to drive me away from this state. Stop creating unconstitutional efforts that curtail my Rights as an American Citizen. If you want to change the Right, then change the Constitution through the amendment process. Otherwise, focus on what you can really change and fund. Schools and roads. Quit wasting my hard earned money that I spend on local businesses that keep Virginians employed. I am not the only one who will vote with my feet. I left California for a reason...not you're trying to re-create it on the East coast.

In summary, I support House Bills 19, 93, 110, 201, 691, 696, 702, 871, 901, 909, 969, 1303, and 1359. I oppose House Bills 21, 40, 207, 217, 229, 626, 700, 907, 919. Please refer to my attached document for further explanation.

I support HB871 because keeping guns out of the hands of kids is vital. I support HB901 as I acknowledge that those closest to a person can often be the ones who are able to spot causes for concern. I support HB907 as it should help to deter “smash and grab” incidents. I support HB969 as CVIs have proven to be incredibly effective in deterring gun violence. I support HB1015 as I believe that hate has no place in our state and want to protect minority communities in our commonwealth. I support HB1359 as it would reduce gun violence by ensuring only eligible, vetted individuals can purchase firearms, and it would also help to prevent impulsive or high-risk purchases.

Oppose HB969. Just another way to funnel tax payer $$$$$. Stop the Grift! Get out of my pocket!

I stand strongly with the VCDL on these proposed laws. VA has always been a bipartisan state on gun issues, and although the second amendment has may purposes- it must be preserved to protect the citizens of this state. Overreaching federal law enforcement, and all threats domestic and foreign are kept in line by responsible firearm ownership. Gun control also impacts lower income groups, impoverished populations, and people of color disproportionately. We must preserve the 2nd amendment.

I strongly oppose this bill.

I am writing to express my strong opposition to the recently proposed bills on gun control. While I understand the intent behind these bills—to enhance public safety—I firmly believe that they will have unintended consequences that infringe on the constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens. The Second Amendment guarantees "the right of individuals to keep and bear arms", and it is a fundamental part of what makes this country free. These bills being proposed would place unnecessary and burdensome restrictions on responsible gun owners, making it harder for Virginians to exercise their rights in a lawful and safe manner. Rather than focusing on restricting access to firearms, I urge the General Assembly to consider measures that target criminals and illegal activities, such as enforcing stricter penalties for those who use firearms in the commission of crimes, or improving background checks for gun purchases. It is essential to address the root causes of violence, such as mental health issues and gang-related activity, rather than punishing responsible gun owners who follow the law. Furthermore, these proposed bills could create significant logistical challenges for gun owners, particularly those who rely on their firearms for self-defense, hunting, or recreational activities. The financial burden and potential legal ramifications of complying with these new regulations would be overwhelming for many Virginians. I strongly urge you to reconsider these proposals and to focus on policies that protect both our rights and our communities. I trust that you will make the best decision for all Virginians, and I sincerely hope that you will oppose these bills.

This bill creates a state agency that only focuses on violence committed using firearms. What about other forms of violence? What about addressing the root cause of that violence? I strongly urge you not to support this bill without amendments to rename it more broadly for all types of violence while focusing on the root cause of violence, and not just the tools criminals use to commit it.

In 2021, my elderly stepmother shot through a closed door during an argument with my elderly father, striking him in the back and paralyzing him. My father has spent the past five years in extreme physical agony, unable to walk, paying caretakers out of pocket to hoist him in and out of bed, unable to care for himself. The lack of movement in his life has led to horrific bed sores, which become bone infections, which lead to extended hospital stays and a horrible quality of life. All this because my stepmother was allowed to have a gun. There are countless stories like this of the bullet's aftermath: of the lifelong physical and mental damage that comes from guns. It has been a horrific five years, full of physical pain and mental anguish for our entire family. I wouldn't wish this on anyone. The bills before you now will not only save lives, they will spare whole swaths of our neighborhoods from needing to deal with these horrors. One bullet, lodged in my father's spine, didn't kill him. Instead, it has shattered the life he had, his ability to work and care for himself, and his family. Each bullet we allow in our communities has the ability to do the same. His care has bankrupted him personally, and now he relies on state care and Medicaid, an avoidable burden on taxpayers. There are numerous reasons guns have no place in our society, and I hope my father's story is just one that helps make change. Please support all bills that make guns harder to access, harder to keep. Please do everything you can to keep guns out of the hands of our society. Thank you for the great work you are doing to keep Virginians safe.

I am writing to oppose the current slate of firearm restriction bills before the General Assembly. While these proposals are framed as public safety measures, in practice they disproportionately harm marginalized Virginians — including racial minorities, LGBTQ+ individuals (especially trans people), immigrants, and low-income residents — who often face higher risks of targeted violence and slower or unequal police response. These bills add costs, delays, and bureaucratic hurdles to exercising a fundamental right. Increased fees, mandatory waiting periods, feature bans, and expanded disqualifications fall hardest on people with limited financial resources, unstable work schedules, or justified concerns about their personal safety. For many vulnerable individuals, the ability to lawfully and promptly acquire a firearm is not about ideology, but about self-defense. History shows that restrictive gun laws are most aggressively enforced in minority communities, amplifying disparities in arrests, prosecution, and legal exposure — even when no harm has occurred. Expanding civil liability, criminal penalties, and subjective risk standards increases that risk. Public safety should not come at the expense of civil rights or equal access to self-protection. Policies that price people out of their rights or delay lawful self-defense do not address the root causes of violence and instead leave the most vulnerable less safe. I respectfully urge you to oppose these bills and support approaches that protect both public safety and the rights of all Virginians, regardless of income, identity, or background. Thank you for your time and consideration.

Oppose all gun control. Why are you assaulting the rights of law abiding Virginians while lowering punishments for violent criminals. This shows that you are not doing this for safety purposes. You are doing this because you have contempt for the Constitution.

I STRONGLY support HB1427. I STRONGLY oppose HB1015 and HB1525. I am neutral on HB916.

PLEASE VOTE NO, ONLY FELONIES SHOULD TAKE FIREARMS

Oppose bills attacking 2nd Amendment rights.

I oppose all of these bills to limit my second amendment freedoms.

HB 916 School administrators have enough work to do educating students and do not need to become nannys for parents as provided for under this bill. There is no real problem to solve here and this legislation is unnecessary. OPPOSE. HB 1015 The penalty under this bill, for a misdemeanor, takes away a person's civil right to keep and bear arms. Maybe for a felony conviction, but not this. It would set a bad precedent. OPPOSE. HB 1427 I support this bill. Restricting handgun purchases to one / 30 days hasn't solved any problem and really only impacts law abiding citizens. Criminals don't care about restrictions on legal purchases. OPPOSE. HB 1525 A person under 21 years old and over 18 is considered and adult who can vote, and be drafted. They have rights under the U.S. Constitution like anyone else and transporting arms for any otherwise legal purpose should not be a crime. "Assault" firearms are not clearly defined and the broad definition is subject to political whims. The term itself is political language that doesn't belong in the law. Finally, any firearm is not capable of a crime as an inanimate object. Criminals are capable and we already have plenty of laws to address them.

The Brady Campaign to End Gun Violence supports these bills.

HB 1015: Putting a lifetime ban on person committed a misdemeanor is unconstitutional. Especially if there is no way to remove it. Think of of all the dumb things people do when they are young or when in failing relationships. Why would we put a permanent scarlet letter on someone without the chance for redemption. The most obvious problem is that this doesn't solve anything. I mean are you banning hands, feet , bats, kitchen knives, etc. HB 1427: Virginia’s One Handgun a Month law is another solution to a non-existent problem, In fact because of this you are no longer notified when some buys multiple handguns. Which is the current Federal law. You are also putting a fiscal burden on your constituents when they lose out on sales. Because they need to wait month for each purchase. after all you are getting the same background check, whether you buy one or 10 guns HB 1525 : Another bill that's already been proven to be unconstitutional. So if it's necessary to restrict 18 - 20 years ability to posses a handgun. Then logically no Law Enforcement officer in the state below 21 should be covered under this law. In fact why do we allow people under 21 to join the national guard and military.

HB 916 - Support - lets any recognized firearms training agency for concealed permit qualification HB 1015 - Oppose - This bill prohibits a person convicted of a misdemeanor assault and battery hate crime from being able to possess firearms. Misdemeanors should never take away a person's civil rights. The bill is unconstitutional under the U.S. Supreme Court's New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen decision. HB 1427 - Oppose - This bill repeals the unconstitutional One Handgun a Month law.

Forum: I urge you to oppose HB1015 and HB1525 as both of these Bills unconstitutionally infringes on a persons guaranteed Rights. HB1015 has already been proven unconstitutional by the SCOTUS. I support HB1427 as it is removes an already unconstitutionally law approved by a government intent on controlling a persons guaranteed right. There is nothing in the Constitution that stipulates a quantity or value on how a person chooses to exercise their rights. HB916 should not restrict or hinder the exercise of a persons 2ndA right. The Bill as written now should not be restrictive such that it controls the actions of the person when they need to use the 2ndA the most. A person should not be restricted on when, how, where they need to protect themselves or others such that they are pressed to NOT exercising their 2ndA rights. If you make it so very difficult to exercise a persons guaranteed rights that are protected, then that person will consider it a hindrance, whereas the criminal element does not care or even considers the control mechanism of the law. V/R, Mr. Charters

We need machine guns and abortions for satanic spawn

Please support HB 1427 Please oppose HB 1015 and HB 1525

This Bill is ridiculous. Do you lose your voting rights because of a traffic ticket? The 2nd amendment is not a Civil Right you can pick and choose who it belongs to so easily.

HB1015 AND HB1525 OPPOSED BY COMMON SENSE HB1427 IN FAVOR

As a fellow Virginian, I urge you to OPPOSE any and all restrictions for firearms and legal gun owners and support those bills that address and support legal gun owners in the Commonwealth. SUPPORT HB 1427 repeals Virginia’s unconstitutional One Handgun a Month law. OPPOSE House Bill 1015 prohibits firearm possession for those convicted of a misdemeanor assault and battery hate crime. Misdemeanors should never strip a person of their civil rights, and this bill is unconstitutional under the U.S. Supreme Court’s NYSRPA v. Bruen decision. OPPOSE House Bill 1525 removes the right of young adults aged 18–20 to possess a handgun or so-called “assault firearm,” except in narrow circumstances on family property. This bill unconstitutionally denies young adults their Second Amendment rights. Thank you for all that you do for our Commonwealth.

I support this bill because state laws covering violent misdemeanor crimes are associated with a 21% reduction in intimate-partner homicide with a firearm and an 18% reduction in overall homicide rates.

No new gun laws

HB1015 is unconstitutional per US Supreme Court NYSRPA v. Bruen and strips civil rights for misdemeanors and should not be allowed to pass HB 1427 lifts unnecessary gun purchases restrictions and should be passed HB1525 denies young adults of constitutional rights and should not be passed Thank you for your time and attention.

OPPOSE HB 1015 and HB 1525, and to SUPPORT HB 1427.

The listed misdemeanors do not justify the removal of any Constitutional Right. A recent U.S. Supreme Court decision declared this bill's provisions to be unconstitutional. The Patron is compelled by a Supreme Court decision to withdraw this Bill. NYSRPA v, Bruen.

HB1015 - Virginia affirms a citizen's right to vote irrespective of misdemeanor convictions, establishing a principle that should be uniformly applied to all constitutionally protected rights. The Second Amendment warrants comparable deference; failing to do so constitutes blatant selectivism in the exercise of fundamental rights and establishes a dangerous precedent that could enable the incremental erosion of other liberties. Moreover, employing a hate crime designation as the criterion for determining eligibility to exercise a right creates an expansive and perilous mechanism for targeting individuals who dissent from the governing body, thereby unconstitutionally stripping them of their rights and protections. HB1427 - Imposing a mandatory waiting period on citizens who lawfully purchase a handgun constitutes a direct infringement on the right to bear arms. When an individual has cleared all legal requirements and demonstrated no reasonable doubt as to their eligibility, compelling them to wait before acquiring another firearm provides no substantive public safety benefit. Such a measure is merely an obstruction masquerading as a protective policy, which paradoxically disarms law-abiding citizens and denies them a critical means of self-defense precisely when they may need it most. HB1525 - Prohibiting individuals from possessing a firearm until the age of twenty-one represents another incremental erosion of constitutionally protected liberties. The logic of such a restriction is deeply inconsistent: in Virginia, a citizen can obtain a driver's license at sixteen, yet must wait until eighteen to exercise a federally protected right. If the concern is truly about maturity and judgment, then any policy raising the firearm ownership age to twenty-one should be paralleled by raising the military enlistment age to the same standard. After all, the very firearms deemed too dangerous for twenty-year-olds are issued en masse to service members for use with far greater lethality. Furthermore, restricting access to firearms during formative years is counterproductive to public safety. Early and consistent training with firearms cultivates proficiency, discipline, and respect for their operation. Denying young adults this opportunity prevents them from developing the crucial experience that ensures responsible handling, thereby creating a liability rather than a protection and endangering the very community the law aims to shield. Historically, this age-based restriction has no precedent. The Continental Army, during the Revolutionary War, enlisted men as young as sixteen, entrusting them with the state-of-the-art weaponry of the era. This established a clear precedent for recognizing the rights and responsibilities of young adults to bear arms in defense of themselves and their nation, rendering current age limitations a modern departure from established American tradition.

I oppose HB1015 and HB1525. I support HB 1427.

Shall not be infringed. It’s literally the second thing our founding fathers drafted. Please stop. All of it. Recant your bills and leave our freedoms alone.

HB1015: Do not pass this non-objective rider. Hate crimes are in the eye of the beholder. Are you aware that in communist China, the first thing they did was to cause children to hate their parents, getting the parents killed. But then when the children grew up and were a threat, then china killed the children who did their work ! The stated reason for killing both the parent and the child was 'hate', hate of the new regime, which morphed. All laws based on 'hate' are anti-christian and deny the value of human life, even the value of people who say hateful things. In Christiandom, we do not punish people for 'hate' words but rather for actions. Actions are a line not to be crossed, but when emotions are considered actions, there is no rule of law.

I oppose HB 1015 and HB 1525. I support HB 1427.

Please vote in favor of HB1427. The Second Amendment doesn't say "unless someone wants to buy more than one handgun within a 30-day period." Please vote against HB 1015. No conviction for a misdemeanor, even if committed because of hate (as opposed to love?) should result in loss of a fundamental constitutional right. Please vote against HB 1525. This is yet another law curtailing the freedom of the law-abiding while doing nothing to stop criminals.

HB 1015 Please do not support this bill. This bill prohibits firearm possession for those convicted of a misdemeanor assault and battery hate crime. Misdemeanors should never strip a person of their civil rights, and this bill is unconstitutional under the U.S. Supreme Court’s NYSRPA v. Bruen decision. HB 1427 Please do not support this bill. This bill repeals Virginia’s unconstitutional One Handgun a Month law. This is an unnecessary obstruction to commerce and free trade as well. HB 1525 - Please do not support this bill due to its negative impacts. The bill removes the right of young adults aged 18–20 to possess a handgun or so-called “assault firearm,” except in narrow circumstances on family property. This bill unconstitutionally does not permit young ADLUTS, who are legally responsible, their Second Amendment rights. This is uncons

• OPPOSE: HB 1015 (Tran) prohibits firearm possession for those convicted of a misdemeanor assault and battery hate crime. Misdemeanors should never strip a person of their civil rights, and this bill is unconstitutional under the U.S. Supreme Court’s NYSRPA v. Bruen decision. This bill needs to be OPPOSED as unconstitutional (both US and Virginia Constitutions). • SUPPORT: HB 1427 (Griffin) repeals Virginia’s unconstitutional One Handgun a Month law. This bill needs to be strongly supported. The restrictions on law-abiding citizens exercising their Constitutional rights need to end. • OPPOSE: HB 1525 (McGuire) removes the right of young adults aged 18–20 to possess a handgun or so-called “assault firearm,” except in narrow circumstances on family property. This bill unconstitutionally denies young adults their Second Amendment rights. These same people are old enough to vote, or to be drafted, so they are old enough to enjoy the Constitutional protections afforded the rest of the adult population.

Fire arms are our founding father right given to us and need to be left to us as Virginian

OPPOSE HB 1015 and HB 1525 I view these bills as legislators grasping at straws. These bills are merely paint on rotten wood. Fix the rot that is our degenerating society, not by anocratic means targeting normal people. SUPPORT HB 1427

HB916, please support this bill. HB1015, please oppose this bill, Misdemeanors should never take away a person’s civil rights. The bill is unconstitutional under the U.S. Supreme Court’s New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen decision. HB1427, please support, this bill repeals the unconstitutional One Handgun a Month law. HB1525, please oppose this bill, the Second Amendment doesn't begin at age 21, it should be applicable to all adults. All adults should have the right to Keep and Bear Arms.

I oppose HB1015 and HB1525. Regarding HB1525, law-abiding young adults should not be deprived of their basic constitutional rights simply because they are young. If 18-20 year-olds can be drafted into military service and vote in elections, they should also be treated as adults for purposes of their Second Amendment rights. Regarding HB1015, misdemeanor convictions should not be a basis for a lifelong deprivation of basic constitutional rights. It is especially perverse to impose these restrictions at the same time the General Assembly is (apparently) on the verge of removing mandatory minimum sentences for many crimes that are far, far more serious. If the General Assembly wishes to make sentencing more flexible for even the most severe crimes, then only one thing could explain simultaneously imposing HB1015's rigid, one-size-fits-all rule on individuals convicted of misdemeanors: hostility to the Second Amendment itself. I oppose this bill.

HB105 (Tran) Misdemeanors should never strip someone of their civil rights, and this bill does just that, making it unconstitutional under the U.S. Supreme court's NYSRPA v. Bruen decision. HB 1427 (Griffin): no citizen should be prohibited to exercising his or her constitutional right just one time per month. What's next? We can only purchase one book per month or write one blog post one time per month. Are you going to allow us to protest just one time per month? You can't limit our right to keep and bear arms. Besides, other states with these laws show no credible evidence that the reduce gun crimes. Most guns used in crimes are stolen anyway. HB916 (Lopez): It is unconstitutional to require someone to earn their civil rights through testing or skill. We did this to blacks, requiring them to pass unfair tests in order to vote. Will you make people take tests to vote or to speak freely? What other amendment is treated this way? The answer is none. HB 1525 (McGuire): This bill unconstitutionally denies adults their Second Amendment Rights? What will you do next? Will you require someone to be 21 to have Miranda Rights? Will you have to be 21 to have the right to refuse to quarter soldiers?

All these bills are just a power grab utter nonsense and will cost you the faith many Virginians

❌ Oppose HB 1015 (Tran) HB 1015 imposes a lifetime loss of firearm rights based solely on a misdemeanor conviction, which is a disproportionate punishment that erodes fundamental civil liberties. Misdemeanors have never historically justified stripping constitutional rights, and this bill directly conflicts with the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in NYSRPA v. Bruen, which requires firearm restrictions to be consistent with this nation’s historical tradition. HB 1015 is unconstitutional and sets a dangerous precedent for expanding rights deprivations without due justification. ✔️ Support HB 1427 (Griffin) HB 1427 restores constitutional integrity by repealing Virginia’s failed and unconstitutional One Handgun a Month law. This restriction has proven ineffective at reducing crime while unlawfully burdening law-abiding citizens’ Second Amendment rights. Repeal aligns Virginia law with Supreme Court precedent and affirms that fundamental rights should not be rationed by the government. ❌ Oppose HB 1525 (McGuire) HB 1525 denies law-abiding adults aged 18–20 the right to possess commonly owned firearms, despite their full recognition as adults under the law. Young adults vote, serve in the military, and are subject to all legal responsibilities—yet this bill selectively strips them of a core constitutional right. The Second Amendment does not contain an age carve-out, and this proposal plainly violates both constitutional text and historical tradition.

❌ Oppose HB 1015 (Tran) HB 1015 imposes a lifetime loss of firearm rights based solely on a misdemeanor conviction, which is a disproportionate punishment that erodes fundamental civil liberties. Misdemeanors have never historically justified stripping constitutional rights, and this bill directly conflicts with the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in NYSRPA v. Bruen, which requires firearm restrictions to be consistent with this nation’s historical tradition. HB 1015 is unconstitutional and sets a dangerous precedent for expanding rights deprivations without due justification. ✔️ Support HB 1427 (Griffin) HB 1427 restores constitutional integrity by repealing Virginia’s failed and unconstitutional One Handgun a Month law. This restriction has proven ineffective at reducing crime while unlawfully burdening law-abiding citizens’ Second Amendment rights. Repeal aligns Virginia law with Supreme Court precedent and affirms that fundamental rights should not be rationed by the government. ❌ Oppose HB 1525 (McGuire) HB 1525 denies law-abiding adults aged 18–20 the right to possess commonly owned firearms, despite their full recognition as adults under the law. Young adults vote, serve in the military, and are subject to all legal responsibilities—yet this bill selectively strips them of a core constitutional right. The Second Amendment does not contain an age carve-out, and this proposal plainly violates both constitutional text and historical tradition.

As a 2nd Amendment constituent, I oppose all of the above bills!

Please Protect Our 2nd Amendment Rights. Thank you.

I would like to express my opposition to HB 1015 prohibits firearm possession for those convicted of a misdemeanor assault and battery hate crime. Misdemeanors should never strip a person of their civil rights, and this bill is unconstitutional under the U.S. Supreme Court’s NYSRPA v. Bruen decision. So what this bill tells me, if someone is in my space berating me, before I use force and "push" this person out of my space while I walk away and then I get charged with an assault, then I could get my second amendment rights revoked for a misdemeanor? Really????? And my opposition HB 1525 removes the right of young adults aged 18–20 to possess a handgun or so-called “assault firearm,” except in narrow circumstances on family property. This bill unconstitutionally denies young adults their Second Amendment rights. My grandson is an avid hunter with his father. Even though my grandson is only 13, this bill would deny him the purchase of a firearm when he becomes an adult at the age of 18. This, in my opinion is unacceptable! I support HB 1427 repeals Virginia’s unconstitutional One Handgun a Month law. Being from a Law Enforcement Family, I have been around firearms all my life. My father is a retired LEO in North Carolina and my husband is Retired LEO from Portsmouth VA . Purchasing One firearm a month is ridiculous. If I have the money, who cares what I spend it on. If I want one or twenty firearms, why should I be restricted as long as I pass the background check? Respectfully, Mary Spruill 3800 Pughsville Rd Suffolk VA 23435 757-676-3880

As usual, your Demokrap proposed bills are all unconstitutional! I AM ADAMANTLY OPPOSED TO ALL UNCONSTITUTIONAL , ANTI-GUN BILLS!!!

According to Article II, Section 7 of the Constitution of Virginia, the oath of office for a Virginia state delegate is: "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge all the duties incumbent upon me as ...................., according to the best of my ability (so help me God)". Seriously, what part of “…shall not be infringed.” is so confusing?? Do your job, stop supporting unconstitutional gun control schemes and be true to the US and Virginia Constitutions.

HB 1015, Delegate Tran, Misdemeanors should never take away a person’s civil rights. This bill is unconstitutional under the U.S. Supreme Court’s New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen decision. I OPPOSE THIS BILL. HB 1427, Delegate Griffin, it is unconstitutional to limit handgun purchases to one per month. I SUPPORT THIS BILL. HB 1525, Delegate McGuire, For young adults, 18 to 20-years-old, this bill is unconstitutional. I OPPOSE THIS BILL.

I am speaking on behalf of both myself, and all the LEGAL GUN OWNERS; THAT WILL NOT UNDERSTAND WHY THEY EITHER CANNOT BUY A FIREARM OR GET A LEGAL FIREARM CONFISCATED FOR A PERCIEVED WRONG. If the slew of gun bills that are being voted on are passed; there will be not only a flight toward back alley guns, and an effect of creating standing criminals out of everyday people by virtue of making legal guns illegal, along with magazines and other components. These bills are a direct attack by trying to go around the second amendment instead of a direct ban, these bills and laws would criminalize actions, and ownership but would NOTHING to stop actual criminals who neither follow law nor direction; what is to stop them from just doing what they do with their guns? Since the legal leaders of my state of residence have decided that my owning of my legal firearms is both an affront and a problem for the democratic machine; i will simplify this; I am not giving up my guns, nor am i turning in my magazines over 10 rounds, nor will i submit to both tyranny and edicts such as "do as i say, not as i do" since the larger majority of wealthy democrats have the money (take from my tax dollars) to provide for private security teams to protect them; I will provide my own security, for my own person with my firearms; i will not surrender my guns or my mags any part of my hardware. A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. NOW WHAT PART OF THIS IS HARD TO UNDERSTAND?

We do not need higher taxes and more antigun laws. Anyone pushing the disarmament agenda should be investigated for corruption and treason.

I like many other Virginians oppose bills HB 1015, HB 1525 being as though those being seem unconstitutional and against are American rights!! As for bill HB 1427 we should not be limited to the amount of firearms we are allowed to purchase.

Please stop infringing on our rights. Time and time again, gun laws have failed to prevent crime because criminals simply do not obey them. These laws only burden law-abiding citizens while doing little to address real criminal behavior.

HB 1015 (Tran) prohibits firearm possession for those convicted of a misdemeanor assault and battery hate crime. Misdemeanors should never strip a person of their civil rights, and this bill is unconstitutional under the U.S. Supreme Court’s NYSRPA v. Bruen decision. HB 1525 (McGuire) removes the right of young adults aged 18–20 to possess a handgun or so-called “assault firearm,” except in narrow circumstances on family property. This bill unconstitutionally denies young adults their Second Amendment rights. It would be nice if the people making these bills would consider if the laws on those that break the law were more severe, then these bills would not need to be considered that impact those that follow the laws. Criminals should be punished, not law abiding citizens. I believe the focus is skewed.

I am for hb916. I would support this whether they were federal employees or not if they lost their job through no fault of their own. Am against hb1015 because one shouldn’t lose their firearm rights because of a minor crime, I am for hb1427. This is a very annoying law that does little to prevent crime. When buying guns one often needs to buy more than one at a time for a hunting party, for instance or moving to a new residence. I am against gb1525. Anyone who is old enough to go to war should be able to buy a gun. The term “assault firearm” or “assault weapon” is a political term - not a military one.

I do not support bills HB1015 or HB1525nas they are clearly unconstitutional and a blatant infringement of the 2nd Amendment!!!. I do support HB1427 as it is a bill that supports and affirms important aspects of our 2nd Amendment.

There was nothing wrong with gun ownership before these bills were made up.YOU ARE NO MAKING LEGAL GUN OWNERS CRIMINALS. YOU NEED TO GO AFTER THE CRIMINALS NOT LEGAL GUN OWNERS.. NOT ONE LEGAL GUN COMMITTED A CRIME THIS PAST YEAR IN VIRGINIA. STOP SCREWING LEGAL GUN OWNERS.

Please support 1427 and go against the others. Law abiding citizens have the right to purchase anything we should want . A butcher knife could be consider a weapon but we are allowed to buy and have those. However; these bill say that we are.not allow to own orpurchase the other. Law abiding citizens are not your problem. Look somewhere else to find the problem with crime. Another example is cars. Over 60000 people die or killed in accidents involving cars. However you are not banning those. Cars have been use in mass killings as well. I could go on and on. We have a right to bear arms. The constitution does not have restrictions in it.

As a constituent, I urge you to OPPOSE: HB 1525, Delegate McGuire, removes the right of young adults to have a handgun or an “assault firearm,” unless used for lawful self-defense or defense of another while in the home or property of parents, grandparents, or guardians. For young adults, 18 to 20-years-old, this bill is unconstitutional. My son (under 21) is currently employed as a licensed armed security officer protecting people such as yourself and others in the community. He paid for training to acquire the required certifications to pursue a career path he was interested in, and you are attempting to not only infringe on his second amendment rights you are injuring his employment and livelihood. We teach our kids to grow up, follow the rules, find something you are passionate about and pursue that, and along the way if you can help out your community then do that. Continuously government officials who claim to be trying to help keep putting obstacles out in the way of our young people. You must oppose this bill! HB 1015, Delegate Tran, prohibits a person convicted of a misdemeanor assault and battery hate crime from being able to possess firearms. Misdemeanors should never take away a person’s civil rights. The bill is unconstitutional under the U.S. Supreme Court’s New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen decision.

This bill would expand firearm prohibitions to include individuals convicted of a misdemeanor assault and battery offense classified as a hate crime, stripping them of their Second Amendment rights without a felony conviction. HB 1015 represents a significant and unconstitutional expansion of prohibited-person categories that treats a misdemeanor conviction as grounds for permanent civil rights deprivation. Under current law and longstanding constitutional principles, misdemeanors do not result in the loss of fundamental rights. HB 1015 breaks from that tradition by attaching firearm prohibitions to offenses that do not rise to the level of felony conduct and that may involve no use of a firearm at all. The bill relies on subjective determinations of motive rather than objective dangerousness, creating an unstable and politically malleable standard for disarmament. The Supreme Court’s decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen makes clear that modern firearm regulations must be consistent with the nation’s historical tradition of gun regulation. There is no historical analogue for disarming individuals based on misdemeanor offenses, let alone offenses enhanced by motive-based classifications. Historically, firearm prohibitions were narrowly limited to individuals who posed a clear and demonstrable danger, not broad classes defined by modern statutory labels. HB 1015 also raises serious due process concerns. By permanently attaching firearm prohibitions to misdemeanor convictions, the bill ensures that the punishment extends far beyond the sentence imposed by the court. This turns misdemeanor proceedings into de facto rights-termination hearings without the procedural safeguards normally required when fundamental rights are at stake. This bill does nothing to target violent criminals who already ignore firearm laws. Instead, it expands government power over lawful citizens and erodes the constitutional line between misdemeanors and felonies. HB 1015 is an unconstitutional overreach that should be rejected.

I am opposed to HB1015 and 1525 and request that you vote against these bills.

HB 1015 - Oppose. This bill sets a dangerous precedent that misdemeanors are grounds for revoking a constitutional right. It also contradicts NYSRPA v. Bruen. HB 1427 - Support. Wow, you mean the government will cease to limit how much of a specific item I can purchase? How kind. HB 1525 - Oppose. So, hypothetically, a 21-year-old in the military can be entrusted with carrying fully automatic weapons, flying a fighter jet, driving a tank, or launching cruise missiles from a ship, but can't be entrusted with the Democrat definition of an "assault weapon" (i.e., it shoots real fast and looks scary)?

My wife and I oppose HB 916, 1015, 1427, and 1525

I oppose HB 1015 and HB 1525 and support HB 1427 because the former bills violate both the United States Constitution and the Constitution of Virginia, while the latter respects the constitutional limits on government power and protects fundamental civil rights. The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees that “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” In District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), the Supreme Court held that this is an individual right, unconnected to service in a militia, and that it protects firearms “in common use” for lawful purposes such as self-defense. In McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010), the Court incorporated this right against the states through the Fourteenth Amendment, making it fully binding on state legislatures. Most recently, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen (2022) reaffirmed that the Second Amendment is not a second-class right subject to interest balancing. The Court held that firearm regulations are constitutional only if they are consistent with the Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation. When a law burdens conduct covered by the Second Amendment’s plain text, the government bears the burden of demonstrating a relevant historical analogue. Absent such a tradition, the regulation is unconstitutional. HB 1015 and HB 1525 fail this test. To the extent these bills impose broad prohibitions, excessive restrictions, or discretionary schemes that burden ordinary, law-abiding citizens, they lack any meaningful historical precedent from the Founding or Reconstruction eras. Generalized claims of public safety cannot override an enumerated constitutional right. Under Bruen, policy preferences are insufficient to justify laws that infringe upon the core right of self-defense. These bills also raise serious equal protection concerns under the Fourteenth Amendment. Fundamental rights may not be selectively burdened or reserved for favored classes. When firearm laws create exemptions for certain groups while denying the same rights to ordinary citizens, they undermine the constitutional guarantee that all persons are entitled to equal protection of the laws. The Virginia Constitution provides additional protection. Article I, Section 13 recognizes that a militia is composed of “the body of the people, trained to arms,” reflecting Virginia’s historic understanding that the right to keep and bear arms belongs to the people themselves. Legislation that broadly disarms or unduly burdens that body of the people conflicts with this constitutional guarantee. By contrast, HB 1427 respects these constitutional boundaries. It aligns Virginia law with Heller, McDonald, and Bruen by treating the right to keep and bear arms as a fundamental right, not a revocable privilege. Supporting HB 1427 affirms both the rule of law and the General Assembly’s obligation to legislate within constitutional limits. For these reasons, I urge opposition to HB 1015 and HB 1525 and support for HB 1427 in defense of the constitutional rights guaranteed by both the United States and Virginia Constitutions.

Please oppose H.B. 1015 & H.B. 1525. Please support H.B. 1427.Please let me know how you vote. Jesse Parker

I would like to comment that I absolutely oppose HB 1015 and urge the committee to vote NO on this bill. No person convicted of a misdemeanor should lose their fundamental constitutionally protected civil rights, particularly for conviction over a "hate crime", which is an exceptionally arbitrary and fluid categorization of an offense. It should also be noted that this bill is clearly unconstitutional under the U.S. Supreme Court’s NYSRPA v. Bruen decision.

Article 1 Section 13 of the Virginia Constitution states: "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; that standing armies, in time of peace, should be avoided as dangerous to liberty;" Virginia is very clear on this being a right of individual Virginians. Just as the United States Constitution states similiar regarding the right of the people to keep and bear arms not being infringed. I am writing to implore you to vote against HB1015 and HB 1525, and to SUPPORT HB 1427. HB1015 is just all around a terrible idea. It refers to misdimeanors and opens the door for future misdimeanors being reason for stripping us of our rights. Also Hate Crime is the most overly used and poorly attributed term ever conceived. You do not commit assault and battery on someone because you like them, you do it because you hate them. Vote NO HB1525 is removing young adults rights simply because of their age and not because they've done anything wrong. This is just not right. Vote NO HB916 the current requirements require showing proper gun saftey and usage. Why do we need more. We do not give literacy or IQ test for voting or being a Journalist, nor for the free exercise of any other right. Why are we trying to add more requirements. Vote NO As for HB1427 there's not much point to limiting Virginia citizens to one handgun a month considering most crimes commited with firearms are not committed same day or even the same month of purchase, they are commited years later. As for buying a bunch and transferring them illegally and strawman purchases, those are already illegal. Please enforce consequences for breaking those laws instead.

These proposed “laws” are just another shackle you guys are trying to impose on Virginians to limit their ability to protect themselves. If 18 year olds can sign up to defending lawmakers in their ivory tower they shouldn’t have their right to own a rifle or a pistol infringed upon by their government that enjoys their protection abroad or at home. As for stripping peoples rights for ownership or bearing arms based on the loosely defined “hate crime” or assault. Almost any interaction can be defined by that especially a misdemeanor. This law gives far too much power to interpretation. Felons are prohibited from owning or purchasing, misdemeanors carrying the weight of felony is wrong on its face and shows clear lack of nuance and whimsical respect for citizens and their rights protected in our constitution. Vote no on HB 1015 and HB 1525.

Any bill that is being considered that infringes upon any Virginians second amendment rights should immediately be removed. These bills do nothing but strip legal gun owners of their rights. There have been numerous studies that show gun bans do not end gun violence. How about hammering down on criminals and the mentally ill? They are the problem, not an inanimate object in a legal, law abiding citizens hands.

HB 916-I urge you to oppose this bill. The current concealed handgun permit training requirements are adequate as is demonstrated by the dearth of incidents involving DHP holders. Further, eliminating the requirement that instructors be approved by the NRA or the USSCA opens the door for less competent instructors. HB 1015-I urge you to oppose this bill, constitutional rights should never be removed due to a misdemeanor crime. Further, the bill is a blatant violation of the Supreme Court's Bruen ruling. HB 1525-I urge you to oppose this bill. This bill unconstitutionally denies young adults, who are considered old enough to serve in the military, of their constitutional rights. HB 1427-I urge you to support this bill, as it will repeal a bill that was searching for a nonexistent problem to be solved. Thank you for your consideration.

There has never been a gun control law that has been passed that has done anything to prevent gun crime. All that these laws do is make things more difficult for law-abiding citizens. As for HB 1015, when has a misdemeanor ever been grounds to remove someone's 2nd Amendment rights? In fact, this has already been ruled on by the Supreme Court in NYSRPA v. Bruen. So what you are doing is going to cost the Commonwealth, as well as a few citizens, money when the Commonwealth is sued. I would prefer that our elected officials be better stewards of our Tax dollars. HB 1427 is just fixing a mistake you all made. There is no data that proves limiting one handgun per month reduces gun crime. This was a feel-good law that should never have seen the light of day. It's only right to repeal it. HB 1525 This one is shocking to me, you are telling our young men and women that its ok for them to go off to war to defend our Nation, but here at home, they don't have their 2nd Amendment protections? There are so many things that we need to fix. Passing gun control laws does nothing to prevent gun crimes, but it does make it harder for those of us follow the laws. I am begging you all to start using some common sense and focus on things that need fixing, not things that make you all feel good.

All of these gun control bills will only hurt law abiding gun owners, not the criminals, who don’t give 2 turds about a law!!!!! THESE LAWS ARE FEDERALLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND NOT TO MENTION THEY ALSO GO AGAINST OUR VIRGINIA CONSTITUTION!!! “WE THE PEOPLE HAVE THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS AND SHALL NOT BE I FRINGED” IS IN BOTH OF THE CONSTITUTIONS!!!!And for all of you democrats think it’s a safety issue, ARE SO WRONG, You think safety is getting rid of a god given right that is BACKED BY BOTH OUR CONSTITUTIONS. YOU ALL, JUST KEEP PUTTING THE PEOPLE THAT COMMIT THE CRIMES BACK OUT ON THE STREET, THAT JUST KEEP COMMITTING THE CRIMES OVER AND OVER AGAIN!!! No matter how many times they get arrested. HOW ABOUT HOLDING THOSE PEOPLE ACCOUNTABLE FOR THIER ACTIONS. AND NOT PUNISHING ALL US PEOPLE WHO HAVE NOT COMMITTED A CRIME OR ANYTHING WRONG , LIKE WE ARE THE ONES THAT HAVE A PROBLEM!!!!!!!! There are more law abiding guns owners than criminals, so If Guns were the problem, why aren’t there more issues, or let alone the calapse of this country. So all I ask for, is all of you to ACTUALLY SIT BACK AND THINK, OF THE RIGHT THING. And ask yourself , WHAT IS THE REAL PROBLEM?

Good afternoon, I am writing today to express my opposition to HB1015 and HB1525 and ask for your support of HB1427. As you are aware, any infringement of gun rights is a violation of both the 2nd Amendment to the US constitution as well as Article 1 Section 13 of the Virginia Constitution. Thank you for your time and considerations to these.

All unconditional

Unconditional

I urge all committee members to vote against any and all bills that further restrict our 2nd Amendment rights and uphold legislation that preserves or restores those rights. The 2nd Amendment is foundational to our inherent rights, and no less a right than any other codified right within our U. S. Constitution.

I believe that the proposed bills are unconstitutional, infringe on the civil rights of the citizenry, and ultimately allow the state to determine who may or may not protect themselves. I also believe that under the current finding of the United States Supreme Court, that these laws will be overturned and the time and expense of debating and passing them will be lost to the citizens of the Commonwealth. Please vote to not pass these bills. Very Respectfully.

Every time Virginia legislators consider limiting our 2A rights you do so in violation of your Oath of Office, the IS Constitution and the Virginia Constitution. Do anything other than fervently opposing any 2A limiting proposals is tantamount to TREASON . Simple as that. SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED! There’s zero ambiguity in those words!

If passing new laws reliably reduced violence, the United States would be the safest nation on earth. The reality is more complicated. Laws are essential for defining unacceptable conduct and punishing wrongdoing. Murder, assault, robbery, and reckless endangerment are already illegal - and rightly so. Yet violence persists, not because these laws are insufficient, but because law alone cannot eliminate violent human behavior. That distinction matters when evaluating the bills before this Committee. These proposals focus primarily on restricting lawful firearm possession by otherwise law-abiding citizens - including adults aged 18 to 20 - and on permanently disarming individuals convicted of misdemeanor offenses. They do little to address violent conduct itself, while imposing sweeping civil-rights consequences on people who are not violent criminals. Under longstanding American legal tradition, misdemeanors do not strip a person of their civil rights. A misdemeanor conviction does not eliminate the right to vote, the right to speak freely, the right to worship, or the right to serve on a jury. These rights are understood to be fundamental, enduring, and proportionate to the offense. Firearm possession should not be treated differently. Permanent disarmament has historically been reserved for serious, dangerous felony conduct - not for misdemeanors, and not through categorical bans untethered from individual risk or due process. The Supreme Court’s decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen governs this analysis. The Court rejected interest-balancing and policy justifications and held that firearm regulations are constitutional only if the government can demonstrate consistency with the Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation. That burden rests entirely with the state. There is no historical analogue for categorical bans on law-abiding adults aged 18 to 20, nor for lifetime firearm prohibitions imposed for misdemeanor convictions. Absent a well-established historical tradition supporting such restrictions, these proposals fail the constitutional test articulated in Bruen and are therefore unconstitutional. The Second Amendment is not a relic tied to 1791 technology. Like all constitutional rights, it protects an enduring principle rather than a specific tool. That understanding predates the Constitution itself. Virginia’s own Declaration of Rights recognized the inherent right of citizens to keep and bear arms, which the Second Amendment later affirmed. Tools evolve; the need for self-defense does not. Nothing in this statement minimizes the reality of violence or the responsibility of government to address it. But effective public safety requires honesty about what laws can accomplish - and restraint in preserving rights that do not come from government and cannot be withdrawn by it. For these reasons, I respectfully urge the Committee to reject these proposals.

Hi, I just wanted to speak on HB1015 and HB1525. In regards to HB1015, the stripping of one of the constitutions major amendments over a minor infraction/misdemeanor is already unconstitutional via NYSRPA vs Bruen. With HB1525 there's the issue of young adults being able to join the military but in the same vain they can't own a firearm. Its utterly unfair. I'd rather see bills that hurt local gang activity than bills that whittle down the rights of citizens. If the first amendment was restricted to the degree the second amendment is we'd look like the UK(no thats not a good thing)

As a constituent, I stand with the Virginia Citizen Defense League and Gun Owners of America and I urge you to OPPOSE: HB 1015, Misdemeanors should never take away a person’s civil rights. Please find me another constitutional right that a misdemeanor results in the loss of that right. There are none. Additionally, the bill is unconstitutional under the U.S. Supreme Court’s New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen decision. HB 1525, This bill denies the constitutional rights of young adults, 18 to 20-years-old. They can do everything else including die for their country, but this bill would keep them from owning a firearm. It does not matter how old you are if you are in the age of the majority, you should have full rights to everything. No exceptions. As a constituent, I urge you to support: HB 1427, repeals the unconstitutional One Handgun a Month law.

These are simply put treason. I do not know how it is where you are but people of the forgotten southwest Virginia raise their children with understanding and training about firearms. All Richmond does is turn a blind eye to the hard working people of this area. You think you can simply take a God given right away. Who do you think you are you don't represent me . You can trust 16 year olds with an automobile that kills a lot more people per year. You (TRY) to impose your will for your donors, so you can please them. I know some of this doesn't pertain to some of these bills here but while I am here why does 10 rounds in a magazine mean so much to you'll? Guess it's cause every town just regergitates your talking points for you to fall in line so you get your perks. You think all the counties doing the 2a sanctuary would be a sign that your ideas are not wanted.

HB1015- Vote No A misdemeanor should not prevent 2A right. HB1427 Vote Yes Should repeal purchase of one a month, hamstrings avid collectors. HB1525 Vote NO 18-20 yr old are adults and their 2A rights should not be denied.

To whom it may concern, I humbly and respectfully request that any and all forms of gun control legislation be completely dropped. If guns were an issue, we would have had thousands of dead people by now....but we do not. Law abiding citizens are not going around shooting people. Crime is low because we have firearms to protect ourselves and criminals don't won't to take a chance on us to find out that we will defend ourselves. GUN FREE zones are the problem. They invite those with evil intentions....because they know there will NOT be a good guy there with a gun to STOP them. The courts, the U.S. Constitution, and the Virginia Constitution is on the side of law abiding citizens when it comes to the Second Amendment. Any gun control law is INFRINGEMENT and UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Are you actually going to put hundreds of thousands of Virginians in jail? Not sure how you will get all your new tax money this way! Not one person I have talked with says they are going to comply with these laws. Law Enforcement says they will not enforce any unconstitutional law as well. Are you really trying to start a war? Do you not understand that thousands of people right here in Virginia are willing to die for their second amendment rights? Without the second amendment, we can not ensure any of our other rights. That's why we have the 2nd Amendment anyway. Have you even read the Constitution? Do you not understand history? This is not California and it never will be. You can pass a law if you want to.....but it will be challenged to the fullest extent on every level. Stop wasting your time on stupid things and help make Virginia affordable and a great place to live. The more stupid laws you make.....the less people are going to want to come make their home in Virginia. All you're going to do is destroy this state. You swore an oath to uphold our rights. Did you lie to your fellow citizens? If you fail in your task to uphold the Constitution and PROTECT the second amendment, it is TREASON on your part. Take a look at the Virginia state flag and remind yourself what that symbol actually means. Do you even know? I ask you to do your research, study history, and learn why Virginia and its law abiding citizens must always be armed....and yes, that includes WITH AR-15 rifles with 30 round magazines. These are common, everyday use firearms. If you are scared of them or don't like the way they look. Buy one for yourself. Get educated. Go to the range and shoot them. Learn and understand why the Constitution wants YOU to have the right to bear arms. It's not us against you. We are all in this together. You won't be in office forever, but one day you may need a firearm to defend yourself or your family from a criminal or Tyranny. Thank you for your time.

Anti-constitutional bills should be struck down, along with the massive tax hike Democrats are pushing on us. Expect citizens to respond in the next election, and in the courts.

As a constituent of the Commonwealth of VA, the proposed bills HB1015, HB1525, HB916 effects the lives of every day law abiding gun owners. I oppose the bills listed and am imploring a vote of no.

I urge you to OPPOSE HB 1015 (Tran), which would prohibit firearm possession for those convicted of a misdemeanor assault and battery hate crime. Misdemeanors should never strip a person of their civil rights, and this bill is unconstitutional under the U.S. Supreme Court’s NYSRPA v. Bruen decision. I urge you to SUPPORT HB 1427 (Griffin), which repeals Virginia’s unconstitutional One Handgun a Month law. I urge you to OPPOSE HB 1525 (McGuire), which removes the right of young adults aged 18–20 to possess a handgun or so-called “assault firearm,” except in narrow circumstances on family property. This bill unconstitutionally denies young adults their Second Amendment rights. If an 18-20 year old can vote and join the armed forces then they should be able to possess a handgun(s), plus this activity is protected by the 2nd amendment. "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED." Thank you for your time!

I oppose HB916. Putting more roadblocks in the way of citizens who are trying to exercise their rights does nothing to prevent crime. I oppose HB1015. No misdemeanor conviction should result in the loss of a right protected by the Constitution. I oppose HB1525. Young adults are adults. They have the right to keep and bear arms just like every other adult American citizen. I support HB1427. American citizens' right to acquire arms is not subject to the interest-balancing test used to justify handgun rationing. "One Handgun a Month" must be relegated to the dustbin of history.

I appose all anti gun unconstitutional bills. The bill of rights says the second amendment. A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Shall not be infringed stands by our fore fathers. It's a God given right. So you do not have any rights to infringe on. The second amendment.

I oppose this bill.

Please vote affirmative, "YEA" on HB 1427-Griffin. Law abiding Virginian should not be restricted on how many handguns they purchase at any time. As long as we pass the background check, the amount of firearm purchases should not be in question. It is our Second Amendment right and it shall not be infringed! Please vote against HB 1015-Tran. this bill is unconstitutional and was further confirmed under the U.S. Supreme Court's NYSRPA v. Bruen decision.

Oppose HB916: I can not recall any situation where a concealed carry holder misused his firearm. This is a bill looking for a problem that does not exist. This will add costs and time that most people do not have to obtain a CHP. The purpose of this bill is to lower the number of people that want to carry concealed. Oppose HB1015: Again this is a bill looking for a problem that does not exist. Hate crime legislation is meaningless. Any crime committed by a criminal against an innocent person is a hate crime. Strictly and harshly punish the perpetrators for any crimes committed against others. Hate crime laws tend to unfairly target one group of people over other groups. Hate crime laws tend to get more and more vague over time. Support HB1427: Allow people to buy more than one gun a month. Oppose HB1525: 18 year olds are considered adults. 18 year olds can join the military and use weapons that most civilians do not have access to. If you don't trust 18-20 year olds to be able to exercise their 2nd Amendment rights, then they should not be able to vote. What needs to be done is to make hunter/gun safety classes mandatory in high school.

I vehemently oppose these bills and all of the other unconstitutional attacks against our Second Amendment here in Virginia. I do not wish to be ruled by an Elite Class of people who will not be subject to these overreaching laws. I am Law Abiding and have done everything right to exercise my second amendment and with the stroke of a pen many Virginians will be subject to criminal charges for legally purchased lawfully possessed items

ALL These Gun Control Bills are Unconstitutional and Will Be Struck Down By The Courts And Will Not Be Complied With

Please do not pass any additional anti-Second Amendment legislation.

Each of these bills is unconstitutional in their own way. Stop distorting the constitution through absurd and emotional "feel good" legislation attempts on behalf of special interest gun control organizations funded by $$ coming from foreign countries like George Soros and sons and US universities, like Johns Hopkins which is in MARYLAND, and their affiliates like Moms Demand Action, not run by moms. Leave Virginia and the second amendment alone.

In each of the gun control bills reaching the Virginia legislature for 2026, I find that there are 2 questions that need to be answered by lawmakers that are repeatedly glanced over and not addressed., almost as if lawmakers fear the answer: 1) How do these bills prevent crime or make the public safer when those committing crimes *do not* check current gun laws to ensure they are in compliance? Each of these bills only affects the common citizen. 2) Why is it so important for Virginia lawmakers to ensure the common citizen is unable to defend themselves, in light of lawmakers, at the same time, reducing heinous crime sentences and hampering law enforcement activities? Every locality that chooses these draconian type of gun bills turns into a hellscape, which in turn, increases crime and the exodus rate of the common citizen (e.g., California, New York and Illinois). These bills are not an address to "public safety" and only serve to remove the ability of the common citizen to say "no". Please address the 2 questions I have presented, and for the record, I adamantly oppose all of these gun restriction bills. Every leader around the globe who attempts to disarm the average citizen has no good intention in mind. Randy Roe Staunton, VA

If you would like to pursue this line of infringement on 2nd ammendment, please take the proper course of action. The only legal way to enact and enforce these proposed infringements on the 2nd ammendment to propose a constitutional ammendment to abolish the 2nd ammendment. If you are able to accomplish this and it is ratified, I will of course support the voice of America. Then you may re-introduce the subject legislation and you have my full support with the backing of the ammended Constitution. "...the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" DEFINITION OF INFRINGE: "to wrongly limit or restrict (something, such as another person's rights)" I cannot believe the VA constituancy elected officials that do not understand english. No matter how you want to reconcile your actions in your "political mind," you know in your "right mind" that you are indeed wrongly restricting the RIGHT granted to US Citizens by the Constitution.

The fact that there are any bills concerning any of our constitutional rights are an affront to my faithful citizenship to the Commonwealth of Virginia and The United States over the last 66 years. If you do not strictly adhere to the constitution which you swore under oath to protect and defend, then I will continue to fight against you in word and financial deeds.

I OPPOSE this bill!!

My family and I expect you to OPPOSE HB 1015 and HB 1525….. and to SUPPORT HB 1427. We are not going to tolerate even the slightest (additional) infringement of our 2A rights.

Regarding HB 1015 and 1525 as well as a lifetime Citizen of the Commonwealth of Virginia and as your constituent, I strongly Oppose the above Bills and any and all Bills that violate the Second Amendments of the United States Constitution as well as Article 1Section 13 of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Virginia. I ask that you Vote no on any such Bills.

Any laws that infringe on anyone’s Constitutional rights granted by the Second Amendment are acts of tyranny. Your agenda does not represent all your constituents, therefore you should not support any of these bills.

I definitely oppose the bills HB1015 and HB1525. If a person is 18 years and older it is considered an adult and be able to fight for our country. Hence it should be able to maintain the privilege and rights as all the adults. The right and responsibility is their to exercise. Also a misdemeanor should not be a cause just lose your right to self defense with the best tools available.

VOTE NO ON HB 1015 - It is unconstitutional under Supreme Court Ruling NYSRPA v. Bruen decision. VOTE YES on HB 1427 - Repeal the unconstitutional statute! VOTE NO on HB 1525 - Adults 18-20 are adults! They carry the weight of responsibility just like all other Virginia citizens and should not be carved out in any way from the rest of the populace. Sub-classing voters who pay taxes and serve in the communities as workers and students should NEVER be considered for any reason.

❌ HB 1015 (Tran) prohibits firearm possession for those convicted of a misdemeanor assault and battery hate crime. Misdemeanors should never strip a person of their civil rights, and this bill is unconstitutional under the U.S. Supreme Court’s NYSRPA v. Bruen decision. Please kill this bill. ✔️ HB 1427 (Griffin) repeals Virginia’s unconstitutional One Handgun a Month law. Please support! ❌ HB 1525 (McGuire) removes the right of young adults aged 18–20 to possess a handgun or so-called “assault firearm,” except in narrow circumstances on family property. This bill unconstitutionally denies young adults their Second Amendment rights. Please kill this bill.

I am opposed to any and all anti gun legislation. Out 2nd amendment is a right that you can not or will be allowed to to take away!

I am opposed to HB 1015 (Tran), which prohibits firearm possession for those convicted of a misdemeanor assault and battery hate crime. Misdemeanors should never strip a person of their civil rights, and this bill is unconstitutional under the U.S. Supreme Court’s NYSRPA v. Bruen decision. I am opposed to HB 1525 (McGuire), which removes the right of young adults aged 18–20 to possess a handgun or so-called “assault firearm,” except in narrow circumstances on family property. This bill unconstitutionally denies young adults their Second Amendment rights. I am for HB 1427 (Griffin), which repeals Virginia’s unconstitutional One Handgun a Month law.

Regarding HB916 - As a concealed carry permit holder, while this bill seems agreeable on the surface (who wouldn't want better trained citizens?), this same language has been used in other states (such as NY) to restrict the rights of law abiding, peaceful, rational citizens. For that reason I do not support this bill. Regarding HB1015 - This strips people of their constitutional rights. There are far too many possibilities for hate crimes to occur that do not actually meet with real hate crimes, especially for misdemeanors. Therefore, I do not support this bill.

I oppose HB916, HB1015, HB1525 because they unconstitutionally infringe Second Amendment rights I favor HB1427 as it repeals a previous unconstitutional infringement of Second Amendment rights Key words of The Second Amendment “shall not be infringed “

I support HB 1427. I am opposed to the remaining three bills (916, 1015, and 1525)

I oppose this bill.

I SUPPORT THIS BILL

With the exception of HB1427 - Griffin, these proposed bills are simply unconstitutional. After the issues we've seen in Minneapolis, I've noticed a obvious uptick in the number of left leaning people buying firearms. As I see it, our right to bear arms is becoming more of a bipartisan issue. Don't let your constituents down by tuning Virginia into a police state and making criminal of those who were not one by only the stroke of a pen. Remember, criminals don't follow the law, these bills will not lower gun crime. This is no different than Clinton's gun bans and we all know those failed miserably.

I oppose this bill

Allowing someone convicted of a hate based offense to have access to a firearm places real people in danger. As a minority, I think about the threat this creates for me, for my baby brothers, and for families who already live with fear rooted in bias and violence. When someone has shown hate toward others based on identity, access to weapons raises the risk of serious harm. This bill reflects common sense. Hate based violence is intentional, and when paired with firearms, the consequences become more severe and more deadly. Communities targeted by hate already face intimidation and harm, and policies should reduce those risks rather than ignore them. Limiting weapon access for people convicted of hate driven crimes helps protect lives and prevent escalation. Supporting this bill means choosing safety, protecting vulnerable communities, and affirming that violence rooted in hate has no place in Virginia.

Taking away someone's constitutional right for a misdemeanor, and such a conviction that is open to such broad interpretation as "hate crimes" always have been, is one of the most blatant moves of tyranny this assembly could push for. Oppose this bill!

I support HB1015 because it constitutes common sense gun regulation which is necessary to reduce the significant number of preventable gun related deaths in the Commonwealth. Conviction of a hate crime must and should preclude legal ownership of a deadly weapon.

I am against these proposed bills to impededany sort of restriction on the carry of firearms, banning any sort of accessory, type or feature of a firearm, or any law that adds additional penalties, burdens, fees, or taxes on firearms. The punishment the law abiding citizen with burdensome laws and infringe upon their constitutional rights. The 2nd ammendment is very clear in "shall not be infringed," yet these bills infringe on the freedom of people to bear arms. The propososers of these bills know they're illegal bills and are not constitutional. Virginia has long been a beacon of freedom, and was instrumental in in the American Revolution to secure that freedom. It is disguisting seeing its politicians try to forcibly take that freedom away from its people. I am opposed to these bills and urge the legislature to throw them out, with prejudice.

As a pediatrician I have long been appalled that firearms are the number one cause of death of our children- and having lived thru both mass shootings in Pittsburgh and Buffalo, I immersed myself in the data to understand the problem- we know FIrearm licensing , and concealed carry licensing that incorporates safe storage training saves lives. We know that the access to assault weapons so easily , especially in people with prior threats or concerning obsessions is a reason for most of our mass shootings in America. We know that in domestic violence access to firearms , even in dating relationships , is why women continue to die even with protective orders in place. As a physician I strongly feel concealed carry , especially assault weapons has no place in hospitals , colleges , schools and public buildings. In Virginia we can have laws that really protect people without infringing on the right of sane citizens to own guns. Brief waiting periods, safe storage education for all gun owners, safe storage requirements for all gun owners and a strong emergency protective order system will save many lives and I urge you to support them.

This bill will not allow anyone convicted of a hate crime to own a gun, We SUPPORT this bill as we believe that hate has no place in our state and want to protect minority communities in our commonwealth.

This bill will not allow anyone convicted of a hate crime to own a gun, We SUPPORT this bill as we believe that hate has no place in our state and want to protect minority communities in our commonwealth.

✅ Safe Child Access Prevention, HB871, Del. Downey (D): This bill will create penalties for gun owners whose gun is illegally used by a minor. We SUPPORT keeping guns out of the hands of kids. ✅ Expanding ERPO Petitioners, HB901, Del. Sullivan (D): This bill will expand risk orders to include family/household members and certain licensed mental health practitioners to the list of those who can petition the courts. We SUPPORT this bill as we acknowledge that those closest to a person can often be the ones who are able to spot causes for concern. ✅ Security for Firearms Dealers, HB907, Del. Shin (D): This bill will require dealers in firearms to enact certain security measures. We SUPPORT this bill as it should help to deter “smash and grab” incidents. ✅ Virginia Gun Violence Prevention Center, HB969, Del. Price (D): This bill creates a center within the Department of Criminal Justice Services that would gather research, strategies, and best practices for Community Violence Intervention Programs and grant funds for community-based programs. We SUPPORT this bill as CVIs have proven to be incredibly effective in deterring gun violence. ✅ Disarm Hate, HB1015, Del. Tran (D): This bill will not allow anyone convicted of a hate crime to own a gun, We SUPPORT this bill as we believe that hate has no place in our state and want to protect minority communities in our commonwealth. ✅ Firearm Purchaser Licensing, HB1359, Del. Hope (D): This bill will require individuals to obtain a license before buying a firearm. We SUPPORT this bill as it would reduce gun violence by ensuring only eligible, vetted individuals can purchase firearms, and it would also help to prevent impulsive or high-risk purchases.

A misdemeanor is not cause for removal of constitutional rights. How can you be in favor of reducing sentencing for violent crimes but in favor of taking away rights? Do you view hate crimes as being limited to one demographic that you plan to target? I agree with the VCDL and all gun rights organizations.

When did our state government decide that they do not have to follow our Constitution of the United States of America? The 2nd Amendment is an individual right under the Constitution that states clearly that it shall not be infringed on which in simple terms means that no government official or group has the ability to take a person's right to keep and bear arms in the United States of America. This Amendment was so important to our forefathers that it is the second thing they wrote to establish that the government does not have the ability to take your right to defend yourself against all enemies and this includes a tyrannical state government that doesn't understand plain text that our country was founded on. It doesn't matter what others opinions or feelings on the subject of the right to bear arms is because it is my right and not their's that we are talking about at this time. As a society of individuals in our country that have never agreed on things of this nature since the invention of the modern firearm we have to look no farther than our own Constitution to see that this is not a collective right of certain people that agree or disagree with the principle of firearms but infact a Constitutional right of an individual to determine there views of their personal right to bear arms. With the world in the state it is in at our present time this Constitutional right is needed more then ever because we are facing people that think that the can completely ignore the Constitution and its not even on a national level but a state level. This is also a truly sad moment of our state that is the founding place for our country as it exists from the time that we settled in this new land of an unknown world at the time but to disrespect our founding Document that started it all on top of it is the worst thing that could happen in our state for these elected officials to look at the Bill of Rights and say to themselves that those Amendment are not worth following because I have a different opinion, belief or feeling on that Amendment that I am personally going to take the individual right of every person in Virginia just because I don't want to follow these Amendments as they are written. Do you understand how this is being a tyrannical government just like the British were when they were trying to control the entire population at the time that we had the Revolution in this great land to start this great country. When people say that the 2nd Amendment is dated and need to be revised but can see the actual beauty in how our forefathers predicted that this Amendment would be necessary throughout time to even to the year 2026 were we have a government that is looking at this exact Amendment and saying no we don't have to follow that anymore because we have all these people that don't like the fact that a free person of the United States of America can purchase anything that has to do with their ability to not only protect themselves in self defense but also to protect themselves from the tyrannical government that is before us today. I'm sorry but as a person that has no affiliation to a political party or any other organization on this subject in our country I believe in our Constitution and the Amendments that were written in the Bill of Rights to protect myself, my family and my friends from people that think that they know what is best for everyone in our country on the basis that they either think they are smarter, richer or elected.

I as a resident of The State of Virginia agree and stand with the positions of the VCDL, GOA, and every other gun rights organization in opposition to all of the firearm restriction bills that you have proposed ,as each are unconstitutional and violate our God given rights.

I am a resident of Ashburn in Loudoun County. I respectfully submit this written testimony in opposition to HB101 and HB1015. I oppose HB101 because changes to concealed handgun permit application submission methods risk introducing inconsistent standards, administrative delays, or discretionary barriers for otherwise qualified applicants. Virginia’s existing permitting framework has functioned effectively by maintaining clear, uniform procedures that balance public safety with due process. Altering submission methods without clear safeguards may disproportionately burden law-abiding citizens without addressing criminal misuse of firearms. I also oppose HB1015 due to concerns regarding proportionality, due process, and the broad scope of misdemeanor hate crime classifications. Extending long-term firearm prohibitions based on misdemeanor convictions risks imposing lasting consequences without sufficient consideration of context, rehabilitation, or individualized assessment. Policies based on offense categorization rather than demonstrated ongoing risk may result in unintended or unequal impacts on individuals who have completed their sentence and are otherwise law-abiding. In both cases, I am concerned that these bills emphasize procedural or categorical restrictions rather than focusing on enforcement of existing laws, accountability for violent conduct, and protection of due process. I respectfully urge the committee to oppose HB101 and HB1015. Thank you for the opportunity to submit written testimony for the public record and for your consideration.

I strongly oppose this bill!

I support HB871 because keeping guns out of the hands of kids is vital. I support HB901 as I acknowledge that those closest to a person can often be the ones who are able to spot causes for concern. I support HB907 as it should help to deter “smash and grab” incidents. I support HB969 as CVIs have proven to be incredibly effective in deterring gun violence. I support HB1015 as I believe that hate has no place in our state and want to protect minority communities in our commonwealth. I support HB1359 as it would reduce gun violence by ensuring only eligible, vetted individuals can purchase firearms, and it would also help to prevent impulsive or high-risk purchases.

A misdemeanor treated like a felony? Absolutely disgusting!

I stand strongly with the VCDL on these proposed laws. VA has always been a bipartisan state on gun issues, and although the second amendment has may purposes- it must be preserved to protect the citizens of this state. Overreaching federal law enforcement, and all threats domestic and foreign are kept in line by responsible firearm ownership. Gun control also impacts lower income groups, impoverished populations, and people of color disproportionately. We must preserve the 2nd amendment.

I strongly oppose this bill.

A misdemeanor shouldn't cause someone to lose their civil rights.

I am writing to express my strong opposition to the recently proposed bills on gun control. While I understand the intent behind these bills—to enhance public safety—I firmly believe that they will have unintended consequences that infringe on the constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens. The Second Amendment guarantees "the right of individuals to keep and bear arms", and it is a fundamental part of what makes this country free. These bills being proposed would place unnecessary and burdensome restrictions on responsible gun owners, making it harder for Virginians to exercise their rights in a lawful and safe manner. Rather than focusing on restricting access to firearms, I urge the General Assembly to consider measures that target criminals and illegal activities, such as enforcing stricter penalties for those who use firearms in the commission of crimes, or improving background checks for gun purchases. It is essential to address the root causes of violence, such as mental health issues and gang-related activity, rather than punishing responsible gun owners who follow the law. Furthermore, these proposed bills could create significant logistical challenges for gun owners, particularly those who rely on their firearms for self-defense, hunting, or recreational activities. The financial burden and potential legal ramifications of complying with these new regulations would be overwhelming for many Virginians. I strongly urge you to reconsider these proposals and to focus on policies that protect both our rights and our communities. I trust that you will make the best decision for all Virginians, and I sincerely hope that you will oppose these bills.

I support the presented gun laws that will improve the Commonwealth’s safety

In 2021, my elderly stepmother shot through a closed door during an argument with my elderly father, striking him in the back and paralyzing him. My father has spent the past five years in extreme physical agony, unable to walk, paying caretakers out of pocket to hoist him in and out of bed, unable to care for himself. The lack of movement in his life has led to horrific bed sores, which become bone infections, which lead to extended hospital stays and a horrible quality of life. All this because my stepmother was allowed to have a gun. There are countless stories like this of the bullet's aftermath: of the lifelong physical and mental damage that comes from guns. It has been a horrific five years, full of physical pain and mental anguish for our entire family. I wouldn't wish this on anyone. The bills before you now will not only save lives, they will spare whole swaths of our neighborhoods from needing to deal with these horrors. One bullet, lodged in my father's spine, didn't kill him. Instead, it has shattered the life he had, his ability to work and care for himself, and his family. Each bullet we allow in our communities has the ability to do the same. His care has bankrupted him personally, and now he relies on state care and Medicaid, an avoidable burden on taxpayers. There are numerous reasons guns have no place in our society, and I hope my father's story is just one that helps make change. Please support all bills that make guns harder to access, harder to keep. Please do everything you can to keep guns out of the hands of our society. Thank you for the great work you are doing to keep Virginians safe.

I am writing to oppose the current slate of firearm restriction bills before the General Assembly. While these proposals are framed as public safety measures, in practice they disproportionately harm marginalized Virginians — including racial minorities, LGBTQ+ individuals (especially trans people), immigrants, and low-income residents — who often face higher risks of targeted violence and slower or unequal police response. These bills add costs, delays, and bureaucratic hurdles to exercising a fundamental right. Increased fees, mandatory waiting periods, feature bans, and expanded disqualifications fall hardest on people with limited financial resources, unstable work schedules, or justified concerns about their personal safety. For many vulnerable individuals, the ability to lawfully and promptly acquire a firearm is not about ideology, but about self-defense. History shows that restrictive gun laws are most aggressively enforced in minority communities, amplifying disparities in arrests, prosecution, and legal exposure — even when no harm has occurred. Expanding civil liability, criminal penalties, and subjective risk standards increases that risk. Public safety should not come at the expense of civil rights or equal access to self-protection. Policies that price people out of their rights or delay lawful self-defense do not address the root causes of violence and instead leave the most vulnerable less safe. I respectfully urge you to oppose these bills and support approaches that protect both public safety and the rights of all Virginians, regardless of income, identity, or background. Thank you for your time and consideration.

Such bills if passed would provide little benefit to the safety of Virginia citizens. Gun violence is not a major concern in Virginia, and criminals will neither abide nor be limited by such legislation. Instead, many responsible citizens would lose their rights. There is no reason to pass such measures. In addition, many of these bills are not written to an excellent level of clarity and will spur much confusion on what remains legal or illegal.

I support this bill and believe the hours of paid leave should be increased.

I support HB1142 because it gives people returning home from incarceration a real chance to rebuild their lives without being immediately crushed by court-imposed debt. In order to give individuals a fair opportunity to rehabilitate, we cannot weigh them down with fines, fees, taxes, or other costs the moment they reenter the community. Those first months are critical. People are trying to secure housing, find a job, reconnect with family, and care for their health. Immediate financial burdens push people into survival mode, making it nearly impossible to move forward. Too often, the system releases someone only to suffocate them in the free world with fines and fees, setting them up to fail and return to incarceration. By delaying immediate payments, this bill balances accountability with compassion. It recognizes that rehabilitation takes time and that breathing room is essential for lasting success. It creates space to regain independence and work toward compliance without feeling trapped by impossible demands. Families and communities benefit when people are supported rather than trapped in cycles of debt and punishment. Supporting this bill is about giving people a fair chance to stand on their own, take responsibility, and move forward with dignity.

I support this bill. My son owes court costs and is serving a long sentence. Once he is released it is going to take him time to find a place and a job (which will almost be near impossible because.of his offense). He will need time to get on his feet before he can even think about court costs. Thank you

I am Scott E. Peyton, Director of Government Affairs at Prison Fellowship, and I am writing to express Prison Fellowship’s support of HB 1142. With nearly 50 years of experience encountering Jesus with men and women behind bars, Prison Fellowship® is a leading national voice shaping the public debate on justice. Our guiding principles are rooted in the biblical call to seek justice, love mercy, and restore hope. In the early period after prison, the risks of recidivism, suicide, drug relapse, homelessness, and unemployment for men and women are particularly high. To aid this transition period, this legislation provides individuals returning from incarceration with a six-month grace period during which they are not required to make payments on court-assessed fines and fees related to their criminal case. This bill does not reduce the amount an individual owes to the court. Virginia has made great strides in supporting successful reentry. We respectfully urge this committee to continue that progress by voting YES on House Bill 1142.

NAACP Virginia State Conference supports these bills Hb1246 Hb861 Hb857 Hb851

Dear Members of the General Assembly, I write in strong support of HB173, HB296, and HB1246 based on my lived experience and years of witnessing how powerful visitation can be when it is treated with humanity and consistency. Family connection stabilizes incarcerated individuals, improves behavior, and gives people hope. Visitation is not a luxury; it is a critical part of rehabilitation. Unfortunately, current practices often work against that purpose. On December 6, 2025, my visit at Buckingham Correctional Center was denied, along with three other women, because our jeans were said to be “too tight,” even though visitors wearing nearly identical clothing had been allowed in earlier that same day. One woman had driven nearly six hours and was still denied an in-person visit. This type of inconsistent enforcement discourages families and erodes trust. I have also had a visit stopped because of a one-inch crack in my car window during the middle of summer, in nearly 90-degree heat. Instead of focusing on safety or reasonable solutions, the visit was terminated. Experiences like this make families feel punished rather than supported. What hurts most is that I remember when visitation brought real family unity. I grew up visiting my father during times when DOC hosted family days. We could go out on the yard, eat hamburgers and hotdogs, play cards, and run around in the field. Those moments mattered. They created connection, motivation, and hope. I looked forward to those visits because they felt human. Now, visits feel stripped of that purpose. There is no movement, no access to nourishment, and even using the bathroom can risk ending a visit. Families are expected to sit for hours without basic accommodations. Where is the family unity in that? HB173, HB296, and HB1246 move Virginia toward fairness, consistency, and dignity. They recognize that families are not a threat to safety, but a vital part of rehabilitation. I respectfully urge you to support all three bills. Their passage would help restore trust, humanity, and the true rehabilitative power of family connection in Virginia’s correctional system.

I fully support this bill so does my son. Especially earned sentence credit. Please pass this bill. It's so important!

i don’t agree with this bill because that would mean even more limits on how often you can visit your loved one. it’s already lots of restrictions & that would just add another one. i feel as if visitation shouldn’t be looked upon as a privilege nor be used as punishment. they are still human & deserve to be able to see & interact with their family. i feel we should have longer visitation time with our loved one. hour or two extra nothing too dramatic. the visits give most of these guys incarcerated hope. being able to see their families give them a reason to keep pushing to the next day. communication with family is already very difficult as most facilities are always locked down. as a family member, we all should be able to see our loved ones not based on vadoc gca levels.

I support real family connection and meaningful visitation. I want people to be able to hug their loved ones and maintain relationships that help them survive incarceration and succeed when they come home. But this bill does not expand visitation as a right. It turns family contact into something that must be earned through “good time” class levels and that can be taken away when someone is struggling. HB1246 creates a phase system tied to Good Conduct Allowance levels and time in those levels. That means visitation and physical contact are not protected. They become an incentive and a punishment tool. When a person’s GCA level drops, they can lose good time and also lose family access. That is a double penalty, and it is not pro family. It creates pressure and instability for people who are already living in a high stress environment. This structure will harm vulnerable populations the most. People with mental health disabilities, intellectual or developmental disabilities, limited English proficiency, trauma histories, or communication barriers are more likely to receive disciplinary infractions or struggle to navigate rules. People in protective custody or restrictive housing for safety reasons may be effectively excluded from the “enhanced” visitation that the bill claims to expand. Families should not lose contact because a loved one is in crisis, misunderstood, or placed in isolation. Virginia should strengthen visitation without weaponizing it. If the General Assembly wants to support families, the bill should remove the GCA based phases and instead create a universal baseline visitation standard for everyone. Enhanced appropriate physical affection should be available during contact visits unless there is a specific, individualized safety reason to restrict it. Any restrictions should require written notice, a clear reason, a time limit, and an appeal process. We should not allow blanket bans based on housing status or classification. Family connection should not be used as leverage. It should be protected as a stabilizing, life saving support, especially for people in crisis. Please reject HB1246 unless it is amended to remove the incentive system and include real guardrails that prevent visitation from being revoked arbitrarily or used as a behavioral control.

I am against this bill and I would think if DOC prides themselves on family and rehabilitation they would not be using an incentive tier for men and women to have that much needed time with their families. Also, you already get 2 hours at visit as it is so it’s not like that’s an added bonus.

I write in strong support of HB296, HB173, and HB1246 as an individual directly affected by Virginia’s visitation policies. I am a long distance visitor who must travel hundreds of miles and coordinate interstate and international travel in order to maintain contact with an incarcerated family member. I am also a parent and a spouse, and the responsibility for planning, funding, and navigating visitation falls primarily on me. My husband is my children’s stepfather and supports them at home while I manage the logistics and emotional labour of maintaining family connection through a complex and inconsistent system. Virginia is nationally recognised for reducing recidivism, with a three year re incarceration rate of approximately 17.6 percent, the lowest in the country. Research consistently shows that maintaining family connections during incarceration is one of the strongest predictors of successful reentry. Individuals who receive visits are significantly less likely to reoffend, with reductions in reconviction rates exceeding 30 percent in some studies. Protecting visitation is therefore not only compassionate policy but a sound public safety strategy. In Virginia, approximately one in fourteen children will experience parental incarceration before age eighteen. As a parent, I experience firsthand how visitation policies affect not only the incarcerated individual but the family member who must absorb the financial costs, travel demands, and administrative barriers in order to keep that connection alive. National data shows fewer than half of incarcerated parents receive in person visits with their children, despite in person contact being the most effective way to preserve meaningful relationships. When visits are shortened or cancelled after significant travel, the burden and impact fall directly on the caregiver who has made those sacrifices. HB173 directly addresses these realities by recognising long distance visitors, minor children, and infrequent visitors, and by establishing a minimum two hour visit. For someone in my position, a short or unpredictable visit does not justify the extensive planning, expense, and disruption required. Limiting suspension of visitation to situations involving a direct and substantial safety threat provides essential protection against arbitrary denials that currently occur without explanation or appeal. HB296 addresses the lack of consistent and clearly communicated visitation rules that I and others must navigate. Requirements often vary by facility or change without notice, creating unnecessary stress and uncertainty. Clear standards improve compliance, reduce conflict, and support staff while ensuring visitors are treated with dignity. HB1246 ensures these reforms are implemented through transparency, data collection, and oversight. Advancing HB296, HB173, and HB1246 affirms Virginia’s commitment to public safety, rehabilitation, and the family members who carry the responsibility of maintaining connection under difficult circumstances.

I am a directly impacted family member of someone incarcerated in Virginia. I am submitting this comment in opposition to HB1246, not because family connection is unimportant, but because this bill misunderstands the reality families like mine are living in. My family member has been held in long-term solitary confinement. In that reality, “enhanced visitation” is not meaningful access, it is largely theoretical. When someone is isolated for months or years, visits are rare, tightly restricted, and often impossible to reach. Families live hours away, must miss work and school, and still may be denied contact due to lockdowns, classifications, or arbitrary enforcement. More importantly, this bill does nothing to address the conditions that make visitation meaningless in the first place. There is also a child involved in this. A child who used to hear from their parent regularly. A child who depended on those calls for comfort, guidance, and reassurance. Now there are long silences where no call comes, let alone visits. This is bill is not fair for children and families who are innocent in this. HB1246 suggests that increased visitation alone can repair this harm. It cannot. Visitation is not a substitute for humane conditions. You cannot “enhance” a visit while someone is being psychologically harmed in isolation. You cannot strengthen families while simultaneously breaking the person at the center of them. This bill fails to grapple with that reality. It offers optics without addressing the root harm. For families like mine, it feels like being asked to accept crumbs while enduring ongoing damage. I urge you to listen to directly impacted families and to prioritize policies that reduce isolation, protect mental health, and preserve real human connection, not symbolic access.

We oppose HB 1246 as written. Visitation is not a “behavior incentive”, it’s harm reduction and a basic human need. This bill makes family connection conditional through DOC-controlled phases tied to good-time levels, creating a system where children and loved ones become leverage. HB 1246 also gives VADOC another tool to restrict families through subjective classifications and uneven program access, disproportionately harming people with disabilities, language barriers, and mental health needs, and families who already travel far to stay connected. If Virginia truly believes family connection supports rehabilitation and safer reentry, then visitation should be a protected baseline for all people, limited only by a documented, individualized safety risk with due process and time limits, not by incentive tiers the DOC can weaponize. Please vote NO on HB 1246 in its current form.

I urge you to vote in favor of these bills, all of which have a common interest -- to protect Virginia residents from unconstitutional action by Federal authorities that are charged with protecting the population. The bills are : HB 650, 1260, 1262, 1264, 1265, 1438, 1440, 1441, 1442, 1482, 1492. My family knows a naturalized U.S. citizen from El Salvador who came to the United States because he married a U.S. citizen. He was arrested in Pennsylvania and held for three days, because they thought he might be an undocumented alien based on racial/ethnic profiling. He had to hire a lawyer to get out. Virginia law enforcement must not cooperate with Federal security forces that are carrying out such unconstitutional activities. My name is Julie Schechter Torres. I am a member of Temple Rodef Shalom. Our houses of worship must be safe from activities by law enforcement. Our schools must be safe for children. I know a 9-year-old child who is legally present in the United States but didn't want to go to school for days after ICE went to her ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. Children are not a threat. If ICE is focusing on criminals - as they say they are - they are in the wrong place. Going there to capture adults is once again using children as "bait". I have lived in countries where criminals stop cars and kidnap people. There is no way to know that law enforcement authorities are who they say they are if they wear masks and don't show identification. There is no reason someone carrying out legal law enforcement activities should need to hide who they are or what they are doing. Masking is just a means of covering up unlawful action. Please pass these bills to protect Virginians.

I am wanting to write in support of HB 650, HB 1260, HB 1265, HB 1438. These bills would work towards truly and wellbeing of helping the community that lives here within the Commonwealth. The behavior and actions of federal officers are dangerous as they are spreading fear and harm that directly work against the trust and wellbeing of many immigrants and other people of color that are present here. Many of those who are directly impacted as they are less likely to feel safe to contact emergency services for life saving care, going to the store for groceries, taking children to school, going to court for things even like protective orders that could help promote their safety- to just name a few. People deserve the ability to live with dignity and safety and these bills would take the necessary steps to helping promote public safety for all.

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills protect sensitive spaces such as courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places, and hospitals from intimidation by federal immigration enforcement. They strengthen public trust and improve accountability by restricting law enforcement officers from obscuring their identities. I oppose HB1459, which would force state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would seriously damage public trust in local law enforcement.

I have watched the news and live feeds from Minneapolis, and today I watched testimonies of violations, physical abuse and murder by ICE. It is hard to not see we are in a Constitutional and humanitarian crisis at a scale I never thought could happen here. Please do not bring this to VA. As Virginia is the birthplace of our Constitution, can we make the choice to refuse this standing army, search and seizures? the beatings and destruction of property and disruption of freedom peace and commerce ICE and similar agencies leave in their wake? We are not being protected by them, but living in terror of them. The trust is gone. And, every decent law enforcement officer carries the massive burden of association with these violent, incompetent, sadistic, rogue, racist hypocrites. Ice must be abolished NOW. Humane reform to immigration law, the justice system, detention conditions (including medical care, oversight without notice, access to lawyers without being shipped out, family visits, and provisions for the safety of people who trusted our country as asylum seekers .) As for actual ,violent criminals- we have a system in place and none of this is necessary if we have trust between communities and law enforcement. Ice needs to be scrapped first for something new - for the people, with the consent of the people , to take its place. What are they but roving patrols racial profiling? I am PROUD of our civil rights legacy in our state. We can take a stand and refuse funding and quartering. We should all be able to look to law enforcement as heroes- the people we could call for help. Every act by ICE... The stalking in the streets, the threats to peaceful protestors and Constitutional recorders, and the fear so many goo community members, citizens snd non-citizens live with every day does not even feel like our country. To think we spend this massive amount of money to torment people working hard and doing their best? I'd rather the money go to give a family a shot at the American Dream, instead of paying someone to try to turn guns on them for pay. Our immigrants- They are our heart. They love this country and its promise. They are strong and brave and they work hard and have strong families and faith. They are full of love and share art, culture, dance, music, food and traditions, a love for community many of us can learn from. It is a terrible thing to not embrace and love these people who give so much and ask for so little. I cannot understand how these people are treated like an object to kick, hold down, choke, gun down, jail or murder, without so much as looking at paperwork. Please end this now, for the love of God. If you do not abolish ICE, remove funding and contracts and don't allow masks or lack of badges. Help prosecute when THEY are the violent criminals. But really, get them out and keep them out. Let our own trained police officers handle the crime. Thank you.

I am a resident in the city of Richmond and I demand the restriction and removal of ICE agents from our communities. I support the bills put forth that seek to limit the access and activities of immigration and law enforcement agents. Thank you

My name is Lillian Komarow. I am a resident of District 12. I am submitting this testimony in support of HB 1441, HB 1440, HB 1442, HB 650, HB 1260, HB 1262, HB 1265, HB 1438, HB 1482, and HB 1492. I am also writing in opposition to HB 1459. I grew up in the extremely diverse Northern Virginia area and I know that immigrants are a huge part of what makes Virginia the beautiful melting pot that it is. I know that immigrants have a wide array of reasons to come to Virginia, but ultimately my personal experience has shown me that immigrants want to live and work in peace. They contribute to Virginia in many positive ways economically and culturally– not that that should be a requirement to be treated humanely. Even if I did not have this background, I would know that the terror we are seeing ICE indiscriminately inflict on undocumented immigrants and US citizens alike across the country is abhorrent. It is imperative that Virginia citizens are able to freely access community services without fear of harassment from federal agents. Across the country we are seeing ICE and CBP agents deliberately terrorize families simply trying to take their children to school or to the doctor. There have been stories on the news of domestic violence victims being too afraid of ICE terrorization to show up to their court dates. Ultimately the actions of ICE are deterring people from accessing important services, and this creates ripple effects into the community by making us ALL less safe. Please protect Virginia citizens by passing HB 1440, HB 650, HB 1260, through. The Commonwealth has both the right and the duty to ensure free and fair election for its citizens. Elections cannot be free and fair when people are afraid of being detained at polling places solely due to their appearance. ICE agents’ presence at polling places would be nothing short of voter intimidation. Please protect the sanctity of our elections by passing HB 1442 through. The responsibility of local and state law enforcement should be to protect and serve Virginia citizens, not waste our resources and create mistrust by collaborating with increasingly hostile federal immigration operations. In addition to sapping limited state and local resources, collaboration blurs accountability for racial profiling and other abusive tactics federal agents take, and opens Virginia police departments up to lawsuits. Both law enforcement leaders and crime victim advocacy organizations alike have spoken out against Virginia law enforcement participating in immigration enforcement, citing eroded trust between police and victims, and even described instances of domestic violence and sexual assault survivors being unwilling to seek assistance. Please pass HB 1442 to prevent this mistrust and wasting of resources, as well as HB 1262 so that Virginians can trust that they are not falling into a trap when seeking immigration assistance services, HB 1264 so that Virginia citizens know they have an Accountability Commission keeping watch on federal agents conducting military style operations in the Commonwealth, and HB 1482 so that federal agents can further be held accountable by not concealing their identity. For the purpose of protecting Virginians, our resources, and our right to free and fair elections, I respectfully urge this committee to support HB 1441, HB 1440, HB 1442, HB 650, HB 1260, HB 1262, HB 1265, HB 1438, HB 1482, and HB 1492 and oppose HB 1459.

For over a decade, federal policy has limited immigration enforcement in “sensitive locations” like schools and health care facilities. That commonsense safeguard was rescinded in January 2025. Since then, we’ve seen the real‑world harm: there are schools shutting down after Border Patrol tackled students and staff, chronic absenteeism as families fear sending their children to school, a family seeking care for their young daughter detained in a clinic parking lot, and families separated at courthouses while trying to attend their legal proceedings. These incidents show what happens when enforcement reaches places where children and families should feel safe. HB 1260 is a straightforward bill that protects the safety and wellbeing of students, families, and school communities. It doesn’t change immigration law or limit federal authority. It simply ensures that when immigration agents appear on a school campus, schools respond with transparency, notice, and due process—so learning doesn’t stop because fear takes over. We know that surprise enforcement near schools ripples far beyond one family. Students stop attending. Parents pull back from teachers. Staff don’t know how to respond. Working directly with immigrant children every day, my colleagues and I have seen firsthand the negative effects of children feeling unsafe while attending school. Many have expressed not wanting to attend school, struggling to focus, and feeling scared in a place they should feel safe in. HB 1260 addresses this clearly and responsibly. HB 1440 extends these same commonsense protections to all “protected areas”—hospitals, preschools, public colleges, and offices of Commonwealth’s Attorneys. It prevents staff from granting access to nonpublic areas for immigration enforcement. This ensures that Virginians living their everyday lives can access essential services without hesitation or fear. And finally, HB 650 brings this same principle to courthouses by prohibiting certain civil arrests in these settings, so Virginians can safely appear in court, participate in proceedings, and support loved ones without fear. Now more than ever before, we must ensure due process is uninterrupted and protected for all living in Virginia. Together, these bills uphold constitutional norms, reduce confusion, and keep children and families safe in the places they must be able to trust. For these reasons, I respectfully urge the Committee to advance HB 1260, HB 1440, and HB 650. Thank you

Dear Virginia House of Delegates, I am writing in support of all bills in this Block 1 subcommittee (HB650; HB1260; HB1262; HB1264; HB1265; HB1438; HB1440; HB1441; HB1442; HB1453; HB1459; HB1482; and HB1492). Each bill has the same underlying principles, in my view, that undergird each one and is worthy of widespread support and consideration. 1) Greater accountability for any abuses of power - something our government is supposedly predicated upon from its foundations of checks and balances. 2) Respect of human dignity - lest we forget another person's humanity and spiral into forms of depravity experienced on widespread scale even within our lifetimes, our parents' lifetimes, or our grandparents' lifetimes, anytime dehumanization becomes the norm and public opinion becomes apathetic we ought to have sirens blaring warning signals. As a conflict prevention and response professional, I have thorough knowledge of human rights abuses at widespread scale at the hands of unchecked power -- the enslavement of Africans and brutality of the chattel slave trade and its legacy of abuses through the Jim Crow Era onward, the forced disappearances of Argentina and Chile, the Holocaust, forced kidnappings and assimilations of First Nations and Native American children at Indian Boarding Schools in Canada and the United States, and more. These bills hold that some places ought to be preserved to honor the humanity in our neighbors, even those who may be undocumented - polling places, courthouses, schools. These bills provide guardrails that Virginia needs to both maintain the humanity of all people, even those who are undocumented. It serves to safeguard the hearts and minds of those citizens and legal residents who have been continuously profiled based on their perceived or actual national origin, and provides more psychological safety for those in our communities who are being targeted from the national stage to local actors dispatched from ICE who have done nothing unlawful. These forcible, unchecked, and brute forces of strength have brought about unnecessary and widespread fear, school absences, medical inattention for fear of being targeted in public, and traumatic experiences for young children and youth. Virginia House of Delegates must provide a healthy check and balance and honor its constituents. Vote in support of these bills. Sincerely, Jena Kitchen

We support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB4141, HB1442 AND HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces such as courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This legislation is intended to strengthen the public trust in our civic places and to improve accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure the identity of members of law enforcement. We are particularly mindful of comments suggesting that ICE members might surround polling places in our November 2026 elections. The presence of masked individuals in any of Virginia’s polling places would interfere with the electoral process at all levels and discourage people from freely exercising their right to vote. The intimidation of voters has no place in this Commonwealth. The Silver Team for Democracy is a group of senior citizens registered to vote in Virginia.

I support this bill and am in favor of the increased safety it will provide for our communities and for my neighbors. I support banning face coverings for federal officers, restricting immigration enforcement officers to 40 feet from polling places, and prohibiting immigration enforcement from schools, hospitals and other above mentioned safe spaces. Limits need to be placed on rogue federal agents, due process upheld and American communities protected.

I am a resident of Alexandria, VA House District 5. I am writing in support of bills in support of HB650, HB1260, HB 1262, HB 1264, HB1265, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, HB1482, and HB1492. These bills are a critical way that we Virginian's can ensure the safety of our communities from Federal overreach. HB650, HB1440, and HB1442 would protect areas that were traditionally not targeted for immigration enforcement. These places, schools, hospitals, courts, places of worship, are critical in ensuring the safety and wellbeing of our community. Right now, families regardless of their immigration status are afraid to leave their houses in order to attend church, go to school, get medical care, or attend important court hearings because they are rightfully worried they will be unjustly detained by ICE due to the color of their skin, the language they speak, or their accent. These bills would help restore access to these Virginians. HB1442 is especially important, as it stops enforcement of immigration laws within 40 feet of polling locations. Given statements by the administration on using ICE around polling places, this bill is critical to ensuring the integrity of our elections. HB1438, HB1441, and HB1482 are critical in building public trust with state and local law enforcement. Currently, federal immigration agents do not identify themselves and wear masks. This causes not only fear in the community and obstruct accountability for these agents, but it makes communities distrust any person wearing camo or who looks like law enforcement as it is difficult to tell who is a federal agent and who is our local law enforcement. These bills also work to prohibit local/state law enforcement to enforce federal immigration law without a judicial warrant. This takes the burden off of local law enforcement in determining what type of warrant they must honor and how they should interact with federal immigration authorities. Finally, HB1260 ensures that schools across the Commonwealth understand and have a plan to interact with immigration enforcement. This bill instructs schools to limit immigration authorities from entering nonpublic areas without a judicial warrant, again restoring to children their ability to attend school without fear. This bill also removes the responsibility and burden from local school boards in determining when and how they should respond to federal immigration authorities, and protects them from being targeted by the administration. In totality, these bills protect Virginians and work to return to them their rights to due process and their sense of safety and dignity that have been taken by the administration.

Any even mildly engaged Virginian ought be alarmed at the slow civil war being carried out on the people of Minneapolis. That is why I fully support HB1264 and HB1482 as critical societal checks on the administration's unfettered military force. Additionally, I support HB650/HB1260 (aren't these the same bill?), HB1265, HB1438, HB1440, and HB1441 for creating safe places and walling off our own government and enforcement agencies from this radical influence. Lastly, steps taken in HB1442 could become extremely important to protecting our democracy as the administration would spiritually invert the Second and Third Enforcement Acts, using the same federal authority that stopped the KKK from harassing black voters in 1870 to instead perform the same kind of intimidation on brown voters in 2026. I oppose HB1459's mandate of cooperation with ICE to snatch untried people out of custody, circumvent the consequences of convicted people by our own justice system, or enact additional punitive measures post incarceration. There is additional alarming language that might imply "going after the families". If state and local PD have a case where they want to cooperate, they already can do so. This bill removes that choice and puts it into a provably untrustworthy institution. I generally support HB1262 and HB1492 for cracking down on bad actors that would take advantage of these troubling times. However, I question the necessity of HB1492: while the long imagined scenario is extremely troubling, we have already seen what evils actual ICE officers are capable of, and how low the bar for entry is. Would this actually help? I mislike HB1453, which goes against our rights as American citizens and good Samaritans to non-violently oppose the actions of federal terrorists.

It would be wrong for the Commonwealth to provide additional assistance to federal immigration enforcement while those federal officers obscure their identities, flout the nation's laws and harass and detain citizens. Do not permit these same federal officers into our schools, hospitals or state offices without authorization.

My name is Yonah Walter. I am a resident of District 10. I am writing in support of bills which enhance public trust in our law enforcement and respect civil rights in our communities. I am a volunteer with the Virginia chapter of Jews United for Justice, but I speak as the great-grandson of immigrants who came as chain migrants with the help of the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS), and as someone inculcated with strong Jewish values including a bedrock principle of respect for all. The American promise of "liberty and justice for all" was a strong call for my family, but to now hear our government speak so coldly about immigrants - let alone to see how our government has mistreated those they even suspect of being immigrants - has disappointed me greatly. The shooting deaths by ICE of nearly a dozen Americans in just the last few months, and the immoral and self-serving rush by the government to blame the victims in those shootings, demands we act to curb these abuses and keep our government in check. We need accountability from government agents, which includes the right to know who purports to represent us and act on our behalf in law enforcement. We need to protect access to public spaces like courthouses and (perhaps especially) polling places. We need to vigorously protect the right of people to move freely without fear of harassment or assault by law enforcement. We need to restore trust in our government. I respectfully urge this committee to support the following: HB650 HB1260 HB1262 HB1264 HB1265 HB1438 HB1440 HB1441 HB1442 HB1482 HB1492

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills protect sensitive spaces such as courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places, and hospitals from intimidation by federal immigration enforcement. They strengthen public trust and improve accountability by restricting law enforcement officers from obscuring their identities. I oppose HB1459, which would force state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would seriously damage public trust in local law enforcement.

My name is Paula Roney. I am a resident of District 3. I am submitting this testimony in support of HB650, HB1260, HB 1262, HB 1264, HB1265, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, HB1482, and HB1492. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This would strengthen public trust and improve accountability. As a long time Virginia public school educator, a grandchild of immigrants who came to this country to escape persecution, and a member of Jews United for Justice, I know the importance of welcoming immigrants to our country. I’ve worked with many students who came to the United States, often on their own, to escape harrowing circumstances. It is vital that they, and all other people are able to attend school, receive medical treatment and be able to access the legal system without fear. Therefore it is critical that our Commonwealth protects access to these vital community services. I respectfully urge this committee to support these bills. Thank you.

I am writing in support of HB1260. As someone who works in a school myself, this issue is very near and dear to my heart. In my own school, I have seen the panic caused by the recent, unprecedented attacks by ICE and DHS. Our students and their families are terrified of what could happen to them. School faculty and staff, myself included, are terrified that they will be powerless to help. This bill would provide real, tangible support to school personnel, to give them something they can do to help. It would provide significant reassurance to school teachers and staff that they have some real way to protect their students, and their students' families. Our children truly are the future, and it is vital that we care for and protect them. Schools must be a place where they can learn and thrive, not a place they fear going to, for risk of immigration raids. I strongly support HB 1260, and I ask that the House of Delegates do so as well.

My name is Susan Kohn. I am a resident of District 15. I am submitting this testimony in support of HB 650,1260, 1262,1264,1265,1438,1440,1441,1453,1492 and in opposition of HB 1459 and 1482. As a pediatrician I am horrified to see my immigrant patients and their families living in fear. I work with children through a non-profit organization that helps to provide access to medical and dental care in Fairfax County. We see hardworking families who are afraid to access health care or even to send their children to school. They worry when someone leaves the house. Will they come back from work, the grocery store, court or school- or be taken by ICE? How can they continue to provide for their children? The children and teens I see were brought to the United States for a better life. Many experienced violence, political upheaval and uncertainty or severe poverty in their countries of origin, which led their parents to seek a place of safety, where they could thrive. My grandparents came to this country in the face of pogroms that terrorized our families in Eastern Europe. They worked hard, as our current immigrants do, to make a future for their children. Our Jewish sacred texts obligate us to care for the stranger and treat all with respect and kindness. They are part of the fabric of a great society. Our neighbors must be able to testify in court if they have been victimized or if they have requested asylum, without the fear of being deported when they show up. All Virginians, whether they are citizens or not, must have the right to access schools, hospitals, places of worship and polling places without fear of intimidation or deportation. All must be able to clearly see the identity of law enforcement personnel and have their day in court with proper representation if accused. Local police should be doing the work of maintaining safety for all residents- not helping ICE deport people without due process. As a Virginian I believe we have a duty to protect those who are most vulnerable in our community. At this time it is our immigrant neighbors who need our help. I respectfully urge this committee to support HB 650, 1260, 1262, 1264, 1265,1438, 1440, 1441,1442, 1453,1492 and oppose HB1459 and HB1482.

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

I submit this comment in support of House Bill 1260. Since the federal government rescinded the sensitive locations policy in 2025, LAJC has been traveling across the Commonwealth holding Know Your Rights presentations for families and children—some as young as five years old—because they are afraid of what might happen if immigration enforcement comes into their schools. When kindergarteners are asking what to do if “ICE comes to my classroom,” something is deeply wrong. HB 1260 works to address this problem, by mandating that schools provide notice to families when immigration authorities are present on campus and requiring that school prohibit immigration enforcement on campus without a valid warrant. It provides complementary protections to other similar legislation being considered this year, specifically the Virginia Education Access & Privacy Act (House Bill 836). We urge you to support this bill.

My comment refers to all bills on the agenda. The Commonwealth of Virginia must take any and all legal action to prevent ICE from terrorizing any Virginia individual or community. This includes all people who come to this country seeking a better life for themselves and their families, just as the many millions before them have done throughout America’s history.

I am a resident of Virginia House of Delegates District One (Del. Hope). I am submitting this testimony in support of House Bills proposing to de-link Virginia Schools, courthouses, protected areas and polling places from being places of enforcement of federal immigration laws by federal agents. Specifically, HB#1260 (no immigration enforcement in schools), HB-1265 (courthouses), HB-1438 (287g agreements prohibited), HB-1440 (protected areas-hospitals, schools, etc), HB-1441 (law enforcement cooperation only with a valid judicial warrant) and HB-1442 (polling places) My family includes two members born overseas, one came as a political refugee. We are longtime members of Temple Rodef Shalom and we work or volunteer in the service of the immigrant community and basic human rights, including in the legal profession. These bills will protect privacy and basic human rights of immigrants, creating safe spaces so they may continue to dwell in peace in our communities. Public safety is improved if immigrants are not loath to report crimes or to show up for their own legal or immigration required appointments without fear of immediate detention without due legal process, or have their children attend school and continue to advance peacefully in our commonwealth. We have seen in Latin America, Africa and other regions the devastation which governments can cause against their citizens, where the USA has been a beacon of hope. And we have seen the benefit when we welcome immigrants to participate fully in business and communities in our country and state: economic benefits which under the current environment are depressed, as many residents miss work and school and doctor appointments due to widespread dragnet approach to immigration by the federal government. I respectfully urge this committee to support the HBs listed above. Thank you.

We want public safety, not public abductions and executions. We have learned that ICE does not respect rule of law or human rights, so support these bills to keep Virginians safe. Every child deserves an education. Every child deserves to be safe at school. Every sick or injured person deserves medical care. So keep ICE out of our school, hospitals, and courthouses. No judicial warrant should mean no entry- and limit what civil arrests can take place in courthouses. We want police to protect, not persecute. So eliminate 287g agreements in Virginia. Allow our local law enforcement to do their job of keeping communities safe, instead of doing ICE's dirty work for them. We want rule of law, not rule by masked mobs. Do not allow law enforcement to cover their faces. That's not community policing- that's KKK tactics. We want free and fair elections, not a return to Jim Crow era intimidation at the polls. Citizens are not safe from ICE, either. Do not allow the federal government to use "immigration enforcement" as a rouse to silence eligible voters through fear and profiling. Support: HB650 - Callsen HB1260 - Shin HB1262 - Glass HB1264 - Shin HB1265 - Glass HB1438 - Guzman HB1440 - Lopez HB1441 - Lopez HB1442 - Lopez HB1453 - Williams HB1459 - Zehr HB1482 - Schmidt HB1492 - Shin

Like many Americans, I have become increasingly alarmed by the immigration enforcement tactics being employed by ICE. While I agree that individuals who are here illegally can and should, in some cases, be deported - ICE is terrorizing immigrant communities in a way that is completely unacceptable and, frankly, un-American. I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482, which would help protect our immigrant communities from terrorization by ICE agents. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. Thank you, Zachary West Constituent from Alexandria

It is essential that we take steps to protect Virginia’s communities and especially in sensitive spaces - our kids, the sick, faith communities. We must protect courtrooms and the rule of law and polling places to allow for free and fair elections. ICE is a threat to our democracy and our safety and that of our neighbors. Please do all that you can to preserve the needed checks and balances and protect our democracy!

I’m very concerned with the overreaching of ICE. They have terrorized communities, broken apart families, disrupted children’s education, wrongfully detained people and even murdered American citizens. Please keep all safeguards in place to protect our citizens. Warrants should be in place before they come after people. ICE agents should follow the same laws and training that police officers are required to. ICE should not be allowed to wait outside or enter courthouses. They should not be wearing masks. This is leading to more dangerous escalations as we have seen in Minneapolis. Please vote to protect the rights of our people, maintain a safe community, and honor the laws and Constitution of our once great country. Please listen to your constituents. We are a country of immigrants and we are all humans. Do what is right.

As a long time resident of Virginia, I have watched the horrific attack on our immigrant population by our federal government. I write to encourage support of these bills to provide additional state protections to our local immigrant communities. It is the moral thing to do. Thank you. Stephanie Elms Alexandria VA

Please support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. Please oppose HB1459. I have taught English to immigrants (both adults and children) here in Roanoke for 15 years. They come from all over the world, speak all different languages, and practice all different religions. They are some of the most grateful, respectful, hard working, generous people I've met. They are a gift and a blessing to my community. All of them want to become legal citizens and contribute to our society. The undocumented ones are here out of desperation and our immigration system makes it impossible for them to be here legally while being safe from the danger of their home countries. I fear for their safety since ICE is unconstitutionally invading people's homes, detaining people without warrants, detaining people who have no criminal record, and have detained legal immigrants and even U.S. citizens. ICE is operating carelessly and irresponsibly. Please protect my immigrant neighbors, students, and friends. Thank you.

I strongly support every bill that limits federal immigration enforcement overreach. Virginia Majority stands in solidarity with immigrant communities across Virginia. We believe that all people, regardless of race, class, or immigration status, deserve to live with dignity, safety, and access to fundamental rights. I support policies that limit federal immigration enforcement overreach, protect access to courts and essential services, and prevent local resources from being used to separate families and criminalize our neighbors. Virginia must lead in protecting immigrant rights by establishing clear boundaries on immigration enforcement activities in our communities, ensuring safe access to schools, healthcare, courthouses, and other essential spaces, and maintaining the trust between local officials and the communities they serve. These policies have my support and are measures that would affirm Virginia’s commitment to being a place where all residents can participate fully in civic life without fear.

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

SUPPORT: HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, HB1482, HB1492. OPPOSE: HB1459 Our communities deserve protection from the overreach of the federal government. At a minimum, this means putting strong boundaries on the activity of federal immigration officers and requiring them to follow existing laws and those that are enacted by this general assembly. We need to protect sensitive spaces like schools, courtrooms, places of worship, hospitals and polling places from ICE/CBP intimidation. All officers - including local law enforcement - should be prohibited from wearing masks or face coverings and ID should be required. In addition, local law enforcement should be prohibited from entering agreements with federal immigration officers and judicial warrants for enforcement should be required. Currently our communities are less safe. We need to stop the unchecked abusive activity by ICE/CBP.

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

I am a pro bono immigration attorney and court watcher, and forme rly a DOJ employee and I know first hand about the overreach of ICE in its detaining people who rather than being the worst of the worst, are actually the best of the best that America has to offer. I represent youngsters who have achieved Special Immigrant Juvenile status and they are still being dragged off the streets. Immigrants are the fabric of our society. We all either are immigrants or trace our roots to immigrants unless we are Native Americans, For those who are illegal because the US makes it is next to impossible to come here illegally from countries inhabited by people of color, they benefit our country, and now we are openly banning those people and giving preference to whites falsely labeled as victims of racism. The system is inverted. We should be thankful for all immigrants. . Instead, the Trump regime treats them - nif they are people of color - like they aren't even human. It's despicable, and it needs to be stopped. Practices that used to be unheard of - going into churches and schools and courthouses and private homes, warrantless, to drag immigrants away from their families and into detention - are commonplace. And inhumane. And much is unconstitutional. We cannot become the next Minneapolis. God bless their response to the invading terrorists. We'll do the same if we have to. But you can prevent it or at least mitigrate the damage. The steps you can take are to use your legislative authority to create protections for the immigrants in our state. You can and must support protection that at least attempts to reign in ICE, among other legislative goals: HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would, among other policies, protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. And they would prevent local law enforcement to work with federal immigrant officers in their terrorizing of immigrants. As we devolve into authoritarism, I am begging you to slow down the march, doing what you can do to protect Virginians. Hopefully, state legislators all over the country, not just blue states, will do the same and protect americans - citizens and non-citizens - from the gross abuses of the law and the lack of humanity of this regime. I know I will continue to fight the regime but Virginians need the help of their legislators in this monumental task. Thank you.

I am in support for HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers; restricts face coverings and requires identification of law enforcement; and prohibits state/local law enforcement from entering agreements with federal immigration officers; requires judicial warrants for enforcement of immigration; I oppose HB1459, misleadingly titled "The Ice-free Communities Act". Requires that when VA law enforcement is holding someone in custody and receives an immigration detainer, they must notify ICE/CBP of the date and time of the detainee's expected release.

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

Please further protect ALL of our kids in pubic schools. This bill is comprehensive and will allow school personnel and school boards the support they need to keep kids safer in these times when federal immigration agents are separating children from their families and using schools as "bait." I support HB 1260

Please further protect ALL of our kids in pubic schools. This bill is comprehensive and will allow school personnel and school boards the support they need to keep kids safer in these times when federal immigration agents are separating children from their families and using schools as "bait." I support HB 1260

I am Kade Keller from Richmond, VA. I write in support of House Bills 1260, 1265, 1438, 1440, 1441, 1442, 1482, and 1492. These policies affirm Virginia’s commitment to being a place where all residents can participate fully in civic life without fear. Virginia must lead in protecting immigrant rights by establishing clear boundaries for immigration enforcement in our communities, ensuring safe access to schools, healthcare, courthouses, and other essential spaces, and maintaining trust between local officials and the communities they serve. All people, regardless of race, class, or immigration status, deserve to live with dignity, safety, and access to fundamental rights.

This is an opportunity for the Commonwealth to respect and protect the riaghts of ALL Virginia citizens. I strongly I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482.

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. Mary Bennett Alexandria Resident I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement. Mary Bennett Alexandria Resident

My name is Rachel Waldstein. I am a resident of District #1. I am submitting this testimony in support of the following bills: • HB 650 Callsen Courthouses • HB 1260 Shin Public elementary/secondary schools, etc; federal immigration investigation and enforcement activities • HB 1262 Glass Va Consumer Protection Act • HB 1264 Shin Virginia Accountability Commission • HB 1265 Glass Courthouses • HB 1438 Guzman 287g • HB 1440 Lopez Protected Areas • HB 1441 Lopez 287g • HB 1442 Lopez Polling Place Protections • HB 1482 Schmidt facemasks • HB 1492 Shin Impersonating federal law enforcement officer I oppose the following bills: • HB 1453 Williams Approaching a first responder with specified intent after a warning; penalty • HB 1459 Zehr Ice-Free Communities Act; notification to federal immigration authorities of pending release of certain prisoners from custody I am a member of Congregation Etz Hayim in Arlington and spent a large part of my career representing the U.S. government in the protection of human rights around the world. I support HB 650, 1260, 1262, 1264, 1265, 1438, 1440, 1441, 1442, 1482, and 1492 based on my Jewish values and my life’s work. Jewish tradition and law recognize the equality and dignity of all people and respect their right to life, bodily integrity, health, housing, education, and due process. The Jewish people have been refugees many times in the past and have often experienced mistreatment by authoritarian governments. It is thus my duty to stand in support of marginalized communities and against government abuses. Law enforcement authorities should not deprive anyone--even those in this country illegally--of life, liberty, or property without following established legal procedures that respect their rights. Since the Federal government has abdicated its responsibilities before the law and Constitution, it is up to the States to uphold national and international human rights law. Passing the above listed bills will make our communities to be safer and will give Commonwealth officials a legal basis to push back on Federal law enforcement officials who break the law. I strongly believe HB 650, 1260, 1262, 1264, 1265, 1438, 1440, 1441, 1442, 1482, and 1492 will improve the lives of all Virginians by allowing us to return our focus to strengthening our economy, education and healthcare systems, and by returning a sense of humanity to our Commonwealth. I oppose HB 1453 and 1459, which I believe will create more fear in our communities and impede Virginians’ ability to express their First Amendment rights. I respectfully urge this committee to support HB 650, 1260, 1262, 1264, 1265, 1438, 1440, 1441, 1442, 1482, and 1492 and to oppose HB 1453 and 1459.

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places, and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

I strongly support the following bills and urge the committee members to pass them on so they can make their way to the House in order to be discussed by all the Delegates: HB1492, HB1482, HB1453, HB1442, HB1441, HB1440, HB1438, HB1265, HB1264, HB1262, HB1260, and HB650. These bills provide much needed limits on ICE agents, and life-saving protections for tens of thousands of people in our commonwealth. Please do the right thing and keep these bills alive and moving through our legislative system.

Support HB 650 1260 1262 1264 1265 1438 1440 1441 1442 1482

I write in support of House Bills 1260, 1265, 1438, 1440, 1441, 1442, 1482, and 1492. These policies affirm Virginia’s commitment to being a place where all residents can participate fully in civic life without fear. Virginia must lead in protecting immigrant rights by establishing clear boundaries for immigration enforcement in our communities, ensuring safe access to schools, healthcare, courthouses, and other essential spaces, and maintaining trust between local officials and the communities they serve. We must stand united to protect our immigrant communities from the threats coming from our federal government, as we do with the many other threats and challenges we face from the Trump Administration. All people, regardless of race, class, or immigration status, deserve to live with dignity, safety, and access to fundamental rights.

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

Regarding proposed bills HB650, HB1260, HB 1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, HB1482: As an alarmed citizen I urge the Safety committee to advance the urgently needed provisions in these bills to help rein in the increasingly extreme and unlawful activities of CBP and ICE.

My name is Margaret Power. I have been a voting resident of District 6 for 37 years. I am submitting this testimony in support of most of the bills pending for your action today. I am the great-granddaughter of immigrants escaping poverty, famine, and persecution in their native land and striving to afford the ‘chain migration’ that re-united them with their families. I am the great-niece of German Jews who were denied entry and were murdered in Hitler’s camps. I am the daughter-in-law of an American Jewish woman, who, as a 13-year-old, escaped Poland and crossed a remote stretch of our northern border without documents during the Hitler years when America turned away refugees. I am the grandmother of two talented, bi-lingual and totally adorable Americans who are nearly as brown as their naturalized father, a Colombian-born doctor. I fear their own government will harm them. Or kill them. Truly- I cannot believe that a time has come in which it is not insane for me to have such fears. I belong to Temple Rodef Shalom in Falls church, where, in collaboration with other faith communities, we have long organized sustained support and services for new refugees, predominantly Afghan friends of the US. As Chairman Simon knows, our community actively advocates for inclusive and just public policy here in Richmond and in the nation’s capital. I respectfully urge you to send these bills forward and to advocate for their passage; collectively, they protect Virginians from violent abuses of federal power, they ensure that some of our essential public services- schools, hospitals and the courts- can be accessed by all; they preserve the sovereignty of the Commonwealth with respect to our law enforcement roles, while assuring federal-state-local collaboration with respect to removing criminals from our midst. As a package, they reinforce the rule of law, including protection of our constitutional rights; they reduce the likelihood of violence in our public spaces; they offer our neighbors - and my grandchildren- better protection by requiring federal immigration agents follow the same transparency standards as state and local law enforcement, and they restore some measure of confidence that we citizens are also unlikely to be kidnapped, injured or murdered so long as we are Virginians. I oppose passage of HB 1453, as it limits our right to free expression, and I also oppose HB1459, which is unnecessary because the Governor’s executive order allows federal-state cooperation with respect to convicted criminals, and, if read to add instances in which individuals can be delivered to DHS, would breach the boundaries established by HB 650 which I strongly support. I respectfully urge this subcommittee to support HB#650, HB#1260,HB#1262,HB#1264,HB#1265, HB#1438, B1440,HB1441,HB1442,HB1482, AND HB1492

I support all these bills which, to my reading of them, extend protections of the law to people attending court appointments so that they cannot be detained by immigration enforcement authorities (or people impersonating immigration enforcement authorities). I support requiring law enforcement officials to not wear masks and to have visible identification, and also not to engage in immigration enforcement activities. I also support bills which protect schools, churches, and private workplaces from immigration enforcement activities, and require judicial warrants (warrants signed by a judge) for any immigration enforcement operation. I would like to see bills requiring due process for any persons detained, including but not limited to access to a lawyer, ability to make phone calls, and right to be treated with dignity and humanity.

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would extend protection to sensitive civic spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers using easily obtained administrative warrants, strengthen public trust and accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity and require that all federal, state and local law enforcement agents are clearly identified by badge and agency, and restrict state and local law enforcement from entering into agreements that require that they act as immigration enforcement officers. There has been ample video footage and court rulings that show that CBP and ICE have exercised excessive force in many of our nation's cities and towns. We need laws that will help to keep Virginians safe.

Writing as a concerned Virginia resident and parent. I support passage of any bill that limits or prevents ICE from acting lawlessly as they have been around any protected spaces. Our neighbors, children and communities should be able to safely conduct business and learn without fear of ICE grabbing them, possibly causing long term trauma from over aggressive tactics to settle what is a civil matter. I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442 and HB1482. I oppose HB1459 to work with ICE in any capacity due to their cruelty.

I fully support every bill that safeguards and protects our immigrant neighbors from the lawless, cruel, immoral and shameful acts committed by federal agents and DHS.

My name is Cindy Denton-Ade . I am a resident of Burke, District 10 . I am submitting testimony in support of bills HB 650, 1260 ,1262 ,1264, 1265,1438,1440,1441,1442,1448,1482,1492. I am a member of Temple B’nai Shalom. All of my Grandparents were immigrants from other counties: the Ukraine, Belarus. If not for the welcoming policies of the United States when they immigrated, they would have been surely been all killed in the Holocaust. My very lovely handyman, who comes from Columbia and is a citizen, was fearful about driving to D.C. Because he felt he would be targeted by ICE. This is not right! Jewish values promote welcoming and protecting the stranger. These bills will go a long way to do just. Virginia, my chosen home, has taken many positive actions since Governor Spanberger has taken office. Let these bills be an addition to actions we can be proud of in protecting immigrants men, women, and children.

Hello, We support the bills that were checked off above to decrease the power & tyranny of ICE. We don't want law-abiding VA citizens exercising their civil rights to be assaulted, injured, or killed. Also, please OPPOSE HB 1459. Unfortunately, if passed, this will give ICE an edge in harassing and arresting our immigrant neighbors. Third, do any of these bills disallow ICE facilities from either opening or operating in VA? If not, is there a way to introduce this language in one of the proposed bills? Thank you! Ana & David Shannon

As a concerned resident of Alexandria who cares deeply about my neighbors, I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I strongly oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

To Va State Legislators, The Trump regime is terrorizing our communities across the US with brutal Immigration enforcement campaigns designed to test the limits of Executive power and the nation’s willingness to stand up against Trump’s Power grab. Masked federal agents are teargassing babies and pastors, Kidnapping neighbors and shipping them off to what will soon be known as American Concentration Camps. To make matters worse these thugs are Killing innocent people right in front of our own eyes. This is outrageous. This pattern of unchecked violence and abuse by Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the Border Patrol, and other federal law enforcement agencies must end. And surely these types of operations by such thugs have NO PLACE IN our state of VIRGINIA! As state legislators, YOU can rein in this type of lawlessness and protect Virginians from these types of unconstitutional actions and keep us all safe from these thugs! We support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills above would protect sensitive spaces like cortrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. Simply put, Passage of these bills will strengthen public trust and improve accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. We oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement. Please work together and vote to Pass HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. Keeping our Virginians safe and protected is your number one job! AND OPPOSE HB 1459 to keep us safe and to build public trust in law enforcement! Your constituents, James and Elizabeth Dolan Arlington, Va. 02/04/2026

HB 650 Clearly seeks to obstruct enforcement of federal law. OPPOSE HB 1260 Clearly seeks to obstruct enforcement of federal law. OPPOSE HB 1264 Clearly seeks to obstruct enforcement of federal law by attempting to intimidate federal law enforcement officers. OPPOSE. HB 1265 Clearly seeks to obstruct enforcement of federal law. OPPOSE HB 1438 Creates division between federal, state, and local law enforcement. Blatantly covers for illegals. OPPOSE HB 1440 Blatantly covers for illegals. OPPOSE HB 1441 Creates division between federal, state, and local law enforcement. Blatantly covers for illegals. OPPOSE HB 1442 If Illegals aren’t supposed to vote, why would this bill be needed? OPPOSE HB 1482 Clearly seeks to obstruct enforcement law enforcement by intimidating them. In some instances, their identity needs to be protected to prevent retribution. OPPOSE HB 1492 This is already a violation of federal law and is unnecessary. See 18 USC SS 912 and SS 913. OPPOSE

My name is Karen Menichelli, and I have resided in Arlington, VA, for over 40 years, currently living in House District 1. I have cherished the diverse and welcoming nature of my community and feel enriched by the many immigrants from around the world who have decided to make their lives here. I am worried for my neighbors given the unnecessarily reckless and cruel practices of our federal immigration officers exhibited in cities like Portland, OR, and Minneapolis, WI. I don’t want those behaviors, which sow mistrust and waste resources, brought to Virginia. I want to protect the humanity, dignity, and safety of our immigrant neighbors and allow free access to important community services without fear of harassment or harm from federal agents. Therefore, I strongly support the above indicated cluster of bills under consideration by the Public Safety Subcommittee and urge the subcommittee to champion these bills and send strong versions to the full House for a vote.

Hello, my name is Francesco. I am a student at Charlottesville High school VA. I am one of many English learner high school students and I'm here to ask for your support for EL funding. Our families need help with better translation services and better understanding of school policies. For example they need better explanations of why their son/daughter is absent, tardy, or late in class.

My name is Ricki Henschel. I am a resident of District 3. I am submitting this testimony on behalf of Jews United for Justice in support of all of the following bills: HB 650, HB1260, HB1262, HB1264, HB1265, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, HB1482, and HB1492. JUFJ organizes Jewish Virginians and allies in support of local campaigns for social, racial, and economic justice. Judaism teaches that we are all made in the image of God. The Bible is clear that we are to welcome the stranger, as this is mentioned more times than any other obligation in the Bible. The assault on and kidnapping of individuals by ICE, pulled from their cars, their homes, their places of work, as if they were violent criminals, is directly in opposition of Jewish values, and should not be happening in our state. . The vast majority of those arrested are not individuals who have committed any crime, and many are in the process of obtaining legal status. We also know that citizens are also being taken because they fit the profile. The ICE raids and deportation machine are harming people indiscriminately: Parents, children, and students are being swept up as they attend routine immigration check-ins and court hearings, go to work, and run their errands. In my community, children are scared to go to school, and parents are concerned about taking their children to school, including those who with legal status, as the reality is that ICE is sweeping up individuals based on skin color and accents. Asking for papers and documentation and creating a reality where people feel they have to always have their papers on them everywhere they go, is reminiscent of every society that has been overtaken by autocracy. In addition, as an individual who has experienced sexual violence, it is no surprise that many in our community are afraid to go to our courts or access services. Everyone should be able to live with safety and dignity – including going to court without fear. Enabling law enforcement to be masked adds to the trauma being created. In addition, state and local police need to be seen as those protecting our communities, not as part of the federal work of ICE. And most recently, the threat of having ICE at polling places has been introduced. This must not be allowed in Virginia. Many citizens fit ICE’s profile, and they will be harassed and maybe too frightened to go to the polls. This can not be allowed. I respectfully urge this committee to support each of these bills that control the methods and manner in which ICE operates within our borders–HB 650, HB1260, HB1262, HB1264, HB1265, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, HB1482, and HB1492. We have the right to require them to follow our laws and the US Constitution. We must welcome the stranger.

I am a resident of Virginia state district 39. We have seen our fair share of unidentified, masked men who have harassed and intimidated our citizens. Please move these bills forward. I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

It is clear to me that the actions of ICE and CBP are not simply aimed at carrying out immigration laws; these federal agencies are rapidly being turned into a paramilitary force whose purposes are intimidation and provocation. Virginians will not tolerate exposure of sensitive paces to their tactics, or collaboration with them by state and local law enforcement. Consequently, I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, HB1482, and I oppose HB1459.

I am a resident of Reston, VA. I am a US Army veteran and Federal retiree with almost 30 years of service to the US. My father’s side of my family immigrated to this country from England sometime in the 1630s. My mother’s side of the family immigrated from Scotland in the late 1750s. To the best of my knowledge, they were undocumented. I believe strongly that I have a right to stay in this country. I have met, heard about, read about, and studied people who have been here longer than my family, and some who have come very recently. If we examine the accomplishments and potential of these folks who arrived before or after my family, none are less deserving of a right to be here. As you study our history and our culture, one realizes that the contributions of immigrants are what makes this country so unique and wonderful. It isn’t how big our Army is, it’s the fact that you can find a taco truck, an Ethiopian restaurant, pottery from Poland, and fashion from France on the same block. It’s in the fact that nearly 100 languages are spoken as mother tongues in Fairfax County Schools. It’s in knowing that this country was built on the backs of African slaves and immigrants from every continent in the world, and the cultures of those immigrants have mixed into the most wonderful stew that we are allowed to enjoy every day. Now, let’s get real. Undocumented people can’t vote, aren’t eligible for benefits, and pay taxes into our system. They work very hard for low wages. Immigrants, much less those who are undocumented, commit crimes at SIGNIFICANTLY lower rates than white men. In short, immigrants are a net gain for our society. The images and stories we are seeing regarding ICE and CBP untrained, unprofessional paramilitary wreaking havoc in Minneapolis is like watching footage from another country. I keep asking myself how we got here, while unfortunately, people of color are saying it has been this way all along. Given that we weren’t aware of the total number of people ICE and CBP killed until they murdered two white people, I am concluding they must be correct. In 2025/26, 40 people have died at the hands of ICE. That is 40 too many. I am in favor of any legislation that hinders the ability of ICE to murder more people regardless of race, color, gender, age, national origin, religion, sexual preference, genetic information, immigration status, or whether or not they are exercising their 1st, 2nd, 4th, or 14th Amendment rights. I am in favor of any legislation that allows immigrants a path to citizenship. While a small minority of people may disagree with me, this is NOT a white nation, and I am against any legislation that tries to turn it into one — even if it is couched in pretty language like “protecting our ‘heritage,’ or ‘our women.’” Please pass any legislation that treats our immigrant population in accordance with human rights, human dignity, civic sense, and common decency. Thank you.

(This plea concerns all House and Senate bills that would provide greater protections for our immigrant population and stop government overreach by DHS and ICE.) Letter of Support for Policies Protecting Immigrants Dear Governor Spanberger, Virginia Delegates, and Virginia Senators, As a citizen who sees all humans as treasured and worthy of respect, I ask you, Governor Spanberger and all Virginia delegates and senators, to support all ICE OUT bills, specifically the following bills to benefit the lives of all citizens and provide specific protections for our immigrant community: HB 660 | HB 836 | HB 911 | HB 1161 | HB 1260 | HB 1265 | HB 1438 | HB 1440 | HB 1441 | HB 1442 | HB 1482 | HB 1492 SB 351 | SB 352 | SB 446 | SB 783 | What each of us has witnessed in California, Washington State, Chicago, North Carolina, and Minneapolis to include traumatization of targeted people and onlookers, great injury, and execution style killings must not become business as usual in Virginia. Please regard the humanity in each person across our Commonwealth and support the passage of these bills. Thank you, Mary Lib Morgan 12401 Dutton Road | Apt 2409 | Midlothian, VA 23113 (804) 928-2057

I am writing in strong support of each of the indicated bills that aim to protect immigrants, and those perceived as immigrants, from the threat and violence perpetuated by ICE. As a Social Worker that works across the Central Virginia region, I have seen my neighbors and clients directly harmed by ICE. Families have been torn apart, resulting in physical, psychological, and financial harm. Furthermore, the threat of ICE has prevented communities I care about from safely accessing healthcare, basic needs, public spaces, and even school. These policies would take an important step to protect the rights and livelihoods of all Virginians, and they would affirm our commonwealth's commitment to ensuring its residents have safe and fair access to participating in civic life.

As a longtime Virginia resident and a person of faith, I am alarmed by ICE's and the DHS's recent gross misconduct, including murdering U.S. citizen. Therefore: I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

I support any bill that abolishes ICE. We need to go back to a civilized nation. At the moment we are not one. Killing innocent Americans for demonstrating their first amendment rights. We need to stop rounding up people for the color of their skin. This is not a Wild West rodeo. Our government has violated numerous constitutional laws by not doing lawful procedures. We promised after the concentration camps where Japanese citizens were detained that America would not do that again. Again America has broken its promise to its citizens. They are removing people who are not criminals and people seeking a better life. Some as they appear for court hearings that they needed to do to become citizens. Let’s go back to a civilized country and start respecting both law and order and stop quotas on human beings. You are helping Americans and the world lose any respect left for America and its government. The three murders that gunned down Renee Good and Alex Pretti had YEARS on the CBP or ICE before those killings. It was like watching a firing squad executing people for no reason. Just being around people that were trigger happy and had no training from years ago. I have watched children have guns held up to their faces. CHILDREN. You are taught to never draw your weapon as a fear tactic or a control technique. It’s common knowledge. Let’s make real immigration laws that help people become American. These immigrants pay more into our treasury than Trump did for three years only paying $750 each year. Or Amazon that paid no taxes. The immigrants contribute to our country and economy unlike billionaires and corporations. Actually we have subsidized Elon more than any taxes he has paid. He has caused more harm to America and Americans safety than any immigrant. Stop this funding of this illegal under trained private police that is not protecting Americans but killing them. I question how anyone who supports this can even say they are Christian. From the brutality of humans in detention, lack of medical care, food that I would only put in my compost bin, to breaking up families, the abuse and murder I have seen and the rounding up by skin color. You do know Jesus was a dark skin Palestinian don’t you? So guess he would be rounded up if he was around today. I have never been so ashamed to be an American and I’m 72 years old. But I know it wasn’t me that made the decisions it was you. That gives me some peace. Find your soul, remember again why we were given the statue of liberty or let’s donate it to a country worthy of that beacon of light. We are distinguishing its significance. I hope you also were able to see the monks marching for peace. They are true humans with love and kindness to all. I am grateful to see so many people touched by them and their journey. In solidarity, Cindy Johnston

I am writing in support of the bills checked above. The bills I would protect immigrants from illegal and abusive practices by ICE and Border Patrol. As events in Minnesota have tragically illustrated, all of us, citizen or not, immigrant or not, legal or not, need protection from these federal agents. Enact these bills to protect sensitive spaces, unmask and identify federal agents, require judicial warrants for immigration, and prohibit state and local law enforcement from entering cooperative agreements with federal immigration officers.,

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement

I would like to lend my support to the passage of these bills. However, I would like to go further. Under no circumstances should any member of the government, police force or Sheriff’s Office cooperate with ICE or Border Control. BUT given that ICE will disobey the laws anyway, I want them out of Virginia entirely, and ideally, dismantled completely.

Please vote in favor of protecting our immigrants from ICE harm!

I support these bills. I volunteer with hospice patients and see how the fear of ICE is affecting our much needed and legal caregivers who fear leaving home to go to their clients. One has been disappeared. I hear from my high school grandchildren the concerns at their schools. This is not how we should be living in the USA.

SUPPORT: HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, HB1482, HB1492. OPPOSE: HB1459 Our communities deserve protection from the overreach of the federal government by putting boundaries on the activity of federal immigration law enforcement officers. We need to protect sensitive spaces like schools, courtrooms, places of worship, hospitals and polling places from ICE/CBP intimidation. All officers should be prohibited from wearing masks or face coverings and ID should be required. In addition, local law enforcement should be prohibited from entering agreements with federal immigration officers and judicial warrants for enforcement should be required. Currently our communities are less safe. We need to stop the unchecked abusive activity by ICE/CBP.

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

I support these 7 bills that protect sensitive spaces from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust in VA. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust. Thank you.

I am deeply concerned about our state and the rest of the country. Immigration enforcement has affected our economy, our well being and our neighbors. Children should not have to live in fear. I am descended from German and Irish immigrants. In their name I submit these comments. Everyone deserves to feel safe in their community. I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. Accountability is important to restoring trust. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement. Please protect Virginians. Protect our children. Protect our communities. Thank you.

People in Alexandria are terrified- undocumented immigrants, Green Card holders and even US citizens are afraid to be harassed, kidnapped or killed by ICE. As such, I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. While we cannot fully stop these immoral and unconstitutional federal practices, we can stop VA from adopting them in our counties and cities. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in local law enforcement and jeopardize public safety.

I believe it is critical to protect Virginians from excessive and brutal immigration enforcement. To that end, I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement and would not serve the interests of the state of Virginia. Thank you for your consideration. Laura Bloodgood

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I do not support face coverings or lack of ID for any law enforcement I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

The Justice and Witness Action Network – Virginia of the United Church of Christ supports HB1260. Targeting immigration enforcement activities to sensitive areas like schools has a chilling effect on our communities. Targeting the most vulnerable among us is neither moral nor just, and our residents should be able to go about the daily business of a civilized society without fear. We urge you to put safeguards in place to protect our schools by voting for HB1260.

I SUPPORT all bills EXCEPT HB1459 I OPPOSE HB1459

I am a resident of state house district 4, state senate district 9, and am a citizen, yet have had multiple people in my life affected by the dramatic changes in immigration action by this administration. I believe it is important that even if we do deport or question immigrants who are not here legally, all of the actions of federal agents and law enforcement must follow or constitutional protections. That is the foundation of who we are as a country before anything else. And this overreach asks affects the vulnerable and our civic institutions when places like schools, hospitals and courthouses are regularly raided with scary, anonymous soldiers. Please vote to limit the overreach and provide commenters reforms. Thank you, Matt Goldstein

VACP and VACLEA respectfully OPPOSE HB 1260 as currently drafted. This legislation is: • Constitutionally preempted under binding Supreme Court precedent • In direct conflict with federal cooperation statutes (8 U.S.C. §§ 1357, 1373) • Violates sworn oaths of Virginia law enforcement officers (Va. Code § 49-1) • Mandates professional ethics violations under universally adopted IACP Code of Ethics • Creates life-threatening operational compromises through mandatory notification requirements • Exposes officers and agencies to federal criminal and civil liability • May violate FCC regulations governing emergency alert systems • Legally invalid and indefensible under established constitutional doctrine HB 1260 places Virginia law enforcement in an impossible legal position, forcing officers to choose between conflicting legal obligations and exposing them to personal liability for implementing state-mandated procedures that violate federal law. HB 1260 is constitutionally preempted under binding Supreme Court precedent. In Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. 387 (2012), the Court struck down Arizona provisions that attempted to regulate federal immigration enforcement operations, holding that immigration regulation is an exclusively federal power under Congress’s naturalization authority (Art. I, § 8, Cl. 4). HB 1260 undermines federal law by: • Creating procedural obstacles to federal immigration enforcement operations • Alerting targets of federal investigations through mandatory mass notification • Requiring judicial warrants beyond federal statutory requirements • Interfering with federal operational discretion and enforcement priorities 8 U.S.C. § 1373 explicitly prohibits states from restricting communication with federal immigration authorities. 8 U.S.C. § 1357(g)(10) explicitly authorizes state and local law enforcement cooperation. HB 1260 prohibits access to nonpublic areas without “a warrant signed by a judge or magistrate.” This requirement conflicts with federal immigration enforcement authority. HB 1260 requires notification to all school employees and parents (K-12) or all students, faculty, and staff (higher education) whenever federal immigration enforcement presence is “confirmed” on school or campus property. This mandatory, system-wide alert: • Compromises operational security for sensitive federal investigations • Risks tipping off potentially dangerous targets • Increases danger to federal officers, school resource officers, campus police, and bystanders • Facilitates flight, evidence destruction, and witness intimidation • Reveals federal enforcement priorities and tactics to subjects of investigation 47 C.F.R. § 11.45 (Emergency Alert System): Prohibits transmission of EAS codes or Attention Signals “in any circumstance other than in an actual National, State or Local Area emergency or authorized test of the EAS.”

I want the legislators to support the above designated bills and any bill that will cut funding, decrease, limit or completely shut down community and law enforcement support for ICE.

I strongly support all the proposed legislation for protecting my neighbors and community, providing civil causes of action, placing a 9/1/26 termination date on existing local ICE agreements. We should not be using our tax dollars and other resources to assist a law-breaking federal government that is pardoning drug traffickers, killing and detaining legal residents and citizens, and promising protection for its agents who violate our Constitutional rights. Thank you.

I write in support of House Bills 1260, 1265, 1438, 1440, 1441, 1442, and 1482. In combination, these bills form a framework to protect civil liberties, reinforce the integrity of public institutions, and clearly define the appropriate scope of law enforcement authority in Virginia. These bills ensure that schools, courthouses, polling places, and other civic spaces remain accessible and safe; that individuals can participate in education, the justice system, and elections without fear or intimidation; and that enforcement actions are transparent, accountable, and grounded in judicial authorization. Collectively, they strengthen public trust by drawing clear boundaries between state and federal roles, prioritizing due process, and strengthening public safety by upholding constitutional rights.

The Young Center for Immigrant Children’s Rights supports this bill.

I am Chelsea Dunn Torrey, the Legal Director of the Youth Justice Program at the Legal Aid Justice Center, and I submit this comment in support of House Bill 1260. Since the federal government rescinded the sensitive locations policy in 2025, our team has been traveling across the Commonwealth holding Know Your Rights presentations for families and children—some as young as five years old—because they are afraid of what might happen if immigration enforcement comes into their schools. When kindergarteners are asking what to do if “ICE comes to my classroom,” something is deeply wrong. SB 1260 works to address this problem, by mandating that schools provide notice to families when immigration authorities are present on campus and requiring that school prohibit immigration enforcement on campus without a valid warrant. It provides complementary protections to other similar legislation being considered this year, specifically the Virginia Education Access & Privacy Act (House Bill 836). We urge you to support this bill.

I hope you read this article regarding education for social studies. Thanks https://www.baconsrebellion.com/excluding-social-studies-from-accountability-to-preserve-inquiry-is-mistaken/

As parents and grandparents, we should be able to send our children to school with confidence and assurance that they are in a protected environment conducive to learning and developing life skills. The possibility of school facilities being invaded by agents investigating for immigration violations and using children as a way to get to those who may be in true violation of immigration laws is ludicrous. These are innocent children and are in no way responsible for any real or perceived violations. The potential presence of ICE officers on a school campus invites dangerous circumstances that can threaten the liberty and life of our children and those charged with their protection when on school property. The bulk of this bill addresses the need for accountability for appropriate general school safety and disaster planning, which I am in full support of. I believe it is appropriate to consider the potential for ICE agents to invade the public school arena as a threat to the safety of our children. There is no valid reason for this to happen. In my opinion, this Bill does not go far enough, only requiring a warrant for Immigration agents to invade. I would urge that an amendment be made to not allow Immigration agents on campus at all.

ICE should not be allowed on school grounds.

I urge you to vote in favor of these bills, all of which have a common interest -- to protect Virginia residents from unconstitutional action by Federal authorities that are charged with protecting the population. The bills are : HB 650, 1260, 1262, 1264, 1265, 1438, 1440, 1441, 1442, 1482, 1492. My family knows a naturalized U.S. citizen from El Salvador who came to the United States because he married a U.S. citizen. He was arrested in Pennsylvania and held for three days, because they thought he might be an undocumented alien based on racial/ethnic profiling. He had to hire a lawyer to get out. Virginia law enforcement must not cooperate with Federal security forces that are carrying out such unconstitutional activities. My name is Julie Schechter Torres. I am a member of Temple Rodef Shalom. Our houses of worship must be safe from activities by law enforcement. Our schools must be safe for children. I know a 9-year-old child who is legally present in the United States but didn't want to go to school for days after ICE went to her ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. Children are not a threat. If ICE is focusing on criminals - as they say they are - they are in the wrong place. Going there to capture adults is once again using children as "bait". I have lived in countries where criminals stop cars and kidnap people. There is no way to know that law enforcement authorities are who they say they are if they wear masks and don't show identification. There is no reason someone carrying out legal law enforcement activities should need to hide who they are or what they are doing. Masking is just a means of covering up unlawful action. Please pass these bills to protect Virginians.

I have watched the news and live feeds from Minneapolis, and today I watched testimonies of violations, physical abuse and murder by ICE. It is hard to not see we are in a Constitutional and humanitarian crisis at a scale I never thought could happen here. Please do not bring this to VA. As Virginia is the birthplace of our Constitution, can we make the choice to refuse this standing army, search and seizures? the beatings and destruction of property and disruption of freedom peace and commerce ICE and similar agencies leave in their wake? We are not being protected by them, but living in terror of them. The trust is gone. And, every decent law enforcement officer carries the massive burden of association with these violent, incompetent, sadistic, rogue, racist hypocrites. Ice must be abolished NOW. Humane reform to immigration law, the justice system, detention conditions (including medical care, oversight without notice, access to lawyers without being shipped out, family visits, and provisions for the safety of people who trusted our country as asylum seekers .) As for actual ,violent criminals- we have a system in place and none of this is necessary if we have trust between communities and law enforcement. Ice needs to be scrapped first for something new - for the people, with the consent of the people , to take its place. What are they but roving patrols racial profiling? I am PROUD of our civil rights legacy in our state. We can take a stand and refuse funding and quartering. We should all be able to look to law enforcement as heroes- the people we could call for help. Every act by ICE... The stalking in the streets, the threats to peaceful protestors and Constitutional recorders, and the fear so many goo community members, citizens snd non-citizens live with every day does not even feel like our country. To think we spend this massive amount of money to torment people working hard and doing their best? I'd rather the money go to give a family a shot at the American Dream, instead of paying someone to try to turn guns on them for pay. Our immigrants- They are our heart. They love this country and its promise. They are strong and brave and they work hard and have strong families and faith. They are full of love and share art, culture, dance, music, food and traditions, a love for community many of us can learn from. It is a terrible thing to not embrace and love these people who give so much and ask for so little. I cannot understand how these people are treated like an object to kick, hold down, choke, gun down, jail or murder, without so much as looking at paperwork. Please end this now, for the love of God. If you do not abolish ICE, remove funding and contracts and don't allow masks or lack of badges. Help prosecute when THEY are the violent criminals. But really, get them out and keep them out. Let our own trained police officers handle the crime. Thank you.

I am a resident in the city of Richmond and I demand the restriction and removal of ICE agents from our communities. I support the bills put forth that seek to limit the access and activities of immigration and law enforcement agents. Thank you

My name is Lillian Komarow. I am a resident of District 12. I am submitting this testimony in support of HB 1441, HB 1440, HB 1442, HB 650, HB 1260, HB 1262, HB 1265, HB 1438, HB 1482, and HB 1492. I am also writing in opposition to HB 1459. I grew up in the extremely diverse Northern Virginia area and I know that immigrants are a huge part of what makes Virginia the beautiful melting pot that it is. I know that immigrants have a wide array of reasons to come to Virginia, but ultimately my personal experience has shown me that immigrants want to live and work in peace. They contribute to Virginia in many positive ways economically and culturally– not that that should be a requirement to be treated humanely. Even if I did not have this background, I would know that the terror we are seeing ICE indiscriminately inflict on undocumented immigrants and US citizens alike across the country is abhorrent. It is imperative that Virginia citizens are able to freely access community services without fear of harassment from federal agents. Across the country we are seeing ICE and CBP agents deliberately terrorize families simply trying to take their children to school or to the doctor. There have been stories on the news of domestic violence victims being too afraid of ICE terrorization to show up to their court dates. Ultimately the actions of ICE are deterring people from accessing important services, and this creates ripple effects into the community by making us ALL less safe. Please protect Virginia citizens by passing HB 1440, HB 650, HB 1260, through. The Commonwealth has both the right and the duty to ensure free and fair election for its citizens. Elections cannot be free and fair when people are afraid of being detained at polling places solely due to their appearance. ICE agents’ presence at polling places would be nothing short of voter intimidation. Please protect the sanctity of our elections by passing HB 1442 through. The responsibility of local and state law enforcement should be to protect and serve Virginia citizens, not waste our resources and create mistrust by collaborating with increasingly hostile federal immigration operations. In addition to sapping limited state and local resources, collaboration blurs accountability for racial profiling and other abusive tactics federal agents take, and opens Virginia police departments up to lawsuits. Both law enforcement leaders and crime victim advocacy organizations alike have spoken out against Virginia law enforcement participating in immigration enforcement, citing eroded trust between police and victims, and even described instances of domestic violence and sexual assault survivors being unwilling to seek assistance. Please pass HB 1442 to prevent this mistrust and wasting of resources, as well as HB 1262 so that Virginians can trust that they are not falling into a trap when seeking immigration assistance services, HB 1264 so that Virginia citizens know they have an Accountability Commission keeping watch on federal agents conducting military style operations in the Commonwealth, and HB 1482 so that federal agents can further be held accountable by not concealing their identity. For the purpose of protecting Virginians, our resources, and our right to free and fair elections, I respectfully urge this committee to support HB 1441, HB 1440, HB 1442, HB 650, HB 1260, HB 1262, HB 1265, HB 1438, HB 1482, and HB 1492 and oppose HB 1459.

Dear Virginia House of Delegates, I am writing in support of all bills in this Block 1 subcommittee (HB650; HB1260; HB1262; HB1264; HB1265; HB1438; HB1440; HB1441; HB1442; HB1453; HB1459; HB1482; and HB1492). Each bill has the same underlying principles, in my view, that undergird each one and is worthy of widespread support and consideration. 1) Greater accountability for any abuses of power - something our government is supposedly predicated upon from its foundations of checks and balances. 2) Respect of human dignity - lest we forget another person's humanity and spiral into forms of depravity experienced on widespread scale even within our lifetimes, our parents' lifetimes, or our grandparents' lifetimes, anytime dehumanization becomes the norm and public opinion becomes apathetic we ought to have sirens blaring warning signals. As a conflict prevention and response professional, I have thorough knowledge of human rights abuses at widespread scale at the hands of unchecked power -- the enslavement of Africans and brutality of the chattel slave trade and its legacy of abuses through the Jim Crow Era onward, the forced disappearances of Argentina and Chile, the Holocaust, forced kidnappings and assimilations of First Nations and Native American children at Indian Boarding Schools in Canada and the United States, and more. These bills hold that some places ought to be preserved to honor the humanity in our neighbors, even those who may be undocumented - polling places, courthouses, schools. These bills provide guardrails that Virginia needs to both maintain the humanity of all people, even those who are undocumented. It serves to safeguard the hearts and minds of those citizens and legal residents who have been continuously profiled based on their perceived or actual national origin, and provides more psychological safety for those in our communities who are being targeted from the national stage to local actors dispatched from ICE who have done nothing unlawful. These forcible, unchecked, and brute forces of strength have brought about unnecessary and widespread fear, school absences, medical inattention for fear of being targeted in public, and traumatic experiences for young children and youth. Virginia House of Delegates must provide a healthy check and balance and honor its constituents. Vote in support of these bills. Sincerely, Jena Kitchen

I support this bill and am in favor of the increased safety it will provide for our communities and for my neighbors. I support banning face coverings for federal officers, restricting immigration enforcement officers to 40 feet from polling places, and prohibiting immigration enforcement from schools, hospitals and other above mentioned safe spaces. Limits need to be placed on rogue federal agents, due process upheld and American communities protected.

Any even mildly engaged Virginian ought be alarmed at the slow civil war being carried out on the people of Minneapolis. That is why I fully support HB1264 and HB1482 as critical societal checks on the administration's unfettered military force. Additionally, I support HB650/HB1260 (aren't these the same bill?), HB1265, HB1438, HB1440, and HB1441 for creating safe places and walling off our own government and enforcement agencies from this radical influence. Lastly, steps taken in HB1442 could become extremely important to protecting our democracy as the administration would spiritually invert the Second and Third Enforcement Acts, using the same federal authority that stopped the KKK from harassing black voters in 1870 to instead perform the same kind of intimidation on brown voters in 2026. I oppose HB1459's mandate of cooperation with ICE to snatch untried people out of custody, circumvent the consequences of convicted people by our own justice system, or enact additional punitive measures post incarceration. There is additional alarming language that might imply "going after the families". If state and local PD have a case where they want to cooperate, they already can do so. This bill removes that choice and puts it into a provably untrustworthy institution. I generally support HB1262 and HB1492 for cracking down on bad actors that would take advantage of these troubling times. However, I question the necessity of HB1492: while the long imagined scenario is extremely troubling, we have already seen what evils actual ICE officers are capable of, and how low the bar for entry is. Would this actually help? I mislike HB1453, which goes against our rights as American citizens and good Samaritans to non-violently oppose the actions of federal terrorists.

My name is Yonah Walter. I am a resident of District 10. I am writing in support of bills which enhance public trust in our law enforcement and respect civil rights in our communities. I am a volunteer with the Virginia chapter of Jews United for Justice, but I speak as the great-grandson of immigrants who came as chain migrants with the help of the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS), and as someone inculcated with strong Jewish values including a bedrock principle of respect for all. The American promise of "liberty and justice for all" was a strong call for my family, but to now hear our government speak so coldly about immigrants - let alone to see how our government has mistreated those they even suspect of being immigrants - has disappointed me greatly. The shooting deaths by ICE of nearly a dozen Americans in just the last few months, and the immoral and self-serving rush by the government to blame the victims in those shootings, demands we act to curb these abuses and keep our government in check. We need accountability from government agents, which includes the right to know who purports to represent us and act on our behalf in law enforcement. We need to protect access to public spaces like courthouses and (perhaps especially) polling places. We need to vigorously protect the right of people to move freely without fear of harassment or assault by law enforcement. We need to restore trust in our government. I respectfully urge this committee to support the following: HB650 HB1260 HB1262 HB1264 HB1265 HB1438 HB1440 HB1441 HB1442 HB1482 HB1492

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills protect sensitive spaces such as courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places, and hospitals from intimidation by federal immigration enforcement. They strengthen public trust and improve accountability by restricting law enforcement officers from obscuring their identities. I oppose HB1459, which would force state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would seriously damage public trust in local law enforcement.

My name is Paula Roney. I am a resident of District 3. I am submitting this testimony in support of HB650, HB1260, HB 1262, HB 1264, HB1265, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, HB1482, and HB1492. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This would strengthen public trust and improve accountability. As a long time Virginia public school educator, a grandchild of immigrants who came to this country to escape persecution, and a member of Jews United for Justice, I know the importance of welcoming immigrants to our country. I’ve worked with many students who came to the United States, often on their own, to escape harrowing circumstances. It is vital that they, and all other people are able to attend school, receive medical treatment and be able to access the legal system without fear. Therefore it is critical that our Commonwealth protects access to these vital community services. I respectfully urge this committee to support these bills. Thank you.

My name is Susan Kohn. I am a resident of District 15. I am submitting this testimony in support of HB 650,1260, 1262,1264,1265,1438,1440,1441,1453,1492 and in opposition of HB 1459 and 1482. As a pediatrician I am horrified to see my immigrant patients and their families living in fear. I work with children through a non-profit organization that helps to provide access to medical and dental care in Fairfax County. We see hardworking families who are afraid to access health care or even to send their children to school. They worry when someone leaves the house. Will they come back from work, the grocery store, court or school- or be taken by ICE? How can they continue to provide for their children? The children and teens I see were brought to the United States for a better life. Many experienced violence, political upheaval and uncertainty or severe poverty in their countries of origin, which led their parents to seek a place of safety, where they could thrive. My grandparents came to this country in the face of pogroms that terrorized our families in Eastern Europe. They worked hard, as our current immigrants do, to make a future for their children. Our Jewish sacred texts obligate us to care for the stranger and treat all with respect and kindness. They are part of the fabric of a great society. Our neighbors must be able to testify in court if they have been victimized or if they have requested asylum, without the fear of being deported when they show up. All Virginians, whether they are citizens or not, must have the right to access schools, hospitals, places of worship and polling places without fear of intimidation or deportation. All must be able to clearly see the identity of law enforcement personnel and have their day in court with proper representation if accused. Local police should be doing the work of maintaining safety for all residents- not helping ICE deport people without due process. As a Virginian I believe we have a duty to protect those who are most vulnerable in our community. At this time it is our immigrant neighbors who need our help. I respectfully urge this committee to support HB 650, 1260, 1262, 1264, 1265,1438, 1440, 1441,1442, 1453,1492 and oppose HB1459 and HB1482.

My comment refers to all bills on the agenda. The Commonwealth of Virginia must take any and all legal action to prevent ICE from terrorizing any Virginia individual or community. This includes all people who come to this country seeking a better life for themselves and their families, just as the many millions before them have done throughout America’s history.

We want public safety, not public abductions and executions. We have learned that ICE does not respect rule of law or human rights, so support these bills to keep Virginians safe. Every child deserves an education. Every child deserves to be safe at school. Every sick or injured person deserves medical care. So keep ICE out of our school, hospitals, and courthouses. No judicial warrant should mean no entry- and limit what civil arrests can take place in courthouses. We want police to protect, not persecute. So eliminate 287g agreements in Virginia. Allow our local law enforcement to do their job of keeping communities safe, instead of doing ICE's dirty work for them. We want rule of law, not rule by masked mobs. Do not allow law enforcement to cover their faces. That's not community policing- that's KKK tactics. We want free and fair elections, not a return to Jim Crow era intimidation at the polls. Citizens are not safe from ICE, either. Do not allow the federal government to use "immigration enforcement" as a rouse to silence eligible voters through fear and profiling. Support: HB650 - Callsen HB1260 - Shin HB1262 - Glass HB1264 - Shin HB1265 - Glass HB1438 - Guzman HB1440 - Lopez HB1441 - Lopez HB1442 - Lopez HB1453 - Williams HB1459 - Zehr HB1482 - Schmidt HB1492 - Shin

I’m very concerned with the overreaching of ICE. They have terrorized communities, broken apart families, disrupted children’s education, wrongfully detained people and even murdered American citizens. Please keep all safeguards in place to protect our citizens. Warrants should be in place before they come after people. ICE agents should follow the same laws and training that police officers are required to. ICE should not be allowed to wait outside or enter courthouses. They should not be wearing masks. This is leading to more dangerous escalations as we have seen in Minneapolis. Please vote to protect the rights of our people, maintain a safe community, and honor the laws and Constitution of our once great country. Please listen to your constituents. We are a country of immigrants and we are all humans. Do what is right.

As a long time resident of Virginia, I have watched the horrific attack on our immigrant population by our federal government. I write to encourage support of these bills to provide additional state protections to our local immigrant communities. It is the moral thing to do. Thank you. Stephanie Elms Alexandria VA

I strongly support every bill that limits federal immigration enforcement overreach. Virginia Majority stands in solidarity with immigrant communities across Virginia. We believe that all people, regardless of race, class, or immigration status, deserve to live with dignity, safety, and access to fundamental rights. I support policies that limit federal immigration enforcement overreach, protect access to courts and essential services, and prevent local resources from being used to separate families and criminalize our neighbors. Virginia must lead in protecting immigrant rights by establishing clear boundaries on immigration enforcement activities in our communities, ensuring safe access to schools, healthcare, courthouses, and other essential spaces, and maintaining the trust between local officials and the communities they serve. These policies have my support and are measures that would affirm Virginia’s commitment to being a place where all residents can participate fully in civic life without fear.

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

SUPPORT: HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, HB1482, HB1492. OPPOSE: HB1459 Our communities deserve protection from the overreach of the federal government. At a minimum, this means putting strong boundaries on the activity of federal immigration officers and requiring them to follow existing laws and those that are enacted by this general assembly. We need to protect sensitive spaces like schools, courtrooms, places of worship, hospitals and polling places from ICE/CBP intimidation. All officers - including local law enforcement - should be prohibited from wearing masks or face coverings and ID should be required. In addition, local law enforcement should be prohibited from entering agreements with federal immigration officers and judicial warrants for enforcement should be required. Currently our communities are less safe. We need to stop the unchecked abusive activity by ICE/CBP.

In this day of information abuse and misuse, transparent advertisement of vital services to help people is important for all consumers. I support HB 1262.

This is an opportunity for the Commonwealth to respect and protect the riaghts of ALL Virginia citizens. I strongly I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482.

My name is Rachel Waldstein. I am a resident of District #1. I am submitting this testimony in support of the following bills: • HB 650 Callsen Courthouses • HB 1260 Shin Public elementary/secondary schools, etc; federal immigration investigation and enforcement activities • HB 1262 Glass Va Consumer Protection Act • HB 1264 Shin Virginia Accountability Commission • HB 1265 Glass Courthouses • HB 1438 Guzman 287g • HB 1440 Lopez Protected Areas • HB 1441 Lopez 287g • HB 1442 Lopez Polling Place Protections • HB 1482 Schmidt facemasks • HB 1492 Shin Impersonating federal law enforcement officer I oppose the following bills: • HB 1453 Williams Approaching a first responder with specified intent after a warning; penalty • HB 1459 Zehr Ice-Free Communities Act; notification to federal immigration authorities of pending release of certain prisoners from custody I am a member of Congregation Etz Hayim in Arlington and spent a large part of my career representing the U.S. government in the protection of human rights around the world. I support HB 650, 1260, 1262, 1264, 1265, 1438, 1440, 1441, 1442, 1482, and 1492 based on my Jewish values and my life’s work. Jewish tradition and law recognize the equality and dignity of all people and respect their right to life, bodily integrity, health, housing, education, and due process. The Jewish people have been refugees many times in the past and have often experienced mistreatment by authoritarian governments. It is thus my duty to stand in support of marginalized communities and against government abuses. Law enforcement authorities should not deprive anyone--even those in this country illegally--of life, liberty, or property without following established legal procedures that respect their rights. Since the Federal government has abdicated its responsibilities before the law and Constitution, it is up to the States to uphold national and international human rights law. Passing the above listed bills will make our communities to be safer and will give Commonwealth officials a legal basis to push back on Federal law enforcement officials who break the law. I strongly believe HB 650, 1260, 1262, 1264, 1265, 1438, 1440, 1441, 1442, 1482, and 1492 will improve the lives of all Virginians by allowing us to return our focus to strengthening our economy, education and healthcare systems, and by returning a sense of humanity to our Commonwealth. I oppose HB 1453 and 1459, which I believe will create more fear in our communities and impede Virginians’ ability to express their First Amendment rights. I respectfully urge this committee to support HB 650, 1260, 1262, 1264, 1265, 1438, 1440, 1441, 1442, 1482, and 1492 and to oppose HB 1453 and 1459.

I strongly support the following bills and urge the committee members to pass them on so they can make their way to the House in order to be discussed by all the Delegates: HB1492, HB1482, HB1453, HB1442, HB1441, HB1440, HB1438, HB1265, HB1264, HB1262, HB1260, and HB650. These bills provide much needed limits on ICE agents, and life-saving protections for tens of thousands of people in our commonwealth. Please do the right thing and keep these bills alive and moving through our legislative system.

Support HB 650 1260 1262 1264 1265 1438 1440 1441 1442 1482

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

My name is Margaret Power. I have been a voting resident of District 6 for 37 years. I am submitting this testimony in support of most of the bills pending for your action today. I am the great-granddaughter of immigrants escaping poverty, famine, and persecution in their native land and striving to afford the ‘chain migration’ that re-united them with their families. I am the great-niece of German Jews who were denied entry and were murdered in Hitler’s camps. I am the daughter-in-law of an American Jewish woman, who, as a 13-year-old, escaped Poland and crossed a remote stretch of our northern border without documents during the Hitler years when America turned away refugees. I am the grandmother of two talented, bi-lingual and totally adorable Americans who are nearly as brown as their naturalized father, a Colombian-born doctor. I fear their own government will harm them. Or kill them. Truly- I cannot believe that a time has come in which it is not insane for me to have such fears. I belong to Temple Rodef Shalom in Falls church, where, in collaboration with other faith communities, we have long organized sustained support and services for new refugees, predominantly Afghan friends of the US. As Chairman Simon knows, our community actively advocates for inclusive and just public policy here in Richmond and in the nation’s capital. I respectfully urge you to send these bills forward and to advocate for their passage; collectively, they protect Virginians from violent abuses of federal power, they ensure that some of our essential public services- schools, hospitals and the courts- can be accessed by all; they preserve the sovereignty of the Commonwealth with respect to our law enforcement roles, while assuring federal-state-local collaboration with respect to removing criminals from our midst. As a package, they reinforce the rule of law, including protection of our constitutional rights; they reduce the likelihood of violence in our public spaces; they offer our neighbors - and my grandchildren- better protection by requiring federal immigration agents follow the same transparency standards as state and local law enforcement, and they restore some measure of confidence that we citizens are also unlikely to be kidnapped, injured or murdered so long as we are Virginians. I oppose passage of HB 1453, as it limits our right to free expression, and I also oppose HB1459, which is unnecessary because the Governor’s executive order allows federal-state cooperation with respect to convicted criminals, and, if read to add instances in which individuals can be delivered to DHS, would breach the boundaries established by HB 650 which I strongly support. I respectfully urge this subcommittee to support HB#650, HB#1260,HB#1262,HB#1264,HB#1265, HB#1438, B1440,HB1441,HB1442,HB1482, AND HB1492

I support all these bills which, to my reading of them, extend protections of the law to people attending court appointments so that they cannot be detained by immigration enforcement authorities (or people impersonating immigration enforcement authorities). I support requiring law enforcement officials to not wear masks and to have visible identification, and also not to engage in immigration enforcement activities. I also support bills which protect schools, churches, and private workplaces from immigration enforcement activities, and require judicial warrants (warrants signed by a judge) for any immigration enforcement operation. I would like to see bills requiring due process for any persons detained, including but not limited to access to a lawyer, ability to make phone calls, and right to be treated with dignity and humanity.

I fully support every bill that safeguards and protects our immigrant neighbors from the lawless, cruel, immoral and shameful acts committed by federal agents and DHS.

My name is Cindy Denton-Ade . I am a resident of Burke, District 10 . I am submitting testimony in support of bills HB 650, 1260 ,1262 ,1264, 1265,1438,1440,1441,1442,1448,1482,1492. I am a member of Temple B’nai Shalom. All of my Grandparents were immigrants from other counties: the Ukraine, Belarus. If not for the welcoming policies of the United States when they immigrated, they would have been surely been all killed in the Holocaust. My very lovely handyman, who comes from Columbia and is a citizen, was fearful about driving to D.C. Because he felt he would be targeted by ICE. This is not right! Jewish values promote welcoming and protecting the stranger. These bills will go a long way to do just. Virginia, my chosen home, has taken many positive actions since Governor Spanberger has taken office. Let these bills be an addition to actions we can be proud of in protecting immigrants men, women, and children.

My name is Karen Menichelli, and I have resided in Arlington, VA, for over 40 years, currently living in House District 1. I have cherished the diverse and welcoming nature of my community and feel enriched by the many immigrants from around the world who have decided to make their lives here. I am worried for my neighbors given the unnecessarily reckless and cruel practices of our federal immigration officers exhibited in cities like Portland, OR, and Minneapolis, WI. I don’t want those behaviors, which sow mistrust and waste resources, brought to Virginia. I want to protect the humanity, dignity, and safety of our immigrant neighbors and allow free access to important community services without fear of harassment or harm from federal agents. Therefore, I strongly support the above indicated cluster of bills under consideration by the Public Safety Subcommittee and urge the subcommittee to champion these bills and send strong versions to the full House for a vote.

My name is Ricki Henschel. I am a resident of District 3. I am submitting this testimony on behalf of Jews United for Justice in support of all of the following bills: HB 650, HB1260, HB1262, HB1264, HB1265, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, HB1482, and HB1492. JUFJ organizes Jewish Virginians and allies in support of local campaigns for social, racial, and economic justice. Judaism teaches that we are all made in the image of God. The Bible is clear that we are to welcome the stranger, as this is mentioned more times than any other obligation in the Bible. The assault on and kidnapping of individuals by ICE, pulled from their cars, their homes, their places of work, as if they were violent criminals, is directly in opposition of Jewish values, and should not be happening in our state. . The vast majority of those arrested are not individuals who have committed any crime, and many are in the process of obtaining legal status. We also know that citizens are also being taken because they fit the profile. The ICE raids and deportation machine are harming people indiscriminately: Parents, children, and students are being swept up as they attend routine immigration check-ins and court hearings, go to work, and run their errands. In my community, children are scared to go to school, and parents are concerned about taking their children to school, including those who with legal status, as the reality is that ICE is sweeping up individuals based on skin color and accents. Asking for papers and documentation and creating a reality where people feel they have to always have their papers on them everywhere they go, is reminiscent of every society that has been overtaken by autocracy. In addition, as an individual who has experienced sexual violence, it is no surprise that many in our community are afraid to go to our courts or access services. Everyone should be able to live with safety and dignity – including going to court without fear. Enabling law enforcement to be masked adds to the trauma being created. In addition, state and local police need to be seen as those protecting our communities, not as part of the federal work of ICE. And most recently, the threat of having ICE at polling places has been introduced. This must not be allowed in Virginia. Many citizens fit ICE’s profile, and they will be harassed and maybe too frightened to go to the polls. This can not be allowed. I respectfully urge this committee to support each of these bills that control the methods and manner in which ICE operates within our borders–HB 650, HB1260, HB1262, HB1264, HB1265, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, HB1482, and HB1492. We have the right to require them to follow our laws and the US Constitution. We must welcome the stranger.

I am a resident of Reston, VA. I am a US Army veteran and Federal retiree with almost 30 years of service to the US. My father’s side of my family immigrated to this country from England sometime in the 1630s. My mother’s side of the family immigrated from Scotland in the late 1750s. To the best of my knowledge, they were undocumented. I believe strongly that I have a right to stay in this country. I have met, heard about, read about, and studied people who have been here longer than my family, and some who have come very recently. If we examine the accomplishments and potential of these folks who arrived before or after my family, none are less deserving of a right to be here. As you study our history and our culture, one realizes that the contributions of immigrants are what makes this country so unique and wonderful. It isn’t how big our Army is, it’s the fact that you can find a taco truck, an Ethiopian restaurant, pottery from Poland, and fashion from France on the same block. It’s in the fact that nearly 100 languages are spoken as mother tongues in Fairfax County Schools. It’s in knowing that this country was built on the backs of African slaves and immigrants from every continent in the world, and the cultures of those immigrants have mixed into the most wonderful stew that we are allowed to enjoy every day. Now, let’s get real. Undocumented people can’t vote, aren’t eligible for benefits, and pay taxes into our system. They work very hard for low wages. Immigrants, much less those who are undocumented, commit crimes at SIGNIFICANTLY lower rates than white men. In short, immigrants are a net gain for our society. The images and stories we are seeing regarding ICE and CBP untrained, unprofessional paramilitary wreaking havoc in Minneapolis is like watching footage from another country. I keep asking myself how we got here, while unfortunately, people of color are saying it has been this way all along. Given that we weren’t aware of the total number of people ICE and CBP killed until they murdered two white people, I am concluding they must be correct. In 2025/26, 40 people have died at the hands of ICE. That is 40 too many. I am in favor of any legislation that hinders the ability of ICE to murder more people regardless of race, color, gender, age, national origin, religion, sexual preference, genetic information, immigration status, or whether or not they are exercising their 1st, 2nd, 4th, or 14th Amendment rights. I am in favor of any legislation that allows immigrants a path to citizenship. While a small minority of people may disagree with me, this is NOT a white nation, and I am against any legislation that tries to turn it into one — even if it is couched in pretty language like “protecting our ‘heritage,’ or ‘our women.’” Please pass any legislation that treats our immigrant population in accordance with human rights, human dignity, civic sense, and common decency. Thank you.

(This plea concerns all House and Senate bills that would provide greater protections for our immigrant population and stop government overreach by DHS and ICE.) Letter of Support for Policies Protecting Immigrants Dear Governor Spanberger, Virginia Delegates, and Virginia Senators, As a citizen who sees all humans as treasured and worthy of respect, I ask you, Governor Spanberger and all Virginia delegates and senators, to support all ICE OUT bills, specifically the following bills to benefit the lives of all citizens and provide specific protections for our immigrant community: HB 660 | HB 836 | HB 911 | HB 1161 | HB 1260 | HB 1265 | HB 1438 | HB 1440 | HB 1441 | HB 1442 | HB 1482 | HB 1492 SB 351 | SB 352 | SB 446 | SB 783 | What each of us has witnessed in California, Washington State, Chicago, North Carolina, and Minneapolis to include traumatization of targeted people and onlookers, great injury, and execution style killings must not become business as usual in Virginia. Please regard the humanity in each person across our Commonwealth and support the passage of these bills. Thank you, Mary Lib Morgan 12401 Dutton Road | Apt 2409 | Midlothian, VA 23113 (804) 928-2057

As a longtime Virginia resident and a person of faith, I am alarmed by ICE's and the DHS's recent gross misconduct, including murdering U.S. citizen. Therefore: I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

I support any bill that abolishes ICE. We need to go back to a civilized nation. At the moment we are not one. Killing innocent Americans for demonstrating their first amendment rights. We need to stop rounding up people for the color of their skin. This is not a Wild West rodeo. Our government has violated numerous constitutional laws by not doing lawful procedures. We promised after the concentration camps where Japanese citizens were detained that America would not do that again. Again America has broken its promise to its citizens. They are removing people who are not criminals and people seeking a better life. Some as they appear for court hearings that they needed to do to become citizens. Let’s go back to a civilized country and start respecting both law and order and stop quotas on human beings. You are helping Americans and the world lose any respect left for America and its government. The three murders that gunned down Renee Good and Alex Pretti had YEARS on the CBP or ICE before those killings. It was like watching a firing squad executing people for no reason. Just being around people that were trigger happy and had no training from years ago. I have watched children have guns held up to their faces. CHILDREN. You are taught to never draw your weapon as a fear tactic or a control technique. It’s common knowledge. Let’s make real immigration laws that help people become American. These immigrants pay more into our treasury than Trump did for three years only paying $750 each year. Or Amazon that paid no taxes. The immigrants contribute to our country and economy unlike billionaires and corporations. Actually we have subsidized Elon more than any taxes he has paid. He has caused more harm to America and Americans safety than any immigrant. Stop this funding of this illegal under trained private police that is not protecting Americans but killing them. I question how anyone who supports this can even say they are Christian. From the brutality of humans in detention, lack of medical care, food that I would only put in my compost bin, to breaking up families, the abuse and murder I have seen and the rounding up by skin color. You do know Jesus was a dark skin Palestinian don’t you? So guess he would be rounded up if he was around today. I have never been so ashamed to be an American and I’m 72 years old. But I know it wasn’t me that made the decisions it was you. That gives me some peace. Find your soul, remember again why we were given the statue of liberty or let’s donate it to a country worthy of that beacon of light. We are distinguishing its significance. I hope you also were able to see the monks marching for peace. They are true humans with love and kindness to all. I am grateful to see so many people touched by them and their journey. In solidarity, Cindy Johnston

Please vote in favor of protecting our immigrants from ICE harm!

I am a long time citizen of Henrico and I am horrified at what is happening with ICE and border patrol in my country now. I hardly recognize this country or the Republican party any more. I am asking all of my reps to do whatever you can to defund ICE and to make them take their masks off, to get much better training and to have signed warrants whenever they are looking for specific people. Finally they should not be allowed to go in schools or houses of worship. Thankyou.

I SUPPORT all bills EXCEPT HB1459 I OPPOSE HB1459

I want the legislators to support the above designated bills and any bill that will cut funding, decrease, limit or completely shut down community and law enforcement support for ICE.

I strongly support all the proposed legislation for protecting my neighbors and community, providing civil causes of action, placing a 9/1/26 termination date on existing local ICE agreements. We should not be using our tax dollars and other resources to assist a law-breaking federal government that is pardoning drug traffickers, killing and detaining legal residents and citizens, and promising protection for its agents who violate our Constitutional rights. Thank you.

I urge you to vote in favor of these bills, all of which have a common interest -- to protect Virginia residents from unconstitutional action by Federal authorities that are charged with protecting the population. The bills are : HB 650, 1260, 1262, 1264, 1265, 1438, 1440, 1441, 1442, 1482, 1492. My family knows a naturalized U.S. citizen from El Salvador who came to the United States because he married a U.S. citizen. He was arrested in Pennsylvania and held for three days, because they thought he might be an undocumented alien based on racial/ethnic profiling. He had to hire a lawyer to get out. Virginia law enforcement must not cooperate with Federal security forces that are carrying out such unconstitutional activities. My name is Julie Schechter Torres. I am a member of Temple Rodef Shalom. Our houses of worship must be safe from activities by law enforcement. Our schools must be safe for children. I know a 9-year-old child who is legally present in the United States but didn't want to go to school for days after ICE went to her ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. Children are not a threat. If ICE is focusing on criminals - as they say they are - they are in the wrong place. Going there to capture adults is once again using children as "bait". I have lived in countries where criminals stop cars and kidnap people. There is no way to know that law enforcement authorities are who they say they are if they wear masks and don't show identification. There is no reason someone carrying out legal law enforcement activities should need to hide who they are or what they are doing. Masking is just a means of covering up unlawful action. Please pass these bills to protect Virginians.

I have watched the news and live feeds from Minneapolis, and today I watched testimonies of violations, physical abuse and murder by ICE. It is hard to not see we are in a Constitutional and humanitarian crisis at a scale I never thought could happen here. Please do not bring this to VA. As Virginia is the birthplace of our Constitution, can we make the choice to refuse this standing army, search and seizures? the beatings and destruction of property and disruption of freedom peace and commerce ICE and similar agencies leave in their wake? We are not being protected by them, but living in terror of them. The trust is gone. And, every decent law enforcement officer carries the massive burden of association with these violent, incompetent, sadistic, rogue, racist hypocrites. Ice must be abolished NOW. Humane reform to immigration law, the justice system, detention conditions (including medical care, oversight without notice, access to lawyers without being shipped out, family visits, and provisions for the safety of people who trusted our country as asylum seekers .) As for actual ,violent criminals- we have a system in place and none of this is necessary if we have trust between communities and law enforcement. Ice needs to be scrapped first for something new - for the people, with the consent of the people , to take its place. What are they but roving patrols racial profiling? I am PROUD of our civil rights legacy in our state. We can take a stand and refuse funding and quartering. We should all be able to look to law enforcement as heroes- the people we could call for help. Every act by ICE... The stalking in the streets, the threats to peaceful protestors and Constitutional recorders, and the fear so many goo community members, citizens snd non-citizens live with every day does not even feel like our country. To think we spend this massive amount of money to torment people working hard and doing their best? I'd rather the money go to give a family a shot at the American Dream, instead of paying someone to try to turn guns on them for pay. Our immigrants- They are our heart. They love this country and its promise. They are strong and brave and they work hard and have strong families and faith. They are full of love and share art, culture, dance, music, food and traditions, a love for community many of us can learn from. It is a terrible thing to not embrace and love these people who give so much and ask for so little. I cannot understand how these people are treated like an object to kick, hold down, choke, gun down, jail or murder, without so much as looking at paperwork. Please end this now, for the love of God. If you do not abolish ICE, remove funding and contracts and don't allow masks or lack of badges. Help prosecute when THEY are the violent criminals. But really, get them out and keep them out. Let our own trained police officers handle the crime. Thank you.

I am a resident in the city of Richmond and I demand the restriction and removal of ICE agents from our communities. I support the bills put forth that seek to limit the access and activities of immigration and law enforcement agents. Thank you

My name is Lillian Komarow. I am a resident of District 12. I am submitting this testimony in support of HB 1441, HB 1440, HB 1442, HB 650, HB 1260, HB 1262, HB 1265, HB 1438, HB 1482, and HB 1492. I am also writing in opposition to HB 1459. I grew up in the extremely diverse Northern Virginia area and I know that immigrants are a huge part of what makes Virginia the beautiful melting pot that it is. I know that immigrants have a wide array of reasons to come to Virginia, but ultimately my personal experience has shown me that immigrants want to live and work in peace. They contribute to Virginia in many positive ways economically and culturally– not that that should be a requirement to be treated humanely. Even if I did not have this background, I would know that the terror we are seeing ICE indiscriminately inflict on undocumented immigrants and US citizens alike across the country is abhorrent. It is imperative that Virginia citizens are able to freely access community services without fear of harassment from federal agents. Across the country we are seeing ICE and CBP agents deliberately terrorize families simply trying to take their children to school or to the doctor. There have been stories on the news of domestic violence victims being too afraid of ICE terrorization to show up to their court dates. Ultimately the actions of ICE are deterring people from accessing important services, and this creates ripple effects into the community by making us ALL less safe. Please protect Virginia citizens by passing HB 1440, HB 650, HB 1260, through. The Commonwealth has both the right and the duty to ensure free and fair election for its citizens. Elections cannot be free and fair when people are afraid of being detained at polling places solely due to their appearance. ICE agents’ presence at polling places would be nothing short of voter intimidation. Please protect the sanctity of our elections by passing HB 1442 through. The responsibility of local and state law enforcement should be to protect and serve Virginia citizens, not waste our resources and create mistrust by collaborating with increasingly hostile federal immigration operations. In addition to sapping limited state and local resources, collaboration blurs accountability for racial profiling and other abusive tactics federal agents take, and opens Virginia police departments up to lawsuits. Both law enforcement leaders and crime victim advocacy organizations alike have spoken out against Virginia law enforcement participating in immigration enforcement, citing eroded trust between police and victims, and even described instances of domestic violence and sexual assault survivors being unwilling to seek assistance. Please pass HB 1442 to prevent this mistrust and wasting of resources, as well as HB 1262 so that Virginians can trust that they are not falling into a trap when seeking immigration assistance services, HB 1264 so that Virginia citizens know they have an Accountability Commission keeping watch on federal agents conducting military style operations in the Commonwealth, and HB 1482 so that federal agents can further be held accountable by not concealing their identity. For the purpose of protecting Virginians, our resources, and our right to free and fair elections, I respectfully urge this committee to support HB 1441, HB 1440, HB 1442, HB 650, HB 1260, HB 1262, HB 1265, HB 1438, HB 1482, and HB 1492 and oppose HB 1459.

Dear Virginia House of Delegates, I am writing in support of all bills in this Block 1 subcommittee (HB650; HB1260; HB1262; HB1264; HB1265; HB1438; HB1440; HB1441; HB1442; HB1453; HB1459; HB1482; and HB1492). Each bill has the same underlying principles, in my view, that undergird each one and is worthy of widespread support and consideration. 1) Greater accountability for any abuses of power - something our government is supposedly predicated upon from its foundations of checks and balances. 2) Respect of human dignity - lest we forget another person's humanity and spiral into forms of depravity experienced on widespread scale even within our lifetimes, our parents' lifetimes, or our grandparents' lifetimes, anytime dehumanization becomes the norm and public opinion becomes apathetic we ought to have sirens blaring warning signals. As a conflict prevention and response professional, I have thorough knowledge of human rights abuses at widespread scale at the hands of unchecked power -- the enslavement of Africans and brutality of the chattel slave trade and its legacy of abuses through the Jim Crow Era onward, the forced disappearances of Argentina and Chile, the Holocaust, forced kidnappings and assimilations of First Nations and Native American children at Indian Boarding Schools in Canada and the United States, and more. These bills hold that some places ought to be preserved to honor the humanity in our neighbors, even those who may be undocumented - polling places, courthouses, schools. These bills provide guardrails that Virginia needs to both maintain the humanity of all people, even those who are undocumented. It serves to safeguard the hearts and minds of those citizens and legal residents who have been continuously profiled based on their perceived or actual national origin, and provides more psychological safety for those in our communities who are being targeted from the national stage to local actors dispatched from ICE who have done nothing unlawful. These forcible, unchecked, and brute forces of strength have brought about unnecessary and widespread fear, school absences, medical inattention for fear of being targeted in public, and traumatic experiences for young children and youth. Virginia House of Delegates must provide a healthy check and balance and honor its constituents. Vote in support of these bills. Sincerely, Jena Kitchen

I support this bill and am in favor of the increased safety it will provide for our communities and for my neighbors. I support banning face coverings for federal officers, restricting immigration enforcement officers to 40 feet from polling places, and prohibiting immigration enforcement from schools, hospitals and other above mentioned safe spaces. Limits need to be placed on rogue federal agents, due process upheld and American communities protected.

Any even mildly engaged Virginian ought be alarmed at the slow civil war being carried out on the people of Minneapolis. That is why I fully support HB1264 and HB1482 as critical societal checks on the administration's unfettered military force. Additionally, I support HB650/HB1260 (aren't these the same bill?), HB1265, HB1438, HB1440, and HB1441 for creating safe places and walling off our own government and enforcement agencies from this radical influence. Lastly, steps taken in HB1442 could become extremely important to protecting our democracy as the administration would spiritually invert the Second and Third Enforcement Acts, using the same federal authority that stopped the KKK from harassing black voters in 1870 to instead perform the same kind of intimidation on brown voters in 2026. I oppose HB1459's mandate of cooperation with ICE to snatch untried people out of custody, circumvent the consequences of convicted people by our own justice system, or enact additional punitive measures post incarceration. There is additional alarming language that might imply "going after the families". If state and local PD have a case where they want to cooperate, they already can do so. This bill removes that choice and puts it into a provably untrustworthy institution. I generally support HB1262 and HB1492 for cracking down on bad actors that would take advantage of these troubling times. However, I question the necessity of HB1492: while the long imagined scenario is extremely troubling, we have already seen what evils actual ICE officers are capable of, and how low the bar for entry is. Would this actually help? I mislike HB1453, which goes against our rights as American citizens and good Samaritans to non-violently oppose the actions of federal terrorists.

My name is Yonah Walter. I am a resident of District 10. I am writing in support of bills which enhance public trust in our law enforcement and respect civil rights in our communities. I am a volunteer with the Virginia chapter of Jews United for Justice, but I speak as the great-grandson of immigrants who came as chain migrants with the help of the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS), and as someone inculcated with strong Jewish values including a bedrock principle of respect for all. The American promise of "liberty and justice for all" was a strong call for my family, but to now hear our government speak so coldly about immigrants - let alone to see how our government has mistreated those they even suspect of being immigrants - has disappointed me greatly. The shooting deaths by ICE of nearly a dozen Americans in just the last few months, and the immoral and self-serving rush by the government to blame the victims in those shootings, demands we act to curb these abuses and keep our government in check. We need accountability from government agents, which includes the right to know who purports to represent us and act on our behalf in law enforcement. We need to protect access to public spaces like courthouses and (perhaps especially) polling places. We need to vigorously protect the right of people to move freely without fear of harassment or assault by law enforcement. We need to restore trust in our government. I respectfully urge this committee to support the following: HB650 HB1260 HB1262 HB1264 HB1265 HB1438 HB1440 HB1441 HB1442 HB1482 HB1492

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills protect sensitive spaces such as courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places, and hospitals from intimidation by federal immigration enforcement. They strengthen public trust and improve accountability by restricting law enforcement officers from obscuring their identities. I oppose HB1459, which would force state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would seriously damage public trust in local law enforcement.

My name is Paula Roney. I am a resident of District 3. I am submitting this testimony in support of HB650, HB1260, HB 1262, HB 1264, HB1265, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, HB1482, and HB1492. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This would strengthen public trust and improve accountability. As a long time Virginia public school educator, a grandchild of immigrants who came to this country to escape persecution, and a member of Jews United for Justice, I know the importance of welcoming immigrants to our country. I’ve worked with many students who came to the United States, often on their own, to escape harrowing circumstances. It is vital that they, and all other people are able to attend school, receive medical treatment and be able to access the legal system without fear. Therefore it is critical that our Commonwealth protects access to these vital community services. I respectfully urge this committee to support these bills. Thank you.

My name is Susan Kohn. I am a resident of District 15. I am submitting this testimony in support of HB 650,1260, 1262,1264,1265,1438,1440,1441,1453,1492 and in opposition of HB 1459 and 1482. As a pediatrician I am horrified to see my immigrant patients and their families living in fear. I work with children through a non-profit organization that helps to provide access to medical and dental care in Fairfax County. We see hardworking families who are afraid to access health care or even to send their children to school. They worry when someone leaves the house. Will they come back from work, the grocery store, court or school- or be taken by ICE? How can they continue to provide for their children? The children and teens I see were brought to the United States for a better life. Many experienced violence, political upheaval and uncertainty or severe poverty in their countries of origin, which led their parents to seek a place of safety, where they could thrive. My grandparents came to this country in the face of pogroms that terrorized our families in Eastern Europe. They worked hard, as our current immigrants do, to make a future for their children. Our Jewish sacred texts obligate us to care for the stranger and treat all with respect and kindness. They are part of the fabric of a great society. Our neighbors must be able to testify in court if they have been victimized or if they have requested asylum, without the fear of being deported when they show up. All Virginians, whether they are citizens or not, must have the right to access schools, hospitals, places of worship and polling places without fear of intimidation or deportation. All must be able to clearly see the identity of law enforcement personnel and have their day in court with proper representation if accused. Local police should be doing the work of maintaining safety for all residents- not helping ICE deport people without due process. As a Virginian I believe we have a duty to protect those who are most vulnerable in our community. At this time it is our immigrant neighbors who need our help. I respectfully urge this committee to support HB 650, 1260, 1262, 1264, 1265,1438, 1440, 1441,1442, 1453,1492 and oppose HB1459 and HB1482.

My comment refers to all bills on the agenda. The Commonwealth of Virginia must take any and all legal action to prevent ICE from terrorizing any Virginia individual or community. This includes all people who come to this country seeking a better life for themselves and their families, just as the many millions before them have done throughout America’s history.

We want public safety, not public abductions and executions. We have learned that ICE does not respect rule of law or human rights, so support these bills to keep Virginians safe. Every child deserves an education. Every child deserves to be safe at school. Every sick or injured person deserves medical care. So keep ICE out of our school, hospitals, and courthouses. No judicial warrant should mean no entry- and limit what civil arrests can take place in courthouses. We want police to protect, not persecute. So eliminate 287g agreements in Virginia. Allow our local law enforcement to do their job of keeping communities safe, instead of doing ICE's dirty work for them. We want rule of law, not rule by masked mobs. Do not allow law enforcement to cover their faces. That's not community policing- that's KKK tactics. We want free and fair elections, not a return to Jim Crow era intimidation at the polls. Citizens are not safe from ICE, either. Do not allow the federal government to use "immigration enforcement" as a rouse to silence eligible voters through fear and profiling. Support: HB650 - Callsen HB1260 - Shin HB1262 - Glass HB1264 - Shin HB1265 - Glass HB1438 - Guzman HB1440 - Lopez HB1441 - Lopez HB1442 - Lopez HB1453 - Williams HB1459 - Zehr HB1482 - Schmidt HB1492 - Shin

I’m very concerned with the overreaching of ICE. They have terrorized communities, broken apart families, disrupted children’s education, wrongfully detained people and even murdered American citizens. Please keep all safeguards in place to protect our citizens. Warrants should be in place before they come after people. ICE agents should follow the same laws and training that police officers are required to. ICE should not be allowed to wait outside or enter courthouses. They should not be wearing masks. This is leading to more dangerous escalations as we have seen in Minneapolis. Please vote to protect the rights of our people, maintain a safe community, and honor the laws and Constitution of our once great country. Please listen to your constituents. We are a country of immigrants and we are all humans. Do what is right.

As a long time resident of Virginia, I have watched the horrific attack on our immigrant population by our federal government. I write to encourage support of these bills to provide additional state protections to our local immigrant communities. It is the moral thing to do. Thank you. Stephanie Elms Alexandria VA

I strongly support every bill that limits federal immigration enforcement overreach. Virginia Majority stands in solidarity with immigrant communities across Virginia. We believe that all people, regardless of race, class, or immigration status, deserve to live with dignity, safety, and access to fundamental rights. I support policies that limit federal immigration enforcement overreach, protect access to courts and essential services, and prevent local resources from being used to separate families and criminalize our neighbors. Virginia must lead in protecting immigrant rights by establishing clear boundaries on immigration enforcement activities in our communities, ensuring safe access to schools, healthcare, courthouses, and other essential spaces, and maintaining the trust between local officials and the communities they serve. These policies have my support and are measures that would affirm Virginia’s commitment to being a place where all residents can participate fully in civic life without fear.

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

SUPPORT: HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, HB1482, HB1492. OPPOSE: HB1459 Our communities deserve protection from the overreach of the federal government. At a minimum, this means putting strong boundaries on the activity of federal immigration officers and requiring them to follow existing laws and those that are enacted by this general assembly. We need to protect sensitive spaces like schools, courtrooms, places of worship, hospitals and polling places from ICE/CBP intimidation. All officers - including local law enforcement - should be prohibited from wearing masks or face coverings and ID should be required. In addition, local law enforcement should be prohibited from entering agreements with federal immigration officers and judicial warrants for enforcement should be required. Currently our communities are less safe. We need to stop the unchecked abusive activity by ICE/CBP.

I strong SUPPORT establishment of a Virginia Accountability Commission to create a permanent record of federal agent actions and insure accountability. Illinois has established such a commission and I have watched powerful testimony about the behaviors of CBP/ICE as a result. Virginia must do what the federal government will not in this moment.

This Commission is crucial in providing information and data to the Governor and others about federal operations in the Commonwealth HB1264 should be put in place sooner rather than later.

This is an opportunity for the Commonwealth to respect and protect the riaghts of ALL Virginia citizens. I strongly I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482.

My name is Rachel Waldstein. I am a resident of District #1. I am submitting this testimony in support of the following bills: • HB 650 Callsen Courthouses • HB 1260 Shin Public elementary/secondary schools, etc; federal immigration investigation and enforcement activities • HB 1262 Glass Va Consumer Protection Act • HB 1264 Shin Virginia Accountability Commission • HB 1265 Glass Courthouses • HB 1438 Guzman 287g • HB 1440 Lopez Protected Areas • HB 1441 Lopez 287g • HB 1442 Lopez Polling Place Protections • HB 1482 Schmidt facemasks • HB 1492 Shin Impersonating federal law enforcement officer I oppose the following bills: • HB 1453 Williams Approaching a first responder with specified intent after a warning; penalty • HB 1459 Zehr Ice-Free Communities Act; notification to federal immigration authorities of pending release of certain prisoners from custody I am a member of Congregation Etz Hayim in Arlington and spent a large part of my career representing the U.S. government in the protection of human rights around the world. I support HB 650, 1260, 1262, 1264, 1265, 1438, 1440, 1441, 1442, 1482, and 1492 based on my Jewish values and my life’s work. Jewish tradition and law recognize the equality and dignity of all people and respect their right to life, bodily integrity, health, housing, education, and due process. The Jewish people have been refugees many times in the past and have often experienced mistreatment by authoritarian governments. It is thus my duty to stand in support of marginalized communities and against government abuses. Law enforcement authorities should not deprive anyone--even those in this country illegally--of life, liberty, or property without following established legal procedures that respect their rights. Since the Federal government has abdicated its responsibilities before the law and Constitution, it is up to the States to uphold national and international human rights law. Passing the above listed bills will make our communities to be safer and will give Commonwealth officials a legal basis to push back on Federal law enforcement officials who break the law. I strongly believe HB 650, 1260, 1262, 1264, 1265, 1438, 1440, 1441, 1442, 1482, and 1492 will improve the lives of all Virginians by allowing us to return our focus to strengthening our economy, education and healthcare systems, and by returning a sense of humanity to our Commonwealth. I oppose HB 1453 and 1459, which I believe will create more fear in our communities and impede Virginians’ ability to express their First Amendment rights. I respectfully urge this committee to support HB 650, 1260, 1262, 1264, 1265, 1438, 1440, 1441, 1442, 1482, and 1492 and to oppose HB 1453 and 1459.

I strongly support the following bills and urge the committee members to pass them on so they can make their way to the House in order to be discussed by all the Delegates: HB1492, HB1482, HB1453, HB1442, HB1441, HB1440, HB1438, HB1265, HB1264, HB1262, HB1260, and HB650. These bills provide much needed limits on ICE agents, and life-saving protections for tens of thousands of people in our commonwealth. Please do the right thing and keep these bills alive and moving through our legislative system.

Support HB 650 1260 1262 1264 1265 1438 1440 1441 1442 1482

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

These bills so far fail to address the issue of detention centers run by ICE and yet we have ample evidence now (especially from Minnesota but also elsewhere) of inhumane conditions in all the detention centers (inhumanity by design, so far as is known). This is not an issue to be taken up in 2027 but, I respectfully suggest, needs to be taken up *now*, in these bills. I will not repeat what anyone paying attention already knows but these detention centers are full of people (reportedly numbering over 73,000, including children) who have had no due process, done nothing wrong, and are ripped out of their work places, schools, and lives, and being treated worse than criminals (in fact, they are being treated far worse even than confirmed child sex predators, such as Ghislaine Maxwell). Virginia must take a stand, and not wait until it is too late, against what already are clearly crimes against humanity. How can we sleep at night knowing this is going on?

I support the bill establishing a Virginia Accountability Commission. I would like to see it spelled out more clearly than it is here (so far as I can see) that the Virginia Accountability Commission will also ensure that the state of Virginia assumes accountability for what is happening in detention centers or other site where people detained are being held. In addition, the Virginia Accountability Commission should work with already established legal authorities to ensure that all detainees have been given their due process rights and are not being unlawfully detained or detained without access to edible food, safe water to drink, medical care, legal counsel, family and phone calls. The Commission should insist on accountability for ensuring that detainees are not forced with sign documents without legal counsel and/or against their will, to include documents that relate to potential self-deportation. I suggest that the Virginia Accountability Commission work with all relevant authorities to ensure that detainees who have not been granted due process are NOT moved through airports or other transportation hubs in the state of Virginia in according with existing anti-Human Trafficking laws. People who have overstayed their visas or who are undocumented should be given due process and treated in accordance with the laws that hold these to be civil, not criminal, violations. This must be emphasized again and again as the public should not equate these violations with criminality. No human being deserves to be terrorized. Let us insist on empathy and humanity for all our fellow humans, and compassion for the little children swept up in this horror.

My name is Margaret Power. I have been a voting resident of District 6 for 37 years. I am submitting this testimony in support of most of the bills pending for your action today. I am the great-granddaughter of immigrants escaping poverty, famine, and persecution in their native land and striving to afford the ‘chain migration’ that re-united them with their families. I am the great-niece of German Jews who were denied entry and were murdered in Hitler’s camps. I am the daughter-in-law of an American Jewish woman, who, as a 13-year-old, escaped Poland and crossed a remote stretch of our northern border without documents during the Hitler years when America turned away refugees. I am the grandmother of two talented, bi-lingual and totally adorable Americans who are nearly as brown as their naturalized father, a Colombian-born doctor. I fear their own government will harm them. Or kill them. Truly- I cannot believe that a time has come in which it is not insane for me to have such fears. I belong to Temple Rodef Shalom in Falls church, where, in collaboration with other faith communities, we have long organized sustained support and services for new refugees, predominantly Afghan friends of the US. As Chairman Simon knows, our community actively advocates for inclusive and just public policy here in Richmond and in the nation’s capital. I respectfully urge you to send these bills forward and to advocate for their passage; collectively, they protect Virginians from violent abuses of federal power, they ensure that some of our essential public services- schools, hospitals and the courts- can be accessed by all; they preserve the sovereignty of the Commonwealth with respect to our law enforcement roles, while assuring federal-state-local collaboration with respect to removing criminals from our midst. As a package, they reinforce the rule of law, including protection of our constitutional rights; they reduce the likelihood of violence in our public spaces; they offer our neighbors - and my grandchildren- better protection by requiring federal immigration agents follow the same transparency standards as state and local law enforcement, and they restore some measure of confidence that we citizens are also unlikely to be kidnapped, injured or murdered so long as we are Virginians. I oppose passage of HB 1453, as it limits our right to free expression, and I also oppose HB1459, which is unnecessary because the Governor’s executive order allows federal-state cooperation with respect to convicted criminals, and, if read to add instances in which individuals can be delivered to DHS, would breach the boundaries established by HB 650 which I strongly support. I respectfully urge this subcommittee to support HB#650, HB#1260,HB#1262,HB#1264,HB#1265, HB#1438, B1440,HB1441,HB1442,HB1482, AND HB1492

I support all these bills which, to my reading of them, extend protections of the law to people attending court appointments so that they cannot be detained by immigration enforcement authorities (or people impersonating immigration enforcement authorities). I support requiring law enforcement officials to not wear masks and to have visible identification, and also not to engage in immigration enforcement activities. I also support bills which protect schools, churches, and private workplaces from immigration enforcement activities, and require judicial warrants (warrants signed by a judge) for any immigration enforcement operation. I would like to see bills requiring due process for any persons detained, including but not limited to access to a lawyer, ability to make phone calls, and right to be treated with dignity and humanity.

I fully support every bill that safeguards and protects our immigrant neighbors from the lawless, cruel, immoral and shameful acts committed by federal agents and DHS.

My name is Cindy Denton-Ade . I am a resident of Burke, District 10 . I am submitting testimony in support of bills HB 650, 1260 ,1262 ,1264, 1265,1438,1440,1441,1442,1448,1482,1492. I am a member of Temple B’nai Shalom. All of my Grandparents were immigrants from other counties: the Ukraine, Belarus. If not for the welcoming policies of the United States when they immigrated, they would have been surely been all killed in the Holocaust. My very lovely handyman, who comes from Columbia and is a citizen, was fearful about driving to D.C. Because he felt he would be targeted by ICE. This is not right! Jewish values promote welcoming and protecting the stranger. These bills will go a long way to do just. Virginia, my chosen home, has taken many positive actions since Governor Spanberger has taken office. Let these bills be an addition to actions we can be proud of in protecting immigrants men, women, and children.

HB 650 Clearly seeks to obstruct enforcement of federal law. OPPOSE HB 1260 Clearly seeks to obstruct enforcement of federal law. OPPOSE HB 1264 Clearly seeks to obstruct enforcement of federal law by attempting to intimidate federal law enforcement officers. OPPOSE. HB 1265 Clearly seeks to obstruct enforcement of federal law. OPPOSE HB 1438 Creates division between federal, state, and local law enforcement. Blatantly covers for illegals. OPPOSE HB 1440 Blatantly covers for illegals. OPPOSE HB 1441 Creates division between federal, state, and local law enforcement. Blatantly covers for illegals. OPPOSE HB 1442 If Illegals aren’t supposed to vote, why would this bill be needed? OPPOSE HB 1482 Clearly seeks to obstruct enforcement law enforcement by intimidating them. In some instances, their identity needs to be protected to prevent retribution. OPPOSE HB 1492 This is already a violation of federal law and is unnecessary. See 18 USC SS 912 and SS 913. OPPOSE

My name is Karen Menichelli, and I have resided in Arlington, VA, for over 40 years, currently living in House District 1. I have cherished the diverse and welcoming nature of my community and feel enriched by the many immigrants from around the world who have decided to make their lives here. I am worried for my neighbors given the unnecessarily reckless and cruel practices of our federal immigration officers exhibited in cities like Portland, OR, and Minneapolis, WI. I don’t want those behaviors, which sow mistrust and waste resources, brought to Virginia. I want to protect the humanity, dignity, and safety of our immigrant neighbors and allow free access to important community services without fear of harassment or harm from federal agents. Therefore, I strongly support the above indicated cluster of bills under consideration by the Public Safety Subcommittee and urge the subcommittee to champion these bills and send strong versions to the full House for a vote.

My name is Ricki Henschel. I am a resident of District 3. I am submitting this testimony on behalf of Jews United for Justice in support of all of the following bills: HB 650, HB1260, HB1262, HB1264, HB1265, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, HB1482, and HB1492. JUFJ organizes Jewish Virginians and allies in support of local campaigns for social, racial, and economic justice. Judaism teaches that we are all made in the image of God. The Bible is clear that we are to welcome the stranger, as this is mentioned more times than any other obligation in the Bible. The assault on and kidnapping of individuals by ICE, pulled from their cars, their homes, their places of work, as if they were violent criminals, is directly in opposition of Jewish values, and should not be happening in our state. . The vast majority of those arrested are not individuals who have committed any crime, and many are in the process of obtaining legal status. We also know that citizens are also being taken because they fit the profile. The ICE raids and deportation machine are harming people indiscriminately: Parents, children, and students are being swept up as they attend routine immigration check-ins and court hearings, go to work, and run their errands. In my community, children are scared to go to school, and parents are concerned about taking their children to school, including those who with legal status, as the reality is that ICE is sweeping up individuals based on skin color and accents. Asking for papers and documentation and creating a reality where people feel they have to always have their papers on them everywhere they go, is reminiscent of every society that has been overtaken by autocracy. In addition, as an individual who has experienced sexual violence, it is no surprise that many in our community are afraid to go to our courts or access services. Everyone should be able to live with safety and dignity – including going to court without fear. Enabling law enforcement to be masked adds to the trauma being created. In addition, state and local police need to be seen as those protecting our communities, not as part of the federal work of ICE. And most recently, the threat of having ICE at polling places has been introduced. This must not be allowed in Virginia. Many citizens fit ICE’s profile, and they will be harassed and maybe too frightened to go to the polls. This can not be allowed. I respectfully urge this committee to support each of these bills that control the methods and manner in which ICE operates within our borders–HB 650, HB1260, HB1262, HB1264, HB1265, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, HB1482, and HB1492. We have the right to require them to follow our laws and the US Constitution. We must welcome the stranger.

I am a resident of Reston, VA. I am a US Army veteran and Federal retiree with almost 30 years of service to the US. My father’s side of my family immigrated to this country from England sometime in the 1630s. My mother’s side of the family immigrated from Scotland in the late 1750s. To the best of my knowledge, they were undocumented. I believe strongly that I have a right to stay in this country. I have met, heard about, read about, and studied people who have been here longer than my family, and some who have come very recently. If we examine the accomplishments and potential of these folks who arrived before or after my family, none are less deserving of a right to be here. As you study our history and our culture, one realizes that the contributions of immigrants are what makes this country so unique and wonderful. It isn’t how big our Army is, it’s the fact that you can find a taco truck, an Ethiopian restaurant, pottery from Poland, and fashion from France on the same block. It’s in the fact that nearly 100 languages are spoken as mother tongues in Fairfax County Schools. It’s in knowing that this country was built on the backs of African slaves and immigrants from every continent in the world, and the cultures of those immigrants have mixed into the most wonderful stew that we are allowed to enjoy every day. Now, let’s get real. Undocumented people can’t vote, aren’t eligible for benefits, and pay taxes into our system. They work very hard for low wages. Immigrants, much less those who are undocumented, commit crimes at SIGNIFICANTLY lower rates than white men. In short, immigrants are a net gain for our society. The images and stories we are seeing regarding ICE and CBP untrained, unprofessional paramilitary wreaking havoc in Minneapolis is like watching footage from another country. I keep asking myself how we got here, while unfortunately, people of color are saying it has been this way all along. Given that we weren’t aware of the total number of people ICE and CBP killed until they murdered two white people, I am concluding they must be correct. In 2025/26, 40 people have died at the hands of ICE. That is 40 too many. I am in favor of any legislation that hinders the ability of ICE to murder more people regardless of race, color, gender, age, national origin, religion, sexual preference, genetic information, immigration status, or whether or not they are exercising their 1st, 2nd, 4th, or 14th Amendment rights. I am in favor of any legislation that allows immigrants a path to citizenship. While a small minority of people may disagree with me, this is NOT a white nation, and I am against any legislation that tries to turn it into one — even if it is couched in pretty language like “protecting our ‘heritage,’ or ‘our women.’” Please pass any legislation that treats our immigrant population in accordance with human rights, human dignity, civic sense, and common decency. Thank you.

(This plea concerns all House and Senate bills that would provide greater protections for our immigrant population and stop government overreach by DHS and ICE.) Letter of Support for Policies Protecting Immigrants Dear Governor Spanberger, Virginia Delegates, and Virginia Senators, As a citizen who sees all humans as treasured and worthy of respect, I ask you, Governor Spanberger and all Virginia delegates and senators, to support all ICE OUT bills, specifically the following bills to benefit the lives of all citizens and provide specific protections for our immigrant community: HB 660 | HB 836 | HB 911 | HB 1161 | HB 1260 | HB 1265 | HB 1438 | HB 1440 | HB 1441 | HB 1442 | HB 1482 | HB 1492 SB 351 | SB 352 | SB 446 | SB 783 | What each of us has witnessed in California, Washington State, Chicago, North Carolina, and Minneapolis to include traumatization of targeted people and onlookers, great injury, and execution style killings must not become business as usual in Virginia. Please regard the humanity in each person across our Commonwealth and support the passage of these bills. Thank you, Mary Lib Morgan 12401 Dutton Road | Apt 2409 | Midlothian, VA 23113 (804) 928-2057

As a longtime Virginia resident and a person of faith, I am alarmed by ICE's and the DHS's recent gross misconduct, including murdering U.S. citizen. Therefore: I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

I support any bill that abolishes ICE. We need to go back to a civilized nation. At the moment we are not one. Killing innocent Americans for demonstrating their first amendment rights. We need to stop rounding up people for the color of their skin. This is not a Wild West rodeo. Our government has violated numerous constitutional laws by not doing lawful procedures. We promised after the concentration camps where Japanese citizens were detained that America would not do that again. Again America has broken its promise to its citizens. They are removing people who are not criminals and people seeking a better life. Some as they appear for court hearings that they needed to do to become citizens. Let’s go back to a civilized country and start respecting both law and order and stop quotas on human beings. You are helping Americans and the world lose any respect left for America and its government. The three murders that gunned down Renee Good and Alex Pretti had YEARS on the CBP or ICE before those killings. It was like watching a firing squad executing people for no reason. Just being around people that were trigger happy and had no training from years ago. I have watched children have guns held up to their faces. CHILDREN. You are taught to never draw your weapon as a fear tactic or a control technique. It’s common knowledge. Let’s make real immigration laws that help people become American. These immigrants pay more into our treasury than Trump did for three years only paying $750 each year. Or Amazon that paid no taxes. The immigrants contribute to our country and economy unlike billionaires and corporations. Actually we have subsidized Elon more than any taxes he has paid. He has caused more harm to America and Americans safety than any immigrant. Stop this funding of this illegal under trained private police that is not protecting Americans but killing them. I question how anyone who supports this can even say they are Christian. From the brutality of humans in detention, lack of medical care, food that I would only put in my compost bin, to breaking up families, the abuse and murder I have seen and the rounding up by skin color. You do know Jesus was a dark skin Palestinian don’t you? So guess he would be rounded up if he was around today. I have never been so ashamed to be an American and I’m 72 years old. But I know it wasn’t me that made the decisions it was you. That gives me some peace. Find your soul, remember again why we were given the statue of liberty or let’s donate it to a country worthy of that beacon of light. We are distinguishing its significance. I hope you also were able to see the monks marching for peace. They are true humans with love and kindness to all. I am grateful to see so many people touched by them and their journey. In solidarity, Cindy Johnston

Please vote in favor of protecting our immigrants from ICE harm!

People in Alexandria are terrified- undocumented immigrants, Green Card holders and even US citizens are afraid to be harassed, kidnapped or killed by ICE. As such, I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. While we cannot fully stop these immoral and unconstitutional federal practices, we can stop VA from adopting them in our counties and cities. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in local law enforcement and jeopardize public safety.

I SUPPORT all bills EXCEPT HB1459 I OPPOSE HB1459

I want the legislators to support the above designated bills and any bill that will cut funding, decrease, limit or completely shut down community and law enforcement support for ICE.

I strongly support all the proposed legislation for protecting my neighbors and community, providing civil causes of action, placing a 9/1/26 termination date on existing local ICE agreements. We should not be using our tax dollars and other resources to assist a law-breaking federal government that is pardoning drug traffickers, killing and detaining legal residents and citizens, and promising protection for its agents who violate our Constitutional rights. Thank you.

This bill should be bipartisan and only for the benefit of the citizens, not government officials and corporations.

When did our state government decide that they do not have to follow our Constitution of the United States of America? The 2nd Amendment is an individual right under the Constitution that states clearly that it shall not be infringed on which in simple terms means that no government official or group has the ability to take a person's right to keep and bear arms in the United States of America. This Amendment was so important to our forefathers that it is the second thing they wrote to establish that the government does not have the ability to take your right to defend yourself against all enemies and this includes a tyrannical state government that doesn't understand plain text that our country was founded on. It doesn't matter what others opinions or feelings on the subject of the right to bear arms is because it is my right and not their's that we are talking about at this time. As a society of individuals in our country that have never agreed on things of this nature since the invention of the modern firearm we have to look no farther than our own Constitution to see that this is not a collective right of certain people that agree or disagree with the principle of firearms but infact a Constitutional right of an individual to determine there views of their personal right to bear arms. With the world in the state it is in at our present time this Constitutional right is needed more then ever because we are facing people that think that the can completely ignore the Constitution and its not even on a national level but a state level. This is also a truly sad moment of our state that is the founding place for our country as it exists from the time that we settled in this new land of an unknown world at the time but to disrespect our founding Document that started it all on top of it is the worst thing that could happen in our state for these elected officials to look at the Bill of Rights and say to themselves that those Amendment are not worth following because I have a different opinion, belief or feeling on that Amendment that I am personally going to take the individual right of every person in Virginia just because I don't want to follow these Amendments as they are written. Do you understand how this is being a tyrannical government just like the British were when they were trying to control the entire population at the time that we had the Revolution in this great land to start this great country. When people say that the 2nd Amendment is dated and need to be revised but can see the actual beauty in how our forefathers predicted that this Amendment would be necessary throughout time to even to the year 2026 were we have a government that is looking at this exact Amendment and saying no we don't have to follow that anymore because we have all these people that don't like the fact that a free person of the United States of America can purchase anything that has to do with their ability to not only protect themselves in self defense but also to protect themselves from the tyrannical government that is before us today. I'm sorry but as a person that has no affiliation to a political party or any other organization on this subject in our country I believe in our Constitution and the Amendments that were written in the Bill of Rights to protect myself, my family and my friends from people that think that they know what is best for everyone in our country on the basis that they either think they are smarter, richer or elected.

I urge you to vote in favor of these bills, all of which have a common interest -- to protect Virginia residents from unconstitutional action by Federal authorities that are charged with protecting the population. The bills are : HB 650, 1260, 1262, 1264, 1265, 1438, 1440, 1441, 1442, 1482, 1492. My family knows a naturalized U.S. citizen from El Salvador who came to the United States because he married a U.S. citizen. He was arrested in Pennsylvania and held for three days, because they thought he might be an undocumented alien based on racial/ethnic profiling. He had to hire a lawyer to get out. Virginia law enforcement must not cooperate with Federal security forces that are carrying out such unconstitutional activities. My name is Julie Schechter Torres. I am a member of Temple Rodef Shalom. Our houses of worship must be safe from activities by law enforcement. Our schools must be safe for children. I know a 9-year-old child who is legally present in the United States but didn't want to go to school for days after ICE went to her ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. Children are not a threat. If ICE is focusing on criminals - as they say they are - they are in the wrong place. Going there to capture adults is once again using children as "bait". I have lived in countries where criminals stop cars and kidnap people. There is no way to know that law enforcement authorities are who they say they are if they wear masks and don't show identification. There is no reason someone carrying out legal law enforcement activities should need to hide who they are or what they are doing. Masking is just a means of covering up unlawful action. Please pass these bills to protect Virginians.

I am wanting to write in support of HB 650, HB 1260, HB 1265, HB 1438. These bills would work towards truly and wellbeing of helping the community that lives here within the Commonwealth. The behavior and actions of federal officers are dangerous as they are spreading fear and harm that directly work against the trust and wellbeing of many immigrants and other people of color that are present here. Many of those who are directly impacted as they are less likely to feel safe to contact emergency services for life saving care, going to the store for groceries, taking children to school, going to court for things even like protective orders that could help promote their safety- to just name a few. People deserve the ability to live with dignity and safety and these bills would take the necessary steps to helping promote public safety for all.

I have watched the news and live feeds from Minneapolis, and today I watched testimonies of violations, physical abuse and murder by ICE. It is hard to not see we are in a Constitutional and humanitarian crisis at a scale I never thought could happen here. Please do not bring this to VA. As Virginia is the birthplace of our Constitution, can we make the choice to refuse this standing army, search and seizures? the beatings and destruction of property and disruption of freedom peace and commerce ICE and similar agencies leave in their wake? We are not being protected by them, but living in terror of them. The trust is gone. And, every decent law enforcement officer carries the massive burden of association with these violent, incompetent, sadistic, rogue, racist hypocrites. Ice must be abolished NOW. Humane reform to immigration law, the justice system, detention conditions (including medical care, oversight without notice, access to lawyers without being shipped out, family visits, and provisions for the safety of people who trusted our country as asylum seekers .) As for actual ,violent criminals- we have a system in place and none of this is necessary if we have trust between communities and law enforcement. Ice needs to be scrapped first for something new - for the people, with the consent of the people , to take its place. What are they but roving patrols racial profiling? I am PROUD of our civil rights legacy in our state. We can take a stand and refuse funding and quartering. We should all be able to look to law enforcement as heroes- the people we could call for help. Every act by ICE... The stalking in the streets, the threats to peaceful protestors and Constitutional recorders, and the fear so many goo community members, citizens snd non-citizens live with every day does not even feel like our country. To think we spend this massive amount of money to torment people working hard and doing their best? I'd rather the money go to give a family a shot at the American Dream, instead of paying someone to try to turn guns on them for pay. Our immigrants- They are our heart. They love this country and its promise. They are strong and brave and they work hard and have strong families and faith. They are full of love and share art, culture, dance, music, food and traditions, a love for community many of us can learn from. It is a terrible thing to not embrace and love these people who give so much and ask for so little. I cannot understand how these people are treated like an object to kick, hold down, choke, gun down, jail or murder, without so much as looking at paperwork. Please end this now, for the love of God. If you do not abolish ICE, remove funding and contracts and don't allow masks or lack of badges. Help prosecute when THEY are the violent criminals. But really, get them out and keep them out. Let our own trained police officers handle the crime. Thank you.

I am a resident in the city of Richmond and I demand the restriction and removal of ICE agents from our communities. I support the bills put forth that seek to limit the access and activities of immigration and law enforcement agents. Thank you

My name is Lillian Komarow. I am a resident of District 12. I am submitting this testimony in support of HB 1441, HB 1440, HB 1442, HB 650, HB 1260, HB 1262, HB 1265, HB 1438, HB 1482, and HB 1492. I am also writing in opposition to HB 1459. I grew up in the extremely diverse Northern Virginia area and I know that immigrants are a huge part of what makes Virginia the beautiful melting pot that it is. I know that immigrants have a wide array of reasons to come to Virginia, but ultimately my personal experience has shown me that immigrants want to live and work in peace. They contribute to Virginia in many positive ways economically and culturally– not that that should be a requirement to be treated humanely. Even if I did not have this background, I would know that the terror we are seeing ICE indiscriminately inflict on undocumented immigrants and US citizens alike across the country is abhorrent. It is imperative that Virginia citizens are able to freely access community services without fear of harassment from federal agents. Across the country we are seeing ICE and CBP agents deliberately terrorize families simply trying to take their children to school or to the doctor. There have been stories on the news of domestic violence victims being too afraid of ICE terrorization to show up to their court dates. Ultimately the actions of ICE are deterring people from accessing important services, and this creates ripple effects into the community by making us ALL less safe. Please protect Virginia citizens by passing HB 1440, HB 650, HB 1260, through. The Commonwealth has both the right and the duty to ensure free and fair election for its citizens. Elections cannot be free and fair when people are afraid of being detained at polling places solely due to their appearance. ICE agents’ presence at polling places would be nothing short of voter intimidation. Please protect the sanctity of our elections by passing HB 1442 through. The responsibility of local and state law enforcement should be to protect and serve Virginia citizens, not waste our resources and create mistrust by collaborating with increasingly hostile federal immigration operations. In addition to sapping limited state and local resources, collaboration blurs accountability for racial profiling and other abusive tactics federal agents take, and opens Virginia police departments up to lawsuits. Both law enforcement leaders and crime victim advocacy organizations alike have spoken out against Virginia law enforcement participating in immigration enforcement, citing eroded trust between police and victims, and even described instances of domestic violence and sexual assault survivors being unwilling to seek assistance. Please pass HB 1442 to prevent this mistrust and wasting of resources, as well as HB 1262 so that Virginians can trust that they are not falling into a trap when seeking immigration assistance services, HB 1264 so that Virginia citizens know they have an Accountability Commission keeping watch on federal agents conducting military style operations in the Commonwealth, and HB 1482 so that federal agents can further be held accountable by not concealing their identity. For the purpose of protecting Virginians, our resources, and our right to free and fair elections, I respectfully urge this committee to support HB 1441, HB 1440, HB 1442, HB 650, HB 1260, HB 1262, HB 1265, HB 1438, HB 1482, and HB 1492 and oppose HB 1459.

Dear Virginia House of Delegates, I am writing in support of all bills in this Block 1 subcommittee (HB650; HB1260; HB1262; HB1264; HB1265; HB1438; HB1440; HB1441; HB1442; HB1453; HB1459; HB1482; and HB1492). Each bill has the same underlying principles, in my view, that undergird each one and is worthy of widespread support and consideration. 1) Greater accountability for any abuses of power - something our government is supposedly predicated upon from its foundations of checks and balances. 2) Respect of human dignity - lest we forget another person's humanity and spiral into forms of depravity experienced on widespread scale even within our lifetimes, our parents' lifetimes, or our grandparents' lifetimes, anytime dehumanization becomes the norm and public opinion becomes apathetic we ought to have sirens blaring warning signals. As a conflict prevention and response professional, I have thorough knowledge of human rights abuses at widespread scale at the hands of unchecked power -- the enslavement of Africans and brutality of the chattel slave trade and its legacy of abuses through the Jim Crow Era onward, the forced disappearances of Argentina and Chile, the Holocaust, forced kidnappings and assimilations of First Nations and Native American children at Indian Boarding Schools in Canada and the United States, and more. These bills hold that some places ought to be preserved to honor the humanity in our neighbors, even those who may be undocumented - polling places, courthouses, schools. These bills provide guardrails that Virginia needs to both maintain the humanity of all people, even those who are undocumented. It serves to safeguard the hearts and minds of those citizens and legal residents who have been continuously profiled based on their perceived or actual national origin, and provides more psychological safety for those in our communities who are being targeted from the national stage to local actors dispatched from ICE who have done nothing unlawful. These forcible, unchecked, and brute forces of strength have brought about unnecessary and widespread fear, school absences, medical inattention for fear of being targeted in public, and traumatic experiences for young children and youth. Virginia House of Delegates must provide a healthy check and balance and honor its constituents. Vote in support of these bills. Sincerely, Jena Kitchen

I support this bill and am in favor of the increased safety it will provide for our communities and for my neighbors. I support banning face coverings for federal officers, restricting immigration enforcement officers to 40 feet from polling places, and prohibiting immigration enforcement from schools, hospitals and other above mentioned safe spaces. Limits need to be placed on rogue federal agents, due process upheld and American communities protected.

Any even mildly engaged Virginian ought be alarmed at the slow civil war being carried out on the people of Minneapolis. That is why I fully support HB1264 and HB1482 as critical societal checks on the administration's unfettered military force. Additionally, I support HB650/HB1260 (aren't these the same bill?), HB1265, HB1438, HB1440, and HB1441 for creating safe places and walling off our own government and enforcement agencies from this radical influence. Lastly, steps taken in HB1442 could become extremely important to protecting our democracy as the administration would spiritually invert the Second and Third Enforcement Acts, using the same federal authority that stopped the KKK from harassing black voters in 1870 to instead perform the same kind of intimidation on brown voters in 2026. I oppose HB1459's mandate of cooperation with ICE to snatch untried people out of custody, circumvent the consequences of convicted people by our own justice system, or enact additional punitive measures post incarceration. There is additional alarming language that might imply "going after the families". If state and local PD have a case where they want to cooperate, they already can do so. This bill removes that choice and puts it into a provably untrustworthy institution. I generally support HB1262 and HB1492 for cracking down on bad actors that would take advantage of these troubling times. However, I question the necessity of HB1492: while the long imagined scenario is extremely troubling, we have already seen what evils actual ICE officers are capable of, and how low the bar for entry is. Would this actually help? I mislike HB1453, which goes against our rights as American citizens and good Samaritans to non-violently oppose the actions of federal terrorists.

My name is Yonah Walter. I am a resident of District 10. I am writing in support of bills which enhance public trust in our law enforcement and respect civil rights in our communities. I am a volunteer with the Virginia chapter of Jews United for Justice, but I speak as the great-grandson of immigrants who came as chain migrants with the help of the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS), and as someone inculcated with strong Jewish values including a bedrock principle of respect for all. The American promise of "liberty and justice for all" was a strong call for my family, but to now hear our government speak so coldly about immigrants - let alone to see how our government has mistreated those they even suspect of being immigrants - has disappointed me greatly. The shooting deaths by ICE of nearly a dozen Americans in just the last few months, and the immoral and self-serving rush by the government to blame the victims in those shootings, demands we act to curb these abuses and keep our government in check. We need accountability from government agents, which includes the right to know who purports to represent us and act on our behalf in law enforcement. We need to protect access to public spaces like courthouses and (perhaps especially) polling places. We need to vigorously protect the right of people to move freely without fear of harassment or assault by law enforcement. We need to restore trust in our government. I respectfully urge this committee to support the following: HB650 HB1260 HB1262 HB1264 HB1265 HB1438 HB1440 HB1441 HB1442 HB1482 HB1492

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills protect sensitive spaces such as courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places, and hospitals from intimidation by federal immigration enforcement. They strengthen public trust and improve accountability by restricting law enforcement officers from obscuring their identities. I oppose HB1459, which would force state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would seriously damage public trust in local law enforcement.

My name is Paula Roney. I am a resident of District 3. I am submitting this testimony in support of HB650, HB1260, HB 1262, HB 1264, HB1265, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, HB1482, and HB1492. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This would strengthen public trust and improve accountability. As a long time Virginia public school educator, a grandchild of immigrants who came to this country to escape persecution, and a member of Jews United for Justice, I know the importance of welcoming immigrants to our country. I’ve worked with many students who came to the United States, often on their own, to escape harrowing circumstances. It is vital that they, and all other people are able to attend school, receive medical treatment and be able to access the legal system without fear. Therefore it is critical that our Commonwealth protects access to these vital community services. I respectfully urge this committee to support these bills. Thank you.

My name is Susan Kohn. I am a resident of District 15. I am submitting this testimony in support of HB 650,1260, 1262,1264,1265,1438,1440,1441,1453,1492 and in opposition of HB 1459 and 1482. As a pediatrician I am horrified to see my immigrant patients and their families living in fear. I work with children through a non-profit organization that helps to provide access to medical and dental care in Fairfax County. We see hardworking families who are afraid to access health care or even to send their children to school. They worry when someone leaves the house. Will they come back from work, the grocery store, court or school- or be taken by ICE? How can they continue to provide for their children? The children and teens I see were brought to the United States for a better life. Many experienced violence, political upheaval and uncertainty or severe poverty in their countries of origin, which led their parents to seek a place of safety, where they could thrive. My grandparents came to this country in the face of pogroms that terrorized our families in Eastern Europe. They worked hard, as our current immigrants do, to make a future for their children. Our Jewish sacred texts obligate us to care for the stranger and treat all with respect and kindness. They are part of the fabric of a great society. Our neighbors must be able to testify in court if they have been victimized or if they have requested asylum, without the fear of being deported when they show up. All Virginians, whether they are citizens or not, must have the right to access schools, hospitals, places of worship and polling places without fear of intimidation or deportation. All must be able to clearly see the identity of law enforcement personnel and have their day in court with proper representation if accused. Local police should be doing the work of maintaining safety for all residents- not helping ICE deport people without due process. As a Virginian I believe we have a duty to protect those who are most vulnerable in our community. At this time it is our immigrant neighbors who need our help. I respectfully urge this committee to support HB 650, 1260, 1262, 1264, 1265,1438, 1440, 1441,1442, 1453,1492 and oppose HB1459 and HB1482.

My comment refers to all bills on the agenda. The Commonwealth of Virginia must take any and all legal action to prevent ICE from terrorizing any Virginia individual or community. This includes all people who come to this country seeking a better life for themselves and their families, just as the many millions before them have done throughout America’s history.

I am a resident of Virginia House of Delegates District One (Del. Hope). I am submitting this testimony in support of House Bills proposing to de-link Virginia Schools, courthouses, protected areas and polling places from being places of enforcement of federal immigration laws by federal agents. Specifically, HB#1260 (no immigration enforcement in schools), HB-1265 (courthouses), HB-1438 (287g agreements prohibited), HB-1440 (protected areas-hospitals, schools, etc), HB-1441 (law enforcement cooperation only with a valid judicial warrant) and HB-1442 (polling places) My family includes two members born overseas, one came as a political refugee. We are longtime members of Temple Rodef Shalom and we work or volunteer in the service of the immigrant community and basic human rights, including in the legal profession. These bills will protect privacy and basic human rights of immigrants, creating safe spaces so they may continue to dwell in peace in our communities. Public safety is improved if immigrants are not loath to report crimes or to show up for their own legal or immigration required appointments without fear of immediate detention without due legal process, or have their children attend school and continue to advance peacefully in our commonwealth. We have seen in Latin America, Africa and other regions the devastation which governments can cause against their citizens, where the USA has been a beacon of hope. And we have seen the benefit when we welcome immigrants to participate fully in business and communities in our country and state: economic benefits which under the current environment are depressed, as many residents miss work and school and doctor appointments due to widespread dragnet approach to immigration by the federal government. I respectfully urge this committee to support the HBs listed above. Thank you.

We want public safety, not public abductions and executions. We have learned that ICE does not respect rule of law or human rights, so support these bills to keep Virginians safe. Every child deserves an education. Every child deserves to be safe at school. Every sick or injured person deserves medical care. So keep ICE out of our school, hospitals, and courthouses. No judicial warrant should mean no entry- and limit what civil arrests can take place in courthouses. We want police to protect, not persecute. So eliminate 287g agreements in Virginia. Allow our local law enforcement to do their job of keeping communities safe, instead of doing ICE's dirty work for them. We want rule of law, not rule by masked mobs. Do not allow law enforcement to cover their faces. That's not community policing- that's KKK tactics. We want free and fair elections, not a return to Jim Crow era intimidation at the polls. Citizens are not safe from ICE, either. Do not allow the federal government to use "immigration enforcement" as a rouse to silence eligible voters through fear and profiling. Support: HB650 - Callsen HB1260 - Shin HB1262 - Glass HB1264 - Shin HB1265 - Glass HB1438 - Guzman HB1440 - Lopez HB1441 - Lopez HB1442 - Lopez HB1453 - Williams HB1459 - Zehr HB1482 - Schmidt HB1492 - Shin

I’m very concerned with the overreaching of ICE. They have terrorized communities, broken apart families, disrupted children’s education, wrongfully detained people and even murdered American citizens. Please keep all safeguards in place to protect our citizens. Warrants should be in place before they come after people. ICE agents should follow the same laws and training that police officers are required to. ICE should not be allowed to wait outside or enter courthouses. They should not be wearing masks. This is leading to more dangerous escalations as we have seen in Minneapolis. Please vote to protect the rights of our people, maintain a safe community, and honor the laws and Constitution of our once great country. Please listen to your constituents. We are a country of immigrants and we are all humans. Do what is right.

As a long time resident of Virginia, I have watched the horrific attack on our immigrant population by our federal government. I write to encourage support of these bills to provide additional state protections to our local immigrant communities. It is the moral thing to do. Thank you. Stephanie Elms Alexandria VA

I strongly support every bill that limits federal immigration enforcement overreach. Virginia Majority stands in solidarity with immigrant communities across Virginia. We believe that all people, regardless of race, class, or immigration status, deserve to live with dignity, safety, and access to fundamental rights. I support policies that limit federal immigration enforcement overreach, protect access to courts and essential services, and prevent local resources from being used to separate families and criminalize our neighbors. Virginia must lead in protecting immigrant rights by establishing clear boundaries on immigration enforcement activities in our communities, ensuring safe access to schools, healthcare, courthouses, and other essential spaces, and maintaining the trust between local officials and the communities they serve. These policies have my support and are measures that would affirm Virginia’s commitment to being a place where all residents can participate fully in civic life without fear.

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

SUPPORT: HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, HB1482, HB1492. OPPOSE: HB1459 Our communities deserve protection from the overreach of the federal government. At a minimum, this means putting strong boundaries on the activity of federal immigration officers and requiring them to follow existing laws and those that are enacted by this general assembly. We need to protect sensitive spaces like schools, courtrooms, places of worship, hospitals and polling places from ICE/CBP intimidation. All officers - including local law enforcement - should be prohibited from wearing masks or face coverings and ID should be required. In addition, local law enforcement should be prohibited from entering agreements with federal immigration officers and judicial warrants for enforcement should be required. Currently our communities are less safe. We need to stop the unchecked abusive activity by ICE/CBP.

I am Kade Keller from Richmond, VA. I write in support of House Bills 1260, 1265, 1438, 1440, 1441, 1442, 1482, and 1492. These policies affirm Virginia’s commitment to being a place where all residents can participate fully in civic life without fear. Virginia must lead in protecting immigrant rights by establishing clear boundaries for immigration enforcement in our communities, ensuring safe access to schools, healthcare, courthouses, and other essential spaces, and maintaining trust between local officials and the communities they serve. All people, regardless of race, class, or immigration status, deserve to live with dignity, safety, and access to fundamental rights.

This is an opportunity for the Commonwealth to respect and protect the riaghts of ALL Virginia citizens. I strongly I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482.

My name is Rachel Waldstein. I am a resident of District #1. I am submitting this testimony in support of the following bills: • HB 650 Callsen Courthouses • HB 1260 Shin Public elementary/secondary schools, etc; federal immigration investigation and enforcement activities • HB 1262 Glass Va Consumer Protection Act • HB 1264 Shin Virginia Accountability Commission • HB 1265 Glass Courthouses • HB 1438 Guzman 287g • HB 1440 Lopez Protected Areas • HB 1441 Lopez 287g • HB 1442 Lopez Polling Place Protections • HB 1482 Schmidt facemasks • HB 1492 Shin Impersonating federal law enforcement officer I oppose the following bills: • HB 1453 Williams Approaching a first responder with specified intent after a warning; penalty • HB 1459 Zehr Ice-Free Communities Act; notification to federal immigration authorities of pending release of certain prisoners from custody I am a member of Congregation Etz Hayim in Arlington and spent a large part of my career representing the U.S. government in the protection of human rights around the world. I support HB 650, 1260, 1262, 1264, 1265, 1438, 1440, 1441, 1442, 1482, and 1492 based on my Jewish values and my life’s work. Jewish tradition and law recognize the equality and dignity of all people and respect their right to life, bodily integrity, health, housing, education, and due process. The Jewish people have been refugees many times in the past and have often experienced mistreatment by authoritarian governments. It is thus my duty to stand in support of marginalized communities and against government abuses. Law enforcement authorities should not deprive anyone--even those in this country illegally--of life, liberty, or property without following established legal procedures that respect their rights. Since the Federal government has abdicated its responsibilities before the law and Constitution, it is up to the States to uphold national and international human rights law. Passing the above listed bills will make our communities to be safer and will give Commonwealth officials a legal basis to push back on Federal law enforcement officials who break the law. I strongly believe HB 650, 1260, 1262, 1264, 1265, 1438, 1440, 1441, 1442, 1482, and 1492 will improve the lives of all Virginians by allowing us to return our focus to strengthening our economy, education and healthcare systems, and by returning a sense of humanity to our Commonwealth. I oppose HB 1453 and 1459, which I believe will create more fear in our communities and impede Virginians’ ability to express their First Amendment rights. I respectfully urge this committee to support HB 650, 1260, 1262, 1264, 1265, 1438, 1440, 1441, 1442, 1482, and 1492 and to oppose HB 1453 and 1459.

I strongly support the following bills and urge the committee members to pass them on so they can make their way to the House in order to be discussed by all the Delegates: HB1492, HB1482, HB1453, HB1442, HB1441, HB1440, HB1438, HB1265, HB1264, HB1262, HB1260, and HB650. These bills provide much needed limits on ICE agents, and life-saving protections for tens of thousands of people in our commonwealth. Please do the right thing and keep these bills alive and moving through our legislative system.

Support HB 650 1260 1262 1264 1265 1438 1440 1441 1442 1482

I write in support of House Bills 1260, 1265, 1438, 1440, 1441, 1442, 1482, and 1492. These policies affirm Virginia’s commitment to being a place where all residents can participate fully in civic life without fear. Virginia must lead in protecting immigrant rights by establishing clear boundaries for immigration enforcement in our communities, ensuring safe access to schools, healthcare, courthouses, and other essential spaces, and maintaining trust between local officials and the communities they serve. We must stand united to protect our immigrant communities from the threats coming from our federal government, as we do with the many other threats and challenges we face from the Trump Administration. All people, regardless of race, class, or immigration status, deserve to live with dignity, safety, and access to fundamental rights.

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

My name is Margaret Power. I have been a voting resident of District 6 for 37 years. I am submitting this testimony in support of most of the bills pending for your action today. I am the great-granddaughter of immigrants escaping poverty, famine, and persecution in their native land and striving to afford the ‘chain migration’ that re-united them with their families. I am the great-niece of German Jews who were denied entry and were murdered in Hitler’s camps. I am the daughter-in-law of an American Jewish woman, who, as a 13-year-old, escaped Poland and crossed a remote stretch of our northern border without documents during the Hitler years when America turned away refugees. I am the grandmother of two talented, bi-lingual and totally adorable Americans who are nearly as brown as their naturalized father, a Colombian-born doctor. I fear their own government will harm them. Or kill them. Truly- I cannot believe that a time has come in which it is not insane for me to have such fears. I belong to Temple Rodef Shalom in Falls church, where, in collaboration with other faith communities, we have long organized sustained support and services for new refugees, predominantly Afghan friends of the US. As Chairman Simon knows, our community actively advocates for inclusive and just public policy here in Richmond and in the nation’s capital. I respectfully urge you to send these bills forward and to advocate for their passage; collectively, they protect Virginians from violent abuses of federal power, they ensure that some of our essential public services- schools, hospitals and the courts- can be accessed by all; they preserve the sovereignty of the Commonwealth with respect to our law enforcement roles, while assuring federal-state-local collaboration with respect to removing criminals from our midst. As a package, they reinforce the rule of law, including protection of our constitutional rights; they reduce the likelihood of violence in our public spaces; they offer our neighbors - and my grandchildren- better protection by requiring federal immigration agents follow the same transparency standards as state and local law enforcement, and they restore some measure of confidence that we citizens are also unlikely to be kidnapped, injured or murdered so long as we are Virginians. I oppose passage of HB 1453, as it limits our right to free expression, and I also oppose HB1459, which is unnecessary because the Governor’s executive order allows federal-state cooperation with respect to convicted criminals, and, if read to add instances in which individuals can be delivered to DHS, would breach the boundaries established by HB 650 which I strongly support. I respectfully urge this subcommittee to support HB#650, HB#1260,HB#1262,HB#1264,HB#1265, HB#1438, B1440,HB1441,HB1442,HB1482, AND HB1492

I support all these bills which, to my reading of them, extend protections of the law to people attending court appointments so that they cannot be detained by immigration enforcement authorities (or people impersonating immigration enforcement authorities). I support requiring law enforcement officials to not wear masks and to have visible identification, and also not to engage in immigration enforcement activities. I also support bills which protect schools, churches, and private workplaces from immigration enforcement activities, and require judicial warrants (warrants signed by a judge) for any immigration enforcement operation. I would like to see bills requiring due process for any persons detained, including but not limited to access to a lawyer, ability to make phone calls, and right to be treated with dignity and humanity.

I fully support every bill that safeguards and protects our immigrant neighbors from the lawless, cruel, immoral and shameful acts committed by federal agents and DHS.

My name is Cindy Denton-Ade . I am a resident of Burke, District 10 . I am submitting testimony in support of bills HB 650, 1260 ,1262 ,1264, 1265,1438,1440,1441,1442,1448,1482,1492. I am a member of Temple B’nai Shalom. All of my Grandparents were immigrants from other counties: the Ukraine, Belarus. If not for the welcoming policies of the United States when they immigrated, they would have been surely been all killed in the Holocaust. My very lovely handyman, who comes from Columbia and is a citizen, was fearful about driving to D.C. Because he felt he would be targeted by ICE. This is not right! Jewish values promote welcoming and protecting the stranger. These bills will go a long way to do just. Virginia, my chosen home, has taken many positive actions since Governor Spanberger has taken office. Let these bills be an addition to actions we can be proud of in protecting immigrants men, women, and children.

HB 650 Clearly seeks to obstruct enforcement of federal law. OPPOSE HB 1260 Clearly seeks to obstruct enforcement of federal law. OPPOSE HB 1264 Clearly seeks to obstruct enforcement of federal law by attempting to intimidate federal law enforcement officers. OPPOSE. HB 1265 Clearly seeks to obstruct enforcement of federal law. OPPOSE HB 1438 Creates division between federal, state, and local law enforcement. Blatantly covers for illegals. OPPOSE HB 1440 Blatantly covers for illegals. OPPOSE HB 1441 Creates division between federal, state, and local law enforcement. Blatantly covers for illegals. OPPOSE HB 1442 If Illegals aren’t supposed to vote, why would this bill be needed? OPPOSE HB 1482 Clearly seeks to obstruct enforcement law enforcement by intimidating them. In some instances, their identity needs to be protected to prevent retribution. OPPOSE HB 1492 This is already a violation of federal law and is unnecessary. See 18 USC SS 912 and SS 913. OPPOSE

Hello, My name is Tyneshia Griffin and I am constituent in Kimberly Pope Adams's District 82. I am in strong support of HB1492, HB482, HB1441, HB1440, HB1438, HB1265, and HB650. These bills are urgently needed to protect immigrant communities and all communities in the state from racially motivated, state-sanctioned, community-based violence being executed by federal agents, local law enforcement affiliating with federal agencies, and citizens who may be motivated to violently target immigrants in the Commonwealth to also stoke fear, shame, panic, and harm on their of their own volition. In my area, ICE has invaded public spaces, kidnapping folks from bus stations for example, making it less safe for members of my community, including myself access transportation, feel safe to move about in our community, and safe free detainment and incarceration. I do not depend on transit solely, but when I need it, it is incredibly helpful for helping me get around the area safely and cheaply. Seniors with no transportation support, folks getting to and from work, students going to school, and folks looking for temporary shelter deserve access to safe public transit, streets, schools, faith centers, workplaces, courthouse, neighborhoods - throughout their entire community. My neighbors and I deserve to be treated with dignity and protected from community-violence and detainment in inhumane jails/camps and these bills provide for that and a failure to pass them fails to complete these responsibilities by leaders and the state. Protect Virginians, protect immigrant communities now.

My name is Karen Menichelli, and I have resided in Arlington, VA, for over 40 years, currently living in House District 1. I have cherished the diverse and welcoming nature of my community and feel enriched by the many immigrants from around the world who have decided to make their lives here. I am worried for my neighbors given the unnecessarily reckless and cruel practices of our federal immigration officers exhibited in cities like Portland, OR, and Minneapolis, WI. I don’t want those behaviors, which sow mistrust and waste resources, brought to Virginia. I want to protect the humanity, dignity, and safety of our immigrant neighbors and allow free access to important community services without fear of harassment or harm from federal agents. Therefore, I strongly support the above indicated cluster of bills under consideration by the Public Safety Subcommittee and urge the subcommittee to champion these bills and send strong versions to the full House for a vote.

My name is Ricki Henschel. I am a resident of District 3. I am submitting this testimony on behalf of Jews United for Justice in support of all of the following bills: HB 650, HB1260, HB1262, HB1264, HB1265, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, HB1482, and HB1492. JUFJ organizes Jewish Virginians and allies in support of local campaigns for social, racial, and economic justice. Judaism teaches that we are all made in the image of God. The Bible is clear that we are to welcome the stranger, as this is mentioned more times than any other obligation in the Bible. The assault on and kidnapping of individuals by ICE, pulled from their cars, their homes, their places of work, as if they were violent criminals, is directly in opposition of Jewish values, and should not be happening in our state. . The vast majority of those arrested are not individuals who have committed any crime, and many are in the process of obtaining legal status. We also know that citizens are also being taken because they fit the profile. The ICE raids and deportation machine are harming people indiscriminately: Parents, children, and students are being swept up as they attend routine immigration check-ins and court hearings, go to work, and run their errands. In my community, children are scared to go to school, and parents are concerned about taking their children to school, including those who with legal status, as the reality is that ICE is sweeping up individuals based on skin color and accents. Asking for papers and documentation and creating a reality where people feel they have to always have their papers on them everywhere they go, is reminiscent of every society that has been overtaken by autocracy. In addition, as an individual who has experienced sexual violence, it is no surprise that many in our community are afraid to go to our courts or access services. Everyone should be able to live with safety and dignity – including going to court without fear. Enabling law enforcement to be masked adds to the trauma being created. In addition, state and local police need to be seen as those protecting our communities, not as part of the federal work of ICE. And most recently, the threat of having ICE at polling places has been introduced. This must not be allowed in Virginia. Many citizens fit ICE’s profile, and they will be harassed and maybe too frightened to go to the polls. This can not be allowed. I respectfully urge this committee to support each of these bills that control the methods and manner in which ICE operates within our borders–HB 650, HB1260, HB1262, HB1264, HB1265, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, HB1482, and HB1492. We have the right to require them to follow our laws and the US Constitution. We must welcome the stranger.

I am a resident of Reston, VA. I am a US Army veteran and Federal retiree with almost 30 years of service to the US. My father’s side of my family immigrated to this country from England sometime in the 1630s. My mother’s side of the family immigrated from Scotland in the late 1750s. To the best of my knowledge, they were undocumented. I believe strongly that I have a right to stay in this country. I have met, heard about, read about, and studied people who have been here longer than my family, and some who have come very recently. If we examine the accomplishments and potential of these folks who arrived before or after my family, none are less deserving of a right to be here. As you study our history and our culture, one realizes that the contributions of immigrants are what makes this country so unique and wonderful. It isn’t how big our Army is, it’s the fact that you can find a taco truck, an Ethiopian restaurant, pottery from Poland, and fashion from France on the same block. It’s in the fact that nearly 100 languages are spoken as mother tongues in Fairfax County Schools. It’s in knowing that this country was built on the backs of African slaves and immigrants from every continent in the world, and the cultures of those immigrants have mixed into the most wonderful stew that we are allowed to enjoy every day. Now, let’s get real. Undocumented people can’t vote, aren’t eligible for benefits, and pay taxes into our system. They work very hard for low wages. Immigrants, much less those who are undocumented, commit crimes at SIGNIFICANTLY lower rates than white men. In short, immigrants are a net gain for our society. The images and stories we are seeing regarding ICE and CBP untrained, unprofessional paramilitary wreaking havoc in Minneapolis is like watching footage from another country. I keep asking myself how we got here, while unfortunately, people of color are saying it has been this way all along. Given that we weren’t aware of the total number of people ICE and CBP killed until they murdered two white people, I am concluding they must be correct. In 2025/26, 40 people have died at the hands of ICE. That is 40 too many. I am in favor of any legislation that hinders the ability of ICE to murder more people regardless of race, color, gender, age, national origin, religion, sexual preference, genetic information, immigration status, or whether or not they are exercising their 1st, 2nd, 4th, or 14th Amendment rights. I am in favor of any legislation that allows immigrants a path to citizenship. While a small minority of people may disagree with me, this is NOT a white nation, and I am against any legislation that tries to turn it into one — even if it is couched in pretty language like “protecting our ‘heritage,’ or ‘our women.’” Please pass any legislation that treats our immigrant population in accordance with human rights, human dignity, civic sense, and common decency. Thank you.

(This plea concerns all House and Senate bills that would provide greater protections for our immigrant population and stop government overreach by DHS and ICE.) Letter of Support for Policies Protecting Immigrants Dear Governor Spanberger, Virginia Delegates, and Virginia Senators, As a citizen who sees all humans as treasured and worthy of respect, I ask you, Governor Spanberger and all Virginia delegates and senators, to support all ICE OUT bills, specifically the following bills to benefit the lives of all citizens and provide specific protections for our immigrant community: HB 660 | HB 836 | HB 911 | HB 1161 | HB 1260 | HB 1265 | HB 1438 | HB 1440 | HB 1441 | HB 1442 | HB 1482 | HB 1492 SB 351 | SB 352 | SB 446 | SB 783 | What each of us has witnessed in California, Washington State, Chicago, North Carolina, and Minneapolis to include traumatization of targeted people and onlookers, great injury, and execution style killings must not become business as usual in Virginia. Please regard the humanity in each person across our Commonwealth and support the passage of these bills. Thank you, Mary Lib Morgan 12401 Dutton Road | Apt 2409 | Midlothian, VA 23113 (804) 928-2057

I am writing in strong support of each of the indicated bills that aim to protect immigrants, and those perceived as immigrants, from the threat and violence perpetuated by ICE. As a Social Worker that works across the Central Virginia region, I have seen my neighbors and clients directly harmed by ICE. Families have been torn apart, resulting in physical, psychological, and financial harm. Furthermore, the threat of ICE has prevented communities I care about from safely accessing healthcare, basic needs, public spaces, and even school. These policies would take an important step to protect the rights and livelihoods of all Virginians, and they would affirm our commonwealth's commitment to ensuring its residents have safe and fair access to participating in civic life.

As a longtime Virginia resident and a person of faith, I am alarmed by ICE's and the DHS's recent gross misconduct, including murdering U.S. citizen. Therefore: I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

I support any bill that abolishes ICE. We need to go back to a civilized nation. At the moment we are not one. Killing innocent Americans for demonstrating their first amendment rights. We need to stop rounding up people for the color of their skin. This is not a Wild West rodeo. Our government has violated numerous constitutional laws by not doing lawful procedures. We promised after the concentration camps where Japanese citizens were detained that America would not do that again. Again America has broken its promise to its citizens. They are removing people who are not criminals and people seeking a better life. Some as they appear for court hearings that they needed to do to become citizens. Let’s go back to a civilized country and start respecting both law and order and stop quotas on human beings. You are helping Americans and the world lose any respect left for America and its government. The three murders that gunned down Renee Good and Alex Pretti had YEARS on the CBP or ICE before those killings. It was like watching a firing squad executing people for no reason. Just being around people that were trigger happy and had no training from years ago. I have watched children have guns held up to their faces. CHILDREN. You are taught to never draw your weapon as a fear tactic or a control technique. It’s common knowledge. Let’s make real immigration laws that help people become American. These immigrants pay more into our treasury than Trump did for three years only paying $750 each year. Or Amazon that paid no taxes. The immigrants contribute to our country and economy unlike billionaires and corporations. Actually we have subsidized Elon more than any taxes he has paid. He has caused more harm to America and Americans safety than any immigrant. Stop this funding of this illegal under trained private police that is not protecting Americans but killing them. I question how anyone who supports this can even say they are Christian. From the brutality of humans in detention, lack of medical care, food that I would only put in my compost bin, to breaking up families, the abuse and murder I have seen and the rounding up by skin color. You do know Jesus was a dark skin Palestinian don’t you? So guess he would be rounded up if he was around today. I have never been so ashamed to be an American and I’m 72 years old. But I know it wasn’t me that made the decisions it was you. That gives me some peace. Find your soul, remember again why we were given the statue of liberty or let’s donate it to a country worthy of that beacon of light. We are distinguishing its significance. I hope you also were able to see the monks marching for peace. They are true humans with love and kindness to all. I am grateful to see so many people touched by them and their journey. In solidarity, Cindy Johnston

Please vote in favor of protecting our immigrants from ICE harm!

I am a long time citizen of Henrico and I am horrified at what is happening with ICE and border patrol in my country now. I hardly recognize this country or the Republican party any more. I am asking all of my reps to do whatever you can to defund ICE and to make them take their masks off, to get much better training and to have signed warrants whenever they are looking for specific people. Finally they should not be allowed to go in schools or houses of worship. Thankyou.

I SUPPORT all bills EXCEPT HB1459 I OPPOSE HB1459

Bills: HB1265 (Glass) and HB650 (Callsen) Position: SUPPORT Courthouses must function as neutral, accessible spaces where individuals can participate in legal proceedings without fear of unrelated civil enforcement actions. HB1265 and HB650 are essential to preserving access to justice and due process in the Commonwealth by prohibiting civil arrests in courthouses and establishing enforceable protections. Legal and empirical research demonstrates that the threat of civil arrest—particularly immigration enforcement—in or around courthouses has a documented chilling effect on court participation. Individuals who fear arrest are less likely to appear for hearings, serve as witnesses, comply with court orders, or seek protective relief, undermining both due process and judicial efficiency (Eagly, 2019; Kohli et al., 2011). In Virginia, these impacts are especially acute in General District and Juvenile & Domestic Relations Courts, where survivors seek protective orders, parents appear in custody matters, and tenants and workers pursue basic legal remedies. When individuals avoid court out of fear, cases are delayed or dismissed, warrants may issue for failure to appear, and victims and witnesses are effectively silenced. This does not enhance public safety—it weakens it. Virginia’s court system depends on voluntary participation to function effectively. Research shows that enforcement activity in civic spaces erodes trust in legal institutions and reduces cooperation with courts and law enforcement, particularly in immigrant communities (Eagly, 2019). This erosion directly conflicts with the Commonwealth’s interest in efficient case resolution and community safety. Importantly, prohibiting civil arrests in courthouses does not prevent lawful enforcement elsewhere. Instead, it draws a clear boundary that protects the integrity of court proceedings. Jurisdictions that separate civil enforcement from courthouse activity report improved court appearance rates and increased willingness of victims and witnesses to engage with the justice system (Kohli et al., 2011). HB1265 and HB650 reinforce courthouse neutrality, strengthen due process, and support public safety by ensuring that access to justice is not conditioned on a person’s immigration status or vulnerability to civil enforcement. I respectfully urge the committee to report both bills favorably and protect our neighbors here in Virginia. Eagly, I. V. (2019). Immigration enforcement and access to justice. UCLA Law Review, 66, 100–170. Kohli, A., Markowitz, P. L., & Chavez, L. (2011). Secure Communities by the numbers: An analysis of demographics and due process. Chief Justice Earl Warren Institute on Law and Social Policy.

The Justice and Witness Action Network – Virginia of the United Church of Christ supports HB1265. As people of faith, we are deeply disturbed by the abuse of basic human rights and the constitutional violations being perpetrated in our communities by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents. ICE is terrorizing our immigrant population, the vast majority of whom are NOT criminals. The way arrests are being carried out creates an atmosphere of distrust between residents and local law enforcement officials. Targeting of individuals at courthouses is especially egregious, because if immigrants fear that showing up in court may result in detention and possible deportation, our justice system itself becomes compromised. People are afraid to show up for routine legal hearings. Victims are afraid to report crimes, witnesses won’t show up to testify – leading to further erosion of public safety and creation of a climate of fear that destabilizes our entire community. Our courthouses should be safe spaces that are off limits to ICE. We urge you to vote yes on HB1265 to protect everyone’s access to Virginia’s judicial system.

I strongly support all the proposed legislation for protecting my neighbors and community, providing civil causes of action, placing a 9/1/26 termination date on existing local ICE agreements. We should not be using our tax dollars and other resources to assist a law-breaking federal government that is pardoning drug traffickers, killing and detaining legal residents and citizens, and promising protection for its agents who violate our Constitutional rights. Thank you.

I write in support of House Bills 1260, 1265, 1438, 1440, 1441, 1442, and 1482. In combination, these bills form a framework to protect civil liberties, reinforce the integrity of public institutions, and clearly define the appropriate scope of law enforcement authority in Virginia. These bills ensure that schools, courthouses, polling places, and other civic spaces remain accessible and safe; that individuals can participate in education, the justice system, and elections without fear or intimidation; and that enforcement actions are transparent, accountable, and grounded in judicial authorization. Collectively, they strengthen public trust by drawing clear boundaries between state and federal roles, prioritizing due process, and strengthening public safety by upholding constitutional rights.

The Virginia State Conference supports HB 650 HB 221 HB 1265

VACFSY IS IN SUPPORT OF THESE BILLS

I’m the sister of a murdered brother in 1994. Carl Griffey who killed my brother with sawed off shotgun recd 168 years in 1995 but since 2006 he’s been going up for parole yearly. Now he is approximately 68 and is Eligible for the “geriatric release” My Mother died from a broken heart and I promised her I will fight to keep him in a cage til I’m dead. My brother was trying to help Carl’s girlfriend from Carl’s anger but Carl was jealous and shot my brother from 10 feet away with sawed off shotgun. Blew my brothers chest AWAY. At the viewing my Mother touched my brother Harry’s chest and it was PLASTIC. I HAD TO LIE TO HER AND TELL HER THATS HOW PEOPLE ARE PREPARED FOR BURIAL. Now I’m the oldest and took care of all arrangements for my brother. I have 2 younger sisters! My brother never was able to meet my sister’ children nor grandchildren nor mine. He needs to stay on that cage til he DIES.

I urge you to vote in favor of these bills, all of which have a common interest -- to protect Virginia residents from unconstitutional action by Federal authorities that are charged with protecting the population. The bills are : HB 650, 1260, 1262, 1264, 1265, 1438, 1440, 1441, 1442, 1482, 1492. My family knows a naturalized U.S. citizen from El Salvador who came to the United States because he married a U.S. citizen. He was arrested in Pennsylvania and held for three days, because they thought he might be an undocumented alien based on racial/ethnic profiling. He had to hire a lawyer to get out. Virginia law enforcement must not cooperate with Federal security forces that are carrying out such unconstitutional activities. My name is Julie Schechter Torres. I am a member of Temple Rodef Shalom. Our houses of worship must be safe from activities by law enforcement. Our schools must be safe for children. I know a 9-year-old child who is legally present in the United States but didn't want to go to school for days after ICE went to her ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. Children are not a threat. If ICE is focusing on criminals - as they say they are - they are in the wrong place. Going there to capture adults is once again using children as "bait". I have lived in countries where criminals stop cars and kidnap people. There is no way to know that law enforcement authorities are who they say they are if they wear masks and don't show identification. There is no reason someone carrying out legal law enforcement activities should need to hide who they are or what they are doing. Masking is just a means of covering up unlawful action. Please pass these bills to protect Virginians.

Altagracia Kubinyi National Domestic Workers Alliance & Care in Action We strongly support the language: HB 1438 (ICE agreements: Del. Guzmán version) In 1917, Carmelita Torres stood up against the cruelty of anti-immigrant laws. More than a century later, that cruelty still exists. I am a proud Afro-Latina, and today, I do not feel safe in the state I love. As I drive through Northern Virginia, Arlington, Loudoun, Fairfax, or Alexandria, I am constantly alert. I measure every turn, every stoplight, every police car, because if I am pulled over, I don’t know if I will make it back home. Recent collaboration with ICE has made everyday life a risk. In cities like Alexandria, our communities face some of the most unsafe conditions since there has been a lot of unclear role from police and ice. I am a former domestic worker, and now an organizer in Northern Virginia with the National Domestic Workers Alliance and Care in Action. I know firsthand how essential safety is—not just for workers, but for the families who depend on us. Domestic workers create stability. We care for children, elders, homes, and families so others can go to work, build careers, and live with dignity. Today, I honor the bravery of those who came before us. Juana Colón, from Comerío, Puerto Rico, protected her comrades from police violence and was tragically shot. Her courage reminds us that working people have always had to fight for dignity—and many still do today. That is why I urge you to support HB 1438, a bill that would end 287(g) agreements and limit voluntary collaboration between Virginia’s state and local law enforcement and ICE. These agreements have caused grave violations of human rights: unlawful detention, racial profiling, and the devastating separation of families. When local police enforce civil immigration laws, trust is destroyed. Immigrant communities are pushed into the shadows, making everyone less safe. Supporting HB 1438 is about dignity. It is about safety. It is about justice. I respectfully urge you to vote in favor of HB 1438. Thank you. ¡Sí se puede!

Elizabeth Reyna de Sorto My name is Elizabeth Reyna de Sorto, and I am a resident of Loudoun County. We arrived in this country in 2019. We came together as a family—my children, my husband, and I. From the outset, we settled here in Virginia. My husband and I began working and paying taxes. We also started the process to resolve our immigration status. We obtained our driver’s licenses, and last year we received our work permits under the protection of a U Visa. When we received the U Visa work permit, we felt that our family finally had stability. But sadly, in January of this year, everything changed. My husband was on his way to work when he was stopped in a traffic stop by Leesburg police. He showed his driver’s license and waited patiently. The officer went back to his car and stayed inside until four ICE vehicles arrived. They took my husband without saying anything to him, despite the fact that he had a valid work permit and a valid driver’s license. He was detained for two weeks in ICE custody and then deported to El Salvador. We do not understand why they committed this injustice, leaving me alone with our five children and all the expenses. My husband is the head of our household, and this situation is affecting us economically and psychologically. These are some of the injustices we are suffering. I ask you to approve all the bills that protect our communities from ICE raids in Virginia—especially those that eliminate 287(g) and all the contracts associated with it. Thank you.

I am wanting to write in support of HB 650, HB 1260, HB 1265, HB 1438. These bills would work towards truly and wellbeing of helping the community that lives here within the Commonwealth. The behavior and actions of federal officers are dangerous as they are spreading fear and harm that directly work against the trust and wellbeing of many immigrants and other people of color that are present here. Many of those who are directly impacted as they are less likely to feel safe to contact emergency services for life saving care, going to the store for groceries, taking children to school, going to court for things even like protective orders that could help promote their safety- to just name a few. People deserve the ability to live with dignity and safety and these bills would take the necessary steps to helping promote public safety for all.

Public Comment on HB 1438 Submitted by: Edwuan Whitehead, Public Policy Director, Center for Common Ground Bill: HB 1438 Mr. Chairman and Members of the subcommittee, My name is Edwuan Whitehead and I serve as the Public Policy Director for the Center for Common Ground. Our organization works across the Commonwealth to ensure that every community including immigrant communities Black and Brown communities and low income families can engage safely and fully in public life. I am submitting this comment in strong support of HB 1438. HB 1438 strengthens public safety by restoring clear boundaries between state level responsibilities and federal immigration authority. The bill prohibits state and local agencies from entering or renewing agreements that allow officers to perform the functions of federal immigration agents. It also prevents people from being held past their lawful release date based solely on administrative requests from immigration authorities. This protects Virginians from unlawful detention and protects localities from costly legal exposure. Community trust is essential for effective policing. When residents believe that any interaction with a local officer could turn into an immigration inquiry people become less likely to report crimes seek help or cooperate as witnesses. HB 1438 directly addresses that problem by prohibiting officers from asking about immigration status citizenship or place of birth during routine stops searches or arrests unless this information is material to a criminal investigation. This approach strengthens safety without compromising any legitimate investigative needs. The bill still preserves full compliance with valid judicial warrants and all federal disclosure requirements. Nothing in HB 1438 prevents cooperation required under state or federal law. It only stops voluntary immigration enforcement activities that have repeatedly proven to undermine public safety and weaken constitutional protections. HB 1438 is balanced. It protects people in custody from unlawful transfers and it addresses coercion intimidation and threats tied to actual or perceived immigration status. It also provides a civil remedy for individuals harmed by violations of the statute and directs the Attorney General to issue guidance to support consistent implementation. When Virginians feel safe reporting crimes and engaging with their local government every community benefits. HB 1438 affirms that public safety in our Commonwealth must be grounded in trust fairness and adherence to the law. For these reasons I respectfully urge the committee to advance HB 1438. Thank you for your time and consideration. Edwuan Whitehead Public Policy Director Center for Common Ground

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills protect sensitive spaces such as courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places, and hospitals from intimidation by federal immigration enforcement. They strengthen public trust and improve accountability by restricting law enforcement officers from obscuring their identities. I oppose HB1459, which would force state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would seriously damage public trust in local law enforcement.

I have watched the news and live feeds from Minneapolis, and today I watched testimonies of violations, physical abuse and murder by ICE. It is hard to not see we are in a Constitutional and humanitarian crisis at a scale I never thought could happen here. Please do not bring this to VA. As Virginia is the birthplace of our Constitution, can we make the choice to refuse this standing army, search and seizures? the beatings and destruction of property and disruption of freedom peace and commerce ICE and similar agencies leave in their wake? We are not being protected by them, but living in terror of them. The trust is gone. And, every decent law enforcement officer carries the massive burden of association with these violent, incompetent, sadistic, rogue, racist hypocrites. Ice must be abolished NOW. Humane reform to immigration law, the justice system, detention conditions (including medical care, oversight without notice, access to lawyers without being shipped out, family visits, and provisions for the safety of people who trusted our country as asylum seekers .) As for actual ,violent criminals- we have a system in place and none of this is necessary if we have trust between communities and law enforcement. Ice needs to be scrapped first for something new - for the people, with the consent of the people , to take its place. What are they but roving patrols racial profiling? I am PROUD of our civil rights legacy in our state. We can take a stand and refuse funding and quartering. We should all be able to look to law enforcement as heroes- the people we could call for help. Every act by ICE... The stalking in the streets, the threats to peaceful protestors and Constitutional recorders, and the fear so many goo community members, citizens snd non-citizens live with every day does not even feel like our country. To think we spend this massive amount of money to torment people working hard and doing their best? I'd rather the money go to give a family a shot at the American Dream, instead of paying someone to try to turn guns on them for pay. Our immigrants- They are our heart. They love this country and its promise. They are strong and brave and they work hard and have strong families and faith. They are full of love and share art, culture, dance, music, food and traditions, a love for community many of us can learn from. It is a terrible thing to not embrace and love these people who give so much and ask for so little. I cannot understand how these people are treated like an object to kick, hold down, choke, gun down, jail or murder, without so much as looking at paperwork. Please end this now, for the love of God. If you do not abolish ICE, remove funding and contracts and don't allow masks or lack of badges. Help prosecute when THEY are the violent criminals. But really, get them out and keep them out. Let our own trained police officers handle the crime. Thank you.

I am a resident in the city of Richmond and I demand the restriction and removal of ICE agents from our communities. I support the bills put forth that seek to limit the access and activities of immigration and law enforcement agents. Thank you

My name is Lillian Komarow. I am a resident of District 12. I am submitting this testimony in support of HB 1441, HB 1440, HB 1442, HB 650, HB 1260, HB 1262, HB 1265, HB 1438, HB 1482, and HB 1492. I am also writing in opposition to HB 1459. I grew up in the extremely diverse Northern Virginia area and I know that immigrants are a huge part of what makes Virginia the beautiful melting pot that it is. I know that immigrants have a wide array of reasons to come to Virginia, but ultimately my personal experience has shown me that immigrants want to live and work in peace. They contribute to Virginia in many positive ways economically and culturally– not that that should be a requirement to be treated humanely. Even if I did not have this background, I would know that the terror we are seeing ICE indiscriminately inflict on undocumented immigrants and US citizens alike across the country is abhorrent. It is imperative that Virginia citizens are able to freely access community services without fear of harassment from federal agents. Across the country we are seeing ICE and CBP agents deliberately terrorize families simply trying to take their children to school or to the doctor. There have been stories on the news of domestic violence victims being too afraid of ICE terrorization to show up to their court dates. Ultimately the actions of ICE are deterring people from accessing important services, and this creates ripple effects into the community by making us ALL less safe. Please protect Virginia citizens by passing HB 1440, HB 650, HB 1260, through. The Commonwealth has both the right and the duty to ensure free and fair election for its citizens. Elections cannot be free and fair when people are afraid of being detained at polling places solely due to their appearance. ICE agents’ presence at polling places would be nothing short of voter intimidation. Please protect the sanctity of our elections by passing HB 1442 through. The responsibility of local and state law enforcement should be to protect and serve Virginia citizens, not waste our resources and create mistrust by collaborating with increasingly hostile federal immigration operations. In addition to sapping limited state and local resources, collaboration blurs accountability for racial profiling and other abusive tactics federal agents take, and opens Virginia police departments up to lawsuits. Both law enforcement leaders and crime victim advocacy organizations alike have spoken out against Virginia law enforcement participating in immigration enforcement, citing eroded trust between police and victims, and even described instances of domestic violence and sexual assault survivors being unwilling to seek assistance. Please pass HB 1442 to prevent this mistrust and wasting of resources, as well as HB 1262 so that Virginians can trust that they are not falling into a trap when seeking immigration assistance services, HB 1264 so that Virginia citizens know they have an Accountability Commission keeping watch on federal agents conducting military style operations in the Commonwealth, and HB 1482 so that federal agents can further be held accountable by not concealing their identity. For the purpose of protecting Virginians, our resources, and our right to free and fair elections, I respectfully urge this committee to support HB 1441, HB 1440, HB 1442, HB 650, HB 1260, HB 1262, HB 1265, HB 1438, HB 1482, and HB 1492 and oppose HB 1459.

Dear Virginia House of Delegates, I am writing in support of all bills in this Block 1 subcommittee (HB650; HB1260; HB1262; HB1264; HB1265; HB1438; HB1440; HB1441; HB1442; HB1453; HB1459; HB1482; and HB1492). Each bill has the same underlying principles, in my view, that undergird each one and is worthy of widespread support and consideration. 1) Greater accountability for any abuses of power - something our government is supposedly predicated upon from its foundations of checks and balances. 2) Respect of human dignity - lest we forget another person's humanity and spiral into forms of depravity experienced on widespread scale even within our lifetimes, our parents' lifetimes, or our grandparents' lifetimes, anytime dehumanization becomes the norm and public opinion becomes apathetic we ought to have sirens blaring warning signals. As a conflict prevention and response professional, I have thorough knowledge of human rights abuses at widespread scale at the hands of unchecked power -- the enslavement of Africans and brutality of the chattel slave trade and its legacy of abuses through the Jim Crow Era onward, the forced disappearances of Argentina and Chile, the Holocaust, forced kidnappings and assimilations of First Nations and Native American children at Indian Boarding Schools in Canada and the United States, and more. These bills hold that some places ought to be preserved to honor the humanity in our neighbors, even those who may be undocumented - polling places, courthouses, schools. These bills provide guardrails that Virginia needs to both maintain the humanity of all people, even those who are undocumented. It serves to safeguard the hearts and minds of those citizens and legal residents who have been continuously profiled based on their perceived or actual national origin, and provides more psychological safety for those in our communities who are being targeted from the national stage to local actors dispatched from ICE who have done nothing unlawful. These forcible, unchecked, and brute forces of strength have brought about unnecessary and widespread fear, school absences, medical inattention for fear of being targeted in public, and traumatic experiences for young children and youth. Virginia House of Delegates must provide a healthy check and balance and honor its constituents. Vote in support of these bills. Sincerely, Jena Kitchen

We support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB4141, HB1442 AND HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces such as courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This legislation is intended to strengthen the public trust in our civic places and to improve accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure the identity of members of law enforcement. We are particularly mindful of comments suggesting that ICE members might surround polling places in our November 2026 elections. The presence of masked individuals in any of Virginia’s polling places would interfere with the electoral process at all levels and discourage people from freely exercising their right to vote. The intimidation of voters has no place in this Commonwealth. The Silver Team for Democracy is a group of senior citizens registered to vote in Virginia.

I support this bill and am in favor of the increased safety it will provide for our communities and for my neighbors. I support banning face coverings for federal officers, restricting immigration enforcement officers to 40 feet from polling places, and prohibiting immigration enforcement from schools, hospitals and other above mentioned safe spaces. Limits need to be placed on rogue federal agents, due process upheld and American communities protected.

I am a resident of Alexandria, VA House District 5. I am writing in support of bills in support of HB650, HB1260, HB 1262, HB 1264, HB1265, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, HB1482, and HB1492. These bills are a critical way that we Virginian's can ensure the safety of our communities from Federal overreach. HB650, HB1440, and HB1442 would protect areas that were traditionally not targeted for immigration enforcement. These places, schools, hospitals, courts, places of worship, are critical in ensuring the safety and wellbeing of our community. Right now, families regardless of their immigration status are afraid to leave their houses in order to attend church, go to school, get medical care, or attend important court hearings because they are rightfully worried they will be unjustly detained by ICE due to the color of their skin, the language they speak, or their accent. These bills would help restore access to these Virginians. HB1442 is especially important, as it stops enforcement of immigration laws within 40 feet of polling locations. Given statements by the administration on using ICE around polling places, this bill is critical to ensuring the integrity of our elections. HB1438, HB1441, and HB1482 are critical in building public trust with state and local law enforcement. Currently, federal immigration agents do not identify themselves and wear masks. This causes not only fear in the community and obstruct accountability for these agents, but it makes communities distrust any person wearing camo or who looks like law enforcement as it is difficult to tell who is a federal agent and who is our local law enforcement. These bills also work to prohibit local/state law enforcement to enforce federal immigration law without a judicial warrant. This takes the burden off of local law enforcement in determining what type of warrant they must honor and how they should interact with federal immigration authorities. Finally, HB1260 ensures that schools across the Commonwealth understand and have a plan to interact with immigration enforcement. This bill instructs schools to limit immigration authorities from entering nonpublic areas without a judicial warrant, again restoring to children their ability to attend school without fear. This bill also removes the responsibility and burden from local school boards in determining when and how they should respond to federal immigration authorities, and protects them from being targeted by the administration. In totality, these bills protect Virginians and work to return to them their rights to due process and their sense of safety and dignity that have been taken by the administration.

Any even mildly engaged Virginian ought be alarmed at the slow civil war being carried out on the people of Minneapolis. That is why I fully support HB1264 and HB1482 as critical societal checks on the administration's unfettered military force. Additionally, I support HB650/HB1260 (aren't these the same bill?), HB1265, HB1438, HB1440, and HB1441 for creating safe places and walling off our own government and enforcement agencies from this radical influence. Lastly, steps taken in HB1442 could become extremely important to protecting our democracy as the administration would spiritually invert the Second and Third Enforcement Acts, using the same federal authority that stopped the KKK from harassing black voters in 1870 to instead perform the same kind of intimidation on brown voters in 2026. I oppose HB1459's mandate of cooperation with ICE to snatch untried people out of custody, circumvent the consequences of convicted people by our own justice system, or enact additional punitive measures post incarceration. There is additional alarming language that might imply "going after the families". If state and local PD have a case where they want to cooperate, they already can do so. This bill removes that choice and puts it into a provably untrustworthy institution. I generally support HB1262 and HB1492 for cracking down on bad actors that would take advantage of these troubling times. However, I question the necessity of HB1492: while the long imagined scenario is extremely troubling, we have already seen what evils actual ICE officers are capable of, and how low the bar for entry is. Would this actually help? I mislike HB1453, which goes against our rights as American citizens and good Samaritans to non-violently oppose the actions of federal terrorists.

It would be wrong for the Commonwealth to provide additional assistance to federal immigration enforcement while those federal officers obscure their identities, flout the nation's laws and harass and detain citizens. Do not permit these same federal officers into our schools, hospitals or state offices without authorization.

My name is Yonah Walter. I am a resident of District 10. I am writing in support of bills which enhance public trust in our law enforcement and respect civil rights in our communities. I am a volunteer with the Virginia chapter of Jews United for Justice, but I speak as the great-grandson of immigrants who came as chain migrants with the help of the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS), and as someone inculcated with strong Jewish values including a bedrock principle of respect for all. The American promise of "liberty and justice for all" was a strong call for my family, but to now hear our government speak so coldly about immigrants - let alone to see how our government has mistreated those they even suspect of being immigrants - has disappointed me greatly. The shooting deaths by ICE of nearly a dozen Americans in just the last few months, and the immoral and self-serving rush by the government to blame the victims in those shootings, demands we act to curb these abuses and keep our government in check. We need accountability from government agents, which includes the right to know who purports to represent us and act on our behalf in law enforcement. We need to protect access to public spaces like courthouses and (perhaps especially) polling places. We need to vigorously protect the right of people to move freely without fear of harassment or assault by law enforcement. We need to restore trust in our government. I respectfully urge this committee to support the following: HB650 HB1260 HB1262 HB1264 HB1265 HB1438 HB1440 HB1441 HB1442 HB1482 HB1492

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills protect sensitive spaces such as courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places, and hospitals from intimidation by federal immigration enforcement. They strengthen public trust and improve accountability by restricting law enforcement officers from obscuring their identities. I oppose HB1459, which would force state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would seriously damage public trust in local law enforcement.

I am writing in support of HB1438. Over the past months I have been completely horrified by the unconscionable acts committed by immigration officials, in Minnesota and across the country. I have seen my fellow Americans gunned down in the streets. I have seen people being dragged from their homes. I have seen a 5 year old boy used as bait, to lure other family members into the hands of immigration officials. This madness must stop, and it is the responsibility of every elected official to do everything in their power to protect their communities from this violence. It is the responsibility of every elected official to ensure that ICE, DHS and immigration cannot commit any more atrocities on our streets. This bill provides many of the protections our communities need, including prohibiting state/local law enforcement from entering agreements with federal immigration officers; requiring judicial warrants for enforcement of immigration and prohibiting state employees or law-enforcement from conducting actions or inquiries regarding immigration. I strongly support HB1438 and the protections it will put in place, and I ask that the House of Delegates does as well.

My name is Paula Roney. I am a resident of District 3. I am submitting this testimony in support of HB650, HB1260, HB 1262, HB 1264, HB1265, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, HB1482, and HB1492. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This would strengthen public trust and improve accountability. As a long time Virginia public school educator, a grandchild of immigrants who came to this country to escape persecution, and a member of Jews United for Justice, I know the importance of welcoming immigrants to our country. I’ve worked with many students who came to the United States, often on their own, to escape harrowing circumstances. It is vital that they, and all other people are able to attend school, receive medical treatment and be able to access the legal system without fear. Therefore it is critical that our Commonwealth protects access to these vital community services. I respectfully urge this committee to support these bills. Thank you.

My name is Susan Kohn. I am a resident of District 15. I am submitting this testimony in support of HB 650,1260, 1262,1264,1265,1438,1440,1441,1453,1492 and in opposition of HB 1459 and 1482. As a pediatrician I am horrified to see my immigrant patients and their families living in fear. I work with children through a non-profit organization that helps to provide access to medical and dental care in Fairfax County. We see hardworking families who are afraid to access health care or even to send their children to school. They worry when someone leaves the house. Will they come back from work, the grocery store, court or school- or be taken by ICE? How can they continue to provide for their children? The children and teens I see were brought to the United States for a better life. Many experienced violence, political upheaval and uncertainty or severe poverty in their countries of origin, which led their parents to seek a place of safety, where they could thrive. My grandparents came to this country in the face of pogroms that terrorized our families in Eastern Europe. They worked hard, as our current immigrants do, to make a future for their children. Our Jewish sacred texts obligate us to care for the stranger and treat all with respect and kindness. They are part of the fabric of a great society. Our neighbors must be able to testify in court if they have been victimized or if they have requested asylum, without the fear of being deported when they show up. All Virginians, whether they are citizens or not, must have the right to access schools, hospitals, places of worship and polling places without fear of intimidation or deportation. All must be able to clearly see the identity of law enforcement personnel and have their day in court with proper representation if accused. Local police should be doing the work of maintaining safety for all residents- not helping ICE deport people without due process. As a Virginian I believe we have a duty to protect those who are most vulnerable in our community. At this time it is our immigrant neighbors who need our help. I respectfully urge this committee to support HB 650, 1260, 1262, 1264, 1265,1438, 1440, 1441,1442, 1453,1492 and oppose HB1459 and HB1482.

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

My comment refers to all bills on the agenda. The Commonwealth of Virginia must take any and all legal action to prevent ICE from terrorizing any Virginia individual or community. This includes all people who come to this country seeking a better life for themselves and their families, just as the many millions before them have done throughout America’s history.

I am a resident of Virginia House of Delegates District One (Del. Hope). I am submitting this testimony in support of House Bills proposing to de-link Virginia Schools, courthouses, protected areas and polling places from being places of enforcement of federal immigration laws by federal agents. Specifically, HB#1260 (no immigration enforcement in schools), HB-1265 (courthouses), HB-1438 (287g agreements prohibited), HB-1440 (protected areas-hospitals, schools, etc), HB-1441 (law enforcement cooperation only with a valid judicial warrant) and HB-1442 (polling places) My family includes two members born overseas, one came as a political refugee. We are longtime members of Temple Rodef Shalom and we work or volunteer in the service of the immigrant community and basic human rights, including in the legal profession. These bills will protect privacy and basic human rights of immigrants, creating safe spaces so they may continue to dwell in peace in our communities. Public safety is improved if immigrants are not loath to report crimes or to show up for their own legal or immigration required appointments without fear of immediate detention without due legal process, or have their children attend school and continue to advance peacefully in our commonwealth. We have seen in Latin America, Africa and other regions the devastation which governments can cause against their citizens, where the USA has been a beacon of hope. And we have seen the benefit when we welcome immigrants to participate fully in business and communities in our country and state: economic benefits which under the current environment are depressed, as many residents miss work and school and doctor appointments due to widespread dragnet approach to immigration by the federal government. I respectfully urge this committee to support the HBs listed above. Thank you.

We want public safety, not public abductions and executions. We have learned that ICE does not respect rule of law or human rights, so support these bills to keep Virginians safe. Every child deserves an education. Every child deserves to be safe at school. Every sick or injured person deserves medical care. So keep ICE out of our school, hospitals, and courthouses. No judicial warrant should mean no entry- and limit what civil arrests can take place in courthouses. We want police to protect, not persecute. So eliminate 287g agreements in Virginia. Allow our local law enforcement to do their job of keeping communities safe, instead of doing ICE's dirty work for them. We want rule of law, not rule by masked mobs. Do not allow law enforcement to cover their faces. That's not community policing- that's KKK tactics. We want free and fair elections, not a return to Jim Crow era intimidation at the polls. Citizens are not safe from ICE, either. Do not allow the federal government to use "immigration enforcement" as a rouse to silence eligible voters through fear and profiling. Support: HB650 - Callsen HB1260 - Shin HB1262 - Glass HB1264 - Shin HB1265 - Glass HB1438 - Guzman HB1440 - Lopez HB1441 - Lopez HB1442 - Lopez HB1453 - Williams HB1459 - Zehr HB1482 - Schmidt HB1492 - Shin

Like many Americans, I have become increasingly alarmed by the immigration enforcement tactics being employed by ICE. While I agree that individuals who are here illegally can and should, in some cases, be deported - ICE is terrorizing immigrant communities in a way that is completely unacceptable and, frankly, un-American. I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482, which would help protect our immigrant communities from terrorization by ICE agents. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. Thank you, Zachary West Constituent from Alexandria

Please support HB1438. This bill would end 287(g) agreements between local law enforcement and limit collaborating with ICE for both local and state-level law enforcement agencies. This is necessary because of the many egregious, highly public actions ICE is taking - in other states as well as here in parts of Virginia. And, I don't want my state to have collaborating on federal immigration issues be treated like a tennis ball that can change with any gubernatorial administration. We need the force of real law. Finally, it should never have been a local law enforcement agency's prerogative to collaborate with ICE or any federal immigration authority. Immigrants are an important part of our communities, and the more pressure they are under to live hidden lives the less safe we ALL are.

It is essential that we take steps to protect Virginia’s communities and especially in sensitive spaces - our kids, the sick, faith communities. We must protect courtrooms and the rule of law and polling places to allow for free and fair elections. ICE is a threat to our democracy and our safety and that of our neighbors. Please do all that you can to preserve the needed checks and balances and protect our democracy!

I’m very concerned with the overreaching of ICE. They have terrorized communities, broken apart families, disrupted children’s education, wrongfully detained people and even murdered American citizens. Please keep all safeguards in place to protect our citizens. Warrants should be in place before they come after people. ICE agents should follow the same laws and training that police officers are required to. ICE should not be allowed to wait outside or enter courthouses. They should not be wearing masks. This is leading to more dangerous escalations as we have seen in Minneapolis. Please vote to protect the rights of our people, maintain a safe community, and honor the laws and Constitution of our once great country. Please listen to your constituents. We are a country of immigrants and we are all humans. Do what is right.

As a long time resident of Virginia, I have watched the horrific attack on our immigrant population by our federal government. I write to encourage support of these bills to provide additional state protections to our local immigrant communities. It is the moral thing to do. Thank you. Stephanie Elms Alexandria VA

Please support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. Please oppose HB1459. I have taught English to immigrants (both adults and children) here in Roanoke for 15 years. They come from all over the world, speak all different languages, and practice all different religions. They are some of the most grateful, respectful, hard working, generous people I've met. They are a gift and a blessing to my community. All of them want to become legal citizens and contribute to our society. The undocumented ones are here out of desperation and our immigration system makes it impossible for them to be here legally while being safe from the danger of their home countries. I fear for their safety since ICE is unconstitutionally invading people's homes, detaining people without warrants, detaining people who have no criminal record, and have detained legal immigrants and even U.S. citizens. ICE is operating carelessly and irresponsibly. Please protect my immigrant neighbors, students, and friends. Thank you.

I strongly support every bill that limits federal immigration enforcement overreach. Virginia Majority stands in solidarity with immigrant communities across Virginia. We believe that all people, regardless of race, class, or immigration status, deserve to live with dignity, safety, and access to fundamental rights. I support policies that limit federal immigration enforcement overreach, protect access to courts and essential services, and prevent local resources from being used to separate families and criminalize our neighbors. Virginia must lead in protecting immigrant rights by establishing clear boundaries on immigration enforcement activities in our communities, ensuring safe access to schools, healthcare, courthouses, and other essential spaces, and maintaining the trust between local officials and the communities they serve. These policies have my support and are measures that would affirm Virginia’s commitment to being a place where all residents can participate fully in civic life without fear.

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

SUPPORT: HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, HB1482, HB1492. OPPOSE: HB1459 Our communities deserve protection from the overreach of the federal government. At a minimum, this means putting strong boundaries on the activity of federal immigration officers and requiring them to follow existing laws and those that are enacted by this general assembly. We need to protect sensitive spaces like schools, courtrooms, places of worship, hospitals and polling places from ICE/CBP intimidation. All officers - including local law enforcement - should be prohibited from wearing masks or face coverings and ID should be required. In addition, local law enforcement should be prohibited from entering agreements with federal immigration officers and judicial warrants for enforcement should be required. Currently our communities are less safe. We need to stop the unchecked abusive activity by ICE/CBP.

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

I am a pro bono immigration attorney and court watcher, and forme rly a DOJ employee and I know first hand about the overreach of ICE in its detaining people who rather than being the worst of the worst, are actually the best of the best that America has to offer. I represent youngsters who have achieved Special Immigrant Juvenile status and they are still being dragged off the streets. Immigrants are the fabric of our society. We all either are immigrants or trace our roots to immigrants unless we are Native Americans, For those who are illegal because the US makes it is next to impossible to come here illegally from countries inhabited by people of color, they benefit our country, and now we are openly banning those people and giving preference to whites falsely labeled as victims of racism. The system is inverted. We should be thankful for all immigrants. . Instead, the Trump regime treats them - nif they are people of color - like they aren't even human. It's despicable, and it needs to be stopped. Practices that used to be unheard of - going into churches and schools and courthouses and private homes, warrantless, to drag immigrants away from their families and into detention - are commonplace. And inhumane. And much is unconstitutional. We cannot become the next Minneapolis. God bless their response to the invading terrorists. We'll do the same if we have to. But you can prevent it or at least mitigrate the damage. The steps you can take are to use your legislative authority to create protections for the immigrants in our state. You can and must support protection that at least attempts to reign in ICE, among other legislative goals: HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would, among other policies, protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. And they would prevent local law enforcement to work with federal immigrant officers in their terrorizing of immigrants. As we devolve into authoritarism, I am begging you to slow down the march, doing what you can do to protect Virginians. Hopefully, state legislators all over the country, not just blue states, will do the same and protect americans - citizens and non-citizens - from the gross abuses of the law and the lack of humanity of this regime. I know I will continue to fight the regime but Virginians need the help of their legislators in this monumental task. Thank you.

I am in support for HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers; restricts face coverings and requires identification of law enforcement; and prohibits state/local law enforcement from entering agreements with federal immigration officers; requires judicial warrants for enforcement of immigration; I oppose HB1459, misleadingly titled "The Ice-free Communities Act". Requires that when VA law enforcement is holding someone in custody and receives an immigration detainer, they must notify ICE/CBP of the date and time of the detainee's expected release.

Support ending 287(g) agreements in Virginia and open collaboration with ICE. Dear Delegates Adele McClure, Joshua Thomas, Dan Helmer, Marcus Simon, My name is Athena Scalise, and I am a resident of Fairfax County since 2001. I am writing to our representatives to urge you to support HB 1438 that ENDS 287(g) agreements and opens voluntary collaboration between Virginia state and local law enforcement with ICE. 287(g) agreements have led to serious violations of people’s rights, including unlawful detention and the separation of families, and caused serious harm, both immediate and long-term. When local law enforcement is redirected to enforce civil immigration law, immigrant communities are driven into the shadows, making people less likely to report crimes, cooperate with police, seek emergency care, undermining safety and security for everyone in our communities. I respectfully implore delegates to unequivocally support, and vote in favor of, HB 1438. Thank you for your leadership and for your service to our dynamic diverse communities. With gratitude, Athena Scalise

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

Law enforcement in VA should be focusing on our needs for public safety and to solve crimes, not help federal agents with immigration enforcement. Let's not divert our employees and officers to something that is not part of their mission by voting yes on HB1438.

Esteemed representatives, My name is Lorena Brady, I have called Virginia my home since 1992, when I arrived via legal pathways from Ecuador, I was 8 years old. I am writing today to respectfully demand that you support HB 1438 that ends 287(g) agreements and the possibility of any collaboration between VA state and local law enforcement with ICE. ICE is terrorizing my community, the everyday threats of detention, family separation are causing long term trauma to my chosen family and neighbors in Virginia. ICE is violating our basic human rights, including unlawful detention, right to safety and life. My son, a US citizen, is only 5 years old and I’ve had to explain to him who the “bad police are” because of what he has witnessed, what he hears his fellow kindergarten classmates say about the fear they are living in. As a community we deserve better, our local law enforcement can not be used to enforce civil immigration law. My fellow immigrant neighbors are hiding, fearful of going to work, sending their children to school. ICE must not be kept out of our schools. Furthermore, we are afraid to report crimes to the police. This hinders effective policing, and compromises everyone's security. Virginia is our home too, we are not criminals, we deserve dignity and the opportunity to live free of racial profiling and undue harm. I respectfully ask that you support and vote in favor of HB 1438. Thank you for your leadership and service to our community.

I am Kade Keller from Richmond, VA. I write in support of House Bills 1260, 1265, 1438, 1440, 1441, 1442, 1482, and 1492. These policies affirm Virginia’s commitment to being a place where all residents can participate fully in civic life without fear. Virginia must lead in protecting immigrant rights by establishing clear boundaries for immigration enforcement in our communities, ensuring safe access to schools, healthcare, courthouses, and other essential spaces, and maintaining trust between local officials and the communities they serve. All people, regardless of race, class, or immigration status, deserve to live with dignity, safety, and access to fundamental rights.

This is an opportunity for the Commonwealth to respect and protect the riaghts of ALL Virginia citizens. I strongly I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482.

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. Mary Bennett Alexandria Resident I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement. Mary Bennett Alexandria Resident

My name is Rachel Waldstein. I am a resident of District #1. I am submitting this testimony in support of the following bills: • HB 650 Callsen Courthouses • HB 1260 Shin Public elementary/secondary schools, etc; federal immigration investigation and enforcement activities • HB 1262 Glass Va Consumer Protection Act • HB 1264 Shin Virginia Accountability Commission • HB 1265 Glass Courthouses • HB 1438 Guzman 287g • HB 1440 Lopez Protected Areas • HB 1441 Lopez 287g • HB 1442 Lopez Polling Place Protections • HB 1482 Schmidt facemasks • HB 1492 Shin Impersonating federal law enforcement officer I oppose the following bills: • HB 1453 Williams Approaching a first responder with specified intent after a warning; penalty • HB 1459 Zehr Ice-Free Communities Act; notification to federal immigration authorities of pending release of certain prisoners from custody I am a member of Congregation Etz Hayim in Arlington and spent a large part of my career representing the U.S. government in the protection of human rights around the world. I support HB 650, 1260, 1262, 1264, 1265, 1438, 1440, 1441, 1442, 1482, and 1492 based on my Jewish values and my life’s work. Jewish tradition and law recognize the equality and dignity of all people and respect their right to life, bodily integrity, health, housing, education, and due process. The Jewish people have been refugees many times in the past and have often experienced mistreatment by authoritarian governments. It is thus my duty to stand in support of marginalized communities and against government abuses. Law enforcement authorities should not deprive anyone--even those in this country illegally--of life, liberty, or property without following established legal procedures that respect their rights. Since the Federal government has abdicated its responsibilities before the law and Constitution, it is up to the States to uphold national and international human rights law. Passing the above listed bills will make our communities to be safer and will give Commonwealth officials a legal basis to push back on Federal law enforcement officials who break the law. I strongly believe HB 650, 1260, 1262, 1264, 1265, 1438, 1440, 1441, 1442, 1482, and 1492 will improve the lives of all Virginians by allowing us to return our focus to strengthening our economy, education and healthcare systems, and by returning a sense of humanity to our Commonwealth. I oppose HB 1453 and 1459, which I believe will create more fear in our communities and impede Virginians’ ability to express their First Amendment rights. I respectfully urge this committee to support HB 650, 1260, 1262, 1264, 1265, 1438, 1440, 1441, 1442, 1482, and 1492 and to oppose HB 1453 and 1459.

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places, and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

I strongly support the following bills and urge the committee members to pass them on so they can make their way to the House in order to be discussed by all the Delegates: HB1492, HB1482, HB1453, HB1442, HB1441, HB1440, HB1438, HB1265, HB1264, HB1262, HB1260, and HB650. These bills provide much needed limits on ICE agents, and life-saving protections for tens of thousands of people in our commonwealth. Please do the right thing and keep these bills alive and moving through our legislative system.

Bills HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482 have my support and I think they are needed in these times. Courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals should be safe places for al and free from heavy handed ICE tactics.. I oppose HB1459 -- ICE should not get any help from law-abiding Virginia forces.

Support HB 650 1260 1262 1264 1265 1438 1440 1441 1442 1482

I write in support of House Bills 1260, 1265, 1438, 1440, 1441, 1442, 1482, and 1492. These policies affirm Virginia’s commitment to being a place where all residents can participate fully in civic life without fear. Virginia must lead in protecting immigrant rights by establishing clear boundaries for immigration enforcement in our communities, ensuring safe access to schools, healthcare, courthouses, and other essential spaces, and maintaining trust between local officials and the communities they serve. We must stand united to protect our immigrant communities from the threats coming from our federal government, as we do with the many other threats and challenges we face from the Trump Administration. All people, regardless of race, class, or immigration status, deserve to live with dignity, safety, and access to fundamental rights.

My name is Federico Cura and I’m an Arlingtonian. I love American freedom & democracy with all my heart and despise anyone trying to harm this great nation especially the morally bankrupt Maga Gop and its criminal president. I want to speak in favor of legislation to limit the abuse of armed masked ICE thugs that have become the Maga militia. I support several bill before this committee but especially Delegate Guzman’s HB1438. Ban ALL Virginia-based law enforcement collaboration with Maga militia ICE which is a border protection agency that belongs at the border and not in states willing to protect voters and that will not bend over and hand over voter rolls to help the trump regime and the Maga Gop corrupt elections they CANNOT win. Also, ban courthouse arrests, keep armed masked ICE thugs out of Virginia schools, and stop any kind of data sharing with this federal agency gone rogue, irresponsible, and unaccountable. Like many other things, the morally bankrupt Maga Gop has corrupted ICE which seems like run by the same domestic terrorists who participated in the antiAmerica Jan 6 terror attack in Washington. From Maine to MN to OH the brave of us are joining together by the thousands to free our cities and Democratically run states from armed masked ICE thugs. It’s time! It’s time to free our cities from masked Maga militias, free our friends & loved ones from abductions & concentration camps, & free America from this cowardly regime of the bullies, for the billionaires. Virginia’s local law enforcement should focus on lawfully protecting public safety and fighting against all threats to the safety, dignity, and well-being of all who live in and travel through Virginia. ICE says it’s focused on one thing but its actions tell a very different story. It s very troubling to hear now Maga leaders like Steve Bannon talk about using essentially armed masked ICE thugs to assault the citizens’ freedom to choose their own representatives in the coming election. The freedom to vote is an essential pillar of our nation’s freedom & democracy.

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

Regarding proposed bills HB650, HB1260, HB 1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, HB1482: As an alarmed citizen I urge the Safety committee to advance the urgently needed provisions in these bills to help rein in the increasingly extreme and unlawful activities of CBP and ICE.

see attached

My name is Margaret Power. I have been a voting resident of District 6 for 37 years. I am submitting this testimony in support of most of the bills pending for your action today. I am the great-granddaughter of immigrants escaping poverty, famine, and persecution in their native land and striving to afford the ‘chain migration’ that re-united them with their families. I am the great-niece of German Jews who were denied entry and were murdered in Hitler’s camps. I am the daughter-in-law of an American Jewish woman, who, as a 13-year-old, escaped Poland and crossed a remote stretch of our northern border without documents during the Hitler years when America turned away refugees. I am the grandmother of two talented, bi-lingual and totally adorable Americans who are nearly as brown as their naturalized father, a Colombian-born doctor. I fear their own government will harm them. Or kill them. Truly- I cannot believe that a time has come in which it is not insane for me to have such fears. I belong to Temple Rodef Shalom in Falls church, where, in collaboration with other faith communities, we have long organized sustained support and services for new refugees, predominantly Afghan friends of the US. As Chairman Simon knows, our community actively advocates for inclusive and just public policy here in Richmond and in the nation’s capital. I respectfully urge you to send these bills forward and to advocate for their passage; collectively, they protect Virginians from violent abuses of federal power, they ensure that some of our essential public services- schools, hospitals and the courts- can be accessed by all; they preserve the sovereignty of the Commonwealth with respect to our law enforcement roles, while assuring federal-state-local collaboration with respect to removing criminals from our midst. As a package, they reinforce the rule of law, including protection of our constitutional rights; they reduce the likelihood of violence in our public spaces; they offer our neighbors - and my grandchildren- better protection by requiring federal immigration agents follow the same transparency standards as state and local law enforcement, and they restore some measure of confidence that we citizens are also unlikely to be kidnapped, injured or murdered so long as we are Virginians. I oppose passage of HB 1453, as it limits our right to free expression, and I also oppose HB1459, which is unnecessary because the Governor’s executive order allows federal-state cooperation with respect to convicted criminals, and, if read to add instances in which individuals can be delivered to DHS, would breach the boundaries established by HB 650 which I strongly support. I respectfully urge this subcommittee to support HB#650, HB#1260,HB#1262,HB#1264,HB#1265, HB#1438, B1440,HB1441,HB1442,HB1482, AND HB1492

I support all these bills which, to my reading of them, extend protections of the law to people attending court appointments so that they cannot be detained by immigration enforcement authorities (or people impersonating immigration enforcement authorities). I support requiring law enforcement officials to not wear masks and to have visible identification, and also not to engage in immigration enforcement activities. I also support bills which protect schools, churches, and private workplaces from immigration enforcement activities, and require judicial warrants (warrants signed by a judge) for any immigration enforcement operation. I would like to see bills requiring due process for any persons detained, including but not limited to access to a lawyer, ability to make phone calls, and right to be treated with dignity and humanity.

My name is Robert Stewart, and I live in Chantilly, Virginia -- Fairfax County. I am an 86 year old Virginia voter and taxpayer, writing today to urge you to support HB 1438, legislation that would end Virginia’s 287(g) agreements and restore clear boundaries between local law enforcement and federal civil immigration enforcement. The record on 287(g) agreements is deeply troubling. Across our country, these agreements have been associated with unlawful detention, racial profiling, and the separation of families, often without any connection to serious criminal activity. Civil immigration violations are not crimes, yet 287(g) deputizes local officers to act as immigration agents—placing them in roles for which they are neither trained nor intended. This approach undermines public safety rather than strengthening it. When immigrant residents fear that a traffic stop, a call for help, or a report of domestic violence could lead to detention or deportation, they understandably stay silent. Crimes go unreported. Witnesses disappear. Trust between police and the communities they serve erodes. That makes all of us less safe. HB 1438 does not prevent cooperation with federal authorities when legally required. Instead, it restores voluntary, transparent, and appropriate collaboration, while ensuring that local law enforcement can focus on what they are meant to do: keep communities safe, build trust, and uphold constitutional rights. I respectfully urge you to vote yes on HB 1438. Virginia should choose policies that promote safety, fairness, and the dignity of families—not ones that create fear and division.

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would extend protection to sensitive civic spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers using easily obtained administrative warrants, strengthen public trust and accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity and require that all federal, state and local law enforcement agents are clearly identified by badge and agency, and restrict state and local law enforcement from entering into agreements that require that they act as immigration enforcement officers. There has been ample video footage and court rulings that show that CBP and ICE have exercised excessive force in many of our nation's cities and towns. We need laws that will help to keep Virginians safe.

Writing as a concerned Virginia resident and parent. I support passage of any bill that limits or prevents ICE from acting lawlessly as they have been around any protected spaces. Our neighbors, children and communities should be able to safely conduct business and learn without fear of ICE grabbing them, possibly causing long term trauma from over aggressive tactics to settle what is a civil matter. I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442 and HB1482. I oppose HB1459 to work with ICE in any capacity due to their cruelty.

I fully support every bill that safeguards and protects our immigrant neighbors from the lawless, cruel, immoral and shameful acts committed by federal agents and DHS.

My name is Cindy Denton-Ade . I am a resident of Burke, District 10 . I am submitting testimony in support of bills HB 650, 1260 ,1262 ,1264, 1265,1438,1440,1441,1442,1448,1482,1492. I am a member of Temple B’nai Shalom. All of my Grandparents were immigrants from other counties: the Ukraine, Belarus. If not for the welcoming policies of the United States when they immigrated, they would have been surely been all killed in the Holocaust. My very lovely handyman, who comes from Columbia and is a citizen, was fearful about driving to D.C. Because he felt he would be targeted by ICE. This is not right! Jewish values promote welcoming and protecting the stranger. These bills will go a long way to do just. Virginia, my chosen home, has taken many positive actions since Governor Spanberger has taken office. Let these bills be an addition to actions we can be proud of in protecting immigrants men, women, and children.

Hello, We support the bills that were checked off above to decrease the power & tyranny of ICE. We don't want law-abiding VA citizens exercising their civil rights to be assaulted, injured, or killed. Also, please OPPOSE HB 1459. Unfortunately, if passed, this will give ICE an edge in harassing and arresting our immigrant neighbors. Third, do any of these bills disallow ICE facilities from either opening or operating in VA? If not, is there a way to introduce this language in one of the proposed bills? Thank you! Ana & David Shannon

As a concerned resident of Alexandria who cares deeply about my neighbors, I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I strongly oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

To Va State Legislators, The Trump regime is terrorizing our communities across the US with brutal Immigration enforcement campaigns designed to test the limits of Executive power and the nation’s willingness to stand up against Trump’s Power grab. Masked federal agents are teargassing babies and pastors, Kidnapping neighbors and shipping them off to what will soon be known as American Concentration Camps. To make matters worse these thugs are Killing innocent people right in front of our own eyes. This is outrageous. This pattern of unchecked violence and abuse by Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the Border Patrol, and other federal law enforcement agencies must end. And surely these types of operations by such thugs have NO PLACE IN our state of VIRGINIA! As state legislators, YOU can rein in this type of lawlessness and protect Virginians from these types of unconstitutional actions and keep us all safe from these thugs! We support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills above would protect sensitive spaces like cortrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. Simply put, Passage of these bills will strengthen public trust and improve accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. We oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement. Please work together and vote to Pass HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. Keeping our Virginians safe and protected is your number one job! AND OPPOSE HB 1459 to keep us safe and to build public trust in law enforcement! Your constituents, James and Elizabeth Dolan Arlington, Va. 02/04/2026

HB 650 Clearly seeks to obstruct enforcement of federal law. OPPOSE HB 1260 Clearly seeks to obstruct enforcement of federal law. OPPOSE HB 1264 Clearly seeks to obstruct enforcement of federal law by attempting to intimidate federal law enforcement officers. OPPOSE. HB 1265 Clearly seeks to obstruct enforcement of federal law. OPPOSE HB 1438 Creates division between federal, state, and local law enforcement. Blatantly covers for illegals. OPPOSE HB 1440 Blatantly covers for illegals. OPPOSE HB 1441 Creates division between federal, state, and local law enforcement. Blatantly covers for illegals. OPPOSE HB 1442 If Illegals aren’t supposed to vote, why would this bill be needed? OPPOSE HB 1482 Clearly seeks to obstruct enforcement law enforcement by intimidating them. In some instances, their identity needs to be protected to prevent retribution. OPPOSE HB 1492 This is already a violation of federal law and is unnecessary. See 18 USC SS 912 and SS 913. OPPOSE

Hello, My name is Tyneshia Griffin and I am constituent in Kimberly Pope Adams's District 82. I am in strong support of HB1492, HB482, HB1441, HB1440, HB1438, HB1265, and HB650. These bills are urgently needed to protect immigrant communities and all communities in the state from racially motivated, state-sanctioned, community-based violence being executed by federal agents, local law enforcement affiliating with federal agencies, and citizens who may be motivated to violently target immigrants in the Commonwealth to also stoke fear, shame, panic, and harm on their of their own volition. In my area, ICE has invaded public spaces, kidnapping folks from bus stations for example, making it less safe for members of my community, including myself access transportation, feel safe to move about in our community, and safe free detainment and incarceration. I do not depend on transit solely, but when I need it, it is incredibly helpful for helping me get around the area safely and cheaply. Seniors with no transportation support, folks getting to and from work, students going to school, and folks looking for temporary shelter deserve access to safe public transit, streets, schools, faith centers, workplaces, courthouse, neighborhoods - throughout their entire community. My neighbors and I deserve to be treated with dignity and protected from community-violence and detainment in inhumane jails/camps and these bills provide for that and a failure to pass them fails to complete these responsibilities by leaders and the state. Protect Virginians, protect immigrant communities now.

My name is Karen Menichelli, and I have resided in Arlington, VA, for over 40 years, currently living in House District 1. I have cherished the diverse and welcoming nature of my community and feel enriched by the many immigrants from around the world who have decided to make their lives here. I am worried for my neighbors given the unnecessarily reckless and cruel practices of our federal immigration officers exhibited in cities like Portland, OR, and Minneapolis, WI. I don’t want those behaviors, which sow mistrust and waste resources, brought to Virginia. I want to protect the humanity, dignity, and safety of our immigrant neighbors and allow free access to important community services without fear of harassment or harm from federal agents. Therefore, I strongly support the above indicated cluster of bills under consideration by the Public Safety Subcommittee and urge the subcommittee to champion these bills and send strong versions to the full House for a vote.

HI my name Abdulazeez I am from Charlottesville. I am writing to you to urge you to support HB 1440 Comprehensive sensitive places bill - this bill prohibits ICE entry of ICE into VA-owned schools, hospitals, and prosecutor's offices. thank you!

My name is Ricki Henschel. I am a resident of District 3. I am submitting this testimony on behalf of Jews United for Justice in support of all of the following bills: HB 650, HB1260, HB1262, HB1264, HB1265, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, HB1482, and HB1492. JUFJ organizes Jewish Virginians and allies in support of local campaigns for social, racial, and economic justice. Judaism teaches that we are all made in the image of God. The Bible is clear that we are to welcome the stranger, as this is mentioned more times than any other obligation in the Bible. The assault on and kidnapping of individuals by ICE, pulled from their cars, their homes, their places of work, as if they were violent criminals, is directly in opposition of Jewish values, and should not be happening in our state. . The vast majority of those arrested are not individuals who have committed any crime, and many are in the process of obtaining legal status. We also know that citizens are also being taken because they fit the profile. The ICE raids and deportation machine are harming people indiscriminately: Parents, children, and students are being swept up as they attend routine immigration check-ins and court hearings, go to work, and run their errands. In my community, children are scared to go to school, and parents are concerned about taking their children to school, including those who with legal status, as the reality is that ICE is sweeping up individuals based on skin color and accents. Asking for papers and documentation and creating a reality where people feel they have to always have their papers on them everywhere they go, is reminiscent of every society that has been overtaken by autocracy. In addition, as an individual who has experienced sexual violence, it is no surprise that many in our community are afraid to go to our courts or access services. Everyone should be able to live with safety and dignity – including going to court without fear. Enabling law enforcement to be masked adds to the trauma being created. In addition, state and local police need to be seen as those protecting our communities, not as part of the federal work of ICE. And most recently, the threat of having ICE at polling places has been introduced. This must not be allowed in Virginia. Many citizens fit ICE’s profile, and they will be harassed and maybe too frightened to go to the polls. This can not be allowed. I respectfully urge this committee to support each of these bills that control the methods and manner in which ICE operates within our borders–HB 650, HB1260, HB1262, HB1264, HB1265, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, HB1482, and HB1492. We have the right to require them to follow our laws and the US Constitution. We must welcome the stranger.

I am a resident of Virginia state district 39. We have seen our fair share of unidentified, masked men who have harassed and intimidated our citizens. Please move these bills forward. I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

I am writing to encourage the passage of all possible legal remedies to protect our immigrant neighbors from indiscriminant and inhumane enforcement of federal immigration law, especially HB 1438 and HB 650. The first is particularly important to prevent local and state law enforcement from being distracted from their fundamental responsibility to protect the people of the Commonwealth and enforce its laws. Moreover, our state and local law enforcement officers should not have their respect in the community undermined by cooperation with federal agencies that have, under the current administration, displayedegregious disregard for the human and constitutional rights of people living in the United States, for due process, and ordinary procedures for investigating charges of misconduct. HB 650 is equally significant. People should not be afraid of participating in court proceedings by the prospect of arrests unrelated to those proceedings and should be fully protected from arrest without the due process enumerated in this bill.

Dear Subcommittee Members, I strongly urge you to support Delegate Guzman’s proposed legislation HB 1438. We need clear, sturdy guardrails to keep DHS, the US Border Patrol, and ICE in check in Virginia. Sadly, we cannot depend on the federal government to rein these agencies in. After all, it is the Trump Administration that is unleashing them to brutalize immigrants and peaceful protesters and trample the rule of law. Let’s show the rest of the country how Virginia protects Virginians and respects the human rights of anyone within our borders. Thank you, Mark Jackley

It is clear to me that the actions of ICE and CBP are not simply aimed at carrying out immigration laws; these federal agencies are rapidly being turned into a paramilitary force whose purposes are intimidation and provocation. Virginians will not tolerate exposure of sensitive paces to their tactics, or collaboration with them by state and local law enforcement. Consequently, I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, HB1482, and I oppose HB1459.

I am a resident of Reston, VA. I am a US Army veteran and Federal retiree with almost 30 years of service to the US. My father’s side of my family immigrated to this country from England sometime in the 1630s. My mother’s side of the family immigrated from Scotland in the late 1750s. To the best of my knowledge, they were undocumented. I believe strongly that I have a right to stay in this country. I have met, heard about, read about, and studied people who have been here longer than my family, and some who have come very recently. If we examine the accomplishments and potential of these folks who arrived before or after my family, none are less deserving of a right to be here. As you study our history and our culture, one realizes that the contributions of immigrants are what makes this country so unique and wonderful. It isn’t how big our Army is, it’s the fact that you can find a taco truck, an Ethiopian restaurant, pottery from Poland, and fashion from France on the same block. It’s in the fact that nearly 100 languages are spoken as mother tongues in Fairfax County Schools. It’s in knowing that this country was built on the backs of African slaves and immigrants from every continent in the world, and the cultures of those immigrants have mixed into the most wonderful stew that we are allowed to enjoy every day. Now, let’s get real. Undocumented people can’t vote, aren’t eligible for benefits, and pay taxes into our system. They work very hard for low wages. Immigrants, much less those who are undocumented, commit crimes at SIGNIFICANTLY lower rates than white men. In short, immigrants are a net gain for our society. The images and stories we are seeing regarding ICE and CBP untrained, unprofessional paramilitary wreaking havoc in Minneapolis is like watching footage from another country. I keep asking myself how we got here, while unfortunately, people of color are saying it has been this way all along. Given that we weren’t aware of the total number of people ICE and CBP killed until they murdered two white people, I am concluding they must be correct. In 2025/26, 40 people have died at the hands of ICE. That is 40 too many. I am in favor of any legislation that hinders the ability of ICE to murder more people regardless of race, color, gender, age, national origin, religion, sexual preference, genetic information, immigration status, or whether or not they are exercising their 1st, 2nd, 4th, or 14th Amendment rights. I am in favor of any legislation that allows immigrants a path to citizenship. While a small minority of people may disagree with me, this is NOT a white nation, and I am against any legislation that tries to turn it into one — even if it is couched in pretty language like “protecting our ‘heritage,’ or ‘our women.’” Please pass any legislation that treats our immigrant population in accordance with human rights, human dignity, civic sense, and common decency. Thank you.

(This plea concerns all House and Senate bills that would provide greater protections for our immigrant population and stop government overreach by DHS and ICE.) Letter of Support for Policies Protecting Immigrants Dear Governor Spanberger, Virginia Delegates, and Virginia Senators, As a citizen who sees all humans as treasured and worthy of respect, I ask you, Governor Spanberger and all Virginia delegates and senators, to support all ICE OUT bills, specifically the following bills to benefit the lives of all citizens and provide specific protections for our immigrant community: HB 660 | HB 836 | HB 911 | HB 1161 | HB 1260 | HB 1265 | HB 1438 | HB 1440 | HB 1441 | HB 1442 | HB 1482 | HB 1492 SB 351 | SB 352 | SB 446 | SB 783 | What each of us has witnessed in California, Washington State, Chicago, North Carolina, and Minneapolis to include traumatization of targeted people and onlookers, great injury, and execution style killings must not become business as usual in Virginia. Please regard the humanity in each person across our Commonwealth and support the passage of these bills. Thank you, Mary Lib Morgan 12401 Dutton Road | Apt 2409 | Midlothian, VA 23113 (804) 928-2057

I am writing in strong support of each of the indicated bills that aim to protect immigrants, and those perceived as immigrants, from the threat and violence perpetuated by ICE. As a Social Worker that works across the Central Virginia region, I have seen my neighbors and clients directly harmed by ICE. Families have been torn apart, resulting in physical, psychological, and financial harm. Furthermore, the threat of ICE has prevented communities I care about from safely accessing healthcare, basic needs, public spaces, and even school. These policies would take an important step to protect the rights and livelihoods of all Virginians, and they would affirm our commonwealth's commitment to ensuring its residents have safe and fair access to participating in civic life.

As a longtime Virginia resident and a person of faith, I am alarmed by ICE's and the DHS's recent gross misconduct, including murdering U.S. citizen. Therefore: I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

I support any bill that abolishes ICE. We need to go back to a civilized nation. At the moment we are not one. Killing innocent Americans for demonstrating their first amendment rights. We need to stop rounding up people for the color of their skin. This is not a Wild West rodeo. Our government has violated numerous constitutional laws by not doing lawful procedures. We promised after the concentration camps where Japanese citizens were detained that America would not do that again. Again America has broken its promise to its citizens. They are removing people who are not criminals and people seeking a better life. Some as they appear for court hearings that they needed to do to become citizens. Let’s go back to a civilized country and start respecting both law and order and stop quotas on human beings. You are helping Americans and the world lose any respect left for America and its government. The three murders that gunned down Renee Good and Alex Pretti had YEARS on the CBP or ICE before those killings. It was like watching a firing squad executing people for no reason. Just being around people that were trigger happy and had no training from years ago. I have watched children have guns held up to their faces. CHILDREN. You are taught to never draw your weapon as a fear tactic or a control technique. It’s common knowledge. Let’s make real immigration laws that help people become American. These immigrants pay more into our treasury than Trump did for three years only paying $750 each year. Or Amazon that paid no taxes. The immigrants contribute to our country and economy unlike billionaires and corporations. Actually we have subsidized Elon more than any taxes he has paid. He has caused more harm to America and Americans safety than any immigrant. Stop this funding of this illegal under trained private police that is not protecting Americans but killing them. I question how anyone who supports this can even say they are Christian. From the brutality of humans in detention, lack of medical care, food that I would only put in my compost bin, to breaking up families, the abuse and murder I have seen and the rounding up by skin color. You do know Jesus was a dark skin Palestinian don’t you? So guess he would be rounded up if he was around today. I have never been so ashamed to be an American and I’m 72 years old. But I know it wasn’t me that made the decisions it was you. That gives me some peace. Find your soul, remember again why we were given the statue of liberty or let’s donate it to a country worthy of that beacon of light. We are distinguishing its significance. I hope you also were able to see the monks marching for peace. They are true humans with love and kindness to all. I am grateful to see so many people touched by them and their journey. In solidarity, Cindy Johnston

I am writing in support of the bills checked above. The bills I would protect immigrants from illegal and abusive practices by ICE and Border Patrol. As events in Minnesota have tragically illustrated, all of us, citizen or not, immigrant or not, legal or not, need protection from these federal agents. Enact these bills to protect sensitive spaces, unmask and identify federal agents, require judicial warrants for immigration, and prohibit state and local law enforcement from entering cooperative agreements with federal immigration officers.,

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement

I would like to lend my support to the passage of these bills. However, I would like to go further. Under no circumstances should any member of the government, police force or Sheriff’s Office cooperate with ICE or Border Control. BUT given that ICE will disobey the laws anyway, I want them out of Virginia entirely, and ideally, dismantled completely.

Please vote in favor of protecting our immigrants from ICE harm!

I support these bills. I volunteer with hospice patients and see how the fear of ICE is affecting our much needed and legal caregivers who fear leaving home to go to their clients. One has been disappeared. I hear from my high school grandchildren the concerns at their schools. This is not how we should be living in the USA.

SUPPORT: HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, HB1482, HB1492. OPPOSE: HB1459 Our communities deserve protection from the overreach of the federal government by putting boundaries on the activity of federal immigration law enforcement officers. We need to protect sensitive spaces like schools, courtrooms, places of worship, hospitals and polling places from ICE/CBP intimidation. All officers should be prohibited from wearing masks or face coverings and ID should be required. In addition, local law enforcement should be prohibited from entering agreements with federal immigration officers and judicial warrants for enforcement should be required. Currently our communities are less safe. We need to stop the unchecked abusive activity by ICE/CBP.

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.

I support these 7 bills that protect sensitive spaces from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust in VA. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust. Thank you.

I am a long time citizen of Henrico and I am horrified at what is happening with ICE and border patrol in my country now. I hardly recognize this country or the Republican party any more. I am asking all of my reps to do whatever you can to defund ICE and to make them take their masks off, to get much better training and to have signed warrants whenever they are looking for specific people. Finally they should not be allowed to go in schools or houses of worship. Thankyou.

I am deeply concerned about our state and the rest of the country. Immigration enforcement has affected our economy, our well being and our neighbors. Children should not have to live in fear. I am descended from German and Irish immigrants. In their name I submit these comments. Everyone deserves to feel safe in their community. I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. Accountability is important to restoring trust. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement. Please protect Virginians. Protect our children. Protect our communities. Thank you.

People in Alexandria are terrified- undocumented immigrants, Green Card holders and even US citizens are afraid to be harassed, kidnapped or killed by ICE. As such, I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. While we cannot fully stop these immoral and unconstitutional federal practices, we can stop VA from adopting them in our counties and cities. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in local law enforcement and jeopardize public safety.

I believe it is critical to protect Virginians from excessive and brutal immigration enforcement. To that end, I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement and would not serve the interests of the state of Virginia. Thank you for your consideration. Laura Bloodgood

I support HB650, HB1260, HB1438, HB1440, HB1441, HB1442, and HB1482. These bills would protect sensitive spaces like courtrooms, schools, places of worship, polling places and hospitals from the intimidation of federal immigration law enforcement officers. This strengthens public trust and improves accountability by restricting the use of facial coverings to obscure identity of members of law enforcement. I do not support face coverings or lack of ID for any law enforcement I oppose HB1459, which forces state and local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. This would damage public trust in state and local law enforcement.