We do not know Mr. Moore, but we do know that many have been ensnared and are being incarcerated wrongly as a result of police unfair, immoral, and unconstitutional practices. One of our members so caught had his pension taken under VA administrative law. This is money he earned and had every right to. There is already NO penalty for judges, prosecutors, and police who wrongfully use tactics to gin up false child endangerment stats for public approbation and federal grant money. Passage of this bill is a step in the right direction toward justice.

We support the bill HB 1556 on the proviso that it authorizes the AG to prosecute cases involving ACTUAL children. To date, LE and prosecutorial arms in VA and elsewhere are allowed to further prosecutions by setting up online sex stings in which police approach unsuspecting adults looking to adult companionship, pretend to be an adult subscriber to a cite in violation of federal and state law, then abruptly claim to be underage (though their picture looks older), before arresting their targets in proactive (non investigatory trolling) and claiming the adult target was the aggressor and grooming a (fake) child merely by talking to the persona. An arrest is made even if no sex talk is advanced, and the prosecution then proceeds as if a real child was endangered. This must NOT be allowed to continue.

HB 1553. We support the bill.

I oppose a portion of House Bill 1589, which increases the Parole Board from 5 members to 10 members. It is written in a manner that may require prisoners, who do NOT have a life sentence, to get more votes to be paroled. This violates EX Post Facto laws under Article I, Section 9, Clause 3 of the U.S. Constitution. This bill, if passed, could negatively affect nearly all parole eligible inmates because an overwhelming majority of them do not have a life sentence. The bill seeks to amend Va Code § 53.1-134 to increase the Board from 5 to 10 members. It then seeks to amend Va Code § 53.1-134.1 to require “a panel of NO FEWER THAN three members” to appear at a prisoners parole hearing. (capitalization added). Finally, it seeks to amend Va Code § 53.1-134.1 to state, in relevant part, “A decision to grant discretionary parole shall require the concurrence of a MAJORITY of members present for the final deliberation and vote….” (capitalization and ellipsis added). These amendments may detriment the above-identified prisoners’ chances of being paroled. At present time, the prisoners need 3 of 5 votes to obtain parole. But the bill, as written, may require prisoners to obtain more votes to get parole. If six or seven Board members were to appear at a prisoner's parole hearing, he would need 4 votes to be paroled. If eight or nine Board members were to appear, he would need 5 votes. If ten members were to appear, he would need six votes. This is more than the three votes currently needed for prisoners to get parole. Also, this law could be used as a political weapon against high-profile criminals. Suppose those prisoners have built a compelling resume supporting their release. The Parole Board could convene in full at the final deliberation hearing (i.e. a public hearing) in effort to reduce the prisoner's chances of being released. It is less likely that such prisoners would get 6 votes in favor of parole. For these reasons, the bill must not pass as written.

We strongly support HB1759, which addresses one of the most significant challenges faced by those reentering society after incarceration: the lack of support for a successful transition. This bill ensures that critical educational, vocational, counseling, substance abuse, and reentry services are made available at probation and parole offices statewide. Through our advocacy, we hear stories of individuals desperate to break free from cycles of recidivism but unable to access the tools and guidance they need to succeed. This bill goes further by requiring collaboration with the Department of Workforce Development and Advancement to provide post-release job search assistance. Employment is a cornerstone of stability, and the services outlined in this bill can mean the difference between a fresh start and a return to prison. HB1759 is a step toward accountability, dignity, and real rehabilitation. It not only supports returning citizens but also benefits families, communities, and the Commonwealth as a whole. I urge you to vote in favor of this bill. _________________________________________________________________________________ We strongly support HB1589. This bill takes critical steps toward improving the structure and functioning of the Virginia Parole Board. Increasing the Board’s membership to 10 members not only allows for greater diversity of thought and experience but ensures that each case is given the time and attention it deserves. We’ve heard directly from incarcerated individuals who often feel that their futures hinge on rushed decisions by an overburdened system. By expanding the Board and requiring panels of three to four members for deliberation and voting, this bill introduces a more thorough and thoughtful process, particularly for those serving life sentences. This bill also includes vital provisions for transparency and fairness, ensuring that victims’ voices are heard and that those eligible for parole receive a meaningful review. Parole isn’t just a bureaucratic process; it’s about second chances, accountability, and hope. HB1589 strengthens the system for everyone involved, and we urge you to support it. ________________________________________________________________________________ We regularly hear from incarcerated individuals trapped in solitary confinement—many for months or even years. They share stories of overwhelming despair, debilitating anxiety, and the feeling of losing their very sense of humanity. One man described forgetting how to hold a conversation. Another said he hadn’t felt the sun on his skin in years. These are not isolated accounts—this is the daily reality of restorative housing as used by VADOC. Solitary confinement strips people of basic social skills, fractures their mental health, and leaves them traumatized. How can we expect rehabilitation when we take away their ability to function in the world? Instead of restoring lives, this practice destroys them. HB2647 is a critical step toward replacing cruelty with dignity. It’s time we move toward humane, effective solutions that truly restore lives and strengthen public safety. Please support this bill.

I support the 2nd amendment. As the 2nd amendment is a RIGHT not a privilege I do NOT support these continued attempts to destroy or limit that right in any way shape of form. I support no FEEs on a permit for this right (I SUPPORT HB1569 and HB1559). I support no GUN bills or law that further limits this I right. I DO NOT SUPPORT HB1597. I DO NOT SUPPORT HB 1607.

Gun reform is critical to keeping our communities safe. Every measure we can pass to ensure our loved ones and neighbors are not at risk of the tragedies that has destroyed too many American families and communities already. Background checks need to be more thorough, red flags must be implemented. There is no precaution too small when it comes to senseless violence and loss at the hands of firearms. and, possibly most importantly, no civilian needs to be able to access or use an assault rifle or the materials to build one (ghost guns/kits). These must be banned here and everywhere. Too much carnage has already taken place on our streets, in our schools and in communities across our country. The gun industry has gone unchecked long enough and accountability is needed today. Change is necessary and we can be that change now. Please do whats best and right to keep Virginians safe from gun violence.

I support these bills to make our community safer

Please pass these comments sense safety laws. The county desperately needs them.

Oppose off shore wind. I’m ground zero in Virginia Beach . I live 500 ft away from offshore/onshore construction at SMR. ITS A NIGHTMARE. Property damage, noisy and diesel dirty. Def not clean energy 18 months of hell and counting.

Please let me know about anything to do with ANY SOLAR or wind. Also why aren't you working on lowering this socialism health obamare that is failing! We pay double our house payment for healthcare. They do a certain percentage of what u make a year. I have to take money out of my 401k for healthcare that counts as income. It shouldn't count as income when you are taxing the heck out of us. We can't travel,most our prescriptions we use to take won't be covered and could go on and on about this robbery of people s hard earned money!

Do you remember any time you have called 911? Who was the 1st person you spoke with? Who was verbal presence and be the calm voice that helped you? Who was the person that started help? A Dispatcher!! It is long overdue for dispatchers to be treated with the same rights and privileges as first responders just as the responders with whom they share the highest public safety responsibilities. I will leave with a quote from Dr. Seuss “To the world you may be one person; but to one person you may be the world.

I have been dispatching for 12 years. This Bill would allow me to have the same disability benefits that my newer hired dispatchers receive from the Hybrid Retirement Plan disability program benefit. I have seen where someone in plan 1 who was out on FMLA for having a baby and she did not have enough accrued time for the full 12 weeks of FMLA., she did not receive paycheck towards the end of her FMLA. However, a different person (who the other person on FMLA Trained) in hybrid plan took FLMA got paid with the Hybrid Retirement Plan disability benefit for the full 12 weeks and did have to use all their accrued time. The Hybrid Retirement Plan disability program doesn't not fully pay it pays 66 percent that would help save accrued time usage. This would make all Dispatchers equal for Retirement Plan disability benefit from VRS. Thank you

I am in my 13 year of dispatching for Caroline County Sheriff's Office. I have been a supervisor for 2 years. I was 45 years old when I started my career as a 911 Dispatcher. This career has been very rewarding in so many ways and it has been very emotional, upsetting, anxious, frustrating, heartbreaking. I attended a supervisor course 2 years and and found out that I do have triggers from doing this job. If I am near someone that is playing out loud a video of people arguing, fighting, screaming I immediately become anxious and angry. If I know the person they have to turn it off or I have to get away from the sound. Most of us have some sort of PTSD, sounds, visuals, the news, storms, snow everyone has a trigger. Let's talk about being a "First Responder", WE are the first on scene. Dispatchers are the first to take the call from someone that is sick, someone found their spouse unconscious and not breathing, Dispatchers are the first to give CPR instructions. We are the voice on the phone to separate a civil or domestic situation. WE (I) am the one that can still hear a 19 yo daughter crying to her mom "please don't leave me" as her mom is having a stroke. This is only a few examples. There are so many that all of us have that we try to compartmentalize. I am in favor of all 3 bills! Please recognize 911 Dispatchers as "First Responders!

This is long over due. please pass this bill

Please refer this bill to the full committee for consideration. This bill would give the locality option to receive enhanced retirement benefits to 911 dispatchers. Under current law, localities may provide enhanced benefits to firefighters and emergency medical technicians but not 911 dispatchers. Without 911 dispatchers no 1st responded would ever be dispatched to an incident.

Without 911 dispatchers, no first responder would ever be dispatched on an incident. Dispatchers experience many of the same psychological trauma and stressors as law enforcement, firefighters, and emergency medical personnel. Dispatchers are the first link in the chain between someone experiencing or observing something terrible and getting the proper assistance to them efficiently. They make decisions in spilt seconds that have a lasting impact on the outcome of an emergency. These 911 personnel are exposed to same stressors that personnel on scene experience. It is demanding work with extended hours, few breaks, and around-the-clock, get-it-right-the-first-time service expectations from the same citizens who expect law enforcement officers, firefighters, and emergency medical technicians to do the same. Please pass this so that all first responders in the Commonwealth have the same benefits.

I support these 3 because I have been a 911 Dispatcher for over 30 years. I have answered calls of many types including my brothers suicide call back in 2006. We hear people scream, take their last breath, shoot themselves, we hear callers beg for their loved one that they found unconscious and not breathing not to leave the that they were supposed to go first as we are giving them CPR instructions and they are attempting to do what we are telling them to do until help can arrive. We have to calm down callers during domestics usually by telling the caller to go to another location in away from the other party before help arrives, and many more. We may not physically be on the scene but we are mentally on the scene. We are the first contact in an emergency.

I am a dispatcher for the Caroline County sheriff’s office, during my shift there could be only 3 of us working at a time. I have taken calls where I’ve had to give CPR instructions while both Medics and Deputies get on scene. Im In favor of this bill for many reasons. We are the calm voice in the storm, we are the first person that they call in need. I support all three bills!

Currently, Dispatchers are excluded from the enhanced retirement benefits, despite their critical role in saving lives during emergencies. These unsung heroes are vital to the safety and security of their communities they serve. Per JLARC study of Oct 2023(table 5), there are public safety occupations that have the same level of physical demand as a Dispatcher but less public safety responsibility that currently receive enhanced benefits. The stress, combined with the 24-7 nature of the job, has made it hard to attract and retain workers. This will help recruit and retain dispatchers. Dispatchers are just like other public safety first responders. They work in bad weather, holidays and weekends. While the Clerks of court and Clerks of the county are off. Please help to stop this disparity against Dispatchers. I would like to give my support to this bill. Please pass this bill and allow local governments, have the option to provide enhanced retirement benefits for full-time salaried dispatchers.

Constitutional carry is the only way law-abiding citizens can fully defend themselves and their families from criminals who refuse to abide by the laws. No restrictive gun laws have seems to reduce gun crimes, have they?

I'm a volunteer with Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America, and we support this bill. State-level offices of violence prevention are critical for sustaining the work of community violence intervention programs. Community violence intervention programs are critical for reducing violence in cities with complex violence ecosystems.

I SUPPORT this bill as community violence intervention programs have proven to be incredibly effective in deterring gun violence. They are great ways to get leadership and insight from local communities, and a way to impact the gun violence epidemic without impacting 2A rights. Grants would be funded by the taxes on firearms and ammo proposed in HB2558, Lopez.

I SUPPORT this bill as these programs have proven to be incredibly effective in deterring gun violence. Grants would be funded by the taxes on firearms and ammo proposed in HB2558, Lopez.

I support this bill because it has a funding stream through the proposed firearms/ammunition tax and there is a proven success rate in programs similar to the one proposed to curb gun violence. It is a common sense approach to keeping Virginias safe.

I support this bill as these programs have proven to be incredibly effective in deterring gun violence. Grants would be funded by the taxes on firearms and ammo proposed in HB2558 Lopez. We especially need this now more than ever with resources being pulled on the federal level due to the new administration.

I support this bill as these programs have proven to be incredibly effective in deterring gun violence and saving lives.

I SUPPORT this bill as these programs have proven to be incredibly effective in deterring gun violence. Grants would be funded by the taxes on firearms and ammo proposed in HB2558, Lopez. These programs help prevent violent reinjury and retaliation which makes our communities safer and their success provides a financial benefit as well.

Community Violence Prevention programs are evidence based and have proven results. These programs work directly with individuals most at risk at being involved with violence and providing them direct and individualized community support. The Hopewell Project SAF program by REAL LIFE has seen a 45% reduction in the number of shooting incidents resulting in injury or death in June 2023 - March 2024 compared to June 2022 - March 2023. These best practices and lessons learned can be used for communities throughout Virginia and make a positive impact to so many individuals.

I support this bill as these programs have proven to be incredibly effective in deterring gun violence. Grants would be funded by the taxes on firearms and ammo proposed in HB2558 Lopez.

We SUPPORT this bill as these programs have proven to be incredibly effective in deterring gun violence. Grants would be funded by the taxes on firearms and ammo proposed in HB2558, Lopez.

Programs like this have proven to be incredibly effective at preventing gun violence, which is one of the top killers of at-risk youth. Protecting them while they're young helps prevent more violence as they grow older.

CVIs are incredibly successful at preventing gun violence. Fully supporting and funding these programs would save many lives!

I support this bill as these programs have proven to be incredibly effective in deterring gun violence. Grants would be funded by the taxes on firearms and ammo proposed in HB2558 Lopez.

I support these bills to make our community safer

Please pass these comments sense safety laws. The county desperately needs them.

January 15, 2025 Honorable Alfonso H. Lopez Chair, House Labor and Commerce – Subcommittee #2 House Committee Room A - 008 General Assembly Building 201 North 9th Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 RE: Support HB 1766 and HB 1767 Dear Delegate Lopez, I am David E. Balducchi, retired from the U.S. Department of Labor, a member of the Advisory Board of Social Action Linking Together (SALT), elected member of the National Academy of Social Insurance, and a resident of Springfield, Virginia. I understand that on January 16, your committee will be considering HB 1766 and HB 1767, two bills offered by chief patron, Delegate Marty Martinez. I write in support of HB 1766, which will increase weekly unemployment benefits for qualified individuals – if otherwise eligible - by $100 higher than the current weekly benefit amount. Higher benefits support local businesses and economies, as unemployment benefits are the fastest working dollar - resulting in a stronger multiplier effect. In addition, the bill requires establishing a work group to study making annual adjustments to the Commonwealth’s weekly benefits based upon the average weekly wage. Some thirty-three states set their maximum benefits as a portion of the state’s average weekly wage, and Virigina should investigate this approach. As well, I support HB 1767, which provides that for new claims effective on or after July 1, 2025, an individual’s weekly unemployment benefit amount shall be paid for a maximum duration of 26 weeks. According to the U.S. Department of Labor, duration should be uniform, so that claimants at all benefit levels can qualify for maximum duration, and experience has shown that, during ordinary times, a duration of 26 weeks is necessary. I urge that members of the Subcommittee #2 to support these bills. Sincerely, David E. Balducchi Member, Advisory Board Social Action Linking Together

We MUST have stricter gun laws. At this point its common sense. Please protect our children and have stricter gun laws in order to keep our children safe at school and beyond.

I support this common-sense bill which would expand the definition of family or household member to afford greater protections following an assault and would make it a misdemeanor to purchase, possess, or transport a firearm after being convicted of assault and battery against an intimate partner. This bill affords further protections to victims of domestic abuse.

I support this common-sense bill which would expand the definition of family or household member to afford greater protections following an assault and would make it a misdemeanor to purchase, possess, or transport a firearm after being convicted of assault and battery against an intimate partner. This bill affords further protections to victims of domestic abuse.

As a sexual and domestic violence advocate and violence prevention practitioner, I urge you to support this bill to expand the definition of family or household member and close the potential loophole that allows dating or sexual partners convicted of domestic violence-related misdemeanors to legally own or possess firearms. Simply the presence of a firearm in a domestic violence situation increases the risk of homicide by 500%. With this bill, we could improve public safety and prevent further violence to survivors of domestic violence. This will not only keep survivors safe, but communities at large by keeping firearms out of the hands of people who shouldn't have them. Thank you.

Hoping for common sense policies from democrats who think of all Virginia citizens first. Please keep the hard working people in mind because we are the ones paying for it.

Please oppose HB1869. Virginians shouldn't lose constitutional rights due to misdemeanors for assault in battery. If it was a felony, yes, but not for misdemeanors.

As a mom, former social worker, and gun owner, I believe in supporting gun legislation that underscores the responsibility of gun ownership and provides protection for our children and loves ones in our communities. I support HB 1869, HB 2064, and HB 2241. I oppose HB 1559, HB 2412 and HB 2414.

HB1559 (SUPPORT) clarifies that you don't need to furnish proof of training when renewing your CHP HB1869 (OPPOSE) expands the prohibition of rights for people convicted of *misdemeanor* assault and battery HB2064 (OPPOSE) requires dealers to post warnings and supply warnings with firearms, as well as supply locking devices HB2145 (SUPPORT) would remove the 30-day wait to purchase for those with new VA driver's licenses that are Real IDs HB2242 (OPPOSE) would prohibit the rights of someone convicted of a *misdemeanor* "hate" crime HB2412 (SUPPORT) would remove the carry ban in VA rest areas and ABC stores HB2414 (SUPPORT) would define in-person training for CHP to include online platforms like Zoom, etc., where the instructor and student can see each other and interact in real time

I am a clinical psychologist who has worked in forensic and correctional mental health for over forty years in Virginia. As such, I have extensive experience evaluating and treating both juveniles and adults who have engaged in gun violence, including mass murder. I have also worked as a police psychologist and have been trained to use firearms. I can confidently assure you that a “good guy with a gun” can at any moment become a danger to society, and laws that limit access to firearms do indeed deter both self-harm and harm to others. For that reason, I support each of these bills that provide for greater ‘good sense’ gun safety. Perhaps more to the point is the fact that most individuals who kill are not interested in nor are they amenable to mental health treatment- regardless of how much this would appear to make sense. Unfortunately, portraying gun violence as a mental health issue will do nothing to reduce the problem. Controlling access to weapons, mandating thoughtful training and registration, and placing safety and the sanctity of life above all else is the only reasonable, respectful and PROVEN response to the threat of impulsivity, entitlement and rage. After spending my professional lifetime with violent offenders, let me assure you that the vast majority of folks who are viewed as “crazy,” still remain very much aware of credibly serious and consistent consequences for bad behavior. Gun violence is NOT a mental health issue but good sense laws and human life are a right above all others.

I support expanding critical protections to additional relationship categories. As a mom to two young girls. I hope that if they ever have an abusive boyfriend, we'll be able to work with law enforcement to ensure that person does not have access to a gun so we can try to save my child's life.

I am vehemently opposed to the proposed amendment that would remove the requirement for individuals renewing their concealed handgun permits to provide proof of training or demonstrate competence. 1. Public Safety Concerns: Removing the necessity for proof of ongoing competence or training at renewal times undermines public safety. The Supreme Court in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) recognized the right to bear arms but also emphasized the importance of regulations that promote safety. 2. Deterioration of Skills: Firearm handling skills require regular practice to maintain. Without mandatory retraining or re-demonstration, permit holders might not keep up with best practices in firearm safety, leading to a potential decline in their ability to handle firearms responsibly. In discussions around Castle Rock v. Gonzales (2005) regarding the enforcement of protective orders, where ongoing training could ensure better public protection. 3. Legal and Regulatory Awareness: The case of McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010) highlighted the importance of understanding the legal framework around gun ownership. Without updated training, individuals might inadvertently break laws, leading to legal issues and potential public endangerment. 4. Risk of Complacency: This complacency can lead to negligence, as seen in cases like United States v. Miller (1939), where the regulation of firearms was discussed in the context of maintaining order and safety, suggesting that ongoing vigilance through training is necessary. 5. Undermining the Principle of Continuous Education: The amendment goes against the principle of continuous education. Just as professionals like doctors or pilots must undergo periodic recertification, gun owners should also be required to refresh their knowledge and skills. This principle was upheld in Buck v. Bell (1927) in a different context, where the court supported the state's interest in public welfare through regulated professional standards. 6. Precedent for Other Regulated Activities: Allowing this amendment sets a dangerous precedent for other regulated activities Contradicts United States v. Carolene Products Co. (1938), where the court supported regulatory measures for public safety. 7. Accountability and Trust: Holds permit holders accountable and builds public trust in the concealed carry system. Trust in regulatory systems was a factor in Wyeth v. Levine (2009), where the Supreme Court considered public trust in safety regulations. 8. Potential for Abuse: There's a potential for abuse where individuals might renew their permits without maintaining the necessary skills or knowledge, especially if their life circumstances change significantly (e.g., health issues affecting their ability to handle firearms safely). This concern aligns with the reasoning in United States v. Salerno (1987) about preventive detention, emphasizing the need for measures to ensure public safety. In conclusion, this amendment jeopardizes public safety, leads to skill deterioration, reduces legal awareness, encourages complacency, undermines the value of continuous education, sets a poor precedent, diminishes accountability, and opens the door for potential abuse. I strongly urge the rejection of this amendment to maintain the integrity, safety, and responsibility inherent in the concealed handgun permit system in Virginia.

My husband and i FULLY SUPPORT this and all common sense gun safety laws. We are gun owners and he is a retired military member. PLEASE pass this bill!

It is critical to extend the same protections to additional relationship categories. Intimate partner or dating relationships also need to to be part of domestic violence and firearms prohibitions.

People who are carrying a concealed weapon into our state should be subject to the laws we have set up to address this issue in Virginia!

These bills allow for those that wish to have guns to still have them, yet put safeguards in place so that the guns do not get into the wrong hands, are misused or changed into weapons meant to kill many people in a short amount of time. Please vote for these common sense gun laws so that children can live safely in our community with gun owners who prioritize safety.

I write as a taxpayer, a mother, a resident, a voter and a citizen of the Commonwealth of Virginia is strong SUPPORT of these bills. Our federal government refuses to do anything to save our children and make our country a safer place because they have all sold out to the NRA so the states is where is going to be so important! I am thankful for the efforts of our elected officials to do the right thing and high encourage passage of these bills.

I support all of these bills that will make our Commonwealth safer, adding critical protections for all.

HB1607 - I SUPPORT this bill as assault weapons make it easier for a person to kill a large number of people in a very short period of time – including children in schools, families at the mall or movies, congregations in houses of worship, etc. Assault weapons have no place in civilian life. HB1608 - I SUPPORT this bill as industry accountability is a great way to force manufacturers to raise standards of safety. HB1622 - I SUPPORT this bill as it would crack down on vehicle gun thefts and make our communities safer. This should be especially important in Virginia as 2022 FBI crime data shows that Richmond, Virginia is among the top 5 cities with the highest rates of gun theft from cars HB1660 - I SUPPORT this bill as automatic and semi-automatic weapons can kill a large number of people in a very short period of time and converting more guns to function this way is terrifying for the safety of our families. HB1797 - I SUPPORT this bill as visitors wishing to carry concealed handguns in Virginia should meet the same level of safety requirements that we require of our state’s residents. In many scenarios, visitors are held to the legal requirements of the state they are visiting, and applying this to gun safety should be common sense. HB1869 - I SUPPORT this bill as it expands critical protections to additional relationship categories. Especially in a time where people marry at a later age and/or more commonly cohabitate prior to marriage, allowing intimate partner, or dating relationships, to be protected keeps Virginians safer. HB1876 - I SUPPORT extending the protection of k-12 schools to our institutions of higher education. This is very personal to me as I spent 9 years working at a university and was involved in a scary situation where a student made violent threats with a firearm. HB1960 - I SUPPORT this bill, as it strengthens protections for domestic violence survivors.

I support these bills to make our community safer

I support HB1869 as it expands critical protections to additional relationship categories. For example, this bill would include a relationship where a woman cohabitates with her boyfriend. As a mother working to keep all children safe from gun violence, I support HB1869 and reducing the number of gun-related deaths in our community and in our nation.

I support this bill because I believe it would make our Commonwealth a safer place for everyone, including our children. Gun violence must be addressed and this is one of the many common sense laws proposed this session that can do that. Please take action and vote for this bill that could save lives.

As a graduate of Virginia Tech who was on campus during the mass shooting that occured on April 16, 2007, I strongly support increased regulations on guns. Having witnessed first half the devastation on communities that guns can cause, we need to prevent high capacity automatic and semi-automatic guns from being sold and ensure that loopholes that allow guns to be sold continue to be closed. As a mother of three young school aged children now, the sense of fear at which all families deal with on a daily basis is unfathomable and shouldn't be allowed to continue.

I support HB1869 as it expands critical protections to additional relationship categories. For example, this bill would include a relationship where a woman cohabitates with her boyfriend.

Please pass these comments sense safety laws. The county desperately needs them.

I support these bills as data shows common sense gun laws save lives.

I support these eight bills, as we need to take action against the senseless violence and deaths caused by guns. We need to ban assault weapons, hold the industry more accountable, prohibit people from leaving firearms visibly unattended in cars, ban kits that create automatic weapons, tighten concealed handgun permits, expand critical protections to additional relationship categories, extend protection against firearms to higher education, and protect domestic violence survivors. As a country and a state, we cannot continue to accept gun violence and deaths as the norm.

I support HB1607 as assault weapons make it easier for a person to kill a large number of people in a very short period of time – including children in schools. I felt the impact of this at Virginia Tech on April 16, 2007 as 32 students and teachers lost their lives. I support HB1608 as industry accountability is a great way to force manufacturers to raise standards of safety. It shouldn't be easier to buy a gun than it is to rent a car. I support HB1622 as it would crack down on vehicle gun thefts and make our communities safer. I support HB1660 as automatic and semi-automatic weapons can kill a large number of people in a very short period of time. I felt the impact of this at Virginia Tech on April 16, 2007 as 32 students and teachers lost their lives. I support HB1797 as visitors wishing to carry concealed handguns in Virginia should meet the same level of safety requirements that we require of our state’s residents. I support HB1869 as it expands critical protections to additional relationship categories. For example, this bill would include a relationship where a woman cohabitates with her boyfriend. I support HB1876 as it extends the protection of k-12 schools to our institutions of higher education. I support HB1960 as it strengthens protections for domestic violence survivors.

I support this bill because I support any bill that seeks to create a safer community for our children to grow up in, that keeps guns away from schools, and that keep deadly weapons out of the hands of violent people who wish to violate our most protected right: the right to life. This is my number one issue.

For HB1894: HB1894 seeks to address the arguably unconstitutional, and undoubtedly inhumane conditions of Virginia prisons. 7 Virginia prisons currently have no central heating or cooling. In the winter, it gets so cold multiple inmates have needed to go to the hospital for hypothermia. it’s so cold that the water in the toilet freezes over while in the summer, it gets so hot that the walls sweat. This too has led to numerous incarcerated people being hospitalized for heat stroke. Medical complications associated with extreme heat or cold are often associated with expenses in excess of 10,000 dollars per hospitalization, a cost which the state bears the burden of. The fiscal impact of this legislation has been paired back significantly in order to ensure that we can take immediate steps to address the inhumane conditions in Virginia prisons. We urge you to support the legislation. For HB 1958: When it comes to free school meals the question on everyone’s mind is the same, why universal? First, significant numbers of students who are food insecure either do not meet existing eligibility requirements or are eligible and are not enrolled for other reasons including stigma. Not only does free school breakfast bridge these gaps in existing programs, but universally free breakfast is also more cost effective. On average, districts which have universal free school breakfast programs spend 58 cents less per breakfast than they cost in districts with means tested programs. This means that instead of spending money on paperwork, we can spend money on feeding hungry kids. Furthermore, children who experience food insecurity are 31% more likely to be hospitalized for health issues, in the short term costing in excess of $12,000. Cases where children are diagnosed with protein-calorie malnutrition can cost Medicaid as much as $1.25 million a for very young children. One in seven children in Virginia are hungry. We urge you to support this legislation and take one step towards eliminating child hunger in Virginia.

Please vote yes to HB 1894!

Please help restore civility in our state by standing with the rule of law. We don’t feel safe in the last four years especially after the looting, violent riots, and mass destruction in our cities.

I urge your support of HB1894 State correctional facilities; cell conditions; temperature monitoring. Of all weather-related illnesses heat is the most fatal. We've all experienced buildings where the temperature at the thermostat doesn't reflect the temperature in other parts of the building. This is even more true of prisons which for security are built with much less free flow or air. Cruel and unusual punishment is banned in the US. The death penalty is banned in Virginia. Heat in cells can violate both of those bans. Please support HB1894.

My son has been in Buckingham Department of Corrections for 9 years the summers are only getting worse he has health issues he has asthma,he is overweight because of depression and because lack of rec. time.Immune disorder. it is so hot in there in the summer if it's 100 outside it's like 110 on the inside they have little envelope windows on their cells a 7-in fan that they cost $30 to buy. they need air conditioner they need correction of temperatures they need oversight. my son also has an immune disorder which is very bad on his health his white blood count can Skyrocket or it can drop very very low he cannot be in that heat. Ty

I speak for my grandson and all incarcerated people who suffer from inhumane conditions. By being in prison they are being punished for their crimes - deprivation of freedom is a powerful emotion. To struggle to breathe due to chronic health issues is beyond cruel. To be uncomfortable in heat or cold is unpleasant but to be in extreme conditions with no reciurse to relief is unbearable. Some relief can be provided at minimal cost. I beg you to look into your heart and restore humanity to those sffering so. Please. Thank you very much.

As a Virginia constituent and an impacted loved one, I support HB 1894. A common sense bill that is proactive in preventing medical illnesses throughout the year. HB 1894 puts an end to incarcerated individuals being unnecessarily cold in the winter and overheated in the summer.

I support these bills to make our community safer

Excessive temperature variances between below 65 and over 80 degrees expose those incarcerated to insufferable conditions in under ventilated and confined spaces such as their cells. These conditions exacerbate underlying health conditions such as asthma and put unnecessary toll on the medical staff at the facilities. The well-being of humans is of utmost priority, and this is a no brainer. We, and the 3000 members we represent completely support this bill.

My name is Marki Gaines and I'm a member of the Virginia Justice Alliance. I also have a loved one incarcerated in Greensville Correctional Center. During the summer months, the buildings, pods, and cells are extremely hot. During the winter, they are extremely cold. Not only can extreme temperatures cause physical illness, it can also cause mental and emotional anxiety. It is inhumane to have these men and women live in unsafe conditions. Therefore, I am in full support of HB1894.

Please pass these comments sense safety laws. The county desperately needs them.

We need things better

As the loved one of someone incarcerated and an advocate for people behind bars, I have seen firsthand how extreme temperatures in correctional facilities impact the physical and mental health of those confined. My loved one was once held at Augusta Correctional Facility, where there was no air conditioning. The heat was unbearable, especially in solitary confinement, where no fans were allowed. The conditions were so extreme that it exacerbated individuals asthma, causing difficulty breathing and increasing their risk of other health complications. Even now, at his current facility, despite having heat and AC, he is freezing because the temperature control is rigid, only turning on at specific times and time of year. These conditions are not only inhumane but can also lead to illnesses and worsen pre-existing conditions such as asthma, heart disease, and arthritis. It’s unacceptable for people to endure these conditions, which affect their health and well-being. We must ensure that correctional facilities maintain temperatures within a humane range, and that measures are in place to protect individuals from extreme heat or cold. This bill is vital to creating conditions that support health and dignity, and I urge you to support it for the sake of the people in our correctional facilities and their families.

The labor force is essential for continued growth and success within The Commonwealth. Worker's should be appropriately compensated with fair wages, accessible/affordable health care, safe work spaces, and financial security for their retirement. Please vote for legislation to help support hard working Virginians.

The Virginia Association for Home Care and Hospice Opposes this legislation as introduced. Current reimbursement rates for agency directed personal care are so low that it is imposable to provide a sick leave benefit. We would support this legislation if it required DMAS to reimburse agency directed personal care for providing a sick leave benefit.

I urge the subcommittee to support HB1921. No one should have to work when sick and home health care workers working when sick puts themselves and the people they care for at risk. Please support sick leave for home health care workers and all workers to safeguard the health of all Virginians. Thank you.

I am Commissioner Rapaport available to address any questions regarding HB1933 relating to the throat cancer bill.

Oppose off shore wind. I’m ground zero in Virginia Beach . I live 500 ft away from offshore/onshore construction at SMR. ITS A NIGHTMARE. Property damage, noisy and diesel dirty. Def not clean energy 18 months of hell and counting.

Please let me know about anything to do with ANY SOLAR or wind. Also why aren't you working on lowering this socialism health obamare that is failing! We pay double our house payment for healthcare. They do a certain percentage of what u make a year. I have to take money out of my 401k for healthcare that counts as income. It shouldn't count as income when you are taxing the heck out of us. We can't travel,most our prescriptions we use to take won't be covered and could go on and on about this robbery of people s hard earned money!

I support HB1935 because home weatherization can go a long way toward reducing the energy burden for low-income families. Often such families occupy older buildings that date from a time when no one worried about insulation or designing homes to be energy efficient. This means that even very frugal people may pay a lot to keep barely warm. Meanwhile the heat leakage from the home wastes energy and contributes to climate problems. Please follow the subcommittee's recommendation and report HB1935.

Please let me know about anything to do with ANY SOLAR or wind. Also why aren't you working on lowering this socialism health obamare that is failing! We pay double our house payment for healthcare. They do a certain percentage of what u make a year. I have to take money out of my 401k for healthcare that counts as income. It shouldn't count as income when you are taxing the heck out of us. We can't travel,most our prescriptions we use to take won't be covered and could go on and on about this robbery of people s hard earned money!

Please help restore civility in our state by standing with the rule of law. We don’t feel safe in the last four years especially after the looting, violent riots, and mass destruction in our cities.

Please pass these comments sense safety laws. The county desperately needs them.

Please help restore civility in our state by standing with the rule of law. We don’t feel safe in the last four years especially after the looting, violent riots, and mass destruction in our cities.

Please pass these comments sense safety laws. The county desperately needs them.

The labor force is essential for continued growth and success within The Commonwealth. Worker's should be appropriately compensated with fair wages, accessible/affordable health care, safe work spaces, and financial security for their retirement. Please vote for legislation to help support hard working Virginians.

This is a common sense bill to help people better manage relations with utilities and to receive appropriate customer service and should be passed.

Anything that deals with procurement must be taken seriously by all parties everywhere. The recent situation in the City of Richmond in which the procurement department were not being addressed appropriately is a reflection of how much the city is in trouble. Who is checking who? Again, I don’t know how much of it is lack of training or integrity, but the fact remains the leadership is not a place to go apply for a job in the City of Richmond. Where is the accountability for the mistakes and failures? Same goes on in the public schools, and lack of safety and security in the city. It is wrong to accept homeless, legalize drugs, chaos, excuse criminals, corruption, encourage government dependency, and victimization.

I am against this bill which proposes to terminate the Virginia Free File program and replace it with a state-developed free tax filing program. Here are my reasons: Disruption of Existing Services: Terminating the Virginia Free File program, which has been in place and utilized by taxpayers, could disrupt services for those who rely on it, potentially causing confusion and inconvenience, similar to concerns about service continuity in Goldberg v. Kelly (1970). Cost and Development: Developing a new state-specific tax filing program involves significant costs, both in terms of initial development and ongoing maintenance. This could be seen as an inefficient use of state resources, echoing fiscal concerns from City of Richmond v. Virginia (1976) regarding government spending. Compatibility Issues: Ensuring the new program is compatible with the IRS Direct File program might be challenging, leading to potential technical issues or delays in implementation, akin to the integration problems discussed in American Electric Power Co., Inc. v. Connecticut (2011) regarding federal-state coordination. Privacy and Security: A state-run program might not have the same level of security infrastructure as established federal or private sector programs, raising privacy concerns similar to those in Carpenter v. United States (2018) about data protection. Efficiency and User Experience: The transition period until 2028 might leave taxpayers without a seamless filing experience, potentially degrading service quality during the interim, which could impact taxpayer satisfaction and compliance, reflecting service delivery critiques in Massachusetts v. EPA (2007). Federal Dependency: Relying on a memorandum of understanding with the IRS for program development could make the state program overly dependent on federal cooperation, potentially affecting Virginia's autonomy in tax administration, a concern similar to federalism issues in New York v. United States (1992). Loss of Private Sector Innovation: Ending the partnership with the Consortium for Virginia might reduce the innovation and competition that private sector involvement brings to tax filing services, potentially leading to a less dynamic and user-friendly state solution, paralleling the market impact concerns in Lochner v. New York (1905). I oppose this legislation due to the potential disruption of existing services, high development costs, compatibility challenges, privacy and security risks, impact on user experience, increased dependency on federal cooperation, and the loss of private sector innovation, advocating for maintaining or enhancing current partnerships rather than creating a new state-run system.

Please vote “No” on this bill. The language of this bill is unreasonably restrictive. The Department of Elections already uses reliable information to match voter registrations with other states, including dates of registration for each state, before determining whether to cancel a voter. Placing the requirement of a “confidence score” of at least 80 percent simply creates confusion and subjectivity to what is otherwise an objective and straightforward process. Without data proving that the existing process results in a significant number of erroneous cancellations, it should be left as is.

If you were in favor of the bill, here are several arguments you might use to support it: Voter Roll Accuracy: The bill aims to ensure that voter rolls are more accurate by requiring better data matching and verification procedures. This could reduce the likelihood of voter fraud by ensuring only eligible voters are on the rolls. Enhanced Data Standards: By setting higher standards for the data used in list maintenance, the bill could lead to more reliable voter lists, reducing errors where ineligible or duplicate registrations might exist. Transparency: The requirement for public access to cancellation records under the Virginia Freedom of Information Act increases transparency in how voter registration is managed, fostering public trust in the electoral system. Proactive Notification: The mandate for notification before cancellation gives voters a chance to correct any misinformation or address issues with their registration, potentially preventing legitimate voters from being removed from the rolls inadvertently. Annual Data Review: The obligation to review data sources annually ensures that the Department of Elections continuously improves its processes, adapting to changes in data quality, technology, or voter demographics. Preventing Cross-Jurisdiction Fraud: By prohibiting the use of data from other states or jurisdictions without unique identifiers, the bill aims to prevent fraudulent activities where individuals might try to vote in multiple places. Confidence in Elections: With more accurate voter lists, there's potentially greater public confidence in election outcomes, as the integrity of the voter registration process is upheld more rigorously. Systematic Approach: The bill provides a systematic approach to voter list maintenance, which could lead to more consistent practices across different registrars, reducing variability in how voter records are managed statewide. Legal Clarity: The clarifications and technical amendments in the bill could help in legal contexts, making it clearer how voter registration and cancellation should be handled, potentially reducing legal disputes over voter eligibility. Long-term Benefits: While there might be short-term costs or adjustments, the long-term benefits could include a cleaner voter database, fewer disputes on election day, and potentially lower costs associated with managing voter challenges or recounts due to registration issues. I am Advocating for this bill for the need of integrity, accuracy, and public trust in the electoral system, these enhancements would make elections more secure and fair. Important for modernizing voter management practices to keep pace with current data handling standards and technologies.

The League of Women Voters supports HB 2276, a bill that will improve Virginia’s voter list maintenance activities and go a long way toward preventing incorrect voter purges. Record matching will be more precise, protecting eligible citizens from disenfranchisement while at the same time preventing those who are not eligible from voting in Virginia. The bill codifies, in detail, security and list maintenance procedures that are already in place throughout the Commonwealth. The bill also strengthens record keeping requirements, so that a voter who has been disenfranchised by mistake can find out what happened. Every locality has a security plan in place, subject to annual reconsideration. The Department of Elections’ IT team can assist any locality that needs help in reaching minimum standards. Change of address procedures are already in place, but the bill spells out the standards. This bill should help to rebuild trust in elections. The League urges the Committee to report.

Do not criminalized pro-Palestine speech, demonstrations and written material.

Ladies and Gentlemen I thank you for the opportunity to share my experience with Virginia’s DOC and consequences of confinement. Our prisons are so short staffed that keeping inmates locked down is a normal practice. I have witnessed my happy go lucky loved one change in front of my face. He gets emotional easily, lost lots of weight, talks with a sadness in his voice, and his mental sharpness is deteriorating quickly. Sacrificing a human’s basic ability to be involved with others is immoral and inhumane. We as a society have labeled incarcerated individuals as worthless pieces of garbage that doesn’t even deserve a nutritional meal let alone any kind of normal life. When I say “normal life” I’m referring to a hot/warm shower, clean clothes without stains or tears, food that is fit to eat, natural sunlight, and temperature controlled environment. We have learned that going without natural light can cause serious depression and lead to other health issues. Imagine being locked down for days at a time where the only face you see is the one looking back at you through a flimsy plastic mirror. Close your eyes for a moment I want each of you to feel the darkness, loneliness, and suffering that solitary confinement creates. Now picture what it must feel like when it’s days, weeks, and months before you can feel human again. Ask yourself how would your loved ones feel if they didn’t hear your voice, get mail, or visits from you for an extended period of time. Better yet how would you feel if you weren’t able to communicate with them for long periods of time? Maybe some of you would like a little mini break from all the noise, but when that break doesn’t end and you’re left alone everything inside of you starts changing. Our society treats animals 100% better than incarcerated people. If a person is found guilty of animal cruelty or abuse they’re punished as well as they should be punished. Yet our prisons and society thinks it’s okay to treat human beings like garbage. See when we bag up our garbage we throw it out and never give it a second thought. This is exactly what we’re doing when we allow people to be confined and it needs to stop. Every life matters- especially those with emotional and mental health needs. Locking down people is creating more harm than good. This practice of punishment should be abolished and deemed a crime against humanity.

Paraphernalia being taxed at 10.5% shouldn't target what is being classified as paraphernalia. Functional glass art would be affected by this tax effectively hurting local glass making artists that already struggle to make it by.

While I agree that cannabis being legal for recreational use yet illegal for sale does not make sense, I strongly disagree that anything other than cannabis plant material itself or its extract should be taxed. The local small businesses and sole proprietors of products (specifically glassware) which are sometimes used for consumption of cannabis already have extreme difficulty making any kind of profit to stay in business due to high costs of materials and supplies, high learning curve to produce such products, and competition against low-quality imported products that are manufactured in countries that pay extremely low wages, not to mention the fact that these small businesses lack the benefits that are typical with employment at a company or corporation. Adding an additional tax to their products will put these Virginia local businesses out of business due to fewer sales from increased prices or lower profits if they decide not to increase their prices. I implore you to vote no on SB 2485 and push for cannabis to be the only product to have an added tax. The livelihood of our beloved Virginia small businesses, artists, and sole proprietorships depend on you. Virginia has an ever growing community of talented artists using their skill to produce small but magnificent works of functional art that the everyday person can afford to have in their home. It would be devastating to lose them. Thank you for your consideration.

D not pass this tax

Comments Document

The Virginia Assembly of Independent Baptists are in opposition to HB2485. Dissenting argument in pdf file below.

I strongly oppose the unjustly high taxation of “paraphernalia” in Virginia. I am a local glassblower and much of my income is earned through the creation and sale of artistic glass pipes. My industry is already struggling, with material and tool prices soaring, so this would be absolutely disastrous for VA glassblowers. I support taxation of cannabis itself but I don’t think glass pipes should have an additional sin tax beyond the standard sales tax. This would encourage distributors to rely more heavily on imported glass and all that money will fly out of our economy and into another country’s.

A tax on cannabis paraphernalia would disproportionately hurt small businesses, stifling growth in an already competitive industry. Small businesses, which often operate with limited resources and narrower profit margins, rely on selling items like pipes, vaporizers, grinders, and rolling papers to attract and retain customers. Imposing an additional tax on these items would increase their cost, making them less affordable for consumers and reducing demand. This, in turn, would hurt the revenue of small retailers, who are often competing against larger chains or online marketplaces with more pricing flexibility. Additionally, the administrative burden of complying with such a tax, including reporting and bookkeeping requirements, would place further strain on small businesses. Many small retailers lack the resources or infrastructure to absorb these additional costs, unlike larger companies that can manage them more effectively. The tax could also push consumers toward untaxed, black-market paraphernalia, undermining the legal market that small businesses depend on. Moreover, the decline in consumer spending on legal products could discourage small entrepreneurs from entering or staying in the cannabis industry, ultimately limiting innovation and diversity in the marketplace. In essence, taxing cannabis paraphernalia would hinder small businesses’ ability to compete, grow, and sustain themselves in this emerging sector.

I strongly oppose the proposed 10.5% tax on marijuana paraphernalia in Virginia. This tax will have devastating consequences for small businesses and local glass artists who rely on the sale of these products for their livelihood. It unfairly targets a niche industry and threatens to drive consumers to cheaper, mass-produced options from out of state, undermining Virginia’s economy and artistic community. Rather than supporting local creators and small businesses, this bill risks suffocating what remains of an already fragile industry. I urge lawmakers to reconsider this harmful proposal and explore alternative solutions that do not penalize hard-working Virginians.

I do not support the proposed tax on marijuana paraphernalia/ HB2485 Sec. 4.1-1003. This tax would be an unjust burden on small business and local artists. Such a tax doesn't exist in any other state with a current legal marijuana market. Please consider the local small artist and businesses and strike this portion of the bill. Best regards L.G

No new tax on cannabis paraphernalia.

Keep taxes off of paraphernalia

I’m against this regulation. It hurts local businesses

This will destroy businesss

These small businesses throughout VA are STILL recovering from COVID! The ones that did survive have endured years of poor legislation around marijuana reform in VA. A bunch of failed policies and red tape. Currently they are now under the relentless attack taking place with this current bill for taxation. Please oppose this bill and keep small businesses open!

do not tax paraphernalia, do not tax glass, do not tax grow shows, do not make it harder for locals to support locals!!! stop attacking small businesses,

Dear Committee Members, I am writing as an employee of Area 51 Smoke Shop in Virginia to express my opposition to the proposed 10.5% tax on marijuana paraphernalia under HB2485, specifically Section 4.1-1003. While I understand the importance of regulating the cannabis market, this tax would create unnecessary challenges for local businesses like the one I work for. No other state with a legal cannabis market has implemented such a tax, and I urge Virginia to avoid imposing this financial burden. Marijuana paraphernalia plays a key role in the legal cannabis industry, and taxing it at this rate would unfairly impact businesses that are already navigating complex regulations and economic pressures. For small businesses like ours, this additional cost could discourage investment, reduce competitiveness, and make it harder to contribute to the growth of Virginia’s cannabis market. Additionally, higher prices may push consumers toward the illegal market, which lacks safety standards and costs the state valuable tax revenue. I respectfully ask the committee to reconsider including paraphernalia in the taxable items under Section 4.1-1003. Excluding these items will help support local businesses, like the one I proudly work for, and foster a sustainable and responsible cannabis market in Virginia. Thank you for your time and attention.

Please consider removing the new defintion for "marijuana paraphernalia" from line A in section 4.1-1003 Marijuana taxes; exemptions. No other state with legal cannabis has a tax on paraphernalia. This tax will hurt a lot of the small businesses

Dear Committee Members, I am writing on behalf of Kultivate Wellness to oppose the proposed 10.5% tax on marijuana paraphernalia under HB2485, specifically Section 4.1-1003. While we support regulating the cannabis market, we believe taxing paraphernalia would place an undue burden on Virginia’s local businesses and manufacturers. No other state with a legal cannabis market has imposed such a tax, and we urge Virginia to avoid this financial strain. Marijuana paraphernalia is an essential component of the legal cannabis industry, and taxing these items at such a high rate would disproportionately impact Virginia-based businesses which are already navigating complex regulatory and economic challenges. Small businesses, like ours, are working diligently to ensure that the legal cannabis market in Virginia grows responsibly and sustainably. However, this additional tax on paraphernalia would likely increase the cost of doing business, discourage investment, and, ultimately, hinder the growth of the state's cannabis industry. Additionally, it could drive consumers to the illegal market, where safety standards aren’t enforced and the state loses tax revenue. We respectfully ask the committee to reconsider including paraphernalia in the taxable items under Section 4.1-1003. Removing this provision will help ensure a competitive and sustainable cannabis market in Virginia. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely,
Evan Somogyi
CEO, Kultivate Wellness

Dear Committee Members, I am writing on behalf of Kulture Smoke & Vape with 3 locations in Virginia since 1999. I oppose the proposed 10.5% tax on marijuana paraphernalia under HB2485, specifically Section 4.1-1003. While we support regulating the cannabis market, we believe taxing paraphernalia would place an undue burden on Virginia’s local businesses and manufacturers. No other state with a legal cannabis market has imposed such a tax, and we urge Virginia to avoid this financial strain. Marijuana paraphernalia is an essential component of the legal cannabis industry, and taxing these items at such a high rate would disproportionately impact Virginia-based businesses which are already navigating complex regulatory and economic challenges. Small businesses, like ours, are working diligently to ensure that the legal cannabis market in Virginia grows responsibly and sustainably. However, this additional tax on paraphernalia would likely increase the cost of doing business, discourage investment, and, ultimately, hinder the growth of the state's cannabis industry. Additionally, it could drive consumers to the illegal market, where safety standards aren’t enforced and the state loses tax revenue. We respectfully ask the committee to reconsider including paraphernalia in the taxable items under Section 4.1-1003. Removing this provision will help ensure a competitive and sustainable cannabis market in Virginia. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely,
Evan Somogyi
CEO, Kulture Smoke & Vape

Dear Committee Members, I am writing on behalf of Area 51 Smoke Shop in Virginia to oppose the proposed 10.5% tax on marijuana paraphernalia under HB2485, specifically Section 4.1-1003. While we support regulating the cannabis market, we believe taxing paraphernalia would place an undue burden on Virginia’s local businesses and manufacturers. No other state with a legal cannabis market has imposed such a tax, and we urge Virginia to avoid this financial strain.Marijuana paraphernalia is an essential component of the legal cannabis industry, and taxing these items at such a high rate would disproportionately impact Virginia-based businesses which are already navigating complex regulatory and economic challenges. Small businesses, like ours, are working diligently to ensure that the legal cannabis market in Virginia grows responsibly and sustainably. However, this additional tax on paraphernalia would likely increase the cost of doing business, discourage investment, and, ultimately, hinder the growth of the state's cannabis industry. Additionally, it could drive consumers to the illegal market, where safety standards aren’t enforced and the state loses tax revenue. We respectfully ask the committee to reconsider including paraphernalia in the taxable items under Section 4.1-1003. Removing this provision will help ensure a competitive and sustainable cannabis market in Virginia. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Michael Liberatore CEO, Area 51 Smoke Shop

Please consider removing the new defintion for "marijuana paraphernalia" from line A in section 4.1-1003 Marijuana taxes; exemptions. No other state with legal cannabis has a tax on paraphernalia. This drastically affects the bottom line on an already struggling industry. I full welcome taxation on cannabis products themselves however.

I know that it may be tempting to pass a bill that collects more tax revenue but you would be jumping like vultures onto an already underprivileged and struggling class of our delicate economy. The cumulative tax proposed here would be 15.8 percent total tax charged on products our state businesses need to then upcharge while still trying to export to states that don’t have this unfair tax imposed. ‘Marijuana paraphernalia’ is an antiquated and inaccurate term for the products, since the exact same products could be used for tobacco consumption and growing. Leaving open loopholes to get around this double standard, the section should be erased from the bill entirely. Strike the barbaric and unfair ‘marijuana paraphernalia’ tax section from the bill before moving forward.

the added paraphernalia tax is section 4.1-1003 is an un needed tax on an already high overhead business. as a glass blower my costs have already doubled since covid so adding one more cost is going to push a lot of people out of work. If they aren’t taxing businesses for selling beer/ wine/ shot glasses then why are actual american glass blowers being taxed for making glass.

Please consider removing the new defintion for "marijuana paraphernalia" from line A in section 4.1-1003 Marijuana taxes; exemptions. No other state with legal cannabis has a tax on paraphernalia. This excessive additional tax would be a gut punch to Virginia manufactuers and retailers. Please don't tax me out of business!

I am in favor of this bill which expands the ability to challenge an attorney-issued subpoena duces tecum in Virginia. Here's why: Broader Protection: By allowing any person affected by or subject to a subpoena duces tecum to file a motion to quash or modify it, this bill broadens the protective scope of legal proceedings, ensuring that individuals indirectly impacted also have a voice, aligning with principles of due process as upheld in Mathews v. Eldridge (1976). Increased Fairness: This change promotes fairness in legal proceedings by giving standing to more parties, reducing the potential for abuse of subpoena power, which echoes the fairness considerations in Goldberg v. Kelly (1970) regarding procedural protections. Efficiency in Legal Process: Allowing affected parties to directly address subpoenas can streamline legal processes by reducing the need for third-party interventions or appeals, potentially speeding up case resolutions, similar to the efficiency arguments in Felker v. Turpin (1996). Privacy and Burden Reduction: This legislation helps protect the privacy of individuals and reduces unnecessary burdens by ensuring that only relevant documents or information are subpoenaed, reflecting privacy concerns akin to those in Carpenter v. United States (2018). Judicial Oversight: Directing the Supreme Court of Virginia to amend its rules ensures that this legislative change is integrated seamlessly into the judicial framework, promoting consistency and clarity in legal practice, much like the judicial rule-making authority discussed in Sibbach v. Wilson & Co. (1941). Prevents Overreach: By providing a mechanism for anyone affected to challenge a subpoena, it helps prevent overreach by attorneys, ensuring subpoenas are not used as tools of harassment or undue pressure, addressing concerns similar to those in NAACP v. Alabama (1958) about abusive legal tactics. Enhances Access to Justice: This bill enhances access to justice by making the legal process more inclusive, allowing more stakeholders to participate actively in defending their rights, which supports the broader access to justice principles from Gideon v. Wainwright (1963). I support this legislation for its enhancement of procedural fairness, efficiency, privacy protection, judicial oversight, prevention of legal overreach, and for improving access to justice, ensuring that the legal system in Virginia operates with greater equity and responsiveness to all parties involved.

The VAIB has been working the Delegate Singh on his bill HB2594 and are in favor and appreciative of the changes he has made and are in support of this bill.

On behalf of the Sikh American community, a community that has faced numerous threats to our houses of worship, including the 2012 mass shooting at the Sikh temple in Oak Creek, WI, which left six members of our congregation dead, we understand the importance of securing our houses of worship. The Sikh American community has worked closely with law enforcement and security officers and we have seen firsthand that the greater understanding they have about our traditions, services and activities, the better prepared they are to respond to any crisis that occurs on the premises. We strongly endorse this bill and believe it will increase the safety of all religious communities as well as effectiveness of those charged with keeping houses of worship safe.

-This bill is highly intrusive of local land use authority. A blanket mandate like this does not take into account the nuance and needs of individual localities. -Residential development is the most consumptive of community services and least fiscally beneficial type of development. Rarely does infrastructure keep up with the pace of residential growth and this would be putting undue burden on many localities that already struggle to keep pace. That burden gets transferred to taxpayers, cost of living goes up, quality of life is reduced and the cycle just perpetuates. -What is the plan to ensure that developers even will build what they propose? There are years and years of worth of approved, yet unbuilt homes already in the residential pipeline in my city and many others. -What will the long-term effects be of prioritizing only high-density/multi-family construction now? And lowering standards? -Will people who desire a single-family (or just a higher quality) home in their future have to leave the state of Virginia? -This bill will significantly reduce the rate of home ownership, which used to be a point of pride and indicator of economic stability in a community. -Is it wise to create this intrusive law now just to band-aid a current problem?

Comments Document

Written Testimony in Support of HB 2647: State Correctional Facilities; use of Restored Housing or Isolated Confinement Restrictions. Steven Mangual Justice Advocate Coordinator, LatinoJustice PRLDEF Member, VA Coalition on Solitary January 23, 2024 Dear Members of the House Subcommittee on Public Safety, Thank you for the opportunity to provide testimony in strong support of HB 2647. My name is Steven Mangual, and I serve as a Justice Advocate Coordinator with LatinoJustice PRLDEF. I am also a solitary survivor who has spent the past three years working alongside the Virginia Coalition on Solitary to end the practice of prolonged isolation in our correctional system. Solitary confinement is a violation of the fundamental values we hold as a society: respect for human dignity, the importance of rehabilitation, and the belief in second chances. It is not only inhumane but also counterproductive. International standards, such as those set by the United Nations, define solitary confinement lasting more than 15 consecutive days as torture. Virginia must not allow this harmful practice to persist. The current reality is dire. Prolonged solitary confinement in Virginia prisons has led to severe physical and mental health consequences, including anxiety, depression, self-harm, and even suicide. These practices also harm public safety. Evidence shows that individuals released from solitary confinement are more likely to re-offend, particularly with violent crimes, because isolation exacerbates trauma and strips individuals of the social and rehabilitative tools they need to succeed. HB 2647 offers a clear and practical solution to address this urgent problem. By capping solitary confinement at 15 consecutive days within any 60-day period, requiring regular oversight, and increasing transparency through public reporting, this legislation ensures accountability while prioritizing the well-being of incarcerated individuals and staff. States like Colorado, Maine, and Mississippi have implemented similar reforms with measurable success: violence has decreased, public safety has improved, and taxpayers have saved millions of dollars. Virginia has an opportunity to lead. By passing HB 2647, this General Assembly can create a more humane and effective correctional system, reduce unnecessary costs, and ensure the safety of both incarcerated individuals and the broader community. I also want to emphasize the voices of those most directly impacted. As a survivor of solitary confinement, I can attest to the lasting trauma it causes. For those who remain trapped in isolation today, this bill represents hope—the hope of a system that values rehabilitation over punishment and humanity over cruelty. I urge this committee to vote in favor of HB 2647 and take a critical step toward ending the destructive practice of prolonged solitary confinement in Virginia. Thank you for your consideration and for your commitment to justice and human dignity. Respectfully submitted, Steven Mangual Justice Advocate Coordinator, LatinoJustice PRLDEF Member, VA Coalition on Solitary

Please support this bill, it's the humane thing to do. You will hear arguments against it that people placed in solitary should not be let out if their behavior does not change, because it means they pose the same risk to correctional officers or others. This does not consider the risk that solitary poses to the people it is inflicted upon. It is torture and often makes people feel worse. Just because the person making that argument in front of you thinks solitary until behavior change is the only option, it doesn't mean that it is the only option. There are other, restorative practices that lead to behavior change. Pass this bill so the correctional officers will have to choose those, instead. People are lighting themselves on fire to protest solitary confinement and other horrible conditions at Red Onion. I question the heart and moral integrity of anyone who does not consider this act of protest and votes against this bill. Please support this bill and help save people's lives and their sanity. Thank you.

We strongly support HB1759, which addresses one of the most significant challenges faced by those reentering society after incarceration: the lack of support for a successful transition. This bill ensures that critical educational, vocational, counseling, substance abuse, and reentry services are made available at probation and parole offices statewide. Through our advocacy, we hear stories of individuals desperate to break free from cycles of recidivism but unable to access the tools and guidance they need to succeed. This bill goes further by requiring collaboration with the Department of Workforce Development and Advancement to provide post-release job search assistance. Employment is a cornerstone of stability, and the services outlined in this bill can mean the difference between a fresh start and a return to prison. HB1759 is a step toward accountability, dignity, and real rehabilitation. It not only supports returning citizens but also benefits families, communities, and the Commonwealth as a whole. I urge you to vote in favor of this bill. _________________________________________________________________________________ We strongly support HB1589. This bill takes critical steps toward improving the structure and functioning of the Virginia Parole Board. Increasing the Board’s membership to 10 members not only allows for greater diversity of thought and experience but ensures that each case is given the time and attention it deserves. We’ve heard directly from incarcerated individuals who often feel that their futures hinge on rushed decisions by an overburdened system. By expanding the Board and requiring panels of three to four members for deliberation and voting, this bill introduces a more thorough and thoughtful process, particularly for those serving life sentences. This bill also includes vital provisions for transparency and fairness, ensuring that victims’ voices are heard and that those eligible for parole receive a meaningful review. Parole isn’t just a bureaucratic process; it’s about second chances, accountability, and hope. HB1589 strengthens the system for everyone involved, and we urge you to support it. ________________________________________________________________________________ We regularly hear from incarcerated individuals trapped in solitary confinement—many for months or even years. They share stories of overwhelming despair, debilitating anxiety, and the feeling of losing their very sense of humanity. One man described forgetting how to hold a conversation. Another said he hadn’t felt the sun on his skin in years. These are not isolated accounts—this is the daily reality of restorative housing as used by VADOC. Solitary confinement strips people of basic social skills, fractures their mental health, and leaves them traumatized. How can we expect rehabilitation when we take away their ability to function in the world? Instead of restoring lives, this practice destroys them. HB2647 is a critical step toward replacing cruelty with dignity. It’s time we move toward humane, effective solutions that truly restore lives and strengthen public safety. Please support this bill.

I believe we should be able to provide an alternative to prolonged solitary confinement. I know people who have worked in prisons providing medical care, counseling or administrative services. They have explained how specific inmate initiate threats, violent attacks and display a disregard for human life. I realize that guards and other workers are exposed to these stressful conditions. I believe that we should consider the models provided in Germany and the Netherlands providing prison reform programs that work. Examples: Inmates training dogs or horses; Inmates raising livestock; Inmates performing commercial landscaping services that translate into viable job skills upon their release. I also realize that we should protect our guards and other workers from violent acts by placing those repeatedly violent inmates into a clean ventilated area and provide them with ZOOM counseling and specialized programs designed to address their emotional instability without endangering the lives of workers. These inmates in the solitary area should be placed on a program that helps them earn their way back to the regular population by demonstrated, documented steps. An outside non-affiliated agency should evaluate the effectiveness of the solitary confinement program.

I am writing to urge you to support efforts to abolish long-term solitary confinement in Virginia. This practice is inhumane, ineffective, and detrimental to both individuals and society. Decades of research have shown that prolonged isolation causes severe psychological harm, including anxiety, depression, and hallucinations, and it disproportionately impacts vulnerable populations, such as individuals with mental illnesses. These harms persist even after release, making rehabilitation and reintegration into society far more difficult. Moreover, long-term solitary confinement does not improve public safety or deter violence within correctional facilities. States like Colorado and Maine have significantly reduced or eliminated its use without compromising security. Instead, they’ve adopted more humane, evidence-based practices that emphasize mental health care, de-escalation, and meaningful programming for incarcerated individuals. Virginia has an opportunity to lead by example, demonstrating that we value human dignity and recognize the potential for growth and redemption in every individual. Ending long-term solitary confinement is not just a moral imperative but also a practical step toward a safer, more effective criminal justice system. I urge you to support legislation that abolishes this harmful practice and invests in humane alternatives. Together, we can build a justice system that reflects the values of fairness, compassion, and rehabilitation. Thank you for your time and attention to this critical issue. Sincerely, President Yolanda Roussell Stafford County NAACP Stafford, VA. 22554

Please end solitary confinement. The implications of solitude breaks the mental state of the average human. To add incarceration solitary confinement will cause the strongest of wills to break thus bringing one to a savage existence.

Please vote YES to this bill. The overly abused use of solitary confinement brings about life-altering changes to one's mind and abilities to function in society. And considering the majority of those in prison will one day return to society, we should be focusing on other means of rehabilitation that have life-lasting positive effects!

Hello, My name is Tomeka Wallace. I am the mother of Demetrius Wallace , #1705834. My son is currently incarcerated at Red Onion State Prison. He has also been on RHU for about 8 months. To be in a cell for 23 to 24 hours a day is totally insane. We cannot contact him via JPay, nor does he get to call home on a daily basis. Sending mail, well good luck with that. He has had over 30 pieces of mail returned to senders from different advocates and other people. Why? This is due to the staff not giving it to him on purpose. If a man has been tried by a jury and given his time by the judge, why in the world does doing your time have to be so hard? Red Onion is a maximum security prison. So he’s already in confinement for 23 hours and only1 hour out. Then, you go to RHU with no time out and some days without the shower or phone. The food is horrible and the cells are either extremely cold or hot. We know that the living arrangements in prison aren’t going to be like regular living. However, confining someone to a cell, no communication with the outside world is cruel. These men have already been taken away from their families and loved ones, surrounded by testosterone 24/7 is bad enough. Yea, commit the crime , do the time as they say, but doing your time in environments that are racist, demeaning and horrifying isn’t how it should be. An animal has more freedom and rights than any black or brown American male. If someone has their dog or any animal chained or locked up for a certain amount of time, you can get animal cruelty charges. Now, these are animals that can actually survive harsh conditions and weather in most cases. Yet, a human being incarcerated is treated way worse in prison. It’s almost like they are being tried again once placed in prison, especially the racist ones that have an agenda. Mentally, the mind is wandering and then thoughts of suicide, self harm, anger, depression and frustration starts to take control. If one is not strong, they will do anything or just take themselves out. This is all forced choices based on the situation they have been put in. Physically, the body is now getting somewhat malnourished as they don’t have the same access to foods they had before. They aren’t given medical attention as needed and some people actually die in situations like this because they where overlooked and not treated properly. To think that this could happen to anyone the way our Judicial system is set up. The average human being cannot sit still or wants to be confined for more than 4 hours. If you work a job, you may get up and move around for a bit. Jobs give people breaks in between. Imagine, 4 walls, a piss pot and a cot for hours, days, weeks, months and years, you would totally loose your mind. But because we are talking about criminals, you all feel they are getting what the deserve and if they loose their mind, it’s ok because they are not human in the systems eyes because they broke the law. The Bible speaks of crime, so we will never escape that. But to be given time should feel like it’s the end of the world especially when you have a release date to come home. Even if, you are still a human being who deserves to be treated with dignity and not judged all over again while incarcerated. This is trauma and causes PTSD and when finally free, those conditions will forever remain in their mind.

As an RN of 40 years, I see solitary confinement as a method of torture. It is not a method to manage housing . Restorative housing is a euphemism. People who have experienced this traumatic method of control, will have long term ill health. Anderson (2025) reported that prison populations have increased by 2% since 2022. This leads to overcrowding, understaffing, and the use of solitary confinement to control, the frustration, and anger as a result of cramming human beings into the badly built environment. Instead of investing in this already vulnerable population, we are ignoring their plight. This is unethical. Furthermore, families who have members imprisoned suffer adverse childhood experiences and poverty leading to long term chronic health conditions that costs states more in the long term (Felitti et al, 1998: Burke Harris, 2018). There also needs to be more oversight to prevent the abuse and neglect of prisoners. Please support this bill to restrict the use of solitary confinement to manage human beings. References Anderson, M. (2025). The prison population is going up as prisons struggle with staffing and overcrowding. https://www.npr.org/2025/01/10/nx-s1-5203113/the-prison-population-is-going-up-as-prisons-struggle-with-staffing-and-overpopulation#:~:text=ANDERSON%3A%20The%20prison%20population%20has,worse%20health%20care%20for%20prisoners. Burke Harris, N. (2018). The deepest well: Healing the long-term effects of childhood adversity. Mariner Books. Felitti VJ, Anda RF, Nordenberg D et al. Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults. The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) study. Am J Prev Med. 1998;14(4):245-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749- 3797(98)00017-8 Yours, Susan Wetherall BSN RN CMSRN

I am testifying on behalf of the Justice & Witness Action Network – VA of the United Church of Christ. Our denomination recognizes prolonged solitary confinement, as defined by ‘The Mandela Rules,’ as a form of torture and condemn its use. Calling it "restrictive housing" or "restorative housing" does not change the fact that it is de facto solitary confinement. No one, no matter what they’ve done, deserves to be subjected to such degrading treatment. It is a violation of the inherent dignity and humanity endowed upon all of us by our Creator. While we recognize that there may be circumstances in which an individual needs to be isolated for their own safety or that of others, there needs to be strict regulation and oversight as well as humane, rehabilitative alternatives to solitary confinement. We urge you to vote for this bill.