Hoping for common sense policies from democrats who think of all Virginia citizens first. Please keep the hard working people in mind because we are the ones paying for it.

Please support HB1559 which clarifies that you do not need to furnish proof of training when renewing your CHP. Thank you.

As a mom, former social worker, and gun owner, I believe in supporting gun legislation that underscores the responsibility of gun ownership and provides protection for our children and loves ones in our communities. I support HB 1869, HB 2064, and HB 2241. I oppose HB 1559, HB 2412 and HB 2414.

HB1559 (SUPPORT) clarifies that you don't need to furnish proof of training when renewing your CHP HB1869 (OPPOSE) expands the prohibition of rights for people convicted of *misdemeanor* assault and battery HB2064 (OPPOSE) requires dealers to post warnings and supply warnings with firearms, as well as supply locking devices HB2145 (SUPPORT) would remove the 30-day wait to purchase for those with new VA driver's licenses that are Real IDs HB2242 (OPPOSE) would prohibit the rights of someone convicted of a *misdemeanor* "hate" crime HB2412 (SUPPORT) would remove the carry ban in VA rest areas and ABC stores HB2414 (SUPPORT) would define in-person training for CHP to include online platforms like Zoom, etc., where the instructor and student can see each other and interact in real time

I am a clinical psychologist who has worked in forensic and correctional mental health for over forty years in Virginia. As such, I have extensive experience evaluating and treating both juveniles and adults who have engaged in gun violence, including mass murder. I have also worked as a police psychologist and have been trained to use firearms. I can confidently assure you that a “good guy with a gun” can at any moment become a danger to society, and laws that limit access to firearms do indeed deter both self-harm and harm to others. For that reason, I support each of these bills that provide for greater ‘good sense’ gun safety. Perhaps more to the point is the fact that most individuals who kill are not interested in nor are they amenable to mental health treatment- regardless of how much this would appear to make sense. Unfortunately, portraying gun violence as a mental health issue will do nothing to reduce the problem. Controlling access to weapons, mandating thoughtful training and registration, and placing safety and the sanctity of life above all else is the only reasonable, respectful and PROVEN response to the threat of impulsivity, entitlement and rage. After spending my professional lifetime with violent offenders, let me assure you that the vast majority of folks who are viewed as “crazy,” still remain very much aware of credibly serious and consistent consequences for bad behavior. Gun violence is NOT a mental health issue but good sense laws and human life are a right above all others.

I am in strong favor of the proposed bill that would amend the process for renewing concealed handgun permits in Virginia, specifically by removing the requirement for previously permitted individuals to provide proof of training or demonstrate competence upon renewal. Here are the compelling reasons supporting this legislation: 1. Recognition of Existing Competence: Individuals who have already been issued a concealed handgun permit have demonstrated their competence with a firearm at the time of their initial application. Requiring them to re-demonstrate this competence does not reflect their ongoing experience and responsibility with firearms. Recognition similar to how professional licenses often do not require re-testing for renewals if there's no change in the law or significant lapse in time. 2. Streamlining the Process: By eliminating the need for retraining or re-demonstration, this efficiency can reduce wait times and administrative costs, aligning with principles of good governance and public service efficiency, which were indirectly supported in cases like Goldberg v. Kelly (1970), where the Supreme Court emphasized the importance of procedural due process in government actions, including the efficiency of administrative processes. 3. Respect for Gun Owners' Time and Resources: Gun owners who seek to renew their permits are often responsible, law-abiding citizens who have already invested time and potentially money into initial training. Requiring them to go through this process is an unnecessary burden, financially and temporally. This bill echoes economic liberty principles found in cases like Lochner v. New York (1905), which argued against undue restrictions on economic activities. 4. Encouragement of Responsible Gun Ownership: This legislation encourages responsible gun ownership by not penalizing permit holders with unnecessary hurdles. It sends a message that the state trusts its citizens. This trust is foundational to the Second Amendment rights, as affirmed in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), where the Supreme Court recognized the right to bear arms for law-abiding citizens. 5. Consistency with Other State Practices: This bill would bring Virginia in line with other states' practices, promoting consistency and reducing confusion for gun owners who might move between states or have dealings in multiple jurisdictions, a situation indirectly addressed in United States v. Masciandaro (2010) regarding the interstate nature of gun rights. 6. Reducing Government Overreach: This bill reduces what could be perceived as government overreach into the personal lives of responsible gun owners. It respects their privacy and autonomy, seen in cases like Griswold v. Connecticut (1965), which recognized a zone of privacy. 7. Focus on Actual Safety Concerns: This targeted approach is more in line with effective public safety strategies, similar to the tailored approach to constitutional rights seen in United States v. Salerno (1987). In conclusion, this bill supports the recognition of previously demonstrated competence, streamlines administrative processes, respects gun owners' resources, encourages responsible ownership, aligns with other states, reduces government overreach, and focuses regulatory efforts where they are most needed. I strongly support its passage to enhance the efficiency, fairness, and trust in Virginia's concealed handgun permit renewal process.

With reference to HB1607: The definition of ‘assault firearms’ used for this bill (as defined in 18.2-308.2:2) is completely arbitrary and includes the most popular firearms in use today by hundreds of thousands of law-abiding citizens in this country. Ref HB1569: The fee for a CHP was always supposed to be used to cover the time and manpower it took to do the background check. As we all know, that can be done now with two minutes on a keyboard. Some localities have set their fees as low as $10. Since a citizen having a CHP, indicating that they have passed a government mandated background check, is only a benefit to the public and not the citizen, the burden should be carried by the public, not the citizen.

Please support HB1559 as it clarifies what is required for renewal of carry permits. According to the FBI data, individual citizens who have gone through the lengthy process to obtain a carry permit are six times LESS likely than active duty police to be arrested for a crime. That means the citizens who are renewing their carry permit are probably the most law abiding class of citizens in the state. Why should they be punished with additional red-tape when renewing their permit.

I'm a volunteer with Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America, and we oppose this bill. It’s very important that anyone carrying a concealed handgun in our communities receives regular training on how to be safe and responsible. We oppose efforts to reduce the amount of training required for permits.

I support the 2nd amendment. As the 2nd amendment is a RIGHT not a privilege I do NOT support these continued attempts to destroy or limit that right in any way shape of form. I support no FEEs on a permit for this right (I SUPPORT HB1569 and HB1559). I support no GUN bills or law that further limits this I right. I DO NOT SUPPORT HB1597. I DO NOT SUPPORT HB 1607.

I support HB1559 - "CHP Renewal Proof Of Training": This bill clarifies for judges & circuit court clerks that once proof of training is furnished with the initial CHP application, that proof carries over to renewals. It is in keeping with 18.2-308.02 (B) which states, "The court shall require proof that the applicant has demonstrated competence with a handgun in person and the applicant may demonstrate such competence by one of the following, but no applicant shall be required to submit to any additional demonstration of competence, nor shall any proof of demonstrated competence expire:" The fact that the applicant has previously held a Virginia CHP is a matter of record and establishes that they have demonstrated competence previously. Please pass this bill!

To the honorable Committee's and representatives, The bills referenced should be automatically tossed. As representatives, you have an oath to uphold and defend the constitution of the United States including the 2nd Amendment which limits GOVERNMENT authority to control firearms, not citizen. Furthermore, each one of these rules does one of two things: 1. It has not and never will do anything to solve the issue of violence. California, New York, Chicago, and many other cities controlled by democrats, and that have passed some of the most sweeping control, has failed to taper down the violence. Why is this truth ignored when it has been STATISTICALLY proven that more firearms and freedom does limit violence. If it saves one child, is it not worth it? Second, it flies in the face of several landmark rulings. First is D.C. vs Heller, and the Second is Bruen vs New York. Both cases have absolutely been paramount in putting the limitation on these bills and must be brought into consideration when reviewing these bills. I ask that you all apply the Historical clause as prescribed by the Supreme Court, and the measure of the absolute law of the land in the US Constitution, and reject these bills outright. The Constitution is absolute and is not fluid. If it is, then many of the other rights and limitations are no longer valid and the whole basis of society is no longer viable in a country such as ours. Thank you.

This makes good sense, proof of training has already been submitted to get the license originally...why submit the same info for a renewal? This would cut down on costs and save time.

Gun reform is critical to keeping our communities safe. Every measure we can pass to ensure our loved ones and neighbors are not at risk of the tragedies that has destroyed too many American families and communities already. Background checks need to be more thorough, red flags must be implemented. There is no precaution too small when it comes to senseless violence and loss at the hands of firearms. and, possibly most importantly, no civilian needs to be able to access or use an assault rifle or the materials to build one (ghost guns/kits). These must be banned here and everywhere. Too much carnage has already taken place on our streets, in our schools and in communities across our country. The gun industry has gone unchecked long enough and accountability is needed today. Change is necessary and we can be that change now. Please do whats best and right to keep Virginians safe from gun violence.

I am a mother, a teacher and apart of Moms Demand Action. I am in support of bill HB1559. It is common sense to have anyone handling a gun with concealed handgun permit to demonstrate competence. I support the renewal of the concealed handgun permit to include a demonstrated competence. This is an important bill for our state of Virginia.

I support these bills to make our community safer

No new gun control. Enforce the current laws. Stop trying to make good guys into bad guys.

Please pass these comments sense safety laws. The county desperately needs them.

I support HB 1559 because it clarifies what is and is NOT required to renew one's CHP. If the General Assembly wishes to ensure Virginians are all educated in gun safety, then restore requirements for all students to be instructed in gun safety as part of physical education or health classes. I support HB 1569 because it lowers the cost of a permit making self-defense more accessible for lower income individuals. Futhermore, since VA no longer requires FBI fingerprinting for this process, the $25 fee for FBI printing incorporated into the fee structure is no longer needed. Localities keeping the higher fees are merely committing theft. I oppose HB 1597 because my hands are too small to use biometric safes. My fingers cannot reach the fingerprint readers/scanners, AND my fingerprints are difficult to read by electronic devices. Furthermore, I resent the government interference in how I manage my own home. This law puts me in danger in the event of a home intrusion. I do not appreciate this reckless attempt to regulate how I protect myself and my family in my own home. Furthermore, enforcement of these requirements would require egregious violations of privacy in our own homes. I oppose HB 1660 because it is too vague to be enforceable. If I can use my own hands or my shirt sleeves or a belt loop to "bump fire" a semi-automatic firearm, will I be arrested? Will my clothing be seized? Will my hands be cut off? Furthermore, at what exact point does a firearm 'mimic automatic weapon fire,' considering that different automatic firearms have different rates of fire? And how does someone determine what the rate of fire is for a person shooting a firearm unassisted? There are professional shooters, such as world champion Jerry Miculek, who can shoot a firearm without assisting devices at eye-popping speeds. Unadulterated semi-automatic firearms can be 'bump fired' by simply holding them the right way. If we put violent criminals in prison and keep them there as long as possible - even restore the death penalty for those who murder repeatedly or commit mass killings, we have no need to regulate firearms or their users in this way.

I am in SUPPORT of HB 1599. As a firearms instructor and educator in the state of Virginia, taking a firearms safety course for the renewal of a concealed carry license is redundant, as is showing up in person to submit the paperwork to receive a new one. Utilizing the opportunity to mail in a renewal form with the pertinent information needed is sufficient AND PRACTICAL. The process of renewal, considering Virginia's laws on acquiring the permit, in general (per § 18.2-308.02), should be easy for not only those renewing their permit, but also for the court personnel responsible for approval.

HB1559: I support this bill. This is a simple, common-sense bill to correct a misunderstanding that some circuit court clerks have. It does not change who is eligible for a concealed handgun permit. It only prevents people from being needlessly hassled by clerks who don't know the law. HB1569: I support this bill. Concealed handgun permit fees are being set higher than necessary by some localities as a source of extra revenue or as a way of discouraging applicants. The existing fee caps were set based on a fingerprinting requirement that no longer exists, so it makes perfect sense to reduce the cap. HB1597: I oppose this bill, which reads like a laundry list of gun storage ideas which may be good ideas in many circumstances, but which should not be mandated by law. The bill even contradicts itself, suggesting that allowing minors to have unsupervised access to firearms should result in a jail sentence, but also saying that if an unsupervised minor uses a firearm in self-defense, it should not be a violation of the law. This bill's provisions related to storage in a vehicle would serve only to punish theft victims. Some people wouldn't need to store their firearms in their vehicles if not for laws passed in 2020 which made it illegal to carry a gun in many public places. HB1660: I oppose this bill. The General Assembly should not attempt to regulate firearm components based on subjective criteria which can vary from person to person.

Shall NOT be infringed.

SUPPORT HB1559-CHP Renewal Proof Of Training: This common-sense bill clarifies for judges and circuit court clerks that once the proof of training is furnished with the initial permit application, that proof carries over to renewals. It is in keeping with 18.2-308.02 (B) which states, "The court shall require proof that the applicant has demonstrated competence with a handgun in person and the applicant may demonstrate such competence by one of the following, but no applicant shall be required to submit to any additional demonstration of competence, nor shall any proof of demonstrated competence expire:" The fact that the applicant has previously held a Virginia CHP is a matter of record and establishes that they have demonstrated competence previously. SUPPORT HB1569-Reduction of fees for CHP: The fee for Virginia Resident Concealed Handgun Permits (CHP) was set based on the cost to the localities and the state, and was ONLY intended to reimburse the government for the expense of processing the permit applications. It was NOT intended as a tax. In fact, if it were a tax it would be akin to a poll tax, which we all can agree is unconstitutional. The allowable amount for the local law enforcement was set at UP TO $35 and included $25 for the FBI fingerprint processing. Fingerprints are no longer allowed for resident concealed handgun permits, and the processing of applications is much less labor intensive due to digital records being widely available. The allowable fee should be reduced accordingly. OPPOSE HB 1597-Secure storage of firearms: The proposed 18.2-308.7:1 is in conflict with the referenced 18.2-56.2, which allows access to firearms by minors age 14 and older, provided the access does not reclessly endanger life or limb of a child under age 14. HB1597 also does not take into account access for hunting. Youth age 12 and above who have successfully completed the hunter education safety course and obtained a hunting license can legally hunt unsupervised according to current Virginia code. In addition, this does not allow for all kinds of firearm locks, including the padlock type that is typically supplied with new firearms. The requirement for biometric safes is unaffordable for many, and biometrics are notoriously unreliable, which could result in injury or loss of life in emergency situations. The section of this bill applying to firearm storage is not always achievable. Some vehicles do not have a place that will adequately conceal a safe. And the penalty section punishes the victim for actions beyond their control if a criminal breaks into the vehicle and steals the gun, which is compounded if that person uses it in a crime and/or harms himself or someone else with it. OPPOSE HB1660-Altering the definition of Trigger Activator: The bill as proposed is ambiguous and unenforceable. What is the definition of "...rate of fire...faster thant that possible for a person to fire such semi-automatic firearm unassisted?" Who sets the standard for this?

I am against any gun control legislation for adults over 18 years old.

As a gun owner, I believe strongly in the responsibility that comes with the right to own and carry firearms. In my parents' household growing up and my own home now, safety and competency are non-negotiable parts of gun ownership. HB1559 would allow concealed carry permits to be renewed without proof of competency, which undermines the commitment to responsibility that should define our gun-owning culture. Requiring proof of competency for all permit holders—whether new or renewing—ensures that individuals carrying concealed firearms are prepared to do so safely and responsibly. Removing this requirement for renewals undermines public safety and sets a dangerous precedent. Firearms are powerful tools, and maintaining regular, up-to-date training is a critical part of protecting both the individual carrying and those around them. I urge you to reject this bill and uphold the standards that keep our communities safer.

We MUST have stricter gun laws. At this point its common sense. Please protect our children and have stricter gun laws in order to keep our children safe at school and beyond.

I support this common-sense bill which would expand the definition of family or household member to afford greater protections following an assault and would make it a misdemeanor to purchase, possess, or transport a firearm after being convicted of assault and battery against an intimate partner. This bill affords further protections to victims of domestic abuse.

I support this common-sense bill which would expand the definition of family or household member to afford greater protections following an assault and would make it a misdemeanor to purchase, possess, or transport a firearm after being convicted of assault and battery against an intimate partner. This bill affords further protections to victims of domestic abuse.

As a sexual and domestic violence advocate and violence prevention practitioner, I urge you to support this bill to expand the definition of family or household member and close the potential loophole that allows dating or sexual partners convicted of domestic violence-related misdemeanors to legally own or possess firearms. Simply the presence of a firearm in a domestic violence situation increases the risk of homicide by 500%. With this bill, we could improve public safety and prevent further violence to survivors of domestic violence. This will not only keep survivors safe, but communities at large by keeping firearms out of the hands of people who shouldn't have them. Thank you.

Hoping for common sense policies from democrats who think of all Virginia citizens first. Please keep the hard working people in mind because we are the ones paying for it.

Please oppose HB1869. Virginians shouldn't lose constitutional rights due to misdemeanors for assault in battery. If it was a felony, yes, but not for misdemeanors.

As a mom, former social worker, and gun owner, I believe in supporting gun legislation that underscores the responsibility of gun ownership and provides protection for our children and loves ones in our communities. I support HB 1869, HB 2064, and HB 2241. I oppose HB 1559, HB 2412 and HB 2414.

HB1559 (SUPPORT) clarifies that you don't need to furnish proof of training when renewing your CHP HB1869 (OPPOSE) expands the prohibition of rights for people convicted of *misdemeanor* assault and battery HB2064 (OPPOSE) requires dealers to post warnings and supply warnings with firearms, as well as supply locking devices HB2145 (SUPPORT) would remove the 30-day wait to purchase for those with new VA driver's licenses that are Real IDs HB2242 (OPPOSE) would prohibit the rights of someone convicted of a *misdemeanor* "hate" crime HB2412 (SUPPORT) would remove the carry ban in VA rest areas and ABC stores HB2414 (SUPPORT) would define in-person training for CHP to include online platforms like Zoom, etc., where the instructor and student can see each other and interact in real time

I am a clinical psychologist who has worked in forensic and correctional mental health for over forty years in Virginia. As such, I have extensive experience evaluating and treating both juveniles and adults who have engaged in gun violence, including mass murder. I have also worked as a police psychologist and have been trained to use firearms. I can confidently assure you that a “good guy with a gun” can at any moment become a danger to society, and laws that limit access to firearms do indeed deter both self-harm and harm to others. For that reason, I support each of these bills that provide for greater ‘good sense’ gun safety. Perhaps more to the point is the fact that most individuals who kill are not interested in nor are they amenable to mental health treatment- regardless of how much this would appear to make sense. Unfortunately, portraying gun violence as a mental health issue will do nothing to reduce the problem. Controlling access to weapons, mandating thoughtful training and registration, and placing safety and the sanctity of life above all else is the only reasonable, respectful and PROVEN response to the threat of impulsivity, entitlement and rage. After spending my professional lifetime with violent offenders, let me assure you that the vast majority of folks who are viewed as “crazy,” still remain very much aware of credibly serious and consistent consequences for bad behavior. Gun violence is NOT a mental health issue but good sense laws and human life are a right above all others.

I support expanding critical protections to additional relationship categories. As a mom to two young girls. I hope that if they ever have an abusive boyfriend, we'll be able to work with law enforcement to ensure that person does not have access to a gun so we can try to save my child's life.

I am vehemently opposed to the proposed amendment that would remove the requirement for individuals renewing their concealed handgun permits to provide proof of training or demonstrate competence. 1. Public Safety Concerns: Removing the necessity for proof of ongoing competence or training at renewal times undermines public safety. The Supreme Court in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) recognized the right to bear arms but also emphasized the importance of regulations that promote safety. 2. Deterioration of Skills: Firearm handling skills require regular practice to maintain. Without mandatory retraining or re-demonstration, permit holders might not keep up with best practices in firearm safety, leading to a potential decline in their ability to handle firearms responsibly. In discussions around Castle Rock v. Gonzales (2005) regarding the enforcement of protective orders, where ongoing training could ensure better public protection. 3. Legal and Regulatory Awareness: The case of McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010) highlighted the importance of understanding the legal framework around gun ownership. Without updated training, individuals might inadvertently break laws, leading to legal issues and potential public endangerment. 4. Risk of Complacency: This complacency can lead to negligence, as seen in cases like United States v. Miller (1939), where the regulation of firearms was discussed in the context of maintaining order and safety, suggesting that ongoing vigilance through training is necessary. 5. Undermining the Principle of Continuous Education: The amendment goes against the principle of continuous education. Just as professionals like doctors or pilots must undergo periodic recertification, gun owners should also be required to refresh their knowledge and skills. This principle was upheld in Buck v. Bell (1927) in a different context, where the court supported the state's interest in public welfare through regulated professional standards. 6. Precedent for Other Regulated Activities: Allowing this amendment sets a dangerous precedent for other regulated activities Contradicts United States v. Carolene Products Co. (1938), where the court supported regulatory measures for public safety. 7. Accountability and Trust: Holds permit holders accountable and builds public trust in the concealed carry system. Trust in regulatory systems was a factor in Wyeth v. Levine (2009), where the Supreme Court considered public trust in safety regulations. 8. Potential for Abuse: There's a potential for abuse where individuals might renew their permits without maintaining the necessary skills or knowledge, especially if their life circumstances change significantly (e.g., health issues affecting their ability to handle firearms safely). This concern aligns with the reasoning in United States v. Salerno (1987) about preventive detention, emphasizing the need for measures to ensure public safety. In conclusion, this amendment jeopardizes public safety, leads to skill deterioration, reduces legal awareness, encourages complacency, undermines the value of continuous education, sets a poor precedent, diminishes accountability, and opens the door for potential abuse. I strongly urge the rejection of this amendment to maintain the integrity, safety, and responsibility inherent in the concealed handgun permit system in Virginia.

My husband and i FULLY SUPPORT this and all common sense gun safety laws. We are gun owners and he is a retired military member. PLEASE pass this bill!

It is critical to extend the same protections to additional relationship categories. Intimate partner or dating relationships also need to to be part of domestic violence and firearms prohibitions.

People who are carrying a concealed weapon into our state should be subject to the laws we have set up to address this issue in Virginia!

These bills allow for those that wish to have guns to still have them, yet put safeguards in place so that the guns do not get into the wrong hands, are misused or changed into weapons meant to kill many people in a short amount of time. Please vote for these common sense gun laws so that children can live safely in our community with gun owners who prioritize safety.

I write as a taxpayer, a mother, a resident, a voter and a citizen of the Commonwealth of Virginia is strong SUPPORT of these bills. Our federal government refuses to do anything to save our children and make our country a safer place because they have all sold out to the NRA so the states is where is going to be so important! I am thankful for the efforts of our elected officials to do the right thing and high encourage passage of these bills.

I support all of these bills that will make our Commonwealth safer, adding critical protections for all.

HB1607 - I SUPPORT this bill as assault weapons make it easier for a person to kill a large number of people in a very short period of time – including children in schools, families at the mall or movies, congregations in houses of worship, etc. Assault weapons have no place in civilian life. HB1608 - I SUPPORT this bill as industry accountability is a great way to force manufacturers to raise standards of safety. HB1622 - I SUPPORT this bill as it would crack down on vehicle gun thefts and make our communities safer. This should be especially important in Virginia as 2022 FBI crime data shows that Richmond, Virginia is among the top 5 cities with the highest rates of gun theft from cars HB1660 - I SUPPORT this bill as automatic and semi-automatic weapons can kill a large number of people in a very short period of time and converting more guns to function this way is terrifying for the safety of our families. HB1797 - I SUPPORT this bill as visitors wishing to carry concealed handguns in Virginia should meet the same level of safety requirements that we require of our state’s residents. In many scenarios, visitors are held to the legal requirements of the state they are visiting, and applying this to gun safety should be common sense. HB1869 - I SUPPORT this bill as it expands critical protections to additional relationship categories. Especially in a time where people marry at a later age and/or more commonly cohabitate prior to marriage, allowing intimate partner, or dating relationships, to be protected keeps Virginians safer. HB1876 - I SUPPORT extending the protection of k-12 schools to our institutions of higher education. This is very personal to me as I spent 9 years working at a university and was involved in a scary situation where a student made violent threats with a firearm. HB1960 - I SUPPORT this bill, as it strengthens protections for domestic violence survivors.

I support these bills to make our community safer

I support HB1869 as it expands critical protections to additional relationship categories. For example, this bill would include a relationship where a woman cohabitates with her boyfriend. As a mother working to keep all children safe from gun violence, I support HB1869 and reducing the number of gun-related deaths in our community and in our nation.

I support this bill because I believe it would make our Commonwealth a safer place for everyone, including our children. Gun violence must be addressed and this is one of the many common sense laws proposed this session that can do that. Please take action and vote for this bill that could save lives.

As a graduate of Virginia Tech who was on campus during the mass shooting that occured on April 16, 2007, I strongly support increased regulations on guns. Having witnessed first half the devastation on communities that guns can cause, we need to prevent high capacity automatic and semi-automatic guns from being sold and ensure that loopholes that allow guns to be sold continue to be closed. As a mother of three young school aged children now, the sense of fear at which all families deal with on a daily basis is unfathomable and shouldn't be allowed to continue.

I support HB1869 as it expands critical protections to additional relationship categories. For example, this bill would include a relationship where a woman cohabitates with her boyfriend.

Please pass these comments sense safety laws. The county desperately needs them.

I support these bills as data shows common sense gun laws save lives.

I support these eight bills, as we need to take action against the senseless violence and deaths caused by guns. We need to ban assault weapons, hold the industry more accountable, prohibit people from leaving firearms visibly unattended in cars, ban kits that create automatic weapons, tighten concealed handgun permits, expand critical protections to additional relationship categories, extend protection against firearms to higher education, and protect domestic violence survivors. As a country and a state, we cannot continue to accept gun violence and deaths as the norm.

I support HB1607 as assault weapons make it easier for a person to kill a large number of people in a very short period of time – including children in schools. I felt the impact of this at Virginia Tech on April 16, 2007 as 32 students and teachers lost their lives. I support HB1608 as industry accountability is a great way to force manufacturers to raise standards of safety. It shouldn't be easier to buy a gun than it is to rent a car. I support HB1622 as it would crack down on vehicle gun thefts and make our communities safer. I support HB1660 as automatic and semi-automatic weapons can kill a large number of people in a very short period of time. I felt the impact of this at Virginia Tech on April 16, 2007 as 32 students and teachers lost their lives. I support HB1797 as visitors wishing to carry concealed handguns in Virginia should meet the same level of safety requirements that we require of our state’s residents. I support HB1869 as it expands critical protections to additional relationship categories. For example, this bill would include a relationship where a woman cohabitates with her boyfriend. I support HB1876 as it extends the protection of k-12 schools to our institutions of higher education. I support HB1960 as it strengthens protections for domestic violence survivors.

I support this bill because I support any bill that seeks to create a safer community for our children to grow up in, that keeps guns away from schools, and that keep deadly weapons out of the hands of violent people who wish to violate our most protected right: the right to life. This is my number one issue.

We MUST have stricter gun laws. At this point its common sense. Please protect our children and have stricter gun laws in order to keep our children safe at school and beyond.

Guns are the #1 cause of death in children, I SUPPORT this bill as gun owners have a responsibility to not let weapons fall into the hands on children, teens, and other untrained or unqualified individuals. Data shows that approximately 55% of gun owners with children in the home do not securely store their weapons. It's beyond time to legislate measures to keep guns away from children.

I am writing in support of HB1597 and the safe storage of a firearm in a vehicle. This is a common sense safe storage gun law to prevent a firearm getting into the hands of a minor. I am writing in support of HB1977 in prohibited possession of a firearm in a hospital with mental health services. I am a nurse in a Richmond city hospital that does provide mental healt services. It is very important that fire arms are prohibited from theses areas to protect the health care workers and patients at this hospital. I am writing in support of HB2064 the providing of locking devices with the sale of a fire arm. This is a common sense and easy safe storage bill. It will provide the purchaser to have easy access to a locking device to keep anyone entering their house or vehicle safe from using this fire arm. I am writing in support of HB2241. I SUPPORT this bill because I believe that hate has no place in our state, and want to protect minority communities in our commonwealth.

I support this bill!

I support this bill because guns are the #1 cause of death in children. Anything that can be done to keep guns safely stored will save lives.

Guns are the #1 cause of death in children, we support this bill.

I support these bills as they prevent those that may not have clear mental faculties from having access to firearms while they are working on treatment for those issues. Many items for purchase in Virginia require that we have safety measures purchased in order to use them - including cars and alcohol. Requiring a gun lock for firearm purchases is common sense to ensure that those that should not be using the gun don't have access to it. Those that have been convicted of a hate crime should also not have access to guns as they have been convicted of criminal act that is motivated by bias against a person or their property. If immigrants are being deported because they are criminals, then citizens that are criminals shouldn't have access to firearms.

This is a bipartisan commonsense measure to keep guns out of the hands of children and teens. No child or family should have to go through the after affects of an accidental shooting or suicide attempt or an escalated disagreement that results in loss of life. We SUPPORT this bill.

I support this bill because guns are the #1 cause of death in children.

On HB1977. Please pass this bill. Prohibiting weapons in any facility is common sense and a way to keep people safe including mental health or emergency medical care. Commonsense restrictions on gun access is important to Virginians and in this case we should do all we can to protect the safety of our medical care providers and those in their care. On HB2064. How this is not already a law is shocking? People who own firearms should automatically be given a way to lock up their weapon. All firearms in Virginia should come with a warning label about keeping it out of the hands of kids. Guns are the #1 cause of death in children, we must make this law. On HB2241. There is no space for Hate in Virginia or anywhere. Now more than ever, we must make sure that criminals especially those convicted of a hate crime are never able to own a gun. Minority communities - and all Virginians should be protected in every way possible.

I am writing in support of HB2064. This is a common sense measure that will increase safety from accidental gun violence.

Guns are the #1 cause of death in children, we SUPPORT this bill. ]

We SUPPORT this bill as commonsense restrictions on gun access and believe in protecting the safety of our medical care providers. Guns are the #1 cause of death in children, we SUPPORT this bill. We SUPPORT this bill because we believe that hate has no place in our state, and want to protect minority communities in our commonwealth.

We SUPPORT this bill as commonsense restrictions on gun access and believe in protecting the safety of our medical care providers. Guns are the #1 cause of death in children, we SUPPORT this bill. We SUPPORT this bill because we believe that hate has no place in our state, and want to protect minority communities in our commonwealth.

HB2064: A gun is huge responsibility and having a mandatory lock would help prevent accidental injuries and death, especially among the most vulnerable, the children. #1 cause of death among children is gun violence. HB2241: A hate crime indicates malice towards others. Allowing guns into the hands of people who commit hate crimes is inviting even more egregious crimes to be committed.

Guns are the #1 cause of death in children. This bill is a great idea to try and reduce accidental and suicide deaths in children.

Hoping for common sense policies from democrats who think of all Virginia citizens first. Please keep the hard working people in mind because we are the ones paying for it.

Please oppose HB2065. I am not sure as a Virginian why we would waste resources on this. There is already a federal component, why would waste valuable resources and time on this. This will also burden gun store owners and make the cost more expensive for the Virginians who need it the most and are hurt the most by this bill. Lets spend resources on real issues.

As a mom, former social worker, and gun owner, I believe in supporting gun legislation that underscores the responsibility of gun ownership and provides protection for our children and loves ones in our communities. I support HB 1869, HB 2064, and HB 2241. I oppose HB 1559, HB 2412 and HB 2414.

HB1559 (SUPPORT) clarifies that you don't need to furnish proof of training when renewing your CHP HB1869 (OPPOSE) expands the prohibition of rights for people convicted of *misdemeanor* assault and battery HB2064 (OPPOSE) requires dealers to post warnings and supply warnings with firearms, as well as supply locking devices HB2145 (SUPPORT) would remove the 30-day wait to purchase for those with new VA driver's licenses that are Real IDs HB2242 (OPPOSE) would prohibit the rights of someone convicted of a *misdemeanor* "hate" crime HB2412 (SUPPORT) would remove the carry ban in VA rest areas and ABC stores HB2414 (SUPPORT) would define in-person training for CHP to include online platforms like Zoom, etc., where the instructor and student can see each other and interact in real time

I am a clinical psychologist who has worked in forensic and correctional mental health for over forty years in Virginia. As such, I have extensive experience evaluating and treating both juveniles and adults who have engaged in gun violence, including mass murder. I have also worked as a police psychologist and have been trained to use firearms. I can confidently assure you that a “good guy with a gun” can at any moment become a danger to society, and laws that limit access to firearms do indeed deter both self-harm and harm to others. For that reason, I support each of these bills that provide for greater ‘good sense’ gun safety. Perhaps more to the point is the fact that most individuals who kill are not interested in nor are they amenable to mental health treatment- regardless of how much this would appear to make sense. Unfortunately, portraying gun violence as a mental health issue will do nothing to reduce the problem. Controlling access to weapons, mandating thoughtful training and registration, and placing safety and the sanctity of life above all else is the only reasonable, respectful and PROVEN response to the threat of impulsivity, entitlement and rage. After spending my professional lifetime with violent offenders, let me assure you that the vast majority of folks who are viewed as “crazy,” still remain very much aware of credibly serious and consistent consequences for bad behavior. Gun violence is NOT a mental health issue but good sense laws and human life are a right above all others.

I support these bills to make our community safer

Please pass these comments sense safety laws. The county desperately needs them.

Hoping for common sense policies from democrats who think of all Virginia citizens first. Please keep the hard working people in mind because we are the ones paying for it.

Please support HB2145 which will remove the 30-day waiting period for purchase for those with the new VA Drivers License (Real IDs).

HB1559 (SUPPORT) clarifies that you don't need to furnish proof of training when renewing your CHP HB1869 (OPPOSE) expands the prohibition of rights for people convicted of *misdemeanor* assault and battery HB2064 (OPPOSE) requires dealers to post warnings and supply warnings with firearms, as well as supply locking devices HB2145 (SUPPORT) would remove the 30-day wait to purchase for those with new VA driver's licenses that are Real IDs HB2242 (OPPOSE) would prohibit the rights of someone convicted of a *misdemeanor* "hate" crime HB2412 (SUPPORT) would remove the carry ban in VA rest areas and ABC stores HB2414 (SUPPORT) would define in-person training for CHP to include online platforms like Zoom, etc., where the instructor and student can see each other and interact in real time

I am a clinical psychologist who has worked in forensic and correctional mental health for over forty years in Virginia. As such, I have extensive experience evaluating and treating both juveniles and adults who have engaged in gun violence, including mass murder. I have also worked as a police psychologist and have been trained to use firearms. I can confidently assure you that a “good guy with a gun” can at any moment become a danger to society, and laws that limit access to firearms do indeed deter both self-harm and harm to others. For that reason, I support each of these bills that provide for greater ‘good sense’ gun safety. Perhaps more to the point is the fact that most individuals who kill are not interested in nor are they amenable to mental health treatment- regardless of how much this would appear to make sense. Unfortunately, portraying gun violence as a mental health issue will do nothing to reduce the problem. Controlling access to weapons, mandating thoughtful training and registration, and placing safety and the sanctity of life above all else is the only reasonable, respectful and PROVEN response to the threat of impulsivity, entitlement and rage. After spending my professional lifetime with violent offenders, let me assure you that the vast majority of folks who are viewed as “crazy,” still remain very much aware of credibly serious and consistent consequences for bad behavior. Gun violence is NOT a mental health issue but good sense laws and human life are a right above all others.

I support these bills to make our community safer

Please pass these comments sense safety laws. The county desperately needs them.

We MUST have stricter gun laws. At this point its common sense. Please protect our children and have stricter gun laws in order to keep our children safe at school and beyond.

Stop this gun control crap you people don't know what the difference between a true assault weapon is I carried one during the gulf war and it's not like the one I have in my gun cabinet AR-15 sold in gun shops is not a assault weapon so give public the true information or better yet put it to a vote by the people let the people decide

I SUPPORT this bill because I believe that hate has no place in our state, I want to protect minority communities in our commonwealth, and it should be common sense that someone convicted of a hate crime should not own a gun.

I am writing in support of HB1597 and the safe storage of a firearm in a vehicle. This is a common sense safe storage gun law to prevent a firearm getting into the hands of a minor. I am writing in support of HB1977 in prohibited possession of a firearm in a hospital with mental health services. I am a nurse in a Richmond city hospital that does provide mental healt services. It is very important that fire arms are prohibited from theses areas to protect the health care workers and patients at this hospital. I am writing in support of HB2064 the providing of locking devices with the sale of a fire arm. This is a common sense and easy safe storage bill. It will provide the purchaser to have easy access to a locking device to keep anyone entering their house or vehicle safe from using this fire arm. I am writing in support of HB2241. I SUPPORT this bill because I believe that hate has no place in our state, and want to protect minority communities in our commonwealth.

I support this bill. We have seen the awful/lethal impact of hate crimes in Virginia and I support any common sense approach to addressing this issue.

I believe that hate has no place in our state and want to protect minority communities in our commonwealth.

We support this bill because we believe that hate has no place in our state and want to protect minority communities in our commonwealth

I support these bills as they prevent those that may not have clear mental faculties from having access to firearms while they are working on treatment for those issues. Many items for purchase in Virginia require that we have safety measures purchased in order to use them - including cars and alcohol. Requiring a gun lock for firearm purchases is common sense to ensure that those that should not be using the gun don't have access to it. Those that have been convicted of a hate crime should also not have access to guns as they have been convicted of criminal act that is motivated by bias against a person or their property. If immigrants are being deported because they are criminals, then citizens that are criminals shouldn't have access to firearms.

We SUPPORT this bill because we believe that hate has no place in our state, and want to protect minority communities in our commonwealth.

I support this bill because I believe that hate has no place in our state and want to protect minority communities in our commonwealth.

On HB1977. Please pass this bill. Prohibiting weapons in any facility is common sense and a way to keep people safe including mental health or emergency medical care. Commonsense restrictions on gun access is important to Virginians and in this case we should do all we can to protect the safety of our medical care providers and those in their care. On HB2064. How this is not already a law is shocking? People who own firearms should automatically be given a way to lock up their weapon. All firearms in Virginia should come with a warning label about keeping it out of the hands of kids. Guns are the #1 cause of death in children, we must make this law. On HB2241. There is no space for Hate in Virginia or anywhere. Now more than ever, we must make sure that criminals especially those convicted of a hate crime are never able to own a gun. Minority communities - and all Virginians should be protected in every way possible.

I am writing in support of HB2241. Hate has no place in Virginia, and people convicted of hate crimes should not have access to lethal weapons.

We SUPPORT this bill because we believe that hate has no place in our state, and want to protect minority communities in our commonwealth.

We SUPPORT this bill as commonsense restrictions on gun access and believe in protecting the safety of our medical care providers. Guns are the #1 cause of death in children, we SUPPORT this bill. We SUPPORT this bill because we believe that hate has no place in our state, and want to protect minority communities in our commonwealth.

We SUPPORT this bill as commonsense restrictions on gun access and believe in protecting the safety of our medical care providers. Guns are the #1 cause of death in children, we SUPPORT this bill. We SUPPORT this bill because we believe that hate has no place in our state, and want to protect minority communities in our commonwealth.

HB2064: A gun is huge responsibility and having a mandatory lock would help prevent accidental injuries and death, especially among the most vulnerable, the children. #1 cause of death among children is gun violence. HB2241: A hate crime indicates malice towards others. Allowing guns into the hands of people who commit hate crimes is inviting even more egregious crimes to be committed.

I support this bill. Hate has no place in our state, and we should protect minority communities in our commonwealth.

Hoping for common sense policies from democrats who think of all Virginia citizens first. Please keep the hard working people in mind because we are the ones paying for it.

Please oppose HB2241. It would be wrong for Virginian's to lose constitutional rights based on misdemeanor hate crimes. This would be abused. Would someone lose their gun rights for wearing an NRA hat or patch? If there was a felony charge for the hate crime, yes, but not a misdemeanor. This could easily conflict with 1st Amendment issue depending on the persons mindset. Please oppose this bill.

Good afternoon, Thank you Chairman and members of the committee. My name is Erin Earp and I'm a Senior Policy Attorney with the GIFFORDS Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence. Prior to working for GIFFORDS, I was an Assistant Commonwealth's Attorney in Alexandria, VA for 8 years. I write to express my, and GIFFORDS, support for Del. Tran's bill, HB2241, which would prohibit individuals from possessing firearms if they have been convicted of simple assault or assault and battery as a hate crime. Research shows that people who have been convicted of violent hate crimes tend to continue or escalate their behavior, and hate crimes are on the rise. In recent years, the FBI has elevated “racially motivated violent extremism” to a top-level priority threat, and identifying white supremacy as a major driver of mass casualty attacks. Between 2014 and 2021, hate crimes increased 94%. Each year, over 10,000 bias-motivated attacks are committed involving firearms. Those who have attacked someone because of their race, color, ethnic or national origin, religion, gender, gender identity, or sexual orientation should not be permitted to purchase or possess firearms. These individuals have shown that they are a danger to marginalized communities, and these communities deserve to be protected. I urge you to favorably report this bill. Thank you.

As a mom, former social worker, and gun owner, I believe in supporting gun legislation that underscores the responsibility of gun ownership and provides protection for our children and loves ones in our communities. I support HB 1869, HB 2064, and HB 2241. I oppose HB 1559, HB 2412 and HB 2414.

HB1559 (SUPPORT) clarifies that you don't need to furnish proof of training when renewing your CHP HB1869 (OPPOSE) expands the prohibition of rights for people convicted of *misdemeanor* assault and battery HB2064 (OPPOSE) requires dealers to post warnings and supply warnings with firearms, as well as supply locking devices HB2145 (SUPPORT) would remove the 30-day wait to purchase for those with new VA driver's licenses that are Real IDs HB2242 (OPPOSE) would prohibit the rights of someone convicted of a *misdemeanor* "hate" crime HB2412 (SUPPORT) would remove the carry ban in VA rest areas and ABC stores HB2414 (SUPPORT) would define in-person training for CHP to include online platforms like Zoom, etc., where the instructor and student can see each other and interact in real time

I am a clinical psychologist who has worked in forensic and correctional mental health for over forty years in Virginia. As such, I have extensive experience evaluating and treating both juveniles and adults who have engaged in gun violence, including mass murder. I have also worked as a police psychologist and have been trained to use firearms. I can confidently assure you that a “good guy with a gun” can at any moment become a danger to society, and laws that limit access to firearms do indeed deter both self-harm and harm to others. For that reason, I support each of these bills that provide for greater ‘good sense’ gun safety. Perhaps more to the point is the fact that most individuals who kill are not interested in nor are they amenable to mental health treatment- regardless of how much this would appear to make sense. Unfortunately, portraying gun violence as a mental health issue will do nothing to reduce the problem. Controlling access to weapons, mandating thoughtful training and registration, and placing safety and the sanctity of life above all else is the only reasonable, respectful and PROVEN response to the threat of impulsivity, entitlement and rage. After spending my professional lifetime with violent offenders, let me assure you that the vast majority of folks who are viewed as “crazy,” still remain very much aware of credibly serious and consistent consequences for bad behavior. Gun violence is NOT a mental health issue but good sense laws and human life are a right above all others.

I strongly oppose the bill that prohibits individuals convicted of misdemeanor hate crimes from possessing firearms, making it a Class 6 felony. This legislation is overly punitive, infringing on Second Amendment rights as established in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008). It disregards the principle of proportionality in punishment, highlighted in Graham v. Florida (2010), by equating a misdemeanor with felony-level consequences. The bill lacks a rehabilitative approach, ignoring the potential for personal growth, contrary to the ethos discussed in Roper v. Simmons (2005). It's too broad, risking misapplication, similar to concerns in Wisconsin v. Mitchell (1993). It also undermines self-defense rights, a core Second Amendment purpose, as seen in Castle Rock v. Gonzales (2005). Furthermore, it raises due process issues by not allowing for appeals or reassessment of risk, violating principles from United States v. Salerno (1987). The potential for biased enforcement, akin to issues in Batson v. Kentucky (1986), and the hindrance of societal reintegration, as discussed in Padilla v. Kentucky (2010), are significant concerns. This bill should be rejected for its lack of balance between public safety and individual rights.

I'm a volunteer with Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America, and I support this bill.

Hoping for common sense policies from democrats who think of all Virginia citizens first. Please keep the hard working people in mind because we are the ones paying for it.

Please support HB2412, in todays world it can very dangerous in public and especially at rest areas especially at night. Removing the carry ban in VA is for rest areas is a common sense gun law - people are vulnerable at these times and legal firearm owners (CHP and none) should be allowed to protect themselves and family if needed. At least allow conceal carry since those people are vetted and very lawful.

As a mom, former social worker, and gun owner, I believe in supporting gun legislation that underscores the responsibility of gun ownership and provides protection for our children and loves ones in our communities. I support HB 1869, HB 2064, and HB 2241. I oppose HB 1559, HB 2412 and HB 2414.

HB1559 (SUPPORT) clarifies that you don't need to furnish proof of training when renewing your CHP HB1869 (OPPOSE) expands the prohibition of rights for people convicted of *misdemeanor* assault and battery HB2064 (OPPOSE) requires dealers to post warnings and supply warnings with firearms, as well as supply locking devices HB2145 (SUPPORT) would remove the 30-day wait to purchase for those with new VA driver's licenses that are Real IDs HB2242 (OPPOSE) would prohibit the rights of someone convicted of a *misdemeanor* "hate" crime HB2412 (SUPPORT) would remove the carry ban in VA rest areas and ABC stores HB2414 (SUPPORT) would define in-person training for CHP to include online platforms like Zoom, etc., where the instructor and student can see each other and interact in real time

I am a clinical psychologist who has worked in forensic and correctional mental health for over forty years in Virginia. As such, I have extensive experience evaluating and treating both juveniles and adults who have engaged in gun violence, including mass murder. I have also worked as a police psychologist and have been trained to use firearms. I can confidently assure you that a “good guy with a gun” can at any moment become a danger to society, and laws that limit access to firearms do indeed deter both self-harm and harm to others. For that reason, I support each of these bills that provide for greater ‘good sense’ gun safety. Perhaps more to the point is the fact that most individuals who kill are not interested in nor are they amenable to mental health treatment- regardless of how much this would appear to make sense. Unfortunately, portraying gun violence as a mental health issue will do nothing to reduce the problem. Controlling access to weapons, mandating thoughtful training and registration, and placing safety and the sanctity of life above all else is the only reasonable, respectful and PROVEN response to the threat of impulsivity, entitlement and rage. After spending my professional lifetime with violent offenders, let me assure you that the vast majority of folks who are viewed as “crazy,” still remain very much aware of credibly serious and consistent consequences for bad behavior. Gun violence is NOT a mental health issue but good sense laws and human life are a right above all others.

I strongly support the proposed bill that would amend the law to permit the carrying of firearms or explosive materials in highway rest areas and government stores, exempting these from the general prohibition against such in buildings owned or leased by the Commonwealth. This legislation is a significant step forward in enhancing personal safety by allowing individuals to carry means of self-defense in locations that might be isolated or less secure, like highway rest areas, which are often located in remote spots where immediate law enforcement response might not be available. This aligns with the principles laid out in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), where the Supreme Court affirmed the individual right to bear arms for self-defense, suggesting that reasonable exceptions to carry restrictions can be made to uphold this right. Moreover, by extending this exception to government stores, the bill recognizes the practical need for self-defense in public spaces where citizens might spend time shopping or waiting, potentially reducing vulnerability in these environments. This aspect of the bill respects the self-defense rationale discussed in Castle Rock v. Gonzales (2005), where the importance of personal security was highlighted. The exemption is well-targeted, ensuring that it does not broadly undermine safety regulations in other Commonwealth buildings, thus maintaining a balance between public safety and individual rights. This legislation also reflects a pragmatic approach, acknowledging that not all Commonwealth properties require the same level of firearm restriction. Highway rest areas and government stores, due to their public nature and the activities they host, benefit from this nuanced policy. By allowing firearm carry in these specific locations, the bill supports the Second Amendment without compromising the safety measures in place for more sensitive or secure government facilities. This measured exemption promotes public safety, respects constitutional rights, and is practical for everyday situations, making it a commendable legislative move that I fully endorse.

I'm a volunteer with Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America, and we oppose this bill.

Hoping for common sense policies from democrats who think of all Virginia citizens first. Please keep the hard working people in mind because we are the ones paying for it.

Please support HB2414 which would define in person training to include online platforms that provide interactivity between trainers and applicants. This provides real time interactions and training and will benefit trainers and applicants.

As a mom, former social worker, and gun owner, I believe in supporting gun legislation that underscores the responsibility of gun ownership and provides protection for our children and loves ones in our communities. I support HB 1869, HB 2064, and HB 2241. I oppose HB 1559, HB 2412 and HB 2414.

HB1559 (SUPPORT) clarifies that you don't need to furnish proof of training when renewing your CHP HB1869 (OPPOSE) expands the prohibition of rights for people convicted of *misdemeanor* assault and battery HB2064 (OPPOSE) requires dealers to post warnings and supply warnings with firearms, as well as supply locking devices HB2145 (SUPPORT) would remove the 30-day wait to purchase for those with new VA driver's licenses that are Real IDs HB2242 (OPPOSE) would prohibit the rights of someone convicted of a *misdemeanor* "hate" crime HB2412 (SUPPORT) would remove the carry ban in VA rest areas and ABC stores HB2414 (SUPPORT) would define in-person training for CHP to include online platforms like Zoom, etc., where the instructor and student can see each other and interact in real time

I am a clinical psychologist who has worked in forensic and correctional mental health for over forty years in Virginia. As such, I have extensive experience evaluating and treating both juveniles and adults who have engaged in gun violence, including mass murder. I have also worked as a police psychologist and have been trained to use firearms. I can confidently assure you that a “good guy with a gun” can at any moment become a danger to society, and laws that limit access to firearms do indeed deter both self-harm and harm to others. For that reason, I support each of these bills that provide for greater ‘good sense’ gun safety. Perhaps more to the point is the fact that most individuals who kill are not interested in nor are they amenable to mental health treatment- regardless of how much this would appear to make sense. Unfortunately, portraying gun violence as a mental health issue will do nothing to reduce the problem. Controlling access to weapons, mandating thoughtful training and registration, and placing safety and the sanctity of life above all else is the only reasonable, respectful and PROVEN response to the threat of impulsivity, entitlement and rage. After spending my professional lifetime with violent offenders, let me assure you that the vast majority of folks who are viewed as “crazy,” still remain very much aware of credibly serious and consistent consequences for bad behavior. Gun violence is NOT a mental health issue but good sense laws and human life are a right above all others.

I am strongly in favor of the bill that removes the in-person demonstration of handgun competence for concealed carry permit applicants, allowing for virtual training via live video and audio communication. This forward-thinking legislation modernizes the process, making it more accessible and inclusive. By incorporating technology, it respects the Second Amendment rights as upheld in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), ensuring that individuals can exercise their right to bear arms without unnecessary barriers. This change acknowledges the advancements in remote learning, proven effective across various educational sectors, ensuring that safety training is not compromised but rather made more flexible. The bill's approach is particularly beneficial for individuals in rural areas where access to in-person training facilities might be limited, for those with mobility issues who find traveling to such locations challenging, or during public health crises when in-person gatherings are restricted. By enabling virtual training, this legislation enhances public safety by broadening access to responsible gun ownership education, allowing more citizens to be trained in firearm safety without geographical or logistical constraints. Moreover, this bill aligns with modern educational practices, promoting efficiency and adaptability in law. It recognizes that technology can facilitate learning just as effectively as traditional methods, if not more so in some cases, by providing interactive, real-time instruction through secure video platforms. This not only respects the rights of gun owners but also ensures that the training remains rigorous and comprehensive, as instructors can still observe and interact with students, ensuring they meet the necessary competence standards. I wholeheartedly support its passage for a more equitable, practical, and forward-looking approach to firearms training.