House of Delegates Speak

Public Comments for 01/29/2025 Agriculture Chesapeake and Natural Resources

HB1662 - Sale and distribution of plastic carryout bags by grocery stores prohibited; civil penalty.

Last Name: Campblin Organization: Virginia NAACP Locality: Fairfax

The Virginia NAACP supports HB1662 (Jones), HB2030 (Anthony) and Hb2267(Anthony)

Last Name: Sheridan Locality: augusta county

Plastic grocery bags typically are used for an average of 12 minutes, yet plastic persists in the environment for 100s if not 1,000s of years. While in the environment, it often ends up in waterways and in the ocean, where it photo degrades into tiny bits called microplastics. These are taken up by animals and enter the food chain. We all now have quantities of plastic chemicals in our organs and blood stream with unclear, but not good, health implications. In fact, plastic may be the new "lead" of environmental health dangers. So, when considering the cost of taking a step to control the huge impact of plastic on health and the environment (its manufacture is a major source of greenhouse gases), we have to remember these costs that will be paid in a degraded ecosystem, increased health issues, and worsening natural disasters from unfettered climate change. To ask that stores provide alternatives seems a small price to pay. Getting consumers ready with education, signage, and publicity will help the transition. If stores need to recoup any increased cost, they can charge a dime for a paper bag. People will learn to bring bags this way, as has been demonstrated in other states with the ban. This seems a small price to pay for the rewards it will bring to the beauty of our Commonwealth, the improvement of fisheries, and the health of our citizens. Respectfully yours, Caroline Sheridan

Last Name: Meyer Locality: Staunton

I sure wish we could get rid of plastic bags! I help with stream cleanups in the Shenandoah Valley and plastic bags, along with cigarette butts and styrofoam, are the worst offenders. I have lived in places (Germany, Massachusetts, California) where stores charge for plastic bags--it's really not that much--in Germany the bags were pretty sturdy and we re-used them over and over 9the Berliner Brieftasche, they were called). Or you ust get used to bringing your own most of the time, and paying when you forget. How hard is that. I'm attaching a little calculator for our area that Environment Virginia creates. I think it's interesting.

Last Name: Johnson Locality: Stafford

While the intent of this legislation to reduce environmental waste is commendable, the outright prohibition of plastic carryout bags by grocery stores has several significant drawbacks: Economic Burden on Consumers: Many consumers rely on plastic bags for convenience and reuse them for other household purposes. Alternatives like paper or cloth bags may impose additional costs on shoppers, disproportionately affecting low-income families. Paper bags are often less durable and require frequent replacements, further adding to the cost burden. Environmental Trade-Offs: While plastic bags have environmental drawbacks, alternatives also have their own impact. For example: Paper Bags: Require significantly more water and energy to produce, resulting in a higher carbon footprint during production and transportation. Reusable Cloth Bags: Often made from cotton or synthetic materials, their production demands extensive resources, and they must be reused hundreds of times to offset their environmental footprint. Impact on Small Businesses: Compliance with this legislation could increase operational costs for smaller grocery stores, forcing them to purchase and provide costlier alternatives. This burden could lead to higher prices for consumers or reduced competitiveness for local businesses. Ineffective Waste Management: Eliminating plastic bags from grocery stores does not address the broader issue of plastic waste. Many plastic bags are repurposed for trash liners or pet waste disposal. Without them, consumers may purchase other plastic products, such as trash bags, which are often thicker and contribute more to landfill waste. Consumer Behavior and Convenience: Banning plastic bags could alienate customers who value convenience. Policies encouraging voluntary behavioral changes, such as offering incentives for bringing reusable bags, might achieve similar goals without imposing a ban. Existing Recycling Efforts: Many grocery stores already participate in recycling programs for plastic bags. Enhancing and expanding these initiatives could provide a practical, less disruptive alternative to an outright ban. Conclusion: A more balanced approach is needed to address the environmental concerns associated with plastic bags. This could include improved recycling infrastructure, consumer education, and incentivized use of reusable bags, rather than a sweeping prohibition that may result in unintended economic and environmental consequences.

Last Name: fraser Locality: COVINGTON

I am totally against this bill which aims to prohibit the sale and distribution of plastic carryout bags by grocery stores starting January 1, 2027. Consumer Convenience: This ban removes a convenient option for consumers, particularly for those who might forget reusable bags or for spontaneous shopping trips, impacting the ease of grocery shopping. Economic Impact on Stores: Grocery stores will face increased costs due to the need to transition to alternative bagging solutions, which might be passed onto consumers, potentially raising the cost of groceries at a time when affordability is crucial. Job Losses: The transition away from plastic bags could lead to job losses in the plastic manufacturing sector, affecting local economies and workers dependent on this industry. Effectiveness Questionable: While the intention is environmental, the effectiveness of such bans in reducing overall plastic waste is debated. Without comprehensive recycling programs or alternatives, this might just shift the problem rather than solve it. Penalty Structure: The civil penalty system, starting with warnings and then fines, could be seen as punitive towards businesses trying to adapt, especially small grocery stores with limited resources to comply quickly. Reusable Bag Program Requirement: Mandating grocery stores to implement programs to encourage reusable bags adds an administrative burden, potentially diverting resources from other business operations or customer service improvements. Exempt Bag Loophole: The definition of exempt bags could lead to confusion or exploitation, where certain plastic bags might still be used under the guise of exemptions, undermining the bill's environmental goals. Lack of Public Readiness: Many consumers might not be ready or willing to switch to reusable bags by the set deadline, leading to resistance or non-compliance, which could affect the bill's success. Alternative Environmental Concerns: The production and disposal of alternatives like paper or cloth bags have their environmental impacts, which this bill does not address, potentially shifting the environmental burden rather than reducing it. I strongly oppose this legislation for its potential to inconvenience consumers, economically strain grocery stores, lead to job losses, and for its questionable effectiveness in truly reducing environmental impact without a holistic approach to waste management.

Last Name: deppe Organization: Private Citizen Locality: Virginia Beach

I strongly support banning grocery store plastic carryout bags. In discussion with both state legislators and Virginia Beach City Council members regarding the plastic bag fee legislation, I am frequently asked, "Why didn't the General Assembly just pass a bag bag ban in the first place?". In the meantime, plastic bags are despoiling our landscape and our waterways, harming our eco-systems (birds, fish, turtles, marine mammals) and clogging our storm water systems. Additionally, plastic bags stay in the environment indefinitely and eventually break down into micro and nano-plastics, making their way into our food chain and into every organ and system in our bodies. Please: Just Ban the Bags! Very Respectfully, James F. Deppe Virginia Beach

Last Name: White Organization: Watershed Restoration Solutions Locality: Blacksburg

Hello, Please require retail establishments to post clear signage designating invasive plants and educating the public on what that means. Invasive plants are a tremendous issue threatening our ecosystems. They out-compete native plants that we need in order to enjoy our land, support animals for hunting and fishing, control floods and erosion, protect infrastructure, protect our trees, and protect wildlife. I work in watershed restoration cleaning up our waterways to provide safer drinking water, protect infrastructure, protect our ability to safely hunt and fish, and protect our native songbirds, trees, flowers, and wildlife. Most of our budget is spent on invasive species removal; it costs a lot, requires the use of herbicides, requires the use of heavy equipment, and requires many years of constant maintenance in order to prevent them from coming back. They damage our ecosystems and I have seen many beautiful old trees die because of invasive English ivy, tree-of-heaven, privet, and invasive honeysuckle. Our songbirds die eating berries from invasive plants. Please pass this legislation. Additionally, please pass the legislation supporting wildlife corridors; in addition to being needed to protect wildlife, this bill would protect so many people. Deer-auto collisions cost states millions each year and injure and kill many drivers. We are also at risk of losing many of our native wildlife species as a result; animals like frogs and salamanders need to cross roadways in order to reach wetlands to breed, and cannot escape cars.

Last Name: Davis Locality: Prince William

I support these

HB1837 - Dealers in agricultural produce.

Last Name: Wagner Locality: Simi Valley

Hi There, We are looking for installation partners in your area. NO COST TO YOU. We sell PVC Marble Design Panels to homeowners and contractors. When a homeowner buys panels but is not handy enough to install them themselves, we want to be able to recommend a vetted installation company. Please check out our website to learn more and to apply for partnership: https://gpe-partners.com We are looking forward to working with you. Marc Wagner COO Great Products Enterprise

HB1844 - Baby Food Protection Act; testing and labeling requirements for toxic heavy metals.

Last Name: Wagner Locality: Simi Valley

Last Name: Morr Organization: Clean Label Project Baby Coalition Locality: Adrian, Michigan

Feedback in response to HB 1844 I am with the Clean Label Project Baby Coalition, a non-profit trade association comprised of over 20 of the top baby food brands. The brands that participate in the Coalition have been independently testing their products for heavy metals for several years and have demonstrated significantly lower presence of these contaminants compared to other products in the category. The Coalition supports HB 1844, however, it strongly compels the State of Virginia to consider the following: There are two subtle differences that may cause industry difficulty and consumer confusion. It is our hope that you could assist in remedying those differences. Of most importance is the prescriptive language required to be on the product label per the respective legislation. As you can see in the following table; there are subtle differences in the labeling requirements (emphasis added). CA AB 899 § (b)(2)(B)(ii) - “For information about toxic element testing on this product, scan the QR code” VA HB1844 § (E)(1) - “For information about toxic heavy metal testing on this product, scan the QR Code” To be truly compliant in both jurisdictions, a label would effectively have to possess both statements despite the similarity of their intent. Were both statements to be placed on product labels, consumers may find this confusing and a distraction from the intent. The second nuance between the legislations is the duration of heavy metals test results that are to be posted on the manufacturer’s website. The AB 899 requirement is “for the duration of the product shelf life for a final baby food product plus one month…” (§(b)(2)(A)(i)). Whilst HB1844 does not define a termination point, essentially requiring the data to be available in perpetuity. In discussions within the Baby Coalition, there’s no concern on making the results publicly available, but having a termination point makes sense so that consumers can expeditiously locate the information they desire and not be deluged with an immense amount of data that has built up over several years. Therefore, since California AB 899 is one year ahead of the labeling requirements of HB1844, the Clean Label Project Baby Coalition brings this to your attention in hopes that a pursuit of an amendment to the HB1844 legislation could be made to align the language requirements with AB 899 so that product labeling compliance is more likely, effective, and lessen marketplace confusion. The Clean Label Project Baby Coalition is a leading trade group representing baby food and baby product manufacturers, which are at the forefront of transparency, providing healthy alternatives, and driving consumer awareness. We stand ready to assist in any capacity to align these critical legislations and champion the cause for cleaner and healthier foods for the most vulnerable population.

Last Name: Callahan Locality: Port Republic, MD (Calvert County)

Comments Document

I am attaching a testimony of my family's experience of my son's lead poisoning by eating contaminated baby food and sharing the importance of testing and labeling baby food to allow parents to make more informed decisions and to help protect one of the most vulnerable populations -- our young children.

HB1887 - Mineral Mine Safety Act; definition of "surface mineral mine," use of cyanide or cyanide compound.

Last Name: Wagner Locality: Simi Valley

HB2000 - Dam Safety Act; powers and duties of DCR, rights and requirements of dam owners, civil penalty.

Last Name: Wagner Locality: Simi Valley

Last Name: fraser Locality: COVINGTON

I am totally against this bill which seeks to amend the Dam Safety Act in ways that could compromise safety and accountability. Weakened Enforcement: Streamlining the Department of Conservation and Recreation's enforcement powers might reduce the rigor and oversight necessary to ensure dam safety, potentially leading to less stringent compliance with safety standards. Ambiguity in Responsibilities: Clarifying the Department's duties during an active dam failure is good, but the bill adds complexity to dam owners' responsibilities, potentially leading to confusion or non-compliance, especially for owners of low hazard structures. Increased Owner Burden: Requiring dam owners to perform safety inspections for structures presenting imminent danger shifts more responsibility onto them without necessarily providing additional support or resources, which could be overwhelming for smaller or less experienced owners. Inundation Zone Identification: Allowing dam owners to identify dam break inundation zones by providing limits rather than filing a map could lead to less precise emergency planning, potentially endangering lives and property downstream. Funding Criteria Changes: Altering the criteria for receiving funds from the Dam Safety, Flood Prevention and Protection Assistance Fund, including project match requirements, might make it harder for some dam owners, particularly those with limited financial means, to secure necessary funding for safety improvements. Repeal of Civil Penalties: Removing civil penalties removes a deterrent for non-compliance with the Act, which could lead to lax attitudes towards dam maintenance and safety, increasing the risk of failures and subsequent disasters. Public Safety Concerns: Overall, these changes could dilute the focus on public safety by reducing the accountability of dam owners and the regulatory power of the Department, potentially leading to more frequent or severe dam-related incidents. Environmental Impact: Dams play a crucial role in managing water resources and preventing floods. Weakening the regulatory framework could have unintended environmental consequences, affecting water quality, wildlife, and flood control efforts. I strongly oppose this legislation for its potential to undermine the safety, regulatory oversight, and environmental integrity associated with dam management in Virginia, urging its rejection to maintain stringent safety standards and accountability.

HB2008 - Virginia Erosion and Stormwater Management Program authority; right of entry.

Last Name: Wagner Locality: Simi Valley

HB2025 - Wildlife corridors or crossings; action plan and programs.

Last Name: Wagner Locality: Simi Valley

Last Name: Oliver Locality: City of Charlottesville

Wildlife crossings are essential in Virginia to protect both animals and motorists by reducing vehicle collisions with wildlife, particularly deer, black bears, and other species that frequently cross roadways. The state's diverse landscapes, from the Blue Ridge Mountains to coastal wetlands, create natural migration corridors that intersect with highways, leading to dangerous encounters. Strategically placed wildlife crossings help maintain habitat connectivity, allowing animals to move safely between feeding and breeding areas without the risk of road fatalities. These structures not only enhance biodiversity and support ecosystem health but also save millions in damages and healthcare costs associated with vehicle-wildlife collisions. Investing in wildlife crossings is a proactive step toward sustainable infrastructure that benefits both people and the environment in Virginia.

Last Name: Lindemann Organization: n/a Locality: Norfolk

Thank you for this opportunity. I am a long-time native and resident of Virginia who professionally has variously been an award-winning NASA engineer turned entrepreneur and award-winning economic development leader. However at this time as a private citizen and on behalf of all citizens of our State, I urge you to Vote YES for all elements of HB2025 in support of wildlife corridor and crossing projects in Virginia. Wildlife Corridors, or Crossings, are simple enough in concept: they are passages placed in locations selected through careful study that allow large (and small) animals to get from one side of a road to another without ever being in the road itself. The need is high, as Virginia now ranks as the 9th WORST STATE in the country for animal-vehicle collisions and fatalities. This is a dramatic worsening from even two years ago when we were an unacceptable 15th-worst. This means the trend is going in the WRONG DIRECTION, and we must do something now. Indeed, “Hot Spot” areas of these casualties have been identified in ALL regions of the State, so the problem affects all Virginians. Having myself been witness to numerous instances of these tragic collisions, they are nothing but horrific. The loss of life -- both human and animal -- and the costs associated with these tragedies is tremendous... though AVOIDABLE, as we now know. Not only do Wildlife Crossings prevent tremendous loss of both human and animal life as well as prevent vast financial loss due to both fatal and non-fatal crashes -- with an over 96% reduction demonstrated already in Virginia! -- they’ve also been proven to ENHANCE TOURISM as well as significantly increase the SAFETY AND ECONOMY OF ROADWAY SHIPPING of all goods – i.e., major big, perpetual business benefits that can and should also be realized here in Virginia. The cost-effectiveness of wildlife crossings is dramatic, and – once implemented -- immediate as well! Of particular importance throughout Virginia, wildlife crossings also importantly serve as flood mitigation structures. Specifically, crossings in the form of properly built underpasses not only enhance flood resilience, they maintain natural streambanks and channels, provide safe aquatic and terrestrial wildlife passage, while also reducing taxpayer burdens caused by road washouts and closures during flooding events. The time is now because available funds initially targeted for leveraging via the Wildlife Crossing Grant Fund as proposed in HB2025 are competitive and time-limited, with more and more states positioning themselves favorably to compete. Importantly -- and thanks to the past visionary strong bi-partisan support provided by our General Assembly through now two Administrations -- Virginia has established itself as an early leader in the area of Wildlife Crossings. In other words, Virginia and our Department of Transportation in partnership with all those who together developed our Wildlife Corridor Action Plan are fully ready and desiring to take this powerful and transformative next step. If we through HB2025 provide for the mechanism to launch the Wildlife Corridor Grant Fund, we will be able to leverage it many, many times over for tremendous and ever-compounding monetary and life-saving benefit -- not to mention increased revenue generation -- for our neighbors, businesses, and visitors beginning the moment you say YES! Thank you.

Last Name: Lindemann Organization: n/a Locality: Norfolk

Last Name: Roberts Organization: Wild Virginia Locality: Charlottesville

I urge you to support HB 2025, a critical step toward addressing Virginia’s growing wildlife-vehicle conflict and ensuring our state’s infrastructure is built for long-term resilience. Right now, Virginia ranks 9th in the nation for wildlife-vehicle collisions - we do not have the luxury in our state to wait to build better infrastructure. Over 89,000 animal collision claims were filed in Virginia in 2024, an increase from previous years. These collisions are not just dangerous—they cost the Commonwealth millions of dollars each year, with each deer collision alone averaging $41,000 in state and personal costs. You should also know that our very own Virginia Transportation Research Council has done great research on the effectiveness of underpasses and exclusionary fencing - projects have seen up to 96% reduction in wildlife-vehicle conflict, and structures can pay for themselves in under 2 years. While Virginia’s Wildlife Corridor Action Plan (WCAP) was a step forward in identifying high-priority areas for connectivity, it lacks the necessary funding and data accuracy to drive real solutions. The plan relies primarily on police-reported deer crashes, which underreport wildlife-vehicle conflict by 5 to 9 times and fail to include impacts on other species, like endangered aquatic life. Without comprehensive data and dedicated funding, meaningful action remains out of reach. Meanwhile, Virginia continues to widen roads without incorporating wildlife passage, making the problem worse, and underpasses are being redone for increased flood resilience without considering wildlife passage, wasting taxpayer dollars. More lanes mean more traffic, more barriers to wildlife movement, and more dangerous and costly collisions. The only viable solution is to integrate both terrestrial and aquatic passage into all project scoping for infrastructure improvements, not just isolated projects. A handful of crossings will not solve Virginia’s crisis—we must require state agencies to prioritize wildlife passage in every road project. HB 2025 ensures that happens. It establishes a structured program within agencies to require wildlife passage considerations in planning, mandates improved wildlife-vehicle conflict data collection, and creates long-term funding pathways for crossing projects. These measures will help mitigate tens of thousands of collisions each year, enhance flood resilience, and protect Virginia’s biodiversity—all while making smarter use of taxpayer dollars by building infrastructure that lasts. I urge you to support HB 2025 and take the necessary steps to make Virginia’s roads safer for both people and wildlife. Thank you.

Last Name: Meyer Locality: Staunton

I support adding wildlife crossings to highways wherever possible, and whenever new infrastructure is added. We all see so many dead animals--deer, fox, raccoons, dogs, turtles, you name it--especially during mating seasons when animals are distracted and less cautions. It is all avoidable of course if people slowed down and paid attention, but that's a harder thing to achieve... It's also a great idea to do a better job tracking how many dead animals are picked up and what species they are. I wrote a paper in graduate school on deer-vehicle collisions, and the data was incredibly spotty and incomplete. Even the insurance companies, which pay the direct costs, don't have or won't share their records. The cost to wildlife and emotional trauma and physical harm to drivers is simply not measured at all. As Virginia gets urbanized, this will only get worse.

Last Name: White Organization: Watershed Restoration Solutions Locality: Blacksburg

Last Name: Davis Locality: Prince William

I support these

HB2030 - Environmental Justice Task Force; established, report.

Last Name: Wagner Locality: Simi Valley

Last Name: Campblin Organization: Virginia NAACP Locality: Fairfax

The Virginia NAACP supports HB1662 (Jones), HB2030 (Anthony) and Hb2267(Anthony)

Last Name: fraser Locality: COVINGTON

I am against this bill which proposes the creation of an Environmental Justice Task Force in Virginia. Bureaucratic Overload: Establishing another task force adds to the bureaucratic structure, potentially leading to redundancy with existing environmental and community development agencies, which already address similar issues. Funding Concerns: The creation of this task force would require funding, which could divert resources from direct environmental protection or community support programs to administrative costs, potentially reducing the effectiveness of current initiatives. Political Influence: The composition of the task force, with appointees from various state departments, might lead to political influence overshadowing genuine environmental justice concerns, risking the task force becoming more about political agendas than community needs. Inefficiency in Policy Making: Tasking this group with advising on policies might slow down decision-making processes, as adding another layer of review could complicate and delay the implementation of necessary environmental actions. Scope and Focus: While the focus on historically economically disadvantaged communities is commendable, the broad mandate of the task force might dilute efforts, spreading resources too thin across various issues without achieving significant, focused outcomes. Reporting Burden: Requiring annual reports could become a formality rather than a tool for actionable change, with the risk of these reports gathering dust rather than prompting real policy shifts or community improvements. Lack of Direct Action: The emphasis on reporting and advising rather than implementing direct action might mean that while issues are highlighted, practical solutions or immediate relief for affected communities could be delayed or overlooked. Potential for Overlap: There's a risk of overlap with existing initiatives or task forces, leading to confusion over jurisdiction and responsibility, which could hinder coordinated efforts on environmental justice. I oppose this legislation due to concerns over bureaucratic expansion, potential inefficiency, and the risk of diverting funds from direct action to administrative overhead, urging instead for more direct, community-focused environmental justice initiatives.

HB2050 - Occoquan Reservoir PFAS Reduction Program; established.

Last Name: Wagner Locality: Simi Valley

Last Name: Farr Locality: Prince William County

Thank you Chair and Members of the Committee. I am Calvin Farr, the General Manager and Chief Executive Officer for Prince William Water. • The Occoquan Reservoir is a vital source of drinking water to hundreds of thousands of people in Prince William and Fairfax Counties • Half of all residents of Prince William County obtain their drinking water from the Occoquan Reservoir • In 1971, the State of Virginia created the Occoquan Policy to protect this critical water supply reservoir from point source pollution • Further, you are likely aware that certain “forever chemicals,” collectively referred to as PFAS, have been detected in the Occoquan Reservoir. • The EPA has determined that PFAS are extremely toxic, saying that exposure to as little as 4 parts per trillion in drinking water creates an unacceptable health risk. • While EPA has passed legislation that requires water utilities to remove PFAS from drinking water, legislation is still needed to keep PFAS out of the Occoquan • House Bill 2050, Occoquan Reservoir PFAS Reduction Program, will have the dual benefit of protecting the Occoquan, as well as ensuring that the cost of removing PFAS from drinking water is not borne solely by utility rate payers. • It is simple, if we don’t want a pollutant in our drinking water, we should prevent that pollutant from being put into our source water, which is the Occoquan • Virginia recognized this principle 50 years ago when it created the Occoquan Policy, and it’s time to do so again. • Prince William Water is for House Bill 2050 • I want to thank the committee for the opportunity to speak on this very important issue

Last Name: Sligh Organization: Wild Virginia Locality: Charlottesville

I am David Sligh, Conservation Director at Wild Virginia. I would like to thank Del. Bulova for his efforts on HB2050 and for accepting and responding to some concerns from the conservation community. We believe the substitute offered today is significantly improved over the version first introduced and we are grateful for those changes. We do have some continuing concerns, as follows: 1) We believe that basing compliance with permit limits on a running annual average of monitoring results, as included in 1.B., can allow harmful levels to be discharged and affect the water supply and that the variability in discharges should weigh against this condition; 2) The addition of an exception to municipal solid waste facilities under 1.D. is unwise, given that landfill leachate is a known and often significant source of PFAS in discharges and would be a serious threat to water supplies; 3) The allowance for cessation of monitoring after four consecutive samples below method detection levels, as allowed under 1.A. may allow dangerous levels of PFAS to be released. The variability in discharges can be quite significant due to variations in industrial processes an other factors and ongoing monitoring is important. Wild Virginia opposes HB2517 from Delegate Runion and asks the subcommittee to reject it. The bill's exemption for sludge land application on land owned and operated by institutions of higher education would be unfair to the public and could create threats to state waters and residents around these sites. Current regulations require public notice and opportunity to comment and these are necessary to let people know what is happening in their communities and have the chance to influence the decisions about these activities. Sludge that is land applied contains many pollutants, including in most if not all cases PFAS, and the normal regulatory process and permit conditions must be used for these sites as they are for all others in the state. Educational institutions have the capacity to meet the regulations and should be required to abide by them.

Last Name: Cameron Organization: Northern Virginia Soil and Water Conservation District Locality: Fairfax County

Statement of the Northern Virginia Soil and Water Conservation District in Support of HB 2050 The mission of the Northern Virginia Soil and Water Conservation District is to promote sustainable urban and suburban activities and stewardship to conserve our soil, water, air, plants, and animal resources in Fairfax County, home of 1.2 million Virginians. We are one of 47 Districts in the Virginia Association of Soil and Water Conservation Districts. We support HB 20250, patroned by Delegate Bulova. The bill would reduce the amount of the class of chemicals known as PFAS in the drinking water supply of Fairfax County provided from the Occoquan Reservoir. In recent years scientists have become increasingly aware of and concerned about the human health effects of PFAS, so we commend Delegate Bulova for patroning this bill to require monitoring and eventually regulation of PFAS in industrial discharges that end up in the Occoquan watershed. We feel it is appropriate to empower local governments to take actions to improve the environmental quality of their communities. We urge the Committee to promptly take positive action on HB 2050.

Last Name: Cameron Organization: Northern Virginia Soil and Water Conservation District Locality: Fairfax County

The mission of the Northern Virginia Soil and Water Conservation District is to promote sustainable urban and suburban activities and stewardship to conserve our soil, water, air, plants, and animal resources in Fairfax County, home of 1.2 million Virginians. We are one of 47 Districts in the Virginia Association of Soil and Water Conservation Districts. We support HB 20250, patroned by Delegate Bulova. The bill would reduce the amount of the class of chemicals known as PFAS in the drinking water supply of Fairfax County provided from the Occoquan Reservoir. In recent years scientists have become increasingly aware of and concerned about the human health effects of PFAS, so we commend Delegate Bulova for patroning this bill to require monitoring and eventually regulation of PFAS in industrial discharges that end up in the Occoquan watershed. We feel it is appropriate to empower local governments to take actions to improve the environmental quality of their communities. We urge the Committee to promptly take positive action on HB 2050.

Last Name: Sarah Mayhew Locality: Fairfax

I urge you to support HB1941, Invasive plants are causing damage to our environment by crowding out native plants that support birds and other wildlife. Invasive plants such as English Ivy that continue to be sold commercially migrate from where they are planted to populate roadsides and parks. I have been a volunteer leader for Fairfax County Parks’ invasive removal efforts since 2006. My volunteers can’t keep up with the spread of invasive plants in our parks, we can only suppress their spread temporarily. By educating consumers to the harm that these plants cause, we can hope to actually reduce their spread and the destruction of our environment . HB 1941 is a logical and reasonable step towards controlling these known invasive plants. As a resident of Fairfax County whose drinking water comes from the Occoquan watershed, I urge you to support HB 2050 to remove pfas forever chemicals from our drinking water. They are known carcinogens. Thank you.

HB2061 - Cumberland State Forest; boundary line agreement and quitclaim of interest, etc.

Last Name: Wagner Locality: Simi Valley

Last Name: fraser Locality: COVINGTON

I am in favor of this bill which authorizes the Department of Forestry to engage in a boundary line agreement and quitclaim of interest concerning property adjacent to Cumberland State Forest. Facilitates Land Management: This legislation allows for better management and clarity of land ownership around Cumberland State Forest, reducing potential disputes over property lines and enhancing the forest's administration. Enhances Accessibility: By accepting a perpetual access easement from Stella Watson Chambliss, Rick Matthew Chambliss, Weyerhaeuser Company, and Wayne Rosson, the bill ensures improved access to parts of the forest not previously connected by an express right-of-way, which is crucial for maintenance, emergency response, and public use. Community and Economic Benefits: Improved access can stimulate local economies by making the forest more accessible for recreational activities, potentially increasing tourism and related economic activities in the area. Environmental Stewardship: Clear boundary agreements and easements support conservation efforts by defining responsibilities and rights, ensuring that the forest can be managed sustainably with less risk of encroachment or misuse. Legal Clarity: The quitclaim of interest and boundary line agreement provide legal clarity, reducing the likelihood of future legal challenges or misunderstandings regarding land use, which is beneficial for both the state and private landowners. Public Safety: Enhanced access routes are vital for safety, allowing quicker response times for emergencies like wildfires or for rescue operations within the forest. Partnership with Private Landowners: This bill fosters a cooperative relationship between the state and private landowners, setting a precedent for future collaborations in land management and conservation efforts. I strongly support this legislation for its practical approach to land management, enhancing accessibility, supporting local economies, promoting environmental stewardship, and ensuring public safety through clear legal frameworks and cooperative agreements.

HB2170 - Virginia Natural Resources Commitment Fund; distribution of certain funds, reports.

Last Name: Wagner Locality: Simi Valley

HB2238 - Trees; preservation during development.

Last Name: Wagner Locality: Simi Valley

Last Name: Grebe Organization: Nature Forward (formerly Audubon Naturalist Society) Locality: Fairfax County & serving NOVA

Please support HB2238 as enabling legislation to allow localities the option to adopt ordinance language which would ensure that the "critical root zones" (CRZ) of trees targeted for preservation as a way to meet all or part of the tree canopy requirements on a site are adequately mapped ahead of a project. The CRZ is the area of soil around a tree where most of its roots are located - it's an area of soil that, when disturbed, could mean significant impacts to a tree, ultimately killing. Allowing localities to get this CRZ information could help inform projects about the likelihood of tree preservation over the long term based on CRZ impacts. This could help ensure preservation of tree canopy in a way that we do not have today by allowing a dialog about modifications to a site plan that may better preserve tree canopy intended to be saved. This proposed legislation acknowledges the importance of tree preservation and provides a tool to help localities more effectively preserve existing canopy (which can otherwise take a decade or more to be replaced upon the death of a tree identified for preservation). This would provide an important benefit to urbanized and urbanizing areas where preservation of existing canopy is critical to mitigate heat island effects, particularly in areas suffering environmental inequities which disproportionately affect those most vulnerable. Please support HB2238.

Last Name: fraser Locality: COVINGTON

I am against this bill which would allow certain localities to impose stringent requirements on developers regarding the preservation of existing trees during development. Increased Development Costs: Requiring developers to submit detailed surveys or maps of tree root zones would significantly increase the cost of development. This could lead to higher housing or commercial space prices, potentially making development less affordable or feasible, especially for smaller projects. Delay in Development: The additional step of mapping critical root zones or providing extensive information could delay project timelines, slowing down economic growth and housing availability in areas where development is critically needed. Legal and Compliance Burdens: This bill adds legal complexities by requiring developers to consider tree roots extending onto adjacent properties, potentially leading to disputes over property rights and complicating the development process with additional legal considerations. Overregulation: By allowing local ordinances to dictate such detailed aspects of development, this bill contributes to overregulation, which can stifle innovation and flexibility in urban planning and development practices. Impact on Property Rights: The requirement might infringe on property rights by imposing conditions that could affect how landowners utilize their property, especially when considering roots crossing property lines, which could lead to conflicts with adjacent landowners. Potential for Inequity: Smaller developers or individual homeowners might find compliance with these requirements disproportionately burdensome compared to larger entities with more resources, leading to inequity in development opportunities. Environmental Focus Disparity: While tree preservation is important, this focus might overshadow other environmental considerations in development, like water management, energy efficiency, or habitat creation, potentially leading to a less holistic approach to sustainable development. Administrative Overhead: Local governments would need to increase their administrative capacity to handle the review of these additional submissions, potentially diverting resources from other municipal services or environmental initiatives. I oppose this legislation due to its potential to increase costs, delay projects, complicate legal compliance, and overregulate development, urging instead for a balanced approach that considers economic viability alongside environmental preservation.

Last Name: Shannon Organization: Southside ReLeaf Locality: Southside Richmond

Dear Madam Chair and Members of the Natural Resources Subcommittee Committee, I am writing to express my strong support for House Bill 2238, which strengthens tree preservation requirements during development. This legislation has the potential to bring significant benefits to communities while addressing critical issues stemming from the loss of urban tree canopies. Trees are essential to public health and environmental sustainability. They improve air and water quality, reduce urban heat islands, and manage stormwater runoff. In communities like those served by Southside ReLeaf, where tree canopy is limited, these benefits are critical for addressing environmental inequities that disproportionately affect those most vulnerable. There are higher asthma rates, greater hospital visits for heat illnesses, and up to a 20-year shorter life expectancy in neighborhoods with a tree deficit. Preserving trees during development can mitigate these disparities, promoting healthier and more resilient communities. Trees are important infrastructure assets that provide essential services in a cooperative system with utilities, transportation, public works, and other facilities that make communities livable. Unlike other infrastructural services that decline or need to be replaced over time, trees yield more benefits as they mature. We should not see trees as being in conflict with how we build and grow our communities but rather protect these investments. Additionally, requiring site plans to include the preservation of existing trees or the planting of new ones ensures that development protects and enhances our tree canopy. This bill establishes a vital framework to hold developers accountable for maintaining or replacing trees during development, preventing the loss of essential tree canopy and aiding in the long-term health of our communities. Without action, the continued loss of tree canopy due to unchecked development will exacerbate these environmental harms. Communities will face increased risks of flooding, reduced climate resilience, and declining public health. HB2238 offers a proactive solution, ensuring that development respects the value of existing natural resources and prioritizes sustainable growth. This bill represents a chance to invest in a future where economic development and environmental preservation go hand in hand, providing long-term benefits for all residents. I urge you to support HB2238 and its vision for a greener and healthier Virginia.

HB2267 - Air quality monitoring program for certain communities; DEQ to establish, report.

Last Name: Blatt Organization: Southside ReLeaf Locality: Richmond

On behalf of Southside ReLeaf, I am writing to express our support for HB2267, which expands and codifies air quality monitoring efforts by the Department of Environmental Quality in the Hampton Roads area. In Southside Richmond, we know all too well how poor air quality impacts community members' health. Life expectancy here is up to 20 years shorter compared to other parts of the city, and Richmond ranks second nationally for asthma-related deaths, according to the 2023 Asthma Capitals Report. We believe the data collected through this legislation will provide valuable insights that can lead to better health outcomes and inform strategies to mitigate air pollution’s effects. We also hope this initiative in Hampton Roads will serve as a foundation for further efforts across the Commonwealth to collect much-needed statewide data for fenceline communities, address air quality issues, and guide future policy decisions.

Last Name: Campblin Organization: Virginia NAACP Locality: Fairfax

The Virginia NAACP supports HB1662 (Jones), HB2030 (Anthony) and Hb2267(Anthony)

Last Name: Blatt Organization: Southside ReLeaf Locality: richmond

Last Name: fraser Locality: COVINGTON

I am against this bill which mandates the Department of Environmental Quality to establish an air quality monitoring program specifically for fenceline communities in Virginia. Resource Allocation: Implementing this program would require significant resources, potentially diverting funds from other critical environmental initiatives or general state services, which might be more broadly beneficial. Administrative Burden: The ongoing nature of the monitoring and the requirement for annual reporting would add considerable administrative workload to the Department of Environmental Quality, possibly straining its capacity to address other environmental issues efficiently. Selective Focus: By focusing solely on fenceline communities, this bill might neglect other areas or populations within the state that could also benefit from enhanced air quality monitoring, leading to an uneven distribution of environmental attention and resources. Potential for Overregulation: The detailed reporting requirements and the involvement of the Virginia Council on Environmental Justice could lead to overregulation, where recommendations might push for unnecessary legislative changes, complicating business operations in affected areas. Economic Impact: Businesses in or near these fenceline communities might face increased scrutiny and potential regulatory actions, which could deter investment or expansion, impacting local economies negatively. Data Overload: The requirement to analyze data on pollution levels, health risks, and recommend actions could overwhelm decision-makers with information, potentially leading to paralysis by analysis rather than actionable change. Legislative Overreach: Directing the General Assembly to review findings annually and consider legislation based on these reports could lead to a cycle of reactive law-making, potentially not allowing enough time for comprehensive assessment or for the implementation of previous legislative changes to take effect. Council Influence: While the involvement of the Virginia Council on Environmental Justice is intended to provide expert advice, there's a risk that political or special interest influences could skew recommendations, affecting the objectivity of the process. I oppose this legislation due to concerns over resource allocation, administrative efficiency, the risk of overregulation, economic impacts, data management, legislative overreach, and the potential for biased influence, advocating instead for a more balanced approach to environmental monitoring that considers the broader needs of the Commonwealth.

HB2306 - Loudoun County; DCR to accept certain property to establish a state park.

Last Name: Wagner Locality: Simi Valley

Last Name: Grebe Organization: Nature Forward (formerly Audubon Naturalist Society) Locality: Fairfax County & serving NOVA

Please support HB2306. This legislation would not only protect and ensure public access to the last surviving privately-held, founding-era, presidential home (of American’s 5th President James Monroe), but it would provide much-needed outdoor recreation access in a rapidly urbanizing area of Loudoun County. Importantly, this area has already been identified as having a high need for outdoor recreation facilities which this site could address. This unique opportunity is fiscally exciting too: Acquisition costs and significant start-up costs have already been covered through non-General Fund sources. As of January 1, 2025, $41.35M has been committed to Oak Hill State Park, towards a total goal of $52M for a property that is expected to have an annual revenue of at least at least $1M. We ask for your support of HB2306 to create a new state park in Loudoun County at James Monroe's Oak Hill.

Last Name: fraser Locality: COVINGTON

I am against this bill which authorizes the Department of Conservation and Recreation to accept property for establishing a new state park in Loudoun County. Financial Implications: Accepting and developing approximately 1,240 acres into a state park would require significant financial investment from the state for acquisition, maintenance, and operation, potentially diverting funds from other necessary conservation or public service projects. Land Use Concerns: The property in question, Oak Hill Farm, might be more beneficial if used for agricultural purposes or left in private hands for local economic activities, contributing to food security or local employment rather than being converted into a park. Local Community Impact: The establishment of a state park could alter the character of the local community, potentially affecting property values, local traffic, and the way of life for residents, especially without broad community consultation. Environmental Management: While creating a state park aims at conservation, the process of converting land, especially if it involves construction or significant landscape changes, might initially disturb local ecosystems before achieving long-term conservation benefits. Maintenance and Operational Challenges: State parks require ongoing maintenance and management, which could strain the Department of Conservation and Recreation's resources, especially if the park does not generate sufficient visitor revenue to offset these costs. Precedent for Future Acquisitions: This bill sets a precedent for future land acquisitions by the state, which might lead to expectations or pressures for similar actions in other areas, potentially leading to overreach in state land ownership. Opportunity Cost: The resources and focus dedicated to this new park could mean less attention or funding for existing state parks or other conservation efforts that might need enhancement or are underutilized. Lack of Public Invitation: There seems to be a lack of public process or community input in the decision to accept this land, which could lead to dissatisfaction or opposition from local residents who might have different visions for the land's use. I oppose this legislation due to the financial burden, potential negative impacts on local land use, community dynamics, and the environment, alongside concerns over resource allocation and the lack of inclusive decision-making, urging for a more considered approach to land acquisition for state parks.

HB2313 - Boarding establishments; work group to consider whether to propose state license, etc.

Last Name: Wagner Locality: Simi Valley

Last Name: Hanly Organization: Animal Welfare League of Alexandria Locality: Alexandria

I am writing in support of HB2313 which pertains to annual inspections of boarding establishment. As the CEO of the Animal Welfare League of Alexandria, it was my team who conducted the investigation of the Petsmart at Potomac Yard, Alexandria after the passing who 3 dogs who had recently boarded at that facility. We would very much like to have the ability to inspect such facilities before a complaint of this magnitude with the hope that these tragedies could be prevented. We appreciate Delegate Lopez for championing this bill.

Last Name: Smith Locality: Bridgewater

HB 2313: I have been operating a daycare and boarding facility for the last 11 years Why does Virginia need this bill? Who will pay for this inspection? What will be the criteria ? There are no published state standards to my knowledge. Will the “assistant”to the state veterinarian be allowed to be an animal rights activist from PETA or HSUS, since those organizations are likely to volunteer personnel? Any representative of the state should definitely be employed by and paid by the state for liability reasons if nothing else. What will be the process of dealing with unannounced inspections if they show up during times management is not present? For instance, on vacation or at lunch? What if there is no staff available to deal with showing them around at the moment they decide to come? The safety of my clients would be my number one concern, not showing around the inspectors. As an aside, new clients are always interested in inspecting my premises, and I am, of course, happy to accommodate them. No one is forced to utilize my facility. I see no particular need for burdening business owners with these inspections. Additionally, the bill does not specify commercial boarding establishments, so will you be inspecting everyone that signs up for rover.com? Will this bill also include horse boarding establishments and private kennels?

Last Name: Smith Locality: Bridgewater

HB2321 - Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority; authority to dissolve, disposition of property.

Last Name: Wagner Locality: Simi Valley

Last Name: fraser Locality: COVINGTON

I am in favor of this bill which grants the Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority (VRFA) the authority to dissolve itself under certain conditions. Local Control: By allowing the VRFA to transfer its property to local governments upon dissolution, this bill ensures that control of recreational facilities and associated lands remains with local entities, who are better positioned to understand and cater to community needs. Efficient Asset Management: This legislation promotes efficient management of assets by enabling the VRFA to divest when its objectives are met, ensuring that properties are not left idle or underutilized, which could happen if they automatically reverted to the Commonwealth. Community Benefit: Transferring property to the locality where the majority of the VRFA's assets are located directly benefits local residents by keeping recreational facilities accessible and potentially enhancing local recreational offerings. Financial Responsibility: The requirement that all bonds and obligations must be settled or provisions made for their payment before dissolution ensures financial responsibility, protecting taxpayers from any residual liabilities. Streamlined Process: The process outlined for dissolution, including the requirement to deliver a resolution to the Governor for legislative action, provides a clear and structured method for ending the Authority's operations, reducing potential legal or administrative confusion. Flexibility for Future Use: Allowing localities to take over the property gives them the flexibility to repurpose or maintain these facilities according to current and future community demands, fostering adaptive reuse. Accountability: The dissolution process, requiring a formal resolution and legislative review, adds a layer of accountability, ensuring that the decision to dissolve is well-considered and in the public interest. Precedent for Other Authorities: This bill sets a positive precedent for other state authorities, demonstrating a mechanism for orderly dissolution when their purposes are fulfilled, which could be beneficial for future governance models. I strongly support this legislation for its focus on local governance, efficient asset management, community benefit, financial prudence, and for providing a clear, accountable process for the dissolution of state authorities when their mission is accomplished.

HB2327 - Eastern Virginia Groundwater Management Advisory Committee; extension of sunset date.

Last Name: Wagner Locality: Simi Valley

HB2516 - Hazardous substances; Hazardous Substance Facility Response Plans, civil penalties.

Last Name: Wagner Locality: Simi Valley

HB2517 - Sewage sludge; land application, permit exemptions, sunset.

Last Name: Wagner Locality: Simi Valley

Last Name: Besa Locality: North Chesterfield

I wish to express my opposition to HB2517. Just because VA Tech or any other institution of higher learning wants to study the land application of biosolids/sludge, that should not relieve that institution from providing the same notice requirements to its neighbors that commercial appliers and private farmers are obligated to provide. I urge an unfavorable report on HB2517. Thank you, Glen Besa

Last Name: Sligh Organization: Wild Virginia Locality: Charlottesville

Last Name: Overbey Organization: don't spread on me Locality: North Garden

HB2517 These comments specifically refer to this proposed language of the bill in this paragraphy: "S. The permitting requirements of this article shall not apply to any land application of sewage sludge when such land is owned and operated by an institution of higher education in the Commonwealth. As used in this subsection, "institution of higher education" means a public institution or private institution of higher education, as those terms are defined in § 23.1-100." Supposedly, the point of this bill is to help make sure universities can land-apply biosolids (sewage sludge) for research, but it is actually an industry-backed document that will result in silencing the public, reducing access to important data, and increasing the potential for chemical contamination of Virginia land and water. The industry and academia are understandably worried right now about public opposition to the land application of biosolids (sewage sludge), given that the public is becoming increasingly aware of how full of toxic chemicals biosolids are, and in particular, PFAS chemicals. This language is so wide-ranging as to allow a university to spread sludge across its entire campus without any notice given or opportunity for input from any stakeholders. That may seem a far-fetched scenario, but the law would allow it, nonetheless. Perhaps the language of this bill was intentionally written as over-broad, so that it could subsequently be amended and narrowed to focus on research. Then its supporters could say it was "fixed" and therefore, ready to be passed. Dear Legislators, please do not fall for this ruse. This idea of exemption for anyone or any institution takes us in exactly the wrong direction. We need firmer state and local controls over sources of pollution -- including sewage sludge -- not looser ones, because federal regulators are dissolving and abdicating all their responsibilities, even as we speak. Now that we know there are PFAS in nearly every sample of sewage sludge taken, we need more public awareness and input on biosolids permits, not less. This bill would cut the public out of the process altogether. I urge you to please kill it.

HB2630 - Trees; replacement during development process in localities, tree canopy fund.

Last Name: Wagner Locality: Simi Valley

HB2633 - Misbranded food; manufactured-protein food products.

Last Name: Wagner Locality: Simi Valley

Last Name: fraser Locality: COVINGTON

In Favor of Increasing Free Fishing Days in Virginia: Promoting Outdoor Recreation: Increased Participation: By expanding from three to six free fishing days, more people, including those who might not otherwise fish due to cost, can enjoy this recreational activity. This could lead to a surge in interest in fishing, particularly among families, children, and newcomers to the sport. Health Benefits: Fishing is an outdoor activity that promotes physical health through exercise and mental health through nature therapy. More free days could encourage a healthier lifestyle among Virginians. Economic and Community Benefits: Boost to Local Economies: More fishing days could lead to increased tourism in fishing-centric communities. Local businesses like bait shops, tackle stores, and restaurants would likely see an uptick in visitors on these days. Community Engagement: Free fishing days can serve as community events, fostering social connections and community pride. They could be part of local festivals or conservation days, enhancing community involvement in environmental stewardship. Conservation and Education: Education Opportunities: These days can be used for educational purposes, teaching new anglers about conservation, fishing ethics, and the importance of aquatic ecosystems. It's an opportunity to promote sustainable fishing practices. Conservation Awareness: By making fishing accessible, people might become more invested in the conservation of local water bodies, leading to greater public support for environmental policies and initiatives. Fair Access to Resources: Equity in Access: Fishing licenses can be a barrier for some, particularly for low-income individuals or families. More free days mean more equitable access to natural resources, aligning with principles of fair use of public lands and waters. Youth and Beginners: Free fishing days are particularly beneficial for introducing youth and beginners to fishing without the initial cost, potentially creating a lifelong interest in fishing and conservation. Administrative and Regulatory Balance: Minimal Impact on Revenue: While there might be a slight decrease in license fee revenue, the increase in participation could lead to long-term benefits like more license sales in the future as people get hooked on fishing. Regulatory Flexibility: The proposal still allows regulatory bodies like the Board of Wildlife Resources and the Commissioner of Marine Resources to manage these days strategically, ensuring they align with conservation goals and do not adversely affect fish populations. Conclusion: The expansion of free fishing days is a positive step towards greater public engagement with Virginia's natural resources, promoting both economic and health benefits while fostering a culture of conservation. It democratizes access to one of nature's most enjoyable activities, potentially leading to a more informed, engaged, and environmentally conscious community.

Last Name: Dan Colegrove Organization: Alliance for Plant Based Inclusion Locality: Falls Church

Comments Document

The Alliance for Plant Based Inclusion (APBI) is opposed to SB 2633. APBI is a coalition of well-known companies that advocates for plant-based food policies that afford consumers the greatest choice, clarity, and flexibility in the marketplace. Our members include ADM, ConAgra Brands, Kellanova, and Kraft-Heinz. Members of the Alliance offer both traditional and plant-based food products appealing to a variety of consumers. APBI’s focus is limited to plant-based foods and doesn’t include cell cultured products or those made with fermentation, insects or fungi. We believe that the bill may hinder consumer choice and clarity, and stifle innovation in the food industry. SB 2633 might prevent makers of plant-based alternatives from providing accurate consumer information as they have been doing for decades. It presupposes shoppers are being misled using traditional terminology when traditional meat terms help them understand the uses and occasions for the plant-based alternative. APBI opposes proposals that would restrict the ability to label and market plant-based products in a truthful way that makes it easy for consumers to understand what they are—and are not—purchasing. These proposals presuppose those consumers are being misled by the use of traditional meat terminology when, in reality, the use of traditional meat terms helps consumers understand the uses and occasions for the plant-based alternative. Misguided attempts to limit communication between companies and their customers are unnecessary, unfair, and in some cases unconstitutional. • Unnecessary: Studies prove that consumers are not misled by labels. • Unfair: These restrictive proposals would unfairly penalize a well-established food category for no reason other than to promote another industry. There is room in the market for everyone, and governments should not be in the position of picking winners and losers. • Unconstitutional: Bills restricting the use of traditional terminology raise legal concerns. Attempts to impose new restrictions run afoul of First Amendment protections that allow companies to label their foods with clear, non-misleading terms. APBI is dedicated to clear and accurate labeling for plant-based foods. Members use terms familiar to consumers not to deceive, but to accurately describe the texture, use, and nature of plant-based products. This approach works to enhance, not diminish, consumer understanding. Labels on our products explicitly indicate their plant-based nature. Today's consumers are increasingly aware and seeking plant-based options for a variety of reasons – health, environmental concerns, and ethical considerations. Consumers are not misled by our labels; on the contrary, they depend on them to make informed decisions aligned with their personal values. The Alliance for Plant Based Inclusion urges you to oppose SB 2633 as it applies to plant-based products. While the goal of ensuring clear and honest labeling is one we share and support, the bill could lead to greater consumer confusion.

HB2638 - Trees; conservation and replacement during development process.

Last Name: Wagner Locality: Simi Valley

HB2656 - Federal park operations; temporary funding.

No Comments Available

HB2709 - Historic landmarks; designating or nominating, notice requirements.

No Comments Available

HB2710 - Food packaging, certain; uniform labeling requirements.

Last Name: Wagner Locality: Simi Valley

HB2775 - Hemp product; clarifies definition.

Last Name: smith Organization: HIS Farm, Suffolk, VA (a small first generation family farm) Locality: Suffolk

We support HB 2775. Consumers should have the right to know what they are purchasing for their and their family’s nutritional needs. One can advertise as a protein source alternative, but to state ‘non-meat’, places negative connotations on meat consumption as well as makes it sound to the consumer that one’s protein needs whether consumed either from plants or animals are similar and interchangeable. However, according to ‘Animal vs. Plant Protein — What’s the Difference?’ on HEALTHLINE.com, Medically reviewed by Jillian Kubala, MS, RD, Nutrition — Written by Kaitlyn Berkheiser and Mary Jane Brown, PhD, RD (UK) — Updated on June 23, 2023: ‘Proteins are made up of amino acids. The human body uses about 20 different amino acids to build proteins (2). Your body can make some amino acids itself, but you have to get nine of them — known as essential amino acids — through your diet. Protein sources can vary greatly in the types of amino acids they contain. Generally, animal proteins are known as complete proteins, meaning they contain all nine essential amino acids. While some plant proteins, including pea protein and soybeans, are also complete protein sources, many other plant foods are considered incomplete proteins (3). This means plant foods such as beans, peanuts, and wheat are rich in total protein but lack one or more of the essential amino acids.’ I thank you for keeping these differences in mind as you vote on HB2775. Sir or Ma’am, also I thank you for your time and willingness to be a community servant. Thank you for stepping in the gap to be a voice for us people at large when we are unable to be present for these meetings that shape our country and community. With great respect, Mrs. Smith on behalf of HIS Farm

Last Name: Castleman Organization: none Locality: Goochland

I have been using CBD oil tincture for over 5 years which I purchase from an independent farmer's company. I am 80 years old and have terrible debilitating osteoarthritis and was on the verge of having a wrist replacement. I apply the oil topically and take under my tongue at bedtime. The pain has reduced so dramatically, that I am no longer a surgical candidate. I take full strength, full spectrum, 2700mg in a 30ml bottle, from which I ingest 1/2 dropper at night. If the current requirements for the amount of CBD which must be in a bottle, I cannot even conceive how large a supply I would need. This seems like this would make all patients have to deal with the large companies and put the small businesses out of business. I can tell you that when I try to purchase CBD from Greenleaf, a huge manufacturer in Richmond, the could not care less what I need. They are only in it for people who smoke THC, which I do not. Very seldom do they have the products that I require, even at many times the price. This is sensible bill. Please support this change!

HB2782 - Blue catfish; Board of Wildlife Resources shall amend 4VAC15-320-25, Creel and length limits.

Last Name: Wagner Locality: Simi Valley

Last Name: Corley Locality: Cumming

The blue catfish are an amazing fish for people to catch and the big ones are the most fun to catch. If you do this, a bunch of catfish will be losing their homes and they’ll only be smaller ones for people to catch. And blue catfish take a long time to grow to that big so please just let them live.

Last Name: green Organization: Catfish community Locality: Hope mills NC

I've caught more trophy blue cats up there than I could dream of in my local rivers down here in se nc and look forward to traveling up there and showing friends every chance I get how good of a trophy fishery the james is. If this goes through, it'll literally wipe out the trophy population. Thanks for listening.

Last Name: Hyde Locality: Jackson County

Passing the bill allowing fellow fishing anglers to have no limit on the catfish would be devastating to the James river & leave a tremendous impact on the catfish industry & the catfish population on that body water.. I highly disagree with the bill as I see there should always be a limit so for there we can continue to see anglers catch & release trophy size catfish instead of seeing people catch all the trophy size catfish just to put them in a pay lake to die, it makes me sick..

Last Name: Oliver Locality: Bardstown

The trophy catfish is a big part of my life with bein able to take my family out and catch these trophy catfish. This would be the worst thing that could ever happen to one of the best trophy catfishing river around. I look at catfish the same way Major League Bass Fishermen look at bass as they are trophy's. I hope this will help change the view on these fish we really need to keep these big catfish safe and keep them around for generations to come. Thanks for your time

Last Name: Hilton Locality: Montgomery Co.

The commercial fishermen will devastate this prime blue catfish fishery. Fishing in Southwest Virginia waters doesn't compare to the James River. That's why we travel 4 hours to catfish and I have friends that travel 10 to 12 hours to fish the James in hopes of catching a trophy blue catfish. Taking all the trophy fish will leave nothing for our children , grandchildren and great grandchildren. Please don't let this fall on deaf ears. Thanks! Randy

Last Name: Mills Locality: Caroline County

Please vote NO to removing the length law from the blue catfish in Virginia! The length law only protects a tiny portion of the biomass of catfish in virginia. Seems like giving 98% of the catfish population to the commercial fisherman was beyond fair. Bluecats are the #2 sought after fish in virginia. Only second to largemouth bass. Trophy fishing for bluecats have exploded in recent years. Alot of money is spent to pursue them. Please don't let them kill the fish we have cought and released for years now. Ty. Vote no to removing the length law across va.

Last Name: Poling Locality: Perry, new Lexington

By passing this bill you will be taking a lot of revenue from the state of Virginia. People from all over the states go to Virginia to fish the James river for trophy blue cats.

Last Name: Hoppet Organization: Outdoorsmen Locality: Rockingham County in North Carolina

Good evening, This bill could do a lot of damage to great fisheries and businesses. Not to mention the livelihood that many depend on daily thanks to the catfish in those rivers. Please consider the people, businesses, economic downfalls from vacationing fishermen, and most importantly the catfish species as a whole. Passing this bill for one group to benefit instead of many, would be a mistake in my opinion. There are many that are depending on you all to make a great decision for those fisheries. Please do the right thing. Thanks for your time and the opportunity to leave this message. Respectfully, Mike

Last Name: Grow Locality: Halstead

Bill 2782, do not pass this bad for the fishing guides. The length limit is important

Last Name: Mosmeier Locality: Sunman

Do not remove size limits.

Last Name: Mcvay Locality: Shelby

Please save the blue catfish

Last Name: Keene Locality: Chesterfield, VA

Please DO NOT loosen the restrictions. I fish for these fish and add quite a bit to the local and state economy in doing so. If allowed, commercial fisherman will destroy our waterways. Thank You. Richard Keene

Last Name: Reynolds Locality: Yanceyville

I have enjoyed a lifetime of family trips to catfish at buggs island lake. Myself friends and family have caught many trophy fish and we use this as fellowship once a year as many of us stay in multiple different states. Harming this fishery would be devastating to our enjoyment as we meet there yearly.

Last Name: Lloyd Locality: Wylliesburg Va

Please vote no to this bill. We do not want our fish to be taken away from us. We need to protect them from the commercial fisherman and keep our waterways from being destroyed. So please vote no to this bill and protect our waterway here in Virginia.

Last Name: Smith Locality: Rockingham county , NC

Please do not go through with this. I myself as one of many people travel an hour and a half away from home to vacation/ and tournament fish at Kerr lake buggs island. VA. My friends and family have traveled there for the last 20 plus years for vacation fishing. If this passes , commercial fishing WILL destroy the blue cat population overall. Please consider not doing this and destroying the blue cat from buggs island.

Last Name: Stone Locality: Osceola

Protect the trophy's!!!

Last Name: Lawrence Locality: Halifax

Please consider not changing this bill. Removing this limit opens a world of issues and allows for an unlimited destruction of fisheries. Removing this law will decimate the larger blue catfish in every fishery. These fish take a long time to grow. These are the fish that keep our population of eating size fish sustainable. Not only that, but they provide revenue to the areas they reside. People come from all over the country to have an opportunity to catch a large blue catfish. This also opens up the opportunity for pay lakes to to do what every they want. Pay lakes take these fish, throw them in a pond with no food source just to be caught over and over until they are die of starvation and mutilation. The fisheries that have blue catfish have an excellent balance and Removing this bill will cause serious disruption to the eco system that currently flourishes. Please reconsider keeping the regulation in place. If anything it could stronger and raise the minimum length to 35" Thank you for your time and consideration.

Last Name: Mathis Locality: Sussex

Removing creel and length limits would be very detrimental to the blue cat populations in the state. And as of me and many other people we have built a lifestyle on catching and releasing trophy blue cats for years. If yall remove these limits and people are allowed to keep unlimited 30+ lb blue cats that will kill the breeding stock. These big fish don’t only provide for a good time they are also our breeding stock. So we ask that yall take the word of the people and listen and don’t remove the limits on our blue cats

Last Name: Ammons Organization: FISHERMAN Locality: Knightdale

Please dont pass this law. Not only will this law affect the trophy catfish population it will also affect the economy an the 30+ Charter captains in the area that feed there families an earn there living by running charters for ppl that come hundreds and hundreds of miles to have the opportunity to catch the fish of a lifetime an make memories with there families friends and loved ones. This will also affect the economy cause millions of dollers are brougght from other states from ppl that strivve for the opportunity to catch and RELEASE one of these fish...

Last Name: Dellinger Locality: Maiden

I do not want this bill passed. Myself and many other anglers fish for trophy catfish in these waters. Not only would this bill hurt the anglers fishing for these trophy’s but it would in impact your local economy when people decide not to travel and fish these waters due to it being fished out.

Last Name: Warren Locality: Moyock

I do not think this bill should be passed due to the recreational group of us guys that enjoy going out to chase big catfish and having them released, if this bill passing it will ruin our hobbies and chances to get away

Last Name: Gentry Organization: Catch the fever Locality: Roxboro

Stop, this isn’t what we want.Yall are messing with what we love.

Last Name: Gossett Locality: Greenwood

Please do not pass this bill. The blue catfish need to have size limits so that the giant catfish can get bigger and people can have the enjoyment of catching a giant catfish and releasing it so it can get bigger and someone else will have a chance to catch it also ty

Last Name: Roland Locality: Ridgeway

Guys you are trying to lift a law that takes our trophy fish . These are fish that took 30 plus years to get this size . These fish 32 “ plus are not as abundant as the fish under 20” the fish under 20 “ and smaller are more abundant . By lifting this bill it will play devastation on the trophy fish that we try so hard to protect and catch and release for our kids to enjoy the thrill of catching a monster blue one day. We as anglers ask that you don’t lift the 32” rule. We would prefer. Slot to be put in place that you can only keep a water size fish which would fall in the 5lb to 10 lb range . Please take in consideration of us fishermen when deciding on this.

Last Name: Barlow Locality: Augusta

This is a statement from Chesapeake Bay magazine March, 2023.. "In the meantime, what about those of us who like to catch and eat fish from the James? The health department lists consumption advisories and suggests avoiding large fish like blue catfish over 32”, which can accumulate high levels of pollutants over time. They also advise people not to eat any fish from the James more than twice a month.' That is a statement from. The Virginia health department. This being true, what is the goal of this bill? Is it to promote taking large fish with more of a health risk home to eat? Is it to increase the harvest opportunity for commercial fisherman to take more of these large fish with a higher HEALTH risk to the be put into a commercial setting without a health risk warning to the consumer? To reiterate what all the other comments on these bills are touched on. The trophy blue catfish is a treasured resource among fisherman and one of the fastest growing segments of the recreational fishing industry. The trophy fish drive the industry with fisherman spending 10s of thousands of dollars each on boats ,travel,gear,food, hotels etc.. to fish for these trophy catfish. Virginia ranks as one of the top destination in the country for this. We have a resource here that very valuable to the state. Say no to these bills .

Last Name: Sheffer Locality: York pa

The james river is home to big and thriving catfish. So many anglers sport fish this river for these big blues doing tournaments and having fun. Just as bass fisherman do. Everyone has their favorite target species! In my opinion. These fish deserve to be respected. It takes a long time for them to get big and allowing there to be no limit will dramatically impact the population. Before humans mother nature balanced the ecosystems. If you think the blue catfish will harm other fish populations. Well your wrong. These fish have been around for years and years. Only thing changing is their size. And once they get so big only then do they have so long to live. Keep the big blue catfish where they belong. The big worry is having to many small fish. If you talk to a professional that stocks fish they will say too many small fish is bad for a trophy fish pond/lake or in this case the james river. I have faith that this can be stopped! Do the right thing!

Last Name: Sprayberry Locality: Rome

Bill hb2782 As a fellow catfisherman if you pass this bill it will delete the trophy catfish you will have people raping these waters just to sale to a pay lake where they will die us trophy catfisherman love what we do catching big catfish and releasing them for the younger generation to catch and enjoy so please think before you pass this bill

Last Name: Denson Locality: Brownwood

I vote no harvest on blue catfish over 32 inches. I’m just a fisherman who fishes as much as I can and know the ecosystem would not be the same with the big “trophy” blue catfish and flathead catfish. These fish have don’t do much harm if any. Taking the trophy fish would do more harm than good.

Last Name: Sturwold Locality: Van wert ohio

Please don't allow more than 1 fish over 32 inches to be taken a day. The trophy bluecats will sadly disappear if this happens. Paylakes will come and turn that river upside down. Sadly the fish in paylakes die. Bluecats are not a trash fish. We travel 650 miles one way every year to fish for these bluecats. The james river is a beautiful place and just won't be the same over the years if this bill is passed. Thanks Paul sturwold

Last Name: Argenbright Locality: Madison Hts

Please vote No to this bill it will cause commercial fishermen to rake the waters and destroy the blue catfish.

Last Name: Meehling Locality: Scottown OH

I do not support this bill first off. Why would you change something that is not broken. The catfishing community has really taken off in the past 4-5 years. As a fellow catfisherman, the rivers listed above are one of the best known bodies of water to catch big blue catfish. This creates revenue for many towns and local stores. When we come to fish for these giant blues, we go to local bait and tackle stores, we eat at local restaurants, we stay in hotels or local airbnbs, and we buy the gas stations gas when we are visiting.Passing this bill will severely impact your local stores in those towns. And it will surely put a hurting on your fishing grounds. As I’ve stated above I do not support this bill.

Last Name: Griles Locality: Halifax county

Hb 1907 along with this bill need to be stopped. The trophy catfish fishery in VA is literally world known. World record catfish has come from Kerr/buggs and also the James River and its surrounding rivers are know as some of the best places to fish for blues in the whole country. Many states are trying to replicate our standards to better their fishery. The state needs to understand how much of a boost this is for local economies as well as a lot of people’s jobs rely on this fishery being maintained at a high quality for their livelihood. Through people coming from all over the world to fish here, tournaments, whole tackle/fishing equipment companies started in the surrounding area because of this fishery. Va blue catfish fishery is arguable the best in the world, let’s not mess it up now or for future generations to come.

Last Name: Cearley Locality: Troy

Removing the size limit and the amount of blue catfish you can keep is blasphemy! Doing that will dwindle the blue cat population to nothing! You will not only eliminate a fish that has become a crucial part of the marine ecosystem you eliminate any and all chances of children and future generations to enjoy the ability to catch for sport or catch to eat blue catfish!

Last Name: Hall Locality: Ashland,Ky

We travel to the James at least once every fall for the chance to catch Large blue cats in numbers and have a blast. Please don’t change this it will ruin the resource.

Last Name: Moses Organization: All Fishers Locality: Huntington WV

I believe we should be allowed to fish for any size fish in Virginia. A lot of Fishers from different areas travel to Virginia and love to fish. The charter fishing and any one fishing love to catch Blue Catfish and release them. It's a great sport and please allow the people to catch any size. I love Virginia

Last Name: Haynes Locality: Charleston, WV

I and many other WV fisherman travel to fish the mighty James River to catch and release giant blue catfish. WV is slowly getting our blue catfish population up but we do not have the numbers that VA has nor the size. We spend a lot of money for catfishing and creates revenue for VA. I feel if this bill would pass it would cause the monster catfish to be harder to catch and we would just fish our local waters.

Last Name: Murphy Locality: Youngsville

Please do not change the limits on Blue catfish. I do not support this bill. This will be detrimental to the fish.

Last Name: Godfrey Locality: SANFORD

This bill will ruin the catfishery for us fishermen who enjoy doing this and removing this is not smart move and won’t be long there will be no more catfish once all the bigger fish are taken out of these said places

Last Name: Christian dove Locality: Danville Va

You are going to do away with all the big catfish in the James River which in return is going to take away the sport aspect of Catfishing and after they get so big, you can’t eat them anyways and it takes years for catfish to get that big

Last Name: MCCURRY Organization: Myself Locality: Pittsylvania

Why change something that isn't broken? Catfishing has become just as popular as bass fishing and it's continuing to grow, people come from all over to fish these fisheries for trophy blue cats and if creel limits change it will slowly deplete our waters and there will be businesses, guides, small towns, restaurants and others affected by this because once the trophy fish are gone people and out of towners will stop coming because there will be no point. It's just a domino effect. Please think about the overall outcome of this and all in all this bill is NO GOOD!!! Nobody benefits from it

Last Name: Stewart Locality: Klingerstown

As a recreational fisherman I would ask that you consider a balance between reducing overall numbers yet still protecting the older trophy class fish. I live in Pennsylvania but plan vacations and travel to Virginia to enjoy the opportunity of pursuing trophy Blue Catfish. Please do not underestimate the value these trophy fish offer to the state of Virginia, it would a terrible shame to waste.

Last Name: Hughes Locality: Oxford

I have been a professional Catfishman for years. Trying to protect The trophy catfish and I would like keep The Regulations the same Kerr Lake . Thank you VAN HUGHES

Last Name: Collings Locality: St Joseph, MO

I am a fisherman who travels to chase big blue cats. There are many of us who do but if regulations are not upheld to protect these fish these communities will lose a large amount of tourism money from us fisherman. Please continue regulating these fisheries. These comments are regarding HB2782. Thank you in advance.

Last Name: Allen Locality: Lancaster SC

A strong reason not to remove protections for blue catfish in Virginia is that these fish are being unfairly blamed for declines in blue crab populations, when research shows they aren’t a major factor in blue crab numbers. Factors like habitat loss and water quality have a far greater impact. Additionally, removing protections could lead to overharvesting, especially in the case of trophy-sized catfish. These large, mature fish are essential for maintaining healthy populations, as they often play a key role in reproductive cycles. If protections are removed, it could lead to indiscriminate fishing practices, like the rise of catfish pay lakes, where fish are taken out of the wild for profit. This would disrupt both the ecosystem and local communities. Keeping limits and protections on trophy-sized catfish ensures that these critical fish remain a sustainable part of Virginia's waterways while also preserving biodiversity and promoting responsible fishing practices. This bill should have never even been drafted.

Last Name: Bradford Organization: Catfishing Locality: Paint bank

Please protect the monster catfish you have. We travel that way often just to catch them. I would love to have a fishery close to me like it.

Last Name: Cochran Locality: Lexington

We really need to keep the size limit so these fish can grow and younger people latter in the years can have as much fun catching them as we all do now.If we dont do this these blue cats will be destroyed.

Last Name: Roseberry Locality: Davidson county

I don't want this passed the reason is I do catfish trouments on many lakes I believe in release and grow this let the catfish reproduce that we need in the lakes and rivers so other anglers like myself to enjoy the wildlife if we keep taking catfish or any other fish out the lakes and rivers we want be able to have catfish trouments much longer me and my family and kids love enjoying the catch of catfish this should not be passed I don't like it at all it shouldn't be passed let's keep catching and releasing this is the way it should be not taking catfish out so they none to be caught please take my consideration I love to keep having catfish trouments so me and my family can enjoy these fish means alot to me

Last Name: Simmons Organization: Myself Locality: Garner

Removing this regulation will be a death sentence for the fishing community In va. It's sad to see money take control of natural resources that the lord provided. Its obvious no one who write the bills has any clue of the catfishing sport. Your taking away so much but het give nothing in return typical govt. You don't care about lives or fish all you care for is the dollar signs you see from.this bill. As a business owner that makes fishing gear and equipment your taking away my job and my way of life. You ream.what you sow God speed!

Last Name: Murphy Locality: Millersburg

Good afternoon, I feel the limit should stay to one fish over 34 inches if it is lifted i feel the trophy fishing will fall off the cliff. Having those trophy fish attract money to the towns that hold tournaments and the local area . I personally spend 14 to 16 days down there a year every year for the past 4 years fishing the spring and again in the fall for king of the james. It's an incredible fishery for trophy fish and enjoy bringing my family out catching fish of a lifetime and putting money in your community I would hate to see it take a turn for the worse. I appreciate the time thank you.

Last Name: Brown Locality: Elkton

Instead of blaming the blue cats on the decline of blue crabs maybe limit the amount the industry can harvest the blue crabs. I fish the Elkton river, towards Turkey Point, and the number of blue catfish that I catch a year is less than a dozen. I also prefer to eat the blue catfish over channel catfish. On the other hand while traveling to and around Turkey Point on boat I have to be very careful because of all the trout lines and crab pots. One year there was 15 different trout lines for the crabs in one sq mile.

Last Name: Moore Organization: Reel Country Guide Service LLC Locality: Ruther Glen

I have a question a little more direct for delagates Kent and Simonds as I am not for either of these bills. If VA approves this bill and destroys the trophy fishery what will be done to help the 30 plus charter fishing business who rely on the trophy fishery to attract business? Will we be financially compensated?

Last Name: Bolt Organization: Myself and fellow fisherman Locality: Central sc

Please leave the current laws in place to protect these trophy fish so our children and grandchildren can enjoy all the same opportunities that we've had catching and releasing these trophy fish.

Last Name: Webb Locality: Mechanicsburg PA

My Name is Matthew Webb. I reside just outside of Harrisburg Pennsylvania. I am writing on behalf of the Catfish community but also on behalf of someone who is involved in the seafood industry that includes Blue Catfish caught in Chesapeake Tributaries and Chesapeake Bay proper. As someone directly involved in the sales of Blue Catfish but also a passionate angler; this conversation can take many twists and turn. I hope to stand out just a bit given my background. The ongoing debate is filled with a lot of misinformation that needs scientific backing for any judgement calls and decisions being made on the subject matter. I can say with certainty after being involved with the seafood market the sales for this species of fish is trending downwards. The demand for this fish in my market is substantially low. Market price for blue catfish is from 5$ a lb to 6.50 $ on a good day. If the goal is to eradicate bluecatfish and or exempt any slot limits. The market will be absolutely flooded without the sales necessary for sustainable income for the commercial fishing and distribution of the species. Maryland waters are doing everything in their power to mitigate the fishery with little success. Maryland and Virginia needs to embrace the power of the recreational fisherman to understand the full scope of what they anglers see everyday in our river systems. In my personal opinion, the bay proper needs more attention than the tidal tributaries holding the trophy catfish. Most of the fish I see being harvested directly from the bay are 30lbs and under. For whatever reason the trophy fish seem to reside in the rivers with lower salinity. The smaller fish seems to be migrating though the bay causing more harm to the crab and rockfish populations than the fish in the river systems. Consider this.. Focus on the harvesting of blue catfish in the bay proper and manage that before you subject the recreational anglers in the tidal river systems. Yes catfish will migrate in and out of the river systems into the bay but the amount of recreational anglers targeting catfish in the bay proper are VERY minimal in comparison to the anglers you see fishing for blue catfish in the river systems with that larger category of fish staying in the river systems. I didn't have a lot of time to prepare this message and would be happy to discuss and help create ideas that will effectively create solutions for everyone. I know commercial fisherman in the bay that would agree and also recreational catfish anglers that would jump on board with this statement. Blue catfish are not going anywhere anytime soon and it would be wise to work with everyone on all front addressing specific details regarding the market driven data and science behind the movement without emotions or biased onions against what many people are led to believe is a "trash fish". Would be happy to elaborate more. Thanks for hearing me out. Matt Webb

Last Name: Myers Organization: CatchaCat club Locality: Ruther Glen va 22546

Save the blues, veto the killer bill. We are a catch and release club, and do not want to see them ( blue cats) destroyed. please do not pass this bill thank you

Last Name: Galvan Locality: Hampton

I am apart of an organization that takes veterans out on the water for some outdoor therapy. These veterans typically suffer from conditions like PTSD or physical limitations. Such a simple thing like catching these trophy catfish in VA waters has made more of a difference than you’ll ever know. These veterans and many a like have had countless memories, smiles, laughs, and stories and all of this would quickly come to an end if this is passed. I strongly urge you to reconsider. Not to mention, the loss to livelihoods, bussinesses etc.

Last Name: Hancock Locality: Amelia

That is the biggest sport for us catching them big blue catfish if you get rid of them what’s next you let them commercial freshman there they will rape the river

Last Name: Mason Locality: Savannah

Protect fish over 32 inches. These are trophy fish that many anglers including myself love to fish for.

Last Name: McGarity Locality: Anderson

I think creel limits help protect our fishery and seeing daily limits lifted will hurt the catfish species as a whole. That’s why I am completely against resources amending the bill

Last Name: Easterling Locality: Summerton

My family and I travel several times a year to fish for giant blue cats. Spend average 2k per trip. Room, gas, food, etc. It’s a growing sport and should be recognized as such. Protect the giant blue cats! Stop the bill!!!

Last Name: kegin Locality: Crescent Oklahoma

I travel to the fine state of Virginia to pursue the trophy catfish. When you stop protection of the trophy Catfish, people just like me will stop coming there. These trophies are such an economic boost to your state. The large breeder fish are the ones that control the future of the species. There will always be small fish to catch and consume. We have long tried in other states to adopt CPR. Catch, Picture , Release. That’s to make it possible for the next generation to enjoy. I urge you to please consider the long term effects of lifting the length limit. There are only a few real trophy waters left in the USA.

Last Name: Grubb Locality: Fairmont

Protect your trophy blue catfish fishery and do not allow this bill to be passed!!

Last Name: Hoskins Locality: Maryville

I and many other cat fisherman all across the country come to the James River to catch trophy size catfish. I have personally seen on my home waters what it’s like to not regulate this fishing by only allowing 1 fish over 32”. When this bill is passed to no longer make it lawful to possess more than 1 fish over the limit per day. This opens the fishery up to pure destruction. We were told here in Tennessee that the small amount of commercial fishing on our waterside was not significant enough to regulate. Now what was once a great fishing destination is nothing but a shell of what it used to be. Please don’t let this happen to the James River. This will not only affect the fishing community but it will also affect the local economy. The major tournaments will go away, the guides will stop guiding for catfish, people will stop coming from all over the country to fish there. When you take fish out that are 32” or bigger then you are taking the breeding fish out of the area. This causes massive problems for a species. Come on Virginia you can stop this.

Last Name: Britt Organization: BobCat Outdoors Youtube Channel Locality: Chattanooga

I think removing the size limitation on these blue Catfish would be a monumental mistake and open your public waters up to poaching by commercial & residential fishermen who intend to harvest fish out of the James River and sell them to pay-lakes in areas like Ohio and Kentucky and be used for sport fishing and gambling in tiny ponds where they die horrible death please reconsider this action!

Last Name: Moore Organization: Reel Country Guide Service LLC Locality: Ruther Glen

My name is Christian Moore. I am a NC native and Il have been a avid catfish anglers for over 20 years. I got into the trophy side of the fishery on the Dan River and Kerr lake. Soon after that I started driving from NC to the James River to experience one of the best trophy Blue catfish fisheries the country has to offer. Once I realized how special this place was I knew it would be the perfect opportunity for me to get my captains license and start my own business. My family and I moved to VA in 2018. I started my guide service in 2021 and as of 2023 it is my full time job. HB 2782 would destroy my business and cause me to close the doors. The population of fish in our river systems over 32" only makes up less than 2 percent of the bio mass. It makes no since why the daily creel limit is trying to be amended. Our trophy Blue catfish fishery brings in millons of dollars in revenue for the state and is a favorite past time for thousands of instate and out of state anglers. I please ask you to kill this bill! As it will not only destroy my family's life but thousands of other families who are very passionate about this sport. Best, Capt. Christian Moore

Last Name: Cayton Organization: Catch the Fever Outdoors Locality: Person County

Please do not pass this bill. The James River is known for having monster catfish and if you remove the size limit and quantities it’s going to go downhill fast. We promote CPR- catch, photo and release of anything over 10lbs. If all the big catfish are caught and kept then we lose the genes for bigger catfish and before long it will only be 10-15lbs sized catfish left. We need those genes from the big fish to pass along so we can have more monster catfish. The amount of business it brings to Hopewell area will be gone if the fishing goes downhill with this new bill. There are fishing guides that take people fishing on the James River and if they can’t catch big catfish people aren’t going to want to go anymore and that makes people lose their jobs and the area of Hopewell will suffer even more. We usually book hotels so we can get out early and fish and can rest up good later. But that won’t happen if you don’t keep a limit and size of catfish people can catch. The genes of these big fish will help generations to continue making the James River the best river for fishing. Most people that catch the big ones can’t eat them because the bigger they are the worst they taste. That’s why most people keep fish under 10lbs to eat. There are even catfish tournaments held on James River and that brings in close to 80+ boats and then there is the Tidal on the James also has at least 80 boats each month for their tournaments and all the hotels and food and buying things we forget will greatly affect the revenue of Hopewell this doesn’t include fishing farther up in Virginia at the James River. We have over 540,000 followers on our facebook page and more on TikTok and YouTube. And if this bill passes we might as well mark the James River off our places to go and will fish Kerr Lake instead. There is more to this bill than just changing the size and quantity people can have. It also is detrimental to the businesses we use while there. They are going to see a huge decrease in hotel rentals and restaurants and will ruin the balance of the lake. Please don’t pass this bill without looking more into the cause and effect it will have on many areas of the James River and their surrounding communities because anglers won’t want to go there and fish. Also a lot of people that catch the monsters waste the meat of the fish when they could have easily taken pics and videos and released the fish to keep growing. This will affect many generations of fishermen including youth fishing as well. I hope you will reconsider passing this bill and look at the impact of doing it has on the communities around the James River. Thank you for your time. Lauren

Last Name: Henry Locality: Va Beach

The trophy blue catfish fishery in eastern Virginia brings anglers from all over the country, it employs guides, it generates revenue for the area. It is a valuable natural resource and this bill would destroy it and many livelihoods along with it. This bill cannot be allowed to pass.

Last Name: Deaton Organization: Codie Deaton Fishing LLC Locality: Celina

We travel from Ohio multiple times a year to fish the James river. There is no other blue cat fishery like it in the world. Removing creel and length limits will destroy the wonderful Virginia blue car fisheries that many anglers from all over the country travel to and spend a substantial amount of money in the state.

Last Name: Orlowski Locality: Dupage villa park

You should not allow them to keep more than one trophy size catch, you will deplete everything in in the waters with these commercial fisherman if you allow them to keep everything trophy size catches

Last Name: Radford Locality: Rutledge

These fish are not hurting any other population of fish leave them alone

Last Name: Harris Organization: Triangle Mods, LLC Locality: Person, Roxboro

Although not a resident of VA, I reside on the VA/NC boarder. I own a company the manufacturers fishing tackle used and sold through out Virginia. Our product is designed for catfish anglers and sold through tackle shops in Virginia. Not only would this Bill negatively affect me as a manufacturer but the tackle shops through out VA as well, but most importantly it eventually eradicate fishing guides who provide the lifelong memories for the residents of Virginia when catching these beautiful monster Blue Catfish. Please consider the voters and wonderful residents of this beautiful state by voting against this bill. We promote CPR (Catch, Photo and Release) across the country as a way of preserving our favorite sport of fishing.

Last Name: Barry Locality: Harvard

People will destroy the blue cats if you remove the restrictions on them! No one will get a new PR either because people will just kill them. It’s important to keep the measures in place so people have something to fish!

Last Name: Tim Bryant Locality: Ararat VA

I travel to the James river no less than 6 times a year . I usually stay for 5 to 7 days. In either a motel or rent a house. Eat out everyday. Buy my fuel there for my boat and truck. And visit the tackle stores for anything we might need. I usually bring between 2 and 5 people with me. And all thats to chase the trophy blue catfish. When I say trophy its the big fish 32 inches and up fish . By doing away with the one fish over 32” limit I feel that it will not be very long at all and these fish will be non existent. I have practiced catch and release for 30 years in hopes it will help the big fish to populate and be more abundant. The up and coming kids and generations need a chance to catch these trophy fish . I hope you reconsider passing this bill and keep the limit to only one fish per day . Zero fish over 32” would be great mandatory release of all big blue cats over 32” . Thanks for your time and please stop this bill.

Last Name: Owens Locality: Bracey

I live on Lake Gaston and very close to Buggs Island Lake. The catfishing community is brings much needed revenue to the small towns around the lakes from food and lodging, fuel, etc. Destroying the blue cat fishery around the James River would have much the same negative effects on a much larger proportion. There are fishermen from all over the country who travel here to fish for blue cats in Kerr, Gaston, James region. The blue cats and the blue crabs can coexist much like the bass and snake head have done in the Potomac River. Please don't set in motion something so destructive to the fisheries and tourism we Virginia's depend on. Thank you.

Last Name: Short Locality: Powhatan

Hello, My name is Austin Short and I would like to say that the Blue Catfish in Virginia are very important to me and my family. We have enjoyed the recreational targeting of trophy Blue Catfish for a while now. I have a YouTube channel where I fish for these fish and that channel is part of my income. The trophy fish in the James River and Kerr Lake are important to their ecosystems because they have been a part of those ecosystems for a long time now. The decline in native species numbers are more to do with human intervention, pollution and already existing native species that feed on them. The Blue Catfish are nothing more than a scape-goat. Please reconsider and take this Bill off the table. Commercial fishermen will cause much more damage than a Blue catfish ever would if the creel limit on trophy size fish is taken away.

Last Name: Watkins Locality: Millers Creek

I look forward to fishing these trophy waters. I live in NC and make the trip there to fish these waters because of the trophy blues. This bill will destroy your fisheries and cost huge economic impacts to all of VA think this thru good you only get one chance to destroy a good fishery!

Last Name: Mark Deyo Organization: Trophy Catfishlover57@Gmail.com Locality: Knoxville Tennessee

The state of Virginia needs to recognize catfish as trophy fish and the money and devastation it would cause by letting commercial fisherman take the welfare of Guides Families motels Airbnb gas stations and restaurants generated by the catfish industry and Tournament Fishing in the state of Virginia the Creole and position limit should not be lifted

Last Name: McCall Locality: Clinton

I do not live in Virginia. However, I do travel up that way about once a year to fish for trophy catfish. If this bill is passed, I am sure that I will choose another destination to fish. I will not compete with commercial fishing for trophy catfish. You will not get my tourism dollars.

Last Name: Graham Organization: The blue catfish 32-in regulation Locality: Knoxville

Hello my name is Mike Graham I would like to send this message to just inform Who It May Concern I am from Knoxville Tennessee and I am a die-hard sportsman and fellow Outdoorsman I thoroughly enjoy making trips to your rivers and reservoirs and enjoying the fishery you have and catching the big catfish that you have and so do hundreds of thousands of other people I know your scientific studies can prove stuff that I cannot but there are a lot of Die Hard catfisherman out there that fish those Rivers religiously that live there the blue catfish population over 32 in is not that many are you would see them on a weekly basis it takes a lot of time and hard work to catch fish that size up there and if the bill is lifted and they are allowed to be took every time they're caught no matter the size the limit the person it would destroy the fishery and it would destroy thousands and thousands of dollars of Revenue that come to your town these fish need to be protected because they have already been almost destroyed from commercial fishing thank you for taking the time to read this message

Last Name: Adkins Locality: Radford

This Bill will be a devastating impact on the population of Blue Catfish in Virginia waters. Virginia has become a fishing destination for Blues for both residents and nonresidents alike. Thousands travel to and across Virginia for the sole reason to fish for Trophy Blue Catfish. Passing this bill will result in commercial fishing destroying our waters and causing lost income for the state and small business including guides that support their families. I myself travel more than four hours across the state multiple times per year to fish for Blue's spending on fuel, food and lodging generating income for business and the state. Bill HB2782 or any other concerning Blue Catfish should be voted against to protect our fisheries. Please vote no to keep the size limit intact.

Last Name: Broadley Locality: Utica

Please protect the trophy blue cat fisheries these rivers have. My self and many other have drove countless hours to your communities and spent thousands of dollars to have to opportunity to chase those fish. Removing the size limit on these fish would be detrimental to their populations.

Last Name: Flowers Organization: Operation Vets with Nets Locality: Clarksville

It takes a trophy catfish 20+ years to grow to its potential. Fish like that are rare and hard to find. This is one of the last places commercial fishermen haven’t destroyed and with no limit the fishing will demolish and so will the economy here.

Last Name: Fox Locality: Mc Arthur

The slot limit should stay in place. Why ruin a good thing you have a beautiful fishery and a beautiful place to fish. Not only will you hurt the fishing but also this towns that the fisherman spend money in getting gas and groceries along with buying fishing license. Please reconsider this.

Last Name: Brad Hayes Locality: Putnam

If this bill passes I will not be coming on my 3 annual trips a year to Hopewell. My business will also stop all dealings in the state of a Virginia as well as thousands of others. This will loose the state so much money in tourism it isn’t even funny. It’s a sad day if a bill like this passes for selfish reasons. Absolutely pathetic.

Last Name: Smith Organization: Catchfishwithus Locality: Marengo

Please kill this bill immediately. The blue catfish has became a viable game fish. Trophy catfishing is a growing industry. This industry is now where bass fishing was in the 1980s. Virginia is a bucket list destination for catfish anglers all over the country. The state needs to recognize this and promote the fishery instead of trying to lessen it. Protecting these fish will ensure future prosperity for the state. Blue catfish are under attack by commercial fishermen throughout the country. This is an opportunity to protect resource that other states have failed to protect.

Last Name: Cox Locality: King

This bill should not be past a fish of that size should not be kept. My wife didn't like fishing until she cought a big blue catfish now she loves it. And I'm hoping when my grand kids get big they have the opportunity to catch a big fish as well. These big fish aren't hurting anything.

Last Name: Riggle Locality: Willow wood ohio

Hello my name is Jeremy riggle . Me and a BUNCH of my local buddy's from ohio drive to the james river multiple times a yr to fish for trophy catfish please don't pass this we bring lots of revenue to Hopewell and surrounding areas gas food hotels Walmart etc .. spend few thousand a yr if this passes we will not come down once it hurts the fishery. The james river is one of the best fishery in the United States this would definitely hurt revenue for the state if it passes !! Thank you for your time and reading my concerns

Last Name: Fitzgibbons Locality: Prince edward

Please vote no to all bills that would loosen restrictions on the blue catfish. Without these trophy fish many small communities and businesses would be greatly impacted for the worse. The problem with the bay is not the blue catfish. It is water quality.

Last Name: DeMint Organization: Muskrat Adventures Locality: Jeffersonvlle

The impact on the Blue Catfish will be devastating of the 32" limit is removed. I live in Ohio and fished the Ohio river for years. The commercial fishing has completely ruined our river. The numbers have been on a steady decline for over a decade. The opportunity to catch trophy blue catfish has dwindled to saddening lows. Many anglers like myself travel to Virginia and fish ths James River specifically to have a chance to catch one of these magnificent giants. Like thousands of others that travel there to fish, we spend a lot of money on your hotels, restaurants, fuel, groceries, ramp fees, fishing licenses, local bait and tackle stores, and many other places that go away with the removal of trophy class blue catfish. I can assure you that little to no money is spent on anglers coming to fish the Ohio river with its depleted trophy class blue catfish. The economic impact alone is reason to stop this bill. The information provided to support this bill has been very vague and blanket terms. The impact is long lasting and would take decades to replace the trophy size Bluecat. Please vote NO on HB2782!

Last Name: Brediger Locality: Roanoke

Please reconsider this bill. All fishermen that fish for catfish are against this bill. It will only hurt the fish population and end something we all love to do.

Last Name: Dickens Locality: Kellyville

We already have a shortage of big fish in a lot of rivers. If this bill passes it will only get worse and harder for people to enjoy the sport of fishing. We need this to stay in place! Don’t make it easier for paylakes!!

Last Name: Haynes Locality: Glencoe

Please reconsider pushing these bills through, I'm an avid catfish angler that travels to fish tournaments, I've seen these sort of new laws pass and destroy fisheries. This is not a good move for the future of blue catfish. The slot limit should stay in place!

Last Name: Roark Locality: Hebron

STOP HB2782. Save our wild habitat.

Last Name: Mills Organization: Virginia Catfish Association Locality: Caroline County

I would like to vote NO on removing the length laws on Blue catfish in virginia. I'm 49 years old and grew up fishing the Rappahannock river for trophy blue cats. I fell in love with those larger fish. If I wasn't in school I was on the water. I've got 3 daughters and some of my best memories are when my youngest daughter caught her first trophy blue catfish. My youngest daughter is 22 years old. We fish the (king of the james) tournament together every year still. I've got pictures of us sitting on the water waiting for fishing time to start. The joy on her face is unmistakable. If you guys remove the length laws off of these fish. It will destroy somthing alot of father's and sons and daughters love to do. We have always said that we only wanted 2% of the entire biomass of bluecats protected for the people who enjoy then. I've practiced catch and release my entire life. To leave something for others to enjoy. Please don't make everything we have done to grow a sport we love. All for nothing. Thank you for reading my comment.

Last Name: Childress Locality: Killen

Please help protect this great fishery we all love! This bill, HB2782, is about to ruin something we all love and anglers for years have worked hard to protect. If passed, it removes the 32-inch regulation on blue catfish in the James, Rappahannock, and York Rivers. We can’t let this happen. The trophy fishery we love could be gone, along with the businesses, guides, and communities that depend on it. Please vote no on amending creel, and length limits on blue catfish in these waters.

Last Name: Fountain Locality: Jasper

I feel really sadden that there is a possibility that the trophy blue catfish in these rivers may be in danger by the lifting of the 32 in law I know thousands of anglers from all across the country who love coming to these waters to try to catch a trophy of a lifetime it is truly one of the best trophy fishers in the country we sure hope it stays that way. Thank you please help us Protect what a great resource you have there

Last Name: Dieter Melhorn Organization: Dieter Melhorn Fishing Locality: CRAMERTON North Carolina

I just got back from spending four days fishing on Kerr Lake in Clarksville Virginia. This is my 5th time traveling from North Carolina to the Clarksville area for fishing. We stayed in a cabin at the state park there for around $450. Cabins were sold out in the park...in the dead of winter....with temperatures in the teens....with the boat ramps and the cove iced over and unusable. Yes, we are dedicated. We also fueled our boat and two vehicles while traveling in Virginia for a total of around $300. Dining in Clarksville was close and convenient and spent almost $400 on food while there. The Dollar General saw us visit a couple of times for sundry items we needed while in town, especially boat snacks, and that was another $200. Add in four days of parking fees at the local boat ramp for $28, and a tow ($189) and repair bill ($425) from another vehicle that suffered a mechanical failure while we were there, we spent close to $2,000 in a short four day visit to the gorgeous state. We were ONE boat of TWO HUNDRED teams, and probably 600 people, that were fishing the Ice Bow Catfish Tournament on Kerr Lake. So, hopefully outside of the repair bill, you could multiple what we spent 200 times. Thats around $300,000 to a small community over one weekend without having to spend a dime of travel and tourism money to get us there. We won't even venture a guess on how many millions Virginia catfish anglers spend on custom catfishing boats there in the state. This was one weekend in Clarksville. Smaller tournaments fill the calendar there throughout the year as they do on the James River. We were there for one reason. Blue catfish. Kerr Lake is home to 1) the world record blue catfish, and 2) the largest blue catfish ever caught in a fishing tournament, It has become, along with the James River, a destination for catfish anglers from around the country. You have a great resource there in the trophy blue catfish, even though it is not a naturally occurring one. The bell can not be "unrung" on the blue catfish. Blue catfish are there to stay. You will never eradicate them. My suggestion is that you protect the trophy blue catfish, harvest the smaller fish for food consumption, and cherish the fact that you have people who make Kerr Lake and the James River a travel destination for these massive fish.

Last Name: Oliver Locality: Bardstown

These are trophy fish that many anglers including myself love to fish for.

Last Name: Racer Locality: Hurricane, WV

Vote NO! This bill is not only going to hurt these fish, but as well as your economy. There are hundreds if not thousands of people a year that travel to the James River area for fishing adventures, they likely spend thousands of dollars on hotels, restaurants, bait and tackle just to name a few, that most likely otherwise would not visit this area. Why do they come there? For a chance at a fish of a lifetime! If you pass this bill over time commercial fishing will kill out the amount of trophy fish and make your fisheries just another body of water, and not a destination location! Please vote NO!!

Last Name: Moore Locality: Westminster sc

Pertaining to HB2782, the blue catfish limit of one fish over 34 inches should stay in place. For years myself and dozens of friends and family members have made trips to the hopewell area to fish the James river. We book motel rooms or rental houses, eat at the restaurants, spend money on souvenirs, and fish, often on a guide boat. If the fish size limit is removed as is planned, it will only be a short time before the James river fishery will be ruined. Commercial fishing (pay lakes) will wipe out the trophy fishery fast, much like they have and do in Kentucky and Ohio. If this happens, Virginia will lose alot of revenue generated from its world class bluecat fishery. I spend a few thousand every trip myself, and I'm only one person. I strongly oppose removing the size limit that's already in place, James Moore

Last Name: lewis Organization: Ohio Hills Catfish Club Locality: Middleport

Please Vote Against This Bill It Can Only Cause A Demise In The Community Around It ,Lot Of Us Travel 8-10 hrs several times a year to enjoy this great fishery , We spend Thousands Of Dollars On Each Trip ,We Rent motels ,air b-b’s buy fuel and food locally while we are there And out of state fishing license . To remove the Fish regulation is only going to create a drop in your economy. When you remove the bigger blue cats another type of fish will take its place ( like Asian Carp ) and you don’t want that

Last Name: Little Locality: Kernersville NC

I personally think that this would be devastating to the trophy population of catfish. Me as well as 1000s of anglers travel hundreds of miles just to fish these lakes and rivers to get the chance at catching a trophy Bluecat. I'm from North Carolina and I think with this Bill being proposed it shouldn't be allowed because John h Kerr and Gaston are both in NC and Va with being from NC as in my eyes you should abide by NC regulations on the above lakes if this devastating Bill should pass . Sincerely ,Mack Little

Last Name: Ellis Locality: Liberty,wv

We vacation at the James river annually to fish for large blue cats. This regulation is not protecting one of your nationally known resource features.

Last Name: Rivers Locality: Chesterfield South Carolina

Make the trip on average 5 times a year to fish the James River from South Carolina. If passed this will kill the trophy fishing that these fisheries have come to be known as.

Last Name: Moses Locality: Huntington

Please vote to protect the fish and not allow the demise of the big beautiful blue catfish by passing bill to reduce size limit… these fish take years to grow that big this areas is home to some of the largest catfish on record and provides boundless opportunities for the economy by drawing in fishermen from all over the country… thx God Bless!

Last Name: fox Locality: Mcarthur

Please vote no on this bill we love coming to the James fishing for Blue Catfish. We travel from Ohio and enjoy the James and the Potomac .

Last Name: Morton Locality: Putnam

Please don't remove the limits on catfish. If limits are lowed or taken down then the rivers and natural resources will be stripped by commercial fisherman and the catfish population will suffer tremendously. I have traveled to the James River multiple times (8 hours one way) just to fish the state natural resources in hopes to catch a giant catfish. As a resident of a state that protects thier catfish I and the other anglers see what kind of growth catfish can have when given an opportunity to grow to maturity.

Last Name: Brown Locality: Boiling Springs, SC

My friends, family, and I make the trip up to your James River 1 sometimes twice a year to enjoy your catfishery. My wife and my buddy Jerry both caught their biggest catfish there. We all would hate to see this fishery be ruined because of being over fished. We always catch and release our catfish. Please take heavy consideration when making this huge decision. Thank you for your time. Benji Brown

Last Name: Hite Locality: Rising Sun Indiana

HB2782 Bill on blue catfish 34” limit. The 34” limit should remain in place to protect our natural resources from over harvest. The Ohio River in my area has been destroyed by commercial fishing to supply PayLakes with trophy catfish. Taking from our God given resources to die in an overstocked paylake . PROTECT TROPHY CATFISH Blues, Flatheads, and channels. We spend thousands of dollars every year traveling to have opportunities to catch these trophy fish with our families, and always Catch, Photo, Release our fish so that future generations have the same opportunities! Thank you!

Last Name: Taylor Locality: Lilesville

The blue catfish is very important to virgina. People come from all over the world to fish the James River. If the laws are changed it will hurt the fishing, but will also hurt the town bc not as many of people will be coming to the town. 1,000s of people make the trip to the James River in hopes of catching a big James river blue catfish. If they new law pass, u will see a big decline in alot of things. They law is perfect right now don't change it.

Last Name: Wagler Locality: Washington

Please check with other states… everywhere regulations are removed or cut back the fishing population of trophy fish have declined… Alabama for example if they were to do this would loose millions in tourism revenue every year… please protect the trophy size fish!!!

Last Name: Keeling Locality: Hurricane

We enjoy fishing for trophy cats. You would allow commercial fisherman to come in and kill fish 50 years old that the state and us trophy fisherman have protected and handled with care all of these years and generations prior! We "fisherman" beg you to trash this bill and any bill not protecting these trophy fish. People everywhere have paid for licenses in understanding that the money would protect wildlife. Come on guys

Last Name: Matt Bredfeld Locality: Gardner, Kansas

Making these changes will have a significant impact on this magnificent resource. People travel across the country to fish these waters, spending 1000's of dollars locally for food, licenses, lodging, fuel etc. Removing the length limit will allow commercial and recreational fishermen to take advantage of this resource, eventually leading to its demise. This will cause a substantial decrease in local and out of state dollars spent in the area and likely a decimation of trophy fish that will never be recovered from. Please do not make this mistake.

Last Name: Sartin Organization: Meat Out Fishing and Blues Brothers Guide Service Locality: Burlington, NC

I am writing this to try and persuade you to vote against this bill. North Carolina and Virginia have to of the best Blue Catfish fisheries in the nation with the World Record fish from Kerr Lake and several state records from Gaston Lake. It’s hard to see why this amazing resource is not being protected from these ridiculous laws. Protecting the larger fish to ensure return visits from anglers from all over the county is paramount. The fact that we are discussing the repeal of this protection is really amazing. Natural resources are what the government is here to protect, now it’s time for them to step up and make the right decisions for the next generations to be able to enjoy this wonderful experience.

Last Name: Puryear Locality: Remington

This will kill the trophy blue catfish fishery.

Last Name: Jordan Locality: Gibsonville

Personally, dont want this bill. It will kill our fishery in the futer. This happened to the striper. Bills gone new limits in place. They coming back. These are our trophy fish. We snjoy the sport. And would like to keep it this way for our children, and our grandchildren to enjoy. Open creel will wipe out the fish. I ask you shoot it down. Save our waters for our future generations to enjoy.

Last Name: Conner Locality: Culloden , west virginia

We travle to the james an spend 1,000s of dollors several times a year to fish this great fishery for blue catfish. Myself an along with many other friends an family bring in 10s of thousands of dollors to the james river fishing for trophy catfish. If one of the best trophy cay fisherys around. I myself have been comong for 22 years about an have already seen a huge decline in the trophy bluecat fishery from electro fishing an commerical fishing. Please protect this great fishery so many of us love.

Last Name: Lewis Locality: Halifax County

The current limit on blues is sufficient and doesn’t need to change to allow fish over 32” to be taken out the waters to deplete the fishery of trophy fish. More regulations ought to be placed on the flathead fish for limits taken to help secure fishing for the future.

Last Name: Stanley Locality: Madison NC

As many other cat fisherman from this area travel 2-4 hours to kerr lake. Lake Gaston. James. To target blue cats over 32”. Staying in motels. Eating in restaurants. Filling our gas tanks. Buying fishing gear and supplies. To end the 32” limit. Would end a lot of our travels

Last Name: Hanks Locality: Lunenburg

This will eliminate all of the big fish in local lakes because it will be a free for all if people get to keep as many big fish as they catch.

Last Name: Davis Locality: Lunenburg

I have been fishing for these fish my whole life and want my kids and grandkids to have the same opportunity. If this bill is passed it take away that opportunity.

Last Name: Troy VanDerau Organization: Heroes Outdoor Therapy Locality: Mechanicsburg PA

I have been running the nonprofit Heroes Outdoor Therapy, which takes veterans on fishing and hunting trips around the country in order to reconnect them to the outdoors and help with their mental health. One of the more frequent trips we offer is taking veterans on fishing trips targeting trophy catfish. The James River is one of the locations you can find nonprofits like ours and others offering a chance to catch a trophy blue catfish. These trips which often result in creating a new passion for these veterans. They then are purchasing yearly license and creating their own memories with their loved ones. The James River should maintain its course to allow those looking to catch a fish of a lifetime. So I would hope for the veterans and that young angler fishing with their father or grandfather that you vote NO and allow those memories of a lifetime to continue. Thank you for your time. Troy VanDerau USMC

Last Name: Hoffman Organization: Dredge Creature Fishing Locality: Hayes, Virginia

Addressing a controversial issue such as the blue catfish in these waterways requires looking at the information through a variety of different lenses. In this case, it is the controversy of the Blue Catfish and the risk that they may pose to the Bay and the native species that are already under duress. That being said, through this process and considering the studies, the use of confirmation bias, blanket terminology, and lack of research has driven a bill that not only is not verifiable from a scientific standpoint, but questionable through the legislative process. We as the public assumed the responsibility of investigating these studies in their entirety, as we have been faced with binary assumptions based off of incomplete information, hearsay, as well as the calculated language in media sources. The detriments of this bill would far outweigh the benefits, and the information being used to support it is largely based in bias, cherry picking studies, and blanket terminology. When reviewing case studies and scholarly, peer reviewed articles and data regarding this fish, it is very clear that there are sweeping assumptions being made without consideration of the entire studies, the methods used, and a lack of general understanding of the scientific process. I encourage the public and legislators alike to fully read and comprehend these studies, including "Estimates of Food Consumption Rates for Invasive Blue Catfish" -Schmitt, Hilling, 2021, which was used as a primary source for the POTENTIAL consumption of Blue crab by the blue catfish, and read its methods in its entirety, "Invasive Blue Catfish in the Chesapeake Bay Region: A Case Study of Competing Management Objectives"- Fabrizio, Nepal, 2020, "Predatory impacts of invasive Blue Catfish in an Atlantic coast estuary" Hilling, Schmitt, 2023, as well as the research article "High salinity tolerance of invasive blue catfish suggests potential for further range expansion in the Chesapeake Bay region" Nepal, Fabrizio 2019. Please be aware of academic language and sourcing. I could write an entire thesis based solely off of the data found in these articles, especially in regards to a detrimental piece of legislation that would not only impact a fraction of a percent of a population that consumes statistically less per pound than its smaller counterparts, with virtually no risk of leaving the waterways due to salinity tolerance, carrying a DO NOT EAT advisory that would not only impact the public as well as the local businesses who has just received grants to try and expand the market of these fish, based on an algorithm assumption created off of a lab study of acclimated catfish who were only fed gizzard shad and blue crab, and even in that study it showed that not only are the larger fish consuming less, they presser fin fish to blue crab. Sending an entire demographic of fish to slaughter that are proven scientifically to be of minimal impact does not accomplish that goal. The series of actions used to present this bill have also casted doubt upon the trustworthiness of our elected officials as well. IF you'd like to find a solution, you must be open to the idea that your own bias as well as the bias of others may not be entirely correct. We are happy to work to a compromise and a solution, however this legislation does more harm than it does good in drastic proportions. We expect better of our delegates, especially those that we entrusted to represent our best interests.

Last Name: Rushton Organization: Trophy Catfishing Locality: Mount Pleasant, NC

Although I am not a resident of VA, we travel there very often for the amazing fishery that is the James River. My fiancé and I run a non-profit tournament series based solely on trophy catfish, and although we don’t partake in running any in VA, we directly see in our local lakes how no creel and size limits have negatively impacted our fisheries in NC. You have something to be proud of with these amazing animals in your waters, and it truly is heartbreaking to see there’s a possibility these trophy sized fish could be put at even more risk. These fish take decades to get as big as they do and to push this bill forward would be treacherous for their ability to grow. Allowing commercial fisherman to deplete the catfish population with no creel and length limit would also mean less revenue generated in these fishing towns by us (sport fishermen/women) in surrounding states who travel hours to come to the James River. Additionally, the many people who depend on these large fish for their businesses they’ve built around this sport are directly negatively impacted . I respectfully disagree with this bill in every sense. Thank you for your consideration in my comments on this matter.

Last Name: Mitchell Locality: Russellville

I strongly urge you to vote no on this bill! Trophy catfishing is a passion of mine and many others. These fish bring in a lot of revenue through out of state fisherman like myself and tournaments. It’s truly the biggest thrill to hook into a freshwater giant that could weigh in excess of 100 pounds. There is plenty of small fish for the table leave the 32 inch limit in place to protect the trophy’s!

Last Name: Freddie Beck Organization: F.O.A.customs and gear Locality: Laurens, SC

This bill will impact small businesses like mine as well as local communities. Catfishing has become the 2nd largest community in fishing ranking just behind bass as far as economic impact. If bill passes the will allow commercial fisherman to depleat the trophy fish and rreduce local and online retail sales of products and income to regular anglers. The impact of commercial fisherman is very evident in places like the Ohio which flourished until the commercial fisherman were allowed similar opportunities. This reduced income to many local communities and small businesses in which many closed down. The blue catfish is not invasive but is not a native species. While they do impact the waters it is in a minimal amount. It does cause for better competition between them and other species in which improves the quality of trophy size fish. Also the catfish are an exciting fish to catch. They put up amazing battles. Lastly I will say if approved this bill will put many locals out of work such as guides, bait shops, and reduce income for many stores, shops, hotels, and small businesses. Please say no to this bill. If not for our generation do it for our children and grandchildren so they can have the opportunity to catch an amazing fish.

Last Name: Blum Organization: Castin' Relief Locality: East Peoria

These fish need to be respected and protected! They are unique and special animals to all of us fishermen and woman. They create the best memories anyone can have between the learning and finding them to accomplishing getting a big one in the boat. Do not take this away from us and allow commercial fisherman to take over the waters. They will be taking and killing hundreds of fish for money. Fish are made by God and should be respected like any other animal. Would we kill all the birds in the sky just trying to get one species? No! So let's not swipe our waters and let them keep anything they want. Keep the limits and let's keep respecting our waters and our fisherman. For most of us this is our relief, our passion and our life. For all of us this is our memories now, our memories from the past and please let us keep making these memories for the future. If you don't understand please just ask to get out and let us show you the connection and what it means to us. Please vote to save our waters!!!! God Bless

Last Name: Taylor Locality: Pickaway County

I want to help protect our trophy, catfish! All the commercial fisherman that has been taking trophy catfish from our waters. Need to be stopped and anyone else taking anything over the limit. This is literally destroying our fisheries for trophy, cat fish! I beg you not to pass this bill! This is where it all starts for fishing as a child! We always practice CPR! catch Photo Release! That’s the way it should be!! Please help protect our fish!!

Last Name: Kenimer Organization: My self Locality: Chester

I don't think it fair to us

Last Name: Page Organization: Catch The Fever Outdoors & All The Anglers This Bill Affects Locality: Roxboro, NC

I strongly oppose HB2782. This bill threatens everything that got me started in fishing and led me to where I am today. My first real experience with trophy catfishing was on the James River, fishing with a guide who introduced me to these incredible fish and the people who make a living from them. That experience didn’t just spark a passion—it inspired me to start my company, Catch The Fever, which now designs fishing rods for catfish anglers all across the United States. This fishery is more than just a resource—it’s a way of life for so many. Guides, businesses, and anglers depend on it to survive. Removing the 32-inch regulation on blue catfish will destroy the trophy fishery that brings people here from across the country. It’ll take away the livelihood of the guides and hurt local economies. Most importantly, it will harm the very community that has helped me grow my business and serve anglers every day. We will not stand for this. These fish, these rivers, and the people who depend on them matter. I urge lawmakers to reject HB2782 and protect the fisheries that mean so much to so many.

Last Name: Leviner Locality: Fayetteville

Vote no to this bill I as well as many other catfishermen travel many miles just to fish the James river for trophy cat fish. I think the regulations should stay the same and nothing change.

Last Name: Barlow Locality: Augusta

I live in Staunton,VA and I want to say to the representatives that read this and the other comments, please vote NO on this bill 2782 to eliminate the 32" size restriction on the blue catfish. I like many other anglers travel to these body's of water for one reason only, and that is a chance to catch a real trophy catfish. I myself make the journey 12 to 18 times a year for the opportunity. For nearly 20 years I have patronized business,hotel, restaurants, Bed n Breakfasts in the area. Not to mention Buying fishing gear, boats and gas etc.. in the effort to catch a giant blue catfish. If the chance of a catching a true trophy disappears, so do all the anglers that visit the area from all over the country. I have talked to anglers from Texas, Mississippi, Alabama, Pennsylvania and they all come to the James river and Gaston and Kerr for the same reason .The trophy sized fish is a very very small percentage of the biomass in the large scheme of things. Say No to the bill and save these trophy fish and the tourism they create. Thank you

Last Name: Robert Denen Organization: Bass Pro KingKat National trail Locality: Youngstown ohio

I am against this bill because we believe that it will harm the trophy Katfish long-term. We as an organization use this water to bring in anglers from all across America to fish the trophy catfish that’s in this waterway by this bill passing it would eliminate the trophy fish and would eventually Stop us from having events on this waterway. We believe it would be a financial disaster to the state to the cities, let alone to the waterway, so where the fish would not be anymore. I’m against this Bill 100%.

Last Name: Yoder Locality: Gladys

I enjoy fishing for trophy blue catfish on the James river. I have 2 young sons and we make the 2.5 HR drive to Richmond several times a month to chase these trophy fish. Our target is blue catfish over 30lbs. Many a day has been spent on the water of the James River, just me and my boys, in the pursuit of these giants. This bill, is passed, has the potential to drastically reduce the population of trophy class catfish. From the studies I have read it takes upwards of 10 yrs to reach 30 lbs and many more to reach the 50 lb plus category. The unlimited harvest of trophy sized fish has the potential to take a fishery that is known nationally for the quality of blue cats it produces and turn it into a river that is still full of catfish but the trophy fish are few and far between. I am asking that this bill is not passed and our fishery is preserved.

Last Name: Bryan Locality: Fredericksburg

I love to trophy catfish

Last Name: Bryan Locality: Fredericksburg

It needs to a be length law period

Last Name: Rouse Organization: 7City Fishing Locality: Virginia Beach

I Oppose of this bill and decision to change the creel limit. These are Trophy fish with very good genetics. The Sport of chasing these Big Bluecats has really taken off the last few years. The Commercial fishing will wipe them out plus Wipe out the small businesses that provide jobs and revenue to the Catfishing industry. This Fishery has changed lives for the better. I ask PLEASE consider Us Anglers and Families when you make a decision. Thank you

Last Name: Bageant Organization: Bigboysfishing Locality: Martinsburg

We say no to this bill. If you pass this bill our trophy fish will be wiped out. We take our families fishing and fish tournaments and when we catch these big fish we release them . We love and care these fish! We please ask that you think about the care of these fish and and us as fisherman that love to catch these big blues.

Last Name: Frazier Locality: Mecklenburg County

Please vote no on this bill. Our blue cat fisheries are greatly loved by one and all who love to catfish. If we allow the commercial fisherman to take at will all the big fish out of our lakes it will be the end of our trophy catfishing. Please do not let this happen it is a much love sport. Thank you

Last Name: Irwin Organization: All va catfisherman please vote no Locality: Aylett

Please keep the size limit where it is .there is no real reason for changing it. There are people all across this country that travel to va. For the thrill of catching one of these trophy fish. not to mention the amount of money that is spent here while in the area Please leave the size limit where it is thank you.

Last Name: campbell Locality: lillington

my passion for chasing the trophy catfish goes all over North Carolina, Virginia, Tennessee, South Carolina. The fact that the creel limit will be done away for these fish means that the trophy catfish population will be depleted because without the certain genetics in certain fish for these catfish to reach the size they do sometimes can take generations. if that happens it will result in no reason for me to go to Virginia to spend my money on chasing these amazing fish. I hope that the creel limit stays in place and these trophy catfish continue to thrive and bring revenue to the state of Virginia.

Last Name: Allanson Locality: Dinwiddie

I have been fishing the James river for trophy cats since 2010 every week one to three times a week. I put these fish in my 100 gallon live well. I see what they regularly eat because they typically regurgitate their food while in there before weighing in at a tournament. Out of close to one hundred fish, one time I had a crab be regurgitated. Usually I have an entire gizzard shad in the live well. Also if I’m targeting the largest fish in the river.. I’ve never targeted them past Jamestown, because typically these larger fish do not thrive in a high salinity environment. I’ve seen the studies that VCU and VA tech have done and this bill is being pushed by someone with poor judgment, the river is absolutely loaded with small catfish perfect for the diner table.Every night at any lighted dock you can find it swarmed with small catfish.It is a problem forsure. The blue catfish are here to stay, they will never be able to eradicate them.Fish over 32 inches are filled with toxins,when there is far greater numbers of under 32” fish available why target a “growing in popularity to catch” older fish, I ran into the leadership of the game and inland fisheries at lunch one day and spoke with them and told them how passionate I was about catfishing. Speaking with the leader of fisheries I was impressed with his knowledge of the different bodies of water. But he said that decreasing the number of smaller fish in the river would help the numbers of trophy fish . I have spent close to 200k on fishing for these fish over the last 15 years and the fishing has been on the decline since I started coming to the river. I would love to see a happy medium where they continue to harvest the under 32” fish and they leave the trophy fish alone so that my 5yr old son and 2 yr old daughter can enjoy what I’m passionate about. I think that would be wise financially for the state to keep an ever growing sport alive and well. I’m amazed every year at how many out of state boats I see every week coming to fish the mighty James for its great fishing! They stay in a hotel for a week and fill their boats every morning and a lot of times come in groups and visit the local tackle shops and restaurants. PLEASE OPPOSE REGULATION ALLOWING THE HARVEST OF FISH OVER 32”

Last Name: Pegram Locality: Forsyth

By allowing this bill to pass, would put strains on the ecological environment, fish that have been around 20-30 years would almost be non existent. Allowing folks to fish and stock 100s of fish would not only hurt the local fisherman who depend on them as a source of food, but the tourism that makes fisherman from other states to look elsewhere due to the lakes being over fished.

Last Name: Tony Easter Locality: Amelia Ct Hse

I name is Anthony Easter. I do not support HB2782. The promoters of this bill is killing our future with youth and new license holders. This is a bad move.

Last Name: Royce Locality: Gasburg

My name is Zakk Royce and I have fished for Blue Catfish on Lake Gaston, Kerr Lake, and the James river my whole life. I grew up targeting these fish with my father, and I have to say they are some of the best memories of my childhood and something that means a lot to me. As time went on the blue catfish in these bodies of water have become more and more popular to fish for. As well as several state record blue catfish being caught, and even a world record blue catfish caught. This has resulted in a lot of anglers from all over the country and even other countries, traveling here to fish for the blue catfish for a chance at one of these trophy fish. With that being said, I have seen what unlimited commercial fishing can do to these fisheries. Before we had the regulation on blue catfish here on Lake Gaston, I personally witnessed major overfishing from out of state commercial fishermen, those of whom also ended up being arrested and charged with multiple offenses before it was all over. North Carolina Wildlife biologists noted major declines in larger blue catfish shortly after. I feel that approving this bill and taking regulations off the larger blue catfish on these bodies of water would be a huge mistake. Not only would it greatly hurt the trophy fishery, but it would also result in a huge loss of revenue in the long run for the local economy around these lakes and rivers. As I mentioned previously many people travel from all over to come here and have a chance at catching one of these trophy fish. These same people spend a lot of money with local fishing guides, lodging, restaurants, etc. Catfishing in general, especially for these trophy blue catfish over 32” has greatly grown in popularity and is steadily growing day by day. There are also multiple major tournaments for large blue catfish that bring in a lot of anglers from all over and a lot of revenue for local communities. Thank you all for your time and consideration in this matter!

Last Name: Barnes Organization: 4REEL Fishing, LLC Locality: Pikeville, North Carolina

At 4REEL Fishing, we are deeply concerned about HB2782 and its potential impact on the fishing community we hold dear. This bill, which seeks to remove the restriction on harvesting more than one blue catfish over 32 inches per day, threatens the very future of Virginia’s trophy catfish fisheries—fisheries that have brought joy, pride, and unforgettable memories to countless anglers. Blue catfish are not just another fish; they are a symbol of our shared passion for the sport. These giants of the water are critical to the ecosystem and to the livelihoods of anglers, guides, and small businesses across Virginia. Targeting these larger, reproductive fish could lead to a collapse in their population, robbing future generations of the chance to experience the thrill of catching a true trophy fish. The current regulation already allows for the sustainable management of blue catfish by permitting unlimited harvest of fish under 32 inches while protecting the iconic giants that define this fishery. Removing these protections risks not only the balance of the ecosystem but also the livelihoods and traditions tied to these waters. Virginia’s recreational fishing industry generates millions of dollars annually, attracting anglers from far and wide to pursue trophy catfish. To take away the opportunity to chase these legendary fish would be to strip away a key part of what makes our waters so special. As a brand rooted in the fishing community, we stand alongside the countless anglers who share a deep love and respect for these fish. We urge lawmakers to think of the legacy we leave behind—one of conservation, responsible management, and protecting the waters we love for generations to come. Respectfully, Tyler Barnes Founder & CEO, 4REEL Fishing

Last Name: Walker Locality: West Union

Vote NO: Before casting your vote, it is important to understand the implications of this bill and its potential harm to the fishery, economy, and community. Trophy size blue catfish are rare, and the proposed measures could inadvertently harm the ecosystem and economy. The region is renowned for offering some of the best trophy catfishing opportunities in the country, attracting anglers from across the nation. I for one travel from South Carolina and spend my hard-earned money on rentals for housing, restaurants, grocery and fuel a few times a year! This bill could undermine a well-established and sustainable recreational fishery, negatively affecting countless small businesses and individuals who depend on it. Please take the time to fully understand the consequences of this legislation. Vote No to protect our trophy catfish fishery, support local economies, and preserve the traditions and opportunities that make this community a destination for anglers worldwide.

Last Name: Suggs Locality: Ellerbe North Carolina

Removing limits on blue catfish in Virginia will be detrimental to tourism and trophy catfishing in VA. I have traveled from the Carolinas for years to fish in your awesome blu cat fisheries. If they decline I would not travel to VA to fish anymore.

Last Name: Thorpe Organization: Tidal James Catfish Club and Kings of The James Catfish Tournament Locality: Hanover

Dear Members of the Virginia House of Delegates, I strongly oppose HB2782, which threatens the sustainability of Virginia’s trophy catfish fisheries. As a recreational catfish angler, owner of a Trophy Catfish Guide Service, and Tournament Director of Kings of the James Catfish Tournament and Tidal James Catfish Club, I witness daily the vital role these fisheries play in our economy, recreation, and environment. Economic Impacts Virginia’s trophy catfish fisheries generate millions annually by attracting anglers from across the U.S. These visitors spend on lodging, dining, fuel, and tackle, supporting local businesses and creating jobs. Fishing tournaments, including the Kings of the James and Tidal James Catfish Club, draw hundreds of participants, boosting tourism and fostering economic growth in riverside communities. Guide services like mine depend on these fisheries to offer year-round recreational opportunities. Unlike commercial harvests, which yield short-term profits, recreational fishing provides sustainable economic benefits. If HB2782 passes, Virginia risks losing its reputation as a premier destination for trophy fishing. Anglers will travel to neighboring states, leaving local businesses and communities to suffer significant economic losses. Public Health Risks The Virginia Department of Health has issued advisories against consuming catfish from many waterways, including the James River, due to PCB contamination. PCBs are linked to cancer and other health risks. Increasing commercial harvests would encourage unsafe consumption of contaminated fish, putting vulnerable populations at risk. Trophy catfish fisheries are more valuable for catch-and-release recreational fishing, which protects both public health and long-term sustainability. Environmental Consequences Trophy catfish are apex predators that maintain ecological balance in Virginia’s rivers. Large catfish are primary breeders; overharvesting them depletes populations and disrupts ecosystems. Neighboring states like North Carolina and South Carolina have experienced the negative effects of overharvesting trophy catfish, including population declines and lost recreational interest. Restoring these fisheries is costly and time-intensive, taking decades to recover. Virginia cannot afford to make the same mistake. Conclusion HB2782 undermines the long-term economic, ecological, and public health benefits of Virginia’s trophy catfish fisheries. These fisheries are irreplaceable resources that support businesses, create jobs, and attract anglers from across the nation. I urge you to oppose HB2782 and instead support policies that prioritize sustainable management to protect Virginia’s economy, environment, and recreational opportunities for future generations. Sincerely, Trey Thorpe Tournament Director, Kings of the James Catfish Tournament Tournament Director, Tidal James Catfish Club

Last Name: Winicki Locality: Wentworth

Please do not pass this bill. Many people believe that Blue Catfish have no benefit to society, and should be removed at all costs. However, most of those people have never felt the thrill and excitement of hooking and reeling in a trophy sized Blue Catfish. The encouragement of the slaughter of trophy Blue Catfish in these waters would take the thrill away from so many of us that can’t get enough of it as well as the take away the opportunity for future generations to enjoy the same excitement. Seeing those trophy blue catfish getting released alive gives us the hope that they will continue to grow give, not only ourselves a change to catch them again, but other anglers. Also, you would be taking away the genetics of these trophy blue catfish, further stunting these majestic giants. Please do not pass this bill.

Last Name: Ostrander Organization: Discover the James And the recreational catfishing community Locality: Richmond City

I do not support HB2782. Here is why:. Virginia Department of Health lists blue catfish from tidal waters over 32” as DO NOT EAT due to PCB contamination. They are a health risk and allowing these fish to flood the market could become a political nightmare in the future when it comes out that they are unhealthy. The one fish over 32” is currently a safeguard regulation to keep contaminated fish from entering the market. It should stay that way. Additionally, blue catfish over 32” is less than 2% percent of the biomass and support a multi million dollar recreational fishery and that is on the James River alone There is currently support from the trophy catfish constituents with the current regulation of the one catfish limit over 32” limit. The electofishey is a new commercial industry and should have a chance to do its job and try to reduce the majority of the biomass of eating sized catfish in the 12” to 26” range. As someone who had made a living, full time, running commercial blue catfish charters, ’ll be on the water when HB2782 is being heard on Monday, January 27, 2025 and hope this statement is read by all decision makers. Blue catfish over 32” are unhealthy and should not be consumed according to our own state health department. Left alone they will continue to generate millions of dollars in local tourism dollars. Capt. Mike Ostrander Discover the James

Last Name: Russ Locality: Bladenboro

Don’t pass the bill. This is the best place for trophy blue cats. I travel 4 hrs to enjoy this fishier.

Last Name: CRAVENOR Locality: Templeton Pa

As avid fisherman and tournament angler I am against HB2782! This bill would hurt the catfish population for many of us that travel far distances to fish these awesome fish! Please don't pass this bill! Thank you!

Last Name: Olvera Locality: Usa stedman nc

I vote no to this bill there but be a s8ze limit for the thropy Catfishing this fish needs a a size limit bc there some fish that are 20 to 50 years old in that body of water they should not be killed from commercial fishing

Last Name: Stanley Locality: Lynchburg

I personally spend thousands of dollars chasing these blue catfish around the waters that is brought up in your bill. Governor Glen Youngkin needs to veto this bill. We have a huge catfish family from VA & NC that disagrees with this bill. Please stop this bill in order to let future generations experience trophy catfish. Millions of dollars between Hopewell VA & Clarksville VA are brought into the economy every year. Without trophy catfish, the revenue will decrease. It’s honestly a sport fish that is recognized by citations, smiles, & therapy for others. Please stop this bill and ensure our love of chasing trophy catfish.

Last Name: Granata Locality: Pittsburgh, PA

My name is Joe Granata. Like thousands of folks, I travel 400+ miles each way several times per year to chase monster blue catfish on the James River. Over the years, the James River has gained a reputation of being one of the best catfish fisheries in the country. It's one of my favorite things to do. I've personally already noticed a decline in the number of "trophy" catfish in the past 5 years or so. These bigger catfish need protection! Within just a few years, the river will be raped dry of all the trophy catfish, much like the lower Ohio River. In addition, taking away an already established apex predator in a body of water will have many negative effects on the rest of the river. Do the right thing for the recreational anglers that bring in millions of dollars to the VA communities, protect these big fish and please vote NO for this bill. Thank you for your time.

Last Name: Nelson Locality: Southampton

Please protect the trophy class bluecat. Changing this would wipe out this fishery. Fishing for trophy catfish in virginia has become a huge sport and the revenue it brings in is incredible. Thank you.

Last Name: Bruni Locality: Pittsburgh

Hello I'm from Pittsburgh pa there's a bunch of us(30) up here that travel to the James River several times a year to fish for blue catfish. There's 30 of us the come down to fish the king of the james. If u allow this to happen it will destroy the blue catfish population down the in Virginia. And not only Virginia but all the small businesses around will suffer from it. All the guides and bait shops The king of the james bring over 1000 ppl to the area for a week in October and we spend alot of money to small businesses and to the state in taxes and fishing licenses Please dnt allow this to happen

Last Name: Wilson Organization: Recreational Anglers Locality: North Carolina

Please stop this bill from passing. I come from North Carolina to chase these trophy fish with my 6yr old daughter. As a NC native, I see the adverse effects of no regulations at all on blue catfish, hence why I keep traveling to Virginia. I hope and pray she will be able to continue to chase these amazing fish. Removing the size limits will absolutely destroy this. Virginia will lose out on revenue on everything from ramp fees, food, gas, out of town licenses, as well as hotels. This doesn’t seem like much, but when you figure the amount of people that travel here out of town, it adds up quickly. The division between commercial and recreational anglers will only get worse, as well as the people’s trust in their Government that has failed us so much the past several years. I feel the blue catfish get a bad reputation and are blamed in the so called shortage of natural forage fish as well as shellfish. As they do eat their part, there are many other things to consider as well. The explosion of cormorants and other fish eating water fowl, the continued reintroduction of striped bass, the comeback of Atlantic sturgeon all play a huge part of the alleged decline in crab numbers. Please Virginia, do the right thing and leave the 32” rule in place so that me and future generations can enjoy this great fishery.

Last Name: Kenimer Locality: CHESTER

Trophy catfish have been a part of my whole families lives for decades, it something we take very much pride and joy in. It's fuck for the kids, and especially friends. Days and nights on the water have been spent learning these fish and how to catch them. We the catfish community are 100% against keeping the fish we catch. Catch and release is what we've done forever. So much time and money has been spent on gear and boats. Catfishing is a lifestyle not just something to do!

Last Name: Arkenbout Locality: Caroline county virginia

As an avid bass and catfisherman I whole heartily disagree with removing creel limits from blue catfish. Trophy blue cats draw anglers from all corners of this country. The james River in particular is a one of a kind bucket list destination for catfisherman. I've personally seen the excitement of many anglers when catching these sometimes giant fish and the joy they also see watching them swim away. Removing creel limits will inevitably destroy this fishery and these large trophy fish will become nothing but a memory. On the other side the economic price will be very costly to the surrounding areas. Many catfish tournaments are hosted on the james River and its tributaries generating hundreds of thousands of dollars for the local economies. These tournaments will definitely come to an end once creel limits are removed. These tournaments and the series trails that go with them also provide thousands of dollars to charities every year and work with multiple veterans programs to give back to the community. This issue is not just about a simple fish. This issue is about a lifestyle and a sport that millions of people love and have for generations. Blue cat fishing has been a part of my life for a long time which has involved my children and grandchildren. Protecting this fishery is something we should all be working towards. I hope to be able to continue to take my kids and grandkids fishing for blue cats for many years to come. Please don't allow greedy people to kill off this River just for their Proffit. These fish need to be protected and creel limits are the best way to keep them protected. Thank you

Last Name: Pat Cimmiyotti Locality: The Dalles, Oregon

My brother and I flew from Oregon to Virginia to fish on the James River to fish for famous monster Blue Catfish on the James River. We spent a significant amount of money while staying in Hopewell. I hope you can reach a middle ground in being able to keep the oversize catfish while maintaining other native species. Oversize catfish are not good to eat especially on the James River due to chemical contaminates that exist in the river. This compromise could be accomplishing by setting certian regulations on individual sections of the river system. This would allow the oversize fishing to remain in certian sections of the river. The oversize fish that migrate into the other sections could be removed. The catfishing community is significant and many rely on these oversize for their living and enjoyment. Thanks Pat Cimmiyotti

Last Name: Moore Locality: Reidsville

This bill if passed will take money away from VA. I travel several times a year to fish the rivers of VA for the blue catfish. I stay several days each trip to fish for blue catfish. The current creel limit needs to stay in place because it is the right thing to keep the rivers with trophy blue catfish. I know several people that travel to VA just to fish the rivers for these blue catfish in several tournaments that are held on the rivers every year. This bill if passed would take all of that money away from VA.

Last Name: London Locality: Reidsville, NC

My nane is Tim London and i frequent several of these waters that will be effected if this bill is passed. I often take veterans as well as several youth anglers out of fishing trips at Kerr lake as well as Lake Gaston. I also fish the james river will my kids several times a year. They love to chase the trophy catfish that the james has to offer. They would be devastated knowing that they would not have the opportunity to catch these trophy fish. Please kill this bill for the sake off not only the fisherman and people who make a living by guiding on there great fisheries but also for our youth.

Last Name: Moore Organization: Recreational catfish anglers Locality: Ruther Glen

Last Name: Temple Locality: Chesterfield

Please vote no to this bill. I have been fishing for trophy catfish since I was just a kid with my dad and I’m passing it along to my kids. We are out on the James River every chance we get chasing these awesome animals. Them being in a generation that spend a lot of time in the house in front of the tv, tablets, or gaming systems I’m very proud that my kids will drop it all to spend the game on the river fishing. Passing this bill will completely kill the trophy catfish fishery Virginia has become known for. A lot of people travel from states away and spend thousands a year to come here and have a chance to catch our giant blue cats. This bill would be the end of a lot of tradition for families like mine and the tournament that Virginia locals and none locals participate in throughout the year. Please protect our bluecat fisheries for the generations to come to enjoy. They mean more to us then the few dollars the commercial guys will make for over harvesting them.

Last Name: Wood Locality: Chesterfield county

I'm writing this to ask that you do not pass Bill HB2782. By passing this bill it could change the future of the trophy catfish forever. Not only does it affect the catfish it affects us as sportsmen and our children and grandchildren. People come to Virginia every year for a chance to catch one of these trophy catfish. People have worked hard for years to build businesses, guides, tackle companies etc. and they're passion shows how much dedication and effort they have put into this sport. In closing, a vote NO protects catfishing for our future generations.

Last Name: Moore Locality: Spotsylvania

Vote No on This Bill: Protect Our Trophy Catfish Fishery Before casting your vote, it’s important to understand the implications of this bill and its potential harm to our fishery, economy, and community. • Purpose of the Bill: What is the intent behind this legislation? If it’s to regulate catfish populations or improve fisheries, it’s crucial to note that less than 3% of blue catfish in our waters reach the trophy size targeted by this bill. These fish are rare and valuable, and the proposed measures could inadvertently harm our ecosystem and economy. • Commercial Fishing Perspective: Commercial fishers do not seek trophy-sized catfish, as these fish have little market value at their size. Instead, they play a vital role in supporting a thriving recreational fishing industry. • Economic and Community Impact: Our region is renowned for offering some of the best trophy catfishing opportunities in the country, attracting anglers from across the nation. This supports: • Local fishing guides and charter captains. • Businesses that supply fishing gear, including rods, reels, lines, hooks, bait, and more. • Tourism-related businesses, such as hotels, restaurants, and outfitters. This bill could undermine a well-established and sustainable recreational fishery, negatively affecting countless small businesses and individuals who depend on it. Please take the time to fully understand the broader consequences of this legislation. Vote No to protect our trophy catfish fishery, support local economies, and preserve the traditions and opportunities that make this community a destination for anglers worldwide.

Last Name: Coleman Locality: Amelia

Hello, my name is Walker Coleman I fish for trophy blue catfish in the tidal rivers of Virginia. By passing this bill it would basically kill Virginias trophy blue catfish population. The end result is killing not only the fish but peoples jobs and hobbies. Because some of us this is all we think about. Not only do people that live in Virginia catch these fish but people all across the country travel here every year to chase these big fish. Virginia has one of the top trophy fisheries in the country for the blue catfish. Please think twice before passing this bill and think about the people that love and care for these fish as if they were there pets. Thank you.

Last Name: Garner Locality: Warsaw

As someone who has fished for catfish since a young boy.their is no point in removing the 32 inch rule. When it comes to blue catfish fishery. Hoping that my kids one day can enjoy this fishery as I have. Please vote no against this bill. Let's keep this it the way it is

Last Name: Horn Locality: Fredericksburg

Stop this bill.

Last Name: Burrell Organization: Hell on reels guide service Locality: Partlow va

As a Virginia captain i pray this bill does not get passed. Virginia has one of the best trophy blue catfish fishery’s in the country. I have people that come from across the country to fish the rappahannock and James river specifically for fish over 32, the science from all the biologist show that there is only 3 percent of the population of catfish are over 32 inches, no buys want fish that big and dwr has do not eat warnings for large catfish. Please take all anglers, captains and recreational anglers into consideration when making your decision on these laws. There is a lot of generations that grew up fishing for these trophy fish and I hope one day this fishery will be around for my kids and future generations to enjoy!

Last Name: Burrell Organization: Hell on reels guide service Locality: Partlow va

End of Comments