Public Comments for 11/13/2024 Privileges and Elections
HJ2 - Constitutional amendment; qualifications of voters, right to vote, persons not entitled to vote.
I strongly oppose HJ1. We must protect innocent human life for all unborn babies. No one has the right to take the life of another innocent human being. The unborn baby has a separate biological identity that is at a temporary, vulnerable stage. The state has its very powers and authority enshrined in our constitution for purposes like this to protect each human being. We all passed through this stage and have done on a continuum throughout life.
I stand in strong opposition to HB375. The US Constitution selects our president by the Electoral College, not by majority vote, and there are excellent reasons for this. This bill is simply an underhanded effort to overturn the US Constitution. I am also firmly opposed to HJ1 which would enshrine abortion in the state Constitution and undermine parental rights on this issue. The majority of this country believes that late-term abortions are immoral and should be illegal. With free access to contraception, unwanted pregnancies should rarely occur. When they do, assisting the mother with prenatal care and adoption plans are far preferable to abortion. And I adamantly oppose eliminating parental rights over a child's healthcare. HJ2 - I would have no opposition to HJ2 provided the amendment did not restore voting rights until after the parole period. Instead, this makes voting rights automatic as soon as released from prison. Parole is part of the sentencing; therefore, the felon has not served his full sentence until after the parole period. And if rights are being restored, shouldn't gun rights also be restored?
I strongly oppose all three bills. Please vote against them.
Regarding the hasty proposed amendments to the Virginia Constitution, I, Heather Hornick, strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. REJECT HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. Sincerely, Heather Hornick Williamsburg, VA
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
pro life all life life marriage family human identity defined by CREATOR thank you
Most Virginians believe all qualified citizens deserve voting rights, including those who’ve served felony sentences and people with disabilities who wish to vote. I support a constitutional amendment for automatic rights restoration upon sentence completion, with no extra steps, and to protect the voting rights of people with disabilities unless a court rules otherwise. Voting rights should not be permanently lost due to past mistakes. Virginia should amend its Constitution to ensure fair restoration and foster civic participation.
I am writing to express my support for HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. “ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment • I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. • HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. • HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. • A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. • Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights • I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage • I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. • Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. If we pass this measure, can we also pass the equivalent of the right to murder postborn children, adults and elderly? HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. These are humans life forms, whether you believe they are ensouled or not. Do you really want to permit the killing of human life forms? Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I am curious what you are going to say to God upon your death that will explain *your* actions. I pray daily for all those who approve elective abortions, but God is equally Just as He is Merciful. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. "All that evil needs to triumph is for good men to do nothing"
All, please ratify the Virginia Constitution and protect Virginian’s rights to same-sex marriage (HJ9 - Sickles) and reproductive freedoms for women (HJ1 - Herring). Thank you for working to protect those who are vulnerable! Sincerely, William Frear
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
HJ1-I strongly oppose enshrining a "right" to abortion in Virginia's constitution. HJ2-I support Hu 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ9-I oppose Hu 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
Please add these three amendments to protect the civil rights of Virginians, especially during these uncertain federal times.
“right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1 -- There should never be any right to terminate an innocent human life. Period. The life of an unborn human is inherently innocent -- in terms of both natural and governmental laws -- as is with any human life. Any attempt to legalize the termination of an innocent human life at any stage of its existence is not only morally indefensible, but is especially so constitutionally. If it is enacted in Virginia, it must be legally overturned before it is ever enacted. Protecting innocent human life is never negotiable HJ2 -- All citizens of the Virginia Commonwealth, who have fully and satisfactorily served out duly authorized sentences as the result of a valid criminal conviction should have all legal and civil rights restored to them, including the right to fully participate in local, state and federal elections. HJ93 -- Both prior to, and throughout the history of Western Civilization, the essential meaning of marriage has always been -- and should always remain -- a legal prerequisite for facilitating the creation of a human family. Its legal essence has always been the between one male and one female in anticipation that they would become the joint and parents of human offspring with the shared legal responsibility of raising their common offspring to adulthood. These joint and share roles can never be optimally shared by same-sex or multiple partners because doing so would degrade both the essential meaning and innate objective of legal marriage. Moreover, it would make a mockery of the establish common and statutory laws related to inheritance divorce and family trusteeships.
HJ1 is a blatant attack on the dignity of the human person. Every child in the womb is a unique individual, with the right to "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness." There is no scientific question that the baby, at any stage of pregnancy, is unique and separate from the mother. A woman's "choice" is to either nurture and protect natural life or to kill an innocent person. Every single person started as an embryo and small child in the womb. Who are we to take away the life that God has given? As explained in the story of previous Planned Parenthood clinic director Abby Johnson, the abortion takes away the baby but does not take away the mother's memory of the baby. I support HJ2. Once people have complete their sentence, they should be allowed to vote again. I oppose HJ9, which attacks the institution of marriage. In the book of Genesis it does not say that God gave Adam a man as his partner, it says that God gave Adam a woman as his partner. While the creation story is not to be taken literally, the point is that man and woman are literally made for each other, they complement each other and have the gift of procreating children. While man and man and woman and woman are certainly meant for friendship with each other, the marriage bond is a mysterious and life giving institution that is unique to man and woman. Only a man and a woman can truly become one, both physically and spiritually. Society today blurs the lines about true masculinity and femininity and that these can even be fluid. Countries in Europe such as Sweden and in the UK have discovered that gender fluidity is actually extremely harmful and dangerous. The role of a man and the role of a woman is unique to each sex. Same sex marriage does not fulfill what marriage is meant for, which is union and procreation.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Protect equal marriage (same sex, interracial, etc.), protect transgender rights (gender affirming care, equal opportunity for sports, mental health care, etc.), women's health care rights (abortion access, right to choose, rights to own body, etc.), protection for special education, and protection to marginalized groups.
I strongly oppose HJ1 which would enshrine abortion on demand in the Va. constitution and remove all attempts to protect unborn infants. I favor HJ2 I strongly oppose HJ9 because marriage always was ,is and will remain a lifetime union between a man and a woman. God planned marriage to be so from the beginning of creation. Pierre Deslauriers
To Whom It May Concern at the House Privileges and Election Meeting, Thank you for the opportunity to share, in writing, my thoughts and opinions on these three bills before you today, this 13th day of November, 2024. We live in a democracy and the freedom to speak and be heard is a constitutional right. Thank you for this format to do so. As to HJ 1: I strongly oppose this constitutional amendment. It violates my religious beliefs to support a bill that calls abortion a reproductive right. I became a mother through adoption and there is not a day that goes by that I am not grateful that my sons’ birth mothers chose life for them. While I fundamentally believe that life begins at conception, this proposed amendment has no limits on when an abortion can take place even into the 9th month when a baby is viable outside the womb and has fully developed pain receptors. This is just wrong on every level. As to HJ 2: I also oppose this constitutional amendment. If a felon has lost the right to vote due to being incarcerated for a felony level crime, I support the current law requiring said person to take action to apply to regain that right to vote. I also believe that should not happen until they have fulfilled all the requirements of their sentencing which extend beyond incarceration. As to HJ 9: I also oppose this constitutional amendment. Repealing this ban on same sec marriage would violate my religious beliefs.
OPPOSE HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. SUPPORT HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. OPPOSE HJ 9 – marriage definition change I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman (a provision regarding marriage that Virginia voters approved in 2006). Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Why are you introducing bills in secret? In fact, why are you so anti-life? These 3 bills are an outlandish attack on the dignity of and respect for human life and ignore the importance of the traditional family as the cornerstone of our American society. Today's world needs to honor and protect all human life, backed by the science of such, and get back to relying on the truths of science. All humans deserve a chance at life and redemption.
Please pass all 3 of these bills. They are important to me and my family.
Block 1 Legislation continued from the 2024 Regular Session, per House Rule 22 HJ1 Constitutional amendment; fundamental right to reproductive freedom (first reference). HJ2 Constitutional amendment; qualifications of voters, right to vote, persons not entitled to vote. HJ9 Constitutional amendment; Marriage between two individuals should not be determined by their gender.
I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. If someone fulfills their prison sentence and any parole time, they should be allowed to vote.
"I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent Virginian's from passing any laws that will protect unborn children. Unborn American children have the same rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness that born Americans have. This amendment's passage could mean that current pro-life laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. Don't enable Virginia to legalize infanticide. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians."
I STRONGLY support these three amendments to our state constitution. Protecting my children's reproductive freedom, restoring voting rights to people convicted of felonies, and ensuring marriage equality are all deeply important to me and the people I love. I want to protect and support all Virginians', rights, regardless of their political affiliation, with these three constitutional amendments!
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
These three bills have been introduced secretly. There is no provision to comment on them on either LIS or Richmond Sunlight. I urge you to withdraw all three and reintroduce them (if you must) when the GA convenes in January. In the meantime, please consider withdrawing them permanently. The amendments, especially HB1 and HB9 strike at the heart of what it means to be alive as a human person (HB1) and destroy the function of the traditional family as the cornerstone of our American society (HB9).
The majority of Virginians believe that all qualified citizens should have access to the ballot, including those who have served their time for felony convictions and people with disabilities who want to participate in the democratic process. I support an amendment to the Virginia Constitution to guarantee that people who have been disenfranchised due to a felony conviction will have their rights automatically restored upon completion of their sentences, without additional steps or paperwork after they are no longer incarcerated, and to ensure people with disabilities never lose their rights without an appropriate judicial finding. This has never been a partisan issue. Both Democratic and Republican governors have chosen to restore voting rights to thousands of citizens; however, Virginia's current governor has reversed the trend. People should not be permanently defined by their past mistakes. Virginians who have successfully served their time should be able to fully rejoin civic life. It is time for Virginians to act to amend our Constitution to create a routine restoration process that reflects fair accountability and encourages civic engagement.
I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment • I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. • HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. • HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. • A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. • Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights • I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage • I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. • Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1 — OPPOSED: Abortion is a medical procedure which has no place in the Constitution of Virginia. Adding it would not only be inappropriate, but it would jeopardize even modest protections for unborn children, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 2 — SUPPORT: I absolutely support the restoration of voting rights for people who have completed their sentences and have been released. This is automatically done in most states, and it is one way to help people reintegrate into society and feel that they have a chance to be contributing citizens. HJ9 — OPPOSED: Marriage predates any nation, religion or law, and as the union of one man and one woman, it has an existential purpose and meaning. It is possible to have a bonding ceremony without the joining of one man and one woman, but it would not be marriage.
Every person who meets the qualifications of voters set forth in the Constitution of Virginia should have the fundamental right to vote in the Commonwealth and that such right shall not be abridged by law. Upon release from incarceration for that felony conviction and without further action required of him, such person shall be invested with all political rights, including the right to vote. If we are to live in a true democracy, every voice must be heard. People who have been released from prison have served their time and deserve to have the full rights of citizenship restored to them. If they are to live by the rules that we collectively decide, they should get a say in their creation. Every Virginian citizen should have a say in our commonwealth otherwise how can we call ourselves a commonwealth as we can no longer say that we are no longer truly operation under a common good, where supreme authority is held by the people - all the people.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. At conception, there comes about a living organism with a unique genetic code of human DNA. Every fetus at any stage is a human person. Abortion both destroys a child's life and wreaks havoc on a mother's heart. We need to support children and their mothers through financial assistance, communal support, and encouragement, not cause further wounds to those who are already in dire straights. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage is not merely a romantic, care-giving relationship. It is a specific kind of friendship, one that this 1) permanent, 2) faithful, and 3) open to life. Only the relationship between one man and one woman has these qualities. Only the relationship between one man and one woman can create the building block on which societies are founded and flourish. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1 "right to reproductive freedom" comment: I oppose on the grounds of distorting of the concept of "fundamental rights". The choice to engage in conduct that might result in the creation of humankind is not something to be protected in a constitution; therefore, the potential outcome of such a choice is not a constitutional subject. I would toss this proposed resolution. HJ2 "Qualifications of voters" comment: I accept this proposed resolution. HJ9 "Marriage" comment: I would not distort the core underlying principle of marriage by tilting at variations. Rather add a separate proposed resolution that addresses the wishes of some to engage in civil unions would allow for the benefits that laws allow for married persons but not the distraction of contorting the fundamental of marriage.
Please vote no to abortion amendment, and the reversal of the one man one woman marriage legislation. These family and life issue determine the way I vote.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment The delayed regret that women commonly wake up to later in life - that they have killed one of their children - is not spoken about nearly enough. It is cognitive dissonance - even within our own legal system - to believe that you can ethically remove a "fetus" yet, if the child is wanted, then murdering a pregnant woman is counted also as murdering an unborn child. I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Please Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I know people incarcerated and not having voting rights is just another way of making them permanently second-class citizens. Restoring voting rights would give hope that there is restoration from bad mistakes in life. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
On the matter of HJ2, regarding the qualifications of voters, I enthusiastically support this amendment. Those who have been convicted of felonies, served their sentences, and returned to their communities, should be supported in as many ways as possible in order to become contributing and successful members of society. This includes enfranchising them so that their voices are heard and their participation in their communities is encouraged. The automatic restoration of voting rights for those who have paid their debt to society sends the message that they are welcome back to their community, and that they are expected to participate in civic life in a productive manner.
As a resident of chesapeake virginia i support this.
The majority of Virginians believe that all qualified citizens should have access to the ballot, including those who have served their time for felony convictions and people with disabilities who want to participate in the democratic process. I support an amendment to the Virginia Constitution to guarantee that people who have been disenfranchised due to a felony conviction will have their rights automatically restored upon completion of their sentences, without additional steps or paperwork after they are no longer incarcerated, and to ensure people with disabilities never lose their rights without an appropriate judicial finding. This has never been a partisan issue. Both Democratic and Republican governors have chosen to restore voting rights to thousands of citizens; however, Virginia's current governor has reversed the trend. People should not be permanently defined by their past mistakes. Virginians who have successfully served their time should be able to fully rejoin civic life. It is time for Virginians to act to amend our Constitution to create a routine restoration process that reflects fair accountability and encourages civic engagement.
I strongly oppose all three bills - HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 as they are currently drafted.
I agree with all three bills each have their importance and relevancy to human rights and protection of those rights. We need to keep Virginia a safe place for women and the lgbtq community.
HJ1 = I oppose HJ 1 which takes the life of an unborn child and injures mentally, spiritually and sometimes physically the mother as well. I've held hundreds of women in my arms who deeply regretted this decision in my work as a post-abortion counselor. It's a lie that this is good for women - the only so called "medical procedure" that harms women. Government should protect all her citizens especially the most innocent and vulnerable among us. Please reconsider this course of action. HJ2 = I support this. HJ9 = I oppose this because marriage between one man and one woman predates any nation, religion or law. Why make a mockery of marriage, when civil unions are available?
I am in favor of all three bills. Abortion is healthcare and saves lives, and consenting adults have the right to marry.
as a mother who had an abortion to remove nonviable twins that would have continued to grow without heartbeats in my body, it is imperative that women continue to have reproductive rights and bodily autonomy. as a woman who went through early menopause at 35, it is imperative that people have the right to gender, affirming care. as a mother of a child that identifies as queer and a friend to many married LGBTQ parents, it is imperative that they keep their rights as well.
"Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness", these three unalienable rights delivered by one of the great founders of this nation and of this Commonwealth has been ingrained into generations of Americans since 1776. That we as people deserve to chase our dreams, love, foster community, and truly build a life worth living without fear. These days fear has become a strong tool to knock us off this path that was set forth in the birth of this nation. But with these three resolutions today, we can reconfirm our foundational commitment to being committed to freedom, to love, to expression, and to many other wonderful aspects of this country. For anyone that does read this, my sincere hope is that you choose freedom and hope over fear. That with these resolutions that we recommit to the work the founders started, of bringing freedom to all walks of life. Passing and codifying these resolutions for reproductive rights, voting rights, and marriage rights are quintessential to the concept of true freedom. That we the people can chase down our own pursuits of happiness and build a stronger Virginia at the same time. So I urge that as our representation, you choose freedom for all and not a select few.
I believe if people have done their time or have full recovered from illness that they should be able to vote as this proposal says.
HJ1: I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ2 I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ9 I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
I strongly support all of these amendments. They are all important for Virginia citizens.
Life is the first inalienable right. Let’s put a priority on the right of a baby to LIVE! Marriage is ordained to be between a man and a woman. There is no moral substitute. Voting rights must be for citizens only. The most accurate process is hand counted paper ballots.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I am in favor of all three bills.
HJ1: I strongly oppose this measure. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ2: I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ9: I vehemently reject this measure! oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I am commenting in favor of protecting reproductive rights and the rights of consenting adults to marry. As seen in other states, if reproductive rights are not protected women will die. I am in favor of all three bills.
I disagree with hj1, we don't need a constitution amendment for abortion. We need to protect women and preborn children. I support hj2, restoration of voting rights. I am against hj9,,. We can protect same sex couple unions with out redefining marriage, which is a union of one man and one woman.
I strongly oppose HJ1. Abortion is murder of a helpless unborn child. How can Virginia purposely condone this action. A person is created at the moment of conception as at that instant a new, different organism and soul is created. I support HJ2. Once a person has paid his/her debt to society, there full citizenship should be restored. I strongly oppose HJ9. Marriage is between one man and one woman. How else is our race propagated. For thousands of years this view of marriage has existed, and we are here because of it. The legal and societal advantages of being married are consistent with with raising a family (having children). It's grossly arrogant to even consider this amendment.
Looking for more information
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Please reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – Please support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – Please oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1 - Abortion is Murder. We must protect mothers and the unborn. What will our state be if HJ1 is allowed in our constitution? Abortion is always wrong. There are people and places to help mothers and protect the unborn. HJ2 - I support all who have completed their sentences and can vote. HJ9 - I oppose HJ9-God made us Male and Female , and marriage is the union between one man and one woman (period).
I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly support the passing of all three of these bills. Ensuring equal rights, voting rights, and reproductive rights is important to me and my family.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose the right to abortion within Virginia as science is very clear that abortion ends a human life. No legislator or any person has the right to terminate a human life, especially an extreme measure allowing abortion throughout pregnancy!! I This is reckless and unrestricted. All human life is precious and should be protected! I am in favor of restoring voting rights to those who have completed their sentences. I am strongly opposed to any measure that attempts to change the definition of marriage. Marriage is between a man and woman as its natural purpose is procreation. All other lifestyles are partnerships that cannot nor should ever be deemed “marriage.” Thank you for listening to my voice! Michelle H Grau
HJ 1 – I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1: Freedom of religion also means freedom *from* religion. Other people's religious beliefs should have no power over a woman's ability to make choices that directly impact her life. With that in mind, I urge you to amend the Virginia state constitution to guarantee access to birth control, abortion and other aspects of reproductive health. Whether someone chooses to use those services is a personal health decision that they should be able to make as needed. Abortion up to viability, when the fetus can sustain its own life, is reasonable and should be the norm. Protecting women means enabling them to access the healthcare they require, when they require it. To ban abortion is to invite death to Virginia. We will see women, like the teenager in Texas and the two women in Georgia, who die because they aren't able to access the healthcare they need. We will see a serious decline in healthcare providers choosing to come to Virginia. There will be economic consequences to banning abortion and reproductive healthcare access in Virginia. It must be enshrined as a right. HJ2: Restore the right to vote once felons have completed their sentence. Their sentence is their debt to society, and they should be enabled and empowered to re-enter society once that debt has been paid. Convicted felons are citizens like any others and should have the right to have their voices heard, which includes being able to choose who represents them after their sentence has been served. HJ9: Any two people should be allowed to marry, regardless of their genders and/or sexes. There is absolutely no reason to deny two people the right to marry. There are many legal, non-religious reasons why same-sex couples would marry, and there's no reason not to extend the same legal protections that heterosexual couples would have. Anyone who says marriage is between a man and a woman only is speaking from a religious point of view, which is their right. However, freedom of religion also means freedom *from* religion, and religious viewpoints should not dictate the law, which is applied to all citizens, regardless of religion.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Reproductive Health Every Virginian should have access to affordable, quality healthcare, including abortion and birth control, with the freedom to make private reproductive choices. Abortion must remain safe, legal, and guided by medical professionals. Protecting reproductive rights safeguards other freedoms, such as marriage equality, contraception access, and privacy in personal decisions. The right to choose also supports racial and economic equality, as marginalized communities face greater barriers to adequate healthcare. Reproductive decisions affect overall well-being, including financial stability, housing, employment, and family support. Voting Rights Restoration Most Virginians believe all qualified citizens deserve voting rights, including those who’ve served felony sentences and people with disabilities who wish to vote. I support a constitutional amendment for automatic rights restoration upon sentence completion, with no extra steps, and to protect the voting rights of people with disabilities unless a court rules otherwise. Voting rights should not be permanently lost due to past mistakes. Virginia should amend its Constitution to ensure fair restoration and foster civic participation. Marriage Equality Virginia’s marriage equality ban no longer reflects the beliefs of its citizens. A 2021 poll showed 71% of Virginians support same-sex marriage, up from just 47% in 2006, highlighting a major shift in public opinion. Given this change, it’s time to remove the outdated ban from Virginia’s constitution. With the rollback of Roe v. Wade, national marriage equality could also be at risk, and Virginia should lead in protecting all citizens' rights. If the state truly is “for lovers,” it must affirm that love is love for everyone.
HJ1: Please vote to amend the Virginia state constitution to guarantee access to birth control, abortion and other aspects of reproductive health. This is what Virginians clearly want, and a fanatical minority should not be able to take our rights away based on their own religious beliefs. HJ2: Please vote to establish routine restoration of voting rights for felons. Once a person's time has been served, they are ready to re-enter society and should have the same rights as any other citizen. HJ3: Please vote to establish the right of same sex individuals to marry. Again, this is what Virginians want, and a fanatical minority should not be able to impose their religious beliefs on the rest of us. Thank you.
I support this amendment. Our country has set a precedent. Once we the people have chose to elect a Convicted felon. How we the people can allow a double standard. We have convicted felons that were convicted as young adults. Have served their time & are now tax paying citizens. If they have to participate in the economy & pay taxes they should be allowed to participate in the election process.
As a citizen of this great Commonwealth, I am writing to ask the House to vote FOR HJ 1, HJ2, and HJ 9. No one should make decisions for a woman’s health other than the woman herself. Women will die if this bill is passed, as we have seen in other states where this has been voted into law. Please support HJ2, as everyone deserves to vote in the state where they live and work. Please support HJ9, as everyone has the right to marriage, regardless of who they love. Virginia is for LOVERS, not backward bigots.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1 - I strongly oppose enshrining a "right" to abortion in Virginia's constitution and, instead of expanding abortion urge you to work for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ2 - all people who have completed their sentences should have the voting rights restored HJ9 - marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. As a result, I oppose HJ9 which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly support all three of these bills. Please pass HJ1 and support womens' rights to choose the healthcare that is best for them. Please pass HJ2 and protect voting rights. Please pass HJ9 and protect marriage equality.
I strongly support HJ2 constitutional amendment, which ensures that every eligible Virginian has the fundamental right to vote. By automatically restoring voting rights to individuals once they are released from incarceration, this amendment removes unnecessary barriers to political participation. This is a crucial step toward a more inclusive democracy that upholds the values of equality and justice that we Virginian citizens hold dear.
HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states.
The right to vote is a fundamental right to the founding of this country. Those who have completed their sentences should have that right reinstated
I oppose any legislation advancing the murder misguidedly called abortion as well as legislation defining or weakening marriage as anything other than between one man and one woman. I oppose restoring voting rights to convicted felons unless pardoned by the governor or legislature.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Hello House Privileges and Elections Committee, I am writing to voice my support for HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Let’s get these Constitutional Amendments on the ballot to secure our individual freedoms. Thank you,
HJ1 Please do not make abortion a constitutional right. Please protect unborn children and their parents. We should be working to help parents and their children, not kill the most defenseless in the womb. HJ2. Please restore voting rights to persons who have completed their sentences. HJ9. Marriage is a union of one man and one woman. It has been so before the beginnings of government and organized society. Please do not try to make so called "same-sex" marriage a constitutional right.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly support HJ2, the proposed constitutional amendment affirming that marriage is between two individuals, regardless of gender. The right to marry is a fundamental human right, and all Virginians—regardless of sexual orientation—should have the freedom to marry the person they love. Marriage equality is not just about legal recognition; it is about dignity, respect, and the ability for all people to form loving, committed relationships without facing discrimination. Protecting and promoting marriage equality strengthens our communities, ensuring that all families have the same legal protections, rights, and responsibilities. It also sends a clear message that Virginia is a state where fairness and acceptance prevail, regardless of one's sexual orientation. By supporting this amendment, we can guarantee that every Virginian has the same right to marry the person they choose, fostering a society where love, commitment, and equality are celebrated for everyone. Let us affirm the values of freedom, love, and equality by passing HJ2.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. It could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. Justice requires it. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. Furthermore, I do support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. Finally, I oppose HJ9 which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. I appreciate your time to read my letter and for working for the common good of the Commonwealth of Virginia.
The People’s Notice OF MALADMINISTRATION To THE Virginia General assembly DUE TO THE unconstitutional proposed Virginia Right to Reproductive Freedom Amendment My Delegate and Senator and this committee will receive asigned copy of this notice certified return receipt copied to the officials named on the first page of the pdf with 5 business days to respond. Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal and Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent I, Catherine Carter, One of The People (as seen in Article I Sections 2 in the Constitution of Virginia) Sui Juris, do now present you with this notice, so that you and your agents may provide due care: (See evidence below) Constitution of Virginia Article I Section 2: People the Source of Power That all power is vested in and consequently derived from, the people, that magistrates are their trustees and servants, and at all times amenable to them. Please take notice that the proposed Virginia Right to Reproductive Freedom Amendment is unonstitutional and to put such amendment on a ballot places the General Assembly in danger of maladministration due to violation of Article I Sections 3 and I1 due to deprivation of the right of our posterity to the enjoyment of life, safety, and happiness without due process of law. (See evidence below) Constitution of Virginia of Article I Section 1: Equality and Rights of Men. “That all men are by nature equally free and independent and have certain inherent rights, of which, when they enter into a state of society, they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their posterity; namely, the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety.” Constitution of Virginia Article I Section 3: Government Instituted for Common Benefit. of all the various modes and forms of government, that is best which is capable of producing the greatest degree of happiness and safety, and is most effectually secured against the danger of maladministration; and, whenever any government shall be found inadequate or contrary to these purposes, a majority of the community hath an indubitable, inalienable, and indefeasible right to reform, alter, or abolish it, in such manner as shall be judged most conducive to the public weal.” [good, prosperity; excerpt] Maxim of Law. An amendment [to the originial instrument] is not a repeal. [Fundamental principles are not annulled by amendment.] Mass. Bond & Ins. Co. v. U.S., 352 u.s. 128, 139. Please take notice, the people wish for the General Assembly to show where in the Virginia Bill of Rights their is clear grant of authority for you to amend the Constitution of Virginia and impair the obligation of contracts by depriving or divesting their posterity of the right to life, liberty or property without due process. (see evidence below) Constitution of Virginia Article I Section 11: Due process of law; obligation of contracts; taking or damaging private property; prohibited discrimination; Jury trial in civil cases. That no person shall be deprived of his life, liberty, or property without due process of law; that the General Assembly shall not pass any law impairing the obligation of contracts. . . . (excerpt)
HJ1: language should be added that defines and safeguards parental rights - requiring their informed consent and permission, and notification where their minor children are concerned with anything "reproductive" related and distinguishes between adults and minors, especially where "medical ender affirming care" or abortion are concerned with regard to minors - children under 18. HJ9: Marriage should be defined as between TWO ADULT human beings/homo-sapiens and what the nature of that contract is. It's a sad state we have come to where one must insist on these definitions, but based on the trends, we must insist. HJ2: Qualifications of voters - Why is there any necessity for this amendment? The ability to vote in Virginia should be restricted (as it currently is) to ONLY verifiable Citizens of the United States of America AND Virginians - to Citizens of Virginia - adults - 18 yrs and older. We should require a government issued photo ID , reduce the days of voting perhaps down to several days (not what it currently is) and return to physical paper ballots, hand counted. We can still make voting easy for qualified, verifiable Citizens AND secure the election process by making it difficult to engage in fraudulent election activities. I've attached a thoughtful article on considerations for all three proposed amendments - written by Dr. Sheila Furey of the Virginia Medical Freedom Alliance. I think these are important aspects to consider with each of the above. Thank you.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2 and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
People should not be permanently defined by their past mistakes. Rather than being at the whim of a governor, Virginians who have successfully served their time should be able to fully rejoin civic life. It is time for Virginians to act to amend our Constitution to create a routine restoration process that reflects fair accountability and encourages civic engagement.
I support HJ1 as it protects the right to make individual choices with limited interference from government while also allowing for responsible legislation when there is a compelling state interest. Furthermore, it allows women to protect their own right to life, something that legislators in other states have recently demonstrated they are poorly equipped to protect, as evidenced by the deaths of women in Texas due to miscarriage and delayed care as well as the deaths of women in Georgia. As a woman that has suffered severe pregnancy complications which could have resulted in death, I know just how complicated pregnancy can be and how it can forever change you. Trust in the medical system and trust that doctors have a patient's best interest at heart is vital for the best outcomes. In my own case, had I not had this trust, I never would have risked another pregnancy knowing that my risk for complication and death were higher. Knowing I had the freedom to make my own health care choices and trusting my doctor enabled me to take that risk and grow my family. This amendment helps to maintain the trust between patients and their doctors. Pregnancy and "right to life" are complex and are not black and white issues. They should not be treated as such. While some pregnant individuals may make a choice others don't agree with, the greater harm comes through taking away a woman's own free will by taking away her bodily autonomy, which is inhumane. Rather legislators and communities could better spend their energy on addressing the root causes of the choices they don't agree with, such as poverty and healthcare, and strive to improve community conditions which better serve us all. I also support HJ9 because government interference in the personal lives of people should be limited and only allowed within reason. Government interference based on personal religious beliefs in a country that believes in religious freedom goes against the principles of what our country was founded upon. I also support HJ2.
I, as a Virginia constituent, am voicing my support for continuing reproductive healthcare AND marriage equality. As a parent and or relative of loving families currently living as a blended and or nonbinary People , I support keeping their rights as equal human beings .
"I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians."
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose the passage of HJ1. This amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children.
Protecting the freedom of marriage equality, voting and reproductive freedom should be an American fundamental right. Bans as we can see throughout the country, have wreaked havoc on families, individuals, clinics, hospitals and livelihoods. They have created OBGYN deserts throughout the south and Midwest and now doctors and hospital staff are refusing to treat women and people who are pregnant with any type of pregnancy complication and miscarriage management. I have personally lost a friend in Alabama cause they refused to treat her pregnancy complication. She leaves two children behind after something that was treatable. It is absolutely barbaric for anyone getting involved other than the only people who need to be involved. It is not our concern on such matters that are not simple. Enshrining the right to Reproductive Freedom ensures that state politicians are OUT of these decisions. Whether it be IVF, to use or not use birth control, birth plans, abortion, testing and so forth, Women’s health etc the government should not be concerned. I support abortion and the critical healthcare necessity it plays in an array of roles. It is not murder because if it was, more than half of the country would be imprisoned both women, young women, men, young men, doctors, healthcare workers and so forth. Life is taking your first Breath and not having to rely on another humans being internal organs to survive. Nor, do most would care to help the Trans and queer kids that have been ridiculed throughout these communities across Virginia. Only supporting some kids and not all is the basis for respecting all of humanity and the differing peoples religion's, perspectives, culture and so on. Doctors who have sworn an oath to protect patients are having to break this oath everyday in states where families, Women, girls and people who can become pregnant are not protected nor will ever be truly free so long as we keep debating about this issue. This should be left to the families and healthcare teams. As for right marriage, denying anyone regardless of Race, Gender, Class, Ability and so forth Constitutionally discriminatory from every different perspective that tries to undermine this right. Everyone should love who they want and plan their families accordingly. If this is not enshrined, we open the door bigotry, racism, sexism and shutting commonwealth that refuses to see these people for the humans they are. As for the right to vote it should be an absolute fundamental Right. Taking this right away that is in our Federal Constitution is to control the outcomes of every elected office from local districts to federal lands. All three of these should be enshrined for All Virginians. Denying this would deny Virginians to live their lives in the way that’s best for them with no interventions or restrictions to hinder and complicate our ways of life.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law
I support all three constitutional amendments: HJ1, HJ2 and HJ9. HJ1: The issue of reproduction freedom is more complicated than the simple choice of weather an unborn person lives or dies. Reproduction has consequence that affects the pregnant person's health during gestation, decisive action must be absolutely allowed in order to make decisions that places the pregnant person's mental and physical health at highest priority. Reproduction also has consequence post birth which all involved parties in reproduction must be ready to face. The pregnant person must be allowed to realize this and make an informed decision based on facts about their life and the situation they find themselves in that can ensure the best outcome for all parties involved, other people are simply unaware of the nuance or facts that may influence their decision and have no right to force them to make a decision against their own interest. HJ2: The purpose of the criminal justice system is to penalize people who break the law and preserve order, with the ultimate goal of rehabilitating those within it, to re-enter society. Blanket removal of fundamental rights and a voice in society is too harsh a punishment for any crime. What motivation is there to become an upstanding citizen and rejoin society if they are forever divorced from it? Opportunities for positive change must be left open. There is an added benefit of reducing judicial burden in the majority of cases. HJ9: From the perspective of government, the morality of marriage between anyone should not be considered in such a case as government is concerned with the fair administration of the legal consequences of marriage in order to recognize family units. The question of morality should be left up to the individuals, religious organizations, and clergy to decide for themselves and should not affect state policy. Not recognizing marriage simply results in a legal grey areas and denial of basic rights and protections all people are entitled to.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment -I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. -HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. -HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. -Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights -I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage -I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. -Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution.HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent.HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born.A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right.Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Honorable House Committee Members, As a registered voter in the Commonwealth of Virginia, Please see blow as to my thoughts and wishes for the Commonwealth of Virginia. There is no reason to waste time with "feel good" legislation from either party. Please consider ONLY Amendments that will not be used to bolster election results. Recent national election results indicate more voters want current protections upheld, rather than legislating on issues to campaign on or increase voter rolls. HJ-1 - Amendment should mirror CURRENT VA Abortion laws ONLY. This includes limitations on 26 weeks without threat to health of baby or mother, AND review by TWO certified OBGYN/MDs to perform afterwards HJ2 - Amendment should include each to be reviewed on a case-by-case basis HJ9 - Is not needed. This is protected by Supremacy Clause Thank you for taking the time to read and consider my opinions. Respectfully, Mark Logan
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Virginians who have served their time should have their voting rights restored along with their other freedoms. This has long been the case in Virginia and should be voted back to encourage these residents to fully participate in their communities. Thank you!
I support rights to abortion, marriage equality and women’s right to choose. This is a vital time in America where we must protect the people that are here and prevent burdens due to unwanted pregnancies. We need to prevent deaths due to complications of miscarriage. We must protect health of all our citizens.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 to protect these freedoms through inclusion in the Commonwealth's constitution. Thank you.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2 and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth's constitution. Thank you.
I support this bill.
I strongly encourage and support HJ1 and the passing of this bill. Every person in this country should have bodily autonomy and the ability to make this incredibly person choice for themselves. Women need to have access to safe reproductive care. Abortions will happen no matter what, it is up to us to decide whether we want those to be safe and sanitary, or if we would rather watch both women, and consequently children, suffer because of our moral objections. I ask you to keep in mind one of the founding principles of this nation - The separation of church and state. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but these opinions can not infringe on public health and women's rights. HJ1 is a matter of community health and safety, and its passing would ensure more secure reproductive healthcare of Virginia's women AND children. Abortion has been a civil right since 1979, only now are we seeing this new wave of regressive rhetoric and action. I ask you to allow our state, and our women, to continue to progress, not regress into a male dominated past. Reproductive rights SAVE LIVES and are a staple of any modern nation that seeks to view women as equal. Please view us as equal!! I am a 21-year-old woman, and I fear for my safety, as well as the safety of my young nieces and cousins every day. I want them to know that they live in a state that values their bodies, their lives, their choices, and understands that abortions are lifesaving care, NOT birth control. No one wants to get an abortion. It is a difficult and harrowing decision, but one that should be between a woman, her doctor, and her god, not a decision of a faceless government. Women have already died because of abortion restrictions and bans in other states. Please don't let Virginia be the same. Young women in this state are scared, and they deserve reassurance that their lawmakers care about their civil rights. Young women deserve to know that people care just as much about our futures, as that of an insentient, unborn, fetus. We deserve the right to make our own choices over our own bodies. I am also in support of HJ2. Voting is a constitutional right and the foundation of our democracy. It is crucial that every eligible person, excluding those convicted of felonies, have the access and freedom to vote. I believe that voting is what allows us to have a relatively fair and just system, so supporting the ability of all eligible persons to express this freedom is crucial to maintaining a lawful, equal democracy. I am also strongly in support of HJ9. Again, marriage is between the two individuals, their religious leaders, and God. The LGBTQ+ community has been historically targeted and systemically disenfranchised, and we have an opportunity to oppose this continued, irrational targeting of individuals on the basis of religious or moral obligation. Again, everyone is entitled to opinions in their personal lives, but these opinions cannot limit the freedoms and rights of others. Queer people have always and will always exist. They are your neighbors, friends, family members. Taking away their right to marry, trying to suppress queer people, historically, have NEVER worked. We are proud of who we are, and no law will change that. It is not a choice to be gay, or trans, or queer, the same way it is not a choice to be straight. I support the right of all people to actualize who they are. Every person deserves the right to love who they love and marry who they would like.
Please support the right to choose and pass HJ 1. We should all have the power to choose for ourselves. Please support the right to vote by passing HJ 2. Once time is served, punishment should be over. Please support the right to marriage by passing HJ 9. We all deserve a family. Religious values do not have a place in these decisions, which are about human rights for everyone in our Commonwealth (not just the radical Christian right).
I am writing to express my strong support for Virginia House Joint Resolutions 1, 2, and 3. These amendments are essential to ensuring the fundamental rights and freedoms of all Virginians. HJ1: Reproductive Rights: This amendment would explicitly protect the right to reproductive freedom, including access to abortion and contraception. It is crucial to safeguard these rights, particularly in light of recent challenges to reproductive healthcare at the national level. HJ2: Right to Vote: This amendment would strengthen voting rights protections in Virginia. It would expand early voting, automatic voter registration, and other measures to ensure that all eligible citizens can exercise their right to vote. HJ3: Same-Sex Marriage Equality: This amendment would enshrine the right to same-sex marriage in the Virginia Constitution. It would provide additional legal protections for same-sex couples and their families. These amendments reflect the values of equality, liberty, and justice that are at the heart of our democracy. They will help to create a more inclusive and equitable Virginia for all. I urge you to support these important amendments.
I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states.
Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose HJ1 - abortion should not be enshrined in Virginia as a constitutional right. On the contrary abortion should be banned except in cases where the life of the mother is threatened. Our Constitution protects the life of an individual and the fetus IS an individual. At that moment of conception that fetus has a God-given soul; it already has human life and is an individual that should have the protection of our Constitution to LIFE. I oppose HJ9 - marriage is between one man and one woman. It is the complementarity of the sexes ordained for the procreation of life. It has always been defined that way and we should not change the essential character of marriage. Call same-sex unions a civil partnership not a marriage. I support HJ2 if the inmate has served their term and remains in good standing within the community upon their release.
I am not in favor of these amendments. Abortion for anyone including the mother is extremely damaging to her and the family members around them. Please reconsider and spare these lives.
Enshrining a right to kill innocent children in their mother’s womb is something we should all resist. Thanks, Stephen Hertz
Reproductive freedom is critical to basic freedom for both women and men. Please preserve choice for Virginia in the face of the Supreme Court's overturning of Roe v Wade. Voting rights are critical for democracy. Please support the right to marry for LGBTQ and trans citizens of Virginia. This is a large percentage of voters and must be protected at the state level.
I oppose to all 3 amendments.
I support restoring voting rights for all persons who have served their sentences.
Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Good morning, as public servants it is important to continue to firmly grasp our humanity and aspire to sincerely help others. I have spoken with young men who have acknowledgement their transgressions. They seek to rise above their challenges and request the opportunity to do so. They have the fortitude and tenacity to succeed but lack the freedom to act. Please pass this bill and grant this freedom.
I support these joint resolutions. They advance freedom, and we should work towards enshrining these important principles in the Constitution of Virginia.
All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Now that a president with felonies have been elected. This constitutional amendment should go through.
I strogly believe it is a womens right to make decisions about her own body and support legislation to that effect. I support the right of felons who have served their time in prison to vote. However, if a person released commits a felony crime axsecond or more times, I support revoking the right to vote. I strongly support same sex marriage. Please ensure/maintain this right of individuals who have same sex partners.
HB375 - I strongly agree with joining the National Popular Vote compact. It gives more power to us as individuals and aligns with democratic norms. This also strengthens Virginia as presidential hopefuls will have to speak to each state and person as opposed to a handful of swing states. HB658 - Ranked choice voting is a better system for voting and is determined by the candidate with the strongest support. It doesn't affect your 1st choice, lower choices will only be considered if the 1st choice doesn't win. This encourages more civil and policy driven campaigns. HJ1 - I strongly agree with individuals having the right to reproductive freedom. HJ2 - People should not be permanently defined by their past mistakes. HJ9 - Marriage is between two people, it should not be defined as between one man and one woman.
I hereby implore the House of Delegates to ratify the Constitution of Virginia and grant: 1. The fundamental right to reproductive freedom to all Virginians (HJ1 - Herring) 2. Automatic restoration of the rights of a convicted individual to vote upon completion of the terms of their sentencing and release from incarceration (HJ2 - Bennett-Parker) 3. Legal rights and protections for two consenting adult persons to marry regardless of sex, gender, race, or religion. (HJ9 - Sickles)
I am urging a NO vote on each one!!
I am writing today in support all proposed amendments. HJ1 protection of reproductive health care is extremely important and essential to ensure the health and safety of women across the state of Virginia. I’ve had family and friends suffer miscarriages and I can’t imagine people being put on a registry or jailed for something completely out of their control. The pain of those medical emergencies was excruciating and our job as a society is to support those people not punish them or worse sentence them to certain death. Reproductive rights go beyond miscarriages and medical emergencies; bodily autonomy is and should remain an indelible freedom. Threats of violence towards women have already increased since the election and I am afraid. It is my right to make my health care decisions and the rights of all women and people. I implore and demand elected officials enshrine this right into the state constitution. HJ2 to reinstate voting rights also has my support. Once debts to society have been paid, folks should be granted the freedom to participate in our democracy. If we want to be a healthy, functioning system, we need all voices that want to be heard to be listened to. Finally, HJ9 protects same-sex marriage. Partnership, love, marriage are all deeply personal things that should be a guaranteed personal freedom. Why does the government even care who is in a partnership with who? Standing in opposition of this is antiquated and unnecessary. Our country is supposed to stand for freedom and liberty for all; why are we denying that freedom? What purpose does it serve besides punching others down? Members of the LGBTQ+ community are entitled to the same rights and benefits and heterosexual couples- full stop. If we are to uphold the tenants we ascribe to we must enshrine same sex marriage.
H1: Please oppose enshrining a "right to abortion" in our Virginia constitution. As a citizen of Virginia, a mother and a counselor, I know that abortion is a tragedy and has lifelong negative effects for the mother and obviously the baby. Abortion is the ending of a life and the more that our government justifies it, the more that our human rights are diminished. The right to life is primary. Having abortion legal up to 9 months is especially harmful as we know that babies have survived living outside of the womb as early as 6 months. Please think of the consequences of this bill and don't allow our state to become one that discards the right to life. H2: I support voting rights being returned to a citizen after completing their prison sentence because I believe that people can change and have seen people change and make their lives better. We should reward their effort to improve their life and choices. People who have made mistakes (all of us) and learned from them are valuable citizens. H9: I oppose H9 which would remove the provision that marriage is between one man and one woman. Thank you.
Please support HJ2, restoration of voting rights to those formerly incarcerated with a felony who have served their time. Voting rights are an important part of successful reentry into the formerly incarcerated person's community, affording them dignity and a heard voice to be part of their community fully once more. As someone who worked many years with Chuck Colson in the 2000s, I can attest how this issue has bipartisan support, and speak to the dignity it restores for formerly incarcerated individuals. Colson attested to the incredible gratitude he felt and spoke of the same reaction and differences it made for other formerly incarcerated people.
Regarding HJ1 - Herring I strongly OPPOSE enshrining a "right" to abortion in Virginia's constitution. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm, protect and support the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ2- I SUPPORT HJ2 All people who have served their sentences should have their voting rights restored. HJ9- I strongly OPPOSE HJ9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states.
As a Virginian born and raised here, I do not want the law to be erased that states marriage is between a man and woman. Please do not undo what God has put in place.
Restoration of voting rights should be coded into law and not left to the discretion of the governor at a given point of time. Virginia is a laggard, one of the last states to adopt this type of provision. We want Virginia to be a leader in the country, not a follower, especially when it comes to rights as intrinsic to our democracy such as voting.
The majority of Virginians believe that all qualified citizens should have access to the ballot, including those who have served their time for felony convictions and people with disabilities who want to participate in the democratic process. I support an amendment to the Virginia Constitution to guarantee that people who have been disenfranchised due to a felony conviction will have their rights automatically restored upon completion of their sentences, without additional steps or paperwork after they are no longer incarcerated, and to ensure people with disabilities never lose their rights without an appropriate judicial finding. This has never been a partisan issue. Both Democratic and Republican governors have chosen to restore voting rights to thousands of citizens; however, Virginia's current governor has reversed the trend. People should not be permanently defined by their past mistakes. Virginians who have successfully served their time should be able to fully rejoin civic life. It is time for Virginians to act to amend our Constitution to create a routine restoration process that reflects fair accountability and encourages civic engagement.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Voting needs to be made as accessible as possible to all who are eligible to vote and it should be determined by a standard process - not left to the personal decision and potential biases of an individual in the governor's mansion.
Our family strongly supports the inclusion of these basic universal human rights in the Constitution of Virginia. Please listen to residents of Virginia and legislatively make explicit and permanent our full human rights to reproductive autonomy, to the vote for returning citizens, and to equal marriage rights for all. Thank you.
HJ 1- Virginia is the only remaining state in the south that allows women to make decisions about their bodies with their families and their doctors. It’s critical that we ensure this right remains by enshrining it into our constitution. HJ 2- Healthy democracies rely on voter participation. Individuals who have served their sentences should be allowed to rejoin society with their rights intact without jumping through additional hoops. Individuals with disabilities are full members of society and should never be denied their right to vote without sufficient judicial oversight. HJ 9 - The right to chose who you love while still enjoying the privileges and protections a marriage can provide has been the law of the land for nearly a decade. It’s time for our constitution to reflect that reality.
Please vote no.
I strongly support all three proposed amendments. Members of my family are at risk here. Taxpayers, loving, caring members of our community. Their rights to happiness and security MUST be guaranteed. I strongly support the rights of two adults to marry and form families. Anything else seems absurd. Reproductive health is a matter solely between a woman and her physician. The State must make this very clear and must resist attempts by others to control decisions that are not theirs to make. I vote.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
My family and I are in favor of HJ2. There is simply no need for Virginian's to have to go through Governor's permission to restore their voting rights. It is vital that all eligible Virginians should be allowed to exercise their right to vote. All couples deserve to have their marriages legally acknowledged, upheld, and protected regardless of gender, sex, or race. HJ9 would accomplish that. I have left a separate comment regarding the right to reproductive healthcare. I encourage you to accept all three constitutional amendments.
HJ1 Reproductive Freedom Do I recall the last time that as a man I was unable to health care decisions about my own body? No, because that’s never happened. I fail to see why women should not enjoy the same rights to bodily autonomy and if we are to be a beacon of light in the commonwealth for ALL citizens, we must endeavor to enshrine the right to reproductive freedoms here in Virginia. Today’s reality is that even with a national abortion ban, the women in my family will be able to choose to safely end a pregnancy because ours is a family of means who can if necessary travel anywhere on the planet for reproductive or other health care. I write today to ensure that such rights aren’t limited to those with means but are freely available within Virginia. Abortion should be legal, safe, and the decision left to those who are pregnant with guidance from medical professionals. True democracy depends on equal rights for all people. Losing our right to reproductive choice opens the door to the loss of other freedoms including other healthcare choices, marriage equality, access to contraception, and the right to engage in private, consensual intimacy without government interference. Not only is the right to a safe and legal abortion a matter of personal freedom, it’s also a major factor in the movements for racial and economic equality. Black individuals, and all underserved communities, already experience unfair barriers and limited access to adequate healthcare services. HJ2 Restoration of Voting Rights If we are nation that is free to elect a recently convicted felon, why should it be the case that a convicted person who has completed their sentence not be allowed to vote? I support an amendment to the Virginia Constitution to guarantee that people who have been disenfranchised due to a felony conviction will have their rights automatically restored upon completion of their sentences, without additional steps or paperwork after they are no longer incarcerated, and to ensure people with disabilities never lose their rights without an appropriate judicial finding. This has never been a partisan issue. Both Democratic and Republican governors have chosen to restore voting rights to thousands of citizens; however, Virginia's current governor has reversed the trend. People should not be permanently defined by their past mistakes. Virginians who have successfully served their time should be able to fully rejoin civic life. It is time for Virginians to act to amend our Constitution to create a routine restoration process that reflects fair accountability and encourages civic engagement. HJ9 Marriage Equality Why should only heterosexual couples suffer the trials, tribulation and absolute insanity that comes with married life? Given risks at the national level to marriage rights, it’s important to properly enshrine the right to marry in Virginia to best protect the rights of all citizens.
Support for Right to Reproductive Freedom Amendment I strongly support the proposed amendment to the Virginia Constitution establishing reproductive freedom as a fundamental right. This amendment ensures that individuals can make autonomous choices about their own reproductive health, free from government interference, except when a compelling state interest in protecting health is demonstrated. By safeguarding personal decision-making and aligning with evidence-based medical standards, this amendment promotes both health and justice. Additionally, it protects individuals and those who assist them from penalization, ensuring reproductive freedom is accessible to all Virginians. Support for Right to Vote Amendment I fully support this amendment, which strengthens our democracy by recognizing voting as a fundamental right for all eligible Virginians. Restoring voting rights automatically upon release from incarceration reflects our belief in rehabilitation and the importance of civic engagement. By simplifying the process, this amendment ensures that citizens reentering society can fully participate in our democracy without unnecessary barriers. Additionally, the clarification on mental capacity respects voters' autonomy while providing a thoughtful safeguard. Support for Right to Marry Amendment This amendment is a vital step toward equality, affirming that marriage is a fundamental right, regardless of gender, sex, or race. By removing outdated and discriminatory language, Virginia's Constitution will better reflect our commitment to equal rights and the recognition of all lawful marriages. Ensuring that every couple is treated equally under the law honors the dignity of all Virginians and upholds the Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell v. Hodges. This amendment aligns our laws with contemporary values of inclusivity and respect.
I SUPPORT HJ2 All people who have complteted their sentenes should have their voting rights restored.
The right to vote is essential for a functioning democracy. Virginians who have paid their debt to society deserve a simple, efficient process for the restoration of voter rights. The current administration has shown how capricious and inconsistent the current pathway to re-enfranchisement can be, and restoring the right to vote for citizens with prior convictions should not be subject to the whims of any one administration. I urge you to pass this bill and enshrine the process for restoration of voting rights in Virginia's constitution.
I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states.
There is no good reason for you to be meeting outside of the legislative session. I do not support any of these amendments. Our current laws & the SC ruling have made it clear that non-citizens may not vote. The citizens of VA do not want abortion up to birth leaving the baby to die. It's abhorrent! Felons' voting rights upon release should be judged individually. Reciprocity or some other consideration may be required.
As a constituent, I’m urging you to vote yes on all three amendments. Reproductive care, as protected by HJ1, is health care and needs to be universally accessible. Decisions about what types of care are necessary should be made at the discretion of a doctor and a patient, not by the government. No person or healthcare provider should fear for repercussions from exercising that right. I am in favor of HJ2. Virginian's should not need a Governor's permission to restore their voting rights. It is vital that all eligible Virginians should be allowed to exercise their right to vote in a democracy. Couples deserve to have their marriages legally acknowledged, upheld, and protected no matter their gender, sex, or race. HJ9 would accomplish that. I encourage you to accept all three constitutional amendments.
I do not support any of the three amendments. I think the current committees are rushing these bills through. Every abortion takes a human life and this citizen of the Commonwealth will raise my voice for those who have no voice.
HJ1: We've seen the medical disasters that can occur when doctors are afraid to treat pregnancy complications due to abortion restrictions. The answer is to get government interference out of the matter as much as feasible. As someone who could become pregnant, I find it terrifying that I might have to navigate complex legal situations just to obtain appropriate healthcare. For these reasons, I support HJ1. HJ2: I believe voting is a fundamental right, not just a privilege or luxury. For this reason I support HJ2, which would expand the right to vote to more adults who have been unjustly stripped of it. HJ9: If someday I am in a committed relationship with someone of my own sex/gender, I hope that it can be recognized by the government in order to make our legal status clear and stable. All same-gender couples deserve that opportunity. Let's put the prejudices of the past behind us.
I strongly feel that with the bedrock rallying cry of no taxation without representation that formed this great country, we should have no person stripped of their right to vote. I submit this to support approving the reinstatement of voting rights.
HJ 1- Virginia is the only remaining state in the south that allows women to make decisions about their bodies with their families and their doctors. It’s critical that we ensure this right remains by enshrining it into our constitution. HJ 2- Healthy democracies rely on voter participation. Individuals who have served their sentences should be allowed to rejoin society with their rights intact without jumping through additional hoops. Individuals with disabilities are full members of society and should never be denied their right to vote without sufficient judicial oversight. HJ 9 - The right to chose who you love while still enjoying the privileges and protections a marriage can provide has been the law of the land for nearly a decade. It’s time for our constitution to reflect that reality. As we watch the Supreme Court, ruling after ruling, we’ve seen rights that a majority of voters support rolled back. Now it’s more important than ever that Virginia take state action to protect its residents.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I am a resident of Henrico, VA, and am writing as a very concerned citizen of Virginia, and as a woman, in SUPPORT of ALL THREE of these constitutional amendments - worried that my rights, and those of fellow Virginians, are under attack and are soon be threatened further. I am concerned for fellow citizens, for our future citizens, and our collective freedom. These Amendments will serve to guide lawmakers to protect these fundamental freedoms in future deliberations and decision-making. Our voices deserve, and need to be heard, and should continue to be fundamentally involved in decisions made about our bodies, our lives, and our representation in our representative democracy. I ask that all of these three constitutional amendments be added to the Virginia State Constitution today. It is the right thing to do, and time is of the essence to ensure the protection and the rights of all of our Citizens. Thank you.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
HJ 1 – Herring I strongly oppose adding a "right" to abortion to Virginia's constitution. There are few protections in place for unborn children, such as requiring parental consent and a ban on partial-birth abortions, and HJ1 would endanger even those. It would also endanger future legislation protecting unborn babies. Babies are people before, during, and after birth and HJ1's policy of unlimited abortion up until birth would be a tragedy and devastation for our state. Instead, I urge that you put policies in place that protect and affirm the dignity and life of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – Bennett-Parker I support HJ 2. As in most states, if someone has completed their sentences that person should have voting rights restored. HJ 9 – Sickles I oppose HJ 9. Marriage came before any nation, religion, or law in its design and purpose and should not be changed.
HU1-I reject HJ1. Virginia is a land of freedom going back to our inception. Virginia had to fight its way into being. Much is the same with these unborn babies-the only difference is that they are not heard. We need to give them the freedom of birth to be heard. HU9 I oppose HJ9. In marriage, two bodies are joined to become one. This one body is being messed with in this constitutional proposal with ideas and rhetoric that will deliberately cost Virginians spoils from this over-popularized, temporary, contemporary thought. Stop the continuation of this illogical proposal. HJ2 Yes, I support HJ 2. Prisoners are people. When they have completed their sentences they can vote.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I support
I support
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I reject HJ 1 Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
I oppose all abortions with only exceptions for tape and incest
I strongly support these amendments. Everyone should be allowed the Healthcare they need to live a healthy life. We should have complete control over our bodies and our lives. We should be free to marry who we love. Thank you.
The timing of this discussion is interesting. Those of us who are tasked with finalizing election results are busy in our canvasses this week and will deal with multiple audits next week. So, obviously, our feedback does not interest you. Nevertheless, I hope you will consider policies that protect the votes of law-abiding citizens and remove the burden on 133 General Registrars and Electoral Boards by reducing the early voting period to two weeks and abolishing Same Day Registration. I encourage you to learn from the chaos in other states and protect legal Virginia voters. Voting is a privilege, not a right.
HJ1- A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. HJ2-I support all people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored. HJ9-I oppose HJ9- Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I support these amendments.
I strongly support passing 1&3 - I honestly can’t believe we are even STILL talking about the right to bodily autonomy and marriage. 🙄 2 - I support this, but would suggest removing the exception to felons voting from the language. Everyone deserves the right to vote, regardless of decisions they have made or been forced to make. That said, if a felon can sit in the WH, why in the world would we think it’s right to withhold the right to vote from the rest of them?!
I support HJ1. Freedom of body and person is a fundamental human right. Governmental interference is wrong. I support HJ2 On e time is served voting rights restitution should be automatic. Make it as easy as possible for citizens to vote. It is our most basic civil rights in free society.
I vehemently oppose HJ 1. There is no freedom in being allowed to take someone else's life.. At the moment of conception, another person's life begins - another person with their own bodies and their own freedoms. They have a right to LIVE! Please consider ways to support women, children and families instead - as Virginians, we should support and protect the life and the dignity of every human being, no matter how small. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored. Voting is a privilege! I vehemently oppose HJ 9 - marriage should not be redefined. Marriage is the union of one man and one woman and other unions are NOT the same.
I support HJ-2
I am in support of these voting rights
Please support the right to choose and pass HJ 1. Please support the right to vote by passing HJ 2. Just because someone made a mistake, they should not have a life sentence preventing them from voting after they have served their sentence. Please support love and the right to marriage by passing HJ 9.
I strongly support passing 1&3 - I honestly can’t believe we are even STILL talking about the right to bodily autonomy and marriage. 🙄 2 - I support this, but would suggest removing the exception to felons voting from the language. Everyone deserves the right to vote, regardless of decisions they have made or been forced to make. That said, if a felon can sit in the WH, why in the world would we think it’s right to withhold the right to vote from the rest of them?!
As a Catholic; as a single, childless woman; and as a member of Generation Z, I gratefully take this opportunity to comment on the proposed amendments. First, I implore you to reject HJ1 – Herring. Unless there is a strong commitment to protecting human life at all stages of development, starting at conception, our Commonwealth cannot truly achieve safety for all, equality of opportunity for all, an encouraging future for the next generation, or the sense that everyone is unreservedly valued. So please oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s Constitution and endangering what safeguards there do exist for the youngest and smallest in our Commonwealth (such as the partial birth abortion ban and the parental consent law). Instead, choose to craft policies that lift up and support the lives of mother and child as both endowed with dignity. Second, I encourage you to move ahead with HJ2 – Bennett-Parker. If our Commonwealth should be a champion of the life and dignity of each and every person, it should also practice a justice that is fundamentally and thoroughly humanistic. This includes restoring voting rights after an individual finishes out his or her sentence. Third and finally, I urge you to reject HJ9 – Sickles and its removal of the definition of marriage as between one man and one woman from Virginia’s Constitution. Defining marriage as between one man and one woman affirms the important and distinctive purpose proper to this institution, a purpose which “predates any nation, religion, or law” (Virginia Catholic Conference). Simultaneously, here as in the other responses to the proposed amendments, the dignity and worth that belong unconditionally to all persons by nature should be strongly and repeatedly emphasized. Thank you so much for this opportunity to comment.
I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states.
It is very important that after a felon has paid his or her dues by being incarcerated for a length of time the felon should be accepted by his or her community and given the right to vote. We should encourage them to live crime less lives and given the rights other citizens have to choose the people who will govern them.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 and enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I stand in support of equal and unfettered voting rights for all men and women of legal age and US citizenship. I submit herewith my support of HJ2. ~Gordon A MacArthur
HJ1 - keep abortion and pregnancy care legal and safe. HJ2 - these people have served their time and deserve the right to vote again without any approval or authorizations needed HJ9 - all families are valid in the state of Virginia. Everyone has a right to marry and create a family with whomever they choose. Virginia is for Lovers.
Beginning with the term: “Reproduction” includes birth control, sterilization, pregnancy, abortion, menstrual regulation (abortion vacuum procedure without a pregnancy test), sex or gender changes, surrogate pregnancy, creating and destroying developing human embryos, and cloning currently illegal, see VA Code, 32.1-12,21-22. The words, “every individual,” apply to all adult males, females, as well as minors under 18 because these words are not restricted, modified or qualified by the Amendment authors. Therefore, no means of reproductive freedom behavior is excluded legal protection because of age or sex by the authors of the Reproductive Freedom Amendment, RFA. Additionally, the Supreme Court ruled, “neither the Fourteenth Amendment nor the Bill of Rights is for adults alone.” [In re Gault, (1967)] The RFA states, “The Commonwealth shall not discriminate in the protection or enforcement of this fundamental right.” But treating males or females under 18 differently than males or females over 18 is a textbook example of discrimination. Attorneys Carrie Severino and Frank Scaturro noted points of the Ohio Abortion Referendum language (2023), which are strikingly similar to the Virginia counterparts that: “The proposed Ohio constitutional amendment would make the state … become a likely jurisdiction to harbor a future Kermit Gosnell, whether he is a practitioner of abortion, sex-change surgery, or other procedures under the umbrella of reproductive care. Complete strangers who assist children in obtaining life-altering procedures would find themselves on the right side of the law, while parents who try to protect their children would be deemed to have run afoul of the law.” “Any individual who tries to assist a minor in pursuing such procedures would be protected by law, while a parent who objects would be cut out of the decision-making process, perhaps even penalized.” “It appears that the amendment … would even offer a level of protection to nonphysicians in their performance of covered procedures — whether abortion, sex-change surgery, or something else. … the language extends to any “person or entity” who provides assistance with the procedure at issue.” [National Review online, March 13, 2023, “Ohio’s Disastrous Abortion Ballot Proposal”]
I care deeply about reproductive rights and marriage equality. I support these amendments.
I support all 3 amendments and look forward to Virginia enshrining restoration of voting rights, marriage equality, and reproductive freedom into our constitution
I fully support HJ1, HJ2 and HJ9. In a time when women's rights and LGBTQ+ rights are being taken away Virginia needs to be forward thinking and solidify those rights. I want my daughters to grow up in a state where they are respected and valued and able to make informed decisions about their own bodies and have the autonomy to make decisions about their lives without fear of government intervention. Please pass these amendments!!
I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states.
Honorable Committee: I oppose HJ1-Herring bill, the enshrining of abortion due to no restrictions up to 9 months and after. I can see if there is a danger to the mother's life and the baby, but at 12 weeks of age, the BABY has a heartbeat and is a human being. The Baby's civil rights must be taken into consideration for it is not the Baby's fault that it was created. What about the Baby's Right to Choose? Those who have sex need to have more accountability for there is birth control other than abortion pill available to prevent pregnancy. I find it disgusting that there are certain individuals who celebrate the killing of an unborn child or the killing of a baby after full term. In abortion, a BABY is mutilated, broken apart and pulled out in pieces. The BABY is a living being that did not choose to be created. It is not the Baby's fault. There need to be benefits available for those who are unable to conceive to adopt babies created by accident. It is inhumane to want to kill a baby for no reason after 12 weeks of gestation and also uncivilized to enjoy the killing of said baby for profit which Planned Parenthood sell the parts of the baby! DO NONE OF YOU HAVE A HEART OF ANY KIND TO THINK OF THE UNBORN BABY AND IT'S RIGHT TO LIFE? I also Oppose HJ2 Bill Bennett Parker I also Oppose HJ9 Bill Sickles Thank you for your time and attention. Kristin Holte
HJ1 Fundamental Right to reproductive Freedom, HJ2 Right to vote-Restoration of Rights, HJ3 Marriage Equality: I support each of these & look forward to their passing as they belong in our system of laws to affirm a full some array of rights available to each citizen of the state of Virginia.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I do not support HJ1. It does not protect innocent children in the womb. Life begins at conception and babies deserve a chance to live. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
HJ1, the right to reproductive freedom. All Virginians should have accessible, quality healthcare that they can afford. This includes all aspects of reproductive care for women - ongoing reproductive health checks, birth control, post-natal care, and abortion - to be determined by the woman and her health care providers. Abortion should be a safe, legal decision made without government interference or penalties for anyone who offers aid or assistance in the process. Virginians have shown their support for reproductive freedom without intrusion from the government. HJ2, the right to vote, restoration of rights. Voting rights should be restored automatically once a person convicted of a felony successfully completes their sentence. Their participation in the democratic process should not be dependent on a vague, arbitrary process decided by the Governor without full explanation of decisions. The Virginia Constitution should be amended to provide the automatic restoration of rights once the sentence for a felony conviction is completed. HJ3, marriage equality. Virginians deserve the opportunity to love and live peacefully with the person of their choice. Just as laws regarding mixed race marriages were changed as citizens attitudes and understanding evolved, the current ban against same-sex marriage should not be part of the Virginia constitution. Virginians' support of same-sex marriage has increased to about 70% in 2021 (Public Religion Research Institute). The current level of support is evidence that the ban should be removed from the constitution. I hope that these bills will be thoughtfully considered for the improved quality of life for all Virginians.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
HJ1, a proposed amendment to the Virginia Constitution that would enshrine extremist no-limits abortion. They do not do this in Europe. OPPOSE This Dem abortion amendment to the Virginia Constitution has got to be the most extreme in the country. No parental consent for minor girls. No protections for a fully-formed viable baby from elective late-term abortions up to the 9th month. This sort of extremism is not what Virginians want.
I am writing to loudly support all three of these bills. I’m excited to see Virginia embrace policy that makes us more equitable and safer during such scary times. I hope we can do what’s right and get these bills through.
I strongly support these three amendments to our state constitution. I want to protect and support the rights of all Virginia's.
I support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. In regards to HJ1, as many said before me, reproductive rights are human rights. A person should be able to make the decision about carrying or terminating a pregnancy without say from the government or religious organizations. Enshrining the right to abortion will ensure that we do not see the unnecessary death of pregnant people due to being denied care, especially during emergency situations. We have seen so many stories coming out of states where this right has been revoked, which has led to the deaths of many unnecessarily. We need to remember that when woman are seeking late term abortions, this is typically a life saving procedure for the mother who is carrying a fetus that is no longer viable. We cannot force a person to suffer through the death of their child and then potentially lose their own life as well due to lack of legal care. Virginia is at the forefront of the southern states in making sure reproductive care is available and it should stay that way. HJ2 - I believe that this is a step in the right direction and support reformed felons being able to regain their civil right to vote and participate in our democracy. HJ9 - All people deserve to marry the person they love, regardless of gender or race. Marriage is a contract where two people are joining their lives. Any adult couple deserves to be able to enter into these contracts. It does not infringe on the rights of others and will ensure that they are able to advocate for their spouse in situations where this is necessary. Many objections to marriage equality stem from a religious viewpoint. In a government where there should be a separation of church and state, this should not be allowed to affect the law. Thank you for your time!
Twenty-five states, plus the District of Columbia either automatically restore the right to vote upon a person's release from incarceration (23) or never deprive the person convicted of a felony of the right to vote (Maine, Vermont, and DC). Fifteen more states automatically restore rights upon completion of additional terms of a sentence. Virginia is the only state that currently leaves the decision whether to restore rights entirely to the unfettered discretion of the governor. Most recent governors have sought to restore rights routinely, consistently and transparently. The current governor restores rights sparingly, arbitrarily, and capriciously, considering restoration to be a matter of "grace." Restoration of rights for those adjudged to be mentally incompetent is also unduly discretionary. First, the judge adjudicating someone's mental competence needs to make a discrete determination with regard to voting rights. Second, when a person is adjudicated to have restored mental competence, voting rights should be automatically restored as well. To ensure these rights, HJ2 needs to pass this year and next, then be put to voters at the ballot box .
I support HJ 2. As in most states, all people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I am in support of all three bills - HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. No one other than a person with a uterus and their doctor should be involved decisions for their wellbeing and health. Women should inately hold autonomy over their own body. It is embarrassing that we are still fighting for this. Marriage equality was decided by the federal government, our state should solidify that right to protect its people from possible attacks from the next administration. If you don't like gay marriage, don't have one.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly OPPOSE HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 Legislation. This nation is supposed to protect life, not destroy it as stated in the HJ1 proposal. Every life is valuable from the moment of conception to natural death. The greatest shame be on any legislator who undermines this right.
Dear Legislators, I have been a citizen my whole life. I am writing to plead for you to stand for me, the Catholic Church and my church’s Gabriel Project. I am a coordinator for this project at my church. We walk with women pregnant who are in crisis because they have an unplanned pregnancy. As a mentor to a woman, we support her by providing her with friendship and love. We help her obtain goods and services free of charge for her and her unborn baby. We go with her to doctor’s appointments as well as help her find food and housing. Finally, we help her spiritually by praying-with and for her. We believe all lives are worthwhile, and that human life begins at conception. For these reasons we are asking you to please oppose HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment • I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. • HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. • HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. • A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. • Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I ask you to please restore: HJ 2 – restoring voting rights • I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. Finally, I ask you to please oppose the following: , HJ 9 – marriage • I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. • Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. • I thank you sincerely for your work and pray that the Holy Spirit speaks to your heart as you vote to save unborn children tomorrow. Sincerely, Mary Young
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect preborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians. Please use your God- given voice and stand up for the most vulnerable.
It’s important for Virginia to protect people’s freedom from government overreach. If 2 consenting adults want to get married, regardless of who they like, they should be allowed to get married. Freedom reigns. Any restrictions on constitutional freedoms would make America look like Iran and North Korea. Protecting women’s rights to abortion is equally important.
Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
- I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. - HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. - HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. - A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. - REJECT HJ 1. Instead, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. - Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose bill HJ1 and ask the delegates to represent me and many unborn children. We can not always legislate issues of the heart such as caring for the unborn; but laws offer a restraint to unbridled killing of the unborn and psychological harm to the mother in crisis. We do the mothers a disservice in allowing abortions up til birth. It is cruel and will scare her soul. The memory of silencing the human life lives on long after the procedure is finished. The least we can do is to amend this bill to place the 24-hour waiting period and the presence of the ultra -sound images. The fact that these two considerations provide a slight hinderance would only be opposed by those striving to make money from the abortion industry. Giving he unborn a chance at life and the mother a reflective window to not make a hasty decision is a safe and reasonable thing to do. I oppose bill HJ2. Virginia already has laws on the books to help those who have served their time be reissued their voting rights. My concern is this may be providing a loop hole for non-citizens to vote. I oppose bill HJ9. My concern is the wording of "individuals" instead of adults. Are we leaving it open for the marriage of minors. We must safe guard children in this increasingly immoral society. Please take time to reword this bill.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I firmly support the passage of HJ 1, HJ 2, and HJ 9 amendments. For HJ1, abortion can be necessary for both healthcare and economic reasons. It should be a mother's decision to determine what is best for her health, especially in scenarios when it could be fatal without the abortion. Without the safety net of H1, maternal mortality rates could increase even more than they already have compared to pre-pandemic levels. We can not afford to let more mothers die from not receiving the care they need. Additionally, there is our economic incentive to abortion by allowing a woman to choose when to become a mother. Most women who seek an abortion are already low-income. When these women are blocked from ending their pregnancy, they wind up worse off than they would if they could choose to have a child when they are more financially secure. It would be a detriment to Virginia to punish women by making them give up their stability or even their own lives. For HJ 9, equality is a fundamental civil right and there is no legal reason a person shouldn't be able to choose who they love and marry. With 4% of Virginia's population being a part of the LGBT community, it is discriminatory and unfair to not allow them equal rights for marriage. There is, again, an economic incentive, as this also helps retain high-skilled workers from the LGBT community in the state of Virginia where they can settle down and have kids of their own if they want. Without this protection, more Virginians would move out of state and cause a loss to our communities and economy.
HJ1 - Reproductive freedom is mandatory to keep the wellbeing of families secure. The only refusal of this is on basis of religion, which should NOT interfere with the state. Reproductive freedom stimulates the economy and takes a large off burden off the welfare system. Not to mention it is morally just, defending victims of sexual violence. HJ2 - Right to vote for ALL is nothing but just. Felons can be rehabilitated. Being a felon does not deny your place as a citizen of the United States. If a felon can run for president and win, a felon should be able to vote. HJ9 - Guaranteeing same sex couples have the right to marry has many benefits: Stimulates the economy, protects same sex families from financial burden, enables same sex families to provide their children a stable home life. The majority of dissenters are on the basis of religion, which cannot be involved in politics.
If it’s not baby, then what is it? A hamburger? A five year old is not as developed as a 20 year old. Nor is a 3 week old as developed as a 9 month old. And yet we wouldn’t call the 5 year old less human. Calling people fetuses is just a way to dehumanize the killing of humans by not calling them humans. End abortion. Allow people to vote and restore their voting powers. They are people too. Marriage is between a man and a woman. Homosexual marriage is contrary to natural design. It doesn’t even make sense from an evolutionary standpoint.
In regards to bill HJ1, we need to ensure that Virginia is ready to protect its citizens in the case of larger abortion restrictions at the federal level. This bill highlights what is not considered in many states and at a federal level which is that as Americans we have a right to bodily autonomy. Reproductive freedom is a right to privacy. Enshrining this right in our state constitution will ensure that women, men, and individuals of any gender feel safe and welcome in Virginia. For HJ2, individuals with felons will never be able to reintegrate into society if they lack the right to vote. A right which makes them American. This is one of the simplest steps Virginia can take to properly rehabilitate formerly incarcerated peoples. Regarding HJ9, repealing and replacing the existing constitutional provision which defines union as only between a man and a woman is necessary both to abide by federal court decisions and to ensure all Virginia residents are treated equally. With the inserted cavet of religious entities being allowed to refuse to conduct a marriage if they choose, there is no reason for anyone of any religious belief to reject this constitutional amendment. It allows them to maintain their freedom of religion while guaranteeing basic freedom to all Virginia residents. Virginia is not Virginia without the LGBTQ community or the black and PoC communities who simply wish to love. As a lifelong resident of Virginia who has lived in numerous locations in our state, I hope you will read these comments and accept all the amendments above as it is in the best interests of the citizens of Virginia whom you represent.
HJ1 - I firmly believe that every person should be responsible for their own health. Especially reproductive health. The government should not have a say in the medical decisions I make regarding myself. HJ2 - I believe felons should have the right to vote. If felons become the president of the united states, why can't felons also choose who they want to run this country? If a felon is registered as a citizen of the U.S. they should be allowed to vote. HJ9 - People should be allowed to marry the person they love, even if they are both men or both women. It's baffling to me that there is even debate surrounding it. It should not be illegal for same sex couples to be married.
I support these bills to protect the rights of women and their doctors to make healthcare decisions themselves. In states where women have lost their rights to reproductive freedom, women are DYING needlessly. This is inexcusable in the United States of America in 2024. As a woman who suffered 4 miscarriages, or what my insurance provider at the time called “spontaneous abortions,” I have nightmares thinking about the multitude ways “friends/spies” might have turned my pain and anguish into a crime by involving themselves in my personal healthcare decisions. An ectopic pregnancy which resulted in the loss of two wanted fetuses and a fallopian tube might have also resulted in the loss of my life due to denial of care. Protect the rights of women’s access to healthcare. The government has no role here. What a conflict with HIPPA.
I am writing in support of HJ1 and HJ9 respectively. I believe each, in their own right, provides agency to Virginians; agency over one’s body, and one’s most personal relationship (with a partner). Protection of these rights, as they should be seen, is paramount in providing for a democratic and free republic. These choices should stay personal, as they were always meant to be.
Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. Abortion is NOT birth control. Educate women on their natural biology, provide support for mothers - especially mothers in the workforce, focus energies on affordable childcare. Do not make preborn children suffer for the failings of this society. Do not end the lives who could very well be what this state, country, and world needs. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
I support these amendments because in a nation that values freedom, individuals should have autonomy over their decisions.
I strongly oppose HJ1. I agree that individuals, both men and women, have the right to decide if and when to have children. However, once those children are already in existence, no one has the right, not even their parents to get rid of them. All life is sacred, and we have a civic duty to protect the most vulnerable, which are the unborn. Abortion up to the moment of birth is unthinkable. This is NOT a healthcare right. I also oppose the idea of minors being able to get an abortion without parental consent. A teen does not have the neurodevelopment to make decisions on a major life event such as pregnancy alone. The American College of Pediatrics agrees with this stance in its position statement Parental Involvement and Consent for Minor's Abortion Federico C. de Miranda, MD, FCP I strongly oppose HJ9 and believe that the original design and purpose of marriage, which predates any nation, religion or law supports Natural Law, that marriage is between one man and one woman and ask that you respect the wishes of your constituents. I do support HJ2 so that voting rights can be restored to all people having completed their sentences.
if the president can be a felon, other people with past felony convictions should at least be able to vote!
HJ 1 - abortion I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. Expanding abortion does nothing to solve the problems that bring mothers to the place where they think it is better to kill their child rather than birth it. Poverty, lack of support, unhealthy relationships, and abuse all continue when resources aren’t toward abortion rather than the support networks that help women (and men) be more stable and successful. Trafficking and sex abuse can continue when abortion is less regulated and more available, making women victims again. Furthermore, by endorsing the idea that the government (or any citizen) can “choose” the value of another human, at any level of vulnerability, and prioritize their own life over a more vulnerable individual, creates a dangerous precedent for how citizens can interact with people who cannot equally advocate and defend themselves. This destabilizes women, men, and families, and creates a rift of hyper-individualism, selfishness, and distrust where cooperation and unity should be a priority. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Studies repeatedly show that marriage is a leading indicator of stability, success, and happiness in adults. Studies also show that children need a mother and a father by repeatedly demonstrating that lacking one has detrimental effects and is an obstacle to future wellbeing and success. If the government truly has the stabilization and success of its people in mind, it will protect and encourage the most stabilizing and success-indicating relationship that is the foundation of future generations: marriage between one man and one woman. Furthermore, marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
These are all important issues to me, we should honor all marriages equally, once felons sentences are complete they should be allowed to vote and be involved in civics with their community,
I fully support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9, as each of these proposed amendments reflects our state’s commitment to individual rights and justice. HJ1 is crucial for safeguarding reproductive freedom by enshrining the right to an abortion. HJ2 rightly restores voting rights for convicted felons upon their release, reinforcing the importance of civic participation and second chances. Finally, HJ9 protects the right to same-sex marriage, ensuring equal rights and dignity for all couples. I urge the committee to advance these bills to help build a fairer, more inclusive state.
HJ 1 – I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – I oppose HJ 9 Marriage is the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
My name is Samuel M Willinger, MD and I live in Lynchburg, Va . HJ-1 : a fundamental right to reproductive freedom : I support this bill... If a woman needs a termination of pregnancy, it is her decision ( and the father's) , not the government's decision .. I understand it is ending a life; however, here is America, we have so little respect for life with our gun violence, mistreatment of women, the Israeli bombing of Gazans with weapons provided by us, etc, that I do not feel I have any right to tell someone else what to do or how they should live their lives.. Prevention of pregnancy would be ideal, so let us provide women with good birth control as well, good health care, and a proper social environment in which to grow up with no drugs, alcohol or guns and teach them how to make good decisions so they avoid unwanted pregnancies.. A Republican would say " the government should not be in my personal business". Well then, why are they trying to tell women what they can and can't do? ...HJ-2 - restoration of voting rights... This is simple.. if a criminal has done his time in prison and he is released, then he is a citizen again with full rights.. he is expected to work, pay taxes, and uphold the law.. Why should he not have the right to vote if he is law abiding? HJ-3 - marriage equality -- this is extremely simple .. of COURSE there should be marriage equality !! Duhh !! .. if two people love each other and want to marry, then there is a little more happiness in the world. What should it matter to the other 8 billion people ? Nobody is telling them who they should love and marry? Whether they are two men, two women or a man and a woman , what does it matter? Homosexuality has been around for thousands of years .. The ancient Greeks had a lot of homosexuality , especially the very warlike Spartans - check your history , people... no matter what the Bible says, does the Bible apply to Hindus? to Bhuddists, to Japanese ( Shinto religion) ? They don't care about a Christian Bible... and people who think homosexuality is abnormal, well , nobody is trying to convince them to be homosexual .... Thank you for this opportunity to offer my opinion .. best regards, Samuel Willinger, MD
HJ1- I support this bill. Women are in charge of their own bodies and it is a fundamental right they can choose whether to have an abortion or not. HJ2 - I support this bill to guarantee voting rights to eligible voters. This just goes without saying. HJ9 - I support this bill to allow two individuals to marry regardless of gender. This has been a right since June 26th 2015. Why are we going back in time? Only to hurt people and take away their given rights? Jesus loves everyone regardless of their gender identity. 1 John 4:8 Anyone who does not love does not know God, because God is love. Leviticus 19:18 You shall not take vengeance or bear a grudge against the sons of your own people, but you shall love your neighbor as yourself.
I strongly support these three proposed amendments to the Virginia Constitution. Ensuring reproductive freedom is crucial for bodily autonomy and healthcare equity (HJ1). Safeguarding the right to vote and removing discriminatory barriers is vital to a healthy democracy (HJ2). Repealing the outdated prohibition on same-sex marriage and affirming the right to marry regardless of gender (HJ9) promotes equality and protects fundamental civil rights. These amendments will bring Virginia’s laws in line with modern values of freedom, equality, and justice for all citizens.
As a practicing Roman Catholic, who follows the 10 Commandments, I strongly object to you trying to make a "right" to abortion in Virginia's constitution. A policy/law of unlimited abortion up until birth is a mockery of God's gift of life and it goes against the constitution of the U.S.A. I would like to know why you are so intent on killing an innocent child. Do you not think of how you are going to answer to God when you see Him face to face? We have already killed more babies than, Hilter, Stalin, and ancient pagan societies. Regarding HJ2 I support HJ2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as in the case in the vast majority of states. Virginia doesn't need to be know for not giving people a second chance. I oppose HJ9, which makes a mockery of marriage. Since the beginning of time, marriage has always been between one man and one woman. Why don't you follow the science, to propagate you need the reproductive systems of a male and female. It is scientifically impossible for two men or two women to produce a child. If you won't listen to the science then please use what little common sense you have for some good. You obviously want to continue to do the work of the devil, by rushing these actions through. I will pray for your soul and may God show His mercy on you.
As a Virginia resident, I urge my delegates to pass all three bills to enshrine reproductive, voting, and marriage rights in our state Constitution. Convicted felons have already served their time within prison walls. Without the right to cast their vote, they remain disenfranchised upon release for the rest of their lives. As a queer AFAB (assigned female at birth) constituent, I worry about the rollbacks and potential repeals by the US Supreme Court on established federally-granted rights. My right to access abortion, birth control, and other family planning services should be protected within the state Constitution. My right to get married to my future partner should be protected as well. I love Virginia, and I plan to spend much of my life here. I can’t imagine a future in which these rights are not permanently guaranteed within my state’s Constitution. Thank you.
I strongly support these three proposed amendments to the Virginia Constitution. Ensuring reproductive freedom is crucial for bodily autonomy and healthcare equity (HJ1). Safeguarding the right to vote and removing discriminatory barriers is vital to a healthy democracy (HJ2). Repealing the outdated prohibition on same-sex marriage and affirming the right to marry regardless of gender (HJ9) promotes equality and protects fundamental civil rights. These amendments will bring Virginia’s laws in line with modern values of freedom, equality, and justice for all citizens.
I support HJ2 and urge you to move it forward for three reasons. First, I believe in the "fundamental right to vote" as articulated in the amendment. The history of our state and nation is a continuing struggle toward that principle. Secondly, JLARC found that 12, 000 Virginians have been disenfranchised by overbroad application of legal guardianship. Of course some of those people are not capable of understanding the election process but courts have been removing the right to vote as a default for anyone in need of a guardian and that has included many who want to participate as citizens, who understand what it means to vote, and who have political opinions that they deserve to express. Finally, I support HJ2 because it makes no sense to deprive people of voting rights after they are released from prison. This only punishes the very ones who are trying to become contributing citizens. Voting is typically unrelated to the crime for which they were sentenced. Moreover, the sentence, long or short, was set in proportion to the crime, so it is not right add this additional disenfranchisement. Frankly, this is an ugly legacy that makes me ashamed for Virginia. It is past time to end this exercise in humiliation.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 and urge the committee to advance these proposed constitutional amendments. HJ1 is essential to safeguarding reproductive rights and ensuring individuals have autonomy over their healthcare decisions. HJ2’s restoration of voting rights for individuals who have completed their incarceration is a necessary step toward justice and reintegration. Lastly, HJ9’s protection of the right to same-sex marriage is crucial to upholding equality and dignity for all families in our state. These measures collectively reflect our commitment to fairness, individual rights, and a more inclusive society.
My comments are as followis. Regarding HU1: A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. For NJ2: I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. As for HU9: I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Plus, marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. Regards, Steve Amato
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent.Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1- I support this bill to ensure that women have choice in regards to reproduction. HJ2 - I support this bill to guarantee voting rights to eligible voters. HJ9 - I support this bill to allow two individuals to marry regardless in of gender or biological sex.
I support these amendments because in a nation that values and prioritizes freedom, I believe that individuals should have autonomy over all their decisions. If we are to truly have our unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the government cannot restrict our autonomy in any way. Furthermore our government has a responsibility to protect our rights and by amending our state constitution we are solidifying that protection in the event that there are challenges to these rights federally.
HJ1-Access to reproductive freedom should be an essential right for all Virginians. Women and their doctors are fully capable of making the best decisions for themselves and their circumstances. The government should not be placing restrictions on what people can do with their own bodies. Even corpses are afforded bodily autonomy! HJ2-Individuals should automatically have their voting rights restored when their sentence is complete. HJ9- LGBTQ+ people should have their right to marry fully protected and upheld by the state of Virginia.
I support an amendment to the Virginia Constitution to guarantee that people who have been disenfranchised due to a felony conviction will have their rights automatically restored upon completion of their sentences, without additional steps or paperwork after they are no longer incarcerated, and to ensure people with disabilities never lose their rights without an appropriate judicial finding. This has never been a partisan issue. Both Democratic and Republican governors have chosen to restore voting rights to thousands of citizens; however, Virginia's current governor has reversed the trend. People should not be permanently defined by their past mistakes.
HJ1 - I strongly oppose enshrining a "right" to abortion in Virginia's constitution. HJ1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. REJECT HJ1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ2 - All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ9 - I oppose HJ9 . Marriage is the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I wholeheartedly support the restoration of voting rights for citizens who have served their time incarcerated in the penal systems of the Commonwealth of Virginia. It says something loud and clear that there are only two states that don’t automatically restore voting rights. It is even more alarming that this process is in the hands of one person, the governor of these two states. We need a restoration system that is clear, consistent and not determined by a sitting Governor. Once a person has served their time for a crime they have committed, their right to vote should not be taken for life!! Do the right thing and allow the citizen to become a whole person again and participate in the right to vote on issues/persons that can affect them, their families, communities and their nation.
Separation of church and state. Keep one person’s church out of the rights and freedoms of every American. I strongly support these three proposed amendments protecting human rights.
I support the three proposed amendments HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 Legal bans on reproductive decisions in other states already show that they are restricting health care to those who are pregnant resulting in unnecessary harm and death of citizens. Government overreach should not prevent citizens from making healthcare decisions with their families, medical practitioners and their clergy. Most states allow felons to regain their voting rights once released. This is important to allow those who have completed their punishment and are no longer incarcerated to regain all the rights of citizenship. I don't see any compelling interest of the state in preventing people who have developed and committed and loving relationship with each other to be prevented from being denied the legal privileges that civil marriage provides. It is in the best interest of the state to ensure these privileges to consenting adults.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child, such as universal maternal healthcare, comprehensive paid family leave funding policies, affordable housing and childcare options. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – right to abortion amendment • I strongly agree with and support enshrining a right to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. • HJ 1 would protect countless pregnant persons across the state and allow them bodily autonomy and the choices to make medical decisions with their doctors and healthcare providers. • A policy of unrestricted abortion access should be a fundamental right. Each instance of required or desired abortion care should be treated as the medically complex and personally nuanced situations that they are without concern for cumbersome and dangerous legislative restriction. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights • I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage • I support HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
Regarding HJ 1, I strongly OPPOSE enshrining a so-called “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. Murder is a WRONG, not a right. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. REJECT HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I OPPOSE HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
* HJ 1 - I strongly oppose enshrining a "right" to abortion in Virginia's constitution. * HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. *A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. *REJECT HJ1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and child. * HJ 2 - All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. *HJ 9 - I oppose HJ 9 Marriage is the union of one man and one woman. * Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 I strongly oppose enshrining a 'right' to abortion in Virginia's Constitution. HJ1 Would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. Please reject enshrining the barbarity and violence of abortion in the Virginia Constitution. We should be defending the right to life not cruelly blotting it out. HJ 2 - restoring voting rights. I support HJ 2 All people who have paid their debt to society by completing their sentences ought to have their right to vote restored. It is only just. HJ 9 The state didn't create marriage, it is a human institution arising from natural law.. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. Do not remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
NO TO AMERICAN TALIBAN. I strongly support these three proposed amendments to the Virginia Constitution. Ensuring reproductive freedom is crucial for bodily autonomy and healthcare equity (HJ1). Safeguarding the right to vote and removing discriminatory barriers is vital to a healthy democracy (HJ2). Repealing the outdated prohibition on same-sex marriage and affirming the right to marry regardless of gender (HJ9) promotes equality and protects fundamental civil rights. These amendments will bring Virginia’s laws in line with modern values of freedom, equality, and justice for all citizens.
HJ 1 – right to abortion amendment • I strongly agree with and support enshrining a right to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. • HJ 1 would protect countless pregnant persons across the state and allow them bodily autonomy and the choices to make medical decisions with their doctors and healthcare providers. • A policy of unrestricted abortion access should be a fundamental right. Each instance of required or desired abortion care should be treated as the medically complex and personally nuanced situations that they are without concern for cumbersome and dangerous legislative restriction. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights • I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage • I support HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
I support this amendment. This ban does not reflect the attitudes and beliefs of Virginians in 2023. A 2021 poll from the Public Religion Research Institute found that 71% of Virginians support the right of same-sex couples to marry. This percentage has only increased since the question began being asked of voters. In 2006, 53% of voters supported the marriage ban. This huge swing shows the massive shift in public opinion on the issue of marriage, and it is clear evidence that the antiquated ban should no longer be a part of Virginia’s constitution. It’s only fair to revisit a political question that has shown such a vast change since it was first broached. With the removal of women’s protections with the destruction of Roe v. Wade, it is possible that marriage equality will be destroyed on a national level as well. Virginia must take the lead to protect all citizens. If Virginia really is “for lovers,” it should recognize that love is love and grant all citizens the right to live their lives in peace.endment.
I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states.
I am opposed to the secretive and rushed process to get these Bills voted on and the intent seems very suspicious. Please vote NO to HJ1 and HJ9 to protect the sanctity of life as well as the values of the Commonwealth. I strongly oppose enshrining the "right" to abortion in to the Virginia Constitution. In addition, I strongly oppose HJ9, and believe that the original design and purpose of marriage, which predates any nation, religion or law supports Natural Law, that marriage is between one man and one woman and ask that you respect the wishes of your constituents. I support HJ2 so that voting rights can be restored to all people having completed their sentences. Thank you for your consideration
I support strongly the passage of HJ1 , Hj2 and HJ9 because these amendments will prevent the people of Virginia from reverting to the dark ages. I want Virginia to remain a beacon of light and safety for reproductive rights and the rights of all of her citizens
I support all 3 bills: the right to reproductive freedom, the right to vote, and the right to marriage equality.
I oppose enshrining abortion rights into our state constitution because modern science and technology prove that what is present within the womb at the earliest stage is a human being. To uphold abortion on demand is tantamount to taking human life. There is no right to take the life of an innocent , vulnerable and innocent human being. I oppose marriage between two persons of the same sex. Marriage from the natural law involves a man and a woman who in the act of two becoming one create new human life, at least the openness is present.
It would put VA on the wrong side of history to reject any of these bills. I thought this was the land of the free? It's embarassing how many so-called "patriots" will vehemently oppose anyone's freedom and right to choose what healthcare they seek and who they engage in holy matrimony with, as well as whether or not someone's past (which has been atoned for) can prevent them from participating in democracy. Opposing these bills will put governmental restrictions in our bodies, our families, and the ability for EVERYONE to make their voices heard. True Americans will support these bills.
Please restore voting rights once inmates have served their time.
I support all 3 bill !! Stay Blue Virginia
HJ1-I vehemently oppose a “right “ to abortion in the Virginia Constitution and reject it. We need life- affirming and protective measures for mother and child not murderous measures HJ2-I support restoration of voting rights for individuals who have completed their sentences HJ9-I oppose removal of constitutional protection of marriage between one man and one woman
HJ1 - I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ2 - I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ3 - I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law
I strongly urge you to support all three bills. As a woman, I deserve the right to vote as well as the right to reproductive health just like every other women in our state and in our country and world. These bills are very serious and having them written into our state constitution will keep Virginians feeling safe and supported during a very dark time. Marriage Equality is also so important to me and should be supported. How can Virginia be for lovers if it's not for all lovers? Time to make big, meaningful changes!
HJ2 - When an individual has paid their debt to society, the right to vote should be automatically restored. The right to vote should not be denied or even have to go through some type of subjective process when your sentence has been completely served. Why should you continue to be punished for a debt that has been satisfied? The answer is, you should not!!! I completely support this bill.
I support HJ1 and implore the committee members to allow this bill to move forward. It is lost on no one that this is a contentious issue and will undoubtedly remain such for quite some time. Ten states have extended the decision of whether to solidify abortion access to its citizens through ballot measures. Virginia should be no different. I see little possibility of a collective, philosophical agreement. As such, democracy should play its course and Virginians should be permitted to vote on this amendment at the ballot box. I support HJ9 and echo other Virginians sentiments that this is merely aligning our state constitution with a right that is already set by Obergefell. Outdated implied prohibitions should be corrected, as we have done for other areas involving racist laws that were set in our state constitution. Many will cite biblical ideology as a reason for halting this bill. I respectfully remind committee members that Christians previously cited their religion while blocking the union between individuals of different races. Many of us today see this belief, which existed for centuries, as a perversion of the text. Not only should religion and state remain separate in regards to respect for our chosen families, the religion that is being pressed upon us is one that twists over time. In a state that championed Loving and has coined "Virginia is for Lovers" in its honor, please correct our misalignment and move this bill forward to protect Virginian citizens whose love deserves equal celebration and protection. I support HJ2 and respectfully press the committee to move the bill forward. Once a citizen repays their debt to society, their rights should be fully restored. These citizens who reintegrate into our cities and towns are impacted by the policies that pass and should have a voice. Residents must be invested in their communities and this will reduce recidivism. It is no secret that individuals from disenfranchised communities often lack resources for proper legal representation and are pressed at a higher rate to accept plea deals. Denying these individuals the restoration of their rights after their punishment only perpetuates the inequitable effects of a jilted justice system. It is also an undeniable irony that a convicted felon was just elected president, and yet, Virginian felons are unable to vote unless individually approved. There should not be such a blanket disenfranchisement. This bill and proposed amendment provides the necessary guardrails. It should move forward.
Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Late term abortion is pure torture and wrong.Every child except for mother's health should have a right to live.They treat dogs better than our precious babys.
I support the automatic restoration of voting rights for individuals who have completed their jail sentences. By eliminating unnecessary legal hurdles, we reduce taxpayer expenses and promote efficiency in our system. Voting is a fundamental right, and allowing people who have served their time to re-engage fully in civic life supports positive reintegration and respects the values of our democracy.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I am in strong support of allowing Virginians to live their lives as they see fit in regards to their reproductive freedoms (HJ1) and whom they choose to love (HJ9). Additionally, those who have served their time should have their voting right restored, without additional hurdles put in their way (HJ2).
HJ 1 – I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – I oppose HJ 9 Marriage is the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Radicalism of every kind in Government is bad for all of us -- regardless of which side of the aisle we sit on. Please stop this nonsense now!
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. By what standard is the GA consider establishing the "right?" The Supreme Court does not see it as a constitutional right. Many Virginians would consider this a wrong - just as much as abortion is wrong, terminating the life of the unborn child and health care providers participating in death rather than giving life. Shame. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, and fundamental wrong, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I urge you to pass all three of these bills. It is unacceptable that someone else's religion can dictate someone else's life and choices. Abortion is healthcare and should be to the discretion of the individual and their medical provider. Criminalizing abortion creates a disgusting precedent for the government to impose it's will over your own bodily autonomy. If you don't believe in abortions, don't get one, it's as simple as that. If you don't support gay marriage, don't get one. It is frankly un-American to support legislation that forces your beliefs onto someone else. Virginia is for lovers, ALL lovers, not just the ones that you personally think are acceptable. Separation of Church and state is important for a reason. Your religion and beliefs do not and will never supercede an individuals right to self determination. If we give the government the power to decide what we can do with our body's and our lives, we will not get that back. These issues might not effect you personally or yet, but they will. The leopards will come for you next.
I strongly support this amendment 100%! Every Virginia resident should have access to affordable, quality health care, including abortion, birth control, and the privacy to make reproductive choices. Virginians made their reproductive opinions clear when they chose to elect representatives who vowed to protect reproductive rights.
The Virginia Right to Vote Coalition is composed of multiple state-based and national organizations, who are working towards the goal of having clear, consistent and fair re-enfranchisement in Virginia’s constitution for eligible voters by 2026. Our respective organizations represent a vast majority of the Commonwealth and represent various advocacy organizations, directly impacted Virginians, disability advocates, educational institutions, re-entry organizations, voting rights advocates. Like the majority of Virginians, we believe that all qualified citizens should have access to the ballot, including those who have served their time for felony convictions and people with disabilities who want to participate in the democratic process. We support an amendment to the Virginia Constitution to guarantee that people who have been disenfranchised due to a felony conviction will have their rights automatically restored upon completion of their sentences, without additional steps or paperwork after they are no longer incarcerated, and to ensure people with disabilities never lose their rights without an appropriate judicial finding. Both Democratic and Republican governors have chosen to restore voting rights to thousands of citizens; however, Virginia's current governor has reversed the trend. People should not be permanently defined by their past mistakes. Virginians who have successfully served their time should be able to fully rejoin civic life. It is time for Virginians to act to amend our Constitution to create a routine restoration process that reflects fair accountability and encourages civic engagement.
I am in support of all 3 bills. Regarding reproductive freedom, the government does not have any say in any other medical intervention so why does it need to intervene in a woman’s rights to choose how she handles her body and pregnancy. Furthermore, if we dictate a women’s right to choose, are we going to one day dictate hospice care, how a person is treated for cancer or their right to a well informed medical procedure? Regarding the voting rights of a convicted felon, my thoughts are simple. So long as they are a citizen of the US and governed under the laws of the U.S. they should have the right to vote. So long as they have completed their sentence/punishment for their crime. Regarding marriage equality, I believe marriage is a personal and mutual decision between 2 consenting adults! The government should not dictate who can marry who based upon sexual orientation. If so, we are only creating another vehicle for falsification of records or manipulation of the system. The government doesn’t dictate which sex can live together or sleep together or buy common property together. Why does the government need to meddle in marriage and only allow heterosexual couples to marry? The government needs to get out of the business of micromanaging peoples lives and do what it was elected to do which is to govern and not micromanage. All that being said if you want to bring in the religious aspect of reproductive rights and marriage equality. The basis of almost all religious beliefs is to not judge. Who gave the government the right to judge and dictate how a pregnant woman or human beings regardless of sexual orientation get to marry? What if your child or grandchild was raped or abused and became pregnant and she is forced to carry to term only traumatized by the sole thing the government made her carry through to term. This puts a further strain on the welfare system and heavily affects mental health which is already a major problem. What if your child or grandchild was living in shame and also lying to you about their happiness as a person and couldn’t marry the person they loved? That is an absolute personal choice and not a government choice! Please support all of the bills and vote yes on them. And please please begin to think with your conscious and put what you “think” will get you re elected or more money aside. You were elected to vote on issues based upon facts and laws and not re election or money.
I write in support of these amendments. Reproductive care should be with a woman, her loved ones and her health care provider - Not the government. Instead let’s invest in maternal care and programs that help families stay healthy. Let Virginia move Forward w safeguarding our right to marry whom we love.
People who have served their time for the felony crime they have committed should reenter society with their full rights as citizens of the Commonwealth. It should not be up to one person to determine the restoration of their rights and these rights to be swayed by who is governor at the time of their release. I firmly believe in this free society that we need this amendment to assure all people can vote.
To the committee: I write in strong support for approval of all three proposed Constitutional Amendments HJ1, HJ2 and HJ9. With regard to HJ1, It is past time to enshrine the personal right to reproductive freedom with protections from penalty and/or prosecution by the state. HJ2 would ensure that every Virginian who meets qualifications is given political rights including the right to vote. As for HJ9, marriage between two individuals is a fundamental right, and should be free of an antiquated and restrictive version of "marriage" that is no longer valid because of the Obergefell v. Hodges case. Thanks to the committee for consideration of all of these Constitutional Amendments. " Let freedom ring" across Virginia. Thank you, Brenda Bengtson
Virginia should enshrine that every individual has the fundamental right to reproductive freedom and that the right to make and effectuate one's own decisions about all matters related to one's pregnancy cannot be denied, burdened, or otherwise infringed upon by the Commonwealth. It is not the commonwealth's place to be a middleman for medical decisions. Virginia should enshrine that every person who meets the qualifications of voters set forth in the Constitution of Virginia shall have the fundamental right to vote in the Commonwealth and that such right shall not be abridged by law. There is no need to have additional hoops to jump through and require that the Governor or other appropriate authority to have the ability to deny the fundamental right to vote. Virginia must repeals the constitutional provision defining marriage as only a union between one man and one woman and provide protection and equality for it's people. The Commonwealth and its political subdivisions must be required to recognize any lawful marriage between two parties and to treat such marriages equally under the law, regardless of the sex, gender, race, or disability of such parties; to do any less denies humanity to the commonwealth's people. It is vital for Virginia to protect the dignity and humanity of it's citizens and by amending the Commonwealth's Constitution to enshrine and protect it's citizen's rights.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in Virginia's Constitution.
I strongly support these three bills to protect our freedoms.
It is important that women in Virginia are protected in their bodily autonomy (HJ1), that the state expands voting rights for citizens of the state (HJ2), and that individuals are allowed to marry regardless of their sexual orientation (HJ9).
Restore their rights! A community consists of equals. How can reformed individuals feel accepted and part of society if there are restrictions to their rights and a person.
I strongly support these three proposed amendments to the Virginia Constitution. Ensuring reproductive freedom is crucial for bodily autonomy and healthcare equity (HJ1). Safeguarding the right to vote and removing discriminatory barriers is vital to a healthy democracy (HJ2). Repealing the outdated prohibition on same-sex marriage and affirming the right to marry regardless of gender (HJ9) promotes equality and protects fundamental civil rights. These amendments will bring Virginia’s laws in line with modern values of freedom, equality, and justice for all citizens.
This should be a fundamental principle of our justice system. We have no hesitation in stripping away rights when someone breaks the law and is convicted, and the same should apply when they have paid their debt and are released back into society. How can anyone consider themselves fully reintegrated if their basic civic rights are not restored? Our nation was born out of a small but powerful event: citizens were being taxed without any say in how their society was governed. Aren't we repeating that same injustice today? "No taxation without representation!"
Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. Oppose HJ 9. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly support these three proposed amendments to the Virginia Constitution. Ensuring reproductive freedom is crucial for bodily autonomy and healthcare equity (HJ1). Safeguarding the right to vote and removing discriminatory barriers is vital to a healthy democracy (HJ2). Repealing the outdated prohibition on same-sex marriage and affirming the right to marry regardless of gender (HJ9) promotes equality and protects fundamental civil rights. These amendments will bring Virginia’s laws in line with modern values of freedom, equality, and justice for all citizens.
Hello House Privileges & Elections Committee, I am writing to voice my support for HJ1, HJ2, & HJ9. I wish for these Constitutional Amendments to be included on the ballot in order to secure our individual freedoms. My medical decisions should only be mine to give, not anyone else. I should be able to have autonomy over my body as an American citizen. To restrict reproductive freedom for women is to admit that America has become comparable to the Taliban. This also applies to marriage. No one has the right to force their personal opinions on love onto strangers & their relations through the government. As someone in an interracial marriage, where would the policing end? Will my marriage be next? Sincerely, Nelliel Azrael Herrera Knoefler
I am in favor of HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. The people of Virginia deserve the right to bodily autonomy and access to reproductive medical care. They deserve the right to marry the person they love. They also deserve to have their right to vote restored once they are released from incarceration. As another individual said here, Virginia is one of the best states in the continental US and with these changes, we can make it even better.
When someone has served their time and has been released back into society, they should be invested with all political rights, including the right to vote. The right to vote is sacred.
I favor HJ 2 which clarifies that certain citizens in Virginia have the right to vote. I call attention to these sentences: “The amendment also provides that a person adjudicated by a court of competent jurisdiction as lacking the capacity to understand the act of voting shall not be entitled to vote during this period of incapacity until his capacity has been reestablished as prescribed by law.” What is the problem that needs to be solved? Many people under guardianship (for financial matters, for example) do understand voting and do wish to vote. But the courts, when assigning a financial guardian, often strip away also their right to vote --- without taking time to investigate the person’s capacity or desire to vote. The person and their guardian may not even be aware that the right to vote is being taken away. When they later discover it, they have no information on how to regain the person’s right to vote. I hope that the proposed Amendment, HJ2, will clarify and rectify this situation.
I support automatic restoration of voting rights to people who have been convicted of a felony after they have served their sentence. I support the restoration of voting rights to individuals who have been legally determined by a court to lack the mental capacity to understand voting after their capacity is reestablished, as determined by law.
I support these amendments because in a nation that values and prioritizes freedom, I believe that individuals should have autonomy over all their decisions. If we are to truly have our unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the government cannot restrict our autonomy in any way. Furthermore our government has a responsibility to protect our rights and by amending our state constitution we are solidifying that protection in the event that there are challenges to these rights federally.
I urge support for automatic restoration of right to felons who have served their sentence, and of bringing the restoration of right to people who have been deemed metally incapacitated in line with legal requirements.
Pass HJ1! All people have the right to reproductive freedom and choice. Pass HJ2! The right to vote should be restored. Pass HJ9! Marriage equality should be a constitutional right!
You have no idea the relief and security it brings me to know that our elected officials are working to ensure our freedoms. Thank you for your work to protect reproductive rights, voting rights, and marriage rights. Thank you for doing what's right for your constituents. Please vote yes to HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 to protect everyone whose voice may not be heard.
I have an 18 year old daughter telling me she’s afraid to have children one day. She fears if she’s in a life threatening condition, she will be left to die. As a therapist in Herndon Va, her sentiment is felt by ALL of my clients. College aged and young adult women are AFRAID to start a family. They also feel at a loss that they may lose the right to make medical decisions, including access to birth control. Support bill HJ1!!! Also support HJ2- people with disabilities and individuals that have served their time in prison deserve to have a voice. Restore their rights. Support HJ9- how dare anyone we elect feel they can determine who we love and who we marry. This is a right. Love is love.
Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
HJ 1 - I strongly oppose enshrining a "right" to abortion in Virginia's constitution. A policy of unlimited abortion should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 - I support HJ2. All who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 3 - I oppose HJ3, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
I fully support all 3 of these amendments in the pursuit of keeping Virginia a place where people of all kinds are honored and respected. This is the appropriate application of the power of states' rights and what we should want to be known for.
I don't support automatic restoration of rights upon release from prison. At the very least, anyone on parole should complete that satisfactorily, before reinstatement of voting. Also, repeat offenders should have a wait period to ensure they do not offend again.
HJ1 - I oppose the so called right to an abortion. It degrades all human life. HJ2 - I support the restoration of rights. HJ9 - I oppose the changing of marriage. It is from the beginning between a man and a woman. All are not made to be married.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. HJ 1 also paves the way for future legislation threatening the choice of doctors, nurses, and other medical professionals in providing care that protects both women and the unborn. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1 : I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ2: I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
All of these bills reflect the importance of Virginians being able to exercise their agency in all areas of their lives. HJ1 speaks to the enshrined principle of doctor/patient confidentiality, which needs to be preserved for all persons but especially for women of childbearing age. HJ2 ensures the guarantee of one person/one vote on which our democracy was based - having expanded to recognize many more than male property holders. HJ9 ensures that "family" is not defined by law as specific to gender or earnings capability or household roles or any other false construct but, rather, by those who are in the relationship and dedicate themselves to this family in a public and purposeful way. For all these reasons, please vote to ensure that these bills pass.
I am in support of HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9, because I strongly believe that individuals deserve to choose if they get an abortion, vote, and who they marry. These rights should not be taken away.
The current restoration process is not well advertised or understood—especially by people whose education is limited, who are in poor heath and/or have no computer or internet. An example as follows: While canvassing I encountered an elderly Viet Nam veteran whose health was fragile but he wanted to vote. We took him to the polls to vote from the car but he was informed that he could not because he was a felon. He thought he had applied for restoration of his rights in the spring at the Essex County Clerk's office but they had no record when I went to talk to them. His felony was for distribution of marijuana years ago. There may have been confusion about the expunging his record versus restoration of rights but the clerk's office apparently did not help him with it. I finally applied on his behalf and with his permission online. This man served our country. How can this be right?
Speaking of HJ1, and HJ9. We need to return to our Christian roots and honor God in this state. Protect the unborn and respect that God instituted marriage to be between one man and one woman.
Voting Rights Restoration The majority of Virginians believe that all qualified citizens should have access to the ballot, including those who have served their time for felony convictions and people with disabilities who want to participate in the democratic process. I support an amendment to the Virginia Constitution to guarantee that people who have been disenfranchised due to a felony conviction will have their rights automatically restored upon completion of their sentences, without additional steps or paperwork after they are no longer incarcerated, and to ensure people with disabilities never lose their rights without an appropriate judicial finding. This has never been a partisan issue. Both Democratic and Republican governors have chosen to restore voting rights to thousands of citizens; however, Virginia's current governor has reversed the trend. People should not be permanently defined by their past mistakes. Virginians who have successfully served their time should be able to fully rejoin civic life. It is time for Virginians to act to amend our Constitution to create a routine restoration process that reflects fair accountability and encourages civic engagement.
HJ 1 – I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored. HJ 9 – I oppose HJ 9 Marriage is the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly support all three constitutional amendments. "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." HJ1 - Reproductive rights are human rights. Deciding whether to have a child and when to have a child is deeply personal and fundamentally tied to bodily autonomy and personal liberty. Human dignity demands that these decisions be at the sole discretion of each individual. Both pregnancy and childbirth have potential health risks, including death. Every person has a constitutional right to life, and to protect that right, must be empowered to choose whether to be subjected to that risk. This amendment will protect against violation of this right by government interference with personal decisions about pregnancy and medical care. On a practical level, reproductive freedoms have a positive effect on the health and economic well being of communities. Reproductive freedoms allow for prospective parents to family plan with intention, including bringing a child into the world when they are financially, emotionally, and physically ready to provide a good life for that child. Pregnancy can be dangerous, and robust medical care, including access to the full spectrum of reproductive care, is essential to protect those who choose to try to carry a child to term in the hopes of starting a family. We are already seeing how restrictions on reproductive freedoms exacerbate these dangers play out in real time as maternal mortality rates rise in states with restrictions on reproductive rights. I wholeheartedly support Virginia setting the example in protecting reproductive freedoms with this amendment. HJ2 - Chandra Bozelko said it well: “Voting is a right that belongs to all citizens, not just good or reformed ones. Denying citizens their rights isn’t an appropriate form of accountability because citizen status can’t be punished out of someone. [I]t’s not punishment. It’s power-stripping.” I support the important step forward this amendment takes in removing an unnecessary barrier to voting rights imposed upon felons. HJ9 - All people deserve the right to marry who they love; this right is inherent in the principle of personal liberty. There is no valid argument for government restriction of marriage rights on the basis of race or gender. The only arguments put forth by those who oppose marriage equality are rooted in religion; separation of church and state requires these arguments be cast aside. It is imperative that freedom of choice in marriage is protected. I unequivocally support this amendment.
I would like to declare my support for HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. HJ1 would ensure that everyone in Virginia would have the right to reproductive freedom and would allow for abortion to be used as one of the life-saving options should something go wrong during the nine months of pregnancy and that's because in order for a baby to be born healthy, the mother must be healthy throughout the process. Also, people who have completed their prison sentences should have their voting rights reinstated, especially if they have completely reformed as citizens since their imprisonment. And lastly, people in the LBGTQ+ community should also have the right to marry and marriage is for everyone of all genders, sexes and races.
I strongly support all three amendments: HJ1 - Fundamental right to reproductive freedom HJ2 - Right to vote - restoration of rights HJ9 - Marriage equality I realize this is the first step in a multi-year process to pass these amendments. I respectfully ask that you do all you can to move them forward. We need to make sure Virginia protects our rights and freedoms!
The majority of Virginians believe that all qualified citizens should have access to the ballot, including those who have served their time for felony convictions and people with disabilities who want to participate in the democratic process. I support an amendment to the Virginia Constitution to guarantee that people who have been disenfranchised due to a felony conviction will have their rights automatically restored upon completion of their sentences, without additional steps or paperwork after they are no longer incarcerated, and to ensure people with disabilities never lose their rights without an appropriate judicial finding. This has never been a partisan issue. Both Democratic and Republican governors have chosen to restore voting rights to thousands of citizens; however, Virginia's current governor has reversed the trend. People should not be permanently defined by their past mistakes. Virginians who have successfully served their time should be able to fully rejoin civic life. It is time for Virginians to act to amend our Constitution to create a routine restoration process that reflects fair accountability and encourages civic engagement.
Virginia is one of only two states (Kentucky is the other) that does not have an automatic restoration of voting rights process for citizens returning home from the carceral system. Shame on us! Once a citizen has been released from prison, they should be truly free and encouraged to participate in our legislative process. SUPPORT HJ2!
I support these amendments because in a nation that values and prioritizes freedom, I believe that individuals should have autonomy over all their decisions. If we are to truly have our unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the government cannot restrict our autonomy in any way. Furthermore our government has a responsibility to protect our rights and by amending our state constitution we are solidifying that protection in the event that there are challenges to these rights federally.
I am writing to support the right of those individuals who have been released from prison. Once they have 'paid their debt,' I believe they should be allowed to vote once again. Sharon Nuzik
HJ1: I support this bill and reproductive freedom because it doesn’t make sense to restrict a medical procedure that can save a person’s life and it doesn’t make sense to have a child born to a parent who doesn’t want them or to overburden the adoption or foster care system even more in the case that child born from an unwanted pregnancy is put up for adoption—for both the quality of life of parents and the unborn child, abortion must stay legal. HJ2: I support this bill because a person who pays taxes to a government—regardless of previous felonies which they’ve already paid for in fines or incarceration—should be able to vote and return to being active members of society if they so wish. HJ9: I support this bill because the right to lawful marriage is a liberty that should not be restricted based on the sex, gender, or race of the individuals involved.
Please include these items to continue basic protections for all individuals as equals under the constitution and the law.
Herring “right to abortion” amendment – HJ1 • I strongly oppose HJ1 which enshrinses a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. • HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. • HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. • A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. • Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. Parker – restoring voting rights – HJ2 • I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. Sickles – marriage – HJ9 • I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. • Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I am in support of amendment HJ2. If the country has decided, for better or worse, that it is perfectly legal for a convicted felon to hold the presidency, there is absolutely no reason to prevent convicted felons from voting for the same office.
The HJ2 bill is a very important bill in my opinion. People who are incarcerated are disproportionately disadvantaged due to race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, or other compounding social factors. This leads to what amounts to voter suppression in my eyes for people who have previously been incarcerated. A good example of this in my eyes is past drug charge offenders that have recovered, which is a group of people I have interacted a good amount with over the past year. A lot of these people are focused on truly providing good to their community, and I feel that if they already served their time they deserve to have a voice that counts in public elections. The HJ9 bill is also incredibly important for the civil rights of citizens of Virginia. Allowing marriage between two women or two men, and validating the marriages that exist already, is an important step towards freedom for the people of this state. Not allowing same sex marriage would be not only bigoted, but extremely disheartening and invalidating for people that love someone of the same sex.
With gratitude to the Virginia Catholic Conference and as a born-and-raised Virginian, I would like to join my support to their stances on the three proposed bills: HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment - I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. - HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. - HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. - A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. - Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights - I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage - I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. - Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. Sincerely, Mary Clare Durel
I strongly support the HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 amendments to the Virginia Constitution. America should be a place that guarantees the fundamental rights and choices of women, celebrates and encourages love in all forms, and protects the act of voting for all qualified citizens. If the nation as a whole can't ensure these rights, I hope that my state at least can.
Abortion is a right that every American should have. Early in the pregnancy, the fetus is not a sentient being like the person carrying it, and it's rights should not be prioritized over the rights of the sentient, conscious individual carrying the fetus. Young girls have been forced to bear the child of their rapist. That is not something anybody should have to do. In instances where the fetus will harm or kill the person carrying it, that person should be allowed to get an abortion. In instances where the person carrying it was raped, they should be allowed to get an abortion. If somebody cannot care for this child, they should be allowed to get an abortion. Attempting to remove this basic bodily right is illogical at best and cruel at worst. All people deserve to vote. It is an obligation and right as an American citizen. Does committing a crime remove your citizenship? Are you no longer an American because you committed a felony? What about the context, what if you were extremely young and you are now a changed person? Should people not be allowed any say in their leader because of an action taken in their past? Marriage is not between a man and a woman. Queer people have spent so many years oppressed because of who they love and it is ridiculous that in 2024 there are still people who believe it is immoral and wrong. It's natural (many animals are gay) and as long as it is between two consenting individuals, what goes on in their love life is no ones business but theirs. Are there really not any bigger issues to be worried about?
I support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Choices about an individual's body belong in the hands of that individual. There should be no involvement of the government, or religious institutions, in decisions that are best made between an individual and their medical providers. No one should be put in a situation where they could be forced to make harmful and difficult choices about their reproductive health for fear of legal repercussions. Voting rights should be guaranteed for every Virginia citizen. If a convicted felon is allowed to run for federal office, then someone released from incarceration should be able to vote, without having to be confirmed by the Governor. All citizens should have the right to have their voice heard and their vote counted. Legal marriage should not be restricted or discriminated against because of race, sex, or gender.
I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states.
I wish to let you know of my strong support for all three: HJ1 - Fundamental right to reproductive freedom HJ2 - Right to vote - restoration of rights HJ9 - Marriage equality I realize this is the first step in a multi-year process to pass these amendments. I respectfully ask that you do all you can to move them forward. We need to make sure Virginia protects our rights and freedoms! Thank you!
The right to reproductive freedom in HJ1 is paramount to the health and welfare of all people in the state of Virginia. This bill would ensure that a mother is not forced to endure any pregnancy without their consent. It would also prevent the cruel treatment of having to endure delivering a stillborn child that could have been removed months prior to delivery. Forcing anyone to undergo such a fate is cruel and inhumane. It is also worth noting that disallowing family planning measures would place an undue burden on Virginia taxpayers. Not only would we be compensating for the healthcare of a child being placed into the adoption system, but also the associated costs of placing a child up for adoption. This process is also cruel for the person who would be placed up for adoption as it does not take consideration as to whether this decision would lead to a life of pain and misery. In summary, abortion is a fundamental right because of the suffering that is prevented from this procedure. I support HJ2 from a more commonsense perspective. This bill ensures that no person is disenfranchised from voting in the state of Virginia. It is only fair to allow those who have been incarcerated to have a voice in the operation of this state. Finally, I also support HJ3 for the unalienable right of any people to marry each other. There is no framework for who is or is not allowed to marry in the United States Constitution. This being said, there is also a predominant LGBTQ+ community here in the state of Virginia. To deny the right to marry for people in this community would also deny their right to the pursuit of happiness as well as the unenumerated rights outlined by the ninth amendment of the US Constitution. Even with this said, there is no harm and only public welfare to be gained by passing this bill. Each and every one of us has the freedom to our own spiritual beliefs and as such the right to mary any consenting adult follows in line with said beliefs.
I strongly support HJ1, and the fundamental right of reproductive freedom for all individuals. I believe that all decisions concerning pregnancy should be between a woman and her health care provider. I support HJ2 - I believe that once an individual has completed serving a sentence for a felony and has paid his or her debt to society, that voting rights should be restored without requiring action by the governor or other state officials to restore his or her civil rights. I also support the provisions regarding persons who lack the capacity to understand the act of voting. I strongly support HJ9 and the affirmative right to marry of two parties regardless of sex, gender, or race , and the requirement that the Commonwealth shall recognize all such marriages and treat them equally under the law
H1- "Right to Abortion" I am a Roman Catholic who strongly opposes HJ1--"Right to Abortion" m Virginia's Constitution, significantly because an unborn baby is not a component of his/her mother's body, but instead is a separate human being with his/her own unique spiritual soul given that baby at the moment of conception. In this day and age, a prospective mother has sufficient resources to decide not to conceive a child--through medical methods, Natural Family Planning (NFP), or abstainance--all very effective and inexpensive and effective means to remain childless if one takes the time to purchase the (of-the-shelf) preventitives; the willingness to study and utilize ones=;s fertility schedule or lack thereof; or the self-control to remain celebate . There are also "day-after" pills that can effective in immediately used in the case of rape which block fertilization of the prospective mother's ovum. There are also a plethera of organizations willing to place unwanted babies and children of all ages, with adopters desirous of providing children with good and safe homes. HJ2: Resoring Voting Rights: I will only support HJ2 for those individuals who have completed their sentences and wish to have their voting rights restored IF they have shown a firm resolve to become lawful citizen of both the Commonwealth of Virginia, as well as the US Government and especially accept the US Constitution & Amendments as our one form of Government. HJ9-Marriage: I oppose HJ9 which wold remove the Constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Not onlyi does marriage have an original designand urpose that predates any nation, religion or law; it especially protects and supports its primary mission to create and bring up children who will use their gifts and talents to improve this world with their good works. A marriage, whether natural (based on common law), judicial (independent of specific faith systems), and spiritual (faith-based) all improve the lives of our citizens because a formal, life-time (if possible), committment is both psychologically sound, as well as a healthy way to, live minimizing the number of often fatal veneral diseases, including AIDS, some types of cancer. I thank you, in advance, considering seriously the opinions I have here stated. Very Respectfully Yours, Tracy MacGovern McCauley, Stanardsville, VA
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. A person's right to reproductive freedom and bodily autonomy is a fundamental to a free society and restriction of such rights in other states is causing a rise in maternal mortality rates. Healthcare providers should not be penalized for protecting the rights of their patients. A person's right to vote should be reinstated upon completion of their incarceration and should not be left to the whims of whomever is in office. Marriage should not be restricted because of race, sex, or gender and the language in the Constitution should be amended to reflect this.
I am in support of HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. These amendments will allow for for people to have autonomy in all their decisions.
I am strongly in support of HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Reproductive rights are human rights. Without women having autonomy over their bodies, many women will die from health complications, not to mention bring babies into non-ideal situations. The parents suffer and the children suffer. Additionally, I am strongly in support of the right for lgbtq+ people to marry. There is no scientific basis for the opposition to gay marriage rights, the only opposition comes from certain interpretations of religion or pure emotion. These religious perspectives and emotions should not be forced onto the choices of other people.
I strongly oppose HJ1 please vote to reject this amendment. I support HJ2 please vote FOR this amendment. I oppose HJ9 please vote to reject this amendment. Thank you!
Yes to HJ2 (voting rights), no to HJ1 and HJ9. I.e., NO to killing babies, and NO to defining marriage as anything other than what it is.
I support bill HJ1. Abortion is a term used medically regardless of whether the act was intentional or not. Impeding reproductive freedom impedes access to appropriate care for both the mother and the fetus. I support bill HJ2. I believe felons should have the right to vote once they have served their sentences. I support bill HJ9. I believe the right to marry should be available to all humans regardless of sex, gender, or race.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 as I believe each of these amendments are integral to upholding the American values of: liberty and the pursuit of happiness. To revoke these rights from people, to treat them as other and undeserving of these freedoms, is completely unethical under The Declaration of Independence and the values of America as a whole. Not to mention basic morality. I believe it is imperative to protect our citizens liberty and rights to bodily autonomy--in both marriage and a person's pregnancy. As well as allowing citizens, regardless of transgressions, to have the right to vote as they live within and participate in our society and community as well. Virginia is one of the best states in the continental US. I believe with these amendments we will be even better. It shows love, care, and respect to all our citizens. I believe in the good heartedness of our representatives and hope that these amendments will inspire other states to follow suit in the goal of creating a better world for every persons.
Because of the rushed nature and secrecy of this meeting, in addition to not allowing any In person testimony, as a citizen of Virginia, I am most concerned and sense a sinister nature to these proceedings. You have been elected by the citizens of Virginia and, by keeping us in the dark, is NOT what you were hired by us to do. We demand to have a voice! I implore you to listen to the citizens before changing language and/or rushing through Bills that are not in line with what the majority of Virginia citizens support. That is unethical and you will be held accountable, hopefully by the citizens of Virginia when you next come up for re-election but certainly by God, our creator, whether you choose to acknowledge Him or not.
HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 all address important individual rights. Reproductive freedom is essential to women’s ability to think and act for themselves, keep themselves safe, and made decisions to govern their own lives like any other adult. It is also essential to protect the rights of LGBTQ people, who deserve to marry like anyone else. Any threat to their rights is a threat to us all. Finally, in a time when there are regular threats to people’s access to the polls, we must protect their voting rights. The Commonwealth of Virginia must not bow to pressure from the federal government and must instead protect the rights of ALL its citizens.
I wholeheartedly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Bodily autonomy is a fundamental freedom that every person should wish to protect; voting rights should not be left to the whims of whomever is in office; and marriage should not be restricted because of race, sex, or gender. These are basic tenets of a truly free nation.
I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states.
Please support these 3 constitutional amendments that work to enshrine the rights of every day citizens. People should have the right to determine what is best for their healthcare with trained medical professionals, not politicians. Persons who have fulfilled their debt to society through incarceration should be able to vote once released; they pay taxes and should be able to have a voice. Adults should have the right to marry and receive the same protections and rights that have been bestowed upon heterosexual couples. Government should be protecting and uplifting its citizens, not tearing them down. Please be a positive example to the rest of the country.
HJ1(support)-government have no saying in ANY reproductive rights on individuals AT ALL, no state no province no federal not even the slightest. HJ2(against)-criminals are still human as long as they are citizens they should be able to vote HJ9(support)-and people should marry who ever they want, imagine you love this person and they love you back and government tell you you're wrong because they quote some random book.
HJ 1 - I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 - I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 - I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I STRONGLY support these three amendments to our state constitution. Protecting women’s reproductive freedom, restoring voting rights to people convicted of felonies, and ensuring marriage equality are all deeply important to me and the people I love. I want to protect and support all Virginians', rights, regardless of their political affiliation, with these three constitutional amendments!
I support all three bills.
I encourage the committee to return to a one-day election process, with voter ID and a valid current address. No same-day registration. Virginians should be assured of integrity at every point that those elected are indeed the choice of the people, and not nefarious forces.
HJ1 - Herring: I support that all individuals should have access to the fundamental right to reproductive freedom. Not all situations are black and white. What benefit is there if we deny or restrict access to a potentially life saving solution for said person? Such a heavy decision needs to stay between patient and provider. HJ2 - Bennett-Parker: If an individual continues to pay State and Federal taxes after being reformed/released, then I believe the right to vote should be able to be reestablished as well. HJ9 - Sickles: I support that marriage between individuals should extend to LGBTQ+ residents. Pursuing happiness should extend to all.
I support all 3 bills to amend Virginia's constitution to protect civil rights and personal liberty.
I encourage the committee to return to a one-day election process, with voter ID and a valid current address. No same-day registration. Virginians should be assured of integrity at every point that those elected are indeed the choice of the people, and not nefarious forces.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
Please see the attached document expressing Prison Fellowship's support for HJ2. Thank you.
A child developing in her mother’s womb suffers during an abortion. Please spare the baby that. There is lots of help available to a mother- to - be, during her pregnancy and after the birth of her baby. I know that abortions are done for many reasons. Each one of those babies has no voice; you are her voice. Thank you.
In addition to HJ1, I also support HJ2 and HJ9. If a convicted felon is able to win an election and hold office, any Virginian and American should be able to vote in an election. In regards to marriage, every Virginian should have the right to choose who they want to marry regardless of gender.
If a felon can be elected president these should be allowed to vote.
This amended bill allowing prior felons to vote after serving their sentence without any additional action is a fair and just bill. Give people their constitutional right back! What is the fear behind not doing so? Are they less than? A convicted felon can be president!
HJ1 I am opposed to enshrining a right to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. It severely jeopardizes the few protections for unborn children ;such as ban on partial birth abortion and parental consent )this is wrong and must be stopped), abortion until birth should not be allowed. I urge you to work on policies that uphold the dignity of every mother and child. HJ2 I support All people who have served their punishment should have their rights restored. I oppose HJ9 that removes the constitutional provision of marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any government or law.
- Ranked choice voting weakens the democratic process by opening the door for one party rule in a state. - Reproductive freedom is a euphemism for abortion access and the fact that the term is being used proves that it is a scandal. An individual does not have the right to kill a person they find inconvenient. To enshrine this as a constitutionally protected right would be to invite the continued judgment of God upon our state. Magistrates have the duty to restrain evil not establish it in law. - Marriage is pre-political and it is the duty of any sane society to honor and protect it. It is a permanent covenant between a man and a woman to establish a family (God willing) which in turn builds healthy communities. To merely reduce it to some kind of relationship between any two individuals is a detriment to our society and an offense against God. We’ve already seen the devastation wrought by divorce, adultery, and sodomy by judicial decree and statute. Why make it even more ingrained in our legal system?
I oppose enshrining unrestricted access to abortion through HJ1. Both the life and dignity of the mother as well as the human infant should be protected. A constitutional amendment would preclude any possible protections to unborn human life. I am in favor of HJ2. Once a person has paid their debt to society through the justice system, their citizens right to vote should be restore
I strongly support the HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 amendments to the Virginia Constitution. America should be a place that guarantees the fundamental rights and choices of women, celebrates and encourages love in all forms, and protects the act of voting for all qualified citizens. If the nation as a whole can't ensure these rights, I hope that my state at least can.
I am writing to express my strong support for the proposed constitutional amendments concerning marriage equality, voting rights, and reproductive freedom. These amendments are vital steps toward ensuring that all people in our state are treated with dignity, respect, and fairness under the law. 1. Marriage Equality Amendment: I fully support the repeal of the constitutional provision that defines marriage as between one man and one woman. Marriage is a fundamental human right, and every individual, regardless of their gender or sexual orientation, should have the ability to marry the person they love without discrimination. This amendment brings our state into alignment with the Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell v. Hodges and reaffirms the core values of liberty and equality for all citizens. 2. Voting Rights Amendment: I wholeheartedly support the provision that ensures the right to vote is not abridged for any person who has completed their incarceration for a felony. Our democracy is strongest when every citizen has an equal opportunity to participate in the electoral process. By allowing those who have served their time and re-entered society to regain their voting rights automatically, we are taking an important step toward restorative justice and ensuring that all voices are heard. 3. Reproductive Freedom Amendment: The right to make personal decisions about one’s reproductive health is a fundamental human right. This amendment is crucial in protecting individuals from government interference in their personal choices regarding pregnancy. I strongly believe that every person should have the autonomy to make decisions about their body and their future, without fear of prosecution or discrimination. This amendment safeguards the health and well-being of individuals, and it is imperative that we ensure these rights remain protected in our state. In conclusion, these amendments are critical to securing a more just and equitable future for all Virginians. I urge our lawmakers to pass these amendments and to continue working toward a state where every individual, regardless of gender, race, sexual orientation, or background, is treated with the respect and dignity they deserve. Thank you for your consideration.
HJ1 - For decades, the Democratic Party has urged us to support them, suggesting that voting for them is essential to protect Roe v. Wade rather than fully codifying it into law, which would ensure abortion access as a legal right. Women in Texas are facing serious risks due to inadequate medical care while doctors are constrained in their ability to help. We must ensure that Virginia does not follow this troubling path. HJ2 - If an individual with 34 felony convictions can become president, why do we continue to behave as though those with felony records do not deserve the restoration of their voting rights? Individuals who have been released from prison have fulfilled their sentences and deserve the opportunity to reintegrate into society. HJ 9 Gay marriage is the law of the land. These families deserve the same ongoing protections afforded to married families in the Commonwealth of Virginia.
Please support HJ1, HJ2 and HJ9. Being able to commit to the person you love, having authority over your own body, and being able to exercise your voting rights once imprisonment is over should forever be inalienable rights in our great state.
EVERY citizen of this country should have the right to vote, regardless of past or present charges/felonies. If this country can elect a felon for president, then we have absolutely ZERO right to remove anyone else’s rights to vote.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
PLEASE OPPOSE HJ1 I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2 All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ9 Marriage is the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1 Reproductive Health Every Virginia resident should have access to affordable, quality health care, including abortion, birth control and the privacy to make reproductive choices. Abortion is not always the ending of ending a pregnancy it it also a medical procedure that terminates a nonviable pregnancy and saves a women's life. Abortion should be legal, safe, and the decision left to those who are pregnant with guidance from medical professionals. True democracy depends on equal rights for all people. Not only is the right to a safe and legal abortion a matter of personal freedom, it’s also a major factor in the movements for racial and economic equality. Black individuals, and all underserved communities, already experience unfair barriers and limited access to adequate healthcare services. HJ2 Voting Rights The majority of Virginians believe that all qualified citizens should have access to the ballot, including those who have served their time for felony convictions and people with disabilities who want to participate in the democratic process. I support an amendment to the Virginia Constitution to guarantee that people who have been disenfranchised due to a felony conviction will have their rights automatically restored upon completion of their sentences, without additional steps or paperwork, and to ensure people with disabilities never lose their rights without an appropriate judicial finding. HJ9 Marriage Equality The 2021 polls from the Public Religion Research Institute found that 71% of Virginians support the right of same-sex couples to marry. In 2006, 53% of voters supported the ban of same-sex couple marriage. This huge swing shows the massive shift in public opinion on this issue of marriage, and it is clear evidence that the antiquated ban should no longer be a part of Virginia’s constitution. It’s only fair to revisit a political question that has shown such a vast change since it was first broached. With the removal of women’s protections with the destruction of Roe v. Wade, it is possible that marriage equality will be destroyed on a national level as well. Virginia must take the lead to protect all citizens. Thank you. Anne Alston CD11
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly support these bills. This is about freedom.
AAUW Virginia feels that every citizen in Virginia has the right to vote. Those convicted of a felony should be entitled to the reinstatement of their rights as a full citizen upon their release from prison. To not do so, creates a category of second class citizen, where one is a citizen, but does not have the basic rights and responsibilities of a citizen. It also leads the government open to charges of favoritism and corruption when some can regain their full citizenship and others cannot, even though all legal conditions have been met. This would level the playing field. Therefore, AAUW-VA urges the passage of HJ2.
Please support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as I understand is the case in the vast majority of states.
I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states.
No restrictions on abortions. No liability for abortions. No criminality for abortions. Marriage is a human right between amongst consenting adults. Population in prisons and jail is counted for the purposes of population for redistricting, no human should be denied the right to vote.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution. Without them, my husband and I are choosing to not to have children due to the risk. Women should have control of their bodies. These decisions should be made between a woman and her doctor no one else. These rights must be protected.
Most Virginians believe all qualified citizens deserve voting rights, including those who’ve served felony sentences and people with disabilities who wish to vote. I support a constitutional amendment for automatic rights restoration upon sentence completion, with no extra steps, and to protect the voting rights of people with disabilities unless a court rules otherwise. Voting rights should not be permanently lost due to past mistakes. Virginia should amend its Constitution to ensure fair restoration and foster civic participation.
Most states restore voting rights to those who have completed their sentences. I support HJ-2 which mandates that all people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored.
Today I would like to address critical issues that affect our society and the fundamental rights of individuals. We must protect marriage equality and ensure the preservation of same-sex marriage. This is not merely a matter of legal recognition; it is about upholding the dignity and rights of all individuals to love and marry who they choose without fear of discrimination. Additionally, we must prioritize access to affordable healthcare, including necessary services such as abortion. This is a matter of bodily autonomy—our bodies, our choices. Every individual must have the right to make informed decisions regarding their own health and well-being, free from judgement or limitation. As we consider amendments to legislation, let us not forget the importance of these issues. It is imperative that we advocate for policies that protect these rights and ensure equitable access to healthcare for every member of our community. Thank you for considering these vital amendments.
I am writing to support HJ2, specifically to amend the Constitution to allow any person convicted of a felony to have all political rights (voting) reinstated to him/her immediately upon release from incarceration, and without further action required of the convicted felon. I believe strongly that all citizens should have the privilege of voting in elections if they have already paid their debt to society. It is simply wrong to continue to punish someone for the rest of their lives for a mistake made in the past and for which they already served time. It is incumbent upon our government to treat all citizens with respect and dignity, and not allowing a person to vote based on a belief that somehow felons can never be reformed, is not only disrespectful, but undermines the sacred rights of all Virginians to have a voice in elections. Please vote yes for HJ2.
As to all three fast-tracking proposed amendments: You are aiming to skirt a deliberative process with robust discussion among all Virginians. You are doing this because you KNOW that your desire to harm and eliminate unborn children when you deem a child inconvenient (despite having been a child yourself!) and to alter what is true marriage which creates families where children are raised with one mother and one father are not popular measures and thus you act as surreptitiously as you can. How underhanded! I oppose HJ 9 and you should reject HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. I demand that you reject HJ 1. Abortion kills children and those children are the future of Virginia. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child and raises those children in families with one father and one mother.
I don’t want any change to the Virginia constitution enshrining the death of unborn babies.
Please oppose those bills!!
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in most states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion, or law.
I support a path for criminals to restore their voting rights; however, since sentencing is very inconsistent, I believe the restoration should be determined by the maximum penalty for the crime. In this way every person convicted of the same crime would lose their voting rights for the same period of time regardless of the imposed sense.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution. Please secure the fundamental human rights for all Virginians. I fully support reproductive freedom, restoration of voting rights, and marriage equality.
HJ1: I OPPOSE. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. It could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2: All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ9: I OPPOSE HJ 9. Marriage has been defined as the union of one man and one woman since before definitions were needed. Our current state constitution reflects this truth passed down through millenia. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law, and is proven to be the best possible medium for raising healthy children.
An old addive states: my right to swing my hand stops at your nose. The right for a woman to terminate the life of an unborn person, stops at the child’s unique DNA, heart beat and brain waves. No one has the right to kill a healthy human being. I adamantly oppose granting any such right that grants a parent to kill their offspring as a means of family planning.
HJ1: I support the right of every individual to have reproductive freedom HJ2: I support the restoration of voting rights to those who have completed the terms of their punishment for crimes HJ9: I support marriage equality for every consenting adult human beings
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution. As a practicing psychiatrist, I believe these rights are incredibly important to supporting the mental health of the citizens of Virginia.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. I know you are trying to ram these bills through due to the results of the election. You obviously have learned nothing from the people speaking their voice. You should be ashamed of yourselves. One day you will stand before Our Lord and Judge. May God have mercy on your souls.
HJ1 - • I strongly oppose enshrining a right to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. This bill would severely jeopardize the few protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ2 - I support this bill.
I oppose HJ1 because it is harmful to families: men, women , children, and our society. Abortion should never be offered as an option to women because it does so much harm to them and it’s shrouded in lies of the evil it causes. We do not have the right to harm an innocent person nor should we ever want to. I support restoring voting rights to reformed persons. HJ2 I oppose redefining marriage which we also have no power to do so and we would be lying if we pretended to. Our society can support those unable to marry in more helpful ways. HJ9
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
RE: HJ1: I support the right of women to have access to all services which support their private choices in matters of reproductive health. RE: HJ2: I support the restoration of voting rights to those who have completed the terms of their punishment for crimes RE: HJ9: I support marriage equality for all adult citizens.
HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 are essential to securing fundamental human rights for all Virginians. As an active and consistent voter I fully support reproductive freedom, restoration of voting rights, and marriage equality. My vote will always be for candidates who stand for and defend these rights
I am against HJ1. A "Right to Abortion" should not be cemented into our constitution. It would take away the ability to make any future adjustment and in one action take away existing laws without examination. It would be more unifying and better for everyone to give needed help to both mother and child. I am for HJ2 to restore voting rights to those who have completed their sentences. I am against HJ3 since we must do all we can to ensure the health and well being of future Virginia citizens. There have been many studies done that show that an intact family with a mother and father is the way to do this
• I oppose HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. • I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. • I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1 It is my religious belief and my legal belief that the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution and its Virginia corollary confirms that an unborn child at the moment of conception is a person with the right to life. Thus, I oppose HJ1. Labelling abortion as a "right" is simply contrary to reality and natural law. HJ 2 I support the restoration of voting rights for those persons whose voting rights have been lost due to criminal convictions once their incarceration has been completed. HJ 9 I oppose HJ 9 as it, too, contradicts reality and natural law. What is "up" is "up" and what is "down" is "down" and legislation cannot say otherwise. 1984 is alive and well if this Resolution results in an amendment to the Constitution of Virginia.
I support All three bills
• I oppose HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. • I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. • I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I adamantly oppose HJ1,HJ2, and HJ9 into the Virginia Constitution. The stance of all 3 proposals is MUCH too extreme and abhorrent for society as well as the VA Constitution. As a retired Mental Health RN I have seen the results of women who have had abortions to include inpatient hospitalization due to the after affects. Women deserve better than this. Abortion delivers one dead baby and one wounded woman!
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for ensuring these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose HJ 1 enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states.
Please protect our rights and freedoms. We want body autonomy and the freedom to marry as we see fit. Religion does not belong in politics. You have a duty to defend our rights against religious ideals that marginalize the people you represent.
I support these amendments because in a nation that values and prioritizes freedom, I believe that individuals should have autonomy over all their decisions. If we are to truly have our unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the government cannot restrict our autonomy in any way. Furthermore our government has a responsibility to protect our rights and by amending our state constitution we are solidifying that protection in the event that there are challenges to these rights federally.
I support HJ2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states.
HJ1: I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ2: I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ9: I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I support HJ1 under the basis of women should have the right to decide what happens with their bodies. I support HJ2 under the basis of mistakes should not render a human unable to participate in democracy. I support HJ9 under the basis of no outside force should be able to stop two consenting adults from getting married.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
1. Every Virginian should have access to affordable, quality healthcare, including abortion and birth control, with the freedom to make private reproductive choices. Abortion must remain safe, legal, and guided by medical professionals. Protecting reproductive rights safeguards other freedoms, such as marriage equality, contraception access, and privacy in personal decisions. 2. Most Virginians believe all qualified citizens deserve voting rights, including those who’ve served felony sentences and people with disabilities who wish to vote. I support a constitutional amendment for automatic rights restoration upon sentence completion, with no extra steps, and to protect the voting rights of people with disabilities unless a court rules otherwise. Voting rights should not be permanently lost due to past mistakes. Virginia should amend its Constitution to ensure fair restoration and foster civic participation. 3.Virginia’s marriage equality ban no longer reflects the beliefs of its citizens. A 2021 poll showed 71% of Virginians support same-sex marriage, up from just 47% in 2006, highlighting a major shift in public opinion. Given this change, it’s time to remove the outdated ban from Virginia’s constitution. With the rollback of Roe v. Wade, national marriage equality could also be at risk, and Virginia should lead in protecting all citizens' rights. If the state truly is “for lovers,” it must affirm that love is love for everyone.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
“I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.”
Good afternoon: I am writing to request representation of my views in Virginia. Regarding HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment: I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. Babies should be protected before they're born--not killed. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Please reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. Regarding HJ 2 – restoring voting rights: I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. Regarding HJ 9 – marriage: I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. God established marriage as a sacred relationship between a man and a woman.
HJ 1 I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Respected House Privileges and Elections Committee Members and associated Delegates: I submit the following points for urgent consideration in your final deliberations concerning HJ(s) 1; 2; and 9: HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment: - I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. - HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. - HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. - A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Strongly urge Rejection of HJ 1. In place of expanding abortion, I respectfully urge you to work instead for non-abortion oriented policies that affirm the life and dignity of every Virginian mother and child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights: I support passage of HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored. Complimentary to the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage - At it's core would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. - Marriage has an original design and purpose, founded not by Humanity alone, that predates any nation, religion or law. Strongly urge Rejection of HJ 9. As a fellow citizen and veteran, I am sincerely appreciative of both the opportunity to submit this written statement and; your professional review/consideration/action based upon them regarding the HJ(s) under your responsibility. Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions/comment/etc.. Respectfully, Edward James Stanton, Jr. edwardstantonjr@gmail.com (703) 780-0661
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, oand HJ9. Enshrining reproductive health protections for women and protecting their physicians is personally important to me. I shudder to think how my life might have been endangered when I required medical treatment for three miscarriages if I had needed to have them in a state like Texas in the current legal climate. My son might have grown without a mother if I hadn’t had the required healthcare in a timely manner. Delays can injure or kill a woman. Ultimately, I believe reproductive health decisions are between a woman and her health care providers. Regarding HJ9, I support it because I believe firmly the decision to be joined in marriage is up to the parties involved, regardless of their gender/. gender identification. If people don’t approve of such unions, then they should decide only for themselves not to engage in such a union .
I strongly support HJ1, HJ1, and HJ9. Every Virginian and human being should have access to safe reproductive healthcare, the right to vote, and the right to marry whomever they love. How can we even call ourselves Americans if we are trying to restrict the freedoms of our peers? This is about empowering people to make the best decisions for their own lives. I strongly urge committee members to pass all three bills.
I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
As a professional who works in the field of mental health, I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Regarding HJ1: Keep church and state separate. Many are stating their opposition to a constitutional right to abortion on moral grounds. I'm supporting a constitutional right to abortion based on scientific grounds. Science is not up for interpretation the same way religion is, so to say that abortion is "wrong" lacks evidence to support the claim. Babies are not being murdered as they are horrifically portrayed to be, however women who are unable to seek a safe abortion or have complications that may require an abortion are dying unfairly and in inhumane ways. Abortion is a medical procedure. Women deserve to have access to any and all medical procedures they may need. To deny abortions in Virginia will place many women at risk and they may attempt to seek an abortion in another state or in unsafe ways. If "abortion trafficking" laws are put into place, travel would be restricted for those seeking this medical procedure and possibly lead to punitive criminal charges and further place strain on jails that are not equipped to manage overpopulation, medical issues, or inmates requiring mental health care. Regarding HJ2: Everyone should have the right to vote in a democracy. Many criminals have mental health issues that contributed to their crimes. Not allowing them to exercise their right to vote is discriminatory. Regarding HJ9: This bares repeating - keep church and state separate in Virginia. Since 1888 the US Supreme Court has declared at least 14 times that marriage is a fundamental right for all. Article 16 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights guarantees “men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion… the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.” Not allowing LGBTQ+ people to marry the person of their choosing is cruel and will lead to increase in crisis response as this population encounters higher rates of suicide attempts.To deny the LGBTQ+ population the ability to marry their partner also strips them of rights in medical emergencies. Since election day, there has been a 700% increase of crisis calls within the LGBTQ+ community according to the Trevor Project. This is a vulnerable population that already experiences shunning from family for being who they are, please do not make them feel shunned by their state as well. I will end with the golden rule: "treat others the way you want to be treated." Thank you for taking time to consider my input.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
I am writing to support the restoration of voting rights for all people who have completed their sentences. In our elections we need to hear from all. We cannot continue to punish those who have served their sentences. They need to have their full rights of citizenship restored. Thank you
I strongly support all 3 bills: HJ1, HJ2, & HJ9. As a citizen of the United States, to maintain our individual freedoms includes and not limited to: rights to vote and freedom of speech, freedom to love who and how your heart knows best, and to have bodily autonomy over your own health care (private relationship between doctors and patients/individuals). Thank you, respectfully. <3
These three bills are common sense legislation that should flow across party lines. As a conservative, I can fully support all three of these items. They all support a freedom to choose. Freedom to choose your own fertility decisions, freedom to vote, and freedom to live and marry who you choose within the boundaries of the law. This is a no brainer, vote yes.
All persons have fundamental rights. All persons should have the right to marry who they choose. All women should have the absolute right to determine what is right for their health and their bodies.
I strongly support the passage of HJ1 - Right to Reproductive Freedom and HJ2 - Right to Vote. HJ1 protects the rights of women, in consultation with their family and medical professionals to make the right decision regarding their reproductive healthcare. Using public policy to limit a women's right to make these choices is prioritizing a narrow definition of life advocated by some christian conservatives over both science and other religious beliefs. Our public policy should not be so narrowly defined that it infringes on another's basic human rights, and self-determination is a human right. HJ2 removes a barrier from the full re-integration of returning citizens back into society. Our history shows us how felony disenfranchisement was used to reduce the number of black men who could vote. Even misdemeanors (e.g. crimes of poverty) were reclassified as felonies to restrict access to the ballot for black men. Let's get rid of this artificial barrier and restore voting rights to our returning citizens who have completed their sentence. Let's do everything we can to welcome back into our communities and help them embrace this responsibility as citizens.
I support HJ 2. To recognize the dignity of all, please support HJ2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. Thank you.
I am in support of this amendment.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
The majority of Virginians believe that all qualified citizens should have access to the ballot, including those who have served their time for felony convictions and people with disabilities who want to participate in the democratic process. I support an amendment to the Virginia Constitution to guarantee that people who have been disenfranchised due to a felony conviction will have their rights automatically restored upon completion of their sentences, without additional steps or paperwork after they are no longer incarcerated, and to ensure people with disabilities never lose their rights without an appropriate judicial finding. This has never been a partisan issue. Both Democratic and Republican governors have chosen to restore voting rights to thousands of citizens; however, Virginia's current governor has reversed the trend. People should not be permanently defined by their past mistakes. Our current President elect who was convicted of a felony in New York would not have been able to vote for himself in the most recent election if he had been a Virginian. He was allowed to vote because New York doesn't remove felons right to vote except while they are incarcerated. Virginians who have successfully served their time should be able to fully rejoin civic life. It is time for Virginians to act to amend our Constitution to create a routine restoration process that reflects fair accountability and encourages civic engagement.
- HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment. -- I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. -- HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. -- HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. -- Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights. - I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting -- rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage. - I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. -- Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ1, and HJ9 and urge committee members to pass all three bills. Every Virginian and every American deserves access to safe reproductive healthcare, the right to vote, and the right to marry whomever they love.
HJ1 - I strongly oppose enshrining a "right" to abortion in Virginia's constitution as it would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect unborn children before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion until birth is a fundamental tragedy and not a fundamental right. While I support a woman's right to do whatever she wants with her own body, I don't believe she has the right to do whatever she wants with someone else's body - in this case, the baby whose composition is a genetically unique and living human being. Instead of expanding abortion, I encourage you to work instead to affirm the life and dignity of every mother and child. HJ 2 - I support HJ 2 as all people who have completed their sentence should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 - I strongly oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage is the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion, or law and should not be manipulated for political gain.
I write to strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. All three of these actions would stand in strong defiance against those who would seek to deprive Virginians of the rights and freedoms they have enjoyed for many years. HJ1 works to ensure that all medical decisions are between a patient and their doctor, and are not to be subject to public inspection and court of public opinion. HJ2 stands to guard the constitutionally guaranteed right to participate in our democracy against those who would try to unjustly silence others as a way to illegally and immorally influence our democracy. HJ9 stands to guard freedoms long enjoyed by many Virginians from those who seek to indefensibly impose their own religious or social views upon the lives of others.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9.
Voting right should be restored to those who have served their sentence for a crime,
Governor Gilmore would not restore voting rights to felons and so they suffered an undue penalty after serving their sentences. For that reason alone, I support restoring a person's right to vote upon release from prison!
The majority of Virginians believe that all qualified citizens should have access to the ballot, including those who have served their time for felony convictions and people with disabilities who want to participate in the democratic process. I support an amendment to the Virginia Constitution to guarantee that people who have been disenfranchised due to a felony conviction will have their rights automatically restored upon completion of their sentences, without additional steps or paperwork after they are no longer incarcerated, and to ensure people with disabilities never lose their rights without an appropriate judicial finding. This has never been a partisan issue. Both Democratic and Republican governors have chosen to restore voting rights to thousands of citizens; however, Virginia's current governor has reversed the trend, in a shameful return to Jim Crow sensibilities. Virginians who have successfully served their time should be able to fully rejoin civic life. It is time for Virginians to act to amend our Constitution to create a routine restoration process that reflects fair accountability and encourages civic engagement.
I oppose this amendment. The Virginia constitution provides for a review by the Government to restore the voting rights of convicted felons.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1 - Herring: OPPOSE. HJ1 I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights: OPPOSE I strongly oppose HJ2. Convicted Felons should not vote. HJ 9 – marriage: OPPOSE I most strongly oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation nto protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental rig Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law
I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states.
I strongly oppose HJ 1 abortion is not a constitutional right and should not be enshrined. You should work instead on making the places where abortions are performed adhere to the same rules and regulations as outpatient surgical centers and urgent cares. Underage women should have to have the consent of an adult, since it is a legal requirement for all surgical procedures if underage to have a parent or guardian sign. Abortion can result in hemorrhage, infection, and loss of fertility, Do more for helping women who are pregnant and want to keep their babies by providing services. We voted a state on the marriage amendment several years ago so it should be put to the people again if that is to be redefined and not voted on by one individual making a decision for the rest of us. I appose HJ9
Please OPPOSE the HJ1 amendment as abortion or killing of infants is inhumane. Birth control should not be allowed to be conducted by taking the life of a baby. It is not a "right" but a "slaughter." Restoring Voting rights, HJ2 is to be supported since people have completed their required prison sentences. I also so OPPOSE HJ9 amendment that would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose. Stop calling something "marriage" when it goes against natural law.
Once conceived a life should never be aborted. Once a convict has served their sentence they should regain voting rights. Leave the one man one women law intact !
I urge my representative to Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. This is a blatant overreach by fear-mongering politics and only seeks to further divide us. Life is human and should be respected whether at the beginning or end of life. Please support policies that give women and children protection, not more rules. I also urge you also to stop working to change the definition of marriage. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. There is nothing that prevents people from living together--many don't even bother with marriage these days and for those of us who believe in the sanctity of marriage, this is a misguided attempt to cater to a very small and unique subset of citizens.
Hello House Privileges and Elections Committee, I am writing to voice my support for HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. I wish for these Constitutional Amendments to be included on the ballot in order to secure our individual freedoms. Thank you and Sincerely, Doc-Marten Knoefler
(1). In pursuit of your right to have an abortion should not mean that I have to pay for it. The moral objection being paramount, the idea that I have to pay for this procedure is totally absurd and unacceptable (2). Marriage is between One man and One woman. Society has already made many variables to this basic truth and making it financially rewarding, will continue to degenerate our moral values.
I support HJ1 and HJ9 for enshrining these essential freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I strongly advocate against HJ1; it is important to rally for the support of human rights to LIFE rather than to methods of destroying it. How can any human being in good conscience support the right to kill another innocent child just because it might be an inconvenience? HJ2. I support the right of incarcerated persons to regain the right to vote after completing their sentences. HJ9 There is a fundamental difference between men and women, and an unwritten law that has sustained the world for centuries that marriage should be between one man and one woman--anything else could lead to a marriage between a person and a bridge or an animal or anything else. What a travesty for humanity!!!!
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. Other people may engage in some contractual or civil union, but marriage is the union of a man and a woman for the purpose of having children. Please preserve the family. Destroying the family will destroy the communities, the society and the country.
I support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for including these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I support all three bills
Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. There should be some limits for the mother who miscarries, and freedom to be counceled by doctors. Also A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1 - Herring - I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in VA’s constitution. HJ2 - Bennett- Parker - I support HJ2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ9 - Sickles - I oppose HJ9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as a union of one man and one woman.
HJ1 - Herring: I strongly oppose amending the Virginia constitution to enshrine the so-called right to abortion. Life is a fundamental right of all human beings, and it is our first and primary right. No human being may have his or her right to life infringed upon. This is most especially true for human lives that are most vulnerable. It's our duty as men and women who seek the common good to protect the lives of pre-born children. Our efforts should be directed towards supporting pregnant women and helping them obtain the resources and the support to bring life into this world. Every human being has dignity, and we must lift up that dignity. HJ2 - Bennett-Parker: Once an individual has completed a sentence, he or she should undoubtedly have voting rights restored. We would be joining most states in our country by restoring the right to vote to those who have faced the consequences of their actions and have re-entered society. HJ9 - Sickles: Marriage and family is the most fundamental unit of any human society. It has existed well before governments and states. It has existed before any system of laws. It stands to reason then that marriage is not a human invention. Consequently it is not up to us as humans to define marriage. Men and women were made, complimentary, by our Creator, God Almighty. His design is set up for human beings to flourish. If we desire to flourish, we must maintain His desing of marriage as between one man and one woman. Anything different will further dimish human ability to live life to its fullest intent.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I wholeheartedly agree with, and support, the words and sentiments to which this my comment is attached. EHT.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. Thank you
The Commonwealth has taken steps to ensure that the right to life is protected for even the worst offenders after being tried and convicted. So too, our youngest and most vulnerable Virginian’s deserve the right to life and protection against any individual, including their mother, who would put them to death. In addition, the protection of marriage between one man and one women is a fundamental building block of society and must be safeguarded. Regarding, HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
These bills are an affront to the majority of Virginians. They are the product of an elite out of touch with reality.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
To Virginia House Delegates, I live in HD 12 (and am proud to have voted for my Delegate- Holly Seibold) and want to express my strong support for all three of the Constitutional Amendments listed below but especially HJ1. Virginia needs to be an example for all the States of how we protect our citizens rights. Hopefully you will all support these Amendments as well and I know I will be volunteering and doing all I can to make sure these are passed. Thanks, Robin K. Tingley Reproductive Health - Every Virginian should have access to affordable, quality healthcare, including abortion and birth control, with the freedom to make private reproductive choices. Abortion must remain safe, legal, and guided by medical professionals. Protecting reproductive rights safeguards other freedoms, such as marriage equality, contraception access, and privacy in personal decisions. The right to choose also supports racial and economic equality, as marginalized communities face greater barriers to adequate healthcare. Reproductive decisions affect overall well-being, including financial stability, housing, employment, and family support. Voting Rights Restoration - Most Virginians believe all qualified citizens deserve voting rights, including those who’ve served felony sentences and people with disabilities who wish to vote. I support a constitutional amendment for automatic rights restoration upon sentence completion, with no extra steps, and to protect the voting rights of people with disabilities unless a court rules otherwise. Voting rights should not be permanently lost due to past mistakes. Virginia should amend its Constitution to ensure fair restoration and foster civic participation. Marriage Equality - Virginia’s marriage equality ban no longer reflects the beliefs of its citizens. A 2021 poll showed 71% of Virginians support same-sex marriage, up from just 47% in 2006, highlighting a major shift in public opinion. Given this change, it’s time to remove the outdated ban from Virginia’s constitution. With the rollback of Roe v. Wade, national marriage equality could also be at risk, and Virginia should lead in protecting all citizens' rights. If the state truly is “for lovers,” it must affirm that love is love for everyone.
I strongly oppose and strongly urge you to oppose the Bill known as HJ-1. I support, and urge you to support, the Bill known as HJ-2. I strongly oppose, and strongly urge you to oppose, the Bill known as HJ-9. Jeff Fortman 240.660.8956
I am writing in full support of all three bills. HJ1: The state has no business interfering in the decisions made between a woman and her healthcare professionals. A constitutional amendment to protect abortion rights is essential for ensuring long-term reproductive freedom. Enshrining these rights provides a stable safeguard against future political shifts, offering citizens a clear and durable guarantee of bodily autonomy. By embedding these protections in the state constitution, lawmakers uphold individuals' ability to make personal medical decisions without interference. Constitutional protection also addresses public health concerns, ensuring safe access to care and reducing the risk of dangerous, unregulated alternatives. Above all, enshrining abortion rights affirms a commitment to individual rights and supports the health and well-being of all residents. HJ2: Individuals previously convicted of a felony who have completed their sentence should have the chance to be reintegrated into society, and not disenfranchised from the opportunity to vote on their representation. HJ9: Any two individuals who love each other should share the right to have their marriage recognized by the state. As decided by the US Supreme Court in Obergefell v. Hodges, the existing law is unconstitutional. This law must be amended to be in compliance with the United States constitution.
HJ 1 strongly oppose HJ 2 agree HJ 3 oppose
My daughter-in-law's birth mother got pregnant in high school. She gave her child up for adoption. Because she chose life, our family has three beautiful grandchildren. HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment • I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. • HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. • HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. • A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. • Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights • I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. Marriage and the family are the central institutions of social life. HJ 9 – marriage • I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. • Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I believe all people have the right to determine what happens to their own bodies. As an AFAB (assigned female at birth), my girlfriend and I both suffer from hormonal imbalances that would render pregnancy dangerous for both ourselves and any potential fetus. Between my girlfriend's removed ovary, my polycystic ovarian syndrome, and my prolactinoma (tumor), our reproductive systems aren't even likely to be fertile. To know that despite all this, we could still be forced to carry children is a scary thought. It's a scary thought not only because of our health conditions that could render potential pregnancies inviable or dangerous, but also because of the implications of what a possible pregnancy would mean for my girlfriend and I. We don't want to raise children, so we'd never be caught dead applying for a surrogate. If either of us were to become pregnant, it could only be a result of sexual assault. It is sad that these are the hypothetical extremes I have to spell out for you in order to make you understand why your laws have no place in my womb. Please protect our reproductive rights. We want to get married and old, not pregnant and forced to carry.
I strongly support HJ1 and HJ2 and HJ9. Every Virginian has a fundamental right to reproductive healthcare, the right to vote if qualifications are met, and the right to marry who they love, regardless of gender.
I strongly oppose and reject codifying a right to Abortion in the Virginia Constitution. It’s not a fundamental “right” but a fundamental “tragedy”. What little safeguards the unborn child has will be denied and for any reason aborted and thrown out like garbage. Is this the kind of state and country we want when we can’t even respect and protect the most vulnerable among us?? Those who have served their time should have their voting rights restored. Marriage should always be defined as between one man and one woman. It’s the truth that has guided our civilization throughout history ,before any religion, culture or governments. No one has the authority to remake or construe the true definition of marriage to suit their own needs or desires. KEEP MARRIAGE IN THE CONSTITUTION AS IT IS CURRENTLY DEFINED BETWEEN ONE MAN AND ONE WOMAN.
Please protect the right to life for the unborn and the dignity of life-bearing marriages between a man and a woman. HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment **I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. **HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. **HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. **A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. **Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights **I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage **I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. **Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose H1J as abortion is a tragedy, not a right, that remains a blight on our state. I oppose HJ 9, since the purpose of marriage is to have and raise children in a secure environment, which is of direct concern to the state. I strongly support HJ 2, as all people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored. Our justice system should be restorative, not punitive, and restoring voting rights is part of the reintegration process.
HJ1 - Please reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. Abortion is not a "right" because murder is not a right, and abortion is murder. HJ2 - I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ9 - I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. Undermining marriage undermines the fabric of our society. Studies have shown that children raised in households with their married mother and father are far more successful than children raised by single parents or homosexual guardians. It is your duty to promote laws that promote the welfare of Virginia's citizens rather than harming Virginia's citizens, whether they be pre-born or older. Please reject HJ1 and HJ9. Please approve HJ2.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I fully support these bills, HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Every citizen of Virginia deserves the right to reproductive healthcare, the right to vote if they meet the qualifications, and the right to marry who they love.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I am strongly opposed to HJ 1: the "right to abortion amendment" that would enshrine the right to abortion to VA's Constitution. It would jeopardize the ban on partial birth abortion and parental consent which is just plain WRONG. It could also stop any future legislation to protect innocent babies before they are born. Unlimited abortion up until birth is barbaric and should be stopped immediately. Please work to provide policies that affirm the dignity of every mother and child. Please protect women and children from this awful scourge on our citizens and nation. I strongly support HJ 2: and believe all people who have served their sentences should have their voting rights restored. I strongly oppose HJ 9: that would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage between one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. It's time to stop the madness!
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states.
HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Protect women and their children from abortion. What a sad state that Virginia wants to enshrine this "right" to kill one's unborn children. We can and should be better than this. When a person's sentence is over, their voting rights should be restored. A marriage is and always be between one man and one woman. Since the beginning of time. Why do we allow others to attempt to re-define this basic fact?
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ2 - I support this bill which supports democratic principles by allowing citizens who have served their sentences to regain their voting rights without enduring procedural barriers.
I woud s=approve for lesser crimes
HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose HJ-1. I support HJ-2. I oppose HJ-9. Thank you for your attention.
HJ 1 – Herring I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 –Bennett-Parker I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – Sickles I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment: I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. Reject HJ 1. I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights: I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage: I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
My wife and I oppose all three house proposals. Abortion is murder, plain and simple. Murder is a crime, not a "right". What about the "right" of the child to live? We need to focus on the child, not the mother. Even after a convicted criminal has served his sentence, he needs to show that he has learned his lesson and will not commit a crime again. I would propose a five-year period after completing his sentence that he be crime free before his voting rights are restored. As far as HJ9 is concerned, marriage is a sacrament, ordained by God, and it is to be between a man and a woman, period.
HJ1 - opposed HJ2 - support HJ9 - opposed
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states.
1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment: I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – Restoring voting rights: I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I support HJ2. The right to vote is not only fundamental to a fair and equitable democracy, it also affirms the status of the individual as a member of society and of the community in which they reside. All those who have served and completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored. Doing so will enable themselves persons to better integrate back into the community if they know they have a voice. Please vote YES to this bill.
I fully support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. It is imperative that these rights be enshrined and protected. Never, in the history of our nation and the human race, have we ever regretted protecting all human rights.
• Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. • I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. • I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
With respect to HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Please Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. With respect to HJ 9 – marriage I strongly oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. Thank you sincerely for attention to these issues, Dr. Evelyn Clingerman Fredericksburg, VA 22406
A House committee is fast-tracking proposed amendments on abortion, marriage and voting rights! In an unusual fast-tracking move, the House Privileges and Elections Committee will be hearing, and presumably voting on, three constitutional amendment proposals tomorrow morning at 11:00am: an extreme “right to abortion” amendment, an amendment to repeal the one-man/one-woman marriage provision, and an amendment to restore voting rights. Committee approval of these resolutions would advance them to the House floor, for a vote early in the 2025 session. The process to amend Virginia’s constitution is multi-year and involves a number of steps, but this latest action must be met with a high volume of voices. We urge you to submit written comments by clicking here and using the form provided. Here are some suggested talking points: HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1 - I 100% support this bill. HJ1 marks a significant step forward for women's rights in Virginia. This law reinforces the fundamental right of women to make personal choices about their reproductive health, ensuring freedom and autonomy for all. Supporting reproductive freedom means upholding equality, respect, and individual agency for every woman across the Commonwealth. HJ2 - I 100% support this bill. HJ2 represents a powerful commitment to the democratic principles of Virginia by ensuring that every eligible citizen has the fundamental right to vote without unnecessary barriers. By allowing citizens who have served their sentences to regain their voting rights automatically, this measure reinforces the belief in second chances and the right to participate in shaping our communities. It also thoughtfully addresses concerns around mental capacity, allowing only those who are currently able to understand the act of voting to participate, while providing a clear path for restoring rights if capacity is regained. This is a forward-thinking step toward an inclusive and fair electoral process in the Commonwealth. HJ9 - I 100% support the passing of this bill. As an LGBTQ+ individual serving the Commonwealth, this amendment represents more than policy—it’s about safeguarding the hopes and dreams that many of us hold for a future where our relationships are respected and our rights are secure. In times of political uncertainty, especially with a new administration that could bring shifting priorities, it’s easy to feel fear for what lies ahead. This amendment provides a sense of stability and assurance, reinforcing that our rights and our families are valued, protected, and legally recognized. It’s a vital step toward a future where we can continue to serve and contribute with confidence, knowing that Virginia stands for equality and inclusion.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution. As a mother there is nothing more important than my daughter having control of her body. These decisions should be made between a woman and her doctor no one else. These rights must be protected.
I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I support HJ 9. Lawful marriage is a right between two parties that exemplifies the freedom our country is founded on. People should not be discriminated against and not allowed marriage based on their sex, gender, or race.
I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment - I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. - HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. - A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. - Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights - I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage - I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. - Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I believe that the right to vote, the right to marriage, and the right to women’s healthcare are essential and so important to the well being of our city and our state. I am writing this to support those values.
I support HJ2. Once you have paid your debt to society, your rights should be restored.
Virginia is one of two states that don't have an automatic restoration of voting rights process for citizens returning home from the prison system. Currently, Virginia's constitution places the process of restoration solely in the discretion of the governor's office. It is imperative that the right to vote for all of Virginia’s eligible citizens is protected. We need a process that is clear and consistent and not dependent on the current governor. Please support HJ2.
I support HJ1 - fundamental right to reproductive freedom, and HJ2 - right to vote. Both of these amendments are needed in Virginia's constitution to live up to ...."liberty and justice for all".
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I do not believe a “right” to abortion should be a part of VA’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in VA law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
No to radical abortion amendment. The right to life is precious and must be defended from the radical left. No to the destruction of marriage definition as one man and one woman.
I strongly oppose HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment, enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment • I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. • HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. • HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. • A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. • Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights • I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage • I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. • Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I, as a veteran born and raised in this beautiful Commonwealth, I fully support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. It is imperative that these rights be enshrined and protected. Never, in the history of our nation and the human race, have we ever regretted protecting all human rights.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. As a voting Virginia resident, I want to know my voice is heard!
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
HJ1 I oppose abortion as life begins from the moment of conception and ends at natural death. Please do not legalize abortion at anytime in Virginia. HJ2 - Once someone has served out their sentence and are released from prison, I support restoring their right to vote. H9 Please recognize marriage as between only a man and a woman and not same sexes.
HJ1 - I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ2 - I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ9 -I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I simply want to express my support for bills HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9, constitutional amendments providing (1) a fundamental right to reproductive freedom; (2) qualifications of voters/right to vote; and (3) marriage between two individuals, respectively.
If you want me to support you, then do this.
If a person has served his/her sentence as prescribed by law, they should be eligible to vote as prescribed by the law. The penal system is about punishment for proven illegal actions but citizen rights should be restored upon meeting time served and any other restrictions as determined by written law.
I am commenting on behalf of the Justice and Witness Action Network – VA of the United Church of Christ. We urge you to support HJ2. As people of faith, we embrace the Biblical mandates of forgiveness, justice and restoration that this amendment embodies. Returning citizens should have their Constitutional right to vote restored to them automatically upon completion of their sentences so they can choose the people who represent them and be free to engage fully in civic life.
Block 1 - HJ1: Firstly, I'm appalled that women's reproductive rights are on the chopping block once again as if we didn't already do this 50 years ago. The fact that women have to beg for these basic rights while rapists get a slap on the wrist and men are not legally bound from day one for child support & healthcare to the child in utero and after birth is madder than the hatter. Secondly, women should be able to choose their life and what that life will look like 20 years from that moment in their life. Letting women die because the child is no longer viable and will kill the mother if they continue well after the ridiculous 6-weeks, to which you would have to be a phsycic to know by the way, is beyond the measure of any sane thought. Women's lives matter, their sanity matters, their health matters, their overall well-being MATTERS! Finally, Should this madness continue, men should be punished just as harshly be it vasectomy or castration. You may think or find that extreme, but that is the very same boat you are placing women in my humble opinion. There is no room for religion here and especially not personal opinion--the only voice that matters is the woman single-handedly experiencing a pregnancy and the drastic changes either option entails. Block 1 - HJ2: IF Trump, a convicted felon, can run for Presidency, then absolutely a reformed/released inmate should have a say in how this country is led and who they choose to lead them. How can we say prisons were created to reform &and guide prisoners to a better path forward on their way out, but take away their voice, their choices for employment, and their overall life being reduced to a person they don't even recognize anymore in the worst of ways. Let them vote, give them every opportunity to do better, be better, and know better. Block 1 - HJ3: Human is human & life is life. Two consenting adults who deeply love one another should absolutely be able to marry one another, be it man to woman, woman to woman, or man to man. It's no one else business who they decide to spend their time and life with because the last time I checked my neighbors, mayor, senators, and congressmen/congresswomen were not paying my bills, sending my children to school, putting food on my table, or paying my taxes. Let them get married, have shared marital assets, and have the ability to pay their taxes with the filing status MARRIED. Could we stop being hypocrites cherry-picking bible verses and stop thinking our personal opinions and beliefs should affect the people that don't even share the same roof over their heads?
I fully support HJ1, J2, and HJ9 as amendments to the VA Constitution. The protection of the rights of our citizens should be front of mind for all of our electeds, and a priority for our General Assembly to take action. HJ1 -- Women have a fundamental right to reproductive freedom, to have agency over their own bodies. While is should be obvious to ALL, it isn't, so we need to have that right enshrined in our Commonwealth's Constitution. HJ2 -- The right to vote is just that, a right to vote. One's ability to vote should only be interrupted after a conviction, and only until they are freed. Persons who have committed crimes, have been adjudicated, and have satisfied their obligations to the Commonwealth should have their right to vote restored automatically -- not by any "case by case" consideration. Notice of such restoration should be provided to the person, both by the releasing institution and the law enforcement entity charged with following up after their release. HJ9 -- The right for two people to marry is a fundamental right, one that is indifferent to the sex, gender or race of the individuals. While religious institutions can refuse to perform a marriage, the political subdivisions, i.e. the Commonwealth cannot. While these three proposed amendments may seem superfluous to some, or offensive to others, to codify these rights for the protectees of the Consititution of the Commonwealth of Virginia is appropriate and necessary. Sarah E. Sussan Midlothian VA c
As the country transitions to a new administration , Virginia must enshrine these rights into our state constitution in order to protect the rights of its citizens. I support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9.
I fully support the automatic restoration of voting rights process for citizens returning home from the carceral system. Currently, Virginia's constitution places the process of restoration solely in the discretion of the governor's office. Just a very simple message: if someone who is guilty as charged of at least one felony on federal crimes can legally run as a candidate for the highest office of the United States with impunity, the automatic restoration of voting rights for those who have already paid their debt to society should not be a question of "if" but an answer of "it must and will".
I support ALL of these bills passing. As a mother who cannot afford and (for health reasons) should not have another pregnancy, reproductive freedom is CRITICALLY important for my family. I am also in an interracial marriage and with the concern for supreme court repeals, I want it in law that anyone of any gender, race, or sexuality can get married. Marriage equality had harmed no one and should be our RIGHT. The government should not get to dictate who we share property and tax returns with.
Given the changing administration, we must enshrine these rights into our state constitution. These are the very rights at risk at a national level.
I would like to voice my strong support for both of these amendments. HJ2 - Once an individual has completed his or her sentence they need to be reintegrated into society and encouraged to maintain productive, law-abiding citizenship. Restoring their right to participate in our electoral process is an important step in that reintegration, and demonstrates that they have resumed both the rights and the responsibilities of citizenship. HJ9 - As long as the two individuals involved are consenting adults, the state has no basis for determining that a particular marriage is invalid due to the respective race, gender, sex, or any other personal characteristics of the individuals involved. There is no benefit to the state or our society for discrimination, and very real harm is done to the individuals discriminated against.
I strongly support these bills, and I hope you will as well. Reproductive freedom should already be the law. No woman is an incubator. Every woman is a human being! If marriage is a religious union between 2 parties, then the government should have no say-so in the matter. If marriage is a governmental contract between 2 parties, then religious beliefs should have no bearing on it. Let people marry who they love! LOVE IS LOVE and boy, do we need some love these days. Felons who have served their sentence should be forgiven and allowed to restore their voting privileges to normal. ESPECIALLY since we will now have a felon running the highest office in our country.
As a city of Tichmond resident in the light of recent national and state policy changes I strongly support all 3 ammendments enshrining basic human rights to bodily autonomy, participation in the democratic process, and right to legal marriage. If Virginia truly is for lovers we must love all of our citizens equally and grant them the same rights
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution. Reproductive health is not murder. People should be able to be and marry who they wish.
I support YES to all three bills. Outlawing abortions does not get rid of them. It outlaws SAFE abortions.
I strongly support all three of these amendments. It is vital that we continue moving forward and keep Virginia feeling safe and welcoming to ALL.
I support all three bills and ask that they be passed. The rights to reproductive freedom, marriage between consenting adults, and the right to vote should not be denied to anyone.
These amendments have not been properly discussed or voted on by constituents. Unlimited murder of unborn babies is not a right. Convicted felons have never had the right to vote so it's unclear why you want them to. The marriage law is unnecessary. This entire session and vote is completely illegitimate and voting to pass these will prove you do not represent the will of Virginians.
I strongly support each of these three constitutional amendments. They are essential to the dignity and well-being of the citizens of the Commonwealth of Virginia. In order to be a thriving, successful community, economically and personally, individuals must be free to pursue their own happiness, make decisions about their own health care, and have their voices heard through the Democratic electoral process. The stronger the individuals in our communities, the better our communities and our Commonwealth will do as a whole. Therefore, I strongly support these constitutional amendments. Thank you for your work in bringing them to the public to vote on.
I am writing to express my support for HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution
I am writing to express my support for HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9.
My comment: I STRONGLY support these three amendments to our state constitution. Protecting my children's reproductive freedom, restoring voting rights to people convicted of felonies, and ensuring marriage equality are all deeply important to me and the people I love. I want to protect and support all Virginians', rights, regardless of their political affiliation, with these three constitutional amendments!
Please protect women’s and LGTBQ+ rights in Virginia. And voting rights should be reinstated to people who have served their time.
Please make sure that any rights restoration does NOT automatically restore the right to acquire or possess firearms or ammunition. Thank you.
Like the majority of Virginians, we believe that all qualified citizens should have access to the ballot, including those who have served their time for felony convictions and people with disabilities who want to participate in the democratic process. We support an amendment to the Virginia Constitution to guarantee that people who have been disenfranchised due to a felony conviction will have their rights automatically restored upon completion of their sentences, without additional steps or paperwork after they are no longer incarcerated, and to ensure people with disabilities never lose their rights without an appropriate judicial finding. Both Democratic and Republican governors have chosen to restore voting rights to thousands of citizens; however, Virginia's current governor has reversed the trend. People should not be permanently defined by their past mistakes. Virginians who have successfully served their time should be able to fully rejoin civic life. It is time for Virginians to act to amend our Constitution to create a routine restoration process that reflects fair accountability and encourages civic engagement.
I strongly support the passage of HJ1,HJ2 and HJ9 in order to enshrine these freedoms and protections in the Commonwealth of Virginia's constitution. Thank you.
Why aren't rights automatically restored once time have been served and financial debts has been paid by American citizens? Virginia being behind with Kentucky is unacceptable. Make the change immediately.
I am writing in support of all three, HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9, to be enshrined in the Commonwealth's constitution. In particular for HJ1, reproductive healthcare should be available to all women. This should not even be a question. As someone who works in women's health, those decisions should be made between the woman and her provider. So many complications can occur in every pregnancy. Denying the appropriate healthcare would be unconscionable.
I strongly support the passage of HJ1,HJ2 and HJ9 in order to enshrine these freedoms and protections in the Commonwealth of Virginia's constitution. Thank you
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth's constitution.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
Voting rights should be automatically restored to our citizens who have completed their sentence. Once they have served their time, their debt of society has been paid, and all rights, including voting, should be automatically restored. I also believe people with disabilities should be able to vote without constraint. We have no right to decide that someone else cannot vote. Please support this amendment.
I support all three proposals. Women have should have a constitutional right to make their reproductive decisions, a person who has been released from prison has already paid their debt to society and should have their voting rights automatically restored, and I support being able to marry the person you love
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 as they are important for safeguarding the rights of citizens of the Commonwealth.
I support these bills. These rights should not be subject to the whims of the public or the will of some of the public to force their religious beliefs on members of the Commonwealth who do not share them.
I vote YES on all of these bills. Everyone deserves life, liberty and pursuit to happiness. That includes consenting adults of the same sex to get married, the right to medical choice of your body (if men have the right and were all equal. Then women deserve the right to choose what happens to their bodies) and for citizens to have a viice electorally. I find it saddening that our country has came to the point that opposing protecting others rights is something they support. AMERICA IS ABOUT FREEDOM. NOT CONTROL. We should protect eachother and not attack one another because we "dont agree". Everyone deserves the choice even if it's not the one you would make. No human has the right to infringe on another humans rights. Period.
HJ1 Abortion should be legal, safe, and the decision left to those who are pregnant with guidance from medical professionals. True democracy depends on equal rights for all people. Losing our right to reproductive choice opens the door to the loss of other freedoms including other healthcare choices, marriage equality, access to contraception, and the right to engage in private, consensual intimacy without government interference. Not only is the right to a safe and legal abortion a matter of personal freedom, it’s also a major factor in the movements for racial and economic equality. Black individuals, and all underserved communities, already experience unfair barriers and limited access to adequate healthcare services. Our reproductive choices impact our physical and psychological well-being, including the foods we eat, where we live, our financial resources, and our capacity to gain and maintain employment and provide for ourselves and our families. Hj2 I support an amendment to the Virginia Constitution to guarantee that people who have been disenfranchised due to a felony conviction will have their rights automatically restored upon completion of their sentences, without additional steps or paperwork after they are no longer incarcerated, and to ensure people with disabilities never lose their rights without an appropriate judicial finding. This has never been a partisan issue. Both Democratic and Republican governors have chosen to restore voting rights to thousands of citizens; however, Virginia's current governor has reversed the trend. People should not be permanently defined by their past mistakes. Virginians who have successfully served their time should be able to fully rejoin civic life. It is time for Virginians to act to amend our Constitution to create a routine restoration process that reflects fair accountability and encourages civic engagement. HJ 9: A 2021 poll from the Public Religion Research Institute found that 71% of Virginians support the right of same-sex couples to marry. Virginia's Constitution and Laws should reflect the views of the majority of Virginians presently living under them, not the views of passed generations. If Virginia really is “for lovers,” it should recognize that love is love and grant all citizens the right to live their lives in peace.
Hello, I am writing to express my support for all three of these common sense amendments protecting and enshrining these basic civil rights for our citizens. A surge of backwards thinking is coming, fueled by ignorance, bigotry, and the false mandate that robbing our citizens of these rights is desired by any more than a small but vocal minority of Americans. The only way to protect against such unethical uprisings is to codify laws against them. Do not lose sight of what is right and just in the face of hatred or fanaticism, no matter how loud or fervent. Sincerely, Michael Baughan
The proposed Amendment HJ1 - Herring would allow people who can become pregnant to make the appropriate decisions for themselves and their families. This would allow people to navigate life without fear of becoming trapped in a relationship, being responsible for someone they cannot provide for, or being in enormous medical debt. This is extremely necessary for the safety and freedom of the people of Virginia. The amendment HJ2 - Bennett-Parker would allow the people the governing bodies make decisions on behalf of a say in who represents them. Everyone should have the ability to vote in favor of who represents their interests, regardless of criminal record. They exist within these systems upon release and their well-being should be included in the decisions made by their representatives. The proposed amendment HJ9 - Sickles would allow it to be written in law that any two people who want to enter into marriage may do so. While this is already the practice and has been legitimized by the Supreme Court, it would be a good faith move from our government to reinforce that decision by reflecting it in Virginia law. Everyone should be able to engage with marriage if they choose to do so, and laws that reflect otherwise are outdated and damaging to our society.
I STRONGLY support these three amendments to our state constitution. Protecting my children's reproductive freedom, restoring voting rights to people convicted of felonies, and ensuring marriage equality are all deeply important to me and the people I love. I want to protect and support all Virginians', rights, regardless of their political affiliation, with these three constitutional amendments!
Reproductive Health. HJ1 I believe that every Virginia resident should have access to affordable, quality health care, including abortion, birth control and the privacy to make reproductive choices. Virginians made their reproductive opinions clear when they chose to elect representatives who vowed to protect reproductive rights. Abortion should be legal, safe, and the decision left to those who are pregnant with guidance from medical professionals. True democracy depends on equal rights for all people. Losing our right to reproductive choice opens the door to the loss of other freedoms including other healthcare choices, marriage equality, access to contraception, and the right to engage in private, consensual intimacy without government interference. Not only is the right to a safe and legal abortion a matter of personal freedom, it’s also a major factor in the movements for racial and economic equality. Black individuals, and all underserved communities, already experience unfair barriers and limited access to adequate healthcare services. Our reproductive choices impact our physical and psychological well-being, including the foods we eat, where we live, our financial resources, and our capacity to gain and maintain employment and provide for ourselves and our families. Voting Rights Restoration HJ2 Data shows that the majority of Virginians believe that all qualified citizens should have access to the ballot, including those who have served their time for felony convictions and people with disabilities who want to participate in the democratic process. I support an amendment to the Virginia Constitution to guarantee that people who have been disenfranchised due to a felony conviction will have their rights automatically restored upon completion of their sentences, without additional steps or paperwork after they are no longer incarcerated, and to ensure people with disabilities never lose their rights without an appropriate judicial finding. This has never been a partisan issue. Both Democratic and Republican governors have chosen to restore voting rights to thousands of citizens; however, Virginia's current governor has reversed the trend. People should not be permanently defined by their past mistakes. Virginians who have successfully served their time should be able to fully rejoin civic life. It is time for Virginians to act to amend our Constitution to create a routine restoration process that reflects fair accountability and encourages civic engagement. Marriage Equality HJ9 This ban does not reflect the attitudes and beliefs of Virginians in 2023. A 2021 poll from the Public Religion Research Institute found that 71% of Virginians support the right of same-sex couples to marry. This percentage has only increased since the question began being asked of voters. In 2006, 53% of voters supported the marriage ban. This huge swing shows the massive shift in public opinion on the issue of marriage, and it is clear evidence that the antiquated ban should no longer be a part of Virginia’s constitution. It’s only fair to revisit a political question that has shown such a vast change since it was first broached. With the removal of women’s protections with the destruction of Roe v. Wade, it is possible that marriage equality will be destroyed on a national level as well. Virginia must take the lead to protect all citizens.
It is vital that we allow those who have served their sentences to be able to vote again and fully participate in society.
As a long time resident of Virginia and former medical professional, I strongly stand with the passing of HJ1 as essential medical access for Virginians. Removal of the codification and protections of individuals and medical professionals to essential reproductive procedures would be incredibly detrimental to our community. I support HJ2 as well, voting and having a voice in our elections process is a right and there should be a pathway for formerly incarcerated individuals to earn back that right. Additionally, I am strongly in support of HJ9. Virginia cannot be "for lovers" if we do not protect the rights of LGBTQIA families and individuals. By not codifying marriage protections we also open up a slippery slope to removal of protections for interracial marriages. If we as a Commonwealth do not pass HJ9, we can no longer say we are for lovers or for our people. So I implore you to pass these essential protections and pathway to restoration of rights. I love Virginia and I would love for it to be a safe place for myself and my family.
Dear Sub-Committee Members, As a concerned voter, I am writing to express my *strong support* for the three proposed constitutional amendments: HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. HJ1: This amendment is vital for safeguarding reproductive freedom in Virginia. It ensures individuals have the right to make personal healthcare decisions without government interference, reflecting our state’s commitment to personal liberty and privacy. HJ2: Protecting and expanding voting rights is fundamental to our democracy. This amendment will help ensure that all eligible Virginians can participate in the electoral process, reinforcing the integrity and inclusiveness of our elections. HJ9: Enshrining marriage equality in our constitution is essential for guaranteeing that all couples have the right to marry, regardless of gender. This amendment affirms Virginia’s commitment to equality and non-discrimination. I urge you to support these amendments, which are crucial for protecting the rights and freedoms of all Virginians. Thank you for considering my views. Sincerely, Dr. King
These three bills speak to the freedom of choice for Virginia residents. Our forefathers fought to preserve these freedoms. Now it is up to you, the elected officials, to make sure all of your constituents have those freedoms. Please pass all three bills.
As our representative, I urge you to protect our reproductive rights, restore voting rights automatically after being released from prison, and protect same-sex marriage.
Hello House Privileges and Elections Committee, I am writing to voice my support for HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Let’s get these Constitutional Amendments on the ballot to secure our individual freedoms. Thank you, Emily Casebolt-Simon
Good afternoon, I am called to write to you about our freedoms. “I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.” Thank you for your serious consideration. Let’s not remove freedom from our foundation. We should not try to regulate morality such as beliefs about when life begins (i have never believed life began at conception). Let’s not regulate mother’s health out of the reproductive health issue. Let’s not regulate wwhich humans can love one another. This over reach is tearing the country apart and making us a worldwide laughing stock. Let freedom ring, Mary Leffler Glen Allen, Va
I fully and adamantly support HJ1 - Herring, HJ2 - Bennett-Parker, & HJ9 - Sickles. I am of the opinion that these bills should absolutely be passed without question.
You guys know the issues here, so let me just say: It is embarrassing that Virginia is the LAST state to allow even some people that completed their sentence to vote. Embarrassing to be LAST!! Weren’t we also LAST in allowing interracial marriage? Our governor is not king of Virginia! Come on VA! If someone has done their time, let’s welcome them back with full rights.
All of these are important issues and need to be protected. As a woman, I fear for my reprodutcive rights and ability to get services should I need them. Everyone should have a right to vote and be heard. I have a good number of friends in same sex relationships and marriages that I feel deserve the protection of their status. All of these bills should be passed as they protect marginal groups who are often overlooked or fought against.
I enthusiastically support the return of the franchise to felons upon the conclusion of their incarceration. I'd frankly be fine with extending the franchise to incarcerated felons. If a felon is good enough to be elected president I cannot imagine any valid argument against felons voting for president.
Only legal taxpayers should be allowed to vote!
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Women’s medical care needs to be protected. Religious beliefs should have no bearing on other people’s medical care. Medical autonomy needs to remain with the individual and should not be dictated by others’ personal/religious beliefs.
I support the fundamental right to reproductive freedom, which allows individuals to make personal healthcare decisions along with their physician - without unnecessary legal barriers or delays that could endanger their life or health. Laws should not be based on religious definitions of life, especially given the diversity of beliefs in our state. I believe that individuals who have served their time deserve the right to participate fully in our democracy, including the right to vote. As they rejoin the workforce and pay taxes, they should have a voice in shaping the laws that govern our communities. Rehabilitation should include reintegration, and that includes not only allowing but encouraging civic engagement. I also stand firmly in favor of marriage equality. Just as society has overwhelmingly supported interracial marriage, the freedom to marry should extend to all consenting adults, regardless of gender or race. These unions bring no harm and deserve legal recognition as well as equal protection under the law.
I believe that all qualified citizens should have access to the ballot, including those who have served their time for felony convictions and people with disabilities who want to participate in the democratic process. I support an amendment to the Virginia Constitution to guarantee that people who have been disenfranchised due to a felony conviction will have their rights automatically restored upon completion of their sentences, without additional steps or paperwork after they are no longer incarcerated, and to ensure people with disabilities never lose their rights without an appropriate judicial finding. Both Democratic and Republican governors have chosen to restore voting rights to thousands of citizens; however, Virginia's current governor has reversed the trend. People should not be permanently defined by their past mistakes. Virginians who have successfully served their time should be able to fully rejoin civic life. It is time for Virginians to act to amend our Constitution to create a routine restoration process that reflects fair accountability and encourages civic engagement
HJ1 – fundamental right to reproductive freedom I am writing to provide support for women's RIGHT to reproductive freedom. HJ2 – right to vote – restoration of rights I am writing to provide support for voting rights for black citizens and the restoration of rights for those who have served their time.
I strongly support and request you vote YES on HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for inclusion in Virginia's Constitution.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Women’s medical care needs to be protected. Religious beliefs should have no bearing on other people’s medical care. Medical autonomy needs to remain with the individual and should not be dictated by others’ personal/religious beliefs.
As a woman in my 80s who has lived through repressive periods and periods of expanded freedoms, I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I strongly support House Joint Resolution 2 (HJ2), introduced by Delegate Elizabeth B. Bennett-Parker, which amends the Virginia Constitution to affirm the fundamental right to vote for all eligible Virginians. This amendment ensures that every individual who meets the established qualifications is entitled to vote, removing unnecessary barriers that currently prevent returning citizens from fully participating in our democracy after serving their sentences. HJ2 provides that individuals convicted of a felony will regain their political rights, including the right to vote, immediately upon release from incarceration. This approach respects the dignity of individuals reintegrating into society, allowing them to actively contribute to their communities and engage in civic life. Additionally, the amendment addresses those temporarily lacking the capacity to understand the act of voting, specifying that their right can be restored once their capacity is reestablished. The right to vote is foundational to our democratic process, and HJ2 brings Virginia closer to an inclusive and just society where voting rights are protected for all qualified citizens. I commend Delegate Bennett-Parker and her co-patrons for their commitment to advancing equal voting rights and urge swift support for this amendment, which will strengthen our Commonwealth's commitment to fairness and participation for all.
I strongly support the amendments as they are important to protecting the rights of all Virginia residents
I FULLY SUPPORT ALL OF THESE BILLS. PLEASE MAKE THIS HAPPEN!!
I strongly support bills HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Please vote to approve these bills. Thank you.
Good afternoon, I am writing to express my support for HJ1, rights to reproductive freedom, HJ2, voting rights, specifically for previously incarcerated persons, and HJ9, marriage equality. I support HJ1 in order to preserve and maintain the mental and physical health of women all throughout Virginia, ensuring their continued participation in society. My support for HJ2 comes from my belief that every United States citizen should be allowed to participate in the democratic process that this country was built upon. If a person has been convicted of a crime, been held accountable, and served their allotted time, their rights to vote should be restored, equal to that of the average Virginia citizen. Finally, HJ9 will guarantee the fundamental right to marry to every person, regardless of their gender, race, or sex.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I strongly support these 3 bills to have these rights enshrined in our constitution! Please vote to approve these bills. Thank you.
Summary of testimony: On behalf of Fair Elections Center, an organization dedicated to removing barriers to voter registration and voting through advocacy and impact litigation, I write to urge the Virginia House of Delegates Committee on Privileges and Elections to carry over HJ 2—a constitutional amendment to ensure Virginians who are not incarcerated and not currently judicially declared incompetent have the right to vote—to the 2025 legislative session. Restoring the right to vote to persons with felony convictions who are no longer incarcerated gives them a second chance at becoming invested members of their community. It has also been well documented that the ability to participate in the democratic process, which allows people to express their voice in our society, ultimately reduces rates of recidivism. Under current law, Virginians with felony convictions are permanently disenfranchised unless and until their right to vote is restored by the Governor through discretionary, and often arbitrary, executive action. Currently, Virginians who are employees, caregivers, church ministers, community leaders, and taxpayers remain stripped of their voice in shaping the laws and institutions that govern their lives as they try to reintegrate into their communities, essentially relegating them to second class citizenship even after they have served their time. HJ 2 would fix this deeply broken system by removing rights restoration from the sole purview and whim of the Governor, instead restoring the right to vote upon completion of an individual’s term of incarceration without any additional paperwork or process once they are no longer incarcerated.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution. It is the primary function of a government to protect the people, not deny them rights or voice.
I am in full support of HJ1, HJ2 and HJ9 for enshrining freedoms in the Commonwealth's Constitution . HJ1 is paramount importance to renew the hopes and dreams of Virginia women and families about reproductive freedom and control over our bodies and family planning. I work with women who have lost much wanted pregnancies and fear the repercussions of a federal abortion ban or state limitations. Please make women feel safe again! HJ2 is a basic American value and the right to vote should be safeguarded and enshrined by the Commonwealth . HJ9 also supports a Virginian's right to love who they choose. Please help Virginians to have the freedoms to love and commit. Thank you ! Karen Coyner, LCSW, DCSW and mom
I am for all of these bills to be passed
I support this Bill in restoring the voting rights of a convicted felon upon release from incarceration without further action required by the individual.
I am a progressive constituent in the state of Virginia and I strongly support the constitutional amendments HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9.
Dear Committee Members, I am writing as a constituent to express my support for HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Our community thrives when each person is endowed with the rights and liberties to make their own choices so that we all may, in the words of our founders, pursue happiness. Thank you for your work. Warm regards, Anna Ritter
I very strongly support the enshrinement of HJ1, HJ2 and HJ9 into our Commonwealth's Constitution. These are all fundamental rights that absolutely deserve to be protected for the sake of our citizens, and for future generations. Given it is likely that each of these may not be protected federally in the future, we must ensure that our Commonwealth's Constitution sets them in stone.
I urge you to support these amendments that protect and ensure fundamental rights, including reproductive freedom (HJ1), marriage equality (HJ9), and the right to vote (HJ2). I am deeply concerned about the importance of codifying these rights which are essential to individual autonomy and equality on a state level because I feel they are under threat on the national level. Reproductive Freedom: Every person should have the autonomy to make personal health decisions without government interference. By supporting reproductive rights, you affirm the belief that individuals have the right to decide on matters affecting their own bodies and lives. Marriage Equality: Supporting marriage equality acknowledges and protects the diverse forms of family and partnership in our society. Ensuring the right to marry regardless of gender or sexual orientation is a matter of dignity, fairness, and respect for individual freedoms. Right to Vote: Voting is the cornerstone of democracy. By protecting the right to vote, you uphold the integrity of our democratic process and ensure that all citizens have an equal voice in shaping our nation’s future. I respectfully urge you to support any amendments that solidify these essential freedoms for all Americans. Thank you for your leadership and for your commitment to protecting the rights of all your constituents.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms into the commonwealth constitution
I am strongly in favor of HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 being enshrined in the Constitution of the Commonwealth or Virginia.
We strongly support the enshrinement of HJ1, HJ2 and HJ9 in the Commonwealth's Constitution, all sacred, fundamental rights which deserve to be both protected and guaranteed. Thank you for your service & dedication to the citizens of Virginia.
I strongly support the proposed amendments to the Constitution - Bills HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution. These are all important in ensuring the rights I feel are important to protect all our citizens
I am writing to urge you to support amendments that protect and ensure fundamental rights, including reproductive freedom (HJ1), marriage equality (HJ9), and the right to vote (HJ2). I am deeply concerned about the importance of safeguarding these freedoms, which are essential to individual autonomy and equality. Reproductive Freedom: Every person should have the autonomy to make personal health decisions without government interference. By supporting reproductive rights, you affirm the belief that individuals have the right to decide on matters affecting their own bodies and lives. Marriage Equality: Supporting marriage equality acknowledges and protects the diverse forms of family and partnership in our society. Ensuring the right to marry regardless of gender or sexual orientation is a matter of dignity, fairness, and respect for individual freedoms. Right to Vote: Voting is the cornerstone of democracy. By protecting the right to vote, you uphold the integrity of our democratic process and ensure that all citizens have an equal voice in shaping our nation’s future. I respectfully urge you to support any amendments that solidify these essential freedoms for all Americans. Thank you for your leadership and for your commitment to protecting the rights of all your constituents.
House of Delegates I am writing in support of HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. America was founded on freedom of religion but was not founded as a Christian nation. Jefferson wrote "It does me no injury for my neighbor to believe in twenty gods or no God. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.” The Constitution does not mention God, Jesus, or Christianity. Our nation was founded on the rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Jefferson further stated in our Declaration of Independence, "The purpose of government is to protect these rights, and that if a government fails to do so, the people have the right to alter or abolish it." Jefferson believed that "the pursuit of happiness" was about making decisions that would lead to the best life possible for a human being. With all this in mind, I urge you to vote yes to these bills as they fundamentally protect our human rights and our rights as American citizens based on the stances our diverse nation was founded on. If we fail at this and instead bring back laws based solely on the religion of the few then we fail as a nation. Thank you.
As a woman and a mother, I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I support these amendments. HJ1 is so important because without bodily autonomy, women are no longer free or equal. HJ2- voting should be made easier, not harder. It is every citizen's right. HJ9 is imperative in protecting everyone's right to.marry the person they love. Nobody else should have a say.
HJ1 – fundamental right to reproductive freedom The choice to bear children is a basic right. If a person has any reason to believe it is the wrong choice for them due to any economic, health, or personal pressures, they should be free to consult with a healthcare provider and stop the pregnancy as early as possible. HJ2 – right to vote – restoration of rights Once a person has fulfilled their required sentence under the law, their right to vote should be restored. HJ9 – marriage equality Marriage is such a large and personal commitment made between two people there is no reasonable argument to interfere or try to stop this joyful union between consenting adults.
I strongly support House Joint Resolution 2 (HJ2), the proposed constitutional amendment to protect and restore voting rights in Virginia. This amendment ensures that all Virginians who meet the qualifications to vote are able to do so, and it restores the right to vote to individuals convicted of felonies upon their release from incarceration, without the need for additional action. By removing the permanent disenfranchisement of people who have served their sentences, HJ2 aligns Virginia with a growing movement toward second chances and reintegration into society. The amendment also fairly addresses those adjudicated as lacking the capacity to vote due to mental incapacity, ensuring that their right to vote is restored once their capacity is reestablished. This measure upholds the principle that voting is a fundamental right and reflects our commitment to a more inclusive and just democracy. I urge the Virginia Legislature to support HJ2 and advance the rights of all citizens to participate in the democratic process.
I strongly support every Virginian’s right to marry the person they love and control their own body. It is important that the commonwealth enshrine these rights into our state constitution.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I’m commenting on all three. All three should be passed. The government should never make medical decisions for another person. Women are already dying in states with abortion bans due to complications with their pregnancies with doctors unable to help due to these bans. Marriage between same sex-couples is legal in all 50 states. The outdated language in our constitution needs to go. Lastly, voting is an American right. If you’ve done your time, you should be able to vote.
I am writing to support reproductive freedom - the healthcare decisions made around childbirth should be between a woman and her doctor without undue influence from the government. I also believe that prior to fetus viability, the woman who has become pregnant should be the one who chooses if she is emotionally, physically, and financially able to care for the child after it has been born. The right to life - for me - extends to the woman first. I believe it is HER life that has value and should bear the weight of autonomy. Remember that it wasn't too long ago that the Virginia assembly voted FOR the ERA. Keep that momentum going!!! I am writing to support voters' rights. There are those who are rising to power in the government sector that would create a dictatorship and authoritarian rule and seek to severely limit the right to vote - which is overwhelmingly how we have voice in our democracy. Keep this essential tool in the hands of Virginia citizens to participate in our governance as a Commonwealth. I am writing to support marriage equality. Human beings should have the freedom and it is a FREEDOM to marry the partner that they choose. Anything other than that is to validate a prejudice that has no scientific and dare I say no moral grounding. I am also in support of all our LGBTQ siblings and believe that transgender rights also need protecting.
Voting Rights Restoration The majority of Virginians believe that all qualified citizens should have access to the ballot, including those who have served their time for felony convictions and people with disabilities who want to participate in the democratic process. I support an amendment to the Virginia Constitution to guarantee that people who have been disenfranchised due to a felony conviction will have their rights automatically restored upon completion of their sentences, without additional steps or paperwork after they are no longer incarcerated, and to ensure people with disabilities never lose their rights without an appropriate judicial finding. This has never been a partisan issue. Both Democratic and Republican governors have chosen to restore voting rights to thousands of citizens; however, Virginia's current governor has reversed the trend. People should not be permanently defined by their past mistakes. Virginians who have successfully served their time should be able to fully rejoin civic life. It is time for Virginians to act to amend our Constitution to create a routine restoration process that reflects fair accountability and encourages civic engagement.
I oppose all three bills.
Reproductive Health Every Virginia resident should have access to affordable, quality health care, including abortion, birth control and the privacy to make reproductive choices. Virginians made their reproductive opinions clear when they chose to elect representatives who vowed to protect reproductive rights. Abortion should be legal, safe, and the decision left to those who are pregnant with guidance from medical professionals. True democracy depends on equal rights for all people. Losing our right to reproductive choice opens the door to the loss of other freedoms including other healthcare choices, marriage equality, access to contraception, and the right to engage in private, consensual intimacy without government interference. Not only is the right to a safe and legal abortion a matter of personal freedom, it’s also a major factor in the movements for racial and economic equality. Black individuals, and all underserved communities, already experience unfair barriers and limited access to adequate healthcare services. Our reproductive choices impact our physical and psychological well-being, including the foods we eat, where we live, our financial resources, and our capacity to gain and maintain employment and provide for ourselves and our families. Voting Rights Restoration The majority of Virginians believe that all qualified citizens should have access to the ballot, including those who have served their time for felony convictions and people with disabilities who want to participate in the democratic process. I support an amendment to the Virginia Constitution to guarantee that people who have been disenfranchised due to a felony conviction will have their rights automatically restored upon completion of their sentences, without additional steps or paperwork after they are no longer incarcerated, and to ensure people with disabilities never lose their rights without an appropriate judicial finding. This has never been a partisan issue. Both Democratic and Republican governors have chosen to restore voting rights to thousands of citizens; however, Virginia's current governor has reversed the trend. People should not be permanently defined by their past mistakes. Virginians who have successfully served their time should be able to fully rejoin civic life. It is time for Virginians to act to amend our Constitution to create a routine restoration process that reflects fair accountability and encourages civic engagement.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Let’s amend our constitution to ensure lasting freedoms.
Fully support passing these bills they are greatly needed
I strongly support Bill HJ9, the proposed constitutional amendment that would guarantee the right to marry for all Virginians, regardless of sex, gender, or race. This is not just a legal change; it is a statement that our state and our society will not go backward. We cannot—and must not—return to a time when love and commitment were limited by discrimination and inequality. Repealing outdated provisions that defined marriage as only between a man and a woman is a crucial step toward ensuring that every person has the right to marry the one they love, no matter their gender or race. This amendment aligns our laws with the values of justice, equality, and respect that we’ve worked so hard to build. It sends a clear message that in Virginia, no one’s love is less valid or worthy of recognition. By ensuring that all marriages are treated equally under the law, we are reaffirming the progress we’ve made and committing to a future where all Virginians, regardless of who they love, can enjoy the dignity, protection, and equality they deserve. We cannot let fear or prejudice hold us back. This amendment is about moving forward, not backward—toward a Virginia that truly lives up to the promise of liberty and justice for all.
I am in support of all 3 bills, women should have a say over their own body. Those are important life changing decisions made with the help of a medical professional and are no one else’s business. Not someone who has no medical background whatsoever, or can comprehend what that woman is going through physically and mentally, or is ignorant to what reproductive care really is because their narrow-mindedness just thinks it’s killing babies but will be the first to support cuts to things like Head Start and SNAP. The governor shouldn’t have the decision to determine if someone who has served their time can vote or not. What’s the saying, there’s no hate quite like Christian love, that doesn’t include all Christian’s but you know who are judging other people and filled with hate because someone isn’t like you. You should be able to love and marry whoever you want to, those are basic human rights.
I am writing for each of these Bills. Marriage is between one man and one woman. Life is to be PROTECTED, not extinguished, and Only CITIZENS should be allowed to vote. We , in Virginia, are NOT interested in becoming California. Thank you so much for reading my concerns. I would like to hear back from you your logic in proposing these issues. Sincerely, Mary Cresswell Marywell123@yahoo.com
I support these amendments because in a nation that values and prioritizes freedom, I believe that individuals should be free to make their own decisions. If we are to truly have our unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the government cannot restrict our autonomy in any way. Furthermore our government has a responsibility to protect all of our rights and by amending our state constitution we are solidifying that protection in the event that there are challenges to these rights federally.
Pass all 3
Pass all 3
All 3 should be passed
It is abhorrent the lengths we go to punish individuals for crimes even after they have paid back the debt of the harm they caused. Treating them as outcasts and pariahs only pushes them out of lawful community and encourages them to return to crime. If felonies do not prevent our politicians from being elected, felonies should not prevent individuals from voting.
Pass all 3
Pass all 3 bills
All citizens of Virginia deserve to have all 3 bills passed.
Pass all 3 bills for all Virginians
Please pass all 3 bills.
All 3 bills must be passed!
I support all three of these bills. People should never be told what to do with their bodies. It is a violation of freedom. The ones opposing abortion cannot even agree as to when life begins, therefore you cannot argue that it is taking a human life. Others that use religion as an excuse for their positions have never read their bible: Genesis 2:7 The LORD God formed the man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being. Hence, even according to their doctrine, life begins at first breath which happens outside the womb.
I fully support all 3 bills
I believe, as a native Virginian and a Marine Corps veteran who grew up mostly in Fieldale, Virginia and over 35 years has lived in Brookneal, Phenix, Blairs, Martinsville, Vinton, Norfolk, Newport News, and now Portsmouth, these amendments are greatly important to every Virginian whether it will directly or indirectly affect them. I am in complete support of these amendments and believe they are vital to ensure our freedoms. Being a commonwealth, we have a history of looking out for our fellow Virginians and doing what is best for our citizens no matter what other states choose and in many ways it is liberating. This can be a liberating moment for all Virginians. Regarding HJ1, I think about my sister, my sister-in-law, and the future of my nieces, as well as, so many others in my life that I know this amendment will positively affect. What more could a Virginian ask than freedom? Regarding HJ2, I think of compassion. People who have been imprisoned and released have completed their time of punishment and rehabilitation back into society. Part of that rehabilitation back into society is the fundamental right to vote and be heard through said vote. Also, allowing those to have their competency “reestablished as prescribed by law” makes their freedom to vote much easier to re-attain than the current wording of our constitution. Regarding HJ9, since the first state made a change regarding equal marriage in 2003 to when it became law of the land in 2015, our freedoms as Americans only grew. It’s time for our state constitution to reflect that. All three of these amendments reflect the most positive sides of Virginia and all Virginians, whether we grew up here or moved here from a state some might consider less free than Virginia. When I see our state flag, I see Virginia’s interpretation of Lady Liberty. It is welcoming knowing that our version is one depicting what we, as Virginians, think of tyrants, as it states on our very own flag, Sic Semper Tyrannis. I also know that with it being comparable to Lady Liberty, we too “yearn to breathe free.” Lastly, as our state motto says, “Virginia is for Lovers.” With love comes compassion and empathy. Let us prove our flag, our motto, and our national symbol of freedom to be correct.
I support all three amendments I believe that individuals should have autonomy over all their decisions. If we are to truly have our rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the government cannot restrict our autonomy in any way. Our government has a responsibility to protect our rights and by amending our state constitution we are solidifying that protection in the event that there are challenges to these rights federally.
I support all 3 of these bills. The right to bodily autonomy is fundamental to all other rights. The government affirms the right to bodily autonomy of deceased persons, disallowing organ donations without the consent of the deceased prior to their death. We need to affirm the right of all persons to make decisions related to their bodies, including those related to reproduction. This includes the right to terminate a pregnancy throughout the gestation period. We cannot put the lives of pregnant persons at risk by valuing potential persons over actual persons. We must protect the right of citizens to vote. This is an imperative! It is the government's responsibility to protect individuals' rights, not to take them away. Religion has no place in government, and taking individuals' rights to marry based on the religious beliefs of a minority (or even the majority) is antithetical to the spirit and the letter of the 1st Amendment to the US Constitution.
I am in favor of HJ1. Reproductive care needs to be universally accessible, and decisions about what types of care are necessary should be made solely by a Virginian and their doctor. No person or doctor should fear for repercussions from exercising that right. I am in favor of HJ2. Virginian's should not need a Governor's permission to be restored their voting rights. It is vital that all eligible Virginians should be enfranchised to exercise their right to vote. I am in favor of HJ 9. Couples deserve to have their marriages legally acknowledged and upheld no matter their gender, sex, or race. This protects both the rights of Virginians who marry legally and of religious institution to not perform marriages against their beliefs.
I support this amendment
I understand the necessity for these bills and I want to throw my support behind all of them. I hope that you will vote in favor of the amendments.
I am writing my support, as I am for these amendments. Virginia has a responsibility to protect our rights, and by amending our state constitution, we are solidifying that protection in the event that there are challenges to these rights federally.
I support all 3 bills.
Reproductive rights are extremely important. It's basic healthcare!! It is not "killing babies", it's giving a woman a right to make decisions for her own body. Opposing this bill is denying woman the right to decide between life & death! Why would you oppose that? By passing this bill you are saying woman are not entitled to make decisions on their own. We fought too long and hard for the rights we have! I totally support the decisions to limit voting to those who are legally entitled to do so. Please support the right for 2 individuals to marry! It's a sad state on our state (country) that children (girls) as young as 9 can be forced to marry but 2 individuals who are committed to each other in love & life would be denied that!
I support these amendments because, in a nation that values and prioritizes freedom, I believe that individuals should have autonomy over all their decisions. If we are to truly have our unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the government cannot restrict our autonomy in any way. Furthermore, our government has a responsibility to protect our rights and by amending our state constitution we are solidifying that protection in the event that there are challenges to these rights federally. Don't let the federal government tread on us!
To the Virginia House of Delegates: I urge you to support H1, H2, and H9 to affirm the fundamental rights to reproductive freedom, voting, and marriage for all Virginians. These rights are foundational to personal autonomy, dignity, and equality. The preservation of these rights ensures that our community remains a place where every individual has the freedom to make personal choices without interference from the state, honoring the principle that these decisions are best left to individuals than governing bodies.
I support this ammendment
I am writing to provide support to these amendments! We need our rights enshrined in the states constitution.
I wholeheartedly support these amendments and believe that they are in the best interest of all Virginians.
I wholeheartedly support HJ2, the proposed constitutional amendment that strengthens the right to vote in Virginia. This amendment is a significant step toward expanding and protecting the fundamental right to vote for all eligible Virginians. By affirming that every person who meets the constitutional qualifications shall have an unabridged right to vote, HJ2 helps ensure that no eligible voter is unfairly disenfranchised. Importantly, this amendment eliminates the current burdensome process that requires individuals convicted of felonies to seek restoration of their civil rights from the Governor or other authorities after serving their time. Under HJ2, individuals who have completed their felony incarceration would automatically regain their political rights, including the right to vote, without any additional administrative hurdles. This change reflects a commitment to fairness and reintegration, recognizing that individuals who have served their time deserve a voice in our democracy as part of their return to society. It’s a matter of fundamental justice to allow citizens who have paid their debt to society to fully participate in civic life. Furthermore, the amendment maintains protections by only restricting voting rights for individuals actively incarcerated for a felony or adjudicated by a court as lacking the mental capacity to understand the act of voting, thereby safeguarding the integrity of the electoral process. By streamlining the restoration of voting rights and affirming that the right to vote cannot be restricted without just cause, HJ2 promotes a more inclusive and just democracy in Virginia. It upholds the principle that every eligible citizen should have a say in shaping the future of their community and state, thereby strengthening our democratic institutions. This amendment is a crucial step toward a more equitable and participatory Commonwealth, ensuring that the right to vote is both protected and accessible for all who are qualified.
I support these amendments because in a nation that values and prioritizes freedom, I believe that individuals should have autonomy over all their decisions. If we are to truly have our unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the government cannot restrict our autonomy in any way. Furthermore our government has a responsibility to protect our rights and by amending our state constitution we are solidifying that protection in the event that there are challenges to these rights federally.
Abortion is never medically necessary. No state in the Union prohibits doing what is necessary to save the lives of mothers in danger, and none of those things are abortions (the intentional killing of the child in the womb). If there was actual interest in mothers' health, in office examinations and ultrasounds would be required before dispensing abortion pills. It is hard to understand how the same crowd saying "my body my choice" was all in for mask, vaccine, and stay-at-home mandates. Equally fascinating are people with yard signs that read "We believe science is real" who apparently also believe that despite every cell in one's body having either XX or XY chromosomes, somehow lifelong prescription pharmaceuticals can change things. I pray you find yourselves on the righteous side of the following observation: "Hell does not appear to the faithless; it is clear and obvious to the faithful." - St. John Chrysostom
-Voting is a constitutional right. If a person has fulfilled their debt to society, then they should have the right to vote. It’s also a great part of rehabilitation and ones stake in community is important to reentry. Voting gives one a sense of community. -Women are dying in this country because of highly restricted reproductive rights. It will only get worse as more data comes out about women put in impossible situations in states with draconian abortion laws. Virginia has to set a standard as a bastion of freedom for women and trust them and healthcare professionals to make their own decisions. It would be abhorrent to restrict women’s healthcare rights. Virginia cannot be one of the states that robs women of their choice and healthcare freedoms. -the right to same sex marriage should be protected. And has been by the US Supreme Court. Restricting anyone’s right to marrying who they wish is immoral and constitutes government overreach
As a woman, psychologist, and family member of a someone in the LGBTQIA+ community, I support these bills and urge you to pass them. Thank you!
If a person has paid their debt to society, they absolutely have the right to vote. It is their constitutional right as an American citizen.
I support reproductive freedom in Virginia and support marriage equality. I also support trans rights in Virginia.
I am writing in support of this amendment, as I believe that when someone has served their time, they should get their right to vote automatically restored. It should not be left up to the changing political postures of the state’s governors. The right to vote is an important part of reintegrating into society.
Voting is a right, and one that should not be taken away at all. I am strongly in support of this amendment to make restoration of voting rights automatic.
I support amending the Virginia Constitution to ensure the automatic restoration of rights to people with felony convictions. Once a debt to society has been paid, it is paid. By denying former felons the automatic restoration of their rights as full citizens, we are sending a message that they can never truly turn the page on the past. Does denying these citizens the right to vote make our communities safer? I do not believe it does. In fact, I believe the opposite it true -- having a voice in the political process is more likely to instill a sense of responsibility. I have never understood the reason for permanent disenfranchisement, other than to continue punishing people beyond the term of their court-issued sentence. What purpose does that serve other than to satisfy some sense of vengeance? When it comes to a restriction on fundamental rights, the burden of proof should be on the commonwealth, not the citizen. In other words, we should not be asking what a former felon has done to justify having their rights restored; rather, we should be asking what (if any) justification exists to continue withholding them.
As per another supporter, "I support an amendment to the Virginia Constitution to guarantee that people who have been disenfranchised due to a felony conviction will have their rights automatically restored upon completion of their sentences--without additional steps or paperwork after they are no longer incarcerated. I also want to ensure that people with disabilities never lose their rights without an appropriate judicial finding. Democratic AND Republican governors have chosen to restore voting rights to thousands of citizens. However, Governor Youngkin has not. People should not be permanently defined by their past mistakes. Those who have successfully served their time should be able to fully rejoin civic life. It is time for Virginians to act to amend our Constitution to create a routine restoration process that reflects fair accountability and encourages civic engagement." In addition, although I am not a lawyer, Section 2 1a says "Each voter shall be a citizen of the United States, shall be eighteen years of age". So, with this wording, anyone, NOT 18 years of age, should not be able to vote. Shouldn't it read, "18 years of age or older" ??
I support an amendment to the Virginia Constitution to guarantee that people who have been disenfranchised due to a felony conviction will have their rights automatically restored upon completion of their sentences--without additional steps or paperwork after they are no longer incarcerated. I also want to ensure that people with disabilities never lose their rights without an appropriate judicial finding. Democratic AND Republican governors have chosen to restore voting rights to thousands of citizens. However, Governor Youngkin has not. People should not be permanently defined by their past mistakes. Those who have successfully served their time should be able to fully rejoin civic life. It is time for Virginians to act to amend our Constitution to create a routine restoration process that reflects fair accountability and encourages civic engagement.
Our Commonnwealth needs a process for returning citizens to have their voting rights restored that is consistent, and fair. When a person, in good faith, reenters society, having fulfilled all that society pressed her or him to fulfill, we ought to act in the same spirit by restoring their rights as citizens of our great nation. What does it do to a human being when after the hard work of bearing and serving their time, only to have a second incarceration by our harsh and unfair policies. Voting is our sacred right. I think particularly of the young people who make a mistake. Are they irredeemable? Never to be forgiven? Whoever is without fault, let him be the judge. Serving your time should restore your full rights to return to your life, inluding voting, having gained a new perspective about your behavior in a culture based on lies. Voting, participation in the community of citizens, is the essence of patriotic behavior. There is no reason to extend punishment into private life out of some institutional spite or doubt. How many of us have learned hard lessons and received the grace of forgiveness having learn our lesson. It's hard enough to live in our litigeous society. If a person is released at the end of her or his judgement, who are we to judge them again? As discerning people, we can distinguish when a crime may be so agregious that voting is a risk to our commonwealth. Okay, that is fair. However, it is an observation that fear of or dislike of a type of person influeneces many of our leaders decisions on this matter ... more than anything else. Please create a fair and consistent voter eligibility policy for the Commonwealth.
HJ9 - Constitutional amendment; marriage between two individuals.
I strongly oppose HJ9. Marriage is a unique covenant made only between a man and a woman. This has been recognized by innumerable civilizations throughout the centuries and is the foundation of the family as the bedrock of civilized societies. The other relationships are friends.
I strongly opposed HJ1. The state must protect innocent human life. No person has the right to take innocent human life. The unborn deserve the state's protection. The state has its authority for the basic purpose of protecting the family, the individual born and unborn. The state should live up to the purpose for which the authority was granted.
I support the recognition of marriage to stay defined as a special status only attained between a man and a woman. That has been the bedrock foundational principle for families recognized in civilized cultures for innumerable centuries. Any other relationship is some form of friendship, but not marriage. I strongly urge rejection of HJ9.
I strongly oppose HJ1. We must protect innocent human life for all unborn babies. No one has the right to take the life of another innocent human being. The unborn baby has a separate biological identity that is at a temporary, vulnerable stage. The state has its very powers and authority enshrined in our constitution for purposes like this to protect each human being. We all passed through this stage and have done on a continuum throughout life.
I am for marriage being defined as a union between one man and one woman. God created humanity male and female in God's image. No human being should attempt to change this. Male and female unions, however imperfect, are the only good design for human society and a chance at healthy family structures. Other relationships are undefined in the Bible in terms of male and female. All relationships are defined by God to be governed by loving God and loving one's neighbor, in the way that we now have see Jesus love others. I am opposed to this amendment.
VOTE SICKLES OUT OF OFFICE RE: HJ9! I DO NOT CONSENT to proposition HJ9 - NO! I DO NOT CONSENT to amend the Constitution of Virginia regarding marriage between "individuals". Marriage is the union between one man and one woman...PERIOD!
I urge you to work to affirm the life and dignity of EVERY child and Mother! I ask…how can we call ourselves civilized as a people and a society when considering “legalized” abortion?? Marriage: The union of 1 man and 1 woman. This definition predates ANY nation, religion, or law. It is written on our hearts as it comes from God.
Is the VCC really a “Catholic “ Organization???? WHY the question regarding pronouns? Sounds woke to me; part of our SICK culture! I am VERY DISAPPOINTED!
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. This is a no brainer. Marriage - the union of 1 man and 1 woman - matters to a healthy society. All other unions, no matter how legal they may be, are not marriage as seen through the lens of history; they are unions, but not foundational to a healthy society. In the 1 man, 1 woman original design, there are many purposes - chief among them are the begetting and raising of children - future citizens, contributors, and taxpayers of our community. Marriage matters to the individuals involved, and the State and nation at large. When you say that any union can be a marriage, you are saying, in effect, that nothing is really a marriage. One man - One woman Marriage exists for a reason and it matters for us all - even those in other types of unions. Don't mess with marriage. One man - One woman.
I strongly oppose all three bills. Please vote against them.
Please Protect Virginian's rights to Same Sex Marriage (HJ9-Sickles) and Reproductive Freedoms for Women (HJ1-Herring)
Regarding the hasty proposed amendments to the Virginia Constitution, I, Heather Hornick, strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. REJECT HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. Sincerely, Heather Hornick Williamsburg, VA
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
pro life all life life marriage family human identity defined by CREATOR thank you
Virginia’s marriage equality ban no longer reflects the beliefs of its citizens. A 2021 poll showed 71% of Virginians support same-sex marriage, up from just 47% in 2006, highlighting a major shift in public opinion. Given this change, it’s time to remove the outdated ban from Virginia’s constitution. With the rollback of Roe v. Wade, national marriage equality could also be at risk, and Virginia should lead in protecting all citizens' rights. If the state truly is “for lovers,” it must affirm that love is love for everyone.
Please do not make a constitutional amendment to be able to kill a child in an inhospitable womb . This is infanticide . It is still a child and many babies can live well even after 20 weeks . My grandsons is testimony to this. Our great common wealth will suffer for this error and you who sign this will be remembered like the evil thoughts of politicians who agreed with enslaved humans ! No one wants to admit it but quietly folks said no to Kamala because she thought this abortion until birth was cool ! It isn’t and never will be . We are all brothers and sisters and don’t want innocent babies killed , Democratic's and Republicans As You are pondering signing that amendment . Know God your creator and mine and all those babies creator is watching how we treat the least of our citizens. . Help women .. really … get OBGYN care free ! This reactionary constitutional amendment is extreme and infanticide!!! We didn’t elect you all for this !!! This was unpopular with Kamala and will be unpopular for you too!!
I strongly oppose enshrining a so-called "right" to abortion in the state Constitution. The right to life is a fundamental and inalienable right for all human beings. Governments are, at the most basic level, tasked with protecting this right to life. I strongly oppose changing the definition of marriage from the natural and normal union of one man and one woman. These efforts to undermine the traditional and God-given order of society can only have catastrophic effects to our state and our country.
I am writing to express my support for HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9
I am writing to express my strong support for HJ9, a resolution to amend the Virginia Constitution to protect marriage equality for all. Every person deserves the right to love and marry freely. LGBTQ+ people have been historically disenfranchised in this country, and now we have an opportunity in Virginia to ensure that LGBTQ+ rights are protected, even in the face of potential changes to federal policy. As your constituent, I urge you to support HJ9 and make this amendment a priority. The time to protect ALL Virginians is now, and I hope you will stand with us by supporting this critical amendment. Thank you for your attention to this essential issue.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. “ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment • I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. • HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. • HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. • A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. • Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights • I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage • I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. • Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. If we pass this measure, can we also pass the equivalent of the right to murder postborn children, adults and elderly? HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. These are humans life forms, whether you believe they are ensouled or not. Do you really want to permit the killing of human life forms? Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I am curious what you are going to say to God upon your death that will explain *your* actions. I pray daily for all those who approve elective abortions, but God is equally Just as He is Merciful. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. "All that evil needs to triumph is for good men to do nothing"
I strongly oppose HJ1. Children are our greatest gift. I oppose a right to abortion. The great people of Virginia can do better for women than kill their babies. Help the mothers, but do not hurt them with abortion. I strongly oppose HJ9. Marriage is between 1 man and 1 woman. We need to reread the story about the Emperor who had no clothes. No one wants to speak the truth anymore, but the truth is only a man and woman can marry.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Concerning HJ1 & Hj9 We do not want any amendment to current Va code that would violate Constitutional protections of even the tiniest Human. His/her has the choice to indulge in breeding or creating a new human life. Buyers remorse is not an ok option if it means snuffing out another person.
All, please ratify the Virginia Constitution and protect Virginian’s rights to same-sex marriage (HJ9 - Sickles) and reproductive freedoms for women (HJ1 - Herring). Thank you for working to protect those who are vulnerable! Sincerely, William Frear
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1-I strongly oppose enshrining a "right" to abortion in Virginia's constitution. HJ2-I support Hu 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ9-I oppose Hu 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
Please add these three amendments to protect the civil rights of Virginians, especially during these uncertain federal times.
I am writing in support of this bill. It frankly frustrates me that this is still an issue not only in Virginia but also in the country as a whole. Marriage between two consenting and loving adults should not be denied regardless of the gender of those wishing to do so. My daughter was born on 6/26/2015 and is proud to share her birthday with the day that gay marriage was legalized in the US. It would be a shame to tell her that it was no longer the case.
“right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I am a woman, wife, and mother. I learned that when this amazing country was founded on the principles of separation of church and state, religious freedom, and pursuit of individual happiness. No one has the right to impose religious beliefs on others; that is wrong. To weaponize laws to put women's lives in danger because they miscarried, were raped, or made personal decisions goes against their rights as human beings. Only women who have gone through pregnancy, breastfeeding, and child rearing know how difficult and challenging it is to be responsible for another life financially and emotionally. I couldn’t impose that on another woman that does not choose to; that is their choice. Women have rights over their bodies. I support the legal union between individuals regardless of gender and who they choose to marry and share their life with. In no way, shape, or form does that choice affect anyone. Laws are put in place to protect everyone, and they should be equitable for all. I know many couples of the same sex live in fear; it is extremely sad and scary to live in uncertainty.
Separation of church and state is a fundamental cornerstone of the United States. However, prevailing powers lie with who enshrine their Judeo-Christian beliefs into law, forcing others to live in ways that go against their natures and beliefs, taking away the freedoms we all hope to have living in this country. Who I marry (being of legal age and consenting to the marriage) shouldn't matter to the courts, regardless of their sex OR RACE. HJ9 is not only enshrining the equality of same sex marriages, but also interracial marriage, which many choose to ignore when voting against, to their detriment. If a church chooses not to marry same sex couples, that's the religions choice, and fully allowable given religious freedom. For the civil government to regulate based on religious beliefs (stemming from mistranslations and blatant misinterpreting of the various holy texts words) should not be allowed. To deny marriage based on race is to take us back to the dark ages that would truly signal the downfall of freedom, but without this bill, would not be codified and would be a permissible reason to deny a marriage. I am fully in favor of HJ9.
HJ1 -- There should never be any right to terminate an innocent human life. Period. The life of an unborn human is inherently innocent -- in terms of both natural and governmental laws -- as is with any human life. Any attempt to legalize the termination of an innocent human life at any stage of its existence is not only morally indefensible, but is especially so constitutionally. If it is enacted in Virginia, it must be legally overturned before it is ever enacted. Protecting innocent human life is never negotiable HJ2 -- All citizens of the Virginia Commonwealth, who have fully and satisfactorily served out duly authorized sentences as the result of a valid criminal conviction should have all legal and civil rights restored to them, including the right to fully participate in local, state and federal elections. HJ93 -- Both prior to, and throughout the history of Western Civilization, the essential meaning of marriage has always been -- and should always remain -- a legal prerequisite for facilitating the creation of a human family. Its legal essence has always been the between one male and one female in anticipation that they would become the joint and parents of human offspring with the shared legal responsibility of raising their common offspring to adulthood. These joint and share roles can never be optimally shared by same-sex or multiple partners because doing so would degrade both the essential meaning and innate objective of legal marriage. Moreover, it would make a mockery of the establish common and statutory laws related to inheritance divorce and family trusteeships.
HJ1 is a blatant attack on the dignity of the human person. Every child in the womb is a unique individual, with the right to "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness." There is no scientific question that the baby, at any stage of pregnancy, is unique and separate from the mother. A woman's "choice" is to either nurture and protect natural life or to kill an innocent person. Every single person started as an embryo and small child in the womb. Who are we to take away the life that God has given? As explained in the story of previous Planned Parenthood clinic director Abby Johnson, the abortion takes away the baby but does not take away the mother's memory of the baby. I support HJ2. Once people have complete their sentence, they should be allowed to vote again. I oppose HJ9, which attacks the institution of marriage. In the book of Genesis it does not say that God gave Adam a man as his partner, it says that God gave Adam a woman as his partner. While the creation story is not to be taken literally, the point is that man and woman are literally made for each other, they complement each other and have the gift of procreating children. While man and man and woman and woman are certainly meant for friendship with each other, the marriage bond is a mysterious and life giving institution that is unique to man and woman. Only a man and a woman can truly become one, both physically and spiritually. Society today blurs the lines about true masculinity and femininity and that these can even be fluid. Countries in Europe such as Sweden and in the UK have discovered that gender fluidity is actually extremely harmful and dangerous. The role of a man and the role of a woman is unique to each sex. Same sex marriage does not fulfill what marriage is meant for, which is union and procreation.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Protect equal marriage (same sex, interracial, etc.), protect transgender rights (gender affirming care, equal opportunity for sports, mental health care, etc.), women's health care rights (abortion access, right to choose, rights to own body, etc.), protection for special education, and protection to marginalized groups.
I’m writing today in response to the Virginia state constitutional amendments HJ1 and HJ9. HJ1 mentions reproductive freedom. This has nothing to do with reproductive freedom. This is reproductive anarchy. Freedom is not the ability to do anything that a person wants to do. It is the freedom to do what’s right. In a free country you’re not free to kill other people. True liberty and freedom has limits and those limits are set by God’s laws. We are not free to kill unborn children, mutilate our bodies, or try to change the sexual design that God gave each person. The marriage amendment H9 allows for marriage between any two parties undefined. This means a man could marry a six-year-old. This reckless amendment will legalize, pedophilia, homosexuality and bestiality. I fear for the souls of those who have drafted and promoted such legislation that is an abomination to God. “ And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.” Matt. 10:28
With regard to HJ1 and HJ9, ammending the constitution of the Commonwealth of Virginia to enshrine these current ideological positions prohibits the state from representing the choice of it's citizens, should a majority, now or in the future, oppose such issues. Please do not support the suppression of future democratic process. With regard to SB270, ranked choice voting is a poor organization system for voting. Please oppose it.
I strongly oppose HJ1 which would enshrine abortion on demand in the Va. constitution and remove all attempts to protect unborn infants. I favor HJ2 I strongly oppose HJ9 because marriage always was ,is and will remain a lifetime union between a man and a woman. God planned marriage to be so from the beginning of creation. Pierre Deslauriers
America was built on separation of church and state. It is not wrong to marry an individual of the same sex. No one is hurting anyone. Love is love and it is important! Isn’t America land of the free? Do not move forward and repeal same sex marriage.
To Whom It May Concern at the House Privileges and Election Meeting, Thank you for the opportunity to share, in writing, my thoughts and opinions on these three bills before you today, this 13th day of November, 2024. We live in a democracy and the freedom to speak and be heard is a constitutional right. Thank you for this format to do so. As to HJ 1: I strongly oppose this constitutional amendment. It violates my religious beliefs to support a bill that calls abortion a reproductive right. I became a mother through adoption and there is not a day that goes by that I am not grateful that my sons’ birth mothers chose life for them. While I fundamentally believe that life begins at conception, this proposed amendment has no limits on when an abortion can take place even into the 9th month when a baby is viable outside the womb and has fully developed pain receptors. This is just wrong on every level. As to HJ 2: I also oppose this constitutional amendment. If a felon has lost the right to vote due to being incarcerated for a felony level crime, I support the current law requiring said person to take action to apply to regain that right to vote. I also believe that should not happen until they have fulfilled all the requirements of their sentencing which extend beyond incarceration. As to HJ 9: I also oppose this constitutional amendment. Repealing this ban on same sec marriage would violate my religious beliefs.
OPPOSE HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. SUPPORT HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. OPPOSE HJ 9 – marriage definition change I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman (a provision regarding marriage that Virginia voters approved in 2006). Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Protect same-sex marriage!
Why are you introducing bills in secret? In fact, why are you so anti-life? These 3 bills are an outlandish attack on the dignity of and respect for human life and ignore the importance of the traditional family as the cornerstone of our American society. Today's world needs to honor and protect all human life, backed by the science of such, and get back to relying on the truths of science. All humans deserve a chance at life and redemption.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
I oppose HJ-9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms that marriage is the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. Marriage, when between one man and one woman, creates a wholesome bond that helps to uphold the moral fiber of our country.
Please pass all 3 of these bills. They are important to me and my family.
Block 1 Legislation continued from the 2024 Regular Session, per House Rule 22 HJ1 Constitutional amendment; fundamental right to reproductive freedom (first reference). HJ2 Constitutional amendment; qualifications of voters, right to vote, persons not entitled to vote. HJ9 Constitutional amendment; Marriage between two individuals should not be determined by their gender.
Please repeal the ban on same-sex marriages, please! I am a lifelong queer mother, who has adopted children through foster care for the last several years. My husband and I are lucky to be a cis/straight couple, but there are so many of our community members, family, and friends who are not afforded this. And why? This is 2024. Repeal this ban NOW!
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has always been between men and women, with the hope that they will have children to carry on our society. Two men or two women can never produce a biological child. If the want to live together fine, but don't call it marriage.
"I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent Virginian's from passing any laws that will protect unborn children. Unborn American children have the same rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness that born Americans have. This amendment's passage could mean that current pro-life laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. Don't enable Virginia to legalize infanticide. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians."
I STRONGLY support these three amendments to our state constitution. Protecting my children's reproductive freedom, restoring voting rights to people convicted of felonies, and ensuring marriage equality are all deeply important to me and the people I love. I want to protect and support all Virginians', rights, regardless of their political affiliation, with these three constitutional amendments!
Please vote no on HJ9. This should not be part of the constitution. This should be up for public debate.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
These three bills have been introduced secretly. There is no provision to comment on them on either LIS or Richmond Sunlight. I urge you to withdraw all three and reintroduce them (if you must) when the GA convenes in January. In the meantime, please consider withdrawing them permanently. The amendments, especially HB1 and HB9 strike at the heart of what it means to be alive as a human person (HB1) and destroy the function of the traditional family as the cornerstone of our American society (HB9).
The majority of Virginians believe that all qualified citizens should have access to the ballot, including those who have served their time for felony convictions and people with disabilities who want to participate in the democratic process. I support an amendment to the Virginia Constitution to guarantee that people who have been disenfranchised due to a felony conviction will have their rights automatically restored upon completion of their sentences, without additional steps or paperwork after they are no longer incarcerated, and to ensure people with disabilities never lose their rights without an appropriate judicial finding. This has never been a partisan issue. Both Democratic and Republican governors have chosen to restore voting rights to thousands of citizens; however, Virginia's current governor has reversed the trend. People should not be permanently defined by their past mistakes. Virginians who have successfully served their time should be able to fully rejoin civic life. It is time for Virginians to act to amend our Constitution to create a routine restoration process that reflects fair accountability and encourages civic engagement.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman
HJ1 SUPPORT- Every Virginian should have access to affordable, quality health care, including abortion, birth control, and the privacy to make reproductive choices. HJ9 SUPPORT- In addition, I believe that individuals have a fundamental right to marry and that the Commonwealth and its political subdivisions should be prevented from denying the issuance of a marriage license to two parties contemplating a lawful marriage on the basis of the sex, gender, or race of such parties.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment • I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. • HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. • HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. • A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. • Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights • I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage • I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. • Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1 — OPPOSED: Abortion is a medical procedure which has no place in the Constitution of Virginia. Adding it would not only be inappropriate, but it would jeopardize even modest protections for unborn children, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 2 — SUPPORT: I absolutely support the restoration of voting rights for people who have completed their sentences and have been released. This is automatically done in most states, and it is one way to help people reintegrate into society and feel that they have a chance to be contributing citizens. HJ9 — OPPOSED: Marriage predates any nation, religion or law, and as the union of one man and one woman, it has an existential purpose and meaning. It is possible to have a bonding ceremony without the joining of one man and one woman, but it would not be marriage.
HJ 1 -- Abortion: Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 9 – Marriage: Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I believe we should repeal the constitutional provision defining marriage as only a union between one man and one woman as well as the related provisions that are no longer valid as a result of the United States Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015). The right to marry is a fundamental right inherent in the liberty of persons and to constrict such a right is in direct opposition to the inherent rights of life, liberty, and happiness. As long as marriage dictates my tax status, my ability to see my partner in the hospital, and the ability for my partner to make legal and medical decisions on my behalf it is in part a legal status and one that comes with a great deal of privilege. As such, it shouldn't be able to be limited on the basis of sex as doing so is an infringement on my legal civil rights. The government doesn't get to dictate my what my family looks like. Get out of my bedroom.
I am opposed to the passage of this amendment. Marriage is between a man and a woman. What consenting adults do on their own time is their own business. Let us not let a group dictate what we cherish as a community.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. At conception, there comes about a living organism with a unique genetic code of human DNA. Every fetus at any stage is a human person. Abortion both destroys a child's life and wreaks havoc on a mother's heart. We need to support children and their mothers through financial assistance, communal support, and encouragement, not cause further wounds to those who are already in dire straights. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage is not merely a romantic, care-giving relationship. It is a specific kind of friendship, one that this 1) permanent, 2) faithful, and 3) open to life. Only the relationship between one man and one woman has these qualities. Only the relationship between one man and one woman can create the building block on which societies are founded and flourish. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1 "right to reproductive freedom" comment: I oppose on the grounds of distorting of the concept of "fundamental rights". The choice to engage in conduct that might result in the creation of humankind is not something to be protected in a constitution; therefore, the potential outcome of such a choice is not a constitutional subject. I would toss this proposed resolution. HJ2 "Qualifications of voters" comment: I accept this proposed resolution. HJ9 "Marriage" comment: I would not distort the core underlying principle of marriage by tilting at variations. Rather add a separate proposed resolution that addresses the wishes of some to engage in civil unions would allow for the benefits that laws allow for married persons but not the distraction of contorting the fundamental of marriage.
Please vote no to abortion amendment, and the reversal of the one man one woman marriage legislation. These family and life issue determine the way I vote.
Every Virginian should have access to affordable, quality health care, including abortion, birth control, and the privacy to make reproductive choices. In addition, I believe that individuals have a fundamental right to marry and that the Commonwealth and its political subdivisions should be prevented from denying the issuance of a marriage license to two parties contemplating a lawful marriage on the basis of the sex, gender, or race of such parties.
I strongly oppose enshrining a right to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ1 would severely jeopardize even the few small protections for unborn babies currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. I urge you to reject HJ1 which expands abortion and instead work for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and child. I also oppose HJ 9 which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. This definition of marriage has its foundation in natural law. Thank you, Mary Mc Laughlin
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment The delayed regret that women commonly wake up to later in life - that they have killed one of their children - is not spoken about nearly enough. It is cognitive dissonance - even within our own legal system - to believe that you can ethically remove a "fetus" yet, if the child is wanted, then murdering a pregnant woman is counted also as murdering an unborn child. I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Please Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I know people incarcerated and not having voting rights is just another way of making them permanently second-class citizens. Restoring voting rights would give hope that there is restoration from bad mistakes in life. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
In 2004, as a 17-year-old high school senior, I wrote a letter to the editor about same-sex marriage, specifically in response to an opinion piece published by a former member of this body. In that article, I urged the former Delegate to realize that people who were coming of age at the time were largely in support of same-sex marriage. I said the voices of the minority (at the time) would grow and be heard. In the spring of 2015, as a 28-year-old woman, I excused myself to the bathroom in my office to cry in joy when gay marriage was legalized across the nation through the Supreme Court decision of Obergefell vs. Hodges. My sister and I toasted on the steps of the Supreme Court that afternoon. As a 38-year-old woman today, I am proud that Virginia codified marriage equality through HB 174 during last year’s General Assembly session. I will be proud to exercise my right to marry regardless of race when I wed my fiancé in the near future. To truly protect this right from future repeal, and to be sure that Virginia is no longer synonymous with anti-miscegenation laws and other discriminatory practices, I enthusiastically support HJ9.
As a resident of chesapeake virginia i support this.
This ban does not reflect the attitudes and beliefs of Virginians in 2023. A 2021 poll from the Public Religion Research Institute found that 71% of Virginians support the right of same-sex couples to marry. This percentage has only increased since the question began being asked of voters. In 2006, 53% of voters supported the marriage ban. This huge swing shows the massive shift in public opinion on the issue of marriage, and it is clear evidence that the antiquated ban should no longer be a part of Virginia’s constitution. It’s only fair to revisit a political question that has shown such a vast change since it was first broached. With the removal of women’s protections with the destruction of Roe v. Wade, it is possible that marriage equality will be destroyed on a national level as well. Virginia must take the lead to protect all citizens. If Virginia really is “for lovers,” it should recognize that love is love and grant all citizens the right to live their lives in peace.
I strongly oppose all three bills - HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 as they are currently drafted.
I agree with all three bills each have their importance and relevancy to human rights and protection of those rights. We need to keep Virginia a safe place for women and the lgbtq community.
HJ1 = I oppose HJ 1 which takes the life of an unborn child and injures mentally, spiritually and sometimes physically the mother as well. I've held hundreds of women in my arms who deeply regretted this decision in my work as a post-abortion counselor. It's a lie that this is good for women - the only so called "medical procedure" that harms women. Government should protect all her citizens especially the most innocent and vulnerable among us. Please reconsider this course of action. HJ2 = I support this. HJ9 = I oppose this because marriage between one man and one woman predates any nation, religion or law. Why make a mockery of marriage, when civil unions are available?
I am in favor of all three bills. Abortion is healthcare and saves lives, and consenting adults have the right to marry.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment We strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 9 – marriage We oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I agree that adults should be able to marry whom they chose. I don't want government to mess with that.
as a mother who had an abortion to remove nonviable twins that would have continued to grow without heartbeats in my body, it is imperative that women continue to have reproductive rights and bodily autonomy. as a woman who went through early menopause at 35, it is imperative that people have the right to gender, affirming care. as a mother of a child that identifies as queer and a friend to many married LGBTQ parents, it is imperative that they keep their rights as well.
I strongly support HJ1, and believe that the right to make reproductive decisions lies in the hands of each individual. It is their body, and their own decisions to make these choices, along with their medical professional and the deity of their choice. At no time should a woman be restricted from medical care by their government. Simply put, if your religion prohibits you from getting an abortion, it is your prerogative not to get one. However, you cannot oppress your religious beliefs on other people, preventing them from making these difficult decisions. As someone who has had to have abortion care as a lifesaving measure, I strongly support this amendment. I cannot imagine the added trauma if I had been required to appear in a court to argue for my life, and possibly have been denied and not be here today. The decision to have an abortion is usually as a backup or last resort due to birth control failure. Abortion care also includes procedures and care necessary for those experiencing complications and miscarriages around pregnancies. There are also multiple instances where incest, rape, or sexual assault have occurred, and a woman is in need of abortion care without having to add to the trauma by being forced to birth a child that was a result of the crime. In regards to HJ9, I strongly support this amendment. It is in our inherent rights in the constitution to our pursuit of happiness. This means loving who you choose, whether it's same sex or opposite sex. This falls back to the same reasoning for HJ1. If your religious beliefs prohibit you from marrying same sex, then don't marry the same sex. But don't oppress that religious belief on others in their pursuit of happiness and liberty.l
"Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness", these three unalienable rights delivered by one of the great founders of this nation and of this Commonwealth has been ingrained into generations of Americans since 1776. That we as people deserve to chase our dreams, love, foster community, and truly build a life worth living without fear. These days fear has become a strong tool to knock us off this path that was set forth in the birth of this nation. But with these three resolutions today, we can reconfirm our foundational commitment to being committed to freedom, to love, to expression, and to many other wonderful aspects of this country. For anyone that does read this, my sincere hope is that you choose freedom and hope over fear. That with these resolutions that we recommit to the work the founders started, of bringing freedom to all walks of life. Passing and codifying these resolutions for reproductive rights, voting rights, and marriage rights are quintessential to the concept of true freedom. That we the people can chase down our own pursuits of happiness and build a stronger Virginia at the same time. So I urge that as our representation, you choose freedom for all and not a select few.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I believe marriage is between one man and one woman. I oppose redefining this traditional and sacred union-institution. Catherine Heffley
HJ1: I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ2 I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ9 I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
“Love is Love” is not just a saying on a tshirt, it’s truth. Legislation impeding the ability of two persons to commit to another through the act of marriage, no matter their personal identity or distinctions, is unethical and inhumane. And legislation that still exists to oppress people should be dissolved immediately. It is not just the right thing to do, but good for business and the state. Support and pass HJ9.
I strongly support all of these amendments. They are all important for Virginia citizens.
Life is the first inalienable right. Let’s put a priority on the right of a baby to LIVE! Marriage is ordained to be between a man and a woman. There is no moral substitute. Voting rights must be for citizens only. The most accurate process is hand counted paper ballots.
I support having respect for marriage by ensuring all couples are allowed to marry no matter sexual orientation or preference! Marriage is a right we should all have access too!
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1 I oppose enshrining a right to abortion. I oppose jeopardizing the few protections for the unborn that we have in the state of Virginia. I feel it is wrong to destroy life in the womb no matter what the stage of development or the circumstances of the conception. Catherine Heffley
I hereby implore the Virginia House of Delegates to ratify the Constitution of Virginia and grant: HJ1 - Herring: The right to reproductive freedom HJ9 - Sickles: The right to lawful marriage between consenting adults regardless of the sex, gender, race, or religion of such parties
I am in favor of all three bills.
HJ1: I strongly oppose this measure. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ2: I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ9: I vehemently reject this measure! oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I am commenting in favor of protecting reproductive rights and the rights of consenting adults to marry. As seen in other states, if reproductive rights are not protected women will die. I am in favor of all three bills.
I disagree with hj1, we don't need a constitution amendment for abortion. We need to protect women and preborn children. I support hj2, restoration of voting rights. I am against hj9,,. We can protect same sex couple unions with out redefining marriage, which is a union of one man and one woman.
I strongly oppose HJ1. Abortion is murder of a helpless unborn child. How can Virginia purposely condone this action. A person is created at the moment of conception as at that instant a new, different organism and soul is created. I support HJ2. Once a person has paid his/her debt to society, there full citizenship should be restored. I strongly oppose HJ9. Marriage is between one man and one woman. How else is our race propagated. For thousands of years this view of marriage has existed, and we are here because of it. The legal and societal advantages of being married are consistent with with raising a family (having children). It's grossly arrogant to even consider this amendment.
Unlimited abortion is criminal. 2 humans are involved. 1. the mother. 2. the baby. The mother is not aborting herself but rather her baby. Exceptions are warranted for rape ,incest, and the life of the mother. The reproductive rights of the infants being murdered must also be protected. A time limit, like the 15 week period endorsed by Governor Youngkin, has to be respected except for cases of the physical life of the mother and miscarriages. No one has the right to murder a viable baby except for the physical life and safety of the mother. Marriage is between one man and one woman. Men and women bring different qualities to a marriage. God did not create a super gender where one sex can do everything. Men in general are stronger , but women provide other qualities that compensate. A good man and a good woman is a combination that can't be beat.
Looking for more information
As a citizen of Henrico, I firmly believe in and support the rights of same-sex marriages.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Please reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – Please support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – Please oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose the passage of HJ9 as this amendment goes against the Word of God, which is clear that marriage is between a man and a woman; “He answered, “Have you not read that he who created them from the beginning made them male and female, and said, ‘Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh’? So they are no longer two but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let not man separate.” (Matthew 19:4-6) The Bible describes marriage as a God-ordained, lifelong, exclusive covenant relationship between a man and a woman, so I cannot in good conscience be in favor of something that so clearly violates scripture. Virginia was founded by godly people and I desire to see Virginia return to its godly roots and uphold the infallible Word of God.”
HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Don’t want to speak but want to voice my support to keep all marriage legal. Love is love!
HJ1 - Abortion is Murder. We must protect mothers and the unborn. What will our state be if HJ1 is allowed in our constitution? Abortion is always wrong. There are people and places to help mothers and protect the unborn. HJ2 - I support all who have completed their sentences and can vote. HJ9 - I oppose HJ9-God made us Male and Female , and marriage is the union between one man and one woman (period).
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I am commenting in favor of protecting reproductive rights and the rights of consenting adults to marry. As seen in other states, if reproductive rights are not protected women will die. The United States has one of the highest maternal death rates in the developed world. The focus should be on expanding access to reproductive health care, not reducing them.
I strongly support the passing of all three of these bills. Ensuring equal rights, voting rights, and reproductive rights is important to me and my family.
I support HJ9. Let's align the Constitution with VA Code and the US Supreme Court ruling. Marriage between two people - regardless of sex or gender - should be based on love.
I support HJ9. Love is love. Any condition set forth by law to suggest otherwise, does direct harm to those impacted. Arguably, by passing HJ9, there is absolutely NO harm to those who oppose same-sex marriage. Opposing this bill reflects a blatant attempt to impose religious belief at a state level, implementing control over communities already marginalized.
Unfortunately time limits me from a robust input. Simply put marriage has it's orgin as an institute given by God, and is a covenant between a man and woman. That includes having and disciplining children to be godly, productive men and women who cultivate virtue. When a marriage is destroyed or distorted or marred, so goes the family, and so goes the nation. Repent and believe the gospel. Thank you.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1 -Abortion I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
In support of HJ9
I strongly oppose the right to abortion within Virginia as science is very clear that abortion ends a human life. No legislator or any person has the right to terminate a human life, especially an extreme measure allowing abortion throughout pregnancy!! I This is reckless and unrestricted. All human life is precious and should be protected! I am in favor of restoring voting rights to those who have completed their sentences. I am strongly opposed to any measure that attempts to change the definition of marriage. Marriage is between a man and woman as its natural purpose is procreation. All other lifestyles are partnerships that cannot nor should ever be deemed “marriage.” Thank you for listening to my voice! Michelle H Grau
HJ 1 – I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1: Freedom of religion also means freedom *from* religion. Other people's religious beliefs should have no power over a woman's ability to make choices that directly impact her life. With that in mind, I urge you to amend the Virginia state constitution to guarantee access to birth control, abortion and other aspects of reproductive health. Whether someone chooses to use those services is a personal health decision that they should be able to make as needed. Abortion up to viability, when the fetus can sustain its own life, is reasonable and should be the norm. Protecting women means enabling them to access the healthcare they require, when they require it. To ban abortion is to invite death to Virginia. We will see women, like the teenager in Texas and the two women in Georgia, who die because they aren't able to access the healthcare they need. We will see a serious decline in healthcare providers choosing to come to Virginia. There will be economic consequences to banning abortion and reproductive healthcare access in Virginia. It must be enshrined as a right. HJ2: Restore the right to vote once felons have completed their sentence. Their sentence is their debt to society, and they should be enabled and empowered to re-enter society once that debt has been paid. Convicted felons are citizens like any others and should have the right to have their voices heard, which includes being able to choose who represents them after their sentence has been served. HJ9: Any two people should be allowed to marry, regardless of their genders and/or sexes. There is absolutely no reason to deny two people the right to marry. There are many legal, non-religious reasons why same-sex couples would marry, and there's no reason not to extend the same legal protections that heterosexual couples would have. Anyone who says marriage is between a man and a woman only is speaking from a religious point of view, which is their right. However, freedom of religion also means freedom *from* religion, and religious viewpoints should not dictate the law, which is applied to all citizens, regardless of religion.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Reproductive Health Every Virginian should have access to affordable, quality healthcare, including abortion and birth control, with the freedom to make private reproductive choices. Abortion must remain safe, legal, and guided by medical professionals. Protecting reproductive rights safeguards other freedoms, such as marriage equality, contraception access, and privacy in personal decisions. The right to choose also supports racial and economic equality, as marginalized communities face greater barriers to adequate healthcare. Reproductive decisions affect overall well-being, including financial stability, housing, employment, and family support. Voting Rights Restoration Most Virginians believe all qualified citizens deserve voting rights, including those who’ve served felony sentences and people with disabilities who wish to vote. I support a constitutional amendment for automatic rights restoration upon sentence completion, with no extra steps, and to protect the voting rights of people with disabilities unless a court rules otherwise. Voting rights should not be permanently lost due to past mistakes. Virginia should amend its Constitution to ensure fair restoration and foster civic participation. Marriage Equality Virginia’s marriage equality ban no longer reflects the beliefs of its citizens. A 2021 poll showed 71% of Virginians support same-sex marriage, up from just 47% in 2006, highlighting a major shift in public opinion. Given this change, it’s time to remove the outdated ban from Virginia’s constitution. With the rollback of Roe v. Wade, national marriage equality could also be at risk, and Virginia should lead in protecting all citizens' rights. If the state truly is “for lovers,” it must affirm that love is love for everyone.
HJ9 should be passed because it is time to do away with archaic legislation that discriminates against people for who they love. Everyone deserves the legal benefits of marriage!
HJ1: Please vote to amend the Virginia state constitution to guarantee access to birth control, abortion and other aspects of reproductive health. This is what Virginians clearly want, and a fanatical minority should not be able to take our rights away based on their own religious beliefs. HJ2: Please vote to establish routine restoration of voting rights for felons. Once a person's time has been served, they are ready to re-enter society and should have the same rights as any other citizen. HJ3: Please vote to establish the right of same sex individuals to marry. Again, this is what Virginians want, and a fanatical minority should not be able to impose their religious beliefs on the rest of us. Thank you.
As a citizen of this great Commonwealth, I am writing to ask the House to vote FOR HJ 1, HJ2, and HJ 9. No one should make decisions for a woman’s health other than the woman herself. Women will die if this bill is passed, as we have seen in other states where this has been voted into law. Please support HJ2, as everyone deserves to vote in the state where they live and work. Please support HJ9, as everyone has the right to marriage, regardless of who they love. Virginia is for LOVERS, not backward bigots.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1 - I strongly oppose enshrining a "right" to abortion in Virginia's constitution and, instead of expanding abortion urge you to work for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ2 - all people who have completed their sentences should have the voting rights restored HJ9 - marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. As a result, I oppose HJ9 which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
As a concerned citizen of Virginia, I am writing to express my strong support for protecting women's reproductive rights and advancing same-sex marriage. These issues are fundamental to the values of equality, autonomy, and dignity that our great Commonwealth stands for. Women's reproductive rights enable individuals to make informed decisions about their health and future. Virginia must continue to uphold and protect the right of women to access safe and legal reproductive healthcare, including contraception and abortion services. Denying these rights not only endangers the health and well-being of women but also undermines their ability to participate fully in society. Every person should have the autonomy to make decisions regarding their own body without interference from governmental restrictions or societal judgment. Similarly, the right to marry is a cornerstone of personal freedom and equality. Same-sex couples deserve the same legal recognition and protections afforded to heterosexual couples. Love is love, and denying this fundamental right to same-sex couples is a violation of basic human rights. The Virginia House of Delegates has the opportunity to lead by example, championing inclusivity and ensuring that all families in our state are treated equally under the law. Both of these issues are about protecting individual freedoms and fostering a compassionate and progressive society. As we move forward, we must create an environment where all individuals can live authentically and pursue their dreams without fear of discrimination or judgment. I urge you to stand firmly in support of protecting women's reproductive rights and advancing the rights of same-sex couples. Your leadership on these matters will send a powerful message that Virginia is committed to equality, justice, and respect for all citizens. Thank you for your attention to these critical issues. I appreciate your service to our community and look forward to seeing positive progress in the Virginia House of Delegates.
I oppose this amendment. Marriage is a Christian institution. Established by God, this holy covenant is defined as a 3-part union between one man, one woman, and God Almighty. Do not pass this amendment.
I oppose HJ9
I strongly support all three of these bills. Please pass HJ1 and support womens' rights to choose the healthcare that is best for them. Please pass HJ2 and protect voting rights. Please pass HJ9 and protect marriage equality.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I hereby implore the Virginia House of Delegates to ratify the Constitution of Virginia and grant: HJ1 - Herring: The right to reproductive freedom HJ9 - Sickles: The right to lawful marriage between consenting adults regardless of the sex, gender, race, or religion of such parties
I oppose any legislation advancing the murder misguidedly called abortion as well as legislation defining or weakening marriage as anything other than between one man and one woman. I oppose restoring voting rights to convicted felons unless pardoned by the governor or legislature.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Hello House Privileges and Elections Committee, I am writing to voice my support for HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Let’s get these Constitutional Amendments on the ballot to secure our individual freedoms. Thank you,
HJ1 Please do not make abortion a constitutional right. Please protect unborn children and their parents. We should be working to help parents and their children, not kill the most defenseless in the womb. HJ2. Please restore voting rights to persons who have completed their sentences. HJ9. Marriage is a union of one man and one woman. It has been so before the beginnings of government and organized society. Please do not try to make so called "same-sex" marriage a constitutional right.
In support of all Virginians across the commonwealth, we must repeal the current constitution’s ban on same sex marriage. All adults in VA should be empowered and safe to marry who they love, regardless of whether that adult identifies as a man, woman, or beyond the binary
It is easy to say you are against reproductive healthcare for women when you ignore the far reaching issues that occur AFTER that "life" arrives in the world. As someone who was in and out of the VA foster care system as a child, who lived in horrible conditions, who was abused, I can say that I would never wish for another child to end up going through the things I have. And the unfortunate reality is that when you FORCE women to have babies they are not mentally, physically, financially able to provide for you are condeming those children to grow up in poverty, in abusive homes, being placed in an overburdened foster care system, etc. Just because a woman is FORCED to have that child, it doesn't mean they will put it up for adoption (that is the least likely outcome when considering you are forcing someone to put their body through one of the most risky, stressful, painful, traumatic experiences... they aren't going through all that just to hand over that child... and we also know most people wanting to adopt are looking for WHITE healthy babies, not babies with severe health issues or deformities, or babies with different skin colors/nationalities). It is easy to scream about how it is murder when YOU aren't the one taking on the risk to your own health/life, when you aren't the one taking on the huge medical debt for prenatal care and delivery, when you don't have to worry about your income being cut off if you are unable to work or as you recover from delivering a child, when you don't have to worry about paying for all of that child's needs, when you don't have to find or pay for the insanely expensive childcare. Those screaming about these "babies" are the same ones complaining about those who are on state assistance programs because they can't financially take care of the kids they have. If it was actually about caring about "life" there would be more effort put into increasing financial supports for medical care, paid maternity leave, housing assistance, food assistance, childcare assistance, etc. And if those "babies" end up being part of the LGBTQ+ community later on, well the same people screaming about being pro-life will be demanding that their ability to exist be taken away. It's only about pro-life until those babies are born, then they move onto complaining about the burden those babies are putting on our federal and state budgets. And all those in the comments who have talked about needing to replenish our population for our economy, well that right there shows it isn't about the well-being of a baby, but about controlling /forcing women to pop out future workers!!! It reduces the value of a woman's life to being nothing more than an incubator, like livestock used for breeding. If men were the ones that could get pregnant this wouldn't even be up for negotiation because no one has ever tried to regulate a man's body or their ability to make medical decisions for themselves. A non-viable fetus should not be given more consideration than a living breathing human being. No one can be forced to donate their organs to sustain someone else's life, well a woman should not be forced against her will to give their body to sustain another life. And every human being should have the right to love who they want, to marry who they want, regardless of what some religions believe. Our constitution and founding fathers clearly state that our nation shall not impose religion on anyone.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. It could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. Justice requires it. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. Furthermore, I do support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. Finally, I oppose HJ9 which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. I appreciate your time to read my letter and for working for the common good of the Commonwealth of Virginia.
HJ1: language should be added that defines and safeguards parental rights - requiring their informed consent and permission, and notification where their minor children are concerned with anything "reproductive" related and distinguishes between adults and minors, especially where "medical ender affirming care" or abortion are concerned with regard to minors - children under 18. HJ9: Marriage should be defined as between TWO ADULT human beings/homo-sapiens and what the nature of that contract is. It's a sad state we have come to where one must insist on these definitions, but based on the trends, we must insist. HJ2: Qualifications of voters - Why is there any necessity for this amendment? The ability to vote in Virginia should be restricted (as it currently is) to ONLY verifiable Citizens of the United States of America AND Virginians - to Citizens of Virginia - adults - 18 yrs and older. We should require a government issued photo ID , reduce the days of voting perhaps down to several days (not what it currently is) and return to physical paper ballots, hand counted. We can still make voting easy for qualified, verifiable Citizens AND secure the election process by making it difficult to engage in fraudulent election activities. I've attached a thoughtful article on considerations for all three proposed amendments - written by Dr. Sheila Furey of the Virginia Medical Freedom Alliance. I think these are important aspects to consider with each of the above. Thank you.
A 2021 found that 71% of Virginians support the right of same-sex couples to marry. This is clear evidence that the antiquated ban on same sex marriage should no longer be a part of Virginia’s constitution. Most Virginians recognize that same sex marriage is not a threat to traditional marriage. Virginia must take the lead to protect all citizens.
Dear House Privileges and Elections Committee Members, I am writing to express my strong support for HJ9, a resolution to amend the Virginia Constitution to protect marriage equality for all. Every person deserves the right to love and marry freely. LGBTQ+ people have been historically disenfranchised in this country, and now we have an opportunity in Virginia to ensure that LGBTQ+ rights are protected, even in the face of potential changes to federal policy. As your constituent, I urge you to support HJ9 and make this amendment a priority. The time to protect ALL Virginians is now, and I hope you will stand with us by supporting this critical amendment. Thank you for your attention to this essential issue. Sincerely, Kyle Gunderson
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2 and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I OPPOSE the passage of HJ9 as this amendment goes against the Word of God, which is clear that marriage is between a man and a woman. The Bible describes marriage as a God-ordained, lifelong, exclusive covenant relationship between a man and a woman. I cannot in good conscience be in favor of something that so clearly violates scripture.
I support HJ1 as it protects the right to make individual choices with limited interference from government while also allowing for responsible legislation when there is a compelling state interest. Furthermore, it allows women to protect their own right to life, something that legislators in other states have recently demonstrated they are poorly equipped to protect, as evidenced by the deaths of women in Texas due to miscarriage and delayed care as well as the deaths of women in Georgia. As a woman that has suffered severe pregnancy complications which could have resulted in death, I know just how complicated pregnancy can be and how it can forever change you. Trust in the medical system and trust that doctors have a patient's best interest at heart is vital for the best outcomes. In my own case, had I not had this trust, I never would have risked another pregnancy knowing that my risk for complication and death were higher. Knowing I had the freedom to make my own health care choices and trusting my doctor enabled me to take that risk and grow my family. This amendment helps to maintain the trust between patients and their doctors. Pregnancy and "right to life" are complex and are not black and white issues. They should not be treated as such. While some pregnant individuals may make a choice others don't agree with, the greater harm comes through taking away a woman's own free will by taking away her bodily autonomy, which is inhumane. Rather legislators and communities could better spend their energy on addressing the root causes of the choices they don't agree with, such as poverty and healthcare, and strive to improve community conditions which better serve us all. I also support HJ9 because government interference in the personal lives of people should be limited and only allowed within reason. Government interference based on personal religious beliefs in a country that believes in religious freedom goes against the principles of what our country was founded upon. I also support HJ2.
I, as a Virginia constituent, am voicing my support for continuing reproductive healthcare AND marriage equality. As a parent and or relative of loving families currently living as a blended and or nonbinary People , I support keeping their rights as equal human beings .
I, as a Virginia constituent, am voicing my support for continuing reproductive healthcare AND marriage equality. As a parent and or relative of loving families currently living as a blended and or nonbinary People , I support keeping their rights as equal human beings .
Marriage Equality must be protected under VA constitutional law. It is not only of a moral and social importance, but an economic issue as well. VA must continue to be a place where non-heterosexual couples can continue to live and work without risk of harassment or loss of rights.
I oppose this bill. Words form ideas and ideas have consequences. Marriage is a Biblical concept not a secular one. Same-sex "marriage" is not congruent with the Biblical construct and, for Christians, is a violation of their religious beliefs. If the idea is to provide persons of the same sex legal legitimacy rather than moral legitimacy, give their status a different name, like was done for "common law marriage" and extend property rights and other legal rights to that group. Same sex marriage is not "marriage" and should not be conflated with it in order to make a moral equivalency.
I urge you to pass both of these items. Women deserve bodily autonomy, & same sex couples should have the same right to marry as heterosexual couples... all living, breathing human beings deserve equal rights. There are no laws that tell a man what he can do with his body. Men can receive PREVENTATIVE medical care BEFORE a serious complication occurs. Women deserve the same right. Religion has no place in our laws when those beliefs are not shared by ALL. Most abortions occur within the 1st trimester. Just because a state FORCES a woman to carry an unwanted pregnancy (one that was a result of rape/insest, failed birth control, etc.) it doesn't mean they will agree to give up a child for adoption after they have to carry for 9 months & endure the trauma/ pain of birth. These babies are likely to be brought into financially unstable homes or abusive homes, where they will live in poverty or have their life put into danger. The foster care system is already overflowing with children pulled from these situations & with funding likely to be cut for financial assistance programs it's not fair to expect women to bring a child into the world that they won't have the capability of providing a good life for. Many times, these women already have children at home, & they can't afford another mouth to feed or the additional medical bills, or the time off for any possible complications or time off to recover after delivery. It is easy for pro-life advocates to scream about the "innocent life" when they aren't the ones that have to potentially endanger their own life, take on an additional financial strain, or worry about losing their job/income. Not to mention, there's already a lack of quality, affordable childcare in our state. When you ignore these other factors, you aren't truly concerned about the "life" of a child. The only late-term procedures done are for complications that could endanger a mother's life or for fetal anomalies discovered during an ultrasound. Doctors used to be able to immediately provide preventive care when there was even a possibility of a serious complication that could endanger the mother's life/health, but now in many states these doctor's have to ignore their oath to "first do no harm" to their living breathing patient & wait until a life threatening infection actually occurs before they can provide care, causing unnecessary pain/suffering for their patient, increasing risks for long-term harm to the patients health, & increasing the chance of death. The false propaganda of "after birth" abortions is referring to parents who chose neonatal palliative care, which means they know their child is not viable for sustaining life on its own due to fatal abnormalities These parents make the choice to provide comfort care without prolonging the child's suffering by allowing additional medical intervention that would only delay the child's death while increasing their suffering and pain. No law should be able to interfere in someone's right to decide what is best for their own health. A dead body has more rights than a woman in many states. Restrictive laws aren't going to encourage people to have babies, it's going to encourage women to not even start families because it's no longer worth risking that a complication will happen & having their own life put at risk/less valued than a non-viable fetus.
"I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians."
Please please please support HJ9! The right to marry is a fundamental right inherent in the liberty of persons and prohibits the Commonwealth and its political subdivisions from denying the issuance of a marriage license to two parties contemplating a lawful marriage on the basis of the sex, gender, or race of such parties! The future is uncertain and the right to marry is one to protect no matter what. Thank you
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose the passage of HJ1. This amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children.
Protecting the freedom of marriage equality, voting and reproductive freedom should be an American fundamental right. Bans as we can see throughout the country, have wreaked havoc on families, individuals, clinics, hospitals and livelihoods. They have created OBGYN deserts throughout the south and Midwest and now doctors and hospital staff are refusing to treat women and people who are pregnant with any type of pregnancy complication and miscarriage management. I have personally lost a friend in Alabama cause they refused to treat her pregnancy complication. She leaves two children behind after something that was treatable. It is absolutely barbaric for anyone getting involved other than the only people who need to be involved. It is not our concern on such matters that are not simple. Enshrining the right to Reproductive Freedom ensures that state politicians are OUT of these decisions. Whether it be IVF, to use or not use birth control, birth plans, abortion, testing and so forth, Women’s health etc the government should not be concerned. I support abortion and the critical healthcare necessity it plays in an array of roles. It is not murder because if it was, more than half of the country would be imprisoned both women, young women, men, young men, doctors, healthcare workers and so forth. Life is taking your first Breath and not having to rely on another humans being internal organs to survive. Nor, do most would care to help the Trans and queer kids that have been ridiculed throughout these communities across Virginia. Only supporting some kids and not all is the basis for respecting all of humanity and the differing peoples religion's, perspectives, culture and so on. Doctors who have sworn an oath to protect patients are having to break this oath everyday in states where families, Women, girls and people who can become pregnant are not protected nor will ever be truly free so long as we keep debating about this issue. This should be left to the families and healthcare teams. As for right marriage, denying anyone regardless of Race, Gender, Class, Ability and so forth Constitutionally discriminatory from every different perspective that tries to undermine this right. Everyone should love who they want and plan their families accordingly. If this is not enshrined, we open the door bigotry, racism, sexism and shutting commonwealth that refuses to see these people for the humans they are. As for the right to vote it should be an absolute fundamental Right. Taking this right away that is in our Federal Constitution is to control the outcomes of every elected office from local districts to federal lands. All three of these should be enshrined for All Virginians. Denying this would deny Virginians to live their lives in the way that’s best for them with no interventions or restrictions to hinder and complicate our ways of life.
I, as a Virginia constituent, am voicing my support for continuing reproductive healthcare AND marriage equality.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law
I support all three constitutional amendments: HJ1, HJ2 and HJ9. HJ1: The issue of reproduction freedom is more complicated than the simple choice of weather an unborn person lives or dies. Reproduction has consequence that affects the pregnant person's health during gestation, decisive action must be absolutely allowed in order to make decisions that places the pregnant person's mental and physical health at highest priority. Reproduction also has consequence post birth which all involved parties in reproduction must be ready to face. The pregnant person must be allowed to realize this and make an informed decision based on facts about their life and the situation they find themselves in that can ensure the best outcome for all parties involved, other people are simply unaware of the nuance or facts that may influence their decision and have no right to force them to make a decision against their own interest. HJ2: The purpose of the criminal justice system is to penalize people who break the law and preserve order, with the ultimate goal of rehabilitating those within it, to re-enter society. Blanket removal of fundamental rights and a voice in society is too harsh a punishment for any crime. What motivation is there to become an upstanding citizen and rejoin society if they are forever divorced from it? Opportunities for positive change must be left open. There is an added benefit of reducing judicial burden in the majority of cases. HJ9: From the perspective of government, the morality of marriage between anyone should not be considered in such a case as government is concerned with the fair administration of the legal consequences of marriage in order to recognize family units. The question of morality should be left up to the individuals, religious organizations, and clergy to decide for themselves and should not affect state policy. Not recognizing marriage simply results in a legal grey areas and denial of basic rights and protections all people are entitled to.
Please continue to support same-sex marriage.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Please reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I also oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly side with HJ1 & HJ9, because regardless of any religious belief, I still believe that this state and country is one of freedom. When it comes to reproductive care, that is between a patient and doctor. In no instance, should a government limit healthcare for any individual. Not only does restricting abortion rights infringe on individual liberties, but it causes an increase in the maternal mortality rate. I side with HJ9 on the same basis. The government has no place inside our marriages. If someone believes that same sex marriage is sinful because of their belief, they have the right to think that, but they have no right to restrict marriage between other consenting adults. If you don’t support same sex marriage, don’t get married to someone of the same sex. We are a country of freedom and liberty. If you find someone (a consenting adult!) that you truly love, that you want to marry, we should all be so lucky. We should have the freedom to do so. Separation of church and state.
My name is Sanu Dieng-Cooper, I am the new Policy Director for the Virginia Sexual and Domestic Violence Action Alliance, representing over 70 sexual and domestic violence agencies across Virginia. On behalf of survivors and the agencies within our membership, we want to express our strong support for marriage equality (HJ9) and reproductive rights (HJ1) for all Virginians. At the Alliance, we believe that every individual has the right to safe, healthy, and respectful relationships, regardless of sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression. Because sexual and domestic violence affects all communities, our response must also be inclusive. Policies that restrict marriage equality or reproductive rights isolate and harm vulnerable communities, particularly LGBTQ+ survivors, making it more difficult for them to access safety, services, and respect. Just as everyone should have the freedom to choose who they love, they should also have access to reproductive options that are equitable, inclusive, and responsive to their needs, regardless of income, gender identity, sexual orientation, race, ethnicity, religion, ability, or age. Victims of sexual and domestic violence already bear the heavy burdens of addressing health issues such as sexually transmitted infections, unintended pregnancies, infertility, and other complications resulting from trauma. Comprehensive sexual and reproductive healthcare is essential to their recovery. We all expect the right to make personal health decisions—whether that means choosing our doctor, selecting a treatment, or deciding to undergo surgery. Reproductive health choices should be no different; they must remain personal, allowing individuals to make the best decisions for themselves based on accurate information and supportive care. Supporting reproductive rights means ensuring that everyone has this autonomy, free from external pressures or barriers. We urge the subcommittee to support measures that promote equity, dignity, and safety for all Virginians, especially the most vulnerable, such as survivors of sexual and domestic violence. Again, we urge you to support HJ1 and HJ9. Thank you for your commitment to advancing justice in our Commonwealth.
Marriage is the original social institution, providing for the care and education of children until they are able to succeed on their own. Historically, marriages between one man and one woman are normative across all cultures, even those which permit other types of marriage. Further, history has shown that cultures which limit marriage to one man and one woman have been more successful in establishing stable societies which better promote the care and education of children, the rights of both spouses, and economic prosperity, while minimizing interpersonal conflict. Since the 1960s, marriage between one man and one woman has been under attack, and society has suffered as a result. The promotion of the individual at the expense of society has contributed to the destruction of marriages to the point that less than half of American households are composed of what used to be normative, i.e. a mother, a father, and their children, all living together. The argument is made that, since the US Supreme Court has ruled that two people of the same sex can, for purposes of law, marry, the Commonwealth’s constitutional definition is obsolete and so should be changed. What purpose would this serve, other than to say that the Commonwealth is unconcerned with the problems that the decline of marriage has produced? Better to leave the definition alone. True, given the US Supreme Court’s decision, it now has no practical effect, but, it can still serve as an expression of the aspiration that in the future society can move toward healing some of the ills that currently afflict us.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Please vote NO to HJ9. It is unnecessary and will be used as a legal basis to attack and silence the voice of anyone who disagrees. So called exemptions for clergy and religious organizations do not protect ordinary citizens who may be targeted because they support marriage as the union of one man and one woman. This has happened in other countries and other states – we must NOT let it happen in Virginia.
Do Not approve either of these - HJ1 or HJ9 . You are not God!
HJ 1 and HJ 9 should not be passed
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment -I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. -HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. -HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. -Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights -I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage -I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. -Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution.HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent.HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born.A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right.Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
This is an antiquated ban and should be dropped from the Virginia Constitution. It no longer represents Virginia voters’ attitudes, because research shows attitudes have shifted in the Commonwealth, and Virginians support the right of same-sex couples to marry. I agree with them. Please protect the rights of all Virginians and allow same-sex couples to marry in our state. Thank you.
Honorable House Committee Members, As a registered voter in the Commonwealth of Virginia, Please see blow as to my thoughts and wishes for the Commonwealth of Virginia. There is no reason to waste time with "feel good" legislation from either party. Please consider ONLY Amendments that will not be used to bolster election results. Recent national election results indicate more voters want current protections upheld, rather than legislating on issues to campaign on or increase voter rolls. HJ-1 - Amendment should mirror CURRENT VA Abortion laws ONLY. This includes limitations on 26 weeks without threat to health of baby or mother, AND review by TWO certified OBGYN/MDs to perform afterwards HJ2 - Amendment should include each to be reviewed on a case-by-case basis HJ9 - Is not needed. This is protected by Supremacy Clause Thank you for taking the time to read and consider my opinions. Respectfully, Mark Logan
Please support the right to choose and pass HJ 1. We should all have the power to choose for ourselves. Women must be able to make real time decisions about their bodies. Reproductive health is personal and PRIVATE between a patient and their chosen health care provider. No one is pro abortion, we are pro choice. Please support the right to marriage by passing HJ 9. We should have the right to love and marry who we wish - to create a family. This is a private matter between 2 people, it doesn't involve or hurt anyone else. Religious values do not have a place in these decisions, which are about human rights for everyone in our Commonwealth.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I support rights to abortion, marriage equality and women’s right to choose. This is a vital time in America where we must protect the people that are here and prevent burdens due to unwanted pregnancies. We need to prevent deaths due to complications of miscarriage. We must protect health of all our citizens.
No legislative body has the authority to add or subtract actual human rights. Lawmakers may only codify, recognize and enumerate rights which exist from the original authority. The authority over life and death originate with the life-giver.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 to protect these freedoms through inclusion in the Commonwealth's constitution. Thank you.
No legislative body has the authority to add or subtract actual human rights. Lawmakers may only codify, recognize and enumerate rights which exist from the original authority. The authority over life and death originate with the life-giver.
When I was 21, I had just left college and my cousin got married to her then-boyfriend, now-husband. My tradition-minded aunt approached me at a family reunion to question why I hadn't dated any girls yet. Like most young gay guys, I made up the excuse that I was too busy studying and paying attention to books to notice anyone romantically. She kept asking about if I would disappoint my parents by not making any kids for them. She scolded me about how it is my duty to get married, produce many kids, and uphold the sanctity of marriage. After five minutes of this, I explained that the sanctity of marriage had already been violated enough. Of all my relatives, 8 aunts, my own parents, and 2 uncles had all followed the same traditional path: all of them got married at a young age, had multiple kids, and then divorced within a few years of their youngest being born. The only positive role model I have had in my family to uphold the "sanctity of marriage" has been my one lesbian aunt and her wife, who have stayed committed to each other now for decades. Please reaffirm marriage equality, and do not give in to any bogus arguments about the "sanctity of marriage" being destroyed by gay people. From my own anecdotal experience, the LGBTQ+ community respects marriage more than the straight community. Let's protect marriage for all!
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2 and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth's constitution. Thank you.
Please ratify marriage equality into the VA constitution, this is a matter of protecting the pre-existing rights of individuals, not one of personal, moral, or religious decision. Government should serve to protect the rights of their citizens, not make judgments on what they should or shouldn’t live their life. As an active member of my local church and a lesbian, I ask you to protect the right of individuals to live their lives how they wish, the rights this country was founded to protect. LGBT+ Virginians deserve to feel welcomed in their own state. Thank you.
I strongly encourage and support HJ1 and the passing of this bill. Every person in this country should have bodily autonomy and the ability to make this incredibly person choice for themselves. Women need to have access to safe reproductive care. Abortions will happen no matter what, it is up to us to decide whether we want those to be safe and sanitary, or if we would rather watch both women, and consequently children, suffer because of our moral objections. I ask you to keep in mind one of the founding principles of this nation - The separation of church and state. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but these opinions can not infringe on public health and women's rights. HJ1 is a matter of community health and safety, and its passing would ensure more secure reproductive healthcare of Virginia's women AND children. Abortion has been a civil right since 1979, only now are we seeing this new wave of regressive rhetoric and action. I ask you to allow our state, and our women, to continue to progress, not regress into a male dominated past. Reproductive rights SAVE LIVES and are a staple of any modern nation that seeks to view women as equal. Please view us as equal!! I am a 21-year-old woman, and I fear for my safety, as well as the safety of my young nieces and cousins every day. I want them to know that they live in a state that values their bodies, their lives, their choices, and understands that abortions are lifesaving care, NOT birth control. No one wants to get an abortion. It is a difficult and harrowing decision, but one that should be between a woman, her doctor, and her god, not a decision of a faceless government. Women have already died because of abortion restrictions and bans in other states. Please don't let Virginia be the same. Young women in this state are scared, and they deserve reassurance that their lawmakers care about their civil rights. Young women deserve to know that people care just as much about our futures, as that of an insentient, unborn, fetus. We deserve the right to make our own choices over our own bodies. I am also in support of HJ2. Voting is a constitutional right and the foundation of our democracy. It is crucial that every eligible person, excluding those convicted of felonies, have the access and freedom to vote. I believe that voting is what allows us to have a relatively fair and just system, so supporting the ability of all eligible persons to express this freedom is crucial to maintaining a lawful, equal democracy. I am also strongly in support of HJ9. Again, marriage is between the two individuals, their religious leaders, and God. The LGBTQ+ community has been historically targeted and systemically disenfranchised, and we have an opportunity to oppose this continued, irrational targeting of individuals on the basis of religious or moral obligation. Again, everyone is entitled to opinions in their personal lives, but these opinions cannot limit the freedoms and rights of others. Queer people have always and will always exist. They are your neighbors, friends, family members. Taking away their right to marry, trying to suppress queer people, historically, have NEVER worked. We are proud of who we are, and no law will change that. It is not a choice to be gay, or trans, or queer, the same way it is not a choice to be straight. I support the right of all people to actualize who they are. Every person deserves the right to love who they love and marry who they would like.
Please support the right to choose and pass HJ 1. We should all have the power to choose for ourselves. Please support the right to vote by passing HJ 2. Once time is served, punishment should be over. Please support the right to marriage by passing HJ 9. We all deserve a family. Religious values do not have a place in these decisions, which are about human rights for everyone in our Commonwealth (not just the radical Christian right).
I find it very disheartening that it's 2024 and we're still deciding what defines a marriage based on sex/gender. Marriage is a commitment that two adult people make to each other. That's it. Any details around sex, gender, or race are none of our business. Want to give an opinion? How about just declaring happiness that two people found each other and want to spend their lives together. Absolutely repeal same-sex marriage prohibition. The LGBTQ+ community deserve equal rights. (Again, I cannot believe this is still up for debate in 2024.)
I am writing to express my strong support for Virginia House Joint Resolutions 1, 2, and 3. These amendments are essential to ensuring the fundamental rights and freedoms of all Virginians. HJ1: Reproductive Rights: This amendment would explicitly protect the right to reproductive freedom, including access to abortion and contraception. It is crucial to safeguard these rights, particularly in light of recent challenges to reproductive healthcare at the national level. HJ2: Right to Vote: This amendment would strengthen voting rights protections in Virginia. It would expand early voting, automatic voter registration, and other measures to ensure that all eligible citizens can exercise their right to vote. HJ3: Same-Sex Marriage Equality: This amendment would enshrine the right to same-sex marriage in the Virginia Constitution. It would provide additional legal protections for same-sex couples and their families. These amendments reflect the values of equality, liberty, and justice that are at the heart of our democracy. They will help to create a more inclusive and equitable Virginia for all. I urge you to support these important amendments.
Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose HJ1 - abortion should not be enshrined in Virginia as a constitutional right. On the contrary abortion should be banned except in cases where the life of the mother is threatened. Our Constitution protects the life of an individual and the fetus IS an individual. At that moment of conception that fetus has a God-given soul; it already has human life and is an individual that should have the protection of our Constitution to LIFE. I oppose HJ9 - marriage is between one man and one woman. It is the complementarity of the sexes ordained for the procreation of life. It has always been defined that way and we should not change the essential character of marriage. Call same-sex unions a civil partnership not a marriage. I support HJ2 if the inmate has served their term and remains in good standing within the community upon their release.
I am not in favor of these amendments. Abortion for anyone including the mother is extremely damaging to her and the family members around them. Please reconsider and spare these lives.
Enshrining a right to kill innocent children in their mother’s womb is something we should all resist. Thanks, Stephen Hertz
I fervently support of HJ9, a vital resolution that will affirm marriage equality for all individuals, irrespective of gender or sexual orientation. This legislation is not merely a matter of legal recognition; it embodies the fundamental human rights of love, choice, and dignity. In a society that prides itself on the principles of liberty and justice for all, it is imperative that we extend these values to every citizen. Marriage is a sacred bond that should be accessible to all, and by passing HJ9, we will take a monumental step towards a more inclusive and equitable Virginia, where every family can thrive without discrimination.
Reproductive freedom is critical to basic freedom for both women and men. Please preserve choice for Virginia in the face of the Supreme Court's overturning of Roe v Wade. Voting rights are critical for democracy. Please support the right to marry for LGBTQ and trans citizens of Virginia. This is a large percentage of voters and must be protected at the state level.
I oppose to all 3 amendments.
I support HJ1 and HJ9 and hope to see them passed.
I strongly oppose removing or altering the constitutional language defining marriage as the union of one woman and one man, an understanding that has been fundamental to human civiliation for centuries.
Hello, I whole heartedly support HJ1 and HJ9, as these are VITAL RIGHTS for woman and humans in general. The right to our own bodily health, safety and well being. The right to marry no matter your sexual orientation should be a right for everyone no matter their sexual orientation. How can we decide what others should be aloud to do in their own lives and still be considered the land of “freedom & rights”? Please pass these life-saving bills that will affirm marriage equality for all individuals, irrespective of gender or sexual orientation as well as womans rights to her own body. People are dying all over the world due to the lack of care they so desperately need. This legislation is not merely a matter of legal recognition; it embodies the fundamental human rights of love, choice, and dignity. In a society that prides itself on the principles of liberty and justice for all, it is imperative that we extend these values to every citizen. Marriage is a sacred bond that should be accessible to all, and by passing HJ9, we will take a monumental step towards a more inclusive and equitable Virginia, where every family can thrive without discrimination. We cannot take steps back, we have come this far in the world for a reason and rights should never be given then taken so carelessly from anyone. We must remember that what we want for ourselves is not what is healthy for all, we must let every individual have the rights to their own bodies and lives. Thank you.
I strongly support bill HJ 9 and marriage equality. My wife and I just celebrated our first wedding anniversary - a celebration of love and equality. To have this taken would be taking a huge step backwards given that this right has been federally protected for the last decade. My wife and I deserve to have our marriage continue to be legally recognized - Protecting this right would allow for future stability of our family. Everyone has the right to love who they love. Passing this bill would allow respect for the lives of all Virginians.
Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I choose to live here, and pay taxes here, because I have equal rights in Virginia. If this changes, I will take my tax dollars elsewhere, and encourage others to do the same. Virginia should continue to protect its constituents and work to be progressive. Allow the voters to decide.
I support these joint resolutions. They advance freedom, and we should work towards enshrining these important principles in the Constitution of Virginia.
I oppose HJ 9. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I fervently support HJ9, a crucial resolution affirming marriage equality for all individuals, regardless of gender or sexual orientation. This legislation transcends legal recognition; it embodies fundamental human rights, including love, choice, and dignity. In a society that prides itself on liberty and justice for all, it is imperative to extend these values to every citizen. Marriage is a sacred bond that should be accessible to all. By passing HJ9, we will take a monumental step towards a more inclusive and equitable Virginia, where every family can thrive without discrimination.
I fervently support HJ9, a crucial resolution affirming marriage equality for all individuals, regardless of gender or sexual orientation. This legislation transcends legal recognition; it embodies fundamental human rights, including love, choice, and dignity. In a society that prides itself on liberty and justice for all, it is imperative to extend these values to every citizen. Marriage is a sacred bond that should be accessible to all. By passing HJ9, we will take a monumental step towards a more inclusive and equitable Virginia, where every family can thrive without discrimination.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strogly believe it is a womens right to make decisions about her own body and support legislation to that effect. I support the right of felons who have served their time in prison to vote. However, if a person released commits a felony crime axsecond or more times, I support revoking the right to vote. I strongly support same sex marriage. Please ensure/maintain this right of individuals who have same sex partners.
HB375 - I strongly agree with joining the National Popular Vote compact. It gives more power to us as individuals and aligns with democratic norms. This also strengthens Virginia as presidential hopefuls will have to speak to each state and person as opposed to a handful of swing states. HB658 - Ranked choice voting is a better system for voting and is determined by the candidate with the strongest support. It doesn't affect your 1st choice, lower choices will only be considered if the 1st choice doesn't win. This encourages more civil and policy driven campaigns. HJ1 - I strongly agree with individuals having the right to reproductive freedom. HJ2 - People should not be permanently defined by their past mistakes. HJ9 - Marriage is between two people, it should not be defined as between one man and one woman.
As a Chinese American who grew up in Fairfax, I recognize the diversity of beliefs that make us a dynamic and vibrant place to raise a family and do business. We must protect this rare environment by taking a stand against those who would try to monopolize their belief system For abortion to be decided by the state, and not by the individual, is an unprecedented amount of power wielded over medical procedures. The State does not force people to donate their organs, so it should not have an extraneous limits on this other medical procedure, especially since the proponents for abortion limitations are not basing their arguments on health reasons but religious ones. Even less needs to be said on any attempts to limit LGBTQ identities or their marriages between adults. We cannot claim to have freedom of religion when one religion gets to make policy over others. Please, support HJ1 and HJ9
Thank you for consideration of this constitutional change. As the fear among Virginia same sex marriages increases due to a likely overturn of marriage equality, having our commonwealth say your love matters means so much. Virginia is for all lovers and this change will ensure that many decide to stay here in our wonderful state. I fear that if we do not change the antiquated constitution many will not feel safe or cared for to stay and our population and diversity will begin to drop. If we don’t act now so many at risk couples will feel abandoned by the home they love. Please cross the aisle and work together in support I’d love and equality for all.
I hereby implore the House of Delegates to ratify the Constitution of Virginia and grant: 1. The fundamental right to reproductive freedom to all Virginians (HJ1 - Herring) 2. Automatic restoration of the rights of a convicted individual to vote upon completion of the terms of their sentencing and release from incarceration (HJ2 - Bennett-Parker) 3. Legal rights and protections for two consenting adult persons to marry regardless of sex, gender, race, or religion. (HJ9 - Sickles)
I am urging a NO vote on each one!!
I am writing today in support all proposed amendments. HJ1 protection of reproductive health care is extremely important and essential to ensure the health and safety of women across the state of Virginia. I’ve had family and friends suffer miscarriages and I can’t imagine people being put on a registry or jailed for something completely out of their control. The pain of those medical emergencies was excruciating and our job as a society is to support those people not punish them or worse sentence them to certain death. Reproductive rights go beyond miscarriages and medical emergencies; bodily autonomy is and should remain an indelible freedom. Threats of violence towards women have already increased since the election and I am afraid. It is my right to make my health care decisions and the rights of all women and people. I implore and demand elected officials enshrine this right into the state constitution. HJ2 to reinstate voting rights also has my support. Once debts to society have been paid, folks should be granted the freedom to participate in our democracy. If we want to be a healthy, functioning system, we need all voices that want to be heard to be listened to. Finally, HJ9 protects same-sex marriage. Partnership, love, marriage are all deeply personal things that should be a guaranteed personal freedom. Why does the government even care who is in a partnership with who? Standing in opposition of this is antiquated and unnecessary. Our country is supposed to stand for freedom and liberty for all; why are we denying that freedom? What purpose does it serve besides punching others down? Members of the LGBTQ+ community are entitled to the same rights and benefits and heterosexual couples- full stop. If we are to uphold the tenants we ascribe to we must enshrine same sex marriage.
H1: Please oppose enshrining a "right to abortion" in our Virginia constitution. As a citizen of Virginia, a mother and a counselor, I know that abortion is a tragedy and has lifelong negative effects for the mother and obviously the baby. Abortion is the ending of a life and the more that our government justifies it, the more that our human rights are diminished. The right to life is primary. Having abortion legal up to 9 months is especially harmful as we know that babies have survived living outside of the womb as early as 6 months. Please think of the consequences of this bill and don't allow our state to become one that discards the right to life. H2: I support voting rights being returned to a citizen after completing their prison sentence because I believe that people can change and have seen people change and make their lives better. We should reward their effort to improve their life and choices. People who have made mistakes (all of us) and learned from them are valuable citizens. H9: I oppose H9 which would remove the provision that marriage is between one man and one woman. Thank you.
I am writing to express my strong opposition to HJ9, which would remove the Constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Undermining traditional marriage threatens healthy family life, the very foundation of society. We have already experienced major societal harm as a result of family dissolution in our time. Legislation such as HJ9 would advance this dissolution, to our great peril.
I am writing to express my strong opposition to HJ9, which would remove the Constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Undermining traditional marriage threatens healthy family life, the very foundation of society. We have already experienced major societal harm as a result of family dissolution in our time. Legislation such as HJ9 would advance this dissolution, to our great peril.
Regarding HJ1 - Herring I strongly OPPOSE enshrining a "right" to abortion in Virginia's constitution. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm, protect and support the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ2- I SUPPORT HJ2 All people who have served their sentences should have their voting rights restored. HJ9- I strongly OPPOSE HJ9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
It's time to pass HJ9 and amend Virginia's constitution and repeal the ban on same-sex marriage!
This ban does not reflect the attitudes and beliefs of Virginians in 2023. A 2021 poll from the Public Religion Research Institute found that 71% of Virginians support the right of same-sex couples to marry. This percentage has only increased since the question began being asked of voters. In 2006, 53% of voters supported the marriage ban. This huge swing shows the massive shift in public opinion on the issue of marriage, and it is clear evidence that the antiquated ban should no longer be a part of Virginia’s constitution. It’s only fair to revisit a political question that has shown such a vast change since it was first broached. With the removal of women’s protections with the destruction of Roe v. Wade, it is possible that marriage equality will be destroyed on a national level as well. Virginia must take the lead to protect all citizens.
Who can marry, and whether those marriages are recognized, should also not be at the whims of whoever may be in office at the time. It is imperative that we enshrine this access in our Constitution. Everyone should have the right to love, marry, and pay taxes with the consenting adult of their choice.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
The people of Virginia deserve the full extent of the Constitution and Declaration of Independence! “The people themselves must be the ultimate makers of their own Constitution.” - Teddy Roosevelt 1912 Keep Virginia amazing! I’m
Our family strongly supports the inclusion of these basic universal human rights in the Constitution of Virginia. Please listen to residents of Virginia and legislatively make explicit and permanent our full human rights to reproductive autonomy, to the vote for returning citizens, and to equal marriage rights for all. Thank you.
HJ 1- Virginia is the only remaining state in the south that allows women to make decisions about their bodies with their families and their doctors. It’s critical that we ensure this right remains by enshrining it into our constitution. HJ 2- Healthy democracies rely on voter participation. Individuals who have served their sentences should be allowed to rejoin society with their rights intact without jumping through additional hoops. Individuals with disabilities are full members of society and should never be denied their right to vote without sufficient judicial oversight. HJ 9 - The right to chose who you love while still enjoying the privileges and protections a marriage can provide has been the law of the land for nearly a decade. It’s time for our constitution to reflect that reality.
I urge you to reject both the HJ1 and HJ9 bills. Residents of the state of Virginia can not feel proud of a state that approves murdering their unborn children (and calling it a "right") and allowing the basic family unit of society to be undermined.
Please vote no.
I strongly support all three proposed amendments. Members of my family are at risk here. Taxpayers, loving, caring members of our community. Their rights to happiness and security MUST be guaranteed. I strongly support the rights of two adults to marry and form families. Anything else seems absurd. Reproductive health is a matter solely between a woman and her physician. The State must make this very clear and must resist attempts by others to control decisions that are not theirs to make. I vote.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
My family and I are in favor of HJ2. There is simply no need for Virginian's to have to go through Governor's permission to restore their voting rights. It is vital that all eligible Virginians should be allowed to exercise their right to vote. All couples deserve to have their marriages legally acknowledged, upheld, and protected regardless of gender, sex, or race. HJ9 would accomplish that. I have left a separate comment regarding the right to reproductive healthcare. I encourage you to accept all three constitutional amendments.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Please support HJ9 to affirm the right to marry for all Virginians. All should be treated equally and fairly in this process. Affirming the right to marry ensures stability for all families to thrive in the commonwealth and contribute toward its well-being and strength. We also contribute to our communities, schools, and the common good and should be afforded the same rights as fellow citizens.
I OPPOSE HJ9 which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman,
HJ1 Reproductive Freedom Do I recall the last time that as a man I was unable to health care decisions about my own body? No, because that’s never happened. I fail to see why women should not enjoy the same rights to bodily autonomy and if we are to be a beacon of light in the commonwealth for ALL citizens, we must endeavor to enshrine the right to reproductive freedoms here in Virginia. Today’s reality is that even with a national abortion ban, the women in my family will be able to choose to safely end a pregnancy because ours is a family of means who can if necessary travel anywhere on the planet for reproductive or other health care. I write today to ensure that such rights aren’t limited to those with means but are freely available within Virginia. Abortion should be legal, safe, and the decision left to those who are pregnant with guidance from medical professionals. True democracy depends on equal rights for all people. Losing our right to reproductive choice opens the door to the loss of other freedoms including other healthcare choices, marriage equality, access to contraception, and the right to engage in private, consensual intimacy without government interference. Not only is the right to a safe and legal abortion a matter of personal freedom, it’s also a major factor in the movements for racial and economic equality. Black individuals, and all underserved communities, already experience unfair barriers and limited access to adequate healthcare services. HJ2 Restoration of Voting Rights If we are nation that is free to elect a recently convicted felon, why should it be the case that a convicted person who has completed their sentence not be allowed to vote? I support an amendment to the Virginia Constitution to guarantee that people who have been disenfranchised due to a felony conviction will have their rights automatically restored upon completion of their sentences, without additional steps or paperwork after they are no longer incarcerated, and to ensure people with disabilities never lose their rights without an appropriate judicial finding. This has never been a partisan issue. Both Democratic and Republican governors have chosen to restore voting rights to thousands of citizens; however, Virginia's current governor has reversed the trend. People should not be permanently defined by their past mistakes. Virginians who have successfully served their time should be able to fully rejoin civic life. It is time for Virginians to act to amend our Constitution to create a routine restoration process that reflects fair accountability and encourages civic engagement. HJ9 Marriage Equality Why should only heterosexual couples suffer the trials, tribulation and absolute insanity that comes with married life? Given risks at the national level to marriage rights, it’s important to properly enshrine the right to marry in Virginia to best protect the rights of all citizens.
Support for Right to Reproductive Freedom Amendment I strongly support the proposed amendment to the Virginia Constitution establishing reproductive freedom as a fundamental right. This amendment ensures that individuals can make autonomous choices about their own reproductive health, free from government interference, except when a compelling state interest in protecting health is demonstrated. By safeguarding personal decision-making and aligning with evidence-based medical standards, this amendment promotes both health and justice. Additionally, it protects individuals and those who assist them from penalization, ensuring reproductive freedom is accessible to all Virginians. Support for Right to Vote Amendment I fully support this amendment, which strengthens our democracy by recognizing voting as a fundamental right for all eligible Virginians. Restoring voting rights automatically upon release from incarceration reflects our belief in rehabilitation and the importance of civic engagement. By simplifying the process, this amendment ensures that citizens reentering society can fully participate in our democracy without unnecessary barriers. Additionally, the clarification on mental capacity respects voters' autonomy while providing a thoughtful safeguard. Support for Right to Marry Amendment This amendment is a vital step toward equality, affirming that marriage is a fundamental right, regardless of gender, sex, or race. By removing outdated and discriminatory language, Virginia's Constitution will better reflect our commitment to equal rights and the recognition of all lawful marriages. Ensuring that every couple is treated equally under the law honors the dignity of all Virginians and upholds the Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell v. Hodges. This amendment aligns our laws with contemporary values of inclusivity and respect.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
Marriage is a right and should be allowed to anyone who wants to do so. This includes LGBTQ+ and same sex marriage. The government should not have a say in who a person loves
There is no good reason for you to be meeting outside of the legislative session. I do not support any of these amendments. Our current laws & the SC ruling have made it clear that non-citizens may not vote. The citizens of VA do not want abortion up to birth leaving the baby to die. It's abhorrent! Felons' voting rights upon release should be judged individually. Reciprocity or some other consideration may be required.
As a constituent, I’m urging you to vote yes on all three amendments. Reproductive care, as protected by HJ1, is health care and needs to be universally accessible. Decisions about what types of care are necessary should be made at the discretion of a doctor and a patient, not by the government. No person or healthcare provider should fear for repercussions from exercising that right. I am in favor of HJ2. Virginian's should not need a Governor's permission to restore their voting rights. It is vital that all eligible Virginians should be allowed to exercise their right to vote in a democracy. Couples deserve to have their marriages legally acknowledged, upheld, and protected no matter their gender, sex, or race. HJ9 would accomplish that. I encourage you to accept all three constitutional amendments.
I do not support any of the three amendments. I think the current committees are rushing these bills through. Every abortion takes a human life and this citizen of the Commonwealth will raise my voice for those who have no voice.
I fervently support of HJ9, a vital resolution that will affirm marriage equality for all individuals, irrespective of gender or sexual orientation. This legislation is not merely a matter of legal recognition; it embodies the fundamental human rights of love, choice, and dignity. In a society that prides itself on the principles of liberty and justice for all, it is imperative that we extend these values to every citizen. Marriage is a sacred bond that should be accessible to all, and by passing HJ9, we will take a monumental step towards a more inclusive and equitable Virginia, where every family can thrive without discrimination.
HJ1: We've seen the medical disasters that can occur when doctors are afraid to treat pregnancy complications due to abortion restrictions. The answer is to get government interference out of the matter as much as feasible. As someone who could become pregnant, I find it terrifying that I might have to navigate complex legal situations just to obtain appropriate healthcare. For these reasons, I support HJ1. HJ2: I believe voting is a fundamental right, not just a privilege or luxury. For this reason I support HJ2, which would expand the right to vote to more adults who have been unjustly stripped of it. HJ9: If someday I am in a committed relationship with someone of my own sex/gender, I hope that it can be recognized by the government in order to make our legal status clear and stable. All same-gender couples deserve that opportunity. Let's put the prejudices of the past behind us.
HJ 1- Virginia is the only remaining state in the south that allows women to make decisions about their bodies with their families and their doctors. It’s critical that we ensure this right remains by enshrining it into our constitution. HJ 2- Healthy democracies rely on voter participation. Individuals who have served their sentences should be allowed to rejoin society with their rights intact without jumping through additional hoops. Individuals with disabilities are full members of society and should never be denied their right to vote without sufficient judicial oversight. HJ 9 - The right to chose who you love while still enjoying the privileges and protections a marriage can provide has been the law of the land for nearly a decade. It’s time for our constitution to reflect that reality. As we watch the Supreme Court, ruling after ruling, we’ve seen rights that a majority of voters support rolled back. Now it’s more important than ever that Virginia take state action to protect its residents.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I am a resident of Henrico, VA, and am writing as a very concerned citizen of Virginia, and as a woman, in SUPPORT of ALL THREE of these constitutional amendments - worried that my rights, and those of fellow Virginians, are under attack and are soon be threatened further. I am concerned for fellow citizens, for our future citizens, and our collective freedom. These Amendments will serve to guide lawmakers to protect these fundamental freedoms in future deliberations and decision-making. Our voices deserve, and need to be heard, and should continue to be fundamentally involved in decisions made about our bodies, our lives, and our representation in our representative democracy. I ask that all of these three constitutional amendments be added to the Virginia State Constitution today. It is the right thing to do, and time is of the essence to ensure the protection and the rights of all of our Citizens. Thank you.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
Ref. HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ1 ignores the fact that modern science is clearly showing that "life" in a mother's womb starts earlier than we understood in 1972 and the negative effects of an abortion on a mother extend years past the abortion date. What more will science unveil in the coming years. You should wait and see. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 is bad politics. You have seen in the most recent election that pandering to an extremist wing of the Democrat Party is suicidal politics. Do you really want to repeat the mistakes of Elizabeth Guzman? Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that address the demand side of abortion. We need robust support to help expecting mothers, and aggressive accountability existed for fathers, not a misguided policy that hits the wrong target. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. This effort to change the constitution is out of step with the public and you will pay a cost for this "initiative" in the election in 2025.
HJ 1 – Herring I strongly oppose adding a "right" to abortion to Virginia's constitution. There are few protections in place for unborn children, such as requiring parental consent and a ban on partial-birth abortions, and HJ1 would endanger even those. It would also endanger future legislation protecting unborn babies. Babies are people before, during, and after birth and HJ1's policy of unlimited abortion up until birth would be a tragedy and devastation for our state. Instead, I urge that you put policies in place that protect and affirm the dignity and life of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – Bennett-Parker I support HJ 2. As in most states, if someone has completed their sentences that person should have voting rights restored. HJ 9 – Sickles I oppose HJ 9. Marriage came before any nation, religion, or law in its design and purpose and should not be changed.
HU1-I reject HJ1. Virginia is a land of freedom going back to our inception. Virginia had to fight its way into being. Much is the same with these unborn babies-the only difference is that they are not heard. We need to give them the freedom of birth to be heard. HU9 I oppose HJ9. In marriage, two bodies are joined to become one. This one body is being messed with in this constitutional proposal with ideas and rhetoric that will deliberately cost Virginians spoils from this over-popularized, temporary, contemporary thought. Stop the continuation of this illogical proposal. HJ2 Yes, I support HJ 2. Prisoners are people. When they have completed their sentences they can vote.
I say no to abortion at anytime I say marriage is between a man and a woman
Adults should be able to marry who they please. It is for no one to decide besides the people involved. The “union of a man and woman” is an archaic religious viewpoint and has no place in policy and politics.
There are 2 sexes. Man and woman. Marriage is for 1 man and 1 woman. There is no need to have a Constitutional Amendment stating otherwise.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I am opposed to HJ1 on reproductive freedom because it fails to take into account the rights of an unborn baby whose life would be terminated by an abortion. I am opposed to HJ on same-sex marriage, as it violates the traditional and proper definition of marriage.
I support
I support
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose HJ1 and HJ9
We love who we love Gay Marriage is legal in VA WE WANT IT It needs to be protected We cannot keep rolling back rights and protections Again The government needs to stay OUT of the personal lives of it’s citizens Want for others what you want for yourself The need to control others needs to STOP
I vehemently oppose HJ 1. There is no freedom in being allowed to take someone else's life.. At the moment of conception, another person's life begins - another person with their own bodies and their own freedoms. They have a right to LIVE! Please consider ways to support women, children and families instead - as Virginians, we should support and protect the life and the dignity of every human being, no matter how small. I vehemently oppose HJ 9 - marriage should not be redefined. Marriage is the union of one man and one woman and other unions are NOT the same.
Dear House of Delegates. I am a new voter and as a new voter I ask that you hear my voice. Everyday thousands of women are dying due to the fact that they are not receiving the proper reproductive care they need. Why should rape victims be forced to carry the child of their attacker, some of these victims just twelve years old? Why should a twelve year old girl be a mother when she could be a kid instead? Why should women have to carry a pregnancy that could in danger their lives? Why should women have to carry a fetus that wouldn’t live long after birth or be disabled? Why? Women deserve the right to proper health care. Some people cannot afford to raise a child or give a disabled child the care they might need, therefore they should be able to choose if they want to continue with the pregnancy. Women shouldn’t even have to explain why they want an abortion to people. It is their right and theirs only, no anyone else’s. I’m also addressing the marriage equality act. As a member of the LGBTQ community myself I wake up everyday scared. I’m scared of being attacked and harassed in the streets purely because of my sexuality. I should be able to love who I want no matter the public’s opinion. Gay marriage became legal in Virginia in 2014, that’s just ten years ago, and suddenly the government wants to revoke it? Just imagine how many lives that effects if revoked. What will happen to those already married? Are they going to be forced to divorce because they don’t fit the imagine of a proper marriage. LGBTQ community suicide rates are on the rise. It’s awful that people would rather die then live because of the hate they receive. Why do this? Because the Bible says so? With all do respect I fully support freedom to religion, but the government is not a church and should not be treated as one. Why do this? Because it’s not natural? Many animals exhibit homosexual behavior, and no “woke agenda” is confusing them. You can’t just take away our rights and say “them’s the breaks” if this bill is passed then you’re allowing discrimination. I should not have think “I’ll be better off dead” almost day because I’m terrified. We are heading towards a dystopian future. Without your help delegates people will suffer. If you care about democracy and care about your citizens, you will help us fight this discrimination. You will help us fight for love.
I support HJ1, as a mother and currently pregnant with my second child I believe ALL women should have access to reproductive freedoms. I do not want to have to fear if I will receive proper care in my state or how far my life has to be at risk for my doctors to perform life saving care. I want to live and be able to raise the children the country is so set on women having with little to no support. I want to continue to go to my doctors appointments and feel safe and know my doctor is not fearful they will be arrested if they give me care. I support HJ9 and protecting marriage equality. Every Virginian should have the right to love who they love and have the same rights under law as I do in my marriage. I believe in loving your neighbor as yourself, which means believing they deserve the same rights you have.
I reject HJ 1 Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
I oppose all abortions with only exceptions for tape and incest
I strongly support these amendments. Everyone should be allowed the Healthcare they need to live a healthy life. We should have complete control over our bodies and our lives. We should be free to marry who we love. Thank you.
People should be able to marry who they choose. The ONLY and I mean the ONLY thing the government should have any say so and interference with that is if there is a minor being married. Same sex marriage effects no one other than the folks that stand behind the title of something in government and hide behind the name of "Christianity". Government and politics are not supposed to cross each other but here we are year after year facing issues because of YOUR religions. Keep marriage OPEN to all who want to be married!
I oppose HJ9- marriage and families need to be prioritized in our state for the raising of our children. The union of a man and a woman is different than a same sex union.
I oppose HJ9. Marriage is to be between one man and one woman and the provisions in Virginia law we have now need to be kept.
I oppose HJ1. We do not need more abortions in Virginia. Abortion harms women and kills children. I have seen my own dead child at 10 weeks old. I oppose HJ9. Marriage is between a man and a woman. It is the building block of society.
HJ1- A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. HJ2-I support all people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored. HJ9-I oppose HJ9- Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I support these amendments.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman
I strongly support passing 1&3 - I honestly can’t believe we are even STILL talking about the right to bodily autonomy and marriage. 🙄 2 - I support this, but would suggest removing the exception to felons voting from the language. Everyone deserves the right to vote, regardless of decisions they have made or been forced to make. That said, if a felon can sit in the WH, why in the world would we think it’s right to withhold the right to vote from the rest of them?!
I vehemently oppose HJ 1. There is no freedom in being allowed to take someone else's life.. At the moment of conception, another person's life begins - another person with their own bodies and their own freedoms. They have a right to LIVE! Please consider ways to support women, children and families instead - as Virginians, we should support and protect the life and the dignity of every human being, no matter how small. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored. Voting is a privilege! I vehemently oppose HJ 9 - marriage should not be redefined. Marriage is the union of one man and one woman and other unions are NOT the same.
I am opposed to HJ-9. Please vote No on HJ-9.
I support this amendment on marriage rights
Please support the right to choose and pass HJ 1. Please support the right to vote by passing HJ 2. Just because someone made a mistake, they should not have a life sentence preventing them from voting after they have served their sentence. Please support love and the right to marriage by passing HJ 9.
I strongly support passing 1&3 - I honestly can’t believe we are even STILL talking about the right to bodily autonomy and marriage. 🙄 2 - I support this, but would suggest removing the exception to felons voting from the language. Everyone deserves the right to vote, regardless of decisions they have made or been forced to make. That said, if a felon can sit in the WH, why in the world would we think it’s right to withhold the right to vote from the rest of them?!
As a Catholic; as a single, childless woman; and as a member of Generation Z, I gratefully take this opportunity to comment on the proposed amendments. First, I implore you to reject HJ1 – Herring. Unless there is a strong commitment to protecting human life at all stages of development, starting at conception, our Commonwealth cannot truly achieve safety for all, equality of opportunity for all, an encouraging future for the next generation, or the sense that everyone is unreservedly valued. So please oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s Constitution and endangering what safeguards there do exist for the youngest and smallest in our Commonwealth (such as the partial birth abortion ban and the parental consent law). Instead, choose to craft policies that lift up and support the lives of mother and child as both endowed with dignity. Second, I encourage you to move ahead with HJ2 – Bennett-Parker. If our Commonwealth should be a champion of the life and dignity of each and every person, it should also practice a justice that is fundamentally and thoroughly humanistic. This includes restoring voting rights after an individual finishes out his or her sentence. Third and finally, I urge you to reject HJ9 – Sickles and its removal of the definition of marriage as between one man and one woman from Virginia’s Constitution. Defining marriage as between one man and one woman affirms the important and distinctive purpose proper to this institution, a purpose which “predates any nation, religion, or law” (Virginia Catholic Conference). Simultaneously, here as in the other responses to the proposed amendments, the dignity and worth that belong unconditionally to all persons by nature should be strongly and repeatedly emphasized. Thank you so much for this opportunity to comment.
The state has no authority to define marriage. It can only acknowledge the reality of marriage as a covenant between one man and one woman. Obergefell was an unlawful court decision and our state has no obligation or authority to legislate its judgements. HJ9 profanes marriage as a God-given institution by attempting to equate marriage with sexually perverse relationships. By proposing to grant the latter the same rights and privileges afforded to truly married couple, this bill would facilitate further perversion of law and justice. For example, it threatens to infringe on the rights of Speech and Religion for those opposed to homosexual unions. It also enables the harm of children subject to adoption and upbringing by same-sex parents. At its core, this proposed amendment is a violation of God's law and created order. Reject HJ9 and repent.
Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Reject HJ9- Civilized societies, particularly those from which this nation has it roots, have, from ancient times, recognized marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage, as such, is a bedrock of civilization, for it is this family unit (male-father/female-mother, uniting and bringing forth children) which provides the best opportunity for a stable atmosphere for nurturing the growth of a healthy moral society. Redefining marriage, which is what HJ9 intends, in effect diminishes and obfuscates the importance of this sacred unit. Rejecting HJ9 will not prevent other types of human cohabitation, but it will help preserve what is arguably the most vital pillar of American society. Reject HJ9.
Reject HJ9- Civilized societies, particularly those from which this nation has it roots, have, from ancient times, recognized marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage, as such, is a bedrock of civilization, for it is this family unit (male-father/female-mother, uniting and bringing forth children) which provides the best opportunity for a stable atmosphere for nurturing the growth of a healthy moral society. Redefining marriage, which is what HJ9 intends, in effect diminishes and obfuscates the importance of this sacred unit. Rejecting HJ9 will not prevent other types of human cohabitation, but it will help preserve what is arguably the most vital pillar of American society. Reject HJ9.
Reject HJ9- Civilized societies, particularly those from which this nation has it roots, have, from ancient times, recognized marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage, as such, is a bedrock of civilization, for it is this family unit (male-father/female-mother, uniting and bringing forth children) which provides the best opportunity for a stable atmosphere for nurturing the growth of a healthy moral society. Redefining marriage, which is what HJ9 intends, in effect diminishes and obfuscates the importance of this sacred unit. Rejecting HJ9 will not prevent other types of human cohabitation, but it will help preserve what is arguably the most vital pillar of American society. Reject HJ9.
Marriage equality is a basic human right, tantamount to the phrasing found in our Declaration of Independence; “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” As the proud parent of a gay son and his husband, our wonderful son-in law, as well as being lifelong friends of multiple same sex couples who’ve celebrated their personal love with legally sanctioned marital sacraments, I stand unequivocally as their ally. No one should be denied their basic human rights to love whomever they behold as a sacred lifelong partner, enjoying all the legal benefits therein such lawfully established relationships provide for all men and women, be it under local, state or federal jurisdiction. I submit herewith my unequivocal solid support for HJ9~Gordon A MacArthur
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 and enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
These proposals do not promote the common good. Abortion does grave injustice to innocent life. Once a debt to society has been paid a person should have their rights and duties as a citizen restored. Marriage of one man and one woman is the building block of a society with a strong future. Keep Virginia’s future strong!
Dear House Privileges and Elections Committee Members, I am writing to express my strong support for HJ9, a resolution to amend the Virginia Constitution to protect marriage equality for all. Every person deserves the right to love and marry freely. I remember, not so long ago, when that right was not yet protected by US law, and my gay friends had no right to marry the ones they loved. I remember, in 2015, when the US Supreme Court decision Obergefell v. Hodges finally decided that gay people have an equal right to marriage, as the 14th Amendment grants citizens the equal protection of the laws. However, as the recent Dobbs decision has shown, even landmark Supreme Court cases that protect citizens' rights, and whose protection millions of Americans rely upon, can be suddenly overturned. Indeed, when writing his opinion on the Dobbs v. Jackson decision, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas wrote that he would further call into question Obergefell v. Hodges. Since then, I and many other Virginians have been rightly concerned that the Obergefell decision may be overturned in the coming years. If that should come to pass, the Virginia Constitution, as it is currently written, would strip away gay people's right to marry those they love. I find this unacceptable. Now is the time to amend our state Constitution so that equal rights will be protected. Virginia is for lovers; let it remain so! We now have an opportunity in Virginia to ensure that the right to marriage equality, regardless of gender, sex, or race, will be protected, even in the face of potential changes to federal policy. As your constituent, I urge you to support HJ9 and make this amendment a priority. The time to protect ALL Virginians is now, and I hope you will stand with us by supporting this critical amendment. Thank you for your attention to this essential issue. Most Sincerely, Ms. Berkin, a voter in Norfolk, VA
HJ1 - keep abortion and pregnancy care legal and safe. HJ2 - these people have served their time and deserve the right to vote again without any approval or authorizations needed HJ9 - all families are valid in the state of Virginia. Everyone has a right to marry and create a family with whomever they choose. Virginia is for Lovers.
Matthew 19:4-6 LSB — “Have you not read that He who created them from the beginning MADE THEM MALE AND FEMALE, and said, ‘FOR THIS REASON A MAN SHALL LEAVE HIS FATHER AND MOTHER AND BE JOINED TO HIS WIFE, AND THE TWO SHALL BECOME ONE FLESH’? “So they are no longer two, but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let no man separate.” I ask you, have you not read? Rebellion against God's creational order will not lead to the flourishing of this great state of Virginia. Rebellion will lead to the judgements that befalls all places that do not submit to God - Sodom, Gomorrah, Tyre, Assyria, Babylon, Sidon, Edom, Moab, Rome. It is the Lord that determines the rise and fall of nations and He has, and can again, bring about decline over the failure to hold the marriage bed in high esteem. Reject all efforts to rebel against God's design for marriage- a male and a female. Reject HJ9. Obedience to God's design is GOOD for a people that wants to flourish. It is GOOD for men. It is GOOD for women. It is GOOD for children. It is GOOD for families. It is GOOD for society. It is GOOD for leaders.
I am the proud mother of a gay son. He is happily married. I view the right to marriage is a basic and fundamental human right. No single human, body of government or other has the right to deny this. To do so, makes the person less than human. Denial of this human right is a hallmark of authoritarian government and theocracies. Denial does not belong in a democracy
Beginning with the term: “Reproduction” includes birth control, sterilization, pregnancy, abortion, menstrual regulation (abortion vacuum procedure without a pregnancy test), sex or gender changes, surrogate pregnancy, creating and destroying developing human embryos, and cloning currently illegal, see VA Code, 32.1-12,21-22. The words, “every individual,” apply to all adult males, females, as well as minors under 18 because these words are not restricted, modified or qualified by the Amendment authors. Therefore, no means of reproductive freedom behavior is excluded legal protection because of age or sex by the authors of the Reproductive Freedom Amendment, RFA. Additionally, the Supreme Court ruled, “neither the Fourteenth Amendment nor the Bill of Rights is for adults alone.” [In re Gault, (1967)] The RFA states, “The Commonwealth shall not discriminate in the protection or enforcement of this fundamental right.” But treating males or females under 18 differently than males or females over 18 is a textbook example of discrimination. Attorneys Carrie Severino and Frank Scaturro noted points of the Ohio Abortion Referendum language (2023), which are strikingly similar to the Virginia counterparts that: “The proposed Ohio constitutional amendment would make the state … become a likely jurisdiction to harbor a future Kermit Gosnell, whether he is a practitioner of abortion, sex-change surgery, or other procedures under the umbrella of reproductive care. Complete strangers who assist children in obtaining life-altering procedures would find themselves on the right side of the law, while parents who try to protect their children would be deemed to have run afoul of the law.” “Any individual who tries to assist a minor in pursuing such procedures would be protected by law, while a parent who objects would be cut out of the decision-making process, perhaps even penalized.” “It appears that the amendment … would even offer a level of protection to nonphysicians in their performance of covered procedures — whether abortion, sex-change surgery, or something else. … the language extends to any “person or entity” who provides assistance with the procedure at issue.” [National Review online, March 13, 2023, “Ohio’s Disastrous Abortion Ballot Proposal”]
I care deeply about reproductive rights and marriage equality. I support these amendments.
I support all 3 amendments and look forward to Virginia enshrining restoration of voting rights, marriage equality, and reproductive freedom into our constitution
I fully support HJ1, HJ2 and HJ9. In a time when women's rights and LGBTQ+ rights are being taken away Virginia needs to be forward thinking and solidify those rights. I want my daughters to grow up in a state where they are respected and valued and able to make informed decisions about their own bodies and have the autonomy to make decisions about their lives without fear of government intervention. Please pass these amendments!!
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Honorable Committee: I oppose HJ1-Herring bill, the enshrining of abortion due to no restrictions up to 9 months and after. I can see if there is a danger to the mother's life and the baby, but at 12 weeks of age, the BABY has a heartbeat and is a human being. The Baby's civil rights must be taken into consideration for it is not the Baby's fault that it was created. What about the Baby's Right to Choose? Those who have sex need to have more accountability for there is birth control other than abortion pill available to prevent pregnancy. I find it disgusting that there are certain individuals who celebrate the killing of an unborn child or the killing of a baby after full term. In abortion, a BABY is mutilated, broken apart and pulled out in pieces. The BABY is a living being that did not choose to be created. It is not the Baby's fault. There need to be benefits available for those who are unable to conceive to adopt babies created by accident. It is inhumane to want to kill a baby for no reason after 12 weeks of gestation and also uncivilized to enjoy the killing of said baby for profit which Planned Parenthood sell the parts of the baby! DO NONE OF YOU HAVE A HEART OF ANY KIND TO THINK OF THE UNBORN BABY AND IT'S RIGHT TO LIFE? I also Oppose HJ2 Bill Bennett Parker I also Oppose HJ9 Bill Sickles Thank you for your time and attention. Kristin Holte
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I do not support HJ1. It does not protect innocent children in the womb. Life begins at conception and babies deserve a chance to live. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
HJ1, the right to reproductive freedom. All Virginians should have accessible, quality healthcare that they can afford. This includes all aspects of reproductive care for women - ongoing reproductive health checks, birth control, post-natal care, and abortion - to be determined by the woman and her health care providers. Abortion should be a safe, legal decision made without government interference or penalties for anyone who offers aid or assistance in the process. Virginians have shown their support for reproductive freedom without intrusion from the government. HJ2, the right to vote, restoration of rights. Voting rights should be restored automatically once a person convicted of a felony successfully completes their sentence. Their participation in the democratic process should not be dependent on a vague, arbitrary process decided by the Governor without full explanation of decisions. The Virginia Constitution should be amended to provide the automatic restoration of rights once the sentence for a felony conviction is completed. HJ3, marriage equality. Virginians deserve the opportunity to love and live peacefully with the person of their choice. Just as laws regarding mixed race marriages were changed as citizens attitudes and understanding evolved, the current ban against same-sex marriage should not be part of the Virginia constitution. Virginians' support of same-sex marriage has increased to about 70% in 2021 (Public Religion Research Institute). The current level of support is evidence that the ban should be removed from the constitution. I hope that these bills will be thoughtfully considered for the improved quality of life for all Virginians.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
HJ1, a proposed amendment to the Virginia Constitution that would enshrine extremist no-limits abortion. They do not do this in Europe. OPPOSE This Dem abortion amendment to the Virginia Constitution has got to be the most extreme in the country. No parental consent for minor girls. No protections for a fully-formed viable baby from elective late-term abortions up to the 9th month. This sort of extremism is not what Virginians want.
I am writing to loudly support all three of these bills. I’m excited to see Virginia embrace policy that makes us more equitable and safer during such scary times. I hope we can do what’s right and get these bills through.
I am Dr. Michael Huffman, Executive Director with the Virginia Assembly of Independent Baptists. I represent the voices of over 500+ Baptist Churches scattered throughout the Commonwealth and we oppose HJ9, and urge all representative to vote no. Please see my brief in the attachment below. Thank you.
I strongly support these three amendments to our state constitution. I want to protect and support the rights of all Virginia's.
I support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. In regards to HJ1, as many said before me, reproductive rights are human rights. A person should be able to make the decision about carrying or terminating a pregnancy without say from the government or religious organizations. Enshrining the right to abortion will ensure that we do not see the unnecessary death of pregnant people due to being denied care, especially during emergency situations. We have seen so many stories coming out of states where this right has been revoked, which has led to the deaths of many unnecessarily. We need to remember that when woman are seeking late term abortions, this is typically a life saving procedure for the mother who is carrying a fetus that is no longer viable. We cannot force a person to suffer through the death of their child and then potentially lose their own life as well due to lack of legal care. Virginia is at the forefront of the southern states in making sure reproductive care is available and it should stay that way. HJ2 - I believe that this is a step in the right direction and support reformed felons being able to regain their civil right to vote and participate in our democracy. HJ9 - All people deserve to marry the person they love, regardless of gender or race. Marriage is a contract where two people are joining their lives. Any adult couple deserves to be able to enter into these contracts. It does not infringe on the rights of others and will ensure that they are able to advocate for their spouse in situations where this is necessary. Many objections to marriage equality stem from a religious viewpoint. In a government where there should be a separation of church and state, this should not be allowed to affect the law. Thank you for your time!
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and its purpose has been put into practice before any nation, religion, or law. Marriage is the fundamental fabric of society - and without it - families would be worse off.
I strongly oppose the proposed amendment to change the definition of marriage as a union between one biological man and one biological woman.
Bill HJ9 should be rejected as marriage is the union of one man and one woman.
I am in support of all three bills - HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. No one other than a person with a uterus and their doctor should be involved decisions for their wellbeing and health. Women should inately hold autonomy over their own body. It is embarrassing that we are still fighting for this. Marriage equality was decided by the federal government, our state should solidify that right to protect its people from possible attacks from the next administration. If you don't like gay marriage, don't have one.
Dear Honorable Delegates of this Committee, I strongly oppose the constitutional amendments proposed by HJ1 and HJ9. Please oppose those amendments. Let us acknowledge the obvious fact that every individual has a fundamental right to life (including the unborn) and to a family. The so called "right to reproductive freedom" appears alive, well and unrestricted in the Commonwealth and our nation. How can we know this? Well, because of the result -- the woman's pregnancy. Human life begins at conception, which is a scientific fact. At that point, the man and woman have already reproduced. Therefore, the "right" actually being sought is the power to legally take a human life, the very human life that is the result of a man's and a women's unrestricted exercise of their right to reproduce. The time "to make and effectuate one's own decisions about all matters related to one's pregnancy" is what men and woman should do prior to intercourse and before reproducing. The protection of human life is, and always has been, a compelling state interest. What is not justifiable is the taking of an innocent human life. With respect to the conduct of committee meetings, the public should have the ability to physically appear and to testify in person before this committee on these proposed amendments. The public is entitled to and should have been given earlier notice, well in advance of such a meeting, in order to allow citizens adequate time to read the proposed amendments and to prepare comments and/or testimony thereon. Therefore, I request that the meeting be adjourned and continued at a later date to allow for greater public participation in the committee's deliberations. Thank you for your kind consideration of my comments.
I oppose the HJ1 and HJ9 amendments. These amendments enshrine the murder of children and defy sacred biblical definition of marriage.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose HJ9 as it seems to disrupt the Christian principles this state was built on. It seems to make sin common and approved.
To all parties concerned, thank you for reviewing this important piece of legislature. After this presidential election, many of us in the lgbt+ community feel that our needs will not continue to be met in this country. Please consider how upset you would be on an individual level if you were told that the person that you loved was not deemed the correct choice by a third party denying the right to marriage. Should we not all be entitled to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness? I beseech you to listen to what our community has to say, we are taxpayers too.
I strongly OPPOSE HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 Legislation. This nation is supposed to protect life, not destroy it as stated in the HJ1 proposal. Every life is valuable from the moment of conception to natural death. The greatest shame be on any legislator who undermines this right.
As a wife and mother, I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has a natural design and purpose that cannot and should not be changed.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect preborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians. Please use your God- given voice and stand up for the most vulnerable.
It’s important for Virginia to protect people’s freedom from government overreach. If 2 consenting adults want to get married, regardless of who they like, they should be allowed to get married. Freedom reigns. Any restrictions on constitutional freedoms would make America look like Iran and North Korea. Protecting women’s rights to abortion is equally important.
I strongly oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. Sincerely, Susan Bond Burke, VA
Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
It is high time that we enshrine the right for all Virginia citizens to be married regardless of sexual orientation. Ours is a land of equality where every person should be free to pursue happiness in partnership with any consenting adult. Thank you for your commitment to doing the right thing for all who dwell in our great commonwealth.
- I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. - HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. - HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. - A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. - REJECT HJ 1. Instead, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. - Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose bill HJ1 and ask the delegates to represent me and many unborn children. We can not always legislate issues of the heart such as caring for the unborn; but laws offer a restraint to unbridled killing of the unborn and psychological harm to the mother in crisis. We do the mothers a disservice in allowing abortions up til birth. It is cruel and will scare her soul. The memory of silencing the human life lives on long after the procedure is finished. The least we can do is to amend this bill to place the 24-hour waiting period and the presence of the ultra -sound images. The fact that these two considerations provide a slight hinderance would only be opposed by those striving to make money from the abortion industry. Giving he unborn a chance at life and the mother a reflective window to not make a hasty decision is a safe and reasonable thing to do. I oppose bill HJ2. Virginia already has laws on the books to help those who have served their time be reissued their voting rights. My concern is this may be providing a loop hole for non-citizens to vote. I oppose bill HJ9. My concern is the wording of "individuals" instead of adults. Are we leaving it open for the marriage of minors. We must safe guard children in this increasingly immoral society. Please take time to reword this bill.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I firmly support the passage of HJ 1, HJ 2, and HJ 9 amendments. For HJ1, abortion can be necessary for both healthcare and economic reasons. It should be a mother's decision to determine what is best for her health, especially in scenarios when it could be fatal without the abortion. Without the safety net of H1, maternal mortality rates could increase even more than they already have compared to pre-pandemic levels. We can not afford to let more mothers die from not receiving the care they need. Additionally, there is our economic incentive to abortion by allowing a woman to choose when to become a mother. Most women who seek an abortion are already low-income. When these women are blocked from ending their pregnancy, they wind up worse off than they would if they could choose to have a child when they are more financially secure. It would be a detriment to Virginia to punish women by making them give up their stability or even their own lives. For HJ 9, equality is a fundamental civil right and there is no legal reason a person shouldn't be able to choose who they love and marry. With 4% of Virginia's population being a part of the LGBT community, it is discriminatory and unfair to not allow them equal rights for marriage. There is, again, an economic incentive, as this also helps retain high-skilled workers from the LGBT community in the state of Virginia where they can settle down and have kids of their own if they want. Without this protection, more Virginians would move out of state and cause a loss to our communities and economy.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1 - Reproductive freedom is mandatory to keep the wellbeing of families secure. The only refusal of this is on basis of religion, which should NOT interfere with the state. Reproductive freedom stimulates the economy and takes a large off burden off the welfare system. Not to mention it is morally just, defending victims of sexual violence. HJ2 - Right to vote for ALL is nothing but just. Felons can be rehabilitated. Being a felon does not deny your place as a citizen of the United States. If a felon can run for president and win, a felon should be able to vote. HJ9 - Guaranteeing same sex couples have the right to marry has many benefits: Stimulates the economy, protects same sex families from financial burden, enables same sex families to provide their children a stable home life. The majority of dissenters are on the basis of religion, which cannot be involved in politics.
If it’s not baby, then what is it? A hamburger? A five year old is not as developed as a 20 year old. Nor is a 3 week old as developed as a 9 month old. And yet we wouldn’t call the 5 year old less human. Calling people fetuses is just a way to dehumanize the killing of humans by not calling them humans. End abortion. Allow people to vote and restore their voting powers. They are people too. Marriage is between a man and a woman. Homosexual marriage is contrary to natural design. It doesn’t even make sense from an evolutionary standpoint.
In regards to bill HJ1, we need to ensure that Virginia is ready to protect its citizens in the case of larger abortion restrictions at the federal level. This bill highlights what is not considered in many states and at a federal level which is that as Americans we have a right to bodily autonomy. Reproductive freedom is a right to privacy. Enshrining this right in our state constitution will ensure that women, men, and individuals of any gender feel safe and welcome in Virginia. For HJ2, individuals with felons will never be able to reintegrate into society if they lack the right to vote. A right which makes them American. This is one of the simplest steps Virginia can take to properly rehabilitate formerly incarcerated peoples. Regarding HJ9, repealing and replacing the existing constitutional provision which defines union as only between a man and a woman is necessary both to abide by federal court decisions and to ensure all Virginia residents are treated equally. With the inserted cavet of religious entities being allowed to refuse to conduct a marriage if they choose, there is no reason for anyone of any religious belief to reject this constitutional amendment. It allows them to maintain their freedom of religion while guaranteeing basic freedom to all Virginia residents. Virginia is not Virginia without the LGBTQ community or the black and PoC communities who simply wish to love. As a lifelong resident of Virginia who has lived in numerous locations in our state, I hope you will read these comments and accept all the amendments above as it is in the best interests of the citizens of Virginia whom you represent.
Please don't let this state fall further into decay. Instead stick with truth - that marriage was designed for man and women. Families are already under attack, and lying to future generations about marriage will only further weaken our society. Those of the same gender seeking a state recognized partnership are welcome to participate in civil unions, just please don't dilute the sanctity of marriage.
HJ1 - I firmly believe that every person should be responsible for their own health. Especially reproductive health. The government should not have a say in the medical decisions I make regarding myself. HJ2 - I believe felons should have the right to vote. If felons become the president of the united states, why can't felons also choose who they want to run this country? If a felon is registered as a citizen of the U.S. they should be allowed to vote. HJ9 - People should be allowed to marry the person they love, even if they are both men or both women. It's baffling to me that there is even debate surrounding it. It should not be illegal for same sex couples to be married.
HJ1- it is not moral to have legal exceptions for murdering children, born or unborn at any time. When will people wake up and provide equal protection under the law, US Constitution 14 Amendment. These human children do not deserve the death penalty for any reason and we need to write Just laws and not evil laws. Abolish human abortion without exception and repeal or supersede any laws that immorally allow or excuse murdering children for any reason without just cause. HJ9 - Marriage is ordained by GOD and by one l biological man and one biological woman which is good for the state to recognize and even encourage as a key and necessary component of our society. It is wrong to attempt to change to meaning of the word marriage or to recognize anything not marriage and or support it as if it were. This is destroying our state and nation, and is a waste of resources to prop up every whim of society that refuses to recognize GOD's plan, His direction to us regarding family and society and procreation and the natural law and order that support a healthy and prosperous and well governed society.
I support these bills to protect the rights of women and their doctors to make healthcare decisions themselves. In states where women have lost their rights to reproductive freedom, women are DYING needlessly. This is inexcusable in the United States of America in 2024. As a woman who suffered 4 miscarriages, or what my insurance provider at the time called “spontaneous abortions,” I have nightmares thinking about the multitude ways “friends/spies” might have turned my pain and anguish into a crime by involving themselves in my personal healthcare decisions. An ectopic pregnancy which resulted in the loss of two wanted fetuses and a fallopian tube might have also resulted in the loss of my life due to denial of care. Protect the rights of women’s access to healthcare. The government has no role here. What a conflict with HIPPA.
I am writing in support of HJ1 and HJ9 respectively. I believe each, in their own right, provides agency to Virginians; agency over one’s body, and one’s most personal relationship (with a partner). Protection of these rights, as they should be seen, is paramount in providing for a democratic and free republic. These choices should stay personal, as they were always meant to be.
Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. Abortion is NOT birth control. Educate women on their natural biology, provide support for mothers - especially mothers in the workforce, focus energies on affordable childcare. Do not make preborn children suffer for the failings of this society. Do not end the lives who could very well be what this state, country, and world needs. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
I strongly oppose HJ1. I agree that individuals, both men and women, have the right to decide if and when to have children. However, once those children are already in existence, no one has the right, not even their parents to get rid of them. All life is sacred, and we have a civic duty to protect the most vulnerable, which are the unborn. Abortion up to the moment of birth is unthinkable. This is NOT a healthcare right. I also oppose the idea of minors being able to get an abortion without parental consent. A teen does not have the neurodevelopment to make decisions on a major life event such as pregnancy alone. The American College of Pediatrics agrees with this stance in its position statement Parental Involvement and Consent for Minor's Abortion Federico C. de Miranda, MD, FCP I strongly oppose HJ9 and believe that the original design and purpose of marriage, which predates any nation, religion or law supports Natural Law, that marriage is between one man and one woman and ask that you respect the wishes of your constituents. I do support HJ2 so that voting rights can be restored to all people having completed their sentences.
I support same-sex marriage. This antiquated ban should no longer be a part of Virginia’s constitution.
I oppose HJ9 , which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion, or law.
What in the hell is this "select a pronoun" and one of the choices is "they". Are you people complete lunatics? Don't you know simple English grammar? Concerning HJ9, the government should not be involved in marriage at all. There should be no laws at all concerning marriage. There should be no such thing as a government-approved marriage, marriage license, etc. Get the government out of the marriage business altogether.
HJ 1 - abortion I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. Expanding abortion does nothing to solve the problems that bring mothers to the place where they think it is better to kill their child rather than birth it. Poverty, lack of support, unhealthy relationships, and abuse all continue when resources aren’t toward abortion rather than the support networks that help women (and men) be more stable and successful. Trafficking and sex abuse can continue when abortion is less regulated and more available, making women victims again. Furthermore, by endorsing the idea that the government (or any citizen) can “choose” the value of another human, at any level of vulnerability, and prioritize their own life over a more vulnerable individual, creates a dangerous precedent for how citizens can interact with people who cannot equally advocate and defend themselves. This destabilizes women, men, and families, and creates a rift of hyper-individualism, selfishness, and distrust where cooperation and unity should be a priority. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Studies repeatedly show that marriage is a leading indicator of stability, success, and happiness in adults. Studies also show that children need a mother and a father by repeatedly demonstrating that lacking one has detrimental effects and is an obstacle to future wellbeing and success. If the government truly has the stabilization and success of its people in mind, it will protect and encourage the most stabilizing and success-indicating relationship that is the foundation of future generations: marriage between one man and one woman. Furthermore, marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose enshrining a "right" to abortion in Virginia's constitution. HJ1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial birth abortion, and the law requiring parental consent. Abortion up until the moment of birth is an appalling tragedy, NOT a health care right.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
These are all important issues to me, we should honor all marriages equally, once felons sentences are complete they should be allowed to vote and be involved in civics with their community,
I fully support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9, as each of these proposed amendments reflects our state’s commitment to individual rights and justice. HJ1 is crucial for safeguarding reproductive freedom by enshrining the right to an abortion. HJ2 rightly restores voting rights for convicted felons upon their release, reinforcing the importance of civic participation and second chances. Finally, HJ9 protects the right to same-sex marriage, ensuring equal rights and dignity for all couples. I urge the committee to advance these bills to help build a fairer, more inclusive state.
HJ 1 – I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – I oppose HJ 9 Marriage is the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
My name is Samuel M Willinger, MD and I live in Lynchburg, Va . HJ-1 : a fundamental right to reproductive freedom : I support this bill... If a woman needs a termination of pregnancy, it is her decision ( and the father's) , not the government's decision .. I understand it is ending a life; however, here is America, we have so little respect for life with our gun violence, mistreatment of women, the Israeli bombing of Gazans with weapons provided by us, etc, that I do not feel I have any right to tell someone else what to do or how they should live their lives.. Prevention of pregnancy would be ideal, so let us provide women with good birth control as well, good health care, and a proper social environment in which to grow up with no drugs, alcohol or guns and teach them how to make good decisions so they avoid unwanted pregnancies.. A Republican would say " the government should not be in my personal business". Well then, why are they trying to tell women what they can and can't do? ...HJ-2 - restoration of voting rights... This is simple.. if a criminal has done his time in prison and he is released, then he is a citizen again with full rights.. he is expected to work, pay taxes, and uphold the law.. Why should he not have the right to vote if he is law abiding? HJ-3 - marriage equality -- this is extremely simple .. of COURSE there should be marriage equality !! Duhh !! .. if two people love each other and want to marry, then there is a little more happiness in the world. What should it matter to the other 8 billion people ? Nobody is telling them who they should love and marry? Whether they are two men, two women or a man and a woman , what does it matter? Homosexuality has been around for thousands of years .. The ancient Greeks had a lot of homosexuality , especially the very warlike Spartans - check your history , people... no matter what the Bible says, does the Bible apply to Hindus? to Bhuddists, to Japanese ( Shinto religion) ? They don't care about a Christian Bible... and people who think homosexuality is abnormal, well , nobody is trying to convince them to be homosexual .... Thank you for this opportunity to offer my opinion .. best regards, Samuel Willinger, MD
HJ1- I support this bill. Women are in charge of their own bodies and it is a fundamental right they can choose whether to have an abortion or not. HJ2 - I support this bill to guarantee voting rights to eligible voters. This just goes without saying. HJ9 - I support this bill to allow two individuals to marry regardless of gender. This has been a right since June 26th 2015. Why are we going back in time? Only to hurt people and take away their given rights? Jesus loves everyone regardless of their gender identity. 1 John 4:8 Anyone who does not love does not know God, because God is love. Leviticus 19:18 You shall not take vengeance or bear a grudge against the sons of your own people, but you shall love your neighbor as yourself.
I strongly support these three proposed amendments to the Virginia Constitution. Ensuring reproductive freedom is crucial for bodily autonomy and healthcare equity (HJ1). Safeguarding the right to vote and removing discriminatory barriers is vital to a healthy democracy (HJ2). Repealing the outdated prohibition on same-sex marriage and affirming the right to marry regardless of gender (HJ9) promotes equality and protects fundamental civil rights. These amendments will bring Virginia’s laws in line with modern values of freedom, equality, and justice for all citizens.
As a practicing Roman Catholic, who follows the 10 Commandments, I strongly object to you trying to make a "right" to abortion in Virginia's constitution. A policy/law of unlimited abortion up until birth is a mockery of God's gift of life and it goes against the constitution of the U.S.A. I would like to know why you are so intent on killing an innocent child. Do you not think of how you are going to answer to God when you see Him face to face? We have already killed more babies than, Hilter, Stalin, and ancient pagan societies. Regarding HJ2 I support HJ2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as in the case in the vast majority of states. Virginia doesn't need to be know for not giving people a second chance. I oppose HJ9, which makes a mockery of marriage. Since the beginning of time, marriage has always been between one man and one woman. Why don't you follow the science, to propagate you need the reproductive systems of a male and female. It is scientifically impossible for two men or two women to produce a child. If you won't listen to the science then please use what little common sense you have for some good. You obviously want to continue to do the work of the devil, by rushing these actions through. I will pray for your soul and may God show His mercy on you.
As a Virginia resident, I urge my delegates to pass all three bills to enshrine reproductive, voting, and marriage rights in our state Constitution. Convicted felons have already served their time within prison walls. Without the right to cast their vote, they remain disenfranchised upon release for the rest of their lives. As a queer AFAB (assigned female at birth) constituent, I worry about the rollbacks and potential repeals by the US Supreme Court on established federally-granted rights. My right to access abortion, birth control, and other family planning services should be protected within the state Constitution. My right to get married to my future partner should be protected as well. I love Virginia, and I plan to spend much of my life here. I can’t imagine a future in which these rights are not permanently guaranteed within my state’s Constitution. Thank you.
I strongly support these three proposed amendments to the Virginia Constitution. Ensuring reproductive freedom is crucial for bodily autonomy and healthcare equity (HJ1). Safeguarding the right to vote and removing discriminatory barriers is vital to a healthy democracy (HJ2). Repealing the outdated prohibition on same-sex marriage and affirming the right to marry regardless of gender (HJ9) promotes equality and protects fundamental civil rights. These amendments will bring Virginia’s laws in line with modern values of freedom, equality, and justice for all citizens.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 and urge the committee to advance these proposed constitutional amendments. HJ1 is essential to safeguarding reproductive rights and ensuring individuals have autonomy over their healthcare decisions. HJ2’s restoration of voting rights for individuals who have completed their incarceration is a necessary step toward justice and reintegration. Lastly, HJ9’s protection of the right to same-sex marriage is crucial to upholding equality and dignity for all families in our state. These measures collectively reflect our commitment to fairness, individual rights, and a more inclusive society.
My comments are as followis. Regarding HU1: A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. For NJ2: I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. As for HU9: I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Plus, marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. Regards, Steve Amato
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent.Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1- I support this bill to ensure that women have choice in regards to reproduction. HJ2 - I support this bill to guarantee voting rights to eligible voters. HJ9 - I support this bill to allow two individuals to marry regardless in of gender or biological sex.
I am writing in support of repealing the constitutional provision defining marriage as between one man and one woman. The marriage of same-sex couples should be protected by our state constitution! They should have that right fully protected. Repealing this provision causes no harm, but only benefits our state by allowing such freedom to its citizens. The amendment states that religious organizations and clergy can refuse to perform any marriage, and that is their right as well.
Good Afternoon, My name is Roxanne Collins. I'm writing to encourage you to vote "YES' on HJ9. I can't describe the fear this causes LGBT families in Virginia. The time to act is NOW. Please prioritize this so that all Virginia families could be protected under state law. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Roxanne
I support these amendments because in a nation that values and prioritizes freedom, I believe that individuals should have autonomy over all their decisions. If we are to truly have our unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the government cannot restrict our autonomy in any way. Furthermore our government has a responsibility to protect our rights and by amending our state constitution we are solidifying that protection in the event that there are challenges to these rights federally.
I urge you to oppose HJ 1 and HJ 9. They are both unnecessary and extreme. Thank you for your consideration.
Marriage Equality This ban does not reflect the attitudes and beliefs of Virginians in 2023. A 2021 poll from the Public Religion Research Institute found that 71% of Virginians support the right of same-sex couples to marry. This percentage has only increased since the question began being asked of voters. In 2006, 53% of voters supported the marriage ban. This huge swing shows the massive shift in public opinion on the issue of marriage, and it is clear evidence that the antiquated ban should no longer be a part of Virginia’s constitution. It’s only fair to revisit a political question that has shown such a vast change since it was first broached. With the removal of women’s protections with the destruction of Roe v. Wade, it is possible that marriage equality will be destroyed on a national level as well. Virginia must take the lead to protect all citizens. If Virginia really is “for lovers,” it should recognize that love is love and grant all citizens the right to live their lives in peace. Furthermore, as a queer person in VA, I want to feel safe, treated justly, and welcomed to access the same rights as anyone else.
HJ1-Access to reproductive freedom should be an essential right for all Virginians. Women and their doctors are fully capable of making the best decisions for themselves and their circumstances. The government should not be placing restrictions on what people can do with their own bodies. Even corpses are afforded bodily autonomy! HJ2-Individuals should automatically have their voting rights restored when their sentence is complete. HJ9- LGBTQ+ people should have their right to marry fully protected and upheld by the state of Virginia.
HJ1 - I strongly oppose enshrining a "right" to abortion in Virginia's constitution. HJ1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. REJECT HJ1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ2 - All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ9 - I oppose HJ9 . Marriage is the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Separation of church and state. Keep one person’s church out of the rights and freedoms of every American. I strongly support these three proposed amendments protecting human rights.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I support the three proposed amendments HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 Legal bans on reproductive decisions in other states already show that they are restricting health care to those who are pregnant resulting in unnecessary harm and death of citizens. Government overreach should not prevent citizens from making healthcare decisions with their families, medical practitioners and their clergy. Most states allow felons to regain their voting rights once released. This is important to allow those who have completed their punishment and are no longer incarcerated to regain all the rights of citizenship. I don't see any compelling interest of the state in preventing people who have developed and committed and loving relationship with each other to be prevented from being denied the legal privileges that civil marriage provides. It is in the best interest of the state to ensure these privileges to consenting adults.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child, such as universal maternal healthcare, comprehensive paid family leave funding policies, affordable housing and childcare options. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – right to abortion amendment • I strongly agree with and support enshrining a right to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. • HJ 1 would protect countless pregnant persons across the state and allow them bodily autonomy and the choices to make medical decisions with their doctors and healthcare providers. • A policy of unrestricted abortion access should be a fundamental right. Each instance of required or desired abortion care should be treated as the medically complex and personally nuanced situations that they are without concern for cumbersome and dangerous legislative restriction. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights • I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage • I support HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
Regarding HJ 1, I strongly OPPOSE enshrining a so-called “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. Murder is a WRONG, not a right. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. REJECT HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I OPPOSE HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Dear Delegate Sickles and Members of the Committee, Please do not change section 15-A of Article 1 of the Bill of Rights of the Virginia Constitution. The one man, one woman Marriage Amendment was approved by the citizens of Virginia in 2006. You do not have the authority to change the definition of marriage and the laws of God. Sincerely, Deirdre Pennefather
I oppose HJ 9. Families are designed by God to be of a man and a woman for the purpose of having children. Children raised in homes of other “family” structures suffer and society suffers in turn. “As the family goes, so goes society” and ours is going down the tubes. Respect natural law.
* HJ 1 - I strongly oppose enshrining a "right" to abortion in Virginia's constitution. * HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. *A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. *REJECT HJ1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and child. * HJ 2 - All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. *HJ 9 - I oppose HJ 9 Marriage is the union of one man and one woman. * Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 I strongly oppose enshrining a 'right' to abortion in Virginia's Constitution. HJ1 Would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. Please reject enshrining the barbarity and violence of abortion in the Virginia Constitution. We should be defending the right to life not cruelly blotting it out. HJ 2 - restoring voting rights. I support HJ 2 All people who have paid their debt to society by completing their sentences ought to have their right to vote restored. It is only just. HJ 9 The state didn't create marriage, it is a human institution arising from natural law.. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. Do not remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman
NO TO AMERICAN TALIBAN. I strongly support these three proposed amendments to the Virginia Constitution. Ensuring reproductive freedom is crucial for bodily autonomy and healthcare equity (HJ1). Safeguarding the right to vote and removing discriminatory barriers is vital to a healthy democracy (HJ2). Repealing the outdated prohibition on same-sex marriage and affirming the right to marry regardless of gender (HJ9) promotes equality and protects fundamental civil rights. These amendments will bring Virginia’s laws in line with modern values of freedom, equality, and justice for all citizens.
HJ 1 – right to abortion amendment • I strongly agree with and support enshrining a right to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. • HJ 1 would protect countless pregnant persons across the state and allow them bodily autonomy and the choices to make medical decisions with their doctors and healthcare providers. • A policy of unrestricted abortion access should be a fundamental right. Each instance of required or desired abortion care should be treated as the medically complex and personally nuanced situations that they are without concern for cumbersome and dangerous legislative restriction. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights • I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage • I support HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
I am opposed to the secretive and rushed process to get these Bills voted on and the intent seems very suspicious. Please vote NO to HJ1 and HJ9 to protect the sanctity of life as well as the values of the Commonwealth. I strongly oppose enshrining the "right" to abortion in to the Virginia Constitution. In addition, I strongly oppose HJ9, and believe that the original design and purpose of marriage, which predates any nation, religion or law supports Natural Law, that marriage is between one man and one woman and ask that you respect the wishes of your constituents. I support HJ2 so that voting rights can be restored to all people having completed their sentences. Thank you for your consideration
I support strongly the passage of HJ1 , Hj2 and HJ9 because these amendments will prevent the people of Virginia from reverting to the dark ages. I want Virginia to remain a beacon of light and safety for reproductive rights and the rights of all of her citizens
I support all 3 bills: the right to reproductive freedom, the right to vote, and the right to marriage equality.
I oppose enshrining abortion rights into our state constitution because modern science and technology prove that what is present within the womb at the earliest stage is a human being. To uphold abortion on demand is tantamount to taking human life. There is no right to take the life of an innocent , vulnerable and innocent human being. I oppose marriage between two persons of the same sex. Marriage from the natural law involves a man and a woman who in the act of two becoming one create new human life, at least the openness is present.
It would put VA on the wrong side of history to reject any of these bills. I thought this was the land of the free? It's embarassing how many so-called "patriots" will vehemently oppose anyone's freedom and right to choose what healthcare they seek and who they engage in holy matrimony with, as well as whether or not someone's past (which has been atoned for) can prevent them from participating in democracy. Opposing these bills will put governmental restrictions in our bodies, our families, and the ability for EVERYONE to make their voices heard. True Americans will support these bills.
Please vote YES for HJ9. Every person has a right to marry who they love whether it’s a man or woman. We have come a long way since this was first introduced. Please change the language to read man OR woman. Thank you, Sydney Morgan 18390 Fairway Oaks Square Leesburg Va. 20176
I support all 3 bill !! Stay Blue Virginia
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation or law.
HJ1-I vehemently oppose a “right “ to abortion in the Virginia Constitution and reject it. We need life- affirming and protective measures for mother and child not murderous measures HJ2-I support restoration of voting rights for individuals who have completed their sentences HJ9-I oppose removal of constitutional protection of marriage between one man and one woman
HJ1 - I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ2 - I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ3 - I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law
I strongly urge you to support all three bills. As a woman, I deserve the right to vote as well as the right to reproductive health just like every other women in our state and in our country and world. These bills are very serious and having them written into our state constitution will keep Virginians feeling safe and supported during a very dark time. Marriage Equality is also so important to me and should be supported. How can Virginia be for lovers if it's not for all lovers? Time to make big, meaningful changes!
I support HJ9, a resolution to amend the Virginia Constitution to protect marriage equality for all. All people deserve love and the right to marriage. LGBTQ+ people have been historically disenfranchised in this country, however we have an opportunity now in Virginia to ensure LGBTQ+ people are protected should there be changes to federal policy.
I support HJ1 and implore the committee members to allow this bill to move forward. It is lost on no one that this is a contentious issue and will undoubtedly remain such for quite some time. Ten states have extended the decision of whether to solidify abortion access to its citizens through ballot measures. Virginia should be no different. I see little possibility of a collective, philosophical agreement. As such, democracy should play its course and Virginians should be permitted to vote on this amendment at the ballot box. I support HJ9 and echo other Virginians sentiments that this is merely aligning our state constitution with a right that is already set by Obergefell. Outdated implied prohibitions should be corrected, as we have done for other areas involving racist laws that were set in our state constitution. Many will cite biblical ideology as a reason for halting this bill. I respectfully remind committee members that Christians previously cited their religion while blocking the union between individuals of different races. Many of us today see this belief, which existed for centuries, as a perversion of the text. Not only should religion and state remain separate in regards to respect for our chosen families, the religion that is being pressed upon us is one that twists over time. In a state that championed Loving and has coined "Virginia is for Lovers" in its honor, please correct our misalignment and move this bill forward to protect Virginian citizens whose love deserves equal celebration and protection. I support HJ2 and respectfully press the committee to move the bill forward. Once a citizen repays their debt to society, their rights should be fully restored. These citizens who reintegrate into our cities and towns are impacted by the policies that pass and should have a voice. Residents must be invested in their communities and this will reduce recidivism. It is no secret that individuals from disenfranchised communities often lack resources for proper legal representation and are pressed at a higher rate to accept plea deals. Denying these individuals the restoration of their rights after their punishment only perpetuates the inequitable effects of a jilted justice system. It is also an undeniable irony that a convicted felon was just elected president, and yet, Virginian felons are unable to vote unless individually approved. There should not be such a blanket disenfranchisement. This bill and proposed amendment provides the necessary guardrails. It should move forward.
Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I am in strong support of allowing Virginians to live their lives as they see fit in regards to their reproductive freedoms (HJ1) and whom they choose to love (HJ9). Additionally, those who have served their time should have their voting right restored, without additional hurdles put in their way (HJ2).
HJ 1 – I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – I oppose HJ 9 Marriage is the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Radicalism of every kind in Government is bad for all of us -- regardless of which side of the aisle we sit on. Please stop this nonsense now!
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. By what standard is the GA consider establishing the "right?" The Supreme Court does not see it as a constitutional right. Many Virginians would consider this a wrong - just as much as abortion is wrong, terminating the life of the unborn child and health care providers participating in death rather than giving life. Shame. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, and fundamental wrong, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I urge you to pass all three of these bills. It is unacceptable that someone else's religion can dictate someone else's life and choices. Abortion is healthcare and should be to the discretion of the individual and their medical provider. Criminalizing abortion creates a disgusting precedent for the government to impose it's will over your own bodily autonomy. If you don't believe in abortions, don't get one, it's as simple as that. If you don't support gay marriage, don't get one. It is frankly un-American to support legislation that forces your beliefs onto someone else. Virginia is for lovers, ALL lovers, not just the ones that you personally think are acceptable. Separation of Church and state is important for a reason. Your religion and beliefs do not and will never supercede an individuals right to self determination. If we give the government the power to decide what we can do with our body's and our lives, we will not get that back. These issues might not effect you personally or yet, but they will. The leopards will come for you next.
I strongly support this amendment 100%! Every Virginia resident should have access to affordable, quality health care, including abortion, birth control, and the privacy to make reproductive choices. Virginians made their reproductive opinions clear when they chose to elect representatives who vowed to protect reproductive rights.
This ban does not reflect the attitudes and beliefs of Virginians in 2023. A 2021 poll from the Public Religion Research Institute found that 71% of Virginians support the right of same-sex couples to marry. This percentage has only increased since the question began being asked of voters. In 2006, 53% of voters supported the marriage ban. If Virginia really is “for lovers,” it should recognize that love is love and grant all citizens the right to live their lives in peace. I support this amendment.
I am in support of all 3 bills. Regarding reproductive freedom, the government does not have any say in any other medical intervention so why does it need to intervene in a woman’s rights to choose how she handles her body and pregnancy. Furthermore, if we dictate a women’s right to choose, are we going to one day dictate hospice care, how a person is treated for cancer or their right to a well informed medical procedure? Regarding the voting rights of a convicted felon, my thoughts are simple. So long as they are a citizen of the US and governed under the laws of the U.S. they should have the right to vote. So long as they have completed their sentence/punishment for their crime. Regarding marriage equality, I believe marriage is a personal and mutual decision between 2 consenting adults! The government should not dictate who can marry who based upon sexual orientation. If so, we are only creating another vehicle for falsification of records or manipulation of the system. The government doesn’t dictate which sex can live together or sleep together or buy common property together. Why does the government need to meddle in marriage and only allow heterosexual couples to marry? The government needs to get out of the business of micromanaging peoples lives and do what it was elected to do which is to govern and not micromanage. All that being said if you want to bring in the religious aspect of reproductive rights and marriage equality. The basis of almost all religious beliefs is to not judge. Who gave the government the right to judge and dictate how a pregnant woman or human beings regardless of sexual orientation get to marry? What if your child or grandchild was raped or abused and became pregnant and she is forced to carry to term only traumatized by the sole thing the government made her carry through to term. This puts a further strain on the welfare system and heavily affects mental health which is already a major problem. What if your child or grandchild was living in shame and also lying to you about their happiness as a person and couldn’t marry the person they loved? That is an absolute personal choice and not a government choice! Please support all of the bills and vote yes on them. And please please begin to think with your conscious and put what you “think” will get you re elected or more money aside. You were elected to vote on issues based upon facts and laws and not re election or money.
With the removal of women’s protections with the destruction of Roe v. Wade, it is possible that marriage equality will be destroyed on a national level as well. Virginia must take the lead to protect all citizens. If Virginia really is “for lovers,” it should recognize that love is love and grant all citizens the right to live their lives in peace. I support this amendment.
I write in support of these amendments. Reproductive care should be with a woman, her loved ones and her health care provider - Not the government. Instead let’s invest in maternal care and programs that help families stay healthy. Let Virginia move Forward w safeguarding our right to marry whom we love.
To the committee: I write in strong support for approval of all three proposed Constitutional Amendments HJ1, HJ2 and HJ9. With regard to HJ1, It is past time to enshrine the personal right to reproductive freedom with protections from penalty and/or prosecution by the state. HJ2 would ensure that every Virginian who meets qualifications is given political rights including the right to vote. As for HJ9, marriage between two individuals is a fundamental right, and should be free of an antiquated and restrictive version of "marriage" that is no longer valid because of the Obergefell v. Hodges case. Thanks to the committee for consideration of all of these Constitutional Amendments. " Let freedom ring" across Virginia. Thank you, Brenda Bengtson
Virginia should enshrine that every individual has the fundamental right to reproductive freedom and that the right to make and effectuate one's own decisions about all matters related to one's pregnancy cannot be denied, burdened, or otherwise infringed upon by the Commonwealth. It is not the commonwealth's place to be a middleman for medical decisions. Virginia should enshrine that every person who meets the qualifications of voters set forth in the Constitution of Virginia shall have the fundamental right to vote in the Commonwealth and that such right shall not be abridged by law. There is no need to have additional hoops to jump through and require that the Governor or other appropriate authority to have the ability to deny the fundamental right to vote. Virginia must repeals the constitutional provision defining marriage as only a union between one man and one woman and provide protection and equality for it's people. The Commonwealth and its political subdivisions must be required to recognize any lawful marriage between two parties and to treat such marriages equally under the law, regardless of the sex, gender, race, or disability of such parties; to do any less denies humanity to the commonwealth's people. It is vital for Virginia to protect the dignity and humanity of it's citizens and by amending the Commonwealth's Constitution to enshrine and protect it's citizen's rights.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in Virginia's Constitution.
I am writing to oppose the law of abortion at 9 months . I do not believe or support abortion at all but especially a full term baby. Please consider my request to vote NO for this bill .
I strongly support these three bills to protect our freedoms.
This ban does not reflect the attitudes and beliefs of Virginians in 2023. A 2021 poll from the Public Religion Research Institute found that 71% of Virginians support the right of same-sex couples to marry. This percentage has only increased since the question began being asked of voters. In 2006, 53% of voters supported the marriage ban. This huge swing shows the massive shift in public opinion on the issue of marriage, and it is clear evidence that the antiquated ban should no longer be a part of Virginia’s constitution. It’s only fair to revisit a political question that has shown such a vast change since it was first broached. With the removal of women’s protections with the destruction of Roe v. Wade, it is possible that marriage equality will be destroyed on a national level as well. Virginia must take the lead to protect all citizens. If Virginia really is “for lovers,” it should recognize that love is love and grant all citizens the right to live their lives in peace.
It is important that women in Virginia are protected in their bodily autonomy (HJ1), that the state expands voting rights for citizens of the state (HJ2), and that individuals are allowed to marry regardless of their sexual orientation (HJ9).
I strongly support these three proposed amendments to the Virginia Constitution. Ensuring reproductive freedom is crucial for bodily autonomy and healthcare equity (HJ1). Safeguarding the right to vote and removing discriminatory barriers is vital to a healthy democracy (HJ2). Repealing the outdated prohibition on same-sex marriage and affirming the right to marry regardless of gender (HJ9) promotes equality and protects fundamental civil rights. These amendments will bring Virginia’s laws in line with modern values of freedom, equality, and justice for all citizens.
Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. Oppose HJ 9. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly support these three proposed amendments to the Virginia Constitution. Ensuring reproductive freedom is crucial for bodily autonomy and healthcare equity (HJ1). Safeguarding the right to vote and removing discriminatory barriers is vital to a healthy democracy (HJ2). Repealing the outdated prohibition on same-sex marriage and affirming the right to marry regardless of gender (HJ9) promotes equality and protects fundamental civil rights. These amendments will bring Virginia’s laws in line with modern values of freedom, equality, and justice for all citizens.
Hello House Privileges & Elections Committee, I am writing to voice my support for HJ1, HJ2, & HJ9. I wish for these Constitutional Amendments to be included on the ballot in order to secure our individual freedoms. My medical decisions should only be mine to give, not anyone else. I should be able to have autonomy over my body as an American citizen. To restrict reproductive freedom for women is to admit that America has become comparable to the Taliban. This also applies to marriage. No one has the right to force their personal opinions on love onto strangers & their relations through the government. As someone in an interracial marriage, where would the policing end? Will my marriage be next? Sincerely, Nelliel Azrael Herrera Knoefler
I strongly urge support for HJ1 to amend the Constitution to support the right of same-sex couples to marry and enjoy all the rights and responsibilities of that state. I also urge support for HJ9 to enshrine reproductive freedom in Virginia's constitution, allowing women to make decisions regarding their reproductive health with their doctors without interference from the government.
Obergefell v. Hodges provides that the right to marry is a fundamental right, regardless of sex or gender. Virginia must follow. I support repealing the constitutional provision as it is no longer valid under Obergefell. Of course all marriages should be treated equally under the law.
I support the right of two individuals to marry regardless of sex, race, color, or creed.
I am in favor of HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. The people of Virginia deserve the right to bodily autonomy and access to reproductive medical care. They deserve the right to marry the person they love. They also deserve to have their right to vote restored once they are released from incarceration. As another individual said here, Virginia is one of the best states in the continental US and with these changes, we can make it even better.
Marriage is a fundamental right between two consenting adults regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity, etc. No one, especially strangers, have any right to be in someone else's relationship. Consenting adults deserve to marry the person they choose to marry regardless of someone else's beliefs. A stranger's beliefs have no basis in someone else's relationship. Simply because someone does not understand or are uncomfortable with something does not inherently make it negative. My daughter has every right to marry her girlfriend. My friends have every right be together. Strangers on the street have every right to be with the person they choose to be with because that is their life, their choice, and minding my own business is not that hard. Protect marriage equality.
HJ This bill should be passed without any discussion. The government needs to remain out of women's doctors' offices. There is nothing else to be said. HJ9 This bill should be passed without any discussion. Marriage needs to remain legal regardless of gender. No one should have the right to dictate who someone loves and who they commit legally to.
I support these amendments because in a nation that values and prioritizes freedom, I believe that individuals should have autonomy over all their decisions. If we are to truly have our unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the government cannot restrict our autonomy in any way. Furthermore our government has a responsibility to protect our rights and by amending our state constitution we are solidifying that protection in the event that there are challenges to these rights federally.
Pass HJ1! All people have the right to reproductive freedom and choice. Pass HJ2! The right to vote should be restored. Pass HJ9! Marriage equality should be a constitutional right!
You have no idea the relief and security it brings me to know that our elected officials are working to ensure our freedoms. Thank you for your work to protect reproductive rights, voting rights, and marriage rights. Thank you for doing what's right for your constituents. Please vote yes to HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 to protect everyone whose voice may not be heard.
I have an 18 year old daughter telling me she’s afraid to have children one day. She fears if she’s in a life threatening condition, she will be left to die. As a therapist in Herndon Va, her sentiment is felt by ALL of my clients. College aged and young adult women are AFRAID to start a family. They also feel at a loss that they may lose the right to make medical decisions, including access to birth control. Support bill HJ1!!! Also support HJ2- people with disabilities and individuals that have served their time in prison deserve to have a voice. Restore their rights. Support HJ9- how dare anyone we elect feel they can determine who we love and who we marry. This is a right. Love is love.
Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
HJ 1 - I strongly oppose enshrining a "right" to abortion in Virginia's constitution. A policy of unlimited abortion should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 - I support HJ2. All who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 3 - I oppose HJ3, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
I fully support all 3 of these amendments in the pursuit of keeping Virginia a place where people of all kinds are honored and respected. This is the appropriate application of the power of states' rights and what we should want to be known for.
I am writing in support of HJ1 and HJ9. As a mother of three children and a Pediatric Nurse Practitioner, I have seen that all children should have equal access to love and create a family with whomever they choose. Our job as parents, healthcare providers, and leaders, is to love them and keep them safe. I believe that HJ1 and HJ9 would protect the children and adult residents of our Commonwealth from limitations on their freedom to marry and start a family with the person they love. Our job is to love and support our children as they grow, not limit their rights and make them feel like second-class citizens. This is especially important to me as a parent and healthcare provider for a very diverse patient population. Please help protect the freedoms of all residents of the Commonwealth of Virginia by supporting HJ1 and HJ9.
HJ1 - I oppose the so called right to an abortion. It degrades all human life. HJ2 - I support the restoration of rights. HJ9 - I oppose the changing of marriage. It is from the beginning between a man and a woman. All are not made to be married.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. HJ 1 also paves the way for future legislation threatening the choice of doctors, nurses, and other medical professionals in providing care that protects both women and the unborn. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1 : I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ2: I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
All of these bills reflect the importance of Virginians being able to exercise their agency in all areas of their lives. HJ1 speaks to the enshrined principle of doctor/patient confidentiality, which needs to be preserved for all persons but especially for women of childbearing age. HJ2 ensures the guarantee of one person/one vote on which our democracy was based - having expanded to recognize many more than male property holders. HJ9 ensures that "family" is not defined by law as specific to gender or earnings capability or household roles or any other false construct but, rather, by those who are in the relationship and dedicate themselves to this family in a public and purposeful way. For all these reasons, please vote to ensure that these bills pass.
I am in support of HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9, because I strongly believe that individuals deserve to choose if they get an abortion, vote, and who they marry. These rights should not be taken away.
I married my husband in 2017 after the supreme court decision. I was prepared to leave Virginia before then. Marriage Equality builds community and economy. Any state should be interested in creating laws that support the building and protecting of he community and economy. Mobile and affluent residents will leave the state in search of welcoming states where they can build their family and community. You don't have to be a democrat to want a state to be prosperous and welcoming.
This ban does not reflect the attitudes and beliefs of Virginians in 2024. Over 71% of Virginians support the right of same-sex couples to marry. The massive shift in public opinion on the issue of marriage in the past 20 years is clear evidence that the antiquated ban should no longer be a part of Virginia’s constitution. It’s only fair to revisit a political question that has shown such a vast change since it was first broached. I recently attended a wedding for two men. The traditional Episcopal service and massive outpouring of love by friends and family were so powerful that they drove one father to reconcile with his son over this issue. He recognized that this much love could not be bad. If Virginia really is “for lovers,” it should recognize that love is love and grant all citizens the right to live their lives in peace.
Speaking of HJ1, and HJ9. We need to return to our Christian roots and honor God in this state. Protect the unborn and respect that God instituted marriage to be between one man and one woman.
Marriage Equality This ban does not reflect the attitudes and beliefs of Virginians in 2023. A 2021 poll from the Public Religion Research Institute found that 71% of Virginians support the right of same-sex couples to marry. This percentage has only increased since the question began being asked of voters. In 2006, 53% of voters supported the marriage ban. This huge swing shows the massive shift in public opinion on the issue of marriage, and it is clear evidence that the antiquated ban should no longer be a part of Virginia’s constitution. It’s only fair to revisit a political question that has shown such a vast change since it was first broached. With the removal of women’s protections with the destruction of Roe v. Wade, it is possible that marriage equality will be destroyed on a national level as well. Virginia must take the lead to protect all citizens. If Virginia really is “for lovers,” it should recognize that love is love and grant all citizens the right to live their lives in peace.
HJ 1 – I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored. HJ 9 – I oppose HJ 9 Marriage is the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly support all three constitutional amendments. "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." HJ1 - Reproductive rights are human rights. Deciding whether to have a child and when to have a child is deeply personal and fundamentally tied to bodily autonomy and personal liberty. Human dignity demands that these decisions be at the sole discretion of each individual. Both pregnancy and childbirth have potential health risks, including death. Every person has a constitutional right to life, and to protect that right, must be empowered to choose whether to be subjected to that risk. This amendment will protect against violation of this right by government interference with personal decisions about pregnancy and medical care. On a practical level, reproductive freedoms have a positive effect on the health and economic well being of communities. Reproductive freedoms allow for prospective parents to family plan with intention, including bringing a child into the world when they are financially, emotionally, and physically ready to provide a good life for that child. Pregnancy can be dangerous, and robust medical care, including access to the full spectrum of reproductive care, is essential to protect those who choose to try to carry a child to term in the hopes of starting a family. We are already seeing how restrictions on reproductive freedoms exacerbate these dangers play out in real time as maternal mortality rates rise in states with restrictions on reproductive rights. I wholeheartedly support Virginia setting the example in protecting reproductive freedoms with this amendment. HJ2 - Chandra Bozelko said it well: “Voting is a right that belongs to all citizens, not just good or reformed ones. Denying citizens their rights isn’t an appropriate form of accountability because citizen status can’t be punished out of someone. [I]t’s not punishment. It’s power-stripping.” I support the important step forward this amendment takes in removing an unnecessary barrier to voting rights imposed upon felons. HJ9 - All people deserve the right to marry who they love; this right is inherent in the principle of personal liberty. There is no valid argument for government restriction of marriage rights on the basis of race or gender. The only arguments put forth by those who oppose marriage equality are rooted in religion; separation of church and state requires these arguments be cast aside. It is imperative that freedom of choice in marriage is protected. I unequivocally support this amendment.
I would like to declare my support for HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. HJ1 would ensure that everyone in Virginia would have the right to reproductive freedom and would allow for abortion to be used as one of the life-saving options should something go wrong during the nine months of pregnancy and that's because in order for a baby to be born healthy, the mother must be healthy throughout the process. Also, people who have completed their prison sentences should have their voting rights reinstated, especially if they have completely reformed as citizens since their imprisonment. And lastly, people in the LBGTQ+ community should also have the right to marry and marriage is for everyone of all genders, sexes and races.
I strongly support all three amendments: HJ1 - Fundamental right to reproductive freedom HJ2 - Right to vote - restoration of rights HJ9 - Marriage equality I realize this is the first step in a multi-year process to pass these amendments. I respectfully ask that you do all you can to move them forward. We need to make sure Virginia protects our rights and freedoms!
I support these amendments because in a nation that values and prioritizes freedom, I believe that individuals should have autonomy over all their decisions. If we are to truly have our unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the government cannot restrict our autonomy in any way. Furthermore our government has a responsibility to protect our rights and by amending our state constitution we are solidifying that protection in the event that there are challenges to these rights federally.
2025 SESSION INTRODUCED 24101382D HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 9 Offered January 10, 2024 Prefiled January 3, 2024 Proposing an amendment to Section 15-A of Article I of the Constitution of Virginia, relating to marriage between two individuals; repeal of same-sex marriage prohibition; affirmative right to marry. ————— Please keep Article I Bill of Rights as originally written. Section 15-A. Marriage Fundamental right to marry. Only a union between one man and one woman may be a marriage valid in or recognized by this Commonwealth and its political subdivisions. The right to marry is a fundamental right inherent in the liberty of persons, and marriage is one of the vital personal rights essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness. This Commonwealth and its political subdivisions shall not create or recognize a legal status for relationships of unmarried individuals that intends to approximate the design, qualities, significance, or effects of marriage and deny the issuance of a marriage license to two parties contemplating a lawful marriage based on the sex, gender, or race of such parties. Nor shall this Commonwealth or its political subdivisions create or recognize another union, partnership, or other legal status to which it is assigned the rights, benefits, obligations, qualities, or effects of marriage. This Commonwealth and its political subdivisions shall recognize any lawful marriage between two parties and treat such marriages equally under the law, regardless of the sex, gender, or race of such parties. Religious organizations and clergy acting in their religious capacity shall have the right to refuse to perform any marriage.
This testimony is in opposition to the proposed constitutional amendment in HJ1, that is most definitely not constitutional at all, nor represents the right to life we should all have as human beings, including the right to life for the littlest guy that’s in the womb. Child sacrifice is the most abhorrent practice, and it should never be legalized in a nation such as ours, or anywhere for that matter. We’re not supposed to take innocent life, but to protect, and uphold it, especially when it comes to children. We should be ashamed as a society that the idea of this would even enter into our very minds. The hands that are swift to shed blood should be restrained from doing this evil, and shouldn’t have the approval of others. Anyone that would murder their own child deserves the greatest form of punishment imaginable. Thankfully, God does have mercy on those who will repent and place their faith in Jesus Christ’s finished work on the cross. He rose again, so you could have eternal life, but you must turn from this wickedness, and trust in the only One that can save you from the wrath of God with His perfect righteousness you can never obtain for yourself. It’s a free gift you can’t earn, and you don’t deserve it, but it can be given to you today if you repent, and place your faith in His death, and sacrifice on the cross for sin. You will have to answer for this on the day of judgment if you pass this, but I plead with you that you would step back and think about what you’re doing if there is anything left of your conscience that isn’t seared by sin. I also testify against HJ9 because God created marriage to be between one man and one woman. If you can’t even define what a man or a woman is, then it truly shows that sin has caused your very common sense to be pushed aside, so you can act on desires that are contrary to God, and His Law. If there’s any ounce of human decency left in you, then I urge you to consider not pushing this forward. If you do this, the ramifications of your actions are going to have a ripple effect on so many lives, families, and the very foundation of our society. You will be held responsible for your actions, even if for a time you believe you will get away with it. God sees all things, even the very intentions of your own hearts. You will have to look at your own face in the mirror every single day knowing that you did this, because you’d rather please man than please God, the One that created you, and gave you life to begin with. Please ponder on this, and give it real thought, and care, because the very fabric of our society depends on it, and God is watching.
HJ1: I support this bill and reproductive freedom because it doesn’t make sense to restrict a medical procedure that can save a person’s life and it doesn’t make sense to have a child born to a parent who doesn’t want them or to overburden the adoption or foster care system even more in the case that child born from an unwanted pregnancy is put up for adoption—for both the quality of life of parents and the unborn child, abortion must stay legal. HJ2: I support this bill because a person who pays taxes to a government—regardless of previous felonies which they’ve already paid for in fines or incarceration—should be able to vote and return to being active members of society if they so wish. HJ9: I support this bill because the right to lawful marriage is a liberty that should not be restricted based on the sex, gender, or race of the individuals involved.
Please include these items to continue basic protections for all individuals as equals under the constitution and the law.
Herring “right to abortion” amendment – HJ1 • I strongly oppose HJ1 which enshrinses a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. • HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. • HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. • A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. • Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. Parker – restoring voting rights – HJ2 • I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. Sickles – marriage – HJ9 • I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. • Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
The HJ2 bill is a very important bill in my opinion. People who are incarcerated are disproportionately disadvantaged due to race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, or other compounding social factors. This leads to what amounts to voter suppression in my eyes for people who have previously been incarcerated. A good example of this in my eyes is past drug charge offenders that have recovered, which is a group of people I have interacted a good amount with over the past year. A lot of these people are focused on truly providing good to their community, and I feel that if they already served their time they deserve to have a voice that counts in public elections. The HJ9 bill is also incredibly important for the civil rights of citizens of Virginia. Allowing marriage between two women or two men, and validating the marriages that exist already, is an important step towards freedom for the people of this state. Not allowing same sex marriage would be not only bigoted, but extremely disheartening and invalidating for people that love someone of the same sex.
With gratitude to the Virginia Catholic Conference and as a born-and-raised Virginian, I would like to join my support to their stances on the three proposed bills: HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment - I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. - HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. - HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. - A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. - Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights - I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage - I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. - Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. Sincerely, Mary Clare Durel
I strongly support the HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 amendments to the Virginia Constitution. America should be a place that guarantees the fundamental rights and choices of women, celebrates and encourages love in all forms, and protects the act of voting for all qualified citizens. If the nation as a whole can't ensure these rights, I hope that my state at least can.
Abortion is a right that every American should have. Early in the pregnancy, the fetus is not a sentient being like the person carrying it, and it's rights should not be prioritized over the rights of the sentient, conscious individual carrying the fetus. Young girls have been forced to bear the child of their rapist. That is not something anybody should have to do. In instances where the fetus will harm or kill the person carrying it, that person should be allowed to get an abortion. In instances where the person carrying it was raped, they should be allowed to get an abortion. If somebody cannot care for this child, they should be allowed to get an abortion. Attempting to remove this basic bodily right is illogical at best and cruel at worst. All people deserve to vote. It is an obligation and right as an American citizen. Does committing a crime remove your citizenship? Are you no longer an American because you committed a felony? What about the context, what if you were extremely young and you are now a changed person? Should people not be allowed any say in their leader because of an action taken in their past? Marriage is not between a man and a woman. Queer people have spent so many years oppressed because of who they love and it is ridiculous that in 2024 there are still people who believe it is immoral and wrong. It's natural (many animals are gay) and as long as it is between two consenting individuals, what goes on in their love life is no ones business but theirs. Are there really not any bigger issues to be worried about?
I support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Choices about an individual's body belong in the hands of that individual. There should be no involvement of the government, or religious institutions, in decisions that are best made between an individual and their medical providers. No one should be put in a situation where they could be forced to make harmful and difficult choices about their reproductive health for fear of legal repercussions. Voting rights should be guaranteed for every Virginia citizen. If a convicted felon is allowed to run for federal office, then someone released from incarceration should be able to vote, without having to be confirmed by the Governor. All citizens should have the right to have their voice heard and their vote counted. Legal marriage should not be restricted or discriminated against because of race, sex, or gender.
HJ-1: Abortion is murder. Amending the constitution to enshrine a right to murder is evil and absurd. The fact that I need to write an online comment to a committee that is asking the question should murder be protected in our constitution? blows my mind. NO! Absolutely not! As civil magistrates you are assigned by God with the role of executing justice on evil doers, as seen in Romans 13. Declaring open season on pre born humans is not in your job description. Stay in your lane! There is a very real God, who you are accountable to. You are not God, you do not have the authority to decide that certain persons have no right to live based on your arbitrary standards of location and development. God has already spoken, the 6th commandment states you shall not murder. Passing HJ-1 is a blatant violation of God's law. And you will be held accountable before His judgement seat. If you wish to be spared Gods wrath. I suggest that this motion be dismissed, that you never again assume the Godlike authority to decide which of His image bearers have value, and you repent of your sins and put your trust fully in Jesus Christ who gave His Life so that we would no longer need to face the judgement we deserve. God saw His sacrifice and His wrath was satisfied, no other sacrifice is necessary, by His stripes we are healed. False God's will always demand more blood, and this is on full display here. Knock it off. HJ 9 – I strongly oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. God created the institution of marriage to be between one man and one woman. Man does not have the right to attempt to redefine it.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I wish to let you know of my strong support for all three: HJ1 - Fundamental right to reproductive freedom HJ2 - Right to vote - restoration of rights HJ9 - Marriage equality I realize this is the first step in a multi-year process to pass these amendments. I respectfully ask that you do all you can to move them forward. We need to make sure Virginia protects our rights and freedoms! Thank you!
The right to reproductive freedom in HJ1 is paramount to the health and welfare of all people in the state of Virginia. This bill would ensure that a mother is not forced to endure any pregnancy without their consent. It would also prevent the cruel treatment of having to endure delivering a stillborn child that could have been removed months prior to delivery. Forcing anyone to undergo such a fate is cruel and inhumane. It is also worth noting that disallowing family planning measures would place an undue burden on Virginia taxpayers. Not only would we be compensating for the healthcare of a child being placed into the adoption system, but also the associated costs of placing a child up for adoption. This process is also cruel for the person who would be placed up for adoption as it does not take consideration as to whether this decision would lead to a life of pain and misery. In summary, abortion is a fundamental right because of the suffering that is prevented from this procedure. I support HJ2 from a more commonsense perspective. This bill ensures that no person is disenfranchised from voting in the state of Virginia. It is only fair to allow those who have been incarcerated to have a voice in the operation of this state. Finally, I also support HJ3 for the unalienable right of any people to marry each other. There is no framework for who is or is not allowed to marry in the United States Constitution. This being said, there is also a predominant LGBTQ+ community here in the state of Virginia. To deny the right to marry for people in this community would also deny their right to the pursuit of happiness as well as the unenumerated rights outlined by the ninth amendment of the US Constitution. Even with this said, there is no harm and only public welfare to be gained by passing this bill. Each and every one of us has the freedom to our own spiritual beliefs and as such the right to mary any consenting adult follows in line with said beliefs.
I strongly support HJ1, and the fundamental right of reproductive freedom for all individuals. I believe that all decisions concerning pregnancy should be between a woman and her health care provider. I support HJ2 - I believe that once an individual has completed serving a sentence for a felony and has paid his or her debt to society, that voting rights should be restored without requiring action by the governor or other state officials to restore his or her civil rights. I also support the provisions regarding persons who lack the capacity to understand the act of voting. I strongly support HJ9 and the affirmative right to marry of two parties regardless of sex, gender, or race , and the requirement that the Commonwealth shall recognize all such marriages and treat them equally under the law
H1- "Right to Abortion" I am a Roman Catholic who strongly opposes HJ1--"Right to Abortion" m Virginia's Constitution, significantly because an unborn baby is not a component of his/her mother's body, but instead is a separate human being with his/her own unique spiritual soul given that baby at the moment of conception. In this day and age, a prospective mother has sufficient resources to decide not to conceive a child--through medical methods, Natural Family Planning (NFP), or abstainance--all very effective and inexpensive and effective means to remain childless if one takes the time to purchase the (of-the-shelf) preventitives; the willingness to study and utilize ones=;s fertility schedule or lack thereof; or the self-control to remain celebate . There are also "day-after" pills that can effective in immediately used in the case of rape which block fertilization of the prospective mother's ovum. There are also a plethera of organizations willing to place unwanted babies and children of all ages, with adopters desirous of providing children with good and safe homes. HJ2: Resoring Voting Rights: I will only support HJ2 for those individuals who have completed their sentences and wish to have their voting rights restored IF they have shown a firm resolve to become lawful citizen of both the Commonwealth of Virginia, as well as the US Government and especially accept the US Constitution & Amendments as our one form of Government. HJ9-Marriage: I oppose HJ9 which wold remove the Constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Not onlyi does marriage have an original designand urpose that predates any nation, religion or law; it especially protects and supports its primary mission to create and bring up children who will use their gifts and talents to improve this world with their good works. A marriage, whether natural (based on common law), judicial (independent of specific faith systems), and spiritual (faith-based) all improve the lives of our citizens because a formal, life-time (if possible), committment is both psychologically sound, as well as a healthy way to, live minimizing the number of often fatal veneral diseases, including AIDS, some types of cancer. I thank you, in advance, considering seriously the opinions I have here stated. Very Respectfully Yours, Tracy MacGovern McCauley, Stanardsville, VA
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. A person's right to reproductive freedom and bodily autonomy is a fundamental to a free society and restriction of such rights in other states is causing a rise in maternal mortality rates. Healthcare providers should not be penalized for protecting the rights of their patients. A person's right to vote should be reinstated upon completion of their incarceration and should not be left to the whims of whomever is in office. Marriage should not be restricted because of race, sex, or gender and the language in the Constitution should be amended to reflect this.
I am in support of HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. These amendments will allow for for people to have autonomy in all their decisions.
I am strongly in support of HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Reproductive rights are human rights. Without women having autonomy over their bodies, many women will die from health complications, not to mention bring babies into non-ideal situations. The parents suffer and the children suffer. Additionally, I am strongly in support of the right for lgbtq+ people to marry. There is no scientific basis for the opposition to gay marriage rights, the only opposition comes from certain interpretations of religion or pure emotion. These religious perspectives and emotions should not be forced onto the choices of other people.
I strongly oppose HJ1 please vote to reject this amendment. I support HJ2 please vote FOR this amendment. I oppose HJ9 please vote to reject this amendment. Thank you!
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I truly feel this is wrong , and it shouldn’t happen because lives are at stack not only the child but the mother also and giving people the right to end pregnancy that late is completely wrong and I stand against it . It shouldn’t be an option for someone to make that choice unless the child has passed in the wound and is mo longer living.
One man one woman Marriage is between one man and one woman. I completely oppose anything that does not keep the bond of marriage between one man and one woman.
Yes to HJ2 (voting rights), no to HJ1 and HJ9. I.e., NO to killing babies, and NO to defining marriage as anything other than what it is.
I strongly oppose enshrining any presumed right to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. Abortion ends an innocent human life, a life that should be protected regardless of the hardships the baby’s might mother face. I oppose removing the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion, or law.
I support bill HJ1. Abortion is a term used medically regardless of whether the act was intentional or not. Impeding reproductive freedom impedes access to appropriate care for both the mother and the fetus. I support bill HJ2. I believe felons should have the right to vote once they have served their sentences. I support bill HJ9. I believe the right to marry should be available to all humans regardless of sex, gender, or race.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 as I believe each of these amendments are integral to upholding the American values of: liberty and the pursuit of happiness. To revoke these rights from people, to treat them as other and undeserving of these freedoms, is completely unethical under The Declaration of Independence and the values of America as a whole. Not to mention basic morality. I believe it is imperative to protect our citizens liberty and rights to bodily autonomy--in both marriage and a person's pregnancy. As well as allowing citizens, regardless of transgressions, to have the right to vote as they live within and participate in our society and community as well. Virginia is one of the best states in the continental US. I believe with these amendments we will be even better. It shows love, care, and respect to all our citizens. I believe in the good heartedness of our representatives and hope that these amendments will inspire other states to follow suit in the goal of creating a better world for every persons.
I STRONGLY oppose HJ9 which grants marriage status to 2 (and perhaps 3 or 4 in days to come) "parties". Where is the state protecting children from potential pedophilia. The perversion of homosexuality is not the same as the path to sanctity created by God. Marriage is between one man and one woman. (<-- PERIOD)
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. Thank you for your time and consideration.
Because of the rushed nature and secrecy of this meeting, in addition to not allowing any In person testimony, as a citizen of Virginia, I am most concerned and sense a sinister nature to these proceedings. You have been elected by the citizens of Virginia and, by keeping us in the dark, is NOT what you were hired by us to do. We demand to have a voice! I implore you to listen to the citizens before changing language and/or rushing through Bills that are not in line with what the majority of Virginia citizens support. That is unethical and you will be held accountable, hopefully by the citizens of Virginia when you next come up for re-election but certainly by God, our creator, whether you choose to acknowledge Him or not.
HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 all address important individual rights. Reproductive freedom is essential to women’s ability to think and act for themselves, keep themselves safe, and made decisions to govern their own lives like any other adult. It is also essential to protect the rights of LGBTQ people, who deserve to marry like anyone else. Any threat to their rights is a threat to us all. Finally, in a time when there are regular threats to people’s access to the polls, we must protect their voting rights. The Commonwealth of Virginia must not bow to pressure from the federal government and must instead protect the rights of ALL its citizens.
I wholeheartedly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Bodily autonomy is a fundamental freedom that every person should wish to protect; voting rights should not be left to the whims of whomever is in office; and marriage should not be restricted because of race, sex, or gender. These are basic tenets of a truly free nation.
Please support these 3 constitutional amendments that work to enshrine the rights of every day citizens. People should have the right to determine what is best for their healthcare with trained medical professionals, not politicians. Persons who have fulfilled their debt to society through incarceration should be able to vote once released; they pay taxes and should be able to have a voice. Adults should have the right to marry and receive the same protections and rights that have been bestowed upon heterosexual couples. Government should be protecting and uplifting its citizens, not tearing them down. Please be a positive example to the rest of the country.
HJ1(support)-government have no saying in ANY reproductive rights on individuals AT ALL, no state no province no federal not even the slightest. HJ2(against)-criminals are still human as long as they are citizens they should be able to vote HJ9(support)-and people should marry who ever they want, imagine you love this person and they love you back and government tell you you're wrong because they quote some random book.
I oppose HJ9 which grants marriage status to 2 (and perhaps 3 or 4 in days to come) "parties". Where is the state protecting children from potential pedophilia. If committee members and Virginians disagree with marriage being between one man and one woman, he/she should discuss it with the Creator of marriage!
HJ 1 - I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 - I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 - I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I STRONGLY support these three amendments to our state constitution. Protecting women’s reproductive freedom, restoring voting rights to people convicted of felonies, and ensuring marriage equality are all deeply important to me and the people I love. I want to protect and support all Virginians', rights, regardless of their political affiliation, with these three constitutional amendments!
I support marriage equality and I hope that our elected officials in Virginia will honor that and honor my marriage.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I support all three bills.
HJ1 - Herring: I support that all individuals should have access to the fundamental right to reproductive freedom. Not all situations are black and white. What benefit is there if we deny or restrict access to a potentially life saving solution for said person? Such a heavy decision needs to stay between patient and provider. HJ2 - Bennett-Parker: If an individual continues to pay State and Federal taxes after being reformed/released, then I believe the right to vote should be able to be reestablished as well. HJ9 - Sickles: I support that marriage between individuals should extend to LGBTQ+ residents. Pursuing happiness should extend to all.
I support all 3 bills to amend Virginia's constitution to protect civil rights and personal liberty.
Abortion is murder and should in no way be permitted. Killing another human is not anyone's "right". Marriage was ordained by God to be between 1 man and 1 women and should not be deviated from.
I support the right to abortion and same sex marriage
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
In addition to HJ1, I also support HJ2 and HJ9. If a convicted felon is able to win an election and hold office, any Virginian and American should be able to vote in an election. In regards to marriage, every Virginian should have the right to choose who they want to marry regardless of gender.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I urge you to move HJ9 forward on the path to amending the Virginia constitution to affirm the right to marry. The year after Virginia passed the one man-one woman amendment, my husband transitioned to live as a woman. We are now getting close to our 50th anniversary, still married, still happy. Our same-sex marriage harms no one any more than our marriage did before my spouse's gender became public. As a member of PFLAG, I've gotten to know families with a child who is transgender. Both parents and transgender children worry and wonder whether there will be a loving relationship in their future. They need to know that the government will not erect artificial, unnecessary barriers to their future happiness. As PFLAG likes to say, vote with love.
HJ1 I am opposed to enshrining a right to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. It severely jeopardizes the few protections for unborn children ;such as ban on partial birth abortion and parental consent )this is wrong and must be stopped), abortion until birth should not be allowed. I urge you to work on policies that uphold the dignity of every mother and child. HJ2 I support All people who have served their punishment should have their rights restored. I oppose HJ9 that removes the constitutional provision of marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any government or law.
- Ranked choice voting weakens the democratic process by opening the door for one party rule in a state. - Reproductive freedom is a euphemism for abortion access and the fact that the term is being used proves that it is a scandal. An individual does not have the right to kill a person they find inconvenient. To enshrine this as a constitutionally protected right would be to invite the continued judgment of God upon our state. Magistrates have the duty to restrain evil not establish it in law. - Marriage is pre-political and it is the duty of any sane society to honor and protect it. It is a permanent covenant between a man and a woman to establish a family (God willing) which in turn builds healthy communities. To merely reduce it to some kind of relationship between any two individuals is a detriment to our society and an offense against God. We’ve already seen the devastation wrought by divorce, adultery, and sodomy by judicial decree and statute. Why make it even more ingrained in our legal system?
I strongly support the HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 amendments to the Virginia Constitution. America should be a place that guarantees the fundamental rights and choices of women, celebrates and encourages love in all forms, and protects the act of voting for all qualified citizens. If the nation as a whole can't ensure these rights, I hope that my state at least can.
I am writing to express my strong support for HJ9, a resolution to amend the Virginia Constitution to protect marriage equality for all. Every person deserves the right to love and marry freely. As your constituent, I urge you to support HJ9 and make this amendment a priority. The time to protect ALL Virginians is now, and I hope you will stand with us by supporting this critical amendment.
I am writing to express my strong support for the proposed constitutional amendments concerning marriage equality, voting rights, and reproductive freedom. These amendments are vital steps toward ensuring that all people in our state are treated with dignity, respect, and fairness under the law. 1. Marriage Equality Amendment: I fully support the repeal of the constitutional provision that defines marriage as between one man and one woman. Marriage is a fundamental human right, and every individual, regardless of their gender or sexual orientation, should have the ability to marry the person they love without discrimination. This amendment brings our state into alignment with the Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell v. Hodges and reaffirms the core values of liberty and equality for all citizens. 2. Voting Rights Amendment: I wholeheartedly support the provision that ensures the right to vote is not abridged for any person who has completed their incarceration for a felony. Our democracy is strongest when every citizen has an equal opportunity to participate in the electoral process. By allowing those who have served their time and re-entered society to regain their voting rights automatically, we are taking an important step toward restorative justice and ensuring that all voices are heard. 3. Reproductive Freedom Amendment: The right to make personal decisions about one’s reproductive health is a fundamental human right. This amendment is crucial in protecting individuals from government interference in their personal choices regarding pregnancy. I strongly believe that every person should have the autonomy to make decisions about their body and their future, without fear of prosecution or discrimination. This amendment safeguards the health and well-being of individuals, and it is imperative that we ensure these rights remain protected in our state. In conclusion, these amendments are critical to securing a more just and equitable future for all Virginians. I urge our lawmakers to pass these amendments and to continue working toward a state where every individual, regardless of gender, race, sexual orientation, or background, is treated with the respect and dignity they deserve. Thank you for your consideration.
AAUW Virginia supports the right of all Virginians to have the fundamental right inherent in the liberty of an individual to marry whom they wish. 71% of Virginians, as of 2021, support this right. This deeply personal decision should not be limited or delineated by government exerting unnecessary control, except in matters of importance to the state. like age minority. Virginia led in creating the Bill of Rights and Virginia must lead in creating personal marital freedom for all of its citizens. AAUW VA urges the passing of HJ 9.
HJ1 - For decades, the Democratic Party has urged us to support them, suggesting that voting for them is essential to protect Roe v. Wade rather than fully codifying it into law, which would ensure abortion access as a legal right. Women in Texas are facing serious risks due to inadequate medical care while doctors are constrained in their ability to help. We must ensure that Virginia does not follow this troubling path. HJ2 - If an individual with 34 felony convictions can become president, why do we continue to behave as though those with felony records do not deserve the restoration of their voting rights? Individuals who have been released from prison have fulfilled their sentences and deserve the opportunity to reintegrate into society. HJ 9 Gay marriage is the law of the land. These families deserve the same ongoing protections afforded to married families in the Commonwealth of Virginia.
• I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. • Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Please support HJ1, HJ2 and HJ9. Being able to commit to the person you love, having authority over your own body, and being able to exercise your voting rights once imprisonment is over should forever be inalienable rights in our great state.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
PLEASE OPPOSE HJ1 I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2 All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ9 Marriage is the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1 Reproductive Health Every Virginia resident should have access to affordable, quality health care, including abortion, birth control and the privacy to make reproductive choices. Abortion is not always the ending of ending a pregnancy it it also a medical procedure that terminates a nonviable pregnancy and saves a women's life. Abortion should be legal, safe, and the decision left to those who are pregnant with guidance from medical professionals. True democracy depends on equal rights for all people. Not only is the right to a safe and legal abortion a matter of personal freedom, it’s also a major factor in the movements for racial and economic equality. Black individuals, and all underserved communities, already experience unfair barriers and limited access to adequate healthcare services. HJ2 Voting Rights The majority of Virginians believe that all qualified citizens should have access to the ballot, including those who have served their time for felony convictions and people with disabilities who want to participate in the democratic process. I support an amendment to the Virginia Constitution to guarantee that people who have been disenfranchised due to a felony conviction will have their rights automatically restored upon completion of their sentences, without additional steps or paperwork, and to ensure people with disabilities never lose their rights without an appropriate judicial finding. HJ9 Marriage Equality The 2021 polls from the Public Religion Research Institute found that 71% of Virginians support the right of same-sex couples to marry. In 2006, 53% of voters supported the ban of same-sex couple marriage. This huge swing shows the massive shift in public opinion on this issue of marriage, and it is clear evidence that the antiquated ban should no longer be a part of Virginia’s constitution. It’s only fair to revisit a political question that has shown such a vast change since it was first broached. With the removal of women’s protections with the destruction of Roe v. Wade, it is possible that marriage equality will be destroyed on a national level as well. Virginia must take the lead to protect all citizens. Thank you. Anne Alston CD11
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly support these bills. This is about freedom.
I support this amendment to remove the outdated constitutional amendment restricting same sex marriage. The United States of America is a secular society and representative democracy. Marriage is a civil institution and while individuals are welcome to adhere to their own religious beliefs, the state should offer the civil benefits of marriage to all its citizens equally without imposing one group's religion on all its citizens.
I would like to strongly express my support for all three bills, each of which greatly enhance the rights and dignity of the people of the Commonwealth.
• I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. • Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
MARRIAGE IS BETWEEN A MAN AND A WOMEN AS STATED IN THE BIBLE. NO OTHER FORM OF INDIVIDUALS SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO GET MARRIED. LETS DO THE RIGHT THING. THIS WILL MEAN BENEFITS AND COSTS. LETS KEEP THE AMENDMENT AS IS. THIS NEEDS TO HAPPEN TO KEEP MY VOTES.
No restrictions on abortions. No liability for abortions. No criminality for abortions. Marriage is a human right between amongst consenting adults. Population in prisons and jail is counted for the purposes of population for redistricting, no human should be denied the right to vote.
HJ 1 – I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution because no such right exists. There is no right to murder an innocent human. HJ 1 violates the constitution, specifically the 14th amendment ("no State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law"), the 6th commandment of God ("Thou shall not murder"). It is disgusting and abhorrent that delegates from the state of VA would seek to violate their own oath to uphold the constitution of the United States and seek to enshrine a right to deny equal human rights to certain Virginian citizens by dehumanizing them based on their level of development and location. I urge you to work instead for policies that protect the life and dignity of every human being, to do justice on behalf of the fatherless instead of making them your prey. In fact, God commands you to do as much. HJ 9 – I strongly oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. God created the institution of marriage to be between one man and one woman. Man does not have the right to attempt to redefine it.
Please repeal the constitutional provision defining marriage as only a union between one man and one woman as well as the related provisions that are no longer valid as a result of the United States Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges. This one is long overdue.
The intention of my comment is to express my support of marriage equality. The Supreme Court granted same-sex couples the right to marry nationwide in 2015. This decision should be honored and protected in the state of Virginia.
I am not opposed to granting the same benefits of as committed relationship based on sexual orientation. In order to end the controversy in our culture, I propose we eliminate the word marriage and its related forms (e.g., married, marry, etc.) be replaced in the legal lexicon with something similar to civil union, relationship contract, etc. Term marriage can be used in a religious context, but legally it will not be used as a type of license, any tax clause/status, any aspect of estate distribution, communal property rights, etc.
Marriage was created by God for the good of man and woman and society. This is a Win-Win-Win situation. Don't mess with it. I oppose HJ-9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Let's keep intact marriage's original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Virginia’s marriage equality ban no longer reflects the beliefs of its citizens. A 2021 poll showed 71% of Virginians support same-sex marriage, up from just 47% in 2006, highlighting a major shift in public opinion. Given this change, it’s time to remove the outdated ban from Virginia’s constitution. With the rollback of Roe v. Wade, national marriage equality could also be at risk, and Virginia should lead in protecting all citizens' rights. If the state truly is “for lovers,” it must affirm that love is love for everyone.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution. Without them, my husband and I are choosing to not to have children due to the risk. Women should have control of their bodies. These decisions should be made between a woman and her doctor no one else. These rights must be protected.
Today I would like to address critical issues that affect our society and the fundamental rights of individuals. We must protect marriage equality and ensure the preservation of same-sex marriage. This is not merely a matter of legal recognition; it is about upholding the dignity and rights of all individuals to love and marry who they choose without fear of discrimination. Additionally, we must prioritize access to affordable healthcare, including necessary services such as abortion. This is a matter of bodily autonomy—our bodies, our choices. Every individual must have the right to make informed decisions regarding their own health and well-being, free from judgement or limitation. As we consider amendments to legislation, let us not forget the importance of these issues. It is imperative that we advocate for policies that protect these rights and ensure equitable access to healthcare for every member of our community. Thank you for considering these vital amendments.
As to all three fast-tracking proposed amendments: You are aiming to skirt a deliberative process with robust discussion among all Virginians. You are doing this because you KNOW that your desire to harm and eliminate unborn children when you deem a child inconvenient (despite having been a child yourself!) and to alter what is true marriage which creates families where children are raised with one mother and one father are not popular measures and thus you act as surreptitiously as you can. How underhanded! I oppose HJ 9 and you should reject HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. I demand that you reject HJ 1. Abortion kills children and those children are the future of Virginia. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child and raises those children in families with one father and one mother.
I don’t want any change to the Virginia constitution enshrining the death of unborn babies.
HJ1-Herring: I strongly support the right of every individual to have the fundamental right to reproductive freedom and that the right to make and effectuate one’s own decisions about all matters related to one’s pregnancy cannot be denied, burdened, or otherwise infringed upon by the Commonwealth. The right to bodily autonomy lives within the person and not at the state, and affects all freedoms and overlaps with so many other institutions including that of the economy, healthcare, poverty, education, and safety from partner violence. I have worked personally as a citizen advocate in the GA for this for 15 years. HJ9-Sickles: I support : Repeals the constitutional provision defining marriage as only a union between one man and one woman as well as the related provisions that are no longer valid as a result of the United States Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015). The amendment provides that the right to marry is a fundamental right inherent in the liberty of persons. I have worked on this issue for 15 years as a citizen activist and mobilizer of others at the GA to share about their personal stories and how the right to marriage and equal citizenship is a right for LGBTQ+ residents.
Please oppose those bills!!
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in most states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion, or law.
I support HJ1 and HJ9. Women should have control over their own bodies. I cannot believe this is even an issue: how is it possible in this day and age that we are discussing whether someone else can decide whether we carry a child or not? This should be a private decision made between a woman and her doctor. Likewise, marriage should be between two people who love each other, and it matters not one whit what gender they are.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution. Please secure the fundamental human rights for all Virginians. I fully support reproductive freedom, restoration of voting rights, and marriage equality.
HJ1: I OPPOSE. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. It could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2: All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ9: I OPPOSE HJ 9. Marriage has been defined as the union of one man and one woman since before definitions were needed. Our current state constitution reflects this truth passed down through millenia. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law, and is proven to be the best possible medium for raising healthy children.
An old addive states: my right to swing my hand stops at your nose. The right for a woman to terminate the life of an unborn person, stops at the child’s unique DNA, heart beat and brain waves. No one has the right to kill a healthy human being. I adamantly oppose granting any such right that grants a parent to kill their offspring as a means of family planning.
HJ1: I support the right of every individual to have reproductive freedom HJ2: I support the restoration of voting rights to those who have completed the terms of their punishment for crimes HJ9: I support marriage equality for every consenting adult human beings
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution. As a practicing psychiatrist, I believe these rights are incredibly important to supporting the mental health of the citizens of Virginia.
HJ 9 – Marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. I know you are trying to ram these bills through due to the results of the election. You obviously have learned nothing from the people speaking their voice. You should be ashamed of yourselves. One day you will stand before Our Lord and Judge. May God have mercy on your souls.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I oppose HJ1 because it is harmful to families: men, women , children, and our society. Abortion should never be offered as an option to women because it does so much harm to them and it’s shrouded in lies of the evil it causes. We do not have the right to harm an innocent person nor should we ever want to. I support restoring voting rights to reformed persons. HJ2 I oppose redefining marriage which we also have no power to do so and we would be lying if we pretended to. Our society can support those unable to marry in more helpful ways. HJ9
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
RE: HJ1: I support the right of women to have access to all services which support their private choices in matters of reproductive health. RE: HJ2: I support the restoration of voting rights to those who have completed the terms of their punishment for crimes RE: HJ9: I support marriage equality for all adult citizens.
HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 are essential to securing fundamental human rights for all Virginians. As an active and consistent voter I fully support reproductive freedom, restoration of voting rights, and marriage equality. My vote will always be for candidates who stand for and defend these rights
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I am against HJ1. A "Right to Abortion" should not be cemented into our constitution. It would take away the ability to make any future adjustment and in one action take away existing laws without examination. It would be more unifying and better for everyone to give needed help to both mother and child. I am for HJ2 to restore voting rights to those who have completed their sentences. I am against HJ3 since we must do all we can to ensure the health and well being of future Virginia citizens. There have been many studies done that show that an intact family with a mother and father is the way to do this
• I oppose HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. • I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. • I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1 It is my religious belief and my legal belief that the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution and its Virginia corollary confirms that an unborn child at the moment of conception is a person with the right to life. Thus, I oppose HJ1. Labelling abortion as a "right" is simply contrary to reality and natural law. HJ 2 I support the restoration of voting rights for those persons whose voting rights have been lost due to criminal convictions once their incarceration has been completed. HJ 9 I oppose HJ 9 as it, too, contradicts reality and natural law. What is "up" is "up" and what is "down" is "down" and legislation cannot say otherwise. 1984 is alive and well if this Resolution results in an amendment to the Constitution of Virginia.
HJ1 OPPOSE • I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. • HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. • A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. • Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. Women in crisis pregnancies need encouragement, counseling, resources and support -- not abortion. HJ 19 - OPPOSE • I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. • Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. Every child deserves a mother and father in a marriage that is freely entered into with an enduring commitment of love, sacrifice, and service toward each other and their children. As the federal government has discovered, a one-man one-woman marriage is the naturally designed, foundation for family life. It may not always be possible in practice, but it essential for human flourishing, public health, and economic opportunity. The courtesy of a written reply is requested.
I support All three bills
• I oppose HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. • I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. • I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I adamantly oppose HJ1,HJ2, and HJ9 into the Virginia Constitution. The stance of all 3 proposals is MUCH too extreme and abhorrent for society as well as the VA Constitution. As a retired Mental Health RN I have seen the results of women who have had abortions to include inpatient hospitalization due to the after affects. Women deserve better than this. Abortion delivers one dead baby and one wounded woman!
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for ensuring these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose HJ 1 enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states.
HJ1. Support ALL life from conception to natural death. Vote no on HJ1. HJ9. Protect real marriage - the union of 1 man & 1 woman only. Vote no on HJ9.
Please protect our rights and freedoms. We want body autonomy and the freedom to marry as we see fit. Religion does not belong in politics. You have a duty to defend our rights against religious ideals that marginalize the people you represent.
I oppose HJ9. Marriage as the union of one man and one woman is in conformity with natural law and predates any nation, religion, or law.
I support these amendments because in a nation that values and prioritizes freedom, I believe that individuals should have autonomy over all their decisions. If we are to truly have our unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the government cannot restrict our autonomy in any way. Furthermore our government has a responsibility to protect our rights and by amending our state constitution we are solidifying that protection in the event that there are challenges to these rights federally.
HJ1: I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ2: I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ9: I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I support HJ1 under the basis of women should have the right to decide what happens with their bodies. I support HJ2 under the basis of mistakes should not render a human unable to participate in democracy. I support HJ9 under the basis of no outside force should be able to stop two consenting adults from getting married.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
1. Every Virginian should have access to affordable, quality healthcare, including abortion and birth control, with the freedom to make private reproductive choices. Abortion must remain safe, legal, and guided by medical professionals. Protecting reproductive rights safeguards other freedoms, such as marriage equality, contraception access, and privacy in personal decisions. 2. Most Virginians believe all qualified citizens deserve voting rights, including those who’ve served felony sentences and people with disabilities who wish to vote. I support a constitutional amendment for automatic rights restoration upon sentence completion, with no extra steps, and to protect the voting rights of people with disabilities unless a court rules otherwise. Voting rights should not be permanently lost due to past mistakes. Virginia should amend its Constitution to ensure fair restoration and foster civic participation. 3.Virginia’s marriage equality ban no longer reflects the beliefs of its citizens. A 2021 poll showed 71% of Virginians support same-sex marriage, up from just 47% in 2006, highlighting a major shift in public opinion. Given this change, it’s time to remove the outdated ban from Virginia’s constitution. With the rollback of Roe v. Wade, national marriage equality could also be at risk, and Virginia should lead in protecting all citizens' rights. If the state truly is “for lovers,” it must affirm that love is love for everyone.
I support these amendments because in a nation that values and prioritizes freedom, I believe that individuals should have autonomy over all their decisions. If we are to truly have our unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the government cannot restrict our autonomy in any way. Furthermore our government has a responsibility to protect our rights and by amending our state constitution we are solidifying that protection in the event that there are challenges to these rights federally.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
HJ 9 – marriage • I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. • Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose HJ 1 and HJ 9. Rather than seeking to allow the extermination of unborn children at any time for any reason, let this state promote their rights and find solutions that allow life to thrive. In an age of demographic decline and relativism, let this state affirm that marriage serves specific biological and social purposes that are only possible between members of the opposite sex.
“I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.”
Good afternoon: I am writing to request representation of my views in Virginia. Regarding HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment: I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. Babies should be protected before they're born--not killed. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Please reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. Regarding HJ 2 – restoring voting rights: I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. Regarding HJ 9 – marriage: I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. God established marriage as a sacred relationship between a man and a woman.
HJ 1 I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Respected House Privileges and Elections Committee Members and associated Delegates: I submit the following points for urgent consideration in your final deliberations concerning HJ(s) 1; 2; and 9: HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment: - I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. - HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. - HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. - A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Strongly urge Rejection of HJ 1. In place of expanding abortion, I respectfully urge you to work instead for non-abortion oriented policies that affirm the life and dignity of every Virginian mother and child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights: I support passage of HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored. Complimentary to the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage - At it's core would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. - Marriage has an original design and purpose, founded not by Humanity alone, that predates any nation, religion or law. Strongly urge Rejection of HJ 9. As a fellow citizen and veteran, I am sincerely appreciative of both the opportunity to submit this written statement and; your professional review/consideration/action based upon them regarding the HJ(s) under your responsibility. Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions/comment/etc.. Respectfully, Edward James Stanton, Jr. edwardstantonjr@gmail.com (703) 780-0661
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, oand HJ9. Enshrining reproductive health protections for women and protecting their physicians is personally important to me. I shudder to think how my life might have been endangered when I required medical treatment for three miscarriages if I had needed to have them in a state like Texas in the current legal climate. My son might have grown without a mother if I hadn’t had the required healthcare in a timely manner. Delays can injure or kill a woman. Ultimately, I believe reproductive health decisions are between a woman and her health care providers. Regarding HJ9, I support it because I believe firmly the decision to be joined in marriage is up to the parties involved, regardless of their gender/. gender identification. If people don’t approve of such unions, then they should decide only for themselves not to engage in such a union .
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ1, and HJ9. Every Virginian and human being should have access to safe reproductive healthcare, the right to vote, and the right to marry whomever they love. How can we even call ourselves Americans if we are trying to restrict the freedoms of our peers? This is about empowering people to make the best decisions for their own lives. I strongly urge committee members to pass all three bills.
HJ1 Herring I am reaching out as a concerned Virginia citizen about the recent proposal to enshrine a right to reproductive freedom in Virginia's constitution. This will open the door to abortion through all nine months of pregnancy. Virginia has never allowed abortion up until birth and of the people who support abortion, only 22% of them support third trimester abortions. This stance is too extreme for Virginia. This proposal will block protection from minors undergoing abortion and other harmful reproductive practices by removing parental knowledge and consent. It will make abortion practices even more dangerous by limiting clinical safety standards and informed consent for women and minors. If you care about your citizens PLEASE do not support this proposal.
I am opposed to HJ1 on reproductive freedom because it fails to take into account the rights of an unborn baby whose life would be terminated by an abortion. I am opposed to HJ on same-sex marriage, as it violates the traditional an proper definition of marriage.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose hj 9. A marriage is only ...can only be between a man & a woman. God is the architect for this, well y documented in the Bible. A man & woman compliment each other, ultimately becoming a " one flesh" Union. Natural law upholds this naturally complimentary Union. Reason dictates. Scotty Cypher
As a professional who works in the field of mental health, I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Regarding HJ1: Keep church and state separate. Many are stating their opposition to a constitutional right to abortion on moral grounds. I'm supporting a constitutional right to abortion based on scientific grounds. Science is not up for interpretation the same way religion is, so to say that abortion is "wrong" lacks evidence to support the claim. Babies are not being murdered as they are horrifically portrayed to be, however women who are unable to seek a safe abortion or have complications that may require an abortion are dying unfairly and in inhumane ways. Abortion is a medical procedure. Women deserve to have access to any and all medical procedures they may need. To deny abortions in Virginia will place many women at risk and they may attempt to seek an abortion in another state or in unsafe ways. If "abortion trafficking" laws are put into place, travel would be restricted for those seeking this medical procedure and possibly lead to punitive criminal charges and further place strain on jails that are not equipped to manage overpopulation, medical issues, or inmates requiring mental health care. Regarding HJ2: Everyone should have the right to vote in a democracy. Many criminals have mental health issues that contributed to their crimes. Not allowing them to exercise their right to vote is discriminatory. Regarding HJ9: This bares repeating - keep church and state separate in Virginia. Since 1888 the US Supreme Court has declared at least 14 times that marriage is a fundamental right for all. Article 16 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights guarantees “men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion… the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.” Not allowing LGBTQ+ people to marry the person of their choosing is cruel and will lead to increase in crisis response as this population encounters higher rates of suicide attempts.To deny the LGBTQ+ population the ability to marry their partner also strips them of rights in medical emergencies. Since election day, there has been a 700% increase of crisis calls within the LGBTQ+ community according to the Trevor Project. This is a vulnerable population that already experiences shunning from family for being who they are, please do not make them feel shunned by their state as well. I will end with the golden rule: "treat others the way you want to be treated." Thank you for taking time to consider my input.
HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
I strongly support all 3 bills: HJ1, HJ2, & HJ9. As a citizen of the United States, to maintain our individual freedoms includes and not limited to: rights to vote and freedom of speech, freedom to love who and how your heart knows best, and to have bodily autonomy over your own health care (private relationship between doctors and patients/individuals). Thank you, respectfully. <3
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. For the dignity of humanity innate in the recognition of marriage as the full gift self between of ONE man and ONE woman as natural law attests, please oppose HJ 9. Thank you!
Why is this being fast-tracked? What are you trying to do literally behind our backs without any concern of what your constituents see as reasonable. The citizens of the Commonwealth of VA are watching this underhanded maneuever. HJ1 -OPPOSE -This should NOT be enshrined in the VA Constition, and I am tired of state representatives not listening to their consitutents. The right is for life, not a consitiutional right to abortion at any stage. This is a horrible bill that promotes murder. The abortion conversation needs to be kept open and we need to work towards policies that are not so radical but rather take a common sense approach to each situations and affirms dignity and life of mother and child. Our state should be protecting all of its citizens, even those unborn, and the abortion issue should not be taken as lightly and as cavalierly as this bill clearly does . HJ9 - OPPOSE- Marriage is a union bewteen a man and a woman for the purposes of building a life and having a family, which cannot be done by two people of the same sex. If you want equal rights for people of the same sex that want to be together, draft something else, but don't bastardize the definition of marriage. To redefine marriage, is clearly against, God's design. PLEASE NOTE, that we are watching how those who represent us and how they vote.
These three bills are common sense legislation that should flow across party lines. As a conservative, I can fully support all three of these items. They all support a freedom to choose. Freedom to choose your own fertility decisions, freedom to vote, and freedom to live and marry who you choose within the boundaries of the law. This is a no brainer, vote yes.
All persons have fundamental rights. All persons should have the right to marry who they choose. All women should have the absolute right to determine what is right for their health and their bodies.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1. I urge you to protect Mothers and Babies from the horrors of Abortion. I STRONGLY Oppose a "right" to abortion. I SUPPORT a right to Life for the Baby and freedom from the psychological torture for a Mother knowing she participated in the killing of her own flesh and blood. HJ9. Marriage is the union of one man and one woman. I OPPOSE any change in the definition of marriage. It predates any nation. It is the best solution for raising healthy children. Messing with the definition of marriage opens a can of worms such that anything can be marriage and therefore marriage is of no value destroying its purpose.
The ban in the Virginia Constitution does not reflect the attitudes and beliefs of Virginians in 2023. A 2021 poll from the Public Religion Research Institute found that 71% of Virginians support the right of same-sex couples to marry. This percentage has only increased since the question began being asked of voters. In 2006, 53% of voters supported the marriage ban. This huge swing shows the massive shift in public opinion on the issue of marriage, and it is clear evidence that the antiquated ban should no longer be a part of Virginia’s constitution. It’s only fair to revisit a political question that has shown such a vast change since it was first broached. With the removal of women’s protections with the destruction of Roe v. Wade, it is possible that marriage equality will be destroyed on a national level as well. Virginia must take the lead to protect all citizens. If Virginia really is “for lovers,” it should recognize that love is love and grant all citizens the right to live their lives in peace.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
- HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment. -- I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. -- HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. -- HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. -- Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights. - I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting -- rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage. - I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. -- Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ1, and HJ9 and urge committee members to pass all three bills. Every Virginian and every American deserves access to safe reproductive healthcare, the right to vote, and the right to marry whomever they love.
HJ1: I strongly oppose HJ1, a "right to abortion" amendment, into Virginia's constitution. HJ1 would jeopardize parental consent and the ban on partial-birth abortion, which is inhuman. Unlimited abortion until birth is a tragedy for both babies and mothers. Please work for policies that support mothers and their children, like supporting pregnancy resource centers, instead of expanding abortion. HJ9: I strongly oppose HJ9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. God designed marriage and it is between one man and one woman.
HJ1 - I strongly oppose enshrining a "right" to abortion in Virginia's constitution as it would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect unborn children before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion until birth is a fundamental tragedy and not a fundamental right. While I support a woman's right to do whatever she wants with her own body, I don't believe she has the right to do whatever she wants with someone else's body - in this case, the baby whose composition is a genetically unique and living human being. Instead of expanding abortion, I encourage you to work instead to affirm the life and dignity of every mother and child. HJ 2 - I support HJ 2 as all people who have completed their sentence should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 - I strongly oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage is the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion, or law and should not be manipulated for political gain.
Dear Members of the Virginia House of Delegates Committee, I am writing today in strong support of the proposed constitutional amendment affirming the right of marriage between two individuals regardless of gender. The Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell v. Hodges made it clear that same-sex couples have the same right to marry as opposite-sex couples. However, codifying this right in our state constitution will ensure that it is protected regardless of future changes in judicial interpretation. Growing up, the ability to be able to marry someone that I love was not even an option unless they were a man. It was only as an adult that marriage equality became federally protected, a long-overdue recognition of the basic rights of LGBTQ+ people like myself. This amendment provides the Commonwealth with the opportunity to further protect and legally uphold the freedoms and dignity of all its citizens, while also respecting religious freedom by allowing religious organizations to refuse to perform marriages as a matter of their doctrine. It is time to update our state constitution to protect the same rights for all Virginians, ensuring they are recognized and protected under state law. This amendment goes beyond correcting outdated provisions that no longer reflect the values or legal realities in our country. It explicitly acknowledges marriage as a fundamental right, inherent in the liberty of all people. By protecting the right to marry without regard to sex, gender, or race, this amendment aligns with our most essential commitments to equality and justice. Recognizing all lawful marriages equally under state law is essential. It is a statement of our shared belief in equal treatment and respect for all families, which strengthens our communities and our society. I urge the committee to move forward with this amendment, knowing it will honor both my rights as an American and a Virginian, as well as the rights of future generations. Thank you for considering my comments.
This ban does not reflect the attitudes and beliefs of Virginians in 2023. A 2021 poll from the Public Religion Research Institute found that 71% of Virginians support the right of same-sex couples to marry. This percentage has only increased since the question began being asked of voters. In 2006, 53% of voters supported the marriage ban. This huge swing shows the massive shift in public opinion on the issue of marriage, and it is clear evidence that the antiquated ban should no longer be a part of Virginia’s constitution. It’s only fair to revisit a political question that has shown such a vast change since it was first broached. With the removal of women’s protections with the destruction of Roe v. Wade, it is possible that marriage equality will be destroyed on a national level as well. Virginia must take the lead to protect all citizens. If Virginia really is “for lovers,” it should recognize that love is love and grant all citizens the right to live their lives in peace.
I am writing to express my strong support for HJ9, a resolution to amend the Virginia Constitution to protect marriage equality for all. Every person deserves the right to love and marry freely. LGBTQ+ people have been historically disenfranchised in this country, and now we have an opportunity in Virginia to ensure that LGBTQ+ rights are protected, even in the face of potential changes to federal policy. As your constituent, I urge you to support HJ9 and make this amendment a priority. The time to protect ALL Virginians is now, and I hope you will stand with us by supporting this critical amendment. Thank you for your attention to this essential issue.
I write to strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. All three of these actions would stand in strong defiance against those who would seek to deprive Virginians of the rights and freedoms they have enjoyed for many years. HJ1 works to ensure that all medical decisions are between a patient and their doctor, and are not to be subject to public inspection and court of public opinion. HJ2 stands to guard the constitutionally guaranteed right to participate in our democracy against those who would try to unjustly silence others as a way to illegally and immorally influence our democracy. HJ9 stands to guard freedoms long enjoyed by many Virginians from those who seek to indefensibly impose their own religious or social views upon the lives of others.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I support HJ9 and urge the committee to pass HJ9. The right to marry should not be limited by race or gender. It has been found to be unconstitutional to do so and should not be in the state constitution. The language defining marriage as a union between a man and a woman should be removed and it should be amended to provide the right regardless of gender and race.
HJ1 - Herring: OPPOSE. HJ1 I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights: OPPOSE I strongly oppose HJ2. Convicted Felons should not vote. HJ 9 – marriage: OPPOSE I most strongly oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation nto protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental rig Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
I strongly oppose HJ 1 abortion is not a constitutional right and should not be enshrined. You should work instead on making the places where abortions are performed adhere to the same rules and regulations as outpatient surgical centers and urgent cares. Underage women should have to have the consent of an adult, since it is a legal requirement for all surgical procedures if underage to have a parent or guardian sign. Abortion can result in hemorrhage, infection, and loss of fertility, Do more for helping women who are pregnant and want to keep their babies by providing services. We voted a state on the marriage amendment several years ago so it should be put to the people again if that is to be redefined and not voted on by one individual making a decision for the rest of us. I appose HJ9
Please OPPOSE the HJ1 amendment as abortion or killing of infants is inhumane. Birth control should not be allowed to be conducted by taking the life of a baby. It is not a "right" but a "slaughter." Restoring Voting rights, HJ2 is to be supported since people have completed their required prison sentences. I also so OPPOSE HJ9 amendment that would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose. Stop calling something "marriage" when it goes against natural law.
I write in support of HJ9 to amend the Virginia constitution to repeal the same-sex marriage prohibition and affirm the right any two individuals, regardless of sex, gender, orientation or race, to marry. The right to marry is a fundamental liberty consistent with Virginia’s long-standing tradition of individual freedoms and protection from governmental intrusion. This amendment would bring the Virginia constitution in line with decision of the United States Supreme Court in Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015). I strongly urge you to support it. Respectfully, Dr. Harold V Hartley III Chesterfield, Virginia
I strongly oppose the HJ1 amendment and its pretense of protecting "women's rights." Murder is not the right of any individual, male or female, to exercise upon any other individual, whether young or old, fully or under developed. "Reproductive rights" is just sterilized wording of an evil practice. I also strongly oppose HJ9, marriage is between one man and one woman for the lifetime of one or both of the parties. Any other combination is not marriage.
Once conceived a life should never be aborted. Once a convict has served their sentence they should regain voting rights. Leave the one man one women law intact !
I urge my representative to Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. This is a blatant overreach by fear-mongering politics and only seeks to further divide us. Life is human and should be respected whether at the beginning or end of life. Please support policies that give women and children protection, not more rules. I also urge you also to stop working to change the definition of marriage. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. There is nothing that prevents people from living together--many don't even bother with marriage these days and for those of us who believe in the sanctity of marriage, this is a misguided attempt to cater to a very small and unique subset of citizens.
Hello House Privileges and Elections Committee, I am writing to voice my support for HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. I wish for these Constitutional Amendments to be included on the ballot in order to secure our individual freedoms. Thank you and Sincerely, Doc-Marten Knoefler
(1). In pursuit of your right to have an abortion should not mean that I have to pay for it. The moral objection being paramount, the idea that I have to pay for this procedure is totally absurd and unacceptable (2). Marriage is between One man and One woman. Society has already made many variables to this basic truth and making it financially rewarding, will continue to degenerate our moral values.
I support HJ1 and HJ9 for enshrining these essential freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I strongly advocate against HJ1; it is important to rally for the support of human rights to LIFE rather than to methods of destroying it. How can any human being in good conscience support the right to kill another innocent child just because it might be an inconvenience? HJ2. I support the right of incarcerated persons to regain the right to vote after completing their sentences. HJ9 There is a fundamental difference between men and women, and an unwritten law that has sustained the world for centuries that marriage should be between one man and one woman--anything else could lead to a marriage between a person and a bridge or an animal or anything else. What a travesty for humanity!!!!
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. Other people may engage in some contractual or civil union, but marriage is the union of a man and a woman for the purpose of having children. Please preserve the family. Destroying the family will destroy the communities, the society and the country.
I support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for including these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I support all three bills
Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. There should be some limits for the mother who miscarries, and freedom to be counceled by doctors. Also A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 9 – Marriage I strongly oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. My reasons are listed below: Marriage has historically been a union between a man and a woman, and this amendment would undermine this longstanding cultural and religious institution. Child-Rearing: children benefit from both a mother and a father -- this is the ideal family structure for raising children. Social Stability: Traditional marriages contribute to stable family units, which create stronger communities. Population Growth: Heterosexual marriage supports natural reproduction, which is essential for demographic and economic stability. Clear Legal Definition: Defining marriage as heterosexual reduces legal complexities and avoids potential conflicts over ever expanding marriage definitions. Religious Beliefs: Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. ALL major faith groups view marriage as sacred between a man and a woman. These values must be protected from from legal conflicts. Respecting Popular Will: Majorities in most societies support traditional marriage.
HJ1 - Herring - I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in VA’s constitution. HJ2 - Bennett- Parker - I support HJ2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ9 - Sickles - I oppose HJ9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as a union of one man and one woman.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
As a man married to another man with a young daughter, HJ 1 and 9 are both intertwined with my and my family’s lives. In terms of HJ 9, while I understand the protections of the Obergefell decision and the Respect for Marriage Act, Congress has shown that the individual states have power and the authority to further provide these fundamental protections to its citizens. By additionally repealing the provision of recognizing marriage as between a man and woman, it further validates and strengthens the authority of my marriage to my husband. It would make me, as a resident of this Commonwealth, feel safe, secure, and proud. I am also fully in support of the provision that any religious person to be exempt from performing same sex marriages if it goes against their beliefs. I would also add that I hope to see arguments against this bill that rely on the basis of religious choice be unacknowledged to uphold the separation of church and state. In terms of HJ 1, this country had a precedent with Roe v Wade for over half a century. The current SCOTUS has shown that precedent does not matter in their personal decisions, so it is again up to the individual states and commonwealths to enact laws that provide equal protections and rights to all of its citizens. Knowing that my daughter was born into a world post-Roe and never knowing that she had those rights before she was born, she will grow up seeing that as a woman, she is less than. That men do not have laws governing what they can and cannot do with their bodies or personal reproductive choices. Men, after all, are able to get vasectomies to prevent getting women pregnant, yet women now have no choice if they do become pregnant, if that pregnancy endangers their lives, if it was through rape, incest, or deceit. I will do all in my power to fight in her behalf to make choices regarding her own body.
HJ1 - Herring: I strongly oppose amending the Virginia constitution to enshrine the so-called right to abortion. Life is a fundamental right of all human beings, and it is our first and primary right. No human being may have his or her right to life infringed upon. This is most especially true for human lives that are most vulnerable. It's our duty as men and women who seek the common good to protect the lives of pre-born children. Our efforts should be directed towards supporting pregnant women and helping them obtain the resources and the support to bring life into this world. Every human being has dignity, and we must lift up that dignity. HJ2 - Bennett-Parker: Once an individual has completed a sentence, he or she should undoubtedly have voting rights restored. We would be joining most states in our country by restoring the right to vote to those who have faced the consequences of their actions and have re-entered society. HJ9 - Sickles: Marriage and family is the most fundamental unit of any human society. It has existed well before governments and states. It has existed before any system of laws. It stands to reason then that marriage is not a human invention. Consequently it is not up to us as humans to define marriage. Men and women were made, complimentary, by our Creator, God Almighty. His design is set up for human beings to flourish. If we desire to flourish, we must maintain His desing of marriage as between one man and one woman. Anything different will further dimish human ability to live life to its fullest intent.
I believe that relationships can take many forms and all deserve respect, however, I support marriage as the legal status between one man and one woman.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I wholeheartedly agree with, and support, the words and sentiments to which this my comment is attached. EHT.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. Thank you
The Commonwealth has taken steps to ensure that the right to life is protected for even the worst offenders after being tried and convicted. So too, our youngest and most vulnerable Virginian’s deserve the right to life and protection against any individual, including their mother, who would put them to death. In addition, the protection of marriage between one man and one women is a fundamental building block of society and must be safeguarded. Regarding, HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
These bills are an affront to the majority of Virginians. They are the product of an elite out of touch with reality.
To Virginia House Delegates, I live in HD 12 (and am proud to have voted for my Delegate- Holly Seibold) and want to express my strong support for all three of the Constitutional Amendments listed below but especially HJ1. Virginia needs to be an example for all the States of how we protect our citizens rights. Hopefully you will all support these Amendments as well and I know I will be volunteering and doing all I can to make sure these are passed. Thanks, Robin K. Tingley Reproductive Health - Every Virginian should have access to affordable, quality healthcare, including abortion and birth control, with the freedom to make private reproductive choices. Abortion must remain safe, legal, and guided by medical professionals. Protecting reproductive rights safeguards other freedoms, such as marriage equality, contraception access, and privacy in personal decisions. The right to choose also supports racial and economic equality, as marginalized communities face greater barriers to adequate healthcare. Reproductive decisions affect overall well-being, including financial stability, housing, employment, and family support. Voting Rights Restoration - Most Virginians believe all qualified citizens deserve voting rights, including those who’ve served felony sentences and people with disabilities who wish to vote. I support a constitutional amendment for automatic rights restoration upon sentence completion, with no extra steps, and to protect the voting rights of people with disabilities unless a court rules otherwise. Voting rights should not be permanently lost due to past mistakes. Virginia should amend its Constitution to ensure fair restoration and foster civic participation. Marriage Equality - Virginia’s marriage equality ban no longer reflects the beliefs of its citizens. A 2021 poll showed 71% of Virginians support same-sex marriage, up from just 47% in 2006, highlighting a major shift in public opinion. Given this change, it’s time to remove the outdated ban from Virginia’s constitution. With the rollback of Roe v. Wade, national marriage equality could also be at risk, and Virginia should lead in protecting all citizens' rights. If the state truly is “for lovers,” it must affirm that love is love for everyone.
I strongly oppose and strongly urge you to oppose the Bill known as HJ-1. I support, and urge you to support, the Bill known as HJ-2. I strongly oppose, and strongly urge you to oppose, the Bill known as HJ-9. Jeff Fortman 240.660.8956
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution imposes on each state a duty to provide the equal protections of the law to all persons within its jurisdiction. Prenatal persons in Virginia are persons within the jurisdiction of Virginia. The proposed amendment violates the 14th Amendment's prohibiting against deny the equal protection of the laws to a class of persons in Virginia. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. The Supreme Court's decision in Obergefell v. Hodges was wrongly decided, as explained in the cogent dissenting opinions in that case.
I support the bill proposed by HJ1-Herring to amend the VA State Constitution to codify reproductive rights. I support the bill proposed by HJ9-Sickles to amend the VA State Constitution to grant the right to marry to any two individuals regardless of gender. Both of these bills are paramount to marginalized citizens of VA. Women should have the right to reproductive freedom without interference from the government. Individuals should be free to marry without interference from the government.
I am writing in full support of all three bills. HJ1: The state has no business interfering in the decisions made between a woman and her healthcare professionals. A constitutional amendment to protect abortion rights is essential for ensuring long-term reproductive freedom. Enshrining these rights provides a stable safeguard against future political shifts, offering citizens a clear and durable guarantee of bodily autonomy. By embedding these protections in the state constitution, lawmakers uphold individuals' ability to make personal medical decisions without interference. Constitutional protection also addresses public health concerns, ensuring safe access to care and reducing the risk of dangerous, unregulated alternatives. Above all, enshrining abortion rights affirms a commitment to individual rights and supports the health and well-being of all residents. HJ2: Individuals previously convicted of a felony who have completed their sentence should have the chance to be reintegrated into society, and not disenfranchised from the opportunity to vote on their representation. HJ9: Any two individuals who love each other should share the right to have their marriage recognized by the state. As decided by the US Supreme Court in Obergefell v. Hodges, the existing law is unconstitutional. This law must be amended to be in compliance with the United States constitution.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 strongly oppose HJ 2 agree HJ 3 oppose
My daughter-in-law's birth mother got pregnant in high school. She gave her child up for adoption. Because she chose life, our family has three beautiful grandchildren. HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment • I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. • HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. • HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. • A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. • Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights • I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. Marriage and the family are the central institutions of social life. HJ 9 – marriage • I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. • Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I believe all people have the right to determine what happens to their own bodies. As an AFAB (assigned female at birth), my girlfriend and I both suffer from hormonal imbalances that would render pregnancy dangerous for both ourselves and any potential fetus. Between my girlfriend's removed ovary, my polycystic ovarian syndrome, and my prolactinoma (tumor), our reproductive systems aren't even likely to be fertile. To know that despite all this, we could still be forced to carry children is a scary thought. It's a scary thought not only because of our health conditions that could render potential pregnancies inviable or dangerous, but also because of the implications of what a possible pregnancy would mean for my girlfriend and I. We don't want to raise children, so we'd never be caught dead applying for a surrogate. If either of us were to become pregnant, it could only be a result of sexual assault. It is sad that these are the hypothetical extremes I have to spell out for you in order to make you understand why your laws have no place in my womb. Please protect our reproductive rights. We want to get married and old, not pregnant and forced to carry.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation or law. The state has an interest in the stability of a true marriage of one man and one woman, for from that beginning all of society springs. Supporting any other arrangement is not only against the natural law, over time it will undermine civil society.
I strongly support HJ1 and HJ2 and HJ9. Every Virginian has a fundamental right to reproductive healthcare, the right to vote if qualifications are met, and the right to marry who they love, regardless of gender.
Please protect the right to life for the unborn and the dignity of life-bearing marriages between a man and a woman. HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment **I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. **HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. **HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. **A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. **Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights **I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage **I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. **Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose H1J as abortion is a tragedy, not a right, that remains a blight on our state. I oppose HJ 9, since the purpose of marriage is to have and raise children in a secure environment, which is of direct concern to the state. I strongly support HJ 2, as all people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored. Our justice system should be restorative, not punitive, and restoring voting rights is part of the reintegration process.
HJ1 - Please reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. Abortion is not a "right" because murder is not a right, and abortion is murder. HJ2 - I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ9 - I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. Undermining marriage undermines the fabric of our society. Studies have shown that children raised in households with their married mother and father are far more successful than children raised by single parents or homosexual guardians. It is your duty to promote laws that promote the welfare of Virginia's citizens rather than harming Virginia's citizens, whether they be pre-born or older. Please reject HJ1 and HJ9. Please approve HJ2.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I fully support these bills, HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Every citizen of Virginia deserves the right to reproductive healthcare, the right to vote if they meet the qualifications, and the right to marry who they love.
With regards to HJ 1 which is the “right to abortion” amendment, I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. This bill would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law including the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. It would also preclude any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. This would be a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. The whole practice of abortion is barbaric and not the actions of a civilized and caring society! please reject this bill and work towards affirming the life and dignity of every mother and every child. As to HJ 9 , which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman, I ask that you strongly oppose this as well. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion, or law and should, therefore, be protected for the good of the society, the protection of children, and the raising of the next generation of citizens.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
As a constituent currently in a mixed-race marriage, I support the affirmation of the fundamental right to marry regardless of race, sex, or gender in HJ9. My marriage a couple generations ago was just as illegal as same-sex marriage was more recently. It was even a crime, as you all know. I believe adding protection for same-sex and mixed-race marriages explicitly to the Virginia constitution can only strengthen Virginia families and reaffirm how far we have come from being the state famous for opposing interracial marriage in Loving v. Virginia. A same-sex marriage is just as valid as my own, and I support removing backwards laws that disallow it and instead proactively affirming our fundamental rights as citizens to marry as we choose.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I am strongly opposed to HJ 1: the "right to abortion amendment" that would enshrine the right to abortion to VA's Constitution. It would jeopardize the ban on partial birth abortion and parental consent which is just plain WRONG. It could also stop any future legislation to protect innocent babies before they are born. Unlimited abortion up until birth is barbaric and should be stopped immediately. Please work to provide policies that affirm the dignity of every mother and child. Please protect women and children from this awful scourge on our citizens and nation. I strongly support HJ 2: and believe all people who have served their sentences should have their voting rights restored. I strongly oppose HJ 9: that would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage between one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. It's time to stop the madness!
Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Protect women and their children from abortion. What a sad state that Virginia wants to enshrine this "right" to kill one's unborn children. We can and should be better than this. When a person's sentence is over, their voting rights should be restored. A marriage is and always be between one man and one woman. Since the beginning of time. Why do we allow others to attempt to re-define this basic fact?
It is past time for Virginia to repeal the same-sex marriage prohibition; affirmative right to marry. The right to marry who you love should be a fundamental right for every Virginian.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
We so not need this,
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose HJ-1. I support HJ-2. I oppose HJ-9. Thank you for your attention.
Good Afternoon, I would like to weigh in on HJ9 which would codify the right to marriage for two people regardless of sex, gender, or race. Please consider the ramifications of a scenario where OvH is overturned by the Supreme Court, as we saw with RvW, but HJ9 is not passed in Virginia. Many people, myself included, married a spouse of the same sex since 2015 - legally and equally to everyone else. We have since bought homes together, started families, and all other milestones that heterosexual couples take, all while under legal marriage by law. If we were suddenly not protected by national law, our families could be at risk which now includes children who have been born to (or adopted by), raised by, and loved by their parents during this time. This would be harmful to the children to learn that their parents are no longer allowed to be married. Furthermore, any legal action we would need to take to protect ourselves would then be an emotional and financial burden on our families, when we are just trying to get by like everyone else no matter the political affiliation. I strongly urge the Virginia legislators not to put families like ours in harms way, as we work, pay taxes, and contribute to our wonderful state as much as anyone else. Please protect us and our children justly by instating the proper laws. Thank You, From a mother and a proud lifelong Virginian
HJ 1 – Herring I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 –Bennett-Parker I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – Sickles I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment: I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. Reject HJ 1. I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights: I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage: I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
My wife and I oppose all three house proposals. Abortion is murder, plain and simple. Murder is a crime, not a "right". What about the "right" of the child to live? We need to focus on the child, not the mother. Even after a convicted criminal has served his sentence, he needs to show that he has learned his lesson and will not commit a crime again. I would propose a five-year period after completing his sentence that he be crime free before his voting rights are restored. As far as HJ9 is concerned, marriage is a sacrament, ordained by God, and it is to be between a man and a woman, period.
HJ1 - opposed HJ2 - support HJ9 - opposed
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1 - As a woman, this is extremely important to me. I believe that everyone woman deserves the right to bodily autonomy and to make our own informed decisions regarding medical care. It is TERRIFYING that women could have that right taken away after already fighting so hard (and winning) to have that freedom. I don't want to live in a state or country where I don't feel safe. Knowing that my rights could be taken away makes me feel the opposite of safe. Please - for myself and every other woman - help protect this human right. HJ9 - As a lesbian and member of the LGBTQ community, this is also personal for me. I met my partner 5 years ago and we have been engaged for almost 1 year. I want and deserve the right to marry the person I love, just like everyone else. This shouldn't even be up for debate anymore. Love is love.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. Marriage defined any other way is not fitting with the natural law concept of complimentarity. When Natural Law is denied, civilization will suffer. Please vote no on this amendment. Thank you.
1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I fully support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. It is imperative that these rights be enshrined and protected. Never, in the history of our nation and the human race, have we ever regretted protecting all human rights.
• Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. • I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. • I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
With respect to HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Please Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. With respect to HJ 9 – marriage I strongly oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. Thank you sincerely for attention to these issues, Dr. Evelyn Clingerman Fredericksburg, VA 22406
A House committee is fast-tracking proposed amendments on abortion, marriage and voting rights! In an unusual fast-tracking move, the House Privileges and Elections Committee will be hearing, and presumably voting on, three constitutional amendment proposals tomorrow morning at 11:00am: an extreme “right to abortion” amendment, an amendment to repeal the one-man/one-woman marriage provision, and an amendment to restore voting rights. Committee approval of these resolutions would advance them to the House floor, for a vote early in the 2025 session. The process to amend Virginia’s constitution is multi-year and involves a number of steps, but this latest action must be met with a high volume of voices. We urge you to submit written comments by clicking here and using the form provided. Here are some suggested talking points: HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has purpose and positive good that design that is not subject to nation's law.
HJ1 - I 100% support this bill. HJ1 marks a significant step forward for women's rights in Virginia. This law reinforces the fundamental right of women to make personal choices about their reproductive health, ensuring freedom and autonomy for all. Supporting reproductive freedom means upholding equality, respect, and individual agency for every woman across the Commonwealth. HJ2 - I 100% support this bill. HJ2 represents a powerful commitment to the democratic principles of Virginia by ensuring that every eligible citizen has the fundamental right to vote without unnecessary barriers. By allowing citizens who have served their sentences to regain their voting rights automatically, this measure reinforces the belief in second chances and the right to participate in shaping our communities. It also thoughtfully addresses concerns around mental capacity, allowing only those who are currently able to understand the act of voting to participate, while providing a clear path for restoring rights if capacity is regained. This is a forward-thinking step toward an inclusive and fair electoral process in the Commonwealth. HJ9 - I 100% support the passing of this bill. As an LGBTQ+ individual serving the Commonwealth, this amendment represents more than policy—it’s about safeguarding the hopes and dreams that many of us hold for a future where our relationships are respected and our rights are secure. In times of political uncertainty, especially with a new administration that could bring shifting priorities, it’s easy to feel fear for what lies ahead. This amendment provides a sense of stability and assurance, reinforcing that our rights and our families are valued, protected, and legally recognized. It’s a vital step toward a future where we can continue to serve and contribute with confidence, knowing that Virginia stands for equality and inclusion.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion, or law.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution. As a mother there is nothing more important than my daughter having control of her body. These decisions should be made between a woman and her doctor no one else. These rights must be protected.
• I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I support HJ 9. Lawful marriage is a right between two parties that exemplifies the freedom our country is founded on. People should not be discriminated against and not allowed marriage based on their sex, gender, or race.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment - I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. - HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. - A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. - Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights - I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage - I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. - Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I believe that the right to vote, the right to marriage, and the right to women’s healthcare are essential and so important to the well being of our city and our state. I am writing this to support those values.
HJ1: I believe that reproductive freedom should be memorialized in the Virginia Constitution. The choice to have an abortion is a deeply personal one and to possibly face punishment for taking actions to protect yourself during a dangerous pregnancy should never happen. Additionally, the treatment for miscarriages is often "abortion", so this also allows for those who have suffered a miscarriage to seek and receive the proper treatment. HJ9: Marriage is a contract between two consenting people. Their gender should be irrelevant, as long as they are of contracting age and able to effectually enter into said contract.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I do not believe a “right” to abortion should be a part of VA’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in VA law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose a right to abortion law. The unborn must be protected. Abortion on demand at any stage of pregnancy goes against our decency as human beings. Marriage should be between a man and a woman. This marital arrangement has its roots in our biblical history and the natural order.
I strongly oppose HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment, enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment • I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. • HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. • HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. • A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. • Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights • I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage • I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. • Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I, as a veteran born and raised in this beautiful Commonwealth, I fully support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. It is imperative that these rights be enshrined and protected. Never, in the history of our nation and the human race, have we ever regretted protecting all human rights.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. As a voting Virginia resident, I want to know my voice is heard!
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
HJ1 I oppose abortion as life begins from the moment of conception and ends at natural death. Please do not legalize abortion at anytime in Virginia. HJ2 - Once someone has served out their sentence and are released from prison, I support restoring their right to vote. H9 Please recognize marriage as between only a man and a woman and not same sexes.
HJ1 - I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ2 - I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ9 -I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I simply want to express my support for bills HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9, constitutional amendments providing (1) a fundamental right to reproductive freedom; (2) qualifications of voters/right to vote; and (3) marriage between two individuals, respectively.
If you want me to support you, then do this.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Block 1 - HJ1: Firstly, I'm appalled that women's reproductive rights are on the chopping block once again as if we didn't already do this 50 years ago. The fact that women have to beg for these basic rights while rapists get a slap on the wrist and men are not legally bound from day one for child support & healthcare to the child in utero and after birth is madder than the hatter. Secondly, women should be able to choose their life and what that life will look like 20 years from that moment in their life. Letting women die because the child is no longer viable and will kill the mother if they continue well after the ridiculous 6-weeks, to which you would have to be a phsycic to know by the way, is beyond the measure of any sane thought. Women's lives matter, their sanity matters, their health matters, their overall well-being MATTERS! Finally, Should this madness continue, men should be punished just as harshly be it vasectomy or castration. You may think or find that extreme, but that is the very same boat you are placing women in my humble opinion. There is no room for religion here and especially not personal opinion--the only voice that matters is the woman single-handedly experiencing a pregnancy and the drastic changes either option entails. Block 1 - HJ2: IF Trump, a convicted felon, can run for Presidency, then absolutely a reformed/released inmate should have a say in how this country is led and who they choose to lead them. How can we say prisons were created to reform &and guide prisoners to a better path forward on their way out, but take away their voice, their choices for employment, and their overall life being reduced to a person they don't even recognize anymore in the worst of ways. Let them vote, give them every opportunity to do better, be better, and know better. Block 1 - HJ3: Human is human & life is life. Two consenting adults who deeply love one another should absolutely be able to marry one another, be it man to woman, woman to woman, or man to man. It's no one else business who they decide to spend their time and life with because the last time I checked my neighbors, mayor, senators, and congressmen/congresswomen were not paying my bills, sending my children to school, putting food on my table, or paying my taxes. Let them get married, have shared marital assets, and have the ability to pay their taxes with the filing status MARRIED. Could we stop being hypocrites cherry-picking bible verses and stop thinking our personal opinions and beliefs should affect the people that don't even share the same roof over their heads?
I fully support HJ1, J2, and HJ9 as amendments to the VA Constitution. The protection of the rights of our citizens should be front of mind for all of our electeds, and a priority for our General Assembly to take action. HJ1 -- Women have a fundamental right to reproductive freedom, to have agency over their own bodies. While is should be obvious to ALL, it isn't, so we need to have that right enshrined in our Commonwealth's Constitution. HJ2 -- The right to vote is just that, a right to vote. One's ability to vote should only be interrupted after a conviction, and only until they are freed. Persons who have committed crimes, have been adjudicated, and have satisfied their obligations to the Commonwealth should have their right to vote restored automatically -- not by any "case by case" consideration. Notice of such restoration should be provided to the person, both by the releasing institution and the law enforcement entity charged with following up after their release. HJ9 -- The right for two people to marry is a fundamental right, one that is indifferent to the sex, gender or race of the individuals. While religious institutions can refuse to perform a marriage, the political subdivisions, i.e. the Commonwealth cannot. While these three proposed amendments may seem superfluous to some, or offensive to others, to codify these rights for the protectees of the Consititution of the Commonwealth of Virginia is appropriate and necessary. Sarah E. Sussan Midlothian VA c
As the country transitions to a new administration , Virginia must enshrine these rights into our state constitution in order to protect the rights of its citizens. I support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9.
I am commenting on behalf of The Justice & Witness Action Network – Virginia of the United Church of Christ. As followers of Christ, we affirm and celebrate human expressions of love and partnership, and we support equal marriage rights for couples regardless of gender. The government should not interfere with couples regardless of gender who choose to marry. Prohibition of same sex marriage has no place in the Constitution of Virginia, and we support passage of HJ9 to repeal the constitutional provision defining marriage as only a union between one man and one woman.
I support ALL of these bills passing. As a mother who cannot afford and (for health reasons) should not have another pregnancy, reproductive freedom is CRITICALLY important for my family. I am also in an interracial marriage and with the concern for supreme court repeals, I want it in law that anyone of any gender, race, or sexuality can get married. Marriage equality had harmed no one and should be our RIGHT. The government should not get to dictate who we share property and tax returns with.
Given the changing administration, we must enshrine these rights into our state constitution. These are the very rights at risk at a national level.
I would like to voice my strong support for both of these amendments. HJ2 - Once an individual has completed his or her sentence they need to be reintegrated into society and encouraged to maintain productive, law-abiding citizenship. Restoring their right to participate in our electoral process is an important step in that reintegration, and demonstrates that they have resumed both the rights and the responsibilities of citizenship. HJ9 - As long as the two individuals involved are consenting adults, the state has no basis for determining that a particular marriage is invalid due to the respective race, gender, sex, or any other personal characteristics of the individuals involved. There is no benefit to the state or our society for discrimination, and very real harm is done to the individuals discriminated against.
I strongly support these bills, and I hope you will as well. Reproductive freedom should already be the law. No woman is an incubator. Every woman is a human being! If marriage is a religious union between 2 parties, then the government should have no say-so in the matter. If marriage is a governmental contract between 2 parties, then religious beliefs should have no bearing on it. Let people marry who they love! LOVE IS LOVE and boy, do we need some love these days. Felons who have served their sentence should be forgiven and allowed to restore their voting privileges to normal. ESPECIALLY since we will now have a felon running the highest office in our country.
As a city of Tichmond resident in the light of recent national and state policy changes I strongly support all 3 ammendments enshrining basic human rights to bodily autonomy, participation in the democratic process, and right to legal marriage. If Virginia truly is for lovers we must love all of our citizens equally and grant them the same rights
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution. Reproductive health is not murder. People should be able to be and marry who they wish.
I support YES to all three bills. Outlawing abortions does not get rid of them. It outlaws SAFE abortions.
I strongly support all three of these amendments. It is vital that we continue moving forward and keep Virginia feeling safe and welcoming to ALL.
I support all three bills and ask that they be passed. The rights to reproductive freedom, marriage between consenting adults, and the right to vote should not be denied to anyone.
These amendments have not been properly discussed or voted on by constituents. Unlimited murder of unborn babies is not a right. Convicted felons have never had the right to vote so it's unclear why you want them to. The marriage law is unnecessary. This entire session and vote is completely illegitimate and voting to pass these will prove you do not represent the will of Virginians.
I strongly support each of these three constitutional amendments. They are essential to the dignity and well-being of the citizens of the Commonwealth of Virginia. In order to be a thriving, successful community, economically and personally, individuals must be free to pursue their own happiness, make decisions about their own health care, and have their voices heard through the Democratic electoral process. The stronger the individuals in our communities, the better our communities and our Commonwealth will do as a whole. Therefore, I strongly support these constitutional amendments. Thank you for your work in bringing them to the public to vote on.
I am writing to express my support for HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution
I am writing to express my support for HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9.
My comment: I STRONGLY support these three amendments to our state constitution. Protecting my children's reproductive freedom, restoring voting rights to people convicted of felonies, and ensuring marriage equality are all deeply important to me and the people I love. I want to protect and support all Virginians', rights, regardless of their political affiliation, with these three constitutional amendments!
Please protect women’s and LGTBQ+ rights in Virginia. And voting rights should be reinstated to people who have served their time.
There should not be a ban on who someone chooses to marry--that is a decision between two people who best understand what they want and what is best for them, both as individuals and as a couple. Leave the government out of this essentially personal decision.
I firmly believe that marriage should now and always be defined between one man and one woman, not subject to unhealthy and fleshly lusts that men or women come up with. I do not support this bill.
I am writing in support of all three, HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9, to be enshrined in the Commonwealth's constitution. In particular for HJ1, reproductive healthcare should be available to all women. This should not even be a question. As someone who works in women's health, those decisions should be made between the woman and her provider. So many complications can occur in every pregnancy. Denying the appropriate healthcare would be unconscionable.
I strongly support the passage of HJ1,HJ2 and HJ9 in order to enshrine these freedoms and protections in the Commonwealth of Virginia's constitution. Thank you
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth's constitution.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I support all three proposals. Women have should have a constitutional right to make their reproductive decisions, a person who has been released from prison has already paid their debt to society and should have their voting rights automatically restored, and I support being able to marry the person you love
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 as they are important for safeguarding the rights of citizens of the Commonwealth.
I strongly support every Virginian’s right to marry who they love and govern our own bodies. It is important that these rights stay in the constitution of our commonwealth otherwise we’re more like a country governed by a dictator than the United States of America.
I support rights of those wishing to marry and these rights should not be restricted by government. Gender should not restrict marriage relationships
I support these bills. These rights should not be subject to the whims of the public or the will of some of the public to force their religious beliefs on members of the Commonwealth who do not share them.
I vote YES on all of these bills. Everyone deserves life, liberty and pursuit to happiness. That includes consenting adults of the same sex to get married, the right to medical choice of your body (if men have the right and were all equal. Then women deserve the right to choose what happens to their bodies) and for citizens to have a viice electorally. I find it saddening that our country has came to the point that opposing protecting others rights is something they support. AMERICA IS ABOUT FREEDOM. NOT CONTROL. We should protect eachother and not attack one another because we "dont agree". Everyone deserves the choice even if it's not the one you would make. No human has the right to infringe on another humans rights. Period.
HJ1 Abortion should be legal, safe, and the decision left to those who are pregnant with guidance from medical professionals. True democracy depends on equal rights for all people. Losing our right to reproductive choice opens the door to the loss of other freedoms including other healthcare choices, marriage equality, access to contraception, and the right to engage in private, consensual intimacy without government interference. Not only is the right to a safe and legal abortion a matter of personal freedom, it’s also a major factor in the movements for racial and economic equality. Black individuals, and all underserved communities, already experience unfair barriers and limited access to adequate healthcare services. Our reproductive choices impact our physical and psychological well-being, including the foods we eat, where we live, our financial resources, and our capacity to gain and maintain employment and provide for ourselves and our families. Hj2 I support an amendment to the Virginia Constitution to guarantee that people who have been disenfranchised due to a felony conviction will have their rights automatically restored upon completion of their sentences, without additional steps or paperwork after they are no longer incarcerated, and to ensure people with disabilities never lose their rights without an appropriate judicial finding. This has never been a partisan issue. Both Democratic and Republican governors have chosen to restore voting rights to thousands of citizens; however, Virginia's current governor has reversed the trend. People should not be permanently defined by their past mistakes. Virginians who have successfully served their time should be able to fully rejoin civic life. It is time for Virginians to act to amend our Constitution to create a routine restoration process that reflects fair accountability and encourages civic engagement. HJ 9: A 2021 poll from the Public Religion Research Institute found that 71% of Virginians support the right of same-sex couples to marry. Virginia's Constitution and Laws should reflect the views of the majority of Virginians presently living under them, not the views of passed generations. If Virginia really is “for lovers,” it should recognize that love is love and grant all citizens the right to live their lives in peace.
Hello, I am writing to express my support for all three of these common sense amendments protecting and enshrining these basic civil rights for our citizens. A surge of backwards thinking is coming, fueled by ignorance, bigotry, and the false mandate that robbing our citizens of these rights is desired by any more than a small but vocal minority of Americans. The only way to protect against such unethical uprisings is to codify laws against them. Do not lose sight of what is right and just in the face of hatred or fanaticism, no matter how loud or fervent. Sincerely, Michael Baughan
The proposed Amendment HJ1 - Herring would allow people who can become pregnant to make the appropriate decisions for themselves and their families. This would allow people to navigate life without fear of becoming trapped in a relationship, being responsible for someone they cannot provide for, or being in enormous medical debt. This is extremely necessary for the safety and freedom of the people of Virginia. The amendment HJ2 - Bennett-Parker would allow the people the governing bodies make decisions on behalf of a say in who represents them. Everyone should have the ability to vote in favor of who represents their interests, regardless of criminal record. They exist within these systems upon release and their well-being should be included in the decisions made by their representatives. The proposed amendment HJ9 - Sickles would allow it to be written in law that any two people who want to enter into marriage may do so. While this is already the practice and has been legitimized by the Supreme Court, it would be a good faith move from our government to reinforce that decision by reflecting it in Virginia law. Everyone should be able to engage with marriage if they choose to do so, and laws that reflect otherwise are outdated and damaging to our society.
I STRONGLY support these three amendments to our state constitution. Protecting my children's reproductive freedom, restoring voting rights to people convicted of felonies, and ensuring marriage equality are all deeply important to me and the people I love. I want to protect and support all Virginians', rights, regardless of their political affiliation, with these three constitutional amendments!
Reproductive Health. HJ1 I believe that every Virginia resident should have access to affordable, quality health care, including abortion, birth control and the privacy to make reproductive choices. Virginians made their reproductive opinions clear when they chose to elect representatives who vowed to protect reproductive rights. Abortion should be legal, safe, and the decision left to those who are pregnant with guidance from medical professionals. True democracy depends on equal rights for all people. Losing our right to reproductive choice opens the door to the loss of other freedoms including other healthcare choices, marriage equality, access to contraception, and the right to engage in private, consensual intimacy without government interference. Not only is the right to a safe and legal abortion a matter of personal freedom, it’s also a major factor in the movements for racial and economic equality. Black individuals, and all underserved communities, already experience unfair barriers and limited access to adequate healthcare services. Our reproductive choices impact our physical and psychological well-being, including the foods we eat, where we live, our financial resources, and our capacity to gain and maintain employment and provide for ourselves and our families. Voting Rights Restoration HJ2 Data shows that the majority of Virginians believe that all qualified citizens should have access to the ballot, including those who have served their time for felony convictions and people with disabilities who want to participate in the democratic process. I support an amendment to the Virginia Constitution to guarantee that people who have been disenfranchised due to a felony conviction will have their rights automatically restored upon completion of their sentences, without additional steps or paperwork after they are no longer incarcerated, and to ensure people with disabilities never lose their rights without an appropriate judicial finding. This has never been a partisan issue. Both Democratic and Republican governors have chosen to restore voting rights to thousands of citizens; however, Virginia's current governor has reversed the trend. People should not be permanently defined by their past mistakes. Virginians who have successfully served their time should be able to fully rejoin civic life. It is time for Virginians to act to amend our Constitution to create a routine restoration process that reflects fair accountability and encourages civic engagement. Marriage Equality HJ9 This ban does not reflect the attitudes and beliefs of Virginians in 2023. A 2021 poll from the Public Religion Research Institute found that 71% of Virginians support the right of same-sex couples to marry. This percentage has only increased since the question began being asked of voters. In 2006, 53% of voters supported the marriage ban. This huge swing shows the massive shift in public opinion on the issue of marriage, and it is clear evidence that the antiquated ban should no longer be a part of Virginia’s constitution. It’s only fair to revisit a political question that has shown such a vast change since it was first broached. With the removal of women’s protections with the destruction of Roe v. Wade, it is possible that marriage equality will be destroyed on a national level as well. Virginia must take the lead to protect all citizens.
I think it's very important that as a state we enshrine the right for a person to marry another person regardless of sex, gender, or race.
I support this amendment.
Let’s take the lead and repeal the constitutional provision defining marriage as only a union between one man and one woman & related provisions. I do NOT want to hear any arguments that this isn’t needed because of Obergefell v. Hodges. We all know what happened with Roe. Churches can’t complain because they are not required to perform any of these marriages. Life is hard enough already – it is NOT the state’s job to make it harder. Love is love. Let the people vote!
As a long time resident of Virginia and former medical professional, I strongly stand with the passing of HJ1 as essential medical access for Virginians. Removal of the codification and protections of individuals and medical professionals to essential reproductive procedures would be incredibly detrimental to our community. I support HJ2 as well, voting and having a voice in our elections process is a right and there should be a pathway for formerly incarcerated individuals to earn back that right. Additionally, I am strongly in support of HJ9. Virginia cannot be "for lovers" if we do not protect the rights of LGBTQIA families and individuals. By not codifying marriage protections we also open up a slippery slope to removal of protections for interracial marriages. If we as a Commonwealth do not pass HJ9, we can no longer say we are for lovers or for our people. So I implore you to pass these essential protections and pathway to restoration of rights. I love Virginia and I would love for it to be a safe place for myself and my family.
Dear Sub-Committee Members, As a concerned voter, I am writing to express my *strong support* for the three proposed constitutional amendments: HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. HJ1: This amendment is vital for safeguarding reproductive freedom in Virginia. It ensures individuals have the right to make personal healthcare decisions without government interference, reflecting our state’s commitment to personal liberty and privacy. HJ2: Protecting and expanding voting rights is fundamental to our democracy. This amendment will help ensure that all eligible Virginians can participate in the electoral process, reinforcing the integrity and inclusiveness of our elections. HJ9: Enshrining marriage equality in our constitution is essential for guaranteeing that all couples have the right to marry, regardless of gender. This amendment affirms Virginia’s commitment to equality and non-discrimination. I urge you to support these amendments, which are crucial for protecting the rights and freedoms of all Virginians. Thank you for considering my views. Sincerely, Dr. King
These three bills speak to the freedom of choice for Virginia residents. Our forefathers fought to preserve these freedoms. Now it is up to you, the elected officials, to make sure all of your constituents have those freedoms. Please pass all three bills.
As our representative, I urge you to protect our reproductive rights, restore voting rights automatically after being released from prison, and protect same-sex marriage.
I am 72 years old. I have lived and worked in Virginia since 1978. In my career, my volunteer work, and my recreational, educational, and civic activities, I have had the opportunity to serve side-by-side with people who identify as LGBTQ persons. Over several generations, my family has included uncles, cousins, nephews, and nieces who identify as LGBTQ. These persons are not lesser persons than people who do not identify as LGBTQ persons. They are valuable human beings, valuable citizens of the Commonwealth, of our nation, and of our world. They deserve the right to love whom they choose. It is wrong for our Virginia Constitution to try to deprive them of the right to marry whom they love. I have been proud to be a Virginian and to be able to appreciate the rights that are recognized in the the landmark case Obergefell v. Hodges. We are a better society and a healthier society because of this ruling under the common law. It is time to make common law marriage equality rights for LGBTQ persons CONSTITUTIONAL rights for LGBTQ persons in Virginia. Please take action in support of the constitutional amendment for Marriage Equality.
Hello House Privileges and Elections Committee, I am writing to voice my support for HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Let’s get these Constitutional Amendments on the ballot to secure our individual freedoms. Thank you, Emily Casebolt-Simon
Good afternoon, I am called to write to you about our freedoms. “I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.” Thank you for your serious consideration. Let’s not remove freedom from our foundation. We should not try to regulate morality such as beliefs about when life begins (i have never believed life began at conception). Let’s not regulate mother’s health out of the reproductive health issue. Let’s not regulate wwhich humans can love one another. This over reach is tearing the country apart and making us a worldwide laughing stock. Let freedom ring, Mary Leffler Glen Allen, Va
I fully and adamantly support HJ1 - Herring, HJ2 - Bennett-Parker, & HJ9 - Sickles. I am of the opinion that these bills should absolutely be passed without question.
I cannot believe it is 2024 and we're discussing the validity of marriages between two consenting adult. Please, in the interest of humiliating me and other constituents 1000% less, eliminate prohibitions to same-sex marriage and enshrine this fundamental right in the state constitution.
All of these are important issues and need to be protected. As a woman, I fear for my reprodutcive rights and ability to get services should I need them. Everyone should have a right to vote and be heard. I have a good number of friends in same sex relationships and marriages that I feel deserve the protection of their status. All of these bills should be passed as they protect marginal groups who are often overlooked or fought against.
Only legal taxpayers should be allowed to vote!
I'm writing to show my support for HJ1 and HJ9. HJ1 protects our right to make our own decisions about our bodies and reproductive health, which is essential for personal freedom. HJ9 ensures that everyone has the right to marry the person they love, regardless of sex, gender, or race. By supporting these amendments, we're standing up for individual liberty and equality in our community. Let's make our state a better place for all by backing these measures!
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Women’s medical care needs to be protected. Religious beliefs should have no bearing on other people’s medical care. Medical autonomy needs to remain with the individual and should not be dictated by others’ personal/religious beliefs.
I support the fundamental right to reproductive freedom, which allows individuals to make personal healthcare decisions along with their physician - without unnecessary legal barriers or delays that could endanger their life or health. Laws should not be based on religious definitions of life, especially given the diversity of beliefs in our state. I believe that individuals who have served their time deserve the right to participate fully in our democracy, including the right to vote. As they rejoin the workforce and pay taxes, they should have a voice in shaping the laws that govern our communities. Rehabilitation should include reintegration, and that includes not only allowing but encouraging civic engagement. I also stand firmly in favor of marriage equality. Just as society has overwhelmingly supported interracial marriage, the freedom to marry should extend to all consenting adults, regardless of gender or race. These unions bring no harm and deserve legal recognition as well as equal protection under the law.
I strongly support marriage equality. As long as a marriage is between two consenting adults, they should be allowed to marry regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity. It literally has no effect on my life or on others. There's is no need for the government to overstretched its reach so deeply into people's personal lives.
I strongly support and request you vote YES on HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for inclusion in Virginia's Constitution.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Women’s medical care needs to be protected. Religious beliefs should have no bearing on other people’s medical care. Medical autonomy needs to remain with the individual and should not be dictated by others’ personal/religious beliefs.
As a woman in my 80s who has lived through repressive periods and periods of expanded freedoms, I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I strongly support House Joint Resolution 9 (HJ9), which seeks to amend the Virginia Constitution to affirm the fundamental right to marry for all individuals, regardless of sex, gender, or race. This amendment is crucial for couples like my husband and me, whose marriage, while recognized under federal law, faces an uncertain future due to shifting political dynamics. Currently, our marriage relies on federal protections, which are vulnerable to change. By amending our state constitution, we can safeguard marriage equality at the state level, ensuring that all Virginians have the right to marry, free from discrimination. This amendment not only repeals outdated provisions defining marriage solely as a union between one man and one woman—provisions invalidated by the Supreme Court's decision in *Obergefell v. Hodges* (2015)—but also affirms the Commonwealth’s commitment to equal rights and justice for all residents. Acting swiftly is essential to protect the progress we've made toward a more inclusive Virginia. The amendment respects religious freedoms, allowing organizations and clergy to make their own choices about performing marriages while ensuring civil marriage rights for all. I commend Delegate Mark D. Sickles and the co-patrons of HJ9 for their leadership on this vital issue and urge the General Assembly to pass this amendment. This will allow Virginians to uphold marriage equality in our foundational laws, creating a safer, more equitable future for all families in Virginia.
I strongly support the amendments as they are important to protecting the rights of all Virginia residents
I FULLY SUPPORT ALL OF THESE BILLS. PLEASE MAKE THIS HAPPEN!!
I oppose all efforts to increase or secure the right to the direct and intentional killing of humans by private persons as in the case of abortion. I oppose any and all efforts to allow marriage between persons other than one man and one woman who have not previously been married unless the other person in that previous marriage is deceased. I oppose the use of ranked choice voting as contrary to our legal tradition, excessively complicated and likely to lead to delays in determining election winners.
I strongly support bills HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Please vote to approve these bills. Thank you.
Good afternoon, I am writing to express my support for HJ1, rights to reproductive freedom, HJ2, voting rights, specifically for previously incarcerated persons, and HJ9, marriage equality. I support HJ1 in order to preserve and maintain the mental and physical health of women all throughout Virginia, ensuring their continued participation in society. My support for HJ2 comes from my belief that every United States citizen should be allowed to participate in the democratic process that this country was built upon. If a person has been convicted of a crime, been held accountable, and served their allotted time, their rights to vote should be restored, equal to that of the average Virginia citizen. Finally, HJ9 will guarantee the fundamental right to marry to every person, regardless of their gender, race, or sex.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I strongly support these 3 bills to have these rights enshrined in our constitution! Please vote to approve these bills. Thank you.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution. It is the primary function of a government to protect the people, not deny them rights or voice.
I am in full support of HJ1, HJ2 and HJ9 for enshrining freedoms in the Commonwealth's Constitution . HJ1 is paramount importance to renew the hopes and dreams of Virginia women and families about reproductive freedom and control over our bodies and family planning. I work with women who have lost much wanted pregnancies and fear the repercussions of a federal abortion ban or state limitations. Please make women feel safe again! HJ2 is a basic American value and the right to vote should be safeguarded and enshrined by the Commonwealth . HJ9 also supports a Virginian's right to love who they choose. Please help Virginians to have the freedoms to love and commit. Thank you ! Karen Coyner, LCSW, DCSW and mom
I am for all of these bills to be passed
I am a progressive constituent in the state of Virginia and I strongly support the constitutional amendments HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9.
Please vote yes on these measures. Women’s rights have been put under attack from a federal level and we must do our part in this commonwealth to do what we can to restore them. Medical decisions are to be made between the care provider and their patient, it is not the business of any other party. Religious obligations have no place inside politics which govern their neighbors. Our founding fathers were quite explicit about this. We cannot trust the right for all to get married will not be challenged on a federal level soon. A marriage, while often performed inside a place of worship, is not relegated to being a Christian ordeal. It is a civil contract between two parties. As brought up above one person’s religion is not to govern the conduct of another. Please vote yes to preserve both marriages that have already been established and future marriages to come. These are core basic human rights we are discussing and it is our duty to preserve them. Please keep our Commonwealth of Virginia a place of freedom, liberty, and protection for all people. Thank you for your time.
Dear Committee Members, I am writing as a constituent to express my support for HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Our community thrives when each person is endowed with the rights and liberties to make their own choices so that we all may, in the words of our founders, pursue happiness. Thank you for your work. Warm regards, Anna Ritter
I very strongly support the enshrinement of HJ1, HJ2 and HJ9 into our Commonwealth's Constitution. These are all fundamental rights that absolutely deserve to be protected for the sake of our citizens, and for future generations. Given it is likely that each of these may not be protected federally in the future, we must ensure that our Commonwealth's Constitution sets them in stone.
I urge you to support these amendments that protect and ensure fundamental rights, including reproductive freedom (HJ1), marriage equality (HJ9), and the right to vote (HJ2). I am deeply concerned about the importance of codifying these rights which are essential to individual autonomy and equality on a state level because I feel they are under threat on the national level. Reproductive Freedom: Every person should have the autonomy to make personal health decisions without government interference. By supporting reproductive rights, you affirm the belief that individuals have the right to decide on matters affecting their own bodies and lives. Marriage Equality: Supporting marriage equality acknowledges and protects the diverse forms of family and partnership in our society. Ensuring the right to marry regardless of gender or sexual orientation is a matter of dignity, fairness, and respect for individual freedoms. Right to Vote: Voting is the cornerstone of democracy. By protecting the right to vote, you uphold the integrity of our democratic process and ensure that all citizens have an equal voice in shaping our nation’s future. I respectfully urge you to support any amendments that solidify these essential freedoms for all Americans. Thank you for your leadership and for your commitment to protecting the rights of all your constituents.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms into the commonwealth constitution
I am strongly in favor of HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 being enshrined in the Constitution of the Commonwealth or Virginia.
We strongly support the enshrinement of HJ1, HJ2 and HJ9 in the Commonwealth's Constitution, all sacred, fundamental rights which deserve to be both protected and guaranteed. Thank you for your service & dedication to the citizens of Virginia.
I strongly support the proposed amendments to the Constitution - Bills HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9.
“I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.”
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution. These are all important in ensuring the rights I feel are important to protect all our citizens
I am writing to urge you to support amendments that protect and ensure fundamental rights, including reproductive freedom (HJ1), marriage equality (HJ9), and the right to vote (HJ2). I am deeply concerned about the importance of safeguarding these freedoms, which are essential to individual autonomy and equality. Reproductive Freedom: Every person should have the autonomy to make personal health decisions without government interference. By supporting reproductive rights, you affirm the belief that individuals have the right to decide on matters affecting their own bodies and lives. Marriage Equality: Supporting marriage equality acknowledges and protects the diverse forms of family and partnership in our society. Ensuring the right to marry regardless of gender or sexual orientation is a matter of dignity, fairness, and respect for individual freedoms. Right to Vote: Voting is the cornerstone of democracy. By protecting the right to vote, you uphold the integrity of our democratic process and ensure that all citizens have an equal voice in shaping our nation’s future. I respectfully urge you to support any amendments that solidify these essential freedoms for all Americans. Thank you for your leadership and for your commitment to protecting the rights of all your constituents.
As a Christian, I am against the amendment to allow same sex marriages. It is contrary to the Bible's design for marriage which defines marriage as a union between one man and one woman. Any other definition of marriage is an abomination.
House of Delegates I am writing in support of HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. America was founded on freedom of religion but was not founded as a Christian nation. Jefferson wrote "It does me no injury for my neighbor to believe in twenty gods or no God. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.” The Constitution does not mention God, Jesus, or Christianity. Our nation was founded on the rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Jefferson further stated in our Declaration of Independence, "The purpose of government is to protect these rights, and that if a government fails to do so, the people have the right to alter or abolish it." Jefferson believed that "the pursuit of happiness" was about making decisions that would lead to the best life possible for a human being. With all this in mind, I urge you to vote yes to these bills as they fundamentally protect our human rights and our rights as American citizens based on the stances our diverse nation was founded on. If we fail at this and instead bring back laws based solely on the religion of the few then we fail as a nation. Thank you.
As a woman and a mother, I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I support these amendments. HJ1 is so important because without bodily autonomy, women are no longer free or equal. HJ2- voting should be made easier, not harder. It is every citizen's right. HJ9 is imperative in protecting everyone's right to.marry the person they love. Nobody else should have a say.
HJ1 – fundamental right to reproductive freedom The choice to bear children is a basic right. If a person has any reason to believe it is the wrong choice for them due to any economic, health, or personal pressures, they should be free to consult with a healthcare provider and stop the pregnancy as early as possible. HJ2 – right to vote – restoration of rights Once a person has fulfilled their required sentence under the law, their right to vote should be restored. HJ9 – marriage equality Marriage is such a large and personal commitment made between two people there is no reasonable argument to interfere or try to stop this joyful union between consenting adults.
I strongly support every Virginian’s right to marry the person they love and control their own body. It is important that the commonwealth enshrine these rights into our state constitution.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I’m commenting on all three. All three should be passed. The government should never make medical decisions for another person. Women are already dying in states with abortion bans due to complications with their pregnancies with doctors unable to help due to these bans. Marriage between same sex-couples is legal in all 50 states. The outdated language in our constitution needs to go. Lastly, voting is an American right. If you’ve done your time, you should be able to vote.
I am writing to support reproductive freedom - the healthcare decisions made around childbirth should be between a woman and her doctor without undue influence from the government. I also believe that prior to fetus viability, the woman who has become pregnant should be the one who chooses if she is emotionally, physically, and financially able to care for the child after it has been born. The right to life - for me - extends to the woman first. I believe it is HER life that has value and should bear the weight of autonomy. Remember that it wasn't too long ago that the Virginia assembly voted FOR the ERA. Keep that momentum going!!! I am writing to support voters' rights. There are those who are rising to power in the government sector that would create a dictatorship and authoritarian rule and seek to severely limit the right to vote - which is overwhelmingly how we have voice in our democracy. Keep this essential tool in the hands of Virginia citizens to participate in our governance as a Commonwealth. I am writing to support marriage equality. Human beings should have the freedom and it is a FREEDOM to marry the partner that they choose. Anything other than that is to validate a prejudice that has no scientific and dare I say no moral grounding. I am also in support of all our LGBTQ siblings and believe that transgender rights also need protecting.
Marriage Equality This ban does not reflect the attitudes and beliefs of Virginians in 2023. A 2021 poll from the Public Religion Research Institute found that 71% of Virginians support the right of same-sex couples to marry. This percentage has only increased since the question began being asked of voters. In 2006, 53% of voters supported the marriage ban. This huge swing shows the massive shift in public opinion on the issue of marriage, and it is clear evidence that the antiquated ban should no longer be a part of Virginia’s constitution. It’s only fair to revisit a political question that has shown such a vast change since it was first broached. With the removal of women’s protections with the destruction of Roe v. Wade, it is possible that marriage equality will be destroyed on a national level as well. Virginia must take the lead to protect all citizens. If Virginia really is “for lovers,” it should recognize that love is love and grant all citizens the right to live their lives in peace.
Dear Members of the Virginia House of Delegates, I am writing to express my profound opposition to the proposed Constitutional amendment establishing a so-called “fundamental right to reproductive freedom” and the proposed Constitutional amendment legalizing same-sex marriage. Such an amendment is a dangerous departure from both biblical values and the core principles that underpin our nation: the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. This amendment, rather than providing genuine liberty, undermines the sanctity of life and compromises the values upon which our society stands. Biblically, life is a divine gift, and each human being, crafted in God’s image from conception, holds intrinsic worth and purpose (Psalm 139:13-16). Our Founding Fathers recognized life as the foundation upon which liberty and happiness rest. To disregard this in favor of a subjective notion of "reproductive freedom" is morally misguided and betrays the essential protection of life our Constitution seeks to guarantee. The damage, however, goes beyond the individual. Enshrining a policy of unrestrained reproductive rights has proven to be devastating to our poorer communities, disproportionately affecting marginalized and vulnerable populations. This “freedom of choice” has, in practice, only exacerbated cycles of poverty and instability by incentivizing practices that strip families of their integrity and strength. This is not the promise of liberty but a corrosive force that erodes the foundations of family and community. The breakdown of the nuclear family is central to the deterioration of our society’s core. This so-called “freedom” fosters a culture of unaccountable and destructive behavior that threatens the stability of the home and dismantles the fabric of our communities. In struggling neighborhoods, where support systems are already stretched thin, this policy only encourages unrestrained and often careless practices that destabilize homes, contribute to generational poverty, and fuel cycles of emotional and financial hardship. When we devalue life in the womb, we teach future generations that life itself holds little meaning. Our nation’s health and future prosperity depend on a renewed commitment to the values that foster strong families, stable homes, and resilient communities. If we continue down this path—embracing what is not liberty but, rather, a harmful moral relativism—our nation itself faces the real and present danger of self-destruction. What has been marketed as “freedom of choice” is, in reality, a covert enemy within, unraveling the social fabric, corroding the sanctity of life, and weakening the very pillars upon which our country was founded. I know that each of you seeks to do good for the people of Virginia, to uplift the most vulnerable, and to promote a just society. However, only when God’s principles define what is “good” can we claim to be truly serving the people. Protecting the unborn and honoring the sanctity of life is an essential part of upholding true justice and compassion. I urge you to reject this amendment, reaffirm our commitment to life, and help rebuild the ethical framework that has made America a beacon of freedom and hope. Sincerely, Marylynn Harvey
I oppose all three bills.
I am writing to voice my opposition to both of these bills. HJ1 has zero restrictions for an abortion. To normalize killing a baby simply because you don't want it at anytime of the pregnancy and call it a "right" is absurd. HJ9 the state has no authority to redefine marriage. God created marriage between a man and a woman. If homosexuals want to be notified if their partner is in a crisis, and have those kinds of rights, make a law that allows that. Whatever you want to call it. But it's not marriage.
Constitutionally, there has never been mention of abortion or marriage at the federal level. At the state level, abortion wasn't regulated until 1950, at the height of religious intolerance in this country, and marriage wasn't regulated until 2007. It is clear that the founding fathers did not believe these issues warranted legal regulation. The only reason to prohibit marriage freedom between two or more consenting adults is religious intolerance of other people's rights, which is unconstitutional. Abortion is a more complex issue as the determination of life extends beyond religious beliefs, however the push against abortion is done from a religious perspective of what human life is, which again is unconstitutional. The constitution does not recognize science any more than it does religion however, but the concept of abortion isn't new now and it wasn't new when the constitution was written. Given that, we must look at how the founding fathers worded the constitution concerning the rights of individuals. Few people would argue that people born here or are naturalized aren't protected by all the rights of the constitution except when incapacitated, obligated to complete civic or military duty, or through poor choices resulting in criminal punishment. But the constitution only says born or naturalized, it makes no statement explicitly stating or even implying that the unborn are US citizens protected by the constitution. From a legal perspective, the unborn are not promised the rights and freedoms under the constitution that the rest of us are, even if one views that as human life. As inconvenient of a truth as that may be for religious individuals, the constitution does not offer the ability to restrict the freedom of constitutionally-protected people's from determining what to do with their bodies, even if they have another living body inside of them, because that other living body not only doesn't have constitutional protections; it isn't even recognized as life by the Constitution. In summary, both the freedom to medical choice and the freedom of consenting choice in marriage must be protected, therefore these bills should pass.
We need to protect women's right to healthcare. Medical care should be a basic right in any educated nation. We need to protect marriage equality. Marriage is a legal contract, not a religious concept. No two consenting adults should be barred this right. If we fail to protect the freedoms of women and the queer communities, then we will continue to fail as a nation. We cannot and will not go back.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Let’s amend our constitution to ensure lasting freedoms.
Fully support passing these bills they are greatly needed
What is often lost in the conversation of marriage equality is legal privilege when it comes to medical events. Unfortunately things happen and our loved ones end up hospitalized and unable to make medical decisions, imagine your partner of decades, years, the love of your life is sitting in a bed, and you have no say on how to carry out medical plans that honor their wishes and their goals, simply because the law said since you have matching genitalia, you can't be married.
I am in support of all 3 bills, women should have a say over their own body. Those are important life changing decisions made with the help of a medical professional and are no one else’s business. Not someone who has no medical background whatsoever, or can comprehend what that woman is going through physically and mentally, or is ignorant to what reproductive care really is because their narrow-mindedness just thinks it’s killing babies but will be the first to support cuts to things like Head Start and SNAP. The governor shouldn’t have the decision to determine if someone who has served their time can vote or not. What’s the saying, there’s no hate quite like Christian love, that doesn’t include all Christian’s but you know who are judging other people and filled with hate because someone isn’t like you. You should be able to love and marry whoever you want to, those are basic human rights.
I am writing for each of these Bills. Marriage is between one man and one woman. Life is to be PROTECTED, not extinguished, and Only CITIZENS should be allowed to vote. We , in Virginia, are NOT interested in becoming California. Thank you so much for reading my concerns. I would like to hear back from you your logic in proposing these issues. Sincerely, Mary Cresswell Marywell123@yahoo.com
As a woman faithfully married to my wonderful partner, another woman, the idea that my marriage is lesser is offensive. As a mother raising two wonderful and healthy children with another woman, the idea that our children are lessened by our parenting is untruthful and bigoted. Our rights are no less and no more than any other couple or parents and that should be enshrined in law.
I support these amendments because in a nation that values and prioritizes freedom, I believe that individuals should be free to make their own decisions. If we are to truly have our unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the government cannot restrict our autonomy in any way. Furthermore our government has a responsibility to protect all of our rights and by amending our state constitution we are solidifying that protection in the event that there are challenges to these rights federally.
Pass all 3
Pass all 3
All 3 should be passed
I oppose HJ9 as one who believes in God and that HE defined marriage. As our representatives I implore you NOT to approve HJ9. Approval invites the judgement and wrath of God individually and corporately. I am praying for you to have wisdom as you make your decisions. Thank you!!!
Pass all 3
Pass all 3 bills
All citizens of Virginia deserve to have all 3 bills passed.
Pass all 3 bills for all Virginians
Please pass all 3 bills.
All 3 bills must be passed!
I support all three of these bills. People should never be told what to do with their bodies. It is a violation of freedom. The ones opposing abortion cannot even agree as to when life begins, therefore you cannot argue that it is taking a human life. Others that use religion as an excuse for their positions have never read their bible: Genesis 2:7 The LORD God formed the man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being. Hence, even according to their doctrine, life begins at first breath which happens outside the womb.
I fully support all 3 bills
I believe, as a native Virginian and a Marine Corps veteran who grew up mostly in Fieldale, Virginia and over 35 years has lived in Brookneal, Phenix, Blairs, Martinsville, Vinton, Norfolk, Newport News, and now Portsmouth, these amendments are greatly important to every Virginian whether it will directly or indirectly affect them. I am in complete support of these amendments and believe they are vital to ensure our freedoms. Being a commonwealth, we have a history of looking out for our fellow Virginians and doing what is best for our citizens no matter what other states choose and in many ways it is liberating. This can be a liberating moment for all Virginians. Regarding HJ1, I think about my sister, my sister-in-law, and the future of my nieces, as well as, so many others in my life that I know this amendment will positively affect. What more could a Virginian ask than freedom? Regarding HJ2, I think of compassion. People who have been imprisoned and released have completed their time of punishment and rehabilitation back into society. Part of that rehabilitation back into society is the fundamental right to vote and be heard through said vote. Also, allowing those to have their competency “reestablished as prescribed by law” makes their freedom to vote much easier to re-attain than the current wording of our constitution. Regarding HJ9, since the first state made a change regarding equal marriage in 2003 to when it became law of the land in 2015, our freedoms as Americans only grew. It’s time for our state constitution to reflect that. All three of these amendments reflect the most positive sides of Virginia and all Virginians, whether we grew up here or moved here from a state some might consider less free than Virginia. When I see our state flag, I see Virginia’s interpretation of Lady Liberty. It is welcoming knowing that our version is one depicting what we, as Virginians, think of tyrants, as it states on our very own flag, Sic Semper Tyrannis. I also know that with it being comparable to Lady Liberty, we too “yearn to breathe free.” Lastly, as our state motto says, “Virginia is for Lovers.” With love comes compassion and empathy. Let us prove our flag, our motto, and our national symbol of freedom to be correct.
I support all three amendments I believe that individuals should have autonomy over all their decisions. If we are to truly have our rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the government cannot restrict our autonomy in any way. Our government has a responsibility to protect our rights and by amending our state constitution we are solidifying that protection in the event that there are challenges to these rights federally.
I support all 3 of these bills. The right to bodily autonomy is fundamental to all other rights. The government affirms the right to bodily autonomy of deceased persons, disallowing organ donations without the consent of the deceased prior to their death. We need to affirm the right of all persons to make decisions related to their bodies, including those related to reproduction. This includes the right to terminate a pregnancy throughout the gestation period. We cannot put the lives of pregnant persons at risk by valuing potential persons over actual persons. We must protect the right of citizens to vote. This is an imperative! It is the government's responsibility to protect individuals' rights, not to take them away. Religion has no place in government, and taking individuals' rights to marry based on the religious beliefs of a minority (or even the majority) is antithetical to the spirit and the letter of the 1st Amendment to the US Constitution.
I am in favor of HJ1. Reproductive care needs to be universally accessible, and decisions about what types of care are necessary should be made solely by a Virginian and their doctor. No person or doctor should fear for repercussions from exercising that right. I am in favor of HJ2. Virginian's should not need a Governor's permission to be restored their voting rights. It is vital that all eligible Virginians should be enfranchised to exercise their right to vote. I am in favor of HJ 9. Couples deserve to have their marriages legally acknowledged and upheld no matter their gender, sex, or race. This protects both the rights of Virginians who marry legally and of religious institution to not perform marriages against their beliefs.
I support this amendment
I understand the necessity for these bills and I want to throw my support behind all of them. I hope that you will vote in favor of the amendments.
I am writing my support, as I am for these amendments. Virginia has a responsibility to protect our rights, and by amending our state constitution, we are solidifying that protection in the event that there are challenges to these rights federally.
I support all 3 bills.
Reproductive rights are extremely important. It's basic healthcare!! It is not "killing babies", it's giving a woman a right to make decisions for her own body. Opposing this bill is denying woman the right to decide between life & death! Why would you oppose that? By passing this bill you are saying woman are not entitled to make decisions on their own. We fought too long and hard for the rights we have! I totally support the decisions to limit voting to those who are legally entitled to do so. Please support the right for 2 individuals to marry! It's a sad state on our state (country) that children (girls) as young as 9 can be forced to marry but 2 individuals who are committed to each other in love & life would be denied that!
I support these amendments because, in a nation that values and prioritizes freedom, I believe that individuals should have autonomy over all their decisions. If we are to truly have our unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the government cannot restrict our autonomy in any way. Furthermore, our government has a responsibility to protect our rights and by amending our state constitution we are solidifying that protection in the event that there are challenges to these rights federally. Don't let the federal government tread on us!
To the Virginia House of Delegates: I urge you to support H1, H2, and H9 to affirm the fundamental rights to reproductive freedom, voting, and marriage for all Virginians. These rights are foundational to personal autonomy, dignity, and equality. The preservation of these rights ensures that our community remains a place where every individual has the freedom to make personal choices without interference from the state, honoring the principle that these decisions are best left to individuals than governing bodies.
I support this ammendment
I am writing to provide support to these amendments! We need our rights enshrined in the states constitution.
I wholeheartedly support these amendments and believe that they are in the best interest of all Virginians.
I am writing to support the passing of HJ 9 - repeal the same-sex marriage ban in the Virginia Constitution. While same-sex marriage is currently the law of the land under the Obergefell decision, we are at risk of it being overturned. Protect those that identify as LGBTQ+ in the state of Virginia. Repeal the same-sex marriage ban before anything happens to marriage equality at the national level. Be proactive.
I fully support HJ9, the proposed constitutional amendment that affirms the right to marriage equality in Virginia. This amendment is a crucial step toward ensuring that our state’s laws reflect the values of equality, freedom, and justice for all individuals. By repealing outdated constitutional provisions that define marriage strictly as a union between one man and one woman, HJ9 brings Virginia’s Constitution in line with the landmark *Obergefell v. Hodges* Supreme Court decision, which recognized the right to marriage for same-sex couples. The amendment affirms that marriage is a fundamental right inherent in the liberty of individuals, regardless of their sex, gender, or race, thereby prohibiting any discriminatory barriers to marriage licenses. Importantly, this amendment ensures that all lawful marriages are recognized and treated equally under Virginia law, providing same-sex couples with the same legal protections, rights, and recognition as opposite-sex couples. This is a vital step toward eliminating discrimination and promoting inclusivity within the Commonwealth. At the same time, it respects religious freedoms by explicitly allowing religious organizations and clergy to refuse to perform marriages that conflict with their beliefs, thus balancing the protection of civil rights with religious liberty. Passing HJ9 would send a powerful message that Virginia stands for equality and respects the rights of all its residents to love and marry whomever they choose, free from discrimination. It would affirm the dignity of all couples, promote stronger, more inclusive communities, and help Virginia remain a welcoming and forward-thinking state. This amendment is not just about correcting the wrongs of the past; it is about securing a future where every Virginian is treated with fairness and respect under the law.
I support these amendments because in a nation that values and prioritizes freedom, I believe that individuals should have autonomy over all their decisions. If we are to truly have our unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the government cannot restrict our autonomy in any way. Furthermore our government has a responsibility to protect our rights and by amending our state constitution we are solidifying that protection in the event that there are challenges to these rights federally.
I am writing to express my strong support for a state constitutional amendment to protect same-sex marriages. This amendment is essential to ensure that all couples, regardless of gender, have the right to marry and enjoy the legal benefits and social recognition that come with marriage. Marriage equality is a fundamental issue of civil rights and social justice. By protecting same-sex marriages in our state constitution, we affirm the dignity and equality of all individuals. This amendment will help to eliminate discrimination and promote inclusivity, ensuring that all families are treated with the respect and fairness they deserve. Furthermore, protecting same-sex marriages strengthens our communities. It allows couples to build stable, loving homes and provides children with the security of legally recognized parents. Marriage equality also contributes to the mental and emotional well-being of LGBTQ+ individuals by affirming their relationships and identities. It is crucial that we take this step to safeguard the rights of same-sex couples, especially in a time when these rights are under threat in various parts of the country. By enshrining marriage equality in our state constitution, we send a powerful message that love and commitment are valued and protected, regardless of gender. I urge lawmakers to support this amendment and to stand up for the rights and dignity of all individuals in our state. Sincerely, Jen Sheldon
We must protect the right for marriage equality. The only argument they make against it is a fictional text (the bible) which has absolutely no bearing in law or government in this nation. We must continue to honor and uphold this right which is already enshrined in law.
I support these amendments because in a nation that values and prioritizes freedom, I believe that individuals should have autonomy over all their decisions. If we are to truly have our unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the government cannot restrict our autonomy in any way. Furthermore our government has a responsibility to protect our rights and by amending our state constitution we are solidifying that protection in the event that there are challenges to these rights federally.
Abortion is never medically necessary. No state in the Union prohibits doing what is necessary to save the lives of mothers in danger, and none of those things are abortions (the intentional killing of the child in the womb). If there was actual interest in mothers' health, in office examinations and ultrasounds would be required before dispensing abortion pills. It is hard to understand how the same crowd saying "my body my choice" was all in for mask, vaccine, and stay-at-home mandates. Equally fascinating are people with yard signs that read "We believe science is real" who apparently also believe that despite every cell in one's body having either XX or XY chromosomes, somehow lifelong prescription pharmaceuticals can change things. I pray you find yourselves on the righteous side of the following observation: "Hell does not appear to the faithless; it is clear and obvious to the faithful." - St. John Chrysostom
-Voting is a constitutional right. If a person has fulfilled their debt to society, then they should have the right to vote. It’s also a great part of rehabilitation and ones stake in community is important to reentry. Voting gives one a sense of community. -Women are dying in this country because of highly restricted reproductive rights. It will only get worse as more data comes out about women put in impossible situations in states with draconian abortion laws. Virginia has to set a standard as a bastion of freedom for women and trust them and healthcare professionals to make their own decisions. It would be abhorrent to restrict women’s healthcare rights. Virginia cannot be one of the states that robs women of their choice and healthcare freedoms. -the right to same sex marriage should be protected. And has been by the US Supreme Court. Restricting anyone’s right to marrying who they wish is immoral and constitutes government overreach
Everyone has the right to be with who they want. Virginia must protect the rights of all people, when it comes to marriage. This is a right for everyone and must not be taken away.
As a woman, psychologist, and family member of a someone in the LGBTQIA+ community, I support these bills and urge you to pass them. Thank you!
I support reproductive freedom in Virginia and support marriage equality. I also support trans rights in Virginia.
Remarks to follow on both measures.
HJ1 - Constitutional amendment; fundamental right to reproductive freedom (first reference).
I strongly opposed HJ1. The state must protect innocent human life. No person has the right to take innocent human life. The unborn deserve the state's protection. The state has its authority for the basic purpose of protecting the family, the individual born and unborn. The state should live up to the purpose for which the authority was granted.
I strongly oppose HJ1. We must protect innocent human life for all unborn babies. No one has the right to take the life of another innocent human being. The unborn baby has a separate biological identity that is at a temporary, vulnerable stage. The state has its very powers and authority enshrined in our constitution for purposes like this to protect each human being. We all passed through this stage and have done on a continuum throughout life.
I demand the rejection of HJ1, on the grounds of the Word of God, and the law of the land. The Scripture is clear that all humans in the womb are created in the image of God and are formed in the mother’s womb. His law expressly forbids the taking of innocent life. These principles have governed societies for thousands of years, and yet our nation has become “advanced” enough to somehow believe that murder is no longer wrong, and that children in the womb are not children. Additionally, the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution protects those same children. Any action in the state of Virginia that violates that should be considered treasonous and be put down. Herring needs to be recalled immediately. Say no to HJ1, and protect all life in the womb.
I stand in strong opposition to HB375. The US Constitution selects our president by the Electoral College, not by majority vote, and there are excellent reasons for this. This bill is simply an underhanded effort to overturn the US Constitution. I am also firmly opposed to HJ1 which would enshrine abortion in the state Constitution and undermine parental rights on this issue. The majority of this country believes that late-term abortions are immoral and should be illegal. With free access to contraception, unwanted pregnancies should rarely occur. When they do, assisting the mother with prenatal care and adoption plans are far preferable to abortion. And I adamantly oppose eliminating parental rights over a child's healthcare. HJ2 - I would have no opposition to HJ2 provided the amendment did not restore voting rights until after the parole period. Instead, this makes voting rights automatic as soon as released from prison. Parole is part of the sentencing; therefore, the felon has not served his full sentence until after the parole period. And if rights are being restored, shouldn't gun rights also be restored?
I am a 63-year-old male. In 1961, my mother, in Florida at the time, got pregnant with her boyfriend. Her story told to me was that she considered having an abortion, which was illegal at the time. Upon investigating her options, she felt unsafe in having one. So, she elected to give birth to me. Even the possible intention of hers to abort me has left me with lifelong emotional scars. I celebrate that my life is worth living and that my mother did not take that away from me by having an abortion. My hope is that no “fetus” will be denied their right to live through an abortion procedure of any kind. I can only imagine the pain and suffering and fear that a young, single expectant mother might feel in the case of rape and incest and have great compassion for that. I hope, though, that adoption would be the better option for her rather than abortion. Many churches and organizations are set up to aid mothers should they need help in carrying their babies to term or in their needs after the babies’ birth (e.g. Crisis Pregnancy Centers). I feel if the government made more resources available for dealing with a pregnancy crisis a more healthy and life-centered society would result, rather than a “just get rid of it” mentality in promoting death. It’s amazing to me how much money is spent on keeping people alive, and yet very little is emphasized in the ambition to make sure that people at least live through birth. I want every child in the womb to have the right to live and give God the sole control of life. He has made all of us. Life is a blessing, though it may be very difficult. I can attest to that.
I urge you to work to affirm the life and dignity of EVERY child and Mother! I ask…how can we call ourselves civilized as a people and a society when considering “legalized” abortion?? Marriage: The union of 1 man and 1 woman. This definition predates ANY nation, religion, or law. It is written on our hearts as it comes from God.
Is the VCC really a “Catholic “ Organization???? WHY the question regarding pronouns? Sounds woke to me; part of our SICK culture! I am VERY DISAPPOINTED!
May Herring become like the babies Herring's amendment would destroy, should HJ1 pass. I do not consent to change Virginia's Constitution. I do not consent to HJ1 or similar intentions. I do not consent to the murder of human babies. I do not consent to abortion/murder of humans. I do not consent to "abortion rights". I do not consent to "HJ1 reproductive rights". I do not consent to the murder of babies. I do not consent to Herring remaining in office. VOTE HERRING OUT!
Virginia is a vibrant state that celebrates all life and offers hope to everyone, even the unborn and those in crisis pregnancy situations. Let's not give up on our fellow citizens and chose death as an "easy out option" to rid ourselves of issues that we are capable of assisting and solving. Unjust death harms us all, in addition to the mother and child, and we are all diminished when we choose it to address our State's solvable issues. • I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth is a frightening possibility--I would hope that those who support a women's right to choose would at least pause at that thought of allowing this until the fetus is near birth.
Please consider the "Racist Roots of Abortion" 1. The orignial name proposed by Margaret Sanger for Planned Parenthood was "The Negro Project" 2. The "goal" of "The Negro Project" was to "exterminate the Negro population". 3. Planned Parenthood and it's subsidiaries - locate nearly 86% of faciliites in the midst of the Black and Hispanic neighborhoods where they continue to physically and emotionally harm members of these communities. 4. Please learn more about the horrific consequences at www.operationrescue.org
I support the amendment to protect reproductive freedom. The alternative to supporting access to legal abortion is to decide what legal action must be taken against the women/girls who get abortions and against the doctors who provide them. The medical and personal reasons for reproductive healthcare are vast. Individuals and their doctors should be trusted to handle that care.
I strongly oppose the passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
I strongly oppose all three bills. Please vote against them.
Members of the General Assembly: Being a resident of Virginia, I stand steady in opposition to Bill HJ1. Sanctity of life is a hallmark of a civilized society. The way this bill reads, it borders on infanticide. Does the unborn child not have a say in his/her survival? We should not be treating life as though giving birth is a matter of convenience. Life is sacred. All unborn children have a natural right to birth. As chosen leaders in the Commonwealth of Virginia, you have an obligation to follow the will of your constituents. At the same time, I think you would agree that life is sacred and that viable options do exist whereby life can be preserved rather than aborted. There is no good reason, other than to protect the life of the mother or in a case of incest or rape, where the option of abortion should be a consideration in a society that values and dignifies life. I beseech you to prayerfully consider the consequences of your actions in this matter.
I oppose HJ1
"I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians."
Since God is all-knowing, He knows each person even before their conception. God's will includes a plan and a purpose for each baby He desires to be conceived. No one has the authority to interfere with the will of God! Sincerely, Ray Weber
"I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians."
Please Protect Virginian's rights to Same Sex Marriage (HJ9-Sickles) and Reproductive Freedoms for Women (HJ1-Herring)
Regarding the hasty proposed amendments to the Virginia Constitution, I, Heather Hornick, strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. REJECT HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. Sincerely, Heather Hornick Williamsburg, VA
"I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians."
I emphatically oppose HJ1. It is abominable and completely morally wrong and EVIL and CRUEL to allow the deaths of precious babies in the womb at ANY POINT in pregnancy. The bill in no way takes into consideration the heinous actions of the "individual" (meant here "woman" as many other Commonwealth of Virginia citizens have correctly pointed out in other written comments for this bill) to KILL another person. ALL of human life is made in God's image, and he is in deep GRIEF and sorrow over every precious baby killed. That a so called "politician" would advocate for murder is absolutely detestable. Reject HJ1! "For You created my inmost being; You knit me together in my mother's womb...Your eyes saw my unformed body; all the days ordained for me were written in Your book before one of them came to be" - Psalm 139 13-16
Please do not allow the murder of infants in the womb to be written into our state constitution. This I would be absolutely terrible! Everyone knows that murdering someone is wrong, and the age of the person has nothing to do with the viability of that life. We shouldn’t kill our grandparents or children with disabilities, why should we be able to kill children with no way of voicing their pain or understanding the horror of what’s happening to them. Say no to this bill!!
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. Please on behalf of unborn lives, these lives are being murdered.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
pro life all life life marriage family human identity defined by CREATOR thank you
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
Please do not make a constitutional amendment to be able to kill a child in an inhospitable womb . This is infanticide . It is still a child and many babies can live well even after 20 weeks . My grandsons is testimony to this. Our great common wealth will suffer for this error and you who sign this will be remembered like the evil thoughts of politicians who agreed with enslaved humans ! No one wants to admit it but quietly folks said no to Kamala because she thought this abortion until birth was cool ! It isn’t and never will be . We are all brothers and sisters and don’t want innocent babies killed , Democratic's and Republicans As You are pondering signing that amendment . Know God your creator and mine and all those babies creator is watching how we treat the least of our citizens. . Help women .. really … get OBGYN care free ! This reactionary constitutional amendment is extreme and infanticide!!! We didn’t elect you all for this !!! This was unpopular with Kamala and will be unpopular for you too!!
I strongly oppose enshrining a so-called "right" to abortion in the state Constitution. The right to life is a fundamental and inalienable right for all human beings. Governments are, at the most basic level, tasked with protecting this right to life. I strongly oppose changing the definition of marriage from the natural and normal union of one man and one woman. These efforts to undermine the traditional and God-given order of society can only have catastrophic effects to our state and our country.
Not only is this a private medical consideration between patients and medical providers, it is a public health issue that greatly affects many areas of Virginia's economy, where marginalized groups bear the brunt of hardships, and face greater barriers to adequate healthcare. Reproductive decisions affect overall well-being, including financial stability, housing, employment, and family support. Every Virginian should have access to affordable, quality healthcare, including abortion and birth control, with the freedom to make private reproductive choices. An individual's right to medical privacy must be protected to the fullest extent. Abortion must remain safe, legal, and guided by medical professionals. Protecting reproductive rights safeguards other freedoms, such as marriage equality, contraception access, and privacy in personal decisions.
I support reproductive freedom.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because it will take abortion too far, abotion until birth is cruel.
Before your final vote, Please consider the following information: 1. The original name for Margaret Sanger's Planned Parenthood, was "The Negro Project" 2. The original goal was to "exterminate the Negro Population" - as Margaret Sanger stated the Planned Parenthood purpose was the "gradual suppression, elimination, and eventual extinction of defective stocks" from a statement given to the KKK regarding the Negro Project. 3. Today, Planned Parenthood and many subsidiaries locate nearly 86% of its facilities near Black and Hispanic communities where it continues to physically and harm members of these communities. 4. Learn more about the horrors of abortion at www.operationrescue.org 5. Abortion does not support "Reproduuctive Rights 6. Women inherently have "REproductive Rights" bestowed on them by GOD. 7. Abortion denies the unborn their Right to Life. Thank you and please go forward to love and protect the most vulnerable.
I am writing to express my support for HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. “ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Abortion until birth…. "I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians."
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment • I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. • HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. • HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. • A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. • Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights • I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage • I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. • Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. If we pass this measure, can we also pass the equivalent of the right to murder postborn children, adults and elderly? HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. These are humans life forms, whether you believe they are ensouled or not. Do you really want to permit the killing of human life forms? Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I am curious what you are going to say to God upon your death that will explain *your* actions. I pray daily for all those who approve elective abortions, but God is equally Just as He is Merciful. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. "All that evil needs to triumph is for good men to do nothing"
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians
I strongly oppose HJ1. Children are our greatest gift. I oppose a right to abortion. The great people of Virginia can do better for women than kill their babies. Help the mothers, but do not hurt them with abortion. I strongly oppose HJ9. Marriage is between 1 man and 1 woman. We need to reread the story about the Emperor who had no clothes. No one wants to speak the truth anymore, but the truth is only a man and woman can marry.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of VA from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in VA could be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want VA to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
We do not support child sacrifice by way of abortion especially up to birth! Abortion Is not birth control! Abortion is murder for an significant number of human infants! Adoption is available for women who do not want or can not fulfill the obligations of motherhood. When the life or death decision of saving either mother or baby forces an abortion that is so unfortunate but medically necessary. Abortion by free election of convenience is murder. Please do not support it! Thank you.
amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
Abortion should be limited to, at most, when the baby human being can't survive outside the womb. How any decent person can support murdering a baby until just before birth is not understandable.
Abortion is the taking of an innocent life. I oppose HJI.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians."
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians."
Concerning HJ1 & Hj9 We do not want any amendment to current Va code that would violate Constitutional protections of even the tiniest Human. His/her has the choice to indulge in breeding or creating a new human life. Buyers remorse is not an ok option if it means snuffing out another person.
All, please ratify the Virginia Constitution and protect Virginian’s rights to same-sex marriage (HJ9 - Sickles) and reproductive freedoms for women (HJ1 - Herring). Thank you for working to protect those who are vulnerable! Sincerely, William Frear
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
HJ1-I strongly oppose enshrining a "right" to abortion in Virginia's constitution. HJ2-I support Hu 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ9-I oppose Hu 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
Please add these three amendments to protect the civil rights of Virginians, especially during these uncertain federal times.
As a woman I am fully in favor of giving every woman the right to make decisions about her health and her body independent of anyone else--especially the government. I worry about the recent trend to take away these important decisions and rights, especially because it means people will die (and have already died) because their lives are deemed unimportant by those claiming to wish to preserve life. Everyone should have the right to reproductive freedom, and I am in favor of this bill.
As Virginians, we should not support a bill that promotes the unrestrained murder of children in development and further contributes to the decline of humanity. From a long career in human services I am aware of many societal ills that plague families and children, including domestic and child abuse; unplanned/unwanted pregnancies; children born into families ill-equipped to provide basic stability and resources; lack of protection for children in-utero whose mothers are using drugs; etc. I have known people who have had abortions and heard their reasons. I have faced my own difficult pregnancies where I was presented with, but refused, the idea of abortion. I underwent a fairly radical and rare procedure to save my last child. I had been exposed to human parvovirus and my baby actually received blood transfusions while in the womb beginning @20 weeks! I have watched the arguments that abortion provides an alternative to the terrible conditions some people face: that the child in the womb is not a child until it is born; that the life of the child is less valuable than the mother who may face hardships and consequences from carrying the child; that a child with disabilities is too much of a burden; etc. I believe these arguments are deceptive and we have been too quick to promote abortion as an option for families experiencing difficult and sometimes horrible situations. We have not offered accurate information about fetal development or the impact abortion can have on a mother’s long-term mental and physical health. We have been pressured to accept abortion as a signal of female and human rights. We have ignored there are people who are willing to provide support to persons experiencing crisis pregnancies and people who are willing to adopt children regardless of circumstances. Many times people use the examples of rape, incest, and the life of the mother as exceptions. I have worked in sexual assault crisis centers and know of very few instances of pregnancy that have resulted in abortion. And with early reporting, pregnancy can often be avoided. When pregnancies do result from a sexual assault, we often fail to recognize that an abortion may compound a victim's grief and trauma and abortion may not be the best choice. I also know a woman who chose abortion because she was facing life-threatening cancer and needed to undergo chemotherapy. This was a haunting decision for her because she had waited many years to be pregnant. However, she had also just watched a friend decline treatment while pregnant and die, leaving her child without a mother. People face terribly difficult circumstances in this world, and we should have compassion for them. But we should not herald abortion as the premier resolution for complex societal issues, but should instead seek long-term, creative solutions that value life for all and unite us. We need to acknowledge that once the sperm meets the egg, life has formed. There are two lives to consider. Today's technology provides visual and auditory scientific evidence that a baby in the womb is alive and a person in development. If we could start with this acknowledgement, then perhaps we can have more civil conversation about what conditions might warrant consideration that one life be terminated. To me, this right to "reproductive freedom" is a mask for what is an unreasonable, unnecessary right for people to murder their babies. This is not the right direction for Virginia.
“right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I am a woman, wife, and mother. I learned that when this amazing country was founded on the principles of separation of church and state, religious freedom, and pursuit of individual happiness. No one has the right to impose religious beliefs on others; that is wrong. To weaponize laws to put women's lives in danger because they miscarried, were raped, or made personal decisions goes against their rights as human beings. Only women who have gone through pregnancy, breastfeeding, and child rearing know how difficult and challenging it is to be responsible for another life financially and emotionally. I couldn’t impose that on another woman that does not choose to; that is their choice. Women have rights over their bodies. I support the legal union between individuals regardless of gender and who they choose to marry and share their life with. In no way, shape, or form does that choice affect anyone. Laws are put in place to protect everyone, and they should be equitable for all. I know many couples of the same sex live in fear; it is extremely sad and scary to live in uncertainty.
HJ1 -- There should never be any right to terminate an innocent human life. Period. The life of an unborn human is inherently innocent -- in terms of both natural and governmental laws -- as is with any human life. Any attempt to legalize the termination of an innocent human life at any stage of its existence is not only morally indefensible, but is especially so constitutionally. If it is enacted in Virginia, it must be legally overturned before it is ever enacted. Protecting innocent human life is never negotiable HJ2 -- All citizens of the Virginia Commonwealth, who have fully and satisfactorily served out duly authorized sentences as the result of a valid criminal conviction should have all legal and civil rights restored to them, including the right to fully participate in local, state and federal elections. HJ93 -- Both prior to, and throughout the history of Western Civilization, the essential meaning of marriage has always been -- and should always remain -- a legal prerequisite for facilitating the creation of a human family. Its legal essence has always been the between one male and one female in anticipation that they would become the joint and parents of human offspring with the shared legal responsibility of raising their common offspring to adulthood. These joint and share roles can never be optimally shared by same-sex or multiple partners because doing so would degrade both the essential meaning and innate objective of legal marriage. Moreover, it would make a mockery of the establish common and statutory laws related to inheritance divorce and family trusteeships.
I oppose this amendment to the state constitution. I have not heard anyone say that unprotected sex can lead to pregnancy. First things first, if a female wants to enjoy sex, she must be prepared for the consequences of not using birth control or insisting the man use the necessary protection. Any amendment that allows abortion for anyone, any reason is beyond logical thinking. I also absolutely do not agree with tax payer funding for any abortion. Why should I be paying for a female to have unprotected sex whenever she desires and I have to pay for her mistake. I'm 84 and have worked for 40 years and still pay taxes. Even thinking about using taxes to pay for Jane Doe's sex activity. You folks doing the bill or bills should take a good hard look at yourselves in the mirror and think about the folks who have to pay the bills for" her" sex activity. It is wrong and you know it. Luther Stephens USMC ret
HJ1 is a blatant attack on the dignity of the human person. Every child in the womb is a unique individual, with the right to "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness." There is no scientific question that the baby, at any stage of pregnancy, is unique and separate from the mother. A woman's "choice" is to either nurture and protect natural life or to kill an innocent person. Every single person started as an embryo and small child in the womb. Who are we to take away the life that God has given? As explained in the story of previous Planned Parenthood clinic director Abby Johnson, the abortion takes away the baby but does not take away the mother's memory of the baby. I support HJ2. Once people have complete their sentence, they should be allowed to vote again. I oppose HJ9, which attacks the institution of marriage. In the book of Genesis it does not say that God gave Adam a man as his partner, it says that God gave Adam a woman as his partner. While the creation story is not to be taken literally, the point is that man and woman are literally made for each other, they complement each other and have the gift of procreating children. While man and man and woman and woman are certainly meant for friendship with each other, the marriage bond is a mysterious and life giving institution that is unique to man and woman. Only a man and a woman can truly become one, both physically and spiritually. Society today blurs the lines about true masculinity and femininity and that these can even be fluid. Countries in Europe such as Sweden and in the UK have discovered that gender fluidity is actually extremely harmful and dangerous. The role of a man and the role of a woman is unique to each sex. Same sex marriage does not fulfill what marriage is meant for, which is union and procreation.
How can we as a society not protect life? Especially the life of those that can't protect themselves. "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." As Virginians, and as Americans, we must protect the right to Life for all Americans. Follow the science- that unborn clump of cells is a human baby. And we must protect them. Please do not proceed with adding abortion to the Virginia constitution.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians. Babies as young as 23 wks from inception are surviving outside the womb if they are born. They are human children. They are alive. The babies inside the womb need others to stand up for them to protect them.
HJ1 (https://trackbill.com/bill/virginia-house-joint-resolution-1-constitutional-amendment-fundamental-right-to-reproductive-freedom-first-reference/2463253/) would legalize infanticide. As written, it must be defeated. Alan L. Baker
To the members of the Committee, I am a young wife and mother of two small children. I would ask that you do not enshrine virtually an unlimited right to abortion within the constitution of the great state of Virginia. If you believe that women who find themselves in the situation of unplanned pregnancies need more options and help, I would ask that you direct funds toward pregnancy care centers, which can give great aid and actually care for women in difficulty. Abortion is never a woman’s first choice, it is only a last resort, one she will regret her entire life. Please choose life. Support women and give them a REAL option, a choice to choose life for their baby and a future of hope for themselves.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Protect equal marriage (same sex, interracial, etc.), protect transgender rights (gender affirming care, equal opportunity for sports, mental health care, etc.), women's health care rights (abortion access, right to choose, rights to own body, etc.), protection for special education, and protection to marginalized groups.
I’m writing today in response to the Virginia state constitutional amendments HJ1 and HJ9. HJ1 mentions reproductive freedom. This has nothing to do with reproductive freedom. This is reproductive anarchy. Freedom is not the ability to do anything that a person wants to do. It is the freedom to do what’s right. In a free country you’re not free to kill other people. True liberty and freedom has limits and those limits are set by God’s laws. We are not free to kill unborn children, mutilate our bodies, or try to change the sexual design that God gave each person. The marriage amendment H9 allows for marriage between any two parties undefined. This means a man could marry a six-year-old. This reckless amendment will legalize, pedophilia, homosexuality and bestiality. I fear for the souls of those who have drafted and promoted such legislation that is an abomination to God. “ And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.” Matt. 10:28
With regard to HJ1 and HJ9, ammending the constitution of the Commonwealth of Virginia to enshrine these current ideological positions prohibits the state from representing the choice of it's citizens, should a majority, now or in the future, oppose such issues. Please do not support the suppression of future democratic process. With regard to SB270, ranked choice voting is a poor organization system for voting. Please oppose it.
Hi, I’m writing in support of the state constitutional amendment to give women the right to all decisions regarding reproductive health. I think this is a necessary and crucial change to protect the women in Virginia and is an urgent matter given that the president elect succeeded during his last term to have Roe vs. Wade overturned and continues to push for restrictions on women’s medical care and health. Please bring the bill to the floor whether it’s traditionally done or not and vote in support of it for the safety and protection of all women. Thank you, Mary K. Howard
I strongly oppose HJ1 which would enshrine abortion on demand in the Va. constitution and remove all attempts to protect unborn infants. I favor HJ2 I strongly oppose HJ9 because marriage always was ,is and will remain a lifetime union between a man and a woman. God planned marriage to be so from the beginning of creation. Pierre Deslauriers
To Whom It May Concern at the House Privileges and Election Meeting, Thank you for the opportunity to share, in writing, my thoughts and opinions on these three bills before you today, this 13th day of November, 2024. We live in a democracy and the freedom to speak and be heard is a constitutional right. Thank you for this format to do so. As to HJ 1: I strongly oppose this constitutional amendment. It violates my religious beliefs to support a bill that calls abortion a reproductive right. I became a mother through adoption and there is not a day that goes by that I am not grateful that my sons’ birth mothers chose life for them. While I fundamentally believe that life begins at conception, this proposed amendment has no limits on when an abortion can take place even into the 9th month when a baby is viable outside the womb and has fully developed pain receptors. This is just wrong on every level. As to HJ 2: I also oppose this constitutional amendment. If a felon has lost the right to vote due to being incarcerated for a felony level crime, I support the current law requiring said person to take action to apply to regain that right to vote. I also believe that should not happen until they have fulfilled all the requirements of their sentencing which extend beyond incarceration. As to HJ 9: I also oppose this constitutional amendment. Repealing this ban on same sec marriage would violate my religious beliefs.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment would allow murder of unborn children.
Honorable Members of the Virginia Legislature, I respectfully ask you, under the law of the one true God as revealed through Jesus Christ, to carefully consider the moral weight of adding abortion rights to our state constitution. Jesus, who was crucified, rose again, and now reigns, will ultimately judge the world. His mercy is offered, yet His patience should not be mistaken for indifference. While often called a right, abortion is the taking of innocent life and is in direct conflict with the God-given value of human life. I urge you to consider the serious moral implications of supporting this legislation, which, according to Scripture, offends God. Each of us is accountable to a higher, eternal law that surpasses human rulings. I hope you will choose to protect the lives of the most vulnerable among us. Thank you for your time, and may God’s wisdom guide you in this decision. Sincerely, Travis Mozingo
I strongly oppose enshrining abortion in Virginia’s constitution. Instead we should be working on policies that help all mothers and their children, born and unborn.
OPPOSE HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. SUPPORT HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. OPPOSE HJ 9 – marriage definition change I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman (a provision regarding marriage that Virginia voters approved in 2006). Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
Hi, I’m writing in support of the state constitutional amendment to give women the right to all decisions in regards to their pregnancy. I think this is a necessary and crucial change to protect the women in Virginia and is an urgent matter given that the president elect succeeded during his last term to have Roe vs. Wade overturned and continues to push for restrictions on women’s medical care and health. Please bring the bill to the floor whether it’s traditionally done or not and vote in support of it for the safety and protection of my children and their children. Thank you, Maria Brockel
I am utterly against this bill. If passed, this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
Why are you introducing bills in secret? In fact, why are you so anti-life? These 3 bills are an outlandish attack on the dignity of and respect for human life and ignore the importance of the traditional family as the cornerstone of our American society. Today's world needs to honor and protect all human life, backed by the science of such, and get back to relying on the truths of science. All humans deserve a chance at life and redemption.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution.
I oppose this amendment
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
"I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians."
"I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians."
"I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians."
"I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians."
"I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians."
"I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians."
Please pass all 3 of these bills. They are important to me and my family.
I am against HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
I am opposed to the passage of HJ1 because that amendment would prevent Virginians from passing any laws to protect unborn Virginia residents and could mean that current prolife Virginia laws will be overturned, as they have been in other states that have passed similar legislation. Abortion is a scourge upon our nation that inflicts terrible suffering, without pain medication, on babies in the womb, once the safest place for babies. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
I oppose passage of HJI.
I am strongly against Bill HJ1, since it will virtually stop residents of Virginia from passing any laws that protect the lives of all Virginians. It opens the way for current pro-life laws in Virginia to be completely overturned. This has occurred in other states that have passed such amendments.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians. As an adoptive mother of one and biological mother of three, I believe deeply that our Virginia Constitution and our national Constitution both afford basic due process rights to all humans, even those not yet born. Virginia should not be in the business of protecting the right to abortion at any time during the forty weeks of gestation. We must be a commonwealth that lives up to the morals established by our founding mothers and fathers...that all humans are created equal, and that life is a precious gift. The citizens of Virginia need to have the debate that is mandated by the US Supreme Court Dobbs opinion removing it as a federal issue. Every jurisdiction needs to honestly debate and decide how to legislate this complex issue. Reproductive rights should not only be considered a right held by females, since it takes and male and a female to start a human life. This honest and difficult discussion needs to be had. Please be courageous and do not just jump to a wide ranging blanket right to terminate a pregnancy. Read up on Margaret Sanger and the eugenics that are at the very foundation of Planned Parenthood. Motherhood is precious. Mothers need to be protected, of course, but Mothers (and young men and women in general) also must be honestly educated about how physically and emotionally damaging an abortion can be. Let's have the conversation. Let's educate, learn from each other and come up with a solution that respects life and liberty and happiness.
The current proposed amendment for the constitutional amendment is far too vague and would allow termination of a pregnancy up until birth. This is a radical stance for “women’s healthcare”. Many doctors and scholars acknowledge a point of viability in a pregnancy (around 22 weeks). Any termination past this point, especially at full gestation, which the vague language in this amendment would allow, is akin to murder. I disagree with this amendment and strongly suggest that it be rejected.
Block 1 Legislation continued from the 2024 Regular Session, per House Rule 22 HJ1 Constitutional amendment; fundamental right to reproductive freedom (first reference). HJ2 Constitutional amendment; qualifications of voters, right to vote, persons not entitled to vote. HJ9 Constitutional amendment; Marriage between two individuals should not be determined by their gender.
I strongly oppose voting to add the “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. Minors should not be allowed to undergo surgical treatments without their parents being aware of the risks they face. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Many infants are born early and survive. We should not allow doctors to just allow there children to die. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
I am opposed to the anti-abortion amendment that is being proposed. This is such an extreme piece of legialation that to not permit public discussion would be abhorent. Please permit the public discussion, and vote No on the amendment.
"I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent Virginian's from passing any laws that will protect unborn children. Unborn American children have the same rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness that born Americans have. This amendment's passage could mean that current pro-life laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. Don't enable Virginia to legalize infanticide. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians."
I STRONGLY support these three amendments to our state constitution. Protecting my children's reproductive freedom, restoring voting rights to people convicted of felonies, and ensuring marriage equality are all deeply important to me and the people I love. I want to protect and support all Virginians', rights, regardless of their political affiliation, with these three constitutional amendments!
I oppose HJ1 to amend the commonwealth's constitution. This amendment will prohibit people of Virginia with the ability to pass laws to protect unborn children. It is my desire that our legislature protect all Virginians, especially the most vulnerable who are unable to speak for themselves.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Please read my post. This issue is very important to me. I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
I am strongly against the passage of HJ1. There are thousands and thousands of prolife individuals in Virginia and so many ladies who have had abortions and later, once the PTSD has worn off, regret them. Have you ever attended the March for Life in Washington, D.C.? Sadly, hardly any news carriers show this and it's because of the incredible, tremendous outpouring of support for the unborn by hundreds of thousands of people. Unborn children are among the most vulnerable and should have protections. I wish everyone would consider that their salvation is at risk before they enact laws that are against God's Will. It's so easy for individuals to be pro-choice because they aren't the ones being killed. I pray for the protection of all Virginians, esp. the unborn and the elderly. It is very sad that some states have not done so. The "my body, my choice" slogan is so wrong and shows a deep self-centeredness. When COVID was rampant, people were not given a choice but told they had to get the vaccine or get fired from their job. So ironic.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
These three bills have been introduced secretly. There is no provision to comment on them on either LIS or Richmond Sunlight. I urge you to withdraw all three and reintroduce them (if you must) when the GA convenes in January. In the meantime, please consider withdrawing them permanently. The amendments, especially HB1 and HB9 strike at the heart of what it means to be alive as a human person (HB1) and destroy the function of the traditional family as the cornerstone of our American society (HB9).
Every Virginia resident should have access to affordable, quality health care, including abortion, birth control and the privacy to make reproductive choices. Virginians made their reproductive opinions clear when they chose to elect representatives who vowed to protect reproductive rights. Abortion should be legal, safe, and the decision left to those who are pregnant with guidance from medical professionals. True democracy depends on equal rights for all people. Losing our right to reproductive choice opens the door to the loss of other freedoms including other healthcare choices, marriage equality, access to contraception, and the right to engage in private, consensual intimacy without government interference. Not only is the right to a safe and legal abortion a matter of personal freedom, it’s also a major factor in the movements for racial and economic equality. Black individuals, and all underserved communities, already experience unfair barriers and limited access to adequate healthcare services. Our reproductive choices impact our physical and psychological well-being, including the foods we eat, where we live, our financial resources, and our capacity to gain and maintain employment and provide for ourselves and our families.
I oppose HJ1 because it would prevent laws being passed to protect an unborn child. All persons, born or unborn, have right of protection under the laws of Virginia.
HJ1 SUPPORT- Every Virginian should have access to affordable, quality health care, including abortion, birth control, and the privacy to make reproductive choices. HJ9 SUPPORT- In addition, I believe that individuals have a fundamental right to marry and that the Commonwealth and its political subdivisions should be prevented from denying the issuance of a marriage license to two parties contemplating a lawful marriage on the basis of the sex, gender, or race of such parties.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution.
I oppose HJ1. !! There are two things with this issue. One is an autonomy issue. Women’s autonomy to make decisions. The other is abortion. Let's not get these mixed up!! Women should have autonomy to make their own decisions. However, the killing of another human being can never be o.k.. Think of all the girls that have been aborted.. Where is their autonomy?
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment • I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. • HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. • HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. • A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. • Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights • I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage • I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. • Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1 — OPPOSED: Abortion is a medical procedure which has no place in the Constitution of Virginia. Adding it would not only be inappropriate, but it would jeopardize even modest protections for unborn children, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 2 — SUPPORT: I absolutely support the restoration of voting rights for people who have completed their sentences and have been released. This is automatically done in most states, and it is one way to help people reintegrate into society and feel that they have a chance to be contributing citizens. HJ9 — OPPOSED: Marriage predates any nation, religion or law, and as the union of one man and one woman, it has an existential purpose and meaning. It is possible to have a bonding ceremony without the joining of one man and one woman, but it would not be marriage.
I strongly oppose HJ1. Instead, please work on policies which affirm the dignity of both women and children.
HJ 1 -- Abortion: Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 9 – Marriage: Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I am opposed to HJ1 as abortion on demand, at taxpayer expense and up to birth is wrong. There are so many options that spare the dignity and life of both mother and baby. Abortion should be the last option in extreme life & death cases.
I am writing in support of further protections for reproductive freedom. The increasingly hostile national climate demands that we step up against a clear threat to the privacy and autonomy of state residents. As a daughter, a woman, and the educator of a new generation, I ask you to protect these vulnerable groups. As a historian, I know that the achievements we have made in the rights of an individual are shallow and fragile things. Please do everything in your power to maintain them.
I strongly oppose the passage of this amendment. We do not take into consideration the rights of that unborn child. The actions of two consenting adults should not determine the fate of an unborn child. We live in a country where we have the right to make our own choices, but we also live in the world where we have to live with those choices. There are families all over Virginia, who are trying to get pregnant and that child deserves a fighting chance to be with a family who wants them. Please do not let this pass.
I believe that we should create a constitutional amendment to protect the fundamental right to reproductive freedom. Bodily autonomy is an important right for all people. My health decisions should between myself and my doctor - that is true for all aspects of my health and should be the same for my reproductive health. I want to know that I will have access to the best medical care possible and the only way to do that is to protect the my right to reproductive healthcare. As we have seen in states that do not protect the right to access such care, health care professionals leave the state leaving women vulnerable not only to common complications with pregnancy but to other health conditions such as cervical cancer. Being able to make the decision my doctor thinks is best will save my life someday and I believe that it is not the place of my government to dictate that choice based not on medical recommendations but on "religious principles" that I do not hold. I don't want to die of sepsis because a politician doesn't think I should be able to access a doctor. If I were to die due to a lack of reproductive healthcare at a critical moment, my death certificate will be sent to the office of every delegate that decided that I do not have a right to care, for my death will be on their hands. Additionally, the government should not have a role in my family planning decisions. That choice is for my husband and I alone. We have rightfully criticized other countries policies that dictate family planning, including the infamous One Child Policy in China. Policies that lead to forced pregnancy are no different from ones that limit each family's choice regarding their children and the size of their family. Both decide that my body is not my own but is instead property of the state. If we are to be an example of freedom, that should extend to the freedom to make decisions about my family and my body without the oversight of the government. The government does not get to dictate what my family looks like in any capacity. Limiting my access to make my own decisions regarding my health and family infringes on the fundamental rights of life, liberty, and happiness that this country was founded on. The rights of men to life, liberty, and happiness are rarely debated as if they are something that can be traded away for legislative points. My rights are no different. Get out of my bedroom. Get out of my doctor's office.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. At conception, there comes about a living organism with a unique genetic code of human DNA. Every fetus at any stage is a human person. Abortion both destroys a child's life and wreaks havoc on a mother's heart. We need to support children and their mothers through financial assistance, communal support, and encouragement, not cause further wounds to those who are already in dire straights. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage is not merely a romantic, care-giving relationship. It is a specific kind of friendship, one that this 1) permanent, 2) faithful, and 3) open to life. Only the relationship between one man and one woman has these qualities. Only the relationship between one man and one woman can create the building block on which societies are founded and flourish. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1 "right to reproductive freedom" comment: I oppose on the grounds of distorting of the concept of "fundamental rights". The choice to engage in conduct that might result in the creation of humankind is not something to be protected in a constitution; therefore, the potential outcome of such a choice is not a constitutional subject. I would toss this proposed resolution. HJ2 "Qualifications of voters" comment: I accept this proposed resolution. HJ9 "Marriage" comment: I would not distort the core underlying principle of marriage by tilting at variations. Rather add a separate proposed resolution that addresses the wishes of some to engage in civil unions would allow for the benefits that laws allow for married persons but not the distraction of contorting the fundamental of marriage.
This bill is heinous and we would like to register our vehement opposition.
I wholeheartedly support the enshrining of women's right to their own body and medical decisions. As a human, it is critically important for a person (male or female) to make informed, medically appropriate decisions regarding their healthcare. If this was an issue about male medical care, I would defer my opinion to the men and their medical providers. However, this is about female medical care, and those decisions should be left to the person whose body and health is at issue, not the government. As a woman of faith, actually practicing Christian (not just lip-service faith), I believe that my faith is personal and my judgement comes from my Lord. Faith should be out of the discussion and I merely include it because others have made it part of their position. It should not be part of the discussion at all. To limit, remove or impose restrictions on this type of medical care will cause unnecessary deaths, trauma, pain and suffering. MOVE THIS FORWARD! Enshrine a woman's right to take care of her health as she and her medical provider determine what is best for her.
please do not advance this bill. No human should have the right to be aborted.
Please vote no to abortion amendment, and the reversal of the one man one woman marriage legislation. These family and life issue determine the way I vote.
Please respect the baby’s life. no to abortion
Every Virginian should have access to affordable, quality health care, including abortion, birth control, and the privacy to make reproductive choices. In addition, I believe that individuals have a fundamental right to marry and that the Commonwealth and its political subdivisions should be prevented from denying the issuance of a marriage license to two parties contemplating a lawful marriage on the basis of the sex, gender, or race of such parties.
"I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians."
"I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians."
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states.
I want extremely limited or no abortion. Please keep marriage defined as between a man and a woman.
I oppose HJ1. This bill eliminates any possibility to protect the unborn from sex-selective abortion and from abortion for babies with treatable conditions/disabilities. While the people of Virginia must come to a compromise on the issue of abortion in situations that involve the life of the mother and certain other dire scenarios, this bill provides zero room for common sense protections for the preborn in the first two trimesters. Please consider that ‘enshrining’ the right to kill the unborn for any reason (or no reason) is a departure from compassion for the living beings involved, but most especially for the preborn, who have no voices. Virginians have slaughtered the voiceless before and trampled on their rights- the indigenous peoples, those kept in slavery, and more. Let us recognize that, once again, we are trampling the voiceless in the name of ‘personal freedom’. HJ1 will remove any and all existing protections for the preborn, and silence them forever in the name of 'reproductive choice'.
I strongly oppose enshrining a right to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ1 would severely jeopardize even the few small protections for unborn babies currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. I urge you to reject HJ1 which expands abortion and instead work for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and child. I also oppose HJ 9 which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. This definition of marriage has its foundation in natural law. Thank you, Mary Mc Laughlin
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment The delayed regret that women commonly wake up to later in life - that they have killed one of their children - is not spoken about nearly enough. It is cognitive dissonance - even within our own legal system - to believe that you can ethically remove a "fetus" yet, if the child is wanted, then murdering a pregnant woman is counted also as murdering an unborn child. I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Please Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I know people incarcerated and not having voting rights is just another way of making them permanently second-class citizens. Restoring voting rights would give hope that there is restoration from bad mistakes in life. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians, therefore I oppose passage of HJ1. Unborn children are human beings and deserve the same protection as born human beings. This amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments.
Dear Madam Chair and members of Privileges and Elections Committee, I write not because I believe you will change your minds, as evidenced by the unusual nature of this meeting and last minute amendments to the proposal that were hardly given ample time to be reviewed, but because I believe those who are marginalized and without a voice need someone to speak on their behalf. From a young age I have considered myself pro-life, seeing that a child within the womb was obviously a unique human individual. My conviction was confirmed upon hearing the tragic stories of friends who had received abortions, leaving them with emotional scars. Women deserve better care and options that do not promote violence. Many of you have personally been touched by adoption and the outpouring of love that is involved in that choice. Women, and society at large, need and deserve more opportunities for offering mercy, choices that reject violence and embrace love. As St Mother Theresa of Calcutta stated, “Any country that accepts abortion is not teaching its people to love, but to use any violence to get what it wants.” All children are gifts and should be received with gratitude and love, even in difficult situations. We must recognize the truth of life, so that all may have life, and have it more abundantly. May the Holy Innocents pray for us. Anna Sisman, Albemarle County resident
I oppose passage of HJ1. I do not support passing an amendment which will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as has happened in other states. We have a duty to protect all the citizens of this state, including those yet unborn. This amendment robs them of their rights and the protection that they deserve as human beings in the most vulnerable state they will ever be in.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
On the matter of HJ1, the fundamental right to reproductive freedom, the correct path is clear. Reproductive freedom is a fundamental human right that allows individuals to make personal decisions about their bodies, health, and futures without interference or coercion. The government should have no business determining what happens to a woman’s body. Medical decisions are, and should be, personal. Reproductive freedom ensures that people have the autonomy to choose whether and when to have children, have access safe and effective contraception, and are able to seek the medical care they need. This freedom of choice is at the very heart of American life- freedom from government interference, freedom to act in one’s own best interest, and freedom to live a life without tyrannical restrictions. Abortion is essential and common healthcare. According to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, roughly one-quarter of women in the United States access abortion care in their lifetime. Restricting access to abortion does not reduce these numbers. In fact, in 2023, the first full year since Roe v. Wade was overturned, abortions across America increased 11% (per the Guttmacher Institute). What restricting access to abortion actually does is make women less safe. Following Texas’ 2021 near-total ban on abortion care, maternal mortality in the state rose by 56%, compared with just 11% nationwide over the same period (per the Gender Equity Policy Institute). Restricting access to reproductive care also exacerbates existing social disparities. Virginians, as whole, want to live in an equitable state. However, abortion bans and restrictions are particularly harmful for marginalized and minority groups who already face barriers to accessing healthcare. By enshrining the right to reproductive freedom in Virginia’s constitution, we take a step towards health equity for all citizens. Thank you for your time.
As a resident of chesapeake virginia i support this.
Every Virginia resident should have access to affordable, quality health care, including abortion, birth control and the privacy to make reproductive choices. Virginians made their reproductive opinions clear when they chose to elect representatives who vowed to protect reproductive rights. Abortion should be legal, safe, and the decision left to those who are pregnant with guidance from medical professionals. True democracy depends on equal rights for all people. Losing our right to reproductive choice opens the door to the loss of other freedoms including other healthcare choices, marriage equality, access to contraception, and the right to engage in private, consensual intimacy without government interference. Not only is the right to a safe and legal abortion a matter of personal freedom, it’s also a major factor in the movements for racial and economic equality. Black individuals, and all underserved communities, already experience unfair barriers and limited access to adequate healthcare services. Our reproductive choices impact our physical and psychological well-being, including the foods we eat, where we live, our financial resources, and our capacity to gain and maintain employment and provide for ourselves and our families.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
I strongly oppose all three bills - HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 as they are currently drafted.
As a nurse and obstetric professional, I am opposed to this amendment. I agree that this is an attempt to hastily pass and push through a constitutional amendment to further the "rights" to an abortion. I am an obstetric nurse and recognize that multiple lies are being promoted by those sponsoring and supporting this amendment. An abortion to protect the life of the mother is virtually non-existent. Those cases where a mother died from bleeding complications related to a miscarriage or abortion is blatant malpractice! I have reviewed every case I have heard of and multiple lies are being promoted. We currently allow aborting in Virginia through 2nd trimester and exceptions already exist in the 3rd trimester. Abortion causes permanent mental and physical harm to women. Unless you have been through it you do not understand this. Please protect women and do not pass HJ1.
I agree with all three bills each have their importance and relevancy to human rights and protection of those rights. We need to keep Virginia a safe place for women and the lgbtq community.
I would be horrified to see a ‘right’ to murder an unborn child up until the moment of birth. Such a law would go against our values. Please do not pass such a law
HJ1 = I oppose HJ 1 which takes the life of an unborn child and injures mentally, spiritually and sometimes physically the mother as well. I've held hundreds of women in my arms who deeply regretted this decision in my work as a post-abortion counselor. It's a lie that this is good for women - the only so called "medical procedure" that harms women. Government should protect all her citizens especially the most innocent and vulnerable among us. Please reconsider this course of action. HJ2 = I support this. HJ9 = I oppose this because marriage between one man and one woman predates any nation, religion or law. Why make a mockery of marriage, when civil unions are available?
I am in favor of all three bills. Abortion is healthcare and saves lives, and consenting adults have the right to marry.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment We strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 9 – marriage We oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
as a mother who had an abortion to remove nonviable twins that would have continued to grow without heartbeats in my body, it is imperative that women continue to have reproductive rights and bodily autonomy. as a woman who went through early menopause at 35, it is imperative that people have the right to gender, affirming care. as a mother of a child that identifies as queer and a friend to many married LGBTQ parents, it is imperative that they keep their rights as well.
I oppose passage of HJ1. We should be focusing our efforts and resources on better supporting women, children, and families, not ending the lives of innocent children.
Please say No to HJ1. This amendment will prevent Virginians from passing any laws to protect unborn children. In addition, it could cause current prolife laws in Virginia to be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments.
I strongly support HJ1, and believe that the right to make reproductive decisions lies in the hands of each individual. It is their body, and their own decisions to make these choices, along with their medical professional and the deity of their choice. At no time should a woman be restricted from medical care by their government. Simply put, if your religion prohibits you from getting an abortion, it is your prerogative not to get one. However, you cannot oppress your religious beliefs on other people, preventing them from making these difficult decisions. As someone who has had to have abortion care as a lifesaving measure, I strongly support this amendment. I cannot imagine the added trauma if I had been required to appear in a court to argue for my life, and possibly have been denied and not be here today. The decision to have an abortion is usually as a backup or last resort due to birth control failure. Abortion care also includes procedures and care necessary for those experiencing complications and miscarriages around pregnancies. There are also multiple instances where incest, rape, or sexual assault have occurred, and a woman is in need of abortion care without having to add to the trauma by being forced to birth a child that was a result of the crime. In regards to HJ9, I strongly support this amendment. It is in our inherent rights in the constitution to our pursuit of happiness. This means loving who you choose, whether it's same sex or opposite sex. This falls back to the same reasoning for HJ1. If your religious beliefs prohibit you from marrying same sex, then don't marry the same sex. But don't oppress that religious belief on others in their pursuit of happiness and liberty.l
I strongly oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment would prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws to protect unborn children and could mean that current pro-life laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
"Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness", these three unalienable rights delivered by one of the great founders of this nation and of this Commonwealth has been ingrained into generations of Americans since 1776. That we as people deserve to chase our dreams, love, foster community, and truly build a life worth living without fear. These days fear has become a strong tool to knock us off this path that was set forth in the birth of this nation. But with these three resolutions today, we can reconfirm our foundational commitment to being committed to freedom, to love, to expression, and to many other wonderful aspects of this country. For anyone that does read this, my sincere hope is that you choose freedom and hope over fear. That with these resolutions that we recommit to the work the founders started, of bringing freedom to all walks of life. Passing and codifying these resolutions for reproductive rights, voting rights, and marriage rights are quintessential to the concept of true freedom. That we the people can chase down our own pursuits of happiness and build a stronger Virginia at the same time. So I urge that as our representation, you choose freedom for all and not a select few.
"I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians."
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
The recent Presidential election indicates that abortion is not supported by a majority of Americans. It is one thing for state law to allow abortions. It is quite another to make it a "right" under the Virginia Constitution. In doing that, a small number of people (Virginia legislators and others urging that that action is necessary) declare for everyone in Virginia that murdering an unborn child up to the moment of birth is both legal and moral. While the legislature has at the power to enact laws, it does not have the authority to redefine morality. Abortion is nothing more than killing an unborn child because he or she is an inconvenience to a woman. It is emphatically not a matter of women's health. With birth control so readily available, no woman can claim that she cannot prevent pregnancy. abortion should not be necessary. There are two primary reasons that some say it is: money - there are organizations that sell the body parts of an aborted fetus and make millions doing so; second women most ardent to keep abortion available are concerned that birth control will damage their health. Neither reason is sufficient to change the Virginia constitution to state abortion is a right. If one form of killing is made a constitutional right, what comes next? Another serious concern with this approach will be the state's willingness to force medical personal and hospitals to act against their religious beliefs and perform abortions. Catholic hospitals, institutions, and medical personnel are uppermost in my mind, but there are others. The legislature does not have the authority to force Virginia residents to act contrary to their religious beliefs by performing abortions, and its acts should be consistent with that limitation. It would be morally wrong for you to decide to protect a choice to end the life of an unborn child and to punish a choice not to participate in that killing of an unborn child. I didn't send anyone to the Virginia state legislature to make that choice. Those private citizens who want to commit an immoral act by killing their unborn child can do so right now in Virginia without legislatively elevating and "enshrining" those choices as virtuous.
HJ1: I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ2 I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ9 I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
We need to keep reproductive rights so women can choose for themselves. I do not want government to infringe on any person's sovereignty.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
I strongly support all of these amendments. They are all important for Virginia citizens.
I strongly oppose this Amendment - it's unnecessary and has disturbingly vague language which can be used to open minor children to coercive and predatory practices and further erode parental rights.
Every baby has the right to life, whether they are wanted or not. They cannot help the circumstances of their conception; they are the innocent party, and yet they are the ones that are made to suffer and be killed, when the only thing they have done "wrong" is exist! If a newborn baby is murdered, everyone is horrified; it is ruled infanticide and the guilty party is incarcerated. But somehow if that same baby were to be aborted just one month before, in the womb, that is a perfectly safe, legal, medical procedure that everyone has the "right" to choose? How is that not the same thing? It isn't the same child a day, a week, or a month later? Our own Declaration of Independence couldn't have stated it more clearly: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that ALL men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are LIFE, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
I oppose enshrining a right to abortion. I oppose jeopardizing the few protections for the unborn that we have in the state of Virginia. I feel it is wrong to destroy life in the womb no matter what the stage of development or the circumstances of the conception.
Life is the first inalienable right. Let’s put a priority on the right of a baby to LIVE! Marriage is ordained to be between a man and a woman. There is no moral substitute. Voting rights must be for citizens only. The most accurate process is hand counted paper ballots.
I ask that when you decide on this bill, you consider a few things. "Pro-Life" is not Pro Life if you are not considering whole-heartedly the life of your citizens after they are born. Women do not use abortions as "birth control". It is painful, physically and emotionally. And it is NOT taken lightly. Considering the outrageously high mortality rate of mothers and babies and the disparities in mortality rates by race and ethnicity in this First-World country, the idea that young girls should become mothers before they have even grown up themselves, or God forbid, a woman should carry and bare a child she has conceived after being raped, I should think it was obvious that we are NOT pro-Life but more Pro-Control. When the Affordable Care Act came into effect, abortion rates plummeted. It has become obvious that the way to save babies is to provide affordable or free birth control, more in-depth sex education in schools, and better access to affordable healthcare. Please do not take the easy way out by forcing control over a woman's autonomy. Vote and behave as if you are truly Pro-Life and work to save all of us.
I encourage support of HJ1 as the oversight of reproduction is the sole right of a woman. No person, organization, or group has any say into the decision-making or control of a woman. It is absurd that legislation needs to even exist about personal medical decisions except for the fact that a small portion of the populace deems it their role to dictate the personal decisions of others. Approve and advance HJ1.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1 I oppose enshrining a right to abortion. I oppose jeopardizing the few protections for the unborn that we have in the state of Virginia. I feel it is wrong to destroy life in the womb no matter what the stage of development or the circumstances of the conception. Catherine Heffley
I am adamantly opposed to the proposition/constitutional amendment to include abortion in Virginia’s constitution. This issue should be decided by the voters as they elect their representatives. Personally, I am pro life and find the initiative proposed as immoral, unethical, and an affront to millions who the same beliefs as me. It is therefore my fervent wish that this proposal not see the light of day.
The misnamed proposed “Reproductive Freedom Amendments” to Virginia’s Constitution proclaim, “… every individual has the fundamental right to reproductive freedom.” If voters approve the RFA, judges will decide what statutes are consistent with it. How will that be done? Chief Justice of the U. S. Supreme Court, Virginia’s John Marshall noted, (1819) “The words of an instrument … will always represent the intention of those who frame it.” And Alexander Hamilton (1791) wrote, “[W]hat ever may have been the intention of the framers of the constitution, or of a law, that intention is to besought for in the instrument itself.” The RFA references “every individual” without age/sex qualification, which includes males, females, adults and children under 18 who will exercise “reproductive freedom,” and will have a right to access birth control, abortion, be sterilized or seek “trans” sex changes and more without parental notice/consent. The Democrat’s RFA necessarily abolishes the age of sexual consent. Sexual behaviors which are currently legal now for adults will apply to minors under the RFA. And Democrats think a 14 year old is mature enough by themselves to comprehend taking a lifetime of cancer-causing sex or gender altering drugs? The Amendment protects persons/organizations which facilitate such juvenile behavior from parental oversight or prosecution because the Amendment states, “nor shall the Commonwealth penalize, prosecute, or otherwise take adverse action against an individual who aids or assists another individual, with such individual's voluntary consent, in the exercise of such individual's right to reproductive freedom.” Prostitution engaged in by adults or minors will become a form of “reproductive freedom” which Virginia could not prohibit. Under the Democrat’s Amendment cloning or gene-editing Nazi Eugenic practices will be legal to produce “designer” babies with super intelligence and physical powers and cannot be restricted. Conceiving children solely to be aborted for the purpose of organ harvesting will become a “fundamental right.” Alarmingly, the Democrat’s Reproductive Amendment does not require written informed consent from an individual for any supposed reproductive medical treatment, nor is “health” defined which has physical, mental and social components. Virginia’s 3rd grade Family Life Standards of Learning (approved 2020) state, “The student will become aware that ... babies begin with a sperm and an egg ... This is an age-appropriate, medically-accurate introduction to reproduction ... at the end of nine months of development, the baby leaves the mother's body ...” But the Reproductive Freedom Amendments allow babies to be killed! What a horrible lesson Democrats are giving Virginia’s school children. The Code of Virginia at, § 18.2-71, states an unauthorized abortion is a type of homicide: “ if any person … cause to be taken by a woman, any drug or other thing, … with intent to destroy her unborn child, or to produce abortion … thereby destroy such child,… he shall be guilty of a Class 4 felony. The Reproductive Freedom Amendment treats pre-born children as if they were garbage. No child is garbage!+96 Vote NO on these Amendments.
I hereby implore the Virginia House of Delegates to ratify the Constitution of Virginia and grant: HJ1 - Herring: The right to reproductive freedom HJ9 - Sickles: The right to lawful marriage between consenting adults regardless of the sex, gender, race, or religion of such parties
Bdhddh
On behalf of State Innovation Exchange (SiX), I am writing in SUPPORT of HJ1 (Herring) which will expand Virginia’s landmark protections in reproductive healthcare, including abortion access. SiX’s Reproductive Freedom Leadership Council (RFLC) is the country’s only network of state legislators who champion reproductive health, rights, and justice. The RFLC network is made up of 700+ visionary leaders who are changing the game to achieve an equitable, resilient, healthy, and prosperous future - including reproductive freedom for all. SiX writes today in support of HJ 1, because it is the kind of critical legislation that will protect abortion care not only in Virginia, but people in surrounding states and across the U.S. who will need to travel for care.
I am in favor of all three bills.
On behalf of my treasured infant granddaughter and all other babies, I pray that you will respect all human life from conception to natural death. Please do not promote VA laws that allow the lives of babies in utero to be taken. As a woman, a mother and a grandmother, please know that not all women consider this a”right “. Thank you for listening and God bless you, Joan Fram
HJ1: I strongly oppose this measure. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ2: I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ9: I vehemently reject this measure! oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I am commenting in favor of protecting reproductive rights and the rights of consenting adults to marry. As seen in other states, if reproductive rights are not protected women will die. I am in favor of all three bills.
If we are going to do anything for women in Virginia we need to affirm their dignity by helping them to carry the human life within them to birth. Abortion is not a “right” it is an abomination. Human beings cooperate with God in the creation of a new human being, and only God has the right to decide life and death. A fetus is NOT the woman’s body, it is a different body all its own! How is it possible to fool one's self into thinking that this baby is anything other than a separate human being with rights of its own , beginning with the right to life! If someone were to tear apart a baby animal they would b arrested, how can u even consider putting the ability to tear apart a human being in the constitution of our once great state! Everybody must face God at some time and an account must b given!
"I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians."
I disagree with hj1, we don't need a constitution amendment for abortion. We need to protect women and preborn children. I support hj2, restoration of voting rights. I am against hj9,,. We can protect same sex couple unions with out redefining marriage, which is a union of one man and one woman.
I strongly oppose HJ1. Abortion is murder of a helpless unborn child. How can Virginia purposely condone this action. A person is created at the moment of conception as at that instant a new, different organism and soul is created. I support HJ2. Once a person has paid his/her debt to society, there full citizenship should be restored. I strongly oppose HJ9. Marriage is between one man and one woman. How else is our race propagated. For thousands of years this view of marriage has existed, and we are here because of it. The legal and societal advantages of being married are consistent with with raising a family (having children). It's grossly arrogant to even consider this amendment.
Unlimited abortion is criminal. 2 humans are involved. 1. the mother. 2. the baby. The mother is not aborting herself but rather her baby. Exceptions are warranted for rape ,incest, and the life of the mother. The reproductive rights of the infants being murdered must also be protected. A time limit, like the 15 week period endorsed by Governor Youngkin, has to be respected except for cases of the physical life of the mother and miscarriages. No one has the right to murder a viable baby except for the physical life and safety of the mother. Marriage is between one man and one woman. Men and women bring different qualities to a marriage. God did not create a super gender where one sex can do everything. Men in general are stronger , but women provide other qualities that compensate. A good man and a good woman is a combination that can't be beat.
Please, please do not pass this radical amendment which will end thousands, even millions of innocent human lives. At a minimum Virginia must have safeguards to protect the health, safety and lives of women and the unborn. Woman deserve more respect and support rather than being coerced, in many situation deliberately or through pressure from our abortion culture, to take this drastic step.
Looking for more information
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. This would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born.
Please say no to killing babies
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Please reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – Please support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – Please oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
it would take away all restrictions on abortions even parental consent and the science showing that the unborn is growing and a developing human being
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
The most fragile members of our society deserve to be protected by the law, not trampled upon and ignored. The unborn throughout all stages of pregnancy are considered to be human beings and their lives should be protected by the law in all circumstances. The “right” to reproductive freedom will never supersede an individual’s right to life. This “right” will corrupt our society into becoming selfish minded individuals chained to their passions without any regard for their actions. Under this law, twisted individuals will be allowed to abuse the law and obtain an abortion in the ninth month of pregnancy or obtain many abortions because they can. I am understanding that the majority of those obtaining abortions are in a dark place, believing that they need to kill their offspring in order to continue their current way of living. I understand they may lose their job, dreams, financial security, respect from others, education, and more, but since when has it been ok to kill in order to keep those things? Not under any US law that I have heard of. Instead of rushing to put a bandaid on an obviously more complicated issue, why aren’t we funding charities and providing resources, help, and hope for these poor individuals? I am telling you this problem will only get worse and society will continue to cripple if we continue to kill and destroy the innocent instead of reaching out and helping the women who are struggling.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I request that HJ1 be totally opposed! Not only is it a health risk to the mother but a violation and denial of the value of the human life she carries within her. I strongly Oppose this unconsciencionable Amendment !!!!!
Vote NO and scrap HJ1. God forbade the intentional killing of innocent human beings when He commanded "thou shall not murder." Abortion is murder. This proposed amendment hides behind the euphemism "reproductive freedom." In reality, it addresses whether or not a woman (and any co-conspirator) should be able to terminate the living child within her without exception and without consequence. There is no God-given right to murder one's child. Regardless of a child's age or the situation in which they were conceived, every child is endowed with the same right to life as every adult. The role of government officials is to protect that God-given right. Government officials have no authority to pervert the law, trample the rights of individuals, set arbitrary standards regarding human life, nor discriminate which humans may or may not exercise their right to live. Members of the Virginia House of Delegates must abandon the evil pursuit spelled out in HJ1. You are in a position of authority because God ordained it. From the book of Romans, Chapter 13: "there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God." Furthermore, your role is to uphold what is good and to punish what is evil. The intentional destruction of an innocent pre-born child is blatantly evil. Disobey God, and you will face His wrath and judgement. You will bring destruction upon your locality and her citizens. The books of Deuteronomy (chapter 28) and Leviticus (chapter 26) detail God's punishment for disobedience. Thousands of years of human history testify to God's consequences for nations and people-groups who embrace child-sacrifice, what modern Americans call abortion or, worse yet, reproductive freedom. Legislator, are you a Christian? Then you understand your obligation is to God first and foremost. You have a duty to defend life. As recorded in the book of Matthew (chapter 25), Jesus said "Assuredly, I say to you, inasmuch as you did it to one of the least of these My brethren, you did it to Me." He further stated "Assuredly, I say to you, inasmuch as you did NOT do it to one of the least of these, you did NOT do it to Me" (emphasis added). Your role is to ensure our Virginia laws reflect what is good and right, not what is evil. And you cannot feign ignorance about the evils of abortion, nor can you hide behind the whims of God-hating constituents. If you are not a Christian, I implore you to repent of your rebellion against God. Turn to Jesus the Christ for your salvation and healing. As stated in the book of Romans, "if you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus and believe in your heart that God has raised Him from the dead, you will be saved. " Vote NO and scrap HJ1. Honor God, defend life, protect our children, do not promote evil.
HJ1 - Abortion is Murder. We must protect mothers and the unborn. What will our state be if HJ1 is allowed in our constitution? Abortion is always wrong. There are people and places to help mothers and protect the unborn. HJ2 - I support all who have completed their sentences and can vote. HJ9 - I oppose HJ9-God made us Male and Female , and marriage is the union between one man and one woman (period).
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
It is distressing that Virginia is poised to turn the corner into abortion on demand. Virginia has said that we are a place of and for all people. Excluding unborn people from that consideration is the opposite of what we should be. There are many common sense laws that can and should be allowed to come forth for consideration as time goes, and this constitutional amendment would preclude that from happening. How can we allow ourselves to become this barbaric and uncaring? Locking in the inability of future legislators to pass laws that reflect compassion and a deep concern for women, children, and families is truly shortsighted. We will hold you accountable of you trust to take us down this path. Learn the lesson: your political future can change in an instant. Virginians do not want this emphasis on death and mischaracterizatuon of it as freedom.
There MUST NEVER be vane-legal leg to stand on for abortion/murder-on-demand IN OUR CONSTITUTION...and to attempt to stealthily (behind-closed-doors)committee this...is attempting to seize all Virginians to be complicit in DemonicDemocrat pro'infantecide-for-hire' witchcraft and murder. SHUT THIS DOWN NOW! What stupid demonic poor poor poor excuses for human beings forwarded this to begin with? .. I want a list of all their names and phone numbers.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I am commenting in favor of protecting reproductive rights and the rights of consenting adults to marry. As seen in other states, if reproductive rights are not protected women will die. The United States has one of the highest maternal death rates in the developed world. The focus should be on expanding access to reproductive health care, not reducing them.
I strongly support the passing of all three of these bills. Ensuring equal rights, voting rights, and reproductive rights is important to me and my family.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians. Every child deserves a chance. Regardless of our age, ability, or any other circumstances, every one of us, as humans, inherently possess extraordinary dignity, value, and worth, from the creation of our unalienable Life, until our natural death.
I oppose a constitutional right to abortion which would in effect foreclose any future legal protections for the life of a pre born infant in the womb
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1 -Abortion I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law
I strongly support HJ1. My reproductive freedom and that of my fellow constituents are at risk without protection at a state level. Supporting reproductive freedom is not simply a pro-abortion stance; it is the recognition that without bodily autonomy and choice for one's own medical decisions, freedoms do not equitably apply in our state policies.
I strongly oppose the right to abortion within Virginia as science is very clear that abortion ends a human life. No legislator or any person has the right to terminate a human life, especially an extreme measure allowing abortion throughout pregnancy!! I This is reckless and unrestricted. All human life is precious and should be protected! I am in favor of restoring voting rights to those who have completed their sentences. I am strongly opposed to any measure that attempts to change the definition of marriage. Marriage is between a man and woman as its natural purpose is procreation. All other lifestyles are partnerships that cannot nor should ever be deemed “marriage.” Thank you for listening to my voice! Michelle H Grau
To Whom it May Concern: I strongly support this amendment to secure the autonomy of a woman and her right to manage pregnancy or the prospect of pregnancy as she sees fit. If we would not require a woman to provide bodily support for humans outside the womb, it does not make sense that the state would require bodily support pre-birth. To do so would deny a woman her fundamental freedoms and turn her into a slave to reproduction. Please pass this amendment.
HJ 1 – I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1: Freedom of religion also means freedom *from* religion. Other people's religious beliefs should have no power over a woman's ability to make choices that directly impact her life. With that in mind, I urge you to amend the Virginia state constitution to guarantee access to birth control, abortion and other aspects of reproductive health. Whether someone chooses to use those services is a personal health decision that they should be able to make as needed. Abortion up to viability, when the fetus can sustain its own life, is reasonable and should be the norm. Protecting women means enabling them to access the healthcare they require, when they require it. To ban abortion is to invite death to Virginia. We will see women, like the teenager in Texas and the two women in Georgia, who die because they aren't able to access the healthcare they need. We will see a serious decline in healthcare providers choosing to come to Virginia. There will be economic consequences to banning abortion and reproductive healthcare access in Virginia. It must be enshrined as a right. HJ2: Restore the right to vote once felons have completed their sentence. Their sentence is their debt to society, and they should be enabled and empowered to re-enter society once that debt has been paid. Convicted felons are citizens like any others and should have the right to have their voices heard, which includes being able to choose who represents them after their sentence has been served. HJ9: Any two people should be allowed to marry, regardless of their genders and/or sexes. There is absolutely no reason to deny two people the right to marry. There are many legal, non-religious reasons why same-sex couples would marry, and there's no reason not to extend the same legal protections that heterosexual couples would have. Anyone who says marriage is between a man and a woman only is speaking from a religious point of view, which is their right. However, freedom of religion also means freedom *from* religion, and religious viewpoints should not dictate the law, which is applied to all citizens, regardless of religion.
Let’s be honest! HJ1 seeks abortion on demand throughout all nine months of pregnancy, including for minors without parental notice or consent, without clinic health standards so Virginia can end up with more notorious clinics like Gosnell’s in Philadelphia! This radical agenda will hurt, not help women! In 1970, a medical journal called “California Medicine” stated in “A New Ethic for Medicine and Society,” “…it has been necessary to separate the idea of abortion from the idea of killing…the result has been a curious avoidance of the scientific fact, which everyone really knows, that human life begins at conception…the very considerable semantic gymnastics which are required to rationalize abortion as anything but taking a human life would be ludicrous if they were not often put forth under socially impeccable auspices…” In other words, the public had to be fooled by some in medicine, into promoting the killing of male and female, black, brown and white, and every race of preborn babies! The United States is one of only 7 countries in the entire world which presently allows abortion past 20 weeks. The others are China, North Korea, Canada, Netherlands (24 weeks), Singapore (24 weeks), and Vietnam. And we want Virginia to extend the killing of babies up to full-term, 40 weeks gestation? At the same time, the raunchy books being placed in school libraries and pornographic sex education in classrooms are tempting young people to experiment with sex, providing a steady stream of preborn babies for abortion mills to increase their profit margins. And, the larger the baby aborted, the more valuable are their body parts, put up for sale on the internet. Does anyone inform the mothers of these aborted babies that their child’s organs were put up for sale? Perpetrators of these heinous acts continue to trade in human flesh while those who exposed these crimes have continued to be prosecuted. Please read about the former abortionists who admit they were in the abortion business mostly for the money, who eventually saw the light and now speak out against the crime of abortion: Dr. Bernard Nathanson, Dr. Carol Everett, Dr. Anthony Levatino, are a few that come to mind, but there are many more. If anyone one of you on this Committee have held an infant in your arms, you know the extreme joy that a new baby brings! So many women who started their pregnancy in difficult circumstances, end up realizing their child was worth every challenge. To women contemplating abortion, know that you are stronger than those who say you should not delay your education or impact your present employment, or you simply cannot afford a baby, or it is more merciful to end the life of a child doomed to a difficult life. Do not give in to these words of despair. Do not lose heart! You are more resilient and capable than the naysayers! Don’t risk living the rest of your lives with profound regrets. Pro-life pregnancy centers stand ready to support your decision to give your child life! A preborn child is not garbage and should never be treated as such. We all know that each one of us began our lives in our mothers’ wombs. Women deserve better than abortion!
I do not approve of abortion except in the case of life and death of the mother.
"I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians."
My family opposes passage of HJ1. This amendment will prevent Virginians from passing any laws that will protect unborn children, and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. We want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians
I oppose the passage of HJ1 because this amendment would prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws to protect those with no voices of their own, unborn children, and this amendment could overturn pro-life laws that are already in place. Virginia should focus on protecting all lives, especially those of children (born and unborn).
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
"I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians." Please choose life and save our babies! Remember, your mom chose you when you were an unborn child!
Reproductive Health Every Virginian should have access to affordable, quality healthcare, including abortion and birth control, with the freedom to make private reproductive choices. Abortion must remain safe, legal, and guided by medical professionals. Protecting reproductive rights safeguards other freedoms, such as marriage equality, contraception access, and privacy in personal decisions. The right to choose also supports racial and economic equality, as marginalized communities face greater barriers to adequate healthcare. Reproductive decisions affect overall well-being, including financial stability, housing, employment, and family support. Voting Rights Restoration Most Virginians believe all qualified citizens deserve voting rights, including those who’ve served felony sentences and people with disabilities who wish to vote. I support a constitutional amendment for automatic rights restoration upon sentence completion, with no extra steps, and to protect the voting rights of people with disabilities unless a court rules otherwise. Voting rights should not be permanently lost due to past mistakes. Virginia should amend its Constitution to ensure fair restoration and foster civic participation. Marriage Equality Virginia’s marriage equality ban no longer reflects the beliefs of its citizens. A 2021 poll showed 71% of Virginians support same-sex marriage, up from just 47% in 2006, highlighting a major shift in public opinion. Given this change, it’s time to remove the outdated ban from Virginia’s constitution. With the rollback of Roe v. Wade, national marriage equality could also be at risk, and Virginia should lead in protecting all citizens' rights. If the state truly is “for lovers,” it must affirm that love is love for everyone.
As a woman, I understand wanting freedom! I love the freedoms I have. However, freedom is intended for every woman--that includes women in the womb! My freedom ends where someone else's freedom begins. What we must realize is that as a woman, I have a choice! I have a choice to use contraceptives! I have a choice to abstain from sexual intercourse! Both of these are choices that NO ONE has power over me to make. However, when a child is conceived--that child has the freedom and right to live. My choice ends where the child in my womb's life begins which scientifically we know is at conception. To enshrine this right into our constitution prevents any changes going forward on any change of thought or culture or mind. Just as the Obergefell decision changed marriage for the country, we do not want to "enshrine" this "right" to the Virginia Commonwealth Constitution.
I urge you to choose life, to support families, and not turn a blind eye to our Lord. Life begins at conception. That is a scientific fact. The unborn child is the most innocent and we should protect them at EVERY stage of development. There should never be a 'right' to kill another innocent human being. Unborn children are just that - innocent human beings.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect women and unborn children and could mean that current pro-life laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of ALL Virginians.
As a Virginia constituent, I urge you to support the passage of HJ1. Additionally, I urge you to disregard all comments invoking God as justification for supporting HJ1; while faith is an admirable personal belief, there's no place for it in Commonwealth law, the birthplace of Separation of Church and State.
HJ1: Please vote to amend the Virginia state constitution to guarantee access to birth control, abortion and other aspects of reproductive health. This is what Virginians clearly want, and a fanatical minority should not be able to take our rights away based on their own religious beliefs. HJ2: Please vote to establish routine restoration of voting rights for felons. Once a person's time has been served, they are ready to re-enter society and should have the same rights as any other citizen. HJ3: Please vote to establish the right of same sex individuals to marry. Again, this is what Virginians want, and a fanatical minority should not be able to impose their religious beliefs on the rest of us. Thank you.
Virginia should not strive to have laws protecting abortion that are more extreme than even some of our allies all over the world. Remember that a majority still see that abortion up to birth is not a good idea. Please consider more balanced options when deciding on such laws. Are we wanting to be "pro-choice" or simply "pro-abortion"?
As a citizen of this great Commonwealth, I am writing to ask the House to vote FOR HJ 1, HJ2, and HJ 9. No one should make decisions for a woman’s health other than the woman herself. Women will die if this bill is passed, as we have seen in other states where this has been voted into law. Please support HJ2, as everyone deserves to vote in the state where they live and work. Please support HJ9, as everyone has the right to marriage, regardless of who they love. Virginia is for LOVERS, not backward bigots.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I urge the committee to protect the right to reproductive freedom in the Constitution of Virginia. Reproductive healthcare, including abortion, is essential healthcare for women and individuals who can become pregnant. As I look forward to starting a family of my own in the next few years, the possibility of reproductive healthcare and abortion being out of reach for me inhibits my decision as complications in pregnancy are incredibly common. Many women in states with abortion bans have died or lost the ability to become pregnant after pregnancy complications that could have been prevented with abortion or reproductive healthcare. I do not wish to die or lose the ability to become pregnant as doctors and healthcare providers worry about following the law when my life is on the line. It is your duty to protect and support the people in Virginia. I ask that you please protect myself, my future child, and all Virginians by enshrining the right to reproductive freedom into law in the state of Virginia.
"I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians."
HJ1 - I strongly oppose enshrining a "right" to abortion in Virginia's constitution and, instead of expanding abortion urge you to work for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ2 - all people who have completed their sentences should have the voting rights restored HJ9 - marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. As a result, I oppose HJ9 which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
Good afternoon, I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current pro-life laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians. Let’s build up and protect the residents of the beautiful state of Virginia, and not kill the most vulnerable of our population, unborn babies, who need our protection the most! Thank you for your time.
Reproductive choices begin long before conception. We are a free people with the right to govern ourselves. Let us as Virginians value the governing of our bodies in ways that uphold the privilege and beauty of creating a new life. Let us put our state’s resources toward teaching self-government, protecting that tiny life, and supporting mothers and families in giving children the best chance of health and happiness. Anything less is beneath us as a free and just nation. Please do not codify in the laws of Virginia a practice which presumes we are incapable of self-government and benevolence. What free and just people would destroy a helpless innocent—and subsidize that destruction—rather than using those resources to help and lift mothers, children, and families? Please vote NO on HJ1. We are better than that.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
As a concerned citizen of Virginia, I am writing to express my strong support for protecting women's reproductive rights and advancing same-sex marriage. These issues are fundamental to the values of equality, autonomy, and dignity that our great Commonwealth stands for. Women's reproductive rights enable individuals to make informed decisions about their health and future. Virginia must continue to uphold and protect the right of women to access safe and legal reproductive healthcare, including contraception and abortion services. Denying these rights not only endangers the health and well-being of women but also undermines their ability to participate fully in society. Every person should have the autonomy to make decisions regarding their own body without interference from governmental restrictions or societal judgment. Similarly, the right to marry is a cornerstone of personal freedom and equality. Same-sex couples deserve the same legal recognition and protections afforded to heterosexual couples. Love is love, and denying this fundamental right to same-sex couples is a violation of basic human rights. The Virginia House of Delegates has the opportunity to lead by example, championing inclusivity and ensuring that all families in our state are treated equally under the law. Both of these issues are about protecting individual freedoms and fostering a compassionate and progressive society. As we move forward, we must create an environment where all individuals can live authentically and pursue their dreams without fear of discrimination or judgment. I urge you to stand firmly in support of protecting women's reproductive rights and advancing the rights of same-sex couples. Your leadership on these matters will send a powerful message that Virginia is committed to equality, justice, and respect for all citizens. Thank you for your attention to these critical issues. I appreciate your service to our community and look forward to seeing positive progress in the Virginia House of Delegates.
I strongly condemn the proposed amendment regarding the taking of innocent human life. Abortion is the tragic ending of a unique and precious life. This law will perpetuate a culture that devalues human life and undermines the fundamental right to life I believe that every human life is sacred, regardless of age, size, development, or condition of dependency. We call upon lawmakers to protect the lives of the unborn and to promote policies that support mothers and families. It is our moral obligation to defend the most vulnerable members of our society. We urge you to reject this amendment and instead codify the reality that every child and citizen is welcomed and protected.
I strongly oppose creating an amendment that promotes the egregious violation of the rights of those who have no voice to protest. While there are many, many improvements to the care for mothers and children that need to implemented, killing the child - regardless of the circumstances of their conception - only perpetuates these evils in our society. As Americans, we have professed since our founding that Life is the preeminent, inalienable right that we are entitled to by our inherent human dignity. There are many gross violations of this dignity in our society today, both sanctioned and in sanctioned, but how is this a surprise when from the very beginning we demonstrate how little we care for that right and dignity? Abortion does not solve these problems and frequently creates new ones as the mothers deal with the mental, physical, and emotional fallout of such a difficult decision, often alone and unsupported. Please help to create a more just and loving society by protecting the rights of our most vulnerable to simply exist, and then work towards greater care for them and their parents throughout and after the pregnancy.
I strongly support all three of these bills. Please pass HJ1 and support womens' rights to choose the healthcare that is best for them. Please pass HJ2 and protect voting rights. Please pass HJ9 and protect marriage equality.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
I believe that life starts at conception and I am against HJ1. I do not want my tax dollars going towards anything like this.
I oppose the passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current pro-life laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
I hereby implore the Virginia House of Delegates to ratify the Constitution of Virginia and grant: HJ1 - Herring: The right to reproductive freedom HJ9 - Sickles: The right to lawful marriage between consenting adults regardless of the sex, gender, race, or religion of such parties
I oppose any legislation advancing the murder misguidedly called abortion as well as legislation defining or weakening marriage as anything other than between one man and one woman. I oppose restoring voting rights to convicted felons unless pardoned by the governor or legislature.
The purpose of government is to *PROTECT* the humans rights: life, liberty, and property. These rights are listed in the order of priority; life is the foremost right. In the rare instances where rights conflict, the higher right must be given priority. Thus, the right of an unborn child to live from conception to natural death overrides the liberty rights of the child's mother (which are true and legitimate, and take precedence in most other contexts). Abortion can only be permitted by a just government if the mother's right to live is under threat -- that is, when two persons' rights to life are in direct conflict with one another. Elevating liberty rights above life rights, as this resolution would, is deeply immoral. It violates the most sacred principles under which a just government must operate, which is based on the basic principles that human beings have unalienable human rights. This is not a strictly religious principle; it is based on the same enlightenment principles that inform our whole system of free government. Virginia made this error before. It once improperly elevated the property rights of slave owners above the liberty rights of their purported slaves. This was unjust. It is a stain on the soul of this commonwealth. Elevating women's liberty rights above the life rights of their unborn children would be equally unjust. It would be another stain on our soul. If we adopt this inversion of rights into law, our posterity will judge us as harshly as we judge those who made the same error two centuries ago.
I oppose the abortion amendment to our state constitution. This amendment would put VA abortion law on par with North Korea and China. Most European countries have a limit on abortions around 12-15 weeks. This state constitution would prohibit laws limiting abortions when the baby can feel pain, or when it is viable outside of the womb. It’s barbaric. Abortion should be illegal altogether as it violates the constitutional rights of the growing human in the womb. Do not approve this amendment.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
People know their bodies best and should, with the help of medical professional input if wanted, have the right to make their own healthcare decisions.
Hello House Privileges and Elections Committee, I am writing to voice my support for HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Let’s get these Constitutional Amendments on the ballot to secure our individual freedoms. Thank you,
HJ1 Please do not make abortion a constitutional right. Please protect unborn children and their parents. We should be working to help parents and their children, not kill the most defenseless in the womb. HJ2. Please restore voting rights to persons who have completed their sentences. HJ9. Marriage is a union of one man and one woman. It has been so before the beginnings of government and organized society. Please do not try to make so called "same-sex" marriage a constitutional right.
It is easy to say you are against reproductive healthcare for women when you ignore the far reaching issues that occur AFTER that "life" arrives in the world. As someone who was in and out of the VA foster care system as a child, who lived in horrible conditions, who was abused, I can say that I would never wish for another child to end up going through the things I have. And the unfortunate reality is that when you FORCE women to have babies they are not mentally, physically, financially able to provide for you are condeming those children to grow up in poverty, in abusive homes, being placed in an overburdened foster care system, etc. Just because a woman is FORCED to have that child, it doesn't mean they will put it up for adoption (that is the least likely outcome when considering you are forcing someone to put their body through one of the most risky, stressful, painful, traumatic experiences... they aren't going through all that just to hand over that child... and we also know most people wanting to adopt are looking for WHITE healthy babies, not babies with severe health issues or deformities, or babies with different skin colors/nationalities). It is easy to scream about how it is murder when YOU aren't the one taking on the risk to your own health/life, when you aren't the one taking on the huge medical debt for prenatal care and delivery, when you don't have to worry about your income being cut off if you are unable to work or as you recover from delivering a child, when you don't have to worry about paying for all of that child's needs, when you don't have to find or pay for the insanely expensive childcare. Those screaming about these "babies" are the same ones complaining about those who are on state assistance programs because they can't financially take care of the kids they have. If it was actually about caring about "life" there would be more effort put into increasing financial supports for medical care, paid maternity leave, housing assistance, food assistance, childcare assistance, etc. And if those "babies" end up being part of the LGBTQ+ community later on, well the same people screaming about being pro-life will be demanding that their ability to exist be taken away. It's only about pro-life until those babies are born, then they move onto complaining about the burden those babies are putting on our federal and state budgets. And all those in the comments who have talked about needing to replenish our population for our economy, well that right there shows it isn't about the well-being of a baby, but about controlling /forcing women to pop out future workers!!! It reduces the value of a woman's life to being nothing more than an incubator, like livestock used for breeding. If men were the ones that could get pregnant this wouldn't even be up for negotiation because no one has ever tried to regulate a man's body or their ability to make medical decisions for themselves. A non-viable fetus should not be given more consideration than a living breathing human being. No one can be forced to donate their organs to sustain someone else's life, well a woman should not be forced against her will to give their body to sustain another life. And every human being should have the right to love who they want, to marry who they want, regardless of what some religions believe. Our constitution and founding fathers clearly state that our nation shall not impose religion on anyone.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Honorable Members of the Virginia Legislature, I humbly implore you, in light of the law of the only living God who revealed Himself in Jesus Christ, who was crucified, died, and was buried—and who rose again on the third day and now sits at the right hand of God, reigning over all, preparing to judge the world with perfect justice. His mercy is presently offered, but His patience should not be mistaken for indifference. With this in mind, I appeal to you to consider the profound moral implications of enshrining the practice of abortion into our state’s constitution. While often defended as a right, abortion is, in truth, the taking of innocent life, and as such, it directly opposes the sanctity and dignity of life that God has ordained. I urge you, with all respect, to refrain from advancing this legislation, which promotes what Scripture reveals as an offense to God. There is a higher law that stands above human legislation, one to which each of us will ultimately be held accountable. It is my hope and prayer that you may choose a path that values and protects the lives of the most vulnerable among us. Thank you for your time, and may God’s wisdom and grace guide you in making a decision that honors Him and safeguards all life. Sincerely, Spencer Cameron
Please, for the sanctity of human life, DO NOT put this into play. Abortion is murder.
I oppose HJ1
Please stand strong in defense and preservation of life and oppose this bill. Thank you!
I oppose HJ1 because I am concerned it will undo current laws that protect unborn life and vulnerable women, such as parental consent laws and waiting periods. I am concerned passage of HJ1 would prevent us from passing more laws to help protect children in the womb and their mothers.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. It could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. Justice requires it. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
It has been established by embryologists that life begins at conception. Therefore, this bill affords ample opportunity to set a precedence for the willful termination of innocent life at any point. In Virginia, if a woman carrying a preborn child, (remember, this stage of life in the womb is the first stage of all human life, note: keyword “life“), is murdered, and her child in the womb is also murdered, this is considered a crime against both the mother and the child. It is the slaying of two innocent victims. To codify intentional abortion at any stage of pregnancy codifies murder. It will open the door to the right to kill the disadvantaged and poor, the physically or mentally challenged, the elderly, and so on. It is inconsistent with the job God has given you to do to pass this atrocity. It is against the Law of God and is unjust. Found in Proverbs, the book of biblical wisdom, chapter 24 or the following words, “if you faint in the day of adversity, your strength is small. Deliver those who are drawn toward death and hold back those stumbling to the slaughter. If you say, ‘surely we did not know this,’ does not He who weighs the hearts consider it? He who keeps your soul, does He not know it? And will not He render to each man according to his deeds?“ You must not embrace evil.
I strongly support the proposed constitutional amendment to enshrine the fundamental right to reproductive freedom in Virginia's constitution. The right to make personal decisions about one's reproductive health is a fundamental aspect of individual privacy and personal responsibility. Each person should have the freedom to make informed choices about their own body, without government interference. This amendment will protect the autonomy and dignity of all Virginians, ensuring that reproductive decisions are made privately and thoughtfully, based on individual circumstances, not political agendas. By safeguarding this right, we honor the principles of personal responsibility and privacy, which are cornerstones of a just and equitable society. This amendment is vital to preserving the rights and freedoms that define our Commonwealth.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. Furthermore, I do support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. Finally, I oppose HJ9 which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. I appreciate your time to read my letter and for working for the common good of the Commonwealth of Virginia.
Honorable Members of the Virginia Legislature, I humbly implore you, in light of the law of the only living God who revealed Himself in Jesus Christ, who was crucified, died, and was buried—and who rose again on the third day and now sits at the right hand of God, reigning over all, preparing to judge the world with perfect justice. His mercy is presently offered, but His patience should not be mistaken for indifference. With this in mind, I appeal to you to consider the profound moral implications of enshrining the practice of abortion into our state’s constitution. While often defended as a right, abortion is, in truth, the taking of innocent life, and as such, it directly opposes the sanctity and dignity of life that God has ordained. I urge you, with all respect, to refrain from advancing this legislation, which promotes what Scripture reveals as an offense to God. There is a higher law that stands above human legislation, one to which each of us will ultimately be held accountable. It is my hope and prayer that you may choose a path that values and protects the lives of the most vulnerable among us. Thank you for your time, and may God’s wisdom and grace guide you in making a decision that honors Him and safeguards all life. Sincerely, Matthew Patti
The People’s Notice OF MALADMINISTRATION To THE Virginia General assembly DUE TO THE unconstitutional proposed Virginia Right to Reproductive Freedom Amendment My Delegate and Senator and this committee will receive asigned copy of this notice certified return receipt copied to the officials named on the first page of the pdf with 5 business days to respond. Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal and Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent I, Catherine Carter, One of The People (as seen in Article I Sections 2 in the Constitution of Virginia) Sui Juris, do now present you with this notice, so that you and your agents may provide due care: (See evidence below) Constitution of Virginia Article I Section 2: People the Source of Power That all power is vested in and consequently derived from, the people, that magistrates are their trustees and servants, and at all times amenable to them. Please take notice that the proposed Virginia Right to Reproductive Freedom Amendment is unonstitutional and to put such amendment on a ballot places the General Assembly in danger of maladministration due to violation of Article I Sections 3 and I1 due to deprivation of the right of our posterity to the enjoyment of life, safety, and happiness without due process of law. (See evidence below) Constitution of Virginia of Article I Section 1: Equality and Rights of Men. “That all men are by nature equally free and independent and have certain inherent rights, of which, when they enter into a state of society, they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their posterity; namely, the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety.” Constitution of Virginia Article I Section 3: Government Instituted for Common Benefit. of all the various modes and forms of government, that is best which is capable of producing the greatest degree of happiness and safety, and is most effectually secured against the danger of maladministration; and, whenever any government shall be found inadequate or contrary to these purposes, a majority of the community hath an indubitable, inalienable, and indefeasible right to reform, alter, or abolish it, in such manner as shall be judged most conducive to the public weal.” [good, prosperity; excerpt] Maxim of Law. An amendment [to the originial instrument] is not a repeal. [Fundamental principles are not annulled by amendment.] Mass. Bond & Ins. Co. v. U.S., 352 u.s. 128, 139. Please take notice, the people wish for the General Assembly to show where in the Virginia Bill of Rights their is clear grant of authority for you to amend the Constitution of Virginia and impair the obligation of contracts by depriving or divesting their posterity of the right to life, liberty or property without due process. (see evidence below) Constitution of Virginia Article I Section 11: Due process of law; obligation of contracts; taking or damaging private property; prohibited discrimination; Jury trial in civil cases. That no person shall be deprived of his life, liberty, or property without due process of law; that the General Assembly shall not pass any law impairing the obligation of contracts. . . . (excerpt)
I respectfully ask that you use the same values about abortion that you use for other constituents. Born or unborn, a beating heart is a life. If you would not allow an individual to kill someone outside of the womb whose heart is beating such as in euthanasia- why would you allow someone to kill a beating heart who is still growing?
I OPPOSE the proposed constitutional amendment due to the fact that it would create a super-right to abortion against the very right to life, which is foundational for all other rights. The language of this amendment goes far beyond Roe v. Wade as it would establish a right to abortion with NO gestational limits. Second and third trimester elective abortions do occur and they are both painful for the human fetus and the later in pregnancy they occur are progressively dangerous for the woman. If enacted, this amendment would also interfere with parental rights to be involved when their minor child is facing a crisis pregnancy.
As a woman and mother of 3 daughters in Virginia I support this amendment. I value life and that includes the life of the young women across the Commonwealth who already born and deserve their rights to their bodily autonomy. There are already too many women being harmed, and even dying, due to arbitrary abortion laws that restrict the medical professionals from making decisions with their pregnant patient. Abortions beyond 20 weeks make up less than 1% of abortions and these are due to both life threatening pregnancies or severe real abnormalities not comparable with lives. We should NOT be adding the burden of legal fears to these heartbreaking decisions. Please vote to support this constitutional amendment.
I oppose this bill.
HJ1: language should be added that defines and safeguards parental rights - requiring their informed consent and permission, and notification where their minor children are concerned with anything "reproductive" related and distinguishes between adults and minors, especially where "medical ender affirming care" or abortion are concerned with regard to minors - children under 18. HJ9: Marriage should be defined as between TWO ADULT human beings/homo-sapiens and what the nature of that contract is. It's a sad state we have come to where one must insist on these definitions, but based on the trends, we must insist. HJ2: Qualifications of voters - Why is there any necessity for this amendment? The ability to vote in Virginia should be restricted (as it currently is) to ONLY verifiable Citizens of the United States of America AND Virginians - to Citizens of Virginia - adults - 18 yrs and older. We should require a government issued photo ID , reduce the days of voting perhaps down to several days (not what it currently is) and return to physical paper ballots, hand counted. We can still make voting easy for qualified, verifiable Citizens AND secure the election process by making it difficult to engage in fraudulent election activities. I've attached a thoughtful article on considerations for all three proposed amendments - written by Dr. Sheila Furey of the Virginia Medical Freedom Alliance. I think these are important aspects to consider with each of the above. Thank you.
I want to state that I am opposed to bill HJ1. All life is sacred, from conception to natural death, regardless of how the conception of the life took place. Only God decides when life begins and when life ends.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2 and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I am reaching out as a concerned Virginian citizen about the proposal to enshrine a right to reproductive freedom in Virginia's constitution. This will open the door to abortion through all nine months of pregnancy. Virginia has never allowed abortion up until birth and of the people who support abortion, less than a quarter of them support third trimester abortions. This stance is too extreme for Virginia. This proposal will block protection from minors undergoing abortion and other harmful reproductive practices by removing parental knowledge and consent. It will make abortion practices even more dangerous by limiting clinical safety standards and informed consent for women and minors. If you care about your citizens please do not support this proposal.
I oppose this bill.
I am in favor of this amendment. I do not understand why knowledge of human biology is lacking in regard to women's reproductive health . Restrictions on the ability of a woman to have an abortion unless her life is in danger begs the question of who decides that, the doctor, a lawyer , my legislator? Pardon the description here , but you would not eat a piece of meat that has been left out on your kitchen counter for an extended period of time. It would become infested with bacteria and if you ingested it, you would become sick. If a miscarriage occurs in a women's body, the same thing happens. The tissue of the fetus becomes infected with bacteria from her microbiome, (naturally present bacteria that causes no problem provided the tissue is healthy). Unless the tissue from the miscarried fetus is removed, the woman's life is in serious danger of being overwhelmed by the bacteria that has invaded the fetal tissue. Sepsis sets in, the woman will go into septic shock which carries a high mortality rate. No antibiotic can reverse this. The miscarried fetal tissue must be removed.
Abortion should be legal, safe, and the decision left to those who are pregnant with guidance from medical professionals. The stories from states that have blocked abortion care are horrifying, as they result in sub-standard care during pregnancies. I would hate to see Virginia limit choices for its population and its medical professionals.
I support HJ1 as it protects the right to make individual choices with limited interference from government while also allowing for responsible legislation when there is a compelling state interest. Furthermore, it allows women to protect their own right to life, something that legislators in other states have recently demonstrated they are poorly equipped to protect, as evidenced by the deaths of women in Texas due to miscarriage and delayed care as well as the deaths of women in Georgia. As a woman that has suffered severe pregnancy complications which could have resulted in death, I know just how complicated pregnancy can be and how it can forever change you. Trust in the medical system and trust that doctors have a patient's best interest at heart is vital for the best outcomes. In my own case, had I not had this trust, I never would have risked another pregnancy knowing that my risk for complication and death were higher. Knowing I had the freedom to make my own health care choices and trusting my doctor enabled me to take that risk and grow my family. This amendment helps to maintain the trust between patients and their doctors. Pregnancy and "right to life" are complex and are not black and white issues. They should not be treated as such. While some pregnant individuals may make a choice others don't agree with, the greater harm comes through taking away a woman's own free will by taking away her bodily autonomy, which is inhumane. Rather legislators and communities could better spend their energy on addressing the root causes of the choices they don't agree with, such as poverty and healthcare, and strive to improve community conditions which better serve us all. I also support HJ9 because government interference in the personal lives of people should be limited and only allowed within reason. Government interference based on personal religious beliefs in a country that believes in religious freedom goes against the principles of what our country was founded upon. I also support HJ2.
In this day and age with birth control so readily available unwanted pregnancy should not frequently occur other than rape and incest. Never should anyone be able to abort up to the time of birth unless the mother's life is endanger.
I strongly oppose HJ1. In my younger (and not so wise) days, I was mistakenly "pro-choice." However, sometimes, age does in fact bring wisdom. With the advance of medical science, it is very clear that life does, in fact, begin at conception. We need to protect the lives of innocent children / babies who can not (yet) speak for themselves. Also, I have witnessed several of my dear 'sisters' who felt -- at the time -- that they had no choice but to get an abortion due to their personal circumstances -- only to see them suffer life-long regret of this decision. It would be so very tragic to allow the abortion (murder) of babies up until the time of delivery. ALL LIVES are precious. I have great empathy for those who find themselves in the situation of an unwanted pregnancy. However, if abortion is allowed in Virginia, please do not let it be legal through the third trimester. Anyone (both women and men who find themselves in the situation of a potentially unwanted pregnancy) should certainly be able to take personal responsibility and make decisions about that pregnancy LONG before the third trimester.
Honorable Members of the Virginia Legislature, I appeal to you to consider the profound moral implications of enshrining the practice of abortion into our state’s constitution. While often defended as a right, abortion is, in truth, the taking of innocent life, and as such, it directly opposes the sanctity and dignity of life that God has ordained. I urge you, with all respect, to refrain from advancing this legislation, which promotes what Scripture reveals as an offense to God. There is a higher law that stands above human legislation, one to which each of us will ultimately be held accountable. It is my hope and prayer that you may choose a path that values and protects the lives of the most vulnerable among us. Thank you for your time, and may God’s wisdom and grace guide you in making a decision that honors Him and safeguards all life. Sincerely, Melinda Mozingo
I, as a Virginia constituent, am voicing my support for continuing reproductive healthcare AND marriage equality. As a parent and or relative of loving families currently living as a blended and or nonbinary People , I support keeping their rights as equal human beings .
Honorable House of Delegates Members: The fundamental right to reproductive freedom is a misnomer. While championing the right of a woman to choose, it would instantiate in law the permission of a woman to terminate the life of her child. Every life is precious--those born and those unborn, and the only difference between the two is time. Every child conceived, even those conceived in rape, incest, or some other bodily violation of the woman, deserves to live. A child in the womb should not killed for the actions forced upon a mother, nor should a woman who decided to not control her body be allowed to destroy the body of her child in order to preserve her body. The argument for bodily autonomy is a red herring. In every abortion there are two bodies--the mother and the child. It is gross lie to say that the mother has bodily autonomy, while the child does not. The child in her womb is not her body to kill, nor is the child a tumor in her body that she must purge. The only way to kill a child in abortion is to blind the eyes, deaden the conscience, and destroy the soul. Studies have shown that abortions lead to longterm negative physical and psychological effects on the woman, and for our great state of Virginia, the ongoing effects of women, en masse, killing their children is to rob the state of tens of thousands of children who will grow up to be mothers, fathers, scientists, social workers, and sanitation technicians. In all, the Commonwealth of Virginia should do everything in its power to protect life---every life---and should never turn its sword on the most vulnerable. Today, our nation has learned the lessons of discrimination based upon ethnicity, skin color, and socio-economic class. We can all agree that discrimination based upon such external and bodily differences is morally wrong. So too, it is morally wrong before man and God, who gives life to every child in the womb, to kill children in the womb, simply because their mothers do not will for them to live. When an unplanned pregnancy occurs, there are always other ways to proceed besides killing the innocent child. Indeed, putting such a law on the books in Virginia, in the name of bodily autonomy, declares that Virginia is morally bankrupt and barbarous people. Good people do not kill their children and the most vulnerable in their midst; good people protect life and rescue those being taken away to death. If Virginia puts any law in place, it should be one that gives equal protection under the law for all men, women, and children, including those formed in the womb by the God who has given to everyone life, breath, and everything else. I strongly oppose the passage of HJ1 and I ask everyone who fears God to reject this bloody bill.
We receive the righteous principals of blind justice and equality under the law, loving your neighbor as yourself, and the condemnation of murder, from Yahweh, our Heavenly Father, the maker of heaven, earth, and all people. Each of these principles is derived and based on the declaration spoken by Yahweh in Genesis 1. That every person, both male and female, is made in the image of God and therefore has equal value before God and all other creatures. This is why we have blind justice because each person, being equal in value to their fellow man, deserves to be judged based on his actions and not his wealth, skin color, level of education, etc. This is why we are commanded to love our neighbor as ourselves because each person, being equal in value to their fellow man, should not love himself more than those who are equal in value to him. This is why murder is condemned because each person, being equal in value to their fellow man, does not have the right to take the life of another who is equal in value to him. Yahweh, the God who raises up and casts down nations, states, leaders, and rulers, has sovereignly placed each of you into the position of authority that you now hold. Each of you, as described in Romans 13, based on your governing position and authority is a servant to this God, whether you choose to openly acknowledge this reality or not, and therefore has a duty and responsibility to act and serve the constituents of the State of Virginia according the righteous standard that he has spoken through his word. This God has set before you the same choice that he placed before the Israelites through the mouth of Moses in Deuteronomy 30. The opportunity to choose life or death, blessing or curse for the State of Virginia, by outright rejecting or continuing the steps toward unrestrained abortion measures and the destruction of persons made in the image of God. I ask that you choose life and blessing for the State of Virginia.
I oppose passage of HJ1. It strips the rights of Virginians to pass laws that will protect unborn children, and may lead to judges invalidating current prolife laws in Virginia, as we've seen in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass laws that protect the lives of all Virginians, including the unborn.
I identify as pro choice, and I oppose current draft of bill HJ1 because it will permit elective abortion at any gestational age, including into third trimester. At this stage of development fetuses are the same age as premature infants, therefore they are people. According to Gallup, most voters oppose elective third-trimester abortion. Further, because a third-trimester abortion can take three days, and due to increased risk of uterine perforation, an emergency medical situation it is typically safer for the mother to have immediate labor induction. Virginia's current gestational limit has not prevented mothers in emergent life-threatening situations from receiving necessary medical intervention, and change is unnecessary. There are many misconceptions about third-trimester abortion, including that it is primarily used euthanize fetuses with fatal anomalies or to save the life the mother. This was debunked by pro-choice researcher Katrina Kimport at UCSF, who found that reasons people get third-trimester abortions similar those who get earlier abortions. Common reasons included financial issues and not knowing they were pregnant earlier. This means that healthy women abort healthy babies in the third trimester when it is legal.
I am hereby registering my strong opposition to this amendment. It is destructive to human life in the womb, and dangerous for minors. The case against abortion is a no-brainer. How can we take a life for the sake of convenience?
I urge you to pass both of these items. Women deserve bodily autonomy, & same sex couples should have the same right to marry as heterosexual couples... all living, breathing human beings deserve equal rights. There are no laws that tell a man what he can do with his body. Men can receive PREVENTATIVE medical care BEFORE a serious complication occurs. Women deserve the same right. Religion has no place in our laws when those beliefs are not shared by ALL. Most abortions occur within the 1st trimester. Just because a state FORCES a woman to carry an unwanted pregnancy (one that was a result of rape/insest, failed birth control, etc.) it doesn't mean they will agree to give up a child for adoption after they have to carry for 9 months & endure the trauma/ pain of birth. These babies are likely to be brought into financially unstable homes or abusive homes, where they will live in poverty or have their life put into danger. The foster care system is already overflowing with children pulled from these situations & with funding likely to be cut for financial assistance programs it's not fair to expect women to bring a child into the world that they won't have the capability of providing a good life for. Many times, these women already have children at home, & they can't afford another mouth to feed or the additional medical bills, or the time off for any possible complications or time off to recover after delivery. It is easy for pro-life advocates to scream about the "innocent life" when they aren't the ones that have to potentially endanger their own life, take on an additional financial strain, or worry about losing their job/income. Not to mention, there's already a lack of quality, affordable childcare in our state. When you ignore these other factors, you aren't truly concerned about the "life" of a child. The only late-term procedures done are for complications that could endanger a mother's life or for fetal anomalies discovered during an ultrasound. Doctors used to be able to immediately provide preventive care when there was even a possibility of a serious complication that could endanger the mother's life/health, but now in many states these doctor's have to ignore their oath to "first do no harm" to their living breathing patient & wait until a life threatening infection actually occurs before they can provide care, causing unnecessary pain/suffering for their patient, increasing risks for long-term harm to the patients health, & increasing the chance of death. The false propaganda of "after birth" abortions is referring to parents who chose neonatal palliative care, which means they know their child is not viable for sustaining life on its own due to fatal abnormalities These parents make the choice to provide comfort care without prolonging the child's suffering by allowing additional medical intervention that would only delay the child's death while increasing their suffering and pain. No law should be able to interfere in someone's right to decide what is best for their own health. A dead body has more rights than a woman in many states. Restrictive laws aren't going to encourage people to have babies, it's going to encourage women to not even start families because it's no longer worth risking that a complication will happen & having their own life put at risk/less valued than a non-viable fetus.
Abortion to birth is an extreme position. We are against.
Every Virginian should have access to affordable, quality healthcare, including abortion and birth control, with the freedom to make private reproductive choices. Abortion must remain safe, legal, and guided by medical professionals. Women's reproductive health is complicated and decisions need to be made between the patient and her physician.
Re; HJ-1 / Herring. I respectfully, but strongly, condemn the proposed amendment HJ-1. All life, regardless of age, size, development, or condition of dependency is valuable and sacred. Pre-born children in their mothers' wombs are the most fragile and vulnerable members of society, and as such deserve our vigilant protection. Unrestricted abortion does not make good sense in terms or health, moral, medical, economic (including population growth), or social health for women in VA or our state as a whole. Unrestricted abortions - whether chemical or surgical - can lead to: physical harm/sterility; depression caused by guilt/regret; and a cover for those perpetrating sex trafficking activities. Additionally, the sexual activity which leads to pregnancies also puts women at risk for STD's . As of March 2024, wric.com reported (CDC data) that the highest rates in VA were Petersburg, Richmond, and Hopewell cities. None of this is good healthcare for women. Dr. Anthony Levatino, an OB-GYN who performed 1,200 abortions reports that out of those, he only had 1 case of rape, 2 of incest, and 9 or 10 at concern of genetic defects. The rest were healthy moms and healthy babies. He later served 9 years on the faculty of Albany Medical Ctr. treating women with the most severe health risks. Abortion procedures, which can take 24-72 hours to dilate the cervix in late term abortions, could actually cost the mother's life in some circumstances. Delivering the babies of these women early was the best health/medical decision for them. Maternal Medicine and Perinatologists specialize in the care of high risk pregnancies to make decisions individually on when an early delivery may happen. But abortion is never medically necessary! Though the child may not always survive, it does not need to be killed. Cardinalnews.org reports in 2024 that " Most of Virginia...has birth rates below the replacement rate," and "New Census Bureau data shows how Northern VA shares certain negative population trends with some of VA's coal counties." March of Dimes.org in Jan. 2024 peristats listed Nat'l. Ctr. for Health Statistics & US Census Bureau data that VA's fertility rate dropped 6.1% between 2012 and 2022. We cannot continue to thrive economically if we are killing off valuable people who will grow up to become businessmen, healthcare providers, engineers, farmers, teachers, chefs, firefighters, police, military service members, etc. But these lives are just not money makers, but are a benefit to society by living. Today.com on Oct. 28, 2024 reported a story about a young man with Down's Syndrome being selected by a fraternity at Clemson. They were actually worried he would not choose them because he was so popular. A brother in Pi Kappa Alpha said," Charlie brings the light to our Chapter house. He's so knowledgeable in all areas of football and just life in general. He brought the happiness we didn't know we were missing." And our own Coastal VA Magazine in Dec. 2023 named VersAbility Resources Nonprofit of the Year, as they help those with disabilities lead "productive and fulfilling lives" which " strengthens the region's economy and quality of life as a whole." Abortion: kills an innocent, helpless child; is never medically necessary to protect the mother and can harm the mother physically, emotionally, and mentally; and damages the economy, population viability, and social fabric of Virginia by ending a life before it can live out his or her purpose.
"I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians."
Honorable Members of the Virginia Legislature, I humbly implore you, in light of the law of the only living God who revealed Himself in Jesus Christ, who was crucified, died, and was buried—and who rose again on the third day and now sits at the right hand of God, reigning over all, preparing to judge the world with perfect justice. His mercy is presently offered, but His patience should not be mistaken for indifference. With this in mind, I appeal to you to consider the profound moral implications of enshrining the practice of abortion into our state’s constitution. While often defended as a right, abortion is, in truth, the taking of innocent life, and as such, it directly opposes the sanctity and dignity of life that God has ordained. I urge you, with all respect, to refrain from advancing this legislation, which promotes what Scripture reveals as an offense to God. There is a higher law that stands above human legislation, one to which each of us will ultimately be held accountable. It is my hope and prayer that you may choose a path that values and protects the lives of the most vulnerable among us. Thank you for your time, and may God’s wisdom and grace guide you in making a decision that honors Him and safeguards all life. Sincerely, Spencer Cameron
I strongly oppose the passage of HJ1. It is a self-evident truth that every person conceived has the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Lives in every generation in Virginia—especially pertaining to physical life—should be protected from conception to natural death. It's time to step forward, not backward. All human life is precious and deserves our support.
Please do not cast a vote supporting this anti-life proposal. Abortion is not a right. It is the taking of a life of an innocent victim.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose the passage of HJ1. This amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children.
Protecting the freedom of marriage equality, voting and reproductive freedom should be an American fundamental right. Bans as we can see throughout the country, have wreaked havoc on families, individuals, clinics, hospitals and livelihoods. They have created OBGYN deserts throughout the south and Midwest and now doctors and hospital staff are refusing to treat women and people who are pregnant with any type of pregnancy complication and miscarriage management. I have personally lost a friend in Alabama cause they refused to treat her pregnancy complication. She leaves two children behind after something that was treatable. It is absolutely barbaric for anyone getting involved other than the only people who need to be involved. It is not our concern on such matters that are not simple. Enshrining the right to Reproductive Freedom ensures that state politicians are OUT of these decisions. Whether it be IVF, to use or not use birth control, birth plans, abortion, testing and so forth, Women’s health etc the government should not be concerned. I support abortion and the critical healthcare necessity it plays in an array of roles. It is not murder because if it was, more than half of the country would be imprisoned both women, young women, men, young men, doctors, healthcare workers and so forth. Life is taking your first Breath and not having to rely on another humans being internal organs to survive. Nor, do most would care to help the Trans and queer kids that have been ridiculed throughout these communities across Virginia. Only supporting some kids and not all is the basis for respecting all of humanity and the differing peoples religion's, perspectives, culture and so on. Doctors who have sworn an oath to protect patients are having to break this oath everyday in states where families, Women, girls and people who can become pregnant are not protected nor will ever be truly free so long as we keep debating about this issue. This should be left to the families and healthcare teams. As for right marriage, denying anyone regardless of Race, Gender, Class, Ability and so forth Constitutionally discriminatory from every different perspective that tries to undermine this right. Everyone should love who they want and plan their families accordingly. If this is not enshrined, we open the door bigotry, racism, sexism and shutting commonwealth that refuses to see these people for the humans they are. As for the right to vote it should be an absolute fundamental Right. Taking this right away that is in our Federal Constitution is to control the outcomes of every elected office from local districts to federal lands. All three of these should be enshrined for All Virginians. Denying this would deny Virginians to live their lives in the way that’s best for them with no interventions or restrictions to hinder and complicate our ways of life.
I most strongly oppose HJ1! Virginians desire, and must be able, to protect all human life, including unborn babies. HJ1 would prevent us from passing or maintaining laws to protect the most defenseless among us - unborn children. Please do not pass HJ1!
I, as a Virginia constituent, am voicing my support for continuing reproductive healthcare AND marriage equality.
Hello, I hope this finds you all well. In this state we believe in the things our Framers declared in the Declaration of Independance. Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness (as expanded upon by John Locke, means the best life possible for a human being); but the first of these is Life. This amendment is anti- life and directly opposes these beliefs. This amendment is not about "healthcare" but rather a lame excuse for the escaping of reprocussions of non abstinence and safe sex. In essense, it calls for the ending of a life rather than the enhancing of anther and we need to vehemently oppose this amendment on those grounds. Life starts at conception when growth and change occur with Zinc Sparks. More importantly, Psalm 139:13-18 New International Version 13 For you created my inmost being; you knit me together in my mother’s womb. 14 I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made; your works are wonderful, I know that full well. 15 My frame was not hidden from you when I was made in the secret place, when I was woven together in the depths of the earth. 16 Your eyes saw my unformed body; all the days ordained for me were written in your book before one of them came to be. Thank you for taking the time to hear out a concerned citizen.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law
I support all three constitutional amendments: HJ1, HJ2 and HJ9. HJ1: The issue of reproduction freedom is more complicated than the simple choice of weather an unborn person lives or dies. Reproduction has consequence that affects the pregnant person's health during gestation, decisive action must be absolutely allowed in order to make decisions that places the pregnant person's mental and physical health at highest priority. Reproduction also has consequence post birth which all involved parties in reproduction must be ready to face. The pregnant person must be allowed to realize this and make an informed decision based on facts about their life and the situation they find themselves in that can ensure the best outcome for all parties involved, other people are simply unaware of the nuance or facts that may influence their decision and have no right to force them to make a decision against their own interest. HJ2: The purpose of the criminal justice system is to penalize people who break the law and preserve order, with the ultimate goal of rehabilitating those within it, to re-enter society. Blanket removal of fundamental rights and a voice in society is too harsh a punishment for any crime. What motivation is there to become an upstanding citizen and rejoin society if they are forever divorced from it? Opportunities for positive change must be left open. There is an added benefit of reducing judicial burden in the majority of cases. HJ9: From the perspective of government, the morality of marriage between anyone should not be considered in such a case as government is concerned with the fair administration of the legal consequences of marriage in order to recognize family units. The question of morality should be left up to the individuals, religious organizations, and clergy to decide for themselves and should not affect state policy. Not recognizing marriage simply results in a legal grey areas and denial of basic rights and protections all people are entitled to.
I oppose passage of HJ1. Abortion until birth does not acknowledge the viability of the infant. I oppose this amendment additionally because it will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Please reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I also oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly side with HJ1 & HJ9, because regardless of any religious belief, I still believe that this state and country is one of freedom. When it comes to reproductive care, that is between a patient and doctor. In no instance, should a government limit healthcare for any individual. Not only does restricting abortion rights infringe on individual liberties, but it causes an increase in the maternal mortality rate. I side with HJ9 on the same basis. The government has no place inside our marriages. If someone believes that same sex marriage is sinful because of their belief, they have the right to think that, but they have no right to restrict marriage between other consenting adults. If you don’t support same sex marriage, don’t get married to someone of the same sex. We are a country of freedom and liberty. If you find someone (a consenting adult!) that you truly love, that you want to marry, we should all be so lucky. We should have the freedom to do so. Separation of church and state.
My name is Sanu Dieng-Cooper, I am the new Policy Director for the Virginia Sexual and Domestic Violence Action Alliance, representing over 70 sexual and domestic violence agencies across Virginia. On behalf of survivors and the agencies within our membership, we want to express our strong support for marriage equality (HJ9) and reproductive rights (HJ1) for all Virginians. At the Alliance, we believe that every individual has the right to safe, healthy, and respectful relationships, regardless of sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression. Because sexual and domestic violence affects all communities, our response must also be inclusive. Policies that restrict marriage equality or reproductive rights isolate and harm vulnerable communities, particularly LGBTQ+ survivors, making it more difficult for them to access safety, services, and respect. Just as everyone should have the freedom to choose who they love, they should also have access to reproductive options that are equitable, inclusive, and responsive to their needs, regardless of income, gender identity, sexual orientation, race, ethnicity, religion, ability, or age. Victims of sexual and domestic violence already bear the heavy burdens of addressing health issues such as sexually transmitted infections, unintended pregnancies, infertility, and other complications resulting from trauma. Comprehensive sexual and reproductive healthcare is essential to their recovery. We all expect the right to make personal health decisions—whether that means choosing our doctor, selecting a treatment, or deciding to undergo surgery. Reproductive health choices should be no different; they must remain personal, allowing individuals to make the best decisions for themselves based on accurate information and supportive care. Supporting reproductive rights means ensuring that everyone has this autonomy, free from external pressures or barriers. We urge the subcommittee to support measures that promote equity, dignity, and safety for all Virginians, especially the most vulnerable, such as survivors of sexual and domestic violence. Again, we urge you to support HJ1 and HJ9. Thank you for your commitment to advancing justice in our Commonwealth.
I oppose this legislation. The taxpayers of Virginia should not be asked to subsidize or support an industry they find objectionable, whether directly funding abortion or funneling taxpayer dollars to the industry. The state should have three priorities: support saving human life as the chief objective; provide unborn children with greater legal status as individuals; and protect the rights of faith-based organizations that provide assistance to women facing crisis pregnancies and who do not have the resources to support their unborn child.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Do Not approve either of these - HJ1 or HJ9 . You are not God!
Hello friends, Please reject this bill that seeks to legalize child sacrifice under the guise of "reproductive freedom". If you believe words have meaning, you would be forced to face the reality that reproduction was the step before arriving here; pregnancy. Scientifically it is not debated that life begins at conception. Therefore reproduction has already taken place and we are dealing with a human being's life. I imagine if there was a bill labeled as "reproductive freedom" that allowed parents to drown unwanted toddlers, you would reject it. Essentially this bill is just that. Please do what's right in God's sight, follow and obey Jesus Christ as magistrates that he has ordained in this important role. As you will one day be held accountable by him. Thank you.
HJ 1 and HJ 9 should not be passed
I am writing to urge you not to pass this amendment. I believe that the passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians. This is my understanding of its impact- It would enshrine a “right to reproductive freedom” in Virginia’s Constitution, opening the door to abortion through all nine months of pregnancy. It could eliminate parental knowledge or consent for minors undergoing invasive abortion procedures. It would prevent reinstatement of critical abortion clinic safety standards and informed consent for women and minors. It could allow men to claim a right to impregnate women without responsibility for child support. It would block protections for minors from harmful sterilization or “gender reassignment” surgeries. I appeal to you to stand for life and well-being for all people, including the unborn.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
12 weeks. Kyrie Eleison
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment -I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. -HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. -HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. -Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights -I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage -I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. -Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution.HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent.HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born.A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right.Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Honorable House Committee Members, As a registered voter in the Commonwealth of Virginia, Please see blow as to my thoughts and wishes for the Commonwealth of Virginia. There is no reason to waste time with "feel good" legislation from either party. Please consider ONLY Amendments that will not be used to bolster election results. Recent national election results indicate more voters want current protections upheld, rather than legislating on issues to campaign on or increase voter rolls. HJ-1 - Amendment should mirror CURRENT VA Abortion laws ONLY. This includes limitations on 26 weeks without threat to health of baby or mother, AND review by TWO certified OBGYN/MDs to perform afterwards HJ2 - Amendment should include each to be reviewed on a case-by-case basis HJ9 - Is not needed. This is protected by Supremacy Clause Thank you for taking the time to read and consider my opinions. Respectfully, Mark Logan
Please support the right to choose and pass HJ 1. We should all have the power to choose for ourselves. Women must be able to make real time decisions about their bodies. Reproductive health is personal and PRIVATE between a patient and their chosen health care provider. No one is pro abortion, we are pro choice. Please support the right to marriage by passing HJ 9. We should have the right to love and marry who we wish - to create a family. This is a private matter between 2 people, it doesn't involve or hurt anyone else. Religious values do not have a place in these decisions, which are about human rights for everyone in our Commonwealth.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I have repeatedly voted for representatives who reflect my beliefs, including that all Virginians should have access to affordable and complete health care. This includes the privacy to make reproductive choices that are legal and safe regarding birth control and abortion. The ability to make this choice and have safe and legal care affects everything in a person’s life, from mental well-being to financially being able to provide food and shelter for yourself. Please do not make this a complicated choice for Virginians. Please vote to allow us to make these choices for ourselves, here in our home state. Thank you.
I support rights to abortion, marriage equality and women’s right to choose. This is a vital time in America where we must protect the people that are here and prevent burdens due to unwanted pregnancies. We need to prevent deaths due to complications of miscarriage. We must protect health of all our citizens.
I vehemently oppose legislation that permits abortion past the first trimester except when the mother's life is medically and critically is imminent danger.
I am totally against HJ1. Please read Psalm 127 in the Bible. “Unless the Lord builds the house, their labor is in vain who built it. Unless the Lord watches over the city, in vain the watchman keeps his vigil. Children are a heritage from the Lord, and the fruit of the womb is a GIFT.”
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 to protect these freedoms through inclusion in the Commonwealth's constitution. Thank you.
No legislative body has the authority to add or subtract actual human rights. Lawmakers may only codify, recognize and enumerate rights which exist from the original authority. The authority over life and death originate with the life-giver.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Abortions should absolutely be limited. Please do now allow this.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2 and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth's constitution. Thank you.
I strongly oppose the Extreme Abortion Amendment HJ1.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current pro-life laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians, including those in their mother’s womb. I believe that each unborn baby is a gift from God (Psalm 127:3 Behold, children are a heritage from the Lord, the fruit of the womb a reward), and there are many scripture verses about “forming (children) in the womb” Jeremiah 1:5, Isaiah 49:1, psalm 139:13, Job 31:5, Isaiah 49:5Isaiah 44:2, Galatians 1:15, Psalm 100:3 to name just a few! The right to end the life of another human being should not be an automatic right of a woman because she chose to engage in an activity that can create a human being without proper forethought. In cases of inset and rape it is not the unborn baby’s fault and so they should not have their right to life destroyed at the hands of another person, it should not be enshrined in our Virginia constitution as it goes against the infallible Word of God
HJ1 would remove all protection of unborn children in Va.. I vehemently oppose that. Unborn Infants are creatures of God deserving of the right to life . They should be respected and nurtured, not brutally and heartlessly destroyed. Pierre Deslauriers
Dear elected leaders, In relation to HJ1 coming before your committee this morning. Myself and my extended family (over 20 adults) would oppose this amendment and even the idea behind it for any bill, and especially for the Virginia constitution. Ending the life of a baby is not a fundamental right. Such a decision should be faced with serious thought to the consequences for the unborn child and for the mother (and even the birth father). Expanding access to abortion endangers women instead of helping them, because of the high rate of complications with this procedure. We request that this is tabled in committee and is not introduced again. Virginia needs to be a state that values the lives of all it's citizens, including mothers and the pre-born. Sincerely, Shelley Scranton Lynchburg, VA
Oppose this amendment as written. Whatever happen to "Safe, Legal, and Rare"? If you want exceptions like rape, incest and life of the mother then re-write the amendment to include them but to have a blanket right to abortion up to birth is wrong and should not be allowed.
Dear Privileges and Elections Committee Members, Please vote NO to the constitutional amendment on the fundamental right to reproductive freedom. This amendment is a danger and distraction from the real problems facing women and babies in Virginia. Women need protection from sexual predators and a guarantee that non-predatory men who father their children will provide love and financial care. Killing unborn babies does not solve problems. Instead abortion leaves physical and mental scars that haunt women for the rest of their lives. Please kill this amendment instead. Thank you
Completely against this. I speak for myself and my family when I say that we will not vote for anyone who has a hand in amending our constitution in this way.
I strongly encourage and support HJ1 and the passing of this bill. Every person in this country should have bodily autonomy and the ability to make this incredibly person choice for themselves. Women need to have access to safe reproductive care. Abortions will happen no matter what, it is up to us to decide whether we want those to be safe and sanitary, or if we would rather watch both women, and consequently children, suffer because of our moral objections. I ask you to keep in mind one of the founding principles of this nation - The separation of church and state. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but these opinions can not infringe on public health and women's rights. HJ1 is a matter of community health and safety, and its passing would ensure more secure reproductive healthcare of Virginia's women AND children. Abortion has been a civil right since 1979, only now are we seeing this new wave of regressive rhetoric and action. I ask you to allow our state, and our women, to continue to progress, not regress into a male dominated past. Reproductive rights SAVE LIVES and are a staple of any modern nation that seeks to view women as equal. Please view us as equal!! I am a 21-year-old woman, and I fear for my safety, as well as the safety of my young nieces and cousins every day. I want them to know that they live in a state that values their bodies, their lives, their choices, and understands that abortions are lifesaving care, NOT birth control. No one wants to get an abortion. It is a difficult and harrowing decision, but one that should be between a woman, her doctor, and her god, not a decision of a faceless government. Women have already died because of abortion restrictions and bans in other states. Please don't let Virginia be the same. Young women in this state are scared, and they deserve reassurance that their lawmakers care about their civil rights. Young women deserve to know that people care just as much about our futures, as that of an insentient, unborn, fetus. We deserve the right to make our own choices over our own bodies. I am also in support of HJ2. Voting is a constitutional right and the foundation of our democracy. It is crucial that every eligible person, excluding those convicted of felonies, have the access and freedom to vote. I believe that voting is what allows us to have a relatively fair and just system, so supporting the ability of all eligible persons to express this freedom is crucial to maintaining a lawful, equal democracy. I am also strongly in support of HJ9. Again, marriage is between the two individuals, their religious leaders, and God. The LGBTQ+ community has been historically targeted and systemically disenfranchised, and we have an opportunity to oppose this continued, irrational targeting of individuals on the basis of religious or moral obligation. Again, everyone is entitled to opinions in their personal lives, but these opinions cannot limit the freedoms and rights of others. Queer people have always and will always exist. They are your neighbors, friends, family members. Taking away their right to marry, trying to suppress queer people, historically, have NEVER worked. We are proud of who we are, and no law will change that. It is not a choice to be gay, or trans, or queer, the same way it is not a choice to be straight. I support the right of all people to actualize who they are. Every person deserves the right to love who they love and marry who they would like.
Please support the right to choose and pass HJ 1. We should all have the power to choose for ourselves. Please support the right to vote by passing HJ 2. Once time is served, punishment should be over. Please support the right to marriage by passing HJ 9. We all deserve a family. Religious values do not have a place in these decisions, which are about human rights for everyone in our Commonwealth (not just the radical Christian right).
Abortion is murder in the sight of God. Please for the sake of your own souls and the lives of the unborn, do not pass this forward. You will be held accountable for your actions.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
Please do not legalize abortion as birth control. Our nation is not that cruel to stand by and let a nine-month fetus fully developed have his or her skull crushed and his or her little body thrown out as medical waste. Abortion is a necessary evil in a few rare cases like rape, insect, or health of the mother, but NEVER as birth control. That would be depraved. Cmon Virginia, we are better than this! Some restrictions on abortion is the only humane solution within our very sad culture. Adoption, not abortion!
I am writing to express my strong support for Virginia House Joint Resolutions 1, 2, and 3. These amendments are essential to ensuring the fundamental rights and freedoms of all Virginians. HJ1: Reproductive Rights: This amendment would explicitly protect the right to reproductive freedom, including access to abortion and contraception. It is crucial to safeguard these rights, particularly in light of recent challenges to reproductive healthcare at the national level. HJ2: Right to Vote: This amendment would strengthen voting rights protections in Virginia. It would expand early voting, automatic voter registration, and other measures to ensure that all eligible citizens can exercise their right to vote. HJ3: Same-Sex Marriage Equality: This amendment would enshrine the right to same-sex marriage in the Virginia Constitution. It would provide additional legal protections for same-sex couples and their families. These amendments reflect the values of equality, liberty, and justice that are at the heart of our democracy. They will help to create a more inclusive and equitable Virginia for all. I urge you to support these important amendments.
I support the right of ALL Virginia residents to affordable, quality health care. This would include the right to make decisions for themselves without fear of punishment from the state. The right to privacy in making medical choices becomes especially important for women, and even more so in the area of reproductive rights. Any woman should have access to the best possible medical information, and if she asks for it, the best possible medical advice in the service of her reproductive health. This would especially include contraception and abortion. These are issues that all women may face, and no men do. But all women are also residents in the state. To ignore the right to privacy of half the population is unconscionable. The right to privacy should include ALL residents. All underserved communities, already experience unfair barriers and limited access to adequate healthcare services. Real democracy depends on the ability of citizens to make their own choices. Our reproductive choices impact our physical and psychological well-being, including the foods we eat, where we live, our financial resources, and our capacity to gain and maintain employment and provide for ourselves and our families. Please vote to protect these rights of women, supported by a majority of Virginians.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
I am opposed to HJ1 on reproductive freedom because it fails to take into account the rights of an unborn baby whose life would be terminated by an abortion. I am opposed to HJ on same-sex marriage, as it violates the traditional and proper definition of marriage.
As a survivor of a saline abortion, I strongly oppose this bill. Thank you for your consideration.
Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Good Day, Myself and my family have been lifelong members of this great state of Virginia. Please vote against HJ1 and protect life and liberty and freedom for those who cannot speak for themselves. The passing of this will bring us inline with barbarism and thousands plus will loose their lives in cruel and painful ways. Please look upon your own children, nieces, and nephews and see the joy that their lives bring to you and your families. Each child deserves a chance at life and the opportunity to thrive in the best country mankind has produced. Thank you for your time and have a nice day.
I oppose HJ1 - abortion should not be enshrined in Virginia as a constitutional right. On the contrary abortion should be banned except in cases where the life of the mother is threatened. Our Constitution protects the life of an individual and the fetus IS an individual. At that moment of conception that fetus has a God-given soul; it already has human life and is an individual that should have the protection of our Constitution to LIFE. I oppose HJ9 - marriage is between one man and one woman. It is the complementarity of the sexes ordained for the procreation of life. It has always been defined that way and we should not change the essential character of marriage. Call same-sex unions a civil partnership not a marriage. I support HJ2 if the inmate has served their term and remains in good standing within the community upon their release.
I am not in favor of these amendments. Abortion for anyone including the mother is extremely damaging to her and the family members around them. Please reconsider and spare these lives.
The Bible says; “For you created my inmost being; you knit me together in my mother’s womb. I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made; your works are wonderful, I know that full well. My frame was not hidden from you when I was made in the secret place, when I was woven together in the depths of the earth. Your eyes saw my unformed body; all the days ordained for me were written in your book before one of them came to be” (New International Version, 2011, Psalm 139:13-16).
Enshrining a right to kill innocent children in their mother’s womb is something we should all resist. Thanks, Stephen Hertz
Reproductive freedom is critical to basic freedom for both women and men. Please preserve choice for Virginia in the face of the Supreme Court's overturning of Roe v Wade. Voting rights are critical for democracy. Please support the right to marry for LGBTQ and trans citizens of Virginia. This is a large percentage of voters and must be protected at the state level.
As a civilized nation I am appalled that the conversation of killing babies, up to birth is something anyone, least of all the governing leaders of our state are talking about. How can you dare refer to this practice as a human right while all the time having a total disregard for the life of a child? This legislation is primarily about removing all consequences of the actions of the woman and man involved in creating this pregnancy. It also takes away the rights of the parent/guardian of an underage child that has become pregnant. I cannot even imagine what has happened in your life that you would believe this is acceptable on any level. This last election states loud and clear across the entire nation, this is not what the American people want. How can you ignore this? Respectfully, M Hopcroft
1. Please call the proposed amendment by its true intention: a right to procure an abortion, i.e., the right to take the life of a human child conceived but not yet born. 2. Quibble if you want, but taking a life is murder. 3. Even if you think adult desires trump a pre-born child’s right to be born, consider Social Security. Our whole Social Security system is predicated on the young, working generation paying for the retirement of the older, retired generation. Killing off the the unborn severely upsets the balance of this arrangement, with serious implications for the long term survivability of Social Security itself.
I oppose to all 3 amendments.
The right to life is foundational to the ability to enjoy every other human right. The fifth amendment to the Constitution of the United States therefore justly forbids any person to be deprived of life without due process of law. While the word person is not defined in the Constitution, it is obvious that every person having a claim to due process was once a child in utero. To permit a child in the womb to be intentionally killed is therefore to take away all of that child’s rights, as is still found in laws which permit charging a person killing an expectant mother and her unborn child with, not one, but two homicides. The Commonwealth was once widely known for depriving slaves of the enjoyment of some of their rights as persons. The Commonwealth now justly disavows such actions. To permit intentional abortion is to perpetrate on the unborn worse deprivation of rights than was accorded to slaves. Some day the Commonwealth will justly disavow its current encouragement of intentional abortion. Why make its future embarrassment even worse by enshrining the total deprivation of the right to life in the Commonwealth’s Constitution? Let us learn from our history by not taking this step!
I support HJ1 and HJ9 and hope to see them passed.
No legislative body has the authority to add or subtract actual human rights. Lawmakers may only codify, recognize and enumerate rights which exist from the original authority. The authority over life and death originate with the life-giver.
Hello, I whole heartedly support HJ1 and HJ9, as these are VITAL RIGHTS for woman and humans in general. The right to our own bodily health, safety and well being. The right to marry no matter your sexual orientation should be a right for everyone no matter their sexual orientation. How can we decide what others should be aloud to do in their own lives and still be considered the land of “freedom & rights”? Please pass these life-saving bills that will affirm marriage equality for all individuals, irrespective of gender or sexual orientation as well as womans rights to her own body. People are dying all over the world due to the lack of care they so desperately need. This legislation is not merely a matter of legal recognition; it embodies the fundamental human rights of love, choice, and dignity. In a society that prides itself on the principles of liberty and justice for all, it is imperative that we extend these values to every citizen. Marriage is a sacred bond that should be accessible to all, and by passing HJ9, we will take a monumental step towards a more inclusive and equitable Virginia, where every family can thrive without discrimination. We cannot take steps back, we have come this far in the world for a reason and rights should never be given then taken so carelessly from anyone. We must remember that what we want for ourselves is not what is healthy for all, we must let every individual have the rights to their own bodies and lives. Thank you.
I support these amendments because in a nation that values and prioritizes freedom, I believe that individuals should have autonomy over all their decisions. If we are to truly have our unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the government cannot restrict our autonomy in any way. Furthermore our government has a responsibility to protect our rights and by amending our state constitution we are solidifying that protection in the event that there are challenges to these rights federally.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
I very much oppose adding a “right” to abortion to Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would remove even widely accepted protections for unborn babies like the partial-birth abortion ban. Instead of supporting this life-denying legislations, I urge you to expand life-affirming supports for mothers and babies.
Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I support these joint resolutions. They advance freedom, and we should work towards enshrining these important principles in the Constitution of Virginia.
"I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians."
I am unable to attend in person for this vote today but implore you in writing that as a Catholic and decent human being, that you protect the life of any unborn child. All life matters and especially the lives of the most vulnerable, those that cannot defend themselves.
"I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians."
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment is extreme, and will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect both preborn children and the health of their mothers. Furthermore, HJ1 could mean that current protections and prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all human beings in Virginia.
I am strongly against HJ1. It is an attack against the weak and defenseless who have done no wrong and are absolutely innocent, which is something every Virginian should be against.
I am writing you this morning to plead with you on behalf of the unborn. Please do not support HJ1. The murdering of children can not be allowed! If it starts here where will it end? In my life, I have seen many women who would long to have a child. To see them go through miscarriages and failed adoptions is crushing. I have also seen many women use abortion as a form of birth control. Why not educate society on planning a family, and the responsibilities of being a mother, and equip these women with the education they need to make the right choice? Is it acceptable for a woman to murder her child because she doesn’t want to be responsible for that child and not the one in the womb? If you answer no to that, then you need to vote against HJ1. God makes no mistakes. Every child upon conception is a precious soul and is depending on you to make the right decision. Thank you for voting against this.
Civil government has not been given the ability to give rights. Rights are given by God alone; a fact which the US constitution explicitly recognizes, and I believe the VA constitution implicitly recognizes. We may try to use more agreeable language to hide it, but what this proposed amendment refers to as a 'right' to reproductive freedom is actually a 'right' to murder certain people. No such right exists, and God, who alone grants rights to His creatures, has made it very clear that we aren't free to murder (Exodus 20:13). This proposed amendment is based on a lie, allows for the free commission of an act that should recieve the death penalty (Leviticus 24:17, Deuteronomy 19:21), and would actually prevent our civil government from doing what it was designed to do (Romans 13). For your own sakes, and for the sake of the children who would be affected by this, do not pass this amendment.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
I am writing in to encourage a strong vote of No on this proposal. Every other posited metric of when Life begins does not account for all circumstances. The only conclusive and sure assertion, is that Life begins at conception. With this reality there is only one logical, ethical, and moral conclusion on how to legislate, and that is to legislate in protection of Life in the womb. We ought not take the life another image bearer that has done us no harm. Please vote No on HJ1
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians. EVERY LIFE MATTERS! Please protect the unborn.
I strogly believe it is a womens right to make decisions about her own body and support legislation to that effect. I support the right of felons who have served their time in prison to vote. However, if a person released commits a felony crime axsecond or more times, I support revoking the right to vote. I strongly support same sex marriage. Please ensure/maintain this right of individuals who have same sex partners.
HB375 - I strongly agree with joining the National Popular Vote compact. It gives more power to us as individuals and aligns with democratic norms. This also strengthens Virginia as presidential hopefuls will have to speak to each state and person as opposed to a handful of swing states. HB658 - Ranked choice voting is a better system for voting and is determined by the candidate with the strongest support. It doesn't affect your 1st choice, lower choices will only be considered if the 1st choice doesn't win. This encourages more civil and policy driven campaigns. HJ1 - I strongly agree with individuals having the right to reproductive freedom. HJ2 - People should not be permanently defined by their past mistakes. HJ9 - Marriage is between two people, it should not be defined as between one man and one woman.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. DON'T DO IT! Abortion is terrible and mothers live with the act in their conscience for life. It hurts both fetus and mom. Abortion is used as an easy "discard" choice but it should NOT be this way. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
If we don't start realizing that LIFE is precious no one will respect ANY LIFE. Abortion is not BIRTH CONTROL. To kill a living human being is murderous and will destroy our heritage, culture, and Country
I wish to voice my opposition to HJ1 . Our nation's own Declaration of Independence states that ALL men are created equal and are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights. That includes life , liberty and the pursuit of happiness.The very first of these is LIFE. It stands to reason that this would include the unborn and the newborn. Please do not pass this amendment since it does NOT protect these most precious lives. Each one of us were once among those lives.
As a Chinese American who grew up in Fairfax, I recognize the diversity of beliefs that make us a dynamic and vibrant place to raise a family and do business. We must protect this rare environment by taking a stand against those who would try to monopolize their belief system For abortion to be decided by the state, and not by the individual, is an unprecedented amount of power wielded over medical procedures. The State does not force people to donate their organs, so it should not have an extraneous limits on this other medical procedure, especially since the proponents for abortion limitations are not basing their arguments on health reasons but religious ones. Even less needs to be said on any attempts to limit LGBTQ identities or their marriages between adults. We cannot claim to have freedom of religion when one religion gets to make policy over others. Please, support HJ1 and HJ9
I strongly condemn the proposed amendment regarding the murder of innocent human life. "Reproductive freedom", a euphemism for abortion, is the tragic, and the vast majority of the time, unnecessary, ending of the life of a unique and precious child, created in the image of God. This amendment will enshrine a culture in Virginia that devalues human life and undermines the fundamental right to life endowed by our Creator. I believe that every human life is sacred, regardless of age, size, development, or condition of dependency. It is our moral obligation to defend the most vulnerable members of our society. There is no one more vulnerable than a baby in his/her mother's womb. The womb was designed to be a safe place for the initial development of a child, but abortion has turned this safe place into a killing field. I cannot urge you strongly enough to reject this amendment and instead codify the reality that every child is protected. I further call upon lawmakers to promote policies that support mothers and families.
As a constituent, I adamantly oppose this bill. A few things: 1. Stop gaslighting the people, abortion is not reproductive healthcare or freedom. It's the opposite. 2. There are many ways to prevent pregnancy and early options for women. Rather than push abortion up to any date, why not teach women their options and ensure all women have access to preventative measures. 3. Abortion after life is viable outside the womb is murder. Plain and simple. We should not allow abortion to be offered at any time within the pregnancy. 26 weeks is already a travesty. Protect human life.
The "right" to kill an innocent human should never be enshrined in our laws. Please oppose HJ1.
I hereby implore the House of Delegates to ratify the Constitution of Virginia and grant: 1. The fundamental right to reproductive freedom to all Virginians (HJ1 - Herring) 2. Automatic restoration of the rights of a convicted individual to vote upon completion of the terms of their sentencing and release from incarceration (HJ2 - Bennett-Parker) 3. Legal rights and protections for two consenting adult persons to marry regardless of sex, gender, race, or religion. (HJ9 - Sickles)
Please vote against HJ1 the Reproductive Rights Amendment. In my opinion this is a dangerous and unprincipled bill. The baby in a mother's womb at all stages of development is a human being and should be protected. The baby is a separate person from the mother. It is not part of her body but a new life growing in her womb. It is deserving of protection not destruction. To carry a new life in your womb is a woman's greatest honor and a blessing from the Creator of all life. Please do not vote to kill the babies but encourage and fund all pregnancy centers and organizations that promote life and support women to be able to carry their children to birth and support them after birth.. Thank you. May God be with you in your conscience and your heart
I strongly support HJ1. The Commonwealth's founding principles of protecting individual liberty from government intrusion must extend to decisions regarding one's own body and reproduction for all Virginians, who being "equally free and independent and having certain inherent rights, of which, when they enter into a state of society, they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their posterity." I urge you to pass HJ1 and enshrine the natural right to make and effectuate decisions about one's own pregnancy without state interference.
I am urging a NO vote on each one!!
I am writing today in support all proposed amendments. HJ1 protection of reproductive health care is extremely important and essential to ensure the health and safety of women across the state of Virginia. I’ve had family and friends suffer miscarriages and I can’t imagine people being put on a registry or jailed for something completely out of their control. The pain of those medical emergencies was excruciating and our job as a society is to support those people not punish them or worse sentence them to certain death. Reproductive rights go beyond miscarriages and medical emergencies; bodily autonomy is and should remain an indelible freedom. Threats of violence towards women have already increased since the election and I am afraid. It is my right to make my health care decisions and the rights of all women and people. I implore and demand elected officials enshrine this right into the state constitution. HJ2 to reinstate voting rights also has my support. Once debts to society have been paid, folks should be granted the freedom to participate in our democracy. If we want to be a healthy, functioning system, we need all voices that want to be heard to be listened to. Finally, HJ9 protects same-sex marriage. Partnership, love, marriage are all deeply personal things that should be a guaranteed personal freedom. Why does the government even care who is in a partnership with who? Standing in opposition of this is antiquated and unnecessary. Our country is supposed to stand for freedom and liberty for all; why are we denying that freedom? What purpose does it serve besides punching others down? Members of the LGBTQ+ community are entitled to the same rights and benefits and heterosexual couples- full stop. If we are to uphold the tenants we ascribe to we must enshrine same sex marriage.
I’m writing in opposition to HJ1 and to attempt to make clear the horror that aborting children in their mother’s womb really is. It seems so clear that in the womb is the only time in any life that a person should be absolutely safe and protected. How do people not know or completely disregard that. That violent act must be seen as the worst thing one human can do to another. I worked as a neonatal and mom-baby nurse for 40 years in four different states and I’ve never been haunted by the fact that we work so tirelessly to save some babies while others are literally thrown in the trash. It must require a complete lack of love and understanding for what is happening every time a baby is killed.
H1: Please oppose enshrining a "right to abortion" in our Virginia constitution. As a citizen of Virginia, a mother and a counselor, I know that abortion is a tragedy and has lifelong negative effects for the mother and obviously the baby. Abortion is the ending of a life and the more that our government justifies it, the more that our human rights are diminished. The right to life is primary. Having abortion legal up to 9 months is especially harmful as we know that babies have survived living outside of the womb as early as 6 months. Please think of the consequences of this bill and don't allow our state to become one that discards the right to life. H2: I support voting rights being returned to a citizen after completing their prison sentence because I believe that people can change and have seen people change and make their lives better. We should reward their effort to improve their life and choices. People who have made mistakes (all of us) and learned from them are valuable citizens. H9: I oppose H9 which would remove the provision that marriage is between one man and one woman. Thank you.
I oppose HJ1 as it fails to protect the lives of our most vulnerable. As a mother who has miscarried two precious souls, one of whom was old enough to bury at 14 weeks , I firmly believe that life begins at conception and every life lost is still grieved. Mothers never forget the lives of their children, even if they don’t have the opportunity to hold them, nurse them and change their diapers. Mothers who murder their children in the womb cannot escape this guilt or grief either. Let’s protect them too. Please vote to protect life, all life.
I oppose passage of HJ1. Please vote no to the passage of a law that so devalues and destroys lives that have been created by God. After all, each one of us “the living” started out at conception in our mothers womb!
Dear Legislators, Please do not pass amendment HJ1. Instead, direct your focus to building a Virginia where all expecting mothers have viable options besides abortion. It is your duty to consider the wellbeing of all the residents of Virginia, particularly those who can't protect themselves. Some of them aren't born yet, but they are living human individuals who deserve your consideration. Just because they are small and helpless doesn't make it ok to kill them for the convenience of others. Enshrining abortion in the Virginia state constitution will not make Virginians more free. It's the next step in creating a culture where human life is less important than economic considerations, comfortable living, or mere personal preference. If you want to make Virginia more free, use your influence to empower Virginians to choose what is good. I am praying for wisdom and courage for you all. Jenna Ciskanik
Regarding HJ1 - Herring I strongly OPPOSE enshrining a "right" to abortion in Virginia's constitution. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm, protect and support the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ2- I SUPPORT HJ2 All people who have served their sentences should have their voting rights restored. HJ9- I strongly OPPOSE HJ9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians. It will also provide the opportunity for abortion up until birth which is a form of murder.
There should be NO lawful or religious influence forced upon any woman's right to choose. PROTECT WOMEN!
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
Abortion should be safe, legal and rare. If a baby is strong enough to survive an apportion attempt, that baby has the right to live. Under the same sentiment, if a baby viable outside the mother’s womb, please give that baby a chance to live. So many families want to adopt newborns. If a woman is 8 months pregnant, maybe a doctor can carefully remove the baby- preserving his/her life. Even if the mother’s life is in danger, the baby can be safely born via c-section. We should take a note from other civilized countries in the western world! America is one the only countries where partial birth and full birth abortions are allowed. Please don’t allow this in Virginia. I am obviously Pro-Life, but here in Virginia, let’s keep abortion: safe, legal and Rare—- if the baby is fully formed he/she deserves the right to live.
As a representative of Virginia it is your obligated duty to stand up for the rights of all humans in Virginia especially those who cannot speak for themselves yet, the unborn fully human children who will be murdered if you pass this bill. The tax dollars we pay should never be used to fund the killing of children. Please vote no to HJ1
I strongly object to this bill. We should not amend our constitution. It is wrong to kill a baby at any stage of life but it is particularly heinous to kill a baby that can survive outside the womb. There should be limits.
Every Virginia resident should have access to affordable, quality health care, including abortion, birth control and the privacy to make reproductive choices. Virginians made their reproductive opinions clear when they chose to elect representatives who vowed to protect reproductive rights. Abortion should be legal, safe, and the decision left to those who are pregnant with guidance from medical professionals. True democracy depends on equal rights for all people. Losing our right to reproductive choice opens the door to the loss of other freedoms including other healthcare choices, marriage equality, access to contraception, and the right to engage in private, consensual intimacy without government interference. Not only is the right to a safe and legal abortion a matter of personal freedom, it’s also a major factor in the movements for racial and economic equality. Black individuals, and all underserved communities, already experience unfair barriers and limited access to adequate healthcare services. Our reproductive choices impact our physical and psychological well-being, including the foods we eat, where we live, our financial resources, and our capacity to gain and maintain employment and provide for ourselves and our families.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Please support HJ1 protecting reproductive freedom for all in the commonwealth. Bodily autonomy and the right to decide healthcare should remain solely between a person and their healthcare provider full stop. Any person or entity outside of the individual has no place in making decisions about that individual's own body.
I am requesting that you not pass this amendment as it would prevent the passing of ANY laws that would protect the unborn child. Please pass laws that protect the unborn.
I OPPOSE passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current pro-life laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of ALL Virginians.
The people of Virginia deserve the full extent of the Constitution and Declaration of Independence! “The people themselves must be the ultimate makers of their own Constitution.” - Teddy Roosevelt 1912 Keep Virginia amazing! I’m
I OPPOSE passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current pro-life laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of ALL Virginians.
I am emphatically against this bill Hj1 to kill babies up to 9 months. This is a abmination to God's creation of life . This is an evil action that only Satan and his cohorts are doing. May God have mercy on their souls.
This is not right. Mo way should murder be legal.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
It is imperative for Virginia to enshrine access to reproductive health care in our constitution. Women are *dying* because they cannot get urgently needed care in states where restrictions were put in place. Doctors cannot be afraid to provide care, and patients cannot be afraid to seek it out.
I strongly oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians."
Our family strongly supports the inclusion of these basic universal human rights in the Constitution of Virginia. Please listen to residents of Virginia and legislatively make explicit and permanent our full human rights to reproductive autonomy, to the vote for returning citizens, and to equal marriage rights for all. Thank you.
HJ 1- Virginia is the only remaining state in the south that allows women to make decisions about their bodies with their families and their doctors. It’s critical that we ensure this right remains by enshrining it into our constitution. HJ 2- Healthy democracies rely on voter participation. Individuals who have served their sentences should be allowed to rejoin society with their rights intact without jumping through additional hoops. Individuals with disabilities are full members of society and should never be denied their right to vote without sufficient judicial oversight. HJ 9 - The right to chose who you love while still enjoying the privileges and protections a marriage can provide has been the law of the land for nearly a decade. It’s time for our constitution to reflect that reality.
I urge you to reject both the HJ1 and HJ9 bills. Residents of the state of Virginia can not feel proud of a state that approves murdering their unborn children (and calling it a "right") and allowing the basic family unit of society to be undermined.
Please vote no.
I am strongly opposed to HJ1. As a mother and someone who cares deeply about the future of this state I am greatly alarmed by this constitutional amendment. This does not protect our minors in any way. A young girl can’t get her ears pierced without parental consent, but under this law she can have an abortion and a sex change operation!? This is outrageous. The medical personnel involved have an ulterior financial motive to encourage our minors towards these gravely life changing operations with no parental consent. A mother and father nurture their children all their lives, and for the state to cut them out of the most important decisions of their life is unacceptable. Parents are their children’s biggest advocate- no one else is. This is a gross overstep of government in private lives. I would also like to see a 24 hour mandatory waiting period before a person is allowed to get an abortion along with the requirement for a woman to see the baby on an ultrasound before killing the life inside. It needs to be made very clear to the mom and dad that they are terminating life. It’s real and could cause emotional trauma for the rest of their life if they proceed with such frivolous actions.
I strongly support all three proposed amendments. Members of my family are at risk here. Taxpayers, loving, caring members of our community. Their rights to happiness and security MUST be guaranteed. I strongly support the rights of two adults to marry and form families. Anything else seems absurd. Reproductive health is a matter solely between a woman and her physician. The State must make this very clear and must resist attempts by others to control decisions that are not theirs to make. I vote.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians. The writers of the Virginia Constitution never contemplated that any such barbaric practice would be incorporated into that Constitution. This has nothing to do with freedom or liberty or life or happiness. It is instead the paganization of the Commonwealth of Virginia. It represents the Nazi idea that whatever can be legislated is legal. The Democrat Party calls President Elect Donald Trump "Hitler" and then tries sleazy practices like this. They have no shame because they have no morals or ethics. Don Beheler 362 Sherwood Dr Blue Ridge, VA 24064
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1 Reproductive Freedom Do I recall the last time that as a man I was unable to health care decisions about my own body? No, because that’s never happened. I fail to see why women should not enjoy the same rights to bodily autonomy and if we are to be a beacon of light in the commonwealth for ALL citizens, we must endeavor to enshrine the right to reproductive freedoms here in Virginia. Today’s reality is that even with a national abortion ban, the women in my family will be able to choose to safely end a pregnancy because ours is a family of means who can if necessary travel anywhere on the planet for reproductive or other health care. I write today to ensure that such rights aren’t limited to those with means but are freely available within Virginia. Abortion should be legal, safe, and the decision left to those who are pregnant with guidance from medical professionals. True democracy depends on equal rights for all people. Losing our right to reproductive choice opens the door to the loss of other freedoms including other healthcare choices, marriage equality, access to contraception, and the right to engage in private, consensual intimacy without government interference. Not only is the right to a safe and legal abortion a matter of personal freedom, it’s also a major factor in the movements for racial and economic equality. Black individuals, and all underserved communities, already experience unfair barriers and limited access to adequate healthcare services. HJ2 Restoration of Voting Rights If we are nation that is free to elect a recently convicted felon, why should it be the case that a convicted person who has completed their sentence not be allowed to vote? I support an amendment to the Virginia Constitution to guarantee that people who have been disenfranchised due to a felony conviction will have their rights automatically restored upon completion of their sentences, without additional steps or paperwork after they are no longer incarcerated, and to ensure people with disabilities never lose their rights without an appropriate judicial finding. This has never been a partisan issue. Both Democratic and Republican governors have chosen to restore voting rights to thousands of citizens; however, Virginia's current governor has reversed the trend. People should not be permanently defined by their past mistakes. Virginians who have successfully served their time should be able to fully rejoin civic life. It is time for Virginians to act to amend our Constitution to create a routine restoration process that reflects fair accountability and encourages civic engagement. HJ9 Marriage Equality Why should only heterosexual couples suffer the trials, tribulation and absolute insanity that comes with married life? Given risks at the national level to marriage rights, it’s important to properly enshrine the right to marry in Virginia to best protect the rights of all citizens.
I urge rejecting HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect pre-born children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians, including the pre-born.
Support for Right to Reproductive Freedom Amendment I strongly support the proposed amendment to the Virginia Constitution establishing reproductive freedom as a fundamental right. This amendment ensures that individuals can make autonomous choices about their own reproductive health, free from government interference, except when a compelling state interest in protecting health is demonstrated. By safeguarding personal decision-making and aligning with evidence-based medical standards, this amendment promotes both health and justice. Additionally, it protects individuals and those who assist them from penalization, ensuring reproductive freedom is accessible to all Virginians. Support for Right to Vote Amendment I fully support this amendment, which strengthens our democracy by recognizing voting as a fundamental right for all eligible Virginians. Restoring voting rights automatically upon release from incarceration reflects our belief in rehabilitation and the importance of civic engagement. By simplifying the process, this amendment ensures that citizens reentering society can fully participate in our democracy without unnecessary barriers. Additionally, the clarification on mental capacity respects voters' autonomy while providing a thoughtful safeguard. Support for Right to Marry Amendment This amendment is a vital step toward equality, affirming that marriage is a fundamental right, regardless of gender, sex, or race. By removing outdated and discriminatory language, Virginia's Constitution will better reflect our commitment to equal rights and the recognition of all lawful marriages. Ensuring that every couple is treated equally under the law honors the dignity of all Virginians and upholds the Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell v. Hodges. This amendment aligns our laws with contemporary values of inclusivity and respect.
I’m very concerned for the safety of women under this amendment. Aside from the fact that abortion can cause serious physical and psychological harm for women, there are no safeguards to protect minors and vulnerable women. Unrestricted abortion enables traffickers and abusive partners who force women to get abortions.
I oppose passage of HJ1. Please do not use legislative fiat to oppose the will of the majority of Virginians. We celebrate life. We do not want to destroy it. Jen Hanrahan
My family and I are opposed to the legislation for abortion on demand and up to birth. Please vote NO on HJ1 and SJ1. Respectfully, Mrs. Rebecca Stine
HJ1 I strongly OPPOSE a "right' to abortion in VA constitution.
I held 20-week-old gestation babies, and they are humans. To think we are considering allowing abortion up to the day of delivery is unthinkable. Please do not allow this bill to pass. May God help us to think about what this means for a future generation who will be murdered by "we the people."
I am urging you to NOT support this anti-life bill. This bill shows no regard or dignity towards human life and does not support any science regarding fetal development or the ability of an unborn baby to feel pain. HJ1 is an overreach of the government and will create a loss of protections and rights for the unborn. Please do not support this on behalf of Virginians.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. Virginians can and do work together to support mothers, children, and families so infanticide is no reasonable solution for families.
I am not in favor of HJ1
We need to be far from the establishment of abortion in this state. I write this in staunch disagreement with the practice. Instead let's establish better routes for adoption.
I oppose amendment HJ1, all human life is sacred. We need to protect the innocent lives of our future!
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
Dear Committee Members, "I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians." Sincerely, Deborah G Cousins
There is no good reason for you to be meeting outside of the legislative session. I do not support any of these amendments. Our current laws & the SC ruling have made it clear that non-citizens may not vote. The citizens of VA do not want abortion up to birth leaving the baby to die. It's abhorrent! Felons' voting rights upon release should be judged individually. Reciprocity or some other consideration may be required.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children. Current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
Reproductive freedom is a human right. I had the tragic misfortune of miscarrying a much wanted pregnancy. I had two young children at the time. My body would not expel the no longer viable fetus on its own, thus I had to have medical intervention (abortion). Had this service not been available, I would not have survived. Please do not take reproductive freedom away from women and families. In the wake of many other states taking away freedoms, women have died. Please don’t let this happen in Virginia!
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians
As a constituent, I’m urging you to vote yes on all three amendments. Reproductive care, as protected by HJ1, is health care and needs to be universally accessible. Decisions about what types of care are necessary should be made at the discretion of a doctor and a patient, not by the government. No person or healthcare provider should fear for repercussions from exercising that right. I am in favor of HJ2. Virginian's should not need a Governor's permission to restore their voting rights. It is vital that all eligible Virginians should be allowed to exercise their right to vote in a democracy. Couples deserve to have their marriages legally acknowledged, upheld, and protected no matter their gender, sex, or race. HJ9 would accomplish that. I encourage you to accept all three constitutional amendments.
Please vote to save children's lives. If adults do not protect them who will. Please vote against bill allowing abortions up to 9 months or any abortions.
I do not support any of the three amendments. I think the current committees are rushing these bills through. Every abortion takes a human life and this citizen of the Commonwealth will raise my voice for those who have no voice.
"I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children. It could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians."
I oppose HJ1 because I am human. Have we forgotten what it is to be human? Has the abandonment of Truth led us to forget who is our brother and sister? If we do not have respect for the smallest and most vulnerable of these brothers and sisters, what is to stop us from justifying all other forms of violence against other humans in other stages of life? Life should never end at the hands of doctors, mothers, fathers, strangers, or any humans.
"I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians."
HJ1: We've seen the medical disasters that can occur when doctors are afraid to treat pregnancy complications due to abortion restrictions. The answer is to get government interference out of the matter as much as feasible. As someone who could become pregnant, I find it terrifying that I might have to navigate complex legal situations just to obtain appropriate healthcare. For these reasons, I support HJ1. HJ2: I believe voting is a fundamental right, not just a privilege or luxury. For this reason I support HJ2, which would expand the right to vote to more adults who have been unjustly stripped of it. HJ9: If someday I am in a committed relationship with someone of my own sex/gender, I hope that it can be recognized by the government in order to make our legal status clear and stable. All same-gender couples deserve that opportunity. Let's put the prejudices of the past behind us.
I adamantly oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
I believe that life is a gift from God, and I do not agree with anyone who would destroy the life of a baby who cannot defend himself. Therefore, I oppose HJ!
This is not a “right” that we as the American people should be fighting for. I am writing this to be a voice for the children in the womb. God commands us to not murder. If you make this as part of the constitution, you will have thousands of baby’s blood on your hands, when you stand before God, which everyone will do. I urge you to not pass this. Obey God, and turn from this wicked act of child sacrifice.
Thank you for defending the defenseless and allowing us to give a voice to the voiceless, our country’s most vulnerable. HJ1 would be a detrimental blow to basic human rights by not even allowing consideration of reasonable measures to defend the unborn. Please shoot down HJ1 and keep your consciences clean and our state a beacon of hope.
HJ 1- Virginia is the only remaining state in the south that allows women to make decisions about their bodies with their families and their doctors. It’s critical that we ensure this right remains by enshrining it into our constitution. HJ 2- Healthy democracies rely on voter participation. Individuals who have served their sentences should be allowed to rejoin society with their rights intact without jumping through additional hoops. Individuals with disabilities are full members of society and should never be denied their right to vote without sufficient judicial oversight. HJ 9 - The right to chose who you love while still enjoying the privileges and protections a marriage can provide has been the law of the land for nearly a decade. It’s time for our constitution to reflect that reality. As we watch the Supreme Court, ruling after ruling, we’ve seen rights that a majority of voters support rolled back. Now it’s more important than ever that Virginia take state action to protect its residents.
I very much oppose the passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws to protect unborn children. This could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned, much like in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians, born and unborn.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I am a woman and believe in women. I know this is hard for some people to understand, but violating the lives of unborn children is not uplifting women in any way. It is a complete affront and degradation of all human life. We must do better for our women, children, and families.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I am a resident of Henrico, VA, and am writing as a very concerned citizen of Virginia, and as a woman, in SUPPORT of ALL THREE of these constitutional amendments - worried that my rights, and those of fellow Virginians, are under attack and are soon be threatened further. I am concerned for fellow citizens, for our future citizens, and our collective freedom. These Amendments will serve to guide lawmakers to protect these fundamental freedoms in future deliberations and decision-making. Our voices deserve, and need to be heard, and should continue to be fundamentally involved in decisions made about our bodies, our lives, and our representation in our representative democracy. I ask that all of these three constitutional amendments be added to the Virginia State Constitution today. It is the right thing to do, and time is of the essence to ensure the protection and the rights of all of our Citizens. Thank you.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
I oppose amendment HJ1. We need to value life of both mother and child. Please do not forget the most innocent victims in abortion. Where is their protection in this amendment.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians. Marcella Hadeed
I strongly and deeply oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians. This law is inhumane and will put countless lives in jeopardy.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians. Thank you for your kind consideration on behalf of women and babies.
Ref. HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ1 ignores the fact that modern science is clearly showing that "life" in a mother's womb starts earlier than we understood in 1972 and the negative effects of an abortion on a mother extend years past the abortion date. What more will science unveil in the coming years. You should wait and see. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 is bad politics. You have seen in the most recent election that pandering to an extremist wing of the Democrat Party is suicidal politics. Do you really want to repeat the mistakes of Elizabeth Guzman? Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that address the demand side of abortion. We need robust support to help expecting mothers, and aggressive accountability existed for fathers, not a misguided policy that hits the wrong target. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. This effort to change the constitution is out of step with the public and you will pay a cost for this "initiative" in the election in 2025.
Because the abortion Industry has become a money making operation where woman's lives are sacrificed for money and politics can dictate how much they are allowed to do this. I AM EXTREMELY OPPOSED TO BILL.HJ1. There can be no right to allow an industry to harm women without oversight. If a woman goes into an abortion clinic they are given NO options but to kill their child. They offer no counseling or material help for the woman but rather than hard persuasion to terminate the life Of their child. As a physcian I have heard too many women tell me they had no choice to abort because they had no money or support and how they tell me through tears they can never forget that they killed their child. In addition we know from other states that this amendment can and has been deceptively worded So it's true meaning is hidden. And that this amendment can lead to babies born alive and left to die--cry themselves to death or suffocate. We also know from electronmicrography that life begins at birth when a completely new human being with completely seperate DNA from the mother or father becomes alive. Therefore any abortion is deliberate killing of innocent human life. When we have more than 2 million people looking to adopt a baby. How can we justify this killing in any way.
Abortion is healthcare. Bans on abortions do not get rid of abortions, they simply get rid of SAFE abortions. There are too many cases where women are dying because they have gone septic, because an embryo has implanted somewhere unsafe (fallopian tube, c section scar), or they have naturally miscarried and an ABORTION is the medically necessary procedure needed to save the mothers life, in all these cases the embryo is nonviable. Only the mother should be able to make these choices. My body my choice. Banning abortions will not end abortions. Pro lifers can focus on the life that exists and hurting in our community outside the womb. They don’t need to infringe on our rights in the name of “vulnerable life”. Forcing that woman to deliver increases her own trauma, and the chances that that child will grow up not having the things it needs. Keep your minds, hands, and policies away from our pussies.
I oppose HJ1-Herring ! This amendment would undermine prolife laws we already have in place. Please do not allow this to happen. Respectfully, Erma Cox
HJ 1 – Herring I strongly oppose adding a "right" to abortion to Virginia's constitution. There are few protections in place for unborn children, such as requiring parental consent and a ban on partial-birth abortions, and HJ1 would endanger even those. It would also endanger future legislation protecting unborn babies. Babies are people before, during, and after birth and HJ1's policy of unlimited abortion up until birth would be a tragedy and devastation for our state. Instead, I urge that you put policies in place that protect and affirm the dignity and life of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – Bennett-Parker I support HJ 2. As in most states, if someone has completed their sentences that person should have voting rights restored. HJ 9 – Sickles I oppose HJ 9. Marriage came before any nation, religion, or law in its design and purpose and should not be changed.
As a mom of three, I am horrified that our state would consider devaluing the precious lives of unborn through all nine months of pregnancy to the point of enshrining their ability to be slaughtered. As a representative body charged with protecting the citizens of our state, I urge you to recognize the inherent dignity of His most precious image bearers.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
Life begins at conception and the continued support of abortion, especially at any stage, keeps us on a path of devaluing life. This decision can move us forward in affecting the value we place on our aged, our disabled, our marginalized, etc. I am a retired L&D nurse and from seeing spontaneous loses of infants from 18 weeks and up, the truth and beauty of life in God's miracle creation stands firm and should not be flushed out. I stronly oppose HJ1 (Section 11-A. Fundamental right to reproductive freedom). and request that you vote to oppose as well.
I am a voter in Albemarle County, Virginia, and I oppose HJ1, the proposed Constitutional Amendment.
HU1-I reject HJ1. Virginia is a land of freedom going back to our inception. Virginia had to fight its way into being. Much is the same with these unborn babies-the only difference is that they are not heard. We need to give them the freedom of birth to be heard. HU9 I oppose HJ9. In marriage, two bodies are joined to become one. This one body is being messed with in this constitutional proposal with ideas and rhetoric that will deliberately cost Virginians spoils from this over-popularized, temporary, contemporary thought. Stop the continuation of this illogical proposal. HJ2 Yes, I support HJ 2. Prisoners are people. When they have completed their sentences they can vote.
I say no to abortion at anytime I say marriage is between a man and a woman
Please don't pass HJ1! I vehemently oppose this bill! God is in Control, and passing HJ1 bill is against His word. Don't choose destruction for Virginians. California's crime/fires are examples of God's wrath. Please Do Not pass HJ1!!!
HJ1 - This is not and never was a fundamental right. Allowing murder of a child up to birth is far, far too extreme. In addition, minors should never be allowed to make such a life altering decision without parental knowledge. If they aren’t mature enough to vote, why would they be old enough to make this kind of decision that they will have to live with the rest of their lives.
Securing a right for violent death of children is reprehensible; allegiance to a death culture is deleterious to our entire populace. It is imperative that representatives employ medical fact which informs the questions of ethics lest a cavalier attitude pervade and degrade this commonwealth. Negating child rights in utero brings the entire state mechanism concerning health and welfare in question in that no frail or fragile personage will ever live in security or safety. "Calling abortion healthcare is as calling slavery job security." Carson
"I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians."
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1 is not about reproductive freedom. It is about allowing the life of the most vulnerable to be killed; destroyed. It is morally wrong and uncivilized to take the life of the unborn. Do not allow this amendment to go forward.
I am opposed to HJ1 on reproductive freedom because it fails to take into account the rights of an unborn baby whose life would be terminated by an abortion. I am opposed to HJ on same-sex marriage, as it violates the traditional and proper definition of marriage.
I am very much opposed to this amendment. Virginia will not benefit from such a law, whose purpose is to promote the vested interests of a small minority. Minorities are important, but as legislators, it is your position to promote the interests of the general welfare of the Commonwealth, not the political interests of a few. Please vote against this amendment!
I support
I support
Life is a gift from God which begins with conception. Abortion is murder. I pray that you will not vote for this bill.
Reject this amendment! You shall not kill is one of the 10 commandments and no one has the right to take the life of another at any point of a person’s life - from conception until natural death. Accept responsibility for your actions, whether a baby is conceived or not! If you cannot, then don’t blame the baby - at least give the baby up for adoption! Thank you and remember there is life after death.
Please vote "No" on abortions (HJ1). I'm asking you to stand up for these children. They are independent human beings. Their location does not change their value. They are dependent on their parents and other adults for life, just as any toddler. We have no right to take their future from them; on the contrary, they have every right to "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness." Please stand up for them and vote "No".
I oppose HJ1. Abortion until birth is provision that would allow legally killing viable, healthy babies and is unnecessary. There are provisions in place to save the life of a mother without purposely killing the baby. The people of Virginia should have a voice in this matter. Please vote no.
I oppose passage of HJ1. This amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children. Virginia should be able to pass laws protecting human life.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I am a husband and a father of our five children. Everyone in our family has duties and obligations according to there situation to help each other within the family. We make sacrifices everyday out of love for each other. It is one of my wife's and my duties to teach our children to become virtuous and to become more virtuous ourselves. As our children get older they start to teach their younger siblings as well the difference between right and wrong, good and bad, just and unjust. They look after each other and protect one another, especially those smaller and younger than them. According to Plato, the purpose of a government is to create a virtuous society. This committee has a responsibility, a duty, to help create a virtuous society. Family is the basis of society and also a reflection of it. In order to have a virtuous family or society, we must love each other. Love is an act which is to will the good of the other. We do not love when we harm or kill the most vulnerable or innocent among us and we certainly do not become more virtuous. My children are still young and developing. A child in the womb is a young, developing person in a stage of life. It is not an act of love to kill our most vulnerable children. Nor is it an act of love to make laws allowing for the killing of innocent children. In a family we make sacrifices for each other daily. In society we are also called to make sacrifices out of love for one another. These sacrifices help us to become more virtuous. I implore you to start working on ideas that can help young mothers and families to bring new life into this world instead of writing laws to destroy life.
A child in the womb should be protected - not offered up for slaughter merely for the convenience of a woman's choice. I hold my infant son asleep as I write this, and he was no less himself at any point in the womb as he is right here in my arms. To be human is to face and embrace change. An abortion is child sacrifice. A woman will sacrifice her child for the sake of her career, her lifestyle, her already unknown future. It is those in power and those with the loudest voices that preach tolerance and kindness to all but they don't mean it. There is absolutely no compassion in the choice to abort a child. Only selfishness. I speak from experience. My biggest regret in life was aborting my first child at 6 weeks - whose DNA already determined so much about them, whose heart was already beating. Who had fingers and toes already beginning to take shape. I did not give my first baby a chance. I deserve hell for it. But for some reason God gave me my son. Each and every human being is created in the image of an Almighty God who loves His creation and calls us to love it to. "Love thy neighbor." These unborn children should be loved. They too are endowed by our Creator with unalienable rights. The first is the right to life. To allow this bill into place is to deny constitutional rights to our youngest, most vulnerable citizens. Please, I beg you. Do not let this bill pass.
Please do not support HJ1. This isn't about bodily autonomy or healthcare. It's about supporting Americans and all people from the moment of conception and allowing them to have their rights to life protected. For people who say this is about bodily autonomy, do you know that the baby that is formed is not your own body? Surely if someone else decides to dismember you, you'd wish you had a voice to stop it? Women deserve more. This also isn't about disguising abortion as healthcare. This is about taking advantage of women who are socio and economically disadvantaged, and making a profit from them. Telling women that abortion is the best and more "empowering" option when support throughout pregnancy and after is more expensive. Planned parenthood actively engages in selling aborted human remains from abortions to make money, as well as covering up women and men who are involved in child and sex trafficking. Women deserve so much more than this. They need taxpayer money and support from the House and all of Congress to get the tools and support they need - access to free ultrasounds and health screenings, support throughout pregnancy, and shelters and resources for those experiencing violence. Allowing abortion up to birth will further push away any civil responsibility that we have to help one another and allow criminals to hide behind the simple and violent act of getting an abortion to cover up the truth. If you are for abortion, you also support covering up trafficking of children and women, and you support women losing the right to child support by men. Do not let this happen. Support life, and support resources for women and children after they are born.
I oppose HJ1 and HJ9
Protecting access to reproductive health care has never been more important. Abortion is health care. Virginia has an obligation to protect women in a country where denying care to women should be what is illegal. Our daughters should not have less rights than their grandmothers And the government has absolutely no business deciding what is best for anyones body.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
I vehemently oppose HJ 1. There is no freedom in being allowed to take someone else's life.. At the moment of conception, another person's life begins - another person with their own bodies and their own freedoms. They have a right to LIVE! Please consider ways to support women, children and families instead - as Virginians, we should support and protect the life and the dignity of every human being, no matter how small. I vehemently oppose HJ 9 - marriage should not be redefined. Marriage is the union of one man and one woman and other unions are NOT the same.
Dear House of Delegates. I am a new voter and as a new voter I ask that you hear my voice. Everyday thousands of women are dying due to the fact that they are not receiving the proper reproductive care they need. Why should rape victims be forced to carry the child of their attacker, some of these victims just twelve years old? Why should a twelve year old girl be a mother when she could be a kid instead? Why should women have to carry a pregnancy that could in danger their lives? Why should women have to carry a fetus that wouldn’t live long after birth or be disabled? Why? Women deserve the right to proper health care. Some people cannot afford to raise a child or give a disabled child the care they might need, therefore they should be able to choose if they want to continue with the pregnancy. Women shouldn’t even have to explain why they want an abortion to people. It is their right and theirs only, no anyone else’s. I’m also addressing the marriage equality act. As a member of the LGBTQ community myself I wake up everyday scared. I’m scared of being attacked and harassed in the streets purely because of my sexuality. I should be able to love who I want no matter the public’s opinion. Gay marriage became legal in Virginia in 2014, that’s just ten years ago, and suddenly the government wants to revoke it? Just imagine how many lives that effects if revoked. What will happen to those already married? Are they going to be forced to divorce because they don’t fit the imagine of a proper marriage. LGBTQ community suicide rates are on the rise. It’s awful that people would rather die then live because of the hate they receive. Why do this? Because the Bible says so? With all do respect I fully support freedom to religion, but the government is not a church and should not be treated as one. Why do this? Because it’s not natural? Many animals exhibit homosexual behavior, and no “woke agenda” is confusing them. You can’t just take away our rights and say “them’s the breaks” if this bill is passed then you’re allowing discrimination. I should not have think “I’ll be better off dead” almost day because I’m terrified. We are heading towards a dystopian future. Without your help delegates people will suffer. If you care about democracy and care about your citizens, you will help us fight this discrimination. You will help us fight for love.
I support HJ1, as a mother and currently pregnant with my second child I believe ALL women should have access to reproductive freedoms. I do not want to have to fear if I will receive proper care in my state or how far my life has to be at risk for my doctors to perform life saving care. I want to live and be able to raise the children the country is so set on women having with little to no support. I want to continue to go to my doctors appointments and feel safe and know my doctor is not fearful they will be arrested if they give me care. I support HJ9 and protecting marriage equality. Every Virginian should have the right to love who they love and have the same rights under law as I do in my marriage. I believe in loving your neighbor as yourself, which means believing they deserve the same rights you have.
I reject HJ 1 Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
I oppose all abortions with only exceptions for tape and incest
I strongly support these amendments. Everyone should be allowed the Healthcare they need to live a healthy life. We should have complete control over our bodies and our lives. We should be free to marry who we love. Thank you.
Oppose further consideration of HJ1 - Herring. Every individual does not have reproductive freedom under this bill. We must stand up to protect those most vulnerable, namely those persons who are being terminated at the sole discretion of the person carrying them. By nature we are very selfish and often need help discerning wisely what actions to make even regarding our own bodies. It takes a village to raise children. Let’s focus our efforts on creating a village worth raising children in instead of one that terminates them so that we don’t have to take responsibility for our actions.
Unrestricted abortion in the name of “reproductive freedom” is not in the interest of Virginians. The state of Virginia has a compelling interest in protecting viable human life. The right to life is the bedrock of all other human rights. Late term abortion sounds good when it is sold as “reproductive freedom,” but it is a heinous and disturbing action that is not legal throughout Europe, and should not be legal in Virginia. NO on HJ1.
I support these amendments because in a nation that values and prioritizes freedom, I believe that individuals should have autonomy over all their decisions. If we are to truly have our unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the government cannot restrict our autonomy in any way. Furthermore our government has a responsibility to protect our rights and by amending our state constitution we are solidifying that protection in the event that there are challenges to these rights federally.
There is no controversy - the developing fetus IS a human being. There is no controversy - the ONLY factors distinguishing the developing fetus from an adult are their environment and their level of development. These unborn children deserve the protection of our state's legislatures. Truly, the measure of any society is how it treats its most vulnerable. Please, protect our unborn children!!
I oppose HJ1 because this amendment will take away the ability of Virginians to enact commonsense policies that protect women and unborn babies from abortion without limits. Abortions for virtually any reason until birth would be enshrined in state law. Taxpayers will be unable to halt the flow of our tax dollars to elective abortion procedures and installing meaningful parental involvement requirements for minors or limits on gruesome abortions late in pregnancy would be out of the question. Similar amendments in other states have also been used to strike down existing protections for unborn babies and their mothers. Instead, let’s build a culture that respects life through all its stages and a state that safeguards the conscience rights of its citizens. This amendment fails to address what’s at the root of this issue: Women and families need support. Let’s come together to make abortion unthinkable, NOT unlimited. NO on this extreme amendment.
Life begins at conception. Once someone has conceived there are two human lives to consider. One is not more valuable than the other.
I urge you to reject HJ1. It is a sad day when our society can provide no other help for a woman facing a complex pregnancy than to murder her child. This does not fix the underlying problem that lead the woman to consider abortion, but instead heaps more trauma on top. No woman needs an abortion. Instead of enshrining the “right” to end the life of her child, we should be helping women with access to safe housing, education, child-care, and providing her the resources and hope necessary to bring her child into the world and raise him/her in a dignified home. Abortion doesn’t solve problems, it only creates more.
I oppose HJ1. We do not need more abortions in Virginia. Abortion harms women and kills children. I have seen my own dead child at 10 weeks old. I oppose HJ9. Marriage is between a man and a woman. It is the building block of society.
The United States Constitution is clear in its Equal Protection clause. Under the 14th Amendment, this proposed constitutional amendment would violate the US Constitution by denying the protection of human life to all human lives, born and unborn. This proposed constitutional amendment should not proceed further, as it violates the US Constitution. It is harmful for women and children across the state. Women’s healthcare deserves better than simply abortion.
I’m opposed to HJ1. Please vote to protect unborn babies.
Not only must we protect the innocent life in the womb but we also need to protect women from being pressured throughout their pregnancy to abort.
I am not in support of this change in our amendment. I believe in the rights of all humans including the unborn. The internal trauma caused by abortion is also something no one talks about. I am an adoptive mother of three children and am so thankful for this precious gift. Abortion is inhuman and kills one life and deeply traumatizes another. I have worked in this space for years and heard so many stories. The long term inner turmoil and pain of choosing abortion can be devastating. And it is unreal to think of so many innocent breathing babies with beating hearts being killed. There has to be a better way. Raise the adoption incentives, increase family life education and so forth but i do not support changing this amendment around abortion and it should not be the option.
"I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians."
"I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians."
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians of all ages, including the unborn.
HJ1- A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. HJ2-I support all people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored. HJ9-I oppose HJ9- Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
As a resident of Virginia and a Christian man, I urge all Virginia magistrates to reject this bill. Abortion is clearly murder—not healthcare. For the sake of the children not yet born and for the sake of our Lord, please do not include this wickedness in our state constitution. Thank you.
I’m writing to oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
I support these amendments.
To whom all should be concerned, Enabling an ability under the constitution of the of state of Virginia without its constituents voting for or against is treason. Your are elected officials that need to be an example by first and foremost protecting all life. The word of God requires of seek wisdom in all matters and not become an enabler to murder. Proverbs 4:6 Do not forsake wisdom, and she will protect you; love her, and she will watch over you. Respectfully, Abel
A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right.
I strongly support passing 1&3 - I honestly can’t believe we are even STILL talking about the right to bodily autonomy and marriage. 🙄 2 - I support this, but would suggest removing the exception to felons voting from the language. Everyone deserves the right to vote, regardless of decisions they have made or been forced to make. That said, if a felon can sit in the WH, why in the world would we think it’s right to withhold the right to vote from the rest of them?!
I am writing you this morning to plead with you on behalf of the unborn. Please do not support HJ1. The murdering of children can not be allowed! If it starts here where will it end? In my life, I have seen many women who would long to have a child. To see them go through miscarriages and failed adoptions is crushing. I have also seen many women use abortion as a form of birth control. Why not educate society on planning a family, and the responsibilities of being a mother, and equip these women with the education they need to make the right choice? Is it acceptable for a woman to murder her child because she doesn’t want to be responsible for that child and not the one in the womb? If you answer no to that, then you need to vote against HJ1. God makes no mistakes. Every child upon conception is a precious soul and is depending on you to make the right decision. Thank you for voting against this.
I am a pro-life constituent and was deeply troubled to learn that Pro-abortion Politicians are trying to add a No Limits on Abortion-until-Birth Amendment to the Virginia Constitution.
I deeply oppose this proposed amendment. We should be protecting all Virginians, especially the weakest and most vulnerable, not ensuring a “right” to snuff out the lives of the unborn. This highly partisan effort does nothing to heal our commonwealth or country nor to protect its citizens.
"I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians."
I support HJ1. Freedom of body and person is a fundamental human right. Governmental interference is wrong. I support HJ2 On e time is served voting rights restitution should be automatic. Make it as easy as possible for citizens to vote. It is our most basic civil rights in free society.
I vehemently oppose HJ 1. There is no freedom in being allowed to take someone else's life.. At the moment of conception, another person's life begins - another person with their own bodies and their own freedoms. They have a right to LIVE! Please consider ways to support women, children and families instead - as Virginians, we should support and protect the life and the dignity of every human being, no matter how small. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored. Voting is a privilege! I vehemently oppose HJ 9 - marriage should not be redefined. Marriage is the union of one man and one woman and other unions are NOT the same.
"I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians
I am opposed to HJ-1, a Constitutional amendment, mischaracterized as a “right to reproductive freedom”. It DOES NOT provide that every individual has the fundamental right to reproductive freedom because it DENIES the unborn The Right to Life. The Commonwealth is absolutely justified by a compelling state interest to promote The Right to Life. As a retired labor leader, I can tell you we need more Virginians alive and living in Virginia! The supporters of this short-sighted legislation are freely admitting that they have no other solutions to the issues facing Virginia and that they believe life is not worth living. Life is worth living! And I pray that those opposed to this legislation carry on and continue to work to solve our problems and issues. This misguided legislation is not the answer. It must be opposed and defeated. We must make Virginia the best place for people to get married, have children, and live life to the fullest. Abortion is evil. Oppose this legislation. Thank you,
I support this amendment! Politicians should NOT be involved in medical care!
Please support the right to choose and pass HJ 1. Please support the right to vote by passing HJ 2. Just because someone made a mistake, they should not have a life sentence preventing them from voting after they have served their sentence. Please support love and the right to marriage by passing HJ 9.
I strongly support passing 1&3 - I honestly can’t believe we are even STILL talking about the right to bodily autonomy and marriage. 🙄 2 - I support this, but would suggest removing the exception to felons voting from the language. Everyone deserves the right to vote, regardless of decisions they have made or been forced to make. That said, if a felon can sit in the WH, why in the world would we think it’s right to withhold the right to vote from the rest of them?!
As a Catholic; as a single, childless woman; and as a member of Generation Z, I gratefully take this opportunity to comment on the proposed amendments. First, I implore you to reject HJ1 – Herring. Unless there is a strong commitment to protecting human life at all stages of development, starting at conception, our Commonwealth cannot truly achieve safety for all, equality of opportunity for all, an encouraging future for the next generation, or the sense that everyone is unreservedly valued. So please oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s Constitution and endangering what safeguards there do exist for the youngest and smallest in our Commonwealth (such as the partial birth abortion ban and the parental consent law). Instead, choose to craft policies that lift up and support the lives of mother and child as both endowed with dignity. Second, I encourage you to move ahead with HJ2 – Bennett-Parker. If our Commonwealth should be a champion of the life and dignity of each and every person, it should also practice a justice that is fundamentally and thoroughly humanistic. This includes restoring voting rights after an individual finishes out his or her sentence. Third and finally, I urge you to reject HJ9 – Sickles and its removal of the definition of marriage as between one man and one woman from Virginia’s Constitution. Defining marriage as between one man and one woman affirms the important and distinctive purpose proper to this institution, a purpose which “predates any nation, religion, or law” (Virginia Catholic Conference). Simultaneously, here as in the other responses to the proposed amendments, the dignity and worth that belong unconditionally to all persons by nature should be strongly and repeatedly emphasized. Thank you so much for this opportunity to comment.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
I'm against HJ1
Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
REJECT HJ1 - Murder is a violation of God's law. Life is a fundamental, God-given right as recognized by our national Constitution, our state laws, and the common law our legal tradition is built upon. The human life is made in God's image and begins at fertilization, meaning the pre-born have a right to life and must be protected from the moment of fertilization. A right to "reproductive freedom" as defined by this bill cannot be enshrined in our Constitution as it does not exist. Murder is not a right. In fact, as an agent of justice, the state has every interest in "penalizing, prosecuting, or otherwise taking adverse action against [any] individual" for committing or assisting in the murder of innocent human beings. Repent, reject HJ1, and may God have mercy on your souls.
The fundamental right to reproductive freedom should NOT be passed. It does not represent the majority of what the state of Virginia stands for and it jeopardizes the safety of women as it will limit clinical safety standards, and undermine the fact that late term abortions are DANGEROUS and DAMAGING. This bill does NOT value the lives and safety of the citizens of Virginia.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
HJ1 : Please allow women (and others) to have autonomy over their reproductive decisions. In VA freedom also means the freedom to choose. We can’t say VA is for lovers and not have progressive reproductive healthcare or a right to privacy between patients and doctors. The ability to make medical decision has no right being in the hands of a legislature. That is privileged information and decision making between a doctor and a patient. Roe v wade had it right and our legislature should remember that. Upwards of 95% of abortions happen within the first 13 weeks meaning most people who get an abortion do so in the first trimester most of the comments on here are fearful of a fake late term abortion hysteria or based on the Bible WHICH NOT EVERYONE FOLLOWS. Hj2 : In reality most people make mistakes. While felonies are serious the people who come out of that are still American citizens (otherwise Trump should not be president but I digress) as fellow Americans they still deserve to have a voice in where their taxes go, who is governing them, and what laws should look like. Life does not stop at prison in fact I would argue it usually begins upon release as most of these people come out wanting to stay out. Hi3: Richmond is most literally a queer city to deny that marriage is different for different people would be to deny equal rights of which half your citizens are. Protect your people’s sanctity of the institution of marriage and repeal the archaic label of one man and one woman. Half our bars are queer owned and very popular that it should be a no brainer equalizing the language of our constitution to include and protect all kinds of marriage because that is a persons right to define that for themselves.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 and enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
Please allow women (and others) to have autonomy over their reproductive decisions. In VA freedom also means the freedom to choose. We can’t say VA is for lovers and not have progressive reproductive healthcare or a right to privacy between patients and doctors. The ability to make medical decision has no right being in the hands of a legislature. That is privileged information and decision making between a doctor and a patient. Roe v wade had it right and our legislature should remember that.
Please allow women (and others) to have autonomy over their reproductive decisions. In VA freedom also means the freedom to choose. We can’t say VA is for lovers and not have progressive reproductive healthcare or a right to privacy between patients and doctors. The ability to make medical decision has no right being in the hands of a legislature. That is privileged information and decision making between a doctor and a patient. Roe v wade had it right and our legislature should remember that.
I am speaking in regards to the HJ1 bill. I do NOT support this constitutional amendment, because women deserve better than abortion. Abortion should not be legal until the moment of birth, and women instead need support and love from those who understand the dignity of every human life. I ask of you to hear our pleas for the precious lives at stake.
Please allow women (and others) to have autonomy over their reproductive decisions. In VA freedom also means the freedom to choose. Also we can’t be VA is for lovers and not have progressive reproductive healthcare.
Please allow women (and others) to have autonomy over their reproductive decisions. In VA freedom also means the freedom to choose. Also we can’t be VA is for lovers and not have progressive reproductive healthcare.
Abortion is not a human right, life is. HJ1 will cause the murder of innocent children. Not only do I strongly reject it. I am horrified at the fact that there is not a single mention about limitations. This bill is trying to set up for infanticide. The Healthcare industry is so advanced that the "need" for abortions is non existent. I say NO
These proposals do not promote the common good. Abortion does grave injustice to innocent life. Once a debt to society has been paid a person should have their rights and duties as a citizen restored. Marriage of one man and one woman is the building block of a society with a strong future. Keep Virginia’s future strong!
Reproductive freedom is one of the essential freedoms inferred in the Declaration of Independence as presented in the phrase, “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” All women rightfully deserve to know and maintain absolute unfettered personal control over their own body, without argument. No government, be it local, state or federal should be dictating to any human, male and especially female, how to manage their reproductive health needs or desires. I submit herewith my support in the affirmative HJ1. ~Gordon A MacArthur
I oppose any law or amendment that would prevent Virginians from passing legislation protecting the life of the unborn.. They have no voice and cannot protect themselves from being aborted. All fetuses have the right to life.
HJ1 - keep abortion and pregnancy care legal and safe. HJ2 - these people have served their time and deserve the right to vote again without any approval or authorizations needed HJ9 - all families are valid in the state of Virginia. Everyone has a right to marry and create a family with whomever they choose. Virginia is for Lovers.
Reject HJ1 - EVERY human being is entitled to protection of the God given right to life. The human being in the womb of an expectant mother is the most vulnerable life and deserves the utmost protection from harm. So called reproductive freedom stops at the point where it will do harm to an innocent life. End the killing of innocent human life. Reject HJ1 and begin to restore moral sanity to this nation.
I strongly oppose HJ1 and do not want it to go forward. There were 16,722 abortions performed in VA in 2022. There is NO lack of access or availability. This bill as proposed would eliminate all health protections for women seeking an abortion such as the right to see the ultrasound, be informed of the gestational age and risks, parental consent laws. This bill is not wanted by women.
This bill is a veiled attempt to enshrine abortion in the Virginia state constitution. It is cloaked in the language of reproductive freedom but that is misleading. I am fine with men and women being free to make their own sexual decisions. However, science tells us that life begins at conception. From that moment forward we must consider the rights of both mother and child. As someone who was targeted for abortion in utero, I feel I have a highly personal stake in this debate. Abortion was sold to my mom as the merciful option because I wasn’t expected to live or expected to have severe disabilities if I did. Today, I am blind and wheelchair and ventilator dependent, but I also have two Master’s degrees, volunteer for multiple nonprofits, live independently, and am grateful every day that my mom chose life for me. As a member of the disability community, I also find the language of this bill extremely concerning. “A state interest is compelling only when it is to ensure the protection of the health of an individual seeking care, consistent with accepted clinical standards of practice and evidence-based medicine.” Does or should the state not also have an interest in protecting and providing care to those who are unable to seek it for themselves due to age or disability. I fear the language of this bill could set a dangerous hand off precedent that would make our most vulnerable populations even more vulnerable. I ask you to consider that this is far more complex than a simple bodily autonomy issue when you vote on this bill. I am a fierce defender of bodily autonomy. However, we can place the right to bodily autonomy over the right to life. If we cannot agree on this, I ask that you still vote no today because of the language issue and the harm it could do to our most vulnerable communities. Thank you
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution.
I oppose abortion until birth. This is one of the most liberal positions in the entire world. Certainly the development of the unborn child at 15 weeks shows that it is a baby that is being killed after it is 15 weeks old. Plus, such a permissive position on abortion is corruptive of our medical and legal professions. In addition, this proposed legislation would vitiate existing legislative protections for the unborn and make it more difficult for all to have children who are the future of our society.
Beginning with the term: “Reproduction” includes birth control, sterilization, pregnancy, abortion, menstrual regulation (abortion vacuum procedure without a pregnancy test), sex or gender changes, surrogate pregnancy, creating and destroying developing human embryos, and cloning currently illegal, see VA Code, 32.1-12,21-22. The words, “every individual,” apply to all adult males, females, as well as minors under 18 because these words are not restricted, modified or qualified by the Amendment authors. Therefore, no means of reproductive freedom behavior is excluded legal protection because of age or sex by the authors of the Reproductive Freedom Amendment, RFA. Additionally, the Supreme Court ruled, “neither the Fourteenth Amendment nor the Bill of Rights is for adults alone.” [In re Gault, (1967)] The RFA states, “The Commonwealth shall not discriminate in the protection or enforcement of this fundamental right.” But treating males or females under 18 differently than males or females over 18 is a textbook example of discrimination. Attorneys Carrie Severino and Frank Scaturro noted points of the Ohio Abortion Referendum language (2023), which are strikingly similar to the Virginia counterparts that: “The proposed Ohio constitutional amendment would make the state … become a likely jurisdiction to harbor a future Kermit Gosnell, whether he is a practitioner of abortion, sex-change surgery, or other procedures under the umbrella of reproductive care. Complete strangers who assist children in obtaining life-altering procedures would find themselves on the right side of the law, while parents who try to protect their children would be deemed to have run afoul of the law.” “Any individual who tries to assist a minor in pursuing such procedures would be protected by law, while a parent who objects would be cut out of the decision-making process, perhaps even penalized.” “It appears that the amendment … would even offer a level of protection to nonphysicians in their performance of covered procedures — whether abortion, sex-change surgery, or something else. … the language extends to any “person or entity” who provides assistance with the procedure at issue.” [National Review online, March 13, 2023, “Ohio’s Disastrous Abortion Ballot Proposal”]
The right and access to birth control is vitally important to women’s reproductive health ( mens as well). Women have the right to choose when and if they become pregnant (especially if abortion is off the table). Women are not broodmares, they must have a say in it!
Please don't pass HJ1 to ammend our state constitution. One of the Ten Commandments is Thou shall not kill. This would allow murdering the babies any time - up through the 9th month. These women considering abortion just need more help to make better choices. That's where we need to put our tax money, not to Planned Parenthood. They do not provide health care.
I care deeply about reproductive rights and marriage equality. I support these amendments.
I support all 3 amendments and look forward to Virginia enshrining restoration of voting rights, marriage equality, and reproductive freedom into our constitution
I strongly oppose HJ1. This bill is written as if abortion access has been denied. Abortion rates have increased by 77% in VA since Dobbs and the number of clinics have increased. There are 19 clinics in VA and 5 of them are in Richmond. Even those who support abortion, only 22% of believe in late term abortions. We could focus on actual maternal care and mortality rates, not add to the mortality rate by supporting abortion up until birth. Check out jfor5.com so you can what the right to reproductive freedom looks like up until birth.
As a voting constituent in the commonwealth of Virginia, I am AGAINST enshrining the “right” to reproductive freedom in our state constitution, as this bill seeks to do. As a woman, I am against the assertion that murder is a “right” that some women claim they should be given. This is not freedom. “Reproductive freedom” takes the lives of future women and men and takes their right to live, to breathe, to move, to be. Their freedom is being blatantly ignored. As a nurse, I know that this is not health care or even healthy for the women seeking for the right to kill their unborn children. It often leads to serious complications after such procedures are completed. And finally as a Christian, I believe the gift of life that God gives is sacred. This bill is immoral and unethical; it is in direct opposition to God’s Law. Please do not amend our constitution to allow such an abhorrent practice to continue. Thank you, Martha Vernot
I fully support HJ1, HJ2 and HJ9. In a time when women's rights and LGBTQ+ rights are being taken away Virginia needs to be forward thinking and solidify those rights. I want my daughters to grow up in a state where they are respected and valued and able to make informed decisions about their own bodies and have the autonomy to make decisions about their lives without fear of government intervention. Please pass these amendments!!
Beginning with the term: “Reproduction” includes birth control, sterilization, pregnancy, abortion, menstrual regulation (abortion vacuum procedure without a pregnancy test), sex or gender changes, surrogate pregnancy, creating and destroying developing human embryos, and cloning currently illegal, see VA Code, 32.1-12,21-22. The words, “every individual,” apply to all adult males, females, as well as minors under 18 because these words are not restricted, modified or qualified by the Amendment authors. Therefore, no means of reproductive freedom behavior is excluded legal protection because of age or sex by the authors of the Reproductive Freedom Amendment, RFA. Additionally, the Supreme Court ruled, “neither the Fourteenth Amendment nor the Bill of Rights is for adults alone.” [In re Gault, (1967)] The RFA states, “The Commonwealth shall not discriminate in the protection or enforcement of this fundamental right.” But treating males or females under 18 differently than males or females over 18 is a textbook example of discrimination. Attorneys Carrie Severino and Frank Scaturro noted points of the Ohio Abortion Referendum language (2023), which are strikingly similar to the Virginia counterparts that: “The proposed Ohio constitutional amendment would make the state … become a likely jurisdiction to harbor a future Kermit Gosnell, whether he is a practitioner of abortion, sex-change surgery, or other procedures under the umbrella of reproductive care. Complete strangers who assist children in obtaining life-altering procedures would find themselves on the right side of the law, while parents who try to protect their children would be deemed to have run afoul of the law.” “Any individual who tries to assist a minor in pursuing such procedures would be protected by law, while a parent who objects would be cut out of the decision-making process, perhaps even penalized.” “It appears that the amendment … would even offer a level of protection to nonphysicians in their performance of covered procedures — whether abortion, sex-change surgery, or something else. … the language extends to any “person or entity” who provides assistance with the procedure at issue.” [National Review online, March 13, 2023, “Ohio’s Disastrous Abortion Ballot Proposal”]
Murdering babies is not a right, it is a sin. The Lord declares that shedding innocent blood pollutes the land that engages in such practices. Furthermore, our State constitution states: "All men are by nature equally free and independent and have certain inherent rights, of which, when they enter into a state of society, they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their posterity..." HJ1 specificically seeks to deprive our posterity of the right to life. These tiny Virginians should not be murdered simply due to their young age. Moreover, children in the womb are not just a hypothetical posterity but rather they are a real and already alive posterity, making them also citizens with rights. Do not let this bill, which seeks to allow the shedding of the innocent blood of tiny citizens, go anywhere! We do not wish to be a state that murders tiny humans and calls it a "reproductive freedom." Murder is not a right. However, it is a right to NOT be murdered. Protect the most vulnerable among us and let's hate what God hates! Proverbs 6:16-18 — There are six things which Yahweh hates, Even seven which are an abomination to Him: Haughty eyes, a lying tongue, And hands that shed innocent blood, A heart that devises wicked thoughts, Feet that hasten to run to evil…"
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
Honorable Committee: I oppose HJ1-Herring bill, the enshrining of abortion due to no restrictions up to 9 months and after. I can see if there is a danger to the mother's life and the baby, but at 12 weeks of age, the BABY has a heartbeat and is a human being. The Baby's civil rights must be taken into consideration for it is not the Baby's fault that it was created. What about the Baby's Right to Choose? Those who have sex need to have more accountability for there is birth control other than abortion pill available to prevent pregnancy. I find it disgusting that there are certain individuals who celebrate the killing of an unborn child or the killing of a baby after full term. In abortion, a BABY is mutilated, broken apart and pulled out in pieces. The BABY is a living being that did not choose to be created. It is not the Baby's fault. There need to be benefits available for those who are unable to conceive to adopt babies created by accident. It is inhumane to want to kill a baby for no reason after 12 weeks of gestation and also uncivilized to enjoy the killing of said baby for profit which Planned Parenthood sell the parts of the baby! DO NONE OF YOU HAVE A HEART OF ANY KIND TO THINK OF THE UNBORN BABY AND IT'S RIGHT TO LIFE? I also Oppose HJ2 Bill Bennett Parker I also Oppose HJ9 Bill Sickles Thank you for your time and attention. Kristin Holte
HJ1 Fundamental Right to reproductive Freedom, HJ2 Right to vote-Restoration of Rights, HJ3 Marriage Equality: I support each of these & look forward to their passing as they belong in our system of laws to affirm a full some array of rights available to each citizen of the state of Virginia.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose any amendment to enshrine abortion into Virginia's constitution, especially one so comprehensive as to codify full-term abortion and the barbaric partial-birth abortion procedures. The vast majority of pro-choice proponents don't even support third trimester abortion, and Virginia has never allowed abortion up to birth. Abortion is the calculated, deliberate ending of a human life, which is a complete violation of our nation's beloved inalienable rights of "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." Where is the life and liberty for the pre-born child? Why do they not have equal protection under the law? Why are we discriminating against someone based on age and ability? Isn't that ageist and ableist?
I do not support HJ1. It does not protect innocent children in the womb. Life begins at conception and babies deserve a chance to live. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
Creating a ‘fundamental right to reproductive freedom’ in Virginia through a constitutional amendment is a terrible idea. Instead of pulling a fast one on us, how about legislators do their jobs and find the consensus on where the law on this should be. Since Virginia code already allows abortion all the way through the second trimester for any reason (§ 18.2-73) (I’m 10 weeks pregnant now, let me tell you, 27 weeks is crazy late in the game and is well past the age preemie babies can survive in NICU) and allows it into the third if the right people say so, let’s pump the brakes on any tricky amendments that use euphemisms to describe abortion. Abortion is tragic and violent and bloody, as any woman who’s had one knows. Let’s take it a little more seriously and if you do anything, consider listening to your voters’ concerns and writing legislation that can be tweaked and debated openly. Amendments can’t be changed easily if they have unintended consequences. Laws can. You’ll probably find most Virginians would be more comfortable with an earlier limit, rather than a blanket amendment which does not represent most of our values. Find a better consensus by talking to your constituents and your colleagues. Most pro choice people support some limit, and it’s probably way under that second trimester mark that *we already have*. And pro lifers don’t want to be steamrolled by some amendment that’s going to be a popularity contest on making Virginia one of the most radical when we already have obscenely loose limits on abortion.
HJ1, the right to reproductive freedom. All Virginians should have accessible, quality healthcare that they can afford. This includes all aspects of reproductive care for women - ongoing reproductive health checks, birth control, post-natal care, and abortion - to be determined by the woman and her health care providers. Abortion should be a safe, legal decision made without government interference or penalties for anyone who offers aid or assistance in the process. Virginians have shown their support for reproductive freedom without intrusion from the government. HJ2, the right to vote, restoration of rights. Voting rights should be restored automatically once a person convicted of a felony successfully completes their sentence. Their participation in the democratic process should not be dependent on a vague, arbitrary process decided by the Governor without full explanation of decisions. The Virginia Constitution should be amended to provide the automatic restoration of rights once the sentence for a felony conviction is completed. HJ3, marriage equality. Virginians deserve the opportunity to love and live peacefully with the person of their choice. Just as laws regarding mixed race marriages were changed as citizens attitudes and understanding evolved, the current ban against same-sex marriage should not be part of the Virginia constitution. Virginians' support of same-sex marriage has increased to about 70% in 2021 (Public Religion Research Institute). The current level of support is evidence that the ban should be removed from the constitution. I hope that these bills will be thoughtfully considered for the improved quality of life for all Virginians.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
HJ1, a proposed amendment to the Virginia Constitution that would enshrine extremist no-limits abortion. They do not do this in Europe. OPPOSE This Dem abortion amendment to the Virginia Constitution has got to be the most extreme in the country. No parental consent for minor girls. No protections for a fully-formed viable baby from elective late-term abortions up to the 9th month. This sort of extremism is not what Virginians want.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians."
Above all, the common outcry, which is justly made on behalf of human rights—for example, the right to health, to home, to work, to family, to culture—is false and illusory if the right to life, the most basic and fundamental right and the condition for all other personal rights, is not defended with maximum determination. No one has the right to choose to do what is wrong. Killing of a life for ones convenience is no where in the constitution that you vowed to uphold. Ironically, protection of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness is in that constitution. VOTE NO ON HJ1!
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
I am Dr. Michael Huffman, Executive Director with the Virginia Assembly of Independent Baptists. I represent the voices of over 500+ Baptist Churches scattered throughout the Commonwealth and we oppose HJ1, and urge all representative to vote no. Please see my brief in the attachment below. Thank you.
I am writing to loudly support all three of these bills. I’m excited to see Virginia embrace policy that makes us more equitable and safer during such scary times. I hope we can do what’s right and get these bills through.
I am a constituent in Roanoke, VA, and it has come to my attention that HJ1, or the "Reproductive Freedom Amendment" is going to be put up as an amendment to the VA constitution by the House Privileges and Elections (P&E) Committee on Wednesday, November 13, at 11:00am. I urge you, as Virginia's representatives, to take action to ensure that this measure does not pass as it is not in the interest of the people of your districts nor Virginia because it de-persons the unborn men and women in the womb and strips them of their human rights. Thank you for your time and consideration.
I am writing to you as a young mother and community member. I ask that you oppose HJ1 as it gives no recognition to babies involved in pregnancy. Yes, we should protect pregnant mothers and give them the care that they need, but this in no way justifies the potential ending of a human life that would be allowed by this amendment. How can the language of the amendment speak repeatedly of the pregnant woman but say nothing about the baby inside her? As if pregnancy is somehow a condition that doesn’t involve a child, but then spontaneously a child enters the picture when he/she is born? Please think deeply about what you are supporting. This will have dire consequences for decades to come. We could be doing so much more to protect vulnerable pregnant women and their unborn children. Thank you for your time in reading this comment.
I strongly support these three amendments to our state constitution. I want to protect and support the rights of all Virginia's.
I support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. In regards to HJ1, as many said before me, reproductive rights are human rights. A person should be able to make the decision about carrying or terminating a pregnancy without say from the government or religious organizations. Enshrining the right to abortion will ensure that we do not see the unnecessary death of pregnant people due to being denied care, especially during emergency situations. We have seen so many stories coming out of states where this right has been revoked, which has led to the deaths of many unnecessarily. We need to remember that when woman are seeking late term abortions, this is typically a life saving procedure for the mother who is carrying a fetus that is no longer viable. We cannot force a person to suffer through the death of their child and then potentially lose their own life as well due to lack of legal care. Virginia is at the forefront of the southern states in making sure reproductive care is available and it should stay that way. HJ2 - I believe that this is a step in the right direction and support reformed felons being able to regain their civil right to vote and participate in our democracy. HJ9 - All people deserve to marry the person they love, regardless of gender or race. Marriage is a contract where two people are joining their lives. Any adult couple deserves to be able to enter into these contracts. It does not infringe on the rights of others and will ensure that they are able to advocate for their spouse in situations where this is necessary. Many objections to marriage equality stem from a religious viewpoint. In a government where there should be a separation of church and state, this should not be allowed to affect the law. Thank you for your time!
My wife and I believe in the sanctity of life - the unborn child is a human being and should be protected. We believe abortation is murder. HJ1 is wrong for our state. Thank you.
Argument Against Abortion The Primacy of Life at Conception Madam Chair and members of the committee, My name is Michael Huffman with The Virginia Assembly of Independent Baptists. As the Executive Director of VAIB, representing hundreds of Virginia pastors and many church members, I oppose HJ1.
We already have reproductive freedom. Abortion is murder. Vote no on HJ1.
"I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment because the people of Virginia should have the right to pass laws that will protect unborn children as well as offer support for their mothers. We in Virginia should not pit a mother against her unborn child. It's so sad that we tell women that their lives will be destroyed if they have a baby. This bill, HJI, could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians."
I strongly oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment may overturn current prolife laws in Virginia. It will also prohibit the people of Virginia from passing any laws saving an unborn life. To pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians should be our right, our duty.
I am in support of all three bills - HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. No one other than a person with a uterus and their doctor should be involved decisions for their wellbeing and health. Women should inately hold autonomy over their own body. It is embarrassing that we are still fighting for this. Marriage equality was decided by the federal government, our state should solidify that right to protect its people from possible attacks from the next administration. If you don't like gay marriage, don't have one.
Dear Honorable Delegates of this Committee, I strongly oppose the constitutional amendments proposed by HJ1 and HJ9. Please oppose those amendments. Let us acknowledge the obvious fact that every individual has a fundamental right to life (including the unborn) and to a family. The so called "right to reproductive freedom" appears alive, well and unrestricted in the Commonwealth and our nation. How can we know this? Well, because of the result -- the woman's pregnancy. Human life begins at conception, which is a scientific fact. At that point, the man and woman have already reproduced. Therefore, the "right" actually being sought is the power to legally take a human life, the very human life that is the result of a man's and a women's unrestricted exercise of their right to reproduce. The time "to make and effectuate one's own decisions about all matters related to one's pregnancy" is what men and woman should do prior to intercourse and before reproducing. The protection of human life is, and always has been, a compelling state interest. What is not justifiable is the taking of an innocent human life. With respect to the conduct of committee meetings, the public should have the ability to physically appear and to testify in person before this committee on these proposed amendments. The public is entitled to and should have been given earlier notice, well in advance of such a meeting, in order to allow citizens adequate time to read the proposed amendments and to prepare comments and/or testimony thereon. Therefore, I request that the meeting be adjourned and continued at a later date to allow for greater public participation in the committee's deliberations. Thank you for your kind consideration of my comments.
I strongly oppose this proposed amendment. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seeany rational person a true fundamental tragedy. Encourage all to vote against this proposal.
I strongly oppose HJ1 which would enshrine abortion-the taking of precious life. VA should be working to affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. VA should be protecting the most vulnerable who do not have a voice.
Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
I oppose the HJ1 and HJ9 amendments. These amendments enshrine the murder of children and defy sacred biblical definition of marriage.
I oppose the passage of HJ1 since this amendment will prevent the people representing Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current pro-life laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass laws that protect and respect the lives of all Virginians.
I implore you to reject this amendment. Human beings are created by the living and Holy and just GOD, in His image. He has said in His Word that you shall not murder. The life of a pre-born baby is a human life, and the willful taking of it, is heinous and evil in the sight of GOD. He is a consuming fire, before whom we shall all stand and give account; He is also gracious and Merciful. I beg you to lead us in repentance for this evil, and uphold justice against those who would slay the innocent. The blood of millions has already run in our streets, under the supposed sanction of human law. For this, there will be a reckoning, for the LORD hears the cries of His people, and delights to lift up the downcast. To continue to allow this blood sacrifice, offered on the altar of our convenience, is to deliberately spit in the face of the GOD who made you. You may say, “I don’t believe in that GOD,” however, Romans 1 and Psalm 19 make it clear that the creation—nature, the stars, the entire universe—speak loudly and effectively of the GOD who created them. “Therefore they (we) are without excuse.” Romans 1 In light of all this, I beg you to not participate in the deeds of darkness whose only fruit is the destruction of those who perpetuate them. Our Father is merciful and kind, but He is also just and holy, and He will not be mocked. All nations and peoples who will not bow in obedience and worship will be destroyed, and suffer the torment that they have purchased with their own children’s blood. I urge you to turn to Christ, the King of kings and Lord of lords, very GOD of very GOD, and seek His face. He is mighty to save. He puts low the proud and lifts up the humble. Please do justly, love mercy, and walk humbly before GOD, and govern in light of that. These little babies, little boys and girls with fingers and toes, whose smiles are irresistible, and whose dependence is more gift than responsibility, need men and women of courage to speak up, and defend them, as they have no ability to speak themselves. Please be courageous and judge righteously. Tim Vernot
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly OPPOSE HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 Legislation. This nation is supposed to protect life, not destroy it as stated in the HJ1 proposal. Every life is valuable from the moment of conception to natural death. The greatest shame be on any legislator who undermines this right.
Dear Legislators, I have been a citizen my whole life. I am writing to plead for you to stand for me, the Catholic Church and my church’s Gabriel Project. I am a coordinator for this project at my church. We walk with women pregnant who are in crisis because they have an unplanned pregnancy. As a mentor to a woman, we support her by providing her with friendship and love. We help her obtain goods and services free of charge for her and her unborn baby. We go with her to doctor’s appointments as well as help her find food and housing. Finally, we help her spiritually by praying-with and for her. We believe all lives are worthwhile, and that human life begins at conception. For these reasons we are asking you to please oppose HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment • I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. • HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. • HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. • A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. • Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I ask you to please restore: HJ 2 – restoring voting rights • I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. Finally, I ask you to please oppose the following: , HJ 9 – marriage • I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. • Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. • I thank you sincerely for your work and pray that the Holy Spirit speaks to your heart as you vote to save unborn children tomorrow. Sincerely, Mary Young
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect preborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians. Please use your God- given voice and stand up for the most vulnerable.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians present and future.
It’s important for Virginia to protect people’s freedom from government overreach. If 2 consenting adults want to get married, regardless of who they like, they should be allowed to get married. Freedom reigns. Any restrictions on constitutional freedoms would make America look like Iran and North Korea. Protecting women’s rights to abortion is equally important.
I oppose this bill as it fundamentally violates any unborn baby's right to life and allows for murder. While this is clearly evident by common sense, it is also clear by divine revelation: "For You formed my inward parts; You covered me in my mother’s womb." - Psalms 139:13 NKJV and also “Whoever sheds man’s blood, By man his blood shall be shed; For in the image of God He made man." - Genesis 9:6 NKJV
I strongly oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current pro-life laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians. Please reject HJ 1 instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. Sincerely, Susan Bond Burke, VA
Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
As a wife and mother of four children, I ask you to reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
- I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. - HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. - HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. - A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. - REJECT HJ 1. Instead, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. - Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose bill HJ1 and ask the delegates to represent me and many unborn children. We can not always legislate issues of the heart such as caring for the unborn; but laws offer a restraint to unbridled killing of the unborn and psychological harm to the mother in crisis. We do the mothers a disservice in allowing abortions up til birth. It is cruel and will scare her soul. The memory of silencing the human life lives on long after the procedure is finished. The least we can do is to amend this bill to place the 24-hour waiting period and the presence of the ultra -sound images. The fact that these two considerations provide a slight hinderance would only be opposed by those striving to make money from the abortion industry. Giving he unborn a chance at life and the mother a reflective window to not make a hasty decision is a safe and reasonable thing to do. I oppose bill HJ2. Virginia already has laws on the books to help those who have served their time be reissued their voting rights. My concern is this may be providing a loop hole for non-citizens to vote. I oppose bill HJ9. My concern is the wording of "individuals" instead of adults. Are we leaving it open for the marriage of minors. We must safe guard children in this increasingly immoral society. Please take time to reword this bill.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Proposed Bill HJ1 should be rejected as it is a death sentence for the innocent and helpless child in the mother’s womb. While a woman should be able to make decisions regarding her health care, that same decision authority should not extend to the point that it endangers the life of another being with distinctly different DNA, i.e., the pre-born child.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
I firmly support the passage of HJ 1, HJ 2, and HJ 9 amendments. For HJ1, abortion can be necessary for both healthcare and economic reasons. It should be a mother's decision to determine what is best for her health, especially in scenarios when it could be fatal without the abortion. Without the safety net of H1, maternal mortality rates could increase even more than they already have compared to pre-pandemic levels. We can not afford to let more mothers die from not receiving the care they need. Additionally, there is our economic incentive to abortion by allowing a woman to choose when to become a mother. Most women who seek an abortion are already low-income. When these women are blocked from ending their pregnancy, they wind up worse off than they would if they could choose to have a child when they are more financially secure. It would be a detriment to Virginia to punish women by making them give up their stability or even their own lives. For HJ 9, equality is a fundamental civil right and there is no legal reason a person shouldn't be able to choose who they love and marry. With 4% of Virginia's population being a part of the LGBT community, it is discriminatory and unfair to not allow them equal rights for marriage. There is, again, an economic incentive, as this also helps retain high-skilled workers from the LGBT community in the state of Virginia where they can settle down and have kids of their own if they want. Without this protection, more Virginians would move out of state and cause a loss to our communities and economy.
I OPPOSE passage of HJ1 because this amendment will PREVENT the people of Virginia from passing ANY laws that will: (1) PROTECT unborn CHILDREN, especially those that are viable, and (2) PROTECT vulnerable MOTHERS who may be forced by circumstances or men who don't have their best interests at heart (or their unborn child's) from the HORROR of having killed her child, a BURDEN she will have to live with for the rest of her life. It puts in jeopardy CURRENT PROLIFE LAWS in Virginia, which would be overturned if this amendment is passed. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that RESPECT the LIVES of ALL Virginians and REAFFIRM the DIGNITY of all Human Beings.
I am writing to you today to urge you to vote no on the Abortion-until-birth amendment. This would prevent any future legislation that would protect and care for every life in Virginia. It would end any possible discussion of pro-life laws and silence the voice of all citizens who believe that the right to life begins at conception. In the name of all the unborn children--the unborn Americans--who cannot speak for themselves, I beg you to spare their lives and vote no to HJ1. Thank you.
HJ1 - Reproductive freedom is mandatory to keep the wellbeing of families secure. The only refusal of this is on basis of religion, which should NOT interfere with the state. Reproductive freedom stimulates the economy and takes a large off burden off the welfare system. Not to mention it is morally just, defending victims of sexual violence. HJ2 - Right to vote for ALL is nothing but just. Felons can be rehabilitated. Being a felon does not deny your place as a citizen of the United States. If a felon can run for president and win, a felon should be able to vote. HJ9 - Guaranteeing same sex couples have the right to marry has many benefits: Stimulates the economy, protects same sex families from financial burden, enables same sex families to provide their children a stable home life. The majority of dissenters are on the basis of religion, which cannot be involved in politics.
I strongly oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws to protect unborn children and could mean that current pro life laws in Virginia will be overturned. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians. Sincerely, Ellen Bonanno
If it’s not baby, then what is it? A hamburger? A five year old is not as developed as a 20 year old. Nor is a 3 week old as developed as a 9 month old. And yet we wouldn’t call the 5 year old less human. Calling people fetuses is just a way to dehumanize the killing of humans by not calling them humans. End abortion. Allow people to vote and restore their voting powers. They are people too. Marriage is between a man and a woman. Homosexual marriage is contrary to natural design. It doesn’t even make sense from an evolutionary standpoint.
I strongly oppose HJ1 - there should be no constitutional right to abortion. A radical piece of legislation like this has no home in Virginia, where the majority of people support at least some restrictions on abortion, with many favoring our current law or one with more restrictions. Abortion up to the point of birth (and yes, that is what this bill essentially proposes) is directly at odds with the will of the people. Additionally, abortion is the intentional killing of an unborn child (and no - it's not the same thing as a miscarriage or a "spontaneous abortion"), who is established by science to have a heart beat, brain activity, and fingernails by 12 weeks. Enshrining abortion in Virginia's constitution is wrong.
It’s wrong to intentionally kill innocent human life. Abortion does that; therefore abortion is wrong – always. Please stand for truth, love, and compassion in our commonwealth.
In regards to bill HJ1, we need to ensure that Virginia is ready to protect its citizens in the case of larger abortion restrictions at the federal level. This bill highlights what is not considered in many states and at a federal level which is that as Americans we have a right to bodily autonomy. Reproductive freedom is a right to privacy. Enshrining this right in our state constitution will ensure that women, men, and individuals of any gender feel safe and welcome in Virginia. For HJ2, individuals with felons will never be able to reintegrate into society if they lack the right to vote. A right which makes them American. This is one of the simplest steps Virginia can take to properly rehabilitate formerly incarcerated peoples. Regarding HJ9, repealing and replacing the existing constitutional provision which defines union as only between a man and a woman is necessary both to abide by federal court decisions and to ensure all Virginia residents are treated equally. With the inserted cavet of religious entities being allowed to refuse to conduct a marriage if they choose, there is no reason for anyone of any religious belief to reject this constitutional amendment. It allows them to maintain their freedom of religion while guaranteeing basic freedom to all Virginia residents. Virginia is not Virginia without the LGBTQ community or the black and PoC communities who simply wish to love. As a lifelong resident of Virginia who has lived in numerous locations in our state, I hope you will read these comments and accept all the amendments above as it is in the best interests of the citizens of Virginia whom you represent.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
I strongly oppose passage of HJ1 because it goes against everything that is decent and just. It is an evil act to put up barriers and tear down the protections that are now in place. If the constitution is changed the road will be made easier to kill more babies. Is that really the legacy Virginia wants? I would think Virginia would vow to protect its citizenry but instead the race to "kill" the youngest and defenseless abound. Sadly those who would seek an alternative will be encouraged to view life as nothing more than a "mistake" or an "option" not as a living child. "Sic Semper Tyrannis" For all who fight for the freedom and justice from the tyrants who do not listen to the people, but instead greedily drink at the trough bent on killing the innocent. This evil is rooted in selfishness and is condemned by God. There is nothing good, just or reasonable about this bill. It has the opposite effect of helping women. Be merciful and choose to not pass this bill. Think about those not yet born, think about what this decision will do to the very fabric of our country. How can one kill a child? It is unconscionable so please reject this bill and sleep well knowing that you have made the better choice. Because it is clear there is no "moral" ground for you to stand on otherwise.
I oppose the HJ1 amendment to the Virginia Constitution. I support protecting the life of all unborn children, the future citizens of our state.
"I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current pro life laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians. I personally know women who have had abortions who later regret it very much. Also many of the states are allowing abortions all the way up to birth. This is infanticide.
Addressing bill HJ1: Per Romans 13, God has given the government a specific job to do, and that job is to enact justice within the civil realm of government. By being governing officials, whether a practiced faith is present or not, God has placed you in the position you are in, and you will stand before Him as to give an account of how you handled the high calling of being a governing official. God has declared that murder is unacceptable, and has further expressed a hatred for hands that shed innocent blood. Entire nations in times past have been exiled and given over to other countries because of this heinous sin. Further, the 14th amendment of our great constitution forbids such action being granted. God and science agree that life in the womb is human life, and the role of our governing bodies is to protect life, and to provide equal protection for all under its jurisdiction. To allow such a bill to pass would deny your God given responsibility, affirm the taking of innocent life (murder), and defy science and the constitution. To pass such a bill, and to not push for bills to completely abolish abortion, is to betray and forsake the favor of God and the American people. Abortion weakens and destroys, not only the life it takes, but those whom partake in it as well. Abortion aids in the complete unhinging of society, as the nuclear family in a natural setting is what establishes communities that function well. To pass this bill leads to further irresponsible acts committed by men and women, and allows for irresponsible men to continue to act in ways that do anything but build and solidify a people. Abortion kills everything, every state, every nation, every community, and every person, children and adults alike, that it touches. There is no wisdom to be found in furthering this detestable action. May the fear of God make all who read this wise, lest we lose all in our war against Him.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect preborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians rather than pass laws that allow the taking of innocent life in the womb through abortion. Science shows that life begins at conception, where a child begins to develop with DNA unique from her parents, already determining her future hair color, eye color, and sex. The child's heart begins to beat 21 days after conception. Fingerprints develop by week 12. Abortion ends the life of an innocent child and cannot be a right in the eyes of Virginia. In the Virginia Declaration of Rights, George Mason wrote "that all men are by nature equally free and independent and have certain inherent rights, of which, when they enter into a state of society, they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their posterity; namely, the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety." When this bill, HJ 1, speaks of a "fundamental right to reproductive freedom", it is referring to a right that was never intended by Virginia's founding fathers. Any potential right for a citizen to a certain liberty to commit an act cannot exist if it also deprives another person of their right to life. "Reproductive freedom" referenced in HJ1 is a misnomer for abortion, which intentionally brings a child's life to a premature end while still in her mother's womb. Abortion is not a right for mothers, but it directly contradicts the responsibility to care for their children that they acquire by nature of their pregnancy, a responsibility that only a mother can fulfil. Mothers and fathers have the obligation in our state and country to care for their already born children, or else they will face penalties for child abuse, charged with Class 4 or Class 6 felonies in Virginia for willful omissions of childcare. Pregnant mothers have no more right to abort their children than fathers have a right to abandon or even kill their children. HJ1 is very concerningly written as an absolute, that no law shall be made to limit abortions in all 9 months of pregnancy in Virginia, and that no penalty shall be given for those who administer abortions. Many children are born premature, including Curtis Means, an Alabama boy, who was born just 21 weeks after his conception. Curtis is now a healthy 4 year old. This law would end the lives of so many children in the womb, who could and should continue to live full, healthy lives. Abortionists who malpractice and injure the mothers they operate on may face immunity if HJ 1 passes. Individuals who pressure reluctant mothers to have abortions may face immunity under HJ1. If this bill passes, our beloved state would become a place that gives adults the freedom to end the lives of their children in the womb. I beg you to please vote against HJ1 and help make our state a place to protects life, from its earliest and most vulnerable moments.
HJ1 - I firmly believe that every person should be responsible for their own health. Especially reproductive health. The government should not have a say in the medical decisions I make regarding myself. HJ2 - I believe felons should have the right to vote. If felons become the president of the united states, why can't felons also choose who they want to run this country? If a felon is registered as a citizen of the U.S. they should be allowed to vote. HJ9 - People should be allowed to marry the person they love, even if they are both men or both women. It's baffling to me that there is even debate surrounding it. It should not be illegal for same sex couples to be married.
I strongly oppose HJ1 which would enshrine the “right” to abort an unborn baby at any time during its time in utero. The unborn child is a separate being from the mother. Legalizing the unrestricted murder of another human being, who happens to be residing in its mother’s womb, is a morally reprehensible act and should not be allowed in the Commonwealth of Virginia.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
HJ1- it is not moral to have legal exceptions for murdering children, born or unborn at any time. When will people wake up and provide equal protection under the law, US Constitution 14 Amendment. These human children do not deserve the death penalty for any reason and we need to write Just laws and not evil laws. Abolish human abortion without exception and repeal or supersede any laws that immorally allow or excuse murdering children for any reason without just cause. HJ9 - Marriage is ordained by GOD and by one l biological man and one biological woman which is good for the state to recognize and even encourage as a key and necessary component of our society. It is wrong to attempt to change to meaning of the word marriage or to recognize anything not marriage and or support it as if it were. This is destroying our state and nation, and is a waste of resources to prop up every whim of society that refuses to recognize GOD's plan, His direction to us regarding family and society and procreation and the natural law and order that support a healthy and prosperous and well governed society.
I support these bills to protect the rights of women and their doctors to make healthcare decisions themselves. In states where women have lost their rights to reproductive freedom, women are DYING needlessly. This is inexcusable in the United States of America in 2024. As a woman who suffered 4 miscarriages, or what my insurance provider at the time called “spontaneous abortions,” I have nightmares thinking about the multitude ways “friends/spies” might have turned my pain and anguish into a crime by involving themselves in my personal healthcare decisions. An ectopic pregnancy which resulted in the loss of two wanted fetuses and a fallopian tube might have also resulted in the loss of my life due to denial of care. Protect the rights of women’s access to healthcare. The government has no role here. What a conflict with HIPPA.
I am writing in support of HJ1 and HJ9 respectively. I believe each, in their own right, provides agency to Virginians; agency over one’s body, and one’s most personal relationship (with a partner). Protection of these rights, as they should be seen, is paramount in providing for a democratic and free republic. These choices should stay personal, as they were always meant to be.
To the delegates, My name is Daniel Papp and I am a college student residing in Fredericksburg. I write to ask that you oppose HJ1 and the amendment which it would implement. Abortion is a misnomer for what this bill seeks to protect. It is a clinicalization of the truth; HJ1 is intended to legalize murder. There is no other way to put it. This bill would put a human life at risk for another’s convenience. The legalization of the murder of unborn children without any restrictions, trivializes the value of human life. Rather than seek to end inconvenient pregnancies, the state should provide support to those mothers experiencing such crises. I ask that you do not support murder, rather I ask that you oppose HJ1. Thank you.
Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. Abortion is NOT birth control. Educate women on their natural biology, provide support for mothers - especially mothers in the workforce, focus energies on affordable childcare. Do not make preborn children suffer for the failings of this society. Do not end the lives who could very well be what this state, country, and world needs. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
In this tumultuous time of misinformation blatant misogyny, and fear-mongering, it is more important than ever that Virginia continue to strive to be on the right side of history. To deny a person access to healthcare would be archaic and cruel, especially to those who have been violated and impregnated without their consent. WE must protect the fundamental right to reproductive freedom and help lead this country forward, despite its efforts to turn back. Not to mention, we take pride in our medical professionals and institutions, and we should allow them to be able to perform their jobs without the fear of punishment.
I oppose Bill HJ1. Reproductive freedom for women should not include the life of the being INSIDE the woman. The life is a separate entity, not a cancer to be removed. Life begins at conception and is ordained by God. Abortion emotionally damages women and allows sex traffickers and rapists to keep abusing women. Abortion also targets and preys on the black community and is based in racism and eugenics. Abortion should not be given free reign to prey upon our young people.
I identify as a leftist, and I oppose bill HJ1 because it will permit elective abortion at any gestational age, including into the third trimester. At this stage of development fetuses are the same age as premature infants, therefore they are people. According to Gallup, most voters oppose elective third-trimester abortion. There are many misconceptions about third-trimester abortion, including that it is primarily used to euthanize fetuses with fatal anomalies or to save the life of the mother. This was debunked by pro-choice researcher Katrina Kimport at UCSF, who found that the reasons people get third-trimester abortions are similar to those who get earlier abortions. Common reasons included financial issues and not knowing they were pregnant earlier. This means that healthy women abort healthy babies in the third trimester when it is legal. Further, because a third-trimester abortion can take three days, and due to increased risk of uterine perforation, in an emergency medical situation it is typically safer for the mother to have an immediate labor induction. Virginia’s current gestational limit has not prevented mothers in emergent life-threatening situations from receiving necessary medical intervention, and change is unnecessary. Yet another misconception is that third-trimester abortions are so rare that their occurrence is insignificant. 103 abortions after 21 weeks gestation were reported to the CDC by Virginia in 2021. Even if elective third-trimester abortions were just a fraction of that, that would mean dozens of healthy premature infants were killed. Dozens of dead children is significant. I also feel it is important to dispel the myth that third-trimester abortions are as peaceful as euthanizing a pet animal. We know premature infants feel pain, and most third-trimester abortions in the US are performed without anesthetizing the baby. Here is the procedure for an induction abortion: day 1, the baby is killed and laminaria is inserted to dilate the cervix; day 2, more laminaria is inserted and labor is induced; day 3, the dead baby is delivered or extracted. Abortion providers usually induce fetal demise prior to the removal of the baby either via lethal injection (poison) or exsanguination (bleeding out). The feticide injection may be an overdose of digoxin, lidocaine, or potassium chloride. Digoxin may take hours to cause cardiac arrest. Horses are not euthanized with lidocaine without anesthesia. And potassium chloride is opposed by the Humane Society and Amnesty International. Exsanguination is also opposed by the Humane Society. In sum, I’d be hard-pressed to frame these procedures as humane; “violent” is a more accurate description. In 2022, Terrisa Bukovinac and Lauren Handy recovered the bodies of three babies killed in third-trimester abortions in Washington, DC. Two appear to have had no abnormalities. I cannot convey the horror of this in words, so I am attaching images of the victims to this comment. I think it is important to witness the reality of third-trimester abortions in order to fully comprehend their barbarity. Altogether, I cannot in good conscience support HJ1 because it would repeal the common-sense gestational limits our state has on abortion and extend them into the third-trimester, which puts healthy babies at risk of cruel and unusual deaths. This is not healthcare; this is extremism. Please protect the babies of Virginia.
Please do not force Virginians from caring for the most vulnerable lives among us by passing the HJ1 amendment. Every life, no matter how small, no matter how developed, is loved by God and has and will touch others. HJ1 bwill prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current pro-life laws in Virginia will be overturned, as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians, especially our youngest brothers and sisters in the womb. May God guide, protect, and strengthen you to love as he has first loved us. May God bless you, Chase Imoru
On behalf of the Virginia Society for Human Life members across Virginia I strongly oppose HJ1. This amendment is nothing more than an attempt to strip all legal protections from unborn children and to prevent the people of the Commonwealth from passing any future laws that would enact reasonable laws regarding abortion practice here. This amendment will also place Virginia women in harms way because it will prevent passage of laws that require her to be fully informed about all her options and risks from various abortion methods. It could also make it hard to pass laws that will protect women in abusive situations from being coerced to have an abortion. It will ultimately require more taxpayer funding of more abortions and remove the conscience rights of medical staff. Other states have seen all this and more when similar amendments have passed. This amendment is not a moderate proposal. It is extreme and dangerous. It will only protect the interests of abortion businesses , not women or their babies. Please don't support this bill, HJ1
I support these amendments because in a nation that values freedom, individuals should have autonomy over their decisions.
The United States Constitution is clear in its Equal Protection clause. Under the 14th Amendment, this proposed constitutional amendment would violate the US Constitution by denying the protection of human life to all human lives, born and unborn. This proposed constitutional amendment should not proceed further, as it violates the US Constitution.
A baby in the womb has a beating heart and brain activity. We have no right to kill another human being. Just because we cannot see he or she, they have just as much of a right to live as you do.
Virginians need to have the right to pass laws protecting the lives of the unborn. If HJ1 is passed, it will severely restrict this right or may even totally eliminate it. HJ1 could also severely impact the operations of Virginian pregnancy centers. The pregnancy center I financially support provides STD testing, counseling for both partners, support to the woman if she chooses to keep her child, etc. This is a key support organization for the local college students.
I strongly oppose HJ1. I agree that individuals, both men and women, have the right to decide if and when to have children. However, once those children are already in existence, no one has the right, not even their parents to get rid of them. All life is sacred, and we have a civic duty to protect the most vulnerable, which are the unborn. Abortion up to the moment of birth is unthinkable. This is NOT a healthcare right. I also oppose the idea of minors being able to get an abortion without parental consent. A teen does not have the neurodevelopment to make decisions on a major life event such as pregnancy alone. The American College of Pediatrics agrees with this stance in its position statement Parental Involvement and Consent for Minor's Abortion Federico C. de Miranda, MD, FCP I strongly oppose HJ9 and believe that the original design and purpose of marriage, which predates any nation, religion or law supports Natural Law, that marriage is between one man and one woman and ask that you respect the wishes of your constituents. I do support HJ2 so that voting rights can be restored to all people having completed their sentences.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I don't recognize a right to directly end the life of any innocent human being, including those who are unborn. Surely there's enough division on this issue in our commonwealth to make a constitutional amendment, enshrining abortion permanently, a very bad idea. This isn't good politics. Rather than forcing through this contentious and ideologically motivated amendment, let's find ways to help women get through pregnancy without panicking, feeling supported instead of abandoned or without good options. I've met NO woman who regretted carrying her baby to term. Let's encourage and empower women to embrace their natural ability to bear children vs. telling them to "fix their problem" by killing the child in their own body. I propose instead that you write and sponsor a constitutional amendment offering tax credits for adoption to make sure all children are wanted instead of threatened with death before their first breath. No one actually wants to have an abortion, and this amendment does nothing to help actual women. It just perpetuates a terrible, corrupt industry. Thank you for your consideration.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are LIFE, liberty and the PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS. Enshrining abortion as a fundamental right in the Virginia constitution disparages the most vulnerable Virginians, those inside a mother’s womb, of these unalienable rights. Unalienable means government cannot take them away. Government cannot grant rights either. HJ1 must not be passed. Whether or not the person reading this is a person of faith or not, the real issue here is that women in crisis need HELP, not a quick solution. Abortion often causes severe mental health issues later on similar to survivors guilt. We need a bill that will do more to help mothers in crisis, and punishing offenders of rape and incest, rather than giving the would be mothers an option to kill their unborn child. A child is a separate entity from the mother, it is not in fact her own body. The law prosecutes murders of pregnant women as double homicides, why do you think that is? The child is an entirely separate human. Please take these comments into consideration when voting on this amendment.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians, especially the lives of those who cannot speak for themselves yet.
HJ 1 - abortion I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. Expanding abortion does nothing to solve the problems that bring mothers to the place where they think it is better to kill their child rather than birth it. Poverty, lack of support, unhealthy relationships, and abuse all continue when resources aren’t toward abortion rather than the support networks that help women (and men) be more stable and successful. Trafficking and sex abuse can continue when abortion is less regulated and more available, making women victims again. Furthermore, by endorsing the idea that the government (or any citizen) can “choose” the value of another human, at any level of vulnerability, and prioritize their own life over a more vulnerable individual, creates a dangerous precedent for how citizens can interact with people who cannot equally advocate and defend themselves. This destabilizes women, men, and families, and creates a rift of hyper-individualism, selfishness, and distrust where cooperation and unity should be a priority. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Studies repeatedly show that marriage is a leading indicator of stability, success, and happiness in adults. Studies also show that children need a mother and a father by repeatedly demonstrating that lacking one has detrimental effects and is an obstacle to future wellbeing and success. If the government truly has the stabilization and success of its people in mind, it will protect and encourage the most stabilizing and success-indicating relationship that is the foundation of future generations: marriage between one man and one woman. Furthermore, marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I firmly believe every Virginia resident should have access to affordable, quality health care, including abortion, birth control and the privacy to make reproductive choices.
I strongly oppose enshrining a "right" to abortion in Virginia's constitution. HJ1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial birth abortion, and the law requiring parental consent. Abortion up until the moment of birth is an appalling tragedy, NOT a health care right.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
When does life begin? We say someone is dead when they no longer have brain activity or a beating heart. Therefore life must begin when we have brain activity and a beating heart. That baby is just as alive as you or I. There have to be limits on abortion.
I strongly oppose enshrining a "right" to abortion in Virginia's constitution. HJ1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial birth abortion, and the law requiring parental consent. Abortion up until the moment of birth is an appalling tragedy, NOT a health care right.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
I would like to petition all involved to consider the sanctity of life when considering this proposal, and therefore decline to pass anything that would permit the murder of an unborn infant while in the womb of his or her mother. We have a responsibility to defend those who are unable to defend themselves.
As a father of a son with multiple limb deformities, we were encouraged to have an abortion when my wife was 18 weeks pregnant. With strong moral convictions and unwavering faith to God, we decided to keep our son in spite of the challenges that lies ahead. It is one of the best decisions that we made In spite of being wheelchair bound, my son finished law school, passed NY bar, and is currently working in NY. God write straight in crooked line
What in the hell is "select a pronoun" and there is an option of "they". Are you all nuts? Don't you know simple English grammar? Concerning the Bill HJ1, what in the hell is "reproductive freedom". Oh, I get it, that is the euphemism for killing the human body that is inside of a pregnant woman's body. Your slogan should be "our bodies, my choice". Go for it - kill as many babies as you can. Kill, kill, kill.
Hi, I, like most Americans [https://apnews.com/article/only-on-ap-us-supreme-court-abortion-religion-health-2c569aa7934233af8e00bef4520a8fa8] believe that some restrictions on elective abortion should be in place to protect unborn children from painful death when they are approaching viability. 39% believe abortion should be ILLEGAL in the 1st trimester 65% believe abortion should be ILLEGAL in the 2nd trimester 80% believe abortion should be ILLEGAL in the 3rd trimester The proposed bill may enshrine abortion in such a way as to not allow any restrictions, limitations, or protections. This is not aligned with the views of Americans (and I would presume Virginians) who believe there should be some restrictions in place as the child approaches viability.
As a Virginian, husband, and father, I object to the amendment of the State’s Constitution to allow for any increase in abortion “rights”. Abortion is not a right. It is, quite plainly, the murder of innocent human life within the womb. As a citizen we are responsible and must hold our lawmakers responsible for protecting all human life. Every child brought into this world through conception deserves and has the right to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness. No one has the right to strip the unborn of that. Abortion does and will always restrict that access. I urge you to protect life for your good and the good of all Virginians.
I oppose passage of HJ1. This amendment will not only prevent Virginians from passing any laws that will protect unborn children ......could alsi mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
These are all important issues to me, we should honor all marriages equally, once felons sentences are complete they should be allowed to vote and be involved in civics with their community,
I fully support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9, as each of these proposed amendments reflects our state’s commitment to individual rights and justice. HJ1 is crucial for safeguarding reproductive freedom by enshrining the right to an abortion. HJ2 rightly restores voting rights for convicted felons upon their release, reinforcing the importance of civic participation and second chances. Finally, HJ9 protects the right to same-sex marriage, ensuring equal rights and dignity for all couples. I urge the committee to advance these bills to help build a fairer, more inclusive state.
HJ 1 – I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – I oppose HJ 9 Marriage is the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
My name is Samuel M Willinger, MD and I live in Lynchburg, Va . HJ-1 : a fundamental right to reproductive freedom : I support this bill... If a woman needs a termination of pregnancy, it is her decision ( and the father's) , not the government's decision .. I understand it is ending a life; however, here is America, we have so little respect for life with our gun violence, mistreatment of women, the Israeli bombing of Gazans with weapons provided by us, etc, that I do not feel I have any right to tell someone else what to do or how they should live their lives.. Prevention of pregnancy would be ideal, so let us provide women with good birth control as well, good health care, and a proper social environment in which to grow up with no drugs, alcohol or guns and teach them how to make good decisions so they avoid unwanted pregnancies.. A Republican would say " the government should not be in my personal business". Well then, why are they trying to tell women what they can and can't do? ...HJ-2 - restoration of voting rights... This is simple.. if a criminal has done his time in prison and he is released, then he is a citizen again with full rights.. he is expected to work, pay taxes, and uphold the law.. Why should he not have the right to vote if he is law abiding? HJ-3 - marriage equality -- this is extremely simple .. of COURSE there should be marriage equality !! Duhh !! .. if two people love each other and want to marry, then there is a little more happiness in the world. What should it matter to the other 8 billion people ? Nobody is telling them who they should love and marry? Whether they are two men, two women or a man and a woman , what does it matter? Homosexuality has been around for thousands of years .. The ancient Greeks had a lot of homosexuality , especially the very warlike Spartans - check your history , people... no matter what the Bible says, does the Bible apply to Hindus? to Bhuddists, to Japanese ( Shinto religion) ? They don't care about a Christian Bible... and people who think homosexuality is abnormal, well , nobody is trying to convince them to be homosexual .... Thank you for this opportunity to offer my opinion .. best regards, Samuel Willinger, MD
HJ1- I support this bill. Women are in charge of their own bodies and it is a fundamental right they can choose whether to have an abortion or not. HJ2 - I support this bill to guarantee voting rights to eligible voters. This just goes without saying. HJ9 - I support this bill to allow two individuals to marry regardless of gender. This has been a right since June 26th 2015. Why are we going back in time? Only to hurt people and take away their given rights? Jesus loves everyone regardless of their gender identity. 1 John 4:8 Anyone who does not love does not know God, because God is love. Leviticus 19:18 You shall not take vengeance or bear a grudge against the sons of your own people, but you shall love your neighbor as yourself.
I oppose passage of HJ1. This would prevent any laws that will protect unborn children. It also could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned! This has already happened in other states.
All human lives are sacred and to allow for abortion in this state is an affront to the justice of this nation. Please oppose this bill.
I strongly support these three proposed amendments to the Virginia Constitution. Ensuring reproductive freedom is crucial for bodily autonomy and healthcare equity (HJ1). Safeguarding the right to vote and removing discriminatory barriers is vital to a healthy democracy (HJ2). Repealing the outdated prohibition on same-sex marriage and affirming the right to marry regardless of gender (HJ9) promotes equality and protects fundamental civil rights. These amendments will bring Virginia’s laws in line with modern values of freedom, equality, and justice for all citizens.
Please oppose the radical pro-abortion HJ1. Women deserve better than to be exposed to an unregulated abortion industry. As someone who has helped women in crisis pregnancies for decades, it is clear that when women are given true informed consent, plus practical support they choose to have their children. By contrast when the abortion clinics are no longer required to give true informed consent, as in access to an accurate ultrasound pre-decision, women are at the mercy of the profit-making abortion clinics and unscrupulous pill websites. We should require abortion clinics to be inspected and to give true informed consent. It is a conflict of interest to have abortion clinics withhold the information a woman needs to know- is the pregnancy viable? Is it ectopic? is she too far along for abortion pills? Also it is a violation of the parents rights to have an underage child suffer the trauma of abortion without any protections. The community in which I live has stepped up to support hundreds of expectant mothers to give them true freedom to carry the life they have seen on sonogram. Education during pregnancy, maternity clothes, diapers, formula, baby clothes and referrals to many types of support makes the healthier choice of life possible. Empowering women to choose life that is truly reproductive and true freedom. Abortion is neither free, nor reproductive and there is no right to take an innocent life.
No person has a right to kill an innocent human life. The Fetus in obviously not guilty of any thing, much less something deserving death. She has human parents, human DNA and is completing the first stages of a human life cycle. Finally she is alive as evidenced by her growth, maintenance of homeostasis, and the fact that if she was not an abortion could not be sought. This ignores the rights of the woman in the womb and tramples her right to bodily autonomy by dismembering her, poisoning her, or otherwise killing her.
As a practicing Roman Catholic, who follows the 10 Commandments, I strongly object to you trying to make a "right" to abortion in Virginia's constitution. A policy/law of unlimited abortion up until birth is a mockery of God's gift of life and it goes against the constitution of the U.S.A. I would like to know why you are so intent on killing an innocent child. Do you not think of how you are going to answer to God when you see Him face to face? We have already killed more babies than, Hilter, Stalin, and ancient pagan societies. Regarding HJ2 I support HJ2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as in the case in the vast majority of states. Virginia doesn't need to be know for not giving people a second chance. I oppose HJ9, which makes a mockery of marriage. Since the beginning of time, marriage has always been between one man and one woman. Why don't you follow the science, to propagate you need the reproductive systems of a male and female. It is scientifically impossible for two men or two women to produce a child. If you won't listen to the science then please use what little common sense you have for some good. You obviously want to continue to do the work of the devil, by rushing these actions through. I will pray for your soul and may God show His mercy on you.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
As a Virginia resident, I urge my delegates to pass all three bills to enshrine reproductive, voting, and marriage rights in our state Constitution. Convicted felons have already served their time within prison walls. Without the right to cast their vote, they remain disenfranchised upon release for the rest of their lives. As a queer AFAB (assigned female at birth) constituent, I worry about the rollbacks and potential repeals by the US Supreme Court on established federally-granted rights. My right to access abortion, birth control, and other family planning services should be protected within the state Constitution. My right to get married to my future partner should be protected as well. I love Virginia, and I plan to spend much of my life here. I can’t imagine a future in which these rights are not permanently guaranteed within my state’s Constitution. Thank you.
I strongly support these three proposed amendments to the Virginia Constitution. Ensuring reproductive freedom is crucial for bodily autonomy and healthcare equity (HJ1). Safeguarding the right to vote and removing discriminatory barriers is vital to a healthy democracy (HJ2). Repealing the outdated prohibition on same-sex marriage and affirming the right to marry regardless of gender (HJ9) promotes equality and protects fundamental civil rights. These amendments will bring Virginia’s laws in line with modern values of freedom, equality, and justice for all citizens.
I oppose abortion until birth. This is too extreme.
I don’t want abortion protected under the VA constitution
What happened to safe legal and rare? What happened to black lives matter? This bill goes way too far, it's "abortion for any reason at any stage of development" and is not in the interest of our people, especially black people. If you think that our country would be better off if we had the 22 million+ black people that have had their lives taken by abortion, than vote against this bill. If you care about our minority communities that have been targeted by abortion since Margaret Sanger and her racist kin started Planned Parenthood, then vote against this bill. If you recognize that abortion take more black lives in our country than guns, alcohol, cancer, covid, auto accidents and ALL other causes combined, then say NO to this bill. Spend OUR taxpayer dollars on helping moms and families KEEP their children, or help the million+ couples who are waiting to adopt a newborn. Safe, rare, and legal-- this bill is far from it.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 and urge the committee to advance these proposed constitutional amendments. HJ1 is essential to safeguarding reproductive rights and ensuring individuals have autonomy over their healthcare decisions. HJ2’s restoration of voting rights for individuals who have completed their incarceration is a necessary step toward justice and reintegration. Lastly, HJ9’s protection of the right to same-sex marriage is crucial to upholding equality and dignity for all families in our state. These measures collectively reflect our commitment to fairness, individual rights, and a more inclusive society.
This amendment only considers the individual rights of the adult and fails to consider the rights of the fetus - which is a separate individual with their own DNA and thus also entitled to the rights of life and liberty. Therefore, I am against the resolution as it stands, as it prefers the rights of one healthy individual over another.
My comments are as followis. Regarding HU1: A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. For NJ2: I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. As for HU9: I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Plus, marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. Regards, Steve Amato
I oppose passage of HJ1 as it would prevent Virginia citizens from having a say through elections and legislation about the protection of innocent unborn lives. It would also open us up to being home to some of the most gruesome, dangerous and painful forms of abortion for both infant and child - late term abortion up until the moment of birth. Virginians have a right to have active and ongoing discourse and legal actions on this very important issue. The laws that many have fought hard to put into place that uphold the fundamental right to life should not be so easily discarded either, which HJ1 would enable. The discussion around this topic is no where near settled and codifying it in this way sets a false sense that there is consensus on where Virginia will fall in the long run on this historical and essential issue. In a post Roe world, we have a right as the citizens of this great state to keep up the dialogue and to move not in knee jerk reactions shutting down all discourse, but with intentionality and participation in the greater debate and moral question. On a personal note, as the child of an adopted Mother, I am so grateful for the people that supported my Mom’s birth Mom and helped her find the way to a good home for my Mother. If laws like this had been in place when my Mother was conceived by an unwed young woman, it is very likely that neither my Mother, myself nor my 4 beautiful children would ever have seen the light of day. We do not want to be a state that condemns generations of our citizens, but rather a place of hope where we work to bring women out of their difficulties while also affirming life. We do not want to become a destination where people come to kill the innocent and get thrown back into what ever hell has brought them to that difficult decision; we want to lift them up, give opportunities and support those in need through what ever desperate circumstances and on to the other side. The rights of women cannot be purchased with the blood of our children, and laws should not be passed that silence the voice of all those women and men who have so much to contribute and say on this matter still.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent.Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Not only must we protect the innocent life, but we’re also leaving women vulnerable to continued pressure throughout their pregnancy to abort. In essence, allowing abortion far into the pregnancy is leaving the woman vulnerable to being threatened, if she doesn’t have the abortion performed, for a greater amount of time.
HJ1- I support this bill to ensure that women have choice in regards to reproduction. HJ2 - I support this bill to guarantee voting rights to eligible voters. HJ9 - I support this bill to allow two individuals to marry regardless in of gender or biological sex.
I strongly opposed HJ1 which states that women should have fundamental rights that are not burdened or infringed upon. Does that right entitle women to let their abortion surviving baby die? Will it eliminate parental rights in handling their minor’s pregnancy? What about the father right that doesn’t want his child aborted? Does that right force Pregnancy Resource Centers to refer women for abortions & force insurance companies & tax payers to pay for abortions? Will it force medical workers to perform abortions against their will? Do these rights apply to non-Virginian citizens from more restrictive states? What about those state’s rights? Under the guise of not burdening, will the lack of safety standards endanger women? Already rules such as not requiring ultrasound or doctor’s exam before issuing an abortion pill is dangerous. These are safeguards to ensure a woman doesn’t have a more advanced or ectopic pregnancy or perhaps isn’t even pregnant. This bill is too vague, leaves too many questions unanswered and violates as many rights as it purportedly protects not the least of which is the unborn baby. Therefore, I strongly oppose HJ1.
I support this amendment as it protects the fundamental right to make personal reproductive choices while limiting government interference. It allows for restrictions only when there are compelling reasons, ensuring that potential concerns can be addressed in extreme cases while individual rights are preserved. This approach respects both personal liberty and responsible governance.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because I believe that all humans (born or pre-born) have the right to life. This amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians. I worked in the public school system for almost 40 years as a teacher of students served in exceptional education classes. I feel very strongly that all children have the right to life.
I support these amendments because in a nation that values and prioritizes freedom, I believe that individuals should have autonomy over all their decisions. If we are to truly have our unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the government cannot restrict our autonomy in any way. Furthermore our government has a responsibility to protect our rights and by amending our state constitution we are solidifying that protection in the event that there are challenges to these rights federally.
I urge you to oppose HJ 1 and HJ 9. They are both unnecessary and extreme. Thank you for your consideration.
I strongly oppose the passage of HJ 1 it takes away any rights of an unborn child and would not allow the passage of any bills to protect them.
Murder is illegal in the US, so this amendment is ludicrous to even consider. Our founding fathers stated that all men are created equal (regardless of how old they are--2 years old or 2 weeks old) and have unalienable rights to LIFE, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Nowhere do they say we have the right to murder our babies, which is actually what "reproductive rights" means. I'm sure some single moms feel burdened with their toddlers and wish they weren't responsible for caring for them--do we just make it legal for her to kill her 2 year old child? This is not reproductive freedom. This is the ultimate child abuse, not to mention the physical, mental, and emotional abuse it forces onto women who haven't woken up to the truth of what "reproductive rights" means. Be pro-woman, pro-child, and pro-truth and stop this amendment immediately.
Good Evening, I’m writing to you as an educated woman, who has endured sexual trauma in my lifetime and feared an unplanned pregnancy. I’m petitioning AGAINST the passage of HJ1 Herring for a multitude of reasons. One reason is the loss of human dignity for not only my fellow women, but also to the unborn child within her womb. If passed, this amendment would enshrine a “right to reproductive freedom” in Virginia’s Constitution, opening the door to abortion (murder) through all nine months of pregnancy. Murder within the womb is unacceptable, regardless of how the child is conceived. Our state should be looking more at ways to HELP the mother awaiting their unborn child, rather than offering solutions that will further harm the mother, the unborn child, and perpetuate the culture of death. This amendment, if passed, would prevent reinstatement of critical abortion clinic safety standards. As mentioned above, this further puts the mother in serious danger, especially if informed consent is not granted to women and minors. As a mother of five girls, this amendment scares me because it could eliminate parental knowledge or consent for minors undergoing invasive abortion procedures. No law-abiding parent should have their parental rights stripped from them, especially regarding medical care & treatment of their children. As parental guardians, we have been entrusted by God and the state to raise our children and provide guidance to them until they reach the legal age of adulthood. If this amendment passes, we lose this right and that is unacceptable in the eyes of the law. Thank you for your consideration and your time for reading my testimony.
Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
HJ1-Access to reproductive freedom should be an essential right for all Virginians. Women and their doctors are fully capable of making the best decisions for themselves and their circumstances. The government should not be placing restrictions on what people can do with their own bodies. Even corpses are afforded bodily autonomy! HJ2-Individuals should automatically have their voting rights restored when their sentence is complete. HJ9- LGBTQ+ people should have their right to marry fully protected and upheld by the state of Virginia.
Abortion up to the moment of birth is unthinkable. This is NOT a healthcare right.
HJ1 - I strongly oppose enshrining a "right" to abortion in Virginia's constitution. HJ1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. REJECT HJ1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ2 - All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ9 - I oppose HJ9 . Marriage is the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Please do not pass the amendment that would allow abortion until birth. Babies are able to experience pain months before birth. No one can say that a child is not a fully developed human being long before he or she is born, not a "blob" of tissue, not a part of the mother's body. I also would like to see that all women considering abortion look at an ultrasound of their babies, so they can see the life that they plan to kill. If these full-term babies survive the abortion process, will they be left to die, or will they be cared for and be put up for adoption? Many women would be happy to adopt these unfortunate children.
As a citizen of the Commonwealth of Virginia, I do not want this amendment to pass because it will allow the murder of innocent children through all nine months of pregnancy. All life is sacred, and we have a civic duty to protect the most vulnerable, which are the unborn. We cannot as a society promote murder of the innocent in any circumstance. In addition to promoting murder, this bill will jeopardize the safety of minors and women, and take parental rights to care for the health of their children away from parents. As a parent myself, I cannot stand for this.
I oppose HJ1. The HJ1 amendment will keep the people of VA from passing laws that would protect unborn children. It could also mean current prolife laws will be overturned. The lives of all Virginians are worthy of respect. I want Virginians to be able to pass laws that protect the unborn.
Women are autonomous over their bodies. This must remain true. Reproductive rights are a fundamental need and it is the job of the government to put in protections for that.
Separation of church and state. Keep one person’s church out of the rights and freedoms of every American. I strongly support these three proposed amendments protecting human rights.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1 should not proceed further. The rights to reproductive freedom as described include the right to terminate a pregnancy at will at any stage of the pregnancy. These terminations result in the death of unborn humans, violating the Equal Protection Clause of the US Constitution's 14th Amendment.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
I support the three proposed amendments HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 Legal bans on reproductive decisions in other states already show that they are restricting health care to those who are pregnant resulting in unnecessary harm and death of citizens. Government overreach should not prevent citizens from making healthcare decisions with their families, medical practitioners and their clergy. Most states allow felons to regain their voting rights once released. This is important to allow those who have completed their punishment and are no longer incarcerated to regain all the rights of citizenship. I don't see any compelling interest of the state in preventing people who have developed and committed and loving relationship with each other to be prevented from being denied the legal privileges that civil marriage provides. It is in the best interest of the state to ensure these privileges to consenting adults.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child, such as universal maternal healthcare, comprehensive paid family leave funding policies, affordable housing and childcare options. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – right to abortion amendment • I strongly agree with and support enshrining a right to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. • HJ 1 would protect countless pregnant persons across the state and allow them bodily autonomy and the choices to make medical decisions with their doctors and healthcare providers. • A policy of unrestricted abortion access should be a fundamental right. Each instance of required or desired abortion care should be treated as the medically complex and personally nuanced situations that they are without concern for cumbersome and dangerous legislative restriction. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights • I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage • I support HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
Concerning HJ1 | Herring | Constitutional amendment; fundamental right to reproductive freedom. I very much oppose this amendment, it takes away all the rights of unborn humans to life, and it will pave the way to one day legalizing taking the away the rights of already born humans to life. We Virginians should not have the right to do whatever we “want” with our bodies reproductively, rapists do whatever they want with their bodies as do pedophiles and yet they should not be given that right to do whatever they want with their bodies as they seek to harm other humans with their bodies. In the same way women who want to do whatever they want with their bodies even if it means harming and killing unborn humans should not be given that right. I’m speaking as a woman myself!! We should have the right to help humans not hurt other humans. It is unbelievable that even a 9 month old baby human minutes away from being born would be able to be legally murdered, this amendment will do just that and make that legal by changing our state’s constitution. This amendment also takes away parental rights which is a foundation to all functioning societies, minors should not be able to make decisions that will harm themselves and that they will one day come to regret, (my sister in law had an abortion as a minor and she to this day greatly regrets what she did) An example of this is that a sane parent would not give their toddler the ability to decide when they are going to run out into the road, they are not yet mature enough to make that decision on their own. In the same way minors should not be given the ability the make decisions without parental consent. All of the delegates on this committee for this amendment except for Mr. Srinivasan are professing Christians (I have read about each one of you including you Mr. Srinivasan and have prayed for each one of you by name) please, I appeal to you as a Virginian and also a Christian, please do not vote in favor of this amendment. Jesus said “The thief does not come except to steal, and to kill, and to destroy. I have come that they may have life, and that they may have it more abundantly.” John 10:10 Regardless of denomination, Christians (who are to be like Jesus) should protect human life in all forms, born, almost born, and unborn. All of you delegates are alive today because someone protected your life and did not take your life. Your Mothers could have chosen to kill yes even murder you but they did not. Please consider that before voting on an amendment that will make it legal to kill all unborn humans, just because they are small and not able to speak yet does not mean they are not valuable. Delegates want to protect and help minorities, well I would say the least protected and helped minority is unborn children. Even you delegates who are for abortion, please consider the many Virginian citizens that are not for abortion, and consider that even most Virginian citizens that are for abortion are not for full term abortions. This amendment would make full term abortions possible something that only 1/4 of pro abortion Virginians are for. Thank you very much Delegates for your time reading and considering my comments.
Regarding HJ 1, I strongly OPPOSE enshrining a so-called “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. Murder is a WRONG, not a right. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. REJECT HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I OPPOSE HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I am opposed to passage of HJ1. This is heartbreaking. We need laws that will protect unborn children.
For thousands of years we know that the undeniable truth is that there is a HUMAN BEING in the womb of his or her mother. Even the greatly flawed Roe vs Wade decision recognized this, though only in the third trimester. This resolution would ultimately pave the way for abortions until birth, the most sinister of all policies o n abortion. I have a nephew who was born in the late 1980s. He was in his sixth month of development in the womb and weighed a little over two pounds at birth. After nine months in the hospital, he went home. He is a proud father today. Since the 1980s, there has been great progress that makes live birth possible earlier.. The people of Virginia will reject any attempt in this resolution or otherwise to to open the way to abortionvto birth.
* HJ 1 - I strongly oppose enshrining a "right" to abortion in Virginia's constitution. * HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. *A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. *REJECT HJ1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and child. * HJ 2 - All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. *HJ 9 - I oppose HJ 9 Marriage is the union of one man and one woman. * Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I am against this amendment as it removes all restriction on abortion, even parental consent for minors. It allows a baby to be aborted late term when it could survive outside the womb. Developing science shows more and more how developed a baby is inside the womb and it in facts begins at conception. The baby is a separate person from the mother, so a mother shouldn’t have the “right” to kill a separate being.
HJ 1 I strongly oppose enshrining a 'right' to abortion in Virginia's Constitution. HJ1 Would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. Please reject enshrining the barbarity and violence of abortion in the Virginia Constitution. We should be defending the right to life not cruelly blotting it out. HJ 2 - restoring voting rights. I support HJ 2 All people who have paid their debt to society by completing their sentences ought to have their right to vote restored. It is only just. HJ 9 The state didn't create marriage, it is a human institution arising from natural law.. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. Do not remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
I oppose HJ1. An unborn child is to have the same entitle to the protection and liberty of any persons. You are dealing with 2 heartbeats from 2 separate hearts, the mother & the unborn child. Life is life. Give life a chance!
I strongly oppose the passing of HJ1. The unborn have a right to life and abortion strips that right away making it a human rights violation. Human beings are not an inconvenience, no matter how we enter the world or the circumstances under which we enter the world. I implore you, do not pass this amendment.
No one has a fundamental right to reproductive freedom to the extent that the proposed Amendment HJ1 would grant them. The language of the HJ1 is so incredibily broad that it could mean anything anyone wants it to mean. I agree that individuals (both men and women!) have the right to decide if and when to have children. However, once those children are already in existence, no one has the right, not even their parents, to kill them, or have them killed. We all know "reproductive freedom" is not what this proposed amendment is about. The amendment is hiding behind the words "reproductive freedom" because that sounds like a good thing! This amendment is about abortion. If passed as is, it would allow abortion up until the moment of birth, for any reason, or no reason at all. Why not allow parents "reproductive freedoms" to extend past the point of their child's birth? If a mother can decide to have her child killed before it's born, why can't she decide to have her child killed after it's born? What is so special about birth? Human life obviously begins before birth. Any kindergartener can tell you that. Abortion is already legal in Virginia through the second trimester. Preborn children who have reached the end of the second trimester have about a 60% chance of survival. Is it not a compelling state interest to protect these children from being decapitated, dismembered, and disemboweled, just as it would be a compelling state interest to protect born children from the same horrific crimes? Why do we think that their right to life matters less just because they are not yet born? Please, do your job as representatives of the Commonwealth of Virginia and scrap this atrocious amendment. We all have a responsibility to protect the most vulnerable among us, and who is more vulnerable than a child?
The fundamental rights that our nation was founded on are the right to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness. Science tells us that when a baby is conceived, unrepeatable DNA is created. A unique, individual human is there. The question is not is an embryo, a fetus, a baby a person, as it is clearly and scientifically a human child. The question is does a mother have the Liberty to take the Life of this child in the Pursuit of her Happiness. Rather than allowing the complete unrestricted destruction of Life, we need laws the enable women to still seek the Pursuit of Happiness while providing Life. Please consider bills instead that truly support the needs of women and birth mothers in Virginia, such as a bill to guarantee maternity leave to all mothers in Virginia or by expanding the WIC program. I have talked to many women who have experienced abortion, every one I talked to felt like they had no other option other than abortion due to financial, social, or other constraints, not because she wanted to take the life of her child. We need to take care of women and support them at all times, especially in pregnancy and motherhood. Allowing unrestricted abortion is not empowering women, it’s just a way to take away innocent Life without actually addressing the real burdens that women face every day in society. Please ask yourself, if your job today was to personally end the life of a baby, could you do it? I lean democrat in almost all areas of politics. But I cannot agree that it is ok to take away the Life of a child. Please, do not do this. The heart is beating at 5 weeks and 1 day. This is human Life. The heartbeat is how we determine if a person is alive in every other instance, but here we turn a blind eye to that science because it is convenient. Please protect the right to Life for all people, born and unborn, and instead focus your efforts on providing support and opportunities to women and mothers throughout the commonwealth. Thank you.
NO TO AMERICAN TALIBAN. I strongly support these three proposed amendments to the Virginia Constitution. Ensuring reproductive freedom is crucial for bodily autonomy and healthcare equity (HJ1). Safeguarding the right to vote and removing discriminatory barriers is vital to a healthy democracy (HJ2). Repealing the outdated prohibition on same-sex marriage and affirming the right to marry regardless of gender (HJ9) promotes equality and protects fundamental civil rights. These amendments will bring Virginia’s laws in line with modern values of freedom, equality, and justice for all citizens.
HJ 1 – right to abortion amendment • I strongly agree with and support enshrining a right to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. • HJ 1 would protect countless pregnant persons across the state and allow them bodily autonomy and the choices to make medical decisions with their doctors and healthcare providers. • A policy of unrestricted abortion access should be a fundamental right. Each instance of required or desired abortion care should be treated as the medically complex and personally nuanced situations that they are without concern for cumbersome and dangerous legislative restriction. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights • I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage • I support HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
Adamantly against HJ1. Virginians do not support this. The amendment provides too many possible edits that could dramatically change the amendment.
I am opposed to the secretive and rushed process to get these Bills voted on and the intent seems very suspicious. Please vote NO to HJ1 and HJ9 to protect the sanctity of life as well as the values of the Commonwealth. I strongly oppose enshrining the "right" to abortion in to the Virginia Constitution. In addition, I strongly oppose HJ9, and believe that the original design and purpose of marriage, which predates any nation, religion or law supports Natural Law, that marriage is between one man and one woman and ask that you respect the wishes of your constituents. I support HJ2 so that voting rights can be restored to all people having completed their sentences. Thank you for your consideration
I support strongly the passage of HJ1 , Hj2 and HJ9 because these amendments will prevent the people of Virginia from reverting to the dark ages. I want Virginia to remain a beacon of light and safety for reproductive rights and the rights of all of her citizens
I support all 3 bills: the right to reproductive freedom, the right to vote, and the right to marriage equality.
Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
I support this amendment Every Virginia resident should have access to affordable, quality health care, including abortion, birth control and the privacy to make reproductive choices. Virginians made their reproductive opinions clear when they chose to elect representatives who vowed to protect reproductive rights. Abortion should be legal, safe, and the decision left to those who are pregnant with guidance from medical professionals. True democracy depends on equal rights for all people. Losing our right to reproductive choice opens the door to the loss of other freedoms including other healthcare choices, marriage equality, access to contraception, and the right to engage in private, consensual intimacy without government interference. Not only is the right to a safe and legal abortion a matter of personal freedom, it’s also a major factor in the movements for racial and economic equality. Black individuals, and all underserved communities, already experience unfair barriers and limited access to adequate healthcare services. Our reproductive choices impact our physical and psychological well-being, including the foods we eat, where we live, our financial resources, and our capacity to gain and maintain employment and provide for ourselves and our families.
House Joint Resolution No. 1 is breathtakingly radical. By defining "state interest" to explicitly exempt unborn human beings from consideration, it would far surpass Roe v. Wade and ensure that abortion could not be limited at any time during pregnancy or for any reason. Such a radical, absolutist position is dramatically out of sync with the desires of Virginians. Enshrining it in the Constitution of Virginia would poison the politics of our Commonwealth in the way that Roe poisoned the politics of our nation by short-circuiting the democratic process, but with an even more extreme position.
I oppose enshrining abortion rights into our state constitution because modern science and technology prove that what is present within the womb at the earliest stage is a human being. To uphold abortion on demand is tantamount to taking human life. There is no right to take the life of an innocent , vulnerable and innocent human being. I oppose marriage between two persons of the same sex. Marriage from the natural law involves a man and a woman who in the act of two becoming one create new human life, at least the openness is present.
I oppose the passage of HJ1 .
It would put VA on the wrong side of history to reject any of these bills. I thought this was the land of the free? It's embarassing how many so-called "patriots" will vehemently oppose anyone's freedom and right to choose what healthcare they seek and who they engage in holy matrimony with, as well as whether or not someone's past (which has been atoned for) can prevent them from participating in democracy. Opposing these bills will put governmental restrictions in our bodies, our families, and the ability for EVERYONE to make their voices heard. True Americans will support these bills.
"I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians."
I strongly oppose any legislation that would further erode the rights of the unborn. They have nobody that will speak for them. There should be no “right” to kill one’s offspring. Try birth control.
I strongly OPPOSE passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
I support all 3 bill !! Stay Blue Virginia
HJ1-I vehemently oppose a “right “ to abortion in the Virginia Constitution and reject it. We need life- affirming and protective measures for mother and child not murderous measures HJ2-I support restoration of voting rights for individuals who have completed their sentences HJ9-I oppose removal of constitutional protection of marriage between one man and one woman
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
Allowing late term abortion is barbaric, and should not be allowed under any circumstances.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. There are currently very few limitations on abortion in this state and HJ 1 would jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. A policy of unlimited abortion up until the moment of birth should be unthinkable. This is not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
HJ1 - I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ2 - I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ3 - I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law
I strongly urge you to support all three bills. As a woman, I deserve the right to vote as well as the right to reproductive health just like every other women in our state and in our country and world. These bills are very serious and having them written into our state constitution will keep Virginians feeling safe and supported during a very dark time. Marriage Equality is also so important to me and should be supported. How can Virginia be for lovers if it's not for all lovers? Time to make big, meaningful changes!
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians." Please do not provide for citizens to murder their own children!
I support HJ1 and implore the committee members to allow this bill to move forward. It is lost on no one that this is a contentious issue and will undoubtedly remain such for quite some time. Ten states have extended the decision of whether to solidify abortion access to its citizens through ballot measures. Virginia should be no different. I see little possibility of a collective, philosophical agreement. As such, democracy should play its course and Virginians should be permitted to vote on this amendment at the ballot box. I support HJ9 and echo other Virginians sentiments that this is merely aligning our state constitution with a right that is already set by Obergefell. Outdated implied prohibitions should be corrected, as we have done for other areas involving racist laws that were set in our state constitution. Many will cite biblical ideology as a reason for halting this bill. I respectfully remind committee members that Christians previously cited their religion while blocking the union between individuals of different races. Many of us today see this belief, which existed for centuries, as a perversion of the text. Not only should religion and state remain separate in regards to respect for our chosen families, the religion that is being pressed upon us is one that twists over time. In a state that championed Loving and has coined "Virginia is for Lovers" in its honor, please correct our misalignment and move this bill forward to protect Virginian citizens whose love deserves equal celebration and protection. I support HJ2 and respectfully press the committee to move the bill forward. Once a citizen repays their debt to society, their rights should be fully restored. These citizens who reintegrate into our cities and towns are impacted by the policies that pass and should have a voice. Residents must be invested in their communities and this will reduce recidivism. It is no secret that individuals from disenfranchised communities often lack resources for proper legal representation and are pressed at a higher rate to accept plea deals. Denying these individuals the restoration of their rights after their punishment only perpetuates the inequitable effects of a jilted justice system. It is also an undeniable irony that a convicted felon was just elected president, and yet, Virginian felons are unable to vote unless individually approved. There should not be such a blanket disenfranchisement. This bill and proposed amendment provides the necessary guardrails. It should move forward.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians." Please do not provide for citizens to murder their own children!
I support this amendment. Women and birthing people should have the right to medical healthcare. In a nation that values and prioritizes freedom, I believe that individuals should have autonomy over all their decisions.
Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
As a survivor of sexual assault, I strongly support this bill because it affirms my right to make decisions about my own body in the wake of trauma. After my assault, I faced the daunting possibility of an unintended pregnancy. The ability to choose whether to continue or end that pregnancy was critical for my emotional and physical healing. This bill ensures that survivors like me, who have already had our autonomy violated, are not further harmed by restrictive laws that limit our ability to make decisions about our reproductive health. This bill protects our right to reproductive freedom and ensures that no one is penalized or prosecuted for making choices about their own bodies, including those who support others in exercising this right. It acknowledges that reproductive decisions are deeply personal and should be made free from political interference or fear of punishment. Reproductive rights are fundamental to dignity, autonomy, and justice, and this bill upholds those values by protecting individuals from discrimination and unnecessary legal barriers. As a survivor, I know firsthand how important it is to have the freedom to make these decisions without being judged or penalized. This bill is essential for ensuring that reproductive freedom remains a protected right for all.
This law actually puts woman and children in danger. If a pregnant person is murdered, the murderer would be convicted of two murders not one. It makes no sense to then allow a child’s own mother to end the life of the baby. In so far as the health and safety of the mother, abortion bands do not prohibit doctors from helping pregnant mother whose life is in danger. Please don’t not pass this amendment so that women and children can experience true safety.
HJ1 should not be passed for three main reasons. First, ending the life of infants in the womb will be allowed up until nine months of pregnancy. At this point, what is the difference between killing a fetus inside of the womb or a child outside of it? Simply its location. No life should be taken by another human being at any point, and almost any person on either side of this issue will admit it should definitely not happen close to nine months pregnancy. Second, minors choosing abortion procedures will not need any parental knowledge or consent. Third, it would hinder reinstatement of critical abortion clinic safety standards. Where is the concern for our women? Every human life is a life. For the sake of our women and children, do not vote for HJ1.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I am in strong support of allowing Virginians to live their lives as they see fit in regards to their reproductive freedoms (HJ1) and whom they choose to love (HJ9). Additionally, those who have served their time should have their voting right restored, without additional hurdles put in their way (HJ2).
HJ 1 – I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – I oppose HJ 9 Marriage is the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
This bill is disgusting. Abortion kills! There was a young girl in the ICU room next to my mom who, after my aunt and her parents started talking mentioned that their daughter was in ICU in a coma because of a botched abortion. Not everyone believes in this health care lie. I made good choices in life and at 48 years old have never needed one due to the fact I was responsible for my actions! More women need to learn how to control themselves and I as a taxpayer shouldn't have to pay for their promiscuity.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians, including the lives of the unborn.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians. Please protect our most vulnerable Virginia citizens. Thank you
I strongly oppose the passage of HJ1, as it would limit the ability of Virginia and Virginians to pass any laws protecting the lives of unborn children. Please protect the most vulnerable citizens of Virginia.
Please do not allow it even easier to kill babies. No for abortion.
"I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians."
Vote No to HJ1. I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians."
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
Radicalism of every kind in Government is bad for all of us -- regardless of which side of the aisle we sit on. Please stop this nonsense now!
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. By what standard is the GA consider establishing the "right?" The Supreme Court does not see it as a constitutional right. Many Virginians would consider this a wrong - just as much as abortion is wrong, terminating the life of the unborn child and health care providers participating in death rather than giving life. Shame. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, and fundamental wrong, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose amendment HJ1. It is against the founding principles of our country- the sanctity of life. The right to abortion at any point up to birth is not reproductive freedon, it is murder. The life that is conceived is a child!
I urge you to pass all three of these bills. It is unacceptable that someone else's religion can dictate someone else's life and choices. Abortion is healthcare and should be to the discretion of the individual and their medical provider. Criminalizing abortion creates a disgusting precedent for the government to impose it's will over your own bodily autonomy. If you don't believe in abortions, don't get one, it's as simple as that. If you don't support gay marriage, don't get one. It is frankly un-American to support legislation that forces your beliefs onto someone else. Virginia is for lovers, ALL lovers, not just the ones that you personally think are acceptable. Separation of Church and state is important for a reason. Your religion and beliefs do not and will never supercede an individuals right to self determination. If we give the government the power to decide what we can do with our body's and our lives, we will not get that back. These issues might not effect you personally or yet, but they will. The leopards will come for you next.
I would like to comment on HJ1 - Herring. I oppose HJ1. Citizens of Virginia and its legislature are called to respect and support life from conception until natural death as taking a life is murder. We do not benefit from murder. I ask that the Virginia legislature pass laws that support and protect life.
Please do not pass the HJ1 abortion bill that will kill unborn babies up the time of birth and don't pass the law that this bill can never be reversed forever.
I strongly support this amendment 100%! Every Virginia resident should have access to affordable, quality health care, including abortion, birth control, and the privacy to make reproductive choices. Virginians made their reproductive opinions clear when they chose to elect representatives who vowed to protect reproductive rights.
It is profoundly disturbing to me that such a radical bill is being forwarded to be imposed on Virginians, regardless of any objections they may have at the killing of innocent and defenseless children. It is profoundly disturbing to me that politicians have no regard for human life and think this is acceptable to put into a state constitution. It is profoundly disturbing to me that any doctor, if they have objections to this, would be mandated to perform this heinous practice. This is evil and will make this proud state into a destination for murder that has been legalized by people who sit in the House in Richmond. It is heartbreaking.
I am in support of all 3 bills. Regarding reproductive freedom, the government does not have any say in any other medical intervention so why does it need to intervene in a woman’s rights to choose how she handles her body and pregnancy. Furthermore, if we dictate a women’s right to choose, are we going to one day dictate hospice care, how a person is treated for cancer or their right to a well informed medical procedure? Regarding the voting rights of a convicted felon, my thoughts are simple. So long as they are a citizen of the US and governed under the laws of the U.S. they should have the right to vote. So long as they have completed their sentence/punishment for their crime. Regarding marriage equality, I believe marriage is a personal and mutual decision between 2 consenting adults! The government should not dictate who can marry who based upon sexual orientation. If so, we are only creating another vehicle for falsification of records or manipulation of the system. The government doesn’t dictate which sex can live together or sleep together or buy common property together. Why does the government need to meddle in marriage and only allow heterosexual couples to marry? The government needs to get out of the business of micromanaging peoples lives and do what it was elected to do which is to govern and not micromanage. All that being said if you want to bring in the religious aspect of reproductive rights and marriage equality. The basis of almost all religious beliefs is to not judge. Who gave the government the right to judge and dictate how a pregnant woman or human beings regardless of sexual orientation get to marry? What if your child or grandchild was raped or abused and became pregnant and she is forced to carry to term only traumatized by the sole thing the government made her carry through to term. This puts a further strain on the welfare system and heavily affects mental health which is already a major problem. What if your child or grandchild was living in shame and also lying to you about their happiness as a person and couldn’t marry the person they loved? That is an absolute personal choice and not a government choice! Please support all of the bills and vote yes on them. And please please begin to think with your conscious and put what you “think” will get you re elected or more money aside. You were elected to vote on issues based upon facts and laws and not re election or money.
I am reaching out as a concerned Virginian citizen about this bill as it will open the door to abortion through all nine months of pregnancy. Virginia has never allowed abortion up until birth and of the people who support abortion, less than a quarter of them support third trimester abortions. This stance is too extreme for Virginia. This proposal will block protection from minors undergoing abortion and other harmful reproductive practices by removing parental knowledge and consent. It will make abortion practices even more dangerous by limiting clinical safety standards and informed consent for women and minors. More than that it directly goes against the Declaration of Independence which states that "all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness". This bill would take away the most fundamental right to Life from the most vulnerable.
I strongly oppose HJ1 and its proposal to enshrine a "right to reproductive freedom" in Virginia's constitution. This will open the door to abortion through all nine months of pregnancy. Virginia has never allowed abortion up until birth; of the people who support abortion, less than a quarter of them support third trimester abortions. This stance is far too extreme for Virginia. This proposal will block protection from minors undergoing abortion and other harmful reproductive practices by removing parental knowledge and consent. It will make abortion practices even more dangerous by limiting clinical safety standards and informed consent for women and minors. If you care about your citizens please do not support this proposal.
“Every individual has the right to reproductive freedom”; unless you’re the baby? Because you’re going to kill the human baby…. So why lie? You really want the freedom to murder. An innocent life? Why not just murder any children you have now out of the womb? What’s the difference? Life is life. A fetus is the word for baby. The Bible says do not murder. The woman does not have a right to kill their child…. That’s a pagan sacrifice to demons. Is that what we do now? Worship Satan? God will judge all murderers. Jesus died so you wouldn’t have to continue in rebellion against Him. Repent from murder. Seek true life in Jesus; then ensure life to every baby in the womb. If not, God of life may very well take yours whenever He pleases and you spend forever away from true joy and peace. He has shown you mercy even now, allowing you to continue to breathe and read this. Today if you hear His voice, do not harden your heart. If you turn to Him, He will have compassion on you.
I write in support of these amendments. Reproductive care should be with a woman, her loved ones and her health care provider - Not the government. Instead let’s invest in maternal care and programs that help families stay healthy. Let Virginia move Forward w safeguarding our right to marry whom we love.
Every Virginia resident should have access to affordable, quality health care, including abortion, birth control and the privacy to make reproductive choices. I support this amendment.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
This will open the door to abortion through all nine months of pregnancy. Virginia has never allowed abortion up until birth and of the people who support abortion, less than a quarter of them support third trimester abortions. This stance is too extreme for Virginia. This proposal will block protection from minors undergoing abortion and other harmful reproductive practices by removing parental knowledge and consent. It will make abortion practices even more dangerous by limiting clinical safety standards and informed consent for women and minors. If you care about your citizens please do not support this proposal.
I support this amendment. Every Virginia resident should have access to affordable, quality health care, including abortion, birth control and the privacy to make reproductive choices. Virginians made their reproductive opinions clear when they chose to elect representatives who vowed to protect reproductive rights.
Dear sirs: As one who lived in Virginia for 27 years, it pains me greatly that you are even considering the same sort of abhorrent legislation as those of other states such as Ohio. The child in the mother's womb is clearly a person in the Holy Scripture, and therefore guaranteed equal protection under the law in the to 14 th amendment. Please do not further offend our Lord by declaring this unknown right in your constitution. This is a slap in our Lord's face and an affront to His name. God says He hates the hands that shed innocent blood in Proverbs chapter 6. By placing this in the Virginia Constitution, you are complicit in the deaths of thousands of babies and make yourselves objects of the Lord's wrath. PLEASE DO NOT DO THIS. I write this because I care for these babies, their parents, and your own souls.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians."
To the committee: I write in strong support for approval of all three proposed Constitutional Amendments HJ1, HJ2 and HJ9. With regard to HJ1, It is past time to enshrine the personal right to reproductive freedom with protections from penalty and/or prosecution by the state. HJ2 would ensure that every Virginian who meets qualifications is given political rights including the right to vote. As for HJ9, marriage between two individuals is a fundamental right, and should be free of an antiquated and restrictive version of "marriage" that is no longer valid because of the Obergefell v. Hodges case. Thanks to the committee for consideration of all of these Constitutional Amendments. " Let freedom ring" across Virginia. Thank you, Brenda Bengtson
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
Please seek input on the Reproduction Bill from the electorate. Everyone should have a right to reproductive care with no string attached because reproductive care is Health Care ! Please vote YES on the reproductive health care bill. Sydney Morgan 18390 Fairway Oaks Square Leesburg Va 20176
A basic human right guaranteed by almighty God and in our Declaration of independence , is the right to live. I oppose bill HJ1 as it strips away the right to live and protect the unborn children. Have mercy on those in the womb.
"I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians."
I am deeply opposed to the passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children. Passage of this amendment could also mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians. Abortion not only destroys the life of an innocent human, it can negatively impact the life of the woman who - believing she has no other option - chooses to end the life of her child. Please allow for honest conversations and be willing to allow women to receive information from both decides of this matter before she is erroneously informed and makes a decision that will radically affect her life forever.
I oppose passage of HJ1 as I would like all Virginia lives including those of unborn children to be protected. As a Parent and Registered Nurse in the State of Virginia, I believe in protecting all rights including those of unborn children. Thank you for listening to my concerns and taking them under consideration.
Virginia should enshrine that every individual has the fundamental right to reproductive freedom and that the right to make and effectuate one's own decisions about all matters related to one's pregnancy cannot be denied, burdened, or otherwise infringed upon by the Commonwealth. It is not the commonwealth's place to be a middleman for medical decisions. Virginia should enshrine that every person who meets the qualifications of voters set forth in the Constitution of Virginia shall have the fundamental right to vote in the Commonwealth and that such right shall not be abridged by law. There is no need to have additional hoops to jump through and require that the Governor or other appropriate authority to have the ability to deny the fundamental right to vote. Virginia must repeals the constitutional provision defining marriage as only a union between one man and one woman and provide protection and equality for it's people. The Commonwealth and its political subdivisions must be required to recognize any lawful marriage between two parties and to treat such marriages equally under the law, regardless of the sex, gender, race, or disability of such parties; to do any less denies humanity to the commonwealth's people. It is vital for Virginia to protect the dignity and humanity of it's citizens and by amending the Commonwealth's Constitution to enshrine and protect it's citizen's rights.
Every Virginia resident should have access to affordable, quality health care, including abortion, birth control and the privacy to make reproductive choices. Virginians made their reproductive opinions clear when they chose to elect representatives who vowed to protect reproductive rights. Abortion should be legal, safe, and the decision left to those who are pregnant with guidance from medical professionals. True democracy depends on equal rights for all people. Losing our right to reproductive choice opens the door to the loss of other freedoms including other healthcare choices, marriage equality, access to contraception, and the right to engage in private, consensual intimacy without government interference. Not only is the right to a safe and legal abortion a matter of personal freedom, it’s also a major factor in the movements for racial and economic equality. Black individuals, and all underserved communities, already experience unfair barriers and limited access to adequate healthcare services. Our reproductive choices impact our physical and psychological well-being, including the foods we eat, where we live, our financial resources, and our capacity to gain and maintain employment and provide for ourselves and our families.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in Virginia's Constitution.
I strongly support these three bills to protect our freedoms.
I am a resident of Middlesex County and am against Bill HJ1. As a Christian, I believe this bill to be murderous. God is a God of life , not death . Please stop Bill HJ1 from passing. Thank you.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
I submit this comment as a woman and as a mother who carried a child with terminal birth defects to term, in a pregnancy where separate complications threatened my own life. Never once did I consider ending my daughter's life, even though she had little to no chance of life outside my womb, and even though my pregnancy with her threatened my own life. She was a child - not a "reproductive health right". During my pregnancy with her, numerous doctors, nurses, and health professionals were touched and inspired by her tenacity; even as an unborn baby she demonstrated a tremendous will to live that is remembered to this day. I never once regret a moment of carrying her, no matter what it cost me. I can't even begin to imagine the sadness, regret, guilt, and grief I would carry with me the rest of my life if I made a different choice. Abortion kills children and it saddles women with a lifetime of pain and suffering. This proposed constitutional amendment would violate the US Constitution by denying the protection of human life to all human lives, born and unborn. This proposed constitutional amendment should not proceed further, as it clearly violates the US Constitution. All unborn children deserve the right to live. All women deserve better then the pain and devastation abortion causes.
It is important that women in Virginia are protected in their bodily autonomy (HJ1), that the state expands voting rights for citizens of the state (HJ2), and that individuals are allowed to marry regardless of their sexual orientation (HJ9).
HJ1 should be summarily rejected. Please do everything in your power to be sure this bill does not pass. It is the duty of every one of us to love our neighbors as ourselves. How much more of a duty for elected officials to love their neighbors by protecting the lives of the most vulnerable in the commonwealth.
Please vote against HJ1. Parents have a right to know their teen daughter is seeking an abortion. Parents are always responsible for follow up physical and psychological consequences from a botched abortion, as I was in the amount of $27,000. This abortion was done legally at the Falls Church Women’s Center in Fairfax County. I urge this committee to oppose HJ1. Protect your daughters and granddaughters from secret abortions. Families deserve better and HJ1 does not afford that protection for families. Eileen Roberts President Parents For Life Fredericksburg, Virginia. 540-419-7720
I strongly support these three proposed amendments to the Virginia Constitution. Ensuring reproductive freedom is crucial for bodily autonomy and healthcare equity (HJ1). Safeguarding the right to vote and removing discriminatory barriers is vital to a healthy democracy (HJ2). Repealing the outdated prohibition on same-sex marriage and affirming the right to marry regardless of gender (HJ9) promotes equality and protects fundamental civil rights. These amendments will bring Virginia’s laws in line with modern values of freedom, equality, and justice for all citizens.
Please protect our reproductive rights. The right to quality fertility and maternal healthcare for all. The right to safe abortion. We owe it to ourselves and our daughters to keep VA safe for all women. Thank you!
Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. Oppose HJ 9. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly support these three proposed amendments to the Virginia Constitution. Ensuring reproductive freedom is crucial for bodily autonomy and healthcare equity (HJ1). Safeguarding the right to vote and removing discriminatory barriers is vital to a healthy democracy (HJ2). Repealing the outdated prohibition on same-sex marriage and affirming the right to marry regardless of gender (HJ9) promotes equality and protects fundamental civil rights. These amendments will bring Virginia’s laws in line with modern values of freedom, equality, and justice for all citizens.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians, especially the ones without a voice.
We have a federal and a state constitution which articulates that every human being has the right to life, liberty and property. It is a scientific reality that what is in the womb is human from the moment of conception. Since we all started out as a fetus (baby) in the womb, as humans we all deserve equal protection under the law, no matter location, age or stage of development. Law makers are commanded by God to do justice and punish the evil doer. The proposed amendment goes against God and our own federal and state constitutions.
I strongly oppose this amendment. To kill a child all the way to birth is murder. We must respect life and this does not do that. If you’re going to insist on abortion, please make it much lower, like 12 weeks We will all answer for our choices and sacrificing our unborn children will be one of them.
Hello House Privileges & Elections Committee, I am writing to voice my support for HJ1, HJ2, & HJ9. I wish for these Constitutional Amendments to be included on the ballot in order to secure our individual freedoms. My medical decisions should only be mine to give, not anyone else. I should be able to have autonomy over my body as an American citizen. To restrict reproductive freedom for women is to admit that America has become comparable to the Taliban. This also applies to marriage. No one has the right to force their personal opinions on love onto strangers & their relations through the government. As someone in an interracial marriage, where would the policing end? Will my marriage be next? Sincerely, Nelliel Azrael Herrera Knoefler
I strongly urge support for HJ1 to amend the Constitution to support the right of same-sex couples to marry and enjoy all the rights and responsibilities of that state. I also urge support for HJ9 to enshrine reproductive freedom in Virginia's constitution, allowing women to make decisions regarding their reproductive health with their doctors without interference from the government.
I am opposed to HJ1 amendment as it has expansive language which opens to the door for abortions into the 9 month if the values and the desires of the mother are for termination with the support of a medical professional. The reality is that medical procedures to protect the life of mom throughout pregnancy are always protected. Medical intervention for the life of the mother for example in cases of ectopic pregnancy are protected. While we may disagree on when a baby has a right to live and is considered alive, no one should have rights to terminate a pregnancy/baby/fetus in the second and third trimester based on their mental, physical or emotional health. In instances of a risk of life of the mother and viability of a baby is reached at 20-24 weeks, medical professionals work to save both the life of the baby and mother in tandem. Prior to that, medical professionals provide medically critical and needed care to the mother and while there may not be much they can do to save the life of the baby, there are alternatives for abortion such an early delivery. Though my personal beliefs are that life begins at conception and abortion at any stage is abhorrent, I believe working to end and prohibit abortion in the second and third trimester are critical. Research shows that a baby/fetus can feel pain as early as 12 weeks of gestation (PMCID: PMC8935428 PMID: 35321491). The decision to abort a baby, while rarely made lightly, isn’t necessary medically since physicians work to save both mom and baby in tandem once viability is reached. If viability has not been reached, medical professionals can offer comfort care to the preterm baby after delivery. Lastly medically critical procedures for mothers who are miscarrying is protected and not illegal. Medical freedom for consenting adults when it does not impact the life (born or unborn) is important but the HJ1 amendment provides too many opportunities for abortion to be available in the middle and late stages of a pregnancy. Please oppose this amendment. - Elizabeth, MBA
It is time for America to stand up, trust God and provide equal protection to all residence in America, even the smallest and most vulnerable among us, the preborn. A baby is a life from conception . They can't speak in the womb , we have to be their voice! They are image bearers of the Lord Almighty, just as you and I are. Killing them in the womb is murder just like killing them outside the womb is!
I am in favor of HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. The people of Virginia deserve the right to bodily autonomy and access to reproductive medical care. They deserve the right to marry the person they love. They also deserve to have their right to vote restored once they are released from incarceration. As another individual said here, Virginia is one of the best states in the continental US and with these changes, we can make it even better.
I support the right for same sex couples to marry in Virginia. Virginia is for lovers of equality. The government should not be blocking consenting adults from marrying.
HJ This bill should be passed without any discussion. The government needs to remain out of women's doctors' offices. There is nothing else to be said. HJ9 This bill should be passed without any discussion. Marriage needs to remain legal regardless of gender. No one should have the right to dictate who someone loves and who they commit legally to.
I oppose passage of the HJ1 amendment. It allows for the destruction of viable life. I believe in protection of all Virginians including the protection of unborn children.
I strongly oppose this bill! Most people agree that this is a complicated issue and should have common sense regulation. Allowing abortion for any reason through all 9 months of pregnancy is barbaric and most Virginians oppose this!
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current pro-life laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
Please protect the right for same sex couples to marry in Virginia. Virginia is for lovers of equality. The government should not be blocking consenting adults from marrying.
I I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
please dont approve this bill. It is not rational.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
I oppose the passage of this law. Life is a gift and should be protected by the law.
I support these amendments because in a nation that values and prioritizes freedom, I believe that individuals should have autonomy over all their decisions. If we are to truly have our unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the government cannot restrict our autonomy in any way. Furthermore our government has a responsibility to protect our rights and by amending our state constitution we are solidifying that protection in the event that there are challenges to these rights federally.
We have seen first-hand in Texas what happens when women and their doctors don’t have freedom to make real-time lifesaving decisions about pregnancy. Women die in miscarriage and during childbirth. The government does not belong in the doctor’s office, nor should it have the right to dictate medical care. Reproductive freedom is a fundamental right.
View this email in your browser Please Act Today to Help Save Babies! Comments and Testimonies Urgently Needed as Virginia Pro-Abortion Democrats Vow to Change the Virginia Constitution. The Privileges and Elections committee has posted their agenda for this Wednesday, Nov. 13th which includes HJ1 which we are accurately calling the "Abortion-until-Birth Amendment". They have opened a portal on the GA site to receive public Comments pro or con. It is essential that pro-life people put their comments in opposition to this radical amendment on this site. The committee staff will count those opposed and those in favor of HJ1. So far, the pro-abortion side has big numbers in favor of passage. So, we need to catch up. Please take a moment and go to the link and make a comment opposing HJ1. Your comment should be short and direct. For example: "I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
Oppose HJ1. Please protect the lives of the unborn.
Pass HJ1! All people have the right to reproductive freedom and choice. Pass HJ2! The right to vote should be restored. Pass HJ9! Marriage equality should be a constitutional right!
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
I am firmly against the passage of HJ1 because it could prevent us, the people of Virginia, from protecting our unborn children. It is sad when puppies in the womb of their mother provoke more sympathy than our own children. We aren’t savages. Save human lives. Please vote against the passage of HJ1.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will promote killing babies. It prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians."
You have no idea the relief and security it brings me to know that our elected officials are working to ensure our freedoms. Thank you for your work to protect reproductive rights, voting rights, and marriage rights. Thank you for doing what's right for your constituents. Please vote yes to HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 to protect everyone whose voice may not be heard.
I have an 18 year old daughter telling me she’s afraid to have children one day. She fears if she’s in a life threatening condition, she will be left to die. As a therapist in Herndon Va, her sentiment is felt by ALL of my clients. College aged and young adult women are AFRAID to start a family. They also feel at a loss that they may lose the right to make medical decisions, including access to birth control. Support bill HJ1!!! Also support HJ2- people with disabilities and individuals that have served their time in prison deserve to have a voice. Restore their rights. Support HJ9- how dare anyone we elect feel they can determine who we love and who we marry. This is a right. Love is love.
I oppose HJ1 because it will repeal and or prevent common sense Virginia laws protecting mothers, unborn children, and teens from the dangers of abortion. We have already seen what happened in Michigan, which enshrined a sweeping abortion on demand amendment in 2022. Several laws were repealed by the state's governor -- common sense laws that protect women from potential harm, like making sure abortion clinics follow strict operational standards (like other medical facilities). Why would you want to get rid of safe and sanitary medical office conditions for a woman? This certainly doesn't seem that you really want to "protect women." This amendment does not respect the lives of people -- born and unborn -- of our Commonwealth. We are supposed to protect the vulnerable and speak on their behalf, not only the unborn, but women in need who face horrible circumstances in their lives. Abortion won't end their misery and need for help. Women deserve better; unborn females deserve better. Let's focus on supporting and uplifting women by showing them real respect. They deserve protection as much as the child they carry in their womb. Thank you.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
Reproductive rights for people with a uterus are fundamental and not a decision to be made by anyone other than the person themself. As a married woman with 2 living children, and 2 children that I lost before they could be here, as a sexual assault survivor: People with a uterus, women, etc. have the fundamental right to make decisions involving their bodies regardless of the beliefs of those around them. People with a uterus, women, etc. have the right to make their own medical decisions and the only other person who may have an opinion is their doctor. They have a right to contraceptives. The health and safety of myself, my daughter, my sisters, and my friends are not up for debate. It is not up to anyone else to decide what is medically necessary or what procedures we may or may not need. If I had not received a medical procedure to dispel the remnants of a pregnancy I had wanted (which is a form of abortion), my first child would have no mother, and my spouse would be a single father. My life matters. People with a uterus, women, etc., their lives matter and by prohibiting, taking away, limiting our access to the care that we need, want, and deserve is an assault and direct attack on us as people.
Dearest delegates, I am writing you as a Christian wife and mother, imploring you to oppose the bill HJ1, "right to reproductive freedom". As a Christian first, I must remind you that your first duty as civil magistrates is to uphold justice, protect the innocent, and punish evildoers. By opposing this bill, you will be accomplishing all three of these values at the same time. No one can deny that abortion at any point during pregnancy is murder of the first degree, and deserves to be treated as such. Innocent children are being slaughtered in their mothers' wombs at an appallingly high rate. Abortion truly is a horrific crime that we as a country have enshrined as "the untouchable right". Romans 13 calls civil magistrates to be "a terror to evildoers" (vs. 3), implying that the role of the law, and therefore those upholding the law, should seek the things of God in upholding just causes. Instead of rewarding evil, I implore you to abstain from any appearance of evil by effectively shooting down this bill. Defending any right to abortion is certainly the opposite of valuing life, and the rewarding of mothers who want to rid themselves of their own children is a travesty that no government should ever strive to be a part of. The Lord says in His word, "Behold, children are a heritage from the LORD, the fruit of the womb a reward. Like arrows in the hand of a warrior are the children of one’s youth. Blessed is the man who fills his quiver with them! He shall not be put to shame when he speaks with his enemies in the gate." Psalm 127:3-5 Please, as God's civil authorities, uphold the strong and good valuing of human life in defending the preborn. Our children are good gifts from God, and we should treat them as such. To do anything other than this is to spit in the face of the Imago Dei, and thence sully the name of our Creator. "He has told you, O man, what is good; and what does the LORD require of you but to do justice, and to love kindness, and to walk humbly with your God?" Micah 6:8 I charge you now, do not profane the name of the Lord. Do not call what is evil "good". Oppose the proud and give justice to the fatherless. The Lord is kind to those who obey, but He will bring His wrath on those who hate His commandments. Strike down the wickedness of abortion in the state of Virginia by casting bill HJ1 into the fire where it rightly belongs. May the Lord bless you and keep you, and may He draw you to Himself in His great mercy. Mrs. Joshua Wright
Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
I have watched diatoms reproduce under a microscope from within their silicon cases. I've watched specs of dust the size of grains of sand hurl across the upper atmosphere so brightly that they get called "shooting stars". I've poured over trigonometry text books and advanced calculus functions and proved geometric laws. I've written software that scours the internet for data, processes it, and presents it in useable, printable mediums. I've read the entire Bible cover to cover dozens of times, and preached it to rooms of Chinese people through a Chinese-speaking interpreter. I've discussed the philosophy of death with nihilists who have a love/hate relationship with real meaning. In spite of all this, the single thing in my life that has been the hardest to wrap my head around is why, in the name of God, human beings are able to even entertain the idea that women should have legal or constitutional freedom to murder their own children. There is no conceivable universe in which any political entity can claim the right to grant this freedom to a human being. The universe and all that is in it belongs to God and his Son, Jesus Christ. He is the author of life, and it is only on his terms that a human being can take the life of another. It is morally reprehensible to take the life of an innocent, defenseless human being. Abortion takes the life of an innocent, defenseless human being. Therefore, abortion is morally reprehensible. It does not need to be any more complicated than that. Abortion is infanticide. Abortion is murder. Abortion must be made unthinkable among a civilized and moral society. All women everywhere in the USA have reproductive rights already. You can go have a baby with anyone you want to. There is no law in the USA stopping you, in any state, from manifesting your reproductive rights. Taking the life of your child in the womb is horrifically miscast as "reproductive rights" and "women's rights" the way a porcelain chamber pot can be called "clean" because the outside is shiny. Killing your children is not reproductive rights, it is murder. Killing your children is not a women's rights or women's health issue. It is murder. There is no conceivable circumstance in which it is not murder. The proposed law has absolutely nothing to do with protecting a woman's rights to 'do whatever she wants with her own body'. This is a lie and a deception. No laws against infanticide dictate what a woman can or can't do with her own body. The child in her womb is not her body. It has its own blood, its own heart, its own soul, and its own DNA. Killing the child is not "doing something to a woman's body", it is doing something to someone else's body. You don't have the right to kill your children. The government cannot give you that right. God hates it. You must repent. Reject this and any bills like it that pretend to care about people and their freedoms. This is evil, and only evil. We don't kill innocent, defenseless, unborn human beings because a crime happened to their mothers (rape). We don't kill innocent, defenseless, unborn human beings because their mom is related to their dad (incest). We don't kill innocent, defenseless, unborn human beings because they aren't 'perfect' (down syndrome, etc). We don't kill innocent, defenseless, unborn human beings because their mom isn't ready to be a mom (convenience). May the Lord Jesus have mercy on our country and on our state.
HJ 1 - I strongly oppose enshrining a "right" to abortion in Virginia's constitution. A policy of unlimited abortion should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 - I support HJ2. All who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 3 - I oppose HJ3, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
Please do not allow this bill to pass. The unborn lives that it will effect are far too many. How many Einsteins have we aborted so far. Please do not let HJ1 pass.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current pro-life laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children. This could mean that current pro-life laws in Virginia will be overturned, as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians. Thank you for your consideration..
I fully support all 3 of these amendments in the pursuit of keeping Virginia a place where people of all kinds are honored and respected. This is the appropriate application of the power of states' rights and what we should want to be known for.
I am writing to urge you to protect and uphold the reproductive rights of Virginians. Every resident in our Commonwealth should have access to affordable, quality health care, including abortion, birth control, and the privacy to make deeply personal reproductive choices. Virginians made their voices clear when they elected representatives committed to protecting these rights. However, reproductive rights extend far beyond the right to terminate unwanted pregnancies. They encompass the right to safeguard women's health in cases of non-viable pregnancies, such as ectopic pregnancies, incomplete miscarriages, and fetal deaths in utero. Women facing these medical emergencies must be able to access timely and safe healthcare without legal hurdles, stigma, or delays that could put their health—or their lives—at risk. This is not just about saving lives, but about preserving the quality of life and health for those who may face life-threatening complications during pregnancy. Historically, the medical system has not prioritized women's health or comfort during childbirth. To illustrate this, consider the fact that chainsaws were originally invented—not for cutting wood—but as a surgical tool to assist in difficult childbirths by sawing through pelvic bone. This gruesome reality highlights a long history of dismissing women's pain and autonomy in healthcare decisions. Today, while medical advancements have made childbirth far safer, there are still attempts to legislate and control women's bodies rather than trust them to make the best decisions for themselves and their families with the guidance of healthcare professionals. If we allow reproductive rights to be stripped away, we open the door to a cascade of intrusions on our personal freedoms, including the right to access contraception, marriage equality, and even the privacy of consensual relationships. True democracy is built on the foundation of equal rights for all people, and losing our right to reproductive choice would set a dangerous precedent for other freedoms we hold dear. I urge you to stand with your constituents in defending not just the right to choose but the broader spectrum of reproductive healthcare that protects the health, dignity, and autonomy of all Virginians. Thank you for your consideration on this crucial issue.
I am writing in support of HJ1 and HJ9. As a mother of three children and a Pediatric Nurse Practitioner, I have seen that all children should have equal access to love and create a family with whomever they choose. Our job as parents, healthcare providers, and leaders, is to love them and keep them safe. I believe that HJ1 and HJ9 would protect the children and adult residents of our Commonwealth from limitations on their freedom to marry and start a family with the person they love. Our job is to love and support our children as they grow, not limit their rights and make them feel like second-class citizens. This is especially important to me as a parent and healthcare provider for a very diverse patient population. Please help protect the freedoms of all residents of the Commonwealth of Virginia by supporting HJ1 and HJ9.
HJ1 - I oppose the so called right to an abortion. It degrades all human life. HJ2 - I support the restoration of rights. HJ9 - I oppose the changing of marriage. It is from the beginning between a man and a woman. All are not made to be married.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. HJ 1 also paves the way for future legislation threatening the choice of doctors, nurses, and other medical professionals in providing care that protects both women and the unborn. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1 : I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ2: I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I do not support an ipen ended right to abortion. It's too broad for a constitutional amendment. We are out of step globally. You can can an abortion on demand all nine months in Iran, but not Europe. Abortion on demand up to birth rejects the rights of a viable fetus. I'm not okay with that. Roe never authorized aborting after the first trimester, excrept for a medical emergency. This language is way beyond the line. I oppose its passage.
All of these bills reflect the importance of Virginians being able to exercise their agency in all areas of their lives. HJ1 speaks to the enshrined principle of doctor/patient confidentiality, which needs to be preserved for all persons but especially for women of childbearing age. HJ2 ensures the guarantee of one person/one vote on which our democracy was based - having expanded to recognize many more than male property holders. HJ9 ensures that "family" is not defined by law as specific to gender or earnings capability or household roles or any other false construct but, rather, by those who are in the relationship and dedicate themselves to this family in a public and purposeful way. For all these reasons, please vote to ensure that these bills pass.
I am in support of HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9, because I strongly believe that individuals deserve to choose if they get an abortion, vote, and who they marry. These rights should not be taken away.
Reproductive Freedom has nothing to do with the life of a child already conceived in the womb. Virginia should not adopt HJ1 as an amendment to its constitution because abortion is the murder of a child and is never justified.
I strongly urge you not to sign this bill, as it poses extreme risks to women, children, and families. 1. Permitting Late-Term Abortions: This bill would allow abortion through all nine months of pregnancy, resulting in the loss of healthy children who could otherwise be adopted by families longing to care for them. 2. Undermining Parental Consent: By eliminating parental consent for minors seeking abortion, this bill endangers young girls, especially those experiencing complications or suffering from abuse, whose parents would otherwise be able to provide support and protection. 3. Lowering Safety Standards: The bill would remove essential safety monitoring of abortion clinics, risking women’s health and safety by allowing substandard practices. 4. Allowing Abandonment: This bill could give men the ability to evade their responsibilities, leaving women and children without needed support. I ask you to protect young girls, women, and families by rejecting this bill. Let’s prioritize safety, responsibility, and the value of life.
We are all image bearers of the One, the only, the living and true God. All image bearers of the Lord deserve equal protection and are deserving of protection under the law. I urge you to protect the lives of the unborn and end the sacrificial offering of our unborn children. Take courage in hand!
I belive that the unborn have a right to life and the Herring proposal infringes on that right and should be rejected.
I am submitting a written comment today because I am unable to attend a meeting in person. Let me make my comment very clear, which is that the United States Constitution is clear in its Equal Protection clause. Under the 14th Amendment, this proposed constitutional amendment would violate the US Constitution by denying the protection of human life to all human lives, born and unborn. This proposed constitutional amendment should not proceed further, as it violates the US Constitution. A woman’s reproductive right is defined as a woman’s fundamental right to reproduce life, not to end life. When we speak about reproductive rights, we are essentially talking about a women’s right to give birth, not to end the life of the fetus. The left will lie to you and tell you it is about a woman’s bodily autonomy, but these are just more lies for them to promote child sacrifice we currently allow that is called abortion. Let us not forget that a woman has the right to make her own decisions leading up to pregnancy. Unfortunately many women are choosing to make irresponsible choices of a promiscuous nature, which lead to unplanned pregnancies, which then lead to many choosing to have abortions, simply because they do not want the responsibility of caring for a child. Sadly, this is where our society has gone morally and ethically speaking, but that does not make it right, nor does it make it acceptable to allow abortions up to full term of pregnancy, or at any point at all. I believe that life begins at conception. At just seven weeks, a heartbeat can be heard on an ultrasound. Abortion is painful and traumatizing for both woman and baby. If you watch an actual abortion video about how abortions are performed, it is horrifying and unbearable to watch all the way through. An unborn baby has no one else to protect him or her but us. It is our duty to protect future generations and that starts with protecting these unborn children.
Speaking of HJ1, and HJ9. We need to return to our Christian roots and honor God in this state. Protect the unborn and respect that God instituted marriage to be between one man and one woman.
As a grandmother who has worked with teenage girls and single mothers for over 40 years, I have seen nothing but heartache and trauma that affects these women for life. Every single woman who has gone through with an abortion is now struggling with mental health issues and/or substance abuse. There are so many people willing to adopt these precious children. I believe with all my heart that this little tiny human being should have rights, too. These women can't take back the fact that their unborn children was aborted, but they can make a difference by sharing their stories. Please hear the voices of so many women who are so sorry and miss their deceased children every single day. To pass Amendment HJ1 that legally allows babies to be killed is so unspeakable. And up to nine months?!! Tragic. Respectfully submitted, Michele Blair, R-CPRS
HJ 1 – I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored. HJ 9 – I oppose HJ 9 Marriage is the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly urge you to OPPOSE HJ1. Where is the right of the little life that is so violently disposed of with no consideration of the baby and no one to be their voice in this barbaric practice of killing the pre-born. Each of you making these decisions has a choice, just as someone made a choice for your life. Praying that you will consider LIFE over death!!!!
I strongly support all three constitutional amendments. "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." HJ1 - Reproductive rights are human rights. Deciding whether to have a child and when to have a child is deeply personal and fundamentally tied to bodily autonomy and personal liberty. Human dignity demands that these decisions be at the sole discretion of each individual. Both pregnancy and childbirth have potential health risks, including death. Every person has a constitutional right to life, and to protect that right, must be empowered to choose whether to be subjected to that risk. This amendment will protect against violation of this right by government interference with personal decisions about pregnancy and medical care. On a practical level, reproductive freedoms have a positive effect on the health and economic well being of communities. Reproductive freedoms allow for prospective parents to family plan with intention, including bringing a child into the world when they are financially, emotionally, and physically ready to provide a good life for that child. Pregnancy can be dangerous, and robust medical care, including access to the full spectrum of reproductive care, is essential to protect those who choose to try to carry a child to term in the hopes of starting a family. We are already seeing how restrictions on reproductive freedoms exacerbate these dangers play out in real time as maternal mortality rates rise in states with restrictions on reproductive rights. I wholeheartedly support Virginia setting the example in protecting reproductive freedoms with this amendment. HJ2 - Chandra Bozelko said it well: “Voting is a right that belongs to all citizens, not just good or reformed ones. Denying citizens their rights isn’t an appropriate form of accountability because citizen status can’t be punished out of someone. [I]t’s not punishment. It’s power-stripping.” I support the important step forward this amendment takes in removing an unnecessary barrier to voting rights imposed upon felons. HJ9 - All people deserve the right to marry who they love; this right is inherent in the principle of personal liberty. There is no valid argument for government restriction of marriage rights on the basis of race or gender. The only arguments put forth by those who oppose marriage equality are rooted in religion; separation of church and state requires these arguments be cast aside. It is imperative that freedom of choice in marriage is protected. I unequivocally support this amendment.
Reproductive Health Every Virginia resident should have access to affordable, quality health care, including abortion, birth control and the privacy to make reproductive choices. Virginians made their reproductive opinions clear when they chose to elect representatives who vowed to protect reproductive rights. Abortion should be legal, safe, and the decision left to those who are pregnant with guidance from medical professionals. True democracy depends on equal rights for all people. Losing our right to reproductive choice opens the door to the loss of other freedoms including other healthcare choices, marriage equality, access to contraception, and the right to engage in private, consensual intimacy without government interference. Not only is the right to a safe and legal abortion a matter of personal freedom, it’s also a major factor in the movements for racial and economic equality. Black individuals, and all underserved communities, already experience unfair barriers and limited access to adequate healthcare services. Our reproductive choices impact our physical and psychological well-being, including the foods we eat, where we live, our financial resources, and our capacity to gain and maintain employment and provide for ourselves and our families.
I would like to declare my support for HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. HJ1 would ensure that everyone in Virginia would have the right to reproductive freedom and would allow for abortion to be used as one of the life-saving options should something go wrong during the nine months of pregnancy and that's because in order for a baby to be born healthy, the mother must be healthy throughout the process. Also, people who have completed their prison sentences should have their voting rights reinstated, especially if they have completely reformed as citizens since their imprisonment. And lastly, people in the LBGTQ+ community should also have the right to marry and marriage is for everyone of all genders, sexes and races.
I strongly support all three amendments: HJ1 - Fundamental right to reproductive freedom HJ2 - Right to vote - restoration of rights HJ9 - Marriage equality I realize this is the first step in a multi-year process to pass these amendments. I respectfully ask that you do all you can to move them forward. We need to make sure Virginia protects our rights and freedoms!
Years ago, while volunteering at a crisis hotline, I took a call from a teen who had been raped at gunpoint by her mother's boyfriend and threatened with death for telling anyone. She needed an abortion to save her life. She identified an adult she thought would be safe to inform for assistance, and our call ended. Two days later the local paper reported that a pregnant teen matching her description had been beaten and left for dead on the side of a road. ### A 2024 study by the Journal of the American College of Surgeons found that in states having restrictive access to abortion, peripartum women were 75% more likely to die by homicide than other women ("peripartum" referring pregnant women or women within a year post-partem). Across all states, peripartum women were 14% more likely to be murdered by their intimate partners than other women. ### Whether for medical reasons or social reasons, why should both woman and fetus die when the woman could live (perhaps to try again)? How can a civil society force desperate woman and girls to risk their lives with coat hangers? Don't women and girls have a right to life? ### To have a right to life, women and girls must have a right to abortion. Let's codify it. ### See https://www.facs.org/media-center/press-releases/2024/pregnant-women-living-in-states-with-limited-access-to-abortion-face-higher-levels-of-intimate-partner-homicide/
It is essential that we establish the right to safe abortion as a constitutional guarantee in Virginia. Please support HJ1 to ensure Virginia remains a safe haven for all individuals, including those seeking medical care from out of state, as well as the healthcare professionals providing life-saving treatments. Forcing individuals to give birth is a violation of fundamental human rights.
I support these amendments because in a nation that values and prioritizes freedom, I believe that individuals should have autonomy over all their decisions. If we are to truly have our unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the government cannot restrict our autonomy in any way. Furthermore our government has a responsibility to protect our rights and by amending our state constitution we are solidifying that protection in the event that there are challenges to these rights federally.
The United States Constitution is clear in its Equal Protection clause. Under the 14th Amendment, this proposed constitutional amendment would violate the US Constitution by denying the protection of human life to all human lives, born and unborn. This proposed constitutional amendment should not proceed further, as it violates the US Constitution.
Reject HJ 1. Rather than expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. This is the compassionate course.
I vehemently oppose amending the Virginia Constitution for the purpose of enshrining what is being termed as "reproductive freedom" into Virginia's Constitution. I have resided in Virginia my entire life and have always been proud to live in this state; however, for the Legislators of Virginia to consider enshrining abortion into our constitution makes me feel very ashame. This HJ1 has absolutely nothing to do with "reproductive freedom", simply put, it is the taking of lives of innocent babies. These are God's little ones, and to attempt to call it anything else is appalling. I sincerely pray that someday Virginia will become a haven for the unborn. To vote on such an important matter and not have the citizens input is terribly wrong. This matter is something that should not be rushed. All of you legislators were elected to office by the people, and we the people (not just some of the people) but all of the people have a right to input in this grave decision.
This will open the door to abortion through all nine months of pregnancy. Virginia has never allowed abortion up until birth and of the people who support abortion, less than a quarter of them support third trimester abortions. This stance is too extreme for Virginia. This proposal will block protection from minors undergoing abortion and other harmful reproductive practices by removing parental knowledge and consent. It will make abortion practices even more dangerous by limiting clinical safety standards and informed consent for women and minors.
This testimony is in opposition to the proposed constitutional amendment in HJ1, that is most definitely not constitutional at all, nor represents the right to life we should all have as human beings, including the right to life for the littlest guy that’s in the womb. Child sacrifice is the most abhorrent practice, and it should never be legalized in a nation such as ours, or anywhere for that matter. We’re not supposed to take innocent life, but to protect, and uphold it, especially when it comes to children. We should be ashamed as a society that the idea of this would even enter into our very minds. The hands that are swift to shed blood should be restrained from doing this evil, and shouldn’t have the approval of others. Anyone that would murder their own child deserves the greatest form of punishment imaginable. Thankfully, God does have mercy on those who will repent and place their faith in Jesus Christ’s finished work on the cross. He rose again, so you could have eternal life, but you must turn from this wickedness, and trust in the only One that can save you from the wrath of God with His perfect righteousness you can never obtain for yourself. It’s a free gift you can’t earn, and you don’t deserve it, but it can be given to you today if you repent, and place your faith in His death, and sacrifice on the cross for sin. You will have to answer for this on the day of judgment if you pass this, but I plead with you that you would step back and think about what you’re doing if there is anything left of your conscience that isn’t seared by sin. I also testify against HJ9 because God created marriage to be between one man and one woman. If you can’t even define what a man or a woman is, then it truly shows that sin has caused your very common sense to be pushed aside, so you can act on desires that are contrary to God, and His Law. If there’s any ounce of human decency left in you, then I urge you to consider not pushing this forward. If you do this, the ramifications of your actions are going to have a ripple effect on so many lives, families, and the very foundation of our society. You will be held responsible for your actions, even if for a time you believe you will get away with it. God sees all things, even the very intentions of your own hearts. You will have to look at your own face in the mirror every single day knowing that you did this, because you’d rather please man than please God, the One that created you, and gave you life to begin with. Please ponder on this, and give it real thought, and care, because the very fabric of our society depends on it, and God is watching.
I'm writing to oppose this demonic legislation that would legally protect the willful killing of unborn boys and girls. The Triune God gives life, and He alone can take it. To those who support this barbarism, I plead with you to turn from your opposition to the living God by turning to Jesus Christ, the Lord of Heaven and Earth, and to that end I pray. May God have mercy on our Commonwealth.
HJ1: I support this bill and reproductive freedom because it doesn’t make sense to restrict a medical procedure that can save a person’s life and it doesn’t make sense to have a child born to a parent who doesn’t want them or to overburden the adoption or foster care system even more in the case that child born from an unwanted pregnancy is put up for adoption—for both the quality of life of parents and the unborn child, abortion must stay legal. HJ2: I support this bill because a person who pays taxes to a government—regardless of previous felonies which they’ve already paid for in fines or incarceration—should be able to vote and return to being active members of society if they so wish. HJ9: I support this bill because the right to lawful marriage is a liberty that should not be restricted based on the sex, gender, or race of the individuals involved.
“On behalf of the 70+ households of Saint Peter Presbyterian Church in Abingdon and Bristol, I urge you to vigorously oppose HJ1. 34,700 preborn human beings were murdered by abortion in the commonwealth of Virginia in 2023 (Guttmacher Institute). More than 34,000 precious individuals who were created in the image of God and who possess every bit as much humanity as those of us who are already born were denied the equal protection of the laws in our state. This is abhorrent and unjust. It violates our duty to God to love our neighbors as ourselves. It violates our duty to act with compassion and do for defenseless preborn children what we would want done for us. It violates the 14th amendment of the US Constitution, which states that “No state… shall deny to any person that equal protection of the laws.” Please do not double down on this barbaric evil in the commonwealth of Virginia by enshrining it in our constitution. I urge you to do everything in your power to reject HJ1. Respectfully, Rev Steve Murphy
My daughter-in-law found out she was pregnant earlier this year. Then she got a frightening diagnosis related to her heart and the pace maker she relies on. Tests indicated that she would not survive carrying her pregnancy to full term. She and my son faced a very tough choice, especially thinking of their 18 month old son. They were considering an abortion to save their family. Luckily additional specialist consults found the initial diagnosis was incorrect and she would in fact be okay. This was a choice no one wants to make but women and their families should be able to make it when needed. Every Virginia resident should have access to affordable, quality health care, including abortion, birth control and the privacy to make reproductive choices. Virginians made their reproductive opinions clear when they chose to elect representatives who vowed to protect reproductive rights. Abortion should be legal, safe, and the decision left to those who are pregnant with guidance from medical professionals. And the Virginia Constitution should reflect this.
Please include these items to continue basic protections for all individuals as equals under the constitution and the law.
Herring “right to abortion” amendment – HJ1 • I strongly oppose HJ1 which enshrinses a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. • HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. • HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. • A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. • Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. Parker – restoring voting rights – HJ2 • I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. Sickles – marriage – HJ9 • I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. • Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
With gratitude to the Virginia Catholic Conference and as a born-and-raised Virginian, I would like to join my support to their stances on the three proposed bills: HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment - I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. - HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. - HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. - A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. - Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights - I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage - I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. - Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. Sincerely, Mary Clare Durel
I strongly support the HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 amendments to the Virginia Constitution. America should be a place that guarantees the fundamental rights and choices of women, celebrates and encourages love in all forms, and protects the act of voting for all qualified citizens. If the nation as a whole can't ensure these rights, I hope that my state at least can.
HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 1 Offered January 10, 2024 Prefiled November 20, 2023 Please DO NOT Include the proposed ARTICLE I in the BILL OF RIGHTS pertaining to an amendment to the Constitution of Virginia: Section 11-A. Fundamental right to reproductive freedom. That every individual has the fundamental right to reproductive freedom. This right to make and effectuate one's own decisions about all matters related to one's pregnancy shall not be denied, burdened, or infringed upon, unless justified by a compelling state interest and achieved by the least restrictive means that do not infringe an individual's autonomous decision-making. A state interest is compelling only when it is to ensure the protection of the health of an individual seeking care, consistent with accepted clinical standards of practice and evidence-based medicine. The Commonwealth shall not discriminate in the protection or enforcement of this fundamental right. That, except when justified by a compelling state interest, the Commonwealth shall not penalize, prosecute, or otherwise take adverse action against an individual on the basis of an actual, potential, perceived, or alleged outcome of such individual's pregnancy, nor shall the Commonwealth penalize, prosecute, or otherwise take adverse action against an individual who aids or assists another individual, with such individual's voluntary consent, in the exercise of such individual's right to reproductive freedom. That this section shall be self-executing and that if any provision of this section is held invalid, it shall be severable from the remaining portions of the section.
I strongly condemn the proposed amendment regarding the taking of innocent human life. Abortion is the tragic ending of a unique and precious life. This law will perpetuate a culture that devalues human life and undermines the fundamental right to life I believe that every human life is sacred, regardless of age, size, development, or condition of dependency. We call upon lawmakers to protect the lives of the unborn and to promote policies that support mothers and families. It is our moral obligation to defend the most vulnerable members of our society. We urge you to reject this amendment and instead codify the reality that every child and citizen is welcomed and protected.
I strongly oppose place the right to abortion into the constitution of Virginia. Rather, I would rather have the government support pregnancy crisis centers which do a great job in helping women in crisis pregnancies. Abortion is not a great option for women because it can cause serious mental and emotional harm. Many women have Post traumatic stress syndrome after an abortion. Every child deserves a chance at life and protection in the womb. If the government does not offer that protection, then who will?
Abortion is a right that every American should have. Early in the pregnancy, the fetus is not a sentient being like the person carrying it, and it's rights should not be prioritized over the rights of the sentient, conscious individual carrying the fetus. Young girls have been forced to bear the child of their rapist. That is not something anybody should have to do. In instances where the fetus will harm or kill the person carrying it, that person should be allowed to get an abortion. In instances where the person carrying it was raped, they should be allowed to get an abortion. If somebody cannot care for this child, they should be allowed to get an abortion. Attempting to remove this basic bodily right is illogical at best and cruel at worst. All people deserve to vote. It is an obligation and right as an American citizen. Does committing a crime remove your citizenship? Are you no longer an American because you committed a felony? What about the context, what if you were extremely young and you are now a changed person? Should people not be allowed any say in their leader because of an action taken in their past? Marriage is not between a man and a woman. Queer people have spent so many years oppressed because of who they love and it is ridiculous that in 2024 there are still people who believe it is immoral and wrong. It's natural (many animals are gay) and as long as it is between two consenting individuals, what goes on in their love life is no ones business but theirs. Are there really not any bigger issues to be worried about?
I support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Choices about an individual's body belong in the hands of that individual. There should be no involvement of the government, or religious institutions, in decisions that are best made between an individual and their medical providers. No one should be put in a situation where they could be forced to make harmful and difficult choices about their reproductive health for fear of legal repercussions. Voting rights should be guaranteed for every Virginia citizen. If a convicted felon is allowed to run for federal office, then someone released from incarceration should be able to vote, without having to be confirmed by the Governor. All citizens should have the right to have their voice heard and their vote counted. Legal marriage should not be restricted or discriminated against because of race, sex, or gender.
HJ-1: Abortion is murder. Amending the constitution to enshrine a right to murder is evil and absurd. The fact that I need to write an online comment to a committee that is asking the question should murder be protected in our constitution? blows my mind. NO! Absolutely not! As civil magistrates you are assigned by God with the role of executing justice on evil doers, as seen in Romans 13. Declaring open season on pre born humans is not in your job description. Stay in your lane! There is a very real God, who you are accountable to. You are not God, you do not have the authority to decide that certain persons have no right to live based on your arbitrary standards of location and development. God has already spoken, the 6th commandment states you shall not murder. Passing HJ-1 is a blatant violation of God's law. And you will be held accountable before His judgement seat. If you wish to be spared Gods wrath. I suggest that this motion be dismissed, that you never again assume the Godlike authority to decide which of His image bearers have value, and you repent of your sins and put your trust fully in Jesus Christ who gave His Life so that we would no longer need to face the judgement we deserve. God saw His sacrifice and His wrath was satisfied, no other sacrifice is necessary, by His stripes we are healed. False God's will always demand more blood, and this is on full display here. Knock it off. HJ 9 – I strongly oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. God created the institution of marriage to be between one man and one woman. Man does not have the right to attempt to redefine it.
On July 1, 2021, Virginia abolished the death penalty, putting an end to the execution of people guilty of murder. If HJ1 is passed, Virginia will enshrine the death penalty for the innocent. Vote NO on HJ1.
This bill is extremely important to enact in our state. The reproductive health of individuals in our state should always be protected, as the privacy of individuals and their private healthcare choices deserve to be a personal choice in a free nation. Please pass this bill, it will likely protect many women and other individuals, especially young people who can be taken advantage of. As a young woman growing up in Virginia, I saw many other young women being taken advantage of by older and/or abusive men. If these men had children with these women, in some cases they would not be able to get away from their groomer or abuser for many years. This bill will not only protects women’s futures in terms of financial stability and career growth, but in bodily and psychic safety. Thank you!
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
I wish to let you know of my strong support for all three: HJ1 - Fundamental right to reproductive freedom HJ2 - Right to vote - restoration of rights HJ9 - Marriage equality I realize this is the first step in a multi-year process to pass these amendments. I respectfully ask that you do all you can to move them forward. We need to make sure Virginia protects our rights and freedoms! Thank you!
Good evening Mr. Travis Hackworth, bc I am reaching out as a concerned Virginian citizen about the recent proposal to enshrine a right to reproductive freedom in Virginia's constitution. This will open the door to abortion through all nine months of pregnancy. Virginia has never allowed abortion up until birth and of the people who support abortion, less than a quarter of them support third trimester abortions. This stance is too extreme for Virginia. This proposal will block protection from minors undergoing abortion and other harmful reproductive practices by removing parental knowledge and consent. It will make abortion practices even more dangerous by limiting clinical safety standards and informed consent for women and minors. If you care about your citizens please do not support this proposal. Sincerely, Abigail Naughton
The right to reproductive freedom in HJ1 is paramount to the health and welfare of all people in the state of Virginia. This bill would ensure that a mother is not forced to endure any pregnancy without their consent. It would also prevent the cruel treatment of having to endure delivering a stillborn child that could have been removed months prior to delivery. Forcing anyone to undergo such a fate is cruel and inhumane. It is also worth noting that disallowing family planning measures would place an undue burden on Virginia taxpayers. Not only would we be compensating for the healthcare of a child being placed into the adoption system, but also the associated costs of placing a child up for adoption. This process is also cruel for the person who would be placed up for adoption as it does not take consideration as to whether this decision would lead to a life of pain and misery. In summary, abortion is a fundamental right because of the suffering that is prevented from this procedure. I support HJ2 from a more commonsense perspective. This bill ensures that no person is disenfranchised from voting in the state of Virginia. It is only fair to allow those who have been incarcerated to have a voice in the operation of this state. Finally, I also support HJ3 for the unalienable right of any people to marry each other. There is no framework for who is or is not allowed to marry in the United States Constitution. This being said, there is also a predominant LGBTQ+ community here in the state of Virginia. To deny the right to marry for people in this community would also deny their right to the pursuit of happiness as well as the unenumerated rights outlined by the ninth amendment of the US Constitution. Even with this said, there is no harm and only public welfare to be gained by passing this bill. Each and every one of us has the freedom to our own spiritual beliefs and as such the right to mary any consenting adult follows in line with said beliefs.
I strongly support HJ1, and the fundamental right of reproductive freedom for all individuals. I believe that all decisions concerning pregnancy should be between a woman and her health care provider. I support HJ2 - I believe that once an individual has completed serving a sentence for a felony and has paid his or her debt to society, that voting rights should be restored without requiring action by the governor or other state officials to restore his or her civil rights. I also support the provisions regarding persons who lack the capacity to understand the act of voting. I strongly support HJ9 and the affirmative right to marry of two parties regardless of sex, gender, or race , and the requirement that the Commonwealth shall recognize all such marriages and treat them equally under the law
H1- "Right to Abortion" I am a Roman Catholic who strongly opposes HJ1--"Right to Abortion" m Virginia's Constitution, significantly because an unborn baby is not a component of his/her mother's body, but instead is a separate human being with his/her own unique spiritual soul given that baby at the moment of conception. In this day and age, a prospective mother has sufficient resources to decide not to conceive a child--through medical methods, Natural Family Planning (NFP), or abstainance--all very effective and inexpensive and effective means to remain childless if one takes the time to purchase the (of-the-shelf) preventitives; the willingness to study and utilize ones=;s fertility schedule or lack thereof; or the self-control to remain celebate . There are also "day-after" pills that can effective in immediately used in the case of rape which block fertilization of the prospective mother's ovum. There are also a plethera of organizations willing to place unwanted babies and children of all ages, with adopters desirous of providing children with good and safe homes. HJ2: Resoring Voting Rights: I will only support HJ2 for those individuals who have completed their sentences and wish to have their voting rights restored IF they have shown a firm resolve to become lawful citizen of both the Commonwealth of Virginia, as well as the US Government and especially accept the US Constitution & Amendments as our one form of Government. HJ9-Marriage: I oppose HJ9 which wold remove the Constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Not onlyi does marriage have an original designand urpose that predates any nation, religion or law; it especially protects and supports its primary mission to create and bring up children who will use their gifts and talents to improve this world with their good works. A marriage, whether natural (based on common law), judicial (independent of specific faith systems), and spiritual (faith-based) all improve the lives of our citizens because a formal, life-time (if possible), committment is both psychologically sound, as well as a healthy way to, live minimizing the number of often fatal veneral diseases, including AIDS, some types of cancer. I thank you, in advance, considering seriously the opinions I have here stated. Very Respectfully Yours, Tracy MacGovern McCauley, Stanardsville, VA
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I am writing to express my strong opposition to HJ1, which would "enshrine" in Virginia's Constitution. This extreme legislation would undermine even the existing modest protections for unborn children and minors, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and parental consent law. Aside from the barbaric act of murdering unborn children, the long term physical and emotional risks of abortion for women are great evils that are ignored, dismissed or denied by abortion proponents and the abortion industry. One can only question the sincerity of those who claim to care about women's well-being when they are unwilling to consider the compelling evidence of harm to women from abortion. In a just and compassionate society, the true well-being of every mother and child should be enshrined, not abortion.
Thank you for working to get reproductive rights enshrined in the constitution of Virginia. It is imperative that people who get pregnant are able to make choices about their bodies; the government should protect that freedom, not dictate what people should do. I am confident the majority of people in Virginia, like a majority of Americans, support freedom of choice when it comes to reproductive healthcare.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. A person's right to reproductive freedom and bodily autonomy is a fundamental to a free society and restriction of such rights in other states is causing a rise in maternal mortality rates. Healthcare providers should not be penalized for protecting the rights of their patients. A person's right to vote should be reinstated upon completion of their incarceration and should not be left to the whims of whomever is in office. Marriage should not be restricted because of race, sex, or gender and the language in the Constitution should be amended to reflect this.
I am in support of HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. These amendments will allow for for people to have autonomy in all their decisions.
I am strongly in support of HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Reproductive rights are human rights. Without women having autonomy over their bodies, many women will die from health complications, not to mention bring babies into non-ideal situations. The parents suffer and the children suffer. Additionally, I am strongly in support of the right for lgbtq+ people to marry. There is no scientific basis for the opposition to gay marriage rights, the only opposition comes from certain interpretations of religion or pure emotion. These religious perspectives and emotions should not be forced onto the choices of other people.
I strongly oppose HJ1 please vote to reject this amendment. I support HJ2 please vote FOR this amendment. I oppose HJ9 please vote to reject this amendment. Thank you!
No one has a “right” to kill a human being at any stage in their development. To suggest otherwise displays a total disregard for the sanctity of human life, whether by a pregnant woman or a mentally ill gunman. Murder should never be a “choice.” I strongly oppose any legislation that allows for the legal murder of human beings, including abortion. . Instead, offer assistance to pregnant women and their unborn children; that is the only loving and humane way to handle unexpected or challenging pregnancies.
I am strongly opposed to HJ1 and any effort to amend the constitution to advance abortion. Legalized abortion up until birth is barbaric.
No one has a “right” to kill a human being at any stage in their development. To suggest otherwise displays a total disregard for the sanctity of human life, whether by a pregnant woman or a mentally ill gunman. Murder should never be a “choice.” I strongly oppose any legislation that allows for the legal murder of human beings, including abortion. . Instead, offer assistance to pregnant women and their unborn children; that is the only loving and humane way to handle unexpected or challenging pregnancies.
I truly feel this is wrong , and it shouldn’t happen because lives are at stack not only the child but the mother also and giving people the right to end pregnancy that late is completely wrong and I stand against it . It shouldn’t be an option for someone to make that choice unless the child has passed in the wound and is mo longer living.
It’s been observed that trauma leads to trauma. A woman ending the life of her child will not make her pain go away. In reality, for hundreds of thousands of silently suffering women, abortion haunts them later in life. I oppose this reckless move to codify “reproductive rights” into our Commonwealth’s Constitution. It is the height of selfishness to end the life of a child for the convenience of the mother and also allowing the father to be exempt from responsibility. Upwards of 90% of abortions are not for rape, incest or related to the health of the mother. The overwhelming majority is for protection of reputation, convenience or fear of the future. None of these reasons come close to denying the individual sovereignty of a boy or girl who cannot speak for themselves.
Yes to HJ2 (voting rights), no to HJ1 and HJ9. I.e., NO to killing babies, and NO to defining marriage as anything other than what it is.
I strongly object to adding the "right" to abortion in the constitution.
I strongly oppose enshrining any presumed right to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. Abortion ends an innocent human life, a life that should be protected regardless of the hardships the baby’s might mother face. I oppose removing the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion, or law.
I STRONGLY oppose HJ1!! Every human being has the right to life including the unborn child. Abortion is NOT reproductive care and it certainly is NOT a fundamental right. I strongly urge you, I beg you, for the sake of the millions of babies who are victims of abortion, NOT to allow this bill to pass.
I support bill HJ1. Abortion is a term used medically regardless of whether the act was intentional or not. Impeding reproductive freedom impedes access to appropriate care for both the mother and the fetus. I support bill HJ2. I believe felons should have the right to vote once they have served their sentences. I support bill HJ9. I believe the right to marry should be available to all humans regardless of sex, gender, or race.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 as I believe each of these amendments are integral to upholding the American values of: liberty and the pursuit of happiness. To revoke these rights from people, to treat them as other and undeserving of these freedoms, is completely unethical under The Declaration of Independence and the values of America as a whole. Not to mention basic morality. I believe it is imperative to protect our citizens liberty and rights to bodily autonomy--in both marriage and a person's pregnancy. As well as allowing citizens, regardless of transgressions, to have the right to vote as they live within and participate in our society and community as well. Virginia is one of the best states in the continental US. I believe with these amendments we will be even better. It shows love, care, and respect to all our citizens. I believe in the good heartedness of our representatives and hope that these amendments will inspire other states to follow suit in the goal of creating a better world for every persons.
As a mother and a Christian, I can assure you that a nation that murders its children en womb for any reason is a nation that deserves the judgment of God. Yet, God can preserve pockets of people who stand against the evil. For the sake of the Great State of Virginia, the unborn citizens of our state, and for the glory of God — vote NO on HJ1. If you do not stand in the gap for the innocent lives, God will hold you personally responsible — and you will bear the blood of these children on your hands. The only right thing to do is to Abolish Human Abortion. This is a scourge upon our land that can only be remedied by repentance — and justice for the unborn. If the leaders of this state do not take on to themselves true justice, they can only expect God’s judgment. And may it be swift. "Righteousness exalts a nation, But sin is a reproach to any people” (Proverbs 14:34). The shedding of innocent blood pollutes the land. Psalm 106:38. I implore you to do the just thing so that your hands will be clean. Sincerely, Mischelle Sandowich
Please do not pass HJ1
I STRONGLY Reject HJ1. Abortion is fundamentally murder, not a fundamental right. No one has the right to kill an innocent person. Instead of expanding abortion, work to affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. The protection of abortion through all 9 months of pregnancy is wrong and would allow children to be killed who would have been able to sustain themselves outside of the womb. Minors are still under the protection and care of their guardians and should not be allowed to make a drastic and life-changing decision without the consent of their parents. Safety standards in abortion clinics are necessary and there for the protection of the mothers - they should not be prevented from being reinstated. Finally, if men impregnate women, they must bear responsibility for that child. The mother has to bear the child and give birth to it, the father should at the very least support her financially.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
Because of the rushed nature and secrecy of this meeting, in addition to not allowing any In person testimony, as a citizen of Virginia, I am most concerned and sense a sinister nature to these proceedings. You have been elected by the citizens of Virginia and, by keeping us in the dark, is NOT what you were hired by us to do. We demand to have a voice! I implore you to listen to the citizens before changing language and/or rushing through Bills that are not in line with what the majority of Virginia citizens support. That is unethical and you will be held accountable, hopefully by the citizens of Virginia when you next come up for re-election but certainly by God, our creator, whether you choose to acknowledge Him or not.
HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 all address important individual rights. Reproductive freedom is essential to women’s ability to think and act for themselves, keep themselves safe, and made decisions to govern their own lives like any other adult. It is also essential to protect the rights of LGBTQ people, who deserve to marry like anyone else. Any threat to their rights is a threat to us all. Finally, in a time when there are regular threats to people’s access to the polls, we must protect their voting rights. The Commonwealth of Virginia must not bow to pressure from the federal government and must instead protect the rights of ALL its citizens.
Do not take away the fundamental right of a woman to choose to continue her pregnancy or to decide when she would like to carry a child. Women should be able to make this personal decision not the government .. how did this even happen that the Government should be involved with such personal choices. This is hideous to deny this freedom. Men do not get told if they can make the decision to fertilize an embryo ..
I wholeheartedly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Bodily autonomy is a fundamental freedom that every person should wish to protect; voting rights should not be left to the whims of whomever is in office; and marriage should not be restricted because of race, sex, or gender. These are basic tenets of a truly free nation.
I strongly believe that a woman's health care decisions should be between her and her doctor. There is NO exception. The government has no business in this. The right to SAFE AND LEGAL health care, access to contraception, and the right to engage in private, consensual intimacy without government interference is essential to all women of Virginia.
HJ1 states that abortion will become a right in all nine months of pregnancy, and even though this right gives “free will” to abort a baby, what’s the cost behind that? There are several reasons why I consider this right to not only be wrong, but I completely agree that this right is deadly and detrimental to society. In this country, our objective is trying to promote growth in a declining population. God Himself commands us in the Bible to “Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth” (Genesis 9:1 NKJV). What does this mean for us in a population that is heading towards a decline? Abortion is not the answer, and could very well be the reason why we’re heading in this declining population as it is. Marriage and Religion Institutes, such as Marri Research, confirms this in stating that “There are in the range of 1.2 million to 1.5 million abortions per year”(Potrykus, Henry, and Higgins 2). What are we as a nation going to decide on this? Are we going to be susceptible to a relative truth based on what feels good, or a truth that’s absolute in research stating that abortion itself is bad? HJ1 is similar to Roe vs. Wade, and yet Roe vs. Wade was overturned in 2022 and kept the legalization of abortion for 50 years in America. The real question is, why would they overturn such a bill that’s been going on for 50 years? One logical conclusion could be this sudden detriment in total population, but I wouldn’t hesitate this would end up as the same case for HJ1. It’s just another simulation of Roe vs. Wade. Although yes, women have had certain circumstances happen to them based on past experiences and unwanted pregnancies, however, abortion is not the answer. Essentially, we’re getting back at whoever caused this certain event to happen by killing a child in the womb, and if you don’t believe me, the Bible says so itself. Christ tells us to love/forgive others despite the circumstances that they put us in, but that love and forgiveness should be given to the care of our future children as well who are on the verge of being aborted by a mother. To put it bluntly, we’re taking the lives of another person in the womb by saying we’re pro-life for abortion. In other words, we’re committing murder to someone else who is innocent and did nothing wrong to us in any way possible. The fact that we’re killing them is unbearable to me personally as a human, they need a chance to live and see the world for what it is. The fact that they never get that chance is what bothers me the most. We’re not doing good for the economy by this, because if this rate of decline continues throughout time, eventually you won’t have any employments for jobs, you won’t have production, and nobody—not even the customer—wins in the end. In terms of Calculus, it’s an h approaches 0 case. We’re approaching that number gradually, and if it doesn’t affect us now it will definitely affect us in the future. Trump will make America great again, and with a secure border we will have less mass murder as well as less cases—which range from 10,000 to 100,000 as of today— of rape and unwanted pregnancies. When Trump secures that, our environment will be safer, and we’ll be able to enjoy what’s blessed most in the U.S., that is, the future of our next generation. What they call HJ1 is both repulsive and dehumanizing in such a sense that it gives me dread for this future. I, as a citizen of the U.S., stand against abortion.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
I emplore you to pass this bill, the government has NO RIGHT to get between the doctor and the patient concerning their own health. Let medical experts do their jobs.
Please support these 3 constitutional amendments that work to enshrine the rights of every day citizens. People should have the right to determine what is best for their healthcare with trained medical professionals, not politicians. Persons who have fulfilled their debt to society through incarceration should be able to vote once released; they pay taxes and should be able to have a voice. Adults should have the right to marry and receive the same protections and rights that have been bestowed upon heterosexual couples. Government should be protecting and uplifting its citizens, not tearing them down. Please be a positive example to the rest of the country.
I am not agreeing with abortion, I live to live ID meeting 17472 Proabortion
HJ1(support)-government have no saying in ANY reproductive rights on individuals AT ALL, no state no province no federal not even the slightest. HJ2(against)-criminals are still human as long as they are citizens they should be able to vote HJ9(support)-and people should marry who ever they want, imagine you love this person and they love you back and government tell you you're wrong because they quote some random book.
I am opposed to Bill HJ 1 concerning abortion rights. I urge all members of the Privileges and Elections Committee to not support this bill as abortion is murder of an innocent child.
Reject HJ1 Abortion is a a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Instead of expanding abortion, work to affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
I am opposed to bill HJ1 concerning abortion rights. I urge all members of the Privileges and Elections Committee to not support this bill as abortion is murder of an innocent child.
Reject HJ1 Abortion is a a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Instead of expanding abortion, work to affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
I urge you to support HJ1 and move the bill forward. I am old enough to remember what it was like before Roe v Wade when poor girls died of illegal abortions and girls whose family could afford it got the care they needed under cover of euphemism. Women in some states have found themselves back in those hypocritical days. We've seen in the last year how health care for pregnant women has deteriorated in those states. When Roe v Wade was decided I felt liberated because now my body was my own to control. I felt that for the first time the law treated me as a full person. I am so saddened that for so many American women we have gone backwards. I do not want that to happen to women in Virginia.
I am writing in support of HJ1. I agree that every individual has the fundamental right to reproductive freedom. Without that basic right, we lose our autonomy. The reasons, circumstances and complications that can create a need for abortion care are as numerous and unique as the individuals who seek such care. HJ1 takes this into account and gives the right and protection to those most qualified to make that decision – a pregnant person and their health care provider. I urge you to move forward with HJ1 and allow the citizens in Virginia to vote on this issue in 2026.
HJ 1 - I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 - I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 - I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I STRONGLY support these three amendments to our state constitution. Protecting women’s reproductive freedom, restoring voting rights to people convicted of felonies, and ensuring marriage equality are all deeply important to me and the people I love. I want to protect and support all Virginians', rights, regardless of their political affiliation, with these three constitutional amendments!
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I support all three bills.
I strongly oppose HJ1. The protection of abortion through all 9 months of pregnancy is wrong and would allow children to be killed who would have been able to sustain themselves outside of the womb. Minors are still under the protection and care of their guardians and should not be allowed to make a drastic and life-changing decision without the consent of their parents. Safety standards in abortion clinics are necessary and there for the protection of the mothers - they should not be prevented from being reinstated. Finally, if men impregnate women, they must bear responsibility for that child. The mother has to bear the child and give birth to it, the father should at the very least support her financially.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
I strongly oppose HJ1!! Every child has the right to life. Abortion is murder. There is no way to justify murder. Please do not allow this bill to pass.
Please oppose HJ1. Murder is the premeditated taking of an innocent human life. It is and always will be wrong to murder innocent human beings. No human has the right to murder any other human. Ever.
HJ1 - Herring: I support that all individuals should have access to the fundamental right to reproductive freedom. Not all situations are black and white. What benefit is there if we deny or restrict access to a potentially life saving solution for said person? Such a heavy decision needs to stay between patient and provider. HJ2 - Bennett-Parker: If an individual continues to pay State and Federal taxes after being reformed/released, then I believe the right to vote should be able to be reestablished as well. HJ9 - Sickles: I support that marriage between individuals should extend to LGBTQ+ residents. Pursuing happiness should extend to all.
I support all 3 bills to amend Virginia's constitution to protect civil rights and personal liberty.
I am very sorry to hear about HJ1 and I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. Abortion takes the life of an innocent human being. The constitution and laws of a state should protect babies right to life, no matter their gestational age. HJ1 will jeopardize existing legal protections for unborn children and will create a culture in our state that does not support life for all of its residents. There are many ways to help mothers who have an unplanned pregnancy. Abortion is not one of them and is a grave affront to human dignity. This attempt to make abortion a constitutional right in our state is tragic and I urge her to withdraw HJ1 from consideration.
Abortion is murder and should in no way be permitted. Killing another human is not anyone's "right". Marriage was ordained by God to be between 1 man and 1 women and should not be deviated from.
My husband and I wish to state emphatically that we are opposed to this bill. Every unborn child is precious to God and to us. Please don't make it easy for life to be snuffed out at its most innocent level.
I support the right to abortion and same sex marriage
Reject HJ1 Abortion is a a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Instead of expanding abortion, work to affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
I stand in opposition to bill HJ1.
As others have noted, "reproductive freedom," the "right to choose," and "bodily autonomy" are deceptive euphemisms for the targeted murder of infants in the womb through dismemberment, suction, or induced miscarriage. It is tragically ironic that those who advocate for this practice ignore that it preys upon women (specifically women of color), female babies (through sex-selective abortion), and disabled individuals (especially those with Down syndrome). HJ-1 explicitly contradicts the most basic function of government, which is to protect the lives of its constituents, and should therefore not be enshrined in Virginia's constitution. I strongly oppose HJ-1 out of love for our smallest and most vulnerable neighbors and my fellow women, and because a society that encourages or tolerates violence is a society that cannot and will not flourish.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
There is no scientific debate about whether or not the baby in the womb is human life. An elementary school science education would explain how the tree outside is alive and so is the baby in the womb at the start of conception. Just because a baby does not look like a baby yet, is not a justified reason to end life, in no other situation would we end life based on appearances . Pointing out that the baby is not full grown yet only highlights how people continue to grow their entire lives, not a reason to end a life. Saying the baby needs the mother to live and cannot yet live on its own, that is most children till the age of 18. All newborn babies would die if left on their own and need the life of the mother but we would never suggest that a mother can kill her 2 month old. A comparison can be made to taking someone off life support, but I can't imagine anyone would pull the plug on a loved one if they knew that for certain in 9 months they'd regain their consciousness and bodily autonomy. Saying the mother has a right to choose is in fact true. The mother did have a right to choose an action that brought the baby into life. To say the mother gets a right to end her babies life is not true, the constitution protects all human beings and their right to life. If the point was made that the mother and the babies life might be filled with struggle, that could definitely be true, but both mother and baby are both beautiful children of God and there are organizations and places willing to help those who are struggling. Instead of adding pain on top of pain, choosing life seems more painful at first but will eventually bear good fruit for both mother and child. Prayers for the unborn and for women who suffer abortion, those considering abortion and all women everywhere to know and feel the love of Jesus Christ. Ask Him for help and He will answer. God Bless.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
Rather than granting rights to sexual reproduction, and sex and gender change to all, even minors, in which strangers may encourage and assist them in life-altering procedures with immunity apart from parental input, a law which the vast number of Virginians would oppose, I instead encourage the committee to agree to the following: 1.Prohibit abortions 2.Penalize persons coercing minor or adult women into having abortions 3.Exempt institutions/companies/individuals from any requirement that mandates the provision or participation of insurance requiring coverage of sterilization, abortion, or providing gender/sex altering services or drugs. 4. Require parental consent as condition of minors exercising all medical prerogatives 5. Impose restrictions/prohibitions on selling or furnishing pornography, films, or sexual devices to minors 6. Protect minors by criminalizing sexual trafficking. Parents have an unalienable right to protect their children. Do not put Virginia's children at risk to great harms by removing them from the umbrella of protection of their parents. Encourage life, not death, in this state! Denmark reduced its abortion rate by 33% when it gave a financial incentive to increase the birthrate! Why don't you encourage Virginians to do the same!!!!
This is far too extreme. To allow abortion to be conducted until the point of birth is to go even further than the Roe court would have allowed, and is effectively the killing of a child that could otherwise be alive, even without depending on the mother. To pass this is, in essence, to state that whomever a child, born or unborn, is reliant upon to live has the right to end the life of that child. And it is undisputed that it is life, as per scientific experts, Biologists. Children, in the days, weeks, months, and years, after birth, are still unable to survive on their own, without some human help. This is not different from an unborn child, which needs human assistance to grow, develop and survive. Such a constitutional amendment is far too broad and restrictive.
A child developing in her mother’s womb suffers during an abortion. Please spare the baby that. There is lots of help available to a mother- to - be, during her pregnancy and after the birth of her baby. I know that abortions are done for many reasons. Each one of those babies has no voice; you are her voice. Thank you.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
Good evening, I am reaching out as a concerned Virignian citizen about the recent proposal to enshrine a right to reproductive freedom in Virginia's constitution (HJ1 | Herring | Constitutional amendment; fundamental right to reproductive freedom). This will open the door to abortion through all nine months of pregnancy. Virginia has never allowed abortion up until birth, and even of the people who support abortion, less than a quarter of them support third trimester abortions. This stance is simply too extreme for Virginia. And worst of all, this proposal will block protection from minors undergoing abortion and other harmful reproductive practices by removing parental knowledge and consent as well as making abortion practices even more dangerous by reducing clinical safety standards and informed consent for women and minors. Human trafficking and sexually abusive situations will have more room to hide within the folds of this proposed amendment. If you care about your citizens please do not support this proposal. I have personally seen the lasting effects of abortion on women and families in my own circle of loved ones. Please don't be turn a blind eye on the ramifications of abortion up to birth. Sincerely, Alexandra Latham
HJ1 I am opposed to enshrining a right to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. It severely jeopardizes the few protections for unborn children ;such as ban on partial birth abortion and parental consent )this is wrong and must be stopped), abortion until birth should not be allowed. I urge you to work on policies that uphold the dignity of every mother and child. HJ2 I support All people who have served their punishment should have their rights restored. I oppose HJ9 that removes the constitutional provision of marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any government or law.
- Ranked choice voting weakens the democratic process by opening the door for one party rule in a state. - Reproductive freedom is a euphemism for abortion access and the fact that the term is being used proves that it is a scandal. An individual does not have the right to kill a person they find inconvenient. To enshrine this as a constitutionally protected right would be to invite the continued judgment of God upon our state. Magistrates have the duty to restrain evil not establish it in law. - Marriage is pre-political and it is the duty of any sane society to honor and protect it. It is a permanent covenant between a man and a woman to establish a family (God willing) which in turn builds healthy communities. To merely reduce it to some kind of relationship between any two individuals is a detriment to our society and an offense against God. We’ve already seen the devastation wrought by divorce, adultery, and sodomy by judicial decree and statute. Why make it even more ingrained in our legal system?
I oppose enshrining unrestricted access to abortion through HJ1. Both the life and dignity of the mother as well as the human infant should be protected. A constitutional amendment would preclude any possible protections to unborn human life. I am in favor of HJ2. Once a person has paid their debt to society through the justice system, their citizens right to vote should be restore
I strongly support the HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 amendments to the Virginia Constitution. America should be a place that guarantees the fundamental rights and choices of women, celebrates and encourages love in all forms, and protects the act of voting for all qualified citizens. If the nation as a whole can't ensure these rights, I hope that my state at least can.
I am writing to express my strong support for the proposed constitutional amendments concerning marriage equality, voting rights, and reproductive freedom. These amendments are vital steps toward ensuring that all people in our state are treated with dignity, respect, and fairness under the law. 1. Marriage Equality Amendment: I fully support the repeal of the constitutional provision that defines marriage as between one man and one woman. Marriage is a fundamental human right, and every individual, regardless of their gender or sexual orientation, should have the ability to marry the person they love without discrimination. This amendment brings our state into alignment with the Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell v. Hodges and reaffirms the core values of liberty and equality for all citizens. 2. Voting Rights Amendment: I wholeheartedly support the provision that ensures the right to vote is not abridged for any person who has completed their incarceration for a felony. Our democracy is strongest when every citizen has an equal opportunity to participate in the electoral process. By allowing those who have served their time and re-entered society to regain their voting rights automatically, we are taking an important step toward restorative justice and ensuring that all voices are heard. 3. Reproductive Freedom Amendment: The right to make personal decisions about one’s reproductive health is a fundamental human right. This amendment is crucial in protecting individuals from government interference in their personal choices regarding pregnancy. I strongly believe that every person should have the autonomy to make decisions about their body and their future, without fear of prosecution or discrimination. This amendment safeguards the health and well-being of individuals, and it is imperative that we ensure these rights remain protected in our state. In conclusion, these amendments are critical to securing a more just and equitable future for all Virginians. I urge our lawmakers to pass these amendments and to continue working toward a state where every individual, regardless of gender, race, sexual orientation, or background, is treated with the respect and dignity they deserve. Thank you for your consideration.
HJ1 - For decades, the Democratic Party has urged us to support them, suggesting that voting for them is essential to protect Roe v. Wade rather than fully codifying it into law, which would ensure abortion access as a legal right. Women in Texas are facing serious risks due to inadequate medical care while doctors are constrained in their ability to help. We must ensure that Virginia does not follow this troubling path. HJ2 - If an individual with 34 felony convictions can become president, why do we continue to behave as though those with felony records do not deserve the restoration of their voting rights? Individuals who have been released from prison have fulfilled their sentences and deserve the opportunity to reintegrate into society. HJ 9 Gay marriage is the law of the land. These families deserve the same ongoing protections afforded to married families in the Commonwealth of Virginia.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental TRAGEDY, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
RE: HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. We should protect always the rights of our unborn children. They also have the right to live.
Members of the Committee: I would like to go on record opposing HJ1. I believe that the unborn child deserves individual rights and our protection. In the Virginia statute 54.1=2972, a person is declared medically and legally dead if there is an absence of brain functions. " Symmetry would argue that life begins when these physiological functions commence in utero." (Dr. Michael A. Okin, MD. Dr. Okin believes this activity to occur around 5-6 weeks in utero. This is just one example of the potentiality of human life in the womb. Please vote to protect the individual rights of the unborn child. And vote No on HJ1 legislation. Thank you.
• I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. • HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. • HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. • A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. • Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
Please support HJ1, HJ2 and HJ9. Being able to commit to the person you love, having authority over your own body, and being able to exercise your voting rights once imprisonment is over should forever be inalienable rights in our great state.
HJ1 I strongly oppose this Amendment and believe an unborn child has rights—a right to live. I urge my State Delegate James W. Morefield to vote no on this proposed Amendment.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
PLEASE OPPOSE HJ1 I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2 All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ9 Marriage is the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
As a Virginia resident, I'm horrified to learn about the proposal to add a constitutional amendment that would allow late-term abortions through nine months. This is a policy not previously supported in Virginia and one that a majority find too extreme. The proposal would also jeopardize parental consent requirements for minors, which would compromise safety standards and limit informed consent. For the well-being of Virginians, I urge you to vote a strong "NO" on this proposal.
The United States Constitution is clear in its Equal Protection clause.Under the 14th Amendment, this proposed constitutional amendment would violate the US Constitution by denying the protection of human life to all human lives, born and unborn. This proposed constitutional amendment should not proceed further, as it violates the US Constitution.Abortion ends the life of a human being. Even when it is not fully developed, it is alive and growing.When a woman says my body, my choice, why does the child not get a choice? It’s their body that’s being destroyed.I am the mother of an 18 month old and a 29 week old baby growing in my womb. There are no words to describe the joy I have felt both pregnancies when I heard their hearts beat as early as 5.5 weeks. There was no denying at that point that a life was growing inside me. Both of my pregnancies have been high risk which means I’ve needed frequent ultrasounds. For 12 weeks straight of this current pregnancy I needed weekly ultrasounds due to an infection. Seeing him weekly was a gift. To see his movements and how he loves to have his hands and feet in front of his face remind me of his brother.We even caught him sucking on his toes! He’s always been a mover and as soon as I starting feeling him kick (both pregnancies early on about 16 weeks) it’s been non stop flutters and kicks. They have personalities even in the womb. Women around the country have been using abortion as birth control. They use it as an excuse to pretend their actions don’t have consequences. They use rape and incest as an excuse for it to be legal for all. While I do not believe there should be any exceptions and that all abortion is murder, you cannot allow a small portion of cases to make the law for all. Women lately, because of media and misrepresented medical cases, have been arguing that an abortion includes treatment for ectopic pregnancies, miscarriages, and septic uteruses as an excuse for abortion for all. This is offensive to any mother who has been in these situations. These women would give anything for their child to be alive. It’s also unnecessarily scaring women. The treatment for these cases is legal. Abortion is the intentional ending of an infants life. None of these cases are intentional. An ectopic pregnancy has zero chance of survival and could kill the mother. With a miscarriage the child has already been lost. I understand that medical coding sometimes codes these treatments as spontaneous abortion but that is different than an actual one. Women in these cases are always protected. It is misinformation that is making doctors afraid of treating these women when really the doctors who don’t provide the necessary treatments haven’t been providing lawful care and are guilty of malpractice. No one has been trying to take away treatment for these cases. One case that’s made national media coverage involved a mother who had taken an abortion pill and was septic. This isn’t a result of doctors not providing care, it is an actual potential side effect of the pill. I understand the law allows abortion up until 26 weeks, however this amendment would allow it for the full 9 months. This is disgusting. The United States considers viability to be at 23-24 weeks. If there is an issue threatening the mother’s life the doctors can deliver the baby not kill it. Abortion is NOT healthcare. It is an extreme form of birth control and is not a right as there are plenty of other birth control options.
HJ1 Reproductive Health Every Virginia resident should have access to affordable, quality health care, including abortion, birth control and the privacy to make reproductive choices. Abortion is not always the ending of ending a pregnancy it it also a medical procedure that terminates a nonviable pregnancy and saves a women's life. Abortion should be legal, safe, and the decision left to those who are pregnant with guidance from medical professionals. True democracy depends on equal rights for all people. Not only is the right to a safe and legal abortion a matter of personal freedom, it’s also a major factor in the movements for racial and economic equality. Black individuals, and all underserved communities, already experience unfair barriers and limited access to adequate healthcare services. HJ2 Voting Rights The majority of Virginians believe that all qualified citizens should have access to the ballot, including those who have served their time for felony convictions and people with disabilities who want to participate in the democratic process. I support an amendment to the Virginia Constitution to guarantee that people who have been disenfranchised due to a felony conviction will have their rights automatically restored upon completion of their sentences, without additional steps or paperwork, and to ensure people with disabilities never lose their rights without an appropriate judicial finding. HJ9 Marriage Equality The 2021 polls from the Public Religion Research Institute found that 71% of Virginians support the right of same-sex couples to marry. In 2006, 53% of voters supported the ban of same-sex couple marriage. This huge swing shows the massive shift in public opinion on this issue of marriage, and it is clear evidence that the antiquated ban should no longer be a part of Virginia’s constitution. It’s only fair to revisit a political question that has shown such a vast change since it was first broached. With the removal of women’s protections with the destruction of Roe v. Wade, it is possible that marriage equality will be destroyed on a national level as well. Virginia must take the lead to protect all citizens. Thank you. Anne Alston CD11
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
"Reproductive rights" is a euphemism for sanctioning the murder of a human being at a vulnerable stage in human development. Ultrasound technology now show us the science of the developing human. When we have a human at any stage they have a right to life. No one can give another person the right to purposely kill them. False narratives abound about women dying from lack of care, and victims of rape and incest. An intentional abortion is never needed for the health of the mother. Dr. Anthony Levatino, former abortion doctor testified to Congress about this . Medical advances make it possible to do everything to try to save both. If the child dies saving the mother it is not an intentional abortion. As for rape and incest...we have two victims, the mother and the child ...since when do we kill the victim of a crime? We need to provide assistance to women in these situations. There are many crisis pregnancy centers that operate on the generosity of pro-life people without government assistance. Imagine what future health and mental health problems could be avoided if we had a bill to support these centers instead of HJ1. I strongly oppose this. What kind of society will we be if we enshrine this "right" in the constitution of our Commonwealth?
I strongly support these bills. This is about freedom.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
I am against HJ1. Science has shown us that a fetus can hear, feel pain, has brain waves and has a beating heart while in utero at various times during gestation. To stop that heart or end the brain function is the murder of an innocent human. Do not legalize murder, please.
I strongly oppose HJ1. A child in the womb has a right to life and that should not be taken away from them.
PLEASE do not enshrine this extreme “right to abortion” amendment in Virginia's Constitution! HJ1 is so extreme that it would challenge even the current limited protections for unborn children including the barbaric and cruel partial-birth abortion and the ill-advised removal of parental consent for minors. HJ1 would go further to pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born! Please help protect these most vulnerable children from extremist and brutal killing. If we as Virginians are willing to so casually kill these vulnerable children, are we also willing to condone killing of other vulnerable Virginians (such as the terminally ill and others whose rights are not respected and protected)? Please help Virginia to be a state who respects and protects every individual from conception to natural death.
I speak on behalf of babies and desire that we keep our children alive. We should not be allowed to prevent innocent infants from being aborted
I would like to strongly express my support for all three bills, each of which greatly enhance the rights and dignity of the people of the Commonwealth.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
No restrictions on abortions. No liability for abortions. No criminality for abortions. Marriage is a human right between amongst consenting adults. Population in prisons and jail is counted for the purposes of population for redistricting, no human should be denied the right to vote.
HJ1-Herring. Please consider policies that affirm the life and dignity of all mothers and children instead of expanding abortion services in the Commonwealth of Virginia. I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. Thank you.
HJ 1 – I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution because no such right exists. There is no right to murder an innocent human. HJ 1 violates the constitution, specifically the 14th amendment ("no State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law"), the 6th commandment of God ("Thou shall not murder"). It is disgusting and abhorrent that delegates from the state of VA would seek to violate their own oath to uphold the constitution of the United States and seek to enshrine a right to deny equal human rights to certain Virginian citizens by dehumanizing them based on their level of development and location. I urge you to work instead for policies that protect the life and dignity of every human being, to do justice on behalf of the fatherless instead of making them your prey. In fact, God commands you to do as much. HJ 9 – I strongly oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. God created the institution of marriage to be between one man and one woman. Man does not have the right to attempt to redefine it.
• I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. • HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. • HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. • A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. • Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
I support a state constitutional amendment to protect the reproductive rights and keep the health care decisions out of the hands of politicians. The public overwhelming supports maintaining access to reproductive care. Now that this decision has been turned over to the states, we should enshrine protections for reproductive rights in Virginia's constitution.
• Enshrine a "right to reproductive freedom" in Virginia's Constitution, opening the door to abortion through all nine months of pregnancy. • Eliminate parental knowledge or consent for minors undergoing invasive abortion procedures. • Prevent reinstatement of critical abortion clinic safety standards and informed consent for women and minors. • Allow men to claim a right to impregnate women without responsibility for child support.
I strongly support this Amendment and believe that every individual has the fundamental right to reproductive freedom and that the right to make and effectuate one’s own decisions about all matters related to one’s pregnancy Should not be denied, burdened, or otherwise infringed upon by the Commonwealth.
AAUW VA believes that everyone can make their own informed choices about their reproductive lives within the dictates of their own moral and religious beliefs. No individual or government should have the right to make these deeply personal decision for another. Most Virginians feel that abortion should be legal and part of women's quality, affordable health care. Therefore AAUW VA urge the Virginia lawmakers to support HJ1, a Virginia constitutional amendment that would ensure reproductive freedom and the right to make decisions about one's own pregnancy.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution. Without them, my husband and I are choosing to not to have children due to the risk. Women should have control of their bodies. These decisions should be made between a woman and her doctor no one else. These rights must be protected.
Every Virginian should have access to affordable, quality healthcare, including abortion and birth control, with the freedom to make private reproductive choices. Abortion must remain safe, legal, and guided by medical professionals. Protecting reproductive rights safeguards other freedoms, such as marriage equality, contraception access, and privacy in personal decisions. The right to choose also supports racial and economic equality, as marginalized communities face greater barriers to adequate healthcare. Reproductive decisions affect overall well-being - this includes financial stability, housing, employment, and family support. If we want healthy productive communities, we must create conditions where all can thrive.
Abortion should not be in the Virginia Constitution.
Today I would like to address critical issues that affect our society and the fundamental rights of individuals. We must protect marriage equality and ensure the preservation of same-sex marriage. This is not merely a matter of legal recognition; it is about upholding the dignity and rights of all individuals to love and marry who they choose without fear of discrimination. Additionally, we must prioritize access to affordable healthcare, including necessary services such as abortion. This is a matter of bodily autonomy—our bodies, our choices. Every individual must have the right to make informed decisions regarding their own health and well-being, free from judgement or limitation. As we consider amendments to legislation, let us not forget the importance of these issues. It is imperative that we advocate for policies that protect these rights and ensure equitable access to healthcare for every member of our community. Thank you for considering these vital amendments.
I have been a board-certified Internal Medicine and Pediatrics physician for 35 years. I continue to practice Internal Medicine and Pediatrics here locally. I strongly oppose enshrining a "right" to abortion in Virginia's constitution. HJ-1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ-1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. For some reason, many continue to believe that children are somehow expendable. They couldn't be more wrong. The total fertility rate in the US is currently 1.786 births per woman. This is markedly below the replacement rate of 2.1 births per woman. And that is just the break even point. We need to be above that number. Allowing abortion to have full rule and reign in any society is an unmitigated disaster. The US (and specifically the Commonwealth of Virginia) should be leading the way in increasing the population through childbirth. How else can our society survive?
RE: HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. Amendments to the state constitution should not be used to imbed for all posterity, a controversial issue for which a current or future legislature can and should be held accountable by their constituents. An amendment such as HJ1 relieves this and all future elected officials from taking a stand for which they must answer to the voters. Lik the US Constitution, Virginia State constitutional amendments should be reserved to limit government interference in people's lives, and not to codify controversial or temporal issues into law. Further, this amendment is not only unnecessary given the current legal protections provided by local and state laws, but further seems only to benefit current abortion providers and invite others into the state, making the commonwealth another in a growing list of "Abortion Tourism" states, and border towns and communities will be inundated with consumers of this macabre industry. I cannot imagine either the founders of the country or the Commonwealth of Virginia agreeing to inclusion of this or of any such item into the Constitution, It seems abusive of the constitutional process, and further precludes timely reversal of dictates for which unforeseeable consequences are certain. Constitutions by definition, should be difficult and time consuming to amend, and should prevent intrusion of the government into the lives of the governed. HJ1 is an abuse of not only the constitution, but also of the amendment process.
As to all three fast-tracking proposed amendments: You are aiming to skirt a deliberative process with robust discussion among all Virginians. You are doing this because you KNOW that your desire to harm and eliminate unborn children when you deem a child inconvenient (despite having been a child yourself!) and to alter what is true marriage which creates families where children are raised with one mother and one father are not popular measures and thus you act as surreptitiously as you can. How underhanded! I oppose HJ 9 and you should reject HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. I demand that you reject HJ 1. Abortion kills children and those children are the future of Virginia. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child and raises those children in families with one father and one mother.
I don’t want any change to the Virginia constitution enshrining the death of unborn babies.
I oppose HJ1! this is just murdering a human life-no abortion up to birth!
HJ1-Herring: I strongly support the right of every individual to have the fundamental right to reproductive freedom and that the right to make and effectuate one’s own decisions about all matters related to one’s pregnancy cannot be denied, burdened, or otherwise infringed upon by the Commonwealth. The right to bodily autonomy lives within the person and not at the state, and affects all freedoms and overlaps with so many other institutions including that of the economy, healthcare, poverty, education, and safety from partner violence. I have worked personally as a citizen advocate in the GA for this for 15 years. HJ9-Sickles: I support : Repeals the constitutional provision defining marriage as only a union between one man and one woman as well as the related provisions that are no longer valid as a result of the United States Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015). The amendment provides that the right to marry is a fundamental right inherent in the liberty of persons. I have worked on this issue for 15 years as a citizen activist and mobilizer of others at the GA to share about their personal stories and how the right to marriage and equal citizenship is a right for LGBTQ+ residents.
Please oppose those bills!!
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in most states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion, or law.
I support HJ1 and HJ9. Women should have control over their own bodies. I cannot believe this is even an issue: how is it possible in this day and age that we are discussing whether someone else can decide whether we carry a child or not? This should be a private decision made between a woman and her doctor. Likewise, marriage should be between two people who love each other, and it matters not one whit what gender they are.
End abortion in Virginia! "During an abortion procedure, if a baby is too large to remove in one piece, abortionists tear off the baby’s limbs and crush the head while the child is alive. This is known as a dismemberment abortion or D&E. Dismemberment abortions are typically performed between 13 and 24 weeks of pregnancy when a baby is too large to remove as a whole. At this stage of development, a baby has a beating heart, fully developed arms and legs, and can swallow, yawn, hiccup, and smile. Abortionists use a sopher clamp—a grasping instrument with rows of sharp “teeth”—to grasp and tear the limbs from the living child’s body. After removing pieces of the child’s skull, the abortionist uses a curette to scrape the uterus and remove the placenta and any remaining parts of the baby. The abortionist then collects all of the baby’s parts and reassembles them to make sure that all of the pieces have been removed. Since the baby is removed in pieces, there is an immediate risk of major complications for the mother with this procedure, including bleeding due to laceration or puncture of the woman’s uterus as well as infection from the baby not being fully removed. Unborn babies are simply not puzzles to be pieced back together after an abortion, and they should not have to bleed to death by having their limbs torn apart." Sourced from Nebraska Family Alliance.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution. Please secure the fundamental human rights for all Virginians. I fully support reproductive freedom, restoration of voting rights, and marriage equality.
HJ1: I OPPOSE. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. It could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2: All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ9: I OPPOSE HJ 9. Marriage has been defined as the union of one man and one woman since before definitions were needed. Our current state constitution reflects this truth passed down through millenia. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law, and is proven to be the best possible medium for raising healthy children.
Good evening, I want it to be known that I stand in opposition to this bill. The first reason being that it seems obvious to me that unborn life is still a human life and as citizens of this commonwealth it is our duty to stand up for and protect all human life. I believe that all life possesses inherent dignity. I oppose the fact that this bill will remove all restrictions on abortion, most notably parental consent. If you care about the dignity of the human person then you cannot in good conscience support this bill. Thank you.
An old addive states: my right to swing my hand stops at your nose. The right for a woman to terminate the life of an unborn person, stops at the child’s unique DNA, heart beat and brain waves. No one has the right to kill a healthy human being. I adamantly oppose granting any such right that grants a parent to kill their offspring as a means of family planning.
HJ1: I support the right of every individual to have reproductive freedom HJ2: I support the restoration of voting rights to those who have completed the terms of their punishment for crimes HJ9: I support marriage equality for every consenting adult human beings
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution. As a practicing psychiatrist, I believe these rights are incredibly important to supporting the mental health of the citizens of Virginia.
I am strongly opposed to the HJ1 amendment. This will further take our Commonwealth in the wrong direction by promoting death of the unborn. Abortion is an intrinsic evil, and should be reduced as much as possible. This amendment is not only anti-life, it is anti-family.
Madams and Sirs I write on behalf of Virgia residents. We should have access to quality health care including birth control and reproductive health care. Our rights should be protected- including our right to make choices about our bodies. Contraception can sometimes be lifesaving. I believe women’s health care decisions are best informed by doctors and made by us women. Please enshrine our fundamental right to reproductive freedom.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. I know you are trying to ram these bills through due to the results of the election. You obviously have learned nothing from the people speaking their voice. You should be ashamed of yourselves. One day you will stand before Our Lord and Judge. May God have mercy on your souls.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendmentI strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution.HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent.HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born.A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right.Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
Given the current, unstable political-social environment, introduction of such an apparently controversial and divisive proposal at this time could only further exacerbate an already potentially explosive situation. This proposal should be withdrawn, or placed in a low-priority-type-status until the new U.S. Congress and Administration are seated and the National-Socio-Political Environment becomes more stable. Then the proposal can be evaluated and debated in our Commonwealth in a more rational, cooler, and calmer manner. Regards … ______________________________ Prof. JOHN D. VASSAR (PMP) Chief Warrant Officer, US Army Aviation (Retired) Senior Faculty Emeritus, University of Phoenix, AZ 410-292-5371 (24/7) John.Vassar@iCloud.com ______________________________
I urge you to reject HJ1 because I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. Unborn children--the most vulnerable citizens of the Commonwealth-- have only a few small protections in Virginia law right now. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize these protections, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 would also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as an appalling tragedy, not a fundamental right or some kind of health care. Please say no to HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, why not work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child and provide a future for the tiniest citizens of Virginia.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
HJ1 - • I strongly oppose enshrining a right to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. This bill would severely jeopardize the few protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ2 - I support this bill.
The Honorable Charniele L. Herring, I am writing to oppose the repugnant bill that you are proposing to amend the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Virginia. We have just seen through the lens of the recent election that the a clear majority of the electorate reject candidates who are singularly focused on a radical approach (right up to the moment of birth) to abortion. Abortion is a stain on the Nation and we should at a minimum move toward a community that embraces "safe, legal, and rare." Your bill does nothing to further that aim. Kindest Regards, William A. Card Dumfries, VA
I strongly oppose HJ1 - This amendment is too extreme! We should not stand for the protection abortion and the death of children throughout 9 months of pregnancy. The elimination parental consent for minors takes away the rights and responsibilities parents of minors have. Under this amendment it would prevent reinstatement of safety standards for abortion clinics, that were originally put in place for the safety of mothers. We should not support putting mothers in even more danger than they already are in during the abortion process. We also cannot allow men to claim a right to impregnate women without liability for child support. Men must own up and take responsibility for their actions.
I oppose HJ1 because it is harmful to families: men, women , children, and our society. Abortion should never be offered as an option to women because it does so much harm to them and it’s shrouded in lies of the evil it causes. We do not have the right to harm an innocent person nor should we ever want to. I support restoring voting rights to reformed persons. HJ2 I oppose redefining marriage which we also have no power to do so and we would be lying if we pretended to. Our society can support those unable to marry in more helpful ways. HJ9
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
RE: HJ1: I support the right of women to have access to all services which support their private choices in matters of reproductive health. RE: HJ2: I support the restoration of voting rights to those who have completed the terms of their punishment for crimes RE: HJ9: I support marriage equality for all adult citizens.
HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 are essential to securing fundamental human rights for all Virginians. As an active and consistent voter I fully support reproductive freedom, restoration of voting rights, and marriage equality. My vote will always be for candidates who stand for and defend these rights
I am against HJ1. A "Right to Abortion" should not be cemented into our constitution. It would take away the ability to make any future adjustment and in one action take away existing laws without examination. It would be more unifying and better for everyone to give needed help to both mother and child. I am for HJ2 to restore voting rights to those who have completed their sentences. I am against HJ3 since we must do all we can to ensure the health and well being of future Virginia citizens. There have been many studies done that show that an intact family with a mother and father is the way to do this
• I oppose HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. • I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. • I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1 It is my religious belief and my legal belief that the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution and its Virginia corollary confirms that an unborn child at the moment of conception is a person with the right to life. Thus, I oppose HJ1. Labelling abortion as a "right" is simply contrary to reality and natural law. HJ 2 I support the restoration of voting rights for those persons whose voting rights have been lost due to criminal convictions once their incarceration has been completed. HJ 9 I oppose HJ 9 as it, too, contradicts reality and natural law. What is "up" is "up" and what is "down" is "down" and legislation cannot say otherwise. 1984 is alive and well if this Resolution results in an amendment to the Constitution of Virginia.
HJ1 OPPOSE • I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. • HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. • A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. • Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. Women in crisis pregnancies need encouragement, counseling, resources and support -- not abortion. HJ 19 - OPPOSE • I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. • Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. Every child deserves a mother and father in a marriage that is freely entered into with an enduring commitment of love, sacrifice, and service toward each other and their children. As the federal government has discovered, a one-man one-woman marriage is the naturally designed, foundation for family life. It may not always be possible in practice, but it essential for human flourishing, public health, and economic opportunity. The courtesy of a written reply is requested.
Let us repent as a Commonwealth, lest we face His anger.
I support All three bills
• I oppose HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. • I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. • I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I am writing to express my strong support for ensuring that every individual has the fundamental right to reproductive freedom. Access to reproductive health care, including contraception, family planning, and safe, legal abortion, is essential for individuals to make informed decisions about their own bodies and futures. Protecting this right not only upholds personal autonomy but also promotes social and economic equality by allowing individuals to pursue education, careers, and family life on their own terms. Reproductive freedom is a cornerstone of human rights, and it is crucial to protect it for all individuals, regardless of background or circumstances. Abortion is about more than simply ending a pregnancy. It encompasses a person’s right to make private, informed choices about their health, their body, and their future. Access to safe abortion services can be essential to preserving a person's physical and mental health, protecting their well-being, and upholding their personal autonomy. When individuals have the freedom to make reproductive decisions, it benefits families, communities, and society at large. This right is crucial not only for those directly affected but for the values of fairness and equality that our society strives to uphold. Abortion is not only about reproductive choice but also about providing essential medical care for individuals facing failed pregnancies. In cases such as miscarriage, ectopic pregnancies, or other life-threatening complications, abortion care is often necessary to protect the health and lives of those affected. Access to this care ensures that individuals and families can navigate these difficult situations safely, with the support of qualified medical professionals. By recognizing abortion as essential healthcare, we support compassionate, life-saving care that respects each person’s health needs and unique circumstances. I have personally experienced multiple failed pregnancies, which were heartbreaking for both my husband and me. Access to abortion care during those times was essential for my health and well-being, and I fear that without it, I would not have the one amazing child that I have today. Abortion is sometimes vital healthcare for those facing complications, and having access to it allowed us to continue building our family safely. Protecting this right means supporting individuals and families during their most challenging moments and giving them a chance at a hopeful future. Let us enshrine the right to reproductive freedom into our constitution so that every individual can have the opportunity to build the family of their choice. Protecting access to comprehensive reproductive healthcare, including abortion, is essential to ensure that people can make the best choices for themselves, their families, and their futures. By safeguarding this right, we uphold values of compassion, autonomy, and dignity, giving every person the chance to navigate their reproductive journey safely and freely. Thank you!
I adamantly oppose HJ1,HJ2, and HJ9 into the Virginia Constitution. The stance of all 3 proposals is MUCH too extreme and abhorrent for society as well as the VA Constitution. As a retired Mental Health RN I have seen the results of women who have had abortions to include inpatient hospitalization due to the after affects. Women deserve better than this. Abortion delivers one dead baby and one wounded woman!
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for ensuring these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose HJ 1 enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states.
HJ1. Support ALL life from conception to natural death. Vote no on HJ1. HJ9. Protect real marriage - the union of 1 man & 1 woman only. Vote no on HJ9.
Please protect our rights and freedoms. We want body autonomy and the freedom to marry as we see fit. Religion does not belong in politics. You have a duty to defend our rights against religious ideals that marginalize the people you represent.
Please let it be noted that I, a female registered to vote in the Commonwealth of Virginia, vehemently and IN NO WAY support HJ1 “enshrining abortion as a right in the Constitution…” and respectfully ask that all members who will be voting on this amendment vote AGAINST it. Virginia does not need any more blood on her hands than we already witnessed under the regime of Governor Northam.
I support these amendments because in a nation that values and prioritizes freedom, I believe that individuals should have autonomy over all their decisions. If we are to truly have our unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the government cannot restrict our autonomy in any way. Furthermore our government has a responsibility to protect our rights and by amending our state constitution we are solidifying that protection in the event that there are challenges to these rights federally.
HJ1: I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ2: I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ9: I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I support HJ1 under the basis of women should have the right to decide what happens with their bodies. I support HJ2 under the basis of mistakes should not render a human unable to participate in democracy. I support HJ9 under the basis of no outside force should be able to stop two consenting adults from getting married.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
The majority of women say that would rather carry their babies to term than to choose abortion so why not offer healthy alternatives to mother and baby rather than abortion on demand? Amending the Virginia Constitution to include a purported "right to abortion" is a scourge on Virginia.
I strongly oppose enshrining a "right" to abortion in Virginia's constitution. HJ1 would jeopardize the law requiring parental consent for minors and the current ban on partial-birth abortion. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth is a tragedy and does not affirm the dignity of women and children. Please support policies that help every woman and child rather than killing some of them. Thank you.
I first would like to express concern and disbelief with the process within the Virginia House that allows or encourages committees that are specifically formed to be focused and address the needs of the public in their dedicated area of focus to neglect their duty and responsibility and turn the process into a "Free for All " and turn the House of Delegates into an even more a disjointed organization than it has historically been. Given that this committee is suppose to be about ensuring honest and fair elections in the commonwealth, HJ1 could be amended to address this issue and involve an elected choice. All pregnancies involve 3 specific parties - Mother, Father and Child. I suggest that the wording of this be modified, so that it will at least remain under even under wildest pretense of the scope and purview of this committee. By modifying the amendment by using the language below, I believe the amendment would better reflect the situation at hand. "Constitutional amendment (first reference); fundamental right to current and future reproductive freedoms. Provides that every individual has the fundamental right and responsibility to consult and obtain agreement with all parties directly involved in a pregnancy (mother, father, child) before making any decision that would significantly impact each of the other parties directly involved in the pregnancy. The right to make and effectuate one's own decisions about all matters related their involvement and participation in the pregnancy, (mother, father, child) cannot be denied, burdened, or otherwise infringed upon by any other directly involved party of the pregnancy. This decision must not be otherwise infringed upon by the Commonwealth, unless justified by a compelling state interest and achieved by the least restrictive means. The amendment prohibits the Commonwealth from penalizing, prosecuting, or otherwise taking adverse action against an individual for exercising the individual's to participate in the decision making process to have Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness by eliminating the right to reproductive capability or for prohibiting another individual in the exercise of such right, unless justified by a compelling state interest." Until we understand that no decisions are made in a vacuum, and that we as a civil society often have to make personal sacrifices to benefit the greater good of posterity, we must not allow a single party, or individual to have the ultimate decision making power over another that would negatively impact them for life, or eliminate their life. This would truly be barbarianism and horrible society to have to live under if one person could control any other person to this level as proposed by the original amendment wording.
Safety of women and women who have become mothers is of high importance. Yet, must also be aware of the sanctity of all life, particularly the most vulnerable: the unborn. Perhaps instead of enshrining a way to kill human beings (which is morally reprehensible), we might consider enshrining ways to support mothers in need through additional actual women's healthcare facilities, proper structural support for pregnancy and early childhood support, and the like. While as a Commonwealth, we might benefit from the tax revenue from abortion facilities, such a desire for profit motive as a government should not destroy our general morality as a people. Killing another person out of convenience has no reasonable justification. We should not make this road to evil easier to obtain. I urge you personally and on behalf of those souls for whom I'm responsible, please reject this evil.
Please vote NO on the pro-abortion amendment if it is voted out of committee. This legislation deserves public comment. I believe this bill also gives voting rights to illegals, which is totally unfair to all US citizens, especially those who obtained their citizenship legally. It is also unconstitutional! So please vote No on HJ1. Thank you.
1. Every Virginian should have access to affordable, quality healthcare, including abortion and birth control, with the freedom to make private reproductive choices. Abortion must remain safe, legal, and guided by medical professionals. Protecting reproductive rights safeguards other freedoms, such as marriage equality, contraception access, and privacy in personal decisions. 2. Most Virginians believe all qualified citizens deserve voting rights, including those who’ve served felony sentences and people with disabilities who wish to vote. I support a constitutional amendment for automatic rights restoration upon sentence completion, with no extra steps, and to protect the voting rights of people with disabilities unless a court rules otherwise. Voting rights should not be permanently lost due to past mistakes. Virginia should amend its Constitution to ensure fair restoration and foster civic participation. 3.Virginia’s marriage equality ban no longer reflects the beliefs of its citizens. A 2021 poll showed 71% of Virginians support same-sex marriage, up from just 47% in 2006, highlighting a major shift in public opinion. Given this change, it’s time to remove the outdated ban from Virginia’s constitution. With the rollback of Roe v. Wade, national marriage equality could also be at risk, and Virginia should lead in protecting all citizens' rights. If the state truly is “for lovers,” it must affirm that love is love for everyone.
I support these amendments because in a nation that values and prioritizes freedom, I believe that individuals should have autonomy over all their decisions. If we are to truly have our unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the government cannot restrict our autonomy in any way. Furthermore our government has a responsibility to protect our rights and by amending our state constitution we are solidifying that protection in the event that there are challenges to these rights federally.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I oppose HJ 1 and HJ 9. Rather than seeking to allow the extermination of unborn children at any time for any reason, let this state promote their rights and find solutions that allow life to thrive. In an age of demographic decline and relativism, let this state affirm that marriage serves specific biological and social purposes that are only possible between members of the opposite sex.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment • I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. • HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. • HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. • A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. • Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
“I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.”
Good afternoon: I am writing to request representation of my views in Virginia. Regarding HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment: I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. Babies should be protected before they're born--not killed. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Please reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. Regarding HJ 2 – restoring voting rights: I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. Regarding HJ 9 – marriage: I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. God established marriage as a sacred relationship between a man and a woman.
HJ 1 I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
My partner was raised by a single mother and her grandparents in Los Angeles county, and I was raised in New Jersey but have lived in Georgia, Texas, and California. Now we've settled in central Virginia where we are closer to family and our friends. We've been through a lot together: a cross-country move with 2 cats, at least one major surgery each, a life threatening battle with COVID 19 at the outset of the pandemic, an unplanned career change due to an injury sustained on the job, and the excitement and stress of buying our first home together at the end of 2023. We have been together for the better part of our twenties and are now young thirty-somethings looking upon even more of life's important choices; like whether or not we want to live our lives for ourselves, or for a future generation and have children of our own. Ultimately, we've began to realize, we would like to raise children sometime in the next few years. However we want to be able to do it on our terms and at our discretion: safely without putting my partner in harms way. In the event that something should go wrong, we NEED access to the proper procedures our healthcare providers advise us to take. That includes abortion access, unequivocally. Other states that have tried to implement abortion bans with medical exemptions across the country have been not just failures but complete and total embarrassments. Women in these states have been suffering from undue stress, infertility, humiliation, and in some truly awful circumstances, completely avoidable death. Doctors rightly are withholding care because these states have held their ability to practice medicine hostage in an effort to curb this medical procedure. Facing these harsh realities and the uncertainty that our most recent election has created, we've been revisiting our decisions about the future regarding our family planning and even our residency in this state. We need safe access to abortion and other means of contraception to make sure we are prepared to bring another life into this world as SAFELY and RESPONSIBLY as possible. It's a decision between my partner, myself, and our doctor. The state has NO PLACE inserting itself into this process at any point in time. Please keep the state out of our family planning and safeguard our access to life-saving medical care, vote yes on this amendment.
Respected House Privileges and Elections Committee Members and associated Delegates: I submit the following points for urgent consideration in your final deliberations concerning HJ(s) 1; 2; and 9: HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment: - I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. - HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. - HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. - A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Strongly urge Rejection of HJ 1. In place of expanding abortion, I respectfully urge you to work instead for non-abortion oriented policies that affirm the life and dignity of every Virginian mother and child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights: I support passage of HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored. Complimentary to the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage - At it's core would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. - Marriage has an original design and purpose, founded not by Humanity alone, that predates any nation, religion or law. Strongly urge Rejection of HJ 9. As a fellow citizen and veteran, I am sincerely appreciative of both the opportunity to submit this written statement and; your professional review/consideration/action based upon them regarding the HJ(s) under your responsibility. Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions/comment/etc.. Respectfully, Edward James Stanton, Jr. edwardstantonjr@gmail.com (703) 780-0661
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose enshrining a right to abortion in the Virginia Constitution. Abortion, whether surgical or chemical, does harm to both mother and child, and many women regret their abortions. Second, the left's extreme zeal to celebrate it and promote it puts America in a terrible light—and to the left of most civilized nations. Third, it's not right to destroy a tiny human life when pregnancy today can be so easily prevented; birth control is cheap and readily available, so unless a woman is raped, she or her partner is responsible for taking prudent measures. I would add in closing that the rhetoric and outright lies of the left in the wake of the Dobbs decision helps no one and should be repudiated here in Virginia.
At very least, considering this Amendment is poorly written and claims “every individual” as opposed to and correctly limited to WOMEN (or at very least “birthing people” as the left has opined); and at most because the language could easily be construed to include even those lives who have already been brought into this world; there is no good reason for this amendment to proceed. Vote no!
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, oand HJ9. Enshrining reproductive health protections for women and protecting their physicians is personally important to me. I shudder to think how my life might have been endangered when I required medical treatment for three miscarriages if I had needed to have them in a state like Texas in the current legal climate. My son might have grown without a mother if I hadn’t had the required healthcare in a timely manner. Delays can injure or kill a woman. Ultimately, I believe reproductive health decisions are between a woman and her health care providers. Regarding HJ9, I support it because I believe firmly the decision to be joined in marriage is up to the parties involved, regardless of their gender/. gender identification. If people don’t approve of such unions, then they should decide only for themselves not to engage in such a union .
I strongly support HJ1, HJ1, and HJ9. Every Virginian and human being should have access to safe reproductive healthcare, the right to vote, and the right to marry whomever they love. How can we even call ourselves Americans if we are trying to restrict the freedoms of our peers? This is about empowering people to make the best decisions for their own lives. I strongly urge committee members to pass all three bills.
TO Our Delegates, I have worked in the Mental Health field for over 20 years and have spoken to many women who have suffered from the psychological pain of abortion. You might ask why? Life begins at conception therefore at some point women realize a life was conceived and was alive and growing in their womb. Because of this wound women and sometimes the father of the baby need healing. Abortion is never about "reproductive health" instead it is about killing a human person conceived and growing in the womb of the mother. I ask you to not consider passing HJ1. Thank you, Bernadette Macdonald, PMHNP
HJ1 Herring I am reaching out as a concerned Virginia citizen about the recent proposal to enshrine a right to reproductive freedom in Virginia's constitution. This will open the door to abortion through all nine months of pregnancy. Virginia has never allowed abortion up until birth and of the people who support abortion, only 22% of them support third trimester abortions. This stance is too extreme for Virginia. This proposal will block protection from minors undergoing abortion and other harmful reproductive practices by removing parental knowledge and consent. It will make abortion practices even more dangerous by limiting clinical safety standards and informed consent for women and minors. If you care about your citizens PLEASE do not support this proposal.
I am opposed to HJ1 on reproductive freedom because it fails to take into account the rights of an unborn baby whose life would be terminated by an abortion. I am opposed to HJ on same-sex marriage, as it violates the traditional an proper definition of marriage.
Please do not pass this Amendment. Any society that disregards the dignity of the unborn is de facto a society that disregards the dignity of human life at any stage. Thank you.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Please reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
As a professional who works in the field of mental health, I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Regarding HJ1: Keep church and state separate. Many are stating their opposition to a constitutional right to abortion on moral grounds. I'm supporting a constitutional right to abortion based on scientific grounds. Science is not up for interpretation the same way religion is, so to say that abortion is "wrong" lacks evidence to support the claim. Babies are not being murdered as they are horrifically portrayed to be, however women who are unable to seek a safe abortion or have complications that may require an abortion are dying unfairly and in inhumane ways. Abortion is a medical procedure. Women deserve to have access to any and all medical procedures they may need. To deny abortions in Virginia will place many women at risk and they may attempt to seek an abortion in another state or in unsafe ways. If "abortion trafficking" laws are put into place, travel would be restricted for those seeking this medical procedure and possibly lead to punitive criminal charges and further place strain on jails that are not equipped to manage overpopulation, medical issues, or inmates requiring mental health care. Regarding HJ2: Everyone should have the right to vote in a democracy. Many criminals have mental health issues that contributed to their crimes. Not allowing them to exercise their right to vote is discriminatory. Regarding HJ9: This bares repeating - keep church and state separate in Virginia. Since 1888 the US Supreme Court has declared at least 14 times that marriage is a fundamental right for all. Article 16 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights guarantees “men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion… the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.” Not allowing LGBTQ+ people to marry the person of their choosing is cruel and will lead to increase in crisis response as this population encounters higher rates of suicide attempts.To deny the LGBTQ+ population the ability to marry their partner also strips them of rights in medical emergencies. Since election day, there has been a 700% increase of crisis calls within the LGBTQ+ community according to the Trevor Project. This is a vulnerable population that already experiences shunning from family for being who they are, please do not make them feel shunned by their state as well. I will end with the golden rule: "treat others the way you want to be treated." Thank you for taking time to consider my input.
Greetings Delegates, Thank you for representing the Chesapeake district, I myself live in Place. I see that you are on the House Privileges and Elections (P&E) Committee, which is slated to hear a proposal on 11.13.24 for a constitutional amendment that would make abortion a constitutional right in Virginia (HJ1). I am writing in opposition to the amendment and it is my request and prayer that you will oppose said amendment too. Between crisis pregnancy centers, Family Qualified Heath Clinics (FQHC's), and hospitals there are ample opportunities for pregnant women to receive the care they need during pregnancy. In Virginia alone, there are 236 FQHC'S (https://npidb.org/organizations/ambulatory_health_care/federally-qualified-health-center-fqhc_261qf0400x/va/). The American Association of Prolife Obstetricians and Gynecologists, to name one body, states "We view the physician’s role as a caregiver, responsible, as far as possible, for the well-being of both the mother and her unborn child". Never before have we been as able to love and help both patients as a society. Please also consider the Dublin Declaration, signed by over 1,000 medical professionals, which states that induced abortion is never medically necessary (https://www.dublindeclaration.com/). All human life is sacred and should, therefore, be protected. We're all undeniably apart of the human species from conception. Therefore, the unborn should be protected from conception. It is wrong to intentionally kill innocent human beings. According to the Center for Disease Control, abortion by definition seeks to initiate the fatal sequence of events to cause a fetus to be nonviable. I refer you to the following website for in depth descriptions and footage of all types of abortion, illustrated by former abortionists (https://www.abortionprocedures.com/). Induced abortion is, therefore, wrong. Please oppose this amendment on 11.13.24. Sincerely, Gupte
As a young mother of three children ages 4, 2, and 9 months, I urge you to consider the life of the child as well as the life of the mother. We must be a culture that supports both and that our laws reflect our value on life from the earliest days through end of life care. There is never any reason to brutally kill a child within the womb. Even in medically necessary situations where the mother’s life is at risk, there is a discussion to be had for early delivery. But the barbaric dismembering of a baby is never a solution. Please protect the unborn in our culture. Even in instances of rape, two wrongs don’t make a right. May we reset the standard for valuing life so that our children can grow up in society where the murder of innocent children is truly unthinkable.
HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
Abortion, up to the time of birth, is not a health right. Its tragic! Early abortion is distasteful enough, but full term is unacceptable!
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I am opposed to an amendment to enshrine abortion in the Virginia Constitution (HJ1). As a retired EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN, I will tell you why this amendment is unnecessary. Most of your constituents do not truly support aborting babies later in pregnancy or in the 3rd trimester at all. However, this amendment which places no restrictions on so-called "reproductive freedom" is supported by many because they are listening to a handful of very concerning cases of medical malpractice , where patients have died or had terrible outcomes because they were treated inappropriately when they had a life-threatening obstetric emergency. They are supporting it because they are fearful that if there is not an amendment that allows basically anything, that they won't be treated appropriately for obstetrical emergencies when they are the patient. Please believe me that this amendment is NOT a solution to this issue. As a physician who has treated innumerable women with emergencies from miscarriages or abortions, I will tell you that it is not a constitutional amendment that is or was needed to prevent those few cases we have seen in the country. My insider knowledge of this is that if I patient is denied care when they have an emergency it is due to provider malpractice. These physicians that did not treat a medical EMERGENCY as an EMERGENCY should be held personally liable. This is simply malpractice and they are trying to hide behind the excuse that the law is ambiguous or they didn't understand. Seriously? Please tell me as our representatives that you do not believe that people that have undergone 11 -12 years of professional training to be emergency physicians or OB/GYN physicians are confused and can't interpret laws. Heartbeat bills and laws like this do NOT prevent anyone from stabilizing and treating a medical emergency. Please know that these are individual cases which need addressed and there does not need to be a constitutional amendment which has unlimited abortion "rights." I'm sure you will read many comments from people who feel there is no other way to protect their rights than passing this amendment. This is not true and I challenge you to figure out a different path than this. Obviously there are other solutions which need to be discussed to prevent the obstetric complications which we have all seen on the news, but please use your head and your heart to vote against this amendment.
Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
I strongly support all 3 bills: HJ1, HJ2, & HJ9. As a citizen of the United States, to maintain our individual freedoms includes and not limited to: rights to vote and freedom of speech, freedom to love who and how your heart knows best, and to have bodily autonomy over your own health care (private relationship between doctors and patients/individuals). Thank you, respectfully. <3
Why is this being fast-tracked? What are you trying to do literally behind our backs without any concern of what your constituents see as reasonable. The citizens of the Commonwealth of VA are watching this underhanded maneuever. HJ1 -OPPOSE -This should NOT be enshrined in the VA Constition, and I am tired of state representatives not listening to their consitutents. The right is for life, not a consitiutional right to abortion at any stage. This is a horrible bill that promotes murder. The abortion conversation needs to be kept open and we need to work towards policies that are not so radical but rather take a common sense approach to each situations and affirms dignity and life of mother and child. Our state should be protecting all of its citizens, even those unborn, and the abortion issue should not be taken as lightly and as cavalierly as this bill clearly does . HJ9 - OPPOSE- Marriage is a union bewteen a man and a woman for the purposes of building a life and having a family, which cannot be done by two people of the same sex. If you want equal rights for people of the same sex that want to be together, draft something else, but don't bastardize the definition of marriage. To redefine marriage, is clearly against, God's design. PLEASE NOTE, that we are watching how those who represent us and how they vote.
These three bills are common sense legislation that should flow across party lines. As a conservative, I can fully support all three of these items. They all support a freedom to choose. Freedom to choose your own fertility decisions, freedom to vote, and freedom to live and marry who you choose within the boundaries of the law. This is a no brainer, vote yes.
All persons have fundamental rights. All persons should have the right to marry who they choose. All women should have the absolute right to determine what is right for their health and their bodies.
I strongly support the passage of HJ1 - Right to Reproductive Freedom and HJ2 - Right to Vote. HJ1 protects the rights of women, in consultation with their family and medical professionals to make the right decision regarding their reproductive healthcare. Using public policy to limit a women's right to make these choices is prioritizing a narrow definition of life advocated by some christian conservatives over both science and other religious beliefs. Our public policy should not be so narrowly defined that it infringes on another's basic human rights, and self-determination is a human right. HJ2 removes a barrier from the full re-integration of returning citizens back into society. Our history shows us how felony disenfranchisement was used to reduce the number of black men who could vote. Even misdemeanors (e.g. crimes of poverty) were reclassified as felonies to restrict access to the ballot for black men. Let's get rid of this artificial barrier and restore voting rights to our returning citizens who have completed their sentence. Let's do everything we can to welcome back into our communities and help them embrace this responsibility as citizens.
I am strongly opposed to HJ1, Constitutional Amendment; fundamental right to reproductive freedom. I beg everyone to consider the life of the child that is being considered as a "reproductive freedom" This goes against the Natural Law. Also, is this not an issue that should be brought before the voters of this state?
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
HJ1 is not in the best interest of the citizens of Virginia because it promotes unrestricted access to abortion in the State of Virginia. Abortion is a dangerous and invasive medical procedure which, if accessed, needs controls to protect the safety of the patient. Although well intended, in support of “a woman’s right to choose,” hasty actions like this one are not advisable.
HJ1. I urge you to protect Mothers and Babies from the horrors of Abortion. I STRONGLY Oppose a "right" to abortion. I SUPPORT a right to Life for the Baby and freedom from the psychological torture for a Mother knowing she participated in the killing of her own flesh and blood. HJ9. Marriage is the union of one man and one woman. I OPPOSE any change in the definition of marriage. It predates any nation. It is the best solution for raising healthy children. Messing with the definition of marriage opens a can of worms such that anything can be marriage and therefore marriage is of no value destroying its purpose.
I opposes abortion in the Constitution. Restoring rights is good action
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I ask that you REJECT HJ 1. for the health and safety/protection of ALL (regardless of age) in our community. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. (I would have asked for such protection for ALL (regardless of race) when slavery was in question. For the sake of ALL please reject HJ1. Thank you!
As a professional woman and the mother of young adult women, I write in strong opposition to HJ1. I am aware of all the rhetoric and rights talk surrounding this effort. However, the only words that matter are the ones in the amendment. At a minimum, HJ1 must be amended to protect women, minor children, conscience rights and taxpayers. The words "every individual" apply to males, females and minors thus placing minor children at risk and potentially gutting parental rights. No surgical or chemical procedure is without risk. The General Assembly has a duty to protect women from malfeasant abortion-providers by not shielding them from civil liability. The language of the amendment fails to do so. Moreover, this amendment, as currently worded, will not allow the GA to restore common sense health and safety regulations for women undergoing abortion. The GA has a duty to protect women by ensuring appropriate informed consent. The current words of the amendment do not do so and should be redacted to explicitly state that these protections may be enacted by the GA. The amendment should also be altered to explicitly protect from forced participation those who conscientiously object to abortion. As written, the amendment may be construed to mandate the use of tax funds to pay for or facilitate abortions. Language should be added to clarify that this is not the case and that the GA may enact laws to protect conscience rights. Please vote against HJ1. It is too extreme for Virginia.
• I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. • HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. • HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. • A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. • Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child
This bill is against the very founding documents of our country, namely that every citizen has the right to life. Science has proven again and again that life begins at the moment of conception. The fact that life-saving procedures can now be performed in-utero is consistent with that as well. The right to abortion at any point up to birth is not reproductive freedom--it is murder of an innocent life. Reproductive freedom comes before conception. There are ways to prevent conception. Once there is conception, the value of the life conceived cannot be determined by whether or not the woman wants to keep and raise the child. The life that is conceived is a child, and though within the mother, is a separate and equal person from the mother. It has rights that must be protected. An amendment that makes any attempt to restrict abortion illegal is an affront to our constitution and embraces a culture of death. If we do not respect the life of an innocent unborn child, we respect no one's life at all. It puts us on a very dangerous path, one like that of Nazi Germany. We start with innocent, unborn children. Then will we determine that all those born with birth defects be done away with? What other groups of people will then be added to the list of undesirables and needful of extermination? This amendment must not be approved.
HJ1 is not in the best interest of the citizens of Virginia because it promotes unrestricted access to abortion in the State of Virginia. Abortion is a dangerous and invasive medical procedure which, if accessed, needs controls to protect the safety of the patient. Although well intended, in support of “a woman’s right to choose,” hasty actions like this one are not advisable. The country and the states need dialogue on the issue of abortion, not reactive processes that would stop the conversation. The famous Hillary Clinton quote that abortion should be “safe, legal, and rare” seems to have fallen from our memory. It has been replaced in them minds of some with a passion to make it “fast, furious and frequent.” Tom Ridge, at one time Governor of Pennsylvania believed that he was helping women by reducing the focus on state health inspections of abortion providers and their facilities. Kermit Gosnell was the result. It is a true and terrible story of what can happen when guard rails are removed from healthcare services. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/may/15/philadelphia-abortion-doctor-kermit-gosnell-sentenced-life Virginia also has a magnificent heritage of supporting religious liberty. Actions other states have taken to make abortion a constitutional right present challenges to this fundamental freedom. Virginia must remain true to this important heritage and avoid any constitutional action that may be in conflict with our freedom of religion.
Please vote No on HJ1 as abortion harms 2 people for decades and through generations. Women deserve better!
Unborn children must be protected! Unborn babies are viable these days as early as 20 weeks gestation. Unborn babies can feel pain at 16 weeks gestation. It is unthinkable that the state of Virginia would allow these lives to be terminated at any point--even up to birth. This is infanticide.
- HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment. -- I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. -- HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. -- HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. -- Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights. - I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting -- rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage. - I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. -- Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ1, and HJ9 and urge committee members to pass all three bills. Every Virginian and every American deserves access to safe reproductive healthcare, the right to vote, and the right to marry whomever they love.
Every Virginia resident should have access to affordable, quality health care, including abortion, birth control and the privacy to make reproductive choices. Virginians made their reproductive opinions clear when they chose to elect representatives who vowed to protect reproductive rights. In Texas with their strict limits on abortions, maternal deaths have risen 56% due to the reluctance of doctors to treat miscarriages and problem pregnancies such as ectopic pregnancy. Texas is also losing medical doctors because these types of restrictions are making it difficult for doctors to provide best care practices for their patients. Reproductive health is a is complicated and not something that should be legislated. In addition, women with chronic conditions such as Chron's Disease are loosing access to effective medications that keep these diseases in remission because these medications are often be toxic to a fetus. Women taking these medications understand the risks and know that they must go off these medications if they wish to have a baby but some states are banning these medication outright. Women, their families, and doctors should have the ability to make decisions unfettered by others' political or religious beliefs. Abortion should be legal, safe, and the decision left to those who are pregnant with guidance from medical professionals. True democracy depends on equal rights for all people. Losing theright to reproductive choice opens the door to the loss of other freedoms including other healthcare choices, marriage equality, access to contraception, and the right to engage in private, consensual intimacy without government interference. Not only is the right to a safe and legal abortion a matter of personal freedom, it’s also a major factor in the movements for racial and economic equality. Black individuals, and all underserved communities, already experience unfair barriers and limited access to adequate healthcare services. Our reproductive choices impact our physical and psychological well-being, including the foods we eat, where we live, our financial resources, and our capacity to gain and maintain employment and provide for ourselves and our families.
I am writing in opposition of HJ1, the "right to abortion" amendment. Enshrining this amendment into our Constitution would threaten any restrictions on abortion, including common sense measures such as parental notification. This would also abortion even after 20 weeks, when scientific evidence has made clear that the unborn child can feel pain. Sometimes in abortion procedures this late, the child is born alive. This also puts the child at a greater risk of infanticide. As ultrasound technology reveals more and more about life in the womb, it should be clear to all that the unborn child is a growing developing human being. By six weeks, it is widely recognized that a heartbeat can be detected. As is the case with all vulnerable individuals in our society, the unborn deserve legal protection.
I oppose a constitutional right to abortion on moral grounds. Once life begins at conception, know God is the arbiter until natural death. Abortion murders a defenseless voiceless child...even more consequential considering our current infertility rate. The result hurts mother, child & our human posterity. At least as many resources should be allocated to other life- affirming alternatives, like adoption , natural family planning & local pregnancy centers ie Agape, Birthright, etc. Pharmaceutically induced abortions are not without risks...particularly when not supervised by a
HJ1: I strongly oppose HJ1, a "right to abortion" amendment, into Virginia's constitution. HJ1 would jeopardize parental consent and the ban on partial-birth abortion, which is inhuman. Unlimited abortion until birth is a tragedy for both babies and mothers. Please work for policies that support mothers and their children, like supporting pregnancy resource centers, instead of expanding abortion. HJ9: I strongly oppose HJ9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. God designed marriage and it is between one man and one woman.
HJ1 - I strongly oppose enshrining a "right" to abortion in Virginia's constitution as it would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect unborn children before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion until birth is a fundamental tragedy and not a fundamental right. While I support a woman's right to do whatever she wants with her own body, I don't believe she has the right to do whatever she wants with someone else's body - in this case, the baby whose composition is a genetically unique and living human being. Instead of expanding abortion, I encourage you to work instead to affirm the life and dignity of every mother and child. HJ 2 - I support HJ 2 as all people who have completed their sentence should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 - I strongly oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage is the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion, or law and should not be manipulated for political gain.
Dear Delegates, I want to let you know that I strongly oppose HJ1. Using the language of "the individual's right to reproductive freedom" makes it sound like this matter pertains only to one individual. When it comes to the choice to have an abortion, however, it is not simply a question of a woman's individual decisions. There is another human being involved in all those decisions: that is, the child in her womb. That child does not have the power to defend his or her own rights, which is all the more a reason to protect them. HJ1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law. HJ1 could also prevent any future legislation to protect unborn children. For women who feel unwilling or unable to have a child, there are various other options besides abortion (before pregnancy: abstinence, or avoidance of conception; after pregnancy: financial support, parenting support, or adoption). None of these options require the killing of the child. If we want to help women who have unwanted pregnancies, the better approach would be to strengthen access to those other options, since they assist the woman while also respecting the life of her child. But adding to the Constitution a fundamental right to reproductive freedom would not help women; it would only promote the violation of the rights of children. I urge you to reject HJ1. Instead, please work for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and child. Sincerely, Rev. William Buckley
The 14th Amendment of the US Constitution (section 1) reads, “No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any PERSON of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any PERSON WITHIN ITS JURISDICTION the equal protection of the laws.” Virginia Law Code § 18.2-32.2. states the penalty for killing a fetus: “A. Any person who unlawfully, willfully, deliberately, maliciously and with premeditation kills the fetus of another is guilty of a Class 2 felony. B. Any person who unlawfully, willfully, deliberately and maliciously kills the fetus of another is guilty of a felony punishable by confinement in a state correctional facility for not less than five nor more than 40 years.” A class 2 felony is only in relation to a “PERSON”. So at minimum in Virginia a FETUS is a PERSON. A PERSON inside the jurisdiction of the state of Virginia is a PERSON regardless of whether inside of another person or even a citizen of the state of Virginia or the U.S.A. But more importantly in the eyes of our Creator, a child in the womb is a person who bears the very image of God. To make a constitutional law that guarantees persons to be able to kill other innocent persons is the greatest injustice know to mankind. Our true constitutional rights are unalienable by our Creator, and He tells us in His Word that murder is not a right of man. Rights are not invented by man or women. I do not support a constitutional amendment (HJ1) to allow this injustice, and nor should any governmental representative. “Who rises up for me against the wicked? Who stands up for me against evildoers? “ ~Psalm 94:16 “Can wicked rulers be allied with you, those who frame injustice by statute? They band together against the life of the righteous and condemn the innocent to death. But the LORD has become my stronghold, and my God the rock of my refuge. He will bring back on them their iniquity and wipe them out for their wickedness; the LORD our God will wipe them out.” ~ Psalm 94:20-23
I write to strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. All three of these actions would stand in strong defiance against those who would seek to deprive Virginians of the rights and freedoms they have enjoyed for many years. HJ1 works to ensure that all medical decisions are between a patient and their doctor, and are not to be subject to public inspection and court of public opinion. HJ2 stands to guard the constitutionally guaranteed right to participate in our democracy against those who would try to unjustly silence others as a way to illegally and immorally influence our democracy. HJ9 stands to guard freedoms long enjoyed by many Virginians from those who seek to indefensibly impose their own religious or social views upon the lives of others.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose HJ1. I believe in the sanctity of life from conception to natural death. Each embryo is a living human being with unique fingerprints and unique DNA, never to be replicated. At 6 weeks there is a detectable heartbeat. At 12 weeks the baby is fully formed. This bill will end all pro-life measures and permanently bar or block any future legislation promoting the protection of the most vulnerable among us, the unborn. This has nothing to do with "bodily autonomy" or any of the other euphemisms used by the pro-abortion supporters. It has everything to do with promoting a culture of death with no regard for life at any stage: preborn, disabled, elderly and the terminally ill. First you come for our babies, then our sick and intellectually challenged, and, finally, our elderly. Ask yourself, why do many in the LGBTQ community support abortion, when they would never have an unplanned pregnancy? Primarily because organizations like Planned Parenthood sell the "gender affirming drugs" they embrace, and PP makes a fortune by doing so. I oppose the blatant political maneuver with this committee hearing to circumvent the normal process, and I vehemently oppose HJ1.
HJ1 - Herring: OPPOSE. HJ1 I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights: OPPOSE I strongly oppose HJ2. Convicted Felons should not vote. HJ 9 – marriage: OPPOSE I most strongly oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
Unlimited abortion is not good.
Every Virginia resident should have access to affordable, quality health care, including abortion, birth control and the privacy to make reproductive choices. Virginians made their reproductive opinions clear when they chose to elect representatives who vowed to protect reproductive rights. Abortion should be legal, safe, and the decision left to those who are pregnant with guidance from medical professionals. True democracy depends on equal rights for all people. Losing our right to reproductive choice opens the door to the loss of other freedoms including other healthcare choices, marriage equality, access to contraception, and the right to engage in private, consensual intimacy without government interference.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation nto protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental rig Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
I strongly oppose HJ 1 abortion is not a constitutional right and should not be enshrined. You should work instead on making the places where abortions are performed adhere to the same rules and regulations as outpatient surgical centers and urgent cares. Underage women should have to have the consent of an adult, since it is a legal requirement for all surgical procedures if underage to have a parent or guardian sign. Abortion can result in hemorrhage, infection, and loss of fertility, Do more for helping women who are pregnant and want to keep their babies by providing services. We voted a state on the marriage amendment several years ago so it should be put to the people again if that is to be redefined and not voted on by one individual making a decision for the rest of us. I appose HJ9
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
Please OPPOSE the HJ1 amendment as abortion or killing of infants is inhumane. Birth control should not be allowed to be conducted by taking the life of a baby. It is not a "right" but a "slaughter." Restoring Voting rights, HJ2 is to be supported since people have completed their required prison sentences. I also so OPPOSE HJ9 amendment that would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose. Stop calling something "marriage" when it goes against natural law.
I am strongly opposed to HJ1. It is important to protect unborn children who who cannot speak for themselves. What future does humanity have if we choose to stop a heartbeat, break bones, and/or destroy organs on the most innocent and defenseless?
I strongly oppose the HJ1 amendment and its pretense of protecting "women's rights." Murder is not the right of any individual, male or female, to exercise upon any other individual, whether young or old, fully or under developed. "Reproductive rights" is just sterilized wording of an evil practice. I also strongly oppose HJ9, marriage is between one man and one woman for the lifetime of one or both of the parties. Any other combination is not marriage.
Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, and could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born.
Once conceived a life should never be aborted. Once a convict has served their sentence they should regain voting rights. Leave the one man one women law intact !
I urge my representative to Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. This is a blatant overreach by fear-mongering politics and only seeks to further divide us. Life is human and should be respected whether at the beginning or end of life. Please support policies that give women and children protection, not more rules. I also urge you also to stop working to change the definition of marriage. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. There is nothing that prevents people from living together--many don't even bother with marriage these days and for those of us who believe in the sanctity of marriage, this is a misguided attempt to cater to a very small and unique subset of citizens.
Hello House Privileges and Elections Committee, I am writing to voice my support for HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. I wish for these Constitutional Amendments to be included on the ballot in order to secure our individual freedoms. Thank you and Sincerely, Doc-Marten Knoefler
HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution.
(1). In pursuit of your right to have an abortion should not mean that I have to pay for it. The moral objection being paramount, the idea that I have to pay for this procedure is totally absurd and unacceptable (2). Marriage is between One man and One woman. Society has already made many variables to this basic truth and making it financially rewarding, will continue to degenerate our moral values.
I support HJ1 and HJ9 for enshrining these essential freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I strongly advocate against HJ1; it is important to rally for the support of human rights to LIFE rather than to methods of destroying it. How can any human being in good conscience support the right to kill another innocent child just because it might be an inconvenience? HJ2. I support the right of incarcerated persons to regain the right to vote after completing their sentences. HJ9 There is a fundamental difference between men and women, and an unwritten law that has sustained the world for centuries that marriage should be between one man and one woman--anything else could lead to a marriage between a person and a bridge or an animal or anything else. What a travesty for humanity!!!!
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. Other people may engage in some contractual or civil union, but marriage is the union of a man and a woman for the purpose of having children. Please preserve the family. Destroying the family will destroy the communities, the society and the country.
I oppose HJ1 both because I personally oppose abortion except in very limited circumstances and because while recognizing that most Virginia voters do not share my views, expanding the access to abortion Virginians already have would be needlessly divisive in a country that is already too badly divided. In effect. I am favoring a truce on abortion and acceptance of an abortion regime similar to that in force in countries such as France.
I support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for including these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I support all three bills
Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. There should be some limits for the mother who miscarries, and freedom to be counceled by doctors. Also A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child and offer alternatives to abortion.
I write in support of HJ1 to amend the Virginia constitution to ensure that every individual has the fundamental right to reproductive freedom. Virginia continues to serve as a beacon of reproductive freedom for our nation, particularly in the South. But dark forces threaten to take away the rights of women to make their own health care decisions in consultation with their physicians without interference from the government. Too many women are suffering—even dying—in states where restrictions on reproductive freedoms have been impoased. This amendment would enshrine existing Virigina law into the constitution, thus ensuring these rights. I strongly urge your support of HJ1. Respectfully, Dr. Harold V Hartley III Chesterfield, Virginia
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
HJ1 - Herring - I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in VA’s constitution. HJ2 - Bennett- Parker - I support HJ2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ9 - Sickles - I oppose HJ9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as a union of one man and one woman.
As a man married to another man with a young daughter, HJ 1 and 9 are both intertwined with my and my family’s lives. In terms of HJ 9, while I understand the protections of the Obergefell decision and the Respect for Marriage Act, Congress has shown that the individual states have power and the authority to further provide these fundamental protections to its citizens. By additionally repealing the provision of recognizing marriage as between a man and woman, it further validates and strengthens the authority of my marriage to my husband. It would make me, as a resident of this Commonwealth, feel safe, secure, and proud. I am also fully in support of the provision that any religious person to be exempt from performing same sex marriages if it goes against their beliefs. I would also add that I hope to see arguments against this bill that rely on the basis of religious choice be unacknowledged to uphold the separation of church and state. In terms of HJ 1, this country had a precedent with Roe v Wade for over half a century. The current SCOTUS has shown that precedent does not matter in their personal decisions, so it is again up to the individual states and commonwealths to enact laws that provide equal protections and rights to all of its citizens. Knowing that my daughter was born into a world post-Roe and never knowing that she had those rights before she was born, she will grow up seeing that as a woman, she is less than. That men do not have laws governing what they can and cannot do with their bodies or personal reproductive choices. Men, after all, are able to get vasectomies to prevent getting women pregnant, yet women now have no choice if they do become pregnant, if that pregnancy endangers their lives, if it was through rape, incest, or deceit. I will do all in my power to fight in her behalf to make choices regarding her own body.
HJ1 - Herring: I strongly oppose amending the Virginia constitution to enshrine the so-called right to abortion. Life is a fundamental right of all human beings, and it is our first and primary right. No human being may have his or her right to life infringed upon. This is most especially true for human lives that are most vulnerable. It's our duty as men and women who seek the common good to protect the lives of pre-born children. Our efforts should be directed towards supporting pregnant women and helping them obtain the resources and the support to bring life into this world. Every human being has dignity, and we must lift up that dignity. HJ2 - Bennett-Parker: Once an individual has completed a sentence, he or she should undoubtedly have voting rights restored. We would be joining most states in our country by restoring the right to vote to those who have faced the consequences of their actions and have re-entered society. HJ9 - Sickles: Marriage and family is the most fundamental unit of any human society. It has existed well before governments and states. It has existed before any system of laws. It stands to reason then that marriage is not a human invention. Consequently it is not up to us as humans to define marriage. Men and women were made, complimentary, by our Creator, God Almighty. His design is set up for human beings to flourish. If we desire to flourish, we must maintain His desing of marriage as between one man and one woman. Anything different will further dimish human ability to live life to its fullest intent.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I wholeheartedly agree with, and support, the words and sentiments to which this my comment is attached. EHT.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. Thank you
The Commonwealth has taken steps to ensure that the right to life is protected for even the worst offenders after being tried and convicted. So too, our youngest and most vulnerable Virginian’s deserve the right to life and protection against any individual, including their mother, who would put them to death. In addition, the protection of marriage between one man and one women is a fundamental building block of society and must be safeguarded. Regarding, HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
These bills are an affront to the majority of Virginians. They are the product of an elite out of touch with reality.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
To Virginia House Delegates, I live in HD 12 (and am proud to have voted for my Delegate- Holly Seibold) and want to express my strong support for all three of the Constitutional Amendments listed below but especially HJ1. Virginia needs to be an example for all the States of how we protect our citizens rights. Hopefully you will all support these Amendments as well and I know I will be volunteering and doing all I can to make sure these are passed. Thanks, Robin K. Tingley Reproductive Health - Every Virginian should have access to affordable, quality healthcare, including abortion and birth control, with the freedom to make private reproductive choices. Abortion must remain safe, legal, and guided by medical professionals. Protecting reproductive rights safeguards other freedoms, such as marriage equality, contraception access, and privacy in personal decisions. The right to choose also supports racial and economic equality, as marginalized communities face greater barriers to adequate healthcare. Reproductive decisions affect overall well-being, including financial stability, housing, employment, and family support. Voting Rights Restoration - Most Virginians believe all qualified citizens deserve voting rights, including those who’ve served felony sentences and people with disabilities who wish to vote. I support a constitutional amendment for automatic rights restoration upon sentence completion, with no extra steps, and to protect the voting rights of people with disabilities unless a court rules otherwise. Voting rights should not be permanently lost due to past mistakes. Virginia should amend its Constitution to ensure fair restoration and foster civic participation. Marriage Equality - Virginia’s marriage equality ban no longer reflects the beliefs of its citizens. A 2021 poll showed 71% of Virginians support same-sex marriage, up from just 47% in 2006, highlighting a major shift in public opinion. Given this change, it’s time to remove the outdated ban from Virginia’s constitution. With the rollback of Roe v. Wade, national marriage equality could also be at risk, and Virginia should lead in protecting all citizens' rights. If the state truly is “for lovers,” it must affirm that love is love for everyone.
I strongly oppose and strongly urge you to oppose the Bill known as HJ-1. I support, and urge you to support, the Bill known as HJ-2. I strongly oppose, and strongly urge you to oppose, the Bill known as HJ-9. Jeff Fortman 240.660.8956
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution imposes on each state a duty to provide the equal protections of the law to all persons within its jurisdiction. Prenatal persons in Virginia are persons within the jurisdiction of Virginia. The proposed amendment violates the 14th Amendment's prohibiting against deny the equal protection of the laws to a class of persons in Virginia. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. The Supreme Court's decision in Obergefell v. Hodges was wrongly decided, as explained in the cogent dissenting opinions in that case.
I support the bill proposed by HJ1-Herring to amend the VA State Constitution to codify reproductive rights. I support the bill proposed by HJ9-Sickles to amend the VA State Constitution to grant the right to marry to any two individuals regardless of gender. Both of these bills are paramount to marginalized citizens of VA. Women should have the right to reproductive freedom without interference from the government. Individuals should be free to marry without interference from the government.
I am writing in full support of all three bills. HJ1: The state has no business interfering in the decisions made between a woman and her healthcare professionals. A constitutional amendment to protect abortion rights is essential for ensuring long-term reproductive freedom. Enshrining these rights provides a stable safeguard against future political shifts, offering citizens a clear and durable guarantee of bodily autonomy. By embedding these protections in the state constitution, lawmakers uphold individuals' ability to make personal medical decisions without interference. Constitutional protection also addresses public health concerns, ensuring safe access to care and reducing the risk of dangerous, unregulated alternatives. Above all, enshrining abortion rights affirms a commitment to individual rights and supports the health and well-being of all residents. HJ2: Individuals previously convicted of a felony who have completed their sentence should have the chance to be reintegrated into society, and not disenfranchised from the opportunity to vote on their representation. HJ9: Any two individuals who love each other should share the right to have their marriage recognized by the state. As decided by the US Supreme Court in Obergefell v. Hodges, the existing law is unconstitutional. This law must be amended to be in compliance with the United States constitution.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
We oppose a right to abortion. Aborting a baby just before birth is a tragedy. These are human lives. Please oppose this.
I oppose HJ1 as abortion is not a Right! Abortion is not in the Constitution of U.S. but it is in the Declaration of Independence. QUOTE " It is not the mother's decision to protect or not protect her baby. The childe has an inalienable right to LIFE granted by GOD at the moment of Conception. The Declaration of Independence lists LIFE as the first inalienable right because without the right to live, all other rights are meaningless". QUOTE: Mother Teresa of Calcutta ~ "It is a poverty to decide that a child must dies so that YOU may live YOUR life as YOU wish. In all 50 states, if a pregnant woman is killed and her baby dies also, it is considered a DOUBLE HOMICIDE. PRE-MEDITATED MURDER: According to the Virginia Code, first-degree murder is defined in § 18.2-32 as any murder that is not capital murder and that meets one or more of the following criteria: The killing was intentional, deliberate, and premeditated The killing was committed by poisoning, starvation, imprisonment, or lying in wait The killing occurred during the commission or attempted commission of arson or burglary First-degree murder is a Class 2 felony, which means that a convicted individual faces a minimum of 20 years in prison and a maximum of life in prison, as well as a fine of up to $100,000. However, there are some differences between first-degree murder and aggravated murder, which is defined in § 18.2-31. For example, someone convicted of first-degree murder may be eligible for parole, good conduct allowances, or conditional release. Some circumstances can increase a murder charge from first-degree to aggravated murder. Aggravated murder can result in serious penalties, including a mandatory life sentence in prison. I ASLO STATE VERY CLEARLY THAT ANY VIRGINIA GERNARAL ASSEMBLY INDIVIDUAL WHO CALLS THEMSELVES A CHRISTIAN CANNOT SUPPORT ABORTION OR SAME SEX MARRIAGE. IT IS ABOMINATION IS GOD'S EYES.
HJ 1 strongly oppose HJ 2 agree HJ 3 oppose
My daughter-in-law's birth mother got pregnant in high school. She gave her child up for adoption. Because she chose life, our family has three beautiful grandchildren. HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment • I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. • HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. • HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. • A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. • Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights • I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. Marriage and the family are the central institutions of social life. HJ 9 – marriage • I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. • Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child
Everyone has the right to life, liberty, and happiness. Abortion takes them away. All humans, however small — even in the womb — have a constitutional right to life. You cannot assert a right by killing someone.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Bottom Line: Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
I believe all people have the right to determine what happens to their own bodies. As an AFAB (assigned female at birth), my girlfriend and I both suffer from hormonal imbalances that would render pregnancy dangerous for both ourselves and any potential fetus. Between my girlfriend's removed ovary, my polycystic ovarian syndrome, and my prolactinoma (tumor), our reproductive systems aren't even likely to be fertile. To know that despite all this, we could still be forced to carry children is a scary thought. It's a scary thought not only because of our health conditions that could render potential pregnancies inviable or dangerous, but also because of the implications of what a possible pregnancy would mean for my girlfriend and I. We don't want to raise children, so we'd never be caught dead applying for a surrogate. If either of us were to become pregnant, it could only be a result of sexual assault. It is sad that these are the hypothetical extremes I have to spell out for you in order to make you understand why your laws have no place in my womb. Please protect our reproductive rights. We want to get married and old, not pregnant and forced to carry.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution.
I am adamantly opposed to HJ1. Unborn children have a right to life. They are human from creation, which occurs as conception. As the Declaration of Independence states "...all men are created (not born) equal." The moment of conception is the only non-arbitrary point to define the beginning of a human life.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution.
I strongly support HJ1 and HJ2 and HJ9. Every Virginian has a fundamental right to reproductive healthcare, the right to vote if qualifications are met, and the right to marry who they love, regardless of gender.
I strongly oppose and reject codifying a right to Abortion in the Virginia Constitution. It’s not a fundamental “right” but a fundamental “tragedy”. What little safeguards the unborn child has will be denied and for any reason aborted and thrown out like garbage. Is this the kind of state and country we want when we can’t even respect and protect the most vulnerable among us?? Those who have served their time should have their voting rights restored. Marriage should always be defined as between one man and one woman. It’s the truth that has guided our civilization throughout history ,before any religion, culture or governments. No one has the authority to remake or construe the true definition of marriage to suit their own needs or desires. KEEP MARRIAGE IN THE CONSTITUTION AS IT IS CURRENTLY DEFINED BETWEEN ONE MAN AND ONE WOMAN.
Please protect the right to life for the unborn and the dignity of life-bearing marriages between a man and a woman. HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment **I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. **HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. **HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. **A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. **Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights **I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage **I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. **Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I very strongly oppose creating a "right" to abortion in Virginia's constitution. Human beings who are growing in their mother's womb need laws that afford them protection from violence. If HJ 1 were to pass, existing VA law to protect vulnerable children before their birth would be made null, and Virginia would move move closer to barbarism and despotism. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. Continuing down the path of unrestricted abortion until birth would create within society a whole set of tragedies. It could not result in any positive effect.
I strongly oppose H1J as abortion is a tragedy, not a right, that remains a blight on our state. I oppose HJ 9, since the purpose of marriage is to have and raise children in a secure environment, which is of direct concern to the state. I strongly support HJ 2, as all people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored. Our justice system should be restorative, not punitive, and restoring voting rights is part of the reintegration process.
HJ1 - Please reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. Abortion is not a "right" because murder is not a right, and abortion is murder. HJ2 - I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ9 - I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. Undermining marriage undermines the fabric of our society. Studies have shown that children raised in households with their married mother and father are far more successful than children raised by single parents or homosexual guardians. It is your duty to promote laws that promote the welfare of Virginia's citizens rather than harming Virginia's citizens, whether they be pre-born or older. Please reject HJ1 and HJ9. Please approve HJ2.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
I fully support these bills, HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Every citizen of Virginia deserves the right to reproductive healthcare, the right to vote if they meet the qualifications, and the right to marry who they love.
With regards to HJ 1 which is the “right to abortion” amendment, I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. This bill would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law including the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. It would also preclude any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. This would be a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. The whole practice of abortion is barbaric and not the actions of a civilized and caring society! please reject this bill and work towards affirming the life and dignity of every mother and every child. As to HJ 9 , which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman, I ask that you strongly oppose this as well. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion, or law and should, therefore, be protected for the good of the society, the protection of children, and the raising of the next generation of citizens.
On behalf of over 600 members of Hadassah Richmond we are writing to request that you vote in the affirmative on HJ1 Constitutional amendment; fundamental right to reproductive freedom As members of Hadassah, The Women’s Zionist Organization of America, an international organization, 300,000 strong with 3300 members voting in the Commonwealth of Virginia, we wholeheartedly support the language in HJ1. We began our work 1912 as a healthcare organization and women’s health remains our priority. We have and always will support every woman’s right to choose her own reproductive care. As a Jewish organization we want to affirm our stance that in the US each human being has the right to their own religious beliefs. Much of the language used to draft anti-choice legislation does not reflect our religious teachings. If you would like to understand more about Jewish laws regarding abortion care, we would be glad to provide it. As the last state in the south that does not encumber a woman's access to all forms of reproductive care, we urge you to vote in favor of HJ1
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I am strongly opposed to HJ 1: the "right to abortion amendment" that would enshrine the right to abortion to VA's Constitution. It would jeopardize the ban on partial birth abortion and parental consent which is just plain WRONG. It could also stop any future legislation to protect innocent babies before they are born. Unlimited abortion up until birth is barbaric and should be stopped immediately. Please work to provide policies that affirm the dignity of every mother and child. Please protect women and children from this awful scourge on our citizens and nation. I strongly support HJ 2: and believe all people who have served their sentences should have their voting rights restored. I strongly oppose HJ 9: that would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage between one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. It's time to stop the madness!
As a mother who is currently expecting her 4th daughter and has young children, I can understand the fear and anxiety surrounding pregnancy. Providing for another human life is a huge financial, mental and emotional responsibility. And yet, abortion is not the answer. Support is. Finding ways to actually empower women instead of selling them the lie that ending their child's life will solve their problems. It is so sickening to me as I carry my 31 week old that we are trying to protect the intentional ending of a life that will literally be born in 9 weeks. Reject HJ 1. Instead of allowing late abortions or having them be an option, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose HJ1 as an attack on the inalienable dignity of human life in whatever setting it occupies.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution.
Protect women and their children from abortion. What a sad state that Virginia wants to enshrine this "right" to kill one's unborn children. We can and should be better than this. When a person's sentence is over, their voting rights should be restored. A marriage is and always be between one man and one woman. Since the beginning of time. Why do we allow others to attempt to re-define this basic fact?
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I vehemently oppose HJ1. Every person is entitled to the right to life, even the most defenseless person such as the unborn child. This bill is unconstitutional and cruel. It forces doctors who take the hippocrate oath "to do no harm" to violate their oath. It punishes the victim of a crime instead of the perpetrator. If the woman is the victim of rape, it doubles the psychological trauma and risk of bleeding out. It will make Virginia a hot spot for murderers seeking to destroy their babies. We do not need to increase our population of serial killers. Worst of all, it violates God's law -- do not murder. What is to stop a woman from killing her 2yr old or 3yr old child? If she is willing to murder at 1 week in utero, 5 months in utero, or 9 months in utero, then she is capable of murdering a 8yr old or your 80yr old grandmother. The government's responsibility is to punish evil and reward good. Please do not reward evil!
HJ 1 I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose this Bill. It will mean the death of many millions including but not limited to women! This is not a lawful Bill to pass and any who support it will be assisting Murder. God’s law should be the law we look to for guidance, and in His word he has proclaimed children to be a blessing. A Baby in the womb ought to have the highest possible protection because it is the most vulnerable of all human beings. Children are Made in Gods image as are all Humans and to abort them is to Murder and openly disobey God’s law. (Exodus 20:1-17).
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
We strongly oppose this amendment because abortion does not make you "un" pregnant, it makes you the parent of dead child. Why isn't there efforts made to support adoption? Most women are tricked into having an abortion out of fear, but there is support statewide to have the child. 1. The movie "Unplanned" should be provided as education in all the public high schools in Virginia to educate girls on what they are getting into. 2. Why is there are no limits on how many abortions a woman can have? Is 3, 4, 5 too many? How about 10? Abortion is not birth control. 3. What are the safeguards in performing abortions on minors? Girls start getting abortions in 8th grade and sometimes as young as 5th grade. Yet no reports on this sexual abuse with minors is in this amendment. 4. What about the selling of the dead baby body parts? Who buys them and for what reason at what price? Where does this (blood) money go?
I oppose HJ-1. I support HJ-2. I oppose HJ-9. Thank you for your attention.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Hello Delegates! Please know that as a Catholic I am very opposed to allow abortion into the constitution of Virginia. It is never okay to commit murder, and as much as many people think it is okay to destroy a clump of cells.... it is a life and a baby created by God and the persons uniting to create this precious soul. I know of a precious young lady whose mom choose life after being raped, and the world is a better place because of this life that was spared. She is now in her 20's and a very happy, loving, productive member of society. Her mom who choose to keep her sees a beautiful daughter, and I love this young lady too. I pray for the people who believe my body, my choice, because it is their choice to not be having sex and to make better decisions as to who they hang out with. It is the rare occasion that one is raped. Because of abortion being an easy answer to bad choices, I believe it has had an affect on society as whole that life is expendable. Please delegates, vote NO on abortion being a right in the great Commonwealth of Virginia. Sincerely, Kristin Sommer +JMJ+
While I am not a resident of VA, I frequently visit as it is nearby, particularly to try to convince people who come from all over the South to Bristol VA in order to murder their preborn children to save their children instead. There is no "right" to murder innocent children. The government has a duty to prohibit murder, and to legally protect murder of children morally repugnant and the fact that the government protects adults against murder is the height of hypocrisy and inequality under the law. Women already have the right to refrain from conceiving children through a variety of means, but once conception has occurred there is a unique child inside his or her mother with their own DNA that has a fundamental right to live.
HJ 1 – Herring I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 –Bennett-Parker I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – Sickles I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose HJ1. Women in Virginia deserve better than abortion. They deserve support for challenging pregnancies. Virginia should provide pregnancy resources that truly empower women. Abortion is not healthcare.
You must oppose HJ1. From conception these children are image bearers of God and worthy of life and protection. To support such an atrocity not only is contrary to the law of our land (U.S. Constitution - 14th Amendment), but far more importantly it is contrary to the law of God ("You shall not murder" and "Love your neighbor as yourself"). To support this amendment may not result in punishment in our land, but most definitely will continue bringing down the wrath of God upon our land and on the people who engage in or support such wickedness.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment: I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. Reject HJ 1. I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights: I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage: I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
My wife and I oppose all three house proposals. Abortion is murder, plain and simple. Murder is a crime, not a "right". What about the "right" of the child to live? We need to focus on the child, not the mother. Even after a convicted criminal has served his sentence, he needs to show that he has learned his lesson and will not commit a crime again. I would propose a five-year period after completing his sentence that he be crime free before his voting rights are restored. As far as HJ9 is concerned, marriage is a sacrament, ordained by God, and it is to be between a man and a woman, period.
I very much oppose the "right" to abortion
HJ1 - opposed HJ2 - support HJ9 - opposed
I BEG of you to PLEASE PROTECT BABIES - still-in-the- womb’s right to life. God’s Word calls for leaders to protect life. Psalm 94:16, 20-23 “Who rises up for me against the wicked? Who stands up for me against evildoers? Can wicked rulers be allied with you, Those who frame injustice by statute? They band together against the life of the righteous and condemn the innocent to death. But the Lord has become my stronghold and my God the rock of my refuge. He will bring back on them their iniquity and wipe them out for their wickedness. The Lord our God will wipe them out. “ Thank you for listening. Please vote NO against a constitutional amendment guaranteeing a “right” to abortion. Jennifer Humphrey Mendota, VA
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1 - As a woman, this is extremely important to me. I believe that everyone woman deserves the right to bodily autonomy and to make our own informed decisions regarding medical care. It is TERRIFYING that women could have that right taken away after already fighting so hard (and winning) to have that freedom. I don't want to live in a state or country where I don't feel safe. Knowing that my rights could be taken away makes me feel the opposite of safe. Please - for myself and every other woman - help protect this human right. HJ9 - As a lesbian and member of the LGBTQ community, this is also personal for me. I met my partner 5 years ago and we have been engaged for almost 1 year. I want and deserve the right to marry the person I love, just like everyone else. This shouldn't even be up for debate anymore. Love is love.
• I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. • HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. • HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. • A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. • Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment: I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – Restoring voting rights: I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I fully support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. It is imperative that these rights be enshrined and protected. Never, in the history of our nation and the human race, have we ever regretted protecting all human rights.
• Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. • I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. • I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
With respect to HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Please Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. With respect to HJ 9 – marriage I strongly oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. Thank you sincerely for attention to these issues, Dr. Evelyn Clingerman Fredericksburg, VA 22406
A House committee is fast-tracking proposed amendments on abortion, marriage and voting rights! In an unusual fast-tracking move, the House Privileges and Elections Committee will be hearing, and presumably voting on, three constitutional amendment proposals tomorrow morning at 11:00am: an extreme “right to abortion” amendment, an amendment to repeal the one-man/one-woman marriage provision, and an amendment to restore voting rights. Committee approval of these resolutions would advance them to the House floor, for a vote early in the 2025 session. The process to amend Virginia’s constitution is multi-year and involves a number of steps, but this latest action must be met with a high volume of voices. We urge you to submit written comments by clicking here and using the form provided. Here are some suggested talking points: HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Given the striking down of Roe v. Wade and the federal elections of many anti-choice politicians, it is more important than ever that we institute protections for women's reproductive health at the state level. As a woman currently on an IUD, if my birth control were to fail it would most likely result in an ectopic pregnancy requiring immediate termination to protect my life, where hesitation could kill me. This being the case, if Virginia were to become subject to a federal abortion ban or other such restrictions, I would be forced to immediately move to another state that has protections in place so that I would be confident of receiving the care I need in such an emergency. I know many other women in Virginia who are similarly situated, especially high-income and educated ones. If we and our families were to leave it would be a harmful brain drain on the Virginia economy. Please, pass any and all regulations to protect Virginia women and doctors from federal overreach into our health care. Aside from the moral argument that my bodily choices are not up for majority vote, there is a practical one, where the entire state would suffer if women with the means to do so were to leave in order to protect their personal liberty and safety.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1 - I 100% support this bill. HJ1 marks a significant step forward for women's rights in Virginia. This law reinforces the fundamental right of women to make personal choices about their reproductive health, ensuring freedom and autonomy for all. Supporting reproductive freedom means upholding equality, respect, and individual agency for every woman across the Commonwealth. HJ2 - I 100% support this bill. HJ2 represents a powerful commitment to the democratic principles of Virginia by ensuring that every eligible citizen has the fundamental right to vote without unnecessary barriers. By allowing citizens who have served their sentences to regain their voting rights automatically, this measure reinforces the belief in second chances and the right to participate in shaping our communities. It also thoughtfully addresses concerns around mental capacity, allowing only those who are currently able to understand the act of voting to participate, while providing a clear path for restoring rights if capacity is regained. This is a forward-thinking step toward an inclusive and fair electoral process in the Commonwealth. HJ9 - I 100% support the passing of this bill. As an LGBTQ+ individual serving the Commonwealth, this amendment represents more than policy—it’s about safeguarding the hopes and dreams that many of us hold for a future where our relationships are respected and our rights are secure. In times of political uncertainty, especially with a new administration that could bring shifting priorities, it’s easy to feel fear for what lies ahead. This amendment provides a sense of stability and assurance, reinforcing that our rights and our families are valued, protected, and legally recognized. It’s a vital step toward a future where we can continue to serve and contribute with confidence, knowing that Virginia stands for equality and inclusion.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution. As a mother there is nothing more important than my daughter having control of her body. These decisions should be made between a woman and her doctor no one else. These rights must be protected.
I strongly oppose amending our Commonwealth’s constitution as this bill proposes. It is a tragedy that we think a baby’s life is so worthless that we would even think to enshrine abortion until birth. We should be working together to find solutions for women with crisis pregnancies that offers real choices for both them and their babies. Planned Parenthood is an oxymoron in that they perform only one service-death of unborn babies; there is no parenthood. Please vote NO to this careless attempt to prevent common sense protections for mothers and their babies!
I am a woman happily married to a man who has also chosen to not have children. Though I have had tubal ligation to ensure this, it is not 100% guaranteed so long as i have a uterus and ovaries. I am well within my rights to be intimate with my husband, but if I were to become pregnant and be blocked from necessary Healthcare, I am guaranteed an ectopic pregnancy that will kill me. I support the right to choose on the basis that no one can be forced to donate use of their organs after death, why should I be forced to donate use of my organs while alive, especially when neither of us would survive regardless? Those who oppose it are not required to partake in it, they have no right to deny it to others.
I oppose HJ1 on the following grounds: HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. Please vote no on this amendment. Thank you.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment - I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. - HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. - A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. - Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights - I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage - I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. - Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I believe that the right to vote, the right to marriage, and the right to women’s healthcare are essential and so important to the well being of our city and our state. I am writing this to support those values.
HJ1: I believe that reproductive freedom should be memorialized in the Virginia Constitution. The choice to have an abortion is a deeply personal one and to possibly face punishment for taking actions to protect yourself during a dangerous pregnancy should never happen. Additionally, the treatment for miscarriages is often "abortion", so this also allows for those who have suffered a miscarriage to seek and receive the proper treatment. HJ9: Marriage is a contract between two consenting people. Their gender should be irrelevant, as long as they are of contracting age and able to effectually enter into said contract.
A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. These children are humans and have a right to life. They should not be murdered. This bill gives no consideration of the baby's pain or his/her mother's post abortion regret. Most of these women think this is their only choice. Let's give women true choice offering them the aid they need. Let's provide the children our state needs for the future. Let us be honorable and holy in God's sight.
I strongly oppose a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth is not a fundamental right. Please reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every woman.
• Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
By now we've all heard the horrendous and tragic stories about the adverse of abortion bans. Reports of women bleeding out and having pregnancies ending in sterilization is barbaric and completely preventible. We must protect women in Virginia from suffering the same fate. Extreme government intervention in our healthcare must be blocked. Women's live are at risk.
I support HJ1 - fundamental right to reproductive freedom, and HJ2 - right to vote. Both of these amendments are needed in Virginia's constitution to live up to ...."liberty and justice for all".
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I do not believe a “right” to abortion should be a part of VA’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in VA law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Oppose this bill. All lives matter including the unborn.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose a right to abortion law. The unborn must be protected. Abortion on demand at any stage of pregnancy goes against our decency as human beings. Marriage should be between a man and a woman. This marital arrangement has its roots in our biblical history and the natural order.
No to radical abortion amendment. The right to life is precious and must be defended from the radical left. No to the destruction of marriage definition as one man and one woman.
I strongly oppose HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment, enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment • I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. • HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. • HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. • A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. • Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights • I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage • I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. • Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I, as a veteran born and raised in this beautiful Commonwealth, I fully support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. It is imperative that these rights be enshrined and protected. Never, in the history of our nation and the human race, have we ever regretted protecting all human rights.
I oppose abortion. All life, mother and baby, deserves fierce protection from destruction.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. As a voting Virginia resident, I want to know my voice is heard!
I strongly oppose the HJ1 Constitutional Amendment. Having NO restrictions on abortion aka Reproductive Rights has several issues for me: • It eliminates all parental knowledge or consent prior to a minor undergoing an invasive abortion procedures; •It prevents Virginia from reinstating critical abortion clinic safety standards and informed written consent for women and minors; •It allows men to claim a fundamental right to impregnate a woman, and to deny responsibility to pay child support for children they wished to abort; •It allows abortion all the way up to 9 months •It allows the abortion pill w/o a medical doctor oversight and w/o an ultrasound - a dangerous event for a woman who has an ectopic pregnancy or is more advanced in her pregnancy than believed. What ever happened to the statement that abortions should be safe and rare. They are currently neither and this amendment is radically less safe or rare. And does "Reproductive Right" entitle women to leave to die a baby born alive from an abortion? Does it force Pregnancy Resource Centers to refer women for abortions? Does that right force insurance companies to pay for abortions? Does it force the taxpayer to pay for abortions? Will it force medical workers to perform abortions against their will in order to ensure women's reproductive rights. Does it shelter sex traffickers who want their sex slaves to get abortions? Do these reproductive rights apply to non-citizens of Virginia, even those from states whose laws are more restrictive? Does it protect abortionists from lawsuits from other states that are more restrictive, etc. What about the rights of the father that didn't want his child aborted? Not to mention that babies are persons that are constitutionally protected with the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Babies feel pain as they are being ripped apart in the womb. Women have been harmed physically, emotionally and spiritually by abortion. Our nations is being harmed by the low birth rate that is causing a huge deficit in social programs like social security. And last but not least, it goes against the will of God. This amendment is too radical and I strongly oppose it.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
HJ1 I oppose abortion as life begins from the moment of conception and ends at natural death. Please do not legalize abortion at anytime in Virginia. HJ2 - Once someone has served out their sentence and are released from prison, I support restoring their right to vote. H9 Please recognize marriage as between only a man and a woman and not same sexes.
HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.
HJ1 - I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ2 - I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ9 -I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I simply want to express my support for bills HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9, constitutional amendments providing (1) a fundamental right to reproductive freedom; (2) qualifications of voters/right to vote; and (3) marriage between two individuals, respectively.
If you want me to support you, then do this.
There is no science to back or support stricter regulations on the bodily autonomy of women and abortion. All arguments made against the medical procedures and the ability of a woman to have a say in her own life and over her own body are done in the face of overwhelming scientific consensus -- at the behest of religious or personal dogma. It is the responsibility of a state body to protect one's owns rights from the infringement of other's opinions, beliefs, or dogma *hence "don't tread on me" being a bumper tag for our state. The phrase does not read "I have the right to tread on whoever I please so long as it aligns with my personal or religious beliefs". Nor has any such notion ever been mentioned or enshrined within any legal precedent or document in the founding of this state or nation.
I strongly urge all legislators to appose HJI. I believe that every life, from conception, has intrinsic values and rights. I would advocate for increased support for pregnant women, such as expanding access to prenatal care, financial support, adoption services, and childcare resources, to address the root causes that lead many women to consider abortion. I also have concerns about the potential long-term physical and psychological effects of abortion on women. Promoting a culture that supports life fosters a healthier society and any legal changes should reflect values that uphold and protect all human life.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
The decision to have an abortion is deeply personal and has only to do with one's health and personal beliefs about life, health, safety, family, and religion. The government should have no say in this at all - yet we are now in a time when we must rely on state governments to keep abortions legal, accessible, and safe. Please pass this bill as the first step to guaranteeing access to abortion in Virginia.
Block 1 - HJ1: Firstly, I'm appalled that women's reproductive rights are on the chopping block once again as if we didn't already do this 50 years ago. The fact that women have to beg for these basic rights while rapists get a slap on the wrist and men are not legally bound from day one for child support & healthcare to the child in utero and after birth is madder than the hatter. Secondly, women should be able to choose their life and what that life will look like 20 years from that moment in their life. Letting women die because the child is no longer viable and will kill the mother if they continue well after the ridiculous 6-weeks, to which you would have to be a phsycic to know by the way, is beyond the measure of any sane thought. Women's lives matter, their sanity matters, their health matters, their overall well-being MATTERS! Finally, Should this madness continue, men should be punished just as harshly be it vasectomy or castration. You may think or find that extreme, but that is the very same boat you are placing women in my humble opinion. There is no room for religion here and especially not personal opinion--the only voice that matters is the woman single-handedly experiencing a pregnancy and the drastic changes either option entails. Block 1 - HJ2: IF Trump, a convicted felon, can run for Presidency, then absolutely a reformed/released inmate should have a say in how this country is led and who they choose to lead them. How can we say prisons were created to reform &and guide prisoners to a better path forward on their way out, but take away their voice, their choices for employment, and their overall life being reduced to a person they don't even recognize anymore in the worst of ways. Let them vote, give them every opportunity to do better, be better, and know better. Block 1 - HJ3: Human is human & life is life. Two consenting adults who deeply love one another should absolutely be able to marry one another, be it man to woman, woman to woman, or man to man. It's no one else business who they decide to spend their time and life with because the last time I checked my neighbors, mayor, senators, and congressmen/congresswomen were not paying my bills, sending my children to school, putting food on my table, or paying my taxes. Let them get married, have shared marital assets, and have the ability to pay their taxes with the filing status MARRIED. Could we stop being hypocrites cherry-picking bible verses and stop thinking our personal opinions and beliefs should affect the people that don't even share the same roof over their heads?
I fully support HJ1, J2, and HJ9 as amendments to the VA Constitution. The protection of the rights of our citizens should be front of mind for all of our electeds, and a priority for our General Assembly to take action. HJ1 -- Women have a fundamental right to reproductive freedom, to have agency over their own bodies. While is should be obvious to ALL, it isn't, so we need to have that right enshrined in our Commonwealth's Constitution. HJ2 -- The right to vote is just that, a right to vote. One's ability to vote should only be interrupted after a conviction, and only until they are freed. Persons who have committed crimes, have been adjudicated, and have satisfied their obligations to the Commonwealth should have their right to vote restored automatically -- not by any "case by case" consideration. Notice of such restoration should be provided to the person, both by the releasing institution and the law enforcement entity charged with following up after their release. HJ9 -- The right for two people to marry is a fundamental right, one that is indifferent to the sex, gender or race of the individuals. While religious institutions can refuse to perform a marriage, the political subdivisions, i.e. the Commonwealth cannot. While these three proposed amendments may seem superfluous to some, or offensive to others, to codify these rights for the protectees of the Consititution of the Commonwealth of Virginia is appropriate and necessary. Sarah E. Sussan Midlothian VA c
It is a poverty that a child must die so that you may live as you wish. I am against this bill! Vote NO
As the country transitions to a new administration , Virginia must enshrine these rights into our state constitution in order to protect the rights of its citizens. I support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9.
This amendment to the constitution acts against the Commonwealth’s interest in promoting the wellbeing of all Virginians. Abortion is traumatic. It is traumatic in all gestational stages. The emotional turmoil experienced by women who undergo an abortion is debilitating, especially for poor women and other women who have experienced trauma. Adding trauma to trauma is not in a woman’s interest. Abortion is state sanctioned harm to women, especially poor women. In the interest of promoting the well being of all women the Commonwealth should limit not expand abortion.
As a woman who experienced 5 miscarriages requiring medical intervention to prevent infection, I strongly support this bill. I have witnessed the deadly consequences in other states who have restricted care for women and I don't want our Commonwealth to be in that position. These decisions should be between a woman, her family and her doctor. Politicians have no right to intervene. I am also the proud mother of twin boys as a result of IVF born in 2006. Virginia was the home of The Jones Institute for Reproductive Medicine and was responsible for the birth of the first test tube baby in 1981. My twins were born in Norfolk as a result in IVF performed at EVMS Jones Institute. Virginia should proudly support and protect women and science and pass this bill to enshrine this right for future generations
I support ALL of these bills passing. As a mother who cannot afford and (for health reasons) should not have another pregnancy, reproductive freedom is CRITICALLY important for my family. I am also in an interracial marriage and with the concern for supreme court repeals, I want it in law that anyone of any gender, race, or sexuality can get married. Marriage equality had harmed no one and should be our RIGHT. The government should not get to dictate who we share property and tax returns with.
Given the changing administration, we must enshrine these rights into our state constitution. These are the very rights at risk at a national level.
I strongly support these bills, and I hope you will as well. Reproductive freedom should already be the law. No woman is an incubator. Every woman is a human being! If marriage is a religious union between 2 parties, then the government should have no say-so in the matter. If marriage is a governmental contract between 2 parties, then religious beliefs should have no bearing on it. Let people marry who they love! LOVE IS LOVE and boy, do we need some love these days. Felons who have served their sentence should be forgiven and allowed to restore their voting privileges to normal. ESPECIALLY since we will now have a felon running the highest office in our country.
As a city of Tichmond resident in the light of recent national and state policy changes I strongly support all 3 ammendments enshrining basic human rights to bodily autonomy, participation in the democratic process, and right to legal marriage. If Virginia truly is for lovers we must love all of our citizens equally and grant them the same rights
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution. Reproductive health is not murder. People should be able to be and marry who they wish.
It has come to my attention that the House Privileges and Elections Committee will be meeting tomorrow to discuss several bills, one of which is House bill HJ1, which would amend the state constitution to permit abortion up through nine months of pregnancy. I am writing you as a constituent to express to how appalling I find it that our state would even consider such a heinous decision. One of the most important roles of government is to protect our citizens, especially the vulnerable and the innocent. The unborn child is the most vulnerable member of our society, and it is our collective responsibility to protect those who cannot protect themselves. The unborn child is also the most innocent person, and it is a travesty that these children are executed willfully and in great number for the “mistakes” and crimes of others. I believe abortion, which in every regard qualifies as murder, is wrong at any stage of pregnancy. Now a bill is being considered in which these little human lives can be destroyed at any time in their development, up until the moment before birth. The only difference being location, whether the child abides within the womb or without. Babies as young as 22 or so weeks of gestation have survived birth and have had the opportunity to enjoy life. Now we would like to deprive a child even older and more fully able to live and thrive that same God-given privilege of enjoying life. I genuinely care for the women with crisis pregnancies. I believe we should provide them with all the care and support that we can, and there are many agencies providing just that. I know because I volunteer with one. Yet, I also believe that the life they carry is not theirs to destroy. That child is not part of her body, even their blood does not mingle. That child is a totally unique person and just as we consider it illegal and an affront to the value of a person to take someone else’s life, no one, including its mother, has the right to decide that that person’s life is without value and worthy to be murdered. Consider how disregard for the most helpless among us will serve to further harden our collective hearts toward other vulnerable populations, such as the old and disabled. Once we believe we can decide who lives and dies, it is a slippery slope towards devaluing all sorts of lives. Just look at Canada and how easily the inconvenient and “useless” members of society are being eliminated. Thank you for your service for Virginia. I pray that you seek the truth and right and do what will bring honor and justice to our great state.
I feel strongly this is not right to allow babies to be murdered in the womb. These are humans and deserve the same protection as the rest of us.
I support YES to all three bills. Outlawing abortions does not get rid of them. It outlaws SAFE abortions.
I strongly support this proposed amendment. The person in the best position to make health decisions for any woman is the woman herself, with the support of her family and her doctor. The state should not interfere with or penalize any woman for making the best decision for her own health.
I strongly support all three of these amendments. It is vital that we continue moving forward and keep Virginia feeling safe and welcoming to ALL.
I support all three bills and ask that they be passed. The rights to reproductive freedom, marriage between consenting adults, and the right to vote should not be denied to anyone.
How will this law translate? Reproductive Freedom =/code for Abortion until Birth without any rational restrictions. This bill eliminates parental rights, a woman's right to truth & support for any option other than abortion, and supports an industry that was created to make money not care for women, the father of the baby, and their families. This bill is an attempt from radical pro-abortion members of the Virginia GA to get even from a Federal election loss, where they were soundly defeated. Once again, running on abortion, abortion, abortion.
These amendments have not been properly discussed or voted on by constituents. Unlimited murder of unborn babies is not a right. Convicted felons have never had the right to vote so it's unclear why you want them to. The marriage law is unnecessary. This entire session and vote is completely illegitimate and voting to pass these will prove you do not represent the will of Virginians.
I stand in opposition to the bill proposed by Delegate Cia Price of Portsmouth. This bill, if it becomes law, would enshrine unlimited abortion up to 9 months in our Virginia Constitution. While there are many in our country that believe in shedding innocent blood, there are many more that would be horrified. It would be a great offense to Almighty God and very unfair to the citizens of Virginia, the majority of which are Christians. I urge the Delegates to reject this bill.
I strongly support each of these three constitutional amendments. They are essential to the dignity and well-being of the citizens of the Commonwealth of Virginia. In order to be a thriving, successful community, economically and personally, individuals must be free to pursue their own happiness, make decisions about their own health care, and have their voices heard through the Democratic electoral process. The stronger the individuals in our communities, the better our communities and our Commonwealth will do as a whole. Therefore, I strongly support these constitutional amendments. Thank you for your work in bringing them to the public to vote on.
I am writing to express my support for HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9.
The United States Constitution is clear in its Equal Protection clause. Under the 14th Amendment, this proposed constitutional amendment would violate the US Constitution by denying the protection of human life to all human lives, born and unborn. This proposed constitutional amendment should not proceed further, as it violates the US Constitution.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution
I am writing to express my support for HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9.
My comment: I STRONGLY support these three amendments to our state constitution. Protecting my children's reproductive freedom, restoring voting rights to people convicted of felonies, and ensuring marriage equality are all deeply important to me and the people I love. I want to protect and support all Virginians', rights, regardless of their political affiliation, with these three constitutional amendments!
States with restrictions on reproductive rights are seeing ob- gyn providers leave in large numbers and maternal and fetal health is suffering. Why would you choose to work in a state where you could be put in jail for performing your job? The best way to reduce abortions is to ensure access to affordable effective contraception and work to reduce child poverty. This bill protects health care workers as well as families
Please protect women’s and LGTBQ+ rights in Virginia. And voting rights should be reinstated to people who have served their time.
Every woman should have the right to choose healthcare that best meets her needs. No government, or person, should have input on that decision. Please support the Reproductive Freedom amendment. Thank you.
I am writing in support of all three, HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9, to be enshrined in the Commonwealth's constitution. In particular for HJ1, reproductive healthcare should be available to all women. This should not even be a question. As someone who works in women's health, those decisions should be made between the woman and her provider. So many complications can occur in every pregnancy. Denying the appropriate healthcare would be unconscionable.
I strongly support the passage of HJ1,HJ2 and HJ9 in order to enshrine these freedoms and protections in the Commonwealth of Virginia's constitution. Thank you
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth's constitution.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I support all three proposals. Women have should have a constitutional right to make their reproductive decisions, a person who has been released from prison has already paid their debt to society and should have their voting rights automatically restored, and I support being able to marry the person you love
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 as they are important for safeguarding the rights of citizens of the Commonwealth.
I am strongly opposed to the pro abortion amendment that is to be added to our Virginia state constitution. I respectfully request that you do not pass this bill please.
The United States Constitution is clear in its Equal Protection clause. Under the 14th Amendment, this proposed constitutional amendment would violate the US Constitution by denying the protection of human life to all human lives, born and unborn. This proposed constitutional amendment should not proceed further, as it violates the US Constitution. Sincerely, Danielle Kelleher
I strongly support every Virginian’s right to marry who they love and govern our own bodies. It is important that these rights stay in the constitution of our commonwealth otherwise we’re more like a country governed by a dictator than the United States of America.
I support these bills. These rights should not be subject to the whims of the public or the will of some of the public to force their religious beliefs on members of the Commonwealth who do not share them.
I vote YES on all of these bills. Everyone deserves life, liberty and pursuit to happiness. That includes consenting adults of the same sex to get married, the right to medical choice of your body (if men have the right and were all equal. Then women deserve the right to choose what happens to their bodies) and for citizens to have a viice electorally. I find it saddening that our country has came to the point that opposing protecting others rights is something they support. AMERICA IS ABOUT FREEDOM. NOT CONTROL. We should protect eachother and not attack one another because we "dont agree". Everyone deserves the choice even if it's not the one you would make. No human has the right to infringe on another humans rights. Period.
I am writing to oppose HJ 1. I have lived in Virginia my whole life, all 22 years of it, and I find this proposal abhorrent. This proposal would permit abortions not only long after the child is capable of feeling pain, but also after viability. Even beyond that, there would be no way of instituting a requirement for reporting underage girls seeking abortions, effectively banning parental rights and instead granting rights to abusers, pedophiles, and traffickers.
HJ1 Abortion should be legal, safe, and the decision left to those who are pregnant with guidance from medical professionals. True democracy depends on equal rights for all people. Losing our right to reproductive choice opens the door to the loss of other freedoms including other healthcare choices, marriage equality, access to contraception, and the right to engage in private, consensual intimacy without government interference. Not only is the right to a safe and legal abortion a matter of personal freedom, it’s also a major factor in the movements for racial and economic equality. Black individuals, and all underserved communities, already experience unfair barriers and limited access to adequate healthcare services. Our reproductive choices impact our physical and psychological well-being, including the foods we eat, where we live, our financial resources, and our capacity to gain and maintain employment and provide for ourselves and our families. Hj2 I support an amendment to the Virginia Constitution to guarantee that people who have been disenfranchised due to a felony conviction will have their rights automatically restored upon completion of their sentences, without additional steps or paperwork after they are no longer incarcerated, and to ensure people with disabilities never lose their rights without an appropriate judicial finding. This has never been a partisan issue. Both Democratic and Republican governors have chosen to restore voting rights to thousands of citizens; however, Virginia's current governor has reversed the trend. People should not be permanently defined by their past mistakes. Virginians who have successfully served their time should be able to fully rejoin civic life. It is time for Virginians to act to amend our Constitution to create a routine restoration process that reflects fair accountability and encourages civic engagement. HJ 9: A 2021 poll from the Public Religion Research Institute found that 71% of Virginians support the right of same-sex couples to marry. Virginia's Constitution and Laws should reflect the views of the majority of Virginians presently living under them, not the views of passed generations. If Virginia really is “for lovers,” it should recognize that love is love and grant all citizens the right to live their lives in peace.
I support rights for women to have reproductive rights to any procedures.. abortion, contraception, reproductive procedures are NOT responsibility of government
Hello, I am writing to express my support for all three of these common sense amendments protecting and enshrining these basic civil rights for our citizens. A surge of backwards thinking is coming, fueled by ignorance, bigotry, and the false mandate that robbing our citizens of these rights is desired by any more than a small but vocal minority of Americans. The only way to protect against such unethical uprisings is to codify laws against them. Do not lose sight of what is right and just in the face of hatred or fanaticism, no matter how loud or fervent. Sincerely, Michael Baughan
The proposed Amendment HJ1 - Herring would allow people who can become pregnant to make the appropriate decisions for themselves and their families. This would allow people to navigate life without fear of becoming trapped in a relationship, being responsible for someone they cannot provide for, or being in enormous medical debt. This is extremely necessary for the safety and freedom of the people of Virginia. The amendment HJ2 - Bennett-Parker would allow the people the governing bodies make decisions on behalf of a say in who represents them. Everyone should have the ability to vote in favor of who represents their interests, regardless of criminal record. They exist within these systems upon release and their well-being should be included in the decisions made by their representatives. The proposed amendment HJ9 - Sickles would allow it to be written in law that any two people who want to enter into marriage may do so. While this is already the practice and has been legitimized by the Supreme Court, it would be a good faith move from our government to reinforce that decision by reflecting it in Virginia law. Everyone should be able to engage with marriage if they choose to do so, and laws that reflect otherwise are outdated and damaging to our society.
I STRONGLY support these three amendments to our state constitution. Protecting my children's reproductive freedom, restoring voting rights to people convicted of felonies, and ensuring marriage equality are all deeply important to me and the people I love. I want to protect and support all Virginians', rights, regardless of their political affiliation, with these three constitutional amendments!
Certainly the right to life is substantially more fundamental than a right to end a unique, unrepeatable, human life in the womb (for scientifically that is what a fetus is). We must ensure that these babies who have no one else to speak have their rights protected - to grow, to be born, and to be free. In addition, there is no reason whatsoever to allow abortions after viability, when babies can be safely delivered rather than their lives ended.
Reproductive Health. HJ1 I believe that every Virginia resident should have access to affordable, quality health care, including abortion, birth control and the privacy to make reproductive choices. Virginians made their reproductive opinions clear when they chose to elect representatives who vowed to protect reproductive rights. Abortion should be legal, safe, and the decision left to those who are pregnant with guidance from medical professionals. True democracy depends on equal rights for all people. Losing our right to reproductive choice opens the door to the loss of other freedoms including other healthcare choices, marriage equality, access to contraception, and the right to engage in private, consensual intimacy without government interference. Not only is the right to a safe and legal abortion a matter of personal freedom, it’s also a major factor in the movements for racial and economic equality. Black individuals, and all underserved communities, already experience unfair barriers and limited access to adequate healthcare services. Our reproductive choices impact our physical and psychological well-being, including the foods we eat, where we live, our financial resources, and our capacity to gain and maintain employment and provide for ourselves and our families. Voting Rights Restoration HJ2 Data shows that the majority of Virginians believe that all qualified citizens should have access to the ballot, including those who have served their time for felony convictions and people with disabilities who want to participate in the democratic process. I support an amendment to the Virginia Constitution to guarantee that people who have been disenfranchised due to a felony conviction will have their rights automatically restored upon completion of their sentences, without additional steps or paperwork after they are no longer incarcerated, and to ensure people with disabilities never lose their rights without an appropriate judicial finding. This has never been a partisan issue. Both Democratic and Republican governors have chosen to restore voting rights to thousands of citizens; however, Virginia's current governor has reversed the trend. People should not be permanently defined by their past mistakes. Virginians who have successfully served their time should be able to fully rejoin civic life. It is time for Virginians to act to amend our Constitution to create a routine restoration process that reflects fair accountability and encourages civic engagement. Marriage Equality HJ9 This ban does not reflect the attitudes and beliefs of Virginians in 2023. A 2021 poll from the Public Religion Research Institute found that 71% of Virginians support the right of same-sex couples to marry. This percentage has only increased since the question began being asked of voters. In 2006, 53% of voters supported the marriage ban. This huge swing shows the massive shift in public opinion on the issue of marriage, and it is clear evidence that the antiquated ban should no longer be a part of Virginia’s constitution. It’s only fair to revisit a political question that has shown such a vast change since it was first broached. With the removal of women’s protections with the destruction of Roe v. Wade, it is possible that marriage equality will be destroyed on a national level as well. Virginia must take the lead to protect all citizens.
I support this amendment.
As a medical student in Virginia, I am in full opposition to the proposed bill. I have chosen this profession to defend and protect all patients and promote the health and wellbeing of all humans I treat. Everyone agrees on the ethical principle of autonomy. However, when does the universal right to autonomy begin? If it does not begin in the womb, we then reach the claim that simply being human is not enough to deserve human rights. Do I, as a student physician have no obligation to look out for the health interests of a patient in the womb? Should I not advise mothers to avoid alcohol in pregnancy? Should I prescribe teratogenic antibiotics simply because it helps the mother? To do so would be ridiculous and complete medical neglect. While treating pregnant patients, physicians have an obligation to care for both mother and child. If this bill is passed in Virginia, it will be a devastating blow to human rights. I sincerely wish the best for all involved in this vote.
As a long time resident of Virginia and former medical professional, I strongly stand with the passing of HJ1 as essential medical access for Virginians. Removal of the codification and protections of individuals and medical professionals to essential reproductive procedures would be incredibly detrimental to our community. I support HJ2 as well, voting and having a voice in our elections process is a right and there should be a pathway for formerly incarcerated individuals to earn back that right. Additionally, I am strongly in support of HJ9. Virginia cannot be "for lovers" if we do not protect the rights of LGBTQIA families and individuals. By not codifying marriage protections we also open up a slippery slope to removal of protections for interracial marriages. If we as a Commonwealth do not pass HJ9, we can no longer say we are for lovers or for our people. So I implore you to pass these essential protections and pathway to restoration of rights. I love Virginia and I would love for it to be a safe place for myself and my family.
Dear Sub-Committee Members, As a concerned voter, I am writing to express my *strong support* for the three proposed constitutional amendments: HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. HJ1: This amendment is vital for safeguarding reproductive freedom in Virginia. It ensures individuals have the right to make personal healthcare decisions without government interference, reflecting our state’s commitment to personal liberty and privacy. HJ2: Protecting and expanding voting rights is fundamental to our democracy. This amendment will help ensure that all eligible Virginians can participate in the electoral process, reinforcing the integrity and inclusiveness of our elections. HJ9: Enshrining marriage equality in our constitution is essential for guaranteeing that all couples have the right to marry, regardless of gender. This amendment affirms Virginia’s commitment to equality and non-discrimination. I urge you to support these amendments, which are crucial for protecting the rights and freedoms of all Virginians. Thank you for considering my views. Sincerely, Dr. King
I firmly support a woman's right to decide what is best for her body. Limiting reproductive choice delegates them to second class citizens.
These three bills speak to the freedom of choice for Virginia residents. Our forefathers fought to preserve these freedoms. Now it is up to you, the elected officials, to make sure all of your constituents have those freedoms. Please pass all three bills.
As our representative, I urge you to protect our reproductive rights, restore voting rights automatically after being released from prison, and protect same-sex marriage.
I am writing to vote NO to the amendment that would allow for abortion on demand in the name of "reproductive freedom". This evil of killing our children in the womb must stop! No one should have the right to have their unborn child murdered. The baby's body is not the mother's body. Also, not only does abortion harm the baby, it also harms the mother emotionally, physically, mentally and spiritually. God is the creator of all life, and it should be protected.
Hello House Privileges and Elections Committee, I am writing to voice my support for HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Let’s get these Constitutional Amendments on the ballot to secure our individual freedoms. Thank you, Emily Casebolt-Simon
Dear Members, Please vote No on Bill HJ1, Reproductive Freedom Bill for the following reasons: 1)The right to any freedom ends when the life of another human being begins. It is morally wrong to deliberately end the life of an innocent, unborn child, if the mother’s physical life or major organ is not endangered 2) Dismembering an unborn child in any stage of development is barbaric. Dismembering anyone is against international law, and allowing it for the cause of reproductive freedom is kin to Nazi Nazi Germany killing 6+ million Jews. Abortion is the Holocaust of our generation, now exceeding 1 million/year. The civil rights issue of our time. 3) Health care providers who believe taking the life of an unborn child is morally wrong will be forced to participate in this atrocity, or lose their jobs. Where is their freedom of speech/conscience? 4) Abortion providers will be protected from doing any harm, and a woman will have no recourse to bring a lawsuit for damages as direct result of the abortionist negligence Consider Scripture: "...I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curses. Therefore choose life so you and your offspring may live, and love the LORD your God and listen to His voice" Deuteronomy 30:19
Good afternoon, I am called to write to you about our freedoms. “I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.” Thank you for your serious consideration. Let’s not remove freedom from our foundation. We should not try to regulate morality such as beliefs about when life begins (i have never believed life began at conception). Let’s not regulate mother’s health out of the reproductive health issue. Let’s not regulate wwhich humans can love one another. This over reach is tearing the country apart and making us a worldwide laughing stock. Let freedom ring, Mary Leffler Glen Allen, Va
I fully and adamantly support HJ1 - Herring, HJ2 - Bennett-Parker, & HJ9 - Sickles. I am of the opinion that these bills should absolutely be passed without question.
All of these are important issues and need to be protected. As a woman, I fear for my reprodutcive rights and ability to get services should I need them. Everyone should have a right to vote and be heard. I have a good number of friends in same sex relationships and marriages that I feel deserve the protection of their status. All of these bills should be passed as they protect marginal groups who are often overlooked or fought against.
Strongly apposed to abortion, especially up to 9 months!
I urge you to vigorously oppose HJ1. 34,700 preborn human beings were murdered by abortion in the Commonwealth of Virginia in 2023 (Guttmacher Institute). More than 34,000 precious individuals who were created in the image of God and who possess every bit as much humanity as those of us who are already born were denied the equal protection of the laws in our state. This is abhorrent and unjust. It violates our duty to God to love our neighbors as ourselves. It violates our duty to act with compassion and do for defenseless preborn children what we would want done for us. It violates the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution which states that "no state... shall deny to any person the equal protection of the laws." Please do not double down on this barbaric evil in the Commonwealth of Virginia by enshrining it in our constitution. I urge you to do everything in your power to reject HJ1. Erika Schanzenbach
Only legal taxpayers should be allowed to vote!
I'm writing to show my support for HJ1 and HJ9. HJ1 protects our right to make our own decisions about our bodies and reproductive health, which is essential for personal freedom. HJ9 ensures that everyone has the right to marry the person they love, regardless of sex, gender, or race. By supporting these amendments, we're standing up for individual liberty and equality in our community. Let's make our state a better place for all by backing these measures!
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Women’s medical care needs to be protected. Religious beliefs should have no bearing on other people’s medical care. Medical autonomy needs to remain with the individual and should not be dictated by others’ personal/religious beliefs.
I enthusiastically support the protection of every individual's reproductive freedom. No human should be compelled to lend or extend the use of their person to benefit a developing fetus. If you cannot force me to donate a kidney, or a lobe of my liver, to a complete stranger, I cannot imagine how one could reasonably compel me to donate the use of my entire body, at great risk to health and life, to a developing organism. I acknowledge individual personal and religious objections to reproductive freedoms but further assert that I, a citizen of a secular state, cannot be obligated to live by someone else's creed. If one's religion or personal moral code excludes individual reproductive freedom then that onus extends no farther than that individual. I do take exception to the verbiage "unless justified by a compelling state interest" because I do not acknowledge any compelling state interest in my bodily autonomy with regards to reproductive rights and health decisions.
I support the fundamental right to reproductive freedom, which allows individuals to make personal healthcare decisions along with their physician - without unnecessary legal barriers or delays that could endanger their life or health. Laws should not be based on religious definitions of life, especially given the diversity of beliefs in our state. I believe that individuals who have served their time deserve the right to participate fully in our democracy, including the right to vote. As they rejoin the workforce and pay taxes, they should have a voice in shaping the laws that govern our communities. Rehabilitation should include reintegration, and that includes not only allowing but encouraging civic engagement. I also stand firmly in favor of marriage equality. Just as society has overwhelmingly supported interracial marriage, the freedom to marry should extend to all consenting adults, regardless of gender or race. These unions bring no harm and deserve legal recognition as well as equal protection under the law.
HJ1 – fundamental right to reproductive freedom I am writing to provide support for women's RIGHT to reproductive freedom. HJ2 – right to vote – restoration of rights I am writing to provide support for voting rights for black citizens and the restoration of rights for those who have served their time.
I strongly support and request you vote YES on HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for inclusion in Virginia's Constitution.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Women’s medical care needs to be protected. Religious beliefs should have no bearing on other people’s medical care. Medical autonomy needs to remain with the individual and should not be dictated by others’ personal/religious beliefs.
Please do NOT enshrine abortion rights in our state constitution. We do not want to be an abortion destination for the South. Virginia is for LOVERS - We should be known as lovers of children, lovers of nature, lovers of families....Please exercise your leadership for the good of those of us in the Commonwealth, not for harm. Abortion takes an innocent life. If a woman or girl is in a crisis pregnancy, could we please help her to address the crisis, and not destroy the baby? We have maternity homes (Mary's Choice RVA) that will house and care for women and their children for up to 4 years. Please let's focus on education, true health care, and LOVE for children and women in need. Thank you.
It is important for the safety of women that we enshrined reproductive health care. Otherwise, women will start dying just as in other states with bans. As a women and a labor and delivery nurse, a ban is terrifying. No other aspect of health care do we deny your wishes based on how you got in that situation nor do we force people to use their bodies to keep other people alive. Drunk driving and got into a car accident? That's fine. You still get surgery and attempts to resuscitate your life. Used IV drugs and now your liver has failed? That's fine. You get a transplant. Brain dead, but don't want to donate your organs to save lifes? That's cool. We'll bury them with you. Nothing about an abortion ban is about saving lives or supporting women. It's about controlling us. As a government official and legislator, you do not have a medical license and don't understand what you are legislating when you start adding restrictions. You know what I call that? Practicing medicine without a license. It's fine for government officials, but the rest of us would go to jail.
As a woman in my 80s who has lived through repressive periods and periods of expanded freedoms, I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
The "Trumpers" get very upset when Democrats reference "the Trump abortion ban". They argue, "Trump didn't ban abortion, he just sent it back to the states so the states can decide." Well, I am demanding to decide!! The 140 legislators should not be making this choice. This should be a ballot question - that was the whole point of sending this issue back to the states. Republican hold outs need to stop trouncing on my rights as a Virginian. Pass this bill so the people can vote!!
Under the 14th Amendment, this proposed constitutional amendment would violate the US Constitution by denying the protection of human life to all human lives, born and unborn. This proposed constitutional amendment should not proceed further, as the United States Constitution is clear in its Equal Protection clause.
I strongly support House Joint Resolution 1 (HJ1), which seeks to amend the Virginia Constitution to protect the fundamental right to reproductive freedom for every individual. This amendment affirms that personal decisions regarding pregnancy belong to each person, free from unwarranted interference by the state. By enshrining this right in the state constitution, HJ1 ensures that Virginians have the freedom to make private, complex health decisions without fear of penalty or prosecution. This amendment respects individuals’ autonomy over their own bodies, preventing the Commonwealth from taking adverse action against those who exercise their reproductive rights or those who assist others in doing so. Importantly, HJ1 allows for limitations only when justified by a compelling state interest, achieved in the least restrictive way possible. This standard prioritizes individual freedoms while balancing the state’s legitimate interests, ensuring a thoughtful and balanced approach to reproductive rights. I commend Delegate Charniele L. Herring and the co-patrons of HJ1 for their leadership in advocating for this amendment. As we witness growing efforts to restrict reproductive rights nationwide, it is vital that Virginia acts swiftly to enshrine these protections, creating a safeguard for future generations and reinforcing our commitment to personal freedom, dignity, and privacy.
I strongly oppose HJ1 concerning a constitutional amendment: fundamental right to reproductive freedom. This is a dangerous proposal that would have a profound and lasting impact on our state. VOTE NO on HJ1!!!
I strongly support the amendments as they are important to protecting the rights of all Virginia residents
I FULLY SUPPORT ALL OF THESE BILLS. PLEASE MAKE THIS HAPPEN!!
I oppose all efforts to increase or secure the right to the direct and intentional killing of humans by private persons as in the case of abortion. I oppose any and all efforts to allow marriage between persons other than one man and one woman who have not previously been married unless the other person in that previous marriage is deceased. I oppose the use of ranked choice voting as contrary to our legal tradition, excessively complicated and likely to lead to delays in determining election winners.
I strongly support bills HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Please vote to approve these bills. Thank you.
Good afternoon, I am writing to express my support for HJ1, rights to reproductive freedom, HJ2, voting rights, specifically for previously incarcerated persons, and HJ9, marriage equality. I support HJ1 in order to preserve and maintain the mental and physical health of women all throughout Virginia, ensuring their continued participation in society. My support for HJ2 comes from my belief that every United States citizen should be allowed to participate in the democratic process that this country was built upon. If a person has been convicted of a crime, been held accountable, and served their allotted time, their rights to vote should be restored, equal to that of the average Virginia citizen. Finally, HJ9 will guarantee the fundamental right to marry to every person, regardless of their gender, race, or sex.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I strongly support these 3 bills to have these rights enshrined in our constitution! Please vote to approve these bills. Thank you.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution. It is the primary function of a government to protect the people, not deny them rights or voice.
I am in full support of HJ1, HJ2 and HJ9 for enshrining freedoms in the Commonwealth's Constitution . HJ1 is paramount importance to renew the hopes and dreams of Virginia women and families about reproductive freedom and control over our bodies and family planning. I work with women who have lost much wanted pregnancies and fear the repercussions of a federal abortion ban or state limitations. Please make women feel safe again! HJ2 is a basic American value and the right to vote should be safeguarded and enshrined by the Commonwealth . HJ9 also supports a Virginian's right to love who they choose. Please help Virginians to have the freedoms to love and commit. Thank you ! Karen Coyner, LCSW, DCSW and mom
I am for all of these bills to be passed
I am a progressive constituent in the state of Virginia and I strongly support the constitutional amendments HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9.
Please vote yes on these measures. Women’s rights have been put under attack from a federal level and we must do our part in this commonwealth to do what we can to restore them. Medical decisions are to be made between the care provider and their patient, it is not the business of any other party. Religious obligations have no place inside politics which govern their neighbors. Our founding fathers were quite explicit about this. We cannot trust the right for all to get married will not be challenged on a federal level soon. A marriage, while often performed inside a place of worship, is not relegated to being a Christian ordeal. It is a civil contract between two parties. As brought up above one person’s religion is not to govern the conduct of another. Please vote yes to preserve both marriages that have already been established and future marriages to come. These are core basic human rights we are discussing and it is our duty to preserve them. Please keep our Commonwealth of Virginia a place of freedom, liberty, and protection for all people. Thank you for your time.
Dear Committee Members, I am writing as a constituent to express my support for HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Our community thrives when each person is endowed with the rights and liberties to make their own choices so that we all may, in the words of our founders, pursue happiness. Thank you for your work. Warm regards, Anna Ritter
I very strongly support the enshrinement of HJ1, HJ2 and HJ9 into our Commonwealth's Constitution. These are all fundamental rights that absolutely deserve to be protected for the sake of our citizens, and for future generations. Given it is likely that each of these may not be protected federally in the future, we must ensure that our Commonwealth's Constitution sets them in stone.
The United States Constitution is clear in its Equal Protection clause. Under the 14th Amendment, this proposed constitutional amendment would violate the US Constitution by denying the protection of human life to all human lives, born and unborn. This proposed constitutional amendment should not proceed further, as it violates the US Constitution.
I urge you to support these amendments that protect and ensure fundamental rights, including reproductive freedom (HJ1), marriage equality (HJ9), and the right to vote (HJ2). I am deeply concerned about the importance of codifying these rights which are essential to individual autonomy and equality on a state level because I feel they are under threat on the national level. Reproductive Freedom: Every person should have the autonomy to make personal health decisions without government interference. By supporting reproductive rights, you affirm the belief that individuals have the right to decide on matters affecting their own bodies and lives. Marriage Equality: Supporting marriage equality acknowledges and protects the diverse forms of family and partnership in our society. Ensuring the right to marry regardless of gender or sexual orientation is a matter of dignity, fairness, and respect for individual freedoms. Right to Vote: Voting is the cornerstone of democracy. By protecting the right to vote, you uphold the integrity of our democratic process and ensure that all citizens have an equal voice in shaping our nation’s future. I respectfully urge you to support any amendments that solidify these essential freedoms for all Americans. Thank you for your leadership and for your commitment to protecting the rights of all your constituents.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms into the commonwealth constitution
As a woman and mother I strongly oppose HJ1. Abortion is NOT healthcare. The fetus is NOT the woman's body. It is a separate individual with its own DNA, fingerprints, blood type completely different from its mother. Life should be protected from conception to natural death. And taxpayers should not have to pay for someone's abortion when we disagree with it!
I am strongly in favor of HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 being enshrined in the Constitution of the Commonwealth or Virginia.
We strongly support the enshrinement of HJ1, HJ2 and HJ9 in the Commonwealth's Constitution, all sacred, fundamental rights which deserve to be both protected and guaranteed. Thank you for your service & dedication to the citizens of Virginia.
I strongly support the proposed amendments to the Constitution - Bills HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9.
“I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.”
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution. These are all important in ensuring the rights I feel are important to protect all our citizens
I am writing to urge you to support amendments that protect and ensure fundamental rights, including reproductive freedom (HJ1), marriage equality (HJ9), and the right to vote (HJ2). I am deeply concerned about the importance of safeguarding these freedoms, which are essential to individual autonomy and equality. Reproductive Freedom: Every person should have the autonomy to make personal health decisions without government interference. By supporting reproductive rights, you affirm the belief that individuals have the right to decide on matters affecting their own bodies and lives. Marriage Equality: Supporting marriage equality acknowledges and protects the diverse forms of family and partnership in our society. Ensuring the right to marry regardless of gender or sexual orientation is a matter of dignity, fairness, and respect for individual freedoms. Right to Vote: Voting is the cornerstone of democracy. By protecting the right to vote, you uphold the integrity of our democratic process and ensure that all citizens have an equal voice in shaping our nation’s future. I respectfully urge you to support any amendments that solidify these essential freedoms for all Americans. Thank you for your leadership and for your commitment to protecting the rights of all your constituents.
House of Delegates I am writing in support of HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. America was founded on freedom of religion but was not founded as a Christian nation. Jefferson wrote "It does me no injury for my neighbor to believe in twenty gods or no God. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.” The Constitution does not mention God, Jesus, or Christianity. Our nation was founded on the rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Jefferson further stated in our Declaration of Independence, "The purpose of government is to protect these rights, and that if a government fails to do so, the people have the right to alter or abolish it." Jefferson believed that "the pursuit of happiness" was about making decisions that would lead to the best life possible for a human being. With all this in mind, I urge you to vote yes to these bills as they fundamentally protect our human rights and our rights as American citizens based on the stances our diverse nation was founded on. If we fail at this and instead bring back laws based solely on the religion of the few then we fail as a nation. Thank you.
As a woman and a mother, I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I am writing to vote NO to the amendment that would allow for abortion on demand in the name of "reproductive freedom". This evil of killing our children in the womb must stop! No one should have the right to have their unborn child murdered. The baby's body is not the mother's body. Also, not only does abortion harm the baby, it also harms the mother emotionally, physically, mentally and spiritually. God is the creator of all life, and it should be protected.
According to figures from the CDC, 95.3% of abortions are just done for birth control. Most abortions are NOT to save the mother's life. NOT for rape or incest. NOT because the baby is severely disabled. Killing babies is immoral, and encouraging this activity through an amendment to our Virginia constitution is abhorrent. I am completely opposed.
I support these amendments. HJ1 is so important because without bodily autonomy, women are no longer free or equal. HJ2- voting should be made easier, not harder. It is every citizen's right. HJ9 is imperative in protecting everyone's right to.marry the person they love. Nobody else should have a say.
HJ1 – fundamental right to reproductive freedom The choice to bear children is a basic right. If a person has any reason to believe it is the wrong choice for them due to any economic, health, or personal pressures, they should be free to consult with a healthcare provider and stop the pregnancy as early as possible. HJ2 – right to vote – restoration of rights Once a person has fulfilled their required sentence under the law, their right to vote should be restored. HJ9 – marriage equality Marriage is such a large and personal commitment made between two people there is no reasonable argument to interfere or try to stop this joyful union between consenting adults.
I strongly support every Virginian’s right to marry the person they love and control their own body. It is important that the commonwealth enshrine these rights into our state constitution.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I’m commenting on all three. All three should be passed. The government should never make medical decisions for another person. Women are already dying in states with abortion bans due to complications with their pregnancies with doctors unable to help due to these bans. Marriage between same sex-couples is legal in all 50 states. The outdated language in our constitution needs to go. Lastly, voting is an American right. If you’ve done your time, you should be able to vote.
I am writing to support reproductive freedom - the healthcare decisions made around childbirth should be between a woman and her doctor without undue influence from the government. I also believe that prior to fetus viability, the woman who has become pregnant should be the one who chooses if she is emotionally, physically, and financially able to care for the child after it has been born. The right to life - for me - extends to the woman first. I believe it is HER life that has value and should bear the weight of autonomy. Remember that it wasn't too long ago that the Virginia assembly voted FOR the ERA. Keep that momentum going!!! I am writing to support voters' rights. There are those who are rising to power in the government sector that would create a dictatorship and authoritarian rule and seek to severely limit the right to vote - which is overwhelmingly how we have voice in our democracy. Keep this essential tool in the hands of Virginia citizens to participate in our governance as a Commonwealth. I am writing to support marriage equality. Human beings should have the freedom and it is a FREEDOM to marry the partner that they choose. Anything other than that is to validate a prejudice that has no scientific and dare I say no moral grounding. I am also in support of all our LGBTQ siblings and believe that transgender rights also need protecting.
I am urging this committee to vote NO on HJ1. I am basing this on three reasons: 1. It is my conviction that codifying abortion in our constitution discriminates against those who believe in God. 84% of the world's population confess faith of various forms. (73% of Virginians identify as Christians). More than one third of them worldwide are Christians. One of the basic tenants of all faiths is a belief that God creates all life. Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, and almost all of the worlds religions oppose abortion. Changing our constitution to codify abortion directly flies in the face of almost all of the organized religions of the world by forcing us to comply with a law that we do not agree with for religious reasons. Our government does not force everyone to attend church. Why is Virginia legislature trying to force everyone to accept something that goes against our faith? 2. Science has proven without a doubt that life begins at conception. Abortion anytime within the 9 months terminates life, which cannot in reality be called anything but murder and morally wrong with the possible exceptions for rape, incest or life risk of the mother. (NOT just because they don't want the baby). When an unborn child's life is terminated, you are taking a life that God might have created to be a future President or Governor, or member of the Virginia House of Delegates. History is full of examples of that actually happening. Jeremiah 1:5 tells us "before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee and before thou came forth out of the womb I sanctified the and I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations." There are others. Maybe even some of you are delegates today so God can use you to vote NO. 3. If a woman wants to have full control of her body. but please understand that God supports that. But not by killing her own children. We have been given many other ways to prevent pregnancies beside simply killing them. Before you vote yes, look at other ways to help the women of Virginia prevent pregnancies without having to resort to the physical and emotional damages to themselves and our society that come from abortion. Don't succumb to the easy way out by voting for something that Planned Parenthood made $2.1 BILLION on in 2023. (34% comes from govt grants and Medicaid reimbursements). Look at the demographics of the locations they are located in. Tragically, they pray on these same citizens with help from politicians who take donations from them. During the recent elections, they spent millions of dollars lobbying our own state representatives. I urge you to find better ways to help our mothers and parents deal with unwanted pregnancies. Fund programs that improve our families lives. Improve our healthcare resources for pregnant mothers. Champion ways/methods to avoid getting pregnant rather than how to end life. Abortion is an easy way out. Last weeks voting results show that a majority of the country think the same way I do. Do the right thing. Vote no.
Dear Members of the Virginia House of Delegates, I am writing to express my profound opposition to the proposed Constitutional amendment establishing a so-called “fundamental right to reproductive freedom” and the proposed Constitutional amendment legalizing same-sex marriage. Such an amendment is a dangerous departure from both biblical values and the core principles that underpin our nation: the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. This amendment, rather than providing genuine liberty, undermines the sanctity of life and compromises the values upon which our society stands. Biblically, life is a divine gift, and each human being, crafted in God’s image from conception, holds intrinsic worth and purpose (Psalm 139:13-16). Our Founding Fathers recognized life as the foundation upon which liberty and happiness rest. To disregard this in favor of a subjective notion of "reproductive freedom" is morally misguided and betrays the essential protection of life our Constitution seeks to guarantee. The damage, however, goes beyond the individual. Enshrining a policy of unrestrained reproductive rights has proven to be devastating to our poorer communities, disproportionately affecting marginalized and vulnerable populations. This “freedom of choice” has, in practice, only exacerbated cycles of poverty and instability by incentivizing practices that strip families of their integrity and strength. This is not the promise of liberty but a corrosive force that erodes the foundations of family and community. The breakdown of the nuclear family is central to the deterioration of our society’s core. This so-called “freedom” fosters a culture of unaccountable and destructive behavior that threatens the stability of the home and dismantles the fabric of our communities. In struggling neighborhoods, where support systems are already stretched thin, this policy only encourages unrestrained and often careless practices that destabilize homes, contribute to generational poverty, and fuel cycles of emotional and financial hardship. When we devalue life in the womb, we teach future generations that life itself holds little meaning. Our nation’s health and future prosperity depend on a renewed commitment to the values that foster strong families, stable homes, and resilient communities. If we continue down this path—embracing what is not liberty but, rather, a harmful moral relativism—our nation itself faces the real and present danger of self-destruction. What has been marketed as “freedom of choice” is, in reality, a covert enemy within, unraveling the social fabric, corroding the sanctity of life, and weakening the very pillars upon which our country was founded. I know that each of you seeks to do good for the people of Virginia, to uplift the most vulnerable, and to promote a just society. However, only when God’s principles define what is “good” can we claim to be truly serving the people. Protecting the unborn and honoring the sanctity of life is an essential part of upholding true justice and compassion. I urge you to reject this amendment, reaffirm our commitment to life, and help rebuild the ethical framework that has made America a beacon of freedom and hope. Sincerely, Marylynn Harvey
Reproductive Health Every Virginia resident should have access to affordable, quality health care, including abortion, birth control and the privacy to make reproductive choices. Virginians made their reproductive opinions clear when they chose to elect representatives who vowed to protect reproductive rights. Abortion should be legal, safe, and the decision left to those who are pregnant with guidance from medical professionals. True democracy depends on equal rights for all people. Losing our right to reproductive choice opens the door to the loss of other freedoms including other healthcare choices, marriage equality, access to contraception, and the right to engage in private, consensual intimacy without government interference. Not only is the right to a safe and legal abortion a matter of personal freedom, it’s also a major factor in the movements for racial and economic equality. Black individuals, and all underserved communities, already experience unfair barriers and limited access to adequate healthcare services. Our reproductive choices impact our physical and psychological well-being, including the foods we eat, where we live, our financial resources, and our capacity to gain and maintain employment and provide for ourselves and our families.
I oppose all three bills.
I am writing to voice my opposition to both of these bills. HJ1 has zero restrictions for an abortion. To normalize killing a baby simply because you don't want it at anytime of the pregnancy and call it a "right" is absurd. HJ9 the state has no authority to redefine marriage. God created marriage between a man and a woman. If homosexuals want to be notified if their partner is in a crisis, and have those kinds of rights, make a law that allows that. Whatever you want to call it. But it's not marriage.
Reproductive rights are essential for women to enjoy their human rights. These rights are centered on women’s ability to make the best choices for their lives, including around the number of children they have, if any, and the spacing between their children’s births. Reproductive rights include prenatal services, safe childbirth, and access to contraception. They also include access to legal and safe abortion. Abortion bans violate the rights to be free from violence, to privacy, to family, to health, and even the right to life. And bans are most devastating for people of color, young people, and marginalized communities, who already have trouble accessing health care and other needed services. Governments should trust women to know what is best for their bodies, their physical and mental health, and their lives.
I stand in opposition to HJ1 as an organizer with Virginia Anti-Abortion Uprising, as a Virginia college student, and as a human being. This amendment is radical and too extreme on abortion access. In Virginia, abortion can already be accessed through the second trimester for all cases, as well in the third trimester when necessary for a patient's health. HJ1 would enshrine a "right to reproductive freedom" into the Virginia constitution, opening the door for the legalization of abortion unrestricted through all nine months of pregnancy. This constitutional amendment is designed to legalize third-trimester, late-term abortions, which is opposed by 70% of Americans according to Gallup. Furthermore, this would open up the door for the removal of important safeguards on the abortion industry. This amendment would enable the elimination of parental knowledge and consent for minors undergoing invasive abortion procedures, prevent reinstatement of critical abortion clinic safety standards and informed consent for women and minors, and allow men to claim a right to impregnate women without responsibility for child support. This is too extreme and out-of-step with most Virginians, who support common-sense restrictions and regulations on the abortion industry, as well as limitations on late-term abortion. I am asking you to stop this amendment here and prevent women, children, and families from being further hurt or killed by the predatory abortion industry. Vote NO on HJ1!
I oppose HJ1 - Herring. Every human being has the right to life starting at conception. There is no reasonable excuse to end the life of a baby.
Constitutionally, there has never been mention of abortion or marriage at the federal level. At the state level, abortion wasn't regulated until 1950, at the height of religious intolerance in this country, and marriage wasn't regulated until 2007. It is clear that the founding fathers did not believe these issues warranted legal regulation. The only reason to prohibit marriage freedom between two or more consenting adults is religious intolerance of other people's rights, which is unconstitutional. Abortion is a more complex issue as the determination of life extends beyond religious beliefs, however the push against abortion is done from a religious perspective of what human life is, which again is unconstitutional. The constitution does not recognize science any more than it does religion however, but the concept of abortion isn't new now and it wasn't new when the constitution was written. Given that, we must look at how the founding fathers worded the constitution concerning the rights of individuals. Few people would argue that people born here or are naturalized aren't protected by all the rights of the constitution except when incapacitated, obligated to complete civic or military duty, or through poor choices resulting in criminal punishment. But the constitution only says born or naturalized, it makes no statement explicitly stating or even implying that the unborn are US citizens protected by the constitution. From a legal perspective, the unborn are not promised the rights and freedoms under the constitution that the rest of us are, even if one views that as human life. As inconvenient of a truth as that may be for religious individuals, the constitution does not offer the ability to restrict the freedom of constitutionally-protected people's from determining what to do with their bodies, even if they have another living body inside of them, because that other living body not only doesn't have constitutional protections; it isn't even recognized as life by the Constitution. In summary, both the freedom to medical choice and the freedom of consenting choice in marriage must be protected, therefore these bills should pass.
Reproductive Health Every Virginia resident should have access to affordable, quality health care, including abortion, birth control and the privacy to make reproductive choices. Virginians made their reproductive opinions clear when they chose to elect representatives who vowed to protect reproductive rights. Abortion should be legal, safe, and the decision left to those who are pregnant with guidance from medical professionals. True democracy depends on equal rights for all people. Losing our right to reproductive choice opens the door to the loss of other freedoms including other healthcare choices, marriage equality, access to contraception, and the right to engage in private, consensual intimacy without government interference. Not only is the right to a safe and legal abortion a matter of personal freedom, it’s also a major factor in the movements for racial and economic equality. Black individuals, and all underserved communities, already experience unfair barriers and limited access to adequate healthcare services. Our reproductive choices impact our physical and psychological well-being, including the foods we eat, where we live, our financial resources, and our capacity to gain and maintain employment and provide for ourselves and our families. Voting Rights Restoration The majority of Virginians believe that all qualified citizens should have access to the ballot, including those who have served their time for felony convictions and people with disabilities who want to participate in the democratic process. I support an amendment to the Virginia Constitution to guarantee that people who have been disenfranchised due to a felony conviction will have their rights automatically restored upon completion of their sentences, without additional steps or paperwork after they are no longer incarcerated, and to ensure people with disabilities never lose their rights without an appropriate judicial finding. This has never been a partisan issue. Both Democratic and Republican governors have chosen to restore voting rights to thousands of citizens; however, Virginia's current governor has reversed the trend. People should not be permanently defined by their past mistakes. Virginians who have successfully served their time should be able to fully rejoin civic life. It is time for Virginians to act to amend our Constitution to create a routine restoration process that reflects fair accountability and encourages civic engagement.
We need to protect women's right to healthcare. Medical care should be a basic right in any educated nation. We need to protect marriage equality. Marriage is a legal contract, not a religious concept. No two consenting adults should be barred this right. If we fail to protect the freedoms of women and the queer communities, then we will continue to fail as a nation. We cannot and will not go back.
Good morning. I am reaching out as a concerned Virignian citizen about the recent proposal to enshrine a right to reproductive freedom in Virginia's constitution aka HJ1 / Herring. This will open the door to abortion through all nine months of pregnancy. Virginia has never allowed abortion up until birth and of the people who support abortion, only 22% of them support third trimester abortions. This stance is too extreme for Virginia. This proposal will block protection from minors undergoing abortion and other harmful reproductive practices by removing parental knowledge and consent. It will make abortion practices even more dangerous by limiting clinical safety standards and informed consent for women and minors. If you care about your citizens PLEASE do not support this proposal. Last but not least the Bible says that God hates hands that shed innocent blood and that sin is a disgrace to a nation. (Proverbs 6:17 and 14:34)
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Let’s amend our constitution to ensure lasting freedoms.
I vehemently disagree that abortion is ever the answer, let alone all nine months of pregnancy. I have miscarried at 11 weeks and had a stillborn at 28 weeks and both were fully human fingers toes, heart, eyes, ears, etc. the youngest baby born and to survive was at 20 weeks. How unspeakable it is to murder a child. It is not a mere clump of cells, a child is not without value just because they’re tucked within the womb. Who then has the right to decided at what point a child has value? Those mere cells must be alive in order to form the human body. The nervous system is developing within the baby in the 3rd week before pregnancy is even detected. How then even can you presume a baby cannot feel pain as he or she is ripped from their mother? Please I beg you reconsider. If we don’t value human life, eventually society erodes because morality is lost when we don’t value the least among us.
Fully support passing these bills they are greatly needed
I am in support of all 3 bills, women should have a say over their own body. Those are important life changing decisions made with the help of a medical professional and are no one else’s business. Not someone who has no medical background whatsoever, or can comprehend what that woman is going through physically and mentally, or is ignorant to what reproductive care really is because their narrow-mindedness just thinks it’s killing babies but will be the first to support cuts to things like Head Start and SNAP. The governor shouldn’t have the decision to determine if someone who has served their time can vote or not. What’s the saying, there’s no hate quite like Christian love, that doesn’t include all Christian’s but you know who are judging other people and filled with hate because someone isn’t like you. You should be able to love and marry whoever you want to, those are basic human rights.
I wholeheartedly support Bill HJ1, the proposed constitutional amendment that would protect the fundamental right to reproductive freedom in Virginia. This bill is not just a legal safeguard; it is a powerful statement that every person deserves the autonomy to make deeply personal decisions about their own body, free from government interference. By ensuring that no one can be penalized, prosecuted, or punished for seeking reproductive care or helping someone else do so, this amendment affirms that reproductive freedom is a basic human right—one that should never be taken away. It recognizes that the decision to carry a pregnancy or seek an abortion is an intensely personal choice, and that only the individual facing that choice should have the authority to make it, without fear of government intrusion. This is about more than just policy; it’s about respecting the dignity, autonomy, and humanity of every person in Virginia. We must pass this amendment to protect our rights and ensure that future generations can live in a state where their most intimate decisions remain their own.
I am writing to express my extreme concern with the bill proposed. Abortion is a violation of the most basic human right, the right to life. While women should have the right to make decisions for their own health, abortion is an act that violates the health and well being of the baby in a woman's womb. A just society works for the protection of all people, particularly those who are vulnerable. A child in it's mother's womb is a uniquely vulnerable and entirely innocent person who deserves protection. Our laws must stem from the basis of our country's founding- that we are all created equal and endowed with certain unalienable rights- namely LIFE, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Denying someone life due to their size, health, usefulness, race, gender, etcetera has been understood throughout human history to be a gross violation of what is good and true. In our concern to ensure women are supported and valued members of an equal and just society we must not trample upon the fundamental right to life of their unborn babies. I passionately support a woman's right to make healthcare decisions for herself and her own body but I can, in no way, extend the purview of those decisions to involve the mutilation and killing of another human person, which is fundamentally what abortion does. May the formative principles that have undergirded our country and been defended by Virginians since the founding of our nation be recalled and renewed in our response to the life and liberty of the most vulnerable in our society.
I am writing for each of these Bills. Marriage is between one man and one woman. Life is to be PROTECTED, not extinguished, and Only CITIZENS should be allowed to vote. We , in Virginia, are NOT interested in becoming California. Thank you so much for reading my concerns. I would like to hear back from you your logic in proposing these issues. Sincerely, Mary Cresswell Marywell123@yahoo.com
Dear Members of the Virginia House of Delegates, I am writing to express my profound opposition to the proposed Constitutional amendment establishing a so-called “fundamental right to reproductive freedom.” Such an amendment is a dangerous departure from both biblical values and the core principles that underpin our nation: the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. This amendment, rather than providing genuine liberty, undermines the sanctity of life and compromises the values upon which our society stands. Biblically, life is a divine gift, and each human being, crafted in God’s image from conception, holds intrinsic worth and purpose (Psalm 139:13-16). Our Founding Fathers recognized life as the foundation upon which liberty and happiness rest. To disregard this in favor of a subjective notion of "reproductive freedom" is morally misguided and betrays the essential protection of life our Constitution seeks to guarantee. The damage, however, goes beyond the individual. Enshrining a policy of unrestrained reproductive rights has proven to be devastating to our poorer communities, disproportionately affecting marginalized and vulnerable populations. This “freedom of choice” has, in practice, only exacerbated cycles of poverty and instability by incentivizing practices that strip families of their integrity and strength. This is not the promise of liberty but a corrosive force that erodes the foundations of family and community. The breakdown of the nuclear family is central to the deterioration of our society’s core. This so-called “freedom” fosters a culture of unaccountable and destructive behavior that threatens the stability of the home and dismantles the fabric of our communities. In struggling neighborhoods, where support systems are already stretched thin, this policy only encourages unrestrained and often careless practices that destabilize homes, contribute to generational poverty, and fuel cycles of emotional and financial hardship. When we devalue life in the womb, we teach future generations that life itself holds little meaning. Our nation’s health and future prosperity depend on a renewed commitment to the values that foster strong families, stable homes, and resilient communities. If we continue down this path—embracing what is not liberty but, rather, a harmful moral relativism—our nation itself faces the real and present danger of self-destruction. What has been marketed as “freedom of choice” is, in reality, a covert enemy within, unraveling the social fabric, corroding the sanctity of life, and weakening the very pillars upon which our country was founded. I know that each of you seeks to do good for the people of Virginia, to uplift the most vulnerable, and to promote a just society. However, only when God’s principles define what is “good” can we claim to be truly serving the people. Protecting the unborn and honoring the sanctity of life is an essential part of upholding true justice and compassion. I urge you to reject this amendment, reaffirm our commitment to life, and help rebuild the ethical framework that has made America a beacon of freedom and hope. Sincerely, Brian J. Noreau Jr. Senior Pastor, Sweethaven Baptist Church SweethavenPastor@gmail.com
I support these amendments because in a nation that values and prioritizes freedom, I believe that individuals should be free to make their own decisions. If we are to truly have our unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the government cannot restrict our autonomy in any way. Furthermore our government has a responsibility to protect all of our rights and by amending our state constitution we are solidifying that protection in the event that there are challenges to these rights federally.
Pass all 3
Pass all 3
All 3 should be passed
Pass all 3
Pass all 3 bills
All citizens of Virginia deserve to have all 3 bills passed.
As a woman, mother, sister, and citizens, I believe in freedom and the right of bodily autonomy. What we do with our bodies should not be the decision of the state or the religion that many who oppose this bill reference so frequently. My own mother had an abortion before she met my father and if that had not occurred she would have had to drop out of school, never completing her degree that supported our family and never meeting my father. My sisters and I would not exist without that decision. Please enshrine the right to freedom into law. This is America, the land of the free and we must live our values.
Pass all 3 bills for all Virginians
The United States Constitution is clear in its Equal Protection clause. Under the 14th Amendment, this proposed constitutional amendment would violate the US Constitution by denying the protection of human life to all human lives, born and unborn. This proposed constitutional amendment should not proceed further, as it violates the US Constitution.
Please pass all 3 bills.
All 3 bills must be passed!
Good morning, I am reaching out as a concerned Virginia citizen about the recent proposal to enshrine a right to reproductive freedom in Virginia's constitution. This will open the door to abortion through all nine months of pregnancy. Virginia has never allowed abortion up until birth and of the people who support abortion, only 22% of them support third trimester abortions. This stance is too extreme for Virginia. This proposal will block protection from minors undergoing abortion and other harmful reproductive practices by removing parental knowledge and consent. It will make abortion practices even more dangerous by limiting clinical safety standards and informed consent for women and minors. If you care about your citizens PLEASE do not support this proposal. Sincerely, Jennifer Agnew
I support all three of these bills. People should never be told what to do with their bodies. It is a violation of freedom. The ones opposing abortion cannot even agree as to when life begins, therefore you cannot argue that it is taking a human life. Others that use religion as an excuse for their positions have never read their bible: Genesis 2:7 The LORD God formed the man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being. Hence, even according to their doctrine, life begins at first breath which happens outside the womb.
as a mother to two, one in the womb and one 10 months old I cannot fathom how devastating it would be to give the option for a woman to choose to end their child’s life at nine months. Steph Curry, Tim Tebow, Justin, Bieber, and Andrea Bocelli were all supposed to be aborted and by the grace of God we’re not and are now incredible human beings. Can you imagine knowing that you have passed the bill that could stop somebody from curing cancer, discovering ways to end warming, creating the next iPhone! These children have spent the last nine months, cultivating an internal relationship with their child. as a state and a nation we must return to being a society that cherish is unborn life, as it is a direct assault on the dignity of human life. I will find out only for the mothers that are put in positions to make hard decisions that they feel like they have another way out of but also for the children that do not have a voice. Passing this bill would be the opposite of feministic- you would be putting young women in vulnerable situations. Please consider your Virginia residents and all, even those who cannot speak yet.
I fully support all 3 bills
I am in strong opposition of the proposed right to abort children in the wombs of their mothers. Everyone has the right to reproduce, but no one has the right to kill a living human being. An abortion ends the life of a living human being. The only time these drugs should be given or procedures done is to protect the life of the mother. Healthcare workers should do no harm, and that includes not harming children in the womb.
I believe, as a native Virginian and a Marine Corps veteran who grew up mostly in Fieldale, Virginia and over 35 years has lived in Brookneal, Phenix, Blairs, Martinsville, Vinton, Norfolk, Newport News, and now Portsmouth, these amendments are greatly important to every Virginian whether it will directly or indirectly affect them. I am in complete support of these amendments and believe they are vital to ensure our freedoms. Being a commonwealth, we have a history of looking out for our fellow Virginians and doing what is best for our citizens no matter what other states choose and in many ways it is liberating. This can be a liberating moment for all Virginians. Regarding HJ1, I think about my sister, my sister-in-law, and the future of my nieces, as well as, so many others in my life that I know this amendment will positively affect. What more could a Virginian ask than freedom? Regarding HJ2, I think of compassion. People who have been imprisoned and released have completed their time of punishment and rehabilitation back into society. Part of that rehabilitation back into society is the fundamental right to vote and be heard through said vote. Also, allowing those to have their competency “reestablished as prescribed by law” makes their freedom to vote much easier to re-attain than the current wording of our constitution. Regarding HJ9, since the first state made a change regarding equal marriage in 2003 to when it became law of the land in 2015, our freedoms as Americans only grew. It’s time for our state constitution to reflect that. All three of these amendments reflect the most positive sides of Virginia and all Virginians, whether we grew up here or moved here from a state some might consider less free than Virginia. When I see our state flag, I see Virginia’s interpretation of Lady Liberty. It is welcoming knowing that our version is one depicting what we, as Virginians, think of tyrants, as it states on our very own flag, Sic Semper Tyrannis. I also know that with it being comparable to Lady Liberty, we too “yearn to breathe free.” Lastly, as our state motto says, “Virginia is for Lovers.” With love comes compassion and empathy. Let us prove our flag, our motto, and our national symbol of freedom to be correct.
I support all three amendments I believe that individuals should have autonomy over all their decisions. If we are to truly have our rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the government cannot restrict our autonomy in any way. Our government has a responsibility to protect our rights and by amending our state constitution we are solidifying that protection in the event that there are challenges to these rights federally.
I support all 3 of these bills. The right to bodily autonomy is fundamental to all other rights. The government affirms the right to bodily autonomy of deceased persons, disallowing organ donations without the consent of the deceased prior to their death. We need to affirm the right of all persons to make decisions related to their bodies, including those related to reproduction. This includes the right to terminate a pregnancy throughout the gestation period. We cannot put the lives of pregnant persons at risk by valuing potential persons over actual persons. We must protect the right of citizens to vote. This is an imperative! It is the government's responsibility to protect individuals' rights, not to take them away. Religion has no place in government, and taking individuals' rights to marry based on the religious beliefs of a minority (or even the majority) is antithetical to the spirit and the letter of the 1st Amendment to the US Constitution.
I am writing to urge you to oppose the constitutional amendment enshrining "reproductive rights." At the time of abortion, reproduction has already happened. A new and distinct human being has come into existence. Allowing special murder privileges for mothers is a violation of the 14th amendment. The 14th amendment states, "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of LIFE, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." A nation that doesn't protect the vulnerable members of society will never be a thriving nation. I know there are many difficult circumstances that make people feel like abortion is their best choice but this isn't so. There are abundant resources for any mother facing uncertain circumstances. The law is a tutor. We must never accept that the murder of children is the answer to a problem. Thank you for standing against this evil amendment.
I am writing on behalf of 175 of your constituents that have one thing in common. We stand firmly against any change to the Virginia constitution that would codify abortion as a guaranteed right for women. The right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness applies to all; even the most fragile among us. A baby in the womb of a mother is a living soul and; therefore, that baby possesses the same rights as the mother carrying them. As a citizen, I do not have the right to end the life of another individual and that applies to life in the womb. Modern technology has clearly shown us that a baby in the womb feels pain and experiences many things. As a pastor, I firmly believe that God values all life. As Virginians, we should value all life as well and that includes the life of a baby. I tire of the philosophy that says, "my body my choice." You cannot choose to end another person's life because in your mind or heart it is the right thing to do. This applies to the life of a baby as well. I urge you on behalf of your constituents to protect all human life and vote no on this issue. Sincerely, Kenneth Biggs (Pastor)
I am in favor of HJ1. Reproductive care needs to be universally accessible, and decisions about what types of care are necessary should be made solely by a Virginian and their doctor. No person or doctor should fear for repercussions from exercising that right. I am in favor of HJ2. Virginian's should not need a Governor's permission to be restored their voting rights. It is vital that all eligible Virginians should be enfranchised to exercise their right to vote. I am in favor of HJ 9. Couples deserve to have their marriages legally acknowledged and upheld no matter their gender, sex, or race. This protects both the rights of Virginians who marry legally and of religious institution to not perform marriages against their beliefs.
I am asking this committee to vote against this amendment to our state constitution. This would allow abortion of all unborn babies up to the 9th month. This is against teachings of our Lord and would allow this state to join in the death of thousands of unborn children. Thank you for your consideration of this request.
I support this amendment
I understand the necessity for these bills and I want to throw my support behind all of them. I hope that you will vote in favor of the amendments.
I am writing my support, as I am for these amendments. Virginia has a responsibility to protect our rights, and by amending our state constitution, we are solidifying that protection in the event that there are challenges to these rights federally.
I oppose HJ1 because based on scientific evidence it is discrimination against a human being unable to present their opposition to have their life violently ended. Nowhere else do we execute a human being just because another person decides it is not convenient for the other person to live. Nowhere else do we execute humans because they are physically handicapped or in some way deformed. HJ1 is a blatant attempt to execute an innocent human being that cannot represent themselves in a court of law that is a right we extend even to murderers. I beg you to apply logic to your decision and VOTE NO. Thank you!!!
I support all 3 bills.
Reproductive rights are extremely important. It's basic healthcare!! It is not "killing babies", it's giving a woman a right to make decisions for her own body. Opposing this bill is denying woman the right to decide between life & death! Why would you oppose that? By passing this bill you are saying woman are not entitled to make decisions on their own. We fought too long and hard for the rights we have! I totally support the decisions to limit voting to those who are legally entitled to do so. Please support the right for 2 individuals to marry! It's a sad state on our state (country) that children (girls) as young as 9 can be forced to marry but 2 individuals who are committed to each other in love & life would be denied that!
The United States Constitution is clear in its Equal Protection clause. Under the 14th Amendment, this proposed constitutional amendment would violate the US Constitution by denying the protection of human life to all human lives, born and unborn. This proposed constitutional amendment should not proceed further, as it violates the US Constitution.
I support these amendments because, in a nation that values and prioritizes freedom, I believe that individuals should have autonomy over all their decisions. If we are to truly have our unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the government cannot restrict our autonomy in any way. Furthermore, our government has a responsibility to protect our rights and by amending our state constitution we are solidifying that protection in the event that there are challenges to these rights federally. Don't let the federal government tread on us!
To the Virginia House of Delegates: I urge you to support H1, H2, and H9 to affirm the fundamental rights to reproductive freedom, voting, and marriage for all Virginians. These rights are foundational to personal autonomy, dignity, and equality. The preservation of these rights ensures that our community remains a place where every individual has the freedom to make personal choices without interference from the state, honoring the principle that these decisions are best left to individuals than governing bodies.
I support this ammendment
I am writing to provide support to these amendments! We need our rights enshrined in the states constitution.
I support these amendments because in a nation that values and prioritizes freedom, I believe that individuals should have autonomy over all of their decisions. Specifically regarding reproductive freedom, any medical decision should be made by the woman and a medical professional. Not regulated by the government.
I wholeheartedly support these amendments and believe that they are in the best interest of all Virginians.
I strongly oppose HJ1 or any resolution like it. Read the Amendment and every time the euphemism "reproductive freedom" is used replace it with the truth of the matter, "the intentional killing of the child in the womb." For he is in fact a child, in his natural state of development. He is innocent and deserving of protection. The only difference between him and you is time, the time required to grow and develop. Just as you needed time from your conception to immerge from your mother's womb and breathe in a whole new way, to the time that you needed to gain size and strength to eat on your own, and then to crawl and then to walk. I implore you to contemplate the ultimate human right, the right to live. Reject HJ1 and do not enshrine abortion in the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Virginia. Act as though someone's life depends on it; because it does.
Women deserve the right to weigh the risks of pregnancy to their own bodies, and they deserve to be able to make informed decisions with their medical providers to protect themselves. No official or legislator will ever understand all the nuances of another person’s care. Religious beliefs cannot be the deciding factor for the rights of women in a pluralistic society. Our government does not provide suitable medical or financial support to families, women, and children in poverty to demand forced incubation, childbearing, or childrearing from anyone. Enshrine women’s reproductive rights and bodily autonomy in our Virginia constitution.
Proposed constitutional amendment HJ1 must be opposed. Women already have "reproductive freedom." This amendment is euphemistically worded to legalize killing babies without restriction. The United States Constitution is clear in its Equal Protection clause. Under the 14th Amendment, HJ1 would violate the US Constitution by denying the protection of human life to all human lives, born and unborn.
I strongly support HJ1, the proposed constitutional amendment that enshrines the fundamental right to reproductive freedom in Virginia. This amendment affirms that every individual has the right to make personal decisions about their own pregnancy, free from government interference, unless a compelling state interest is at stake and addressed through the least restrictive means. By protecting Virginians from being penalized or prosecuted for exercising their reproductive rights, this measure safeguards the autonomy and dignity of individuals, ensuring that they can make deeply personal health decisions without fear of legal repercussions. This is a vital step towards upholding the principles of freedom and privacy in the Commonwealth.
I support these amendments because in a nation that values and prioritizes freedom, I believe that individuals should have autonomy over all their decisions. If we are to truly have our unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the government cannot restrict our autonomy in any way. Furthermore our government has a responsibility to protect our rights and by amending our state constitution we are solidifying that protection in the event that there are challenges to these rights federally.
I am apposed to the amendment to the Virginia State Constitution that would allow abortion all the way to 9 months. This action is offensive to God, and will not serve our state well. Women have other alternatives other than abortion.
I support the right to life written in the Declaration of Independence. Murder should not be legalized in the Virginia constitution, no matter the age of the victim.
I am shocked and dismayed to see this measure attempting to go forward, again. The only way to guarantee reproductive rights for every citizen is to allow every citizen to be born. Please vote against this bill.
I oppose the adjenda to enshrine abortion. abortion is murder and we must not tolerate it!
I am writing to express my strong support for a constitutional amendment to protect abortion rights. This amendment is crucial to ensure that every individual has the fundamental right to make decisions about their own body and reproductive health. Abortion rights are essential for gender equality, personal autonomy, and public health. Without these protections, countless individuals could be forced to carry unwanted pregnancies to term, which can have devastating physical, emotional, and economic consequences. It is imperative that we safeguard these rights to prevent such outcomes and to uphold the principles of freedom and privacy. Furthermore, access to safe and legal abortion services is a matter of public health. Restricting abortion rights does not eliminate the need for abortions; it only makes them more dangerous. By enshrining abortion rights in the Constitution, we can ensure that all individuals have access to safe medical care, regardless of their socioeconomic status or geographic location. This amendment is not just about protecting a medical procedure; it is about affirming the dignity and autonomy of every person. It is about recognizing that reproductive rights are human rights. I urge lawmakers to support this amendment and to stand up for the rights and health of all individuals. Sincerely, Jen Sheldon
I support these amendments because in a nation that values and prioritizes freedom, I believe that individuals should have autonomy over all their decisions. If we are to truly have our unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the government cannot restrict our autonomy in any way. Furthermore our government has a responsibility to protect our rights and by amending our state constitution we are solidifying that protection in the event that there are challenges to these rights federally.
Abortion is healthcare and we must protect this right! This issue should be between a woman and her doctor and the state or federal government should not be involved in any part of this decision. The vast majority of women getting an abortion already have children. We are not evil baby killers. We already know what it takes and know that we are not able to provide that for this new clump of cells. The foster care system is a tragic mess! And public assistance is abysmal. Post abortion regret is almost nil. I got pregnant while going through a nasty divorce. This man does everything he can to make life more difficult for me and our child. I knew immediately that I could not bring a second life into his mess. The baby would be 4 now. While I am doing well for myself now (I have bought a home, I successfully run my own business) there is NO way I would have been able to afford childcare for a baby these past 4 years. Let alone all the other myriad of expenses and needs of an infant. And that man has proved again and again he would have fought me every step of the way. Having a second child would have had a significant negative impact on the standard of living for me and my daughter. Forced birth without any social support is devastating not to mention dangerous and life threatening to many women. We must preserve this right to womens own bodily autonomy.
I support women’s rights to make decisions about their own body. I trust women to have the knowledge and courage to decide what is best for them. People came to this country for religious freedom. Why are you now trying to impose your religious views and standards on everyone? There are numerous religious and sectarian opinions of the being of life, and the use of abortion services. Let the People of Virginia decide what is best for them! God gave man a free will so who are you to take it away!
This proposed constitutional right to abortion, if it were to pass, has nothing to do with reproductive freedom for women, and all to do with the brutal killing of an unborn human being. Previous comments inferring that VA be a haven for those wanting the right to kill all the way up to birth, is indeed, a very sad commentary on the state of the value of human life and on the State of VA if it were to pass.
Amending Virginia's State Constitution to ensure the right to access abortion is not just a matter of policy; it is a fundamental issue of women's rights, autonomy, and health. Women should have the undeniable freedom to make decisions about their own bodies, and this includes the right to choose whether to continue a pregnancy. This amendment is essential to protect women's health, dignity, and equality in our society. We must stand together to advocate for these rights, ensuring that future generations of women can make choices about their lives without interference or stigma. Three years ago, I was filled with excitement at the thought of expanding our family. After all, the joy of raising my first child had been one of the greatest gifts of my life. When I first saw the positive pregnancy test, my heart soared. I imagined the laughter, the sibling bond, and the new adventures that awaited us. However, as the weeks passed, something felt off. I experienced sharp pains and unusual symptoms that left me feeling uneasy. I brushed them aside, convincing myself that every pregnancy is different. But soon, the pain became unbearable, and I found myself at the doctor’s office, anxiety swirling in my stomach. After a series of tests, I was faced with the heart-wrenching diagnosis of an ectopic pregnancy. The doctor explained that the embryo had implanted in my fallopian tube rather than the uterus. My mind raced, filled with questions and fears. I thought about my child, how to explain this loss, and what it meant for our family. The emotional toll was immense. I felt a mix of grief and guilt. How could I mourn a pregnancy that wasn’t meant to be? I worried about my child, who sensed my distress but couldn’t understand it. I had to navigate this complex journey of loss while being a present and nurturing parent. Without access to safe and free abortion my child would have lost his only mother. It is imperative that women are empowered to make their own decisions regarding their reproductive healthcare. It is time for Virginia to lead the way in championing women's rights by enshrining the right to access abortion in our constitution. Every woman deserves to have control over her reproductive health, and this constitutional amendment is a critical step toward achieving that goal. Let us unite and fight for a future where all women can exercise their rights freely and safely.
The United States Constitution is clear in its Equal Protection clause. Under the 14th Amendment, this proposed constitutional amendment would violate the US Constitution by denying the protection of human life to all human lives, born and unborn. This proposed constitutional amendment should not proceed further, as it violates the US Constitution.
I support this amendment for reproductive freedom. Many years ago I got pregnant while in college due to failure of contraception method. I was able to obtain an abortion legally and it saved me! I was not financially nor emotionally ready to have a baby and I was able to complete college unencumbered by the physical, emotional and financial worries that would have come from having a baby at that time. Later, after a successful career I married and started a family. This was much better for me and society I believe. I have never been on welfare; I own my own house and my son does too.
Ladies and Gentlemen, I have never written in or addressed a committee in this way, but feel compelled to do so in this case. I believe in the reproductive rights of all individuals. No one has the right, however, to the end the life of an unborn child. When the vast majority of individuals wanting to do so, seem to desire to do so because they do not want to be inconvenienced by having a baby. Pregnancy is the natural consequence of many previous decisions. Every individual has the right to decide what they will do with these decisions, but they do not have the right to remove the consequences of those decisions by taking the life of their unborn child. It is not the place of the government to “grant” or recognize rights that God has not given. Respectfully, Pastor Ben Webster Newport News Baptist Church
I am completely against this movement and think that it just another way for irresponsible people to act and should be considered murder at least after there is a heart beat. Plan B is always an option right after sex and if they wait to take it that's on them. There are also options to put child up for adoption so there is really no need for this movement at all. Children are a gift from God!!!
Thank you for allowing me to leave my remarks. This is in response to the pro abortion amendment to the Virginia Constitution. I am against this amendment and feel it should NOT be amended into our constitution. We value life and feel anything less is immoral. Life begins at conception and to abort a baby from the mother’s womb constitutes murder. I pray you will reconsider this plan and not include it into the constitution. Thank you for your time
Abortion is never medically necessary. No state in the Union prohibits doing what is necessary to save the lives of mothers in danger, and none of those things are abortions (the intentional killing of the child in the womb). If there was actual interest in mothers' health, in office examinations and ultrasounds would be required before dispensing abortion pills. It is hard to understand how the same crowd saying "my body my choice" was all in for mask, vaccine, and stay-at-home mandates. Equally fascinating are people with yard signs that read "We believe science is real" who apparently also believe that despite every cell in one's body having either XX or XY chromosomes, somehow lifelong prescription pharmaceuticals can change things. I pray you find yourselves on the righteous side of the following observation: "Hell does not appear to the faithless; it is clear and obvious to the faithful." - St. John Chrysostom
Esteemed Delegates, The issue of abortion is one that should never have become politicized. The killing of unborn children by medical professionals, who swear an oath to do no harm to anyone, is abhorrent. In fact, the original Hippocratic oath explicitly forbids medical professionals from causing abortions. It is a violation of human dignity and all morality to sanction the murder of an innocent child because he or she is an inconvenience to his or her parents. I recognize that there are rare cases where women who have suffered through horrific events face pregnancy in painful circumstances, but those cases are a distinct minority. The majority of you identify yourselves with churches or other Christian organizations, and I call upon you now to represent the least of these, the aborted infants, and speak out against this moral evil. Since the church began, it has been battling the murder of the weak and helpless, be it through abortion or "exposure" (where babies were left in the wilderness to die because they were not wanted). One day God will call upon you and ask you what you did for His children when you seek to enter into His Kingdom. There is no need for a constitutional right to kill one's child. In 95% of situations, a voluntary act leads to pregnancy, and the inconvenient result of someone's choice does not justify the murder of a living human being. I recognize that this is a minority position, but the beauty of representative democracy is that the majority cannot abuse the minority. Unfortunately, aborted children cannot stand up for themselves, so I am calling on you, their representatives, to do so. In short, abortion, and the murder of innocent infants, is horrible, and there are far better solutions to the problems faced than creating a constitutional right to abortion. I agree that women should have a choice and control of their reproduction - a choice whether or not to engage in the activities that lead to reproduction and pregnancy in the first place. Please see reason and morality here and reject this constitutional amendment. Virginia should continue to provide resources to help mothers who are struggling with unwanted infants and should address the socioeconomic issues that lead women into feeling that they need an abortion in the first place. Promoting Virginia's families and the importance of the relationships between mothers and fathers and their children is of the utmost importance and will serve our great Commonwealth far more than a right to an abortion that appeases the radicalized. I pray for you as I pray for all of my leaders, and I sincerely hope that you can see the moral and reasonable path forward. "For you formed my inward parts; you knitted me together in my mother’s womb. I praise you, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made. Wonderful are your works; my soul knows it very well. My frame was not hidden from you, when I was being made in secret, intricately woven in the depths of the earth. Your eyes saw my unformed substance; in your book were written, every one of them, the days that were formed for me, when as yet there was none of them.” Psalm 139 "Open your mouth for the mute, for the rights of all who are destitute." - Proverbs 31 "Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed, for God made man in his own image." - Genesis 9:6 - For context, I share this verse as evidence of the value of human life, not any kind of pronouncement of judgment. Thank you.
Please support HJ1. It is essential that we protect reproductive rights and allow women of all ages to make decisions about their own reproductive care. Their decisions should be based on their own values and desires, along with the advice of their physicians, NOT on the opinions of the government. It has been made clear throughout the election season that most people within the government have no idea of the actual impact of the laws they are trying to implement. As a nurse of 28 years, a menopausal woman, and a mother of two teenagers, I want access to appropriate reproductive care throughout the lifespan. In order to protect the availability of OBGYNs, we need to have laws that allow them to practice safely and provide care that doesn't impose risk on their patients. Thank you. Patricia Kotora, BSN, RN
I am dismayed by the amendment being proposed. Reproductive rights have been touted as healthcare, it is not. Its a personal choice to end the life of a child. I'm fearful that Virginia, a state I was birthed and raised in, would allow for babies to be aborted at any stage of development. This could be a slippery slope for Virginia in terms of what we will allow. If we allow this, where does it end? Many states voted thisast election cycle on whether they would allow abortions up to 9 MONTHS! This is outrageous. A fully, formed human ready to breathe, eat, and learn will be threatened by adults who took an oath to do no harm. Please reconsider this amendment, every life is precious and counts. Maybe our state could reform our foster cares and allow for more adoptions. I am praying that God will allow others to have a clear view of what reproductive rights are and that hearts will be changed.
I'm against the killing of humans in any form. It is just unconscionable that we in Virginia would seek am amendment to make sure we can despose of humans if they are not wanted .
Abortion is not a fundamental, civil, or constitutional right. It is most certainly not a form of birth control, or an excuse to evade personal responsibility. There are countless families struggling to have children of their own, who would feel blessed and honored to love and care for those children unwanted by their biological mother and father. This unfortunate bill would enshrine access to abortion in Virginia’s Constitution, opening the door to abortion (murder of babies) through all nine months of pregnancy. It could eliminate parental knowledge or consent for minors undergoing these invasive and dangerous abortion procedures. It would also prevent reinstatement of critical abortion clinic safety standards, and informed consent for women and minors. As a Virginia citizen, and a woman, I strongly oppose this bill in all regards.
-Voting is a constitutional right. If a person has fulfilled their debt to society, then they should have the right to vote. It’s also a great part of rehabilitation and ones stake in community is important to reentry. Voting gives one a sense of community. -Women are dying in this country because of highly restricted reproductive rights. It will only get worse as more data comes out about women put in impossible situations in states with draconian abortion laws. Virginia has to set a standard as a bastion of freedom for women and trust them and healthcare professionals to make their own decisions. It would be abhorrent to restrict women’s healthcare rights. Virginia cannot be one of the states that robs women of their choice and healthcare freedoms. -the right to same sex marriage should be protected. And has been by the US Supreme Court. Restricting anyone’s right to marrying who they wish is immoral and constitutes government overreach
As a woman, psychologist, and family member of a someone in the LGBTQIA+ community, I support these bills and urge you to pass them. Thank you!
I represent 300+ Pastors and Churches across Virginia. We stand opposed to HJ1.
This is a freedom that should never be in question. A woman should have autonomy over all decisions when it comes to HER body. There should be no debate. There is never a situation where government should be involved in a woman’s right to choose.
I support reproductive freedom in Virginia and support marriage equality. I also support trans rights in Virginia.
I am writing in support of HJ1 as I support reproductive freedom and the right to choose. Everyone has a right to control their own fertility and exercise reproductive autonomy. This is particularly important for all women, girls and people who can become pregnant. An abortion is a medical procedure that ends a pregnancy. It is basic healthcare needed by millions of women, girls and people who can get pregnant. In places where abortion is legal and accessible and where there is less stigma, people can get abortions safely and with no risk. However, in places where abortion is stigmatised, criminalised or restricted, people are forced to resort to unsafe abortions. All people have a right to bodily autonomy which is another reason why anyone who can become pregnant should be able to get an abortion. However, many people, especially those from historically marginalised communities, face social, economic and political conditions which hinder their ability to exercise reproductive autonomy. Please protect our right to reproductive choice. Protect our freedom.
Remarks to follow on both measures.
Dear Mr. Chairman and House Committee Members: In 2021, 961,000 innocent hearts stopped beating in our country. This was not from genocide, nor was there a huge natural disaster. It was from abortion, the cause of more deaths in our country than heart disease, cancer, or any other illness or accident. As you consider this bill, you have the opportunity to speak against one of the great wrongs of our times. Every one of you reading this used to be an unborn human fetus. You were given the opportunity to live, to achieve great things, even to take your place as a member of this Virginia House of Delegates. It is a right granted to you, and to every other citizen of this great country (born and unborn), by our country's Declaration of Independence. This is a privilege that is rare if not unique in history. It would be safe to say that the majority of human beings have lived under oppressive circumstances and have enjoyed few such legal protections. But these rights are not guaranteed; they must be protected. In the 1960s the 2500-year-old prohibition against abortion in the Hippocratic Oath was removed by our medical community, and in the 1980s the protection of life from conception was also stricken out. Nothing happens in a vacuum, and there was a reason those changes were made to medical science. Today many body parts are taken from the live bodies of unborn human beings and sold to the highest bidder in our country for billions of dollars. It is an unspeakable evil. It is also far more prevalent in black communities, with 474 abortions per 1000 live births as of 2015 (see urbancare.org study). Abortion clinics are intentionally placed in urban locations that will attract pregnant black girls disproportionately. As an adoptive father of a newborn black girl years ago, I am particularly passionate to speak out against such wrongful discrimination and such wanton destruction of a beautiful and storied race of people. Abortion is not just numbers, it is people's faces, and people's names, and tens of millions of human lives that should have enjoyed the same wonderful privileges you and I have. Please give careful thought to this bill and cast your vote against it. Some doctor, some lawyer, some musician, some astronaut, some politician, some bricklayer, some mother, some father, some child, some friend will thank you someday who has not been born yet. And all because you were willing in your sacred conscience as one of our political leaders to first, do no harm. Thank you for your consideration of my words, and for your faithful service to this great Commonwealth. May God bless your work richly. Respectfully, Jeremy Vogan 100 S. Lynnhaven Drive Staunton, VA 24401
I do not want this Amendment because : . It would enshrine a "right" to reproductive freedom (AKA access to abortion)in Virginia's constitution , opening the door to abortion(murder)through all nine months of pregnancy. . It could eliminate parental knowledge or consent for minors undergoing invasive abortion procedures . . It would prevent reinstatement of critical abortion clinic safety standards and informed consent for women and minors.
I DO NOT want this abortion amendment! I am advocating PRO-LIFE! Vote NO!!! My standards for terminating human life in the womb are based on Scripture, which is considered murder!
I am submitting this Message To the committee to oppose, to vigorously oppose the HJ 1 amendment to the constitution of the state of Virginia Even to consider such an amendment to the constitution of Virginia is unforgivable .. malicious And simply put BEYOND EVIL.. No one on this committee or anyone ever Has the the Right to Play GOD… In closing this message: how manipulative is this FastTrack amendment to ensure upgrading abortion rights in Virginia… But this seems to be what the Democratic Party does now in America in regard to us citizens: you manipulate, you lie, you deceive Justice is MIne days the Lotd… in passing this HJ one bill you will be responsible and held accountable, not only for the allowing a nine month old baby to be terminated, but also take away parental rights so that minors can make their own choices…. Consider that this HJ1 Amendment to the constitution of Virginia: will someday possibly come back to you in your own family… In Closing; this intentional Fast Tracking of Amendment to the constitution of Virginia is: Why Americans Unanimously turn their back and their trust on you and all Democrats..
I vehemently oppose this bill. Children, from conception, have a fundamental right to life. Abortion ends the life of a human being, primarily for the convenience of adults who should be protecting children, not condemning them to executions in the womb. Enshrining abortion as a constitutional right would be a heinous act will condemn the Commonwealth that would sanction it.
Dear House Privileges and Elections Committee: I urge you to oppose the HJ1 constitutional amendment relating to the fundamental right to reproductive freedom. The American College of Pediatricians recognizes that at the moment of conception a “human being emerges as a whole, genetically distinct, individuated zygotic living human organism, a member of the species Homo sapiens, needing only the proper environment in order to grow and develop.” That “proper environment” is the mother’s womb for nine months of pregnancy. If an individual has the “right to make and effectuate one's own decisions about all matters related to one's pregnancy…," as stated in the amendment, this would allow legal chemical & surgical abortion (i.e. the deliberate termination of a pregnancy) through all nine months of pregnancy. When abortion occurs, the unique human being developing in the mother’s womb is killed. In southwest Virginia, voters have been working to pass laws that will protect the lives of the children in the womb. Russell county is a pro-life sanctuary. The Washington County, Virginia Board of Supervisors has approved an ordinance that restricts the location of abortion clinics in the county. For more than two years, concerned citizens have been urging the Bristol, VA City Council to pass ordinances protecting the unborn. Constituents in southwest Virginia do not want abortion enshrined in our constitution. If passed, this amendment would also prevent reinstatement of critical abortion clinic safety standards and informed consent for women and minors. If passed this amendment could eliminate parental knowledge or consent for minors undergoing invasive abortion procedures. If passed, this amendment would enshrine abortion rights in Virginia’s Constitution under the guise of “reproductive freedom.” No one deserves the freedom to intentionally end the life of another person. Again, I urge you to oppose the HJ1 constitutional amendment. Thank you for taking the time to listen to my comments. Angie Bush Abingdon, VA
Brutally terminating the life of our most innocent and vulnerable preborn neighbors is not reproductive freedom. What happened to the right to life? All lives are equally valuable and should have equal rights and protection from harm under the law. Abortion emotionally damages women and allows sex traffickers and rapists to keep abusing women. Abortion also targets and preys on the black community and is based in racism and eugenics. The abortion procedure poisons, dismembers, and starves a human in the womb who has a unique , separate DNA and heartbeat. This is evil. We must support pregnancy help centers and other health centers that promote life and life affirming medical services and care rather than a culture of death and despair for pregnant women.
This bill is not a bill that any true Christian can support. Abortion far from being a good thing is a large reason that our country is falling apart at the seams. Rather than loving the blessing of children God has given (psalm 127, & 128) we murder them before they are even given the chance to see the light of day, ripping them from the wombs where they should find the most security and love. God says in his word “Thou shalt not Murder!” (Exodus 20, Romans 13:9, Matthew 5:21) God has created them in His image as He has us also (psalm 127, 128, Eph 2:10, 2 cor 3:18, James 3:9, Genesis 1:26) This also would go against portions of the 4th and 5th amendments of the USA Constitution. Those who would seek to willfully destroy these little ones, should in reality actually be the ones being prosecuted for denying not only these children's constitutional rights but also for unconstitutional capital punishment and for denying them their God given rights. We as Christian’s must stand against this and as my representatives I call for the condemnation of this bill. We must Repent as a nation and turn to the Lord before He turns His back on us as a country and destroys us for this abomination in our nation.
HJ1| Herring | Murder of unborn children is not, and has never been, a reproductive right. Rather, it is reproductive tyranny and wholesale slaughter of the unborn. The Lord, the Most High God condemns murder in His holy law (Exodus 20:13), and Jesus Christ His Son declared the second great command to be love for our neighbors (Matthew 22:39). Please oppose this bill and love your littlest neighbors. Please oppose this bill and stand up for the rights of these littlest men and women, created equal in the sight of God and man with certain unalienable rights- the right to life; the right to liberty; the right to the pursuit of happiness. Please oppose this bill and fulfill your duty as legislators to provide justice and do not uphold what would be heinous injustice to preborn Virginians.