Public Comments for 08/20/2025 Joint Commission to Oversee the Transition of the Commonwealth into a Cannabis Retail Market
All my life I was told cannabis was a gateway drug. I couldn't understand how something that came from nature, a plant that made me feel amazing when I consumed it.... Why was it bad ? Why did it balance my life, instead of making it out of balance.... Because it's medicine to people like me. The entire process, from starting a seedling, to harvesting the flower, it's all part of a healthy healing process for me. It's reintroduced me to the wonders of soil science and conservation, to regenerative farming, and to the simple wonder of constantly being able to learn something. I would love to see the retail market include some type of farmer's market spots for small scale growers, and more room for the grass roots movement that cannabis really is, not as much the big spenders who are going to get whatever they lobby enough for. Thank you.
To the Members of the Cannabis Control Authority, I am writing today to urge you to consider a specific and successful model for cannabis access, one that ensures patient well-being, fosters a competitive market, and promotes public trust. This model is the medical caregiver program, a system that has been effectively implemented in states like Michigan. Virginia has an opportunity to learn from the successes and challenges of other states. The current framework, centered on a few large-scale operations, has created a limited and inaccessible system for many patients. The Michigan caregiver program offers a proven alternative. Under this model, a licensed caregiver who is at least 21 years old can be designated by a registered patient on their state application. These caregivers may assist up to five patients at a time and are legally permitted to cultivate up to 12 plants per patient. This creates a direct connection between a patient and a trusted, small-scale producer, with a maximum of 72 plants if the caregiver is also a patient. The benefits of a caregiver program are numerous and directly address many of the concerns surrounding a limited medical market: Improved Patient Access: A caregiver program provides a crucial alternative for patients who do not live near a licensed dispensary. It ensures that medical cannabis remains accessible to individuals across the Commonwealth, regardless of their proximity to a retail location. Trust and Quality Control: The most effective way to ensure product quality is through trust, which is often a defining feature of a caregiver-patient relationship. Patients can have a personal connection with the individual growing their medicine, providing a level of confidence that no corporate branding can replicate. This personal accountability is a powerful form of quality assurance. Economic Equity and Innovation: A caregiver program breaks the potential for a medical monopoly. It allows small businesses and individuals to participate in the legal market, fostering economic equity and driving innovation from the ground up. This system promotes competition, which in turn leads to a greater diversity of products and better pricing for patients. A Safer Alternative: By allowing patients to obtain their medicine from a regulated, verified source, a caregiver program can help reduce reliance on the illicit market. This transitions consumers from an unregulated and untaxed system to one with oversight, providing a safer pathway for patients. The Michigan model is not simply a theoretical concept; it is a successful, operational system that has been a cornerstone of its medical cannabis program. Adopting a similar approach in Virginia would not undermine the current medical framework but would instead enhance it, ensuring that the health and well-being of patients remain the top priority. A caregiver program is not an obstacle to regulation; it is an extension of it. It is a system that balances patient needs with a structured and supervised environment. In closing, I urge the Cannabis Control Authority to consider the merits of a medical caregiver program. This is a path toward a more compassionate, equitable, and patient-focused medical cannabis market in Virginia. Thank you for your time and for your consideration of this critical issue.
The current legal framework, as it stands, threatens to undermine the very market we are trying to build. We have an opportunity to learn from other industries and create a cannabis market that is not only robust and safe but also fair and accessible to all Virginians. I wish to draw your attention to a specific piece of language that represents a fundamental overreach. The current definition of 'marijuana paraphernalia' is so broad that it attempts to single out and isolate a huge range of common equipment that has other legitimate uses. Under this language, a light fixture from a store like Home Depot, a standard bag of potting soil, or a simple ventilation fan is no longer just a home and garden product. The moment it is 'intended for use' in cannabis cultivation, it is branded as 'paraphernalia.' This is a regulatory overreach that treats basic tools and materials—the building blocks of any agricultural pursuit—as inherently suspect. It is not about addressing a genuine public danger; it is about creating an arbitrary distinction that stifles growth and innovation. This overreach is a barrier to a healthy and transparent market.
My main point concerns the very foundation of this new market. If we want it to be successful, it must be built on principles of equality and open access for all. We have a successful model to look to right here in our own state: the craft brewery industry. With over 350 licensed breweries across Virginia, we have a vibrant and thriving ecosystem of independent businesses. The state's licensing model has fostered this growth by creating a tiered system based on production volume, not by capping the number of licenses. This open approach is a proven path to success. We can also look to a state like Michigan, which has a mature and thriving cannabis market. Unlike Virginia's proposed legislation, which sought to cap licenses at 450 for cultivation and 400 for retail with high fees, Michigan's state government chose not to cap licenses at all. Instead, it created a tiered system based on the scale of the operation, with different classes of grower licenses based on plant count: Class A for up to 100 plants, Class B for up to 500 plants, and Class C for up to 2,000 plants. This system, along with a dedicated microbusiness license, allows for a wide range of operators, from small, family-owned businesses to larger cultivators. This model promotes a competitive and innovative market without shutting out small producers before they even have a chance. In the cannabis market, the equivalent of a production tier would be square footage. We should set the same bar by creating a tiered licensing system with an unlimited number of licenses that are tailored to the scale of the business, such as: Breeder and Geneticist Licenses, which are the bedrock of innovation and diversity. Nursery Licenses, for under 1% thc with unlimited counts A Micro-Cultivator Tier, for operations up to 1,000 square feet. A Small-Scale Cultivator Tier, for operations up to 5,000 square feet. A Mid-Scale Cultivator Tier, for operations up to 10,000 square feet. A Single-Source Craft License, which would allow small, independent operators to do everything themselves with direct sells to consumers. There is an even more crucial reason for this open approach. The legacy market, the unregulated market that has existed in Virginia for decades, is a reality that will not simply disappear with the passage of new laws. A key component of the legacy market is trust. For decades, consumers have relied on a friend or neighbor, an individual they know and trust, who grew something with passion and care. This is the same reason why consumers go to a farmers’ market—they trust the farmer because the farmer grew it. That level of personal connection and trust goes well beyond any kind of testing and safety measurement we have today. To preserve and integrate that trust, it is absolutely crucial that the small producer and craft farmer have the ability for direct-to-consumer sales. This could be through a simple and streamlined online delivery service or a farmers' market-style program. Allowing this direct connection is not just good for business; it is the most effective way to transition the trust of the legacy market into a safe, legal, and regulated one.
Dear Members of the Joint Commission to Oversee the Transition of the Commonwealth into a Cannabis Retail Market, I am sending the attached letter as a pdf because it is a little too long to include here. The purpose of the attached letter is to twofold. First, I want to thank you for your thoughtful approach to cannabis policy development and implementation. I left the July 9 meeting feeling grateful to the members of the Commission. Second, I would like to share information about my area of expertise, which is conducting research to support state and national public health education campaigns. I would be glad to offer my support to the Commission if that would be useful. Sincerely, Jane Appleyard Allen Center for Communication & Media Impact, RTI International janeallen@rti.org | www.rti.org | 781-370-4041 Pronouns: she, her, hers Delivering the promise of science for global good
There is so much distrust in how larger companies run their operations. Cases of contaminated flower due to poor growing practices are a major concern for the average cannabis user. As there is so little oversight in that area, shifting the focus to small scale production is one easy fix. Small businesses rely on word of mouth and positive customer experiences instead of having the capital to just shift their branding or target market if delivering bad product. The barrier of entry is just too high in the current climate for small scale operations to start. For example, in order to get sell any currently legal industrial hemp flower to friends or family, I would need to spend over $1000 just in application fees to be able to grow, process, store, handle, and sell direct to consumer. That does not make sense when most growers could only sell a few hundred dollars worth of extra flower from each grow. That leaves the option of operating illegally, giving away product for free, or operating at a loss. Neither of these are favorable for the average home grower. I run a business selling produce and vegetable starts from my garden. I can sell all the other products legally grown in my garden without any extra barriers to entry, but not cannabis flower used for smoking. If I sold the flower in a kit designed for craft use making infused salve or candles, that would be completely legal as the law is currently written. I have confirmed this with VDACs hemp enforcement agency to be the case. The laws need a clean slate where the barrier of entry is equally accessible to all people and business entities. The restriction on person to person sales should be lifted. The original growing laws were done to make personal consumption safer are more legal. Let’s keep making progress in that direction. Respectfully, A gardener, father and business owner who is trying to take his love for growing cannabis and turn it into a way to pay off debt and invest in the future.
My name is Brandon. I’m 26 years old, and I’ve been working as an HVAC technician here in Virginia for eight years. On top of that, I’ve been growing and using cannabis responsibly for a good part of my adult life. For me, cannabis isn’t just something to “get high.” It’s something that’s taught me patience, responsibility, and even skills I use in my career. It gave me a way to learn science hands-on, and it gave me pride in creating something with my own two hands. On a personal level, cannabis helps me wind down after long, physically exhausting days. It eases my sore muscles, helps me sleep, and keeps my stress in check. It does all of that without leaving me feeling wrecked like alcohol does. And I’m not alone—friends of mine who are veterans use it for PTSD, people I know with chronic pain or anxiety use it instead of pills, and I’ve even met parents who found relief for their kids with seizures through cannabis oil. These aren’t criminals. They’re hardworking Virginians who just want safe access to something that improves their lives. That’s why legalization matters. Right now, Virginia is missing out on huge opportunities. Look at states like Colorado—they’ve brought in hundreds of millions in tax revenue, created thousands of jobs, and revitalized farming communities. We could do the same here. Farmers who are struggling could finally have a profitable, sustainable crop. Tradespeople like me—HVAC techs, electricians, carpenters—would see more work building out grow facilities and dispensaries. Legal cannabis wouldn’t just help individuals; it would boost entire industries. There’s also the issue of justice. Cannabis prohibition has always hit certain communities harder, even though usage rates are about the same everywhere. People’s lives have been ruined over a joint, while alcohol—far more dangerous—remains completely legal. Decriminalization was a step, but it’s not enough. As long as there’s no legal market, the black market keeps thriving, and that helps nobody. And let’s talk safety. Right now, if you buy cannabis on the street, you have no idea what’s in it—mold, pesticides, dangerous additives. Legalization means regulation. It means products are tested, labeled, and safe. It also means sales are restricted to adults 21 and over, just like alcohol. Dealers don’t check IDs—dispensaries do. I know some people still have concerns. But cannabis isn’t a gateway drug—that’s been disproven over and over. In fact, it’s often used as a substitute for more dangerous substances. Crime doesn’t spike in legal states—if anything, black market activity drops. Legalization allows for real public education and better enforcement than we have now. At the end of the day, this comes down to freedom and common sense. Virginians should have the right to choose cannabis the same way they can choose alcohol or tobacco. And our state should benefit from the jobs, the tax revenue, and the opportunities that come with it. I love this state. I’m proud to work with my hands, to build and repair things for people, and to contribute to my community. But I also believe Virginia deserves better than outdated cannabis laws that hurt people and hold us back. It’s time for us to move forward. Legalizing cannabis isn’t just good policy—it’s the right thing to do for our economy, for justice, for public health, and for the everyday people who call Virginia home. Thank you.
Every state that has legalized cannabis has had AT LEAST 1 of 3 things has happened but The people that actually touch and care for the plants get screwed! The reason every state has failed to properly transition from Illegal to regulated adult sales is they for get about the Legacy Market! We have a unique opportunity to create a shinning example of what A true free market for Cannabis farmers and patients can be. Small family and craft legacy farmers are the most lean and innovative types of businesses we have, so they are they only group who can get operating in 6-12mon. With proper funding from the Fund as they have zero access to capital that isnt predatory or scammers But sadly not thinking realistically as we have seen how that plays out in numerous other states most of which are controlled by MSOs This biggest elephant in the room that no one wants to address is my communit… the Drug War Veterans. I stand here representing almost 400 farmers and over 4k Virgina citizens that have been charged/convicted of non violet cannabis related offenses. Where is the opportunity for us? I was arrested at 15 in Henrico for a bowl with resin in my pocket during a likely illegal traffic stop in my own neighborhood , and taken into the station and interrogated for hours before my parents were informed. That same police officer pulled me over no less than 4 times in 2yrs, for non moving violations. Most of which ended up getting me community service. This was my introduction into a profiling at 16yrs old. Then I spend over 18months in prison at age 19 for simple possession and paid well over 200k in fines/probation fees not to mention legal costs. Well now the shoes on the other foot, so this legislation must have a priority pathway for nonviolent cannabis offenders, not lumped in with vets and hbcu grads and Pell grant recipients, those may all be well meaning but have nothing to do with restoring the wrongs of the past. This pathway to licensing is in some cases, the only opportunity at generational wealth or business ownership for some and it’s the only right thing to do, to help repair the mental, physical, emotional, and financial damage caused by the lies of the Government. Lets be clear the war on drug was a propaganda campaign against its own citizens and the DEA said in 1987 cannabis proved to cause no harm to the public health so what we are really talking about is wrongful convictions, unlawful imprisonment and emotional/psycological torture, so this pathway is more akin to blanket pardons than it is to unconstitutional preferential treatment as the mutil-million dollar truelief leagal team would have you it’s corporate lawfare This is the ONLY OPTION to repair the harms done by the government against its people. There is no precedent to sight because its never been done the right way before. The modern day criminal justice systems that we all agree is not working for the working class and I have experienced first hand all because of my connection this plant. This is the reason every other state has failed because Legacy farmers built this industry and we will never let you hand it over to corporations who have proven time and time again they choose profits over people!
Virginia’s move toward adult-use cannabis legalization was built on a promise to repair the harms of the War on Drugs, which disproportionately devastated Black and Brown communities. The 2021 JLARC Report made clear that racial disparities in marijuana enforcement were stark: Black Virginians were 3.5 times more likely to be arrested than whites despite equal use rates. Even after legalization, disparities continue—nearly 60% of marijuana-related cases in 2022 involved Black adults, who represent only 20% of the population. In some counties, Black residents were more than 40 times more likely to be arrested. These realities underscore why equity must remain central to Virginia’s cannabis policy. Why Equity Matters Past bills like HB2485 sought to prioritize those most harmed by prohibition. Criteria included past convictions, residency or education in disadvantaged communities, veteran status, and Pell Grant eligibility. Supports included fee waivers, loans, and incubation programs for minority-owned and small businesses. These provisions aimed to reduce barriers that have kept communities of color from entering regulated markets elsewhere. Emerging Challenges. Recent policymaking risks shifting focus toward medical cannabis operators and hemp producers, sidelining equity. Early access for large operators without strong equity obligations threatens to undermine restorative goals. CEC stresses that early start advantages must come with requirements to: incubate minority- and community-owned businesses provide grants (not just loans) funded by revenues and fees, deliver technical support and waive prohibitive licensing, capital, and site control requirements. Equity Reinvestment Fund The Cannabis Equity Reinvestment Fund (§ 2.2-2499.8) is the cornerstone of restorative justice and must retain at least 60% of cannabis tax revenues. These funds should support communities disproportionately targeted by enforcement, education, job training, and reentry programs, grants and mentoring for equity applicants, indigent defense and small business loan programs. Micro Business Framework HB698 provided a pathway for equity-focused licensing, 60 micro businesses begin sales in early 2025, impact-based applicant criteria (residency, veteran status, Pell Grant, or prior enforcement impact), capital and site control waivers to ensure access, and that medical operators must incubate six micro businesses but cannot hold ownership stakes. Policy Recommendations CEC urges lawmakers to narrow equity definitions to prioritize those most harmed by enforcement. require public reporting on licensing and fund distributions, create an independent oversight body to monitor outcomes, expand support services to include legal, financial, and marketing help, and tie early operator privileges to binding incubation and funding obligations. Conclusion Virginia can create an inclusive cannabis economy that addresses historic injustice while generating opportunity. Equity must not be secondary—it must remain the guiding principle. By holding large operators accountable, safeguarding the 60% revenue allocation, and lowering barriers for small and minority businesses, lawmakers can ensure legalization delivers real justice and opportunity. Cannabis Equity Consultants remains committed to working with policymakers, regulators, and communities to keep equity at the core of Virginia’s cannabis future.
My name is Matthew Adolph, and my story is part of Virginia’s cannabis history. I was incarcerated in Virginia from 2007 to 2010 for selling and cultivating cannabis. Fifteen years later, in 2025, the weight of that conviction still haunts me — limiting opportunities, shaping how I’m treated, and reminding me of the decades of damage prohibition inflicted on people like me. My journey is also public record: • First-ever cannabis town hall in Virginia Beach (March 2023, WAVY News): https://www.wavy.com/video/first-ever-town-hall-on-cannabis-held-in-virginia-beach/8456400/ • General Assembly cannabis hearing (January 2024) — I appear in the white jacket to the left: https://youtu.be/Y-dD7qYH5DE?si=-k9E0dc644YN2SA5 • CBS 6 coverage of the Virginia marijuana marketplace plan (January 2024): https://www.wtvr.com/news/local-news/virginia-marijuana-marketplace-plan-jan-18-2024 • Virginian-Pilot coverage of Hampton Roads cannabis entrepreneurs (February 29, 2024): https://www.pilotonline.com/2024/02/29/hampton-roads-cannabis-entrepreneurs-support-legislation-to-create-virginia-retail-market/ I am also building platforms — ReignForest.io and MagicNugAlmanac.com — both under construction and set to launch very soon. These are being designed not for Wall Street, but for Virginia’s people: digital spaces for cannabis education, opportunity, and equity, so Virginians have the tools to navigate and thrive in this new market. But despite legalization debates, we rarely address the people. In 2007, I went to prison for cannabis. Inside, I labored on a chain gang for $0.35 an hour. After release in 2010, I was denied job after job because of that record. Even as I rebuilt my life through entrepreneurship — turning the same hustle into legal businesses, growing from a single box of books to warehouses, training others, and mentoring reentry programs — the shadow of cannabis prohibition remains in 2025. Along this path, I have been guided by the wisdom of Jesse Frierson, Phil Thompson, and Marty Jewell of the Richmond Crusade of Voters, who taught me the importance of advocacy and standing up for equity. The truth is, most states have failed to get this right. New York’s equity program stalled under lawsuits and corporate influence. Illinois promised fairness but licenses largely went to insiders. These efforts left justice-impacted people still waiting. Virginia has a chance to do what no state has yet done — build a retail cannabis market that is both legal and just. I urge the Commission to: 1. Guarantee enforceable equity. Reserve licenses, capital, and ownership pathways for justice-impacted Virginians with cannabis convictions. 2. Acknowledge the human cost. Legalization must include real repair for the communities most harmed. 3. Protect small Virginia entrepreneurs. Don’t let corporate giants dominate at the expense of local business owners. 4. Lead the nation. Be the first state to design a cannabis market that prioritizes fairness, repair, and opportunity. I am proof that with opportunity, redemption and contribution are possible. But I am also proof that prohibition’s scars do not fade on their own. If Virginia wants a truly fair and thriving cannabis market, it must finally write people like me into the future — instead of leaving us behind once again. Thank you for your time. Respectfully submitted, Matthew Adolph [City of Virginia Beach, Virginia]
My name is Jabria Craft, and I live in Richmond, Virginia. I am a cannabis educator and coach who works directly with consumers, helping them build intentional and responsible relationships with this plant. First, I want to thank you for your time and for the important work you’re doing. I especially appreciate hearing Committee Member Ebbin’s acknowledgment of cannabis education because from my perspective, it is one of the most critical gaps in Virginia’s emerging retail market. I fully support creating an equitable, accessible, and community-centered retail market, but access without education creates risks we can and should avoid. Most consumers currently have very limited guidance on: • How to choose products that meet their specific needs and desired states • How to diversify cannabinoids to benefit from the plant’s full medicinal potential • Which consumption methods best support their individual goals • How potency levels affect both their experience and long-term well-being Without robust, shame-free education, we see increased rates of overconsumption, misinformation, confusion, and cannabis-related harms like paranoia, CHS, and dysregulated use. I also want to underscore that there is demand for this education. Through my work, I’ve built a community of over 70,000 people actively seeking guidance on creating intentional and sustainable relationships with cannabis. Hundreds regularly participate in community-led tolerance breaks and harm reduction practices, showing us there is both a need and a desire for informed, accessible resources and support. Additionally, we must acknowledge that the harms of prohibition and misinformation have not been felt equally. Black, brown, queer, and disabled people—the very communities most impacted by criminalization—continue to face systemic barriers to safe access, economic participation, and trusted information. As Virginia designs this market, we have an opportunity—and an obligation—to center those communities, not leave them behind. I strongly urge the Commission to: • Allocate tax revenue toward community-based cannabis education rooted in harm reduction, cultural competency, and accessibility • Develop evidence-informed resources to help people navigate potency, cannabinoids, dosing, and consumption methods responsibly • Partner with trusted educators, practitioners, and grassroots organizations already doing this work to reach the people most affected This is about more than regulating a product; it’s about creating a culture of intention, safety, and equity as we move into this next chapter for Virginia. I deeply believe we can build a system that supports both public health and personal empowerment, but only if we invest in education as intentionally as we invest in access. Thank you for your time, your leadership, and your commitment to putting people and communities first as we shape the future of cannabis in Virginia.
Virginia Hemp Coalition Policy & Legislative Recommendations for 2025/2026 Summary: We at the VHC fundamentally believe that Cannabis Sativa, also called Hemp and Marijuana among other names, which consists of many different cultivars used by mankind as a resource for various beneficial end uses, is our right to cultivate, process, manufacture, and consume. This viewpoint is fundamental to our unwavering mission to bring this plant to its rightful place in society and end all the corrupt prohibition and games being played by various government powers at the Federal and State level. This does not mean we believe there should be no regulations, actually just the opposite. We recommend fair regulation of the various hemp and marijuana products in the marketplace, just like all other similar products. There are three categories in which we believe these products should fall into for regulations – industrial hemp products, dietary supplement/food products derived from hemp, and intoxicating cannabis products. This document will go into those three categories and discuss our policy and legislative recommendations for the future, taking into account public safety, economic opportunities, inherent rights, and public health. We believe that policy and regulations for these three categories are not complicated as many politicians and bureaucrats make it out to be. We don’t have to reinvent the wheel, as we have similar products in all three categories that provide guidelines. Our hemp/cannabis policy agenda is in alignment with the American way of free markets, personal responsibly, reasonable regulations, and an even playing field where the Government is not picking winners and losers. We live in the United States of America, not North Korea, where the State controls industry. Hemp/cannabis derived products should get the same respect as all other similar products in the American marketplace. Intoxicating Cannabinoids Policy: Research and anecdotal evidence indicate THC may be used to treat a wide range of medical conditions, and from a recreational standpoint, it can feel good, causing a sensation of euphoria and relaxation in some, while potentially increasing appetite. We live in a society where beer, wine and liquor are ubiquitous and in easy reach of children without child protective packaging. We look at the current regulation of beer, wine and tobacco for guidance on how we should be regulating THC derived products. Again, this isn’t “rocket science” and we do not need to reinvent the wheel when considering how to regulate these products consumers desire. We recommend regulating intoxicating cannabinoids much like beer and wine. The age limit should be 21 and over, and taxation should be in line with other products. All stores that stock these products should be licensed like the ABC does for alcohol, and the products themselves should be tested for purity and contaminates and be properly labeled. There should always be a free market like beer and wine, and the Government should never allow monopolies for these products as that only increases the sales of black market cannabis. Just like the Government promotes the beer and wine industry for the economy and taxation revenues, they should also promote the cannabis industry.
Hello, my concern with the Okta is that the state is making health care providers collect social security numbers in order to provide a healthcare service. I'm sure that the Veteran's Administration can tell you that this is a bad idea on multiple levels. In fact, Medicare isn't even putting SS#s on their cards anymore. Because it's a bad idea to do that.
I’m interested in knowing what Virginia’s would like to do with people that were incarcerated for Cannabis in previous years before legalization?
Elect Abigail Spanberger For Governor Of Virginia Because She Will Legalize Marijuana Whereas The Other Lady Running For Governor Of Virginia Doesn't Want To Legalize It
These proposed changes are not needed and shift focus away from healthcare providers. As a patient I believe this is overreach by the CCA and not needed!
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient. I strongly oppose the CCA’s mandate that all certifications move to its portal on November 2, 2025. This bypasses both the General Assembly and Virginia’s public rule-making requirements. It disregards the role of providers, who know our histories, educate us, and support us as our needs change. My doctor knows me and is able to help me make safe decisions about my use of this product. Also, what is going on with HSA 1? We have been without a provider since this system was set up. When will we get a Health Service Area in Charlottesville?
Please consider changing the definition of "Marijuana paraphernalia" in the 2025 bill to only include the last line "ingesting, inhaling, or otherwise introducing into the human body marijuana." The definition is too exhaustive and could create regulatory problems for grow supplies and such items. Refining the definition would also make easier adding a line that requires paraphernalia imported into Virginia to have "Country of Origin" labeling. Too many stores in Virginia are selling and marketing glass pipe imports as made in America. Virginia has a rich history in glassblowing. Customers who want American made art glass pipes, specifically Virginia/local made, should have a right to know what they are buying. Thank You!
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new policy forcing all certifications into its portal. This was not approved by the VA General Assembly and ignores Virginia law. The CCA needs to reconsider and not pass this change.
I oppose the CCA’s portal mandate you are trying to impose. This was not passed by the State of Virginia General Assembly and ignores Virginia's public facing process for rule changes like this. It also interferes with patient care and undermines our medical providers. We should reconsider if the CCA should be in charge of this process or if the members of the CCA board are the right, qualified people to be making these decisions.
As a medical cannabis patient in Virginia, I reject the CCA’s certification rule. It bypasses the legislature and disregards Virginia’s laws. My provider knows my medical history and must remain central to my care. This new mandate only creates barriers and doesnt help patients who need educated care.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient writing to express opposition to the CCA’s recent mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through its portal beginning November 2, 2025. This requirement was not enacted by the General Assembly and circumvents the public rule making process required under Virginia law.
As a Virginia medical cannabis patient, I oppose the CCA mandate taking effect November 2, 2025. It is unlawful because it was not passed by the General Assembly and it bypasses the public rule making process. My provider knows my health needs and adjusts my care as required. The CCA system would block that flexibility.
As a Virginia medical cannabis patient, I oppose the CCA mandate taking effect November 2, 2025. It is unlawful because it was not passed by the General Assembly and it bypasses the public process. My provider knows my healthcare needs and adjusts my care as required. The CCA system would block that flexibility.
As a patient, I ask that the CCA withdraw its portal mandate. It was not authorized by the General Assembly and fails to follow the legal Viginia process. It also will disrupt my provider’s ability to manage my care and prescription.
I oppose the CCA’s new certification requirement. It wasn’t passed by lawmakers and ignores the rule making process. My provider must remain free to adjust my care when needed.
As a Virginia medical cannabis patient, I strongly object to the CCA mandate requiring all certifications to go through its portal starting November 2, 2025. This action was not authorized by the legislature and sidesteps the lawful rule making process. The rule disrupts care for patients like me. My provider knows my medical history and updates my certification when my needs change. The CCA system will take that away.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s certification portal mandate beginning November 2, 2025. This requirement was not passed by the General Assembly and denies Virginians the public rulemaking process our laws guarantee. My provider’s knowledge of my medical history and ongoing care is essential. Forcing everything through the CCA system strips away my right to a flexible, patient-centered approach.
Dear Sir or Madam, I oppose the CCA’s decision to centralize certifications in its portal starting November 2, 2025. It wasn’t passed by the legislature and cuts out public oversight. This disrupts my relationship with my provider. It is not needed. Thank You, Ruth Hurd
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient and reject the CCA’s portal mandate. It sidesteps both the General Assembly and public accountability. My provider knows my needs and must be able to update my certification. This change serves no purpose with legalization so near.
I oppose the CCA’s November 2, 2025 certification requirement. It was never passed by lawmakers and skips Virginia’s process. My provider, not a state portal, should manage my care. With legalization on the horizon, this rule is harmful.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I write as one of the many Virginia medical cannabis patients opposing the CCA’s certification mandate, effective November 2, 2025. The mandate was not enacted by the General Assembly and avoids the required public rule making process. Providers are essential to our health. By removing their ability to update certifications, the CCA system disrupts care for countless Virginians. This mandate is an unhelpful step backward.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient. I urge the CCA to reconsider its new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through its portal beginning November 2, 2025. This decision was not authorized by the General Assembly and bypasses the lawful public rulemaking process. This rule disrupts patient care by limiting providers’ ability to make timely adjustments. With adult-use legalization approaching, such restrictions are unnecessary and harmful.
As a Virginia patient, I oppose the CCA mandate requiring certifications to go through its portal starting November 2, 2025. This mandate was not passed by lawmakers and avoids the transparent rule making process our laws require. This policy undermines my provider’s role in my care and blocks needed updates to certifications. Patients deserve accountability, not overreach.
As a Virginia patient, I oppose the CCA’s certification portal rule, scheduled to take effect November 2, 2025. This mandate was not enacted by the General Assembly and fails to follow the established process required by Virginia law. It threatens my medical care, and others, by removing my provider’s ability to update certifications as needed. This policy is both unlawful and unnecessary.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I object to the CCA’s new certification mandate taking effect November 2, 2025. This decision bypasses the General Assembly and the legal process for changes. This change WASTES resources and creates disruption just as Virginia moves toward adult-use legalization. My provider already offers safe, ongoing care. There is NO NEED FOR THIS!
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I object to the CCA’s new certification mandate taking effect November 2, 2025. This decision bypasses the General Assembly and the legal process for changes. This change WASTES resources and creates disruption just as Virginia moves toward adult-use legalization. My provider already offers safe, ongoing care. There is NO NEED FOR THIS!
As a Virginia medical cannabis patient, I oppose the CCA’s certification mandate effective November 2, 2025. This policy bypasses both the legislature and Virginia’s rule making requirements. My care depends on trust between me and my provider. They know my medical history and update my certification as my needs change. The CCA system severs that bond and inserts unnecessary obstacles. This mandate is misguided and an overstep by the CCA.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient. The CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be submitted through its portal as of November 2, 2025 threatens my medical care. This policy was not approved by the General Assembly and bypasses the lawful rule process. My provider is my lifelinem, they know my history and help guide my treatment. The CCA system disrupts that essential care.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I am alarmed by the CCA’s plan to force all certifications into its portal beginning November 2, 2025. This mandate was NEVER passed by the General Assembly and avoids the rule making process that ensures fairness and accountability. My care depends on my provider, who understands my medical history and adjusts treatment when needed. This system would block that - and for what reason???? Why impose such a harmful barrier now???
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient. I oppose the CCA’s November 2, 2025 certification mandate. It bypasses the General Assembly and violates Virginia’s required public rule making process. This rule disrupts care, undermines the provider-patient relationship, and is unnecessary with legalization imminent.
As a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and cancer survivor, I strongly object to the CCA mandate requiring all certifications to go through its portal starting November 2, 2025. This action was NOT authorized by the legislature and sidesteps the lawful rule-making process. This rule disrupts care for patients like me. My provider knows my EXTENSIVE medical history and updates my certification when my needs change. The CCA system will take that away for NO REASON. This change is set to hurt patients more than it helps.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I urgently oppose the CCA’s mandate forcing all certifications through its portal starting November 2, 2025. This decision bypasses both the General Assembly and the public’s right to input under Virginia law. My provider is not just a name in a system — they know my medical history, provide education, and adjust treatment when necessary. The CCA mandate undermines that essential care. With legalization less than six months away, imposing such a disruptive requirement is harmful and unjust.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient writing to express opposition to the CCA’s recent mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through its portal beginning November 2, 2025. This requirement was not enacted by the General Assembly and circumvents the public rule making process required under Virginia law. My provider understands my medical history and provides essential ongoing care. The proposed system would disrupt that relationship and limit my provider’s ability to update my certification in response to changing needs. With adult-use legalization expected soon, this mandate is unwarranted and counterproductive.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I strongly oppose the CCA’s mandate that all certifications move to its portal on November 2, 2025. This policy bypasses both the General Assembly and Virginia’s public rule-making requirements. It disregards the role of providers, who know our histories, educate us, and support us as our needs change. Forcing everything into the CCA system disrupts patient care. With legalization around the corner, patients deserve stability — not unnecessary obstacles.
As a Virginia medical cannabis patient, I oppose the CCA mandate taking effect November 2, 2025. It is unlawful because it was not passed by the General Assembly and it bypasses the public rulemaking process. My provider knows my health needs and adjusts my care as required. The CCA system would block that flexibility. With adult-use legalization close, this new barrier makes no sense.
I am a medical cannabis patient in Virginia. My provider has taken the time to know my medical history, educate me, and adjust my treatment as needed. The CCA’s plan to require all certifications to run through its portal beginning November 2, 2025 would disrupt this relationship and limit my care. This rule was not passed by the General Assembly and ignores Virginia’s required rulemaking process. With legalization approaching, patients should not be subjected to unnecessary restrictions like this.
I write to oppose the CCA’s new portal mandate for certifications, effective November 2, 2025. This rule was not enacted by the General Assembly and avoids the public rule making process guaranteed by Virginia law. As a patient, my provider is central to my care. They know my history and adjust my certification as needed. The CCA system undermines this process and creates needless obstacles. With adult-use legalization imminent, such a mandate is unjustified.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I do not support the CCA’s requirement that all certifications go through its portal after November 2, 2025. This was never approved by the General Assembly and does not follow the rulemaking steps required by law. My provider knows me, my history, and my needs. Moving certifications into the CCA system would take away flexibility and hurt my care. Since legalization is expected soon, this mandate is unnecessary.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I urgently oppose the CCA’s mandate forcing all certifications through its portal starting November 2, 2025. This decision bypasses both the General Assembly and the public’s right to input under Virginia law. My provider is not just a name in a system — they know my medical history, provide education, and adjust treatment when necessary. The CCA mandate undermines that essential care. With legalization less than six months away, imposing such a disruptive requirement is harmful and unjust.
I am 74 years old, a taxpayer and I write this commission as a Virginia medical cannabis patient in opposition the CCA’s registration mandate for 2025. This policy did not pass our General Assembly and circumvents Virginia’s required public rule-making process. It directly interferes with the physician-patient relationship. My provider, who understands my medical history and treatment needs, would lose the ability to update my certification promptly as conditions change. With adult-use legalization likely months away, implementing this mandate is unjustified and harmful.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and my care depends on my provider’s knowledge of my medical history and needs. The CCA’s new rule requiring all certifications to be processed through its portal as of November 2, 2025 threatens that care. This change was not enacted by the General Assembly and bypasses the legal rule making process. Restricting certifications to the CCA system removes flexibility, disrupts patient-provider relationships, and ultimately harms those of us relying on consistent treatment. Given the proximity of adult-use legalization, this requirement is both premature and unnecessary.
As a Virginia medical cannabis patient, I respectfully but firmly object to the CCA’s new requirement that all certifications go through its portal beginning November 2, 2025. This mandate was not passed by the General Assembly and sidesteps the public rulemaking process required by state law. My healthcare provider is familiar with my unique medical history and provides vital education and support. Shifting certifications into the CCA system would undermine this relationship and limit my provider’s ability to respond to changes in my treatment. With adult-use legalization approaching, now is not the time to create unnecessary barriers.
I am a registered Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I strongly oppose the CCA’s mandate requiring all certifications to be processed exclusively through its portal starting November 2, 2025. This policy was not authorized by the General Assembly and circumvents the public rulemaking process outlined in Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, educates me on treatment options, and provides ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA system disrupts my care and removes my provider’s ability to update my certification as my needs evolve. With adult-use legalization likely less than six months away, this mandate is unnecessary and harmful.
As a patient receiving cannabis under a doctor's certification I do not want the change suggested by the Board. I am receiving care from the doctor of my choice who can review my medical records and dispense appropriately. My doctor is someone I trust. My level of knowledge is sufficient to allow me to chose for myself.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rule making process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. What is this commission doing????
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
My name is Jonathan Warburton, a Virginia citizen planning to start a small, craft cannabis business upon recreational legalization. The existing medical market is dominated and run by large, well-funded Multi-State Operators (MSOs). Without intentional safeguards, these same MSOs are positioned to dominate and monopolize the recreational market as well, leaving little room for independent, Virginia-owned businesses and startups to participate or succeed. I envision starting a local, independent business specializing in premium, small-batch cannabis cultivation. This “craft” model provides unique quality, community connection, and consumer choice that large scale operators cannot replicate. Just as importantly, the profits from a “Mom and Pop” style business would remain in Virginia rather than being extracted by out-of-state corporations. I am concerned that the barriers to entering the market, such as excessive capital requirements or MSOs lobbying against smaller license tiers, will make it impossible for passionate, quality-focused Virginians like myself to compete or even launch a business. To ensure Virginia develops a fair and competitive market, I respectfully urge the Commission to address the following questions: 1. Will the licensing structure explicitly include dedicated tiers (like microbusiness or craft grower licenses) with scaled requirements appropriate for small to midsize operators? I urge the Commission to look at successful models, such as Delaware's tiered licensing system, which effectively supports smaller entrants. 2. What concrete measures are being taken to actively reduce financial and regulatory barriers to entry for truly independent, Virginia-owned small businesses? This includes addressing application and licensing fees, operational costs, and compliance burdens that MSOs can easily absorb, effectively locking out local entrepreneurs. 3. How will the Commission ensure that small-scale, quality-driven cultivation is valued and protected as part of Virginia’s retail framework? Product diversity and consumer choice depend on the intentional inclusion of smaller operators. A fair and inclusive market will not happen by default. It requires deliberate policy choices that level the playing field and prevent monopolization by multi-state corporations. I urge the Commission to ensure that Virginians, especially independent craft operators, have a viable path to participate and succeed in this new industry. Thank you for your commitment to building a cannabis market that reflects Virginia’s values and creates opportunities for all of its citizens.
My name is Jonathan Warburton, a Virginia citizen planning to start a small, craft cannabis business upon recreational legalization. The existing medical market is dominated and run by large, well-funded Multi-State Operators (MSOs). Without intentional safeguards, these same MSOs are positioned to dominate and monopolize the recreational market as well, leaving little room for independent, Virginia-owned businesses and startups to participate or succeed. I envision starting a local, independent business specializing in premium, small-batch cannabis cultivation. This “craft” model provides unique quality, community connection, and consumer choice that large scale operators cannot replicate. Just as importantly, the profits from a “Mom and Pop” style business would remain in Virginia rather than being extracted by out-of-state corporations. I am concerned that the barriers to entering the market, such as excessive capital requirements or MSOs lobbying against smaller license tiers, will make it impossible for passionate, quality-focused Virginians like myself to compete or even launch a business. To ensure Virginia develops a fair and competitive market, I respectfully urge the Commission to address the following questions: 1. Will the licensing structure explicitly include dedicated tiers (like microbusiness or craft grower licenses) with scaled requirements appropriate for small to midsize operators? I urge the Commission to look at successful models, such as Delaware's tiered licensing system, which effectively supports smaller entrants. 2. What concrete measures are being taken to actively reduce financial and regulatory barriers to entry for truly independent, Virginia-owned small businesses? This includes addressing application and licensing fees, operational costs, and compliance burdens that MSOs can easily absorb, effectively locking out local entrepreneurs. 3. How will the Commission ensure that small-scale, quality-driven cultivation is valued and protected as part of Virginia’s retail framework? Product diversity and consumer choice depend on the intentional inclusion of smaller operators. A fair and inclusive market will not happen by default. It requires deliberate policy choices that level the playing field and prevent monopolization by multi-state corporations. I urge the Commission to ensure that Virginians, especially independent craft operators, have a viable path to participate and succeed in this new industry. Thank you for your commitment to building a cannabis market that reflects Virginia’s values and creates opportunities for all of its citizens.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
My name is Martin Amos, and I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process. Thank you Martin Amos
I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. I do not think that the government should be involved in my healthcare! We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. She has helped me through some very serious insomnia issues. I would probably still be struggling without her knowledge and care. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. This mandate should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process. Thank you. Ethan Ford
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am the husband of a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the mandate that all patients must be certified through the CCA portal. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the rule making process required by Virginia law! Forcing all certifications into CCA’s system would disrupt my wife’s care, and remove her provider’s ability to update her certification should her needs change.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I have been a Virgina medical cannabis patient for several years for the treatment of inoperable complex lower back pain. I oppose the Cannabis Control Authority’s (CCA) new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025 unless there are modifications to the process as proposed. I understand the proposed change was not passed by the General Assemble and appears to by pass the public rule making process required by Virginia law. My provider who happens to be a medical professional knows my medical history and has been exceptional in providing medical support and education. The forcing of all certifications into the CCA’s proposed system without system modifications that would allow my provider to update my certification when required by my medical condition does not follow the intent of a true medical cannabis program. The implementation of the proposed CCA portal without following the proper legislative process does not allow for broader public participation in the design of a process that truly responds to the General Assembly’s intent in establishing the Commonwealth's medical cannabis program.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
Dear Members of the Virginia Cannabis Control Authority, I am writing to express my deep concern regarding the mandate that significantly impacts the ability of medical cannabis practitioners to serve their patients effectively. As a patient under the care of a licensed cannabis physician, I have been informed that this new regulation will hinder her ability to provide the care I rely on. This mandate not only places undue restrictions on medical professionals but also threatens the continuity and quality of care for patients like myself who depend on cannabis as a legitimate and effective treatment. My doctor has consistently acted in accordance with Virginia law and medical ethics, and her guidance has been essential to my well-being. Limiting her ability to practice undermines the trust and progress that Virginia’s medical cannabis program has worked hard to build. I urge the Authority to reconsider this mandate and engage with medical professionals and patients to better understand the real-world consequences of these changes. A collaborative approach that respects both public safety and patient care is essential. Please do not allow bureaucratic overreach to compromise the health and autonomy of Virginia’s medical cannabis community.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process. I have registered with the CA portal for the last two years. Unfortunately, the system never did process my registration correctly. I feel it would cause more problems for us Medical Marijuana (MMJ) patients than it would fix. The current system works well, and adding an additional step would likely burden many MMJ patients without access to the internet, amd/or having limited funds (many of us are disabled on a fixed, low income).
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a senior citizen and a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process! - Leo Norton
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. Why is this change happening??!!
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rule making process required by Virginia law. John Shields
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I adamantly oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rule making process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
Good day! I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process. Thank you for your time!
I respectfully oppose the Cannabis Control Authority’s (CCA) mandate requiring all medical cannabis certifications be processed exclusively through the CCA portal. This policy is unnecessary, inconsistent with statutory authority, procedurally defective, and harmful to both patients and providers. The consistent feedback from patients and my own experience as a healthcare provider and former legislator lead me to conclude this mandate should not move forward in its current form. 1. Exclusive Point of Access Is Inconsistent With Medical Practice and Unprecedented in Virginia The issue is not the existence of a portal but making it the only method to issue certifications. In every other area of medical practice in Virginia, providers retain the ability to issue, store, and amend records within their own systems. Even during the earlier registration requirement, providers issued certifications directly, and patients completed state registration. Mandating exclusive portal use imposes a single-gatekeeper model with no precedent in Virginia healthcare and conflicts with § 4.1-1601(B), which requires a written certification “on a form provided by the Authority” but does not require exclusive portal issuance. 2. Loss of Provider Access to the Medical Record Once a certification is issued in the CCA portal, I cannot directly edit my attestation. Any change must be submitted as an “Update application” in the portal and is subject to Authority review. This delays care, disrupts continuity, and conflicts with confidentiality and security principles in § 4.1-1601(H). 3. Inconsistent With Governing Cannabis Law Nothing in § 4.1-1601(B) authorizes the CCA to require that certifications be issued only through its portal. Legislative intent was to ensure a standard form, not to create an exclusive processing channel that reduces provider autonomy and limits patient choice. 4. Violation of the Administrative Process Act (APA) The APA requires formal notice-and-comment procedures for changes of this nature, including a Notice of Intended Regulatory Action, economic impact analysis, and public comment periods (§§ 2.2-4007, 2.2-4007.01–.05, 2.2-4002.1). Implementing this mandate as an internal policy circumvents those requirements, depriving stakeholders of their legal right to participate. Summary Concern: Regulatory End Run By issuing this as a policy directive rather than a regulation, the CCA is bypassing both its enabling statute and procedural safeguards, undermining transparency, stakeholder engagement, and public trust. Recommendation Pause until: Authority for the mandate is established in statute or adopted through an APA-compliant regulatory process. Providers retain full read/write access to their patient records. The issue is addressed in the next General Assembly Session. A public transition plan and FAQ are posted with a lawful period for public comment. Stakeholders, including patients and providers, are fully consulted. Virginia’s medical cannabis program was built on principles of patient access, provider autonomy, and legal transparency. This mandate undermines all three. I urge the Board to delay or reject implementation until a lawful, patient-centered, and collaborative path forward is established. Respectfully submitted, Dawn M. Adams, DNP, ANP-BC Former Delegate, VA GA (2018-2024) Assistant Professor (Policy) Richmond, Virginia
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rule making process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We may be less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. Thank you,
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process. Thank you, Danyelle Ketring
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
It's a shame at my age I must suffer with pain 24-7. I am 65 yrs of age with multiple symptoms and lack of use of my hands. You take away our pain meds for fear of addiction, now you want to take away or control the only other remedy that helps. We elderly are the Unintended victims that must suffer because of the carelessness of those who abuse their meds. I finally found something that helps ease my pain and again you wish to take that from us elderly. And the Government wonders why there is so many on street drugs. I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
As a patient receiving cannabis under a doctor's certification I do not want the change suggested by the Board. I am receiving care from the doctor of my choice who can review my medical records and dispense appropriately. She is someone I trust. My level of knowledge is sufficient to allow me to chose for myself. Thank you, J. Thomas McGrath
I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. I have benefited from the certification process in my care for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (dianosed January 2025). The provider I worked with was fully informed of my medical history and took a great deal of time to educate me. She also offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Lisa Asiamah
The program has been well appreciated and beneficial. I would recommend to keep the program in place as it works for patients and has benefited Virginia with taxes as well. I would like to see this stay in place as it has benefited my health overall.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process. Thank you for you support, G Tune
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process. Thank you Meredith Gomez 500 thomas rd Lynxhburg va 24501
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I have suffered with depression most of my adult life. I am 72-years old. Under the care of Dr. Dawn Adams, I have experienced a dramatic turnaround. I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
Hello, I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process. Thank you for your time, Blair Harris
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2,2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid to 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process. Thank you for attention to this matter. George W. Thomas Iii
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process
To whom it may concern: I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process. Sincerely, Allison Wilder, PhD
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process. It only takes a few minutes: click the link, enter your name and location, paste or personalize the comment above, and hit submit. I know it’s summer and everyone is busy. But this change is real, it is coming quickly, and it will directly affect your access to care. Please take a few minutes to speak up now. Dr Adams has been taking care of us all she does a in depth face time an makes sure i know what in doing with my Medication , an makes sure im not taking anything that can hurt me cause I'm on a lot medications . She has a [phone line open for us i have called just to ask questions about things i don't understand not only that she emails us all during the year tells us when laws change in Chesterfield an other information throughout the year . She does her job above an beyond , she is very professional and thorough . I would think i would be losing out on all this if you do what your doing an that affects my life . thanks David
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. Stop placing undo burdens on the citizens. We voted for our legislative body to address these needs, they voted, and now we have to continue fighting to not go backwards! The My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process. I am writing this under a pseudonym. I can be reached at elsieshadows@gmail.com
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
Hello, I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rule-making process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
Hello, I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process. Thank you
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
As a Virginia medical cannabis patient, I strongly oppose the Cannabis Control Authority’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed exclusively through the CCA portal starting November 2, 2025. This sweeping change was never approved by the General Assembly and blatantly circumvents the public rulemaking process mandated by Virginia law. My healthcare provider intimately understands my medical history, dedicates time to educate me, and provides essential ongoing support tailored to my evolving needs. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system threatens to disrupt this critical patient-provider relationship and strips my provider of the ability to promptly update my certification as my condition changes. With adult-use legalization likely less than six months away, and current certifications remaining valid well into 2026, this mandate is not only unnecessary but also harmful. It undermines patient care and disregards the proper legislative process. I urge the CCA to halt this mandate and respect the legal framework designed to protect patients like me.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient who strongly opposes the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal in Nov 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly , and it bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process. I kindly ask you to reject the mandate requiring all cannabis certifications to be processed through the CCA portal.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process. Thank you, Mr. Withrow
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a legal medical user of cannabis. My care provider takes the time to educate me, follow my symptoms, and change my certification if necessary. The proposed rule changes, I.e., submitting everything through the CCA portal would effectively end this (to me) vital medical aspect that my care provider offers. Please rethink this industrial approach that will do harm to people who are legitimate medical users of cannabis.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
Please do not precede with the changes to the medical cannabis prescription recording. I feel this to be a violation of my doctor/ patient privilege. My information should be between my doctor and I, not a government portal. Medical cannabis is helping people and preventing use of other, more dangerous drugs such as opioids. Doctor's don't have to do that with opioids to prescribe them, don't make it so they do with a safer drug
I am a voting citizen and behavioral health provider in the community, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. Providers who prescribe Cannabis know the medical history, takes the time to educate their patients, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt care and remove the provider’s ability to update certifications if the patient's needs change. This kind of complication is not imposed on any other medication or provider and makes the process complicated and difficult for patients. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider, Dawn Adams, knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. Thank you, GailMarie Steininger
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. This legislation interferes with my medical care and privacy for no greater good. This mandate has not been approved by the people of Virginia. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. As I underst his change, it was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, coordinates with my primary health care provider, (as well as my pain management clinic and orthopedic specialist when necessary), and offers ongoing support. Please note that each of my healthcare providers agreed with my use of cannibis for pain management and especially for restful sleeping, but we're federally restricted prescribe such treatment. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my cannibis provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. Important to note is that my cannabis provider's expertise assessed my total health and determined the proper prescription and modality for me was to ensure I got a restful night's sleep. As a result, I have less pain throughout the day which can be managed with Tylenol and occasional Robaxin for muscle strains. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process. If you feel mandating is necessary, then give my cannabis provider authority to write prescriptions that a cannabis dispensary must compound.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. As I underst his change, it was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, coordinates with my primary health care provider, (as well as my pain management clinic and orthopedic specialist when necessary), and offers ongoing support. Please note that each of my healthcare providers agreed with my use of cannibis for pain management and especially for restful sleeping, but we're federally restricted prescribe such treatment. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my cannibis provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. Important to note is that my cannabis provider's expertise assessed my total health and determined the proper prescription and modality for me was to ensure I got a restful night's sleep. As a result, I have less pain throughout the day which can be managed with Tylenol and occasional Robaxin for muscle strains. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process. If you feel mandating is necessary, then give my cannabis provider authority to write prescriptions that a cannabis dispensary must compound.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process. David Mount
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process. Lastly, I am a retired principal who has had operations for pain since retiring. My doctor knows my history and shares actual data about what may improve my situation and what may have negative repercussions. I do not see how the upcoming change will benefit my condition and the services I currently receive. Thank you, Greg Ciszek
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I have been made aware of potential changes to the certification process that appear to make it so my provider can no longer directly provide me care. I understand the need to consolidate and streamline systems, but removing providers' ability to provide guidance and care does not seem like collateral damage worth incurring. There are very many facets to consider with regards to medical cannabis - it is not a one size fits all. And with recreational cannabis forthcoming, the need for patients to have trusted guidance will be more important than ever. Self-medication may be reliable for some, but many (myself included) rely on the opinions of professionals to weigh heavily on our decision making process. If a provider loses a patient's medical history and ability to directly engage with the patient, their job becomes increasingly difficult and patients suffer as a result. If it is a matter of ensuring certifications are tracked, that can be done without imposing a roadblock for providers and making patients suffer. I have seen what happens when patients need their pharmaceuticals but have to jump through hoops with insurance and multiple third parties just to get what their doctor - a trained professional that spent a decade or more of their life getting educated on how to provide care - already knows is the proper treatment. These delays can be weeks or months long for medicines that can wreak havoc if people miss a single dose. I cannot stand to see the same happen for cannabis.
This medication has been taken by me for pain management. Please allow Dr Adam’s to continue to work with me on this medication. Thank you
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process. With Respect, Scotty Jamerson
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rule making process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
I am a Virginia medical cannabis patient, and I oppose the CCA’s new mandate requiring all certifications to be processed through the CCA portal beginning November 2, 2025. This change was not passed by the General Assembly and bypasses the public rulemaking process required by Virginia law. My provider knows my medical history, takes the time to educate me, and offers ongoing support. Forcing all certifications into the CCA’s system would disrupt my care and remove my provider’s ability to update my certification if my needs change. We are likely less than six months from adult-use legalization, and certifications issued now remain valid into 2026. This mandate is unnecessary, harmful, and should not be implemented without following the proper legislative process.
The previous tier system for canopy size and amount of licenses allowed should stay near where they are at because these hemp farmers will flood the system with cheap outdoor or greenhouse (larger price point, but slightly) if they allowed to have large canopies then flipping their farms to delta 9. Also the utilities for water need to be considered for outdoors. While indoor uses more electrical, solar and wind can compensate for this, unlike data centers. In favor of restricting seed-to-sale in favor of two-tier system from wholesaler to retailer, but i see a conflict as MSOs already use satellite locations for retail so some may argue disadvantage. Stabilization caps to real estate assessors over green-zones should be in language to prevent greed from municipalities and land owners profiting from state resources given to those arrested for cannabis in the past struggling to start a new business. I think the Lucas proposal to use revenue for Medicaid cuts should actually be pooled from Rainy Day funds because if this is not a rainy day, what is?! Also lowering some of the pre-K funds should be okay if the forecast models are correct for sales we will be quite alright with providing resources, on top of local tax revenues that can be directed their as well. In fact might incentivize localities to participate and not opt-out if they have more autonomy and responsibility for pre-K funds