Public Comments for 01/26/2024 Public Safety
HB23 - Weapons; possession or transportation into facility that provides mental health services, etc.
My name is Laura, and I’m your constituent. Gun violence prevention is my top priority. Please support hi. Safety legislation that is brought up for a vote. These are the bills I support. Thank you for your time.
I am opposed to all of these unconstitutional and anit-american gun laws and regulations. There is no room for more gun laws and regulations in this state.
Contrary to how certain government officials treat it, the second amendment is written using plain, easy to understand language, and insists that government has no right to take away the right for ordinary people like us to defend ourselves, as the constitution and bill of rights do not simply give people rights, but protects them from government manipulation and control. It’s incredibly disappointing and a tragedy that people choose to commit acts of violence with these rights, but restricting those who wish to exercise their rights peaceably due to those who wouldn’t follow these rules in the first place is incredibly naive. I, as well as every other person in the United States, deserve to protect my family with the best technology available. While some people look at certain defense weapon setups as a “why do you need that” situation, 1) I have the right to defend myself with the best tool available, and so I will choose that every time, 2) why do you “need” anything other than basic necessities (fast car, Gucci clothes, etc)? The government has no place in deciding what I “need”, 3) people with the intent to harm will not care what laws govern peaceful people, so what would limiting the victim’s access to proper tools do? You may think that by “banning” or otherwise restricting access to a certain thing would mean that all of the “bad” things would magically go away, but they will not. Evil has always and will always exist, and I have every right to defend myself from it using the best tool available wherever I, or my family, choose to go. Restricting access on certain properties (the government isn’t actively protecting me everywhere), requiring certain training (who is paying for this?), limiting certain types of firearms (go ahead and define “assault weapon” in plain language please), and restricting ammo purchasing (I thought you wanted us to train; how does this help then?) are all means that end up hurting the average person and helping those who wish to hurt others, as the rest of us will be left in a position to insufficiently defend ourselves. I urge you to understand that while, yes, it is awful that evil people commit horrific acts, this right ultimately allows me to protect myself and my family from these evil people as well and as evil will always exist (we certainly like to delusion ourselves into believing that we live in a utopia, but we do not), I will protect my family accordingly. The government has no right to restrict this. Leave the peaceful citizens alone, more firmly punish those who hurt others, and help communities where this is an issue to prevent the upbringing of more evil people.
I oppose these bills that are attacking the rights of law-abiding gun owners.
Please stop trying to make criminals of law abiding citizens who just want to protect themselves. Me and my partner have recently become firearm owners because of situations that have arisen in our day to day lives, such as harassment of my wife almost to the point of altercation, sketchy characters waiting in front of our door/ducking in and out of our bushes at all times of the night, people breaking into cars in the neighborhood etc (many times the police/security were called only to arrive 45mins to an hour later). with many of these nonsensical bills you condemn us to allowing any possible violence to happen to us without a chance of defending our selves. Instead of helping fix the problem, you seek to make criminals out of any Virginian who has followed the law and legal purchased a firearm. Shame on you. I am Virginian native and since I was 18 I voted leaning blue in local and state elections you all are making me think this was a mistake. I am not proud of Virginia “progressives” who would rather strip my wife of her chance and right to defend her self rather than try to address the root of crime. Don’t make law abiding people criminals. Do some actual work and address the criminals! 2 of the proposed bills would make in illegal to bring your concealed firearm into a restaurant and another makes it a crime to have the firearm in your vehicle…. Like really? This is literally just to fill jails and strip people of their rights.
Many of these gun laws are unfair to law abiding citizens and do not affect criminals. These gun laws should be vetoed.
These bills infringe on the rights of the United States citizens given to us by the second amendment. The only thing these bills will accomplish will take the firearms out of the hands of law abiding citizens, while criminals will still have access.
I do not support any bill that removes any right from law abiding citizens to protect themselves from those who WILL NOT abide by these laws. These laws ONLY give CRIMINALS the upper hand.
There are approximately 47 bills regarding gun control between the House and Senate. Rather than fix issues that actually protect and enhance the lives of Virginians, many of these bills seek to disenfranchise and reduce the safety of the citizens in this great Commonwealth. Firearms are so fundamental to the founding and continued existence of our free society that they are listed just second to the freedom of speech in amendments to the constitution. It is plainly clear to all that countries and states who have banned or severely restricted firearms that violence does not end with their banning. Unjust deaths are not prevented. It simply ensures that law abiding citizens are left defenseless from those that wish to harm them, whether that be individuals or an organization. I write this knowing that it will be completely disregarded by the bills authors, but in hopes that others feel galvanized to speak up against unjust actions made in the name of progress. To those who wish to protect themselves with firearms while simultaneously stripping them from the common man, may you take heed of the Virginia state motto.
A lot of these laws contradict one another. I can’t support them. Both of our parties have failed us.
Stop trying to strip 2nd Amendment rights from law abiding citizens with a constitutional right to own and carry firearms. Not a single one of these laws/bills you’re trying to enact would have stopped any of the mass shootings we’ve seen.
I oppose all of these blatantly unconstitutional bills and wish our elected officials would actually get to work on fixing things that matter to Virginians.
It is obvious these elected officials want you to die at the behest of an anarcho tyrannical state where violent perpetual offenders are off with a slap on the wrist, while YOU tax payer are criminalized for not wanting to be a victim to these perpetual perpetrators. The elected officials funded by big Pro-Death lobby of Giffords and Bloomberg sit in their cushy NOVA HOAd mansions behind security while you plebs go to work everyday to pay their salary. These same officials effectively bribe the police state by giving them a way to pay off a mortgage and boat in exchange for your oppression. YOU citizen must morally oppose these pro-Death bills. Democracy has fallen and its only driven by money hungry Babylonians who swim in excess and delicacy while YOU PLEBS cant even afford milk, eggs or pampers. Remember these people do not hold dominion over you. Call your congressman/woman and CHRIST IS KING!
There is no acceptable reason to infringe upon the Constitutionally-protected (both US and Virginia's Constitutions) rights of Americans and Virginians. None of these bills purported to reduce gun-related violence actually seem to prioritize the reduction of causal effects of overall violence. Many of these are merely attempts to curb the rights of the People to keep and bear arms, because our legislative bodies are full of corrupt, weak, and contemptible individuals. Show us the bills for addressing the root causes of violence: mental health, income inequality, social instability, lack of education and educational opportunities, drug & human trafficking, or employment & wages (this list is not all-inclusive).
Time and time again it has been proven that criminals do not care about or follow restrictive firearm laws. Virginia already has some of the most restrictive firearms laws in the country ("B+" rating from Giffords), more unconstitutional infringements upon law abiding citizens is not the answer. We need to address the root causes (access to mental health resources for example) and not throw bandaids at it by punishing responsible, law abiding, gun owners. I oppose these bills and urge you to do the same.
As a fellow Democrat, it’s important to acknowledge the complexities surrounding gun ownership and the Second Amendment. 1. Self-Defense: Firearms can be a crucial tool for individuals to protect themselves, especially in high-crime areas or situations where law enforcement response times are slow. 2. Sport and Recreation: Many Americans enjoy shooting sports like hunting, skeet shooting, and target practice as a recreational activity, fostering a sense of community and skill-building. 3. Cultural Tradition: Gun ownership is deeply ingrained in American culture, with a rich history of hunting and marksmanship passed down through generations. 4. Economic Impact: The firearms industry contributes significantly to the economy, generating jobs and revenue through manufacturing, sales, and related services. 5. Civil Liberties: Upholding the right to bear arms is fundamental to preserving individual freedoms and safeguarding against government overreach. 6. Empowerment of Marginalized Communities: For historically marginalized groups, owning firearms can serve as a means of empowerment and protection against hate crimes or discriminatory violence. 7. Emergency Preparedness: In times of natural disasters or civil unrest, responsible gun owners can help maintain order and protect their families and communities. 8. Deterrence of Crime: Research suggests that the presence of armed civilians can deter potential criminals and reduce overall crime rates in certain contexts. 9. Veterans and Law Enforcement: Many veterans and law enforcement officers transition to civilian life with a continued appreciation for firearms, utilizing their expertise for civilian defense and security. 10. Balanced Approach: Instead of blanket gun control measures, we can advocate for comprehensive solutions that address root causes of violence, such as mental health support, poverty reduction, and community intervention programs.
I oppose the proposed firearms legislation put forward by this legislature and any legislation that violates the 1st, 2nd, and 4th, amendment rights of any Virginian. The desire for safer communities, a more united nation, and healing for our public health is something that we all can share in but these bills do not achieve that. Rather, they regulate and penalize. They unconstitutionally restrict the rights of the many in the name of safety and serve only to harm our rights. I would be doing a disservice to our state and my fellow citizens if I did not also provide potential solutions or remedies to the violence we face. First, we as communities need to promote voluntary storage facilities for those who are experiencing hardship and are concerned about suicide. Ideally making it easier to put firearms safely out of reach when suicide risks are greater. To do this it would need to be a system at the lowest level with minimum government involvement besides funding and partnership with local ranges. We would also need to reach out to those in our lives who are in a bad place and encourage the use of these facilities. Second, we should promote a culture of safe handling and respect for firearms through school courses and community organizations because assault weapons or not suicide, or accidents only take one bullet from a single action firearm. Lastly and more broadly we should focus on the issues surrounding the violence. Whether it is drugs and organized criminal activity or the mental health crisis as it has become known we should be working to fix these issues first. I.e. legalize weed, adapt police training, and push to root out organized crime, promote common social values and family cohesion, increase freedom, physical activity, and discipline in the school system.
These firearms bill are either redundant or unless in any meaningful way. If you care about reducing violence, please focus on criminals. Please stop trying to disarm families and law abiding citizen from protecting themselves.
I am a liberal through and through, I believe in individual rights and the opportunity for prosperity for all. I vote democrat because I care about my community, the rights of minorities, and women’s rights. The proposed legislation limiting the ability of free, law abiding citizens to purchase firearms, carry, and general use should not be limited further. I have witnessed violence at the hands of criminals, some later caught and it was shown that they did not legally acquire these firearms. The proposed legislation will effectively stop those who abide by the laws of Virginia from being able to properly protect themselves. It is known that police will not protect you, and they have no legal obligation to do so. This puts us at a dilemma, it’s either blindly trust the police to protect us and our families or have the ability to protect ourselves. I am not advocated for looser gun laws by any means, but I am advocating for more common sense gun laws. What do I mean by this you may ask? Well I mean background checks are a must and proper certification to conceal carry. I am a former Marine, I was a firefighter, and am a current student at a great university in our nations capital. I like to think I am reasonable in my thinking, but after looking and reading the propositions I checked above, I can’t help but feel betrayed by my own party. There is more than 5 guns for every American in this country. Gun control must target the people who do not follow the law and try to prevent violence from occurring, and the proposed legislation above does not help in that manner. I am hopeful that you will read this and reconsider the language in the legislation and I am even more hopeful that I can protect my family as necessary. I will always vote for progress but that’s not to say that I will always vote against my interests. Locally, crime has been on the rise and I have had to deal with it directly with little to no help from the police. I will (to the fullest extent of the law) protect myself as necessary from anyone who wishes to inflict harm on myself or family, and I hope you see that the average citizen in Virginia can not afford a security detail or rely on our police for protection. Thank you and have a great day.
Please stop infringing on our god given right, protected by the constitution of the United States (which you all have sworn to uphold and protect), to keep and bear arms. Responsible gun owners are not the problem in America’s gun violence epidemic. We follow the law. Criminals don’t. We use our firearms to protect ourselves, loved ones, and community. Chipping away at this right we have makes us more vulnerable to becoming victims of gun violence, not protect us from it. These laws only serve to empower those with evil intentions. Rather, might I suggest harsher penalties for those who commit senseless acts of violence with firearms instead of going after the good men and women of the commonwealth who wish only to use their firearms for lawful purposes.
Dear House of Delegates, I'm writing to you today as a concerned citizen. The introduction of bills aimed at heavily regulating firearms, is not warranted or wanted by the people of Virginia. Our nation stands at a crossroads, where the desire to address gun violence intersects with the constitutional rights affirmed by the Supreme Court. The Second Amendment's protection of the right to bear arms is not just a legal directive but a reflection of our commitment to individual freedom. In this context, the proposed regulations, while motivated by a commendable desire to reduce violence, raise significant concerns about their effectiveness and the potential consequences for law-abiding citizens. Research, including findings published in the Journal of Quantitative Criminology, suggests that the relationship between strict gun laws and the reduction of gun violence is not as straightforward as one might hope. Cities with stringent gun regulations continue to face challenges with gun-related crimes, indicating that those intent on violence often find ways to circumvent the law. This reality prompts us to question whether new restrictions will achieve their intended goal or merely place additional burdens on those who seek firearms for legitimate purposes, including self-defense. Moreover, the abundance of firearms in the United States presents a logistical challenge to the enforcement of such regulations. With more guns than people in the country, the task of significantly reducing the availability of firearms to criminals, without infringing on the rights of law-abiding citizens, is daunting. It is within this complex landscape that I urge you to consider the broader implications of the proposed gun control measures. The parallels drawn with other contentious issues, such as the regulation of women's healthcare, highlight the potential for policy decisions to inadvertently infringe upon individual freedoms and deepen societal divisions. Such outcomes not only detract from the intended goals of enhancing public safety but also risk alienating segments of the population whose support is essential for the advancement of our collective well-being. I respectfully ask that you consider the potential consequences of the proposed gun control measures, not just for the immediate future but for the legacy we leave for generations to come. It is my hope that, together, we can find a way to address the challenges of gun violence in a manner that honors our values, respects our freedoms, and genuinely enhances the safety and well-being of our communities.
STOP INFRINGING OUR RIGHTS. Get rid of every single gun control bill that is here and START ENFORCING THE LAWS WE ALREADY HAVE. Stop trying to turn law abiding citizens into criminals. I am disgusted that all of these nonsense bills have even made it this far. You can have these laws in Northern Virginia where everyone hates guns but don’t force this garbage into the rest of the state. GET RID OF ALL OF THIS GARBAGE and keep your noses out of everyone’s business. More government is not the answer.
Virginia already has some of the strictest gun laws in the nation. We can all agree violence is an issue but making more unconstitutional, on a national and state level, gun laws will not help with the rates of violent crimes and property crimes as we see from states with stricter gun laws. We need to increase access to mental health and community resources to address the root causes of issues rather than criminalizing responsible gun owners. I am opposed to this attack on the second amendment which is the fundamental backbone that protects the other freedoms guranteed in the constitution.
The second amendment is very clear in its intent that these rights “shall not be infringed”. Removing/ restricting law abiding citizens right to self defense and protection against unwitting organizations and persons is not only more harmful, but a clear violation of the rights this country was founded on.
Dear Honorable Members of the House of Delegates, I write to you today as a concerned citizen, deeply invested in the well-being and safety of our communities, and as someone who values the principles upon which our nation was founded. The issue at hand, the introduction of bills aimed at heavily regulating firearms, is one that I believe warrants a thoughtful reconsideration in light of its broader implications. Our nation stands at a crossroads, where the desire to address gun violence intersects with the constitutional rights affirmed by the Supreme Court. The Second Amendment's protection of the right to bear arms is not just a legal directive but a reflection of our commitment to individual freedom. In this context, the proposed regulations, while motivated by a commendable desire to reduce violence, raise significant concerns about their effectiveness and the potential consequences for law-abiding citizens. Research, including findings published in the Journal of Quantitative Criminology, suggests that the relationship between strict gun laws and the reduction of gun violence is not as straightforward as one might hope. Cities with stringent gun regulations continue to face challenges with gun-related crimes, indicating that those intent on violence often find ways to circumvent the law. This reality prompts us to question whether new restrictions will achieve their intended goal or merely place additional burdens on those who seek firearms for legitimate purposes, including self-defense. Moreover, the abundance of firearms in the United States presents a logistical challenge to the enforcement of such regulations. With more guns than people in the country, the task of significantly reducing the availability of firearms to criminals, without infringing on the rights of law-abiding citizens, is daunting. It is within this complex landscape that I urge you to consider the broader implications of the proposed gun control measures. The parallels drawn with other contentious issues, such as the regulation of women's healthcare, highlight the potential for policy decisions to inadvertently infringe upon individual freedoms and deepen societal divisions. Such outcomes not only detract from the intended goals of enhancing public safety but also ***risk alienating segments of the population whose support is essential for the advancement of our collective well-being.*** Constituents see this robust effort to "see what sticks" as a weakness within our party. Comparatively imbalanced with the diverse range of issues and concerns that we face everyday. A waste. As we move forward, I encourage you to approach this issue with a balanced perspective, one that recognizes the need for effective strategies to combat gun violence while also safeguarding the constitutional rights and freedoms that define our nation. The path to meaningful change is complex, requiring a nuanced understanding of the issues at hand and a commitment to policies that truly serve the best interests of all our citizens. In closing, I respectfully ask that you consider the potential consequences of the proposed gun control measures, not just for the immediate future but for the legacy we leave for generations to come. It is my hope that, together, we can find a way to address the challenges of gun violence in a manner that honors our values, respects our freedoms, and genuinely enhances the safety and well-being of our communities.
You guys need to stop attacking our 2nd amendment and get help for these kids growing up with identity crisis’s . You coming after law abiding citizens is appalling and the fact that your leaning towards becoming the despicable state of California is saddening. If the president can have security which uses firearms that even the normal civilian can’t have this raises the issue of how can a civilian defend against a tyrannical government with a featureless 10 round ar-15 ? Keep this up and we know exactly what your end goal is.
As a left leaning voter and citizen of Virginia, these new restrictions on our right to bear arms are sickening. Stop proposing so many bans and limits, and maybe a realistic bill, like the safe credit, won’t be universally protested. If you actually want to quell gun violence, keep focused on affordable mental and physical healthcare, improving the education system, and reducing income inequality. While the right may not support these real improvements, I cannot in good faith support or vote for any politician who supports banning or restricting the rights of law abiding citizens in our beautiful commonwealth. Thank you.
The 2nd amendment states "shall not be infringed". All of these bills are infringement and are therefore unconstitutional. Should we pass laws that people must pass a test before they can have freedom of speech? What about pass a test before you can vote? What about if someone does not have training they will be slaves again? Name one other right outlined in the constitution where a citizen has to jump through hoops before they can use that right? I oppose all of these bills as they will do more harm than good. I can understand wanting to keep people safe but gun control does the opposite. These bills will only make it harder for law abiding citizens to exercise their rights while criminals will still ignore the law. Criminals will still get illegal guns or weapons and will commit more crimes since they know the public is unable to defend themselves. Benjamin Franklin once said: "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." You writing bills saying "give up your rights and guns and we will protect you". Well ask the Native Americans how that worked out for them. Ask a Jewish person who was under Nazi control how that worked out for them. Well Hitler's first step was to take away the guns from the public so they could not protect themselves and over 6 million people lost their lives. Since you do not know history you are writing bills which will doom us to repeat it. You know 75 years ago when you could just buy a gun in a catalog and it was shipped to your house we did not have this issue. In the 60s and 70s when people would have a gun in their truck at school or take one in for show and tell we did not have a gun issue. This is a mental health issue. Deal with mental health and you will fix the public safety issue. Zero of my guns have killed people because guns do not kill people. People kill people. Look at Ukraine and Israel for just one form of example why we need LESS gun control. All of these gun laws are unconstitutional and should be thrown out. Do the right thing and let us law abiding citizens have their rights as outlined in the constitution. Do not pass laws which infringe on our rights. If the 2nd amendment falls, the 1st will follow . When the 1st and 2nd fall the 13th will fall and our country will be lost and we will be back in chains.
I am very opposed to the vast majority of these bills. I am a legal gun owner with my CHP. Many of these bills heavily restrict my right to bear arms in a legal capacity. I don’t understand why I should be punished for doing everything legally and correctly only to become a felon in the coming months through these legislations
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Whether or not a person chooses to exercise this right is up to them. Otherwise, it shall not be infringed.
I can not, and nobody should, support these unconstitutional laws. THROW THEM ALL OUT.
You guys make it harder and harder to vote Democrat every single cycle. Complete ban on Semi Automatics more or less making the state even stricter towards guns then states like Maryland? I oppose all these even the "herp common sense derp" ones because the states party has made it clear they don't give a crap about anything but putting hollow wins for politicians because hhheeeyyy punishing law abiding gun owners is a whole lot easier then creating jobs or reducing crime. If these bills die before getting to the governors desk, especially the bans, then I will gladly continue to vote DNC. But if Youngkin has to veto these and you make me say something I never thought I would "Thank god Youngkin won" then I look forward to blindly going down the ticket in 2024 and checking "R" on everyone. Thank you for taking the time to read this.
I do not support more legislation infringing on my 2nd Ammendment rights. Please fund more enforcement for the proactive enforcement of existing laws and regulations pertaining to firearms.
I oppose this legislation.
The litany of gun control measures under consideration will do nothing to effectively reduce crime and violence, and will only further restrict the rights of law abiding firearms owners. Not to mention the countless examples from other locales across the country where these same measure have been put into place and the result is more violent crime as criminals can now feel safe that the general population is not armed. Strongly oppose all proposed bills.
The ridiculous litany of gun control measures under consideration will do nothing to effectively reduce crime and violence, and will only further restrict the rights of law abiding firearms owners.
We dont need MORE laws regarding firearms, we need to enforce the laws that are already on the books. If enforcement is done then these laws are redundant and not necessary. Don't pass more laws just for the sake of passing laws. They do nothing but make law abiding citizens confused and they dont do anything to stop problems.
I am writing to express my great concern, to the legislatures that continue to ignore their oath of swearing to protect and uphold the rights of the citizens as protected by the United States Constitution and the Virginian Constitution. "The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED". You beaurcrats do not grant that right to he people, it is God given. While you grandstand and ateemlt to make laws to hurt the everydayaw abiding American citizen, you turn a way and do nothing in these bills to punish criminals committing crimes. It is already illegal to murder people. To grandstand and think that any of these bills would stop someone from murdering or harming another person is laughable. Quite literally. You pander screaming about these firearm safety bills while you walk around with security and people with "guns" to keep you safe. Start enforcing the existing laws against criminals who commit crimes vs trying to turn law abiding people, who take training, are serious about protection of family, themselves and others, and trying to disarm them and make them criminals. Or we will vote you out! Uphold your Oath or be prepared for the consequences your actions lead to by the American people. Regards Mr. Harris
I know most modern politicians aren’t historians but the Bill of Rights is really simple. If you read that, you’ll also read the 2nd Amendment which is really simple as well. In the same docket you’re trying to give more benefits to police and take away more rights from citizens. You ought to be ashamed. What a farce freedom is anymore.
These anti gun laws are an infringement on all Virginian's 2A rights.
I am opposed to additional new laws or further regulations placed on firearms or other means of self defense, or which limit the ability to conduct commerce or carry such items. Not only does the constitution make it clear this is a violation of my rights, it does nothing to address or reduce the actions of criminals.
All infringements on the second amendment are acts of treason and should be treated as such. Acting in favor of such infringements makes you a traitor to this nation and th commonwealth.
All Virginians want our families to be safe from gun violence. However, passing such broad restrictions on firearms commonly used for self defense is not the answer. The updated definition of assault weapons and the associated prohibitions do little to nothing to stop criminals who are willing to illegally buy or steal firearms. There are plenty of firearms out there for criminals to access, with well over 400 million guns in civilian ownership in the United States. It is too late to round them all up. These bills will disproportionately affect those citizens who go out of their way to follow our commonwealth's laws; the people who are unlikely to commit a violent crime in the first place. The solutions to gun violence that stand a chance at working are community-oriented interventions that decrease poverty, drug use, gang activity, combat mental illness, and advocate for the safe storage of firearms. Sociologists know these factors correlate strongly with ALL types of violence. On average, two-thirds of firearms deaths are suicides, an assault weapons ban won't do a thing about those. Of the remaining 1/3 of firearms homicides, more than half are drug, gang, or domestic violence related. Let's pass bipartisan legislation that addresses these underlying problems, instead of preventing average Virginians from protecting themselves with firearms that are already ubiquitous.
I am Opposed to any limitations on the Second Amendment and any restrictive firearm laws. We have adequate, if not already overbearing, laws on the books now and should not be creating more laws restricting all the aspects of firearm use, sales, and any other aspects of the right to bear arms.
These firearm laws are mostly reactionary to the media response on firearms. This is a major infringement on the 2nd amendment and needs to be stopped.
An inordinate focus on the control of firearms only serves to infringe the rights of the law-abiding citizen in defense of his life and property. The State should instead focus on the apprehension and incarceration of individuals engaging in criminal behavior and associated misuse of firearms.
Any law that infringes on my Gods-given right to own and bear arms is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Any law passed that infringes this right will be answered with a lawsuit.
Hello. There are a plethora of bills that were proposed, which would clearly violate the second amendment rights of many law abiding citizens. First of all, considering concealed carry should be permit-less carry, it is counterproductive to increase the requirements for concealed carry. Restrictions on where law abiding citizens can lawfully carry their now “permitted” firearms is asinine, as well as the proposition of a bill that would make it a penalty to leave a firearm in your car. You would essentially be disarming a large number of people who wish to follow these unlawful order in a day and age where the democratic agenda is to act like there are mass shootings on a daily basis. Effectively disarming the majority and increasing the requirements and legal loopholes to carry is such a vulnerable state to be in and I hope we’re smart enough to avoid that. Restrictions on “Plastic firearms and unfinished frames etc” is not only terrible literature that does nothing to explain, but it is a direct violation of the 2nd amendment considering you have a federal right to make firearms for personal use, which would include additively manufactured parts. Wait periods are also a horrifying thing to think of, considering how many times it has been proven to be a terrible idea, keeping guns out of the hands that need them most to protect themselves and their families. “Assault firearms” and anything to do with them is nonsense considering the blatant inability to define said “assault weapon”. People who don’t understand guns, shouldn’t be making laws on guns. A shorter barrel does not make it more lethal, in fact it lowers the muzzle velocity, causing less force on impact and penetration, in turn causing less collateral damage. Any sort of “assault weapons” bills are targeting law abiding citizens who have every right to use the modern advances in firearm technology just as police officers and military. The only people these bills are effecting are the already law abiding citizens. The criminals who got their hands on said weapons illegally aren’t going to be making sure that their ALREADY ILLEGAL WEAPONS are fully compliant with state laws and regulations before they go commit another crime. In no way shape or form should someone need to disadvantage themselves in a life or death situation because political members with an armed security detail don’t feel the need for a gun. Why would I want to limit myself to a firearm that is going to be inadequate in home defense, or one that does not have a high enough capacity to protect myself from the ever growing threat of home invasion and the increased trend of multiple home invaders breaking in armed. If it was you alone in your house with 6 armed intruders who most definitely must have checked their local laws and firearm regulations and made sure their firearms aren’t violating any rules before they break into your house, would you want to limit yourself to a low capacity firearm that is going to be extremely difficult to use effectively in a high stress situation, or are you taking a rifle which for reasons that don’t make sense, must have a 16 inch barrel, with a larger capacity magazine, and a stock that you can use to safely brace the firearm to prevent stray shots and provide more accurate fire. Personally I’m going to take anything and everything I can get in a situation that means life or death for me and my loved ones EVERY SINGLE DAY OF THE WEEK. Focus on the mental health crisis.
These laws are mostly going to effect law abiding citizens like myself and all the people I know. WHEN HAVE CRIMINALS FOLLOWED LAWS??? The only thing these criminals that commit gun related offenses is some kind of force of action. Why are you going to try to take our 2nd Amendment Rights away from people who follow the laws and love our great country? We should be focusing on increasing penalties against those who commit the crimes. Stop focusing on the law abiding citizens and focus on the criminals that are terrorizing all of our towns. Our government is letting millions and millions of unknown people in our country without having a clue what kind of person they are. I'm sure most are good people like you and me but not all of them are. We need our guns to be able to protect ourselves, our families, our neighbors, and our country if needed. Our founding fathers have it right and put a lot of thoughts into our constitution and bill of rights. I thought Democrats were about equality and the working man/woman. If you all want good for us law abiding citizens, work together, make compromises, and start doing your duty. We do not need more "big government" taking more rights. What we need is a closed border so we can fight this drug crisis. Slow the flow of drugs and these gangs fall apart. Once they fall apart maybe these shootings would slow down. Please do the right thing and do not sign these gun bills. All this woke crap is ruining our country. Y'all need to please make changes and focus on what's going to help all of us not just the minority.
Hello, The right to own and bear firearms is intrinsic in the very nature of the founding of the United States. We must remember the spirit of the 2nd Amendment and the right of all civilians to own and bear arms. Firearms are the great equalizer and can allow and individual to defend themselves when they previously could not. Gun violence and the mental health epidemic are closely interlinked and one cannot pass restrictive firearm laws and expect gun violence to go away. Gun bans and the use of restrictive purchasing requirements, magazine limits, waiting periods, and red flag laws have been shown not to be effective in stemming gun violence. I urge anybody reading this message to say "NO" to 2nd Amendment restrictions.
I strongly, along with many fellow Virginians oppose any villainous disarmament bills disguised as "public safety". The second amendment clearly states "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" and out of touch elitist politicians who enjoy the luxury of armed security are choosing to ignore the constitution and force us to rely on sub-par police protection. The same people who want to defund the police want to disarm us. Embracing the second amendment is what is keeping our crime rates low compared to New York and California. We have seen the blatant disregard that criminals have for these so-called laws; emboldened criminals who are not afraid of the consequences and innocent law-abiding people who are forced to live in fear because a bunch of tyrants are letting power corrupt them. I do not want to live in fear and neither do the rest of us. In addition; a lot of counties and cities have declared themselves as second amendment sanctuaries to protect the rights of free individuals from the overreach of tyrannical politicians. These bills are a Trojan horse that will lead to more crime. You anti-gun politicians should be ashamed of yourselves; give up your private security and train yourselves. Then you will change your minds; because in the end, nobody is coming to save you. I would rather have a fighting chance against armed assailants than die waiting for help to arrive. These bills are pure evil
These all seem like infringements that will do nothing to curb any crime. Further they will only create criminals out of everyday law abiding folk. These are laws that seem to be targeting victimless crimes.
I oppose all of these selected bills since I firmly believe they are in conflict with the Second Amendment of the US Constitution. The Second Amendment clearly states that it shall not be infringed upon. Any and all proposed legislation that would place limits on how, where, and when responsible citizens arm themselves runs afoul of that. Our founding fathers correctly held the belief that all people have a natural born right to arm and protect themselves and that the government has no authority to interfere with that. While I agree with the sentiment of reducing violence among our society, gun laws only harm the law abiding citizen and leave criminals who already have a disregard for the law to still be armed. If our elected officials who proposed these bills actually cared about addressing our violence problem, they would focus more on addressing the root causes of violence and crime. More worthwhile pursuits in my opinion would be focused on addressing socio-economic problems that plague disadvantaged communities, creating a more robust and well-equipped mental healthcare system, and overhauling our educational systems to setup our children for better success in life. Thank you all for your time.
I'm against any unconstitutional law, and any law that strips Americans of their rights. These laws are an attack on the 2nd ammendment and hold NO facts in stopping crime. They are a punishment on law abiding people and in no way will make virginia a safer place.
I oppose all these unconstitutional, dangerous, and pointless laws.
I oppose all useless firearm changes. Criminals will not obey
I was born in Henrico county and vote in every election. Guns are currently the #1 killer of our children under the age of 18. I am writing to show my support for these bills because gun violence prevention is my top priority. Please support gun safety legislation that is brought up for a vote! Thank you so much for your time.
My name is Laura Sledge and I am your constituent. Guns are currently the #1 killer of our children under the age of 18, and gun violence prevention is my top priority. Please support gun safety legislation that is brought up for a vote. Here are the bills I support. Thank you for your time.
I support common sense bills HB 1181, 1195, 12, 1424, 1462, 158, 175, 183,23, 270. Safe storage and training make sense! Let's keep everyone safe.
Hello, My name is Hayley Redmond Cilley. Guns are currently the #1 killer of our children under age 18, and I am calling because gun violence prevention is my top priority. Please support gun safety legislation that is brought up for a vote! We need safer communities for all, but especially for our children.
Dear Sir or Madame. Last year in Newport News I was assaulted by a 27 year old black man from Chesapeake because of his road rage.. This was at my local bank 11;30 in the morning. This young man almost lost his life at my hand because you cannot reel in your problem young men. His words feet from me were ' im going to kick your ass and then kill you'. My pistol changed his mind. I saw for myself the woke judges and a woke system that perpetuates the problem. The criminal justice system has been flung far far left which IS causing a public safety hazzard. No new gun control is needed. More jail time for the trash that i dealt with is. My Congressman Bobby Scott and Delegate Cia Price do not represent me.
I am a member of VA Moms For Change, a gun violence prevention group and I support these bills
When Democrats violate the Covenant between the PEOPLE and the US Constitution as well as the VA Constitution they are acting lawlessly and undermining the commitment toward good Government agreed on for over 200 + years. Seems Democrats didn't learn anything from the Civil war. The mentality of the "Tyrant" and the "Slave Holder" still exists among the Demo-rat Party, removing statues and trying to hide and rewrite history is not good government. Oaths, integrity, and Good Government, mean nothing to this Cabal of Evil minded men and women. We the PEOPLE need and demand good government not a patch work or illegal laws we are expected to "obey" while the "perps" that pass them have no consequence for breaking Constitutional law or good Government. The Demo-rat Party needs to be dismantled and the "ignorant" ejected from the Virginia legislature at once and for all. Peter Buckingham Crozet, VA 22932
OPPOSITION to HB12 - Jones OPPOSITION to HB23 - Laufer OPPOSITION to HB158 - McClure OPPOSITION to HB183 - Simon SUPPORT of HB289 - Wiley OPPOSITION to HB351 - Clark OPPOSITION to HB585 – Mundon King SUPPORT of HB756 - Walker OPPOSITION to HB791 - Henson OPPOSITION to HB861 - Hernandez SUPPORT of HB872 - Earley SUPPORT of HB1141 - Cordoza OPPOSITION to HB1174 - Sickles SUPPORT of HB1198 - Scott
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
I am writing in support of HB 12, 23, 158, 183, 351, 585, 791 and 861. I also write in opposition to HB 289, 756, 872, 1141 and 1198. There is ample evidence that minimal restrictions on firearms has resulted in countless deaths and injuries. Sensible restrictions on access to lethal weapons are sorely needed at this time. In fact, the Supreme Court, in deciding on the right to bear arms, has also stated that “Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited. [It is] not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.” If, unfortunately, assault-style weapons continue to be manufactured and owned, their access must be limited by age. In that case I would support HB 1174. Thank you for your attention to these comments.
Please support common sense gun safety legislation, such as Amy Laufer's HB23, and Simon's HB183 which pertains to secure storage. If more guns made us safer, we would be the safest country in the world, and we clearly are NOT. No other wealthy nation has even close to the number of gun related deaths (homicides, suicides and accidental) that we do. It is a shame on America and the state of Virginia that the number one killer of children is now GUNS. We owe it to our children to do better by them.
I am a member of the Charlottesville Coalition for Gun Violence Prevention and the Charlottesville Center for Peace and Justice. I support all the gun safety bills: 12 23 158 183 351 585 791 861 1141 1174 I oppose these bills: 289 756 872 1198
.Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. I oppose unnecessary.
On behalf of the League of Women Voters of Virginia, please support this bill. Thank you
Please stop wasting your time and my money on bills that have proven to be have zero impact on public safety, Please refer to Maryland, California, and the other states that already have these laws
Good afternoon, I am writing to implore you to STOP with all of the gun control bills. You are punishing law abiding citizens, who now have their RIGHTS THAT SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED, infringed. And the criminals who do NOT follow these laws but who they are directed at, are not affected. Please enforce ALL of the laws that are presently in the books and prosecute those people breaking the laws and stop letting them out on bail and bond through the Soros DA’s.
HB23 and HB861 Law abiding concealed carry individual are not the problem, and criminals who do not obtain guns legally will not follow this law either. HB12 and HB158 Already exist on the federal level why waste time and money on these bills HB791 who in their right mind would make a child or teenager a felon for bringing a BB-gun into a school, how often does this even happen for this to be considered. HB1174 This bill is unconstitutional at best! How can a man or woman b considered an adult at the age of 18, join the military at the age of 18, and not be allowed to purchase a weapon at the age of 18. Not to mention all other irreversible life changes that are allowed from birth to age 18. Please vote no to all of theses bills and any other unconstitutional gun control bills that come in front of the committee. Concerned constituent.
In reference to all of the above proposed house bills…. In short there is NO need for any more restrictions of any type on the purchase (to include locations of ffls in reference to schools and forcing purchasers to buy locks when they already safely store their firearms), carry, storage, and use of any type of firearms. It is extremely clear that more restrictions do not do anything to stem the flow of violent crimes which may or may not involve firearms (using DC, Chicago, NYC etc as examples, where very strict firearms laws have done nothing to lower violent crime). Instead, we need to focus on allowing law enforcement to aggressively enforce the numerous existing laws, demand commonwealth attorneys offices hold criminals responsible and ensure long prison sentences on offenders. As a citizen of the commonwealth for my entire life, and a local law enforcement officer for over 2 decades I can tell you from personal experience simply adding restrictions and more laws is worthless and simply slows down the system. As they say when seconds count, the police are only minutes away…. Do not place any more restrictions on residents of the commonwealth who are forced to live in increasingly dangerous localities due to the legal changes of the past 5 years, which allow offenders to go unpunished or under punished. Simply because you do not like firearms does not mean that others should not have lessened access to purchase, use, and carry the firearms of their choice. Thank you for your consideration
I would like for the Commonwealth of Virginia to have Constitutional Carry as the law of the entire state , our right as stated in the constitution of the united states and the constitution of the Commonwealth of virginia as written by our founders gives each citizen the right to keep and bear arms with no exclusions, to be secure in their persons, unless that right has been forfeited,. Exercising this right should never lead to forfeiture of this right.
I would like for the Commonwealth of Virginia to have Constitutional Carry as the law of the entire state , our right as stated in the constitution of the united states and the constitution of the Commonwealth of virginia as written by our founders gives each citizen the right to keep and bear arms with no exclusions, to be secure in their persons, unless that right has been forfeited,. Exercising this right should never lead to forfeiture of this right.
For HB12 and HB158: Already covered by federal law, no additional expense should be put on the FFL or the consumer. For HB23 and HB861: You are adding restrictions on personal protection and safety while not ensuring my safety and that of my family. I have been to hospitals in the commonwealth over the last few years, the security provided couldn't stop a squirrel from running through the hospital, much less someone with mal-intent. If you want the citizens to rely on the government for safety, then provide, otherwise don't restrict it. For HB585: You want to prevent FFLs from being within 1.5 mile radius of a school, yet smoke shops or other convenience stores that have vaping products are allowed, with the latter being a much bigger problem in our schools, yet no restrictions. It is silly to assume an FFL poses any danger to a school and I have yet to hear of any incident involving an FFL and a school. Most home based FFLs do not have long term storage. Please educate yourself before trying to implement "feel good" laws. We have other major issues with our schools that need to be addressed, i.e. teach retention, giving teachers more power for discipline, parental involvement/non-involvement, allowing for greater choice of subjects and stopping teaching to a test where our children learn nothing. For HB183: Another "Feel good" law. There have been multiple examples of minors protecting their family over the last several years. But, how would this law have stopped someone like the Sandyhook shooter, who killed his mother and took her safe keys? It wouldn't have. Just like it wouldn't stop a home invade killing the owner and using their safe key/finger print to access a firearm. For HB1174: At the outset this is unconstitutional, but if you want to effect real change in regard to this, open it up to an expanded background, where the applicant/purchaser that is under the age of 21 must consent to a check of their juvenile record in order to purchase, specifically looking for violent crimes. If this were in place, it may thwart some from attempting to buy, while those that continue and consent it would flag in the system, like it does when a felon attempts to buy a firearm at a gunshow. There is much more that needs to go into this, i.e. at what point when the applicant has an established adult history can they purchase after having violent crimes on their juvenile record, 25? 21? I implore every law maker to due their due diligence when it comes to rights stated in both the Virginia Constitution and the US Constitution. Do not be beholden to your donors and ram "feel good" laws through our legislature. When someone spouts statistics to you, take a moment and do you own research, look at the source material, anyone can make states lean in their favor by changing a few words or omitting parts of a study. You must work for the all the people, those you agree with and disagree with and look at all the information, not just what your donors give you. Thank you for your time.
This is absolutely egregious. A home-based FFL is an enterprise that is cleared at a higher level of proficiency and familiarity with firearms issues than any authority VA - the FFL holders are cleared and backed by the ATF. Further, an FFL, home-based or otherwise, is an enterprise in the business of safe transfer of weapons to individuals after doing criminal checks on the prospective buyer. The location near a school is irrelevant - it does not constitute a threat to a school simply because an FFL is nearby. This is a bad faith argument, and false equivalence. It’s a thin veneer. Simply put, it’s been proposed by people who do not like private ownership of firearms, and schools were picked because (deceptively) because they are evenly districted and spread through the state - after all, they’re supposed to be, to allow children access to education without having to travel unreasonably far. This also means that selecting schools as the criteria for a “no home FFL bubble” means you effectively throw a blanket over the industry. This has nothing to do with the safety of children. I find this frankly offensive and dishonest. Show me evidence where an FFL near a school has caused a problem? More than that, show me a single instance where the location was any sort of relevant. You cannot. Because it’s not true. It’s false equivalence. Let me be clear. I am a liberal person. But part of being liberal means remembering that fear mongering and bad faith, secretive agendas hurt progress. They turn people against it. Drop this frivolous nonsense. Stop making us look like idiots, please. Your crusade against portions of the bill of rights (because come on folks, we know what it is, it’s misguided) opens up very dangerous precedents for other bad faith actors to whittle down the contents of the other amendments. Read a history book. Please.
I do not support these bills. I request you vote NO on them. HB 12, Jones, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon, requires all firearms in a home be secured if there is a minor in the home. Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, prevents home-based gun dealers from operating within 1.5 miles of a school. Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, makes it illegal for anyone under 21 to purchase any kind of firearm. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen.
Constitutional issues when made political do no justice to representatives or their constituents. Dishonesty to the public erodes any ability for trust and assumptions based on party affiliation close down civil discussion. Some representatives run for office for gun control matters and get voted in but are you being honest with your constituents. I can quote statistics as could those supporting gun control but there are logical truths being ignored. We should change our terminology from gun control, to gun control over law biding citizens because each law that is passed in most situation only further restricts law biding citizens. Most gun laws only increase the ability to become a victim to criminal actions because in order to abide by laws implemented it puts the citizen at a considerable disadvantage . Gun free zones only mean unarmed citizens open to criminal behavior due to the inability to defend one's self. Law enforcement only enforce the laws, and cannot be there to prevent the actual crimes in most situations. Criminals intent on malfeasance will not abide by any laws put in place but exploit any such laws that allow for an advantage against an unarmed individual. This is not to say that I am apposed to back ground checks even at gun shows to avoid loop holes as I support such measures but to restrict carrying at locations or gun free zones only makes for sitting ducks. Restricting common circulation of rifles or any similar type to the AR-15 platform again only further limits the citizen from criminals AND tyrannical infrastructures within the state and federal levels. We can never assume that our representatives are in power for support of the people and our constitution I am not in support of any of the current gun control bills, I am in support of all the pro gun bills. In light of whatever is voted into law ,if it further restricts my constitutional rights and civil rights I simply cannot and will not comply. Thank you for your time on this matter.
As a fellow resident of Virginia, I urge you to OPPOSE the multiple anti-gun bills being heard today (1/25/24) in the House Public Safety Subcommittee on Firearms, including: HB 12 HB 158 HB 183 HB 351 HB 23 HB 861 HB 585 HB 1174 Please focus more on protecting lawful gun owners and enforcing the laws that career criminals routinely disregard. Thank you.
Dear Delegates of the House Public Safety- Firearms subcommittee, The selected bills are flagrantly and utterly unconstitutional and they stand as a direct violation on the sovereignty and liberties of the citizenry of the Commonwealth. Plainly stated they violate the United States Constitution ( the Supreme Law of the Land) and the God given rights of the people which the Commonwealth purports to “protect”. Such legislation is also preposterous factually as firearms are not the “problem” , they are merely tools and as such they are inert objects that are incapable of exerting will without an evil individual wielding them for malevolent purposes. Criminality is the problem , as criminals do not have any regard for the law or the well being of their fellow man, hence the definition of criminal. Therefore all of the selected legislation put hence forth only seeks to disarm law abiding citizens, those that are neither inclined nor committed to violating the law. Law abiding citizens possess firearms to defend our lives, the lives of our families, and to ensure that our sovereignty and liberty is not stripped away from us by tyrannical Marxist ideologues masquerading as “compassionate” and “caring” legislators. This is not Washington, Illinois, or even Maryland, this is the great Commonwealth of Virginia. That Virginia which led the American revolution under George Washington and in the defense of liberty against the tyrannical crown of England that once sought to oppress and yoke the citizens of the American colonies. The motto that adorns the seal of Virginia and our great state flag is “Sic Semper Tyrannis”, which means “Death to Tyrants”. Such a motto is more apropos in the tumultuous political climate of modernity than ever before, perhaps even more so than during the revolution in which it was founded. Being elected to represent the people does not confer upon any individual the power to strip the people of their inalienable rights, those rights that were enshrined by our great founders in the Constitution. To violate the United States Constitution in an effort to subjugate the people of the republic is by definition treason. The citizenry of the Commonwealth has spoken, we demand that you cease attempting to violate the rights of the people and do the actual job that you were elected to do . If such malevolently contrived shibboleth manages to pass out of the House of Delegates and Senate without veto from Governor Youngkin we will not abide by, adhere to, or sanction unconstitutional mandates in any way. Mass noncompliance will be the response to such attempts to strip the people of their Liberty. Thank you for your attention and your time, vote no to this abhorrent legislation. L.S. McClung RN, PMH-BC, CARN
I am writing to oppose these anti-gun, anti-self-defense, anti-rights, bills. Having previously lived for nearly 20 years in another state with many of them and more, the experience of that state was that, contrary to crime dropping nationally to historic lows, their crime increased after restrictions were added. Unsurprisingly, criminals don't obey laws. They seek to exploit those who do. These laws taking away liberty and presumption of innocence of people who seek to obey laws, do nothing but create a maze of rules that ensnare unsuspecting good people who are unaware of the litany of restrictions, their nuance and ever-changing interpretation in the future. At best, people are forced to forgo their rights to self-defense entirely because they have one or more stops on their daily travels in a restricted area. Worse, otherwise law abiding people unaware of these many restrictions, find themselves in violation having no intention, history or desire to violate the law, much less hurt anyone. These are not the people with whom our criminal code and law enforcement resources should concern themselves. Even beyond that, if faced with a violent threat in these "sensitive places", those law abiding people will now be at an even greater disadvantage as we, the people, do not enjoy an armed and dedicated police force traveling with and around us as many politicians do. I noticed sniper teams on the roofs in the surrounding area during this past VCDL Lobby Day ensuring your safely against some hypothetical threat. We are not so fortunate as we go out in the world to have such resources protecting us. Worse yet, we had been been required to disarm prior to expressing our first amendment rights that day both outside and inside the building. Whether storage, locality of carry, age of an adult required to purchase or restrictions otherwise, law abiding people are not and never were the problem. Stop punishing them collectively for the actions of violent individuals. Respect and protect their rights and presumption of innocence as the US and Virginia Constitutions require of you. When you regulate firearms, it is not the machine of a firearm you are regulating. It is the people you are regulating. It is the rights of the people you are taking away. With all the supposed progress we have made, how is it that we are less deserving of liberty now than we were in the past?
Every single one of these proposed laws are blatantly unconstitutional under the plain text of both the Virginia and US constitutions. The SCOTUS has ruled multiple times, must recently in June 2022, that the 2A prohibits these types of attacks on free citizens. Voting for any of these bills is a waste of tax payer dollars, morally and ethically wrong, and, by definition of the courts already having ruled on these or similar laws as unconstitutional, an act of treason against the USA and by extension an insurrection.
I urge you to OPPOSE each of the following bills: HB 12 Federal law already covers this and additional state enforcement will create unnecessary expense. We don’t need more bills that could create negative financial impact on our community. HB 23 This is not constitutional under the Supreme Court Decision made in 2022: New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen. This bill prevents visitors, family, and staff from their right to self defense. Is it right to prevent an abused single mother from carrying her most effective tool of defense because she has to take her child to the ER? Wouldn’t this give anyone with nefarious intentions an easy location? Note: Cornell Law has published a clear summary of the Bruen Decision, easily accessed with an online search. I mention this case further below. HB 158 Federal law already covers this and additional State enforcement will create unnecessary expense. HB 183 Current law already covers 14 and under. increasing the scope of the law to apply to 15, 16, and 17-year-olds is an overreach. Minors in this age group have used firearms to save their own life and protect the lives of their families by stopping home invasions and violent attacks on their households. This bill is an overreach. HB 585 What problem is this bill trying to solve? What’s the difference between driving 1.5 miles or 5 or 10? This bill is unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Furthermore, home-based gun dealers don't usually have signs outside of their home. Buyers have to be invited in for a purchase and FFL transfer. Also, convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products (not legal for minors to purchase) are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791 BB guns, and other pneumatic projectile devices, are specifically designed as hobbyist or sporting equipment. Making the possession of these on school grounds a felony is a complete overreach. Are we going to outlaw sticks, or stones, or archery, or baseball bats? These are all similarly dangerous. If BB guns have been used for violence at a school, please inform me. Otherwise, this is a “fix” to a problem that doesn’t exist. HB 861 This is not constitutional under Bruen and prevents visitors, family, and staff from their right to self defense. Is it right to prevent an abused single mother from carrying her most effective tool of defense because she has to take her child to the ER? Wouldn’t this give anyone with nefarious intentions an easy location? HB 1174 This bill is not constitutional. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen. People in this age group are not minors. They are included in the same Second Amendment rights as older adults.
I'm a law abiding citizen, retired law enforcement officer, and responding Public Safety 1st Responder Chaplain. I have been called out, responding to or serving at a number of violent acts, anf times, often in dangerous areas. I believe in these violent times, and knowing that criminals don't and won't obey the laws, that I have a need and right to be able to defend and protect myself, and be able to continue carrying, as I have for many years. Our drivers permit is for all 50 states, and we don't have to stop at a state border. I believe a concealed carry permit should be the same, recognized in all 50 states. To have to leave my firearm inside my car, to go into a public building or rest area on the highway, can put me in needless danger. If I have to take off a d put my firearm in my trunk, it let's a criminal see where it is and I don't have it. That can let them steal the firearm and/or harm me. Please allow our law abiding citizens use their 2nd Amendment Right To Keep and Bear (bear = to carry) arms. We need to fully prosecuted existing gun laws snd crimes, Not Add More Gun Controls that criminals won't obey any way. Murder has been against the law for centuries, but increasingly still going on, sometimes unpunished.
Please keep your gun grabbing hands off legally owned guns.Why not enforce the laws already on the books. Tell D.A. To do their jobs, go after the illegal guns. It is not legal guns that is the problem, it is the illegal guns. If more people carried legally crime could go down because the bad guys won’t know whose packing and could respond to crime. Thank you for reading my response. Alexander G. Morris IV.
The attack on the right to keep and bear arms has only increased over the past 18 months since the Supreme Court clarified in the Bruen decision the standard to which modern gun control legislation must be held. Many politicians around the country know that the bills put forth since that time are unconstitutional, but they also know it usually takes years to throw out their unconstitutional bills through court, and by then they have already cost time, money, and lives of American citizens. Rather than confront the underlying issues of our nation that lead to violence, they choose to take the easy way out and simply blame inanimate objects to deflect from their own political incompetency. Virginia representatives need to be better than that. The bills proposed are either duplicative of federal law, pointless, or dangerous. All are unconstitutional. All are a reflection of a disregard for commonsense safety measures like taking criminals off the streets. These bills must not be passed. Not because they will be signed into law, but because its the duty of Virginia state representatives to uphold the constitution and work to solve problems. These bills due neither.
Please do not vote for or advance any anti gun bills. Each one limits a citizens 2nd Amendment rights... I.E. banning commonly owned and used semi automatic rifles, which is unconstitutional under Bruen... Raising the age to purchase firearms. If one can serve in the military, one can purchase a firearm. Plus, its unconstitutional under Bruen AND a Virginia court ruled against it as well. Limiting where one can carry. This only creates more soft targets which criminals will not obey anyway. Banning unserialized firearms . Unconstitutional since some were made before 1968, when numbers were not required. Also, people have the right to build unserialized firearms in their homes for personal use. This has never been an issue, but decriminalization of crimes is causing an increase in violent crimes. THAT is a problem. Limiting how many firearms one can purchase in a given period is unfair. These are just a few . Please understand all the anti gun bills are unconstitutional, especially in light of the Bruen decision. I do urge you to vote for any pro gun bills. The right to keep and bear arms is a constitutional right. The Heller, McDonald, and Bruen decisions reinforce that right. The only limits on this right should be for criminals, illegal aliens, and anyone who has been mentally adjudicated/ forced into an institution. The issue we face should be how to repair our broken mental health infrastructure, not to limit the constitutional rights of law abiding citizens. Thank you Mr Raymond Pezzoli
Our freedom was won with illegal and unregistered firearms. Please look to the G.O. A. And VCDL for guidance on Second Amendment issues. Freedom first, safety second.
I support these bills!
Hello, My name is Sameet Singh, I was born in Punjab, India and moved to Northern Virginia when I was 1 year old. Since then, I’veattended some great K-12 schools in the NOVA area, graduated from George Mason University in 2020, and now work in the Cyber Security field, serving one of our largest US Government Departments. My message to you today is not regarding any single bill in particular, but more of a mindset. I’m sure everyone here has a family that they would do anything for. We work hard everyday to provide for and to protect our families. And a big part in being able to protect, is having the right tool to protect yourself and your family members. This is why the best tool to have at your disposal is a firearm, a gun. Because if you or your family were attacked by someone in your home or out and about in public, a firearm, would be the best tool to have to save yourself and them from an attacker. Even if you’re able to call the police, it’ll at least take a few minutes for them to arrive, and sadly, within those minutes, only a few seconds are needed to completely change your world. Therefore, you are always your OWN first responser, before any other help arrives. This is why, anything, that would hinder your ability to protect yourself or your family with the best tool that you could use, a firearm, should really be re-thought. Unfortunately our society is not at the point where crime dosen’t happen, there’s no supernatural being or superhero that will swoop in to protect us in our times of need, there’s no Spider-Man or Superman who will save the day for us. However, the next best thing we have, is an responsibly armed citizen. A citizen who who is able to be gentle and loving with their kids and partner, but at the same time, prepared and alert at a moments notice when danger reveals itself. Thank you for listening, and thank you for your service to your communities, I wish you all a prosperous new year. Best, Sameet Singh
The Supreme Court has ruled that localities do not have the authority to declare broad swaths of spaces as "gun-free zones" and if private property managers wish to forbid firearms and weapons from their property they already have that right. Voting on such an unconstitutional bill is simply a waste of time where clear court rulings already apply. Many of these other bills have already been ruled unconstitutional under Bruen. And some of these bills such as making a BB gun a felony when on school grounds is simply idiotic. The House needs to stop wasting time on idiotic and frivolous bills that are simply nothing less than virtue signaling. There is real work to be done and you should attend to that business and not such tripe.
HB12 - Jones . I not not support . All firearms dealers currently offer a Firearm locking device on the sale or transfer of handguns. All new firearm come with a locking device and warning labels. child safety warning required. This doesn't change the current practice by dealers in offering for free locking devices. HB 23 Weapons; possession or transportation into facility that provides mental health services, etc. I do not support,. This bill does not exempt ems medical services or the fire service which many carry concealed when transporting patients to an emergency room or mental health facility on the duty. HB158 - McClure I do not support . All firearms dealers currently offer a Firearm locking device on the sale or transfer of handguns. All new firearm come with a locking device and warning labels. child safety warning required. This doesn't change the current practice by dealers in offering for free locking devices. HB183 - Simon HB289 - Wiley I support carrying a concealed handgun with a permit into public parking lots and storing there gun makes sense and do not unarm the citizen while in their personal vehicle. HB351 - Clark I not not support . All firearms dealers currently offer a Firearm locking device on the sale or transfer of handguns. All new firearm come with a locking device and warning labels. child safety warning required. This doesn't change the current practice by dealers in offering for free locking devices. most police departments give away free locking devices. HB585 - Mundon King I do not support this bill changes little firearms transactions which must be performed at a already approved ATF dealer location. 1.5miles is overreach by the state. HB756 - Walker I do not support. This limits gun rights. Not protection for EMS or fire personnel HB791 - Henson I do not support. This bill eliminates the number of programs that have pneumatic bb gun competition for 4 H at private or religious schools. HB861 - Hernandez I do not support,. This bill does not exempt ems medical services or the fire service which many carry concealed when transporting patients to an emergency room or mental health facility in the duty. HB872 - Earley I support . Always a lawful citizen to store a lawfully possessed firearm and ammunition in a locked private motor vehicle parked at any parking area owned or controlled by the Commonwealth. HB1141 - Cordoza I support HB1174 - Sickles I do not support changing the definition of an assault weapon widely and increasing the age which will make little difference. HB1198 - Scott, P.A. I support in reducing the fee
Vietnam Veteran - Retired Special Agent & LEO ( military 19 yrs & Federal 10 plus years) - that is me. Please consider the Bill of Rights; law abiding citizens rights to freedoms and rights of self protection. Criminals don’t follow laws against violence and criminal acts. Thank you
I oppose all of the gun control measures proposed in this session. I support Mr. Freitas' proposal for permitless carry.
Seems to me the General Assembly needs to pay attention to the Supreme Court rulings. Most of these bills if not all ignore what the Court has ruled on. Does the Gov. of Virginia think they are above the highest court in the land? Also, do not think for a Nano second that I believe these bills are about crime control. They are all about people control PERIOD. A Tyrannical state. I will fight this!!
I am submitting comments in opposition to these anti-gun rights bills. These bills do nothing to increase actual safety of Virginians. They serve only to further infringe upon our Second Amendment rights and those rights enshrined in our Virginia Constitution. Instead of focusing on the root causes of violent crimes, Democrats have chosen to target lawful Virginians' firearms rights. Most of these bills are a false solution for non-existent problems. Some of these bills would flagrantly be un-Constitutional and in opposition to prior U.S. Supreme Court decisions to include the Heller and Bruen decisions. In the 2023 Virginia elections, no candidate ran on a pro-gun control platform, therefore no mandate was handed to the House to implement such infringements. Virginians made our pro-Second Amendment stance clear in RIchmond in January 2020 when 40,000 people rallied against similar bills during that session and over 95% of Virginia counties' Board of Supervisors passed Second Amendment Sanctuary statuses. I urge the Committee Members to vote No on these bills. Thank you.
As a constituent, I urge you to OPPOSE the following bills: HB 12, Jones, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon, requires all firearms in a home be secured if there is a minor in the home. Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, prevents home-based gun dealers from operating within 1.5 miles of a school. Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, makes it illegal for anyone under 21 to purchase any kind of firearm. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen.
NOT ONE OF THESE BILLS ARE CONSTITUTIONAL &/OR NECESSARY! THEY'RE SIMPLY SOLUTIONS IN SEARCH OF NONEXISTENT PROBLEMS! HB 12: Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23: Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158: Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183: Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585: Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791: Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861: Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174: A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen. Thank you.
HB 12, Jones - requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. These requirements represent an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under the Supreme Court's Bruen decision and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon, requires all firearms in a home be secured if there is a minor in the home. Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, prevents home-based gun dealers from operating within 1.5 miles of a school. Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, makes it illegal for anyone under 21 to purchase any kind of firearm. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen.
This is just a solution in search of a problem. Don't make laws we do not need. Thank you!
So there is nothing as important in and for Virginia other then Supporting Communist Legislation against the Constitution of VA and the US Constitution that all this effort must be the first thing on the agenda when a Demo-rat Majority is fraudulently elected to the House and Senate. You fools must make the people that pay you off very happy to have you ear and sell yourself to the Communist Party. Demo-rats are an embarrassment to Freedom and Good Government. Patrick Henry, you may have heard of him? Show me that age and country where the rights and liberties of the people were placed on the sole chance of their rulers being good men, without a consequent loss of liberty? ********************************** The eternal difference between right and wrong does not fluctuate, it is immutable. ********************************** The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government - lest it come to dominate our lives and interests. ********************************** Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? ********************************** Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined.... The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun.
I strongly support House bills 12, 23, 158, 183, 351, 861 and 585, These bills will make our communities safer by requiring safe storage of firearms, banning the sales of assault weapons to people under 21 years of age, and restricting the public places where people can carry firearms, including mental health facilities. Safe storage will protect children and teens from inadvertent shootings and school shootings, and everyone from suicide. Waiting periods for purchase can prevent impulsive misuse. I oppose bills 389, 872, 1141, and 1198. Allowing more guns into more places will not make us safer. Every shooter is a law-abiding citizen with 2nd amendment rights, until they open fire on other people. I don't trust a "good guy" with a gun to have the current training or expertise to shoot down a criminal without accidentally hitting innocent people, or themselves. There is always the threat that a criminal will grab a gun from the "good guy" and turn it on him/her. As a diplomat representing the United States in foreign countries during my 33 years in the U.S. State Department, my heart bled every time we had another mass shooting. People there would ask me, "What is wrong with your society?" The first seven gun safety bills passed in 2020 made Virginia a leader in gun safety legislation. Subsequent shootings, such as six-year old shooting his teacher with his mother's gun, demonstrate the need for evidence-driven initiatives that will reduce gun death and injuries in our Commonwealth.
HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff.
I urge you to OPPOSE the following bills: HB 12, HB 23, HB 158, HB 183, HB 585, HB 791, HB 1174 For some of these bills... they are meaningless, as they are already covered by Federal Law... the committee and legislature should not be wasting time on bills and laws that are already on the books! For some of the other bills... they are already deemed UNCONSTITUTIONAL under the 2nd Amendment and existing Supreme Court decisions. If these become law, they have a high probably of being voided/vacated within a year or two. Aside from taking away existing rights of Virginia citizens in that time... you will ensure lawyers on both sides of the issue will make a lot of money so they can drive fancy cars and send their kids to expensive schools. Stop indirectly putting money (half of which are paid with tax dollars) in lawyers’ pockets. I'd rather our courts address real crime and issues... not laws already deemed unconstitutional. Many of these bills attempt to create a tactical "solution"... except that the specific problem the "solution" addresses doesn't or never existed or occurred in the Commonwealth. I request that my elected officials address meaningful solutions, and ensure existing rights of law-abiding citizens are not infringed upon. Thank you for your time.
These proposals are solutions in search of problems. Many of these violate the Bruen decision. I would love for us to eliminate sovereign immunity. These politicians must be able to be sued personally, held both criminally and civilly liable for any vote in favor of a law, if they knew or should have known it violates or God given rights.
I feel violated. This legislation scares me and I'm a constituent. Show me the evidence that the legislation you are proposing will actually reduce crime and violence. There is none. These are "do something" acts that restrict my right as a good, sane, sober, moral and prudent citizen to keep and bear arms. If there were a violent criminal act for which I was now unprepared, restricted in my ability to defend innocent life, who will bear responsibility for that?
Good afternoon Delegates, I stand in opposition to all of these unconstitutional bills that will not do anything to curb and only demonize legal, lawful Virginians. Also, many of these bill are redundant to either existing commonwealth law or federal regulations. Lawful firearm owners are the back bone of this great commonwealth and country. I urge you all to recognize that Virginia is one of the safest states in the nation and that all of these proposed laws are violations of the Constitution and should not moved forward to a vote. Thank you for your time and consideration on this very important matter D Scott Burns
As a born and bred Virginian; a father and husband; a disabled veteran and active member in the community; I cannot understand why individuals who are elected, willingly do what they can to violate both the Virginia and United States Constitutions to penalize law-abiding citizens such as myself. I have spent a life of duty and dedication in service and occupations to protect our State and Country from those who wish to subjecgate its citizens or worse. Not only do all of these restrictions seek a perspective only solution, they do so at the cost of innocent citizens. Law-abiding citizens do not commit drug gang offenses, home invasions, mass shootings. These are the acts of career criminals or mentally disturbed individuals. None of these proposed bills addresses those issues or the deeper problem of why people are so quick to commit these acts. Murder is murder, whether a gun is used or a cane, it is still wrong. I'm more concerned about why, instead of the tool. Obviously, certain politicians are only worried about the tools. These proposed bills are all clearly agenda focused without factual information to support true results that may be gained by violating state and federal laws to enact. The Supreme Court very clearly defined the right to arms and most of these bills would violate those freedoms. Nor is it legislators purview to dictate what citizens do with what they have within the confines if their own home. THAT, is yet another violation. It is also disturbing that legislators seem to be focused on separating Virginia from reciprocity, thus affecting relations with other states, which ultimately led to a civil war last time. They are also creating more areas where people who mean to harm can do so without fear of being stopped such as adding a new gun free zone. This is a very bad and ill-conceived premise. If the point has not been made yet, then perhaps citizens need to start holding legislators civilly responsible for lives lost as a result of such zones. Clearly they are not effective. I ask that you stop operating under partisan politics and quid pro quo agendas which only serve to penalize and subjegate our citizenry. This is not what servicemembers and veterans served, sacrificed and vowed to defend. Freedom has a cost, and it is difficult to understand, especially through the fear and pain. There is NO such thing as safety. There never was, and never will be. America has MANY enemies out there in the world, and it's citizens; it's armed citizens; are the LAST line of defense. Continuing to attempt to disarm law-abiding citizens only further prompts the question by citizens for the legislators... "Whose side are you truly on?" Please repeal these bills and focus more on actual crime, deterrence for early release, stiffer penalties for existing criminals who continue to commit them and stop bringing in more and more illegal immigrants. Thank you for your attention. Lessons of the Past, Lost to Actions of the Present, Will Forever Damn the Future. -Sean Flippin - 1989
Please stop wasting our money, as a taxpayer, on initiatives and regulation that are at best ineffective and at worst making things safer for Criminals. Creating areas that are gun-free makes safe areas for Criminals as they know that their victims will not have the tools necessary to defend themselves. Stop trying to make us, the public, less safe. Stop releasing criminals, especially repeat-offenders, Releasing criminals causes us to acquire tools to keep ourselves and our families safe.
As a constituent, I urge you to OPPOSE the following bills: HB 12, Jones, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon, requires all firearms in a home be secured if there is a minor in the home. Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, prevents home-based gun dealers from operating within 1.5 miles of a school. Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, makes it illegal for anyone under 21 to purchase any kind of firearm. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen. I thank you. Mr. & Mrs Lon Horiuchi
Everyone of these bills further restricting the rights of the law abiding citizen should be voted down.
This bill must be OPPOSED. These bills do NOTHING to prevent/reduce crime. In fact, these types of bills will eventually ENABLE and allow MORE crime (just look at crime in Maryland and DC) by reducing Virginian's ability to adequately and easily protect themselves. This bill is immoral, unjust, unconstitutional and racist as it will HARM black and brown people, other minorities, women, the elderly, and children who will be the eventual victims as a result of laws like this. Using these types of bills to slowly deny the public's human right of self defense will NOT save lives or keep people safe. This has been proven again and again. As lawmakers, you have an obligation to ensure that the laws you enact *protect* our God-given, human right of self defense -- you should *not* be disenfranchising us and making us MORE vulnerable to crime and injustices with these ignorant bills. Thank you.
As a voting resident and veteran I strongly OPPOSE the following bills: HB 12, Jones, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon, requires all firearms in a home be secured if there is a minor in the home. Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, prevents home-based gun dealers from operating within 1.5 miles of a school. Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, makes it illegal for anyone under 21 to purchase any kind of firearm. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen. This bills have gone beyond the scope of "safety" and are clearly an attempt to strip the constitutional rights of law abiding citizens of this great Commonwealth. The majority of these bills have already been struck down my the SCOTUS. Remember your oath: I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God. v/r Thomas Speich
I do not support any proposed gun restriction bills. I have been a resident of VA for 40 years and have never been in trouble with the law. I do not think the bills that are being proposed will deter gun violence. The issue is not guns. It is mental health.
Dear Democrats proposing duplicative and unconstitutional bills: It is apparent that you seek to propose bills that ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL based on the US Supreme Court. Please reference the Heller and Bruen decisions. It would appear you are taking that as a mere suggestion? Further, the "catch me if you can" approach to lawmaking is ridiculous. Yes, we know the strategy made famous by Obama...pass laws you know are unconstitutional knowing it will take ~5 years and millions of dollars to undo them. In the interim, the damage is done. This is the stuff of tyrants. HB 12: DUPLICATIVE OF FEDERAL LAW. HB 23: UNCONSTITUTIONAL UNDER BRUEN. HB 158: DUPLICATIVE OF FEDERAL LAW. HB 183: DUPLICATIVE. 14 and under is covered. There are many cases were 15, 16, 17 year olds defending themselves and family from crime using firearms. HB 585: UNCONSTITUTIONAL. HB 791: a solution looking for a problem. Most normal people grew up playing with BB guns. Cite all the crime associated with BB guns? HB 861: UNCONSTITUTIONAL UNDER BRUEN. HB 1174: UNCONSTITUTIONAL UNDER BRUEN. already heard and struck down in other states. The disarmament agenda is tiresome. If you spent half the energy in Richmond, Hampton, Norfolk, and Petersburg, 95%+ of "gun violence" would be taken care of. Your main perpetrator group is black men killing black men, 18-34. Don't you read the Virginia Crime Commission's reports? if you were serious, you'd be going after ACTUAL criminals vs. passing meaningless laws that only impact the law abiding.
HB 12, Jones, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure - Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon - Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, is Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, is not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen.
We are encouraging our state politicians to work on meaningful solutions that will actually help reduce gun violence, violence in general, theft, and improve the quality of our lives. Let's start enforcing current laws that are reasonable and remove those that aren't. Work on quickly improving the number of quality jobs in VA. Through good local educational services that focus on the required skills, people can improve their own lives, the lives of their family, and have more hope for the future. Childcare assistance can help families that are working. It's time to create a new playbook and stop passing additional restrictive laws that only burden our citizens and families. Start improving our lives which leads to less violence, good jobs, and strong families that can raise our children better.
Why is it that you want to continue to go against your sworn oath to office and institute further gun restrictions and control on law biding citizens? With control of the senate and house why don't you focus on the root of the problem which is more to improve the socio-economic issues regions face which should in turn lower drug and gang related problems which in turn is the true reason behind your "gun violence" issue you continue to speak on. WE DO NOT HAVE A GUN VIOLENCE ISSUE, we have violence issue that you need to address not through more gun restrictions. Enough with the gun control bills, it is the first thing the democratic party pushes when they get control of the majority. Use this time to better the communities or is that just tok difficult for you? As all you want to do is make it so criminals have more power over law biding citizens, pull our children into gang and drug culture and go easy on crime so they know there is no accountability for their actions.
I wish congress would treat firearms and firearms owners in Virginia like they do illegal aliens. Turn a blind eye to them and just let them be free. Never make rules about securing access or entry to them. Ensure that none of them need paperwork or if they do, wait so long before you check to make sure any of it is accurate, you never find the illegals and in this case, firearms. That would be swell.
"The right to keepand bear arms shall not be infringed..." Those who carry firearms should not leave them in vehicles. Many guns used in crimes are stolen, often from vehicles. Hospitals and other places people gather are where trained armed civilians can thwart a crime or mass shooting. The AR-15 is a civilian multi-purpose rifle -- easy to operate, inexpensive, accurate, low recoil, low cost ammo, and potentially lethal when necessary. It is the best rifle ever invented for U.S. civilian use...hunting, self and home defense, and target shooting. Resources in VA should be used for law enforcement, crime prevention and mental health. Take ILLEGAL guns off the streets.
Given the second amendment of the constitution, there shall be no laws that prevent me from being able to protect myself. I am a conceal carry holder and have been for almost 10 years now. We vehemently oppose any laws that would prevent Conceal Carry Holders from carrying our weapon. Our goal is to have protection and not need it rather than needing protection, and not being able to have it. We will not comply.
When will misguided legislators learn that infringing the right of law abiding citizens to exercise our Second Amendment liberties does nothing to make the public safe? In fact, it makes us all less safe because criminals love restrictions on lawful firearm ownership. Wake up! Follow the Constitution. “The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed!” Bishop E.W. Jackson STAND Virginia PAC
First, SCOTUS has addressed gun rights; access to magazines & ammo multiple times. Multiple times, SCOTUS' decision has sided with law abiding gun owners. I am curious as to why you continue to suppress our God given constitutionally protected right to bear arms? I can only assume one of two reasons. Either (A) you are completely uneducated as to the writers of the constitution, as well as their separate and several memoirs on the right to keep and bear arms; and furthermore ignorant of the right of the People to keep and bear arms as a result of the People having fought against tyranny using NOT federally provided military arms and ammunition - rather, PRIVATELY owned arms and ammunition. Below are just a few examples of historically accurate statements on said RIGHTS : “No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.” – Thomas Jefferson, Virginia Constitution, Draft 1, 1776 “A strong body makes the mind strong. As to the species of exercises, I advise the gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it gives boldness, enterprise and independence to the mind. Games played with the ball, and others of that nature, are too violent for the body and stamp no character on the mind. Let your gun therefore be your constant companion of your walks.” – Thomas Jefferson, letter to Peter Carr, August 19, 1785 “Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops.” – Noah Webster, An Examination of the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution, October 10, 1787 “To disarm the people…[i]s the most effectual way to enslave them.” – George Mason, The Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution, June 14, 1788 “I ask who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers.” – George Mason, Address to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 4, 1788 My questions are simply these, who do you expect to follow these laws that you put forth? Criminals? Why would you expect someone who is a CRIMINAL to obey the law? Maybe you should take some time and learn the definition? Which brings me to part (B) as to why I think you are trying to bar citizens from owning semi-auto rifles & there average magazines - you fear us to the point where you want to disarm us in much the same way HITLER disarmed HIS constituency. Clearly Thomas Jefferson had it correct - when he said “The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes…. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.” – Thomas Jefferson, Commonplace Book (quoting 18th century criminologist Cesare Beccaria), 1774-1776. Tyranny is the only reasonable explanation for your efforts because the lies spread by the US Government regarding death tolls, etc., is a complete fallacy. All you have to do is a little independent research regarding 'mass shootings.' And yes, private citizens did in fact have legal ownership of canons all the way through the Civil War era. Only an idiot would believe the lies that they did not.
In Caetano v. Massachusetts (2016), the Supreme Court reiterated its earlier rulings that "the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding" and that its protection is not limited to "only those weapons useful in warfare". New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen (2022) is a landmark: [ In a 6–3 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that New York's law was unconstitutional and that the ability to carry a pistol in public was a constitutional right guaranteed by the Second Amendment. — A 2022 poll found that 64% of Americans were in favor of the ruling in contrast with 35% of Americans that say they oppose the decision.[50] Additionally, 36%, the largest single share, said they strongly support the Court's ruling in contrast with 16% who said they strongly oppose it. The Legal Aid Society said the decision "may be an affirmative step toward ending arbitrary licensing standards that have inhibited lawful Black and Brown gun ownership in New York."[46] Former house minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R‑CA) supported the ruling, saying it "rightfully ensures the right of all law-abiding Americans to defend themselves without unnecessary government interference."[47] Law professor Steve Vladeck said the decision will "have monumental ramifications far beyond carrying firearms in public" and predicts there will be a "slew of litigation challenging any and every gun-control measure". Tread AROUND the 2nd amendment to our Constitution of the United States of America. Around it. Not on it; not lightly upon it! Carefully consider your vote! (Attachment: Photo of one night of a dangerous riot in a public place.)
Please leave law abiding citizens alone and focus the Commonwealth’s limited resources on the arrest, conviction, and incarceration of violent individuals. Paul Trible Blue Grass, VA
Suggest instead of Firearms Safety Subcommittee... Crimes Safety Subcommittee. greatly more effective! THE REAL ISSUE!
None of these proposals will impact the behavior of a criminal - only making law abiding citizens vulnerable as a new "gun free" zone attracts people seeking to make a statement with a gun and want time to do so before someone with a gun shows up. Additionally, most of these targeted problems are not currently problems or represent a growing trend that needs additional protections enacted to address. In my view, these bills have limited to no chance to provide additional protections or impact criminal behavior but DO further strip your constituents God give rights to provide the illusion of protection.
As a constituent, I urge you to OPPOSE the following bills: HB 12, Jones, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon, requires all firearms in a home be secured if there is a minor in the home. Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, prevents home-based gun dealers from operating within 1.5 miles of a school. Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, makes it illegal for anyone under 21 to purchase any kind of firearm. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen.
I'm a volunteer with Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America, and I support this bill.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support the following bills: HB1174, HB1181, HB1195, HB12, HB1424, HB1462, HB158, HB175, HB183, HB23, HB270, HB318, HB319, HB351, HB362, HB585, HB602, HB637, HB791, HB797, HB798, HB799, HB861, HB916, & HB945 I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I oppose these bills: HB1030, HB1141, HB1198, HB1230, HB1235, HB1321, HB1325, HB1386, HB289, HB389, HB756, & HB872 Innocent children are dying on our watch. Please do something.
My fellow Virginia’s I write today to comment on the bills before you. I am a retired Army veterans. I grew up in Virginia, went to ODU and instead of seeking residency in other states, stayed a Virginian and paid taxes while on active duty. I fought in war and lost good Soldiers and friends defending this nation, you and our Constitution. I retired in Virginia because I love this state. Your body will decide, with its vote, to either infringe on our rights or defend them. I ask you to defend them like those friends and Soldiers that also did. I am a responsible gun owner who raised his children to be responsible gun owners (all three are serving or served). I am also a CCP holder who is willing to defend his fellow citizens. If you vote for any of these bills to limit our rights it will impact my ability to defend myself and my family. Please do the right thing and defend the 2nd Amd. My wife and I already decided to leave the state if you enact these measures to limit our rights. Thank you Oliver Rose
HB 12, Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen.
The selected bills are unconstitutional! They must be voted down!
HB 23 above disarms legally armed citizens while doing nothing to prevent crime. It makes another "self defense free" zone where criminals will ignore it.
All of these anti 2nd amendment bills DO NOT represent the vast majority of the citizenry of Virginia. All of these anti-gun bills will do absolutely nothing to impact crime, and are only a form of punishment to responsible gun owners in the commonwealth. These bills are meant to only meant to elicit “feel-good” emotions for those sensing they are impacting gun crime. Stop letting criminals go free early and do not focus the legislatures efforts on infringing on the rights of the people to legally defend themselves from those who mean to do grievous harm.
It is outrageous that the General Assembly is using our 2nd Amendment right to punish law abiding citizens who have done nothing wrong other then to defend themselves. It’s clear that Democrats pander to their bases without a thought about the citizens of this Commonwealth or this nation. This issue amongst others, galvanize the voters to get out and vote for the party that does not seek to encroach our rights under the State and Federal Constitution. There is zero proof that We The People are deranged killers, a mob or even the radical right that the Democrat who currently occupies the White House has said. He’d called us Nazis and portrayed honest, hardworking and law abiding citizens as the problem. We are not. Opens border, out of control spending, child indoctrination and parroting the DNC is the problem that is self inflicted and deserves nothing less then our disgust and rebuke come November 2024. The General Assembly reflects the divide between Northern Virginia to Richmond and the difference in South Eastern, Western Virginia. The Democrat party and Legislature know full well that gun control laws if enacted, will not reduce violence but increase victimhood that they’ll blame on Republicans and the cycle continues. Pathetic fools and they wonder why I’ve stopped contributing to candidates who never deliver to fools who govern us.
This bill disarms doctors, nurses, emergency medical personnel, and other medical care providers in their workplace. Hospitals must provide care to all patients, even patients who are emotionally or psychologically disturbed - these patients may be dangerous and they may be armed. It is not reasonable to prohibit doctors, nurses and other medical care providers from effectively defending themselves in their workplace.
Please, NO more gun control. You all KNOW that criminals do not follow your laws. All your gun control does is limit my and my family's rights to self defense and peaceful enjoyment of the shooting sports. Instead, put, and keep, actual violent offenders in jail. It really is that simple.
As a woman and a 30 plus year Emergency Department nurse I ask you to reject these onerous gun control laws. Laws like these discourage women who are most at risk from being able to obtain the means to defend themselves. I worked many a late night shift in Northern Virginia and walked through empty parking lots and garages worried about my safety. Women should not have to suffer this and should have ready access to the means to defend themselves. You aren't disarming criminals your are disarming women.
The bills under consideration will do nothing to increase the safety of Virginians while infringing on our right to defend ourselves. They are designed to make it more difficult to obtain a firearm, possess a firearm, or use a firearm to defend oneself or others. Meanwhile criminals will continue unabated. Moreover, most of these unconstitutional laws have been rendered moot as they have been struck down by state and federal courts. As a former police officer and detective I implore you to reject these useless and unconstitutional laws. Thank you
No more gun control legislation. It's not the gun that's the issue. It's the mentally ill folks that obtained a gun.
I strongly oppose these bills as they are direct infringements on the 2nd Amendment of The Constitution. Most of these have already been found to be unconstitutional by various courts yet they are still being presented as bills. I am completely against these and any other such bills that infringe on the constitutional and inalienable rights of the Citizens of the United States of America and of the Commonwealth of Virginia.
No more unconstitutional gun control.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support these bills. I expect to see more gun violence prevention legislation *actually pass* since there is so much nonpartisan alignment on this topic. The status quo is unacceptable. Our pro-gun culture is a threat to our children, and a slap in the face to every person who has lost their lives to gun violence. Enough is enough - policy over prayers.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support this bill.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support this bill. Gun violence in our communities and in our state is heartbreaking and changes need to be made to protect the citizens of Virginia.
I am a member of Virginia moms for change and I support these bills.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change and I support these bills. To all responsible gun owners: you shouldn't be afraid of these common sense bills. These bills are directed at people who are not handling their firearms as the deadly weapons that they can be. Instead of thinking your rights are being taken away, consider instead how safe storage, permits and waiting periods could help the daily gun violence in our country. Keep your guns, we are not trying to take them away. These bills are an opportunity for you, as a responsible gun owner, to be a part of the solution to help cut down on needless violence.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change and I support the selected bills. I believe they will make our communities safer and that gun violence is a critical issue we must address with such legislation and more.
I am a member of Virginia Mom's for Change, a group working towards gun violence prevention. We support the bills indicated above.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group. I support bills HB1174 HB1181 HB1195 HB12 HB1424 HB1462 HB158 HB175 HB183 HB23 HB270 HB318 HB319 HB351 HB362 HB585 HB602 HB637 HB791 HB798 HB799 HB861 HB916 HB945
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group. I support bills HB1174 HB1181 HB1195 HB12 HB1424 HB1462 HB158 HB175 HB183 HB23 HB270 HB318 HB319 HB351 HB362 HB585 HB602 HB637 HB791 HB798 HB799 HB861 HB916 HB945
and I support these bills. The bills we support are: HB1174, HB1181, HB1195, HB12, HB1424, HB1462, HB158, HB175, HB183, HB23, HB270, HB318, HB319, HB351, HB362, HB585, HB602, HB637, HB791, HB797, HB798, HB799, HB861, HB916, & HB945
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support these bills. The bills we support are: HB1174, HB1181, HB1195, HB12, HB1424, HB1462, HB 158, HB175, HB183, HB23, HB270, HB318, HB319, HB351, HB362, HB585, HB602, HB637, HB791, HB797, HB798, HB799, HB861, HB916, & HB945
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support these bills. The bills we support are: HB1174, HB1181, HB1195, HB12, HB1424, HB1462, HB158, HB175, HB183, HB23, HB270, HB318, HB319, HB351, HB362, HB585, HB602, HB637, HB791, HB797, HB798, HB799, HB861, HB916, & HB945
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support this bill.
Blatantly unconstitutional proposals.
The Virginia NAACP supports this bill. We support common sense gun legislation that will have a significant impact on reducing gun violence and saving lives; this includes comprehensive background checks on the sale of firearms, limitations on purchasing firearms and prohibition of selling and transporting assault weapons - this is necessary legislation to keep Virginians safe.
The end of solitary confinement must be done My son was murdered in solitary confinement at Red Onion Prison in Pound Va on 1/3/22.
The Virginia NAACP supports this bill. We support common sense gun legislation that will have a significant impact on reducing gun violence and saving lives; this includes comprehensive background checks on the sale of firearms, limitations on purchasing firearms and prohibition of selling and transporting assault weapons - this is necessary legislation to keep Virginians safe.
Our Constitution does not provide citizens with privileges. It establishes a government with checks and balances and specifically limits the governments ability to remove the rights of its people. In regards to the matter at hand, it specifically says the the government cannot place limitations on the right of a citizen to keep and bear arms. Before I get the typical response, I know you are already aware that the phrase "well regulated" specifically refers to an being trained and ready to bear said arms. The language at the time did not use the term "regulated" as we do with modern regulations. It has been proven in the courts repeatedly that the laws you are currently considering are unconstitutional. Of this I am sure you are already aware. By spending time and tax dollars discussing laws that you know to be unconstitutional, you are in fact wasting time and tax dollars that could be spent on productive issues. I can only assume your intent is to intentionally waste time, and force members of the firearms industry to waste money on legal fees defending the constitution you have sworn to uphold. Please consider actual data and actual facts when considering gun legislation. No data supports the claim the "assault weapon" bans actually reduce gun related crime. More guns are being purchased now than ever before, yet now that the latest FBI data has been released, we can see that gun related crimes have not increased. Also, like every year that the FBI has released data, so called "assault weapons" make up a very small portion of all gun crimes. For your general knowledge the term "assault weapon" was first coined by Adolf Hitler. He renamed one of their new automatic firearms, the Sturmgewehr, because he felt that the name "assault weapon" would strike fear in allied forces. This is also the exact reason the gun control community uses this term as well. The fact is that these firearms are not fully automatic and cannot be made so without a high degree of machining skills and mechanical knowhow. Plus doing so is already illegal. The fact is the Biden's latest gun control act has not been equally enforced. It was supposed to provide additional support for school security and mental health services. It was supposed to provide stronger punishments for those cought breaking existing gun laws. It was supposed to allow FFL's to use the NICS system to check employees. It was supposed to allow FFL's to be able to instantly check inventory or potential purchase/trades by their serial number to determine if the firearm has been stolen or used in any crimes. None of these provisions have been acted upon or enforced. Please drop these latest gun control bills. They are unconstitutional and will never pass. Please do not waste your time and our tax dollars on these wasted efforts. Regards, Jonathan Goodman
THe Virginia NAACP supports this bill. We support common sense gun legislation that will have a significant impact on reducing gun violence and saving lives; this includes comprehensive background checks on the sale of firearms, limitations on purchasing firearms and prohibition of selling and transporting assault weapons - this is necessary legislation to keep Virginians safe.
The Virginia NAACP supports this bill. We support common sense gun legislation that will have a significant impact on reducing gun violence and saving lives; this includes comprehensive background checks on the sale of firearms, limitations on purchasing firearms and prohibition of selling and transporting assault weapons - this is necessary legislation to keep Virginians safe.
THe Virginia NAACP supports this bill. We support common sense gun legislation that will have a significant impact on reducing gun violence and saving lives; this includes comprehensive background checks on the sale of firearms, limitations on purchasing firearms and prohibition of selling and transporting assault weapons - this is necessary legislation to keep Virginians safe.
The Virginia NAACP supports this bill. We support common sense gun legislation that will have a significant impact on reducing gun violence and saving lives; this includes comprehensive background checks on the sale of firearms, limitations on purchasing firearms and prohibition of selling and transporting assault weapons - this is necessary legislation to keep Virginians safe.
I'm a volunteer with Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America, and I support this bill.
HB158 - Firearm locking device; required for sale or transfer of firearm.
My name is Laura, and I’m your constituent. Gun violence prevention is my top priority. Please support hi. Safety legislation that is brought up for a vote. These are the bills I support. Thank you for your time.
Please do not make life more difficult for responsible gun owners. Many of the proposed laws are clearly unconstitutional and will be struck down anyway. Others may be constitutional but are completely draconian. Virginia already has some of the toughest gun laws in the country All the bills I am providing feedback for would not make VA safer. Next time Republicans are in power they will reverse those anyway. But even if that does not happen, you are contributing to the further polarization of politics. There won't be any bipartisanship left on 2nd amendment issues or even other issues
I am opposed to all of these unconstitutional and anit-american gun laws and regulations. There is no room for more gun laws and regulations in this state.
Contrary to how certain government officials treat it, the second amendment is written using plain, easy to understand language, and insists that government has no right to take away the right for ordinary people like us to defend ourselves, as the constitution and bill of rights do not simply give people rights, but protects them from government manipulation and control. It’s incredibly disappointing and a tragedy that people choose to commit acts of violence with these rights, but restricting those who wish to exercise their rights peaceably due to those who wouldn’t follow these rules in the first place is incredibly naive. I, as well as every other person in the United States, deserve to protect my family with the best technology available. While some people look at certain defense weapon setups as a “why do you need that” situation, 1) I have the right to defend myself with the best tool available, and so I will choose that every time, 2) why do you “need” anything other than basic necessities (fast car, Gucci clothes, etc)? The government has no place in deciding what I “need”, 3) people with the intent to harm will not care what laws govern peaceful people, so what would limiting the victim’s access to proper tools do? You may think that by “banning” or otherwise restricting access to a certain thing would mean that all of the “bad” things would magically go away, but they will not. Evil has always and will always exist, and I have every right to defend myself from it using the best tool available wherever I, or my family, choose to go. Restricting access on certain properties (the government isn’t actively protecting me everywhere), requiring certain training (who is paying for this?), limiting certain types of firearms (go ahead and define “assault weapon” in plain language please), and restricting ammo purchasing (I thought you wanted us to train; how does this help then?) are all means that end up hurting the average person and helping those who wish to hurt others, as the rest of us will be left in a position to insufficiently defend ourselves. I urge you to understand that while, yes, it is awful that evil people commit horrific acts, this right ultimately allows me to protect myself and my family from these evil people as well and as evil will always exist (we certainly like to delusion ourselves into believing that we live in a utopia, but we do not), I will protect my family accordingly. The government has no right to restrict this. Leave the peaceful citizens alone, more firmly punish those who hurt others, and help communities where this is an issue to prevent the upbringing of more evil people.
I oppose these bills that are attacking the rights of law-abiding gun owners.
Please stop trying to make criminals of law abiding citizens who just want to protect themselves. Me and my partner have recently become firearm owners because of situations that have arisen in our day to day lives, such as harassment of my wife almost to the point of altercation, sketchy characters waiting in front of our door/ducking in and out of our bushes at all times of the night, people breaking into cars in the neighborhood etc (many times the police/security were called only to arrive 45mins to an hour later). with many of these nonsensical bills you condemn us to allowing any possible violence to happen to us without a chance of defending our selves. Instead of helping fix the problem, you seek to make criminals out of any Virginian who has followed the law and legal purchased a firearm. Shame on you. I am Virginian native and since I was 18 I voted leaning blue in local and state elections you all are making me think this was a mistake. I am not proud of Virginia “progressives” who would rather strip my wife of her chance and right to defend her self rather than try to address the root of crime. Don’t make law abiding people criminals. Do some actual work and address the criminals! 2 of the proposed bills would make in illegal to bring your concealed firearm into a restaurant and another makes it a crime to have the firearm in your vehicle…. Like really? This is literally just to fill jails and strip people of their rights.
Many of these gun laws are unfair to law abiding citizens and do not affect criminals. These gun laws should be vetoed.
Leave law abiding citizens alone.
State Legislature members, A right delayed is a right denied. Quoting the 2022 NYSRPA v. Bruen Supreme Court Case: 'The constitutional right to bear arms in public for self-defense is not “a second-class right, subject to an entirely different body of rules than the other Bill of Rights guarantees.” McDonald, 561 U. S., at 780 (plurality opinion). The exercise of other constitutional rights does not require individuals to demonstrate to government officers some special need. The Second Amendment right to carry arms in public for self defense is no different.' The recent NYSRPA v. Bruen case highlighted the significance of individual self-defense, and it's crucial to consider the rights of law-abiding citizens in crafting firearm legislation. While the goal of enhancing public safety is commendable, an outright ban on certain firearms and magazines will disproportionately impact responsible gun owners who use these tools for legitimate purposes, such as self-defense and sport. It is essential to strike a balance between public safety and the preservation of individual rights. Instead of blanket bans, and bureaucratic obstacles that only harass lawful firearm owners, we should focus on comprehensive measures that address the root causes of gun violence. This approach respects the constitutional rights of citizens while fostering a safer society. Criminals are not deterred by restrictions on lawful purchase at federally-licensed FFL Dealers. They do not bother going through the process of applying for a concealed carry permit, because they do not intend to carry lawfully. People who want to use weapons to hurt innocent citizens of Virginia will not be impeded by these House and Senate Bills. Instead, the only individuals who will have their behavior modified are lawful men and women who are unable to defend themselves against those who will commit crimes regardless of what is written into law this Legislative Session. If you pass the above laws, it will only serve to waste hard-working Taxpayers' money fighting them in Federal Court. California and New York have lost their cases seeking to uphold unconstitutional gun laws, and the sponsors of these bills will lose too. Do the right thing - the hard thing - enforce the laws we already have, get the small minority of violent criminals off the streets of Virginia, and uphold the constitutional rights of your polity.
These bills infringe on the rights of the United States citizens given to us by the second amendment. The only thing these bills will accomplish will take the firearms out of the hands of law abiding citizens, while criminals will still have access.
I do not support any bill that removes any right from law abiding citizens to protect themselves from those who WILL NOT abide by these laws. These laws ONLY give CRIMINALS the upper hand.
There are approximately 47 bills regarding gun control between the House and Senate. Rather than fix issues that actually protect and enhance the lives of Virginians, many of these bills seek to disenfranchise and reduce the safety of the citizens in this great Commonwealth. Firearms are so fundamental to the founding and continued existence of our free society that they are listed just second to the freedom of speech in amendments to the constitution. It is plainly clear to all that countries and states who have banned or severely restricted firearms that violence does not end with their banning. Unjust deaths are not prevented. It simply ensures that law abiding citizens are left defenseless from those that wish to harm them, whether that be individuals or an organization. I write this knowing that it will be completely disregarded by the bills authors, but in hopes that others feel galvanized to speak up against unjust actions made in the name of progress. To those who wish to protect themselves with firearms while simultaneously stripping them from the common man, may you take heed of the Virginia state motto.
Stop trying to strip 2nd Amendment rights from law abiding citizens with a constitutional right to own and carry firearms. Not a single one of these laws/bills you’re trying to enact would have stopped any of the mass shootings we’ve seen.
I oppose all of these blatantly unconstitutional bills and wish our elected officials would actually get to work on fixing things that matter to Virginians.
It is obvious these elected officials want you to die at the behest of an anarcho tyrannical state where violent perpetual offenders are off with a slap on the wrist, while YOU tax payer are criminalized for not wanting to be a victim to these perpetual perpetrators. The elected officials funded by big Pro-Death lobby of Giffords and Bloomberg sit in their cushy NOVA HOAd mansions behind security while you plebs go to work everyday to pay their salary. These same officials effectively bribe the police state by giving them a way to pay off a mortgage and boat in exchange for your oppression. YOU citizen must morally oppose these pro-Death bills. Democracy has fallen and its only driven by money hungry Babylonians who swim in excess and delicacy while YOU PLEBS cant even afford milk, eggs or pampers. Remember these people do not hold dominion over you. Call your congressman/woman and CHRIST IS KING!
There is no acceptable reason to infringe upon the Constitutionally-protected (both US and Virginia's Constitutions) rights of Americans and Virginians. None of these bills purported to reduce gun-related violence actually seem to prioritize the reduction of causal effects of overall violence. Many of these are merely attempts to curb the rights of the People to keep and bear arms, because our legislative bodies are full of corrupt, weak, and contemptible individuals. Show us the bills for addressing the root causes of violence: mental health, income inequality, social instability, lack of education and educational opportunities, drug & human trafficking, or employment & wages (this list is not all-inclusive).
Time and time again it has been proven that criminals do not care about or follow restrictive firearm laws. Virginia already has some of the most restrictive firearms laws in the country ("B+" rating from Giffords), more unconstitutional infringements upon law abiding citizens is not the answer. We need to address the root causes (access to mental health resources for example) and not throw bandaids at it by punishing responsible, law abiding, gun owners. I oppose these bills and urge you to do the same.
I oppose the proposed firearms legislation put forward by this legislature and any legislation that violates the 1st, 2nd, and 4th, amendment rights of any Virginian. The desire for safer communities, a more united nation, and healing for our public health is something that we all can share in but these bills do not achieve that. Rather, they regulate and penalize. They unconstitutionally restrict the rights of the many in the name of safety and serve only to harm our rights. I would be doing a disservice to our state and my fellow citizens if I did not also provide potential solutions or remedies to the violence we face. First, we as communities need to promote voluntary storage facilities for those who are experiencing hardship and are concerned about suicide. Ideally making it easier to put firearms safely out of reach when suicide risks are greater. To do this it would need to be a system at the lowest level with minimum government involvement besides funding and partnership with local ranges. We would also need to reach out to those in our lives who are in a bad place and encourage the use of these facilities. Second, we should promote a culture of safe handling and respect for firearms through school courses and community organizations because assault weapons or not suicide, or accidents only take one bullet from a single action firearm. Lastly and more broadly we should focus on the issues surrounding the violence. Whether it is drugs and organized criminal activity or the mental health crisis as it has become known we should be working to fix these issues first. I.e. legalize weed, adapt police training, and push to root out organized crime, promote common social values and family cohesion, increase freedom, physical activity, and discipline in the school system.
These firearms bill are either redundant or unless in any meaningful way. If you care about reducing violence, please focus on criminals. Please stop trying to disarm families and law abiding citizen from protecting themselves.
I am a liberal through and through, I believe in individual rights and the opportunity for prosperity for all. I vote democrat because I care about my community, the rights of minorities, and women’s rights. The proposed legislation limiting the ability of free, law abiding citizens to purchase firearms, carry, and general use should not be limited further. I have witnessed violence at the hands of criminals, some later caught and it was shown that they did not legally acquire these firearms. The proposed legislation will effectively stop those who abide by the laws of Virginia from being able to properly protect themselves. It is known that police will not protect you, and they have no legal obligation to do so. This puts us at a dilemma, it’s either blindly trust the police to protect us and our families or have the ability to protect ourselves. I am not advocated for looser gun laws by any means, but I am advocating for more common sense gun laws. What do I mean by this you may ask? Well I mean background checks are a must and proper certification to conceal carry. I am a former Marine, I was a firefighter, and am a current student at a great university in our nations capital. I like to think I am reasonable in my thinking, but after looking and reading the propositions I checked above, I can’t help but feel betrayed by my own party. There is more than 5 guns for every American in this country. Gun control must target the people who do not follow the law and try to prevent violence from occurring, and the proposed legislation above does not help in that manner. I am hopeful that you will read this and reconsider the language in the legislation and I am even more hopeful that I can protect my family as necessary. I will always vote for progress but that’s not to say that I will always vote against my interests. Locally, crime has been on the rise and I have had to deal with it directly with little to no help from the police. I will (to the fullest extent of the law) protect myself as necessary from anyone who wishes to inflict harm on myself or family, and I hope you see that the average citizen in Virginia can not afford a security detail or rely on our police for protection. Thank you and have a great day.
Please stop infringing on our god given right, protected by the constitution of the United States (which you all have sworn to uphold and protect), to keep and bear arms. Responsible gun owners are not the problem in America’s gun violence epidemic. We follow the law. Criminals don’t. We use our firearms to protect ourselves, loved ones, and community. Chipping away at this right we have makes us more vulnerable to becoming victims of gun violence, not protect us from it. These laws only serve to empower those with evil intentions. Rather, might I suggest harsher penalties for those who commit senseless acts of violence with firearms instead of going after the good men and women of the commonwealth who wish only to use their firearms for lawful purposes.
Dear House of Delegates, I'm writing to you today as a concerned citizen. The introduction of bills aimed at heavily regulating firearms, is not warranted or wanted by the people of Virginia. Our nation stands at a crossroads, where the desire to address gun violence intersects with the constitutional rights affirmed by the Supreme Court. The Second Amendment's protection of the right to bear arms is not just a legal directive but a reflection of our commitment to individual freedom. In this context, the proposed regulations, while motivated by a commendable desire to reduce violence, raise significant concerns about their effectiveness and the potential consequences for law-abiding citizens. Research, including findings published in the Journal of Quantitative Criminology, suggests that the relationship between strict gun laws and the reduction of gun violence is not as straightforward as one might hope. Cities with stringent gun regulations continue to face challenges with gun-related crimes, indicating that those intent on violence often find ways to circumvent the law. This reality prompts us to question whether new restrictions will achieve their intended goal or merely place additional burdens on those who seek firearms for legitimate purposes, including self-defense. Moreover, the abundance of firearms in the United States presents a logistical challenge to the enforcement of such regulations. With more guns than people in the country, the task of significantly reducing the availability of firearms to criminals, without infringing on the rights of law-abiding citizens, is daunting. It is within this complex landscape that I urge you to consider the broader implications of the proposed gun control measures. The parallels drawn with other contentious issues, such as the regulation of women's healthcare, highlight the potential for policy decisions to inadvertently infringe upon individual freedoms and deepen societal divisions. Such outcomes not only detract from the intended goals of enhancing public safety but also risk alienating segments of the population whose support is essential for the advancement of our collective well-being. I respectfully ask that you consider the potential consequences of the proposed gun control measures, not just for the immediate future but for the legacy we leave for generations to come. It is my hope that, together, we can find a way to address the challenges of gun violence in a manner that honors our values, respects our freedoms, and genuinely enhances the safety and well-being of our communities.
STOP INFRINGING OUR RIGHTS. Get rid of every single gun control bill that is here and START ENFORCING THE LAWS WE ALREADY HAVE. Stop trying to turn law abiding citizens into criminals. I am disgusted that all of these nonsense bills have even made it this far. You can have these laws in Northern Virginia where everyone hates guns but don’t force this garbage into the rest of the state. GET RID OF ALL OF THIS GARBAGE and keep your noses out of everyone’s business. More government is not the answer.
Please stop attempting to infringe on my 2nd amendment rights. Responsible gun owners are not behind any gun violence. Maybe focus on bills that will actually keep guns out of the hands of those that should not have them rather than stripping the rights away of law-abiding citizens. Not a single one of those bills will stop criminals from breaking the law, all they will do is prevent me from being able to effectively defend myself and my family against said criminal.
Virginia already has some of the strictest gun laws in the nation. We can all agree violence is an issue but making more unconstitutional, on a national and state level, gun laws will not help with the rates of violent crimes and property crimes as we see from states with stricter gun laws. We need to increase access to mental health and community resources to address the root causes of issues rather than criminalizing responsible gun owners. I am opposed to this attack on the second amendment which is the fundamental backbone that protects the other freedoms guranteed in the constitution.
The second amendment is very clear in its intent that these rights “shall not be infringed”. Removing/ restricting law abiding citizens right to self defense and protection against unwitting organizations and persons is not only more harmful, but a clear violation of the rights this country was founded on.
Dear Honorable Members of the House of Delegates, I write to you today as a concerned citizen, deeply invested in the well-being and safety of our communities, and as someone who values the principles upon which our nation was founded. The issue at hand, the introduction of bills aimed at heavily regulating firearms, is one that I believe warrants a thoughtful reconsideration in light of its broader implications. Our nation stands at a crossroads, where the desire to address gun violence intersects with the constitutional rights affirmed by the Supreme Court. The Second Amendment's protection of the right to bear arms is not just a legal directive but a reflection of our commitment to individual freedom. In this context, the proposed regulations, while motivated by a commendable desire to reduce violence, raise significant concerns about their effectiveness and the potential consequences for law-abiding citizens. Research, including findings published in the Journal of Quantitative Criminology, suggests that the relationship between strict gun laws and the reduction of gun violence is not as straightforward as one might hope. Cities with stringent gun regulations continue to face challenges with gun-related crimes, indicating that those intent on violence often find ways to circumvent the law. This reality prompts us to question whether new restrictions will achieve their intended goal or merely place additional burdens on those who seek firearms for legitimate purposes, including self-defense. Moreover, the abundance of firearms in the United States presents a logistical challenge to the enforcement of such regulations. With more guns than people in the country, the task of significantly reducing the availability of firearms to criminals, without infringing on the rights of law-abiding citizens, is daunting. It is within this complex landscape that I urge you to consider the broader implications of the proposed gun control measures. The parallels drawn with other contentious issues, such as the regulation of women's healthcare, highlight the potential for policy decisions to inadvertently infringe upon individual freedoms and deepen societal divisions. Such outcomes not only detract from the intended goals of enhancing public safety but also ***risk alienating segments of the population whose support is essential for the advancement of our collective well-being.*** Constituents see this robust effort to "see what sticks" as a weakness within our party. Comparatively imbalanced with the diverse range of issues and concerns that we face everyday. A waste. As we move forward, I encourage you to approach this issue with a balanced perspective, one that recognizes the need for effective strategies to combat gun violence while also safeguarding the constitutional rights and freedoms that define our nation. The path to meaningful change is complex, requiring a nuanced understanding of the issues at hand and a commitment to policies that truly serve the best interests of all our citizens. In closing, I respectfully ask that you consider the potential consequences of the proposed gun control measures, not just for the immediate future but for the legacy we leave for generations to come. It is my hope that, together, we can find a way to address the challenges of gun violence in a manner that honors our values, respects our freedoms, and genuinely enhances the safety and well-being of our communities.
You guys need to stop attacking our 2nd amendment and get help for these kids growing up with identity crisis’s . You coming after law abiding citizens is appalling and the fact that your leaning towards becoming the despicable state of California is saddening. If the president can have security which uses firearms that even the normal civilian can’t have this raises the issue of how can a civilian defend against a tyrannical government with a featureless 10 round ar-15 ? Keep this up and we know exactly what your end goal is.
As a left leaning voter and citizen of Virginia, these new restrictions on our right to bear arms are sickening. Stop proposing so many bans and limits, and maybe a realistic bill, like the safe credit, won’t be universally protested. If you actually want to quell gun violence, keep focused on affordable mental and physical healthcare, improving the education system, and reducing income inequality. While the right may not support these real improvements, I cannot in good faith support or vote for any politician who supports banning or restricting the rights of law abiding citizens in our beautiful commonwealth. Thank you.
The 2nd amendment states "shall not be infringed". All of these bills are infringement and are therefore unconstitutional. Should we pass laws that people must pass a test before they can have freedom of speech? What about pass a test before you can vote? What about if someone does not have training they will be slaves again? Name one other right outlined in the constitution where a citizen has to jump through hoops before they can use that right? I oppose all of these bills as they will do more harm than good. I can understand wanting to keep people safe but gun control does the opposite. These bills will only make it harder for law abiding citizens to exercise their rights while criminals will still ignore the law. Criminals will still get illegal guns or weapons and will commit more crimes since they know the public is unable to defend themselves. Benjamin Franklin once said: "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." You writing bills saying "give up your rights and guns and we will protect you". Well ask the Native Americans how that worked out for them. Ask a Jewish person who was under Nazi control how that worked out for them. Well Hitler's first step was to take away the guns from the public so they could not protect themselves and over 6 million people lost their lives. Since you do not know history you are writing bills which will doom us to repeat it. You know 75 years ago when you could just buy a gun in a catalog and it was shipped to your house we did not have this issue. In the 60s and 70s when people would have a gun in their truck at school or take one in for show and tell we did not have a gun issue. This is a mental health issue. Deal with mental health and you will fix the public safety issue. Zero of my guns have killed people because guns do not kill people. People kill people. Look at Ukraine and Israel for just one form of example why we need LESS gun control. All of these gun laws are unconstitutional and should be thrown out. Do the right thing and let us law abiding citizens have their rights as outlined in the constitution. Do not pass laws which infringe on our rights. If the 2nd amendment falls, the 1st will follow . When the 1st and 2nd fall the 13th will fall and our country will be lost and we will be back in chains.
I am very opposed to the vast majority of these bills. I am a legal gun owner with my CHP. Many of these bills heavily restrict my right to bear arms in a legal capacity. I don’t understand why I should be punished for doing everything legally and correctly only to become a felon in the coming months through these legislations
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Whether or not a person chooses to exercise this right is up to them. Otherwise, it shall not be infringed.
I can not, and nobody should, support these unconstitutional laws. THROW THEM ALL OUT.
You guys make it harder and harder to vote Democrat every single cycle. Complete ban on Semi Automatics more or less making the state even stricter towards guns then states like Maryland? I oppose all these even the "herp common sense derp" ones because the states party has made it clear they don't give a crap about anything but putting hollow wins for politicians because hhheeeyyy punishing law abiding gun owners is a whole lot easier then creating jobs or reducing crime. If these bills die before getting to the governors desk, especially the bans, then I will gladly continue to vote DNC. But if Youngkin has to veto these and you make me say something I never thought I would "Thank god Youngkin won" then I look forward to blindly going down the ticket in 2024 and checking "R" on everyone. Thank you for taking the time to read this.
I do not support more legislation infringing on my 2nd Ammendment rights. Please fund more enforcement for the proactive enforcement of existing laws and regulations pertaining to firearms.
I oppose this legislation.
The litany of gun control measures under consideration will do nothing to effectively reduce crime and violence, and will only further restrict the rights of law abiding firearms owners. Not to mention the countless examples from other locales across the country where these same measure have been put into place and the result is more violent crime as criminals can now feel safe that the general population is not armed. Strongly oppose all proposed bills.
The ridiculous litany of gun control measures under consideration will do nothing to effectively reduce crime and violence, and will only further restrict the rights of law abiding firearms owners.
We dont need MORE laws regarding firearms, we need to enforce the laws that are already on the books. If enforcement is done then these laws are redundant and not necessary. Don't pass more laws just for the sake of passing laws. They do nothing but make law abiding citizens confused and they dont do anything to stop problems.
I am writing to express my great concern, to the legislatures that continue to ignore their oath of swearing to protect and uphold the rights of the citizens as protected by the United States Constitution and the Virginian Constitution. "The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED". You beaurcrats do not grant that right to he people, it is God given. While you grandstand and ateemlt to make laws to hurt the everydayaw abiding American citizen, you turn a way and do nothing in these bills to punish criminals committing crimes. It is already illegal to murder people. To grandstand and think that any of these bills would stop someone from murdering or harming another person is laughable. Quite literally. You pander screaming about these firearm safety bills while you walk around with security and people with "guns" to keep you safe. Start enforcing the existing laws against criminals who commit crimes vs trying to turn law abiding people, who take training, are serious about protection of family, themselves and others, and trying to disarm them and make them criminals. Or we will vote you out! Uphold your Oath or be prepared for the consequences your actions lead to by the American people. Regards Mr. Harris
I know most modern politicians aren’t historians but the Bill of Rights is really simple. If you read that, you’ll also read the 2nd Amendment which is really simple as well. In the same docket you’re trying to give more benefits to police and take away more rights from citizens. You ought to be ashamed. What a farce freedom is anymore.
These anti gun laws are an infringement on all Virginian's 2A rights.
I am opposed to additional new laws or further regulations placed on firearms or other means of self defense, or which limit the ability to conduct commerce or carry such items. Not only does the constitution make it clear this is a violation of my rights, it does nothing to address or reduce the actions of criminals.
I am against all of these blatantly unconstitutional firearms restrictions. I'm strongly against: SB2| Deeds | Assault firearms certain ammunition, etc.; purchase, possession, sale, transfer, etc., prohibited. This tries to ban things that are in common use, which has never worked well for the government, remember Prohibition? Remember the war on drugs? Just like the last assault weapons ban, this will literally just make AR-15s more popular and easier to get illegally. And I am against: HB585 | Mundon King | Home-based firearms dealers; prohibited near schools, penalties. That specifically targets home-based FFLs whose house is somewhere near a school. This would put hundreds of Virginia residents out of business just because of where they live.
All infringements on the second amendment are acts of treason and should be treated as such. Acting in favor of such infringements makes you a traitor to this nation and th commonwealth.
I am Opposed to any limitations on the Second Amendment and any restrictive firearm laws. We have adequate, if not already overbearing, laws on the books now and should not be creating more laws restricting all the aspects of firearm use, sales, and any other aspects of the right to bear arms.
These firearm laws are mostly reactionary to the media response on firearms. This is a major infringement on the 2nd amendment and needs to be stopped.
An inordinate focus on the control of firearms only serves to infringe the rights of the law-abiding citizen in defense of his life and property. The State should instead focus on the apprehension and incarceration of individuals engaging in criminal behavior and associated misuse of firearms.
Any law that infringes on my Gods-given right to own and bear arms is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Any law passed that infringes this right will be answered with a lawsuit.
Hello. There are a plethora of bills that were proposed, which would clearly violate the second amendment rights of many law abiding citizens. First of all, considering concealed carry should be permit-less carry, it is counterproductive to increase the requirements for concealed carry. Restrictions on where law abiding citizens can lawfully carry their now “permitted” firearms is asinine, as well as the proposition of a bill that would make it a penalty to leave a firearm in your car. You would essentially be disarming a large number of people who wish to follow these unlawful order in a day and age where the democratic agenda is to act like there are mass shootings on a daily basis. Effectively disarming the majority and increasing the requirements and legal loopholes to carry is such a vulnerable state to be in and I hope we’re smart enough to avoid that. Restrictions on “Plastic firearms and unfinished frames etc” is not only terrible literature that does nothing to explain, but it is a direct violation of the 2nd amendment considering you have a federal right to make firearms for personal use, which would include additively manufactured parts. Wait periods are also a horrifying thing to think of, considering how many times it has been proven to be a terrible idea, keeping guns out of the hands that need them most to protect themselves and their families. “Assault firearms” and anything to do with them is nonsense considering the blatant inability to define said “assault weapon”. People who don’t understand guns, shouldn’t be making laws on guns. A shorter barrel does not make it more lethal, in fact it lowers the muzzle velocity, causing less force on impact and penetration, in turn causing less collateral damage. Any sort of “assault weapons” bills are targeting law abiding citizens who have every right to use the modern advances in firearm technology just as police officers and military. The only people these bills are effecting are the already law abiding citizens. The criminals who got their hands on said weapons illegally aren’t going to be making sure that their ALREADY ILLEGAL WEAPONS are fully compliant with state laws and regulations before they go commit another crime. In no way shape or form should someone need to disadvantage themselves in a life or death situation because political members with an armed security detail don’t feel the need for a gun. Why would I want to limit myself to a firearm that is going to be inadequate in home defense, or one that does not have a high enough capacity to protect myself from the ever growing threat of home invasion and the increased trend of multiple home invaders breaking in armed. If it was you alone in your house with 6 armed intruders who most definitely must have checked their local laws and firearm regulations and made sure their firearms aren’t violating any rules before they break into your house, would you want to limit yourself to a low capacity firearm that is going to be extremely difficult to use effectively in a high stress situation, or are you taking a rifle which for reasons that don’t make sense, must have a 16 inch barrel, with a larger capacity magazine, and a stock that you can use to safely brace the firearm to prevent stray shots and provide more accurate fire. Personally I’m going to take anything and everything I can get in a situation that means life or death for me and my loved ones EVERY SINGLE DAY OF THE WEEK. Focus on the mental health crisis.
Gun laws do not prevent firearm homicides, based upon gun control organization's own data (Giffords) •No correlation between strict gun laws and firearm homicide incidents •.07 coefficient of determination (AKA R2) where .90 is a strong association •There likely would be a weak association showing gun laws driving the firearm homicide rate higher if Washington, DC was given a score and ranked by Giffords.
Hello, The right to own and bear firearms is intrinsic in the very nature of the founding of the United States. We must remember the spirit of the 2nd Amendment and the right of all civilians to own and bear arms. Firearms are the great equalizer and can allow and individual to defend themselves when they previously could not. Gun violence and the mental health epidemic are closely interlinked and one cannot pass restrictive firearm laws and expect gun violence to go away. Gun bans and the use of restrictive purchasing requirements, magazine limits, waiting periods, and red flag laws have been shown not to be effective in stemming gun violence. I urge anybody reading this message to say "NO" to 2nd Amendment restrictions.
I strongly, along with many fellow Virginians oppose any villainous disarmament bills disguised as "public safety". The second amendment clearly states "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" and out of touch elitist politicians who enjoy the luxury of armed security are choosing to ignore the constitution and force us to rely on sub-par police protection. The same people who want to defund the police want to disarm us. Embracing the second amendment is what is keeping our crime rates low compared to New York and California. We have seen the blatant disregard that criminals have for these so-called laws; emboldened criminals who are not afraid of the consequences and innocent law-abiding people who are forced to live in fear because a bunch of tyrants are letting power corrupt them. I do not want to live in fear and neither do the rest of us. In addition; a lot of counties and cities have declared themselves as second amendment sanctuaries to protect the rights of free individuals from the overreach of tyrannical politicians. These bills are a Trojan horse that will lead to more crime. You anti-gun politicians should be ashamed of yourselves; give up your private security and train yourselves. Then you will change your minds; because in the end, nobody is coming to save you. I would rather have a fighting chance against armed assailants than die waiting for help to arrive. These bills are pure evil
These all seem like infringements that will do nothing to curb any crime. Further they will only create criminals out of everyday law abiding folk. These are laws that seem to be targeting victimless crimes.
I oppose all of these selected bills since I firmly believe they are in conflict with the Second Amendment of the US Constitution. The Second Amendment clearly states that it shall not be infringed upon. Any and all proposed legislation that would place limits on how, where, and when responsible citizens arm themselves runs afoul of that. Our founding fathers correctly held the belief that all people have a natural born right to arm and protect themselves and that the government has no authority to interfere with that. While I agree with the sentiment of reducing violence among our society, gun laws only harm the law abiding citizen and leave criminals who already have a disregard for the law to still be armed. If our elected officials who proposed these bills actually cared about addressing our violence problem, they would focus more on addressing the root causes of violence and crime. More worthwhile pursuits in my opinion would be focused on addressing socio-economic problems that plague disadvantaged communities, creating a more robust and well-equipped mental healthcare system, and overhauling our educational systems to setup our children for better success in life. Thank you all for your time.
I'm against any unconstitutional law, and any law that strips Americans of their rights. These laws are an attack on the 2nd ammendment and hold NO facts in stopping crime. They are a punishment on law abiding people and in no way will make virginia a safer place.
I oppose all these unconstitutional, dangerous, and pointless laws.
I oppose all useless firearm changes. Criminals will not obey
HB113 | Sullivan | Handguns; possession, purchase, or transportation by persons convicted of certain drug offenses. HB1174 | Sickles | Assault firearms; age requirement for purchase, penalty. HB1195 | Hayes | Firearms; waiting period for purchases, penalty. HB12 | Jones | Handguns; firearm locking device required for sale or transfer, child safety warning required. HB1235 | Zehr | Concealed handguns; protective orders. HB1424 | Hope | Firearms; valid permit to purchase, penalties. HB1462 | Laufer | Firearm in unattended motor vehicle; civil penalty. HB158 | McClure | Firearm locking device; required for sale or transfer of firearm. HB16 | Garrett | Firearm or explosive material; carrying within Capitol Square and the surrounding area, etc. HB173 | Simon | Plastic firearms and unfinished frames, etc.; manufacture, import, etc. prohibited, penalties. HB175 | Simon | Assault firearms; carrying in public areas prohibited, penalty. HB183 | Simon | Firearms; storage in residence where minor or person prohibited from possessing is present, penalty. HB2 | Helmer | Assault firearms & certain ammunition, etc.; purchase, sales, transfers, etc., prohibited. HB22 | Jones | Auto sears; definition, prohibition on manufacture, importation, sale, etc., penalty. HB270 | Reid | Commonwealth Comprehensive Gun Safety Program; established, etc. HB319 | Helmer | Firearms instructors & safety prog.; removes reference to NRA & U.S. Concealed Carry Assoc. in Code. HB35 | Clark | Firearm safety device; expands definition of device. HB351 | Clark | Firearm; locking device required for purchase, households where minor resides, penalty. HB362 | McClure | Firearms; purchase, etc., following an assault and battery against an intimate or dating partner. HB454 | Callsen | Firearm/explosive material; carrying w/in Capitol Square or bldg. owned or leased by Commonwealth. HB46 | Bennett-Parker | Firearm; transfers to another person from a prohibited person. HB466 | Helmer | Concealed handgun permits; reciprocity with other states. HB791 | Henson | Pneumatic guns; Class 6 felony to possess. HB797 | Hope | Concealed handguns; demonstrated competence for a permit, firearms instructors and safety programs. HB798 | Hope | Firearms; purchase, possession, etc., following an assault and battery or stalking violation. HB799 | Hope | Concealed handgun permit applications; fingerprints required by local governments. HB861 | Hernandez | Weapons; carrying into hospital that provides mental health services. HB945 | Lopez | Firearm safety device; expands definition of device. SB100 | Ebbin | Plastic firearms and unfinished frames, etc.; manufacture, import, etc. prohibited, penalties. SB2 | Deeds | Assault firearms & certain ammunition, etc.; purchase, possession, sale, transfer, etc., prohibited. SB210 | Perry | Auto sears; prohibition on manufacture, importation, sale, etc., penalty. SB273 | Subramanyam | Firearms; waiting period for purchases, penalty. I oppose all these bills.
I oppose this bill as it seeks to infringe on the Consitutionally proctected rights of lawabiding citizens to protect themselves from criminals, criminals who do not follow the law. This bill makes it harder for someone to keep themselves safe and is primarily a solution in search of problems to fix. Virginia has one of the lowest crime rates in the country and even less gun related crimes being committed year over year. This is not due to gun control laws, in fact as gun control laws increase, s o does the rate of violent crimes. Criminals are not afraid of police, they are afraid of armed citizens. The subject of this bill has already been defeated in courts, passing this into law will only subject the Commonwealth to more lawsuits to have it repealed costing us more in taxes. Enough of our taxpayers money has been wasted in politicians attempting to pass "feel good" bills to try and prove they are doing their job. I urge the legistature to focus on enforcing and imposing stricter penalties for those that break our exsiting laws over creating new laws that only serve to pe nalize the law abiding citizens.
I was born in Henrico county and vote in every election. Guns are currently the #1 killer of our children under the age of 18. I am writing to show my support for these bills because gun violence prevention is my top priority. Please support gun safety legislation that is brought up for a vote! Thank you so much for your time.
My name is Laura Sledge and I am your constituent. Guns are currently the #1 killer of our children under the age of 18, and gun violence prevention is my top priority. Please support gun safety legislation that is brought up for a vote. Here are the bills I support. Thank you for your time.
I support common sense bills HB 1181, 1195, 12, 1424, 1462, 158, 175, 183,23, 270. Safe storage and training make sense! Let's keep everyone safe.
Hello, My name is Hayley Redmond Cilley. Guns are currently the #1 killer of our children under age 18, and I am calling because gun violence prevention is my top priority. Please support gun safety legislation that is brought up for a vote! We need safer communities for all, but especially for our children.
I am writing in opposition to both HB 12 and HB 158. It is obvious elected legislators are not paying attention to the obvious details, but only looking to throw everything at the wall to see what sticks and what they can get away with. Why would two people submit the exact same bill, when they could show their support to the one bill. Firearms already included locking devices when purchased from an FFL and warning papers are already included. Citizens with common sense already know that they Will be held liable criminally and/or civilly. There are existing laws that cover intentional acts negligence. This is being repetitive and targeting the wrong people. I strongly oppose repetitive legislation that will not do anything to help with the root cause where people don't value lives in general. I urge the legislature to vote No.
Dear Sir or Madame. Last year in Newport News I was assaulted by a 27 year old black man from Chesapeake because of his road rage.. This was at my local bank 11;30 in the morning. This young man almost lost his life at my hand because you cannot reel in your problem young men. His words feet from me were ' im going to kick your ass and then kill you'. My pistol changed his mind. I saw for myself the woke judges and a woke system that perpetuates the problem. The criminal justice system has been flung far far left which IS causing a public safety hazzard. No new gun control is needed. More jail time for the trash that i dealt with is. My Congressman Bobby Scott and Delegate Cia Price do not represent me.
I am a member of VA Moms For Change, a gun violence prevention group and I support these bills
When Democrats violate the Covenant between the PEOPLE and the US Constitution as well as the VA Constitution they are acting lawlessly and undermining the commitment toward good Government agreed on for over 200 + years. Seems Democrats didn't learn anything from the Civil war. The mentality of the "Tyrant" and the "Slave Holder" still exists among the Demo-rat Party, removing statues and trying to hide and rewrite history is not good government. Oaths, integrity, and Good Government, mean nothing to this Cabal of Evil minded men and women. We the PEOPLE need and demand good government not a patch work or illegal laws we are expected to "obey" while the "perps" that pass them have no consequence for breaking Constitutional law or good Government. The Demo-rat Party needs to be dismantled and the "ignorant" ejected from the Virginia legislature at once and for all. Peter Buckingham Crozet, VA 22932
OPPOSITION to HB12 - Jones OPPOSITION to HB23 - Laufer OPPOSITION to HB158 - McClure OPPOSITION to HB183 - Simon SUPPORT of HB289 - Wiley OPPOSITION to HB351 - Clark OPPOSITION to HB585 – Mundon King SUPPORT of HB756 - Walker OPPOSITION to HB791 - Henson OPPOSITION to HB861 - Hernandez SUPPORT of HB872 - Earley SUPPORT of HB1141 - Cordoza OPPOSITION to HB1174 - Sickles SUPPORT of HB1198 - Scott
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
I am writing in support of HB 12, 23, 158, 183, 351, 585, 791 and 861. I also write in opposition to HB 289, 756, 872, 1141 and 1198. There is ample evidence that minimal restrictions on firearms has resulted in countless deaths and injuries. Sensible restrictions on access to lethal weapons are sorely needed at this time. In fact, the Supreme Court, in deciding on the right to bear arms, has also stated that “Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited. [It is] not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.” If, unfortunately, assault-style weapons continue to be manufactured and owned, their access must be limited by age. In that case I would support HB 1174. Thank you for your attention to these comments.
I am a member of the Charlottesville Coalition for Gun Violence Prevention and the Charlottesville Center for Peace and Justice. I support all the gun safety bills: 12 23 158 183 351 585 791 861 1141 1174 I oppose these bills: 289 756 872 1198
Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. Opposed unnecessary
Please stop wasting your time and my money on bills that have proven to be have zero impact on public safety, Please refer to Maryland, California, and the other states that already have these laws
Good afternoon, I am writing to implore you to STOP with all of the gun control bills. You are punishing law abiding citizens, who now have their RIGHTS THAT SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED, infringed. And the criminals who do NOT follow these laws but who they are directed at, are not affected. Please enforce ALL of the laws that are presently in the books and prosecute those people breaking the laws and stop letting them out on bail and bond through the Soros DA’s.
HB23 and HB861 Law abiding concealed carry individual are not the problem, and criminals who do not obtain guns legally will not follow this law either. HB12 and HB158 Already exist on the federal level why waste time and money on these bills HB791 who in their right mind would make a child or teenager a felon for bringing a BB-gun into a school, how often does this even happen for this to be considered. HB1174 This bill is unconstitutional at best! How can a man or woman b considered an adult at the age of 18, join the military at the age of 18, and not be allowed to purchase a weapon at the age of 18. Not to mention all other irreversible life changes that are allowed from birth to age 18. Please vote no to all of theses bills and any other unconstitutional gun control bills that come in front of the committee. Concerned constituent.
In reference to all of the above proposed house bills…. In short there is NO need for any more restrictions of any type on the purchase (to include locations of ffls in reference to schools and forcing purchasers to buy locks when they already safely store their firearms), carry, storage, and use of any type of firearms. It is extremely clear that more restrictions do not do anything to stem the flow of violent crimes which may or may not involve firearms (using DC, Chicago, NYC etc as examples, where very strict firearms laws have done nothing to lower violent crime). Instead, we need to focus on allowing law enforcement to aggressively enforce the numerous existing laws, demand commonwealth attorneys offices hold criminals responsible and ensure long prison sentences on offenders. As a citizen of the commonwealth for my entire life, and a local law enforcement officer for over 2 decades I can tell you from personal experience simply adding restrictions and more laws is worthless and simply slows down the system. As they say when seconds count, the police are only minutes away…. Do not place any more restrictions on residents of the commonwealth who are forced to live in increasingly dangerous localities due to the legal changes of the past 5 years, which allow offenders to go unpunished or under punished. Simply because you do not like firearms does not mean that others should not have lessened access to purchase, use, and carry the firearms of their choice. Thank you for your consideration
I would like for the Commonwealth of Virginia to have Constitutional Carry as the law of the entire state , our right as stated in the constitution of the united states and the constitution of the Commonwealth of virginia as written by our founders gives each citizen the right to keep and bear arms with no exclusions, to be secure in their persons, unless that right has been forfeited,. Exercising this right should never lead to forfeiture of this right.
I would like for the Commonwealth of Virginia to have Constitutional Carry as the law of the entire state , our right as stated in the constitution of the united states and the constitution of the Commonwealth of virginia as written by our founders gives each citizen the right to keep and bear arms with no exclusions, to be secure in their persons, unless that right has been forfeited,. Exercising this right should never lead to forfeiture of this right.
For HB12 and HB158: Already covered by federal law, no additional expense should be put on the FFL or the consumer. For HB23 and HB861: You are adding restrictions on personal protection and safety while not ensuring my safety and that of my family. I have been to hospitals in the commonwealth over the last few years, the security provided couldn't stop a squirrel from running through the hospital, much less someone with mal-intent. If you want the citizens to rely on the government for safety, then provide, otherwise don't restrict it. For HB585: You want to prevent FFLs from being within 1.5 mile radius of a school, yet smoke shops or other convenience stores that have vaping products are allowed, with the latter being a much bigger problem in our schools, yet no restrictions. It is silly to assume an FFL poses any danger to a school and I have yet to hear of any incident involving an FFL and a school. Most home based FFLs do not have long term storage. Please educate yourself before trying to implement "feel good" laws. We have other major issues with our schools that need to be addressed, i.e. teach retention, giving teachers more power for discipline, parental involvement/non-involvement, allowing for greater choice of subjects and stopping teaching to a test where our children learn nothing. For HB183: Another "Feel good" law. There have been multiple examples of minors protecting their family over the last several years. But, how would this law have stopped someone like the Sandyhook shooter, who killed his mother and took her safe keys? It wouldn't have. Just like it wouldn't stop a home invade killing the owner and using their safe key/finger print to access a firearm. For HB1174: At the outset this is unconstitutional, but if you want to effect real change in regard to this, open it up to an expanded background, where the applicant/purchaser that is under the age of 21 must consent to a check of their juvenile record in order to purchase, specifically looking for violent crimes. If this were in place, it may thwart some from attempting to buy, while those that continue and consent it would flag in the system, like it does when a felon attempts to buy a firearm at a gunshow. There is much more that needs to go into this, i.e. at what point when the applicant has an established adult history can they purchase after having violent crimes on their juvenile record, 25? 21? I implore every law maker to due their due diligence when it comes to rights stated in both the Virginia Constitution and the US Constitution. Do not be beholden to your donors and ram "feel good" laws through our legislature. When someone spouts statistics to you, take a moment and do you own research, look at the source material, anyone can make states lean in their favor by changing a few words or omitting parts of a study. You must work for the all the people, those you agree with and disagree with and look at all the information, not just what your donors give you. Thank you for your time.
I do not support these bills. I request you vote NO on them. HB 12, Jones, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon, requires all firearms in a home be secured if there is a minor in the home. Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, prevents home-based gun dealers from operating within 1.5 miles of a school. Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, makes it illegal for anyone under 21 to purchase any kind of firearm. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen.
Constitutional issues when made political do no justice to representatives or their constituents. Dishonesty to the public erodes any ability for trust and assumptions based on party affiliation close down civil discussion. Some representatives run for office for gun control matters and get voted in but are you being honest with your constituents. I can quote statistics as could those supporting gun control but there are logical truths being ignored. We should change our terminology from gun control, to gun control over law biding citizens because each law that is passed in most situation only further restricts law biding citizens. Most gun laws only increase the ability to become a victim to criminal actions because in order to abide by laws implemented it puts the citizen at a considerable disadvantage . Gun free zones only mean unarmed citizens open to criminal behavior due to the inability to defend one's self. Law enforcement only enforce the laws, and cannot be there to prevent the actual crimes in most situations. Criminals intent on malfeasance will not abide by any laws put in place but exploit any such laws that allow for an advantage against an unarmed individual. This is not to say that I am apposed to back ground checks even at gun shows to avoid loop holes as I support such measures but to restrict carrying at locations or gun free zones only makes for sitting ducks. Restricting common circulation of rifles or any similar type to the AR-15 platform again only further limits the citizen from criminals AND tyrannical infrastructures within the state and federal levels. We can never assume that our representatives are in power for support of the people and our constitution I am not in support of any of the current gun control bills, I am in support of all the pro gun bills. In light of whatever is voted into law ,if it further restricts my constitutional rights and civil rights I simply cannot and will not comply. Thank you for your time on this matter.
As a fellow resident of Virginia, I urge you to OPPOSE the multiple anti-gun bills being heard today (1/25/24) in the House Public Safety Subcommittee on Firearms, including: HB 12 HB 158 HB 183 HB 351 HB 23 HB 861 HB 585 HB 1174 Please focus more on protecting lawful gun owners and enforcing the laws that career criminals routinely disregard. Thank you.
Dear Delegates of the House Public Safety- Firearms subcommittee, The selected bills are flagrantly and utterly unconstitutional and they stand as a direct violation on the sovereignty and liberties of the citizenry of the Commonwealth. Plainly stated they violate the United States Constitution ( the Supreme Law of the Land) and the God given rights of the people which the Commonwealth purports to “protect”. Such legislation is also preposterous factually as firearms are not the “problem” , they are merely tools and as such they are inert objects that are incapable of exerting will without an evil individual wielding them for malevolent purposes. Criminality is the problem , as criminals do not have any regard for the law or the well being of their fellow man, hence the definition of criminal. Therefore all of the selected legislation put hence forth only seeks to disarm law abiding citizens, those that are neither inclined nor committed to violating the law. Law abiding citizens possess firearms to defend our lives, the lives of our families, and to ensure that our sovereignty and liberty is not stripped away from us by tyrannical Marxist ideologues masquerading as “compassionate” and “caring” legislators. This is not Washington, Illinois, or even Maryland, this is the great Commonwealth of Virginia. That Virginia which led the American revolution under George Washington and in the defense of liberty against the tyrannical crown of England that once sought to oppress and yoke the citizens of the American colonies. The motto that adorns the seal of Virginia and our great state flag is “Sic Semper Tyrannis”, which means “Death to Tyrants”. Such a motto is more apropos in the tumultuous political climate of modernity than ever before, perhaps even more so than during the revolution in which it was founded. Being elected to represent the people does not confer upon any individual the power to strip the people of their inalienable rights, those rights that were enshrined by our great founders in the Constitution. To violate the United States Constitution in an effort to subjugate the people of the republic is by definition treason. The citizenry of the Commonwealth has spoken, we demand that you cease attempting to violate the rights of the people and do the actual job that you were elected to do . If such malevolently contrived shibboleth manages to pass out of the House of Delegates and Senate without veto from Governor Youngkin we will not abide by, adhere to, or sanction unconstitutional mandates in any way. Mass noncompliance will be the response to such attempts to strip the people of their Liberty. Thank you for your attention and your time, vote no to this abhorrent legislation. L.S. McClung RN, PMH-BC, CARN
Every single one of these proposed laws are blatantly unconstitutional under the plain text of both the Virginia and US constitutions. The SCOTUS has ruled multiple times, must recently in June 2022, that the 2A prohibits these types of attacks on free citizens. Voting for any of these bills is a waste of tax payer dollars, morally and ethically wrong, and, by definition of the courts already having ruled on these or similar laws as unconstitutional, an act of treason against the USA and by extension an insurrection.
I urge you to OPPOSE each of the following bills: HB 12 Federal law already covers this and additional state enforcement will create unnecessary expense. We don’t need more bills that could create negative financial impact on our community. HB 23 This is not constitutional under the Supreme Court Decision made in 2022: New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen. This bill prevents visitors, family, and staff from their right to self defense. Is it right to prevent an abused single mother from carrying her most effective tool of defense because she has to take her child to the ER? Wouldn’t this give anyone with nefarious intentions an easy location? Note: Cornell Law has published a clear summary of the Bruen Decision, easily accessed with an online search. I mention this case further below. HB 158 Federal law already covers this and additional State enforcement will create unnecessary expense. HB 183 Current law already covers 14 and under. increasing the scope of the law to apply to 15, 16, and 17-year-olds is an overreach. Minors in this age group have used firearms to save their own life and protect the lives of their families by stopping home invasions and violent attacks on their households. This bill is an overreach. HB 585 What problem is this bill trying to solve? What’s the difference between driving 1.5 miles or 5 or 10? This bill is unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Furthermore, home-based gun dealers don't usually have signs outside of their home. Buyers have to be invited in for a purchase and FFL transfer. Also, convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products (not legal for minors to purchase) are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791 BB guns, and other pneumatic projectile devices, are specifically designed as hobbyist or sporting equipment. Making the possession of these on school grounds a felony is a complete overreach. Are we going to outlaw sticks, or stones, or archery, or baseball bats? These are all similarly dangerous. If BB guns have been used for violence at a school, please inform me. Otherwise, this is a “fix” to a problem that doesn’t exist. HB 861 This is not constitutional under Bruen and prevents visitors, family, and staff from their right to self defense. Is it right to prevent an abused single mother from carrying her most effective tool of defense because she has to take her child to the ER? Wouldn’t this give anyone with nefarious intentions an easy location? HB 1174 This bill is not constitutional. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen. People in this age group are not minors. They are included in the same Second Amendment rights as older adults.
I'm a law abiding citizen, retired law enforcement officer, and responding Public Safety 1st Responder Chaplain. I have been called out, responding to or serving at a number of violent acts, anf times, often in dangerous areas. I believe in these violent times, and knowing that criminals don't and won't obey the laws, that I have a need and right to be able to defend and protect myself, and be able to continue carrying, as I have for many years. Our drivers permit is for all 50 states, and we don't have to stop at a state border. I believe a concealed carry permit should be the same, recognized in all 50 states. To have to leave my firearm inside my car, to go into a public building or rest area on the highway, can put me in needless danger. If I have to take off a d put my firearm in my trunk, it let's a criminal see where it is and I don't have it. That can let them steal the firearm and/or harm me. Please allow our law abiding citizens use their 2nd Amendment Right To Keep and Bear (bear = to carry) arms. We need to fully prosecuted existing gun laws snd crimes, Not Add More Gun Controls that criminals won't obey any way. Murder has been against the law for centuries, but increasingly still going on, sometimes unpunished.
Please keep your gun grabbing hands off legally owned guns.Why not enforce the laws already on the books. Tell D.A. To do their jobs, go after the illegal guns. It is not legal guns that is the problem, it is the illegal guns. If more people carried legally crime could go down because the bad guys won’t know whose packing and could respond to crime. Thank you for reading my response. Alexander G. Morris IV.
The attack on the right to keep and bear arms has only increased over the past 18 months since the Supreme Court clarified in the Bruen decision the standard to which modern gun control legislation must be held. Many politicians around the country know that the bills put forth since that time are unconstitutional, but they also know it usually takes years to throw out their unconstitutional bills through court, and by then they have already cost time, money, and lives of American citizens. Rather than confront the underlying issues of our nation that lead to violence, they choose to take the easy way out and simply blame inanimate objects to deflect from their own political incompetency. Virginia representatives need to be better than that. The bills proposed are either duplicative of federal law, pointless, or dangerous. All are unconstitutional. All are a reflection of a disregard for commonsense safety measures like taking criminals off the streets. These bills must not be passed. Not because they will be signed into law, but because its the duty of Virginia state representatives to uphold the constitution and work to solve problems. These bills due neither.
Please do not vote for or advance any anti gun bills. Each one limits a citizens 2nd Amendment rights... I.E. banning commonly owned and used semi automatic rifles, which is unconstitutional under Bruen... Raising the age to purchase firearms. If one can serve in the military, one can purchase a firearm. Plus, its unconstitutional under Bruen AND a Virginia court ruled against it as well. Limiting where one can carry. This only creates more soft targets which criminals will not obey anyway. Banning unserialized firearms . Unconstitutional since some were made before 1968, when numbers were not required. Also, people have the right to build unserialized firearms in their homes for personal use. This has never been an issue, but decriminalization of crimes is causing an increase in violent crimes. THAT is a problem. Limiting how many firearms one can purchase in a given period is unfair. These are just a few . Please understand all the anti gun bills are unconstitutional, especially in light of the Bruen decision. I do urge you to vote for any pro gun bills. The right to keep and bear arms is a constitutional right. The Heller, McDonald, and Bruen decisions reinforce that right. The only limits on this right should be for criminals, illegal aliens, and anyone who has been mentally adjudicated/ forced into an institution. The issue we face should be how to repair our broken mental health infrastructure, not to limit the constitutional rights of law abiding citizens. Thank you Mr Raymond Pezzoli
Our freedom was won with illegal and unregistered firearms. Please look to the G.O. A. And VCDL for guidance on Second Amendment issues. Freedom first, safety second.
I support these bills!
Hello, My name is Sameet Singh, I was born in Punjab, India and moved to Northern Virginia when I was 1 year old. Since then, I’veattended some great K-12 schools in the NOVA area, graduated from George Mason University in 2020, and now work in the Cyber Security field, serving one of our largest US Government Departments. My message to you today is not regarding any single bill in particular, but more of a mindset. I’m sure everyone here has a family that they would do anything for. We work hard everyday to provide for and to protect our families. And a big part in being able to protect, is having the right tool to protect yourself and your family members. This is why the best tool to have at your disposal is a firearm, a gun. Because if you or your family were attacked by someone in your home or out and about in public, a firearm, would be the best tool to have to save yourself and them from an attacker. Even if you’re able to call the police, it’ll at least take a few minutes for them to arrive, and sadly, within those minutes, only a few seconds are needed to completely change your world. Therefore, you are always your OWN first responser, before any other help arrives. This is why, anything, that would hinder your ability to protect yourself or your family with the best tool that you could use, a firearm, should really be re-thought. Unfortunately our society is not at the point where crime dosen’t happen, there’s no supernatural being or superhero that will swoop in to protect us in our times of need, there’s no Spider-Man or Superman who will save the day for us. However, the next best thing we have, is an responsibly armed citizen. A citizen who who is able to be gentle and loving with their kids and partner, but at the same time, prepared and alert at a moments notice when danger reveals itself. Thank you for listening, and thank you for your service to your communities, I wish you all a prosperous new year. Best, Sameet Singh
HB12 - Jones . I not not support . All firearms dealers currently offer a Firearm locking device on the sale or transfer of handguns. All new firearm come with a locking device and warning labels. child safety warning required. This doesn't change the current practice by dealers in offering for free locking devices. HB 23 Weapons; possession or transportation into facility that provides mental health services, etc. I do not support,. This bill does not exempt ems medical services or the fire service which many carry concealed when transporting patients to an emergency room or mental health facility on the duty. HB158 - McClure I do not support . All firearms dealers currently offer a Firearm locking device on the sale or transfer of handguns. All new firearm come with a locking device and warning labels. child safety warning required. This doesn't change the current practice by dealers in offering for free locking devices. HB183 - Simon HB289 - Wiley I support carrying a concealed handgun with a permit into public parking lots and storing there gun makes sense and do not unarm the citizen while in their personal vehicle. HB351 - Clark I not not support . All firearms dealers currently offer a Firearm locking device on the sale or transfer of handguns. All new firearm come with a locking device and warning labels. child safety warning required. This doesn't change the current practice by dealers in offering for free locking devices. most police departments give away free locking devices. HB585 - Mundon King I do not support this bill changes little firearms transactions which must be performed at a already approved ATF dealer location. 1.5miles is overreach by the state. HB756 - Walker I do not support. This limits gun rights. Not protection for EMS or fire personnel HB791 - Henson I do not support. This bill eliminates the number of programs that have pneumatic bb gun competition for 4 H at private or religious schools. HB861 - Hernandez I do not support,. This bill does not exempt ems medical services or the fire service which many carry concealed when transporting patients to an emergency room or mental health facility in the duty. HB872 - Earley I support . Always a lawful citizen to store a lawfully possessed firearm and ammunition in a locked private motor vehicle parked at any parking area owned or controlled by the Commonwealth. HB1141 - Cordoza I support HB1174 - Sickles I do not support changing the definition of an assault weapon widely and increasing the age which will make little difference. HB1198 - Scott, P.A. I support in reducing the fee
Vietnam Veteran - Retired Special Agent & LEO ( military 19 yrs & Federal 10 plus years) - that is me. Please consider the Bill of Rights; law abiding citizens rights to freedoms and rights of self protection. Criminals don’t follow laws against violence and criminal acts. Thank you
I oppose all of the gun control measures proposed in this session. I support Mr. Freitas' proposal for permitless carry.
Seems to me the General Assembly needs to pay attention to the Supreme Court rulings. Most of these bills if not all ignore what the Court has ruled on. Does the Gov. of Virginia think they are above the highest court in the land? Also, do not think for a Nano second that I believe these bills are about crime control. They are all about people control PERIOD. A Tyrannical state. I will fight this!!
I am submitting comments in opposition to these anti-gun rights bills. These bills do nothing to increase actual safety of Virginians. They serve only to further infringe upon our Second Amendment rights and those rights enshrined in our Virginia Constitution. Instead of focusing on the root causes of violent crimes, Democrats have chosen to target lawful Virginians' firearms rights. Most of these bills are a false solution for non-existent problems. Some of these bills would flagrantly be un-Constitutional and in opposition to prior U.S. Supreme Court decisions to include the Heller and Bruen decisions. In the 2023 Virginia elections, no candidate ran on a pro-gun control platform, therefore no mandate was handed to the House to implement such infringements. Virginians made our pro-Second Amendment stance clear in RIchmond in January 2020 when 40,000 people rallied against similar bills during that session and over 95% of Virginia counties' Board of Supervisors passed Second Amendment Sanctuary statuses. I urge the Committee Members to vote No on these bills. Thank you.
As a constituent, I urge you to OPPOSE the following bills: HB 12, Jones, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon, requires all firearms in a home be secured if there is a minor in the home. Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, prevents home-based gun dealers from operating within 1.5 miles of a school. Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, makes it illegal for anyone under 21 to purchase any kind of firearm. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen.
NOT ONE OF THESE BILLS ARE CONSTITUTIONAL &/OR NECESSARY! THEY'RE SIMPLY SOLUTIONS IN SEARCH OF NONEXISTENT PROBLEMS! HB 12: Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23: Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158: Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183: Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585: Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791: Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861: Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174: A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen. Thank you.
HB 12, Jones - requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. These requirements represent an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under the Supreme Court's Bruen decision and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon, requires all firearms in a home be secured if there is a minor in the home. Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, prevents home-based gun dealers from operating within 1.5 miles of a school. Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, makes it illegal for anyone under 21 to purchase any kind of firearm. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen.
This is just a solution in search of a problem. Don't make laws we do not need. Thank you!
So there is nothing as important in and for Virginia other then Supporting Communist Legislation against the Constitution of VA and the US Constitution that all this effort must be the first thing on the agenda when a Demo-rat Majority is fraudulently elected to the House and Senate. You fools must make the people that pay you off very happy to have you ear and sell yourself to the Communist Party. Demo-rats are an embarrassment to Freedom and Good Government. Patrick Henry, you may have heard of him? Show me that age and country where the rights and liberties of the people were placed on the sole chance of their rulers being good men, without a consequent loss of liberty? ********************************** The eternal difference between right and wrong does not fluctuate, it is immutable. ********************************** The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government - lest it come to dominate our lives and interests. ********************************** Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? ********************************** Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined.... The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun.
I strongly support House bills 12, 23, 158, 183, 351, 861 and 585, These bills will make our communities safer by requiring safe storage of firearms, banning the sales of assault weapons to people under 21 years of age, and restricting the public places where people can carry firearms, including mental health facilities. Safe storage will protect children and teens from inadvertent shootings and school shootings, and everyone from suicide. Waiting periods for purchase can prevent impulsive misuse. I oppose bills 389, 872, 1141, and 1198. Allowing more guns into more places will not make us safer. Every shooter is a law-abiding citizen with 2nd amendment rights, until they open fire on other people. I don't trust a "good guy" with a gun to have the current training or expertise to shoot down a criminal without accidentally hitting innocent people, or themselves. There is always the threat that a criminal will grab a gun from the "good guy" and turn it on him/her. As a diplomat representing the United States in foreign countries during my 33 years in the U.S. State Department, my heart bled every time we had another mass shooting. People there would ask me, "What is wrong with your society?" The first seven gun safety bills passed in 2020 made Virginia a leader in gun safety legislation. Subsequent shootings, such as six-year old shooting his teacher with his mother's gun, demonstrate the need for evidence-driven initiatives that will reduce gun death and injuries in our Commonwealth.
HB12 When you buy a new gun. You are given a lock with it. It comes with an instruction manual. The only thing it doesn’t come with is hearing protection. HB585. So if a gun dealer has been at its establishment longer than the school has been there. how's will you move the school? Or will the state pay to relocate the gun dealer? Gun safety should be taught in schools. HB861. Ok say I’m working in Richmond. ( construction ) and I’m carrying a legal Gun. And I get hurt. I’m more worried about getting help. Wouldn’t you be too. But you don’t want to give your gun to someone else. What would you do?
HB 158, McClure, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers.
I urge you to OPPOSE the following bills: HB 12, HB 23, HB 158, HB 183, HB 585, HB 791, HB 1174 For some of these bills... they are meaningless, as they are already covered by Federal Law... the committee and legislature should not be wasting time on bills and laws that are already on the books! For some of the other bills... they are already deemed UNCONSTITUTIONAL under the 2nd Amendment and existing Supreme Court decisions. If these become law, they have a high probably of being voided/vacated within a year or two. Aside from taking away existing rights of Virginia citizens in that time... you will ensure lawyers on both sides of the issue will make a lot of money so they can drive fancy cars and send their kids to expensive schools. Stop indirectly putting money (half of which are paid with tax dollars) in lawyers’ pockets. I'd rather our courts address real crime and issues... not laws already deemed unconstitutional. Many of these bills attempt to create a tactical "solution"... except that the specific problem the "solution" addresses doesn't or never existed or occurred in the Commonwealth. I request that my elected officials address meaningful solutions, and ensure existing rights of law-abiding citizens are not infringed upon. Thank you for your time.
These proposals are solutions in search of problems. Many of these violate the Bruen decision. I would love for us to eliminate sovereign immunity. These politicians must be able to be sued personally, held both criminally and civilly liable for any vote in favor of a law, if they knew or should have known it violates or God given rights.
I feel violated. This legislation scares me and I'm a constituent. Show me the evidence that the legislation you are proposing will actually reduce crime and violence. There is none. These are "do something" acts that restrict my right as a good, sane, sober, moral and prudent citizen to keep and bear arms. If there were a violent criminal act for which I was now unprepared, restricted in my ability to defend innocent life, who will bear responsibility for that?
Good afternoon Delegates, I stand in opposition to all of these unconstitutional bills that will not do anything to curb and only demonize legal, lawful Virginians. Also, many of these bill are redundant to either existing commonwealth law or federal regulations. Lawful firearm owners are the back bone of this great commonwealth and country. I urge you all to recognize that Virginia is one of the safest states in the nation and that all of these proposed laws are violations of the Constitution and should not moved forward to a vote. Thank you for your time and consideration on this very important matter D Scott Burns
As a born and bred Virginian; a father and husband; a disabled veteran and active member in the community; I cannot understand why individuals who are elected, willingly do what they can to violate both the Virginia and United States Constitutions to penalize law-abiding citizens such as myself. I have spent a life of duty and dedication in service and occupations to protect our State and Country from those who wish to subjecgate its citizens or worse. Not only do all of these restrictions seek a perspective only solution, they do so at the cost of innocent citizens. Law-abiding citizens do not commit drug gang offenses, home invasions, mass shootings. These are the acts of career criminals or mentally disturbed individuals. None of these proposed bills addresses those issues or the deeper problem of why people are so quick to commit these acts. Murder is murder, whether a gun is used or a cane, it is still wrong. I'm more concerned about why, instead of the tool. Obviously, certain politicians are only worried about the tools. These proposed bills are all clearly agenda focused without factual information to support true results that may be gained by violating state and federal laws to enact. The Supreme Court very clearly defined the right to arms and most of these bills would violate those freedoms. Nor is it legislators purview to dictate what citizens do with what they have within the confines if their own home. THAT, is yet another violation. It is also disturbing that legislators seem to be focused on separating Virginia from reciprocity, thus affecting relations with other states, which ultimately led to a civil war last time. They are also creating more areas where people who mean to harm can do so without fear of being stopped such as adding a new gun free zone. This is a very bad and ill-conceived premise. If the point has not been made yet, then perhaps citizens need to start holding legislators civilly responsible for lives lost as a result of such zones. Clearly they are not effective. I ask that you stop operating under partisan politics and quid pro quo agendas which only serve to penalize and subjegate our citizenry. This is not what servicemembers and veterans served, sacrificed and vowed to defend. Freedom has a cost, and it is difficult to understand, especially through the fear and pain. There is NO such thing as safety. There never was, and never will be. America has MANY enemies out there in the world, and it's citizens; it's armed citizens; are the LAST line of defense. Continuing to attempt to disarm law-abiding citizens only further prompts the question by citizens for the legislators... "Whose side are you truly on?" Please repeal these bills and focus more on actual crime, deterrence for early release, stiffer penalties for existing criminals who continue to commit them and stop bringing in more and more illegal immigrants. Thank you for your attention. Lessons of the Past, Lost to Actions of the Present, Will Forever Damn the Future. -Sean Flippin - 1989
Please stop wasting our money, as a taxpayer, on initiatives and regulation that are at best ineffective and at worst making things safer for Criminals. Creating areas that are gun-free makes safe areas for Criminals as they know that their victims will not have the tools necessary to defend themselves. Stop trying to make us, the public, less safe. Stop releasing criminals, especially repeat-offenders, Releasing criminals causes us to acquire tools to keep ourselves and our families safe.
As a constituent, I urge you to OPPOSE the following bills: HB 12, Jones, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon, requires all firearms in a home be secured if there is a minor in the home. Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, prevents home-based gun dealers from operating within 1.5 miles of a school. Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, makes it illegal for anyone under 21 to purchase any kind of firearm. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen. I thank you. Mr. & Mrs Lon Horiuchi
Everyone of these bills further restricting the rights of the law abiding citizen should be voted down.
This bill must be OPPOSED. These bills do NOTHING to prevent/reduce crime. In fact, these types of bills will eventually ENABLE and allow MORE crime (just look at crime in Maryland and DC) by reducing Virginian's ability to adequately and easily protect themselves. This bill is immoral, unjust, unconstitutional and racist as it will HARM black and brown people, other minorities, women, the elderly, and children who will be the eventual victims as a result of laws like this. Using these types of bills to slowly deny the public's human right of self defense will NOT save lives or keep people safe. This has been proven again and again. As lawmakers, you have an obligation to ensure that the laws you enact *protect* our God-given, human right of self defense -- you should *not* be disenfranchising us and making us MORE vulnerable to crime and injustices with these ignorant bills. Thank you.
As a voting resident and veteran I strongly OPPOSE the following bills: HB 12, Jones, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon, requires all firearms in a home be secured if there is a minor in the home. Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, prevents home-based gun dealers from operating within 1.5 miles of a school. Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, makes it illegal for anyone under 21 to purchase any kind of firearm. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen. This bills have gone beyond the scope of "safety" and are clearly an attempt to strip the constitutional rights of law abiding citizens of this great Commonwealth. The majority of these bills have already been struck down my the SCOTUS. Remember your oath: I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God. v/r Thomas Speich
I do not support any proposed gun restriction bills. I have been a resident of VA for 40 years and have never been in trouble with the law. I do not think the bills that are being proposed will deter gun violence. The issue is not guns. It is mental health.
Dear Democrats proposing duplicative and unconstitutional bills: It is apparent that you seek to propose bills that ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL based on the US Supreme Court. Please reference the Heller and Bruen decisions. It would appear you are taking that as a mere suggestion? Further, the "catch me if you can" approach to lawmaking is ridiculous. Yes, we know the strategy made famous by Obama...pass laws you know are unconstitutional knowing it will take ~5 years and millions of dollars to undo them. In the interim, the damage is done. This is the stuff of tyrants. HB 12: DUPLICATIVE OF FEDERAL LAW. HB 23: UNCONSTITUTIONAL UNDER BRUEN. HB 158: DUPLICATIVE OF FEDERAL LAW. HB 183: DUPLICATIVE. 14 and under is covered. There are many cases were 15, 16, 17 year olds defending themselves and family from crime using firearms. HB 585: UNCONSTITUTIONAL. HB 791: a solution looking for a problem. Most normal people grew up playing with BB guns. Cite all the crime associated with BB guns? HB 861: UNCONSTITUTIONAL UNDER BRUEN. HB 1174: UNCONSTITUTIONAL UNDER BRUEN. already heard and struck down in other states. The disarmament agenda is tiresome. If you spent half the energy in Richmond, Hampton, Norfolk, and Petersburg, 95%+ of "gun violence" would be taken care of. Your main perpetrator group is black men killing black men, 18-34. Don't you read the Virginia Crime Commission's reports? if you were serious, you'd be going after ACTUAL criminals vs. passing meaningless laws that only impact the law abiding.
HB 12, Jones, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure - Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon - Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, is Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, is not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen.
We are encouraging our state politicians to work on meaningful solutions that will actually help reduce gun violence, violence in general, theft, and improve the quality of our lives. Let's start enforcing current laws that are reasonable and remove those that aren't. Work on quickly improving the number of quality jobs in VA. Through good local educational services that focus on the required skills, people can improve their own lives, the lives of their family, and have more hope for the future. Childcare assistance can help families that are working. It's time to create a new playbook and stop passing additional restrictive laws that only burden our citizens and families. Start improving our lives which leads to less violence, good jobs, and strong families that can raise our children better.
Why is it that you want to continue to go against your sworn oath to office and institute further gun restrictions and control on law biding citizens? With control of the senate and house why don't you focus on the root of the problem which is more to improve the socio-economic issues regions face which should in turn lower drug and gang related problems which in turn is the true reason behind your "gun violence" issue you continue to speak on. WE DO NOT HAVE A GUN VIOLENCE ISSUE, we have violence issue that you need to address not through more gun restrictions. Enough with the gun control bills, it is the first thing the democratic party pushes when they get control of the majority. Use this time to better the communities or is that just tok difficult for you? As all you want to do is make it so criminals have more power over law biding citizens, pull our children into gang and drug culture and go easy on crime so they know there is no accountability for their actions.
I wish congress would treat firearms and firearms owners in Virginia like they do illegal aliens. Turn a blind eye to them and just let them be free. Never make rules about securing access or entry to them. Ensure that none of them need paperwork or if they do, wait so long before you check to make sure any of it is accurate, you never find the illegals and in this case, firearms. That would be swell.
"The right to keepand bear arms shall not be infringed..." Those who carry firearms should not leave them in vehicles. Many guns used in crimes are stolen, often from vehicles. Hospitals and other places people gather are where trained armed civilians can thwart a crime or mass shooting. The AR-15 is a civilian multi-purpose rifle -- easy to operate, inexpensive, accurate, low recoil, low cost ammo, and potentially lethal when necessary. It is the best rifle ever invented for U.S. civilian use...hunting, self and home defense, and target shooting. Resources in VA should be used for law enforcement, crime prevention and mental health. Take ILLEGAL guns off the streets.
Given the second amendment of the constitution, there shall be no laws that prevent me from being able to protect myself. I am a conceal carry holder and have been for almost 10 years now. We vehemently oppose any laws that would prevent Conceal Carry Holders from carrying our weapon. Our goal is to have protection and not need it rather than needing protection, and not being able to have it. We will not comply.
When will misguided legislators learn that infringing the right of law abiding citizens to exercise our Second Amendment liberties does nothing to make the public safe? In fact, it makes us all less safe because criminals love restrictions on lawful firearm ownership. Wake up! Follow the Constitution. “The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed!” Bishop E.W. Jackson STAND Virginia PAC
First, SCOTUS has addressed gun rights; access to magazines & ammo multiple times. Multiple times, SCOTUS' decision has sided with law abiding gun owners. I am curious as to why you continue to suppress our God given constitutionally protected right to bear arms? I can only assume one of two reasons. Either (A) you are completely uneducated as to the writers of the constitution, as well as their separate and several memoirs on the right to keep and bear arms; and furthermore ignorant of the right of the People to keep and bear arms as a result of the People having fought against tyranny using NOT federally provided military arms and ammunition - rather, PRIVATELY owned arms and ammunition. Below are just a few examples of historically accurate statements on said RIGHTS : “No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.” – Thomas Jefferson, Virginia Constitution, Draft 1, 1776 “A strong body makes the mind strong. As to the species of exercises, I advise the gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it gives boldness, enterprise and independence to the mind. Games played with the ball, and others of that nature, are too violent for the body and stamp no character on the mind. Let your gun therefore be your constant companion of your walks.” – Thomas Jefferson, letter to Peter Carr, August 19, 1785 “Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops.” – Noah Webster, An Examination of the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution, October 10, 1787 “To disarm the people…[i]s the most effectual way to enslave them.” – George Mason, The Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution, June 14, 1788 “I ask who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers.” – George Mason, Address to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 4, 1788 My questions are simply these, who do you expect to follow these laws that you put forth? Criminals? Why would you expect someone who is a CRIMINAL to obey the law? Maybe you should take some time and learn the definition? Which brings me to part (B) as to why I think you are trying to bar citizens from owning semi-auto rifles & there average magazines - you fear us to the point where you want to disarm us in much the same way HITLER disarmed HIS constituency. Clearly Thomas Jefferson had it correct - when he said “The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes…. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.” – Thomas Jefferson, Commonplace Book (quoting 18th century criminologist Cesare Beccaria), 1774-1776. Tyranny is the only reasonable explanation for your efforts because the lies spread by the US Government regarding death tolls, etc., is a complete fallacy. All you have to do is a little independent research regarding 'mass shootings.' And yes, private citizens did in fact have legal ownership of canons all the way through the Civil War era. Only an idiot would believe the lies that they did not.
In Caetano v. Massachusetts (2016), the Supreme Court reiterated its earlier rulings that "the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding" and that its protection is not limited to "only those weapons useful in warfare". New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen (2022) is a landmark: [ In a 6–3 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that New York's law was unconstitutional and that the ability to carry a pistol in public was a constitutional right guaranteed by the Second Amendment. — A 2022 poll found that 64% of Americans were in favor of the ruling in contrast with 35% of Americans that say they oppose the decision.[50] Additionally, 36%, the largest single share, said they strongly support the Court's ruling in contrast with 16% who said they strongly oppose it. The Legal Aid Society said the decision "may be an affirmative step toward ending arbitrary licensing standards that have inhibited lawful Black and Brown gun ownership in New York."[46] Former house minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R‑CA) supported the ruling, saying it "rightfully ensures the right of all law-abiding Americans to defend themselves without unnecessary government interference."[47] Law professor Steve Vladeck said the decision will "have monumental ramifications far beyond carrying firearms in public" and predicts there will be a "slew of litigation challenging any and every gun-control measure". Tread AROUND the 2nd amendment to our Constitution of the United States of America. Around it. Not on it; not lightly upon it! Carefully consider your vote! (Attachment: Photo of one night of a dangerous riot in a public place.)
Please leave law abiding citizens alone and focus the Commonwealth’s limited resources on the arrest, conviction, and incarceration of violent individuals. Paul Trible Blue Grass, VA
Suggest instead of Firearms Safety Subcommittee... Crimes Safety Subcommittee. greatly more effective! THE REAL ISSUE!
None of these proposals will impact the behavior of a criminal - only making law abiding citizens vulnerable as a new "gun free" zone attracts people seeking to make a statement with a gun and want time to do so before someone with a gun shows up. Additionally, most of these targeted problems are not currently problems or represent a growing trend that needs additional protections enacted to address. In my view, these bills have limited to no chance to provide additional protections or impact criminal behavior but DO further strip your constituents God give rights to provide the illusion of protection.
As a constituent, I urge you to OPPOSE the following bills: HB 12, Jones, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon, requires all firearms in a home be secured if there is a minor in the home. Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, prevents home-based gun dealers from operating within 1.5 miles of a school. Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, makes it illegal for anyone under 21 to purchase any kind of firearm. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen.
I'm a volunteer with Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America, and I support this bill.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support the following bills: HB1174, HB1181, HB1195, HB12, HB1424, HB1462, HB158, HB175, HB183, HB23, HB270, HB318, HB319, HB351, HB362, HB585, HB602, HB637, HB791, HB797, HB798, HB799, HB861, HB916, & HB945 I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I oppose these bills: HB1030, HB1141, HB1198, HB1230, HB1235, HB1321, HB1325, HB1386, HB289, HB389, HB756, & HB872 Innocent children are dying on our watch. Please do something.
My fellow Virginia’s I write today to comment on the bills before you. I am a retired Army veterans. I grew up in Virginia, went to ODU and instead of seeking residency in other states, stayed a Virginian and paid taxes while on active duty. I fought in war and lost good Soldiers and friends defending this nation, you and our Constitution. I retired in Virginia because I love this state. Your body will decide, with its vote, to either infringe on our rights or defend them. I ask you to defend them like those friends and Soldiers that also did. I am a responsible gun owner who raised his children to be responsible gun owners (all three are serving or served). I am also a CCP holder who is willing to defend his fellow citizens. If you vote for any of these bills to limit our rights it will impact my ability to defend myself and my family. Please do the right thing and defend the 2nd Amd. My wife and I already decided to leave the state if you enact these measures to limit our rights. Thank you Oliver Rose
HB 12, Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen.
The selected bills are unconstitutional! They must be voted down!
This proposed legislation is blatantly unconstitutional and, if passed, it will, no doubt, be challenged in court. The taxpayers of Virginia will then be obligated to defend these unconstitutional measures, and those defenses will almost certainly lose. This will result in costly, meaningless court costs for all Virginia taxpayers. Those tax dollars could be spent on more meaningful and productive activities that benefit all citizens.
All of these anti 2nd amendment bills DO NOT represent the vast majority of the citizenry of Virginia. All of these anti-gun bills will do absolutely nothing to impact crime, and are only a form of punishment to responsible gun owners in the commonwealth. These bills are meant to only meant to elicit “feel-good” emotions for those sensing they are impacting gun crime. Stop letting criminals go free early and do not focus the legislatures efforts on infringing on the rights of the people to legally defend themselves from those who mean to do grievous harm.
It is outrageous that the General Assembly is using our 2nd Amendment right to punish law abiding citizens who have done nothing wrong other then to defend themselves. It’s clear that Democrats pander to their bases without a thought about the citizens of this Commonwealth or this nation. This issue amongst others, galvanize the voters to get out and vote for the party that does not seek to encroach our rights under the State and Federal Constitution. There is zero proof that We The People are deranged killers, a mob or even the radical right that the Democrat who currently occupies the White House has said. He’d called us Nazis and portrayed honest, hardworking and law abiding citizens as the problem. We are not. Opens border, out of control spending, child indoctrination and parroting the DNC is the problem that is self inflicted and deserves nothing less then our disgust and rebuke come November 2024. The General Assembly reflects the divide between Northern Virginia to Richmond and the difference in South Eastern, Western Virginia. The Democrat party and Legislature know full well that gun control laws if enacted, will not reduce violence but increase victimhood that they’ll blame on Republicans and the cycle continues. Pathetic fools and they wonder why I’ve stopped contributing to candidates who never deliver to fools who govern us.
Please, NO more gun control. You all KNOW that criminals do not follow your laws. All your gun control does is limit my and my family's rights to self defense and peaceful enjoyment of the shooting sports. Instead, put, and keep, actual violent offenders in jail. It really is that simple.
As a woman and a 30 plus year Emergency Department nurse I ask you to reject these onerous gun control laws. Laws like these discourage women who are most at risk from being able to obtain the means to defend themselves. I worked many a late night shift in Northern Virginia and walked through empty parking lots and garages worried about my safety. Women should not have to suffer this and should have ready access to the means to defend themselves. You aren't disarming criminals your are disarming women.
The bills under consideration will do nothing to increase the safety of Virginians while infringing on our right to defend ourselves. They are designed to make it more difficult to obtain a firearm, possess a firearm, or use a firearm to defend oneself or others. Meanwhile criminals will continue unabated. Moreover, most of these unconstitutional laws have been rendered moot as they have been struck down by state and federal courts. As a former police officer and detective I implore you to reject these useless and unconstitutional laws. Thank you
No more gun control legislation. It's not the gun that's the issue. It's the mentally ill folks that obtained a gun.
I strongly oppose these bills as they are direct infringements on the 2nd Amendment of The Constitution. Most of these have already been found to be unconstitutional by various courts yet they are still being presented as bills. I am completely against these and any other such bills that infringe on the constitutional and inalienable rights of the Citizens of the United States of America and of the Commonwealth of Virginia.
No more unconstitutional gun control.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support these bills. I expect to see more gun violence prevention legislation *actually pass* since there is so much nonpartisan alignment on this topic. The status quo is unacceptable. Our pro-gun culture is a threat to our children, and a slap in the face to every person who has lost their lives to gun violence. Enough is enough - policy over prayers.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support this bill.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support this bill. Gun violence in our communities and in our state is heartbreaking and changes need to be made to protect the citizens of Virginia.
I am a member of Virginia moms for change and I support these bills.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change and I support these bills. To all responsible gun owners: you shouldn't be afraid of these common sense bills. These bills are directed at people who are not handling their firearms as the deadly weapons that they can be. Instead of thinking your rights are being taken away, consider instead how safe storage, permits and waiting periods could help the daily gun violence in our country. Keep your guns, we are not trying to take them away. These bills are an opportunity for you, as a responsible gun owner, to be a part of the solution to help cut down on needless violence.
Remember Delegates...you took an Oath to 'Support and Defend the Constitution of the Unites States of America' which includes the 2nd Amendment!
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change and I support the selected bills. I believe they will make our communities safer and that gun violence is a critical issue we must address with such legislation and more.
I am a member of Virginia Mom's for Change, a group working towards gun violence prevention. We support the bills indicated above.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group. I support bills HB1174 HB1181 HB1195 HB12 HB1424 HB1462 HB158 HB175 HB183 HB23 HB270 HB318 HB319 HB351 HB362 HB585 HB602 HB637 HB791 HB798 HB799 HB861 HB916 HB945
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group. I support bills HB1174 HB1181 HB1195 HB12 HB1424 HB1462 HB158 HB175 HB183 HB23 HB270 HB318 HB319 HB351 HB362 HB585 HB602 HB637 HB791 HB798 HB799 HB861 HB916 HB945
and I support these bills. The bills we support are: HB1174, HB1181, HB1195, HB12, HB1424, HB1462, HB158, HB175, HB183, HB23, HB270, HB318, HB319, HB351, HB362, HB585, HB602, HB637, HB791, HB797, HB798, HB799, HB861, HB916, & HB945
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support these bills. The bills we support are: HB1174, HB1181, HB1195, HB12, HB1424, HB1462, HB 158, HB175, HB183, HB23, HB270, HB318, HB319, HB351, HB362, HB585, HB602, HB637, HB791, HB797, HB798, HB799, HB861, HB916, & HB945
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support these bills. The bills we support are: HB1174, HB1181, HB1195, HB12, HB1424, HB1462, HB158, HB175, HB183, HB23, HB270, HB318, HB319, HB351, HB362, HB585, HB602, HB637, HB791, HB797, HB798, HB799, HB861, HB916, & HB945
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support this bill.
The Virginia NAACP supports this bill. We support common sense gun legislation that will have a significant impact on reducing gun violence and saving lives; this includes comprehensive background checks on the sale of firearms, limitations on purchasing firearms and prohibition of selling and transporting assault weapons - this is necessary legislation to keep Virginians safe.
The end of solitary confinement must be done My son was murdered in solitary confinement at Red Onion Prison in Pound Va on 1/3/22.
The Virginia NAACP supports this bill. We support common sense gun legislation that will have a significant impact on reducing gun violence and saving lives; this includes comprehensive background checks on the sale of firearms, limitations on purchasing firearms and prohibition of selling and transporting assault weapons - this is necessary legislation to keep Virginians safe.
Our Constitution does not provide citizens with privileges. It establishes a government with checks and balances and specifically limits the governments ability to remove the rights of its people. In regards to the matter at hand, it specifically says the the government cannot place limitations on the right of a citizen to keep and bear arms. Before I get the typical response, I know you are already aware that the phrase "well regulated" specifically refers to an being trained and ready to bear said arms. The language at the time did not use the term "regulated" as we do with modern regulations. It has been proven in the courts repeatedly that the laws you are currently considering are unconstitutional. Of this I am sure you are already aware. By spending time and tax dollars discussing laws that you know to be unconstitutional, you are in fact wasting time and tax dollars that could be spent on productive issues. I can only assume your intent is to intentionally waste time, and force members of the firearms industry to waste money on legal fees defending the constitution you have sworn to uphold. Please consider actual data and actual facts when considering gun legislation. No data supports the claim the "assault weapon" bans actually reduce gun related crime. More guns are being purchased now than ever before, yet now that the latest FBI data has been released, we can see that gun related crimes have not increased. Also, like every year that the FBI has released data, so called "assault weapons" make up a very small portion of all gun crimes. For your general knowledge the term "assault weapon" was first coined by Adolf Hitler. He renamed one of their new automatic firearms, the Sturmgewehr, because he felt that the name "assault weapon" would strike fear in allied forces. This is also the exact reason the gun control community uses this term as well. The fact is that these firearms are not fully automatic and cannot be made so without a high degree of machining skills and mechanical knowhow. Plus doing so is already illegal. The fact is the Biden's latest gun control act has not been equally enforced. It was supposed to provide additional support for school security and mental health services. It was supposed to provide stronger punishments for those cought breaking existing gun laws. It was supposed to allow FFL's to use the NICS system to check employees. It was supposed to allow FFL's to be able to instantly check inventory or potential purchase/trades by their serial number to determine if the firearm has been stolen or used in any crimes. None of these provisions have been acted upon or enforced. Please drop these latest gun control bills. They are unconstitutional and will never pass. Please do not waste your time and our tax dollars on these wasted efforts. Regards, Jonathan Goodman
THe Virginia NAACP supports this bill. We support common sense gun legislation that will have a significant impact on reducing gun violence and saving lives; this includes comprehensive background checks on the sale of firearms, limitations on purchasing firearms and prohibition of selling and transporting assault weapons - this is necessary legislation to keep Virginians safe.
Virginia Moms for Change supports bills HB2, HB22, HB46, HB113, HB173, HB362, HB454, & HB466. Gun violence is preventable and want our state laws to protect kids not guns.
The Virginia NAACP supports this bill. We support common sense gun legislation that will have a significant impact on reducing gun violence and saving lives; this includes comprehensive background checks on the sale of firearms, limitations on purchasing firearms and prohibition of selling and transporting assault weapons - this is necessary legislation to keep Virginians safe.
THe Virginia NAACP supports this bill. We support common sense gun legislation that will have a significant impact on reducing gun violence and saving lives; this includes comprehensive background checks on the sale of firearms, limitations on purchasing firearms and prohibition of selling and transporting assault weapons - this is necessary legislation to keep Virginians safe.
Every gun law is an infringement. I oppose HB 158.
The Virginia NAACP supports this bill. We support common sense gun legislation that will have a significant impact on reducing gun violence and saving lives; this includes comprehensive background checks on the sale of firearms, limitations on purchasing firearms and prohibition of selling and transporting assault weapons - this is necessary legislation to keep Virginians safe.
Support
I'm a volunteer with Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America, and I support this bill.
HB159 - State correctional and juvenile correctional facilities; use of canines, prohibited acts.
Hi there, I'm Natalie from Social Busy Bee, your partner in the exciting world of Instagram growth. I've discovered something phenomenal for skyrocketing your Instagram popularity and I'm thrilled to share it with you! Social Growth Engine introduces a groundbreaking service that takes your Instagram engagement to new heights. It's effortless: - Zero in on producing unforgettable content. - Extremely budget-friendly at a mere $36/month. - Completely safe (no password needed), incredibly powerful, and Instagram's best friend. I've experienced remarkable results firsthand, and I'm sure you will too! Amplify your Instagram presence right now: http://get.socialbuzzzy.com/instagram_booster Best wishes, Natalie at Social Busy Bee"
Hi I am writing to you on behalf of The Well Connection UK, a media and publishing company. We could easily get virginia.gov featured in various publications such as magazines, online blogs and news sites. This would undoubtedly help virginia.gov with publicity, reputation, domain authority and organic search engine rankings. We have a wide range of options including completely free collaborations, sponsored posts, guest posts and banner ads. If this sounds of interest, please reach out to the senior business development manager, Anita at info@thewellconnection.co.uk and whatsapp +447395206515 (GMT) Kind regards Clifton Junior Outreach Assistant
I oppose all these unconstitutional, dangerous, and pointless laws.
A 2023 report based on reviewing public-records requests, court documents, medical records and interviews with dozens of bite victims identified 295 incidents of attack-trained dogs biting incarcerated people over the six years from 2017-2022. Most of those attacks (92 percent) – 271 attacks –were in Virginia! This is barbaric. Virginia, we MUST and can do Better! Please vote YES for HB159.
As a concerned citizen of the Commonwealth of Virginia, canine use in a law enforcement or correctional setting is a valuable tool in protecting public public safety and the safety of the officers and inmates in the department of corrections. Our law enforcement and Corrections officers already work in a very dangerous environment. With the elimination of canines will ultimately lead to more staff and inmate assaults due to their current effectiveness of being a good deterrent by their presence alone. I am one hundred percent against this bill due to these reasons. Canines are the only things protecting the officers, staff, inmates and the public. The use of patrol canines is much needed in the correctional facilities that houses the most violent inmates in the state, such as levels 4, 5 and super max prisons and by taking those away you are putting the corrections officers, staff and other inmates in more dangerous and life threatening situations as well as law enforcement. Think of the publics safety and how just having canine in the area helps control the situations, without canines there will be chaos, there will be an increase of violence, there will be extreme staff shortages all across the state worse than it is now, just by having them present protects everyone. This bill must be stopped.
To vote yes on this bill would be terrible. From a citizen standpoint, it would be a huge jeopardy in public safety at every capacity if canines were removed.
The use of canines in prisons is rooted in our racist history, especially here in Virginia. Canines are trained to cause harm, and here in Virginia we have the highest rate of attacks and injuries caused by canine use in prisons. Canines have also caused physical harm to correction officers as well bc they don't always know who to attack. There are correction officers who are just as afraid of the canines as the inmates. K9 handlers, whether in a prison or on the streets, know how to trigger their dogs to attack and cause false positives in the instance of contraband searches. There have been many documented cases here in Virginia of inmates being permanently harmed physically, mentally, and emotionally. Virginia has been sued by over a dozen inmates bc of K9 attacks in prisons, and VA has even settled some of the cases. Reading the comments it's easy to tell they are written overwhelmingly by correction officers. No matter what someone is sent to prison for, we know they usually come out much worse than they went in. The fact prisons create a constant environment of fear and psychological harm, is one of the reasons prisons cause much more societal harm than good. We don't need K9s in prisons, especially not in juvenile facilities. We do need our correction officers to have much better training, higher levels of education, access to mental health resources, and better pay. No, I have never been to jail or prison, neither has anyone in my immediate family. I do however work in the juvenile justice space, and I care. I do have family who works to help provide mental health care in one of our correctional facilities here in VA and the way the correction officers treat the inmates is shameful and just wrong. K9s should not be used to "maintain order". It is wrong and cruel. I strongly urge the passing of HB159.
Good afternoon, This matter pertains to canines in the department of corrections. I understand many want to take it out, but also, let me make it aware of how dangerous the environment is and can be. These inmates threaten staff daily. Weapons are found almost daily. The safety and security of staff as well as other inmates IS crucial. The incident reports written and the charges against inmates due to the behavior and actions should suffice enough evidence to show the danger if anyone should look into it, if anyone has. Many times, canine has responded and stopped staff assaults, as well as other inmates fighting, and or groups of inmates fighting. The things the daily correctional officer observes, sees, and endures daily is not of the normal task one can take on. Anyone can act a part when needed. The inmates are good to portray one aspect when certain individuals are around, but when officers are there doing their jobs, it is a different mindset for inmates. Canines are there to protect and serve, the same as canines in outside law enforcement. There is no deviation. In this case, correctional officers are dealing with the worse type of individual with antisocial type personalities. If canines are taken away, I will guarantee you there will be major disturbances(riots) among inmates, a much high staff shortage, and a higher level of staff assaults and assaults on other inmates. These dogs are the greatest deterrent for inside VADOC. I'm not sure the mission on taking out canine, it is a major mistake and a greater chance of lives being at stake. I think reassessing this decision is a must and to be looked further into. Thank you for your time.
The use of patrol canine is needed in the facilities that house the most violent inmates in the state. They are the only thing protecting staff and inmates. Canines are the only reason there isn't more deaths or serious injuries for staff and inmates.
As a concerned citizen of the Commonwealth of Virginia, canine use in a correctional or law enforcement setting is a valuable tool in protecting public safety. They protect the safety of staff and inmates in prison or jail setting, which ultimately leads to the protection of the public. Our law enforcement and corrections officers already work in a dangerous environment, and elimination of canines will ultimately lead to more staff and inmate assaults due to their current effectiveness of being a deterrent by their presence alone. I am one hundred percent against this bill due to these reasons.
This bill will have so many safety effects on the staff and officers. This should be considered along with the concerns of losing employees because the dogs are the most effective deterrent with the inmates. Please don't pass this bill.
On the matter of HB159, I whole heartedly do not support this bill. This bill, if passed will in fact be the end of higher level institutions in Virginia. The only reason the number of serious incidents as far as staff assaults or any assault for that matter has not completely turned into murders is because of the patrol canines. If this bill is passed, the Virginia department of corrections will crumble. If you think you've seen staffing issues, pass this bill and you will see a mass exodus of corrections officers. The corrections officer only guarantee of going home to their family rests solely on patrol canines. The corrections officer is not properly equipped with tools to defend themselves. A simple can of OC nor a projectile launcher does not deter an inmate if they choose to bring harm to another inmate or worse a staff member. If this bill is passed, I whole heartedly hold the founding member of this bill responsible for the repructions this will bring. Extreme staff shortages, and worse, the blood of corrections staff will be on your hands. This bill must be stopped.
HB 159 is highly inaccurate and will undermine public safety for all of the Commonwealth of Virginia. The Department of Corrections (DOC) does not use "attack dogs." The K9 units are for protection and safety for staff and inmates alike. There are very highly trained handlers who will only use force if the situation amd circumstances arise. Without K9 units in the DOC, inmates will not adhere to behavior standards and will attack staff and other inmates with very little to stand in the way of stopping violence perpetrated by them. Consequences for inmates are getting lower each year and they are growing more brazen. Staff assaults are increasing. Staffing at Virginia prisons is not increasing. Passing this bill will create a public safety disaster.
Canines are needed in correctional facilities to help maintain security. They control a lot of issues with just being present. If canines weren’t in these high level institutions staff and inmates are more likely to be hurt or possibly worse. Please leave these canines in these prisons so that the staff, public , and inmate safety continues. Those individuals that think they’re not needed should come and walk around these inmates with nothing to protect them and see if they feel safe. The inmates housed in these facilities are known for misbehavior and not complying with rules and procedures or else they wouldn’t be here. Wallens Ridge and Red Onion house the worst inmates in Virginia and most don’t care who is hurt. Staff assaults as well as inmate assaults will go up if canines are removed as well as officers quitting these difficult jobs if their safety is not taken into consideration. The prison system is already having problems staffing and this will definitely not help matters. I wouldn’t want to work around these individuals without canines being present to intervene in bad situations. Things can go bad quickly in a prison and the canines are a good deterrent.
To whom it may concern, Bill HB159 should not be passed period. K-9's are a valuable asset to the correctional setting in the State of Virginia Institutions are safer, the public is safer having these K-9 Officers as a part of the institutions in the state. These animals work hard and deserve recognition, not punishment. Our prison system houses some of the most dangerous inmates in the state as well as inmates from other states and countries and to remove these K-9's is one step closer to losing the structure and discipline that crucial for inmates reform to become productive citizens, and better people. Staff members lives have been saved by these four legged hero's whom this bill is trying to punish by removing them. I ask to to vote NO on bill HB159 so that the Virginia institutions are ran safer and staff members including K-9's are not neglected and made to feel like their voices are not heard. These animals who perform the job duties have no voice and Virginians have to be the voice that recognizes what a blessing these K-9's are the the institutional operations of the Virginia prison system. Thank you, A concerned citizen.
As a sister of a previously incarcerated person, I would like to state that my brother’s life was saved by utilization of a prison K9. I am sure that most of the comments in support have come from staff members inside of the institutions but those dogs help protect and maintain order for the inmates as well. My brother was brutally attacked at an institution and has repeatedly stated that the only deterrence for the aggressor was the K9. He states the aggressor was pepper sprayed, he was shot with the gun and still continued to assault my brother. He only stopped his behavior when the K9 intervened. He has stated more than once that he really owes his life to a dog. I would hate to think what the result would have been otherwise. Let’s not take a chance in seeing someone else possibly lose a life due to not having a K9 available.
As I read the summary of HB 159 the only question that comes to mind is, how can anyone supporting HB 159 actually care about the safety of the public, employees, and those incarcerated. Patrol canines are the main deterrent for assaults. Physical altercations are commonplace in correctional settings. Watch camera footage of what stops the majority of fights. The presence of patrol canines entering a pod is enough. To those who support HB 159, Do you expect staff to physically stop fights? Risk personal injury and possibly injuring the combatants further?
Canines need to be kept in the prisons. There are not enough officers as it is on shifts to handle the mass amount of prisoners. When they get out of control, the dogs are the only thing that stops them. They will immediately stop and lay down. If you have 5 or 10 or even more in a fight with each other or worse, on an officer, it's the only way to stop the fighting. I work in a male prison and I am a female. I cant imagine not having the dogs to help. My son is an officer. He said its dangerous enough to work with serial killers, rapists, and people that are just mean and are not capable of ever living normal and if the dogs go, a lot of people will quit. Then it just makes it even more dangerous for the ones left behind. There are already prisons in VA that are run by the inmates and no one seems to care. I have family that have been made to go work a week in the northern area prisons and inmates are not charged with anything, they are let loose and even have made their way to the main door of a control room which should never happen. If dogs were used, that would never happen. Whose life is more important to you? Your officers/Sgts./Lts. or people that are capable of killing you and your family if they were on the outside? People that want the dogs taken away have never worked in or around 100s of inmates at a time. I would think most may have someone in prison they want to protect; however, if they see how they truly acted in here they may change their mind. Men that like to show their private parts to female workers/nurses and scream and curse and call people names and messages that come through threatening workers lives and their family's lives. The dogs are the only thing left that help control the mass chaos that happens in here!!!! If you dont believe it... well, you should ask for footage of fights and how the dogs control it!
If we lose the k 9 in the prisons I fear for the life's of all staff and offenders inside the prisons the k 9 are there for everyone's safety
The Virginia department of corrections number one goal is Public Safety, also the Safety of the staff members and Inmates. If the K9-units were to be taken from Virginia institutions this would dramatically jeopardize the safety of the general public, staff and inmates inside the Department. You would see an increase in assaults upon staff, an increase the severity of the assaults to staff and inmates. Patrol K-9s are the best and sometimes the only tool we have that can and will prevent minor, serious and potentially deadly assaults against staff and inmates. If they were taken away assaults will happen on a daily basis to the extent of life-threatening injuries. I also know of many employees that would seek employment elsewhere because the danger of the job would increase so much without our k-9 units.
This bill would be detrimental to the safety of inmates and employees at any SL-5 facility. These facilities house some of the most assaultive and aggressive inmates in Virginia and they are housed at these facilities for a reason, you cannot maintain a safe environment without the K-9's in these facilities.
Dear Sir or Madame. Last year in Newport News I was assaulted by a 27 year old black man from Chesapeake because of his road rage.. This was at my local bank 11;30 in the morning. This young man almost lost his life at my hand because you cannot reel in your problem young men. His words feet from me were ' im going to kick your ass and then kill you'. My pistol changed his mind. I saw for myself the woke judges and a woke system that perpetuates the problem. The criminal justice system has been flung far far left which IS causing a public safety hazzard. No new gun control is needed. More jail time for the trash that i dealt with is. My Congressman Bobby Scott and Delegate Cia Price do not represent me.
The People that wear the DOC Uniform and work behind the closed gates that deal with the individuals that society cant handle and are a threat to the general public who do this job with no weapons when the inmates have them, deal with Inmates who have nothing to loose most of which have a vendetta against law enforcement and you are wanting to take the most useful tool away from the that being the k9 and there handler. most issues that arise in the correctional setting are quickly and quietly stopped by a show of force and that being the DOG . it merely being present stops issues before they have a chance to escalated to a more extreme situation. I believe taking away the patrol K-9 or the k9 in general in our higher level facility will be detrimental to the safety and security of both the general public and staff members and thats the DOC"S WHOLE MISSION STATEMENT and with all do respect should be the Delegates main concern.
Canines are efficient in promoting safety within institutions and the community.
I am concerned about the staff in prisons if canines are taken out. Officers are not able to carry guns. They can only carry pepper spray and that does have an effect on everyone. I have seen individuals not even flinch with pepper spray. The canines may not even have to be released, many times once a canine is present, inmates stopped fighting/assaulting staff or other inmates just because of the canine being present. I feel that the state continues to limit officers and staff's safety for individuals who have committed crimes and are in prison for a reason. Indvidual's that want to make these recommendations/decisions have not even worked in a prison. When someone makes these suggestions, they should have to come work a week at a Level 5 or above prison. Also, having a prison located in your community, you want to ensure the community continues to be safe. I feel canines should remain in prisons. It is another safety tool for staff, the community and even the inmates.
Canines help promote the safety of not only staff, but also inmates and the public within prisons in Virginia.
Your average citizen, or politician, will never experience the level of violence that takes place in a maximum-security prison. Inside those walls is another world most citizens, and politicians, know nothing about. Maximum security prisons were built to house convicted felons whose behavior is unmanageable at lower-level prisons. There is danger to prison staff and inmates alike because the majority of violent incidents is inmate attacking inmate. Inside these walls are non-lethal weapons that are meant to deter violence. Most inmates are undeterred by rubber pellets and gas. They are deterred by trained security dogs. When a trained security dog and its handler enter a pod where a violent altercation is occurring, the fight stops. The handling of an altercation is a choreographed event where responding staff, trained security dogs, as well as inmates who are involved and not involved, follow the steps that have been created by politicians and citizen insight in Richmond. The trained security dogs are a necessary part of life inside these walls and have saved many lives, inmates and staff. There is rarely an incident when an inmate or staff member is actually bitten because inmates, security and prison staff all respect the trained security dogs and the role they play. Everyday citizens, and politicians, need to understand these control measures are necessary for this kind of environment and having trained security dogs makes the daily lives of inmates and staff safer. Regardless of what some extremists' opinions would have us believe, inside these walls is an organized, structured environment. Inmates are housed, fed, clothed, receive medical, dental and psychological treatment, as well as educational opportunities and many hold jobs where they earn money and are a vital part of the operation of the institution. When inmates speak out, write grievances, stage protests and hunger strikes, their views are considered, and their needs are addressed. Policy changes all the time to accommodate new issues. But maximum-security prisons exist for a reason. And violence does occur. I think if concerned citizens, family members, and politicians, stopped to think, they would appreciate the fact that an inmate's life was saved because the arrival of a trained security dog immediately deescalated a violent situation and everyone involved was able to walk away. Staff, officers, and inmates need those dogs.
It is unrealistic to remove the dogs from prison facilities. Especially level 5 and 6 prisons. These dogs and the officers that handle them are used as tool and deterrent during serious incidents in these facilities. The dogs are used for the protection of the people working and living at these prisons.
Canine use is very much needed in facilities for public protection. Lives are in danger without them.
HB 159 is proposing to abolish and destroy the canine program for the Virginia Department of Corrections (VADOC). Even though the bill suggests it is a wonderful idea, the safety concerns for security staff, non-security, and even inmates should not go unnoticed! These dogs are well trained along with their handlers and are a crucial part within the justice system. Imagine a large brawl breaks out within a pod; there can be almost 100 inmates out on the pod floor on certain buildings. What is the likelihood of having the equivalent amount of staff respond to handle this situation-whereas a canine with possibly one or two officers can quail this matter. And in most cases, these canines are there as a show of force as opposed to always taking action. Inmates respond well to canine handlers. This will then prevent inmates from attempting to harm one another as much, and will also assist in protecting staff. In some instances where the canines are utilized, they act as a slight buffer to lower the risk of staff becoming injured or even worse. All in all, canines are a vital part of the VADOC and must be kept to maintain safety and balance within these walls. Doing away with the canine program will also create other problems as well. The State of Virginia will then have more occupational vacancies, injuries will go up, and sadly death rates. With that being said, please allow the canine program to remain in the VADOC; if not for the staff, keep them for the inmates' safety. Don't put blood on your own hands by passing this bill.
As a citizen of the commonwealth, I want to comment on the bill to abolish canines in correctional facilities. Anyone with knowledge of these facilities understands the impact this would have on not only the safety of staff working within, but the public living near and around the prison walls. Canines allow a level of control that would not be possible considering the limited resources available in correctional facilities to protect against combative inmates, escapes, and maintaining order. As a pregnant woman living near multiple facilities, I feel safer knowing this level of resistance exists between my family and myself and those incarcerated in high level security prisons. Those trained to utilize canine intervention exhibit pride in and respect for what they do and are trusted by the community. In a perfect world, such elements of protection would not be needed. Unfortunately, Southwest Virginia has been burdened with the task of housing high-level dangerous members of society that cannot be trusted not only in public, but in lower-level facilities, as well. Please do not take away the relief and comfort of knowing our well-trained canines and handlers stand as a barrier between our treasured home and sense of security and the real and present danger that high-level inmates present.
Hi! As a citizen of Wise County I'm against this law. I'd have some many friends that work for the DOC specifically Wallens Rigde and Red Onion. The use of K9s is necessary for this environment when your dealing with the worse of the worse there's a reason why they are in a level 5 or 6 facility. K9s is no only for the safety of the Officer's, is also for the safety of the inmates population. They help to prevent attacks on staff or inmates. They are use during mass movement ( chows, recreation yard, religious services and more ). K9s help with all this activities along with their handlers. Some people complain about being bit but the reality is if they do what they are supposed to do nothing will happen. Do your time behave yourself but no they don't care. and unless you have worked in a Prison you don't know what's like when u deal with a murderer, rapist, doing life time sentences. They have nothing to lose. Officers get assaulted every day but people don't see it or heard about it. K9s is a tool to provide safety for Staff and inmates.
These officers need some form of protection and the k9s are all the inmates respond to. Removing them would put many lives in danger. Lives of productive tax paying members of society.
If you do not have canine in the prison system you will totally lose what little control you have now over the convicts.It will allow open season on staff and you will be even more short handed than you are now,not to mention paying out death benefits to staff families.
As an employee at a maximum security prison I am able to see that there is a tremendous need for canine support in the prison system. Many times I have witnessed situations in which individual, as well as groups of inmates have become combative and have attempted to cause harm to others in the process. There have been many situations in which staff response, alone, does not resolve the issue. In this case, canine intervention has been proven effective in de-escalating seemingly otherwise uncontrollable circumstances. Removing the canines will not only increase the risk of staff and other inmate injury, harm, or possible death, it also will increase the public's risk for harm due to the possibility of rioting or escape of one or multiple inmates. These canines are the protection of the public, the employees, and the inmates of the prison system. To take away the canines would ultimately cause less structure by, if nothing else, removing that "fear factor" that the canines instill in the inmate population. If there is an issue with the canines, create or update policies on their use inside the prisons. As an employee, local resident, and institutional healthcare provider, I DO NOT think the removal of canines in the prison will be beneficial to anyone. The benefit of removal does not outweigh the risk. Please help keep us protected. Please keep the DOC employees and the public safe!
The presence of patrol canines has a positive psychological impact on correctional staff and inmates. When constantly exposed to potential threats and high-stress environments, personnel's morale and mental well-being often bear the brunt. The comfort and assurance that come from knowing a skilled canine unit is tirelessly working to ensure everyone's safety alleviate stress levels and facilitate a safer working environment for all. Without canines, institutions will see a rise in altercations as well as staff leaving. Those who have never stepped foot inside of a security max prison, should not propose bills they know nothing about.
Canines are a lifeline of the police dept and corrections facility to provide safety to not only inmates but to the officers and public.
the only thing that the inmates fear are the dogs here, they don't have no fear of the officers so if you take the dogs away what's going to stop them from hurting or killing a officer or a non officer .
If this bill is passed, there will be a significant rise in staff assaults, a significant increase in vacancy, a significant rise in injuries, and there will be a significant rise in serious injuries on inmates. The patrol canines in the Virginia Department of Corrections have stopped multiple fights just at their presence. Major injuries, including attempted murders have been stopped at the presence of a patrol canine. I have seen this first hand. For someone trying to pass a bill that has not probably stepped foot inside of a level four or five prison has no clue of how effective the patrol canines. It keeps staff safe and inmates alike. Like I have said if this bill is passed, the department of corrections will have a totally different problem on their hand. They will have an increase in vacancies because many officers said they will quit, they will have an increase in staff assaults, they will have an increase in inmate violence, they will have a increase in serious bodily injury or death.
Canines deter inmates from fighting each other and correction officers. They provide safety for everyone who works inside these institutions. Staff will no longer have control over these institutions. More institutions will close due to staff shortages. This bill goes against public safety.
Being a correctional officer since 1998. I have worked many different institution and agencies. Having K9 is imperative for a safe and secure institution. Agency previous employees for did not have k9. Several incidents I witnessed inmates being fatally assaulted by other inmates. At that time all measures of deterring inmates by staff was to late. Inmates died because of this. One situation led to a major disturbance causing several million dollars in institutional damages. All could and would have stopped with the use of K9. K9 when used accordingly is a tool of law enforcement nationwide. I have a duty to protect life , this will hender my abilities to do that. With the recent retention problems facing corrections nationwide, this will surely be a step in reverse . This will cause more institutions to close , delay programs rehabilitation and re entry efforts. Do we really want to step back in time and allow the violence to affect the ordinary operations of inmates and staff? Nothing about this bill makes sense as a security perspective. This bill is another way to defund the police efforts without publicly saying just that. If this bill passes be prepared to have a staff shortage across the commonwealth of epic proportions.
I don't feel that removing K9s from Correctional Facilities is a good idea. Most people requesting this have never been in or worked in a prison. Many fights are deterred because of the presence of a K9. All Officers, Non-security Staff, and inmates will be at a greater risk of harm with the removal of K9s. When inmates are in transition within the prison, K9 is what prevents many, many fights. When in transition, inmates mix with other inmates from different housing units which causes problems. Inmates are placed carefully in housing units based on gang affiliation and enemies list(keep separate). When certain programs are attended by inmates then the inmates do mix with others from other housing units. When inmates in transition see the K9 it stops them from instigating a fight, even gang fights. When a fight does break out it is usually one inmate mad at another. The instigator is doing the attacking while the other inmate doesn't want to fight. K9 use prevents serious bodily harm to the non-confrontational inmate and keeps our officers from having to engage in combat with an inmates. Other inmates watching may attack the officer if the officer is forced to engage in the fight because inmates want to defend other inmates against the officers. We are having difficulty employing officers and retaining new officers because of how laxed the Correctional Centers have become on inmate accountability. Keep our officers safe by reducing their chances of having to engage in a fight with inmates carrying shanks! Sincerely, Marina Wright, Teacher, Wallens Ridge State Prison
The removal of canine patrol officers from the prison system would not only raise the number of assaults on staff and other inmates, the assaults would be more violent and could have fatal outcomes.
I have worked in corrections for 14 years and I have seen 1st hand how having canines at a corrections facility can drastically reduce altercations between offenders and almost eliminate staff assaults. To do away with canines at a level 5 institution is an open invitation for offenders to do as they please to other offenders and to staff. Canines are the backbone of Wallens Ridge State Prison and I would hope you continue that.... THANK YOU.
I support K9s in all DOC facilities!
This debate over guns was settled in 1791. We have all the laws we need to cover the action of a criminal. Murder is illegal no matter the tool used. Assualt is illegal no matter the tool used. Your ridiculous attack on the rights of all Virginians is just another chapter in the failure our our legislature to deal with the true issues that plague our state. Restore our rights and work to better the state and stop with the petty and vindictive law making that only hurts the innocent. Every day our governing bodies from congress to you become less relevant as a part of our lives, since all you ever manage to do is destroy and steal.
In Ohio one year after constitution carry passed gun crimes went down
I've commend prior on these issue but would like to reemphasize that more laws of these nature only impose on those of us that already obey the law and I think that you could explain this to your constituents demanding more gun control. I always find it ironic and dubious that those wanting more gun control either don't own a gun, have never fired a gun or don't want to purchase one but wish to infringe upon those of us who are responsible gun owners. Many of these bills on gun control shouldn't even be proposed and if you are supporting these bills you're being dishonest to your own base in tell them that this will reduce crime. It can't reduce crime and never has since other cities such as Chicago ,crime ALWAYS increases with more gun control and Always goes down with less in most situations. I have friend who lives in Chicago and had to sue because they outlawed all firearms several years back. The citizens won that case and were allowed to own AR-15's and all various forms of semi automatic fire arms pistol and rifle. According to him and the data CRIME WENT DOWN. The exception to gun laws which are already on the book as always is proper back ground checks so criminals cannot exploit the legal process by purchasing as a felon. As for removing someone's rights to own a gun under a DUI or DWI I fail to see any relevance or correlation and causation to the issue of guns in general. I am apposed to all these gun control bills and support the two pro guns bills being proposed.
I urge the committee to vote in favor of HB159 because it will limit the use of canines which will reduce the strain of incarceration, making it more likely that prisoners will be able to be rehabilitated. It is not a good thing that so many of the total dog bites in prisons in the US are from Virginia prisons. We can do better.
It is my belief and opinion that removing K9 patrol dogs from our correctional facilities takes a huge safety tool from correctional staff as well as inmates. The pure presence of the K9 acts as a deterrent from unwanted behavior from inmates and has prevented an unnumbered amount of incidents than can’t be tracked with data. The only data that is ever mentioned is when there is a required engagement. The use of patrol K9 has prevented serious injury to an unnumbered amount of inmates and staff members during assaults that occur in correctional facilities. The K9 itself along with its handlers are required to submit to very intense training to ensure safe and proper use of this tool. I feel that the removal of K9 will definitely take away from the overall safety and security of all inmates and staff in correctional facilities. I ask that the committee look at the overall picture and the purpose of the use of K9 not just 271 engagements that are being talked about in this bill. If you look at the number of incidents that occur in maximum security facilities this number is very minimal and only show the number of times when inmates refuse to comply and cease the disruptive behaviors. I strongly oppose this bill.
Taking K9 out of our prisons will only hurt the safety of our Commonwealth. It will put out Correctional staff in grave danger at high security institutions plus inmates at risk of serious harm. I have done my research as a concern citizen and that is one piece of data that can not be calculated of how many incidents do not occur because of K9 presence. I think of K9 presence as the 1st deterrent of inmate violence. It is my understanding that K9 are only used at higher security where the threat of death and serious injury are more likely to occur. The bill states at juvenile facilities. I can not find any data as to where a Juvenile facility in Va has used a patrol K9. I feel this was added to the bill as a scare tactic to push for the bill to pass. It is about time our elected officials stand up for voting citizens and law enforcement.
I am a mental health clinician currently employed at Wallens Ridge State Prison in Big Stone Gap, VA where canines are used to ensure the safety of inmates as well as employees. This fall, I witnessed a fight among several inmates on the floor of one of our housing units. The inmates were not responding to the directions of the correctional officers in the building at that time, nor did the deployment of pepper spray by the officers deter their fighting. It was then that the officers called for a canine. When the dog entered the housing unit, his presence was announced by the K9 officers handling the canine. It was at that time, the fighting ceased, and all inmates went to the floor, without incident. No one was bitten and no one, inmates nor officers, were seriously injured. The mere presence of that canine restored order to that building. If the inmates had continued to fight, there could have been deaths due to the inmates blatantly choosing to disobey direct orders. I am a female working in an all-male, level 5 maximum security prison, and I provide mental health services to the inmates in their housing units. I usually walk by myself from my office in the administration portion of the prison, and I regularly encounter inmates as I walk around the compound. Many of these inmates travel to their destinations and are not escorted by security staff. There are always officers monitoring movement from the gun posts outside, and there are usually canines present keeping watch as well. They don’t act aggressively, nor do they intimidate the inmates. They just sit and watch. I feel much safer walking solo across the compound knowing the canines are present. That canine is there for my protection and would be able to come to my defense faster than one of the officers in the gun posts if I were to be attacked by one of the inmates. The canines are not used maliciously towards the inmates but are used as another level of safety for everyone, inmates included. I ask that you take my concerns as a prison employee into consideration before casting your vote for this bill. The cornerstone of the VA Department of Corrections is public safety, and I strongly feel that the use of canines in our correctional facilities only contributes to the safety of the public and to the safety of its employees. Thank you for your time.
I am writing to ask you to VOTE YES for HB159 Correctional facilities; use of canines. Most states have eliminated the use of attack-trained canines in handling people who are incarcerated. Virginia is one of eight states that continues to use attack-dogs to “manage” people. A 2023 report based on reviewing public-records requests, court documents, medical records and interviews with dozens of bite victims identified 295 incidents of attack-trained dogs biting incarcerated people over the six years from 2017-2022. Most of those attacks (92 percent) – 271 attacks – were in Virginia. Why is Virginia so far ahead in this barbaric practice? Virginia must do better. Vote yes for HB159. Thank you.
This practice is so detrimental to the well-being of all people. It has been studied and confirmed to cause more harm than good and it is well past time to discontinue. We need oversight of the jails and prisons to assure it stops.
This practice is so detrimental to the well-being of all people. It has been studied and confirmed to cause more harm than good and it is well past time to discontinue. We need oversight of the jails and prisons to assure it stops.
The end of solitary confinement must be done My son was murdered in solitary confinement at Red Onion Prison in Pound Va on 1/3/22.
I definitely support HB159! How many lawsuits does VADOC have to have before they realize the use of canines, by many of their Corrections Officers, is causing more harm than good? Most of these dogs aren't even properly trained. My husband has witnessed men being attacked by dogs (in their cell, and that's against policy), or after the person has retreated or laid down on the floor. These dogs should not maul people! You don't need attack dogs when you already have the pellet guns and mace. Get rid of these dogs. Too many people are abusing their authority and using these animals to instill fear in people. If you need to break up a fight, do it the same way you do when you gang up on men in the prison (5 guards on 1 man). Put your gloves on and break up the fight, don't use dogs because they clearly don't have a kill switch because they aren't obeying anyone's command.
Recently an independent study was conducted, it showed Virginia used their attack dogs 271 times. The highest in the country. The state in second place is Arizona, they used their dogs 15 times over the same period. So, are Virginia prisoners that much worse or does Virginia need to go back to the drawing board? There needs to be accountability and oversight if for this reason alone.
I support these Bills!
.
This set of bills came to my attention in an e-mail from King Salim Khalfani who I first met at a summit of leaders noting Harrisonburg's Martin Luther King, Jr. Way street renaming. The renaming and the summit were initiated by the late Stan Maclin, who I assisted with research in the renaming and as secretary in the Harrisonburg Martin Luther King, Jr. Way Coalition. Last Monday, the Coalition celebrated the tenth anniversary of the dedication of that street. Leaders from organizations that had drawn thousands in festivals, advocacy, and service events over the course of the year, braved harsh weather and a pandemic surge to organize and attend this special instance of Harrisonburg's annual celebration known as People's Day. We were led in prayer by the Rabbi from our local congregation on a theme of seeing the humanity of our fellow human beings. The Rabbi's words, in this context, echoed Dr. King's message in his April 4th, 1967 speech, Beyond Vietnam, that to get beyond continually having to protest the brutality of wars over there, our society needed to undergo a radical revolution in values that would lead us to end the systemic brutality to our fellow human beings, starting right here. I thus submit my comments to oppose brutality toward our fellow human beings in our criminal legal system. Harrisonburg's street renaming showed another way. After the street renaming, communities unaccustomed to having a say over their own governance for a time felt represented. Our city bloomed and our incarceration rate plummeted to global levels that neither brutality nor reforms could reach. I tracked these numbers from my position as economic adviser to Judge John Paul's committee on alternatives to incarceration where those results quickly persuaded me that my task was completed: what we were doing, building a better community inspired by the economic vision of Dr. King's final year, was already better than what could be achieved within the criminal legal system. I hope we can reduce the brutality we inflict, and look to reducing incarceration and increasing community resilience to lower the chance of whatever negative events the brutality aspires to counter. I thus write in support of: HB159 and HB726 and in opposition to HB308 .
We must ask ourselves, does committing a crime make us not a human anymore? The use of dogs to attack people is a human rights violation. For those who have been attacked and those who have witnessed attacks, it has devastating long-term implications. Some of these implications include intrusive thoughts and nightmares, not to mention the physical scars. From 2017-2022 there were 295 documented dog attacks nationwide. Virginia is an outlier with being responsible for 271 of these attacks. Canines are not solely being used for the event of imminent danger. They are being used for cell extractions and in situations where no violence is taking place. What is the most disturbing fact about this is that canines are being used to taunt incarcerated individuals. Here is a direct report from a formerly incarcerated individual who experienced a canine attack in Red Onion State Prison in 2017. As he was being attacked by a canine, the handler yelled, "Get 'em, boy!" he yelled. "Get that n—." "I wish I could tie you to my bumper and drag you down the street." Dogs have a long history of being deployed and used against Black people. Attack-trained dogs have helped violently enforce white supremacy. The use of canines also has a negative impact on the canine. The fact that they are being conditioned to such extreme violence leads them into a state of distress as well. There are reports of them biting off their own tails due to the distress. These dogs are not being adopted because they become and remain so aggressive. In Virginia, four dogs were euthanized for aggression, destructive behavior, or liability risk in 2021 alone. The following year, another dog was euthanized after severely biting handlers at Wallens Ridge, Sussex I, and River North, according to an internal email and incident reports. I do not support this bill because it is extremely inhumane on humans and the dogs as well. There are other ways that the VADOC can figure out alternative methods to the use of canines.
Can you IMAGINE being attacked by a dog? What if someone commanded that dog to "get" you? What if you were attacked while in handcuffs with no way to protect yourself? I can't imagine. But there are thousands of human beings that have to live in fear of these trained attack dogs every day. This is a vicious and inhumane form of punishment. We 100% support Del. Seibold! Please stop the use and abuse of attack dogs!
We live in a country where every other day we are outraged and horrified by news of dog attacks on humans. Why does this NOT extend to PEOPLE in prison? The use of dogs to "correct" a person is as INHUMANE and BARBARIC as it gets! Virginia should lead the nation in how it treats it's residents with dignity and keep them SAFE as HUMAN BEINGS. Instead, we lead the nation in using animals to ATTACK PEOPLE! This is appalling! VA it is WAY past time to end this practice! STOP THE TORTURE!
I support Del Seibold’s bill to ban the use of attack K9s in prisons.
There is little justifiable use of attack dogs to deal with most issues with incarcerated. Having been incarcerated myself, I saw dogs used to attack and restrain even after the adult was detained. It is absolutely appallingly there, and does not need to be used on children.
While at Red Onion State Prison, I personally witnessed an inmate assault an officer, but once they were fully restrained in handcuffs and shackles laying face down on the floor surrounded by officers, Lt. Lambert instructed the Canine officers to bring their dogs in and attack the inmate on the ground. While at Sussex 2 State Prison, there was a fight called over the radio in 3-D pod. The pod I was in (1-C) was on the BLVD and coming back from chow and the Canine's were running down the center of the sidewalk and an inmate had his back up against the fence and the dog man didn't have full control while running down the sidewalk, and the dog was able jump up and to the side and bite the inmate in the stomach. Sussex 2 State Prison officials made the inmate agree to sweep it all under the rug. They use the Canines to scare us when we get off the bus at Wallens Ridge State Prison, and Red Onion State Prison. They use them to move us down the sidewalk going to and from chow. If we're fighting, they'll sic them onto us, but have trouble getting them off of us, this is where most of the damage has been done to victims of Canine bites. By: Robert Briscoe Inmate at Keen Mountain Correctional Center
I worked in the VADOC for over 22 years as an Officer, Sergeant, Lieutenant and my final six years as the Investigator at Keen Mountain Correctional Center. There were several canine use of force cases that I worked, along with SIU, that were not justified and should have never happened. One of those involved a female counselor that exited the housing unit, as a canine and handler were entering through the same door. The handler failed have control of his canine, resulting in a deep bite on her thigh that left a blood pool on the boulevard. Another was a bite on an inmate that was walking out of the pod going to the dining hall. The canine handler was unaware the inmate was behind him, as the inmate approached the canine turned and engaged, with the handler giving enough lead for the dog to engage. Both were found that the handler was at fault. I am sure the inmate sued and was awarded a settlement as he (inmate) did nothing wrong. VADOC leadership has over-relied on patrol canines to cover security posts in lieu of chronic understaffing. This has increased the number of contacts/engagements with patrol canines. This is detrimental to inmates, staff and the canine program. Handlers are expected to be the first respondents to inmate-on-inmate fights and inmate-on-staff assaults. This mandate puts the handler and canine in harms way as the handler is completely vulnerable if his canine engages. In approximately 2007, I responded to an incident in B-2 pod at KMCC in which approximately 15 inmates refused to lock down in their cells. They planned to take the pod officer hostage, fortunately, there were four officers in the building that were not normally there. We responded immediately as the pod officer recognized that something wasn't right. We were able to foil the inmate's plans and secure the inmates involved. However, the offenders were expecting a canine response and had one inmate that was prepared to take the bite from the canine (his arm was thoroughly wrapped with sheets and a jacket.) Once engaged, the other inmates planned to kill the dog and take the handler hostage. You see, when a canine engages, he is attention is completely on the target. The handler's attention is completely on the canine at that point, leaving the handler vulnerable to attack. VADOC leadership has known this for years and has continued to place the handlers at risk. They have also failed in reigning in unnecessary or unjustified canine engagements as evidenced by Hannah Beckler's recent article/documentary revealing the VADOC had 272 canine engagements from 2017 through 2022, which was the most documented engagements in the country. The runner-up was Arizona with only 15. I was shocked at the comparison. The VADOC has been able to do this, because in reality, they have been accountable to no one. How much money has the VADOC paid out on lawsuits over canine engagements? How much has the VADOC paid out for medical care for inmates and staff that have suffered canine bites? As legislators, you must act on this data. I was never comfortable working around canines and was lucky enough to avoid being bitten, but I did have a few close calls. I do feel, given the chronic understaffing of the agency, the patrol canines can be used for inmate escapes, in a riotous situations (for support) and could man all external security posts and conduct all external security checks. They should not be used inside as they have been for years.
I strongly support HB 159 to reduce the use in canines in juvenile facilities and I believe that most Virginians would also support it if they but knew this bill was being debated.
I am writing on behalf of an inmate at Sussex I - in Summer of 2023 - the dog got loose and bit the trainer on the yard and they had to remove the officer off the yard. In 2021 at Sussex I - this inmate's friend was walking to the recreation yard, and he was walking past the officer with the dog, and the dog jumped and bit him on the arm. The officers tried to write a charge for the inmate saying he provoked the dog, which is incorrect. In 2014, two men were fighting in the rec yard at Wallens Ridge. The dog was let go, to go and bite one of the men who was already on the yard. The dog jumped to bite one of the inmates, and the inmate grabbed the dog to stop him from attacking him and the officer instructed the inmate to let go of the dog. The dog then bit the shoulder of the inmate and dragged him a couple of feet across the yard. The officers with the dog will walk close to inmates as means to intimidate, saying that inmates are the aggressors. They use the dogs to scare us. And they talk to us like we are inhuman and use the dogs to justify and put fear into us.
I am writing this on behalf of an inmate that was housed in 2009 at Wallens Ridge State Prison. On the top tier of the pod, a fight broke out - and everyone was ordered to stop and lay down. A man was in the shower at the time, and the canine unit came in and told him to lay down. He asked if he could get dressed. They declined. He didn't want to let him get out and lay down, and he declined. So they let the dogs on him while he was naked in the shower and he wasn't seen since. He was visibly injured to his arms when he came out of the shower.
This is on behalf of an inmate at Keen Mountain Correctional Center - 2008. The inmates would have a gate break as an opportunity to come off the recreation yard and would be pat down. The dog was doing flips with choker chains on, and eventually came out of the choker chain, and his back was to the dog as the officer was patting him down and the dog jumped at him and was an inch away from his arm. In 2004 - Keen Mountain Correctional Center, a counselor named Mrs. White was coming out of A building, and the dog men were to the side, and the dog took off running and bit her. There has been fights in the pod, and the dog was brought in, and the inmate was shot with the cannon twice and pepper sprayed and was subdued on the ground. When the dog came in, he wasn't aggressive toward the inmate, but the officer took the dog by the head and held him to the inmate's leg until the dog bit.
This is on behalf on an inmate that was housed at Wallens Ridge. As soon as the dog comes into an area, no-one is being violent. Usually once the dogs arrive, people get on the ground. Once you submit, they allow the dogs to bite you and the correctional officers are speaking badly to you. I have witnessed inmates walking past the correctional officer with the dog, on the way to school and the dog randomly attacked him for no reason. To settle this, the inmate was offered $100 in property and a job. The things I have witnessed and seen dogs do has mentally impacted me for the rest of my life. Once a dog is biting, the correctional officers have to use force to remove the dog from the person.
I write this on behalf of an inmate that was housed at Wallens Ridge - in the year 2016. The victim was being attacked by two other inmates. The dog was brought in by the correctional officer, but the dog was directed to attack, Dontae - not the two attacking him. Dontae was already on the ground when the dog attacked him. He was not fighting back at this point; he was subdued on the ground. A second time, the inmate was on the recreation yard at Wallens Ridge - 2010. There was a fight, and all the inmates were directed to lay on the ground. The dog (with titanium canines) came in with the correctional officer, once everyone was on the ground - at this point no one was fighting. The dog went to an inmate by the pull up bar, bit him on the legs and arms multiple times, and pulled him approximately 2 feet, jerking each time.
On behalf of an inmate who was housed at Wallens Ridge State Prison - during mid 2020, the inmate was heading to chow in the chow hall with his entire pod (C4). Once inside the chow hall, he heard a commotion outside of the chow hall, and an inmate barged through the chow hall doors, with correctional officers following him. They wrestled him to the ground, and whilst he was subdued, they were beating him. On the opposite side of the chow hall, the correctional officer with the dog entered the chow hall, and all other inmates were on the ground. Upon entering the chow hall, inmates are scattered on the ground around the door. The dog comes in, in front of the correctional officer, snapping at peoples' legs who were uninvolved in the incident. The dog grabbed an inmate who was not involved's leg and ripped his pants. The officer in control of the dog instructed everyone to move out of the way, and then approached the inmate who was being subdued, and said 'skeet' which is the command to the dog to attack or get aggressive. The dog started biting the inmate in his lower calf and then moved up to his buttocks. While this is happening, the inmate is face down, with his hands handcuffed behind his back and correctional officers are kicking him and punching him in his face. This lasts for 30-45 seconds. The inmate was then taken to medical for treatment of puncture wounds. The cause of this altercation was accusation that the inmate was in the possession of a weapon.
HB183 - Firearms; storage in residence where minor or person prohibited from possessing is present, penalty.
My name is Laura, and I’m your constituent. Gun violence prevention is my top priority. Please support hi. Safety legislation that is brought up for a vote. These are the bills I support. Thank you for your time.
Law abiding citizens should not be punished for exercising their constitutional rights. Bill HB2 causes half of the state to become felons, just for exercising their rights to own firearms. HB1424 is unconstitutional because nothing in the second amendment says anything about having to have a license to own a gun. SB522 , similarly to HB1424 , is unconstitutional. The second amendment states that the right to bear arms shall not be infringed. People shouldn’t have to take a training course to own a gun. It’s your right to bear arms without government approval, or having to take a training course. It forces you to give up your ability to exercise your own rights. SB57 causes law abiding people to be in danger of criminals coming into a restaurant with a gun and not being able to defend themselves. SB327 once again is unconstitutional. The second amendment says nothing about an age restriction on any type of firearm. SB273 is unconstitutional because nothing states that you have to wait a certain amount of time to own a firearm. SB2 , just like HB2, shouldn’t cause law abiding people to not be able to own an “Assault weapon” or ammunition for an “Assault weapon”; because the second amendment doesn’t prohibit any style of firearm or ammunition from being sold or possessed.
I am opposed to all of these unconstitutional and anit-american gun laws and regulations. There is no room for more gun laws and regulations in this state.
Contrary to how certain government officials treat it, the second amendment is written using plain, easy to understand language, and insists that government has no right to take away the right for ordinary people like us to defend ourselves, as the constitution and bill of rights do not simply give people rights, but protects them from government manipulation and control. It’s incredibly disappointing and a tragedy that people choose to commit acts of violence with these rights, but restricting those who wish to exercise their rights peaceably due to those who wouldn’t follow these rules in the first place is incredibly naive. I, as well as every other person in the United States, deserve to protect my family with the best technology available. While some people look at certain defense weapon setups as a “why do you need that” situation, 1) I have the right to defend myself with the best tool available, and so I will choose that every time, 2) why do you “need” anything other than basic necessities (fast car, Gucci clothes, etc)? The government has no place in deciding what I “need”, 3) people with the intent to harm will not care what laws govern peaceful people, so what would limiting the victim’s access to proper tools do? You may think that by “banning” or otherwise restricting access to a certain thing would mean that all of the “bad” things would magically go away, but they will not. Evil has always and will always exist, and I have every right to defend myself from it using the best tool available wherever I, or my family, choose to go. Restricting access on certain properties (the government isn’t actively protecting me everywhere), requiring certain training (who is paying for this?), limiting certain types of firearms (go ahead and define “assault weapon” in plain language please), and restricting ammo purchasing (I thought you wanted us to train; how does this help then?) are all means that end up hurting the average person and helping those who wish to hurt others, as the rest of us will be left in a position to insufficiently defend ourselves. I urge you to understand that while, yes, it is awful that evil people commit horrific acts, this right ultimately allows me to protect myself and my family from these evil people as well and as evil will always exist (we certainly like to delusion ourselves into believing that we live in a utopia, but we do not), I will protect my family accordingly. The government has no right to restrict this. Leave the peaceful citizens alone, more firmly punish those who hurt others, and help communities where this is an issue to prevent the upbringing of more evil people.
I oppose these bills that are attacking the rights of law-abiding gun owners.
Please stop trying to make criminals of law abiding citizens who just want to protect themselves. Me and my partner have recently become firearm owners because of situations that have arisen in our day to day lives, such as harassment of my wife almost to the point of altercation, sketchy characters waiting in front of our door/ducking in and out of our bushes at all times of the night, people breaking into cars in the neighborhood etc (many times the police/security were called only to arrive 45mins to an hour later). with many of these nonsensical bills you condemn us to allowing any possible violence to happen to us without a chance of defending our selves. Instead of helping fix the problem, you seek to make criminals out of any Virginian who has followed the law and legal purchased a firearm. Shame on you. I am Virginian native and since I was 18 I voted leaning blue in local and state elections you all are making me think this was a mistake. I am not proud of Virginia “progressives” who would rather strip my wife of her chance and right to defend her self rather than try to address the root of crime. Don’t make law abiding people criminals. Do some actual work and address the criminals! 2 of the proposed bills would make in illegal to bring your concealed firearm into a restaurant and another makes it a crime to have the firearm in your vehicle…. Like really? This is literally just to fill jails and strip people of their rights.
Many of these gun laws are unfair to law abiding citizens and do not affect criminals. These gun laws should be vetoed.
Leave law abiding citizens alone.
These bills infringe on the rights of the United States citizens given to us by the second amendment. The only thing these bills will accomplish will take the firearms out of the hands of law abiding citizens, while criminals will still have access.
I do not support any bill that removes any right from law abiding citizens to protect themselves from those who WILL NOT abide by these laws. These laws ONLY give CRIMINALS the upper hand.
There are approximately 47 bills regarding gun control between the House and Senate. Rather than fix issues that actually protect and enhance the lives of Virginians, many of these bills seek to disenfranchise and reduce the safety of the citizens in this great Commonwealth. Firearms are so fundamental to the founding and continued existence of our free society that they are listed just second to the freedom of speech in amendments to the constitution. It is plainly clear to all that countries and states who have banned or severely restricted firearms that violence does not end with their banning. Unjust deaths are not prevented. It simply ensures that law abiding citizens are left defenseless from those that wish to harm them, whether that be individuals or an organization. I write this knowing that it will be completely disregarded by the bills authors, but in hopes that others feel galvanized to speak up against unjust actions made in the name of progress. To those who wish to protect themselves with firearms while simultaneously stripping them from the common man, may you take heed of the Virginia state motto.
A lot of these laws contradict one another. I can’t support them. Both of our parties have failed us.
Stop trying to strip 2nd Amendment rights from law abiding citizens with a constitutional right to own and carry firearms. Not a single one of these laws/bills you’re trying to enact would have stopped any of the mass shootings we’ve seen.
I oppose all of these blatantly unconstitutional bills and wish our elected officials would actually get to work on fixing things that matter to Virginians.
It is obvious these elected officials want you to die at the behest of an anarcho tyrannical state where violent perpetual offenders are off with a slap on the wrist, while YOU tax payer are criminalized for not wanting to be a victim to these perpetual perpetrators. The elected officials funded by big Pro-Death lobby of Giffords and Bloomberg sit in their cushy NOVA HOAd mansions behind security while you plebs go to work everyday to pay their salary. These same officials effectively bribe the police state by giving them a way to pay off a mortgage and boat in exchange for your oppression. YOU citizen must morally oppose these pro-Death bills. Democracy has fallen and its only driven by money hungry Babylonians who swim in excess and delicacy while YOU PLEBS cant even afford milk, eggs or pampers. Remember these people do not hold dominion over you. Call your congressman/woman and CHRIST IS KING!
There is no acceptable reason to infringe upon the Constitutionally-protected (both US and Virginia's Constitutions) rights of Americans and Virginians. None of these bills purported to reduce gun-related violence actually seem to prioritize the reduction of causal effects of overall violence. Many of these are merely attempts to curb the rights of the People to keep and bear arms, because our legislative bodies are full of corrupt, weak, and contemptible individuals. Show us the bills for addressing the root causes of violence: mental health, income inequality, social instability, lack of education and educational opportunities, drug & human trafficking, or employment & wages (this list is not all-inclusive).
Time and time again it has been proven that criminals do not care about or follow restrictive firearm laws. Virginia already has some of the most restrictive firearms laws in the country ("B+" rating from Giffords), more unconstitutional infringements upon law abiding citizens is not the answer. We need to address the root causes (access to mental health resources for example) and not throw bandaids at it by punishing responsible, law abiding, gun owners. I oppose these bills and urge you to do the same.
As a fellow Democrat, it’s important to acknowledge the complexities surrounding gun ownership and the Second Amendment. 1. Self-Defense: Firearms can be a crucial tool for individuals to protect themselves, especially in high-crime areas or situations where law enforcement response times are slow. 2. Sport and Recreation: Many Americans enjoy shooting sports like hunting, skeet shooting, and target practice as a recreational activity, fostering a sense of community and skill-building. 3. Cultural Tradition: Gun ownership is deeply ingrained in American culture, with a rich history of hunting and marksmanship passed down through generations. 4. Economic Impact: The firearms industry contributes significantly to the economy, generating jobs and revenue through manufacturing, sales, and related services. 5. Civil Liberties: Upholding the right to bear arms is fundamental to preserving individual freedoms and safeguarding against government overreach. 6. Empowerment of Marginalized Communities: For historically marginalized groups, owning firearms can serve as a means of empowerment and protection against hate crimes or discriminatory violence. 7. Emergency Preparedness: In times of natural disasters or civil unrest, responsible gun owners can help maintain order and protect their families and communities. 8. Deterrence of Crime: Research suggests that the presence of armed civilians can deter potential criminals and reduce overall crime rates in certain contexts. 9. Veterans and Law Enforcement: Many veterans and law enforcement officers transition to civilian life with a continued appreciation for firearms, utilizing their expertise for civilian defense and security. 10. Balanced Approach: Instead of blanket gun control measures, we can advocate for comprehensive solutions that address root causes of violence, such as mental health support, poverty reduction, and community intervention programs.
I oppose the proposed firearms legislation put forward by this legislature and any legislation that violates the 1st, 2nd, and 4th, amendment rights of any Virginian. The desire for safer communities, a more united nation, and healing for our public health is something that we all can share in but these bills do not achieve that. Rather, they regulate and penalize. They unconstitutionally restrict the rights of the many in the name of safety and serve only to harm our rights. I would be doing a disservice to our state and my fellow citizens if I did not also provide potential solutions or remedies to the violence we face. First, we as communities need to promote voluntary storage facilities for those who are experiencing hardship and are concerned about suicide. Ideally making it easier to put firearms safely out of reach when suicide risks are greater. To do this it would need to be a system at the lowest level with minimum government involvement besides funding and partnership with local ranges. We would also need to reach out to those in our lives who are in a bad place and encourage the use of these facilities. Second, we should promote a culture of safe handling and respect for firearms through school courses and community organizations because assault weapons or not suicide, or accidents only take one bullet from a single action firearm. Lastly and more broadly we should focus on the issues surrounding the violence. Whether it is drugs and organized criminal activity or the mental health crisis as it has become known we should be working to fix these issues first. I.e. legalize weed, adapt police training, and push to root out organized crime, promote common social values and family cohesion, increase freedom, physical activity, and discipline in the school system.
I am a liberal through and through, I believe in individual rights and the opportunity for prosperity for all. I vote democrat because I care about my community, the rights of minorities, and women’s rights. The proposed legislation limiting the ability of free, law abiding citizens to purchase firearms, carry, and general use should not be limited further. I have witnessed violence at the hands of criminals, some later caught and it was shown that they did not legally acquire these firearms. The proposed legislation will effectively stop those who abide by the laws of Virginia from being able to properly protect themselves. It is known that police will not protect you, and they have no legal obligation to do so. This puts us at a dilemma, it’s either blindly trust the police to protect us and our families or have the ability to protect ourselves. I am not advocated for looser gun laws by any means, but I am advocating for more common sense gun laws. What do I mean by this you may ask? Well I mean background checks are a must and proper certification to conceal carry. I am a former Marine, I was a firefighter, and am a current student at a great university in our nations capital. I like to think I am reasonable in my thinking, but after looking and reading the propositions I checked above, I can’t help but feel betrayed by my own party. There is more than 5 guns for every American in this country. Gun control must target the people who do not follow the law and try to prevent violence from occurring, and the proposed legislation above does not help in that manner. I am hopeful that you will read this and reconsider the language in the legislation and I am even more hopeful that I can protect my family as necessary. I will always vote for progress but that’s not to say that I will always vote against my interests. Locally, crime has been on the rise and I have had to deal with it directly with little to no help from the police. I will (to the fullest extent of the law) protect myself as necessary from anyone who wishes to inflict harm on myself or family, and I hope you see that the average citizen in Virginia can not afford a security detail or rely on our police for protection. Thank you and have a great day.
Please stop infringing on our god given right, protected by the constitution of the United States (which you all have sworn to uphold and protect), to keep and bear arms. Responsible gun owners are not the problem in America’s gun violence epidemic. We follow the law. Criminals don’t. We use our firearms to protect ourselves, loved ones, and community. Chipping away at this right we have makes us more vulnerable to becoming victims of gun violence, not protect us from it. These laws only serve to empower those with evil intentions. Rather, might I suggest harsher penalties for those who commit senseless acts of violence with firearms instead of going after the good men and women of the commonwealth who wish only to use their firearms for lawful purposes.
Dear House of Delegates, I'm writing to you today as a concerned citizen. The introduction of bills aimed at heavily regulating firearms, is not warranted or wanted by the people of Virginia. Our nation stands at a crossroads, where the desire to address gun violence intersects with the constitutional rights affirmed by the Supreme Court. The Second Amendment's protection of the right to bear arms is not just a legal directive but a reflection of our commitment to individual freedom. In this context, the proposed regulations, while motivated by a commendable desire to reduce violence, raise significant concerns about their effectiveness and the potential consequences for law-abiding citizens. Research, including findings published in the Journal of Quantitative Criminology, suggests that the relationship between strict gun laws and the reduction of gun violence is not as straightforward as one might hope. Cities with stringent gun regulations continue to face challenges with gun-related crimes, indicating that those intent on violence often find ways to circumvent the law. This reality prompts us to question whether new restrictions will achieve their intended goal or merely place additional burdens on those who seek firearms for legitimate purposes, including self-defense. Moreover, the abundance of firearms in the United States presents a logistical challenge to the enforcement of such regulations. With more guns than people in the country, the task of significantly reducing the availability of firearms to criminals, without infringing on the rights of law-abiding citizens, is daunting. It is within this complex landscape that I urge you to consider the broader implications of the proposed gun control measures. The parallels drawn with other contentious issues, such as the regulation of women's healthcare, highlight the potential for policy decisions to inadvertently infringe upon individual freedoms and deepen societal divisions. Such outcomes not only detract from the intended goals of enhancing public safety but also risk alienating segments of the population whose support is essential for the advancement of our collective well-being. I respectfully ask that you consider the potential consequences of the proposed gun control measures, not just for the immediate future but for the legacy we leave for generations to come. It is my hope that, together, we can find a way to address the challenges of gun violence in a manner that honors our values, respects our freedoms, and genuinely enhances the safety and well-being of our communities.
STOP INFRINGING OUR RIGHTS. Get rid of every single gun control bill that is here and START ENFORCING THE LAWS WE ALREADY HAVE. Stop trying to turn law abiding citizens into criminals. I am disgusted that all of these nonsense bills have even made it this far. You can have these laws in Northern Virginia where everyone hates guns but don’t force this garbage into the rest of the state. GET RID OF ALL OF THIS GARBAGE and keep your noses out of everyone’s business. More government is not the answer.
Please stop attempting to infringe on my 2nd amendment rights. Responsible gun owners are not behind any gun violence. Maybe focus on bills that will actually keep guns out of the hands of those that should not have them rather than stripping the rights away of law-abiding citizens. Not a single one of those bills will stop criminals from breaking the law, all they will do is prevent me from being able to effectively defend myself and my family against said criminal.
Virginia already has some of the strictest gun laws in the nation. We can all agree violence is an issue but making more unconstitutional, on a national and state level, gun laws will not help with the rates of violent crimes and property crimes as we see from states with stricter gun laws. We need to increase access to mental health and community resources to address the root causes of issues rather than criminalizing responsible gun owners. I am opposed to this attack on the second amendment which is the fundamental backbone that protects the other freedoms guranteed in the constitution.
The second amendment is very clear in its intent that these rights “shall not be infringed”. Removing/ restricting law abiding citizens right to self defense and protection against unwitting organizations and persons is not only more harmful, but a clear violation of the rights this country was founded on.
Dear Honorable Members of the House of Delegates, I write to you today as a concerned citizen, deeply invested in the well-being and safety of our communities, and as someone who values the principles upon which our nation was founded. The issue at hand, the introduction of bills aimed at heavily regulating firearms, is one that I believe warrants a thoughtful reconsideration in light of its broader implications. Our nation stands at a crossroads, where the desire to address gun violence intersects with the constitutional rights affirmed by the Supreme Court. The Second Amendment's protection of the right to bear arms is not just a legal directive but a reflection of our commitment to individual freedom. In this context, the proposed regulations, while motivated by a commendable desire to reduce violence, raise significant concerns about their effectiveness and the potential consequences for law-abiding citizens. Research, including findings published in the Journal of Quantitative Criminology, suggests that the relationship between strict gun laws and the reduction of gun violence is not as straightforward as one might hope. Cities with stringent gun regulations continue to face challenges with gun-related crimes, indicating that those intent on violence often find ways to circumvent the law. This reality prompts us to question whether new restrictions will achieve their intended goal or merely place additional burdens on those who seek firearms for legitimate purposes, including self-defense. Moreover, the abundance of firearms in the United States presents a logistical challenge to the enforcement of such regulations. With more guns than people in the country, the task of significantly reducing the availability of firearms to criminals, without infringing on the rights of law-abiding citizens, is daunting. It is within this complex landscape that I urge you to consider the broader implications of the proposed gun control measures. The parallels drawn with other contentious issues, such as the regulation of women's healthcare, highlight the potential for policy decisions to inadvertently infringe upon individual freedoms and deepen societal divisions. Such outcomes not only detract from the intended goals of enhancing public safety but also ***risk alienating segments of the population whose support is essential for the advancement of our collective well-being.*** Constituents see this robust effort to "see what sticks" as a weakness within our party. Comparatively imbalanced with the diverse range of issues and concerns that we face everyday. A waste. As we move forward, I encourage you to approach this issue with a balanced perspective, one that recognizes the need for effective strategies to combat gun violence while also safeguarding the constitutional rights and freedoms that define our nation. The path to meaningful change is complex, requiring a nuanced understanding of the issues at hand and a commitment to policies that truly serve the best interests of all our citizens. In closing, I respectfully ask that you consider the potential consequences of the proposed gun control measures, not just for the immediate future but for the legacy we leave for generations to come. It is my hope that, together, we can find a way to address the challenges of gun violence in a manner that honors our values, respects our freedoms, and genuinely enhances the safety and well-being of our communities.
You guys need to stop attacking our 2nd amendment and get help for these kids growing up with identity crisis’s . You coming after law abiding citizens is appalling and the fact that your leaning towards becoming the despicable state of California is saddening. If the president can have security which uses firearms that even the normal civilian can’t have this raises the issue of how can a civilian defend against a tyrannical government with a featureless 10 round ar-15 ? Keep this up and we know exactly what your end goal is.
As a left leaning voter and citizen of Virginia, these new restrictions on our right to bear arms are sickening. Stop proposing so many bans and limits, and maybe a realistic bill, like the safe credit, won’t be universally protested. If you actually want to quell gun violence, keep focused on affordable mental and physical healthcare, improving the education system, and reducing income inequality. While the right may not support these real improvements, I cannot in good faith support or vote for any politician who supports banning or restricting the rights of law abiding citizens in our beautiful commonwealth. Thank you.
The 2nd amendment states "shall not be infringed". All of these bills are infringement and are therefore unconstitutional. Should we pass laws that people must pass a test before they can have freedom of speech? What about pass a test before you can vote? What about if someone does not have training they will be slaves again? Name one other right outlined in the constitution where a citizen has to jump through hoops before they can use that right? I oppose all of these bills as they will do more harm than good. I can understand wanting to keep people safe but gun control does the opposite. These bills will only make it harder for law abiding citizens to exercise their rights while criminals will still ignore the law. Criminals will still get illegal guns or weapons and will commit more crimes since they know the public is unable to defend themselves. Benjamin Franklin once said: "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." You writing bills saying "give up your rights and guns and we will protect you". Well ask the Native Americans how that worked out for them. Ask a Jewish person who was under Nazi control how that worked out for them. Well Hitler's first step was to take away the guns from the public so they could not protect themselves and over 6 million people lost their lives. Since you do not know history you are writing bills which will doom us to repeat it. You know 75 years ago when you could just buy a gun in a catalog and it was shipped to your house we did not have this issue. In the 60s and 70s when people would have a gun in their truck at school or take one in for show and tell we did not have a gun issue. This is a mental health issue. Deal with mental health and you will fix the public safety issue. Zero of my guns have killed people because guns do not kill people. People kill people. Look at Ukraine and Israel for just one form of example why we need LESS gun control. All of these gun laws are unconstitutional and should be thrown out. Do the right thing and let us law abiding citizens have their rights as outlined in the constitution. Do not pass laws which infringe on our rights. If the 2nd amendment falls, the 1st will follow . When the 1st and 2nd fall the 13th will fall and our country will be lost and we will be back in chains.
I am very opposed to the vast majority of these bills. I am a legal gun owner with my CHP. Many of these bills heavily restrict my right to bear arms in a legal capacity. I don’t understand why I should be punished for doing everything legally and correctly only to become a felon in the coming months through these legislations
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Whether or not a person chooses to exercise this right is up to them. Otherwise, it shall not be infringed.
I can not, and nobody should, support these unconstitutional laws. THROW THEM ALL OUT.
You guys make it harder and harder to vote Democrat every single cycle. Complete ban on Semi Automatics more or less making the state even stricter towards guns then states like Maryland? I oppose all these even the "herp common sense derp" ones because the states party has made it clear they don't give a crap about anything but putting hollow wins for politicians because hhheeeyyy punishing law abiding gun owners is a whole lot easier then creating jobs or reducing crime. If these bills die before getting to the governors desk, especially the bans, then I will gladly continue to vote DNC. But if Youngkin has to veto these and you make me say something I never thought I would "Thank god Youngkin won" then I look forward to blindly going down the ticket in 2024 and checking "R" on everyone. Thank you for taking the time to read this.
I do not support more legislation infringing on my 2nd Ammendment rights. Please fund more enforcement for the proactive enforcement of existing laws and regulations pertaining to firearms.
I oppose this legislation.
First off, knives are a basic tool with myriad uses and have been around since ancient history. Any limitation on them is so insulting, and insane. We are not children. It is infuriating that money was spent to even write that down. The fact that I would need a right to carry a knife spelled out is not something our forefathers could have possibly anticipated, since it’s a simple tool. A screwdriver is exactly as deadly as any knife. I would know, I’ve been an ICU nurse for nearly a decade and I have seen people stabbed with both. Matter of fact, a hammer would be a superior concealed weapon with more lethality than either. Second, many of these new gun laws make sense. Many of them do not. I do not want stalkers, domestic abusers, or drug dealers buying guns. A waiting period and proficiency training is fine, although I believe it to be unconstitutional I would comply. However it appears we are going to make it illegal to purchase specific parts for guns, to build your own serialized and registered firearm, and to concealed carry in many public spaces. I also see a poorly defined and overly restrictive “assault weapons” ban. The most insane is the ban on parents having firearms in the home at all. That is unacceptable. The latter group of laws are an infringement based on the opinions of the woefully uninformed. I should not lose my right to responsible ownership, maintenance and concealed carry with a permit due to the lobbying of a group that has failed to due the due diligence to learn about the rights they wish to throw away for all of us. I have a concealed carry permit. It has saved my life of nearly saved my life multiple times. The police can be great, but they are minutes away when seconds count. For instance, as I was leaving a restaurant in the city I was targeted by 2 men with illegal guns. I did not know them, we had never interacted, but suddenly there was a gun pointing at me from a car circling around me in the parking lot. Without escape available, I drew my pistol in response. The car stopped circling and left, giving me time to alert law enforcement before there were any holes in me. If I come face to face with a mass shooter, as so many do, I prefer to be armed. The organization of mothers pushing for these laws can define the law of their household. But not mine. Learn from the past for gods sake. We do not need and will eventually not accept increasing restrictions and price hikes allowing only the wealthy and connected to be armed. Governor, I ask that you veto these laws which only restrict law abiding citizens. You are the person elected in part because you are the option on the ballot who would not let this stand. So don’t. To those in support of these laws: every right you surrender is one you can never recover without 10 times the struggle it took to get to the place where you were able to throw it away. Learning from your mistakes is not viable when you codify them into law. You are making several mistakes. You can’t restrict and underfund the police department and make personal defense harder at the same time. That is advantageous to no one. It is not how things work in this world where evil people exist, no matter how deep in the sand your head is. And the next time you’re grunting and sweating, tearing a box open like a fucking caveman you might want to try a knife before adding more legislation An armed society is a polite society, let’s keep it that way.
The litany of gun control measures under consideration will do nothing to effectively reduce crime and violence, and will only further restrict the rights of law abiding firearms owners. Not to mention the countless examples from other locales across the country where these same measure have been put into place and the result is more violent crime as criminals can now feel safe that the general population is not armed. Strongly oppose all proposed bills.
The ridiculous litany of gun control measures under consideration will do nothing to effectively reduce crime and violence, and will only further restrict the rights of law abiding firearms owners.
We dont need MORE laws regarding firearms, we need to enforce the laws that are already on the books. If enforcement is done then these laws are redundant and not necessary. Don't pass more laws just for the sake of passing laws. They do nothing but make law abiding citizens confused and they dont do anything to stop problems.
I am writing to express my great concern, to the legislatures that continue to ignore their oath of swearing to protect and uphold the rights of the citizens as protected by the United States Constitution and the Virginian Constitution. "The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED". You beaurcrats do not grant that right to he people, it is God given. While you grandstand and ateemlt to make laws to hurt the everydayaw abiding American citizen, you turn a way and do nothing in these bills to punish criminals committing crimes. It is already illegal to murder people. To grandstand and think that any of these bills would stop someone from murdering or harming another person is laughable. Quite literally. You pander screaming about these firearm safety bills while you walk around with security and people with "guns" to keep you safe. Start enforcing the existing laws against criminals who commit crimes vs trying to turn law abiding people, who take training, are serious about protection of family, themselves and others, and trying to disarm them and make them criminals. Or we will vote you out! Uphold your Oath or be prepared for the consequences your actions lead to by the American people. Regards Mr. Harris
I know most modern politicians aren’t historians but the Bill of Rights is really simple. If you read that, you’ll also read the 2nd Amendment which is really simple as well. In the same docket you’re trying to give more benefits to police and take away more rights from citizens. You ought to be ashamed. What a farce freedom is anymore.
These anti gun laws are an infringement on all Virginian's 2A rights.
I am opposed to additional new laws or further regulations placed on firearms or other means of self defense, or which limit the ability to conduct commerce or carry such items. Not only does the constitution make it clear this is a violation of my rights, it does nothing to address or reduce the actions of criminals.
I am against all of these blatantly unconstitutional firearms restrictions. I'm strongly against: SB2| Deeds | Assault firearms certain ammunition, etc.; purchase, possession, sale, transfer, etc., prohibited. This tries to ban things that are in common use, which has never worked well for the government, remember Prohibition? Remember the war on drugs? Just like the last assault weapons ban, this will literally just make AR-15s more popular and easier to get illegally. And I am against: HB585 | Mundon King | Home-based firearms dealers; prohibited near schools, penalties. That specifically targets home-based FFLs whose house is somewhere near a school. This would put hundreds of Virginia residents out of business just because of where they live.
All infringements on the second amendment are acts of treason and should be treated as such. Acting in favor of such infringements makes you a traitor to this nation and th commonwealth.
All Virginians want our families to be safe from gun violence. However, passing such broad restrictions on firearms commonly used for self defense is not the answer. The updated definition of assault weapons and the associated prohibitions do little to nothing to stop criminals who are willing to illegally buy or steal firearms. There are plenty of firearms out there for criminals to access, with well over 400 million guns in civilian ownership in the United States. It is too late to round them all up. These bills will disproportionately affect those citizens who go out of their way to follow our commonwealth's laws; the people who are unlikely to commit a violent crime in the first place. The solutions to gun violence that stand a chance at working are community-oriented interventions that decrease poverty, drug use, gang activity, combat mental illness, and advocate for the safe storage of firearms. Sociologists know these factors correlate strongly with ALL types of violence. On average, two-thirds of firearms deaths are suicides, an assault weapons ban won't do a thing about those. Of the remaining 1/3 of firearms homicides, more than half are drug, gang, or domestic violence related. Let's pass bipartisan legislation that addresses these underlying problems, instead of preventing average Virginians from protecting themselves with firearms that are already ubiquitous.
I am Opposed to any limitations on the Second Amendment and any restrictive firearm laws. We have adequate, if not already overbearing, laws on the books now and should not be creating more laws restricting all the aspects of firearm use, sales, and any other aspects of the right to bear arms.
These firearm laws are mostly reactionary to the media response on firearms. This is a major infringement on the 2nd amendment and needs to be stopped.
An inordinate focus on the control of firearms only serves to infringe the rights of the law-abiding citizen in defense of his life and property. The State should instead focus on the apprehension and incarceration of individuals engaging in criminal behavior and associated misuse of firearms.
Any law that infringes on my Gods-given right to own and bear arms is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Any law passed that infringes this right will be answered with a lawsuit.
Hello. There are a plethora of bills that were proposed, which would clearly violate the second amendment rights of many law abiding citizens. First of all, considering concealed carry should be permit-less carry, it is counterproductive to increase the requirements for concealed carry. Restrictions on where law abiding citizens can lawfully carry their now “permitted” firearms is asinine, as well as the proposition of a bill that would make it a penalty to leave a firearm in your car. You would essentially be disarming a large number of people who wish to follow these unlawful order in a day and age where the democratic agenda is to act like there are mass shootings on a daily basis. Effectively disarming the majority and increasing the requirements and legal loopholes to carry is such a vulnerable state to be in and I hope we’re smart enough to avoid that. Restrictions on “Plastic firearms and unfinished frames etc” is not only terrible literature that does nothing to explain, but it is a direct violation of the 2nd amendment considering you have a federal right to make firearms for personal use, which would include additively manufactured parts. Wait periods are also a horrifying thing to think of, considering how many times it has been proven to be a terrible idea, keeping guns out of the hands that need them most to protect themselves and their families. “Assault firearms” and anything to do with them is nonsense considering the blatant inability to define said “assault weapon”. People who don’t understand guns, shouldn’t be making laws on guns. A shorter barrel does not make it more lethal, in fact it lowers the muzzle velocity, causing less force on impact and penetration, in turn causing less collateral damage. Any sort of “assault weapons” bills are targeting law abiding citizens who have every right to use the modern advances in firearm technology just as police officers and military. The only people these bills are effecting are the already law abiding citizens. The criminals who got their hands on said weapons illegally aren’t going to be making sure that their ALREADY ILLEGAL WEAPONS are fully compliant with state laws and regulations before they go commit another crime. In no way shape or form should someone need to disadvantage themselves in a life or death situation because political members with an armed security detail don’t feel the need for a gun. Why would I want to limit myself to a firearm that is going to be inadequate in home defense, or one that does not have a high enough capacity to protect myself from the ever growing threat of home invasion and the increased trend of multiple home invaders breaking in armed. If it was you alone in your house with 6 armed intruders who most definitely must have checked their local laws and firearm regulations and made sure their firearms aren’t violating any rules before they break into your house, would you want to limit yourself to a low capacity firearm that is going to be extremely difficult to use effectively in a high stress situation, or are you taking a rifle which for reasons that don’t make sense, must have a 16 inch barrel, with a larger capacity magazine, and a stock that you can use to safely brace the firearm to prevent stray shots and provide more accurate fire. Personally I’m going to take anything and everything I can get in a situation that means life or death for me and my loved ones EVERY SINGLE DAY OF THE WEEK. Focus on the mental health crisis.
These laws are mostly going to effect law abiding citizens like myself and all the people I know. WHEN HAVE CRIMINALS FOLLOWED LAWS??? The only thing these criminals that commit gun related offenses is some kind of force of action. Why are you going to try to take our 2nd Amendment Rights away from people who follow the laws and love our great country? We should be focusing on increasing penalties against those who commit the crimes. Stop focusing on the law abiding citizens and focus on the criminals that are terrorizing all of our towns. Our government is letting millions and millions of unknown people in our country without having a clue what kind of person they are. I'm sure most are good people like you and me but not all of them are. We need our guns to be able to protect ourselves, our families, our neighbors, and our country if needed. Our founding fathers have it right and put a lot of thoughts into our constitution and bill of rights. I thought Democrats were about equality and the working man/woman. If you all want good for us law abiding citizens, work together, make compromises, and start doing your duty. We do not need more "big government" taking more rights. What we need is a closed border so we can fight this drug crisis. Slow the flow of drugs and these gangs fall apart. Once they fall apart maybe these shootings would slow down. Please do the right thing and do not sign these gun bills. All this woke crap is ruining our country. Y'all need to please make changes and focus on what's going to help all of us not just the minority.
Hello, The right to own and bear firearms is intrinsic in the very nature of the founding of the United States. We must remember the spirit of the 2nd Amendment and the right of all civilians to own and bear arms. Firearms are the great equalizer and can allow and individual to defend themselves when they previously could not. Gun violence and the mental health epidemic are closely interlinked and one cannot pass restrictive firearm laws and expect gun violence to go away. Gun bans and the use of restrictive purchasing requirements, magazine limits, waiting periods, and red flag laws have been shown not to be effective in stemming gun violence. I urge anybody reading this message to say "NO" to 2nd Amendment restrictions.
I strongly, along with many fellow Virginians oppose any villainous disarmament bills disguised as "public safety". The second amendment clearly states "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" and out of touch elitist politicians who enjoy the luxury of armed security are choosing to ignore the constitution and force us to rely on sub-par police protection. The same people who want to defund the police want to disarm us. Embracing the second amendment is what is keeping our crime rates low compared to New York and California. We have seen the blatant disregard that criminals have for these so-called laws; emboldened criminals who are not afraid of the consequences and innocent law-abiding people who are forced to live in fear because a bunch of tyrants are letting power corrupt them. I do not want to live in fear and neither do the rest of us. In addition; a lot of counties and cities have declared themselves as second amendment sanctuaries to protect the rights of free individuals from the overreach of tyrannical politicians. These bills are a Trojan horse that will lead to more crime. You anti-gun politicians should be ashamed of yourselves; give up your private security and train yourselves. Then you will change your minds; because in the end, nobody is coming to save you. I would rather have a fighting chance against armed assailants than die waiting for help to arrive. These bills are pure evil
These all seem like infringements that will do nothing to curb any crime. Further they will only create criminals out of everyday law abiding folk. These are laws that seem to be targeting victimless crimes.
I oppose all of these selected bills since I firmly believe they are in conflict with the Second Amendment of the US Constitution. The Second Amendment clearly states that it shall not be infringed upon. Any and all proposed legislation that would place limits on how, where, and when responsible citizens arm themselves runs afoul of that. Our founding fathers correctly held the belief that all people have a natural born right to arm and protect themselves and that the government has no authority to interfere with that. While I agree with the sentiment of reducing violence among our society, gun laws only harm the law abiding citizen and leave criminals who already have a disregard for the law to still be armed. If our elected officials who proposed these bills actually cared about addressing our violence problem, they would focus more on addressing the root causes of violence and crime. More worthwhile pursuits in my opinion would be focused on addressing socio-economic problems that plague disadvantaged communities, creating a more robust and well-equipped mental healthcare system, and overhauling our educational systems to setup our children for better success in life. Thank you all for your time.
I'm against any unconstitutional law, and any law that strips Americans of their rights. These laws are an attack on the 2nd ammendment and hold NO facts in stopping crime. They are a punishment on law abiding people and in no way will make virginia a safer place.
I oppose all these unconstitutional, dangerous, and pointless laws.
I oppose all useless firearm changes. Criminals will not obey
HB113 | Sullivan | Handguns; possession, purchase, or transportation by persons convicted of certain drug offenses. HB1174 | Sickles | Assault firearms; age requirement for purchase, penalty. HB1195 | Hayes | Firearms; waiting period for purchases, penalty. HB12 | Jones | Handguns; firearm locking device required for sale or transfer, child safety warning required. HB1235 | Zehr | Concealed handguns; protective orders. HB1424 | Hope | Firearms; valid permit to purchase, penalties. HB1462 | Laufer | Firearm in unattended motor vehicle; civil penalty. HB158 | McClure | Firearm locking device; required for sale or transfer of firearm. HB16 | Garrett | Firearm or explosive material; carrying within Capitol Square and the surrounding area, etc. HB173 | Simon | Plastic firearms and unfinished frames, etc.; manufacture, import, etc. prohibited, penalties. HB175 | Simon | Assault firearms; carrying in public areas prohibited, penalty. HB183 | Simon | Firearms; storage in residence where minor or person prohibited from possessing is present, penalty. HB2 | Helmer | Assault firearms & certain ammunition, etc.; purchase, sales, transfers, etc., prohibited. HB22 | Jones | Auto sears; definition, prohibition on manufacture, importation, sale, etc., penalty. HB270 | Reid | Commonwealth Comprehensive Gun Safety Program; established, etc. HB319 | Helmer | Firearms instructors & safety prog.; removes reference to NRA & U.S. Concealed Carry Assoc. in Code. HB35 | Clark | Firearm safety device; expands definition of device. HB351 | Clark | Firearm; locking device required for purchase, households where minor resides, penalty. HB362 | McClure | Firearms; purchase, etc., following an assault and battery against an intimate or dating partner. HB454 | Callsen | Firearm/explosive material; carrying w/in Capitol Square or bldg. owned or leased by Commonwealth. HB46 | Bennett-Parker | Firearm; transfers to another person from a prohibited person. HB466 | Helmer | Concealed handgun permits; reciprocity with other states. HB791 | Henson | Pneumatic guns; Class 6 felony to possess. HB797 | Hope | Concealed handguns; demonstrated competence for a permit, firearms instructors and safety programs. HB798 | Hope | Firearms; purchase, possession, etc., following an assault and battery or stalking violation. HB799 | Hope | Concealed handgun permit applications; fingerprints required by local governments. HB861 | Hernandez | Weapons; carrying into hospital that provides mental health services. HB945 | Lopez | Firearm safety device; expands definition of device. SB100 | Ebbin | Plastic firearms and unfinished frames, etc.; manufacture, import, etc. prohibited, penalties. SB2 | Deeds | Assault firearms & certain ammunition, etc.; purchase, possession, sale, transfer, etc., prohibited. SB210 | Perry | Auto sears; prohibition on manufacture, importation, sale, etc., penalty. SB273 | Subramanyam | Firearms; waiting period for purchases, penalty. I oppose all these bills.
We are residents of Henrico and mourn with a family who lost their daughter to gun violence. The minor who committed the murder had access to an unlocked/unsecured firearm inside his guardians' home. Had the guardians of this individual been responsible gun owners ("well-regulated" as written in the 2A) and kept their firearm under lock-and-key, the senseless death of this young girl would have been prevented. There is no doubt this country struggles with gun violence, and there are no easy answers. But it's important that we pass common sense gun legislation that does not infringe on rights, but will absolutely improve the safety of citizens. Thank you for passing HB183.
I was born in Henrico county and vote in every election. Guns are currently the #1 killer of our children under the age of 18. I am writing to show my support for these bills because gun violence prevention is my top priority. Please support gun safety legislation that is brought up for a vote! Thank you so much for your time.
My name is Laura Sledge and I am your constituent. Guns are currently the #1 killer of our children under the age of 18, and gun violence prevention is my top priority. Please support gun safety legislation that is brought up for a vote. Here are the bills I support. Thank you for your time.
I support common sense bills HB 1181, 1195, 12, 1424, 1462, 158, 175, 183,23, 270. Safe storage and training make sense! Let's keep everyone safe.
Hello, My name is Hayley Redmond Cilley. Guns are currently the #1 killer of our children under age 18, and I am calling because gun violence prevention is my top priority. Please support gun safety legislation that is brought up for a vote! We need safer communities for all, but especially for our children.
This bill defeats the purpose of owning a firearm: the ability to effectively defend yourself in a *timely* manner. If you have all of your firearms locked up due to a minor being in your household.....then what do you do if you suddenly find yourself or your loved ones under attack? Gun safes are difficult to get into by nature. They're even difficult for their owners to get into in a timely manner. I highly suggest this bill be amended to allow for firearms to be stored in safes *or* have a trigger lock or some other sort of locking mechanism on the weapon. ---I'm especially concerned for single mothers in regards to the secondary consequences of this bill. Women, especially single moms, are often the targets of criminals. If a single mother finds herself under attack by a violent criminal (say an abusive husband) and needs to defend herself and/or her children, she is at an automatic disadvantage. How is a single mother being assaulted and battered supposed to make her way to her gun safe and find the time to unlock it and utilize her firearm for self defense? This bill completely disregards women's safety ---Another item that needs amending to this bill : what about residences that don't primarily house minors, but minors sometimes visit, such as a grandparent's house or aunt/uncle ? Do those firearms owners have to purchase a safe just in case a relative (who is a minor) comes to visit them for brief periods of time? That seems ridiculous and nonsensical. Again, this is why locks on firearms (whether trigger locks or other types) should be allowed in this bill as a form of "safe storage". It gives people flexibility in keeping their homes and visitors safe. ----Another option that should be added to this bill as a method of safely keeping a firearm is if the firing pin (also known as a "striker") is stored separately from the firearm. If a firearm is disassembled enough so that the firing pin/striker can be pulled out and stored separately from the rest of the firearm...the firearm essentially becomes a bludgeoning weapon at best. You can't operate/fire a firearm without its firing pin/striker in place. ---Another item I find abhorrent about this bill is that it completely undermines poorer firearms owners. Gun safes are not cheap. This bill puts the poor, unemployed, underemployed, and financially unstable at risk. Most of those aforementioned demographics live in high crime neighborhoods. Now these individuals cannot easily protect themselves against violent criminals because they must either get rid of their firearms or find a way to purchase an expensive gun safe. --- The final item I find ridiculous about this bill is that you can only store a loaded weapon if it is in a biometric storage device which the minor isn't authorized to use. Biometric storage devices are even more expensive than regular gun safes and other firearm storage methods. This item of the bill clearly favors the wealthy over the poor & financially unstable. If you need to use a firearm to protect your life or the lives of your loved ones, you likely need to use it right away. Seconds can mean the difference between life or death. Being unable to store a firearm loaded unless you can afford to purchase a biometric storage device is ridiculous and dangerous for law-abiding firearms owners. This particular part of the bill clearly favors criminals over law-abiding citizens and potential victims of violent crime.
Dear Sir or Madame. Last year in Newport News I was assaulted by a 27 year old black man from Chesapeake because of his road rage.. This was at my local bank 11;30 in the morning. This young man almost lost his life at my hand because you cannot reel in your problem young men. His words feet from me were ' im going to kick your ass and then kill you'. My pistol changed his mind. I saw for myself the woke judges and a woke system that perpetuates the problem. The criminal justice system has been flung far far left which IS causing a public safety hazzard. No new gun control is needed. More jail time for the trash that i dealt with is. My Congressman Bobby Scott and Delegate Cia Price do not represent me.
I am a member of VA Moms For Change, a gun violence prevention group and I support these bills
When Democrats violate the Covenant between the PEOPLE and the US Constitution as well as the VA Constitution they are acting lawlessly and undermining the commitment toward good Government agreed on for over 200 + years. Seems Democrats didn't learn anything from the Civil war. The mentality of the "Tyrant" and the "Slave Holder" still exists among the Demo-rat Party, removing statues and trying to hide and rewrite history is not good government. Oaths, integrity, and Good Government, mean nothing to this Cabal of Evil minded men and women. We the PEOPLE need and demand good government not a patch work or illegal laws we are expected to "obey" while the "perps" that pass them have no consequence for breaking Constitutional law or good Government. The Demo-rat Party needs to be dismantled and the "ignorant" ejected from the Virginia legislature at once and for all. Peter Buckingham Crozet, VA 22932
OPPOSITION to HB12 - Jones OPPOSITION to HB23 - Laufer OPPOSITION to HB158 - McClure OPPOSITION to HB183 - Simon SUPPORT of HB289 - Wiley OPPOSITION to HB351 - Clark OPPOSITION to HB585 – Mundon King SUPPORT of HB756 - Walker OPPOSITION to HB791 - Henson OPPOSITION to HB861 - Hernandez SUPPORT of HB872 - Earley SUPPORT of HB1141 - Cordoza OPPOSITION to HB1174 - Sickles SUPPORT of HB1198 - Scott
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
I am writing in support of HB 12, 23, 158, 183, 351, 585, 791 and 861. I also write in opposition to HB 289, 756, 872, 1141 and 1198. There is ample evidence that minimal restrictions on firearms has resulted in countless deaths and injuries. Sensible restrictions on access to lethal weapons are sorely needed at this time. In fact, the Supreme Court, in deciding on the right to bear arms, has also stated that “Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited. [It is] not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.” If, unfortunately, assault-style weapons continue to be manufactured and owned, their access must be limited by age. In that case I would support HB 1174. Thank you for your attention to these comments.
I am an educator, a veteran, a Mom's Demand Action volunteer, and a gun violence survivor. I support HB183 and all bills that will move us in the direction of reducing gun violence.
Please support common sense gun safety legislation, such as Amy Laufer's HB23, and Simon's HB183 which pertains to secure storage. If more guns made us safer, we would be the safest country in the world, and we clearly are NOT. No other wealthy nation has even close to the number of gun related deaths (homicides, suicides and accidental) that we do. It is a shame on America and the state of Virginia that the number one killer of children is now GUNS. We owe it to our children to do better by them.
I am a member of the Charlottesville Coalition for Gun Violence Prevention and the Charlottesville Center for Peace and Justice. I support all the gun safety bills: 12 23 158 183 351 585 791 861 1141 1174 I oppose these bills: 289 756 872 1198
. Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members.
On behalf of the League of Women Voters of Virginia, please support HB183 bill. Thank you
Please stop wasting your time and my money on bills that have proven to be have zero impact on public safety, Please refer to Maryland, California, and the other states that already have these laws
Good afternoon, I am writing to implore you to STOP with all of the gun control bills. You are punishing law abiding citizens, who now have their RIGHTS THAT SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED, infringed. And the criminals who do NOT follow these laws but who they are directed at, are not affected. Please enforce ALL of the laws that are presently in the books and prosecute those people breaking the laws and stop letting them out on bail and bond through the Soros DA’s.
In reference to all of the above proposed house bills…. In short there is NO need for any more restrictions of any type on the purchase (to include locations of ffls in reference to schools and forcing purchasers to buy locks when they already safely store their firearms), carry, storage, and use of any type of firearms. It is extremely clear that more restrictions do not do anything to stem the flow of violent crimes which may or may not involve firearms (using DC, Chicago, NYC etc as examples, where very strict firearms laws have done nothing to lower violent crime). Instead, we need to focus on allowing law enforcement to aggressively enforce the numerous existing laws, demand commonwealth attorneys offices hold criminals responsible and ensure long prison sentences on offenders. As a citizen of the commonwealth for my entire life, and a local law enforcement officer for over 2 decades I can tell you from personal experience simply adding restrictions and more laws is worthless and simply slows down the system. As they say when seconds count, the police are only minutes away…. Do not place any more restrictions on residents of the commonwealth who are forced to live in increasingly dangerous localities due to the legal changes of the past 5 years, which allow offenders to go unpunished or under punished. Simply because you do not like firearms does not mean that others should not have lessened access to purchase, use, and carry the firearms of their choice. Thank you for your consideration
I would like for the Commonwealth of Virginia to have Constitutional Carry as the law of the entire state , our right as stated in the constitution of the united states and the constitution of the Commonwealth of virginia as written by our founders gives each citizen the right to keep and bear arms with no exclusions, to be secure in their persons, unless that right has been forfeited,. Exercising this right should never lead to forfeiture of this right.
I would like for the Commonwealth of Virginia to have Constitutional Carry as the law of the entire state , our right as stated in the constitution of the united states and the constitution of the Commonwealth of virginia as written by our founders gives each citizen the right to keep and bear arms with no exclusions, to be secure in their persons, unless that right has been forfeited,. Exercising this right should never lead to forfeiture of this right.
For HB12 and HB158: Already covered by federal law, no additional expense should be put on the FFL or the consumer. For HB23 and HB861: You are adding restrictions on personal protection and safety while not ensuring my safety and that of my family. I have been to hospitals in the commonwealth over the last few years, the security provided couldn't stop a squirrel from running through the hospital, much less someone with mal-intent. If you want the citizens to rely on the government for safety, then provide, otherwise don't restrict it. For HB585: You want to prevent FFLs from being within 1.5 mile radius of a school, yet smoke shops or other convenience stores that have vaping products are allowed, with the latter being a much bigger problem in our schools, yet no restrictions. It is silly to assume an FFL poses any danger to a school and I have yet to hear of any incident involving an FFL and a school. Most home based FFLs do not have long term storage. Please educate yourself before trying to implement "feel good" laws. We have other major issues with our schools that need to be addressed, i.e. teach retention, giving teachers more power for discipline, parental involvement/non-involvement, allowing for greater choice of subjects and stopping teaching to a test where our children learn nothing. For HB183: Another "Feel good" law. There have been multiple examples of minors protecting their family over the last several years. But, how would this law have stopped someone like the Sandyhook shooter, who killed his mother and took her safe keys? It wouldn't have. Just like it wouldn't stop a home invade killing the owner and using their safe key/finger print to access a firearm. For HB1174: At the outset this is unconstitutional, but if you want to effect real change in regard to this, open it up to an expanded background, where the applicant/purchaser that is under the age of 21 must consent to a check of their juvenile record in order to purchase, specifically looking for violent crimes. If this were in place, it may thwart some from attempting to buy, while those that continue and consent it would flag in the system, like it does when a felon attempts to buy a firearm at a gunshow. There is much more that needs to go into this, i.e. at what point when the applicant has an established adult history can they purchase after having violent crimes on their juvenile record, 25? 21? I implore every law maker to due their due diligence when it comes to rights stated in both the Virginia Constitution and the US Constitution. Do not be beholden to your donors and ram "feel good" laws through our legislature. When someone spouts statistics to you, take a moment and do you own research, look at the source material, anyone can make states lean in their favor by changing a few words or omitting parts of a study. You must work for the all the people, those you agree with and disagree with and look at all the information, not just what your donors give you. Thank you for your time.
This is absolutely egregious. A home-based FFL is an enterprise that is cleared at a higher level of proficiency and familiarity with firearms issues than any authority VA - the FFL holders are cleared and backed by the ATF. Further, an FFL, home-based or otherwise, is an enterprise in the business of safe transfer of weapons to individuals after doing criminal checks on the prospective buyer. The location near a school is irrelevant - it does not constitute a threat to a school simply because an FFL is nearby. This is a bad faith argument, and false equivalence. It’s a thin veneer. Simply put, it’s been proposed by people who do not like private ownership of firearms, and schools were picked because (deceptively) because they are evenly districted and spread through the state - after all, they’re supposed to be, to allow children access to education without having to travel unreasonably far. This also means that selecting schools as the criteria for a “no home FFL bubble” means you effectively throw a blanket over the industry. This has nothing to do with the safety of children. I find this frankly offensive and dishonest. Show me evidence where an FFL near a school has caused a problem? More than that, show me a single instance where the location was any sort of relevant. You cannot. Because it’s not true. It’s false equivalence. Let me be clear. I am a liberal person. But part of being liberal means remembering that fear mongering and bad faith, secretive agendas hurt progress. They turn people against it. Drop this frivolous nonsense. Stop making us look like idiots, please. Your crusade against portions of the bill of rights (because come on folks, we know what it is, it’s misguided) opens up very dangerous precedents for other bad faith actors to whittle down the contents of the other amendments. Read a history book. Please.
I do not support these bills. I request you vote NO on them. HB 12, Jones, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon, requires all firearms in a home be secured if there is a minor in the home. Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, prevents home-based gun dealers from operating within 1.5 miles of a school. Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, makes it illegal for anyone under 21 to purchase any kind of firearm. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen.
Constitutional issues when made political do no justice to representatives or their constituents. Dishonesty to the public erodes any ability for trust and assumptions based on party affiliation close down civil discussion. Some representatives run for office for gun control matters and get voted in but are you being honest with your constituents. I can quote statistics as could those supporting gun control but there are logical truths being ignored. We should change our terminology from gun control, to gun control over law biding citizens because each law that is passed in most situation only further restricts law biding citizens. Most gun laws only increase the ability to become a victim to criminal actions because in order to abide by laws implemented it puts the citizen at a considerable disadvantage . Gun free zones only mean unarmed citizens open to criminal behavior due to the inability to defend one's self. Law enforcement only enforce the laws, and cannot be there to prevent the actual crimes in most situations. Criminals intent on malfeasance will not abide by any laws put in place but exploit any such laws that allow for an advantage against an unarmed individual. This is not to say that I am apposed to back ground checks even at gun shows to avoid loop holes as I support such measures but to restrict carrying at locations or gun free zones only makes for sitting ducks. Restricting common circulation of rifles or any similar type to the AR-15 platform again only further limits the citizen from criminals AND tyrannical infrastructures within the state and federal levels. We can never assume that our representatives are in power for support of the people and our constitution I am not in support of any of the current gun control bills, I am in support of all the pro gun bills. In light of whatever is voted into law ,if it further restricts my constitutional rights and civil rights I simply cannot and will not comply. Thank you for your time on this matter.
As a fellow resident of Virginia, I urge you to OPPOSE the multiple anti-gun bills being heard today (1/25/24) in the House Public Safety Subcommittee on Firearms, including: HB 12 HB 158 HB 183 HB 351 HB 23 HB 861 HB 585 HB 1174 Please focus more on protecting lawful gun owners and enforcing the laws that career criminals routinely disregard. Thank you.
Dear Delegates of the House Public Safety- Firearms subcommittee, The selected bills are flagrantly and utterly unconstitutional and they stand as a direct violation on the sovereignty and liberties of the citizenry of the Commonwealth. Plainly stated they violate the United States Constitution ( the Supreme Law of the Land) and the God given rights of the people which the Commonwealth purports to “protect”. Such legislation is also preposterous factually as firearms are not the “problem” , they are merely tools and as such they are inert objects that are incapable of exerting will without an evil individual wielding them for malevolent purposes. Criminality is the problem , as criminals do not have any regard for the law or the well being of their fellow man, hence the definition of criminal. Therefore all of the selected legislation put hence forth only seeks to disarm law abiding citizens, those that are neither inclined nor committed to violating the law. Law abiding citizens possess firearms to defend our lives, the lives of our families, and to ensure that our sovereignty and liberty is not stripped away from us by tyrannical Marxist ideologues masquerading as “compassionate” and “caring” legislators. This is not Washington, Illinois, or even Maryland, this is the great Commonwealth of Virginia. That Virginia which led the American revolution under George Washington and in the defense of liberty against the tyrannical crown of England that once sought to oppress and yoke the citizens of the American colonies. The motto that adorns the seal of Virginia and our great state flag is “Sic Semper Tyrannis”, which means “Death to Tyrants”. Such a motto is more apropos in the tumultuous political climate of modernity than ever before, perhaps even more so than during the revolution in which it was founded. Being elected to represent the people does not confer upon any individual the power to strip the people of their inalienable rights, those rights that were enshrined by our great founders in the Constitution. To violate the United States Constitution in an effort to subjugate the people of the republic is by definition treason. The citizenry of the Commonwealth has spoken, we demand that you cease attempting to violate the rights of the people and do the actual job that you were elected to do . If such malevolently contrived shibboleth manages to pass out of the House of Delegates and Senate without veto from Governor Youngkin we will not abide by, adhere to, or sanction unconstitutional mandates in any way. Mass noncompliance will be the response to such attempts to strip the people of their Liberty. Thank you for your attention and your time, vote no to this abhorrent legislation. L.S. McClung RN, PMH-BC, CARN
I am writing to oppose these anti-gun, anti-self-defense, anti-rights, bills. Having previously lived for nearly 20 years in another state with many of them and more, the experience of that state was that, contrary to crime dropping nationally to historic lows, their crime increased after restrictions were added. Unsurprisingly, criminals don't obey laws. They seek to exploit those who do. These laws taking away liberty and presumption of innocence of people who seek to obey laws, do nothing but create a maze of rules that ensnare unsuspecting good people who are unaware of the litany of restrictions, their nuance and ever-changing interpretation in the future. At best, people are forced to forgo their rights to self-defense entirely because they have one or more stops on their daily travels in a restricted area. Worse, otherwise law abiding people unaware of these many restrictions, find themselves in violation having no intention, history or desire to violate the law, much less hurt anyone. These are not the people with whom our criminal code and law enforcement resources should concern themselves. Even beyond that, if faced with a violent threat in these "sensitive places", those law abiding people will now be at an even greater disadvantage as we, the people, do not enjoy an armed and dedicated police force traveling with and around us as many politicians do. I noticed sniper teams on the roofs in the surrounding area during this past VCDL Lobby Day ensuring your safely against some hypothetical threat. We are not so fortunate as we go out in the world to have such resources protecting us. Worse yet, we had been been required to disarm prior to expressing our first amendment rights that day both outside and inside the building. Whether storage, locality of carry, age of an adult required to purchase or restrictions otherwise, law abiding people are not and never were the problem. Stop punishing them collectively for the actions of violent individuals. Respect and protect their rights and presumption of innocence as the US and Virginia Constitutions require of you. When you regulate firearms, it is not the machine of a firearm you are regulating. It is the people you are regulating. It is the rights of the people you are taking away. With all the supposed progress we have made, how is it that we are less deserving of liberty now than we were in the past?
Every single one of these proposed laws are blatantly unconstitutional under the plain text of both the Virginia and US constitutions. The SCOTUS has ruled multiple times, must recently in June 2022, that the 2A prohibits these types of attacks on free citizens. Voting for any of these bills is a waste of tax payer dollars, morally and ethically wrong, and, by definition of the courts already having ruled on these or similar laws as unconstitutional, an act of treason against the USA and by extension an insurrection.
I urge you to OPPOSE each of the following bills: HB 12 Federal law already covers this and additional state enforcement will create unnecessary expense. We don’t need more bills that could create negative financial impact on our community. HB 23 This is not constitutional under the Supreme Court Decision made in 2022: New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen. This bill prevents visitors, family, and staff from their right to self defense. Is it right to prevent an abused single mother from carrying her most effective tool of defense because she has to take her child to the ER? Wouldn’t this give anyone with nefarious intentions an easy location? Note: Cornell Law has published a clear summary of the Bruen Decision, easily accessed with an online search. I mention this case further below. HB 158 Federal law already covers this and additional State enforcement will create unnecessary expense. HB 183 Current law already covers 14 and under. increasing the scope of the law to apply to 15, 16, and 17-year-olds is an overreach. Minors in this age group have used firearms to save their own life and protect the lives of their families by stopping home invasions and violent attacks on their households. This bill is an overreach. HB 585 What problem is this bill trying to solve? What’s the difference between driving 1.5 miles or 5 or 10? This bill is unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Furthermore, home-based gun dealers don't usually have signs outside of their home. Buyers have to be invited in for a purchase and FFL transfer. Also, convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products (not legal for minors to purchase) are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791 BB guns, and other pneumatic projectile devices, are specifically designed as hobbyist or sporting equipment. Making the possession of these on school grounds a felony is a complete overreach. Are we going to outlaw sticks, or stones, or archery, or baseball bats? These are all similarly dangerous. If BB guns have been used for violence at a school, please inform me. Otherwise, this is a “fix” to a problem that doesn’t exist. HB 861 This is not constitutional under Bruen and prevents visitors, family, and staff from their right to self defense. Is it right to prevent an abused single mother from carrying her most effective tool of defense because she has to take her child to the ER? Wouldn’t this give anyone with nefarious intentions an easy location? HB 1174 This bill is not constitutional. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen. People in this age group are not minors. They are included in the same Second Amendment rights as older adults.
I'm a law abiding citizen, retired law enforcement officer, and responding Public Safety 1st Responder Chaplain. I have been called out, responding to or serving at a number of violent acts, anf times, often in dangerous areas. I believe in these violent times, and knowing that criminals don't and won't obey the laws, that I have a need and right to be able to defend and protect myself, and be able to continue carrying, as I have for many years. Our drivers permit is for all 50 states, and we don't have to stop at a state border. I believe a concealed carry permit should be the same, recognized in all 50 states. To have to leave my firearm inside my car, to go into a public building or rest area on the highway, can put me in needless danger. If I have to take off a d put my firearm in my trunk, it let's a criminal see where it is and I don't have it. That can let them steal the firearm and/or harm me. Please allow our law abiding citizens use their 2nd Amendment Right To Keep and Bear (bear = to carry) arms. We need to fully prosecuted existing gun laws snd crimes, Not Add More Gun Controls that criminals won't obey any way. Murder has been against the law for centuries, but increasingly still going on, sometimes unpunished.
Please keep your gun grabbing hands off legally owned guns.Why not enforce the laws already on the books. Tell D.A. To do their jobs, go after the illegal guns. It is not legal guns that is the problem, it is the illegal guns. If more people carried legally crime could go down because the bad guys won’t know whose packing and could respond to crime. Thank you for reading my response. Alexander G. Morris IV.
The attack on the right to keep and bear arms has only increased over the past 18 months since the Supreme Court clarified in the Bruen decision the standard to which modern gun control legislation must be held. Many politicians around the country know that the bills put forth since that time are unconstitutional, but they also know it usually takes years to throw out their unconstitutional bills through court, and by then they have already cost time, money, and lives of American citizens. Rather than confront the underlying issues of our nation that lead to violence, they choose to take the easy way out and simply blame inanimate objects to deflect from their own political incompetency. Virginia representatives need to be better than that. The bills proposed are either duplicative of federal law, pointless, or dangerous. All are unconstitutional. All are a reflection of a disregard for commonsense safety measures like taking criminals off the streets. These bills must not be passed. Not because they will be signed into law, but because its the duty of Virginia state representatives to uphold the constitution and work to solve problems. These bills due neither.
Please do not vote for or advance any anti gun bills. Each one limits a citizens 2nd Amendment rights... I.E. banning commonly owned and used semi automatic rifles, which is unconstitutional under Bruen... Raising the age to purchase firearms. If one can serve in the military, one can purchase a firearm. Plus, its unconstitutional under Bruen AND a Virginia court ruled against it as well. Limiting where one can carry. This only creates more soft targets which criminals will not obey anyway. Banning unserialized firearms . Unconstitutional since some were made before 1968, when numbers were not required. Also, people have the right to build unserialized firearms in their homes for personal use. This has never been an issue, but decriminalization of crimes is causing an increase in violent crimes. THAT is a problem. Limiting how many firearms one can purchase in a given period is unfair. These are just a few . Please understand all the anti gun bills are unconstitutional, especially in light of the Bruen decision. I do urge you to vote for any pro gun bills. The right to keep and bear arms is a constitutional right. The Heller, McDonald, and Bruen decisions reinforce that right. The only limits on this right should be for criminals, illegal aliens, and anyone who has been mentally adjudicated/ forced into an institution. The issue we face should be how to repair our broken mental health infrastructure, not to limit the constitutional rights of law abiding citizens. Thank you Mr Raymond Pezzoli
Our freedom was won with illegal and unregistered firearms. Please look to the G.O. A. And VCDL for guidance on Second Amendment issues. Freedom first, safety second.
I support these bills!
Hello, My name is Sameet Singh, I was born in Punjab, India and moved to Northern Virginia when I was 1 year old. Since then, I’veattended some great K-12 schools in the NOVA area, graduated from George Mason University in 2020, and now work in the Cyber Security field, serving one of our largest US Government Departments. My message to you today is not regarding any single bill in particular, but more of a mindset. I’m sure everyone here has a family that they would do anything for. We work hard everyday to provide for and to protect our families. And a big part in being able to protect, is having the right tool to protect yourself and your family members. This is why the best tool to have at your disposal is a firearm, a gun. Because if you or your family were attacked by someone in your home or out and about in public, a firearm, would be the best tool to have to save yourself and them from an attacker. Even if you’re able to call the police, it’ll at least take a few minutes for them to arrive, and sadly, within those minutes, only a few seconds are needed to completely change your world. Therefore, you are always your OWN first responser, before any other help arrives. This is why, anything, that would hinder your ability to protect yourself or your family with the best tool that you could use, a firearm, should really be re-thought. Unfortunately our society is not at the point where crime dosen’t happen, there’s no supernatural being or superhero that will swoop in to protect us in our times of need, there’s no Spider-Man or Superman who will save the day for us. However, the next best thing we have, is an responsibly armed citizen. A citizen who who is able to be gentle and loving with their kids and partner, but at the same time, prepared and alert at a moments notice when danger reveals itself. Thank you for listening, and thank you for your service to your communities, I wish you all a prosperous new year. Best, Sameet Singh
The Supreme Court has ruled that localities do not have the authority to declare broad swaths of spaces as "gun-free zones" and if private property managers wish to forbid firearms and weapons from their property they already have that right. Voting on such an unconstitutional bill is simply a waste of time where clear court rulings already apply. Many of these other bills have already been ruled unconstitutional under Bruen. And some of these bills such as making a BB gun a felony when on school grounds is simply idiotic. The House needs to stop wasting time on idiotic and frivolous bills that are simply nothing less than virtue signaling. There is real work to be done and you should attend to that business and not such tripe.
HB12 - Jones . I not not support . All firearms dealers currently offer a Firearm locking device on the sale or transfer of handguns. All new firearm come with a locking device and warning labels. child safety warning required. This doesn't change the current practice by dealers in offering for free locking devices. HB 23 Weapons; possession or transportation into facility that provides mental health services, etc. I do not support,. This bill does not exempt ems medical services or the fire service which many carry concealed when transporting patients to an emergency room or mental health facility on the duty. HB158 - McClure I do not support . All firearms dealers currently offer a Firearm locking device on the sale or transfer of handguns. All new firearm come with a locking device and warning labels. child safety warning required. This doesn't change the current practice by dealers in offering for free locking devices. HB183 - Simon HB289 - Wiley I support carrying a concealed handgun with a permit into public parking lots and storing there gun makes sense and do not unarm the citizen while in their personal vehicle. HB351 - Clark I not not support . All firearms dealers currently offer a Firearm locking device on the sale or transfer of handguns. All new firearm come with a locking device and warning labels. child safety warning required. This doesn't change the current practice by dealers in offering for free locking devices. most police departments give away free locking devices. HB585 - Mundon King I do not support this bill changes little firearms transactions which must be performed at a already approved ATF dealer location. 1.5miles is overreach by the state. HB756 - Walker I do not support. This limits gun rights. Not protection for EMS or fire personnel HB791 - Henson I do not support. This bill eliminates the number of programs that have pneumatic bb gun competition for 4 H at private or religious schools. HB861 - Hernandez I do not support,. This bill does not exempt ems medical services or the fire service which many carry concealed when transporting patients to an emergency room or mental health facility in the duty. HB872 - Earley I support . Always a lawful citizen to store a lawfully possessed firearm and ammunition in a locked private motor vehicle parked at any parking area owned or controlled by the Commonwealth. HB1141 - Cordoza I support HB1174 - Sickles I do not support changing the definition of an assault weapon widely and increasing the age which will make little difference. HB1198 - Scott, P.A. I support in reducing the fee
Vietnam Veteran - Retired Special Agent & LEO ( military 19 yrs & Federal 10 plus years) - that is me. Please consider the Bill of Rights; law abiding citizens rights to freedoms and rights of self protection. Criminals don’t follow laws against violence and criminal acts. Thank you
I oppose all of the gun control measures proposed in this session. I support Mr. Freitas' proposal for permitless carry.
Seems to me the General Assembly needs to pay attention to the Supreme Court rulings. Most of these bills if not all ignore what the Court has ruled on. Does the Gov. of Virginia think they are above the highest court in the land? Also, do not think for a Nano second that I believe these bills are about crime control. They are all about people control PERIOD. A Tyrannical state. I will fight this!!
I am submitting comments in opposition to these anti-gun rights bills. These bills do nothing to increase actual safety of Virginians. They serve only to further infringe upon our Second Amendment rights and those rights enshrined in our Virginia Constitution. Instead of focusing on the root causes of violent crimes, Democrats have chosen to target lawful Virginians' firearms rights. Most of these bills are a false solution for non-existent problems. Some of these bills would flagrantly be un-Constitutional and in opposition to prior U.S. Supreme Court decisions to include the Heller and Bruen decisions. In the 2023 Virginia elections, no candidate ran on a pro-gun control platform, therefore no mandate was handed to the House to implement such infringements. Virginians made our pro-Second Amendment stance clear in RIchmond in January 2020 when 40,000 people rallied against similar bills during that session and over 95% of Virginia counties' Board of Supervisors passed Second Amendment Sanctuary statuses. I urge the Committee Members to vote No on these bills. Thank you.
As a constituent, I urge you to OPPOSE the following bills: HB 12, Jones, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon, requires all firearms in a home be secured if there is a minor in the home. Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, prevents home-based gun dealers from operating within 1.5 miles of a school. Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, makes it illegal for anyone under 21 to purchase any kind of firearm. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen.
Regarding HB183: It's a shame that we the people have to keep up with all the ways our government wants to restrict us from living out our rights. The government has no business telling me how to handle my firearms in my own home. Regarding HB791: BB guns? Are you kidding? Get a real job.
NOT ONE OF THESE BILLS ARE CONSTITUTIONAL &/OR NECESSARY! THEY'RE SIMPLY SOLUTIONS IN SEARCH OF NONEXISTENT PROBLEMS! HB 12: Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23: Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158: Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183: Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585: Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791: Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861: Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174: A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen. Thank you.
HB 12, Jones - requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. These requirements represent an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under the Supreme Court's Bruen decision and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon, requires all firearms in a home be secured if there is a minor in the home. Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, prevents home-based gun dealers from operating within 1.5 miles of a school. Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, makes it illegal for anyone under 21 to purchase any kind of firearm. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen.
This is just a solution in search of a problem. Don't make laws we do not need. Thank you!
So there is nothing as important in and for Virginia other then Supporting Communist Legislation against the Constitution of VA and the US Constitution that all this effort must be the first thing on the agenda when a Demo-rat Majority is fraudulently elected to the House and Senate. You fools must make the people that pay you off very happy to have you ear and sell yourself to the Communist Party. Demo-rats are an embarrassment to Freedom and Good Government. Patrick Henry, you may have heard of him? Show me that age and country where the rights and liberties of the people were placed on the sole chance of their rulers being good men, without a consequent loss of liberty? ********************************** The eternal difference between right and wrong does not fluctuate, it is immutable. ********************************** The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government - lest it come to dominate our lives and interests. ********************************** Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? ********************************** Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined.... The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun.
I strongly support House bills 12, 23, 158, 183, 351, 861 and 585, These bills will make our communities safer by requiring safe storage of firearms, banning the sales of assault weapons to people under 21 years of age, and restricting the public places where people can carry firearms, including mental health facilities. Safe storage will protect children and teens from inadvertent shootings and school shootings, and everyone from suicide. Waiting periods for purchase can prevent impulsive misuse. I oppose bills 389, 872, 1141, and 1198. Allowing more guns into more places will not make us safer. Every shooter is a law-abiding citizen with 2nd amendment rights, until they open fire on other people. I don't trust a "good guy" with a gun to have the current training or expertise to shoot down a criminal without accidentally hitting innocent people, or themselves. There is always the threat that a criminal will grab a gun from the "good guy" and turn it on him/her. As a diplomat representing the United States in foreign countries during my 33 years in the U.S. State Department, my heart bled every time we had another mass shooting. People there would ask me, "What is wrong with your society?" The first seven gun safety bills passed in 2020 made Virginia a leader in gun safety legislation. Subsequent shootings, such as six-year old shooting his teacher with his mother's gun, demonstrate the need for evidence-driven initiatives that will reduce gun death and injuries in our Commonwealth.
In regards to HB2 and additional proposed firearm-related legislation. I do not believe adding additional restrictions, especially financial burdens, is a fair and ethical way of combating crime and violence with firearms. I believe there should be more freedom for owning and carrying firearms, but like the idea of additional training requirements and locking devices (gun safes) when in a home with minors. If the state were to enact any bills or policies further restricting access, there needs to be a free (government funded) way to access these rights for law-abiding citizens free of discrimination of any kind.
HB 183, Simon, requires all firearms in a home be secured if there is a minor in the home. Unnecessary Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members.
I urge you to OPPOSE the following bills: HB 12, HB 23, HB 158, HB 183, HB 585, HB 791, HB 1174 For some of these bills... they are meaningless, as they are already covered by Federal Law... the committee and legislature should not be wasting time on bills and laws that are already on the books! For some of the other bills... they are already deemed UNCONSTITUTIONAL under the 2nd Amendment and existing Supreme Court decisions. If these become law, they have a high probably of being voided/vacated within a year or two. Aside from taking away existing rights of Virginia citizens in that time... you will ensure lawyers on both sides of the issue will make a lot of money so they can drive fancy cars and send their kids to expensive schools. Stop indirectly putting money (half of which are paid with tax dollars) in lawyers’ pockets. I'd rather our courts address real crime and issues... not laws already deemed unconstitutional. Many of these bills attempt to create a tactical "solution"... except that the specific problem the "solution" addresses doesn't or never existed or occurred in the Commonwealth. I request that my elected officials address meaningful solutions, and ensure existing rights of law-abiding citizens are not infringed upon. Thank you for your time.
These proposals are solutions in search of problems. Many of these violate the Bruen decision. I would love for us to eliminate sovereign immunity. These politicians must be able to be sued personally, held both criminally and civilly liable for any vote in favor of a law, if they knew or should have known it violates or God given rights.
I feel violated. This legislation scares me and I'm a constituent. Show me the evidence that the legislation you are proposing will actually reduce crime and violence. There is none. These are "do something" acts that restrict my right as a good, sane, sober, moral and prudent citizen to keep and bear arms. If there were a violent criminal act for which I was now unprepared, restricted in my ability to defend innocent life, who will bear responsibility for that?
Good afternoon Delegates, I stand in opposition to all of these unconstitutional bills that will not do anything to curb and only demonize legal, lawful Virginians. Also, many of these bill are redundant to either existing commonwealth law or federal regulations. Lawful firearm owners are the back bone of this great commonwealth and country. I urge you all to recognize that Virginia is one of the safest states in the nation and that all of these proposed laws are violations of the Constitution and should not moved forward to a vote. Thank you for your time and consideration on this very important matter D Scott Burns
As a born and bred Virginian; a father and husband; a disabled veteran and active member in the community; I cannot understand why individuals who are elected, willingly do what they can to violate both the Virginia and United States Constitutions to penalize law-abiding citizens such as myself. I have spent a life of duty and dedication in service and occupations to protect our State and Country from those who wish to subjecgate its citizens or worse. Not only do all of these restrictions seek a perspective only solution, they do so at the cost of innocent citizens. Law-abiding citizens do not commit drug gang offenses, home invasions, mass shootings. These are the acts of career criminals or mentally disturbed individuals. None of these proposed bills addresses those issues or the deeper problem of why people are so quick to commit these acts. Murder is murder, whether a gun is used or a cane, it is still wrong. I'm more concerned about why, instead of the tool. Obviously, certain politicians are only worried about the tools. These proposed bills are all clearly agenda focused without factual information to support true results that may be gained by violating state and federal laws to enact. The Supreme Court very clearly defined the right to arms and most of these bills would violate those freedoms. Nor is it legislators purview to dictate what citizens do with what they have within the confines if their own home. THAT, is yet another violation. It is also disturbing that legislators seem to be focused on separating Virginia from reciprocity, thus affecting relations with other states, which ultimately led to a civil war last time. They are also creating more areas where people who mean to harm can do so without fear of being stopped such as adding a new gun free zone. This is a very bad and ill-conceived premise. If the point has not been made yet, then perhaps citizens need to start holding legislators civilly responsible for lives lost as a result of such zones. Clearly they are not effective. I ask that you stop operating under partisan politics and quid pro quo agendas which only serve to penalize and subjegate our citizenry. This is not what servicemembers and veterans served, sacrificed and vowed to defend. Freedom has a cost, and it is difficult to understand, especially through the fear and pain. There is NO such thing as safety. There never was, and never will be. America has MANY enemies out there in the world, and it's citizens; it's armed citizens; are the LAST line of defense. Continuing to attempt to disarm law-abiding citizens only further prompts the question by citizens for the legislators... "Whose side are you truly on?" Please repeal these bills and focus more on actual crime, deterrence for early release, stiffer penalties for existing criminals who continue to commit them and stop bringing in more and more illegal immigrants. Thank you for your attention. Lessons of the Past, Lost to Actions of the Present, Will Forever Damn the Future. -Sean Flippin - 1989
As a constituent, I urge you to OPPOSE the following bills: HB 12, Jones, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon, requires all firearms in a home be secured if there is a minor in the home. Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, prevents home-based gun dealers from operating within 1.5 miles of a school. Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, makes it illegal for anyone under 21 to purchase any kind of firearm. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen. I thank you. Mr. & Mrs Lon Horiuchi
Everyone of these bills further restricting the rights of the law abiding citizen should be voted down.
This bill must be OPPOSED. These bills do NOTHING to prevent/reduce crime. In fact, these types of bills will eventually ENABLE and allow MORE crime (just look at crime in Maryland and DC) by reducing Virginian's ability to adequately and easily protect themselves. This bill is immoral, unjust, unconstitutional and racist as it will HARM black and brown people, other minorities, women, the elderly, and children who will be the eventual victims as a result of laws like this. Using these types of bills to slowly deny the public's human right of self defense will NOT save lives or keep people safe. This has been proven again and again. As lawmakers, you have an obligation to ensure that the laws you enact *protect* our God-given, human right of self defense -- you should *not* be disenfranchising us and making us MORE vulnerable to crime and injustices with these ignorant bills. Thank you.
As a voting resident and veteran I strongly OPPOSE the following bills: HB 12, Jones, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon, requires all firearms in a home be secured if there is a minor in the home. Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, prevents home-based gun dealers from operating within 1.5 miles of a school. Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, makes it illegal for anyone under 21 to purchase any kind of firearm. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen. This bills have gone beyond the scope of "safety" and are clearly an attempt to strip the constitutional rights of law abiding citizens of this great Commonwealth. The majority of these bills have already been struck down my the SCOTUS. Remember your oath: I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God. v/r Thomas Speich
I do not support any proposed gun restriction bills. I have been a resident of VA for 40 years and have never been in trouble with the law. I do not think the bills that are being proposed will deter gun violence. The issue is not guns. It is mental health.
Dear Democrats proposing duplicative and unconstitutional bills: It is apparent that you seek to propose bills that ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL based on the US Supreme Court. Please reference the Heller and Bruen decisions. It would appear you are taking that as a mere suggestion? Further, the "catch me if you can" approach to lawmaking is ridiculous. Yes, we know the strategy made famous by Obama...pass laws you know are unconstitutional knowing it will take ~5 years and millions of dollars to undo them. In the interim, the damage is done. This is the stuff of tyrants. HB 12: DUPLICATIVE OF FEDERAL LAW. HB 23: UNCONSTITUTIONAL UNDER BRUEN. HB 158: DUPLICATIVE OF FEDERAL LAW. HB 183: DUPLICATIVE. 14 and under is covered. There are many cases were 15, 16, 17 year olds defending themselves and family from crime using firearms. HB 585: UNCONSTITUTIONAL. HB 791: a solution looking for a problem. Most normal people grew up playing with BB guns. Cite all the crime associated with BB guns? HB 861: UNCONSTITUTIONAL UNDER BRUEN. HB 1174: UNCONSTITUTIONAL UNDER BRUEN. already heard and struck down in other states. The disarmament agenda is tiresome. If you spent half the energy in Richmond, Hampton, Norfolk, and Petersburg, 95%+ of "gun violence" would be taken care of. Your main perpetrator group is black men killing black men, 18-34. Don't you read the Virginia Crime Commission's reports? if you were serious, you'd be going after ACTUAL criminals vs. passing meaningless laws that only impact the law abiding.
HB 12, Jones, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure - Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon - Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, is Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, is not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen.
We are encouraging our state politicians to work on meaningful solutions that will actually help reduce gun violence, violence in general, theft, and improve the quality of our lives. Let's start enforcing current laws that are reasonable and remove those that aren't. Work on quickly improving the number of quality jobs in VA. Through good local educational services that focus on the required skills, people can improve their own lives, the lives of their family, and have more hope for the future. Childcare assistance can help families that are working. It's time to create a new playbook and stop passing additional restrictive laws that only burden our citizens and families. Start improving our lives which leads to less violence, good jobs, and strong families that can raise our children better.
Why is it that you want to continue to go against your sworn oath to office and institute further gun restrictions and control on law biding citizens? With control of the senate and house why don't you focus on the root of the problem which is more to improve the socio-economic issues regions face which should in turn lower drug and gang related problems which in turn is the true reason behind your "gun violence" issue you continue to speak on. WE DO NOT HAVE A GUN VIOLENCE ISSUE, we have violence issue that you need to address not through more gun restrictions. Enough with the gun control bills, it is the first thing the democratic party pushes when they get control of the majority. Use this time to better the communities or is that just tok difficult for you? As all you want to do is make it so criminals have more power over law biding citizens, pull our children into gang and drug culture and go easy on crime so they know there is no accountability for their actions.
I wish congress would treat firearms and firearms owners in Virginia like they do illegal aliens. Turn a blind eye to them and just let them be free. Never make rules about securing access or entry to them. Ensure that none of them need paperwork or if they do, wait so long before you check to make sure any of it is accurate, you never find the illegals and in this case, firearms. That would be swell.
"The right to keepand bear arms shall not be infringed..." Those who carry firearms should not leave them in vehicles. Many guns used in crimes are stolen, often from vehicles. Hospitals and other places people gather are where trained armed civilians can thwart a crime or mass shooting. The AR-15 is a civilian multi-purpose rifle -- easy to operate, inexpensive, accurate, low recoil, low cost ammo, and potentially lethal when necessary. It is the best rifle ever invented for U.S. civilian use...hunting, self and home defense, and target shooting. Resources in VA should be used for law enforcement, crime prevention and mental health. Take ILLEGAL guns off the streets.
Given the second amendment of the constitution, there shall be no laws that prevent me from being able to protect myself. I am a conceal carry holder and have been for almost 10 years now. We vehemently oppose any laws that would prevent Conceal Carry Holders from carrying our weapon. Our goal is to have protection and not need it rather than needing protection, and not being able to have it. We will not comply.
When will misguided legislators learn that infringing the right of law abiding citizens to exercise our Second Amendment liberties does nothing to make the public safe? In fact, it makes us all less safe because criminals love restrictions on lawful firearm ownership. Wake up! Follow the Constitution. “The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed!” Bishop E.W. Jackson STAND Virginia PAC
First, SCOTUS has addressed gun rights; access to magazines & ammo multiple times. Multiple times, SCOTUS' decision has sided with law abiding gun owners. I am curious as to why you continue to suppress our God given constitutionally protected right to bear arms? I can only assume one of two reasons. Either (A) you are completely uneducated as to the writers of the constitution, as well as their separate and several memoirs on the right to keep and bear arms; and furthermore ignorant of the right of the People to keep and bear arms as a result of the People having fought against tyranny using NOT federally provided military arms and ammunition - rather, PRIVATELY owned arms and ammunition. Below are just a few examples of historically accurate statements on said RIGHTS : “No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.” – Thomas Jefferson, Virginia Constitution, Draft 1, 1776 “A strong body makes the mind strong. As to the species of exercises, I advise the gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it gives boldness, enterprise and independence to the mind. Games played with the ball, and others of that nature, are too violent for the body and stamp no character on the mind. Let your gun therefore be your constant companion of your walks.” – Thomas Jefferson, letter to Peter Carr, August 19, 1785 “Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops.” – Noah Webster, An Examination of the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution, October 10, 1787 “To disarm the people…[i]s the most effectual way to enslave them.” – George Mason, The Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution, June 14, 1788 “I ask who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers.” – George Mason, Address to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 4, 1788 My questions are simply these, who do you expect to follow these laws that you put forth? Criminals? Why would you expect someone who is a CRIMINAL to obey the law? Maybe you should take some time and learn the definition? Which brings me to part (B) as to why I think you are trying to bar citizens from owning semi-auto rifles & there average magazines - you fear us to the point where you want to disarm us in much the same way HITLER disarmed HIS constituency. Clearly Thomas Jefferson had it correct - when he said “The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes…. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.” – Thomas Jefferson, Commonplace Book (quoting 18th century criminologist Cesare Beccaria), 1774-1776. Tyranny is the only reasonable explanation for your efforts because the lies spread by the US Government regarding death tolls, etc., is a complete fallacy. All you have to do is a little independent research regarding 'mass shootings.' And yes, private citizens did in fact have legal ownership of canons all the way through the Civil War era. Only an idiot would believe the lies that they did not.
In Caetano v. Massachusetts (2016), the Supreme Court reiterated its earlier rulings that "the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding" and that its protection is not limited to "only those weapons useful in warfare". New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen (2022) is a landmark: [ In a 6–3 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that New York's law was unconstitutional and that the ability to carry a pistol in public was a constitutional right guaranteed by the Second Amendment. — A 2022 poll found that 64% of Americans were in favor of the ruling in contrast with 35% of Americans that say they oppose the decision.[50] Additionally, 36%, the largest single share, said they strongly support the Court's ruling in contrast with 16% who said they strongly oppose it. The Legal Aid Society said the decision "may be an affirmative step toward ending arbitrary licensing standards that have inhibited lawful Black and Brown gun ownership in New York."[46] Former house minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R‑CA) supported the ruling, saying it "rightfully ensures the right of all law-abiding Americans to defend themselves without unnecessary government interference."[47] Law professor Steve Vladeck said the decision will "have monumental ramifications far beyond carrying firearms in public" and predicts there will be a "slew of litigation challenging any and every gun-control measure". Tread AROUND the 2nd amendment to our Constitution of the United States of America. Around it. Not on it; not lightly upon it! Carefully consider your vote! (Attachment: Photo of one night of a dangerous riot in a public place.)
Please leave law abiding citizens alone and focus the Commonwealth’s limited resources on the arrest, conviction, and incarceration of violent individuals. Paul Trible Blue Grass, VA
Suggest instead of Firearms Safety Subcommittee... Crimes Safety Subcommittee. greatly more effective! THE REAL ISSUE!
None of these proposals will impact the behavior of a criminal - only making law abiding citizens vulnerable as a new "gun free" zone attracts people seeking to make a statement with a gun and want time to do so before someone with a gun shows up. Additionally, most of these targeted problems are not currently problems or represent a growing trend that needs additional protections enacted to address. In my view, these bills have limited to no chance to provide additional protections or impact criminal behavior but DO further strip your constituents God give rights to provide the illusion of protection.
As a constituent, I urge you to OPPOSE the following bills: HB 12, Jones, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon, requires all firearms in a home be secured if there is a minor in the home. Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, prevents home-based gun dealers from operating within 1.5 miles of a school. Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, makes it illegal for anyone under 21 to purchase any kind of firearm. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen.
I'm a volunteer with Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America, and I support this bill.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support the following bills: HB1174, HB1181, HB1195, HB12, HB1424, HB1462, HB158, HB175, HB183, HB23, HB270, HB318, HB319, HB351, HB362, HB585, HB602, HB637, HB791, HB797, HB798, HB799, HB861, HB916, & HB945 I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I oppose these bills: HB1030, HB1141, HB1198, HB1230, HB1235, HB1321, HB1325, HB1386, HB289, HB389, HB756, & HB872 Innocent children are dying on our watch. Please do something.
My fellow Virginia’s I write today to comment on the bills before you. I am a retired Army veterans. I grew up in Virginia, went to ODU and instead of seeking residency in other states, stayed a Virginian and paid taxes while on active duty. I fought in war and lost good Soldiers and friends defending this nation, you and our Constitution. I retired in Virginia because I love this state. Your body will decide, with its vote, to either infringe on our rights or defend them. I ask you to defend them like those friends and Soldiers that also did. I am a responsible gun owner who raised his children to be responsible gun owners (all three are serving or served). I am also a CCP holder who is willing to defend his fellow citizens. If you vote for any of these bills to limit our rights it will impact my ability to defend myself and my family. Please do the right thing and defend the 2nd Amd. My wife and I already decided to leave the state if you enact these measures to limit our rights. Thank you Oliver Rose
HB 12, Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen.
The selected bills are unconstitutional! They must be voted down!
This proposed legislation is blatantly unconstitutional and, if passed, it will, no doubt, be challenged in court. The taxpayers of Virginia will then be obligated to defend these unconstitutional measures, and those defenses will almost certainly lose. This will result in costly, meaningless court costs for all Virginia taxpayers. Those tax dollars could be spent on more meaningful and productive activities that benefit all citizens.
All of these anti 2nd amendment bills DO NOT represent the vast majority of the citizenry of Virginia. All of these anti-gun bills will do absolutely nothing to impact crime, and are only a form of punishment to responsible gun owners in the commonwealth. These bills are meant to only meant to elicit “feel-good” emotions for those sensing they are impacting gun crime. Stop letting criminals go free early and do not focus the legislatures efforts on infringing on the rights of the people to legally defend themselves from those who mean to do grievous harm.
It is outrageous that the General Assembly is using our 2nd Amendment right to punish law abiding citizens who have done nothing wrong other then to defend themselves. It’s clear that Democrats pander to their bases without a thought about the citizens of this Commonwealth or this nation. This issue amongst others, galvanize the voters to get out and vote for the party that does not seek to encroach our rights under the State and Federal Constitution. There is zero proof that We The People are deranged killers, a mob or even the radical right that the Democrat who currently occupies the White House has said. He’d called us Nazis and portrayed honest, hardworking and law abiding citizens as the problem. We are not. Opens border, out of control spending, child indoctrination and parroting the DNC is the problem that is self inflicted and deserves nothing less then our disgust and rebuke come November 2024. The General Assembly reflects the divide between Northern Virginia to Richmond and the difference in South Eastern, Western Virginia. The Democrat party and Legislature know full well that gun control laws if enacted, will not reduce violence but increase victimhood that they’ll blame on Republicans and the cycle continues. Pathetic fools and they wonder why I’ve stopped contributing to candidates who never deliver to fools who govern us.
Please, NO more gun control. You all KNOW that criminals do not follow your laws. All your gun control does is limit my and my family's rights to self defense and peaceful enjoyment of the shooting sports. Instead, put, and keep, actual violent offenders in jail. It really is that simple.
As a woman and a 30 plus year Emergency Department nurse I ask you to reject these onerous gun control laws. Laws like these discourage women who are most at risk from being able to obtain the means to defend themselves. I worked many a late night shift in Northern Virginia and walked through empty parking lots and garages worried about my safety. Women should not have to suffer this and should have ready access to the means to defend themselves. You aren't disarming criminals your are disarming women.
The bills under consideration will do nothing to increase the safety of Virginians while infringing on our right to defend ourselves. They are designed to make it more difficult to obtain a firearm, possess a firearm, or use a firearm to defend oneself or others. Meanwhile criminals will continue unabated. Moreover, most of these unconstitutional laws have been rendered moot as they have been struck down by state and federal courts. As a former police officer and detective I implore you to reject these useless and unconstitutional laws. Thank you
No more gun control legislation. It's not the gun that's the issue. It's the mentally ill folks that obtained a gun.
I strongly oppose these bills as they are direct infringements on the 2nd Amendment of The Constitution. Most of these have already been found to be unconstitutional by various courts yet they are still being presented as bills. I am completely against these and any other such bills that infringe on the constitutional and inalienable rights of the Citizens of the United States of America and of the Commonwealth of Virginia.
No more unconstitutional gun control.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support these bills. I expect to see more gun violence prevention legislation *actually pass* since there is so much nonpartisan alignment on this topic. The status quo is unacceptable. Our pro-gun culture is a threat to our children, and a slap in the face to every person who has lost their lives to gun violence. Enough is enough - policy over prayers.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support this bill.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support this bill. Gun violence in our communities and in our state is heartbreaking and changes need to be made to protect the citizens of Virginia.
I am a member of Virginia moms for change and I support these bills.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change and I support these bills. To all responsible gun owners: you shouldn't be afraid of these common sense bills. These bills are directed at people who are not handling their firearms as the deadly weapons that they can be. Instead of thinking your rights are being taken away, consider instead how safe storage, permits and waiting periods could help the daily gun violence in our country. Keep your guns, we are not trying to take them away. These bills are an opportunity for you, as a responsible gun owner, to be a part of the solution to help cut down on needless violence.
Remember Delegates...you took an Oath to 'Support and Defend the Constitution of the Unites States of America' which includes the 2nd Amendment!
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change and I support the selected bills. I believe they will make our communities safer and that gun violence is a critical issue we must address with such legislation and more.
I am a member of Virginia Mom's for Change, a group working towards gun violence prevention. We support the bills indicated above.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group. I support bills HB1174 HB1181 HB1195 HB12 HB1424 HB1462 HB158 HB175 HB183 HB23 HB270 HB318 HB319 HB351 HB362 HB585 HB602 HB637 HB791 HB798 HB799 HB861 HB916 HB945
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group. I support bills HB1174 HB1181 HB1195 HB12 HB1424 HB1462 HB158 HB175 HB183 HB23 HB270 HB318 HB319 HB351 HB362 HB585 HB602 HB637 HB791 HB798 HB799 HB861 HB916 HB945
and I support these bills. The bills we support are: HB1174, HB1181, HB1195, HB12, HB1424, HB1462, HB158, HB175, HB183, HB23, HB270, HB318, HB319, HB351, HB362, HB585, HB602, HB637, HB791, HB797, HB798, HB799, HB861, HB916, & HB945
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support these bills. The bills we support are: HB1174, HB1181, HB1195, HB12, HB1424, HB1462, HB 158, HB175, HB183, HB23, HB270, HB318, HB319, HB351, HB362, HB585, HB602, HB637, HB791, HB797, HB798, HB799, HB861, HB916, & HB945
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support these bills. The bills we support are: HB1174, HB1181, HB1195, HB12, HB1424, HB1462, HB158, HB175, HB183, HB23, HB270, HB318, HB319, HB351, HB362, HB585, HB602, HB637, HB791, HB797, HB798, HB799, HB861, HB916, & HB945
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support this bill.
The Virginia NAACP supports this bill. We support common sense gun legislation that will have a significant impact on reducing gun violence and saving lives; this includes comprehensive background checks on the sale of firearms, limitations on purchasing firearms and prohibition of selling and transporting assault weapons - this is necessary legislation to keep Virginians safe.
The end of solitary confinement must be done My son was murdered in solitary confinement at Red Onion Prison in Pound Va on 1/3/22.
The Virginia NAACP supports this bill. We support common sense gun legislation that will have a significant impact on reducing gun violence and saving lives; this includes comprehensive background checks on the sale of firearms, limitations on purchasing firearms and prohibition of selling and transporting assault weapons - this is necessary legislation to keep Virginians safe.
Our Constitution does not provide citizens with privileges. It establishes a government with checks and balances and specifically limits the governments ability to remove the rights of its people. In regards to the matter at hand, it specifically says the the government cannot place limitations on the right of a citizen to keep and bear arms. Before I get the typical response, I know you are already aware that the phrase "well regulated" specifically refers to an being trained and ready to bear said arms. The language at the time did not use the term "regulated" as we do with modern regulations. It has been proven in the courts repeatedly that the laws you are currently considering are unconstitutional. Of this I am sure you are already aware. By spending time and tax dollars discussing laws that you know to be unconstitutional, you are in fact wasting time and tax dollars that could be spent on productive issues. I can only assume your intent is to intentionally waste time, and force members of the firearms industry to waste money on legal fees defending the constitution you have sworn to uphold. Please consider actual data and actual facts when considering gun legislation. No data supports the claim the "assault weapon" bans actually reduce gun related crime. More guns are being purchased now than ever before, yet now that the latest FBI data has been released, we can see that gun related crimes have not increased. Also, like every year that the FBI has released data, so called "assault weapons" make up a very small portion of all gun crimes. For your general knowledge the term "assault weapon" was first coined by Adolf Hitler. He renamed one of their new automatic firearms, the Sturmgewehr, because he felt that the name "assault weapon" would strike fear in allied forces. This is also the exact reason the gun control community uses this term as well. The fact is that these firearms are not fully automatic and cannot be made so without a high degree of machining skills and mechanical knowhow. Plus doing so is already illegal. The fact is the Biden's latest gun control act has not been equally enforced. It was supposed to provide additional support for school security and mental health services. It was supposed to provide stronger punishments for those cought breaking existing gun laws. It was supposed to allow FFL's to use the NICS system to check employees. It was supposed to allow FFL's to be able to instantly check inventory or potential purchase/trades by their serial number to determine if the firearm has been stolen or used in any crimes. None of these provisions have been acted upon or enforced. Please drop these latest gun control bills. They are unconstitutional and will never pass. Please do not waste your time and our tax dollars on these wasted efforts. Regards, Jonathan Goodman
Dear Committee, I am resident of Richmond City and I am writing in OPPOSITION of these anti Second Amendment bills. The nature, language and prohibitions covered in these bills clearly violate multiple provisions of the US Constitution and in direct violation of simple text reading of Second Amendment of US Constitution - A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. US Supreme Court time and again, including Heller and more recently in Bruen decision reiterated that any law that does not fall into plain reading of Second Amendment Text and lacking Historical analogue at the time of founding clearly violates US Constitution. Multiple recent lower court cases since Bruen has been decided on that ruling and rendered multiple laws across the country as UnConstitutional. You are here by notified that the proposed bills violated both Text and Spirit of US Constitution, more specifically Second Amendment. You are further notified to remind you that you took official oath to uphold US Constitution and Virginia Constitution. Please vote NO on these bills. Thank you
The Virginia NAACP supports this bill. We support common sense gun legislation that will have a significant impact on reducing gun violence and saving lives; this includes comprehensive background checks on the sale of firearms, limitations on purchasing firearms and prohibition of selling and transporting assault weapons - this is necessary legislation to keep Virginians safe.
THe Virginia NAACP supports this bill. We support common sense gun legislation that will have a significant impact on reducing gun violence and saving lives; this includes comprehensive background checks on the sale of firearms, limitations on purchasing firearms and prohibition of selling and transporting assault weapons - this is necessary legislation to keep Virginians safe.
The Virginia NAACP supports this bill. We support common sense gun legislation that will have a significant impact on reducing gun violence and saving lives; this includes comprehensive background checks on the sale of firearms, limitations on purchasing firearms and prohibition of selling and transporting assault weapons - this is necessary legislation to keep Virginians safe.
I'm a volunteer with Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America, and I support this bill. Requiring guns to be securely stored prevents children from getting their hands on firearms and unintentionally shooting themselves or others or bringing them to the playground or school. In incidents of gunfire on school grounds, roughly three-quarters of shooters obtained the gun(s) they used from their home or the homes of relatives or friends.
HB203 - Private security services business; training requirements for human trafficking.
Hi there, I'm Natalie from Social Busy Bee, your partner in the exciting world of Instagram growth. I've discovered something phenomenal for skyrocketing your Instagram popularity and I'm thrilled to share it with you! Social Growth Engine introduces a groundbreaking service that takes your Instagram engagement to new heights. It's effortless: - Zero in on producing unforgettable content. - Extremely budget-friendly at a mere $36/month. - Completely safe (no password needed), incredibly powerful, and Instagram's best friend. I've experienced remarkable results firsthand, and I'm sure you will too! Amplify your Instagram presence right now: http://get.socialbuzzzy.com/instagram_booster Best wishes, Natalie at Social Busy Bee"
Hi I am writing to you on behalf of The Well Connection UK, a media and publishing company. We could easily get virginia.gov featured in various publications such as magazines, online blogs and news sites. This would undoubtedly help virginia.gov with publicity, reputation, domain authority and organic search engine rankings. We have a wide range of options including completely free collaborations, sponsored posts, guest posts and banner ads. If this sounds of interest, please reach out to the senior business development manager, Anita at info@thewellconnection.co.uk and whatsapp +447395206515 (GMT) Kind regards Clifton Junior Outreach Assistant
I oppose all these unconstitutional, dangerous, and pointless laws.
Virginia Coalition Against Human Trafficking requests support HB203 as would increase awareness of human trafficking and the provide the tools to know what to do when it is encountered within the private security sector.
Dear Sir or Madame. Last year in Newport News I was assaulted by a 27 year old black man from Chesapeake because of his road rage.. This was at my local bank 11;30 in the morning. This young man almost lost his life at my hand because you cannot reel in your problem young men. His words feet from me were ' im going to kick your ass and then kill you'. My pistol changed his mind. I saw for myself the woke judges and a woke system that perpetuates the problem. The criminal justice system has been flung far far left which IS causing a public safety hazzard. No new gun control is needed. More jail time for the trash that i dealt with is. My Congressman Bobby Scott and Delegate Cia Price do not represent me.
This debate over guns was settled in 1791. We have all the laws we need to cover the action of a criminal. Murder is illegal no matter the tool used. Assualt is illegal no matter the tool used. Your ridiculous attack on the rights of all Virginians is just another chapter in the failure our our legislature to deal with the true issues that plague our state. Restore our rights and work to better the state and stop with the petty and vindictive law making that only hurts the innocent. Every day our governing bodies from congress to you become less relevant as a part of our lives, since all you ever manage to do is destroy and steal.
In Ohio one year after constitution carry passed gun crimes went down
I've commend prior on these issue but would like to reemphasize that more laws of these nature only impose on those of us that already obey the law and I think that you could explain this to your constituents demanding more gun control. I always find it ironic and dubious that those wanting more gun control either don't own a gun, have never fired a gun or don't want to purchase one but wish to infringe upon those of us who are responsible gun owners. Many of these bills on gun control shouldn't even be proposed and if you are supporting these bills you're being dishonest to your own base in tell them that this will reduce crime. It can't reduce crime and never has since other cities such as Chicago ,crime ALWAYS increases with more gun control and Always goes down with less in most situations. I have friend who lives in Chicago and had to sue because they outlawed all firearms several years back. The citizens won that case and were allowed to own AR-15's and all various forms of semi automatic fire arms pistol and rifle. According to him and the data CRIME WENT DOWN. The exception to gun laws which are already on the book as always is proper back ground checks so criminals cannot exploit the legal process by purchasing as a felon. As for removing someone's rights to own a gun under a DUI or DWI I fail to see any relevance or correlation and causation to the issue of guns in general. I am apposed to all these gun control bills and support the two pro guns bills being proposed.
HB250 - Law-enforcement officers; interrogation practices.
Hi there, I'm Natalie from Social Busy Bee, your partner in the exciting world of Instagram growth. I've discovered something phenomenal for skyrocketing your Instagram popularity and I'm thrilled to share it with you! Social Growth Engine introduces a groundbreaking service that takes your Instagram engagement to new heights. It's effortless: - Zero in on producing unforgettable content. - Extremely budget-friendly at a mere $36/month. - Completely safe (no password needed), incredibly powerful, and Instagram's best friend. I've experienced remarkable results firsthand, and I'm sure you will too! Amplify your Instagram presence right now: http://get.socialbuzzzy.com/instagram_booster Best wishes, Natalie at Social Busy Bee"
Hi I am writing to you on behalf of The Well Connection UK, a media and publishing company. We could easily get virginia.gov featured in various publications such as magazines, online blogs and news sites. This would undoubtedly help virginia.gov with publicity, reputation, domain authority and organic search engine rankings. We have a wide range of options including completely free collaborations, sponsored posts, guest posts and banner ads. If this sounds of interest, please reach out to the senior business development manager, Anita at info@thewellconnection.co.uk and whatsapp +447395206515 (GMT) Kind regards Clifton Junior Outreach Assistant
It is obvious these elected officials want you to die at the behest of an anarcho tyrannical state where violent perpetual offenders are off with a slap on the wrist, while YOU tax payer are criminalized for not wanting to be a victim to these perpetual perpetrators. The elected officials funded by big Pro-Death lobby of Giffords and Bloomberg sit in their cushy NOVA HOAd mansions behind security while you plebs go to work everyday to pay their salary. These same officials effectively bribe the police state by giving them a way to pay off a mortgage and boat in exchange for your oppression. YOU citizen must morally oppose these pro-Death bills. Democracy has fallen and its only driven by money hungry Babylonians who swim in excess and delicacy while YOU PLEBS cant even afford milk, eggs or pampers. Remember these people do not hold dominion over you. Call your congressman/woman and CHRIST IS KING!
I oppose all these unconstitutional, dangerous, and pointless laws.
Dear Sir or Madame. Last year in Newport News I was assaulted by a 27 year old black man from Chesapeake because of his road rage.. This was at my local bank 11;30 in the morning. This young man almost lost his life at my hand because you cannot reel in your problem young men. His words feet from me were ' im going to kick your ass and then kill you'. My pistol changed his mind. I saw for myself the woke judges and a woke system that perpetuates the problem. The criminal justice system has been flung far far left which IS causing a public safety hazzard. No new gun control is needed. More jail time for the trash that i dealt with is. My Congressman Bobby Scott and Delegate Cia Price do not represent me.
This debate over guns was settled in 1791. We have all the laws we need to cover the action of a criminal. Murder is illegal no matter the tool used. Assualt is illegal no matter the tool used. Your ridiculous attack on the rights of all Virginians is just another chapter in the failure our our legislature to deal with the true issues that plague our state. Restore our rights and work to better the state and stop with the petty and vindictive law making that only hurts the innocent. Every day our governing bodies from congress to you become less relevant as a part of our lives, since all you ever manage to do is destroy and steal.
In Ohio one year after constitution carry passed gun crimes went down
I've commend prior on these issue but would like to reemphasize that more laws of these nature only impose on those of us that already obey the law and I think that you could explain this to your constituents demanding more gun control. I always find it ironic and dubious that those wanting more gun control either don't own a gun, have never fired a gun or don't want to purchase one but wish to infringe upon those of us who are responsible gun owners. Many of these bills on gun control shouldn't even be proposed and if you are supporting these bills you're being dishonest to your own base in tell them that this will reduce crime. It can't reduce crime and never has since other cities such as Chicago ,crime ALWAYS increases with more gun control and Always goes down with less in most situations. I have friend who lives in Chicago and had to sue because they outlawed all firearms several years back. The citizens won that case and were allowed to own AR-15's and all various forms of semi automatic fire arms pistol and rifle. According to him and the data CRIME WENT DOWN. The exception to gun laws which are already on the book as always is proper back ground checks so criminals cannot exploit the legal process by purchasing as a felon. As for removing someone's rights to own a gun under a DUI or DWI I fail to see any relevance or correlation and causation to the issue of guns in general. I am apposed to all these gun control bills and support the two pro guns bills being proposed.
I am Chief Maggie DeBoard from the Herndon Police Department, and I am providing comment on two bills on behalf of the VA Chiefs Association (VACP) as their legislative committee chair. In regard to HB 250, we are strongly opposed to any formal attempt to dictate how law enforcement officers operationally conduct interrogations. Detectives must have the ability to adjust their tactics to the individual being questioned, while ensuring they are doing so in a legal and lawful manner. How they conduct their interrogations are guided by Miranda and Supreme Court case law. Every case is different, every suspect is different, and model policies should not guide how these custodial interrogations are carried out. By creating model policies for an operational practice that varies greatly from suspect to suspect, you severely limit a detective's approach to how he or she needs to conduct an interrogation. The courts have the role in each criminal case to determine if such interrogation was legal/lawful. That decision should remain with the courts, who look at each one based on the facts of the case, and if the officer followed established case law on the matter. Detectives currently receive training from experienced subject matter experts in this area, and that training is modified as new case law develops. That training should not be dictated by DCJS, nor should they create model policies that will inevitably become out of date over time and create arguments for defense attorneys as to why one detective did not conduct an interrogation in the same manner as another. Ref HB 776, the VACP fully supports this legislation which simply removes the need for agencies to ask for a waiver from DCJS to hire an individual who is eligible for and applied for citizenship. We agree with the language in this bill; this will provide agencies with more flexibility to recruit and hire qualified individuals from our minority and/or migrant communities who meet the requirements. These individuals will be processed in the same manner as any other applicant and must still meet all other hiring standards before being employed. It also encourages lawful immigration and a path to citizenship for those who desire to work as a law enforcement officer in the Commonwealth. Thank you for allowing us to provide our input today.
The end of solitary confinement must be done My son was murdered in solitary confinement at Red Onion Prison in Pound Va on 1/3/22.
This bill is long overdue, and is a step in the right direction. Cops need to have guidelines, particularly for those cases which involve police online unethical and illegal behavior in mass surveillance, intrusion on dating and social media sites where they create criminals more than find them. Any imposition of clear requirements the violation of which comes with penalties is welcome. We support this bill.
HB279 - Military leaves of absence for employees of the Commonwealth, etc.; includes prof. firefighters.
I oppose all these unconstitutional, dangerous, and pointless laws.
Dear Sir or Madame. Last year in Newport News I was assaulted by a 27 year old black man from Chesapeake because of his road rage.. This was at my local bank 11;30 in the morning. This young man almost lost his life at my hand because you cannot reel in your problem young men. His words feet from me were ' im going to kick your ass and then kill you'. My pistol changed his mind. I saw for myself the woke judges and a woke system that perpetuates the problem. The criminal justice system has been flung far far left which IS causing a public safety hazzard. No new gun control is needed. More jail time for the trash that i dealt with is. My Congressman Bobby Scott and Delegate Cia Price do not represent me.
This debate over guns was settled in 1791. We have all the laws we need to cover the action of a criminal. Murder is illegal no matter the tool used. Assualt is illegal no matter the tool used. Your ridiculous attack on the rights of all Virginians is just another chapter in the failure our our legislature to deal with the true issues that plague our state. Restore our rights and work to better the state and stop with the petty and vindictive law making that only hurts the innocent. Every day our governing bodies from congress to you become less relevant as a part of our lives, since all you ever manage to do is destroy and steal.
In Ohio one year after constitution carry passed gun crimes went down
I've commend prior on these issue but would like to reemphasize that more laws of these nature only impose on those of us that already obey the law and I think that you could explain this to your constituents demanding more gun control. I always find it ironic and dubious that those wanting more gun control either don't own a gun, have never fired a gun or don't want to purchase one but wish to infringe upon those of us who are responsible gun owners. Many of these bills on gun control shouldn't even be proposed and if you are supporting these bills you're being dishonest to your own base in tell them that this will reduce crime. It can't reduce crime and never has since other cities such as Chicago ,crime ALWAYS increases with more gun control and Always goes down with less in most situations. I have friend who lives in Chicago and had to sue because they outlawed all firearms several years back. The citizens won that case and were allowed to own AR-15's and all various forms of semi automatic fire arms pistol and rifle. According to him and the data CRIME WENT DOWN. The exception to gun laws which are already on the book as always is proper back ground checks so criminals cannot exploit the legal process by purchasing as a felon. As for removing someone's rights to own a gun under a DUI or DWI I fail to see any relevance or correlation and causation to the issue of guns in general. I am apposed to all these gun control bills and support the two pro guns bills being proposed.
HB351 - Firearm; locking device required for purchase, households where minor resides, penalty.
Hi there, I'm Natalie from Social Busy Bee, your partner in the exciting world of Instagram growth. I've discovered something phenomenal for skyrocketing your Instagram popularity and I'm thrilled to share it with you! Social Growth Engine introduces a groundbreaking service that takes your Instagram engagement to new heights. It's effortless: - Zero in on producing unforgettable content. - Extremely budget-friendly at a mere $36/month. - Completely safe (no password needed), incredibly powerful, and Instagram's best friend. I've experienced remarkable results firsthand, and I'm sure you will too! Amplify your Instagram presence right now: http://get.socialbuzzzy.com/instagram_booster Best wishes, Natalie at Social Busy Bee"
Hi I am writing to you on behalf of The Well Connection UK, a media and publishing company. We could easily get virginia.gov featured in various publications such as magazines, online blogs and news sites. This would undoubtedly help virginia.gov with publicity, reputation, domain authority and organic search engine rankings. We have a wide range of options including completely free collaborations, sponsored posts, guest posts and banner ads. If this sounds of interest, please reach out to the senior business development manager, Anita at info@thewellconnection.co.uk and whatsapp +447395206515 (GMT) Kind regards Clifton Junior Outreach Assistant
My name is Laura, and I’m your constituent. Gun violence prevention is my top priority. Please support hi. Safety legislation that is brought up for a vote. These are the bills I support. Thank you for your time.
Law abiding citizens should not be punished for exercising their constitutional rights. Bill HB2 causes half of the state to become felons, just for exercising their rights to own firearms. HB1424 is unconstitutional because nothing in the second amendment says anything about having to have a license to own a gun. SB522 , similarly to HB1424 , is unconstitutional. The second amendment states that the right to bear arms shall not be infringed. People shouldn’t have to take a training course to own a gun. It’s your right to bear arms without government approval, or having to take a training course. It forces you to give up your ability to exercise your own rights. SB57 causes law abiding people to be in danger of criminals coming into a restaurant with a gun and not being able to defend themselves. SB327 once again is unconstitutional. The second amendment says nothing about an age restriction on any type of firearm. SB273 is unconstitutional because nothing states that you have to wait a certain amount of time to own a firearm. SB2 , just like HB2, shouldn’t cause law abiding people to not be able to own an “Assault weapon” or ammunition for an “Assault weapon”; because the second amendment doesn’t prohibit any style of firearm or ammunition from being sold or possessed.
I am opposed to all of these unconstitutional and anit-american gun laws and regulations. There is no room for more gun laws and regulations in this state.
Contrary to how certain government officials treat it, the second amendment is written using plain, easy to understand language, and insists that government has no right to take away the right for ordinary people like us to defend ourselves, as the constitution and bill of rights do not simply give people rights, but protects them from government manipulation and control. It’s incredibly disappointing and a tragedy that people choose to commit acts of violence with these rights, but restricting those who wish to exercise their rights peaceably due to those who wouldn’t follow these rules in the first place is incredibly naive. I, as well as every other person in the United States, deserve to protect my family with the best technology available. While some people look at certain defense weapon setups as a “why do you need that” situation, 1) I have the right to defend myself with the best tool available, and so I will choose that every time, 2) why do you “need” anything other than basic necessities (fast car, Gucci clothes, etc)? The government has no place in deciding what I “need”, 3) people with the intent to harm will not care what laws govern peaceful people, so what would limiting the victim’s access to proper tools do? You may think that by “banning” or otherwise restricting access to a certain thing would mean that all of the “bad” things would magically go away, but they will not. Evil has always and will always exist, and I have every right to defend myself from it using the best tool available wherever I, or my family, choose to go. Restricting access on certain properties (the government isn’t actively protecting me everywhere), requiring certain training (who is paying for this?), limiting certain types of firearms (go ahead and define “assault weapon” in plain language please), and restricting ammo purchasing (I thought you wanted us to train; how does this help then?) are all means that end up hurting the average person and helping those who wish to hurt others, as the rest of us will be left in a position to insufficiently defend ourselves. I urge you to understand that while, yes, it is awful that evil people commit horrific acts, this right ultimately allows me to protect myself and my family from these evil people as well and as evil will always exist (we certainly like to delusion ourselves into believing that we live in a utopia, but we do not), I will protect my family accordingly. The government has no right to restrict this. Leave the peaceful citizens alone, more firmly punish those who hurt others, and help communities where this is an issue to prevent the upbringing of more evil people.
I oppose these bills that are attacking the rights of law-abiding gun owners.
Many of these gun laws are unfair to law abiding citizens and do not affect criminals. These gun laws should be vetoed.
State Legislature members, A right delayed is a right denied. Quoting the 2022 NYSRPA v. Bruen Supreme Court Case: 'The constitutional right to bear arms in public for self-defense is not “a second-class right, subject to an entirely different body of rules than the other Bill of Rights guarantees.” McDonald, 561 U. S., at 780 (plurality opinion). The exercise of other constitutional rights does not require individuals to demonstrate to government officers some special need. The Second Amendment right to carry arms in public for self defense is no different.' The recent NYSRPA v. Bruen case highlighted the significance of individual self-defense, and it's crucial to consider the rights of law-abiding citizens in crafting firearm legislation. While the goal of enhancing public safety is commendable, an outright ban on certain firearms and magazines will disproportionately impact responsible gun owners who use these tools for legitimate purposes, such as self-defense and sport. It is essential to strike a balance between public safety and the preservation of individual rights. Instead of blanket bans, and bureaucratic obstacles that only harass lawful firearm owners, we should focus on comprehensive measures that address the root causes of gun violence. This approach respects the constitutional rights of citizens while fostering a safer society. Criminals are not deterred by restrictions on lawful purchase at federally-licensed FFL Dealers. They do not bother going through the process of applying for a concealed carry permit, because they do not intend to carry lawfully. People who want to use weapons to hurt innocent citizens of Virginia will not be impeded by these House and Senate Bills. Instead, the only individuals who will have their behavior modified are lawful men and women who are unable to defend themselves against those who will commit crimes regardless of what is written into law this Legislative Session. If you pass the above laws, it will only serve to waste hard-working Taxpayers' money fighting them in Federal Court. California and New York have lost their cases seeking to uphold unconstitutional gun laws, and the sponsors of these bills will lose too. Do the right thing - the hard thing - enforce the laws we already have, get the small minority of violent criminals off the streets of Virginia, and uphold the constitutional rights of your polity.
These bills infringe on the rights of the United States citizens given to us by the second amendment. The only thing these bills will accomplish will take the firearms out of the hands of law abiding citizens, while criminals will still have access.
I do not support any bill that removes any right from law abiding citizens to protect themselves from those who WILL NOT abide by these laws. These laws ONLY give CRIMINALS the upper hand.
There are approximately 47 bills regarding gun control between the House and Senate. Rather than fix issues that actually protect and enhance the lives of Virginians, many of these bills seek to disenfranchise and reduce the safety of the citizens in this great Commonwealth. Firearms are so fundamental to the founding and continued existence of our free society that they are listed just second to the freedom of speech in amendments to the constitution. It is plainly clear to all that countries and states who have banned or severely restricted firearms that violence does not end with their banning. Unjust deaths are not prevented. It simply ensures that law abiding citizens are left defenseless from those that wish to harm them, whether that be individuals or an organization. I write this knowing that it will be completely disregarded by the bills authors, but in hopes that others feel galvanized to speak up against unjust actions made in the name of progress. To those who wish to protect themselves with firearms while simultaneously stripping them from the common man, may you take heed of the Virginia state motto.
A lot of these laws contradict one another. I can’t support them. Both of our parties have failed us.
Stop trying to strip 2nd Amendment rights from law abiding citizens with a constitutional right to own and carry firearms. Not a single one of these laws/bills you’re trying to enact would have stopped any of the mass shootings we’ve seen.
I oppose all of these blatantly unconstitutional bills and wish our elected officials would actually get to work on fixing things that matter to Virginians.
It is obvious these elected officials want you to die at the behest of an anarcho tyrannical state where violent perpetual offenders are off with a slap on the wrist, while YOU tax payer are criminalized for not wanting to be a victim to these perpetual perpetrators. The elected officials funded by big Pro-Death lobby of Giffords and Bloomberg sit in their cushy NOVA HOAd mansions behind security while you plebs go to work everyday to pay their salary. These same officials effectively bribe the police state by giving them a way to pay off a mortgage and boat in exchange for your oppression. YOU citizen must morally oppose these pro-Death bills. Democracy has fallen and its only driven by money hungry Babylonians who swim in excess and delicacy while YOU PLEBS cant even afford milk, eggs or pampers. Remember these people do not hold dominion over you. Call your congressman/woman and CHRIST IS KING!
These proposed laws will do nothing but make more victims out of citizens that are exercising their 2nd amendment rights. Criminals do not care about these restrictions, these laws are merely an extension of the culture war. They are meant to punish anyone that the Northern Virginia and big city politicians don’t like. While violent criminals continue to arm themselves, the law abiding citizens of The Commonwealth would be left without defense. These laws are feckless and meant only to virtue signal. One with even a basic understanding of our constitution would see these as exactly what they are: illegal and Un-American.
There is no acceptable reason to infringe upon the Constitutionally-protected (both US and Virginia's Constitutions) rights of Americans and Virginians. None of these bills purported to reduce gun-related violence actually seem to prioritize the reduction of causal effects of overall violence. Many of these are merely attempts to curb the rights of the People to keep and bear arms, because our legislative bodies are full of corrupt, weak, and contemptible individuals. Show us the bills for addressing the root causes of violence: mental health, income inequality, social instability, lack of education and educational opportunities, drug & human trafficking, or employment & wages (this list is not all-inclusive).
Time and time again it has been proven that criminals do not care about or follow restrictive firearm laws. Virginia already has some of the most restrictive firearms laws in the country ("B+" rating from Giffords), more unconstitutional infringements upon law abiding citizens is not the answer. We need to address the root causes (access to mental health resources for example) and not throw bandaids at it by punishing responsible, law abiding, gun owners. I oppose these bills and urge you to do the same.
As a fellow Democrat, it’s important to acknowledge the complexities surrounding gun ownership and the Second Amendment. 1. Self-Defense: Firearms can be a crucial tool for individuals to protect themselves, especially in high-crime areas or situations where law enforcement response times are slow. 2. Sport and Recreation: Many Americans enjoy shooting sports like hunting, skeet shooting, and target practice as a recreational activity, fostering a sense of community and skill-building. 3. Cultural Tradition: Gun ownership is deeply ingrained in American culture, with a rich history of hunting and marksmanship passed down through generations. 4. Economic Impact: The firearms industry contributes significantly to the economy, generating jobs and revenue through manufacturing, sales, and related services. 5. Civil Liberties: Upholding the right to bear arms is fundamental to preserving individual freedoms and safeguarding against government overreach. 6. Empowerment of Marginalized Communities: For historically marginalized groups, owning firearms can serve as a means of empowerment and protection against hate crimes or discriminatory violence. 7. Emergency Preparedness: In times of natural disasters or civil unrest, responsible gun owners can help maintain order and protect their families and communities. 8. Deterrence of Crime: Research suggests that the presence of armed civilians can deter potential criminals and reduce overall crime rates in certain contexts. 9. Veterans and Law Enforcement: Many veterans and law enforcement officers transition to civilian life with a continued appreciation for firearms, utilizing their expertise for civilian defense and security. 10. Balanced Approach: Instead of blanket gun control measures, we can advocate for comprehensive solutions that address root causes of violence, such as mental health support, poverty reduction, and community intervention programs.
I oppose the proposed firearms legislation put forward by this legislature and any legislation that violates the 1st, 2nd, and 4th, amendment rights of any Virginian. The desire for safer communities, a more united nation, and healing for our public health is something that we all can share in but these bills do not achieve that. Rather, they regulate and penalize. They unconstitutionally restrict the rights of the many in the name of safety and serve only to harm our rights. I would be doing a disservice to our state and my fellow citizens if I did not also provide potential solutions or remedies to the violence we face. First, we as communities need to promote voluntary storage facilities for those who are experiencing hardship and are concerned about suicide. Ideally making it easier to put firearms safely out of reach when suicide risks are greater. To do this it would need to be a system at the lowest level with minimum government involvement besides funding and partnership with local ranges. We would also need to reach out to those in our lives who are in a bad place and encourage the use of these facilities. Second, we should promote a culture of safe handling and respect for firearms through school courses and community organizations because assault weapons or not suicide, or accidents only take one bullet from a single action firearm. Lastly and more broadly we should focus on the issues surrounding the violence. Whether it is drugs and organized criminal activity or the mental health crisis as it has become known we should be working to fix these issues first. I.e. legalize weed, adapt police training, and push to root out organized crime, promote common social values and family cohesion, increase freedom, physical activity, and discipline in the school system.
These firearms bill are either redundant or unless in any meaningful way. If you care about reducing violence, please focus on criminals. Please stop trying to disarm families and law abiding citizen from protecting themselves.
I am a liberal through and through, I believe in individual rights and the opportunity for prosperity for all. I vote democrat because I care about my community, the rights of minorities, and women’s rights. The proposed legislation limiting the ability of free, law abiding citizens to purchase firearms, carry, and general use should not be limited further. I have witnessed violence at the hands of criminals, some later caught and it was shown that they did not legally acquire these firearms. The proposed legislation will effectively stop those who abide by the laws of Virginia from being able to properly protect themselves. It is known that police will not protect you, and they have no legal obligation to do so. This puts us at a dilemma, it’s either blindly trust the police to protect us and our families or have the ability to protect ourselves. I am not advocated for looser gun laws by any means, but I am advocating for more common sense gun laws. What do I mean by this you may ask? Well I mean background checks are a must and proper certification to conceal carry. I am a former Marine, I was a firefighter, and am a current student at a great university in our nations capital. I like to think I am reasonable in my thinking, but after looking and reading the propositions I checked above, I can’t help but feel betrayed by my own party. There is more than 5 guns for every American in this country. Gun control must target the people who do not follow the law and try to prevent violence from occurring, and the proposed legislation above does not help in that manner. I am hopeful that you will read this and reconsider the language in the legislation and I am even more hopeful that I can protect my family as necessary. I will always vote for progress but that’s not to say that I will always vote against my interests. Locally, crime has been on the rise and I have had to deal with it directly with little to no help from the police. I will (to the fullest extent of the law) protect myself as necessary from anyone who wishes to inflict harm on myself or family, and I hope you see that the average citizen in Virginia can not afford a security detail or rely on our police for protection. Thank you and have a great day.
Please stop infringing on our god given right, protected by the constitution of the United States (which you all have sworn to uphold and protect), to keep and bear arms. Responsible gun owners are not the problem in America’s gun violence epidemic. We follow the law. Criminals don’t. We use our firearms to protect ourselves, loved ones, and community. Chipping away at this right we have makes us more vulnerable to becoming victims of gun violence, not protect us from it. These laws only serve to empower those with evil intentions. Rather, might I suggest harsher penalties for those who commit senseless acts of violence with firearms instead of going after the good men and women of the commonwealth who wish only to use their firearms for lawful purposes.
Dear House of Delegates, I'm writing to you today as a concerned citizen. The introduction of bills aimed at heavily regulating firearms, is not warranted or wanted by the people of Virginia. Our nation stands at a crossroads, where the desire to address gun violence intersects with the constitutional rights affirmed by the Supreme Court. The Second Amendment's protection of the right to bear arms is not just a legal directive but a reflection of our commitment to individual freedom. In this context, the proposed regulations, while motivated by a commendable desire to reduce violence, raise significant concerns about their effectiveness and the potential consequences for law-abiding citizens. Research, including findings published in the Journal of Quantitative Criminology, suggests that the relationship between strict gun laws and the reduction of gun violence is not as straightforward as one might hope. Cities with stringent gun regulations continue to face challenges with gun-related crimes, indicating that those intent on violence often find ways to circumvent the law. This reality prompts us to question whether new restrictions will achieve their intended goal or merely place additional burdens on those who seek firearms for legitimate purposes, including self-defense. Moreover, the abundance of firearms in the United States presents a logistical challenge to the enforcement of such regulations. With more guns than people in the country, the task of significantly reducing the availability of firearms to criminals, without infringing on the rights of law-abiding citizens, is daunting. It is within this complex landscape that I urge you to consider the broader implications of the proposed gun control measures. The parallels drawn with other contentious issues, such as the regulation of women's healthcare, highlight the potential for policy decisions to inadvertently infringe upon individual freedoms and deepen societal divisions. Such outcomes not only detract from the intended goals of enhancing public safety but also risk alienating segments of the population whose support is essential for the advancement of our collective well-being. I respectfully ask that you consider the potential consequences of the proposed gun control measures, not just for the immediate future but for the legacy we leave for generations to come. It is my hope that, together, we can find a way to address the challenges of gun violence in a manner that honors our values, respects our freedoms, and genuinely enhances the safety and well-being of our communities.
STOP INFRINGING OUR RIGHTS. Get rid of every single gun control bill that is here and START ENFORCING THE LAWS WE ALREADY HAVE. Stop trying to turn law abiding citizens into criminals. I am disgusted that all of these nonsense bills have even made it this far. You can have these laws in Northern Virginia where everyone hates guns but don’t force this garbage into the rest of the state. GET RID OF ALL OF THIS GARBAGE and keep your noses out of everyone’s business. More government is not the answer.
Please stop attempting to infringe on my 2nd amendment rights. Responsible gun owners are not behind any gun violence. Maybe focus on bills that will actually keep guns out of the hands of those that should not have them rather than stripping the rights away of law-abiding citizens. Not a single one of those bills will stop criminals from breaking the law, all they will do is prevent me from being able to effectively defend myself and my family against said criminal.
Virginia already has some of the strictest gun laws in the nation. We can all agree violence is an issue but making more unconstitutional, on a national and state level, gun laws will not help with the rates of violent crimes and property crimes as we see from states with stricter gun laws. We need to increase access to mental health and community resources to address the root causes of issues rather than criminalizing responsible gun owners. I am opposed to this attack on the second amendment which is the fundamental backbone that protects the other freedoms guranteed in the constitution.
The second amendment is very clear in its intent that these rights “shall not be infringed”. Removing/ restricting law abiding citizens right to self defense and protection against unwitting organizations and persons is not only more harmful, but a clear violation of the rights this country was founded on.
Dear Honorable Members of the House of Delegates, I write to you today as a concerned citizen, deeply invested in the well-being and safety of our communities, and as someone who values the principles upon which our nation was founded. The issue at hand, the introduction of bills aimed at heavily regulating firearms, is one that I believe warrants a thoughtful reconsideration in light of its broader implications. Our nation stands at a crossroads, where the desire to address gun violence intersects with the constitutional rights affirmed by the Supreme Court. The Second Amendment's protection of the right to bear arms is not just a legal directive but a reflection of our commitment to individual freedom. In this context, the proposed regulations, while motivated by a commendable desire to reduce violence, raise significant concerns about their effectiveness and the potential consequences for law-abiding citizens. Research, including findings published in the Journal of Quantitative Criminology, suggests that the relationship between strict gun laws and the reduction of gun violence is not as straightforward as one might hope. Cities with stringent gun regulations continue to face challenges with gun-related crimes, indicating that those intent on violence often find ways to circumvent the law. This reality prompts us to question whether new restrictions will achieve their intended goal or merely place additional burdens on those who seek firearms for legitimate purposes, including self-defense. Moreover, the abundance of firearms in the United States presents a logistical challenge to the enforcement of such regulations. With more guns than people in the country, the task of significantly reducing the availability of firearms to criminals, without infringing on the rights of law-abiding citizens, is daunting. It is within this complex landscape that I urge you to consider the broader implications of the proposed gun control measures. The parallels drawn with other contentious issues, such as the regulation of women's healthcare, highlight the potential for policy decisions to inadvertently infringe upon individual freedoms and deepen societal divisions. Such outcomes not only detract from the intended goals of enhancing public safety but also ***risk alienating segments of the population whose support is essential for the advancement of our collective well-being.*** Constituents see this robust effort to "see what sticks" as a weakness within our party. Comparatively imbalanced with the diverse range of issues and concerns that we face everyday. A waste. As we move forward, I encourage you to approach this issue with a balanced perspective, one that recognizes the need for effective strategies to combat gun violence while also safeguarding the constitutional rights and freedoms that define our nation. The path to meaningful change is complex, requiring a nuanced understanding of the issues at hand and a commitment to policies that truly serve the best interests of all our citizens. In closing, I respectfully ask that you consider the potential consequences of the proposed gun control measures, not just for the immediate future but for the legacy we leave for generations to come. It is my hope that, together, we can find a way to address the challenges of gun violence in a manner that honors our values, respects our freedoms, and genuinely enhances the safety and well-being of our communities.
You guys need to stop attacking our 2nd amendment and get help for these kids growing up with identity crisis’s . You coming after law abiding citizens is appalling and the fact that your leaning towards becoming the despicable state of California is saddening. If the president can have security which uses firearms that even the normal civilian can’t have this raises the issue of how can a civilian defend against a tyrannical government with a featureless 10 round ar-15 ? Keep this up and we know exactly what your end goal is.
As a left leaning voter and citizen of Virginia, these new restrictions on our right to bear arms are sickening. Stop proposing so many bans and limits, and maybe a realistic bill, like the safe credit, won’t be universally protested. If you actually want to quell gun violence, keep focused on affordable mental and physical healthcare, improving the education system, and reducing income inequality. While the right may not support these real improvements, I cannot in good faith support or vote for any politician who supports banning or restricting the rights of law abiding citizens in our beautiful commonwealth. Thank you.
The 2nd amendment states "shall not be infringed". All of these bills are infringement and are therefore unconstitutional. Should we pass laws that people must pass a test before they can have freedom of speech? What about pass a test before you can vote? What about if someone does not have training they will be slaves again? Name one other right outlined in the constitution where a citizen has to jump through hoops before they can use that right? I oppose all of these bills as they will do more harm than good. I can understand wanting to keep people safe but gun control does the opposite. These bills will only make it harder for law abiding citizens to exercise their rights while criminals will still ignore the law. Criminals will still get illegal guns or weapons and will commit more crimes since they know the public is unable to defend themselves. Benjamin Franklin once said: "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." You writing bills saying "give up your rights and guns and we will protect you". Well ask the Native Americans how that worked out for them. Ask a Jewish person who was under Nazi control how that worked out for them. Well Hitler's first step was to take away the guns from the public so they could not protect themselves and over 6 million people lost their lives. Since you do not know history you are writing bills which will doom us to repeat it. You know 75 years ago when you could just buy a gun in a catalog and it was shipped to your house we did not have this issue. In the 60s and 70s when people would have a gun in their truck at school or take one in for show and tell we did not have a gun issue. This is a mental health issue. Deal with mental health and you will fix the public safety issue. Zero of my guns have killed people because guns do not kill people. People kill people. Look at Ukraine and Israel for just one form of example why we need LESS gun control. All of these gun laws are unconstitutional and should be thrown out. Do the right thing and let us law abiding citizens have their rights as outlined in the constitution. Do not pass laws which infringe on our rights. If the 2nd amendment falls, the 1st will follow . When the 1st and 2nd fall the 13th will fall and our country will be lost and we will be back in chains.
I am very opposed to the vast majority of these bills. I am a legal gun owner with my CHP. Many of these bills heavily restrict my right to bear arms in a legal capacity. I don’t understand why I should be punished for doing everything legally and correctly only to become a felon in the coming months through these legislations
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Whether or not a person chooses to exercise this right is up to them. Otherwise, it shall not be infringed.
I can not, and nobody should, support these unconstitutional laws. THROW THEM ALL OUT.
You guys make it harder and harder to vote Democrat every single cycle. Complete ban on Semi Automatics more or less making the state even stricter towards guns then states like Maryland? I oppose all these even the "herp common sense derp" ones because the states party has made it clear they don't give a crap about anything but putting hollow wins for politicians because hhheeeyyy punishing law abiding gun owners is a whole lot easier then creating jobs or reducing crime. If these bills die before getting to the governors desk, especially the bans, then I will gladly continue to vote DNC. But if Youngkin has to veto these and you make me say something I never thought I would "Thank god Youngkin won" then I look forward to blindly going down the ticket in 2024 and checking "R" on everyone. Thank you for taking the time to read this.
I do not support more legislation infringing on my 2nd Ammendment rights. Please fund more enforcement for the proactive enforcement of existing laws and regulations pertaining to firearms.
I oppose this legislation.
First off, knives are a basic tool with myriad uses and have been around since ancient history. Any limitation on them is so insulting, and insane. We are not children. It is infuriating that money was spent to even write that down. The fact that I would need a right to carry a knife spelled out is not something our forefathers could have possibly anticipated, since it’s a simple tool. A screwdriver is exactly as deadly as any knife. I would know, I’ve been an ICU nurse for nearly a decade and I have seen people stabbed with both. Matter of fact, a hammer would be a superior concealed weapon with more lethality than either. Second, many of these new gun laws make sense. Many of them do not. I do not want stalkers, domestic abusers, or drug dealers buying guns. A waiting period and proficiency training is fine, although I believe it to be unconstitutional I would comply. However it appears we are going to make it illegal to purchase specific parts for guns, to build your own serialized and registered firearm, and to concealed carry in many public spaces. I also see a poorly defined and overly restrictive “assault weapons” ban. The most insane is the ban on parents having firearms in the home at all. That is unacceptable. The latter group of laws are an infringement based on the opinions of the woefully uninformed. I should not lose my right to responsible ownership, maintenance and concealed carry with a permit due to the lobbying of a group that has failed to due the due diligence to learn about the rights they wish to throw away for all of us. I have a concealed carry permit. It has saved my life of nearly saved my life multiple times. The police can be great, but they are minutes away when seconds count. For instance, as I was leaving a restaurant in the city I was targeted by 2 men with illegal guns. I did not know them, we had never interacted, but suddenly there was a gun pointing at me from a car circling around me in the parking lot. Without escape available, I drew my pistol in response. The car stopped circling and left, giving me time to alert law enforcement before there were any holes in me. If I come face to face with a mass shooter, as so many do, I prefer to be armed. The organization of mothers pushing for these laws can define the law of their household. But not mine. Learn from the past for gods sake. We do not need and will eventually not accept increasing restrictions and price hikes allowing only the wealthy and connected to be armed. Governor, I ask that you veto these laws which only restrict law abiding citizens. You are the person elected in part because you are the option on the ballot who would not let this stand. So don’t. To those in support of these laws: every right you surrender is one you can never recover without 10 times the struggle it took to get to the place where you were able to throw it away. Learning from your mistakes is not viable when you codify them into law. You are making several mistakes. You can’t restrict and underfund the police department and make personal defense harder at the same time. That is advantageous to no one. It is not how things work in this world where evil people exist, no matter how deep in the sand your head is. And the next time you’re grunting and sweating, tearing a box open like a fucking caveman you might want to try a knife before adding more legislation An armed society is a polite society, let’s keep it that way.
The litany of gun control measures under consideration will do nothing to effectively reduce crime and violence, and will only further restrict the rights of law abiding firearms owners. Not to mention the countless examples from other locales across the country where these same measure have been put into place and the result is more violent crime as criminals can now feel safe that the general population is not armed. Strongly oppose all proposed bills.
The ridiculous litany of gun control measures under consideration will do nothing to effectively reduce crime and violence, and will only further restrict the rights of law abiding firearms owners.
We dont need MORE laws regarding firearms, we need to enforce the laws that are already on the books. If enforcement is done then these laws are redundant and not necessary. Don't pass more laws just for the sake of passing laws. They do nothing but make law abiding citizens confused and they dont do anything to stop problems.
I am writing to express my great concern, to the legislatures that continue to ignore their oath of swearing to protect and uphold the rights of the citizens as protected by the United States Constitution and the Virginian Constitution. "The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED". You beaurcrats do not grant that right to he people, it is God given. While you grandstand and ateemlt to make laws to hurt the everydayaw abiding American citizen, you turn a way and do nothing in these bills to punish criminals committing crimes. It is already illegal to murder people. To grandstand and think that any of these bills would stop someone from murdering or harming another person is laughable. Quite literally. You pander screaming about these firearm safety bills while you walk around with security and people with "guns" to keep you safe. Start enforcing the existing laws against criminals who commit crimes vs trying to turn law abiding people, who take training, are serious about protection of family, themselves and others, and trying to disarm them and make them criminals. Or we will vote you out! Uphold your Oath or be prepared for the consequences your actions lead to by the American people. Regards Mr. Harris
I know most modern politicians aren’t historians but the Bill of Rights is really simple. If you read that, you’ll also read the 2nd Amendment which is really simple as well. In the same docket you’re trying to give more benefits to police and take away more rights from citizens. You ought to be ashamed. What a farce freedom is anymore.
These anti gun laws are an infringement on all Virginian's 2A rights.
I am opposed to additional new laws or further regulations placed on firearms or other means of self defense, or which limit the ability to conduct commerce or carry such items. Not only does the constitution make it clear this is a violation of my rights, it does nothing to address or reduce the actions of criminals.
I am against all of these blatantly unconstitutional firearms restrictions. I'm strongly against: SB2| Deeds | Assault firearms certain ammunition, etc.; purchase, possession, sale, transfer, etc., prohibited. This tries to ban things that are in common use, which has never worked well for the government, remember Prohibition? Remember the war on drugs? Just like the last assault weapons ban, this will literally just make AR-15s more popular and easier to get illegally. And I am against: HB585 | Mundon King | Home-based firearms dealers; prohibited near schools, penalties. That specifically targets home-based FFLs whose house is somewhere near a school. This would put hundreds of Virginia residents out of business just because of where they live.
All infringements on the second amendment are acts of treason and should be treated as such. Acting in favor of such infringements makes you a traitor to this nation and th commonwealth.
All Virginians want our families to be safe from gun violence. However, passing such broad restrictions on firearms commonly used for self defense is not the answer. The updated definition of assault weapons and the associated prohibitions do little to nothing to stop criminals who are willing to illegally buy or steal firearms. There are plenty of firearms out there for criminals to access, with well over 400 million guns in civilian ownership in the United States. It is too late to round them all up. These bills will disproportionately affect those citizens who go out of their way to follow our commonwealth's laws; the people who are unlikely to commit a violent crime in the first place. The solutions to gun violence that stand a chance at working are community-oriented interventions that decrease poverty, drug use, gang activity, combat mental illness, and advocate for the safe storage of firearms. Sociologists know these factors correlate strongly with ALL types of violence. On average, two-thirds of firearms deaths are suicides, an assault weapons ban won't do a thing about those. Of the remaining 1/3 of firearms homicides, more than half are drug, gang, or domestic violence related. Let's pass bipartisan legislation that addresses these underlying problems, instead of preventing average Virginians from protecting themselves with firearms that are already ubiquitous.
I am Opposed to any limitations on the Second Amendment and any restrictive firearm laws. We have adequate, if not already overbearing, laws on the books now and should not be creating more laws restricting all the aspects of firearm use, sales, and any other aspects of the right to bear arms.
These firearm laws are mostly reactionary to the media response on firearms. This is a major infringement on the 2nd amendment and needs to be stopped.
An inordinate focus on the control of firearms only serves to infringe the rights of the law-abiding citizen in defense of his life and property. The State should instead focus on the apprehension and incarceration of individuals engaging in criminal behavior and associated misuse of firearms.
Any law that infringes on my Gods-given right to own and bear arms is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Any law passed that infringes this right will be answered with a lawsuit.
Hello. There are a plethora of bills that were proposed, which would clearly violate the second amendment rights of many law abiding citizens. First of all, considering concealed carry should be permit-less carry, it is counterproductive to increase the requirements for concealed carry. Restrictions on where law abiding citizens can lawfully carry their now “permitted” firearms is asinine, as well as the proposition of a bill that would make it a penalty to leave a firearm in your car. You would essentially be disarming a large number of people who wish to follow these unlawful order in a day and age where the democratic agenda is to act like there are mass shootings on a daily basis. Effectively disarming the majority and increasing the requirements and legal loopholes to carry is such a vulnerable state to be in and I hope we’re smart enough to avoid that. Restrictions on “Plastic firearms and unfinished frames etc” is not only terrible literature that does nothing to explain, but it is a direct violation of the 2nd amendment considering you have a federal right to make firearms for personal use, which would include additively manufactured parts. Wait periods are also a horrifying thing to think of, considering how many times it has been proven to be a terrible idea, keeping guns out of the hands that need them most to protect themselves and their families. “Assault firearms” and anything to do with them is nonsense considering the blatant inability to define said “assault weapon”. People who don’t understand guns, shouldn’t be making laws on guns. A shorter barrel does not make it more lethal, in fact it lowers the muzzle velocity, causing less force on impact and penetration, in turn causing less collateral damage. Any sort of “assault weapons” bills are targeting law abiding citizens who have every right to use the modern advances in firearm technology just as police officers and military. The only people these bills are effecting are the already law abiding citizens. The criminals who got their hands on said weapons illegally aren’t going to be making sure that their ALREADY ILLEGAL WEAPONS are fully compliant with state laws and regulations before they go commit another crime. In no way shape or form should someone need to disadvantage themselves in a life or death situation because political members with an armed security detail don’t feel the need for a gun. Why would I want to limit myself to a firearm that is going to be inadequate in home defense, or one that does not have a high enough capacity to protect myself from the ever growing threat of home invasion and the increased trend of multiple home invaders breaking in armed. If it was you alone in your house with 6 armed intruders who most definitely must have checked their local laws and firearm regulations and made sure their firearms aren’t violating any rules before they break into your house, would you want to limit yourself to a low capacity firearm that is going to be extremely difficult to use effectively in a high stress situation, or are you taking a rifle which for reasons that don’t make sense, must have a 16 inch barrel, with a larger capacity magazine, and a stock that you can use to safely brace the firearm to prevent stray shots and provide more accurate fire. Personally I’m going to take anything and everything I can get in a situation that means life or death for me and my loved ones EVERY SINGLE DAY OF THE WEEK. Focus on the mental health crisis.
These laws are mostly going to effect law abiding citizens like myself and all the people I know. WHEN HAVE CRIMINALS FOLLOWED LAWS??? The only thing these criminals that commit gun related offenses is some kind of force of action. Why are you going to try to take our 2nd Amendment Rights away from people who follow the laws and love our great country? We should be focusing on increasing penalties against those who commit the crimes. Stop focusing on the law abiding citizens and focus on the criminals that are terrorizing all of our towns. Our government is letting millions and millions of unknown people in our country without having a clue what kind of person they are. I'm sure most are good people like you and me but not all of them are. We need our guns to be able to protect ourselves, our families, our neighbors, and our country if needed. Our founding fathers have it right and put a lot of thoughts into our constitution and bill of rights. I thought Democrats were about equality and the working man/woman. If you all want good for us law abiding citizens, work together, make compromises, and start doing your duty. We do not need more "big government" taking more rights. What we need is a closed border so we can fight this drug crisis. Slow the flow of drugs and these gangs fall apart. Once they fall apart maybe these shootings would slow down. Please do the right thing and do not sign these gun bills. All this woke crap is ruining our country. Y'all need to please make changes and focus on what's going to help all of us not just the minority.
Gun laws do not prevent firearm homicides, based upon gun control organization's own data (Giffords) •No correlation between strict gun laws and firearm homicide incidents •.07 coefficient of determination (AKA R2) where .90 is a strong association •There likely would be a weak association showing gun laws driving the firearm homicide rate higher if Washington, DC was given a score and ranked by Giffords.
Hello, The right to own and bear firearms is intrinsic in the very nature of the founding of the United States. We must remember the spirit of the 2nd Amendment and the right of all civilians to own and bear arms. Firearms are the great equalizer and can allow and individual to defend themselves when they previously could not. Gun violence and the mental health epidemic are closely interlinked and one cannot pass restrictive firearm laws and expect gun violence to go away. Gun bans and the use of restrictive purchasing requirements, magazine limits, waiting periods, and red flag laws have been shown not to be effective in stemming gun violence. I urge anybody reading this message to say "NO" to 2nd Amendment restrictions.
I strongly, along with many fellow Virginians oppose any villainous disarmament bills disguised as "public safety". The second amendment clearly states "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" and out of touch elitist politicians who enjoy the luxury of armed security are choosing to ignore the constitution and force us to rely on sub-par police protection. The same people who want to defund the police want to disarm us. Embracing the second amendment is what is keeping our crime rates low compared to New York and California. We have seen the blatant disregard that criminals have for these so-called laws; emboldened criminals who are not afraid of the consequences and innocent law-abiding people who are forced to live in fear because a bunch of tyrants are letting power corrupt them. I do not want to live in fear and neither do the rest of us. In addition; a lot of counties and cities have declared themselves as second amendment sanctuaries to protect the rights of free individuals from the overreach of tyrannical politicians. These bills are a Trojan horse that will lead to more crime. You anti-gun politicians should be ashamed of yourselves; give up your private security and train yourselves. Then you will change your minds; because in the end, nobody is coming to save you. I would rather have a fighting chance against armed assailants than die waiting for help to arrive. These bills are pure evil
These all seem like infringements that will do nothing to curb any crime. Further they will only create criminals out of everyday law abiding folk. These are laws that seem to be targeting victimless crimes.
I oppose all of these selected bills since I firmly believe they are in conflict with the Second Amendment of the US Constitution. The Second Amendment clearly states that it shall not be infringed upon. Any and all proposed legislation that would place limits on how, where, and when responsible citizens arm themselves runs afoul of that. Our founding fathers correctly held the belief that all people have a natural born right to arm and protect themselves and that the government has no authority to interfere with that. While I agree with the sentiment of reducing violence among our society, gun laws only harm the law abiding citizen and leave criminals who already have a disregard for the law to still be armed. If our elected officials who proposed these bills actually cared about addressing our violence problem, they would focus more on addressing the root causes of violence and crime. More worthwhile pursuits in my opinion would be focused on addressing socio-economic problems that plague disadvantaged communities, creating a more robust and well-equipped mental healthcare system, and overhauling our educational systems to setup our children for better success in life. Thank you all for your time.
I'm against any unconstitutional law, and any law that strips Americans of their rights. These laws are an attack on the 2nd ammendment and hold NO facts in stopping crime. They are a punishment on law abiding people and in no way will make virginia a safer place.
I oppose all these unconstitutional, dangerous, and pointless laws.
I oppose all useless firearm changes. Criminals will not obey
HB113 | Sullivan | Handguns; possession, purchase, or transportation by persons convicted of certain drug offenses. HB1174 | Sickles | Assault firearms; age requirement for purchase, penalty. HB1195 | Hayes | Firearms; waiting period for purchases, penalty. HB12 | Jones | Handguns; firearm locking device required for sale or transfer, child safety warning required. HB1235 | Zehr | Concealed handguns; protective orders. HB1424 | Hope | Firearms; valid permit to purchase, penalties. HB1462 | Laufer | Firearm in unattended motor vehicle; civil penalty. HB158 | McClure | Firearm locking device; required for sale or transfer of firearm. HB16 | Garrett | Firearm or explosive material; carrying within Capitol Square and the surrounding area, etc. HB173 | Simon | Plastic firearms and unfinished frames, etc.; manufacture, import, etc. prohibited, penalties. HB175 | Simon | Assault firearms; carrying in public areas prohibited, penalty. HB183 | Simon | Firearms; storage in residence where minor or person prohibited from possessing is present, penalty. HB2 | Helmer | Assault firearms & certain ammunition, etc.; purchase, sales, transfers, etc., prohibited. HB22 | Jones | Auto sears; definition, prohibition on manufacture, importation, sale, etc., penalty. HB270 | Reid | Commonwealth Comprehensive Gun Safety Program; established, etc. HB319 | Helmer | Firearms instructors & safety prog.; removes reference to NRA & U.S. Concealed Carry Assoc. in Code. HB35 | Clark | Firearm safety device; expands definition of device. HB351 | Clark | Firearm; locking device required for purchase, households where minor resides, penalty. HB362 | McClure | Firearms; purchase, etc., following an assault and battery against an intimate or dating partner. HB454 | Callsen | Firearm/explosive material; carrying w/in Capitol Square or bldg. owned or leased by Commonwealth. HB46 | Bennett-Parker | Firearm; transfers to another person from a prohibited person. HB466 | Helmer | Concealed handgun permits; reciprocity with other states. HB791 | Henson | Pneumatic guns; Class 6 felony to possess. HB797 | Hope | Concealed handguns; demonstrated competence for a permit, firearms instructors and safety programs. HB798 | Hope | Firearms; purchase, possession, etc., following an assault and battery or stalking violation. HB799 | Hope | Concealed handgun permit applications; fingerprints required by local governments. HB861 | Hernandez | Weapons; carrying into hospital that provides mental health services. HB945 | Lopez | Firearm safety device; expands definition of device. SB100 | Ebbin | Plastic firearms and unfinished frames, etc.; manufacture, import, etc. prohibited, penalties. SB2 | Deeds | Assault firearms & certain ammunition, etc.; purchase, possession, sale, transfer, etc., prohibited. SB210 | Perry | Auto sears; prohibition on manufacture, importation, sale, etc., penalty. SB273 | Subramanyam | Firearms; waiting period for purchases, penalty. I oppose all these bills.
I oppose this bill as it seeks to infringe on the Consitutionally proctected rights of lawabiding citizens to protect themselves from criminals, criminals who do not follow the law. This bill makes it harder for someone to keep themselves safe and is primarily a solution in search of problems to fix. Virginia has one of the lowest crime rates in the country and even less gun related crimes being committed year over year. This is not due to gun control laws, in fact as gun control laws increase, s o does the rate of violent crimes. Criminals are not afraid of police, they are afraid of armed citizens. The subject of this bill has already been defeated in courts, passing this into law will only subject the Commonwealth to more lawsuits to have it repealed costing us more in taxes. Enough of our taxpayers money has been wasted in politicians attempting to pass "feel good" bills to try and prove they are doing their job. I urge the legistature to focus on enforcing and imposing stricter penalties for those that break our exsiting laws over creating new laws that only serve to pe nalize the law abiding citizens.
I was born in Henrico county and vote in every election. Guns are currently the #1 killer of our children under the age of 18. I am writing to show my support for these bills because gun violence prevention is my top priority. Please support gun safety legislation that is brought up for a vote! Thank you so much for your time.
My name is Laura Sledge and I am your constituent. Guns are currently the #1 killer of our children under the age of 18, and gun violence prevention is my top priority. Please support gun safety legislation that is brought up for a vote. Here are the bills I support. Thank you for your time.
Please support HB 318, HB319, HB351, HB362, HB585, HB602, HB637, HB791, HB797, HB798, HB798, HB799, HB 861, HB16, HB45 Let's keep our children and other innocent bystanders safe!
Hello, My name is Hayley Redmond Cilley. Guns are currently the #1 killer of our children under age 18, and I am calling because gun violence prevention is my top priority. Please support gun safety legislation that is brought up for a vote! We need safer communities for all, but especially for our children.
Dear Sir or Madame. Last year in Newport News I was assaulted by a 27 year old black man from Chesapeake because of his road rage.. This was at my local bank 11;30 in the morning. This young man almost lost his life at my hand because you cannot reel in your problem young men. His words feet from me were ' im going to kick your ass and then kill you'. My pistol changed his mind. I saw for myself the woke judges and a woke system that perpetuates the problem. The criminal justice system has been flung far far left which IS causing a public safety hazzard. No new gun control is needed. More jail time for the trash that i dealt with is. My Congressman Bobby Scott and Delegate Cia Price do not represent me.
I am a member of VA Moms For Change, a gun violence prevention group and I support these bills
When Democrats violate the Covenant between the PEOPLE and the US Constitution as well as the VA Constitution they are acting lawlessly and undermining the commitment toward good Government agreed on for over 200 + years. Seems Democrats didn't learn anything from the Civil war. The mentality of the "Tyrant" and the "Slave Holder" still exists among the Demo-rat Party, removing statues and trying to hide and rewrite history is not good government. Oaths, integrity, and Good Government, mean nothing to this Cabal of Evil minded men and women. We the PEOPLE need and demand good government not a patch work or illegal laws we are expected to "obey" while the "perps" that pass them have no consequence for breaking Constitutional law or good Government. The Demo-rat Party needs to be dismantled and the "ignorant" ejected from the Virginia legislature at once and for all. Peter Buckingham Crozet, VA 22932
OPPOSITION to HB12 - Jones OPPOSITION to HB23 - Laufer OPPOSITION to HB158 - McClure OPPOSITION to HB183 - Simon SUPPORT of HB289 - Wiley OPPOSITION to HB351 - Clark OPPOSITION to HB585 – Mundon King SUPPORT of HB756 - Walker OPPOSITION to HB791 - Henson OPPOSITION to HB861 - Hernandez SUPPORT of HB872 - Earley SUPPORT of HB1141 - Cordoza OPPOSITION to HB1174 - Sickles SUPPORT of HB1198 - Scott
I am writing in support of HB 12, 23, 158, 183, 351, 585, 791 and 861. I also write in opposition to HB 289, 756, 872, 1141 and 1198. There is ample evidence that minimal restrictions on firearms has resulted in countless deaths and injuries. Sensible restrictions on access to lethal weapons are sorely needed at this time. In fact, the Supreme Court, in deciding on the right to bear arms, has also stated that “Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited. [It is] not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.” If, unfortunately, assault-style weapons continue to be manufactured and owned, their access must be limited by age. In that case I would support HB 1174. Thank you for your attention to these comments.
I am a member of the Charlottesville Coalition for Gun Violence Prevention and the Charlottesville Center for Peace and Justice. I support all the gun safety bills: 12 23 158 183 351 585 791 861 1141 1174 I oppose these bills: 289 756 872 1198
On behalf of the League of Women Voters of Virginia, please support HB351. Thank you
Please stop wasting your time and my money on bills that have proven to be have zero impact on public safety, Please refer to Maryland, California, and the other states that already have these laws
Good afternoon, I am writing to implore you to STOP with all of the gun control bills. You are punishing law abiding citizens, who now have their RIGHTS THAT SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED, infringed. And the criminals who do NOT follow these laws but who they are directed at, are not affected. Please enforce ALL of the laws that are presently in the books and prosecute those people breaking the laws and stop letting them out on bail and bond through the Soros DA’s.
In reference to all of the above proposed house bills…. In short there is NO need for any more restrictions of any type on the purchase (to include locations of ffls in reference to schools and forcing purchasers to buy locks when they already safely store their firearms), carry, storage, and use of any type of firearms. It is extremely clear that more restrictions do not do anything to stem the flow of violent crimes which may or may not involve firearms (using DC, Chicago, NYC etc as examples, where very strict firearms laws have done nothing to lower violent crime). Instead, we need to focus on allowing law enforcement to aggressively enforce the numerous existing laws, demand commonwealth attorneys offices hold criminals responsible and ensure long prison sentences on offenders. As a citizen of the commonwealth for my entire life, and a local law enforcement officer for over 2 decades I can tell you from personal experience simply adding restrictions and more laws is worthless and simply slows down the system. As they say when seconds count, the police are only minutes away…. Do not place any more restrictions on residents of the commonwealth who are forced to live in increasingly dangerous localities due to the legal changes of the past 5 years, which allow offenders to go unpunished or under punished. Simply because you do not like firearms does not mean that others should not have lessened access to purchase, use, and carry the firearms of their choice. Thank you for your consideration
I would like for the Commonwealth of Virginia to have Constitutional Carry as the law of the entire state , our right as stated in the constitution of the united states and the constitution of the Commonwealth of virginia as written by our founders gives each citizen the right to keep and bear arms with no exclusions, to be secure in their persons, unless that right has been forfeited,. Exercising this right should never lead to forfeiture of this right.
I would like for the Commonwealth of Virginia to have Constitutional Carry as the law of the entire state , our right as stated in the constitution of the united states and the constitution of the Commonwealth of virginia as written by our founders gives each citizen the right to keep and bear arms with no exclusions, to be secure in their persons, unless that right has been forfeited,. Exercising this right should never lead to forfeiture of this right.
This is absolutely egregious. A home-based FFL is an enterprise that is cleared at a higher level of proficiency and familiarity with firearms issues than any authority VA - the FFL holders are cleared and backed by the ATF. Further, an FFL, home-based or otherwise, is an enterprise in the business of safe transfer of weapons to individuals after doing criminal checks on the prospective buyer. The location near a school is irrelevant - it does not constitute a threat to a school simply because an FFL is nearby. This is a bad faith argument, and false equivalence. It’s a thin veneer. Simply put, it’s been proposed by people who do not like private ownership of firearms, and schools were picked because (deceptively) because they are evenly districted and spread through the state - after all, they’re supposed to be, to allow children access to education without having to travel unreasonably far. This also means that selecting schools as the criteria for a “no home FFL bubble” means you effectively throw a blanket over the industry. This has nothing to do with the safety of children. I find this frankly offensive and dishonest. Show me evidence where an FFL near a school has caused a problem? More than that, show me a single instance where the location was any sort of relevant. You cannot. Because it’s not true. It’s false equivalence. Let me be clear. I am a liberal person. But part of being liberal means remembering that fear mongering and bad faith, secretive agendas hurt progress. They turn people against it. Drop this frivolous nonsense. Stop making us look like idiots, please. Your crusade against portions of the bill of rights (because come on folks, we know what it is, it’s misguided) opens up very dangerous precedents for other bad faith actors to whittle down the contents of the other amendments. Read a history book. Please.
Constitutional issues when made political do no justice to representatives or their constituents. Dishonesty to the public erodes any ability for trust and assumptions based on party affiliation close down civil discussion. Some representatives run for office for gun control matters and get voted in but are you being honest with your constituents. I can quote statistics as could those supporting gun control but there are logical truths being ignored. We should change our terminology from gun control, to gun control over law biding citizens because each law that is passed in most situation only further restricts law biding citizens. Most gun laws only increase the ability to become a victim to criminal actions because in order to abide by laws implemented it puts the citizen at a considerable disadvantage . Gun free zones only mean unarmed citizens open to criminal behavior due to the inability to defend one's self. Law enforcement only enforce the laws, and cannot be there to prevent the actual crimes in most situations. Criminals intent on malfeasance will not abide by any laws put in place but exploit any such laws that allow for an advantage against an unarmed individual. This is not to say that I am apposed to back ground checks even at gun shows to avoid loop holes as I support such measures but to restrict carrying at locations or gun free zones only makes for sitting ducks. Restricting common circulation of rifles or any similar type to the AR-15 platform again only further limits the citizen from criminals AND tyrannical infrastructures within the state and federal levels. We can never assume that our representatives are in power for support of the people and our constitution I am not in support of any of the current gun control bills, I am in support of all the pro gun bills. In light of whatever is voted into law ,if it further restricts my constitutional rights and civil rights I simply cannot and will not comply. Thank you for your time on this matter.
As a fellow resident of Virginia, I urge you to OPPOSE the multiple anti-gun bills being heard today (1/25/24) in the House Public Safety Subcommittee on Firearms, including: HB 12 HB 158 HB 183 HB 351 HB 23 HB 861 HB 585 HB 1174 Please focus more on protecting lawful gun owners and enforcing the laws that career criminals routinely disregard. Thank you.
Dear Delegates of the House Public Safety- Firearms subcommittee, The selected bills are flagrantly and utterly unconstitutional and they stand as a direct violation on the sovereignty and liberties of the citizenry of the Commonwealth. Plainly stated they violate the United States Constitution ( the Supreme Law of the Land) and the God given rights of the people which the Commonwealth purports to “protect”. Such legislation is also preposterous factually as firearms are not the “problem” , they are merely tools and as such they are inert objects that are incapable of exerting will without an evil individual wielding them for malevolent purposes. Criminality is the problem , as criminals do not have any regard for the law or the well being of their fellow man, hence the definition of criminal. Therefore all of the selected legislation put hence forth only seeks to disarm law abiding citizens, those that are neither inclined nor committed to violating the law. Law abiding citizens possess firearms to defend our lives, the lives of our families, and to ensure that our sovereignty and liberty is not stripped away from us by tyrannical Marxist ideologues masquerading as “compassionate” and “caring” legislators. This is not Washington, Illinois, or even Maryland, this is the great Commonwealth of Virginia. That Virginia which led the American revolution under George Washington and in the defense of liberty against the tyrannical crown of England that once sought to oppress and yoke the citizens of the American colonies. The motto that adorns the seal of Virginia and our great state flag is “Sic Semper Tyrannis”, which means “Death to Tyrants”. Such a motto is more apropos in the tumultuous political climate of modernity than ever before, perhaps even more so than during the revolution in which it was founded. Being elected to represent the people does not confer upon any individual the power to strip the people of their inalienable rights, those rights that were enshrined by our great founders in the Constitution. To violate the United States Constitution in an effort to subjugate the people of the republic is by definition treason. The citizenry of the Commonwealth has spoken, we demand that you cease attempting to violate the rights of the people and do the actual job that you were elected to do . If such malevolently contrived shibboleth manages to pass out of the House of Delegates and Senate without veto from Governor Youngkin we will not abide by, adhere to, or sanction unconstitutional mandates in any way. Mass noncompliance will be the response to such attempts to strip the people of their Liberty. Thank you for your attention and your time, vote no to this abhorrent legislation. L.S. McClung RN, PMH-BC, CARN
I'm a law abiding citizen, retired law enforcement officer, and responding Public Safety 1st Responder Chaplain. I have been called out, responding to or serving at a number of violent acts, anf times, often in dangerous areas. I believe in these violent times, and knowing that criminals don't and won't obey the laws, that I have a need and right to be able to defend and protect myself, and be able to continue carrying, as I have for many years. Our drivers permit is for all 50 states, and we don't have to stop at a state border. I believe a concealed carry permit should be the same, recognized in all 50 states. To have to leave my firearm inside my car, to go into a public building or rest area on the highway, can put me in needless danger. If I have to take off a d put my firearm in my trunk, it let's a criminal see where it is and I don't have it. That can let them steal the firearm and/or harm me. Please allow our law abiding citizens use their 2nd Amendment Right To Keep and Bear (bear = to carry) arms. We need to fully prosecuted existing gun laws snd crimes, Not Add More Gun Controls that criminals won't obey any way. Murder has been against the law for centuries, but increasingly still going on, sometimes unpunished.
Please keep your gun grabbing hands off legally owned guns.Why not enforce the laws already on the books. Tell D.A. To do their jobs, go after the illegal guns. It is not legal guns that is the problem, it is the illegal guns. If more people carried legally crime could go down because the bad guys won’t know whose packing and could respond to crime. Thank you for reading my response. Alexander G. Morris IV.
Please do not vote for or advance any anti gun bills. Each one limits a citizens 2nd Amendment rights... I.E. banning commonly owned and used semi automatic rifles, which is unconstitutional under Bruen... Raising the age to purchase firearms. If one can serve in the military, one can purchase a firearm. Plus, its unconstitutional under Bruen AND a Virginia court ruled against it as well. Limiting where one can carry. This only creates more soft targets which criminals will not obey anyway. Banning unserialized firearms . Unconstitutional since some were made before 1968, when numbers were not required. Also, people have the right to build unserialized firearms in their homes for personal use. This has never been an issue, but decriminalization of crimes is causing an increase in violent crimes. THAT is a problem. Limiting how many firearms one can purchase in a given period is unfair. These are just a few . Please understand all the anti gun bills are unconstitutional, especially in light of the Bruen decision. I do urge you to vote for any pro gun bills. The right to keep and bear arms is a constitutional right. The Heller, McDonald, and Bruen decisions reinforce that right. The only limits on this right should be for criminals, illegal aliens, and anyone who has been mentally adjudicated/ forced into an institution. The issue we face should be how to repair our broken mental health infrastructure, not to limit the constitutional rights of law abiding citizens. Thank you Mr Raymond Pezzoli
Our freedom was won with illegal and unregistered firearms. Please look to the G.O. A. And VCDL for guidance on Second Amendment issues. Freedom first, safety second.
I support these bills!
Hello, My name is Sameet Singh, I was born in Punjab, India and moved to Northern Virginia when I was 1 year old. Since then, I’veattended some great K-12 schools in the NOVA area, graduated from George Mason University in 2020, and now work in the Cyber Security field, serving one of our largest US Government Departments. My message to you today is not regarding any single bill in particular, but more of a mindset. I’m sure everyone here has a family that they would do anything for. We work hard everyday to provide for and to protect our families. And a big part in being able to protect, is having the right tool to protect yourself and your family members. This is why the best tool to have at your disposal is a firearm, a gun. Because if you or your family were attacked by someone in your home or out and about in public, a firearm, would be the best tool to have to save yourself and them from an attacker. Even if you’re able to call the police, it’ll at least take a few minutes for them to arrive, and sadly, within those minutes, only a few seconds are needed to completely change your world. Therefore, you are always your OWN first responser, before any other help arrives. This is why, anything, that would hinder your ability to protect yourself or your family with the best tool that you could use, a firearm, should really be re-thought. Unfortunately our society is not at the point where crime dosen’t happen, there’s no supernatural being or superhero that will swoop in to protect us in our times of need, there’s no Spider-Man or Superman who will save the day for us. However, the next best thing we have, is an responsibly armed citizen. A citizen who who is able to be gentle and loving with their kids and partner, but at the same time, prepared and alert at a moments notice when danger reveals itself. Thank you for listening, and thank you for your service to your communities, I wish you all a prosperous new year. Best, Sameet Singh
HB12 - Jones . I not not support . All firearms dealers currently offer a Firearm locking device on the sale or transfer of handguns. All new firearm come with a locking device and warning labels. child safety warning required. This doesn't change the current practice by dealers in offering for free locking devices. HB 23 Weapons; possession or transportation into facility that provides mental health services, etc. I do not support,. This bill does not exempt ems medical services or the fire service which many carry concealed when transporting patients to an emergency room or mental health facility on the duty. HB158 - McClure I do not support . All firearms dealers currently offer a Firearm locking device on the sale or transfer of handguns. All new firearm come with a locking device and warning labels. child safety warning required. This doesn't change the current practice by dealers in offering for free locking devices. HB183 - Simon HB289 - Wiley I support carrying a concealed handgun with a permit into public parking lots and storing there gun makes sense and do not unarm the citizen while in their personal vehicle. HB351 - Clark I not not support . All firearms dealers currently offer a Firearm locking device on the sale or transfer of handguns. All new firearm come with a locking device and warning labels. child safety warning required. This doesn't change the current practice by dealers in offering for free locking devices. most police departments give away free locking devices. HB585 - Mundon King I do not support this bill changes little firearms transactions which must be performed at a already approved ATF dealer location. 1.5miles is overreach by the state. HB756 - Walker I do not support. This limits gun rights. Not protection for EMS or fire personnel HB791 - Henson I do not support. This bill eliminates the number of programs that have pneumatic bb gun competition for 4 H at private or religious schools. HB861 - Hernandez I do not support,. This bill does not exempt ems medical services or the fire service which many carry concealed when transporting patients to an emergency room or mental health facility in the duty. HB872 - Earley I support . Always a lawful citizen to store a lawfully possessed firearm and ammunition in a locked private motor vehicle parked at any parking area owned or controlled by the Commonwealth. HB1141 - Cordoza I support HB1174 - Sickles I do not support changing the definition of an assault weapon widely and increasing the age which will make little difference. HB1198 - Scott, P.A. I support in reducing the fee
Vietnam Veteran - Retired Special Agent & LEO ( military 19 yrs & Federal 10 plus years) - that is me. Please consider the Bill of Rights; law abiding citizens rights to freedoms and rights of self protection. Criminals don’t follow laws against violence and criminal acts. Thank you
I oppose all of the gun control measures proposed in this session. I support Mr. Freitas' proposal for permitless carry.
Seems to me the General Assembly needs to pay attention to the Supreme Court rulings. Most of these bills if not all ignore what the Court has ruled on. Does the Gov. of Virginia think they are above the highest court in the land? Also, do not think for a Nano second that I believe these bills are about crime control. They are all about people control PERIOD. A Tyrannical state. I will fight this!!
NOT ONE OF THESE BILLS ARE CONSTITUTIONAL &/OR NECESSARY! THEY'RE SIMPLY SOLUTIONS IN SEARCH OF NONEXISTENT PROBLEMS! HB 12: Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23: Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158: Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183: Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585: Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791: Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861: Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174: A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen. Thank you.
So there is nothing as important in and for Virginia other then Supporting Communist Legislation against the Constitution of VA and the US Constitution that all this effort must be the first thing on the agenda when a Demo-rat Majority is fraudulently elected to the House and Senate. You fools must make the people that pay you off very happy to have you ear and sell yourself to the Communist Party. Demo-rats are an embarrassment to Freedom and Good Government. Patrick Henry, you may have heard of him? Show me that age and country where the rights and liberties of the people were placed on the sole chance of their rulers being good men, without a consequent loss of liberty? ********************************** The eternal difference between right and wrong does not fluctuate, it is immutable. ********************************** The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government - lest it come to dominate our lives and interests. ********************************** Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? ********************************** Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined.... The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun.
I strongly support House bills 12, 23, 158, 183, 351, 861 and 585, These bills will make our communities safer by requiring safe storage of firearms, banning the sales of assault weapons to people under 21 years of age, and restricting the public places where people can carry firearms, including mental health facilities. Safe storage will protect children and teens from inadvertent shootings and school shootings, and everyone from suicide. Waiting periods for purchase can prevent impulsive misuse. I oppose bills 389, 872, 1141, and 1198. Allowing more guns into more places will not make us safer. Every shooter is a law-abiding citizen with 2nd amendment rights, until they open fire on other people. I don't trust a "good guy" with a gun to have the current training or expertise to shoot down a criminal without accidentally hitting innocent people, or themselves. There is always the threat that a criminal will grab a gun from the "good guy" and turn it on him/her. As a diplomat representing the United States in foreign countries during my 33 years in the U.S. State Department, my heart bled every time we had another mass shooting. People there would ask me, "What is wrong with your society?" The first seven gun safety bills passed in 2020 made Virginia a leader in gun safety legislation. Subsequent shootings, such as six-year old shooting his teacher with his mother's gun, demonstrate the need for evidence-driven initiatives that will reduce gun death and injuries in our Commonwealth.
In regards to HB2 and additional proposed firearm-related legislation. I do not believe adding additional restrictions, especially financial burdens, is a fair and ethical way of combating crime and violence with firearms. I believe there should be more freedom for owning and carrying firearms, but like the idea of additional training requirements and locking devices (gun safes) when in a home with minors. If the state were to enact any bills or policies further restricting access, there needs to be a free (government funded) way to access these rights for law-abiding citizens free of discrimination of any kind.
These proposals are solutions in search of problems. Many of these violate the Bruen decision. I would love for us to eliminate sovereign immunity. These politicians must be able to be sued personally, held both criminally and civilly liable for any vote in favor of a law, if they knew or should have known it violates or God given rights.
I feel violated. This legislation scares me and I'm a constituent. Show me the evidence that the legislation you are proposing will actually reduce crime and violence. There is none. These are "do something" acts that restrict my right as a good, sane, sober, moral and prudent citizen to keep and bear arms. If there were a violent criminal act for which I was now unprepared, restricted in my ability to defend innocent life, who will bear responsibility for that?
As a born and bred Virginian; a father and husband; a disabled veteran and active member in the community; I cannot understand why individuals who are elected, willingly do what they can to violate both the Virginia and United States Constitutions to penalize law-abiding citizens such as myself. I have spent a life of duty and dedication in service and occupations to protect our State and Country from those who wish to subjecgate its citizens or worse. Not only do all of these restrictions seek a perspective only solution, they do so at the cost of innocent citizens. Law-abiding citizens do not commit drug gang offenses, home invasions, mass shootings. These are the acts of career criminals or mentally disturbed individuals. None of these proposed bills addresses those issues or the deeper problem of why people are so quick to commit these acts. Murder is murder, whether a gun is used or a cane, it is still wrong. I'm more concerned about why, instead of the tool. Obviously, certain politicians are only worried about the tools. These proposed bills are all clearly agenda focused without factual information to support true results that may be gained by violating state and federal laws to enact. The Supreme Court very clearly defined the right to arms and most of these bills would violate those freedoms. Nor is it legislators purview to dictate what citizens do with what they have within the confines if their own home. THAT, is yet another violation. It is also disturbing that legislators seem to be focused on separating Virginia from reciprocity, thus affecting relations with other states, which ultimately led to a civil war last time. They are also creating more areas where people who mean to harm can do so without fear of being stopped such as adding a new gun free zone. This is a very bad and ill-conceived premise. If the point has not been made yet, then perhaps citizens need to start holding legislators civilly responsible for lives lost as a result of such zones. Clearly they are not effective. I ask that you stop operating under partisan politics and quid pro quo agendas which only serve to penalize and subjegate our citizenry. This is not what servicemembers and veterans served, sacrificed and vowed to defend. Freedom has a cost, and it is difficult to understand, especially through the fear and pain. There is NO such thing as safety. There never was, and never will be. America has MANY enemies out there in the world, and it's citizens; it's armed citizens; are the LAST line of defense. Continuing to attempt to disarm law-abiding citizens only further prompts the question by citizens for the legislators... "Whose side are you truly on?" Please repeal these bills and focus more on actual crime, deterrence for early release, stiffer penalties for existing criminals who continue to commit them and stop bringing in more and more illegal immigrants. Thank you for your attention. Lessons of the Past, Lost to Actions of the Present, Will Forever Damn the Future. -Sean Flippin - 1989
Everyone of these bills further restricting the rights of the law abiding citizen should be voted down.
I do not support any proposed gun restriction bills. I have been a resident of VA for 40 years and have never been in trouble with the law. I do not think the bills that are being proposed will deter gun violence. The issue is not guns. It is mental health.
HB 12, Jones, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure - Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon - Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, is Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, is not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen.
Why is it that you want to continue to go against your sworn oath to office and institute further gun restrictions and control on law biding citizens? With control of the senate and house why don't you focus on the root of the problem which is more to improve the socio-economic issues regions face which should in turn lower drug and gang related problems which in turn is the true reason behind your "gun violence" issue you continue to speak on. WE DO NOT HAVE A GUN VIOLENCE ISSUE, we have violence issue that you need to address not through more gun restrictions. Enough with the gun control bills, it is the first thing the democratic party pushes when they get control of the majority. Use this time to better the communities or is that just tok difficult for you? As all you want to do is make it so criminals have more power over law biding citizens, pull our children into gang and drug culture and go easy on crime so they know there is no accountability for their actions.
"The right to keepand bear arms shall not be infringed..." Those who carry firearms should not leave them in vehicles. Many guns used in crimes are stolen, often from vehicles. Hospitals and other places people gather are where trained armed civilians can thwart a crime or mass shooting. The AR-15 is a civilian multi-purpose rifle -- easy to operate, inexpensive, accurate, low recoil, low cost ammo, and potentially lethal when necessary. It is the best rifle ever invented for U.S. civilian use...hunting, self and home defense, and target shooting. Resources in VA should be used for law enforcement, crime prevention and mental health. Take ILLEGAL guns off the streets.
Given the second amendment of the constitution, there shall be no laws that prevent me from being able to protect myself. I am a conceal carry holder and have been for almost 10 years now. We vehemently oppose any laws that would prevent Conceal Carry Holders from carrying our weapon. Our goal is to have protection and not need it rather than needing protection, and not being able to have it. We will not comply.
When will misguided legislators learn that infringing the right of law abiding citizens to exercise our Second Amendment liberties does nothing to make the public safe? In fact, it makes us all less safe because criminals love restrictions on lawful firearm ownership. Wake up! Follow the Constitution. “The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed!” Bishop E.W. Jackson STAND Virginia PAC
First, SCOTUS has addressed gun rights; access to magazines & ammo multiple times. Multiple times, SCOTUS' decision has sided with law abiding gun owners. I am curious as to why you continue to suppress our God given constitutionally protected right to bear arms? I can only assume one of two reasons. Either (A) you are completely uneducated as to the writers of the constitution, as well as their separate and several memoirs on the right to keep and bear arms; and furthermore ignorant of the right of the People to keep and bear arms as a result of the People having fought against tyranny using NOT federally provided military arms and ammunition - rather, PRIVATELY owned arms and ammunition. Below are just a few examples of historically accurate statements on said RIGHTS : “No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.” – Thomas Jefferson, Virginia Constitution, Draft 1, 1776 “A strong body makes the mind strong. As to the species of exercises, I advise the gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it gives boldness, enterprise and independence to the mind. Games played with the ball, and others of that nature, are too violent for the body and stamp no character on the mind. Let your gun therefore be your constant companion of your walks.” – Thomas Jefferson, letter to Peter Carr, August 19, 1785 “Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops.” – Noah Webster, An Examination of the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution, October 10, 1787 “To disarm the people…[i]s the most effectual way to enslave them.” – George Mason, The Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution, June 14, 1788 “I ask who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers.” – George Mason, Address to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 4, 1788 My questions are simply these, who do you expect to follow these laws that you put forth? Criminals? Why would you expect someone who is a CRIMINAL to obey the law? Maybe you should take some time and learn the definition? Which brings me to part (B) as to why I think you are trying to bar citizens from owning semi-auto rifles & there average magazines - you fear us to the point where you want to disarm us in much the same way HITLER disarmed HIS constituency. Clearly Thomas Jefferson had it correct - when he said “The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes…. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.” – Thomas Jefferson, Commonplace Book (quoting 18th century criminologist Cesare Beccaria), 1774-1776. Tyranny is the only reasonable explanation for your efforts because the lies spread by the US Government regarding death tolls, etc., is a complete fallacy. All you have to do is a little independent research regarding 'mass shootings.' And yes, private citizens did in fact have legal ownership of canons all the way through the Civil War era. Only an idiot would believe the lies that they did not.
Please leave law abiding citizens alone and focus the Commonwealth’s limited resources on the arrest, conviction, and incarceration of violent individuals. Paul Trible Blue Grass, VA
Suggest instead of Firearms Safety Subcommittee... Crimes Safety Subcommittee. greatly more effective! THE REAL ISSUE!
None of these proposals will impact the behavior of a criminal - only making law abiding citizens vulnerable as a new "gun free" zone attracts people seeking to make a statement with a gun and want time to do so before someone with a gun shows up. Additionally, most of these targeted problems are not currently problems or represent a growing trend that needs additional protections enacted to address. In my view, these bills have limited to no chance to provide additional protections or impact criminal behavior but DO further strip your constituents God give rights to provide the illusion of protection.
I'm a volunteer with Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America, and I support this bill.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support the following bills: HB1174, HB1181, HB1195, HB12, HB1424, HB1462, HB158, HB175, HB183, HB23, HB270, HB318, HB319, HB351, HB362, HB585, HB602, HB637, HB791, HB797, HB798, HB799, HB861, HB916, & HB945 I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I oppose these bills: HB1030, HB1141, HB1198, HB1230, HB1235, HB1321, HB1325, HB1386, HB289, HB389, HB756, & HB872 Innocent children are dying on our watch. Please do something.
My fellow Virginia’s I write today to comment on the bills before you. I am a retired Army veterans. I grew up in Virginia, went to ODU and instead of seeking residency in other states, stayed a Virginian and paid taxes while on active duty. I fought in war and lost good Soldiers and friends defending this nation, you and our Constitution. I retired in Virginia because I love this state. Your body will decide, with its vote, to either infringe on our rights or defend them. I ask you to defend them like those friends and Soldiers that also did. I am a responsible gun owner who raised his children to be responsible gun owners (all three are serving or served). I am also a CCP holder who is willing to defend his fellow citizens. If you vote for any of these bills to limit our rights it will impact my ability to defend myself and my family. Please do the right thing and defend the 2nd Amd. My wife and I already decided to leave the state if you enact these measures to limit our rights. Thank you Oliver Rose
This proposed legislation is blatantly unconstitutional and, if passed, it will, no doubt, be challenged in court. The taxpayers of Virginia will then be obligated to defend these unconstitutional measures, and those defenses will almost certainly lose. This will result in costly, meaningless court costs for all Virginia taxpayers. Those tax dollars could be spent on more meaningful and productive activities that benefit all citizens.
It is outrageous that the General Assembly is using our 2nd Amendment right to punish law abiding citizens who have done nothing wrong other then to defend themselves. It’s clear that Democrats pander to their bases without a thought about the citizens of this Commonwealth or this nation. This issue amongst others, galvanize the voters to get out and vote for the party that does not seek to encroach our rights under the State and Federal Constitution. There is zero proof that We The People are deranged killers, a mob or even the radical right that the Democrat who currently occupies the White House has said. He’d called us Nazis and portrayed honest, hardworking and law abiding citizens as the problem. We are not. Opens border, out of control spending, child indoctrination and parroting the DNC is the problem that is self inflicted and deserves nothing less then our disgust and rebuke come November 2024. The General Assembly reflects the divide between Northern Virginia to Richmond and the difference in South Eastern, Western Virginia. The Democrat party and Legislature know full well that gun control laws if enacted, will not reduce violence but increase victimhood that they’ll blame on Republicans and the cycle continues. Pathetic fools and they wonder why I’ve stopped contributing to candidates who never deliver to fools who govern us.
Please, NO more gun control. You all KNOW that criminals do not follow your laws. All your gun control does is limit my and my family's rights to self defense and peaceful enjoyment of the shooting sports. Instead, put, and keep, actual violent offenders in jail. It really is that simple.
As a woman and a 30 plus year Emergency Department nurse I ask you to reject these onerous gun control laws. Laws like these discourage women who are most at risk from being able to obtain the means to defend themselves. I worked many a late night shift in Northern Virginia and walked through empty parking lots and garages worried about my safety. Women should not have to suffer this and should have ready access to the means to defend themselves. You aren't disarming criminals your are disarming women.
The bills under consideration will do nothing to increase the safety of Virginians while infringing on our right to defend ourselves. They are designed to make it more difficult to obtain a firearm, possess a firearm, or use a firearm to defend oneself or others. Meanwhile criminals will continue unabated. Moreover, most of these unconstitutional laws have been rendered moot as they have been struck down by state and federal courts. As a former police officer and detective I implore you to reject these useless and unconstitutional laws. Thank you
No more gun control legislation. It's not the gun that's the issue. It's the mentally ill folks that obtained a gun.
No more unconstitutional gun control.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support these bills. I expect to see more gun violence prevention legislation *actually pass* since there is so much nonpartisan alignment on this topic. The status quo is unacceptable. Our pro-gun culture is a threat to our children, and a slap in the face to every person who has lost their lives to gun violence. Enough is enough - policy over prayers.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support this bill.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support this bill. Gun violence in our communities and in our state is heartbreaking and changes need to be made to protect the citizens of Virginia.
I am a member of Virginia moms for change and I support these bills.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change and I support these bills. To all responsible gun owners: you shouldn't be afraid of these common sense bills. These bills are directed at people who are not handling their firearms as the deadly weapons that they can be. Instead of thinking your rights are being taken away, consider instead how safe storage, permits and waiting periods could help the daily gun violence in our country. Keep your guns, we are not trying to take them away. These bills are an opportunity for you, as a responsible gun owner, to be a part of the solution to help cut down on needless violence.
Remember Delegates...you took an Oath to 'Support and Defend the Constitution of the Unites States of America' which includes the 2nd Amendment!
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change and I support the selected bills. I believe they will make our communities safer and that gun violence is a critical issue we must address with such legislation and more.
I am a member of Virginia Mom's for Change, a group working towards gun violence prevention. We support the bills indicated above.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group. I support bills HB1174 HB1181 HB1195 HB12 HB1424 HB1462 HB158 HB175 HB183 HB23 HB270 HB318 HB319 HB351 HB362 HB585 HB602 HB637 HB791 HB798 HB799 HB861 HB916 HB945
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group. I support bills HB1174 HB1181 HB1195 HB12 HB1424 HB1462 HB158 HB175 HB183 HB23 HB270 HB318 HB319 HB351 HB362 HB585 HB602 HB637 HB791 HB798 HB799 HB861 HB916 HB945
and I support these bills. The bills we support are: HB1174, HB1181, HB1195, HB12, HB1424, HB1462, HB158, HB175, HB183, HB23, HB270, HB318, HB319, HB351, HB362, HB585, HB602, HB637, HB791, HB797, HB798, HB799, HB861, HB916, & HB945
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support these bills. The bills we support are: HB1174, HB1181, HB1195, HB12, HB1424, HB1462, HB 158, HB175, HB183, HB23, HB270, HB318, HB319, HB351, HB362, HB585, HB602, HB637, HB791, HB797, HB798, HB799, HB861, HB916, & HB945
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support these bills. The bills we support are: HB1174, HB1181, HB1195, HB12, HB1424, HB1462, HB158, HB175, HB183, HB23, HB270, HB318, HB319, HB351, HB362, HB585, HB602, HB637, HB791, HB797, HB798, HB799, HB861, HB916, & HB945
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support this bill.
The Virginia NAACP supports this bill. We support common sense gun legislation that will have a significant impact on reducing gun violence and saving lives; this includes comprehensive background checks on the sale of firearms, limitations on purchasing firearms and prohibition of selling and transporting assault weapons - this is necessary legislation to keep Virginians safe.
The end of solitary confinement must be done My son was murdered in solitary confinement at Red Onion Prison in Pound Va on 1/3/22.
The Virginia NAACP supports this bill. We support common sense gun legislation that will have a significant impact on reducing gun violence and saving lives; this includes comprehensive background checks on the sale of firearms, limitations on purchasing firearms and prohibition of selling and transporting assault weapons - this is necessary legislation to keep Virginians safe.
Our Constitution does not provide citizens with privileges. It establishes a government with checks and balances and specifically limits the governments ability to remove the rights of its people. In regards to the matter at hand, it specifically says the the government cannot place limitations on the right of a citizen to keep and bear arms. Before I get the typical response, I know you are already aware that the phrase "well regulated" specifically refers to an being trained and ready to bear said arms. The language at the time did not use the term "regulated" as we do with modern regulations. It has been proven in the courts repeatedly that the laws you are currently considering are unconstitutional. Of this I am sure you are already aware. By spending time and tax dollars discussing laws that you know to be unconstitutional, you are in fact wasting time and tax dollars that could be spent on productive issues. I can only assume your intent is to intentionally waste time, and force members of the firearms industry to waste money on legal fees defending the constitution you have sworn to uphold. Please consider actual data and actual facts when considering gun legislation. No data supports the claim the "assault weapon" bans actually reduce gun related crime. More guns are being purchased now than ever before, yet now that the latest FBI data has been released, we can see that gun related crimes have not increased. Also, like every year that the FBI has released data, so called "assault weapons" make up a very small portion of all gun crimes. For your general knowledge the term "assault weapon" was first coined by Adolf Hitler. He renamed one of their new automatic firearms, the Sturmgewehr, because he felt that the name "assault weapon" would strike fear in allied forces. This is also the exact reason the gun control community uses this term as well. The fact is that these firearms are not fully automatic and cannot be made so without a high degree of machining skills and mechanical knowhow. Plus doing so is already illegal. The fact is the Biden's latest gun control act has not been equally enforced. It was supposed to provide additional support for school security and mental health services. It was supposed to provide stronger punishments for those cought breaking existing gun laws. It was supposed to allow FFL's to use the NICS system to check employees. It was supposed to allow FFL's to be able to instantly check inventory or potential purchase/trades by their serial number to determine if the firearm has been stolen or used in any crimes. None of these provisions have been acted upon or enforced. Please drop these latest gun control bills. They are unconstitutional and will never pass. Please do not waste your time and our tax dollars on these wasted efforts. Regards, Jonathan Goodman
THe Virginia NAACP supports this bill. We support common sense gun legislation that will have a significant impact on reducing gun violence and saving lives; this includes comprehensive background checks on the sale of firearms, limitations on purchasing firearms and prohibition of selling and transporting assault weapons - this is necessary legislation to keep Virginians safe.
The Virginia NAACP supports this bill. We support common sense gun legislation that will have a significant impact on reducing gun violence and saving lives; this includes comprehensive background checks on the sale of firearms, limitations on purchasing firearms and prohibition of selling and transporting assault weapons - this is necessary legislation to keep Virginians safe.
THe Virginia NAACP supports this bill. We support common sense gun legislation that will have a significant impact on reducing gun violence and saving lives; this includes comprehensive background checks on the sale of firearms, limitations on purchasing firearms and prohibition of selling and transporting assault weapons - this is necessary legislation to keep Virginians safe.
The Virginia NAACP supports this bill. We support common sense gun legislation that will have a significant impact on reducing gun violence and saving lives; this includes comprehensive background checks on the sale of firearms, limitations on purchasing firearms and prohibition of selling and transporting assault weapons - this is necessary legislation to keep Virginians safe.
Every gun law is an infringement. I am a parent and I oppose HB351.
I'm a volunteer with Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America, and I support this bill.
HB389 - Concealed handgun; carrying without a permit.
I am a Henrico County resident and I oppose these bills. Guns are the #1 killer of children under the age of 18 and the United States has a gun homicide rate 26 times higher than that of peer nations. A recent Fox News poll found that the majority of Americans want more gun safety laws, including background checks, red flag laws, and waiting periods for gun purchases. Let's use common sense regulations to help protect our children. I oppose these bills. Thank you for your time.
The extent to which the government has infringed on the rights of American citizens is staggering. With each right restored as the ATF and anti-freedom states lose in court over and over again, the gun controllers sound the alarm about expanding gun rights and the associated dangers. Yet, there is no data to back up concealed carry permit holders committing crime with their firearms. If there were, it would already be all over the media and embedded in every gun control argument. Grossly manipulated data is already routinely cited by gun controllers to mislead the public. The fact that there is nothing for these same dishonest individuals to spin about constitutional carry shows the utter lack of evidence. Dangerous people who commit crime already carry weapons without permits. Many politicians today support policies that favor criminals over free citizens. Anyone who votes against these bills is squarely in that oppressive body of politicians who do not belong in office. These bills must be passed now.
Dear Sir or Madame. Last year in Newport News I was assaulted by a 27 year old black man from Chesapeake because of his road rage.. This was at my local bank 11;30 in the morning. This young man almost lost his life at my hand because you cannot reel in your problem young men. His words feet from me were ' im going to kick your ass and then kill you'. My pistol changed his mind. I saw for myself the woke judges and a woke system that perpetuates the problem. The criminal justice system has been flung far far left which IS causing a public safety hazzard. No new gun control is needed. More jail time for the trash that i dealt with is. My Congressman Bobby Scott and Delegate Cia Price do not represent me.
I am a member of VA Moms For Change, a gun violence prevention group and I oppose these bills
For the Delegates and witnesses who took offense to VCDL speaking for all races, please know that we have members of all races. We speak for all of our members. Racism is unconscionable, and laws founded on racist principles should be repealed. It doesn't matter who repeals them, what matters is that affirmative action is taken to strike down all forms of racism and recognize that we are one race, human. In addition, we take offense to the accusation that we do not promote safety. As an organization, and as individuals, we have routinely and consistently promoted safety and education. We recognize that creating defense free zones advertises to criminals that they will have the ability to inflict massive carnage before someone arrives with the proper tools to stop their assault. We look at real data that shows a.) gun free zones attract crime, not discourage it, and b.) violent crimes are routinely and frequently stopped by an armed civilian, many times without shots being fired and without loss of life. In the cases of mass murders, in 2022, 41.3% were stopped by armed civilians. If you exclude so-called gun free zones from the data, the rate goes up to 63.5%. This, again, supports the statement that gun free zones are a lie, and are really killing zones. Finally, I would wager that if there were a fee, a test, and a permit required in order to vote, this body would reject that concept soundly. Yes, we do have voter registration as a means of ensuring that each person votes in the correct precinct and only votes once. However, it is accepted that a poll tax is unconstitutional, and rightly so. In addition, there is no civics exam or IQ test required before a person is allowed to vote. Nor is there any impediment for an individual to voice their opinion, worship as they see fit (or not), or be secure in their personal effects. I would submit to you that a $50 fee in order to exercise a natural right...one that is so important that it is constitutionally protected...places the exercising of that right out of the reach of underprivileged communities. This affects over 10% of the population of Virginia, which is a significant number of people. These people typically live in areas with higher crime rate and conceivable have a higher need for tools of self defense. You are denying them the ability to do so discreetly.
As a woman I urge you to stand up for fellow women's right to defend themselves in our state. The ability to carry frees women to go about day to day business without constant fear of violence against them. I travel alone throughout this state and neighboring states. Most of the people I am in contact with on these trips are also women traveling alone in campers or staying alone in hotels. It is vital we are able to carry as free people and not be always reliant on the old fashioned practice of carrying a man with us. Please don't continue rolling us back in the dark ages! Give rights to women to protect ourselves.....by ourselves.
As a constituent I urge you to support my right to self-defense by SUPPORTING both HB 389, Delegate Griffin, and HB 1030, Delegate Freitas. These bills are identical and allow a person to carry a concealed handgun without a permit anywhere they could openly carry that handgun, as long as they are not disqualified for getting a concealed handgun permit. It's the same person and same gun, whether they are openly carrying or put on a coat. The concealed handgun permits would continue to be available and would provide extra benefits over carrying without a permit. 27 states have carry without a permit currently and more are expected this year. A recent study in Ohio shows crime dropped after the state adopted carry without a permit. No state that has adopted it has repealed it. Neighboring Kentucky, Tennessee and West Virginia are all states that don't require a permit to carry a concealed handgun. Let me know how you are going to vote on these important bills.
I urge you to vote yes for both HB1030 and HB389. Constitutional carry should already be in place. There are already laws on the books to be applied to those criminals who make an intentional decision to harm other law abiding citizens. These bills will enable law abiding citizens to have the freedom of choice to decide if they want to carry a concealed firearm in order to be prepared to protect their, their families, or their community in self defense. Ironically those who have made the choice to become a criminal are already not following the current law of getting a conceal carry permit before they conceal a weapon in their daily lives to commit criminal activity. Criminals will start thinking twice before commiting violent or potentially deadly crimes when they know it is more likely that a potential victim will have the means to defend themselves. Voting YES for HB389 and HB1030 will allow law abiding citizens (far majority of citizens) to be able to defend themselves.
I urge you to support my right to self-defense by SUPPORTING HB 389, Delegate Griffin. This bill allows a person to carry a concealed handgun without a permit anywhere they could openly carry that handgun, as long as they are not disqualified for getting a concealed handgun permit. It's the same person and same gun, whether they are openly carrying or put on a coat. The concealed handgun permits would continue to be available and would provide extra benefits over carrying without a permit. 27 states have carry without a permit currently and more are expected this year. A recent study in Ohio shows crime dropped after the state adopted carry without a permit. No state that has adopted it has repealed it. Neighboring Kentucky, Tennessee and West Virginia are all states that don't require a permit to carry a concealed handgun.
This should be the law of the land already. Not only is it the right thing to do, it positively affirms the rights protected in Article I Section 13 of our own state constitution. We can also see a drop in crime when these bills are enacted, such as with Ohio. The current system just makes it difficult for the poor and disadvantaged to protect their life and leaves them vulnerable to predation. When you examine mass shoot incidents and eliminate locations where carry is not allowed you will find the majority of those cases see stopped by armed citizens. This will also benefit us in reducing administration costs of the permits and will keep poorer and less educated people from running afoul of all the current complicated laws. Is the commonwealth really benefitted from putting non violent persons in jail because they forgot to renew a form or were confused by concealed carry reciprocity nuances?
I encourage all to vote yes on both of these bills so that the community can come together and have the most effective means do their part and assist law enforcement in protecting their communities and loved ones. Crime has been on the rise and a very reasonable response to battling such unfortunate incidents is to educate and remove the amount of potential victims there are by acknowledging our god given right to bear arms in its fullest capacity as the 2nd amendment guarantees.
Hello, I would urge the members of the House Public Safety Committee to vote YES on HB389 - Griffin and HB1030 - Freitas. Over the past two decades, more than 50 percent of U.S. states have passed laws allowing for constitutional carry or permitless carry. Most recently in 2023, Florida and Nebraska passed Constitutional Carry laws. In 2022, Alabama, Ohio, Indiana, and Georgia all passed Constitutional Carry legislation. As a valid Chesterfield County Concealed Carry citizen, I strongly urge the passing of this legislation as it would allow citizens the right to conceal carry without requiring the lengthy training class requirements, paperwork, fee's, and court/judicial backlog/waiting period associated with obtaining a permit. Further these bills would allow law abiding citizens the right to self protection measures in an every increasingly dangerous world. The facts are simple, criminals don't legally obtain firearms nor do they file the appropriate paperwork to conceal carry, they simply show up and cause havoc and often take lives in the process. These bills would allow everyday citizens the opportunity to protect themselves, their loved ones, and their fellow neighbors/community in the event of a violent crime taking place. Thank you, William
Please pass HB389 and HB1030. It is our God-given right, as per the 2nd Amendment of the United States Constitution, to bear arms, which will not be infringed by the government. No innocent, law abiding citizen should have to suffer taking time off from work or school and spend money going to the county courthouse to apply for a CHP, in order to be able to go about in public, outside the safety of one's home, with his/her firearm concealed from plain sight, ready to protect his/her own life or the lives of others.
Hello, I’m am writing today to make my voice heard for the first time as a newly informed citizen about matters such as these that goes on within our government. I wish to display my support for both HB1030, and HB389 at this time. As a member of this community and as an armed security officer myself I believe that law abiding citizens shouldn’t have to take extra steps in order to exercise rights they already possess. I encourage all to vote yes on these two bills and make self defense more accessible to the community so that criminals think twice about snatching grandmas purse!!!
I have a right to protect myself, family, and property from any threat, perceived or real. I will continue to exercise this right and I expect my public servants to protect my rights as they themselves desire to have their rights protected.
I have a right to protect myself, family, and property from any threat, perceived or real. I will continue to exercise this right and I expect my public servants to protect my rights as they themselves desire to have their rights protected.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments. As a lifelong 26 year old citizen of the commonwealth of Virginia I would like to take a moment to discuss these Bills. These bills intend to allow concealed carry of firearms without a permit in places open carry would be legal. I strongly urge you all to support this bill. Virginia is a state of significant historic importance. From Washington's Virginia minutemen in the revolutionary War to the many presidents born in this fine state Virginia is a state built by the blood and sweat of patriots. Carrying firearms is a constitutionally ensured God given right of which the government must protect. A permit being necessary to conceal carry firearms is itself an infringement of that right. No one would seriously suggest an application process for a license to be able to practice our right of free speech. Therefore it is of the utmost importance to pass these bills to protect our rights which hang with such fragility in the balance. I would like to also add the benefit of an armed populous given the right to freely exercise their firearm rights. States which have passed constitutional carry laws have had their crime decrease sometimes by significant amounts this is because the first line of defense against wouldbe criminals is the American citizen. The American citizen is always the first responder and must be given the right to protect themselves and their family with whatever tool they see fit. I would also like to add that gun free zones which have unfortunately grown in the past decade have been consistently targeted due to the ease of which attacks can be made without anyone being able to actively fight back to defend themselves. It is hypocritical in my opinion of lawmakers who enjoy the protection of constant armed security to restrict the freedoms of the citizens to be able to defend themselves with the same tools your very lives are protected with. Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback I hope you make the right decision by the people who elected you and who want you to uphold our gun rights.
This debate over guns was settled in 1791. We have all the laws we need to cover the action of a criminal. Murder is illegal no matter the tool used. Assualt is illegal no matter the tool used. Your ridiculous attack on the rights of all Virginians is just another chapter in the failure our our legislature to deal with the true issues that plague our state. Restore our rights and work to better the state and stop with the petty and vindictive law making that only hurts the innocent. Every day our governing bodies from congress to you become less relevant as a part of our lives, since all you ever manage to do is destroy and steal.
Please do not let 'common sense" gun laws unconstitutionally infringe on our rights. Law abiding citizens have the right to self defense and private firearm ownership.
I have written to committee in the past requesting you not vote to pass on gun control bills of any kind. I would like to encourage you to vote for HB1030 and HB389. Virginia was founded on concepts of liberty, independence and responsibility. We have a long and proud tradition of safe and proper gun use here. I am asking that you consider this, the law abiding outnumber the criminals, shouldn't we legally have the same rights that are enjoyed in 27 other states? Stop treating gun owners in Virginia as if they are committing crimes no matter what they do. Start treating us as citizens and neighbors who are good and decent people. Please don't fall for propaganda and the hate filled messages anti-constitution people carry. We don't need to be turned into another horrible failed demonstration of overreach and oligarchy by a governmental body. Allow 'constitutional carry' within the Commonwealth can only strengthen our sense of safety as proven in other places, criminals fear to tread where their so called 'victims' can fight back. Remember, when Virginia first went to 'Shall Issue' permits, and all around they denied that right, Virginia was the safest of the 'DMV' region. We must continue to protect all, ensure the safety of Virginians is protected and enhanced. Do not try and turn us into another place rife with crime like other states that deny it's residents basic constitutional rights. A beginning for this would be a vote of 'Yes' on HB389 and HB1030. Thank you.
In Ohio one year after constitution carry passed gun crimes went down
The great Commonwealth of Virginia should be proud to pass these two bills. They are the will of the people and solidify our rights as guaranteed by the federal and state constitutions. Please pass these bills.
As a resident of the great Commonwealth and disabled veteran, I hold dearly and fully support the right to self-defense by all law abiding citizens no matter race, creed, or color and these bills, HB 389, Delegate Griffin, and HB 1030, Delegate Freitas, will ensure just that. Both bills are identical and allow a person to carry a concealed handgun without a permit anywhere they could openly carry that handgun, as long as they are not disqualified for getting a concealed handgun permit. It's the same person and same gun, whether they are openly carrying or put on a coat. The concealed handgun permits would continue to be available and would provide extra benefits over carrying without a permit. 27 states have carry without a permit currently and more are expected this year. A recent study in Ohio shows crime dropped after the state adopted carry without a permit. No state that has adopted it has repealed it. Neighboring Kentucky, Tennessee and West Virginia are all states that don't require a permit to carry a concealed handgun. v/r Thomas Speich
I've commend prior on these issue but would like to reemphasize that more laws of these nature only impose on those of us that already obey the law and I think that you could explain this to your constituents demanding more gun control. I always find it ironic and dubious that those wanting more gun control either don't own a gun, have never fired a gun or don't want to purchase one but wish to infringe upon those of us who are responsible gun owners. Many of these bills on gun control shouldn't even be proposed and if you are supporting these bills you're being dishonest to your own base in tell them that this will reduce crime. It can't reduce crime and never has since other cities such as Chicago ,crime ALWAYS increases with more gun control and Always goes down with less in most situations. I have friend who lives in Chicago and had to sue because they outlawed all firearms several years back. The citizens won that case and were allowed to own AR-15's and all various forms of semi automatic fire arms pistol and rifle. According to him and the data CRIME WENT DOWN. The exception to gun laws which are already on the book as always is proper back ground checks so criminals cannot exploit the legal process by purchasing as a felon. As for removing someone's rights to own a gun under a DUI or DWI I fail to see any relevance or correlation and causation to the issue of guns in general. I am apposed to all these gun control bills and support the two pro guns bills being proposed.
Criminals already have a defacto Constitutuional Carry ability in that they disregard laws that prohibit carrying guns in general. You cannot prevent someone from carrying a gun, and allowing law abiding citizens to carry guns without paying a fee for a CHP just evens the playing field. Good guys carrying guns makes everyone safer, as criminals would think twice before committing a crime knowing their victim may be armed. Make VA Constitutuional carry like many other states have done.
Please vote yes on: HB 389, Delegate Griffin and HB 1030, Delegate Freitas Thanks. Brian Johnson
Criminals can do whatever they want to. It's time we stop punishing everyone else and let law-abiding, good people have the freedom to protect themselves if they choose.
All gun control laws are repugnant to the 2nd Amendment of the United States Constitution, and as United States Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall found in Marbury vs. Madison, such laws are void. Unfortunately, there are those in our halls of government that only recognize acts of law established by their contemporaries. As such, it is imperative that these bills be passed, as written, in order to employ the force of law as means to compel the historically and legally ignorant to recognize what should be universally understood as a natural right.
"Constitutional carry" is common sense. Constitutional carry normalizes the right to exercise our Constitutional Rights. Currently, there is a popular, and misguided, idea that only criminals and zealots carry a firearm -- that misconception is reinforced by the artificial barriers placed in the way of lawfully carrying a firearm. In the current situation, it would seem that only the most motivated "gun nut" would go out of their way to go through all the obstacles currently restricting the exercise this Constitutionally granted right -- or a criminal who does not care what the law, and "normal society" says. Let's dull and tarnish the "outlaw" status criminals get from being illegally armed. Constitutional Carry would remove the barriers for "normal people" to exercise their rights. We need more "normal people" to tarnish the glamour criminals feel about their status symbol illegal handguns. Let's make guns boring.
I support passing both HB389 and HB1030. In keeping with the recent US Supreme Court decision New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. Bruen, every person in Virginia, who meets the current CHP requirement, should be able to carry a concealed weapon. With wide open borders, fewer police officers, it is imperative that individuals be able to defend themselves, their family, and others in dire need. Sincerely yours, Terrence J Finazzo
Good evening Delegates, I am writing in support of a Constitutional Carry bill for this great commonwealth. This bill will only further empower our fellow citizens and, as proven in other states, actually reduces crime! These are great things and what your fellow Virginians want. I urge you to vote, Yes, on this bill. Thank you for your time
Constitutional Carry in Virginia will allow law abiding citizens to fully exercise their Natural Right of self defense as protected by the Constitution. It result in reduced crime as well. This has be demonstrated in EVERY state that has adopted it.
Honorable Delegates The simple fact is that in every state where it has been enacted Constitutional Carry has reduced crime or helped it to remain low. The proof is in the results. Thank you
Please support HB 389 and 1030 ref Constitutional Carry. Victor Calaman Jr. Richmond
As a constituent I urge you to support my right to self-defense by SUPPORTING both HB 389, Delegate Griffin, and HB 1030, Delegate Freitas. These bills are identical and allow a person to carry a concealed handgun without a permit anywhere they could openly carry that handgun, as long as they are not disqualified for getting a concealed handgun permit. It's the same person and same gun, whether they are openly carrying or put on a coat. The concealed handgun permits would continue to be available and would provide extra benefits over carrying without a permit. 27 states have carry without a permit currently and more are expected this year. A recent study in Ohio shows crime dropped after the state adopted carry without a permit. No state that has adopted it has repealed it. Neighboring Kentucky, Tennessee and West Virginia are all states that don't require a permit to carry a concealed handgun.
I oppose these bills.
In regards to HB2 and additional proposed firearm-related legislation. I do not believe adding additional restrictions, especially financial burdens, is a fair and ethical way of combating crime and violence with firearms. I believe there should be more freedom for owning and carrying firearms, but like the idea of additional training requirements and locking devices (gun safes) when in a home with minors. If the state were to enact any bills or policies further restricting access, there needs to be a free (government funded) way to access these rights for law-abiding citizens free of discrimination of any kind.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support the following bills: HB1174, HB1181, HB1195, HB12, HB1424, HB1462, HB158, HB175, HB183, HB23, HB270, HB318, HB319, HB351, HB362, HB585, HB602, HB637, HB791, HB797, HB798, HB799, HB861, HB916, & HB945 I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I oppose these bills: HB1030, HB1141, HB1198, HB1230, HB1235, HB1321, HB1325, HB1386, HB289, HB389, HB756, & HB872 Innocent children are dying on our watch. Please do something.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I oppose this bill.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change and I oppose these bills
I am with Virginia Moms for Change. I am a mother of 3 and a grandmother of 1. I STRONGLY oppose these bills.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I oppose these bills.
Remember Delegates...you took an Oath to 'Support and Defend the Constitution of the Unites States of America' which includes the 2nd Amendment!
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change and I oppose these bills.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I oppose this bill.
The end of solitary confinement must be done My son was murdered in solitary confinement at Red Onion Prison in Pound Va on 1/3/22.
I strongly oppose HB16 and HB389.
I OPPOSE these bills as there is little to no data that this will make our communities safer; in fact, states with permitless carry have been show to have more gun-related deaths. Please keep VA safe.
I, Karen Higa, a resident of Falls Church, VA, and advocate for safer communities and Brady United Against Gun Violence, am providing virtual testimony AGAINST the following three bills before the House Public Safety Committee: HB 11, HB16, HB 389 Many of the perpetrators of our nation’s crimes were given gun permits, so we must put a stop to this carnage and work toward providing a safer community for our citizens and especially our children.
I am a Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America, mother of 3, and former social worker. I oppose this bill.
I OPPOSE these bills. Permitless states have shown an increase in gun-related deaths.
Our Constitution does not provide citizens with privileges. It establishes a government with checks and balances and specifically limits the governments ability to remove the rights of its people. In regards to the matter at hand, it specifically says the the government cannot place limitations on the right of a citizen to keep and bear arms. Before I get the typical response, I know you are already aware that the phrase "well regulated" specifically refers to an being trained and ready to bear said arms. The language at the time did not use the term "regulated" as we do with modern regulations. It has been proven in the courts repeatedly that the laws you are currently considering are unconstitutional. Of this I am sure you are already aware. By spending time and tax dollars discussing laws that you know to be unconstitutional, you are in fact wasting time and tax dollars that could be spent on productive issues. I can only assume your intent is to intentionally waste time, and force members of the firearms industry to waste money on legal fees defending the constitution you have sworn to uphold. Please consider actual data and actual facts when considering gun legislation. No data supports the claim the "assault weapon" bans actually reduce gun related crime. More guns are being purchased now than ever before, yet now that the latest FBI data has been released, we can see that gun related crimes have not increased. Also, like every year that the FBI has released data, so called "assault weapons" make up a very small portion of all gun crimes. For your general knowledge the term "assault weapon" was first coined by Adolf Hitler. He renamed one of their new automatic firearms, the Sturmgewehr, because he felt that the name "assault weapon" would strike fear in allied forces. This is also the exact reason the gun control community uses this term as well. The fact is that these firearms are not fully automatic and cannot be made so without a high degree of machining skills and mechanical knowhow. Plus doing so is already illegal. The fact is the Biden's latest gun control act has not been equally enforced. It was supposed to provide additional support for school security and mental health services. It was supposed to provide stronger punishments for those cought breaking existing gun laws. It was supposed to allow FFL's to use the NICS system to check employees. It was supposed to allow FFL's to be able to instantly check inventory or potential purchase/trades by their serial number to determine if the firearm has been stolen or used in any crimes. None of these provisions have been acted upon or enforced. Please drop these latest gun control bills. They are unconstitutional and will never pass. Please do not waste your time and our tax dollars on these wasted efforts. Regards, Jonathan Goodman
I am John Calhoun Co-Director of Lewinsville Faith in Action (LFA) , an organization, "in partnership with others, works for political, social, economic and environmental policies that are based on justice and compassion." LFA stands in vehement opposition to HB 11, HB 16 and HB 316, bills that will not protect, but further endanger the lives of the Commonweath's citizens. More guns, more explosives in protected areas means only more deaths, more shattered families.
I am John Calhoun Co-Director of Lewinsville Faith in Action (LFA) , an organization, "in partnership with others, works for political, social, economic and environmental policies that are based on justice and compassion." LFA stands in vehement opposition to HB 11, HB 16 and HB 316, bills that will not protect, but further endanger the lives of the Commonweath's citizens. More guns, more explosives in protected areas means only more deaths, more shattered families.
Dear Committee, I am resident of Richmond City and I am writing in SUPPORT of these anti Second Amendment bills. Second Amendment of US Constitution simply reads - A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. US Supreme Court time and again, including Heller and more recently in Bruen decision reiterated that any law that does not fall into plain reading of Second Amendment Text and lacking Historical analogue at the time of founding clearly violates US Constitution. Multiple recent lower court cases since Bruen has been decided on that ruling and rendered multiple anti-2A laws across the country as Unconstitutional. Anti-2A members of society talk about these "universal background checks". So one must ask ourselves, should one go through same process as law enforcement, pass same background checks etc, WHAT reason do we now have in unconstitutionally preventing that individual from carrying the firearms in the same places and manner as a law enforcement representative can. Why have one laws for People and completely another set of laws for the Govt and Privileged ? You are here by notified that the proposed bills are required undo some of the unconstitutional laws passed in the recent past and save the State some time, money and embarrassment to be caused when those unconstitutional laws are repealed by Courts setting permanent blockage on anti-2A law makers. . You are further notified to remind you that you took official oath to uphold US Constitution and Virginia Constitution. Please vote YES on these bills. Thank you
I strongly oppose the above marked bills because they are potentially DETRIMENTAL to PUBLIC SAFETY.
I OPPOSE these bills and implore you to focus on actions that actually reduce gun violence in our community. Permitless carry has been shown to result in MORE gun related deaths.
I oppose these bills. There is not data to suggest permit-less carry makes communities safer, in fact, this is associated with more gun violence.
I oppose these bills.
Oppose these bills greatly. Just want common-sense gun safety legislation passed.
We need to be making gun control legislation stronger to keep our kids safe! The statistics show more guns do not make us safer! Look at the rest of the developed world! I’m opposed to this legislation.
I OPPOSE these bills as there is little to no data that they make our communities safer- in fact, states with permitless carry have been shown to have more gun-related deaths.
I oppose Bills HB11, HB16 and HB389 because I want to keep our children and our communities safe. Data has proven time and time again that more guns to not mean safer communities.
Virginia Moms for Change opposes HB11, HB16, & HB389. We do not support loosening the weapons restrictions currently in place.
I'm a volunteer with Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America, and I oppose this bill.
HB444 - Virginia Rap Back Service; criminal history record monitoring.
I oppose all these unconstitutional, dangerous, and pointless laws.
Dear Sir or Madame. Last year in Newport News I was assaulted by a 27 year old black man from Chesapeake because of his road rage.. This was at my local bank 11;30 in the morning. This young man almost lost his life at my hand because you cannot reel in your problem young men. His words feet from me were ' im going to kick your ass and then kill you'. My pistol changed his mind. I saw for myself the woke judges and a woke system that perpetuates the problem. The criminal justice system has been flung far far left which IS causing a public safety hazzard. No new gun control is needed. More jail time for the trash that i dealt with is. My Congressman Bobby Scott and Delegate Cia Price do not represent me.
This debate over guns was settled in 1791. We have all the laws we need to cover the action of a criminal. Murder is illegal no matter the tool used. Assualt is illegal no matter the tool used. Your ridiculous attack on the rights of all Virginians is just another chapter in the failure our our legislature to deal with the true issues that plague our state. Restore our rights and work to better the state and stop with the petty and vindictive law making that only hurts the innocent. Every day our governing bodies from congress to you become less relevant as a part of our lives, since all you ever manage to do is destroy and steal.
In Ohio one year after constitution carry passed gun crimes went down
I've commend prior on these issue but would like to reemphasize that more laws of these nature only impose on those of us that already obey the law and I think that you could explain this to your constituents demanding more gun control. I always find it ironic and dubious that those wanting more gun control either don't own a gun, have never fired a gun or don't want to purchase one but wish to infringe upon those of us who are responsible gun owners. Many of these bills on gun control shouldn't even be proposed and if you are supporting these bills you're being dishonest to your own base in tell them that this will reduce crime. It can't reduce crime and never has since other cities such as Chicago ,crime ALWAYS increases with more gun control and Always goes down with less in most situations. I have friend who lives in Chicago and had to sue because they outlawed all firearms several years back. The citizens won that case and were allowed to own AR-15's and all various forms of semi automatic fire arms pistol and rifle. According to him and the data CRIME WENT DOWN. The exception to gun laws which are already on the book as always is proper back ground checks so criminals cannot exploit the legal process by purchasing as a felon. As for removing someone's rights to own a gun under a DUI or DWI I fail to see any relevance or correlation and causation to the issue of guns in general. I am apposed to all these gun control bills and support the two pro guns bills being proposed.
The end of solitary confinement must be done My son was murdered in solitary confinement at Red Onion Prison in Pound Va on 1/3/22.
HB585 - Home-based firearms dealers; prohibited near schools, penalties.
My name is Laura, and I’m your constituent. Gun violence prevention is my top priority. Please support hi. Safety legislation that is brought up for a vote. These are the bills I support. Thank you for your time.
Please do not make life more difficult for responsible gun owners. Many of the proposed laws are clearly unconstitutional and will be struck down anyway. Others may be constitutional but are completely draconian. Virginia already has some of the toughest gun laws in the country All the bills I am providing feedback for would not make VA safer. Next time Republicans are in power they will reverse those anyway. But even if that does not happen, you are contributing to the further polarization of politics. There won't be any bipartisanship left on 2nd amendment issues or even other issues
I am opposed to all of these unconstitutional and anit-american gun laws and regulations. There is no room for more gun laws and regulations in this state.
Contrary to how certain government officials treat it, the second amendment is written using plain, easy to understand language, and insists that government has no right to take away the right for ordinary people like us to defend ourselves, as the constitution and bill of rights do not simply give people rights, but protects them from government manipulation and control. It’s incredibly disappointing and a tragedy that people choose to commit acts of violence with these rights, but restricting those who wish to exercise their rights peaceably due to those who wouldn’t follow these rules in the first place is incredibly naive. I, as well as every other person in the United States, deserve to protect my family with the best technology available. While some people look at certain defense weapon setups as a “why do you need that” situation, 1) I have the right to defend myself with the best tool available, and so I will choose that every time, 2) why do you “need” anything other than basic necessities (fast car, Gucci clothes, etc)? The government has no place in deciding what I “need”, 3) people with the intent to harm will not care what laws govern peaceful people, so what would limiting the victim’s access to proper tools do? You may think that by “banning” or otherwise restricting access to a certain thing would mean that all of the “bad” things would magically go away, but they will not. Evil has always and will always exist, and I have every right to defend myself from it using the best tool available wherever I, or my family, choose to go. Restricting access on certain properties (the government isn’t actively protecting me everywhere), requiring certain training (who is paying for this?), limiting certain types of firearms (go ahead and define “assault weapon” in plain language please), and restricting ammo purchasing (I thought you wanted us to train; how does this help then?) are all means that end up hurting the average person and helping those who wish to hurt others, as the rest of us will be left in a position to insufficiently defend ourselves. I urge you to understand that while, yes, it is awful that evil people commit horrific acts, this right ultimately allows me to protect myself and my family from these evil people as well and as evil will always exist (we certainly like to delusion ourselves into believing that we live in a utopia, but we do not), I will protect my family accordingly. The government has no right to restrict this. Leave the peaceful citizens alone, more firmly punish those who hurt others, and help communities where this is an issue to prevent the upbringing of more evil people.
I oppose these bills that are attacking the rights of law-abiding gun owners.
Please stop trying to make criminals of law abiding citizens who just want to protect themselves. Me and my partner have recently become firearm owners because of situations that have arisen in our day to day lives, such as harassment of my wife almost to the point of altercation, sketchy characters waiting in front of our door/ducking in and out of our bushes at all times of the night, people breaking into cars in the neighborhood etc (many times the police/security were called only to arrive 45mins to an hour later). with many of these nonsensical bills you condemn us to allowing any possible violence to happen to us without a chance of defending our selves. Instead of helping fix the problem, you seek to make criminals out of any Virginian who has followed the law and legal purchased a firearm. Shame on you. I am Virginian native and since I was 18 I voted leaning blue in local and state elections you all are making me think this was a mistake. I am not proud of Virginia “progressives” who would rather strip my wife of her chance and right to defend her self rather than try to address the root of crime. Don’t make law abiding people criminals. Do some actual work and address the criminals! 2 of the proposed bills would make in illegal to bring your concealed firearm into a restaurant and another makes it a crime to have the firearm in your vehicle…. Like really? This is literally just to fill jails and strip people of their rights.
Many of these gun laws are unfair to law abiding citizens and do not affect criminals. These gun laws should be vetoed.
State Legislature members, A right delayed is a right denied. Quoting the 2022 NYSRPA v. Bruen Supreme Court Case: 'The constitutional right to bear arms in public for self-defense is not “a second-class right, subject to an entirely different body of rules than the other Bill of Rights guarantees.” McDonald, 561 U. S., at 780 (plurality opinion). The exercise of other constitutional rights does not require individuals to demonstrate to government officers some special need. The Second Amendment right to carry arms in public for self defense is no different.' The recent NYSRPA v. Bruen case highlighted the significance of individual self-defense, and it's crucial to consider the rights of law-abiding citizens in crafting firearm legislation. While the goal of enhancing public safety is commendable, an outright ban on certain firearms and magazines will disproportionately impact responsible gun owners who use these tools for legitimate purposes, such as self-defense and sport. It is essential to strike a balance between public safety and the preservation of individual rights. Instead of blanket bans, and bureaucratic obstacles that only harass lawful firearm owners, we should focus on comprehensive measures that address the root causes of gun violence. This approach respects the constitutional rights of citizens while fostering a safer society. Criminals are not deterred by restrictions on lawful purchase at federally-licensed FFL Dealers. They do not bother going through the process of applying for a concealed carry permit, because they do not intend to carry lawfully. People who want to use weapons to hurt innocent citizens of Virginia will not be impeded by these House and Senate Bills. Instead, the only individuals who will have their behavior modified are lawful men and women who are unable to defend themselves against those who will commit crimes regardless of what is written into law this Legislative Session. If you pass the above laws, it will only serve to waste hard-working Taxpayers' money fighting them in Federal Court. California and New York have lost their cases seeking to uphold unconstitutional gun laws, and the sponsors of these bills will lose too. Do the right thing - the hard thing - enforce the laws we already have, get the small minority of violent criminals off the streets of Virginia, and uphold the constitutional rights of your polity.
These bills infringe on the rights of the United States citizens given to us by the second amendment. The only thing these bills will accomplish will take the firearms out of the hands of law abiding citizens, while criminals will still have access.
I do not support any bill that removes any right from law abiding citizens to protect themselves from those who WILL NOT abide by these laws. These laws ONLY give CRIMINALS the upper hand.
There are approximately 47 bills regarding gun control between the House and Senate. Rather than fix issues that actually protect and enhance the lives of Virginians, many of these bills seek to disenfranchise and reduce the safety of the citizens in this great Commonwealth. Firearms are so fundamental to the founding and continued existence of our free society that they are listed just second to the freedom of speech in amendments to the constitution. It is plainly clear to all that countries and states who have banned or severely restricted firearms that violence does not end with their banning. Unjust deaths are not prevented. It simply ensures that law abiding citizens are left defenseless from those that wish to harm them, whether that be individuals or an organization. I write this knowing that it will be completely disregarded by the bills authors, but in hopes that others feel galvanized to speak up against unjust actions made in the name of progress. To those who wish to protect themselves with firearms while simultaneously stripping them from the common man, may you take heed of the Virginia state motto.
A lot of these laws contradict one another. I can’t support them. Both of our parties have failed us.
Stop trying to strip 2nd Amendment rights from law abiding citizens with a constitutional right to own and carry firearms. Not a single one of these laws/bills you’re trying to enact would have stopped any of the mass shootings we’ve seen.
I oppose all of these blatantly unconstitutional bills and wish our elected officials would actually get to work on fixing things that matter to Virginians.
I oppose this bill as it seeks to infringe on the Consitutionally proctected rights of lawabiding citizens to protect themselves from criminals, criminals who do not follow the law. This bill makes it harder for someone to keep themselves safe and is primarily a solution in search of problems to fix. Virginia has one of the lowest crime rates in the country and even less gun related crimes being committed year over year. This is not due to gun control laws, in fact as gun control laws increase, so does the rate of violent crimes. Criminals are not afraid of police, they are afraid of armed citizens. I urge the legistature to focus on enforcing and imposing stricter penalties for those that break our exsiting laws over creating new laws that only serve to penalize the law abiding citizens.
There is no acceptable reason to infringe upon the Constitutionally-protected (both US and Virginia's Constitutions) rights of Americans and Virginians. None of these bills purported to reduce gun-related violence actually seem to prioritize the reduction of causal effects of overall violence. Many of these are merely attempts to curb the rights of the People to keep and bear arms, because our legislative bodies are full of corrupt, weak, and contemptible individuals. Show us the bills for addressing the root causes of violence: mental health, income inequality, social instability, lack of education and educational opportunities, drug & human trafficking, or employment & wages (this list is not all-inclusive).
Time and time again it has been proven that criminals do not care about or follow restrictive firearm laws. Virginia already has some of the most restrictive firearms laws in the country ("B+" rating from Giffords), more unconstitutional infringements upon law abiding citizens is not the answer. We need to address the root causes (access to mental health resources for example) and not throw bandaids at it by punishing responsible, law abiding, gun owners. I oppose these bills and urge you to do the same.
These firearms bill are either redundant or unless in any meaningful way. If you care about reducing violence, please focus on criminals. Please stop trying to disarm families and law abiding citizen from protecting themselves.
Dear House of Delegates, I'm writing to you today as a concerned citizen. The introduction of bills aimed at heavily regulating firearms, is not warranted or wanted by the people of Virginia. Our nation stands at a crossroads, where the desire to address gun violence intersects with the constitutional rights affirmed by the Supreme Court. The Second Amendment's protection of the right to bear arms is not just a legal directive but a reflection of our commitment to individual freedom. In this context, the proposed regulations, while motivated by a commendable desire to reduce violence, raise significant concerns about their effectiveness and the potential consequences for law-abiding citizens. Research, including findings published in the Journal of Quantitative Criminology, suggests that the relationship between strict gun laws and the reduction of gun violence is not as straightforward as one might hope. Cities with stringent gun regulations continue to face challenges with gun-related crimes, indicating that those intent on violence often find ways to circumvent the law. This reality prompts us to question whether new restrictions will achieve their intended goal or merely place additional burdens on those who seek firearms for legitimate purposes, including self-defense. Moreover, the abundance of firearms in the United States presents a logistical challenge to the enforcement of such regulations. With more guns than people in the country, the task of significantly reducing the availability of firearms to criminals, without infringing on the rights of law-abiding citizens, is daunting. It is within this complex landscape that I urge you to consider the broader implications of the proposed gun control measures. The parallels drawn with other contentious issues, such as the regulation of women's healthcare, highlight the potential for policy decisions to inadvertently infringe upon individual freedoms and deepen societal divisions. Such outcomes not only detract from the intended goals of enhancing public safety but also risk alienating segments of the population whose support is essential for the advancement of our collective well-being. I respectfully ask that you consider the potential consequences of the proposed gun control measures, not just for the immediate future but for the legacy we leave for generations to come. It is my hope that, together, we can find a way to address the challenges of gun violence in a manner that honors our values, respects our freedoms, and genuinely enhances the safety and well-being of our communities.
I oppose HB 585. Question: How far does a CONVICTED SEX OFFENDER/PEDOPHILE have to live from schools and day care centers in VA? Answer: 500 FEET! (§ 18.2-370.3. Sex offenses prohibiting residing in proximity to children; penalty.) Question: How far does the FFL the neighbors are complaining about live from the school(s)? Answer: I have no idea, but I'm willing to bet a six pack it's about 1.5 miles. So community members, local officials and Mundon King are comfortable with convicted sexual abusers of children living down the street from a school or day care center but highly regulated, legal businesses that pose no known problem or danger must be outlawed? Nice priorities. While I agree that some people should not be permitted to own pointy knitting needles, you people are obscene in your choice to protect the rights of convicted pedophiles over the rights of legal businesses. Shame on all of you!
STOP INFRINGING OUR RIGHTS. Get rid of every single gun control bill that is here and START ENFORCING THE LAWS WE ALREADY HAVE. Stop trying to turn law abiding citizens into criminals. I am disgusted that all of these nonsense bills have even made it this far. You can have these laws in Northern Virginia where everyone hates guns but don’t force this garbage into the rest of the state. GET RID OF ALL OF THIS GARBAGE and keep your noses out of everyone’s business. More government is not the answer.
The second amendment is very clear in its intent that these rights “shall not be infringed”. Removing/ restricting law abiding citizens right to self defense and protection against unwitting organizations and persons is not only more harmful, but a clear violation of the rights this country was founded on.
Dear Honorable Members of the House of Delegates, I write to you today as a concerned citizen, deeply invested in the well-being and safety of our communities, and as someone who values the principles upon which our nation was founded. The issue at hand, the introduction of bills aimed at heavily regulating firearms, is one that I believe warrants a thoughtful reconsideration in light of its broader implications. Our nation stands at a crossroads, where the desire to address gun violence intersects with the constitutional rights affirmed by the Supreme Court. The Second Amendment's protection of the right to bear arms is not just a legal directive but a reflection of our commitment to individual freedom. In this context, the proposed regulations, while motivated by a commendable desire to reduce violence, raise significant concerns about their effectiveness and the potential consequences for law-abiding citizens. Research, including findings published in the Journal of Quantitative Criminology, suggests that the relationship between strict gun laws and the reduction of gun violence is not as straightforward as one might hope. Cities with stringent gun regulations continue to face challenges with gun-related crimes, indicating that those intent on violence often find ways to circumvent the law. This reality prompts us to question whether new restrictions will achieve their intended goal or merely place additional burdens on those who seek firearms for legitimate purposes, including self-defense. Moreover, the abundance of firearms in the United States presents a logistical challenge to the enforcement of such regulations. With more guns than people in the country, the task of significantly reducing the availability of firearms to criminals, without infringing on the rights of law-abiding citizens, is daunting. It is within this complex landscape that I urge you to consider the broader implications of the proposed gun control measures. The parallels drawn with other contentious issues, such as the regulation of women's healthcare, highlight the potential for policy decisions to inadvertently infringe upon individual freedoms and deepen societal divisions. Such outcomes not only detract from the intended goals of enhancing public safety but also ***risk alienating segments of the population whose support is essential for the advancement of our collective well-being.*** Constituents see this robust effort to "see what sticks" as a weakness within our party. Comparatively imbalanced with the diverse range of issues and concerns that we face everyday. A waste. As we move forward, I encourage you to approach this issue with a balanced perspective, one that recognizes the need for effective strategies to combat gun violence while also safeguarding the constitutional rights and freedoms that define our nation. The path to meaningful change is complex, requiring a nuanced understanding of the issues at hand and a commitment to policies that truly serve the best interests of all our citizens. In closing, I respectfully ask that you consider the potential consequences of the proposed gun control measures, not just for the immediate future but for the legacy we leave for generations to come. It is my hope that, together, we can find a way to address the challenges of gun violence in a manner that honors our values, respects our freedoms, and genuinely enhances the safety and well-being of our communities.
You guys need to stop attacking our 2nd amendment and get help for these kids growing up with identity crisis’s . You coming after law abiding citizens is appalling and the fact that your leaning towards becoming the despicable state of California is saddening. If the president can have security which uses firearms that even the normal civilian can’t have this raises the issue of how can a civilian defend against a tyrannical government with a featureless 10 round ar-15 ? Keep this up and we know exactly what your end goal is.
As a left leaning voter and citizen of Virginia, these new restrictions on our right to bear arms are sickening. Stop proposing so many bans and limits, and maybe a realistic bill, like the safe credit, won’t be universally protested. If you actually want to quell gun violence, keep focused on affordable mental and physical healthcare, improving the education system, and reducing income inequality. While the right may not support these real improvements, I cannot in good faith support or vote for any politician who supports banning or restricting the rights of law abiding citizens in our beautiful commonwealth. Thank you.
I am very opposed to the vast majority of these bills. I am a legal gun owner with my CHP. Many of these bills heavily restrict my right to bear arms in a legal capacity. I don’t understand why I should be punished for doing everything legally and correctly only to become a felon in the coming months through these legislations
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Whether or not a person chooses to exercise this right is up to them. Otherwise, it shall not be infringed.
I can not, and nobody should, support these unconstitutional laws. THROW THEM ALL OUT.
You guys make it harder and harder to vote Democrat every single cycle. Complete ban on Semi Automatics more or less making the state even stricter towards guns then states like Maryland? I oppose all these even the "herp common sense derp" ones because the states party has made it clear they don't give a crap about anything but putting hollow wins for politicians because hhheeeyyy punishing law abiding gun owners is a whole lot easier then creating jobs or reducing crime. If these bills die before getting to the governors desk, especially the bans, then I will gladly continue to vote DNC. But if Youngkin has to veto these and you make me say something I never thought I would "Thank god Youngkin won" then I look forward to blindly going down the ticket in 2024 and checking "R" on everyone. Thank you for taking the time to read this.
I do not support more legislation infringing on my 2nd Ammendment rights. Please fund more enforcement for the proactive enforcement of existing laws and regulations pertaining to firearms.
I oppose this legislation.
The litany of gun control measures under consideration will do nothing to effectively reduce crime and violence, and will only further restrict the rights of law abiding firearms owners. Not to mention the countless examples from other locales across the country where these same measure have been put into place and the result is more violent crime as criminals can now feel safe that the general population is not armed. Strongly oppose all proposed bills.
The ridiculous litany of gun control measures under consideration will do nothing to effectively reduce crime and violence, and will only further restrict the rights of law abiding firearms owners.
We dont need MORE laws regarding firearms, we need to enforce the laws that are already on the books. If enforcement is done then these laws are redundant and not necessary. Don't pass more laws just for the sake of passing laws. They do nothing but make law abiding citizens confused and they dont do anything to stop problems.
I am writing to express my great concern, to the legislatures that continue to ignore their oath of swearing to protect and uphold the rights of the citizens as protected by the United States Constitution and the Virginian Constitution. "The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED". You beaurcrats do not grant that right to he people, it is God given. While you grandstand and ateemlt to make laws to hurt the everydayaw abiding American citizen, you turn a way and do nothing in these bills to punish criminals committing crimes. It is already illegal to murder people. To grandstand and think that any of these bills would stop someone from murdering or harming another person is laughable. Quite literally. You pander screaming about these firearm safety bills while you walk around with security and people with "guns" to keep you safe. Start enforcing the existing laws against criminals who commit crimes vs trying to turn law abiding people, who take training, are serious about protection of family, themselves and others, and trying to disarm them and make them criminals. Or we will vote you out! Uphold your Oath or be prepared for the consequences your actions lead to by the American people. Regards Mr. Harris
I am opposed to additional new laws or further regulations placed on firearms or other means of self defense, or which limit the ability to conduct commerce or carry such items. Not only does the constitution make it clear this is a violation of my rights, it does nothing to address or reduce the actions of criminals.
I am against all of these blatantly unconstitutional firearms restrictions. I'm strongly against: SB2| Deeds | Assault firearms certain ammunition, etc.; purchase, possession, sale, transfer, etc., prohibited. This tries to ban things that are in common use, which has never worked well for the government, remember Prohibition? Remember the war on drugs? Just like the last assault weapons ban, this will literally just make AR-15s more popular and easier to get illegally. And I am against: HB585 | Mundon King | Home-based firearms dealers; prohibited near schools, penalties. That specifically targets home-based FFLs whose house is somewhere near a school. This would put hundreds of Virginia residents out of business just because of where they live.
I strongly oppose any bill, law or ordinance that infringes on the undeniable constitutional right to keep and bear arms. These include any ban, any further age restrictions, if a person (18) is old enough to join the military and use real "assault weapons" then they should be fully capable to purchase a semi automatic firearm of their choice. I oppose any law or ordinance that restricts my ability to defend my family and myself as I see fit, this includes bans on where I can carry my lawful firearm, what type of firearm and the magazine size of my choice. How about we make laws that are tougher on criminals and stop punishing law abiding people who actually care and follow the law.
All infringements on the second amendment are acts of treason and should be treated as such. Acting in favor of such infringements makes you a traitor to this nation and th commonwealth.
I am Opposed to any limitations on the Second Amendment and any restrictive firearm laws. We have adequate, if not already overbearing, laws on the books now and should not be creating more laws restricting all the aspects of firearm use, sales, and any other aspects of the right to bear arms.
These firearm laws are mostly reactionary to the media response on firearms. This is a major infringement on the 2nd amendment and needs to be stopped.
An inordinate focus on the control of firearms only serves to infringe the rights of the law-abiding citizen in defense of his life and property. The State should instead focus on the apprehension and incarceration of individuals engaging in criminal behavior and associated misuse of firearms.
Any law that infringes on my Gods-given right to own and bear arms is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Any law passed that infringes this right will be answered with a lawsuit.
Hello. There are a plethora of bills that were proposed, which would clearly violate the second amendment rights of many law abiding citizens. First of all, considering concealed carry should be permit-less carry, it is counterproductive to increase the requirements for concealed carry. Restrictions on where law abiding citizens can lawfully carry their now “permitted” firearms is asinine, as well as the proposition of a bill that would make it a penalty to leave a firearm in your car. You would essentially be disarming a large number of people who wish to follow these unlawful order in a day and age where the democratic agenda is to act like there are mass shootings on a daily basis. Effectively disarming the majority and increasing the requirements and legal loopholes to carry is such a vulnerable state to be in and I hope we’re smart enough to avoid that. Restrictions on “Plastic firearms and unfinished frames etc” is not only terrible literature that does nothing to explain, but it is a direct violation of the 2nd amendment considering you have a federal right to make firearms for personal use, which would include additively manufactured parts. Wait periods are also a horrifying thing to think of, considering how many times it has been proven to be a terrible idea, keeping guns out of the hands that need them most to protect themselves and their families. “Assault firearms” and anything to do with them is nonsense considering the blatant inability to define said “assault weapon”. People who don’t understand guns, shouldn’t be making laws on guns. A shorter barrel does not make it more lethal, in fact it lowers the muzzle velocity, causing less force on impact and penetration, in turn causing less collateral damage. Any sort of “assault weapons” bills are targeting law abiding citizens who have every right to use the modern advances in firearm technology just as police officers and military. The only people these bills are effecting are the already law abiding citizens. The criminals who got their hands on said weapons illegally aren’t going to be making sure that their ALREADY ILLEGAL WEAPONS are fully compliant with state laws and regulations before they go commit another crime. In no way shape or form should someone need to disadvantage themselves in a life or death situation because political members with an armed security detail don’t feel the need for a gun. Why would I want to limit myself to a firearm that is going to be inadequate in home defense, or one that does not have a high enough capacity to protect myself from the ever growing threat of home invasion and the increased trend of multiple home invaders breaking in armed. If it was you alone in your house with 6 armed intruders who most definitely must have checked their local laws and firearm regulations and made sure their firearms aren’t violating any rules before they break into your house, would you want to limit yourself to a low capacity firearm that is going to be extremely difficult to use effectively in a high stress situation, or are you taking a rifle which for reasons that don’t make sense, must have a 16 inch barrel, with a larger capacity magazine, and a stock that you can use to safely brace the firearm to prevent stray shots and provide more accurate fire. Personally I’m going to take anything and everything I can get in a situation that means life or death for me and my loved ones EVERY SINGLE DAY OF THE WEEK. Focus on the mental health crisis.
Gun laws do not prevent firearm homicides, based upon gun control organization's own data (Giffords) •No correlation between strict gun laws and firearm homicide incidents •.07 coefficient of determination (AKA R2) where .90 is a strong association •There likely would be a weak association showing gun laws driving the firearm homicide rate higher if Washington, DC was given a score and ranked by Giffords.
Hello, The right to own and bear firearms is intrinsic in the very nature of the founding of the United States. We must remember the spirit of the 2nd Amendment and the right of all civilians to own and bear arms. Firearms are the great equalizer and can allow and individual to defend themselves when they previously could not. Gun violence and the mental health epidemic are closely interlinked and one cannot pass restrictive firearm laws and expect gun violence to go away. Gun bans and the use of restrictive purchasing requirements, magazine limits, waiting periods, and red flag laws have been shown not to be effective in stemming gun violence. I urge anybody reading this message to say "NO" to 2nd Amendment restrictions.
I strongly, along with many fellow Virginians oppose any villainous disarmament bills disguised as "public safety". The second amendment clearly states "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" and out of touch elitist politicians who enjoy the luxury of armed security are choosing to ignore the constitution and force us to rely on sub-par police protection. The same people who want to defund the police want to disarm us. Embracing the second amendment is what is keeping our crime rates low compared to New York and California. We have seen the blatant disregard that criminals have for these so-called laws; emboldened criminals who are not afraid of the consequences and innocent law-abiding people who are forced to live in fear because a bunch of tyrants are letting power corrupt them. I do not want to live in fear and neither do the rest of us. In addition; a lot of counties and cities have declared themselves as second amendment sanctuaries to protect the rights of free individuals from the overreach of tyrannical politicians. These bills are a Trojan horse that will lead to more crime. You anti-gun politicians should be ashamed of yourselves; give up your private security and train yourselves. Then you will change your minds; because in the end, nobody is coming to save you. I would rather have a fighting chance against armed assailants than die waiting for help to arrive. These bills are pure evil
These all seem like infringements that will do nothing to curb any crime. Further they will only create criminals out of everyday law abiding folk. These are laws that seem to be targeting victimless crimes.
I'm against any unconstitutional law, and any law that strips Americans of their rights. These laws are an attack on the 2nd ammendment and hold NO facts in stopping crime. They are a punishment on law abiding people and in no way will make virginia a safer place.
I oppose all these unconstitutional, dangerous, and pointless laws.
I oppose this bill as it seeks to infringe on the Consitutionally proctected rights of lawabiding citizens to protect themselves from criminals, criminals who do not follow the law. This bill makes it harder for someone to keep themselves safe and is primarily a solution in search of problems to fix. Virginia has one of the lowest crime rates in the country and even less gun related crimes being committed year over year. This is not due to gun control laws, in fact as gun control laws increase, s o does the rate of violent crimes. Criminals are not afraid of police, they are afraid of armed citizens. The subject of this bill has already been defeated in courts, passing this into law will only subject the Commonwealth to more lawsuits to have it repealed costing us more in taxes. Enough of our taxpayers money has been wasted in politicians attempting to pass "feel good" bills to try and prove they are doing their job. I urge the legistature to focus on enforcing and imposing stricter penalties for those that break our exsiting laws over creating new laws that only serve to pe nalize the law abiding citizens.
I was born in Henrico county and vote in every election. Guns are currently the #1 killer of our children under the age of 18. I am writing to show my support for these bills because gun violence prevention is my top priority. Please support gun safety legislation that is brought up for a vote! Thank you so much for your time.
My name is Laura Sledge and I am your constituent. Guns are currently the #1 killer of our children under the age of 18, and gun violence prevention is my top priority. Please support gun safety legislation that is brought up for a vote. Here are the bills I support. Thank you for your time.
Please support HB 318, HB319, HB351, HB362, HB585, HB602, HB637, HB791, HB797, HB798, HB798, HB799, HB 861, HB16, HB45 Let's keep our children and other innocent bystanders safe!
Hello, My name is Hayley Redmond Cilley. Guns are currently the #1 killer of our children under age 18, and I am calling because gun violence prevention is my top priority. Please support gun safety legislation that is brought up for a vote! We need safer communities for all, but especially for our children.
I opposed HB585. This bill unjustly punishes lawful businesses. This is not a solution to prevent school shootings. There needs to be more education and training at a local level to identify and guide a potential school shooter down a different path.
I'm attaching an example of the areas that would be restricted in the Richmond, VA area. As you can see, this bill would make it almost impossible for a home-based FFL to operate. All of the green circles represent a 1.5 mile radius around a school. This attack on lawful, highly regulated businesses is unwarranted and unamerican. It will do nothing to promote safety and will cost the taxpayers unnecessary expenses. The bill would put 70% of the FFLs in Virginia out of business, closing over 1,400 businesses. This will cost the state tax revenue, and will decrease public safety, not increase it.
HB 585 is a deeply flawed and discriminatory proposal that directly threatens the viability of Virginia's home-based FFLs. These small businesses, which have demonstrated a commitment to safety and regulatory compliance often surpassing that of their brick-and-mortar counterparts, are integral to the state's economic fabric and community security. The legislation is alarmingly detached from objective data and is propelled by subjective biases, setting a perilous precedent of targeting lawful enterprises without just cause. Its ripple effects will be felt across the Commonwealth, establishing prohibitive barriers to lawful firearm ownership, and severely infringing upon the constitutional rights of citizens from all walks of life. In summary, HB 585 constitutes a blatant overstep that jeopardizes economic freedom, public safety, and constitutional liberties in Virginia. It is imperative that this proposal be reevaluated and dismissed to prevent the widespread and unwarranted damage it portends.
I strongly oppose HB585. It unfairly targets home-based FFLs and would virtually eliminate them in the Northern Virginia area on the basis of preventing something that is not even an issue and could actually result in more risks itself. Removing locations for lawful citizens to purchase firearms from licensed FFLs is not a logical way to prevent criminal issues from gun violence.
Eliminating home-based FFLs for any reason is unacceptable. In my experience, home-based FFLs are generally better and safer than brick & motor storefront FFLs. The lower volume of transfers/customers allows a more personal and professional experience. The home-based FFLs I use always have an atmosphere that promotes safety & thoroughness, more so than most stores I visit. I can see no merit in regulating these businesses based upon proximity to a school and cannot envision this having any positive, quantifiable impact upon public safety.
Limiting FFL’s infringes on our rights.
Dear Sir or Madame. Last year in Newport News I was assaulted by a 27 year old black man from Chesapeake because of his road rage.. This was at my local bank 11;30 in the morning. This young man almost lost his life at my hand because you cannot reel in your problem young men. His words feet from me were ' im going to kick your ass and then kill you'. My pistol changed his mind. I saw for myself the woke judges and a woke system that perpetuates the problem. The criminal justice system has been flung far far left which IS causing a public safety hazzard. No new gun control is needed. More jail time for the trash that i dealt with is. My Congressman Bobby Scott and Delegate Cia Price do not represent me.
I am a member of VA Moms For Change, a gun violence prevention group and I support these bills
When Democrats violate the Covenant between the PEOPLE and the US Constitution as well as the VA Constitution they are acting lawlessly and undermining the commitment toward good Government agreed on for over 200 + years. Seems Democrats didn't learn anything from the Civil war. The mentality of the "Tyrant" and the "Slave Holder" still exists among the Demo-rat Party, removing statues and trying to hide and rewrite history is not good government. Oaths, integrity, and Good Government, mean nothing to this Cabal of Evil minded men and women. We the PEOPLE need and demand good government not a patch work or illegal laws we are expected to "obey" while the "perps" that pass them have no consequence for breaking Constitutional law or good Government. The Demo-rat Party needs to be dismantled and the "ignorant" ejected from the Virginia legislature at once and for all. Peter Buckingham Crozet, VA 22932
I am a responsible firearms enthusiast who, though not registered with any political party, has consistently voted for Democratic candidates for the last two decades. This bill is a terrible idea; home-based FFLs provide valuable, affordable services to citizens of the Commonwealth who wish to acquire guns for personal protection and/or sport. Some home-based FFLs specialize in catering to LGBTQ+ persons or members of other minority communities who do not feel comfortable buying guns at retail outfits, many of which attract a deeply conservative clientele. All home-based FFLs are also inherently small businesses, which I do not believe Virginia should be discouraging. The bill will do nothing to make children safer, or anyone else- people will obviously still be able to possess and transport firearms near schools, in neighborhoods, etc. It just punishes residents of the state by directing sales to larger businesses, including pawn shops and big-box sporting goods chains. Please reconsider this proposal.
OPPOSITION to HB12 - Jones OPPOSITION to HB23 - Laufer OPPOSITION to HB158 - McClure OPPOSITION to HB183 - Simon SUPPORT of HB289 - Wiley OPPOSITION to HB351 - Clark OPPOSITION to HB585 – Mundon King SUPPORT of HB756 - Walker OPPOSITION to HB791 - Henson OPPOSITION to HB861 - Hernandez SUPPORT of HB872 - Earley SUPPORT of HB1141 - Cordoza OPPOSITION to HB1174 - Sickles SUPPORT of HB1198 - Scott
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
This bill won’t do anything but ruin good people.
Hello, I'm writing this in opposition to HB585. There is no reason why law abiding FFLs should not be allowed to exist within a 1.5 mile radius around schools. There has been no research proving that even a small minority of FFLs do not follow safe practices with gun handling and storage. This law only exists to make it more difficult for legal citizens to apply for a Federal Firearms License if there home exists with few minutes drive of a school. Please vote no on this bill or else risk a lost vote on your next election cycle. Best, Shawn Foster.
First of all, there is no data/statistics to show that residential FFL's pose a threat to nearby schools. Residential FFL's are not conventional retail firearms dealers. All they do for the most part is run background checks for customers who order a firearm online retailer. Residential FFL's don't have stocked inventory in a retail style setting - there are no display cases full of firearms. Residential FFL's essentially operate in an administrative capacity from their kitchen table and simply facilitate the enforcement of current gun laws that require EVERYONE be subject to a background check when purchasing a firearm. With the nature of commerce shifting to primarily online shopping, firearms sales are no different. Consumers shop online to get the lowest price on the item they want to purchase. In contrast for example, every retail gun store in Woodbridge operates within 1.5 miles of a school and those stores will always have stocked inventory, etc. For example, All Shooters Tactical in Woodbridge is ~1700ft from Gar-Field High School and Woodbridge Gold and Pawn is within 4000ft (less than 1 mile) of not one, not two, not four but FIVE schools (Belmont Elementary, Fred M. Lynn MS, R Dean Kilby Elementary, Cardinal Montessori and Occoquan Elementary). 1.5 miles is an unreasonable distance to restrict this activity. Everyone lives within 1.5 miles of a school. There are already existing statutes for Gun Free School zones which mandate 1000 ft Also there is no data to support that residential FFL's are more prone to break in's, etc. Again, in contrast, all of the last firearms dealer thefts in NoVA were all from retail locations. Residential FFL's are bound to the same licensing requirements and guidelines provided by the ATF, so ALL active FFLs have met those requirements. This bill is a direct attempt to reduce the legal means in which law abiding citizens have to purchase a firearm since background checks are required by law shrouded in a false pretenses. Should be focused on ENFORCING current gun laws, which are effective when enforced.
Stop your manipulate laws to infringe our 2nd Amendment rights. We are sick and tired of you sons of vipers promoting degenerate ideology and tyrannical rules. If guns are so bad, make the government give up their guns first before the citizens. Let's see how that goes for you all liars.
I am writing in support of HB 12, 23, 158, 183, 351, 585, 791 and 861. I also write in opposition to HB 289, 756, 872, 1141 and 1198. There is ample evidence that minimal restrictions on firearms has resulted in countless deaths and injuries. Sensible restrictions on access to lethal weapons are sorely needed at this time. In fact, the Supreme Court, in deciding on the right to bear arms, has also stated that “Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited. [It is] not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.” If, unfortunately, assault-style weapons continue to be manufactured and owned, their access must be limited by age. In that case I would support HB 1174. Thank you for your attention to these comments.
This bill is not a step in the right direction. All it does is put honest law abiding citizens out of business. I wholeheartedly disagree with this bill and what it will do for me as a consumer.
I have historically used home-based gun dealers as they provide the best customer service to their customers. I have used my dealer Dan for many transfers for my collection because he is a veteran, very knowledgeable about our changing gun laws and procedures. This is a clear example of abusive regulation intended to drive good people out of business and is in no way related to SAFETY. My collection exceeds the number of guns stored by a small home-based dealer and thus this bill is counter-productive.
As a long time law abiding gun owner I don’t see how this legislation does anything but benefit brick and mortar gun dealers. While it feels good to cloak this in the interest of children’s safety it actually does nothing to further this. I’d like to see a focus on effectiveness rather than making a hollow gesture with unintended consequences. Why not make things more difficult for criminals and those with serious mental issues?
I am a member of the Charlottesville Coalition for Gun Violence Prevention and the Charlottesville Center for Peace and Justice. I support all the gun safety bills: 12 23 158 183 351 585 791 861 1141 1174 I oppose these bills: 289 756 872 1198
HB-585 should not be passed: Home-based FFLs follow the same standards and processes as brick and mortar gun shops and we are subject to the same compliance inspections Home-based FFLs are no more likely to let guns fall into the wrong hands than any other business model. Proximity of Home-based FFLs to a school has no effect on public safety -- FFLs are not putting fully loaded weapons in the hands of the purchasers during the firearms transfer transaction. Getting rid of Home-based FFLs reduces price competition on lower FFL fees as well as ease of access to local FFLs
This is unnecessary and harmful legislation that will not have an effect on gun violence or public safety. It will, instead, put many small businesses out of commission. Smart legislation to increase public safety is required - addressing the actual causes of gun violence. Please reconsider options to convert this from political posturing to socially beneficial.
. Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Opposed
I oppose HB585. This proposal is a direct attack on small business. HB585 would do nothing except hurt FFL’s. This bill will not prevent nor stop any crime, it will only serve the Democrat agenda to blindly attack the Second Amendment in any way possible.
This is an absolutely ridiculous bill that the Democratic party is using, along with Mrs. King, to force their toxic communist agenda onto the residents of NoVA. The fact that this CLEARLY targets residential FFL's is pretty sinister seeing that almost every Residential FFL is located within 1.5 miles of a school. Clearly the democrats, and Mrs. King, are just trying to shut these businesses/people down, which will almost certainly be the framework for more bills/restrictions to come soon after. Seeing that almost every physical gun store in Woodbridge and Manassas are located, and operate, within 1.5 miles of a school, again this clearly shows they are focused on shutting down the residential FFL's before moving on to the larger businesses. This bill is absolutely useless in helping solve/fix anything in today's culture. We don't need less gun stores or FFL's. Instead we need better, more competent people in power that understand that these issues across the US stem directly from the mental illnesses that are openly celebrated by the Democrats. They, and Mrs. King, are the issue/cancer in today's society, not these FFL's that are trying to operate lawfully and legally. For those reasons, I fully support throwing this bill out in its entirety and urge the committee voting on it to be very careful as this will once again set another precedent that will almost certainly take us down a slippery slope with the Democrats and their agenda towards banning all guns.
I do not support the bill that seeks to eliminate home-based FFLs from any area within 1.5 miles of a school. In Alexandria we have several of these businesses that are a benefit to the community. There isn't a square inch of property in Northern Virginia that isn't within 1.5 miles of a school, so this would effectively wipe out all home-based FFLs in NoVa. This bill would shut down thousands of small legitimate small business owners and do nothing at all to advance public safety. This benefits only retail store-front gun dealers. Home-based FFLs follow the same standards and processes as brick and mortar gun shops and are subject to the same compliance inspections. They are no more likely to let guns fall into the wrong hands than any other business model. And the proximity to a schools has no effect on public safety.
Please stop wasting your time and my money on bills that have proven to be have zero impact on public safety, Please refer to Maryland, California, and the other states that already have these laws
So, how many crimes have been committed by FFLs within 1.5 miles of a school??? Are people people picking up guns from FFLs within this area and committing crimes??? Yeah, no. This is an idiot bill submitted by an idiot. I vehemently oppose this bill. Here's an idea, how about prohibiting crime within 1.5 miles of a school?
No on 585. There is no coorelation of residential FFLs to threats to a school. This bill harms the professions of citizens without any reductuon in risk or increase in school safety.
Good afternoon, I am writing to implore you to STOP with all of the gun control bills. You are punishing law abiding citizens, who now have their RIGHTS THAT SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED, infringed. And the criminals who do NOT follow these laws but who they are directed at, are not affected. Please enforce ALL of the laws that are presently in the books and prosecute those people breaking the laws and stop letting them out on bail and bond through the Soros DA’s.
Oppose this bill. This bill seeks to destroy small-business owners. I have gone to an FFL that operates out of their house multiple times. There are no signs or indicators that the house even stores firearms. All the bill will do is criminalize the business owner, cause them to lose their own source of livelihood or forcefully move them out of an area they would have otherwise been able to conduct business as they have been in the past.
In regards to HB 585, this is a purposeless bill that will do nothing to help lower gun crimes. It would actually do the opposite and cause more by making normal law abiding citizens into criminals. It does nothing besides infringe on law abiding citizens 2nd amendment right. If this were to pass it would make me and I believe many other people second guess who to vote for in upcoming elections.
Dear state legislators, As a proud citizen of the United States of America and immigrant that escaped communist China, I wholeheartedly love America for all its values and traditions. Despite the flaws of our country, there are inherent rights we are proud of and despite the many challenges of second amendment protections and laws, the proposed legislative laws are not addressing any issues directly. Systemic issues that are being discussed do not fix the underlying problems of mental health and by taking action to make it more difficult for responsible Gun owners and enthusiasts from possessing firearms. Please reassess the systemic dynamics flaw in these proposed laws, as they are designed to negatively affect responsible gun owners and does not impact the actual crisis of mental health issues that occur when tragedies happen. Having escaped communist countries, the importance of keeping Americans safe but also protecting our rights is a difficult job, but taking away rights limiting our ability to purchase at our desire, responsibly, is a flawed process to fix the issues. I vote democratic every time I can, but these changes proposed to ban ARs and magazine capacities are not going to solve the issue. Increase funding for education, healthcare for the mentally ill, and address the root cause of parental problems that stem into more serious issues versus assuming alleviating the problem is by taking gun and firearm rights away from those that did not commit these crimes. I could speak more into this but as a young American and Virginian who believes in America, this should not be passed and will not do anything except make it clear there was no thought process that went into how this can be solved. Thank you for your time.
Proponents of allowing Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) to operate within 1.5 miles of schools emphasize the importance of upholding the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens. The right to bear arms is a fundamental constitutional freedom that should not be unduly restricted based on geographical proximity to educational institutions. Firstly, advocates argue that imposing restrictions on the location of FFLs near schools could infringe upon the rights of responsible gun owners without significantly contributing to enhanced safety. They contend that law-abiding citizens who obtain firearms through legal channels, such as FFLs, are not the primary contributors to gun-related crimes. Instead, the focus should be on addressing illegal firearm transactions and activities that pose a real threat to public safety. Additionally, proponents emphasize the importance of self-defense and the role firearms play in protecting individuals and their property. Restricting FFLs near schools may limit access to legal means of self-defense for law-abiding citizens living or working in those areas. They argue that responsible gun ownership, coupled with proper training and background checks facilitated by FFLs, can contribute to a safer community. Furthermore, advocates highlight the need to avoid blanket regulations that may disproportionately impact law-abiding citizens while not effectively addressing the root causes of gun violence. They argue for a more nuanced approach, focusing on comprehensive background checks, mental health evaluations, and education on responsible gun ownership rather than restricting the locations of FFLs. In conclusion, proponents argue that preserving the Second Amendment rights of citizens is crucial, and imposing restrictions on the proximity of FFLs to schools may not be the most effective way to enhance public safety. They advocate for a balanced approach that addresses the underlying issues associated with gun violence while respecting the constitutional rights of responsible gun owners.
This bill is a terrible piece of legislation that will not make our communities safer, have any sort of effect on crime, will burden tax payers and destroy hundreds of legal small businesses in the Commonwealth. I have a good relationship with my local, legal, firearms dealer. His business is managed within his home. I can tell you that as a busy working parent, time is of the essence, and my life doesn’t fit neatly in a 9-6 box. Home based FFL’s offer the greater flexibilty compared to retail locations store hours. Most home based FFL’s also offer better pricing for firearms transfers compared to retail locations. Locally, the least inexpensive retail location charges $40 per transfer; my home based FFL charges half of that. So I’m getting a service that is more convenient, cheaper, and more flexible compared to purchasing from a retail location. The current system works as designed; no home based FFL is willing to circumvent federal and state laws and risk their license by engaging in illegal activity. I say all of that to say this is a bad piece of legislation that will affect thousands of LAW ABIDING VIRGINIANS with absolutely no upside.
Has there been any form of analysis on the contribution of home-based FFLs to gun violence? Home-based FFLs have the same compliance requirements as a brick-and-mortar businesses, so it seems arbitrary to apply this rule as a special case.
In reference to all of the above proposed house bills…. In short there is NO need for any more restrictions of any type on the purchase (to include locations of ffls in reference to schools and forcing purchasers to buy locks when they already safely store their firearms), carry, storage, and use of any type of firearms. It is extremely clear that more restrictions do not do anything to stem the flow of violent crimes which may or may not involve firearms (using DC, Chicago, NYC etc as examples, where very strict firearms laws have done nothing to lower violent crime). Instead, we need to focus on allowing law enforcement to aggressively enforce the numerous existing laws, demand commonwealth attorneys offices hold criminals responsible and ensure long prison sentences on offenders. As a citizen of the commonwealth for my entire life, and a local law enforcement officer for over 2 decades I can tell you from personal experience simply adding restrictions and more laws is worthless and simply slows down the system. As they say when seconds count, the police are only minutes away…. Do not place any more restrictions on residents of the commonwealth who are forced to live in increasingly dangerous localities due to the legal changes of the past 5 years, which allow offenders to go unpunished or under punished. Simply because you do not like firearms does not mean that others should not have lessened access to purchase, use, and carry the firearms of their choice. Thank you for your consideration
I would like for the Commonwealth of Virginia to have Constitutional Carry as the law of the entire state , our right as stated in the constitution of the united states and the constitution of the Commonwealth of virginia as written by our founders gives each citizen the right to keep and bear arms with no exclusions, to be secure in their persons, unless that right has been forfeited,. Exercising this right should never lead to forfeiture of this right.
I would like for the Commonwealth of Virginia to have Constitutional Carry as the law of the entire state , our right as stated in the constitution of the united states and the constitution of the Commonwealth of virginia as written by our founders gives each citizen the right to keep and bear arms with no exclusions, to be secure in their persons, unless that right has been forfeited,. Exercising this right should never lead to forfeiture of this right.
This is a violation of the second amendment and an infringement on out rights
For HB12 and HB158: Already covered by federal law, no additional expense should be put on the FFL or the consumer. For HB23 and HB861: You are adding restrictions on personal protection and safety while not ensuring my safety and that of my family. I have been to hospitals in the commonwealth over the last few years, the security provided couldn't stop a squirrel from running through the hospital, much less someone with mal-intent. If you want the citizens to rely on the government for safety, then provide, otherwise don't restrict it. For HB585: You want to prevent FFLs from being within 1.5 mile radius of a school, yet smoke shops or other convenience stores that have vaping products are allowed, with the latter being a much bigger problem in our schools, yet no restrictions. It is silly to assume an FFL poses any danger to a school and I have yet to hear of any incident involving an FFL and a school. Most home based FFLs do not have long term storage. Please educate yourself before trying to implement "feel good" laws. We have other major issues with our schools that need to be addressed, i.e. teach retention, giving teachers more power for discipline, parental involvement/non-involvement, allowing for greater choice of subjects and stopping teaching to a test where our children learn nothing. For HB183: Another "Feel good" law. There have been multiple examples of minors protecting their family over the last several years. But, how would this law have stopped someone like the Sandyhook shooter, who killed his mother and took her safe keys? It wouldn't have. Just like it wouldn't stop a home invade killing the owner and using their safe key/finger print to access a firearm. For HB1174: At the outset this is unconstitutional, but if you want to effect real change in regard to this, open it up to an expanded background, where the applicant/purchaser that is under the age of 21 must consent to a check of their juvenile record in order to purchase, specifically looking for violent crimes. If this were in place, it may thwart some from attempting to buy, while those that continue and consent it would flag in the system, like it does when a felon attempts to buy a firearm at a gunshow. There is much more that needs to go into this, i.e. at what point when the applicant has an established adult history can they purchase after having violent crimes on their juvenile record, 25? 21? I implore every law maker to due their due diligence when it comes to rights stated in both the Virginia Constitution and the US Constitution. Do not be beholden to your donors and ram "feel good" laws through our legislature. When someone spouts statistics to you, take a moment and do you own research, look at the source material, anyone can make states lean in their favor by changing a few words or omitting parts of a study. You must work for the all the people, those you agree with and disagree with and look at all the information, not just what your donors give you. Thank you for your time.
House Bill to Ban Home Based FFLs HB 585 Proposed Democrat Bill Seeks to Eliminate Home-Based FFLs from Northern Virginia The idea is to ban home-based FFLs from operating within 1.5 miles of any school. There isn't a square inch of property in NoVa that isn't within 1.5 miles of a school, so this would effectively wipe out all home-based FFLs in NoVa. Anti-gun strategists and consultants have been coming up with clever ways to disrupt the gun industry. By singling out home-based FFLs, they are coming up with a strategy that benefits brick and mortar gun shops while relying on public ignorance about how FFL transfers work. Doing so would shut down thousands of small legitimate small business owners and do nothing at all to advance public safety. As consumers, you will have to go to retail store-front gun dealers for all sales and transfers. To be clear: Home-based FFLs follow the same standards and processes as brick and mortar gun shops and we are subject to the same compliance inspections We are no more likely to let guns fall into the wrong hands than any other business model Proximity to a school has no effect on public safety
I do not support this bill. It will shut down many at home businesses and affect many more people all for just having a legal business only for having it within 1.5 miles from a school. There is no reason for this and a waste of valuable time and money.
This is an arbitrarily written law that will do nothing to prevent school gun crimes but punishes small businesses. Yet another "gun control" measure that doesn't address the source of the problem or actually make real efforts to protect children. By law, FFLs must conduct thorough background checks. The distance from a FFL to a school is irrelevant to gun crime.
We, do not approve of these numerous bills aligned with insecurities and not with logic and our constitution. NO to HB585 Hb585 is even more so illogical to our commonwealth, by slandering private firearm businesses and their integrity and passion for our constitution with manufactured fear amongst the public with non existing false realities. HOME BASED FFL business adhere to all the same state and federal requirements that Cabelas and Bass Pro do. HB585 specifically targets the community in a negative aspect only. No everyday Virginia resident will see any benefit to this for the rest of their bloodline. The only benefit is to the criminals in our communities, by removal of access of everyday law Abiding citizens to the access of firearms in the community utilizing their 2nd amendment rights. HB 585 is aimed at dismantling the gun industry and not your childs safety. There is NO DATASET in existence that links school shootings, firearm presence in schools or accidental child access to firearms, to the PROXIMITY of home based FFLs to schools. The only thing that exists is uninformed emotionally manipulated parents misunderstanding of home based FFL requirements.
HB585 is clearly a thinly veiled attempt to close every law abiding gun dealer in the state. It's a back door attempt to ban guns and violate the 2nd Amendment. Do not vote for this bill. The governor won't sign it anyway, so please don't waste any more valuable time on it. John Miller Manassas
I oppose restrictions on home-based firearms dealer. There is no evidence of any situation that it created an unsafe environment and there is evidence that will create a monopoly on specific businesses.
Home-based FFLs follow the same standards and processes as brick and mortar gun shops and we are subject to the same compliance inspections We are no more likely to let guns fall into the wrong hands than any other business model Proximity to a school has no effect on public safety This bill is a complete abuse of power and overreach by the local government.
This is absolutely egregious. A home-based FFL is an enterprise that is cleared at a higher level of proficiency and familiarity with firearms issues than any authority VA - the FFL holders are cleared and backed by the ATF. Further, an FFL, home-based or otherwise, is an enterprise in the business of safe transfer of weapons to individuals after doing criminal checks on the prospective buyer. The location near a school is irrelevant - it does not constitute a threat to a school simply because an FFL is nearby. This is a bad faith argument, and false equivalence. It’s a thin veneer. Simply put, it’s been proposed by people who do not like private ownership of firearms, and schools were picked because (deceptively) because they are evenly districted and spread through the state - after all, they’re supposed to be, to allow children access to education without having to travel unreasonably far. This also means that selecting schools as the criteria for a “no home FFL bubble” means you effectively throw a blanket over the industry. This has nothing to do with the safety of children. I find this frankly offensive and dishonest. Show me evidence where an FFL near a school has caused a problem? More than that, show me a single instance where the location was any sort of relevant. You cannot. Because it’s not true. It’s false equivalence. Let me be clear. I am a liberal person. But part of being liberal means remembering that fear mongering and bad faith, secretive agendas hurt progress. They turn people against it. Drop this frivolous nonsense. Stop making us look like idiots, please. Your crusade against portions of the bill of rights (because come on folks, we know what it is, it’s misguided) opens up very dangerous precedents for other bad faith actors to whittle down the contents of the other amendments. Read a history book. Please.
Home-based FFLs follow the same standards and processes as brick and mortar gun shops and are subject to the same compliance inspections We are no more likely to let guns fall into the wrong hands than any other business model Proximity to a school has no effect on public safety
There isn't a square inch of property in Northern Virginia that isn't within 1.5 miles of a school, so this would effectively wipe out all home-based FFLs in Northern Virginia. Anti-gun strategists and consultants have been coming up with clever ways to disrupt the gun industry. By singling out home-based FFLs, they are coming up with a strategy that benefits brick and mortar gun shops while relying on public ignorance about how FFL transfers work. Doing so would shut down thousands of small legitimate small business owners and do nothing at all to advance public safety. As consumers, we will have to go to expensive retail store-front gun dealers for all sales and transfers. Home-based FFLs follow the same standards and processes as brick and mortar gun shops and are subject to the same compliance inspections. Home-based FFLs are no more likely to let guns fall into the wrong hands than any other business model. Proximity to a school has no effect on public safety.
This bill does nothing to address any actual violence problems. There's no difference between a "home based" and a brick and mortar FFL. They are subject to the same standards of compliance per the ATF. What problem does this bill even attempt to solve?? Kids leaving school to buy guns after class?? All this does is penalize hard working honest people. It will have zero results on crime or violence.
I do not support these bills. I request you vote NO on them. HB 12, Jones, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon, requires all firearms in a home be secured if there is a minor in the home. Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, prevents home-based gun dealers from operating within 1.5 miles of a school. Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, makes it illegal for anyone under 21 to purchase any kind of firearm. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen.
Constitutional issues when made political do no justice to representatives or their constituents. Dishonesty to the public erodes any ability for trust and assumptions based on party affiliation close down civil discussion. Some representatives run for office for gun control matters and get voted in but are you being honest with your constituents. I can quote statistics as could those supporting gun control but there are logical truths being ignored. We should change our terminology from gun control, to gun control over law biding citizens because each law that is passed in most situation only further restricts law biding citizens. Most gun laws only increase the ability to become a victim to criminal actions because in order to abide by laws implemented it puts the citizen at a considerable disadvantage . Gun free zones only mean unarmed citizens open to criminal behavior due to the inability to defend one's self. Law enforcement only enforce the laws, and cannot be there to prevent the actual crimes in most situations. Criminals intent on malfeasance will not abide by any laws put in place but exploit any such laws that allow for an advantage against an unarmed individual. This is not to say that I am apposed to back ground checks even at gun shows to avoid loop holes as I support such measures but to restrict carrying at locations or gun free zones only makes for sitting ducks. Restricting common circulation of rifles or any similar type to the AR-15 platform again only further limits the citizen from criminals AND tyrannical infrastructures within the state and federal levels. We can never assume that our representatives are in power for support of the people and our constitution I am not in support of any of the current gun control bills, I am in support of all the pro gun bills. In light of whatever is voted into law ,if it further restricts my constitutional rights and civil rights I simply cannot and will not comply. Thank you for your time on this matter.
As a fellow resident of Virginia, I urge you to OPPOSE the multiple anti-gun bills being heard today (1/25/24) in the House Public Safety Subcommittee on Firearms, including: HB 12 HB 158 HB 183 HB 351 HB 23 HB 861 HB 585 HB 1174 Please focus more on protecting lawful gun owners and enforcing the laws that career criminals routinely disregard. Thank you.
This bill seems pointless. What is the point of banning a legitimate business from conducting business in or around a certain radius from public property? Banning businesses from conducting business on their own private property is a serious government overreach.
Dear Delegates of the House Public Safety- Firearms subcommittee, The selected bills are flagrantly and utterly unconstitutional and they stand as a direct violation on the sovereignty and liberties of the citizenry of the Commonwealth. Plainly stated they violate the United States Constitution ( the Supreme Law of the Land) and the God given rights of the people which the Commonwealth purports to “protect”. Such legislation is also preposterous factually as firearms are not the “problem” , they are merely tools and as such they are inert objects that are incapable of exerting will without an evil individual wielding them for malevolent purposes. Criminality is the problem , as criminals do not have any regard for the law or the well being of their fellow man, hence the definition of criminal. Therefore all of the selected legislation put hence forth only seeks to disarm law abiding citizens, those that are neither inclined nor committed to violating the law. Law abiding citizens possess firearms to defend our lives, the lives of our families, and to ensure that our sovereignty and liberty is not stripped away from us by tyrannical Marxist ideologues masquerading as “compassionate” and “caring” legislators. This is not Washington, Illinois, or even Maryland, this is the great Commonwealth of Virginia. That Virginia which led the American revolution under George Washington and in the defense of liberty against the tyrannical crown of England that once sought to oppress and yoke the citizens of the American colonies. The motto that adorns the seal of Virginia and our great state flag is “Sic Semper Tyrannis”, which means “Death to Tyrants”. Such a motto is more apropos in the tumultuous political climate of modernity than ever before, perhaps even more so than during the revolution in which it was founded. Being elected to represent the people does not confer upon any individual the power to strip the people of their inalienable rights, those rights that were enshrined by our great founders in the Constitution. To violate the United States Constitution in an effort to subjugate the people of the republic is by definition treason. The citizenry of the Commonwealth has spoken, we demand that you cease attempting to violate the rights of the people and do the actual job that you were elected to do . If such malevolently contrived shibboleth manages to pass out of the House of Delegates and Senate without veto from Governor Youngkin we will not abide by, adhere to, or sanction unconstitutional mandates in any way. Mass noncompliance will be the response to such attempts to strip the people of their Liberty. Thank you for your attention and your time, vote no to this abhorrent legislation. L.S. McClung RN, PMH-BC, CARN
I am writing to oppose these anti-gun, anti-self-defense, anti-rights, bills. Having previously lived for nearly 20 years in another state with many of them and more, the experience of that state was that, contrary to crime dropping nationally to historic lows, their crime increased after restrictions were added. Unsurprisingly, criminals don't obey laws. They seek to exploit those who do. These laws taking away liberty and presumption of innocence of people who seek to obey laws, do nothing but create a maze of rules that ensnare unsuspecting good people who are unaware of the litany of restrictions, their nuance and ever-changing interpretation in the future. At best, people are forced to forgo their rights to self-defense entirely because they have one or more stops on their daily travels in a restricted area. Worse, otherwise law abiding people unaware of these many restrictions, find themselves in violation having no intention, history or desire to violate the law, much less hurt anyone. These are not the people with whom our criminal code and law enforcement resources should concern themselves. Even beyond that, if faced with a violent threat in these "sensitive places", those law abiding people will now be at an even greater disadvantage as we, the people, do not enjoy an armed and dedicated police force traveling with and around us as many politicians do. I noticed sniper teams on the roofs in the surrounding area during this past VCDL Lobby Day ensuring your safely against some hypothetical threat. We are not so fortunate as we go out in the world to have such resources protecting us. Worse yet, we had been been required to disarm prior to expressing our first amendment rights that day both outside and inside the building. Whether storage, locality of carry, age of an adult required to purchase or restrictions otherwise, law abiding people are not and never were the problem. Stop punishing them collectively for the actions of violent individuals. Respect and protect their rights and presumption of innocence as the US and Virginia Constitutions require of you. When you regulate firearms, it is not the machine of a firearm you are regulating. It is the people you are regulating. It is the rights of the people you are taking away. With all the supposed progress we have made, how is it that we are less deserving of liberty now than we were in the past?
Every single one of these proposed laws are blatantly unconstitutional under the plain text of both the Virginia and US constitutions. The SCOTUS has ruled multiple times, must recently in June 2022, that the 2A prohibits these types of attacks on free citizens. Voting for any of these bills is a waste of tax payer dollars, morally and ethically wrong, and, by definition of the courts already having ruled on these or similar laws as unconstitutional, an act of treason against the USA and by extension an insurrection.
I urge you to OPPOSE each of the following bills: HB 12 Federal law already covers this and additional state enforcement will create unnecessary expense. We don’t need more bills that could create negative financial impact on our community. HB 23 This is not constitutional under the Supreme Court Decision made in 2022: New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen. This bill prevents visitors, family, and staff from their right to self defense. Is it right to prevent an abused single mother from carrying her most effective tool of defense because she has to take her child to the ER? Wouldn’t this give anyone with nefarious intentions an easy location? Note: Cornell Law has published a clear summary of the Bruen Decision, easily accessed with an online search. I mention this case further below. HB 158 Federal law already covers this and additional State enforcement will create unnecessary expense. HB 183 Current law already covers 14 and under. increasing the scope of the law to apply to 15, 16, and 17-year-olds is an overreach. Minors in this age group have used firearms to save their own life and protect the lives of their families by stopping home invasions and violent attacks on their households. This bill is an overreach. HB 585 What problem is this bill trying to solve? What’s the difference between driving 1.5 miles or 5 or 10? This bill is unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Furthermore, home-based gun dealers don't usually have signs outside of their home. Buyers have to be invited in for a purchase and FFL transfer. Also, convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products (not legal for minors to purchase) are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791 BB guns, and other pneumatic projectile devices, are specifically designed as hobbyist or sporting equipment. Making the possession of these on school grounds a felony is a complete overreach. Are we going to outlaw sticks, or stones, or archery, or baseball bats? These are all similarly dangerous. If BB guns have been used for violence at a school, please inform me. Otherwise, this is a “fix” to a problem that doesn’t exist. HB 861 This is not constitutional under Bruen and prevents visitors, family, and staff from their right to self defense. Is it right to prevent an abused single mother from carrying her most effective tool of defense because she has to take her child to the ER? Wouldn’t this give anyone with nefarious intentions an easy location? HB 1174 This bill is not constitutional. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen. People in this age group are not minors. They are included in the same Second Amendment rights as older adults.
I'm a law abiding citizen, retired law enforcement officer, and responding Public Safety 1st Responder Chaplain. I have been called out, responding to or serving at a number of violent acts, anf times, often in dangerous areas. I believe in these violent times, and knowing that criminals don't and won't obey the laws, that I have a need and right to be able to defend and protect myself, and be able to continue carrying, as I have for many years. Our drivers permit is for all 50 states, and we don't have to stop at a state border. I believe a concealed carry permit should be the same, recognized in all 50 states. To have to leave my firearm inside my car, to go into a public building or rest area on the highway, can put me in needless danger. If I have to take off a d put my firearm in my trunk, it let's a criminal see where it is and I don't have it. That can let them steal the firearm and/or harm me. Please allow our law abiding citizens use their 2nd Amendment Right To Keep and Bear (bear = to carry) arms. We need to fully prosecuted existing gun laws snd crimes, Not Add More Gun Controls that criminals won't obey any way. Murder has been against the law for centuries, but increasingly still going on, sometimes unpunished.
To Whom it may concern, Regarding bill HB 585. I believe this bill is a waste of time. Never have I ever heard of someone picking up a firearm from an FFL and immediately running out to commit a crime with it. Normally FFL's dont have those firearms in their possession very long. As customers will usually come to pick them up after being notified that they have arrived at their FFL. Have some common sense and do away with this bill.
Please keep your gun grabbing hands off legally owned guns.Why not enforce the laws already on the books. Tell D.A. To do their jobs, go after the illegal guns. It is not legal guns that is the problem, it is the illegal guns. If more people carried legally crime could go down because the bad guys won’t know whose packing and could respond to crime. Thank you for reading my response. Alexander G. Morris IV.
The attack on the right to keep and bear arms has only increased over the past 18 months since the Supreme Court clarified in the Bruen decision the standard to which modern gun control legislation must be held. Many politicians around the country know that the bills put forth since that time are unconstitutional, but they also know it usually takes years to throw out their unconstitutional bills through court, and by then they have already cost time, money, and lives of American citizens. Rather than confront the underlying issues of our nation that lead to violence, they choose to take the easy way out and simply blame inanimate objects to deflect from their own political incompetency. Virginia representatives need to be better than that. The bills proposed are either duplicative of federal law, pointless, or dangerous. All are unconstitutional. All are a reflection of a disregard for commonsense safety measures like taking criminals off the streets. These bills must not be passed. Not because they will be signed into law, but because its the duty of Virginia state representatives to uphold the constitution and work to solve problems. These bills due neither.
Please do not vote for or advance any anti gun bills. Each one limits a citizens 2nd Amendment rights... I.E. banning commonly owned and used semi automatic rifles, which is unconstitutional under Bruen... Raising the age to purchase firearms. If one can serve in the military, one can purchase a firearm. Plus, its unconstitutional under Bruen AND a Virginia court ruled against it as well. Limiting where one can carry. This only creates more soft targets which criminals will not obey anyway. Banning unserialized firearms . Unconstitutional since some were made before 1968, when numbers were not required. Also, people have the right to build unserialized firearms in their homes for personal use. This has never been an issue, but decriminalization of crimes is causing an increase in violent crimes. THAT is a problem. Limiting how many firearms one can purchase in a given period is unfair. These are just a few . Please understand all the anti gun bills are unconstitutional, especially in light of the Bruen decision. I do urge you to vote for any pro gun bills. The right to keep and bear arms is a constitutional right. The Heller, McDonald, and Bruen decisions reinforce that right. The only limits on this right should be for criminals, illegal aliens, and anyone who has been mentally adjudicated/ forced into an institution. The issue we face should be how to repair our broken mental health infrastructure, not to limit the constitutional rights of law abiding citizens. Thank you Mr Raymond Pezzoli
I am writing to express my opposition to Virginia House Bill 585. This bill, which seeks to prohibit home-based Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) within 1.5 miles of elementary or middle schools, seems to be a solution in search of a problem which does not exist. Based on ATF data from January 2024, there are over 2,100 FFLs in Virginia. The vast majority of these are home-based businesses, and I would speculate that a substantial number of them are located within 1.5 miles of a school. This bill, in attempting to address a non-existent risk, does not take into account the exceptional record of safety and compliance of home-based FFLs in Virginia, and puts the livelihood of many hundreds of small business owners at risk. Home-based FFLs are a vital part of our community and economy. They provide essential services for responsible firearm ownership, including education, safety training, and lawful access to firearms. The majority of these FFLs are run by individuals deeply committed to promoting safe and responsible gun ownership in their local communities. Home-based FFLs also provide equitable access to the increasing ranks of traditionally underrepresented groups in the firearms community such as women and people of color. These home-based FFLs often serve as vital access points in diverse communities, offering more convenient and comfortable environments for these groups who might otherwise feel alienated in traditional gun store settings. Secondly, the rationale behind the bill seems to be rooted in a perception of increased risk or danger, which is not supported by data. Home-based FFLs have consistently demonstrated a high level of adherence to federal and state regulations. The stringent licensing requirements imposed by the ATF and by local regulatory bodies ensure that these businesses operate under strict guidelines to maintain public safety. Even with nearly 2,000 data points in communities across the state, there is simply no evidence supporting the risks this bill seeks to address or that the proximity of home-based FFLs to schools poses any increased risk to students or the community. The operation of these businesses is highly regulated, discreet, and does not interfere with the safety and security of school environments. In conclusion, while the intention of HB 585 to protect children is commendable, its approach is misguided and is an example of fear-based vs. fact-based legislation. It is a feel-good bill that unfairly targets law-abiding home-based FFLs, some of the most highly regulated individuals in the firearms community, without addressing any demonstrable risk. I urge you to consider the negative impact this bill would have on responsible small business owners across the state and to vote against it or any variation of it. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Greetings, My business is currently affected by this propose law, I'm within 800 feet of a school. I started a home based FFL because of my interest in firearms and also as a way to provide for my family. This law is solving a problem that doesn't exist. There are also more than 2,000 FFLs in Virginia, most of which are home-based in the state. I am not in support of this proposed legislation and neither are any home-based FFLs or their clients. We provide a service for the state and do background checks for every possible firearm to avoid criminals obtaining firearms. HB 585 is not a smart piece of legislation, this is an attack on small business owners and the second amendment as well.
To Whom It May Concern, HB 585, while under the guise of “public safety” is infringing upon the rights of public citizens to possess and do what they like on their private property. It is a step toward infringe upon their second amendment rights and I ask that this bill be struck down. Sincerely, Kelly Cabana
This proposed bill will put thousands of Virginians out of business for no reason. It will do nothing to advance public safety. Home based FFLs provide vital services to our communities in a safe and secure environment. We follow the same laws and standards as "brick and mortar" gun shops, children are no more likely to illegally obtain a firearm from us than they are any firearms business. The idea of banning entire business categories based on proximity to a school is arbitrary, deliberate, and bad faith attempt to shut down legitimate, tax paying firearm dealers and limit the public's access to firearms. Shameful.
Our freedom was won with illegal and unregistered firearms. Please look to the G.O. A. And VCDL for guidance on Second Amendment issues. Freedom first, safety second.
I support these bills!
Hello, I am providing my written statement in opposition to the following bills. I strongly feel these bills will undermine constitutional liberties to carry and possess firearms by law abiding citizens and in fact many of these bills are an attempts to fix a problem that doesn't exist. HB 12 Jones - requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. Do criminals purchase guns from dealers through a legal process? No, they don't. So providing a locking device and a "warning" sticker won't serve to curb any gun violence, only be one more thing for legal law abiding citizens to have to contend with when purchasing legally. HB 23, HB158, HB861 - prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. Have you been to Chippenham or MVC hospitals lately? In the last 90 days there have been multiple shootings inside these facilities by criminals and people intent on doing harm to those in need. I am a law abiding citizen who holds a concealed weapons permit in Chesterfield County, I attend frequent gun safety and training courses. Simply put, if you ban Concealed carry in these facilities, a good guy with a gun could never stop a bad guy with a gun, you would in effect be leaving the door open for criminals to commit mass casualty incidents against unarmed citizens. And are we supposed to rely on police response in these facilities? The mean time to respond by police forces across the country is 5-6 minutes. HB 585, Mundon King, prevents home-based gun dealers from operating within 1.5 miles of a school. This is unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. What data do you have and who thought there was such a "need" to fix this issue? How many home based gun dealers actually live within 1.5 miles of a school in Virginia? HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a Felony. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. What data was pulled to show the number of BB Gun incidents in schools in Virginia? This is a solution to a non-problem. How about you pass legislation that increases school resource officers funding, or better yet pass legislation that allows teachers to conceal carry with proper training in classrooms so god forbid there is another shooter incident, they can properly neutralize the situation without waiting on police response of 5-6 minutes. Less criminals would try to harm school children with the proper deterrence in place. This bill achieves very little in terms of moving the needle for safety in schools. HB 1174, Sickles, makes it illegal for anyone under 21 to purchase any kind of firearm. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen. Thanks for your time in these matters.
Hello, My name is Sameet Singh, I was born in Punjab, India and moved to Northern Virginia when I was 1 year old. Since then, I’veattended some great K-12 schools in the NOVA area, graduated from George Mason University in 2020, and now work in the Cyber Security field, serving one of our largest US Government Departments. My message to you today is not regarding any single bill in particular, but more of a mindset. I’m sure everyone here has a family that they would do anything for. We work hard everyday to provide for and to protect our families. And a big part in being able to protect, is having the right tool to protect yourself and your family members. This is why the best tool to have at your disposal is a firearm, a gun. Because if you or your family were attacked by someone in your home or out and about in public, a firearm, would be the best tool to have to save yourself and them from an attacker. Even if you’re able to call the police, it’ll at least take a few minutes for them to arrive, and sadly, within those minutes, only a few seconds are needed to completely change your world. Therefore, you are always your OWN first responser, before any other help arrives. This is why, anything, that would hinder your ability to protect yourself or your family with the best tool that you could use, a firearm, should really be re-thought. Unfortunately our society is not at the point where crime dosen’t happen, there’s no supernatural being or superhero that will swoop in to protect us in our times of need, there’s no Spider-Man or Superman who will save the day for us. However, the next best thing we have, is an responsibly armed citizen. A citizen who who is able to be gentle and loving with their kids and partner, but at the same time, prepared and alert at a moments notice when danger reveals itself. Thank you for listening, and thank you for your service to your communities, I wish you all a prosperous new year. Best, Sameet Singh
HB12 - Jones . I not not support . All firearms dealers currently offer a Firearm locking device on the sale or transfer of handguns. All new firearm come with a locking device and warning labels. child safety warning required. This doesn't change the current practice by dealers in offering for free locking devices. HB 23 Weapons; possession or transportation into facility that provides mental health services, etc. I do not support,. This bill does not exempt ems medical services or the fire service which many carry concealed when transporting patients to an emergency room or mental health facility on the duty. HB158 - McClure I do not support . All firearms dealers currently offer a Firearm locking device on the sale or transfer of handguns. All new firearm come with a locking device and warning labels. child safety warning required. This doesn't change the current practice by dealers in offering for free locking devices. HB183 - Simon HB289 - Wiley I support carrying a concealed handgun with a permit into public parking lots and storing there gun makes sense and do not unarm the citizen while in their personal vehicle. HB351 - Clark I not not support . All firearms dealers currently offer a Firearm locking device on the sale or transfer of handguns. All new firearm come with a locking device and warning labels. child safety warning required. This doesn't change the current practice by dealers in offering for free locking devices. most police departments give away free locking devices. HB585 - Mundon King I do not support this bill changes little firearms transactions which must be performed at a already approved ATF dealer location. 1.5miles is overreach by the state. HB756 - Walker I do not support. This limits gun rights. Not protection for EMS or fire personnel HB791 - Henson I do not support. This bill eliminates the number of programs that have pneumatic bb gun competition for 4 H at private or religious schools. HB861 - Hernandez I do not support,. This bill does not exempt ems medical services or the fire service which many carry concealed when transporting patients to an emergency room or mental health facility in the duty. HB872 - Earley I support . Always a lawful citizen to store a lawfully possessed firearm and ammunition in a locked private motor vehicle parked at any parking area owned or controlled by the Commonwealth. HB1141 - Cordoza I support HB1174 - Sickles I do not support changing the definition of an assault weapon widely and increasing the age which will make little difference. HB1198 - Scott, P.A. I support in reducing the fee
Vietnam Veteran - Retired Special Agent & LEO ( military 19 yrs & Federal 10 plus years) - that is me. Please consider the Bill of Rights; law abiding citizens rights to freedoms and rights of self protection. Criminals don’t follow laws against violence and criminal acts. Thank you
I oppose all of the gun control measures proposed in this session. I support Mr. Freitas' proposal for permitless carry.
Seems to me the General Assembly needs to pay attention to the Supreme Court rulings. Most of these bills if not all ignore what the Court has ruled on. Does the Gov. of Virginia think they are above the highest court in the land? Also, do not think for a Nano second that I believe these bills are about crime control. They are all about people control PERIOD. A Tyrannical state. I will fight this!!
I am submitting comments in opposition to these anti-gun rights bills. These bills do nothing to increase actual safety of Virginians. They serve only to further infringe upon our Second Amendment rights and those rights enshrined in our Virginia Constitution. Instead of focusing on the root causes of violent crimes, Democrats have chosen to target lawful Virginians' firearms rights. Most of these bills are a false solution for non-existent problems. Some of these bills would flagrantly be un-Constitutional and in opposition to prior U.S. Supreme Court decisions to include the Heller and Bruen decisions. In the 2023 Virginia elections, no candidate ran on a pro-gun control platform, therefore no mandate was handed to the House to implement such infringements. Virginians made our pro-Second Amendment stance clear in RIchmond in January 2020 when 40,000 people rallied against similar bills during that session and over 95% of Virginia counties' Board of Supervisors passed Second Amendment Sanctuary statuses. I urge the Committee Members to vote No on these bills. Thank you.
I am against this bill since it is baseless and not help reducing crimes. There is not enough scientific, objective, and long term studies with convincing proofs that home based FFLs would cause security risks if the FFL is within 1.5 miles radius of a school. This bill is based on imagination or discrimination. I am against this bill.
As a constituent, I urge you to OPPOSE the following bills: HB 12, Jones, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon, requires all firearms in a home be secured if there is a minor in the home. Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, prevents home-based gun dealers from operating within 1.5 miles of a school. Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, makes it illegal for anyone under 21 to purchase any kind of firearm. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen.
NOT ONE OF THESE BILLS ARE CONSTITUTIONAL &/OR NECESSARY! THEY'RE SIMPLY SOLUTIONS IN SEARCH OF NONEXISTENT PROBLEMS! HB 12: Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23: Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158: Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183: Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585: Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791: Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861: Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174: A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen. Thank you.
HB 12, Jones - requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. These requirements represent an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under the Supreme Court's Bruen decision and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon, requires all firearms in a home be secured if there is a minor in the home. Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, prevents home-based gun dealers from operating within 1.5 miles of a school. Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, makes it illegal for anyone under 21 to purchase any kind of firearm. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen.
This is just a solution in search of a problem. Don't make laws we do not need. Thank you!
So there is nothing as important in and for Virginia other then Supporting Communist Legislation against the Constitution of VA and the US Constitution that all this effort must be the first thing on the agenda when a Demo-rat Majority is fraudulently elected to the House and Senate. You fools must make the people that pay you off very happy to have you ear and sell yourself to the Communist Party. Demo-rats are an embarrassment to Freedom and Good Government. Patrick Henry, you may have heard of him? Show me that age and country where the rights and liberties of the people were placed on the sole chance of their rulers being good men, without a consequent loss of liberty? ********************************** The eternal difference between right and wrong does not fluctuate, it is immutable. ********************************** The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government - lest it come to dominate our lives and interests. ********************************** Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? ********************************** Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined.... The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun.
I strongly support House bills 12, 23, 158, 183, 351, 861 and 585, These bills will make our communities safer by requiring safe storage of firearms, banning the sales of assault weapons to people under 21 years of age, and restricting the public places where people can carry firearms, including mental health facilities. Safe storage will protect children and teens from inadvertent shootings and school shootings, and everyone from suicide. Waiting periods for purchase can prevent impulsive misuse. I oppose bills 389, 872, 1141, and 1198. Allowing more guns into more places will not make us safer. Every shooter is a law-abiding citizen with 2nd amendment rights, until they open fire on other people. I don't trust a "good guy" with a gun to have the current training or expertise to shoot down a criminal without accidentally hitting innocent people, or themselves. There is always the threat that a criminal will grab a gun from the "good guy" and turn it on him/her. As a diplomat representing the United States in foreign countries during my 33 years in the U.S. State Department, my heart bled every time we had another mass shooting. People there would ask me, "What is wrong with your society?" The first seven gun safety bills passed in 2020 made Virginia a leader in gun safety legislation. Subsequent shootings, such as six-year old shooting his teacher with his mother's gun, demonstrate the need for evidence-driven initiatives that will reduce gun death and injuries in our Commonwealth.
HB 585, Mundon King, prevents home-based gun dealers from operating within 1.5 miles of a school. Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that.
I urge you to OPPOSE the following bills: HB 12, HB 23, HB 158, HB 183, HB 585, HB 791, HB 1174 For some of these bills... they are meaningless, as they are already covered by Federal Law... the committee and legislature should not be wasting time on bills and laws that are already on the books! For some of the other bills... they are already deemed UNCONSTITUTIONAL under the 2nd Amendment and existing Supreme Court decisions. If these become law, they have a high probably of being voided/vacated within a year or two. Aside from taking away existing rights of Virginia citizens in that time... you will ensure lawyers on both sides of the issue will make a lot of money so they can drive fancy cars and send their kids to expensive schools. Stop indirectly putting money (half of which are paid with tax dollars) in lawyers’ pockets. I'd rather our courts address real crime and issues... not laws already deemed unconstitutional. Many of these bills attempt to create a tactical "solution"... except that the specific problem the "solution" addresses doesn't or never existed or occurred in the Commonwealth. I request that my elected officials address meaningful solutions, and ensure existing rights of law-abiding citizens are not infringed upon. Thank you for your time.
These proposals are solutions in search of problems. Many of these violate the Bruen decision. I would love for us to eliminate sovereign immunity. These politicians must be able to be sued personally, held both criminally and civilly liable for any vote in favor of a law, if they knew or should have known it violates or God given rights.
I feel violated. This legislation scares me and I'm a constituent. Show me the evidence that the legislation you are proposing will actually reduce crime and violence. There is none. These are "do something" acts that restrict my right as a good, sane, sober, moral and prudent citizen to keep and bear arms. If there were a violent criminal act for which I was now unprepared, restricted in my ability to defend innocent life, who will bear responsibility for that?
Good afternoon Delegates, I stand in opposition to all of these unconstitutional bills that will not do anything to curb and only demonize legal, lawful Virginians. Also, many of these bill are redundant to either existing commonwealth law or federal regulations. Lawful firearm owners are the back bone of this great commonwealth and country. I urge you all to recognize that Virginia is one of the safest states in the nation and that all of these proposed laws are violations of the Constitution and should not moved forward to a vote. Thank you for your time and consideration on this very important matter D Scott Burns
As a born and bred Virginian; a father and husband; a disabled veteran and active member in the community; I cannot understand why individuals who are elected, willingly do what they can to violate both the Virginia and United States Constitutions to penalize law-abiding citizens such as myself. I have spent a life of duty and dedication in service and occupations to protect our State and Country from those who wish to subjecgate its citizens or worse. Not only do all of these restrictions seek a perspective only solution, they do so at the cost of innocent citizens. Law-abiding citizens do not commit drug gang offenses, home invasions, mass shootings. These are the acts of career criminals or mentally disturbed individuals. None of these proposed bills addresses those issues or the deeper problem of why people are so quick to commit these acts. Murder is murder, whether a gun is used or a cane, it is still wrong. I'm more concerned about why, instead of the tool. Obviously, certain politicians are only worried about the tools. These proposed bills are all clearly agenda focused without factual information to support true results that may be gained by violating state and federal laws to enact. The Supreme Court very clearly defined the right to arms and most of these bills would violate those freedoms. Nor is it legislators purview to dictate what citizens do with what they have within the confines if their own home. THAT, is yet another violation. It is also disturbing that legislators seem to be focused on separating Virginia from reciprocity, thus affecting relations with other states, which ultimately led to a civil war last time. They are also creating more areas where people who mean to harm can do so without fear of being stopped such as adding a new gun free zone. This is a very bad and ill-conceived premise. If the point has not been made yet, then perhaps citizens need to start holding legislators civilly responsible for lives lost as a result of such zones. Clearly they are not effective. I ask that you stop operating under partisan politics and quid pro quo agendas which only serve to penalize and subjegate our citizenry. This is not what servicemembers and veterans served, sacrificed and vowed to defend. Freedom has a cost, and it is difficult to understand, especially through the fear and pain. There is NO such thing as safety. There never was, and never will be. America has MANY enemies out there in the world, and it's citizens; it's armed citizens; are the LAST line of defense. Continuing to attempt to disarm law-abiding citizens only further prompts the question by citizens for the legislators... "Whose side are you truly on?" Please repeal these bills and focus more on actual crime, deterrence for early release, stiffer penalties for existing criminals who continue to commit them and stop bringing in more and more illegal immigrants. Thank you for your attention. Lessons of the Past, Lost to Actions of the Present, Will Forever Damn the Future. -Sean Flippin - 1989
Please stop wasting our money, as a taxpayer, on initiatives and regulation that are at best ineffective and at worst making things safer for Criminals. Creating areas that are gun-free makes safe areas for Criminals as they know that their victims will not have the tools necessary to defend themselves. Stop trying to make us, the public, less safe. Stop releasing criminals, especially repeat-offenders, Releasing criminals causes us to acquire tools to keep ourselves and our families safe.
As a constituent, I urge you to OPPOSE the following bills: HB 12, Jones, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon, requires all firearms in a home be secured if there is a minor in the home. Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, prevents home-based gun dealers from operating within 1.5 miles of a school. Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, makes it illegal for anyone under 21 to purchase any kind of firearm. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen. I thank you. Mr. & Mrs Lon Horiuchi
Licensed firearms dealers are among the most regulated businesses in the US. Licensed firearms dealers in Virginia are regulated and licensed at the federal, state and local levels. Banning home-based licensed firearms dealers within an arbitrary 1.5 mile radius of schools will solve no problem, and clearly is intended to harass small business owners, as there is zero data showing that home-based licensed firearm dealers are an unusually high source of crime any more than any other business. It is arguable that drugs and alcohol are a far bigger problem for school-aged kids, yet Virginia does not have distance restrictions on alcohol being sold near schools, only that alcohol may not be consumed "on the grounds" of the school. Cannabis dispensaries have a 1000 ft from schools restriction. Furthermore, why 1.5 miles. Why not 2 miles? or 10? If you're going to create a law like this in the name of "safety", you should also ban the sales of any other weapon as well. According to the DOJ, knives are used in homicides 2-3 times as much as so called "assault weapons" or any rifle. Will you also ban knife sales? Finally, this law is unconstitutional under the Bruen standard. Unless the state legislature wants to tie itself up in lawsuits, lose, and then pay the legal fees of the plaintiffs, this absurd bill must not become law.
Everyone of these bills further restricting the rights of the law abiding citizen should be voted down.
This bill must be OPPOSED. These bills do NOTHING to prevent/reduce crime. In fact, these types of bills will eventually ENABLE and allow MORE crime (just look at crime in Maryland and DC) by reducing Virginian's ability to adequately and easily protect themselves. This bill is immoral, unjust, unconstitutional and racist as it will HARM black and brown people, other minorities, women, the elderly, and children who will be the eventual victims as a result of laws like this. Using these types of bills to slowly deny the public's human right of self defense will NOT save lives or keep people safe. This has been proven again and again. As lawmakers, you have an obligation to ensure that the laws you enact *protect* our God-given, human right of self defense -- you should *not* be disenfranchising us and making us MORE vulnerable to crime and injustices with these ignorant bills. Thank you.
As a voting resident and veteran I strongly OPPOSE the following bills: HB 12, Jones, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon, requires all firearms in a home be secured if there is a minor in the home. Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, prevents home-based gun dealers from operating within 1.5 miles of a school. Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, makes it illegal for anyone under 21 to purchase any kind of firearm. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen. This bills have gone beyond the scope of "safety" and are clearly an attempt to strip the constitutional rights of law abiding citizens of this great Commonwealth. The majority of these bills have already been struck down my the SCOTUS. Remember your oath: I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God. v/r Thomas Speich
I do not support any proposed gun restriction bills. I have been a resident of VA for 40 years and have never been in trouble with the law. I do not think the bills that are being proposed will deter gun violence. The issue is not guns. It is mental health.
Dear Democrats proposing duplicative and unconstitutional bills: It is apparent that you seek to propose bills that ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL based on the US Supreme Court. Please reference the Heller and Bruen decisions. It would appear you are taking that as a mere suggestion? Further, the "catch me if you can" approach to lawmaking is ridiculous. Yes, we know the strategy made famous by Obama...pass laws you know are unconstitutional knowing it will take ~5 years and millions of dollars to undo them. In the interim, the damage is done. This is the stuff of tyrants. HB 12: DUPLICATIVE OF FEDERAL LAW. HB 23: UNCONSTITUTIONAL UNDER BRUEN. HB 158: DUPLICATIVE OF FEDERAL LAW. HB 183: DUPLICATIVE. 14 and under is covered. There are many cases were 15, 16, 17 year olds defending themselves and family from crime using firearms. HB 585: UNCONSTITUTIONAL. HB 791: a solution looking for a problem. Most normal people grew up playing with BB guns. Cite all the crime associated with BB guns? HB 861: UNCONSTITUTIONAL UNDER BRUEN. HB 1174: UNCONSTITUTIONAL UNDER BRUEN. already heard and struck down in other states. The disarmament agenda is tiresome. If you spent half the energy in Richmond, Hampton, Norfolk, and Petersburg, 95%+ of "gun violence" would be taken care of. Your main perpetrator group is black men killing black men, 18-34. Don't you read the Virginia Crime Commission's reports? if you were serious, you'd be going after ACTUAL criminals vs. passing meaningless laws that only impact the law abiding.
HB 12, Jones, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure - Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon - Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, is Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, is not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen.
We are encouraging our state politicians to work on meaningful solutions that will actually help reduce gun violence, violence in general, theft, and improve the quality of our lives. Let's start enforcing current laws that are reasonable and remove those that aren't. Work on quickly improving the number of quality jobs in VA. Through good local educational services that focus on the required skills, people can improve their own lives, the lives of their family, and have more hope for the future. Childcare assistance can help families that are working. It's time to create a new playbook and stop passing additional restrictive laws that only burden our citizens and families. Start improving our lives which leads to less violence, good jobs, and strong families that can raise our children better.
Why is it that you want to continue to go against your sworn oath to office and institute further gun restrictions and control on law biding citizens? With control of the senate and house why don't you focus on the root of the problem which is more to improve the socio-economic issues regions face which should in turn lower drug and gang related problems which in turn is the true reason behind your "gun violence" issue you continue to speak on. WE DO NOT HAVE A GUN VIOLENCE ISSUE, we have violence issue that you need to address not through more gun restrictions. Enough with the gun control bills, it is the first thing the democratic party pushes when they get control of the majority. Use this time to better the communities or is that just tok difficult for you? As all you want to do is make it so criminals have more power over law biding citizens, pull our children into gang and drug culture and go easy on crime so they know there is no accountability for their actions.
I wish congress would treat firearms and firearms owners in Virginia like they do illegal aliens. Turn a blind eye to them and just let them be free. Never make rules about securing access or entry to them. Ensure that none of them need paperwork or if they do, wait so long before you check to make sure any of it is accurate, you never find the illegals and in this case, firearms. That would be swell.
"The right to keepand bear arms shall not be infringed..." Those who carry firearms should not leave them in vehicles. Many guns used in crimes are stolen, often from vehicles. Hospitals and other places people gather are where trained armed civilians can thwart a crime or mass shooting. The AR-15 is a civilian multi-purpose rifle -- easy to operate, inexpensive, accurate, low recoil, low cost ammo, and potentially lethal when necessary. It is the best rifle ever invented for U.S. civilian use...hunting, self and home defense, and target shooting. Resources in VA should be used for law enforcement, crime prevention and mental health. Take ILLEGAL guns off the streets.
Given the second amendment of the constitution, there shall be no laws that prevent me from being able to protect myself. I am a conceal carry holder and have been for almost 10 years now. We vehemently oppose any laws that would prevent Conceal Carry Holders from carrying our weapon. Our goal is to have protection and not need it rather than needing protection, and not being able to have it. We will not comply.
When will misguided legislators learn that infringing the right of law abiding citizens to exercise our Second Amendment liberties does nothing to make the public safe? In fact, it makes us all less safe because criminals love restrictions on lawful firearm ownership. Wake up! Follow the Constitution. “The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed!” Bishop E.W. Jackson STAND Virginia PAC
First, SCOTUS has addressed gun rights; access to magazines & ammo multiple times. Multiple times, SCOTUS' decision has sided with law abiding gun owners. I am curious as to why you continue to suppress our God given constitutionally protected right to bear arms? I can only assume one of two reasons. Either (A) you are completely uneducated as to the writers of the constitution, as well as their separate and several memoirs on the right to keep and bear arms; and furthermore ignorant of the right of the People to keep and bear arms as a result of the People having fought against tyranny using NOT federally provided military arms and ammunition - rather, PRIVATELY owned arms and ammunition. Below are just a few examples of historically accurate statements on said RIGHTS : “No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.” – Thomas Jefferson, Virginia Constitution, Draft 1, 1776 “A strong body makes the mind strong. As to the species of exercises, I advise the gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it gives boldness, enterprise and independence to the mind. Games played with the ball, and others of that nature, are too violent for the body and stamp no character on the mind. Let your gun therefore be your constant companion of your walks.” – Thomas Jefferson, letter to Peter Carr, August 19, 1785 “Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops.” – Noah Webster, An Examination of the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution, October 10, 1787 “To disarm the people…[i]s the most effectual way to enslave them.” – George Mason, The Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution, June 14, 1788 “I ask who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers.” – George Mason, Address to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 4, 1788 My questions are simply these, who do you expect to follow these laws that you put forth? Criminals? Why would you expect someone who is a CRIMINAL to obey the law? Maybe you should take some time and learn the definition? Which brings me to part (B) as to why I think you are trying to bar citizens from owning semi-auto rifles & there average magazines - you fear us to the point where you want to disarm us in much the same way HITLER disarmed HIS constituency. Clearly Thomas Jefferson had it correct - when he said “The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes…. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.” – Thomas Jefferson, Commonplace Book (quoting 18th century criminologist Cesare Beccaria), 1774-1776. Tyranny is the only reasonable explanation for your efforts because the lies spread by the US Government regarding death tolls, etc., is a complete fallacy. All you have to do is a little independent research regarding 'mass shootings.' And yes, private citizens did in fact have legal ownership of canons all the way through the Civil War era. Only an idiot would believe the lies that they did not.
In Caetano v. Massachusetts (2016), the Supreme Court reiterated its earlier rulings that "the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding" and that its protection is not limited to "only those weapons useful in warfare". New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen (2022) is a landmark: [ In a 6–3 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that New York's law was unconstitutional and that the ability to carry a pistol in public was a constitutional right guaranteed by the Second Amendment. — A 2022 poll found that 64% of Americans were in favor of the ruling in contrast with 35% of Americans that say they oppose the decision.[50] Additionally, 36%, the largest single share, said they strongly support the Court's ruling in contrast with 16% who said they strongly oppose it. The Legal Aid Society said the decision "may be an affirmative step toward ending arbitrary licensing standards that have inhibited lawful Black and Brown gun ownership in New York."[46] Former house minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R‑CA) supported the ruling, saying it "rightfully ensures the right of all law-abiding Americans to defend themselves without unnecessary government interference."[47] Law professor Steve Vladeck said the decision will "have monumental ramifications far beyond carrying firearms in public" and predicts there will be a "slew of litigation challenging any and every gun-control measure". Tread AROUND the 2nd amendment to our Constitution of the United States of America. Around it. Not on it; not lightly upon it! Carefully consider your vote! (Attachment: Photo of one night of a dangerous riot in a public place.)
Please leave law abiding citizens alone and focus the Commonwealth’s limited resources on the arrest, conviction, and incarceration of violent individuals. Paul Trible Blue Grass, VA
Suggest instead of Firearms Safety Subcommittee... Crimes Safety Subcommittee. greatly more effective! THE REAL ISSUE!
None of these proposals will impact the behavior of a criminal - only making law abiding citizens vulnerable as a new "gun free" zone attracts people seeking to make a statement with a gun and want time to do so before someone with a gun shows up. Additionally, most of these targeted problems are not currently problems or represent a growing trend that needs additional protections enacted to address. In my view, these bills have limited to no chance to provide additional protections or impact criminal behavior but DO further strip your constituents God give rights to provide the illusion of protection.
As a constituent, I urge you to OPPOSE the following bills: HB 12, Jones, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon, requires all firearms in a home be secured if there is a minor in the home. Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, prevents home-based gun dealers from operating within 1.5 miles of a school. Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, makes it illegal for anyone under 21 to purchase any kind of firearm. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen.
I'm a volunteer with Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America, and I support this bill.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support the following bills: HB1174, HB1181, HB1195, HB12, HB1424, HB1462, HB158, HB175, HB183, HB23, HB270, HB318, HB319, HB351, HB362, HB585, HB602, HB637, HB791, HB797, HB798, HB799, HB861, HB916, & HB945 I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I oppose these bills: HB1030, HB1141, HB1198, HB1230, HB1235, HB1321, HB1325, HB1386, HB289, HB389, HB756, & HB872 Innocent children are dying on our watch. Please do something.
My fellow Virginia’s I write today to comment on the bills before you. I am a retired Army veterans. I grew up in Virginia, went to ODU and instead of seeking residency in other states, stayed a Virginian and paid taxes while on active duty. I fought in war and lost good Soldiers and friends defending this nation, you and our Constitution. I retired in Virginia because I love this state. Your body will decide, with its vote, to either infringe on our rights or defend them. I ask you to defend them like those friends and Soldiers that also did. I am a responsible gun owner who raised his children to be responsible gun owners (all three are serving or served). I am also a CCP holder who is willing to defend his fellow citizens. If you vote for any of these bills to limit our rights it will impact my ability to defend myself and my family. Please do the right thing and defend the 2nd Amd. My wife and I already decided to leave the state if you enact these measures to limit our rights. Thank you Oliver Rose
HB 12, Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen.
The selected bills are unconstitutional! They must be voted down!
This proposed legislation is blatantly unconstitutional and, if passed, it will, no doubt, be challenged in court. The taxpayers of Virginia will then be obligated to defend these unconstitutional measures, and those defenses will almost certainly lose. This will result in costly, meaningless court costs for all Virginia taxpayers. Those tax dollars could be spent on more meaningful and productive activities that benefit all citizens.
HB 23 above disarms legally armed citizens while doing nothing to prevent crime. It makes another "self defense free" zone where criminals will ignore it.
All of these anti 2nd amendment bills DO NOT represent the vast majority of the citizenry of Virginia. All of these anti-gun bills will do absolutely nothing to impact crime, and are only a form of punishment to responsible gun owners in the commonwealth. These bills are meant to only meant to elicit “feel-good” emotions for those sensing they are impacting gun crime. Stop letting criminals go free early and do not focus the legislatures efforts on infringing on the rights of the people to legally defend themselves from those who mean to do grievous harm.
It is outrageous that the General Assembly is using our 2nd Amendment right to punish law abiding citizens who have done nothing wrong other then to defend themselves. It’s clear that Democrats pander to their bases without a thought about the citizens of this Commonwealth or this nation. This issue amongst others, galvanize the voters to get out and vote for the party that does not seek to encroach our rights under the State and Federal Constitution. There is zero proof that We The People are deranged killers, a mob or even the radical right that the Democrat who currently occupies the White House has said. He’d called us Nazis and portrayed honest, hardworking and law abiding citizens as the problem. We are not. Opens border, out of control spending, child indoctrination and parroting the DNC is the problem that is self inflicted and deserves nothing less then our disgust and rebuke come November 2024. The General Assembly reflects the divide between Northern Virginia to Richmond and the difference in South Eastern, Western Virginia. The Democrat party and Legislature know full well that gun control laws if enacted, will not reduce violence but increase victimhood that they’ll blame on Republicans and the cycle continues. Pathetic fools and they wonder why I’ve stopped contributing to candidates who never deliver to fools who govern us.
Please, NO more gun control. You all KNOW that criminals do not follow your laws. All your gun control does is limit my and my family's rights to self defense and peaceful enjoyment of the shooting sports. Instead, put, and keep, actual violent offenders in jail. It really is that simple.
As a woman and a 30 plus year Emergency Department nurse I ask you to reject these onerous gun control laws. Laws like these discourage women who are most at risk from being able to obtain the means to defend themselves. I worked many a late night shift in Northern Virginia and walked through empty parking lots and garages worried about my safety. Women should not have to suffer this and should have ready access to the means to defend themselves. You aren't disarming criminals your are disarming women.
The bills under consideration will do nothing to increase the safety of Virginians while infringing on our right to defend ourselves. They are designed to make it more difficult to obtain a firearm, possess a firearm, or use a firearm to defend oneself or others. Meanwhile criminals will continue unabated. Moreover, most of these unconstitutional laws have been rendered moot as they have been struck down by state and federal courts. As a former police officer and detective I implore you to reject these useless and unconstitutional laws. Thank you
No more gun control legislation. It's not the gun that's the issue. It's the mentally ill folks that obtained a gun.
I strongly oppose these bills as they are direct infringements on the 2nd Amendment of The Constitution. Most of these have already been found to be unconstitutional by various courts yet they are still being presented as bills. I am completely against these and any other such bills that infringe on the constitutional and inalienable rights of the Citizens of the United States of America and of the Commonwealth of Virginia.
No more unconstitutional gun control.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support these bills. I expect to see more gun violence prevention legislation *actually pass* since there is so much nonpartisan alignment on this topic. The status quo is unacceptable. Our pro-gun culture is a threat to our children, and a slap in the face to every person who has lost their lives to gun violence. Enough is enough - policy over prayers.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support this bill.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support this bill. Gun violence in our communities and in our state is heartbreaking and changes need to be made to protect the citizens of Virginia.
I am a member of Virginia moms for change and I support these bills.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change and I support these bills. To all responsible gun owners: you shouldn't be afraid of these common sense bills. These bills are directed at people who are not handling their firearms as the deadly weapons that they can be. Instead of thinking your rights are being taken away, consider instead how safe storage, permits and waiting periods could help the daily gun violence in our country. Keep your guns, we are not trying to take them away. These bills are an opportunity for you, as a responsible gun owner, to be a part of the solution to help cut down on needless violence.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change and I support the selected bills. I believe they will make our communities safer and that gun violence is a critical issue we must address with such legislation and more.
I am a member of Virginia Mom's for Change, a group working towards gun violence prevention. We support the bills indicated above.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group. I support bills HB1174 HB1181 HB1195 HB12 HB1424 HB1462 HB158 HB175 HB183 HB23 HB270 HB318 HB319 HB351 HB362 HB585 HB602 HB637 HB791 HB798 HB799 HB861 HB916 HB945
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group. I support bills HB1174 HB1181 HB1195 HB12 HB1424 HB1462 HB158 HB175 HB183 HB23 HB270 HB318 HB319 HB351 HB362 HB585 HB602 HB637 HB791 HB798 HB799 HB861 HB916 HB945
and I support these bills. The bills we support are: HB1174, HB1181, HB1195, HB12, HB1424, HB1462, HB158, HB175, HB183, HB23, HB270, HB318, HB319, HB351, HB362, HB585, HB602, HB637, HB791, HB797, HB798, HB799, HB861, HB916, & HB945
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support these bills. The bills we support are: HB1174, HB1181, HB1195, HB12, HB1424, HB1462, HB 158, HB175, HB183, HB23, HB270, HB318, HB319, HB351, HB362, HB585, HB602, HB637, HB791, HB797, HB798, HB799, HB861, HB916, & HB945
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support these bills. The bills we support are: HB1174, HB1181, HB1195, HB12, HB1424, HB1462, HB158, HB175, HB183, HB23, HB270, HB318, HB319, HB351, HB362, HB585, HB602, HB637, HB791, HB797, HB798, HB799, HB861, HB916, & HB945
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support this bill.
The Virginia NAACP supports this bill. We support common sense gun legislation that will have a significant impact on reducing gun violence and saving lives; this includes comprehensive background checks on the sale of firearms, limitations on purchasing firearms and prohibition of selling and transporting assault weapons - this is necessary legislation to keep Virginians safe.
The end of solitary confinement must be done My son was murdered in solitary confinement at Red Onion Prison in Pound Va on 1/3/22.
The Virginia NAACP supports this bill. We support common sense gun legislation that will have a significant impact on reducing gun violence and saving lives; this includes comprehensive background checks on the sale of firearms, limitations on purchasing firearms and prohibition of selling and transporting assault weapons - this is necessary legislation to keep Virginians safe.
Our Constitution does not provide citizens with privileges. It establishes a government with checks and balances and specifically limits the governments ability to remove the rights of its people. In regards to the matter at hand, it specifically says the the government cannot place limitations on the right of a citizen to keep and bear arms. Before I get the typical response, I know you are already aware that the phrase "well regulated" specifically refers to an being trained and ready to bear said arms. The language at the time did not use the term "regulated" as we do with modern regulations. It has been proven in the courts repeatedly that the laws you are currently considering are unconstitutional. Of this I am sure you are already aware. By spending time and tax dollars discussing laws that you know to be unconstitutional, you are in fact wasting time and tax dollars that could be spent on productive issues. I can only assume your intent is to intentionally waste time, and force members of the firearms industry to waste money on legal fees defending the constitution you have sworn to uphold. Please consider actual data and actual facts when considering gun legislation. No data supports the claim the "assault weapon" bans actually reduce gun related crime. More guns are being purchased now than ever before, yet now that the latest FBI data has been released, we can see that gun related crimes have not increased. Also, like every year that the FBI has released data, so called "assault weapons" make up a very small portion of all gun crimes. For your general knowledge the term "assault weapon" was first coined by Adolf Hitler. He renamed one of their new automatic firearms, the Sturmgewehr, because he felt that the name "assault weapon" would strike fear in allied forces. This is also the exact reason the gun control community uses this term as well. The fact is that these firearms are not fully automatic and cannot be made so without a high degree of machining skills and mechanical knowhow. Plus doing so is already illegal. The fact is the Biden's latest gun control act has not been equally enforced. It was supposed to provide additional support for school security and mental health services. It was supposed to provide stronger punishments for those cought breaking existing gun laws. It was supposed to allow FFL's to use the NICS system to check employees. It was supposed to allow FFL's to be able to instantly check inventory or potential purchase/trades by their serial number to determine if the firearm has been stolen or used in any crimes. None of these provisions have been acted upon or enforced. Please drop these latest gun control bills. They are unconstitutional and will never pass. Please do not waste your time and our tax dollars on these wasted efforts. Regards, Jonathan Goodman
THe Virginia NAACP supports this bill. We support common sense gun legislation that will have a significant impact on reducing gun violence and saving lives; this includes comprehensive background checks on the sale of firearms, limitations on purchasing firearms and prohibition of selling and transporting assault weapons - this is necessary legislation to keep Virginians safe.
The Virginia NAACP supports this bill. We support common sense gun legislation that will have a significant impact on reducing gun violence and saving lives; this includes comprehensive background checks on the sale of firearms, limitations on purchasing firearms and prohibition of selling and transporting assault weapons - this is necessary legislation to keep Virginians safe.
THe Virginia NAACP supports this bill. We support common sense gun legislation that will have a significant impact on reducing gun violence and saving lives; this includes comprehensive background checks on the sale of firearms, limitations on purchasing firearms and prohibition of selling and transporting assault weapons - this is necessary legislation to keep Virginians safe.
The Virginia NAACP supports this bill. We support common sense gun legislation that will have a significant impact on reducing gun violence and saving lives; this includes comprehensive background checks on the sale of firearms, limitations on purchasing firearms and prohibition of selling and transporting assault weapons - this is necessary legislation to keep Virginians safe.
HB586 - Law-enforcement officers; training standards.
Hi there, I'm Natalie from Social Busy Bee, your partner in the exciting world of Instagram growth. I've discovered something phenomenal for skyrocketing your Instagram popularity and I'm thrilled to share it with you! Social Growth Engine introduces a groundbreaking service that takes your Instagram engagement to new heights. It's effortless: - Zero in on producing unforgettable content. - Extremely budget-friendly at a mere $36/month. - Completely safe (no password needed), incredibly powerful, and Instagram's best friend. I've experienced remarkable results firsthand, and I'm sure you will too! Amplify your Instagram presence right now: http://get.socialbuzzzy.com/instagram_booster Best wishes, Natalie at Social Busy Bee"
Hi I am writing to you on behalf of The Well Connection UK, a media and publishing company. We could easily get virginia.gov featured in various publications such as magazines, online blogs and news sites. This would undoubtedly help virginia.gov with publicity, reputation, domain authority and organic search engine rankings. We have a wide range of options including completely free collaborations, sponsored posts, guest posts and banner ads. If this sounds of interest, please reach out to the senior business development manager, Anita at info@thewellconnection.co.uk and whatsapp +447395206515 (GMT) Kind regards Clifton Junior Outreach Assistant
Dear House of Delegates, I'm writing to you today as a concerned citizen. The introduction of bills aimed at heavily regulating firearms, is not warranted or wanted by the people of Virginia. Our nation stands at a crossroads, where the desire to address gun violence intersects with the constitutional rights affirmed by the Supreme Court. The Second Amendment's protection of the right to bear arms is not just a legal directive but a reflection of our commitment to individual freedom. In this context, the proposed regulations, while motivated by a commendable desire to reduce violence, raise significant concerns about their effectiveness and the potential consequences for law-abiding citizens. Research, including findings published in the Journal of Quantitative Criminology, suggests that the relationship between strict gun laws and the reduction of gun violence is not as straightforward as one might hope. Cities with stringent gun regulations continue to face challenges with gun-related crimes, indicating that those intent on violence often find ways to circumvent the law. This reality prompts us to question whether new restrictions will achieve their intended goal or merely place additional burdens on those who seek firearms for legitimate purposes, including self-defense. Moreover, the abundance of firearms in the United States presents a logistical challenge to the enforcement of such regulations. With more guns than people in the country, the task of significantly reducing the availability of firearms to criminals, without infringing on the rights of law-abiding citizens, is daunting. It is within this complex landscape that I urge you to consider the broader implications of the proposed gun control measures. The parallels drawn with other contentious issues, such as the regulation of women's healthcare, highlight the potential for policy decisions to inadvertently infringe upon individual freedoms and deepen societal divisions. Such outcomes not only detract from the intended goals of enhancing public safety but also risk alienating segments of the population whose support is essential for the advancement of our collective well-being. I respectfully ask that you consider the potential consequences of the proposed gun control measures, not just for the immediate future but for the legacy we leave for generations to come. It is my hope that, together, we can find a way to address the challenges of gun violence in a manner that honors our values, respects our freedoms, and genuinely enhances the safety and well-being of our communities.
I oppose all these unconstitutional, dangerous, and pointless laws.
Dear Sir or Madame. Last year in Newport News I was assaulted by a 27 year old black man from Chesapeake because of his road rage.. This was at my local bank 11;30 in the morning. This young man almost lost his life at my hand because you cannot reel in your problem young men. His words feet from me were ' im going to kick your ass and then kill you'. My pistol changed his mind. I saw for myself the woke judges and a woke system that perpetuates the problem. The criminal justice system has been flung far far left which IS causing a public safety hazzard. No new gun control is needed. More jail time for the trash that i dealt with is. My Congressman Bobby Scott and Delegate Cia Price do not represent me.
This debate over guns was settled in 1791. We have all the laws we need to cover the action of a criminal. Murder is illegal no matter the tool used. Assualt is illegal no matter the tool used. Your ridiculous attack on the rights of all Virginians is just another chapter in the failure our our legislature to deal with the true issues that plague our state. Restore our rights and work to better the state and stop with the petty and vindictive law making that only hurts the innocent. Every day our governing bodies from congress to you become less relevant as a part of our lives, since all you ever manage to do is destroy and steal.
In Ohio one year after constitution carry passed gun crimes went down
I've commend prior on these issue but would like to reemphasize that more laws of these nature only impose on those of us that already obey the law and I think that you could explain this to your constituents demanding more gun control. I always find it ironic and dubious that those wanting more gun control either don't own a gun, have never fired a gun or don't want to purchase one but wish to infringe upon those of us who are responsible gun owners. Many of these bills on gun control shouldn't even be proposed and if you are supporting these bills you're being dishonest to your own base in tell them that this will reduce crime. It can't reduce crime and never has since other cities such as Chicago ,crime ALWAYS increases with more gun control and Always goes down with less in most situations. I have friend who lives in Chicago and had to sue because they outlawed all firearms several years back. The citizens won that case and were allowed to own AR-15's and all various forms of semi automatic fire arms pistol and rifle. According to him and the data CRIME WENT DOWN. The exception to gun laws which are already on the book as always is proper back ground checks so criminals cannot exploit the legal process by purchasing as a felon. As for removing someone's rights to own a gun under a DUI or DWI I fail to see any relevance or correlation and causation to the issue of guns in general. I am apposed to all these gun control bills and support the two pro guns bills being proposed.
The Virginia Association of Chiefs of Police (VACP) requests a line amendment to remove Virginia Department of Health from the bill. We have a long standing federal grant with the Department of Behavioral Health to offer Revive training for public safety. The program is viewed as a national standard because of our strong relationship with DBHDS and the strength of the training curriculum. Va Department of Health has no role or expertise in working with public safety. The VACP views this an an effort by DOH to undermine this program.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support this bill.
The Virginia NAACP supports this bill. We support common sense gun legislation that will have a significant impact on reducing gun violence and saving lives; this includes comprehensive background checks on the sale of firearms, limitations on purchasing firearms and prohibition of selling and transporting assault weapons - this is necessary legislation to keep Virginians safe.
The end of solitary confinement must be done My son was murdered in solitary confinement at Red Onion Prison in Pound Va on 1/3/22.
The Virginia NAACP supports this bill. We support common sense gun legislation that will have a significant impact on reducing gun violence and saving lives; this includes comprehensive background checks on the sale of firearms, limitations on purchasing firearms and prohibition of selling and transporting assault weapons - this is necessary legislation to keep Virginians safe.
THe Virginia NAACP supports this bill. We support common sense gun legislation that will have a significant impact on reducing gun violence and saving lives; this includes comprehensive background checks on the sale of firearms, limitations on purchasing firearms and prohibition of selling and transporting assault weapons - this is necessary legislation to keep Virginians safe.
The Virginia NAACP supports this bill. We support common sense gun legislation that will have a significant impact on reducing gun violence and saving lives; this includes comprehensive background checks on the sale of firearms, limitations on purchasing firearms and prohibition of selling and transporting assault weapons - this is necessary legislation to keep Virginians safe.
THe Virginia NAACP supports this bill. We support common sense gun legislation that will have a significant impact on reducing gun violence and saving lives; this includes comprehensive background checks on the sale of firearms, limitations on purchasing firearms and prohibition of selling and transporting assault weapons - this is necessary legislation to keep Virginians safe.
The Virginia NAACP supports this bill. We support common sense gun legislation that will have a significant impact on reducing gun violence and saving lives; this includes comprehensive background checks on the sale of firearms, limitations on purchasing firearms and prohibition of selling and transporting assault weapons - this is necessary legislation to keep Virginians safe.
HB602 - Firearm Violence Intervention and Prevention, Virginia Center for, etc.; created.
Hi there, I'm Natalie from Social Busy Bee, your partner in the exciting world of Instagram growth. I've discovered something phenomenal for skyrocketing your Instagram popularity and I'm thrilled to share it with you! Social Growth Engine introduces a groundbreaking service that takes your Instagram engagement to new heights. It's effortless: - Zero in on producing unforgettable content. - Extremely budget-friendly at a mere $36/month. - Completely safe (no password needed), incredibly powerful, and Instagram's best friend. I've experienced remarkable results firsthand, and I'm sure you will too! Amplify your Instagram presence right now: http://get.socialbuzzzy.com/instagram_booster Best wishes, Natalie at Social Busy Bee"
Hi I am writing to you on behalf of The Well Connection UK, a media and publishing company. We could easily get virginia.gov featured in various publications such as magazines, online blogs and news sites. This would undoubtedly help virginia.gov with publicity, reputation, domain authority and organic search engine rankings. We have a wide range of options including completely free collaborations, sponsored posts, guest posts and banner ads. If this sounds of interest, please reach out to the senior business development manager, Anita at info@thewellconnection.co.uk and whatsapp +447395206515 (GMT) Kind regards Clifton Junior Outreach Assistant
My name is Laura, and I’m your constituent. Gun violence prevention is my top priority. Please support hi. Safety legislation that is brought up for a vote. These are the bills I support. Thank you for your time.
Law abiding citizens should not be punished for exercising their constitutional rights. Bill HB2 causes half of the state to become felons, just for exercising their rights to own firearms. HB1424 is unconstitutional because nothing in the second amendment says anything about having to have a license to own a gun. SB522 , similarly to HB1424 , is unconstitutional. The second amendment states that the right to bear arms shall not be infringed. People shouldn’t have to take a training course to own a gun. It’s your right to bear arms without government approval, or having to take a training course. It forces you to give up your ability to exercise your own rights. SB57 causes law abiding people to be in danger of criminals coming into a restaurant with a gun and not being able to defend themselves. SB327 once again is unconstitutional. The second amendment says nothing about an age restriction on any type of firearm. SB273 is unconstitutional because nothing states that you have to wait a certain amount of time to own a firearm. SB2 , just like HB2, shouldn’t cause law abiding people to not be able to own an “Assault weapon” or ammunition for an “Assault weapon”; because the second amendment doesn’t prohibit any style of firearm or ammunition from being sold or possessed.
I am opposed to all of these unconstitutional and anit-american gun laws and regulations. There is no room for more gun laws and regulations in this state.
Contrary to how certain government officials treat it, the second amendment is written using plain, easy to understand language, and insists that government has no right to take away the right for ordinary people like us to defend ourselves, as the constitution and bill of rights do not simply give people rights, but protects them from government manipulation and control. It’s incredibly disappointing and a tragedy that people choose to commit acts of violence with these rights, but restricting those who wish to exercise their rights peaceably due to those who wouldn’t follow these rules in the first place is incredibly naive. I, as well as every other person in the United States, deserve to protect my family with the best technology available. While some people look at certain defense weapon setups as a “why do you need that” situation, 1) I have the right to defend myself with the best tool available, and so I will choose that every time, 2) why do you “need” anything other than basic necessities (fast car, Gucci clothes, etc)? The government has no place in deciding what I “need”, 3) people with the intent to harm will not care what laws govern peaceful people, so what would limiting the victim’s access to proper tools do? You may think that by “banning” or otherwise restricting access to a certain thing would mean that all of the “bad” things would magically go away, but they will not. Evil has always and will always exist, and I have every right to defend myself from it using the best tool available wherever I, or my family, choose to go. Restricting access on certain properties (the government isn’t actively protecting me everywhere), requiring certain training (who is paying for this?), limiting certain types of firearms (go ahead and define “assault weapon” in plain language please), and restricting ammo purchasing (I thought you wanted us to train; how does this help then?) are all means that end up hurting the average person and helping those who wish to hurt others, as the rest of us will be left in a position to insufficiently defend ourselves. I urge you to understand that while, yes, it is awful that evil people commit horrific acts, this right ultimately allows me to protect myself and my family from these evil people as well and as evil will always exist (we certainly like to delusion ourselves into believing that we live in a utopia, but we do not), I will protect my family accordingly. The government has no right to restrict this. Leave the peaceful citizens alone, more firmly punish those who hurt others, and help communities where this is an issue to prevent the upbringing of more evil people.
Please stop trying to make criminals of law abiding citizens who just want to protect themselves. Me and my partner have recently become firearm owners because of situations that have arisen in our day to day lives, such as harassment of my wife almost to the point of altercation, sketchy characters waiting in front of our door/ducking in and out of our bushes at all times of the night, people breaking into cars in the neighborhood etc (many times the police/security were called only to arrive 45mins to an hour later). with many of these nonsensical bills you condemn us to allowing any possible violence to happen to us without a chance of defending our selves. Instead of helping fix the problem, you seek to make criminals out of any Virginian who has followed the law and legal purchased a firearm. Shame on you. I am Virginian native and since I was 18 I voted leaning blue in local and state elections you all are making me think this was a mistake. I am not proud of Virginia “progressives” who would rather strip my wife of her chance and right to defend her self rather than try to address the root of crime. Don’t make law abiding people criminals. Do some actual work and address the criminals! 2 of the proposed bills would make in illegal to bring your concealed firearm into a restaurant and another makes it a crime to have the firearm in your vehicle…. Like really? This is literally just to fill jails and strip people of their rights.
The number of bills that the Virginia legislature is attempting to pass that will infringe on the constitutional rights of its citizenry is appalling. We as law abiding citizens are afforded the right to defend ourselves and families. None of these laws will reduce crime as it is purported to do. Crimes are committed by individuals not the firearm. Start placing the blame where it should be which is the person committing the crime. Instead these laws will only punish and limit the rights of law abiding citizens.
State Legislature members, A right delayed is a right denied. Quoting the 2022 NYSRPA v. Bruen Supreme Court Case: 'The constitutional right to bear arms in public for self-defense is not “a second-class right, subject to an entirely different body of rules than the other Bill of Rights guarantees.” McDonald, 561 U. S., at 780 (plurality opinion). The exercise of other constitutional rights does not require individuals to demonstrate to government officers some special need. The Second Amendment right to carry arms in public for self defense is no different.' The recent NYSRPA v. Bruen case highlighted the significance of individual self-defense, and it's crucial to consider the rights of law-abiding citizens in crafting firearm legislation. While the goal of enhancing public safety is commendable, an outright ban on certain firearms and magazines will disproportionately impact responsible gun owners who use these tools for legitimate purposes, such as self-defense and sport. It is essential to strike a balance between public safety and the preservation of individual rights. Instead of blanket bans, and bureaucratic obstacles that only harass lawful firearm owners, we should focus on comprehensive measures that address the root causes of gun violence. This approach respects the constitutional rights of citizens while fostering a safer society. Criminals are not deterred by restrictions on lawful purchase at federally-licensed FFL Dealers. They do not bother going through the process of applying for a concealed carry permit, because they do not intend to carry lawfully. People who want to use weapons to hurt innocent citizens of Virginia will not be impeded by these House and Senate Bills. Instead, the only individuals who will have their behavior modified are lawful men and women who are unable to defend themselves against those who will commit crimes regardless of what is written into law this Legislative Session. If you pass the above laws, it will only serve to waste hard-working Taxpayers' money fighting them in Federal Court. California and New York have lost their cases seeking to uphold unconstitutional gun laws, and the sponsors of these bills will lose too. Do the right thing - the hard thing - enforce the laws we already have, get the small minority of violent criminals off the streets of Virginia, and uphold the constitutional rights of your polity.
These bills infringe on the rights of the United States citizens given to us by the second amendment. The only thing these bills will accomplish will take the firearms out of the hands of law abiding citizens, while criminals will still have access.
I do not support any bill that removes any right from law abiding citizens to protect themselves from those who WILL NOT abide by these laws. These laws ONLY give CRIMINALS the upper hand.
A lot of these laws contradict one another. I can’t support them. Both of our parties have failed us.
I oppose all of these blatantly unconstitutional bills and wish our elected officials would actually get to work on fixing things that matter to Virginians.
There is no acceptable reason to infringe upon the Constitutionally-protected (both US and Virginia's Constitutions) rights of Americans and Virginians. None of these bills purported to reduce gun-related violence actually seem to prioritize the reduction of causal effects of overall violence. Many of these are merely attempts to curb the rights of the People to keep and bear arms, because our legislative bodies are full of corrupt, weak, and contemptible individuals. Show us the bills for addressing the root causes of violence: mental health, income inequality, social instability, lack of education and educational opportunities, drug & human trafficking, or employment & wages (this list is not all-inclusive).
Time and time again it has been proven that criminals do not care about or follow restrictive firearm laws. Virginia already has some of the most restrictive firearms laws in the country ("B+" rating from Giffords), more unconstitutional infringements upon law abiding citizens is not the answer. We need to address the root causes (access to mental health resources for example) and not throw bandaids at it by punishing responsible, law abiding, gun owners. I oppose these bills and urge you to do the same.
As a fellow Democrat, it’s important to acknowledge the complexities surrounding gun ownership and the Second Amendment. 1. Self-Defense: Firearms can be a crucial tool for individuals to protect themselves, especially in high-crime areas or situations where law enforcement response times are slow. 2. Sport and Recreation: Many Americans enjoy shooting sports like hunting, skeet shooting, and target practice as a recreational activity, fostering a sense of community and skill-building. 3. Cultural Tradition: Gun ownership is deeply ingrained in American culture, with a rich history of hunting and marksmanship passed down through generations. 4. Economic Impact: The firearms industry contributes significantly to the economy, generating jobs and revenue through manufacturing, sales, and related services. 5. Civil Liberties: Upholding the right to bear arms is fundamental to preserving individual freedoms and safeguarding against government overreach. 6. Empowerment of Marginalized Communities: For historically marginalized groups, owning firearms can serve as a means of empowerment and protection against hate crimes or discriminatory violence. 7. Emergency Preparedness: In times of natural disasters or civil unrest, responsible gun owners can help maintain order and protect their families and communities. 8. Deterrence of Crime: Research suggests that the presence of armed civilians can deter potential criminals and reduce overall crime rates in certain contexts. 9. Veterans and Law Enforcement: Many veterans and law enforcement officers transition to civilian life with a continued appreciation for firearms, utilizing their expertise for civilian defense and security. 10. Balanced Approach: Instead of blanket gun control measures, we can advocate for comprehensive solutions that address root causes of violence, such as mental health support, poverty reduction, and community intervention programs.
I oppose the proposed firearms legislation put forward by this legislature and any legislation that violates the 1st, 2nd, and 4th, amendment rights of any Virginian. The desire for safer communities, a more united nation, and healing for our public health is something that we all can share in but these bills do not achieve that. Rather, they regulate and penalize. They unconstitutionally restrict the rights of the many in the name of safety and serve only to harm our rights. I would be doing a disservice to our state and my fellow citizens if I did not also provide potential solutions or remedies to the violence we face. First, we as communities need to promote voluntary storage facilities for those who are experiencing hardship and are concerned about suicide. Ideally making it easier to put firearms safely out of reach when suicide risks are greater. To do this it would need to be a system at the lowest level with minimum government involvement besides funding and partnership with local ranges. We would also need to reach out to those in our lives who are in a bad place and encourage the use of these facilities. Second, we should promote a culture of safe handling and respect for firearms through school courses and community organizations because assault weapons or not suicide, or accidents only take one bullet from a single action firearm. Lastly and more broadly we should focus on the issues surrounding the violence. Whether it is drugs and organized criminal activity or the mental health crisis as it has become known we should be working to fix these issues first. I.e. legalize weed, adapt police training, and push to root out organized crime, promote common social values and family cohesion, increase freedom, physical activity, and discipline in the school system.
These firearms bill are either redundant or unless in any meaningful way. If you care about reducing violence, please focus on criminals. Please stop trying to disarm families and law abiding citizen from protecting themselves.
I am a liberal through and through, I believe in individual rights and the opportunity for prosperity for all. I vote democrat because I care about my community, the rights of minorities, and women’s rights. The proposed legislation limiting the ability of free, law abiding citizens to purchase firearms, carry, and general use should not be limited further. I have witnessed violence at the hands of criminals, some later caught and it was shown that they did not legally acquire these firearms. The proposed legislation will effectively stop those who abide by the laws of Virginia from being able to properly protect themselves. It is known that police will not protect you, and they have no legal obligation to do so. This puts us at a dilemma, it’s either blindly trust the police to protect us and our families or have the ability to protect ourselves. I am not advocated for looser gun laws by any means, but I am advocating for more common sense gun laws. What do I mean by this you may ask? Well I mean background checks are a must and proper certification to conceal carry. I am a former Marine, I was a firefighter, and am a current student at a great university in our nations capital. I like to think I am reasonable in my thinking, but after looking and reading the propositions I checked above, I can’t help but feel betrayed by my own party. There is more than 5 guns for every American in this country. Gun control must target the people who do not follow the law and try to prevent violence from occurring, and the proposed legislation above does not help in that manner. I am hopeful that you will read this and reconsider the language in the legislation and I am even more hopeful that I can protect my family as necessary. I will always vote for progress but that’s not to say that I will always vote against my interests. Locally, crime has been on the rise and I have had to deal with it directly with little to no help from the police. I will (to the fullest extent of the law) protect myself as necessary from anyone who wishes to inflict harm on myself or family, and I hope you see that the average citizen in Virginia can not afford a security detail or rely on our police for protection. Thank you and have a great day.
Please stop infringing on our god given right, protected by the constitution of the United States (which you all have sworn to uphold and protect), to keep and bear arms. Responsible gun owners are not the problem in America’s gun violence epidemic. We follow the law. Criminals don’t. We use our firearms to protect ourselves, loved ones, and community. Chipping away at this right we have makes us more vulnerable to becoming victims of gun violence, not protect us from it. These laws only serve to empower those with evil intentions. Rather, might I suggest harsher penalties for those who commit senseless acts of violence with firearms instead of going after the good men and women of the commonwealth who wish only to use their firearms for lawful purposes.
Dear House of Delegates, I'm writing to you today as a concerned citizen. The introduction of bills aimed at heavily regulating firearms, is not warranted or wanted by the people of Virginia. Our nation stands at a crossroads, where the desire to address gun violence intersects with the constitutional rights affirmed by the Supreme Court. The Second Amendment's protection of the right to bear arms is not just a legal directive but a reflection of our commitment to individual freedom. In this context, the proposed regulations, while motivated by a commendable desire to reduce violence, raise significant concerns about their effectiveness and the potential consequences for law-abiding citizens. Research, including findings published in the Journal of Quantitative Criminology, suggests that the relationship between strict gun laws and the reduction of gun violence is not as straightforward as one might hope. Cities with stringent gun regulations continue to face challenges with gun-related crimes, indicating that those intent on violence often find ways to circumvent the law. This reality prompts us to question whether new restrictions will achieve their intended goal or merely place additional burdens on those who seek firearms for legitimate purposes, including self-defense. Moreover, the abundance of firearms in the United States presents a logistical challenge to the enforcement of such regulations. With more guns than people in the country, the task of significantly reducing the availability of firearms to criminals, without infringing on the rights of law-abiding citizens, is daunting. It is within this complex landscape that I urge you to consider the broader implications of the proposed gun control measures. The parallels drawn with other contentious issues, such as the regulation of women's healthcare, highlight the potential for policy decisions to inadvertently infringe upon individual freedoms and deepen societal divisions. Such outcomes not only detract from the intended goals of enhancing public safety but also risk alienating segments of the population whose support is essential for the advancement of our collective well-being. I respectfully ask that you consider the potential consequences of the proposed gun control measures, not just for the immediate future but for the legacy we leave for generations to come. It is my hope that, together, we can find a way to address the challenges of gun violence in a manner that honors our values, respects our freedoms, and genuinely enhances the safety and well-being of our communities.
STOP INFRINGING OUR RIGHTS. Get rid of every single gun control bill that is here and START ENFORCING THE LAWS WE ALREADY HAVE. Stop trying to turn law abiding citizens into criminals. I am disgusted that all of these nonsense bills have even made it this far. You can have these laws in Northern Virginia where everyone hates guns but don’t force this garbage into the rest of the state. GET RID OF ALL OF THIS GARBAGE and keep your noses out of everyone’s business. More government is not the answer.
Virginia already has some of the strictest gun laws in the nation. We can all agree violence is an issue but making more unconstitutional, on a national and state level, gun laws will not help with the rates of violent crimes and property crimes as we see from states with stricter gun laws. We need to increase access to mental health and community resources to address the root causes of issues rather than criminalizing responsible gun owners. I am opposed to this attack on the second amendment which is the fundamental backbone that protects the other freedoms guranteed in the constitution.
The second amendment is very clear in its intent that these rights “shall not be infringed”. Removing/ restricting law abiding citizens right to self defense and protection against unwitting organizations and persons is not only more harmful, but a clear violation of the rights this country was founded on.
You guys need to stop attacking our 2nd amendment and get help for these kids growing up with identity crisis’s . You coming after law abiding citizens is appalling and the fact that your leaning towards becoming the despicable state of California is saddening. If the president can have security which uses firearms that even the normal civilian can’t have this raises the issue of how can a civilian defend against a tyrannical government with a featureless 10 round ar-15 ? Keep this up and we know exactly what your end goal is.
As a left leaning voter and citizen of Virginia, these new restrictions on our right to bear arms are sickening. Stop proposing so many bans and limits, and maybe a realistic bill, like the safe credit, won’t be universally protested. If you actually want to quell gun violence, keep focused on affordable mental and physical healthcare, improving the education system, and reducing income inequality. While the right may not support these real improvements, I cannot in good faith support or vote for any politician who supports banning or restricting the rights of law abiding citizens in our beautiful commonwealth. Thank you.
The 2nd amendment states "shall not be infringed". All of these bills are infringement and are therefore unconstitutional. Should we pass laws that people must pass a test before they can have freedom of speech? What about pass a test before you can vote? What about if someone does not have training they will be slaves again? Name one other right outlined in the constitution where a citizen has to jump through hoops before they can use that right? I oppose all of these bills as they will do more harm than good. I can understand wanting to keep people safe but gun control does the opposite. These bills will only make it harder for law abiding citizens to exercise their rights while criminals will still ignore the law. Criminals will still get illegal guns or weapons and will commit more crimes since they know the public is unable to defend themselves. Benjamin Franklin once said: "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." You writing bills saying "give up your rights and guns and we will protect you". Well ask the Native Americans how that worked out for them. Ask a Jewish person who was under Nazi control how that worked out for them. Well Hitler's first step was to take away the guns from the public so they could not protect themselves and over 6 million people lost their lives. Since you do not know history you are writing bills which will doom us to repeat it. You know 75 years ago when you could just buy a gun in a catalog and it was shipped to your house we did not have this issue. In the 60s and 70s when people would have a gun in their truck at school or take one in for show and tell we did not have a gun issue. This is a mental health issue. Deal with mental health and you will fix the public safety issue. Zero of my guns have killed people because guns do not kill people. People kill people. Look at Ukraine and Israel for just one form of example why we need LESS gun control. All of these gun laws are unconstitutional and should be thrown out. Do the right thing and let us law abiding citizens have their rights as outlined in the constitution. Do not pass laws which infringe on our rights. If the 2nd amendment falls, the 1st will follow . When the 1st and 2nd fall the 13th will fall and our country will be lost and we will be back in chains.
I am very opposed to the vast majority of these bills. I am a legal gun owner with my CHP. Many of these bills heavily restrict my right to bear arms in a legal capacity. I don’t understand why I should be punished for doing everything legally and correctly only to become a felon in the coming months through these legislations
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Whether or not a person chooses to exercise this right is up to them. Otherwise, it shall not be infringed.
I can not, and nobody should, support these unconstitutional laws. THROW THEM ALL OUT.
You guys make it harder and harder to vote Democrat every single cycle. Complete ban on Semi Automatics more or less making the state even stricter towards guns then states like Maryland? I oppose all these even the "herp common sense derp" ones because the states party has made it clear they don't give a crap about anything but putting hollow wins for politicians because hhheeeyyy punishing law abiding gun owners is a whole lot easier then creating jobs or reducing crime. If these bills die before getting to the governors desk, especially the bans, then I will gladly continue to vote DNC. But if Youngkin has to veto these and you make me say something I never thought I would "Thank god Youngkin won" then I look forward to blindly going down the ticket in 2024 and checking "R" on everyone. Thank you for taking the time to read this.
I do not support more legislation infringing on my 2nd Ammendment rights. Please fund more enforcement for the proactive enforcement of existing laws and regulations pertaining to firearms.
I oppose this legislation.
First off, knives are a basic tool with myriad uses and have been around since ancient history. Any limitation on them is so insulting, and insane. We are not children. It is infuriating that money was spent to even write that down. The fact that I would need a right to carry a knife spelled out is not something our forefathers could have possibly anticipated, since it’s a simple tool. A screwdriver is exactly as deadly as any knife. I would know, I’ve been an ICU nurse for nearly a decade and I have seen people stabbed with both. Matter of fact, a hammer would be a superior concealed weapon with more lethality than either. Second, many of these new gun laws make sense. Many of them do not. I do not want stalkers, domestic abusers, or drug dealers buying guns. A waiting period and proficiency training is fine, although I believe it to be unconstitutional I would comply. However it appears we are going to make it illegal to purchase specific parts for guns, to build your own serialized and registered firearm, and to concealed carry in many public spaces. I also see a poorly defined and overly restrictive “assault weapons” ban. The most insane is the ban on parents having firearms in the home at all. That is unacceptable. The latter group of laws are an infringement based on the opinions of the woefully uninformed. I should not lose my right to responsible ownership, maintenance and concealed carry with a permit due to the lobbying of a group that has failed to due the due diligence to learn about the rights they wish to throw away for all of us. I have a concealed carry permit. It has saved my life of nearly saved my life multiple times. The police can be great, but they are minutes away when seconds count. For instance, as I was leaving a restaurant in the city I was targeted by 2 men with illegal guns. I did not know them, we had never interacted, but suddenly there was a gun pointing at me from a car circling around me in the parking lot. Without escape available, I drew my pistol in response. The car stopped circling and left, giving me time to alert law enforcement before there were any holes in me. If I come face to face with a mass shooter, as so many do, I prefer to be armed. The organization of mothers pushing for these laws can define the law of their household. But not mine. Learn from the past for gods sake. We do not need and will eventually not accept increasing restrictions and price hikes allowing only the wealthy and connected to be armed. Governor, I ask that you veto these laws which only restrict law abiding citizens. You are the person elected in part because you are the option on the ballot who would not let this stand. So don’t. To those in support of these laws: every right you surrender is one you can never recover without 10 times the struggle it took to get to the place where you were able to throw it away. Learning from your mistakes is not viable when you codify them into law. You are making several mistakes. You can’t restrict and underfund the police department and make personal defense harder at the same time. That is advantageous to no one. It is not how things work in this world where evil people exist, no matter how deep in the sand your head is. And the next time you’re grunting and sweating, tearing a box open like a fucking caveman you might want to try a knife before adding more legislation An armed society is a polite society, let’s keep it that way.
The ridiculous litany of gun control measures under consideration will do nothing to effectively reduce crime and violence, and will only further restrict the rights of law abiding firearms owners.
We dont need MORE laws regarding firearms, we need to enforce the laws that are already on the books. If enforcement is done then these laws are redundant and not necessary. Don't pass more laws just for the sake of passing laws. They do nothing but make law abiding citizens confused and they dont do anything to stop problems.
I am writing to express my great concern, to the legislatures that continue to ignore their oath of swearing to protect and uphold the rights of the citizens as protected by the United States Constitution and the Virginian Constitution. "The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED". You beaurcrats do not grant that right to he people, it is God given. While you grandstand and ateemlt to make laws to hurt the everydayaw abiding American citizen, you turn a way and do nothing in these bills to punish criminals committing crimes. It is already illegal to murder people. To grandstand and think that any of these bills would stop someone from murdering or harming another person is laughable. Quite literally. You pander screaming about these firearm safety bills while you walk around with security and people with "guns" to keep you safe. Start enforcing the existing laws against criminals who commit crimes vs trying to turn law abiding people, who take training, are serious about protection of family, themselves and others, and trying to disarm them and make them criminals. Or we will vote you out! Uphold your Oath or be prepared for the consequences your actions lead to by the American people. Regards Mr. Harris
I am opposed to additional new laws or further regulations placed on firearms or other means of self defense, or which limit the ability to conduct commerce or carry such items. Not only does the constitution make it clear this is a violation of my rights, it does nothing to address or reduce the actions of criminals.
I am against all of these blatantly unconstitutional firearms restrictions. I'm strongly against: SB2| Deeds | Assault firearms certain ammunition, etc.; purchase, possession, sale, transfer, etc., prohibited. This tries to ban things that are in common use, which has never worked well for the government, remember Prohibition? Remember the war on drugs? Just like the last assault weapons ban, this will literally just make AR-15s more popular and easier to get illegally. And I am against: HB585 | Mundon King | Home-based firearms dealers; prohibited near schools, penalties. That specifically targets home-based FFLs whose house is somewhere near a school. This would put hundreds of Virginia residents out of business just because of where they live.
I strongly oppose any bill, law or ordinance that infringes on the undeniable constitutional right to keep and bear arms. These include any ban, any further age restrictions, if a person (18) is old enough to join the military and use real "assault weapons" then they should be fully capable to purchase a semi automatic firearm of their choice. I oppose any law or ordinance that restricts my ability to defend my family and myself as I see fit, this includes bans on where I can carry my lawful firearm, what type of firearm and the magazine size of my choice. How about we make laws that are tougher on criminals and stop punishing law abiding people who actually care and follow the law.
All infringements on the second amendment are acts of treason and should be treated as such. Acting in favor of such infringements makes you a traitor to this nation and th commonwealth.
I am Opposed to any limitations on the Second Amendment and any restrictive firearm laws. We have adequate, if not already overbearing, laws on the books now and should not be creating more laws restricting all the aspects of firearm use, sales, and any other aspects of the right to bear arms.
These firearm laws are mostly reactionary to the media response on firearms. This is a major infringement on the 2nd amendment and needs to be stopped.
An inordinate focus on the control of firearms only serves to infringe the rights of the law-abiding citizen in defense of his life and property. The State should instead focus on the apprehension and incarceration of individuals engaging in criminal behavior and associated misuse of firearms.
Any law that infringes on my Gods-given right to own and bear arms is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Any law passed that infringes this right will be answered with a lawsuit.
Hello. There are a plethora of bills that were proposed, which would clearly violate the second amendment rights of many law abiding citizens. First of all, considering concealed carry should be permit-less carry, it is counterproductive to increase the requirements for concealed carry. Restrictions on where law abiding citizens can lawfully carry their now “permitted” firearms is asinine, as well as the proposition of a bill that would make it a penalty to leave a firearm in your car. You would essentially be disarming a large number of people who wish to follow these unlawful order in a day and age where the democratic agenda is to act like there are mass shootings on a daily basis. Effectively disarming the majority and increasing the requirements and legal loopholes to carry is such a vulnerable state to be in and I hope we’re smart enough to avoid that. Restrictions on “Plastic firearms and unfinished frames etc” is not only terrible literature that does nothing to explain, but it is a direct violation of the 2nd amendment considering you have a federal right to make firearms for personal use, which would include additively manufactured parts. Wait periods are also a horrifying thing to think of, considering how many times it has been proven to be a terrible idea, keeping guns out of the hands that need them most to protect themselves and their families. “Assault firearms” and anything to do with them is nonsense considering the blatant inability to define said “assault weapon”. People who don’t understand guns, shouldn’t be making laws on guns. A shorter barrel does not make it more lethal, in fact it lowers the muzzle velocity, causing less force on impact and penetration, in turn causing less collateral damage. Any sort of “assault weapons” bills are targeting law abiding citizens who have every right to use the modern advances in firearm technology just as police officers and military. The only people these bills are effecting are the already law abiding citizens. The criminals who got their hands on said weapons illegally aren’t going to be making sure that their ALREADY ILLEGAL WEAPONS are fully compliant with state laws and regulations before they go commit another crime. In no way shape or form should someone need to disadvantage themselves in a life or death situation because political members with an armed security detail don’t feel the need for a gun. Why would I want to limit myself to a firearm that is going to be inadequate in home defense, or one that does not have a high enough capacity to protect myself from the ever growing threat of home invasion and the increased trend of multiple home invaders breaking in armed. If it was you alone in your house with 6 armed intruders who most definitely must have checked their local laws and firearm regulations and made sure their firearms aren’t violating any rules before they break into your house, would you want to limit yourself to a low capacity firearm that is going to be extremely difficult to use effectively in a high stress situation, or are you taking a rifle which for reasons that don’t make sense, must have a 16 inch barrel, with a larger capacity magazine, and a stock that you can use to safely brace the firearm to prevent stray shots and provide more accurate fire. Personally I’m going to take anything and everything I can get in a situation that means life or death for me and my loved ones EVERY SINGLE DAY OF THE WEEK. Focus on the mental health crisis.
Gun laws do not prevent firearm homicides, based upon gun control organization's own data (Giffords) •No correlation between strict gun laws and firearm homicide incidents •.07 coefficient of determination (AKA R2) where .90 is a strong association •There likely would be a weak association showing gun laws driving the firearm homicide rate higher if Washington, DC was given a score and ranked by Giffords.
I strongly, along with many fellow Virginians oppose any villainous disarmament bills disguised as "public safety". The second amendment clearly states "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" and out of touch elitist politicians who enjoy the luxury of armed security are choosing to ignore the constitution and force us to rely on sub-par police protection. The same people who want to defund the police want to disarm us. Embracing the second amendment is what is keeping our crime rates low compared to New York and California. We have seen the blatant disregard that criminals have for these so-called laws; emboldened criminals who are not afraid of the consequences and innocent law-abiding people who are forced to live in fear because a bunch of tyrants are letting power corrupt them. I do not want to live in fear and neither do the rest of us. In addition; a lot of counties and cities have declared themselves as second amendment sanctuaries to protect the rights of free individuals from the overreach of tyrannical politicians. These bills are a Trojan horse that will lead to more crime. You anti-gun politicians should be ashamed of yourselves; give up your private security and train yourselves. Then you will change your minds; because in the end, nobody is coming to save you. I would rather have a fighting chance against armed assailants than die waiting for help to arrive. These bills are pure evil
These all seem like infringements that will do nothing to curb any crime. Further they will only create criminals out of everyday law abiding folk. These are laws that seem to be targeting victimless crimes.
I oppose all of these selected bills since I firmly believe they are in conflict with the Second Amendment of the US Constitution. The Second Amendment clearly states that it shall not be infringed upon. Any and all proposed legislation that would place limits on how, where, and when responsible citizens arm themselves runs afoul of that. Our founding fathers correctly held the belief that all people have a natural born right to arm and protect themselves and that the government has no authority to interfere with that. While I agree with the sentiment of reducing violence among our society, gun laws only harm the law abiding citizen and leave criminals who already have a disregard for the law to still be armed. If our elected officials who proposed these bills actually cared about addressing our violence problem, they would focus more on addressing the root causes of violence and crime. More worthwhile pursuits in my opinion would be focused on addressing socio-economic problems that plague disadvantaged communities, creating a more robust and well-equipped mental healthcare system, and overhauling our educational systems to setup our children for better success in life. Thank you all for your time.
I'm against any unconstitutional law, and any law that strips Americans of their rights. These laws are an attack on the 2nd ammendment and hold NO facts in stopping crime. They are a punishment on law abiding people and in no way will make virginia a safer place.
I oppose all these unconstitutional, dangerous, and pointless laws.
I oppose this bill as it seeks to infringe on the Consitutionally proctected rights of lawabiding citizens to protect themselves from criminals, criminals who do not follow the law. This bill makes it harder for someone to keep themselves safe and is primarily a solution in search of problems to fix. Virginia has one of the lowest crime rates in the country and even less gun related crimes being committed year over year. This is not due to gun control laws, in fact as gun control laws increase, s o does the rate of violent crimes. Criminals are not afraid of police, they are afraid of armed citizens. The subject of this bill has already been defeated in courts, passing this into law will only subject the Commonwealth to more lawsuits to have it repealed costing us more in taxes. Enough of our taxpayers money has been wasted in politicians attempting to pass "feel good" bills to try and prove they are doing their job. I urge the legistature to focus on enforcing and imposing stricter penalties for those that break our exsiting laws over creating new laws that only serve to pe nalize the law abiding citizens.
I was born in Henrico county and vote in every election. Guns are currently the #1 killer of our children under the age of 18. I am writing to show my support for these bills because gun violence prevention is my top priority. Please support gun safety legislation that is brought up for a vote! Thank you so much for your time.
My name is Laura Sledge and I am your constituent. Guns are currently the #1 killer of our children under the age of 18, and gun violence prevention is my top priority. Please support gun safety legislation that is brought up for a vote. Here are the bills I support. Thank you for your time.
Please support HB 318, HB319, HB351, HB362, HB585, HB602, HB637, HB791, HB797, HB798, HB798, HB799, HB 861, HB16, HB45 Let's keep our children and other innocent bystanders safe!
Hello, My name is Hayley Redmond Cilley. Guns are currently the #1 killer of our children under age 18, and I am calling because gun violence prevention is my top priority. Please support gun safety legislation that is brought up for a vote! We need safer communities for all, but especially for our children.
Dear Sir or Madame. Last year in Newport News I was assaulted by a 27 year old black man from Chesapeake because of his road rage.. This was at my local bank 11;30 in the morning. This young man almost lost his life at my hand because you cannot reel in your problem young men. His words feet from me were ' im going to kick your ass and then kill you'. My pistol changed his mind. I saw for myself the woke judges and a woke system that perpetuates the problem. The criminal justice system has been flung far far left which IS causing a public safety hazzard. No new gun control is needed. More jail time for the trash that i dealt with is. My Congressman Bobby Scott and Delegate Cia Price do not represent me.
I am a member of VA Moms For Change, a gun violence prevention group and I support these bills
This debate over guns was settled in 1791. We have all the laws we need to cover the action of a criminal. Murder is illegal no matter the tool used. Assualt is illegal no matter the tool used. Your ridiculous attack on the rights of all Virginians is just another chapter in the failure our our legislature to deal with the true issues that plague our state. Restore our rights and work to better the state and stop with the petty and vindictive law making that only hurts the innocent. Every day our governing bodies from congress to you become less relevant as a part of our lives, since all you ever manage to do is destroy and steal.
In Ohio one year after constitution carry passed gun crimes went down
I've commend prior on these issue but would like to reemphasize that more laws of these nature only impose on those of us that already obey the law and I think that you could explain this to your constituents demanding more gun control. I always find it ironic and dubious that those wanting more gun control either don't own a gun, have never fired a gun or don't want to purchase one but wish to infringe upon those of us who are responsible gun owners. Many of these bills on gun control shouldn't even be proposed and if you are supporting these bills you're being dishonest to your own base in tell them that this will reduce crime. It can't reduce crime and never has since other cities such as Chicago ,crime ALWAYS increases with more gun control and Always goes down with less in most situations. I have friend who lives in Chicago and had to sue because they outlawed all firearms several years back. The citizens won that case and were allowed to own AR-15's and all various forms of semi automatic fire arms pistol and rifle. According to him and the data CRIME WENT DOWN. The exception to gun laws which are already on the book as always is proper back ground checks so criminals cannot exploit the legal process by purchasing as a felon. As for removing someone's rights to own a gun under a DUI or DWI I fail to see any relevance or correlation and causation to the issue of guns in general. I am apposed to all these gun control bills and support the two pro guns bills being proposed.
I support these bills!
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support the following bills: HB1174, HB1181, HB1195, HB12, HB1424, HB1462, HB158, HB175, HB183, HB23, HB270, HB318, HB319, HB351, HB362, HB585, HB602, HB637, HB791, HB797, HB798, HB799, HB861, HB916, & HB945 I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I oppose these bills: HB1030, HB1141, HB1198, HB1230, HB1235, HB1321, HB1325, HB1386, HB289, HB389, HB756, & HB872 Innocent children are dying on our watch. Please do something.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support these bills. I expect to see more gun violence prevention legislation *actually pass* since there is so much nonpartisan alignment on this topic. The status quo is unacceptable. Our pro-gun culture is a threat to our children, and a slap in the face to every person who has lost their lives to gun violence. Enough is enough - policy over prayers.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support this bill.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support this bill. Gun violence in our communities and in our state is heartbreaking and changes need to be made to protect the citizens of Virginia.
I am a member of Virginia moms for change and I support these bills.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change and I support these bills. To all responsible gun owners: you shouldn't be afraid of these common sense bills. These bills are directed at people who are not handling their firearms as the deadly weapons that they can be. Instead of thinking your rights are being taken away, consider instead how safe storage, permits and waiting periods could help the daily gun violence in our country. Keep your guns, we are not trying to take them away. These bills are an opportunity for you, as a responsible gun owner, to be a part of the solution to help cut down on needless violence.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change and I support the selected bills. I believe they will make our communities safer and that gun violence is a critical issue we must address with such legislation and more.
I am a member of Virginia Mom's for Change, a group working towards gun violence prevention. We support the bills indicated above.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group. I support bills HB1174 HB1181 HB1195 HB12 HB1424 HB1462 HB158 HB175 HB183 HB23 HB270 HB318 HB319 HB351 HB362 HB585 HB602 HB637 HB791 HB798 HB799 HB861 HB916 HB945
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group. I support bills HB1174 HB1181 HB1195 HB12 HB1424 HB1462 HB158 HB175 HB183 HB23 HB270 HB318 HB319 HB351 HB362 HB585 HB602 HB637 HB791 HB798 HB799 HB861 HB916 HB945
and I support these bills. The bills we support are: HB1174, HB1181, HB1195, HB12, HB1424, HB1462, HB158, HB175, HB183, HB23, HB270, HB318, HB319, HB351, HB362, HB585, HB602, HB637, HB791, HB797, HB798, HB799, HB861, HB916, & HB945
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support these bills. The bills we support are: HB1174, HB1181, HB1195, HB12, HB1424, HB1462, HB 158, HB175, HB183, HB23, HB270, HB318, HB319, HB351, HB362, HB585, HB602, HB637, HB791, HB797, HB798, HB799, HB861, HB916, & HB945
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support these bills. The bills we support are: HB1174, HB1181, HB1195, HB12, HB1424, HB1462, HB158, HB175, HB183, HB23, HB270, HB318, HB319, HB351, HB362, HB585, HB602, HB637, HB791, HB797, HB798, HB799, HB861, HB916, & HB945
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support this bill.
The end of solitary confinement must be done My son was murdered in solitary confinement at Red Onion Prison in Pound Va on 1/3/22.
Our Constitution does not provide citizens with privileges. It establishes a government with checks and balances and specifically limits the governments ability to remove the rights of its people. In regards to the matter at hand, it specifically says the the government cannot place limitations on the right of a citizen to keep and bear arms. Before I get the typical response, I know you are already aware that the phrase "well regulated" specifically refers to an being trained and ready to bear said arms. The language at the time did not use the term "regulated" as we do with modern regulations. It has been proven in the courts repeatedly that the laws you are currently considering are unconstitutional. Of this I am sure you are already aware. By spending time and tax dollars discussing laws that you know to be unconstitutional, you are in fact wasting time and tax dollars that could be spent on productive issues. I can only assume your intent is to intentionally waste time, and force members of the firearms industry to waste money on legal fees defending the constitution you have sworn to uphold. Please consider actual data and actual facts when considering gun legislation. No data supports the claim the "assault weapon" bans actually reduce gun related crime. More guns are being purchased now than ever before, yet now that the latest FBI data has been released, we can see that gun related crimes have not increased. Also, like every year that the FBI has released data, so called "assault weapons" make up a very small portion of all gun crimes. For your general knowledge the term "assault weapon" was first coined by Adolf Hitler. He renamed one of their new automatic firearms, the Sturmgewehr, because he felt that the name "assault weapon" would strike fear in allied forces. This is also the exact reason the gun control community uses this term as well. The fact is that these firearms are not fully automatic and cannot be made so without a high degree of machining skills and mechanical knowhow. Plus doing so is already illegal. The fact is the Biden's latest gun control act has not been equally enforced. It was supposed to provide additional support for school security and mental health services. It was supposed to provide stronger punishments for those cought breaking existing gun laws. It was supposed to allow FFL's to use the NICS system to check employees. It was supposed to allow FFL's to be able to instantly check inventory or potential purchase/trades by their serial number to determine if the firearm has been stolen or used in any crimes. None of these provisions have been acted upon or enforced. Please drop these latest gun control bills. They are unconstitutional and will never pass. Please do not waste your time and our tax dollars on these wasted efforts. Regards, Jonathan Goodman
HB637 - Substantial Risk Order Training Program; Department of Criminal Justice Services to establish.
Hi there, I'm Natalie from Social Busy Bee, your partner in the exciting world of Instagram growth. I've discovered something phenomenal for skyrocketing your Instagram popularity and I'm thrilled to share it with you! Social Growth Engine introduces a groundbreaking service that takes your Instagram engagement to new heights. It's effortless: - Zero in on producing unforgettable content. - Extremely budget-friendly at a mere $36/month. - Completely safe (no password needed), incredibly powerful, and Instagram's best friend. I've experienced remarkable results firsthand, and I'm sure you will too! Amplify your Instagram presence right now: http://get.socialbuzzzy.com/instagram_booster Best wishes, Natalie at Social Busy Bee"
Hi I am writing to you on behalf of The Well Connection UK, a media and publishing company. We could easily get virginia.gov featured in various publications such as magazines, online blogs and news sites. This would undoubtedly help virginia.gov with publicity, reputation, domain authority and organic search engine rankings. We have a wide range of options including completely free collaborations, sponsored posts, guest posts and banner ads. If this sounds of interest, please reach out to the senior business development manager, Anita at info@thewellconnection.co.uk and whatsapp +447395206515 (GMT) Kind regards Clifton Junior Outreach Assistant
My name is Laura, and I’m your constituent. Gun violence prevention is my top priority. Please support hi. Safety legislation that is brought up for a vote. These are the bills I support. Thank you for your time.
I oppose all of these blatantly unconstitutional bills and wish our elected officials would actually get to work on fixing things that matter to Virginians.
Gun laws do not prevent firearm homicides, based upon gun control organization's own data (Giffords) •No correlation between strict gun laws and firearm homicide incidents •.07 coefficient of determination (AKA R2) where .90 is a strong association •There likely would be a weak association showing gun laws driving the firearm homicide rate higher if Washington, DC was given a score and ranked by Giffords.
I oppose all these unconstitutional, dangerous, and pointless laws.
I was born in Henrico county and vote in every election. Guns are currently the #1 killer of our children under the age of 18. I am writing to show my support for these bills because gun violence prevention is my top priority. Please support gun safety legislation that is brought up for a vote! Thank you so much for your time.
Please support HB 318, HB319, HB351, HB362, HB585, HB602, HB637, HB791, HB797, HB798, HB798, HB799, HB 861, HB16, HB45 Let's keep our children and other innocent bystanders safe!
Hello, My name is Hayley Redmond Cilley. Guns are currently the #1 killer of our children under age 18, and I am calling because gun violence prevention is my top priority. Please support gun safety legislation that is brought up for a vote! We need safer communities for all, but especially for our children.
Dear Sir or Madame. Last year in Newport News I was assaulted by a 27 year old black man from Chesapeake because of his road rage.. This was at my local bank 11;30 in the morning. This young man almost lost his life at my hand because you cannot reel in your problem young men. His words feet from me were ' im going to kick your ass and then kill you'. My pistol changed his mind. I saw for myself the woke judges and a woke system that perpetuates the problem. The criminal justice system has been flung far far left which IS causing a public safety hazzard. No new gun control is needed. More jail time for the trash that i dealt with is. My Congressman Bobby Scott and Delegate Cia Price do not represent me.
I am a member of VA Moms For Change, a gun violence prevention group and I support these bills
This debate over guns was settled in 1791. We have all the laws we need to cover the action of a criminal. Murder is illegal no matter the tool used. Assualt is illegal no matter the tool used. Your ridiculous attack on the rights of all Virginians is just another chapter in the failure our our legislature to deal with the true issues that plague our state. Restore our rights and work to better the state and stop with the petty and vindictive law making that only hurts the innocent. Every day our governing bodies from congress to you become less relevant as a part of our lives, since all you ever manage to do is destroy and steal.
In Ohio one year after constitution carry passed gun crimes went down
I've commend prior on these issue but would like to reemphasize that more laws of these nature only impose on those of us that already obey the law and I think that you could explain this to your constituents demanding more gun control. I always find it ironic and dubious that those wanting more gun control either don't own a gun, have never fired a gun or don't want to purchase one but wish to infringe upon those of us who are responsible gun owners. Many of these bills on gun control shouldn't even be proposed and if you are supporting these bills you're being dishonest to your own base in tell them that this will reduce crime. It can't reduce crime and never has since other cities such as Chicago ,crime ALWAYS increases with more gun control and Always goes down with less in most situations. I have friend who lives in Chicago and had to sue because they outlawed all firearms several years back. The citizens won that case and were allowed to own AR-15's and all various forms of semi automatic fire arms pistol and rifle. According to him and the data CRIME WENT DOWN. The exception to gun laws which are already on the book as always is proper back ground checks so criminals cannot exploit the legal process by purchasing as a felon. As for removing someone's rights to own a gun under a DUI or DWI I fail to see any relevance or correlation and causation to the issue of guns in general. I am apposed to all these gun control bills and support the two pro guns bills being proposed.
Substantial Risk Protection Orders save lives and prevent suicides, but there is great variation around the state in using them because of a lack of education on when and h ow to use them. HB637 is important to ensure all relevant parties are trained to know when and how to apply these orders across the Commonwealth.
I support these bills!
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support these bills. I expect to see more gun violence prevention legislation *actually pass* since there is so much nonpartisan alignment on this topic. The status quo is unacceptable. Our pro-gun culture is a threat to our children, and a slap in the face to every person who has lost their lives to gun violence. Enough is enough - policy over prayers.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support this bill.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support this bill. Gun violence in our communities and in our state is heartbreaking and changes need to be made to protect the citizens of Virginia.
I am a member of Virginia moms for change and I support these bills.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change and I support these bills. To all responsible gun owners: you shouldn't be afraid of these common sense bills. These bills are directed at people who are not handling their firearms as the deadly weapons that they can be. Instead of thinking your rights are being taken away, consider instead how safe storage, permits and waiting periods could help the daily gun violence in our country. Keep your guns, we are not trying to take them away. These bills are an opportunity for you, as a responsible gun owner, to be a part of the solution to help cut down on needless violence.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change and I support the selected bills. I believe they will make our communities safer and that gun violence is a critical issue we must address with such legislation and more.
I am a member of Virginia Mom's for Change, a group working towards gun violence prevention. We support the bills indicated above.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group. I support bills HB1174 HB1181 HB1195 HB12 HB1424 HB1462 HB158 HB175 HB183 HB23 HB270 HB318 HB319 HB351 HB362 HB585 HB602 HB637 HB791 HB798 HB799 HB861 HB916 HB945
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group. I support bills HB1174 HB1181 HB1195 HB12 HB1424 HB1462 HB158 HB175 HB183 HB23 HB270 HB318 HB319 HB351 HB362 HB585 HB602 HB637 HB791 HB798 HB799 HB861 HB916 HB945
and I support these bills. The bills we support are: HB1174, HB1181, HB1195, HB12, HB1424, HB1462, HB158, HB175, HB183, HB23, HB270, HB318, HB319, HB351, HB362, HB585, HB602, HB637, HB791, HB797, HB798, HB799, HB861, HB916, & HB945
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support these bills. The bills we support are: HB1174, HB1181, HB1195, HB12, HB1424, HB1462, HB 158, HB175, HB183, HB23, HB270, HB318, HB319, HB351, HB362, HB585, HB602, HB637, HB791, HB797, HB798, HB799, HB861, HB916, & HB945
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support these bills. The bills we support are: HB1174, HB1181, HB1195, HB12, HB1424, HB1462, HB158, HB175, HB183, HB23, HB270, HB318, HB319, HB351, HB362, HB585, HB602, HB637, HB791, HB797, HB798, HB799, HB861, HB916, & HB945
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support this bill.
The end of solitary confinement must be done My son was murdered in solitary confinement at Red Onion Prison in Pound Va on 1/3/22.
HB738 - Space Force; extension of certain benefits and privileges for persons serving in Armed Forces.
I oppose all these unconstitutional, dangerous, and pointless laws.
Dear Sir or Madame. Last year in Newport News I was assaulted by a 27 year old black man from Chesapeake because of his road rage.. This was at my local bank 11;30 in the morning. This young man almost lost his life at my hand because you cannot reel in your problem young men. His words feet from me were ' im going to kick your ass and then kill you'. My pistol changed his mind. I saw for myself the woke judges and a woke system that perpetuates the problem. The criminal justice system has been flung far far left which IS causing a public safety hazzard. No new gun control is needed. More jail time for the trash that i dealt with is. My Congressman Bobby Scott and Delegate Cia Price do not represent me.
This debate over guns was settled in 1791. We have all the laws we need to cover the action of a criminal. Murder is illegal no matter the tool used. Assualt is illegal no matter the tool used. Your ridiculous attack on the rights of all Virginians is just another chapter in the failure our our legislature to deal with the true issues that plague our state. Restore our rights and work to better the state and stop with the petty and vindictive law making that only hurts the innocent. Every day our governing bodies from congress to you become less relevant as a part of our lives, since all you ever manage to do is destroy and steal.
In Ohio one year after constitution carry passed gun crimes went down
I've commend prior on these issue but would like to reemphasize that more laws of these nature only impose on those of us that already obey the law and I think that you could explain this to your constituents demanding more gun control. I always find it ironic and dubious that those wanting more gun control either don't own a gun, have never fired a gun or don't want to purchase one but wish to infringe upon those of us who are responsible gun owners. Many of these bills on gun control shouldn't even be proposed and if you are supporting these bills you're being dishonest to your own base in tell them that this will reduce crime. It can't reduce crime and never has since other cities such as Chicago ,crime ALWAYS increases with more gun control and Always goes down with less in most situations. I have friend who lives in Chicago and had to sue because they outlawed all firearms several years back. The citizens won that case and were allowed to own AR-15's and all various forms of semi automatic fire arms pistol and rifle. According to him and the data CRIME WENT DOWN. The exception to gun laws which are already on the book as always is proper back ground checks so criminals cannot exploit the legal process by purchasing as a felon. As for removing someone's rights to own a gun under a DUI or DWI I fail to see any relevance or correlation and causation to the issue of guns in general. I am apposed to all these gun control bills and support the two pro guns bills being proposed.
DOD will testify orally via Zoom. Our written testimony is attached.
The end of solitary confinement must be done My son was murdered in solitary confinement at Red Onion Prison in Pound Va on 1/3/22.
HB776 - Law-enforcement officers; minimum qualifications, citizenship, waiver.
Contrary to how certain government officials treat it, the second amendment is written using plain, easy to understand language, and insists that government has no right to take away the right for ordinary people like us to defend ourselves, as the constitution and bill of rights do not simply give people rights, but protects them from government manipulation and control. It’s incredibly disappointing and a tragedy that people choose to commit acts of violence with these rights, but restricting those who wish to exercise their rights peaceably due to those who wouldn’t follow these rules in the first place is incredibly naive. I, as well as every other person in the United States, deserve to protect my family with the best technology available. While some people look at certain defense weapon setups as a “why do you need that” situation, 1) I have the right to defend myself with the best tool available, and so I will choose that every time, 2) why do you “need” anything other than basic necessities (fast car, Gucci clothes, etc)? The government has no place in deciding what I “need”, 3) people with the intent to harm will not care what laws govern peaceful people, so what would limiting the victim’s access to proper tools do? You may think that by “banning” or otherwise restricting access to a certain thing would mean that all of the “bad” things would magically go away, but they will not. Evil has always and will always exist, and I have every right to defend myself from it using the best tool available wherever I, or my family, choose to go. Restricting access on certain properties (the government isn’t actively protecting me everywhere), requiring certain training (who is paying for this?), limiting certain types of firearms (go ahead and define “assault weapon” in plain language please), and restricting ammo purchasing (I thought you wanted us to train; how does this help then?) are all means that end up hurting the average person and helping those who wish to hurt others, as the rest of us will be left in a position to insufficiently defend ourselves. I urge you to understand that while, yes, it is awful that evil people commit horrific acts, this right ultimately allows me to protect myself and my family from these evil people as well and as evil will always exist (we certainly like to delusion ourselves into believing that we live in a utopia, but we do not), I will protect my family accordingly. The government has no right to restrict this. Leave the peaceful citizens alone, more firmly punish those who hurt others, and help communities where this is an issue to prevent the upbringing of more evil people.
I oppose all these unconstitutional, dangerous, and pointless laws.
Dear Sir or Madame. Last year in Newport News I was assaulted by a 27 year old black man from Chesapeake because of his road rage.. This was at my local bank 11;30 in the morning. This young man almost lost his life at my hand because you cannot reel in your problem young men. His words feet from me were ' im going to kick your ass and then kill you'. My pistol changed his mind. I saw for myself the woke judges and a woke system that perpetuates the problem. The criminal justice system has been flung far far left which IS causing a public safety hazzard. No new gun control is needed. More jail time for the trash that i dealt with is. My Congressman Bobby Scott and Delegate Cia Price do not represent me.
This debate over guns was settled in 1791. We have all the laws we need to cover the action of a criminal. Murder is illegal no matter the tool used. Assualt is illegal no matter the tool used. Your ridiculous attack on the rights of all Virginians is just another chapter in the failure our our legislature to deal with the true issues that plague our state. Restore our rights and work to better the state and stop with the petty and vindictive law making that only hurts the innocent. Every day our governing bodies from congress to you become less relevant as a part of our lives, since all you ever manage to do is destroy and steal.
In Ohio one year after constitution carry passed gun crimes went down
I've commend prior on these issue but would like to reemphasize that more laws of these nature only impose on those of us that already obey the law and I think that you could explain this to your constituents demanding more gun control. I always find it ironic and dubious that those wanting more gun control either don't own a gun, have never fired a gun or don't want to purchase one but wish to infringe upon those of us who are responsible gun owners. Many of these bills on gun control shouldn't even be proposed and if you are supporting these bills you're being dishonest to your own base in tell them that this will reduce crime. It can't reduce crime and never has since other cities such as Chicago ,crime ALWAYS increases with more gun control and Always goes down with less in most situations. I have friend who lives in Chicago and had to sue because they outlawed all firearms several years back. The citizens won that case and were allowed to own AR-15's and all various forms of semi automatic fire arms pistol and rifle. According to him and the data CRIME WENT DOWN. The exception to gun laws which are already on the book as always is proper back ground checks so criminals cannot exploit the legal process by purchasing as a felon. As for removing someone's rights to own a gun under a DUI or DWI I fail to see any relevance or correlation and causation to the issue of guns in general. I am apposed to all these gun control bills and support the two pro guns bills being proposed.
I am Chief Maggie DeBoard from the Herndon Police Department, and I am providing comment on two bills on behalf of the VA Chiefs Association (VACP) as their legislative committee chair. In regard to HB 250, we are strongly opposed to any formal attempt to dictate how law enforcement officers operationally conduct interrogations. Detectives must have the ability to adjust their tactics to the individual being questioned, while ensuring they are doing so in a legal and lawful manner. How they conduct their interrogations are guided by Miranda and Supreme Court case law. Every case is different, every suspect is different, and model policies should not guide how these custodial interrogations are carried out. By creating model policies for an operational practice that varies greatly from suspect to suspect, you severely limit a detective's approach to how he or she needs to conduct an interrogation. The courts have the role in each criminal case to determine if such interrogation was legal/lawful. That decision should remain with the courts, who look at each one based on the facts of the case, and if the officer followed established case law on the matter. Detectives currently receive training from experienced subject matter experts in this area, and that training is modified as new case law develops. That training should not be dictated by DCJS, nor should they create model policies that will inevitably become out of date over time and create arguments for defense attorneys as to why one detective did not conduct an interrogation in the same manner as another. Ref HB 776, the VACP fully supports this legislation which simply removes the need for agencies to ask for a waiver from DCJS to hire an individual who is eligible for and applied for citizenship. We agree with the language in this bill; this will provide agencies with more flexibility to recruit and hire qualified individuals from our minority and/or migrant communities who meet the requirements. These individuals will be processed in the same manner as any other applicant and must still meet all other hiring standards before being employed. It also encourages lawful immigration and a path to citizenship for those who desire to work as a law enforcement officer in the Commonwealth. Thank you for allowing us to provide our input today.
The end of solitary confinement must be done My son was murdered in solitary confinement at Red Onion Prison in Pound Va on 1/3/22.
HB791 - Pneumatic guns; Class 6 felony to possess.
Hi there, I'm Natalie from Social Busy Bee, your partner in the exciting world of Instagram growth. I've discovered something phenomenal for skyrocketing your Instagram popularity and I'm thrilled to share it with you! Social Growth Engine introduces a groundbreaking service that takes your Instagram engagement to new heights. It's effortless: - Zero in on producing unforgettable content. - Extremely budget-friendly at a mere $36/month. - Completely safe (no password needed), incredibly powerful, and Instagram's best friend. I've experienced remarkable results firsthand, and I'm sure you will too! Amplify your Instagram presence right now: http://get.socialbuzzzy.com/instagram_booster Best wishes, Natalie at Social Busy Bee"
Hi I am writing to you on behalf of The Well Connection UK, a media and publishing company. We could easily get virginia.gov featured in various publications such as magazines, online blogs and news sites. This would undoubtedly help virginia.gov with publicity, reputation, domain authority and organic search engine rankings. We have a wide range of options including completely free collaborations, sponsored posts, guest posts and banner ads. If this sounds of interest, please reach out to the senior business development manager, Anita at info@thewellconnection.co.uk and whatsapp +447395206515 (GMT) Kind regards Clifton Junior Outreach Assistant
My name is Laura, and I’m your constituent. Gun violence prevention is my top priority. Please support hi. Safety legislation that is brought up for a vote. These are the bills I support. Thank you for your time.
I am opposed to all of these unconstitutional and anit-american gun laws and regulations. There is no room for more gun laws and regulations in this state.
Contrary to how certain government officials treat it, the second amendment is written using plain, easy to understand language, and insists that government has no right to take away the right for ordinary people like us to defend ourselves, as the constitution and bill of rights do not simply give people rights, but protects them from government manipulation and control. It’s incredibly disappointing and a tragedy that people choose to commit acts of violence with these rights, but restricting those who wish to exercise their rights peaceably due to those who wouldn’t follow these rules in the first place is incredibly naive. I, as well as every other person in the United States, deserve to protect my family with the best technology available. While some people look at certain defense weapon setups as a “why do you need that” situation, 1) I have the right to defend myself with the best tool available, and so I will choose that every time, 2) why do you “need” anything other than basic necessities (fast car, Gucci clothes, etc)? The government has no place in deciding what I “need”, 3) people with the intent to harm will not care what laws govern peaceful people, so what would limiting the victim’s access to proper tools do? You may think that by “banning” or otherwise restricting access to a certain thing would mean that all of the “bad” things would magically go away, but they will not. Evil has always and will always exist, and I have every right to defend myself from it using the best tool available wherever I, or my family, choose to go. Restricting access on certain properties (the government isn’t actively protecting me everywhere), requiring certain training (who is paying for this?), limiting certain types of firearms (go ahead and define “assault weapon” in plain language please), and restricting ammo purchasing (I thought you wanted us to train; how does this help then?) are all means that end up hurting the average person and helping those who wish to hurt others, as the rest of us will be left in a position to insufficiently defend ourselves. I urge you to understand that while, yes, it is awful that evil people commit horrific acts, this right ultimately allows me to protect myself and my family from these evil people as well and as evil will always exist (we certainly like to delusion ourselves into believing that we live in a utopia, but we do not), I will protect my family accordingly. The government has no right to restrict this. Leave the peaceful citizens alone, more firmly punish those who hurt others, and help communities where this is an issue to prevent the upbringing of more evil people.
I oppose these bills that are attacking the rights of law-abiding gun owners.
Please stop trying to make criminals of law abiding citizens who just want to protect themselves. Me and my partner have recently become firearm owners because of situations that have arisen in our day to day lives, such as harassment of my wife almost to the point of altercation, sketchy characters waiting in front of our door/ducking in and out of our bushes at all times of the night, people breaking into cars in the neighborhood etc (many times the police/security were called only to arrive 45mins to an hour later). with many of these nonsensical bills you condemn us to allowing any possible violence to happen to us without a chance of defending our selves. Instead of helping fix the problem, you seek to make criminals out of any Virginian who has followed the law and legal purchased a firearm. Shame on you. I am Virginian native and since I was 18 I voted leaning blue in local and state elections you all are making me think this was a mistake. I am not proud of Virginia “progressives” who would rather strip my wife of her chance and right to defend her self rather than try to address the root of crime. Don’t make law abiding people criminals. Do some actual work and address the criminals! 2 of the proposed bills would make in illegal to bring your concealed firearm into a restaurant and another makes it a crime to have the firearm in your vehicle…. Like really? This is literally just to fill jails and strip people of their rights.
Many of these gun laws are unfair to law abiding citizens and do not affect criminals. These gun laws should be vetoed.
State Legislature members, A right delayed is a right denied. Quoting the 2022 NYSRPA v. Bruen Supreme Court Case: 'The constitutional right to bear arms in public for self-defense is not “a second-class right, subject to an entirely different body of rules than the other Bill of Rights guarantees.” McDonald, 561 U. S., at 780 (plurality opinion). The exercise of other constitutional rights does not require individuals to demonstrate to government officers some special need. The Second Amendment right to carry arms in public for self defense is no different.' The recent NYSRPA v. Bruen case highlighted the significance of individual self-defense, and it's crucial to consider the rights of law-abiding citizens in crafting firearm legislation. While the goal of enhancing public safety is commendable, an outright ban on certain firearms and magazines will disproportionately impact responsible gun owners who use these tools for legitimate purposes, such as self-defense and sport. It is essential to strike a balance between public safety and the preservation of individual rights. Instead of blanket bans, and bureaucratic obstacles that only harass lawful firearm owners, we should focus on comprehensive measures that address the root causes of gun violence. This approach respects the constitutional rights of citizens while fostering a safer society. Criminals are not deterred by restrictions on lawful purchase at federally-licensed FFL Dealers. They do not bother going through the process of applying for a concealed carry permit, because they do not intend to carry lawfully. People who want to use weapons to hurt innocent citizens of Virginia will not be impeded by these House and Senate Bills. Instead, the only individuals who will have their behavior modified are lawful men and women who are unable to defend themselves against those who will commit crimes regardless of what is written into law this Legislative Session. If you pass the above laws, it will only serve to waste hard-working Taxpayers' money fighting them in Federal Court. California and New York have lost their cases seeking to uphold unconstitutional gun laws, and the sponsors of these bills will lose too. Do the right thing - the hard thing - enforce the laws we already have, get the small minority of violent criminals off the streets of Virginia, and uphold the constitutional rights of your polity.
These bills infringe on the rights of the United States citizens given to us by the second amendment. The only thing these bills will accomplish will take the firearms out of the hands of law abiding citizens, while criminals will still have access.
I do not support any bill that removes any right from law abiding citizens to protect themselves from those who WILL NOT abide by these laws. These laws ONLY give CRIMINALS the upper hand.
There are approximately 47 bills regarding gun control between the House and Senate. Rather than fix issues that actually protect and enhance the lives of Virginians, many of these bills seek to disenfranchise and reduce the safety of the citizens in this great Commonwealth. Firearms are so fundamental to the founding and continued existence of our free society that they are listed just second to the freedom of speech in amendments to the constitution. It is plainly clear to all that countries and states who have banned or severely restricted firearms that violence does not end with their banning. Unjust deaths are not prevented. It simply ensures that law abiding citizens are left defenseless from those that wish to harm them, whether that be individuals or an organization. I write this knowing that it will be completely disregarded by the bills authors, but in hopes that others feel galvanized to speak up against unjust actions made in the name of progress. To those who wish to protect themselves with firearms while simultaneously stripping them from the common man, may you take heed of the Virginia state motto.
A lot of these laws contradict one another. I can’t support them. Both of our parties have failed us.
Stop trying to strip 2nd Amendment rights from law abiding citizens with a constitutional right to own and carry firearms. Not a single one of these laws/bills you’re trying to enact would have stopped any of the mass shootings we’ve seen.
I oppose all of these blatantly unconstitutional bills and wish our elected officials would actually get to work on fixing things that matter to Virginians.
These proposed laws will do nothing but make more victims out of citizens that are exercising their 2nd amendment rights. Criminals do not care about these restrictions, these laws are merely an extension of the culture war. They are meant to punish anyone that the Northern Virginia and big city politicians don’t like. While violent criminals continue to arm themselves, the law abiding citizens of The Commonwealth would be left without defense. These laws are feckless and meant only to virtue signal. One with even a basic understanding of our constitution would see these as exactly what they are: illegal and Un-American.
Time and time again it has been proven that criminals do not care about or follow restrictive firearm laws. Virginia already has some of the most restrictive firearms laws in the country ("B+" rating from Giffords), more unconstitutional infringements upon law abiding citizens is not the answer. We need to address the root causes (access to mental health resources for example) and not throw bandaids at it by punishing responsible, law abiding, gun owners. I oppose these bills and urge you to do the same.
As a fellow Democrat, it’s important to acknowledge the complexities surrounding gun ownership and the Second Amendment. 1. Self-Defense: Firearms can be a crucial tool for individuals to protect themselves, especially in high-crime areas or situations where law enforcement response times are slow. 2. Sport and Recreation: Many Americans enjoy shooting sports like hunting, skeet shooting, and target practice as a recreational activity, fostering a sense of community and skill-building. 3. Cultural Tradition: Gun ownership is deeply ingrained in American culture, with a rich history of hunting and marksmanship passed down through generations. 4. Economic Impact: The firearms industry contributes significantly to the economy, generating jobs and revenue through manufacturing, sales, and related services. 5. Civil Liberties: Upholding the right to bear arms is fundamental to preserving individual freedoms and safeguarding against government overreach. 6. Empowerment of Marginalized Communities: For historically marginalized groups, owning firearms can serve as a means of empowerment and protection against hate crimes or discriminatory violence. 7. Emergency Preparedness: In times of natural disasters or civil unrest, responsible gun owners can help maintain order and protect their families and communities. 8. Deterrence of Crime: Research suggests that the presence of armed civilians can deter potential criminals and reduce overall crime rates in certain contexts. 9. Veterans and Law Enforcement: Many veterans and law enforcement officers transition to civilian life with a continued appreciation for firearms, utilizing their expertise for civilian defense and security. 10. Balanced Approach: Instead of blanket gun control measures, we can advocate for comprehensive solutions that address root causes of violence, such as mental health support, poverty reduction, and community intervention programs.
I oppose the proposed firearms legislation put forward by this legislature and any legislation that violates the 1st, 2nd, and 4th, amendment rights of any Virginian. The desire for safer communities, a more united nation, and healing for our public health is something that we all can share in but these bills do not achieve that. Rather, they regulate and penalize. They unconstitutionally restrict the rights of the many in the name of safety and serve only to harm our rights. I would be doing a disservice to our state and my fellow citizens if I did not also provide potential solutions or remedies to the violence we face. First, we as communities need to promote voluntary storage facilities for those who are experiencing hardship and are concerned about suicide. Ideally making it easier to put firearms safely out of reach when suicide risks are greater. To do this it would need to be a system at the lowest level with minimum government involvement besides funding and partnership with local ranges. We would also need to reach out to those in our lives who are in a bad place and encourage the use of these facilities. Second, we should promote a culture of safe handling and respect for firearms through school courses and community organizations because assault weapons or not suicide, or accidents only take one bullet from a single action firearm. Lastly and more broadly we should focus on the issues surrounding the violence. Whether it is drugs and organized criminal activity or the mental health crisis as it has become known we should be working to fix these issues first. I.e. legalize weed, adapt police training, and push to root out organized crime, promote common social values and family cohesion, increase freedom, physical activity, and discipline in the school system.
These firearms bill are either redundant or unless in any meaningful way. If you care about reducing violence, please focus on criminals. Please stop trying to disarm families and law abiding citizen from protecting themselves.
Please stop infringing on our god given right, protected by the constitution of the United States (which you all have sworn to uphold and protect), to keep and bear arms. Responsible gun owners are not the problem in America’s gun violence epidemic. We follow the law. Criminals don’t. We use our firearms to protect ourselves, loved ones, and community. Chipping away at this right we have makes us more vulnerable to becoming victims of gun violence, not protect us from it. These laws only serve to empower those with evil intentions. Rather, might I suggest harsher penalties for those who commit senseless acts of violence with firearms instead of going after the good men and women of the commonwealth who wish only to use their firearms for lawful purposes.
Dear House of Delegates, I'm writing to you today as a concerned citizen. The introduction of bills aimed at heavily regulating firearms, is not warranted or wanted by the people of Virginia. Our nation stands at a crossroads, where the desire to address gun violence intersects with the constitutional rights affirmed by the Supreme Court. The Second Amendment's protection of the right to bear arms is not just a legal directive but a reflection of our commitment to individual freedom. In this context, the proposed regulations, while motivated by a commendable desire to reduce violence, raise significant concerns about their effectiveness and the potential consequences for law-abiding citizens. Research, including findings published in the Journal of Quantitative Criminology, suggests that the relationship between strict gun laws and the reduction of gun violence is not as straightforward as one might hope. Cities with stringent gun regulations continue to face challenges with gun-related crimes, indicating that those intent on violence often find ways to circumvent the law. This reality prompts us to question whether new restrictions will achieve their intended goal or merely place additional burdens on those who seek firearms for legitimate purposes, including self-defense. Moreover, the abundance of firearms in the United States presents a logistical challenge to the enforcement of such regulations. With more guns than people in the country, the task of significantly reducing the availability of firearms to criminals, without infringing on the rights of law-abiding citizens, is daunting. It is within this complex landscape that I urge you to consider the broader implications of the proposed gun control measures. The parallels drawn with other contentious issues, such as the regulation of women's healthcare, highlight the potential for policy decisions to inadvertently infringe upon individual freedoms and deepen societal divisions. Such outcomes not only detract from the intended goals of enhancing public safety but also risk alienating segments of the population whose support is essential for the advancement of our collective well-being. I respectfully ask that you consider the potential consequences of the proposed gun control measures, not just for the immediate future but for the legacy we leave for generations to come. It is my hope that, together, we can find a way to address the challenges of gun violence in a manner that honors our values, respects our freedoms, and genuinely enhances the safety and well-being of our communities.
STOP INFRINGING OUR RIGHTS. Get rid of every single gun control bill that is here and START ENFORCING THE LAWS WE ALREADY HAVE. Stop trying to turn law abiding citizens into criminals. I am disgusted that all of these nonsense bills have even made it this far. You can have these laws in Northern Virginia where everyone hates guns but don’t force this garbage into the rest of the state. GET RID OF ALL OF THIS GARBAGE and keep your noses out of everyone’s business. More government is not the answer.
Dear Honorable Members of the House of Delegates, I write to you today as a concerned citizen, deeply invested in the well-being and safety of our communities, and as someone who values the principles upon which our nation was founded. The issue at hand, the introduction of bills aimed at heavily regulating firearms, is one that I believe warrants a thoughtful reconsideration in light of its broader implications. Our nation stands at a crossroads, where the desire to address gun violence intersects with the constitutional rights affirmed by the Supreme Court. The Second Amendment's protection of the right to bear arms is not just a legal directive but a reflection of our commitment to individual freedom. In this context, the proposed regulations, while motivated by a commendable desire to reduce violence, raise significant concerns about their effectiveness and the potential consequences for law-abiding citizens. Research, including findings published in the Journal of Quantitative Criminology, suggests that the relationship between strict gun laws and the reduction of gun violence is not as straightforward as one might hope. Cities with stringent gun regulations continue to face challenges with gun-related crimes, indicating that those intent on violence often find ways to circumvent the law. This reality prompts us to question whether new restrictions will achieve their intended goal or merely place additional burdens on those who seek firearms for legitimate purposes, including self-defense. Moreover, the abundance of firearms in the United States presents a logistical challenge to the enforcement of such regulations. With more guns than people in the country, the task of significantly reducing the availability of firearms to criminals, without infringing on the rights of law-abiding citizens, is daunting. It is within this complex landscape that I urge you to consider the broader implications of the proposed gun control measures. The parallels drawn with other contentious issues, such as the regulation of women's healthcare, highlight the potential for policy decisions to inadvertently infringe upon individual freedoms and deepen societal divisions. Such outcomes not only detract from the intended goals of enhancing public safety but also ***risk alienating segments of the population whose support is essential for the advancement of our collective well-being.*** Constituents see this robust effort to "see what sticks" as a weakness within our party. Comparatively imbalanced with the diverse range of issues and concerns that we face everyday. A waste. As we move forward, I encourage you to approach this issue with a balanced perspective, one that recognizes the need for effective strategies to combat gun violence while also safeguarding the constitutional rights and freedoms that define our nation. The path to meaningful change is complex, requiring a nuanced understanding of the issues at hand and a commitment to policies that truly serve the best interests of all our citizens. In closing, I respectfully ask that you consider the potential consequences of the proposed gun control measures, not just for the immediate future but for the legacy we leave for generations to come. It is my hope that, together, we can find a way to address the challenges of gun violence in a manner that honors our values, respects our freedoms, and genuinely enhances the safety and well-being of our communities.
You guys need to stop attacking our 2nd amendment and get help for these kids growing up with identity crisis’s . You coming after law abiding citizens is appalling and the fact that your leaning towards becoming the despicable state of California is saddening. If the president can have security which uses firearms that even the normal civilian can’t have this raises the issue of how can a civilian defend against a tyrannical government with a featureless 10 round ar-15 ? Keep this up and we know exactly what your end goal is.
As a left leaning voter and citizen of Virginia, these new restrictions on our right to bear arms are sickening. Stop proposing so many bans and limits, and maybe a realistic bill, like the safe credit, won’t be universally protested. If you actually want to quell gun violence, keep focused on affordable mental and physical healthcare, improving the education system, and reducing income inequality. While the right may not support these real improvements, I cannot in good faith support or vote for any politician who supports banning or restricting the rights of law abiding citizens in our beautiful commonwealth. Thank you.
The 2nd amendment states "shall not be infringed". All of these bills are infringement and are therefore unconstitutional. Should we pass laws that people must pass a test before they can have freedom of speech? What about pass a test before you can vote? What about if someone does not have training they will be slaves again? Name one other right outlined in the constitution where a citizen has to jump through hoops before they can use that right? I oppose all of these bills as they will do more harm than good. I can understand wanting to keep people safe but gun control does the opposite. These bills will only make it harder for law abiding citizens to exercise their rights while criminals will still ignore the law. Criminals will still get illegal guns or weapons and will commit more crimes since they know the public is unable to defend themselves. Benjamin Franklin once said: "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." You writing bills saying "give up your rights and guns and we will protect you". Well ask the Native Americans how that worked out for them. Ask a Jewish person who was under Nazi control how that worked out for them. Well Hitler's first step was to take away the guns from the public so they could not protect themselves and over 6 million people lost their lives. Since you do not know history you are writing bills which will doom us to repeat it. You know 75 years ago when you could just buy a gun in a catalog and it was shipped to your house we did not have this issue. In the 60s and 70s when people would have a gun in their truck at school or take one in for show and tell we did not have a gun issue. This is a mental health issue. Deal with mental health and you will fix the public safety issue. Zero of my guns have killed people because guns do not kill people. People kill people. Look at Ukraine and Israel for just one form of example why we need LESS gun control. All of these gun laws are unconstitutional and should be thrown out. Do the right thing and let us law abiding citizens have their rights as outlined in the constitution. Do not pass laws which infringe on our rights. If the 2nd amendment falls, the 1st will follow . When the 1st and 2nd fall the 13th will fall and our country will be lost and we will be back in chains.
I can not, and nobody should, support these unconstitutional laws. THROW THEM ALL OUT.
You guys make it harder and harder to vote Democrat every single cycle. Complete ban on Semi Automatics more or less making the state even stricter towards guns then states like Maryland? I oppose all these even the "herp common sense derp" ones because the states party has made it clear they don't give a crap about anything but putting hollow wins for politicians because hhheeeyyy punishing law abiding gun owners is a whole lot easier then creating jobs or reducing crime. If these bills die before getting to the governors desk, especially the bans, then I will gladly continue to vote DNC. But if Youngkin has to veto these and you make me say something I never thought I would "Thank god Youngkin won" then I look forward to blindly going down the ticket in 2024 and checking "R" on everyone. Thank you for taking the time to read this.
I do not support more legislation infringing on my 2nd Ammendment rights. Please fund more enforcement for the proactive enforcement of existing laws and regulations pertaining to firearms.
I oppose this legislation.
The litany of gun control measures under consideration will do nothing to effectively reduce crime and violence, and will only further restrict the rights of law abiding firearms owners. Not to mention the countless examples from other locales across the country where these same measure have been put into place and the result is more violent crime as criminals can now feel safe that the general population is not armed. Strongly oppose all proposed bills.
The ridiculous litany of gun control measures under consideration will do nothing to effectively reduce crime and violence, and will only further restrict the rights of law abiding firearms owners.
We dont need MORE laws regarding firearms, we need to enforce the laws that are already on the books. If enforcement is done then these laws are redundant and not necessary. Don't pass more laws just for the sake of passing laws. They do nothing but make law abiding citizens confused and they dont do anything to stop problems.
I am writing to express my great concern, to the legislatures that continue to ignore their oath of swearing to protect and uphold the rights of the citizens as protected by the United States Constitution and the Virginian Constitution. "The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED". You beaurcrats do not grant that right to he people, it is God given. While you grandstand and ateemlt to make laws to hurt the everydayaw abiding American citizen, you turn a way and do nothing in these bills to punish criminals committing crimes. It is already illegal to murder people. To grandstand and think that any of these bills would stop someone from murdering or harming another person is laughable. Quite literally. You pander screaming about these firearm safety bills while you walk around with security and people with "guns" to keep you safe. Start enforcing the existing laws against criminals who commit crimes vs trying to turn law abiding people, who take training, are serious about protection of family, themselves and others, and trying to disarm them and make them criminals. Or we will vote you out! Uphold your Oath or be prepared for the consequences your actions lead to by the American people. Regards Mr. Harris
I know most modern politicians aren’t historians but the Bill of Rights is really simple. If you read that, you’ll also read the 2nd Amendment which is really simple as well. In the same docket you’re trying to give more benefits to police and take away more rights from citizens. You ought to be ashamed. What a farce freedom is anymore.
I am opposed to additional new laws or further regulations placed on firearms or other means of self defense, or which limit the ability to conduct commerce or carry such items. Not only does the constitution make it clear this is a violation of my rights, it does nothing to address or reduce the actions of criminals.
I strongly oppose any bill, law or ordinance that infringes on the undeniable constitutional right to keep and bear arms. These include any ban, any further age restrictions, if a person (18) is old enough to join the military and use real "assault weapons" then they should be fully capable to purchase a semi automatic firearm of their choice. I oppose any law or ordinance that restricts my ability to defend my family and myself as I see fit, this includes bans on where I can carry my lawful firearm, what type of firearm and the magazine size of my choice. How about we make laws that are tougher on criminals and stop punishing law abiding people who actually care and follow the law.
All infringements on the second amendment are acts of treason and should be treated as such. Acting in favor of such infringements makes you a traitor to this nation and th commonwealth.
All Virginians want our families to be safe from gun violence. However, passing such broad restrictions on firearms commonly used for self defense is not the answer. The updated definition of assault weapons and the associated prohibitions do little to nothing to stop criminals who are willing to illegally buy or steal firearms. There are plenty of firearms out there for criminals to access, with well over 400 million guns in civilian ownership in the United States. It is too late to round them all up. These bills will disproportionately affect those citizens who go out of their way to follow our commonwealth's laws; the people who are unlikely to commit a violent crime in the first place. The solutions to gun violence that stand a chance at working are community-oriented interventions that decrease poverty, drug use, gang activity, combat mental illness, and advocate for the safe storage of firearms. Sociologists know these factors correlate strongly with ALL types of violence. On average, two-thirds of firearms deaths are suicides, an assault weapons ban won't do a thing about those. Of the remaining 1/3 of firearms homicides, more than half are drug, gang, or domestic violence related. Let's pass bipartisan legislation that addresses these underlying problems, instead of preventing average Virginians from protecting themselves with firearms that are already ubiquitous.
I am Opposed to any limitations on the Second Amendment and any restrictive firearm laws. We have adequate, if not already overbearing, laws on the books now and should not be creating more laws restricting all the aspects of firearm use, sales, and any other aspects of the right to bear arms.
These firearm laws are mostly reactionary to the media response on firearms. This is a major infringement on the 2nd amendment and needs to be stopped.
An inordinate focus on the control of firearms only serves to infringe the rights of the law-abiding citizen in defense of his life and property. The State should instead focus on the apprehension and incarceration of individuals engaging in criminal behavior and associated misuse of firearms.
Any law that infringes on my Gods-given right to own and bear arms is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Any law passed that infringes this right will be answered with a lawsuit.
Hello. There are a plethora of bills that were proposed, which would clearly violate the second amendment rights of many law abiding citizens. First of all, considering concealed carry should be permit-less carry, it is counterproductive to increase the requirements for concealed carry. Restrictions on where law abiding citizens can lawfully carry their now “permitted” firearms is asinine, as well as the proposition of a bill that would make it a penalty to leave a firearm in your car. You would essentially be disarming a large number of people who wish to follow these unlawful order in a day and age where the democratic agenda is to act like there are mass shootings on a daily basis. Effectively disarming the majority and increasing the requirements and legal loopholes to carry is such a vulnerable state to be in and I hope we’re smart enough to avoid that. Restrictions on “Plastic firearms and unfinished frames etc” is not only terrible literature that does nothing to explain, but it is a direct violation of the 2nd amendment considering you have a federal right to make firearms for personal use, which would include additively manufactured parts. Wait periods are also a horrifying thing to think of, considering how many times it has been proven to be a terrible idea, keeping guns out of the hands that need them most to protect themselves and their families. “Assault firearms” and anything to do with them is nonsense considering the blatant inability to define said “assault weapon”. People who don’t understand guns, shouldn’t be making laws on guns. A shorter barrel does not make it more lethal, in fact it lowers the muzzle velocity, causing less force on impact and penetration, in turn causing less collateral damage. Any sort of “assault weapons” bills are targeting law abiding citizens who have every right to use the modern advances in firearm technology just as police officers and military. The only people these bills are effecting are the already law abiding citizens. The criminals who got their hands on said weapons illegally aren’t going to be making sure that their ALREADY ILLEGAL WEAPONS are fully compliant with state laws and regulations before they go commit another crime. In no way shape or form should someone need to disadvantage themselves in a life or death situation because political members with an armed security detail don’t feel the need for a gun. Why would I want to limit myself to a firearm that is going to be inadequate in home defense, or one that does not have a high enough capacity to protect myself from the ever growing threat of home invasion and the increased trend of multiple home invaders breaking in armed. If it was you alone in your house with 6 armed intruders who most definitely must have checked their local laws and firearm regulations and made sure their firearms aren’t violating any rules before they break into your house, would you want to limit yourself to a low capacity firearm that is going to be extremely difficult to use effectively in a high stress situation, or are you taking a rifle which for reasons that don’t make sense, must have a 16 inch barrel, with a larger capacity magazine, and a stock that you can use to safely brace the firearm to prevent stray shots and provide more accurate fire. Personally I’m going to take anything and everything I can get in a situation that means life or death for me and my loved ones EVERY SINGLE DAY OF THE WEEK. Focus on the mental health crisis.
Gun laws do not prevent firearm homicides, based upon gun control organization's own data (Giffords) •No correlation between strict gun laws and firearm homicide incidents •.07 coefficient of determination (AKA R2) where .90 is a strong association •There likely would be a weak association showing gun laws driving the firearm homicide rate higher if Washington, DC was given a score and ranked by Giffords.
I strongly, along with many fellow Virginians oppose any villainous disarmament bills disguised as "public safety". The second amendment clearly states "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" and out of touch elitist politicians who enjoy the luxury of armed security are choosing to ignore the constitution and force us to rely on sub-par police protection. The same people who want to defund the police want to disarm us. Embracing the second amendment is what is keeping our crime rates low compared to New York and California. We have seen the blatant disregard that criminals have for these so-called laws; emboldened criminals who are not afraid of the consequences and innocent law-abiding people who are forced to live in fear because a bunch of tyrants are letting power corrupt them. I do not want to live in fear and neither do the rest of us. In addition; a lot of counties and cities have declared themselves as second amendment sanctuaries to protect the rights of free individuals from the overreach of tyrannical politicians. These bills are a Trojan horse that will lead to more crime. You anti-gun politicians should be ashamed of yourselves; give up your private security and train yourselves. Then you will change your minds; because in the end, nobody is coming to save you. I would rather have a fighting chance against armed assailants than die waiting for help to arrive. These bills are pure evil
I oppose all of these selected bills since I firmly believe they are in conflict with the Second Amendment of the US Constitution. The Second Amendment clearly states that it shall not be infringed upon. Any and all proposed legislation that would place limits on how, where, and when responsible citizens arm themselves runs afoul of that. Our founding fathers correctly held the belief that all people have a natural born right to arm and protect themselves and that the government has no authority to interfere with that. While I agree with the sentiment of reducing violence among our society, gun laws only harm the law abiding citizen and leave criminals who already have a disregard for the law to still be armed. If our elected officials who proposed these bills actually cared about addressing our violence problem, they would focus more on addressing the root causes of violence and crime. More worthwhile pursuits in my opinion would be focused on addressing socio-economic problems that plague disadvantaged communities, creating a more robust and well-equipped mental healthcare system, and overhauling our educational systems to setup our children for better success in life. Thank you all for your time.
I'm against any unconstitutional law, and any law that strips Americans of their rights. These laws are an attack on the 2nd ammendment and hold NO facts in stopping crime. They are a punishment on law abiding people and in no way will make virginia a safer place.
I oppose all these unconstitutional, dangerous, and pointless laws.
HB113 | Sullivan | Handguns; possession, purchase, or transportation by persons convicted of certain drug offenses. HB1174 | Sickles | Assault firearms; age requirement for purchase, penalty. HB1195 | Hayes | Firearms; waiting period for purchases, penalty. HB12 | Jones | Handguns; firearm locking device required for sale or transfer, child safety warning required. HB1235 | Zehr | Concealed handguns; protective orders. HB1424 | Hope | Firearms; valid permit to purchase, penalties. HB1462 | Laufer | Firearm in unattended motor vehicle; civil penalty. HB158 | McClure | Firearm locking device; required for sale or transfer of firearm. HB16 | Garrett | Firearm or explosive material; carrying within Capitol Square and the surrounding area, etc. HB173 | Simon | Plastic firearms and unfinished frames, etc.; manufacture, import, etc. prohibited, penalties. HB175 | Simon | Assault firearms; carrying in public areas prohibited, penalty. HB183 | Simon | Firearms; storage in residence where minor or person prohibited from possessing is present, penalty. HB2 | Helmer | Assault firearms & certain ammunition, etc.; purchase, sales, transfers, etc., prohibited. HB22 | Jones | Auto sears; definition, prohibition on manufacture, importation, sale, etc., penalty. HB270 | Reid | Commonwealth Comprehensive Gun Safety Program; established, etc. HB319 | Helmer | Firearms instructors & safety prog.; removes reference to NRA & U.S. Concealed Carry Assoc. in Code. HB35 | Clark | Firearm safety device; expands definition of device. HB351 | Clark | Firearm; locking device required for purchase, households where minor resides, penalty. HB362 | McClure | Firearms; purchase, etc., following an assault and battery against an intimate or dating partner. HB454 | Callsen | Firearm/explosive material; carrying w/in Capitol Square or bldg. owned or leased by Commonwealth. HB46 | Bennett-Parker | Firearm; transfers to another person from a prohibited person. HB466 | Helmer | Concealed handgun permits; reciprocity with other states. HB791 | Henson | Pneumatic guns; Class 6 felony to possess. HB797 | Hope | Concealed handguns; demonstrated competence for a permit, firearms instructors and safety programs. HB798 | Hope | Firearms; purchase, possession, etc., following an assault and battery or stalking violation. HB799 | Hope | Concealed handgun permit applications; fingerprints required by local governments. HB861 | Hernandez | Weapons; carrying into hospital that provides mental health services. HB945 | Lopez | Firearm safety device; expands definition of device. SB100 | Ebbin | Plastic firearms and unfinished frames, etc.; manufacture, import, etc. prohibited, penalties. SB2 | Deeds | Assault firearms & certain ammunition, etc.; purchase, possession, sale, transfer, etc., prohibited. SB210 | Perry | Auto sears; prohibition on manufacture, importation, sale, etc., penalty. SB273 | Subramanyam | Firearms; waiting period for purchases, penalty. I oppose all these bills.
I was born in Henrico county and vote in every election. Guns are currently the #1 killer of our children under the age of 18. I am writing to show my support for these bills because gun violence prevention is my top priority. Please support gun safety legislation that is brought up for a vote! Thank you so much for your time.
My name is Laura Sledge and I am your constituent. Guns are currently the #1 killer of our children under the age of 18, and gun violence prevention is my top priority. Please support gun safety legislation that is brought up for a vote. Here are the bills I support. Thank you for your time.
Please support HB 318, HB319, HB351, HB362, HB585, HB602, HB637, HB791, HB797, HB798, HB798, HB799, HB 861, HB16, HB45 Let's keep our children and other innocent bystanders safe!
Hello, My name is Hayley Redmond Cilley. Guns are currently the #1 killer of our children under age 18, and I am calling because gun violence prevention is my top priority. Please support gun safety legislation that is brought up for a vote! We need safer communities for all, but especially for our children.
I oppose this bill. Airsoft guns and paintball guns are considered "pneumatic guns". There are many other examples of toy guns that could be considered "pneumatic guns" under this bill. ----As the bill is currently written (1/31/2024) the first incident of a pneumatic gun on "(a) the property of any child day center or public, private, or religious preschool, or elementary, middle, or high school, including buildings and grounds; (b) that portion of any property open to the public and then exclusively used for school-sponsored functions or extracurricular activities while such functions or activities are taking place; or (c) any school bus owned or operated by any such school..." is a Class 1 Misdemeanor and second instance & beyond would be a Class 6 Felony. ---This bill becoming a law would mean that someone could be charged and convicted of a felony for having even what constitutes a toy gun on school grounds or in areas where school-related activities are being conducted. That is absurd and nonsensical. ---It would make sense if the person with the "pneumatic gun" were using it to hurt others and/or it could be legally proven to have intended to use it to hurt others. I could understand how that would constitute a Class 6 Felony, but simply possessing one of these vaguely defined "pneumatic guns" should not be considered anywhere close to a Class 6 Felony. For the record the sentence for a Class 6 Felony conviction could include one to five years in prison and a fine of $2,500. So if someone simply brings a toy pneumatic gun onto school property or a school-related activity, and they do it more than once, they could end up in prison for five years and have to pay a $2,500 fine? That makes no sense and is not ethical. This bill needs to be re-written so it is more realistic in terms of what specific "pneumatic guns" are actually dangerous to people and specifies only punishing people who are using more dangerous (not toy) pneumatic guns to *actively* hurt others in areas/activities mentioned in section (A) of the bill.
I am in opposition to these bills as a long time concealed carry permit holder who has lived in Virginia for. 30 years and has voted in Virginian elections since I was 18. These bills make it harder for someone to keep themselves safe while are primarily solutions in search of problems to fix. Virginia has one of the lowest crime rates in the country and even less gun related crimes being committed year over year. This is not a success of the gun control lobby but they would certainly have you believe it is. They are often unconstitutional limits on a persons 2nd amendment rights and do not serve to make Virginians safer. The ban on assault firearms is written in such a way that it would ban most modern defensive handguns carried by men and women across the commonwealth. These are law abiding concealed carry holders or regular citizens who have purchased regular firearms with regular features. Much akin to wanting a car with leather seats or GPS. These are not features only found on “scary” guns they are features that assist those with hearing or sight issues to use a handgun safely. We already have laws preventing firearms usage in crimes but these would simply disempower lawful citizens from having features on their guns that are normal and regular modern features. These bills would do nothing to prevent actual criminals from obtaining or using prohibited firearms in crime but would disenfranchise law abiding citizens from enjoying a Virginian hobby that has a history older than the state itself.
Dear Sir or Madame. Last year in Newport News I was assaulted by a 27 year old black man from Chesapeake because of his road rage.. This was at my local bank 11;30 in the morning. This young man almost lost his life at my hand because you cannot reel in your problem young men. His words feet from me were ' im going to kick your ass and then kill you'. My pistol changed his mind. I saw for myself the woke judges and a woke system that perpetuates the problem. The criminal justice system has been flung far far left which IS causing a public safety hazzard. No new gun control is needed. More jail time for the trash that i dealt with is. My Congressman Bobby Scott and Delegate Cia Price do not represent me.
I am a member of VA Moms For Change, a gun violence prevention group and I support these bills
When Democrats violate the Covenant between the PEOPLE and the US Constitution as well as the VA Constitution they are acting lawlessly and undermining the commitment toward good Government agreed on for over 200 + years. Seems Democrats didn't learn anything from the Civil war. The mentality of the "Tyrant" and the "Slave Holder" still exists among the Demo-rat Party, removing statues and trying to hide and rewrite history is not good government. Oaths, integrity, and Good Government, mean nothing to this Cabal of Evil minded men and women. We the PEOPLE need and demand good government not a patch work or illegal laws we are expected to "obey" while the "perps" that pass them have no consequence for breaking Constitutional law or good Government. The Demo-rat Party needs to be dismantled and the "ignorant" ejected from the Virginia legislature at once and for all. Peter Buckingham Crozet, VA 22932
Pneumatic guns should be allowed on middle school and high school property. Pneumatic guns are used to compete in Junior Olympic and Olympic sports. Middle and high schools compete in marksmanship competitions around the country. Collegiate athletes in shooting sports earn scholarships. In addition to these positive points, statistics indicate that high school shooting sports are safer than most other high school sports. If the purpose of this bill is to improve children’s safety then it should be targeted at removing sports with high rates of injury rather than a sport that is among the safest.
OPPOSITION to HB12 - Jones OPPOSITION to HB23 - Laufer OPPOSITION to HB158 - McClure OPPOSITION to HB183 - Simon SUPPORT of HB289 - Wiley OPPOSITION to HB351 - Clark OPPOSITION to HB585 – Mundon King SUPPORT of HB756 - Walker OPPOSITION to HB791 - Henson OPPOSITION to HB861 - Hernandez SUPPORT of HB872 - Earley SUPPORT of HB1141 - Cordoza OPPOSITION to HB1174 - Sickles SUPPORT of HB1198 - Scott
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
I am writing in support of HB 12, 23, 158, 183, 351, 585, 791 and 861. I also write in opposition to HB 289, 756, 872, 1141 and 1198. There is ample evidence that minimal restrictions on firearms has resulted in countless deaths and injuries. Sensible restrictions on access to lethal weapons are sorely needed at this time. In fact, the Supreme Court, in deciding on the right to bear arms, has also stated that “Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited. [It is] not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.” If, unfortunately, assault-style weapons continue to be manufactured and owned, their access must be limited by age. In that case I would support HB 1174. Thank you for your attention to these comments.
I am a member of the Charlottesville Coalition for Gun Violence Prevention and the Charlottesville Center for Peace and Justice. I support all the gun safety bills: 12 23 158 183 351 585 791 861 1141 1174 I oppose these bills: 289 756 872 1198
. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. Opposed
Please stop wasting your time and my money on bills that have proven to be have zero impact on public safety, Please refer to Maryland, California, and the other states that already have these laws
Good afternoon, I am writing to implore you to STOP with all of the gun control bills. You are punishing law abiding citizens, who now have their RIGHTS THAT SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED, infringed. And the criminals who do NOT follow these laws but who they are directed at, are not affected. Please enforce ALL of the laws that are presently in the books and prosecute those people breaking the laws and stop letting them out on bail and bond through the Soros DA’s.
HB23 and HB861 Law abiding concealed carry individual are not the problem, and criminals who do not obtain guns legally will not follow this law either. HB12 and HB158 Already exist on the federal level why waste time and money on these bills HB791 who in their right mind would make a child or teenager a felon for bringing a BB-gun into a school, how often does this even happen for this to be considered. HB1174 This bill is unconstitutional at best! How can a man or woman b considered an adult at the age of 18, join the military at the age of 18, and not be allowed to purchase a weapon at the age of 18. Not to mention all other irreversible life changes that are allowed from birth to age 18. Please vote no to all of theses bills and any other unconstitutional gun control bills that come in front of the committee. Concerned constituent.
In reference to all of the above proposed house bills…. In short there is NO need for any more restrictions of any type on the purchase (to include locations of ffls in reference to schools and forcing purchasers to buy locks when they already safely store their firearms), carry, storage, and use of any type of firearms. It is extremely clear that more restrictions do not do anything to stem the flow of violent crimes which may or may not involve firearms (using DC, Chicago, NYC etc as examples, where very strict firearms laws have done nothing to lower violent crime). Instead, we need to focus on allowing law enforcement to aggressively enforce the numerous existing laws, demand commonwealth attorneys offices hold criminals responsible and ensure long prison sentences on offenders. As a citizen of the commonwealth for my entire life, and a local law enforcement officer for over 2 decades I can tell you from personal experience simply adding restrictions and more laws is worthless and simply slows down the system. As they say when seconds count, the police are only minutes away…. Do not place any more restrictions on residents of the commonwealth who are forced to live in increasingly dangerous localities due to the legal changes of the past 5 years, which allow offenders to go unpunished or under punished. Simply because you do not like firearms does not mean that others should not have lessened access to purchase, use, and carry the firearms of their choice. Thank you for your consideration
I would like for the Commonwealth of Virginia to have Constitutional Carry as the law of the entire state , our right as stated in the constitution of the united states and the constitution of the Commonwealth of virginia as written by our founders gives each citizen the right to keep and bear arms with no exclusions, to be secure in their persons, unless that right has been forfeited,. Exercising this right should never lead to forfeiture of this right.
I would like for the Commonwealth of Virginia to have Constitutional Carry as the law of the entire state , our right as stated in the constitution of the united states and the constitution of the Commonwealth of virginia as written by our founders gives each citizen the right to keep and bear arms with no exclusions, to be secure in their persons, unless that right has been forfeited,. Exercising this right should never lead to forfeiture of this right.
This is absolutely egregious. A home-based FFL is an enterprise that is cleared at a higher level of proficiency and familiarity with firearms issues than any authority VA - the FFL holders are cleared and backed by the ATF. Further, an FFL, home-based or otherwise, is an enterprise in the business of safe transfer of weapons to individuals after doing criminal checks on the prospective buyer. The location near a school is irrelevant - it does not constitute a threat to a school simply because an FFL is nearby. This is a bad faith argument, and false equivalence. It’s a thin veneer. Simply put, it’s been proposed by people who do not like private ownership of firearms, and schools were picked because (deceptively) because they are evenly districted and spread through the state - after all, they’re supposed to be, to allow children access to education without having to travel unreasonably far. This also means that selecting schools as the criteria for a “no home FFL bubble” means you effectively throw a blanket over the industry. This has nothing to do with the safety of children. I find this frankly offensive and dishonest. Show me evidence where an FFL near a school has caused a problem? More than that, show me a single instance where the location was any sort of relevant. You cannot. Because it’s not true. It’s false equivalence. Let me be clear. I am a liberal person. But part of being liberal means remembering that fear mongering and bad faith, secretive agendas hurt progress. They turn people against it. Drop this frivolous nonsense. Stop making us look like idiots, please. Your crusade against portions of the bill of rights (because come on folks, we know what it is, it’s misguided) opens up very dangerous precedents for other bad faith actors to whittle down the contents of the other amendments. Read a history book. Please.
I do not support these bills. I request you vote NO on them. HB 12, Jones, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon, requires all firearms in a home be secured if there is a minor in the home. Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, prevents home-based gun dealers from operating within 1.5 miles of a school. Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, makes it illegal for anyone under 21 to purchase any kind of firearm. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen.
Constitutional issues when made political do no justice to representatives or their constituents. Dishonesty to the public erodes any ability for trust and assumptions based on party affiliation close down civil discussion. Some representatives run for office for gun control matters and get voted in but are you being honest with your constituents. I can quote statistics as could those supporting gun control but there are logical truths being ignored. We should change our terminology from gun control, to gun control over law biding citizens because each law that is passed in most situation only further restricts law biding citizens. Most gun laws only increase the ability to become a victim to criminal actions because in order to abide by laws implemented it puts the citizen at a considerable disadvantage . Gun free zones only mean unarmed citizens open to criminal behavior due to the inability to defend one's self. Law enforcement only enforce the laws, and cannot be there to prevent the actual crimes in most situations. Criminals intent on malfeasance will not abide by any laws put in place but exploit any such laws that allow for an advantage against an unarmed individual. This is not to say that I am apposed to back ground checks even at gun shows to avoid loop holes as I support such measures but to restrict carrying at locations or gun free zones only makes for sitting ducks. Restricting common circulation of rifles or any similar type to the AR-15 platform again only further limits the citizen from criminals AND tyrannical infrastructures within the state and federal levels. We can never assume that our representatives are in power for support of the people and our constitution I am not in support of any of the current gun control bills, I am in support of all the pro gun bills. In light of whatever is voted into law ,if it further restricts my constitutional rights and civil rights I simply cannot and will not comply. Thank you for your time on this matter.
I am writing to oppose these anti-gun, anti-self-defense, anti-rights, bills. Having previously lived for nearly 20 years in another state with many of them and more, the experience of that state was that, contrary to crime dropping nationally to historic lows, their crime increased after restrictions were added. Unsurprisingly, criminals don't obey laws. They seek to exploit those who do. These laws taking away liberty and presumption of innocence of people who seek to obey laws, do nothing but create a maze of rules that ensnare unsuspecting good people who are unaware of the litany of restrictions, their nuance and ever-changing interpretation in the future. At best, people are forced to forgo their rights to self-defense entirely because they have one or more stops on their daily travels in a restricted area. Worse, otherwise law abiding people unaware of these many restrictions, find themselves in violation having no intention, history or desire to violate the law, much less hurt anyone. These are not the people with whom our criminal code and law enforcement resources should concern themselves. Even beyond that, if faced with a violent threat in these "sensitive places", those law abiding people will now be at an even greater disadvantage as we, the people, do not enjoy an armed and dedicated police force traveling with and around us as many politicians do. I noticed sniper teams on the roofs in the surrounding area during this past VCDL Lobby Day ensuring your safely against some hypothetical threat. We are not so fortunate as we go out in the world to have such resources protecting us. Worse yet, we had been been required to disarm prior to expressing our first amendment rights that day both outside and inside the building. Whether storage, locality of carry, age of an adult required to purchase or restrictions otherwise, law abiding people are not and never were the problem. Stop punishing them collectively for the actions of violent individuals. Respect and protect their rights and presumption of innocence as the US and Virginia Constitutions require of you. When you regulate firearms, it is not the machine of a firearm you are regulating. It is the people you are regulating. It is the rights of the people you are taking away. With all the supposed progress we have made, how is it that we are less deserving of liberty now than we were in the past?
Every single one of these proposed laws are blatantly unconstitutional under the plain text of both the Virginia and US constitutions. The SCOTUS has ruled multiple times, must recently in June 2022, that the 2A prohibits these types of attacks on free citizens. Voting for any of these bills is a waste of tax payer dollars, morally and ethically wrong, and, by definition of the courts already having ruled on these or similar laws as unconstitutional, an act of treason against the USA and by extension an insurrection.
I urge you to OPPOSE each of the following bills: HB 12 Federal law already covers this and additional state enforcement will create unnecessary expense. We don’t need more bills that could create negative financial impact on our community. HB 23 This is not constitutional under the Supreme Court Decision made in 2022: New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen. This bill prevents visitors, family, and staff from their right to self defense. Is it right to prevent an abused single mother from carrying her most effective tool of defense because she has to take her child to the ER? Wouldn’t this give anyone with nefarious intentions an easy location? Note: Cornell Law has published a clear summary of the Bruen Decision, easily accessed with an online search. I mention this case further below. HB 158 Federal law already covers this and additional State enforcement will create unnecessary expense. HB 183 Current law already covers 14 and under. increasing the scope of the law to apply to 15, 16, and 17-year-olds is an overreach. Minors in this age group have used firearms to save their own life and protect the lives of their families by stopping home invasions and violent attacks on their households. This bill is an overreach. HB 585 What problem is this bill trying to solve? What’s the difference between driving 1.5 miles or 5 or 10? This bill is unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Furthermore, home-based gun dealers don't usually have signs outside of their home. Buyers have to be invited in for a purchase and FFL transfer. Also, convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products (not legal for minors to purchase) are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791 BB guns, and other pneumatic projectile devices, are specifically designed as hobbyist or sporting equipment. Making the possession of these on school grounds a felony is a complete overreach. Are we going to outlaw sticks, or stones, or archery, or baseball bats? These are all similarly dangerous. If BB guns have been used for violence at a school, please inform me. Otherwise, this is a “fix” to a problem that doesn’t exist. HB 861 This is not constitutional under Bruen and prevents visitors, family, and staff from their right to self defense. Is it right to prevent an abused single mother from carrying her most effective tool of defense because she has to take her child to the ER? Wouldn’t this give anyone with nefarious intentions an easy location? HB 1174 This bill is not constitutional. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen. People in this age group are not minors. They are included in the same Second Amendment rights as older adults.
I'm a law abiding citizen, retired law enforcement officer, and responding Public Safety 1st Responder Chaplain. I have been called out, responding to or serving at a number of violent acts, anf times, often in dangerous areas. I believe in these violent times, and knowing that criminals don't and won't obey the laws, that I have a need and right to be able to defend and protect myself, and be able to continue carrying, as I have for many years. Our drivers permit is for all 50 states, and we don't have to stop at a state border. I believe a concealed carry permit should be the same, recognized in all 50 states. To have to leave my firearm inside my car, to go into a public building or rest area on the highway, can put me in needless danger. If I have to take off a d put my firearm in my trunk, it let's a criminal see where it is and I don't have it. That can let them steal the firearm and/or harm me. Please allow our law abiding citizens use their 2nd Amendment Right To Keep and Bear (bear = to carry) arms. We need to fully prosecuted existing gun laws snd crimes, Not Add More Gun Controls that criminals won't obey any way. Murder has been against the law for centuries, but increasingly still going on, sometimes unpunished.
Please keep your gun grabbing hands off legally owned guns.Why not enforce the laws already on the books. Tell D.A. To do their jobs, go after the illegal guns. It is not legal guns that is the problem, it is the illegal guns. If more people carried legally crime could go down because the bad guys won’t know whose packing and could respond to crime. Thank you for reading my response. Alexander G. Morris IV.
The attack on the right to keep and bear arms has only increased over the past 18 months since the Supreme Court clarified in the Bruen decision the standard to which modern gun control legislation must be held. Many politicians around the country know that the bills put forth since that time are unconstitutional, but they also know it usually takes years to throw out their unconstitutional bills through court, and by then they have already cost time, money, and lives of American citizens. Rather than confront the underlying issues of our nation that lead to violence, they choose to take the easy way out and simply blame inanimate objects to deflect from their own political incompetency. Virginia representatives need to be better than that. The bills proposed are either duplicative of federal law, pointless, or dangerous. All are unconstitutional. All are a reflection of a disregard for commonsense safety measures like taking criminals off the streets. These bills must not be passed. Not because they will be signed into law, but because its the duty of Virginia state representatives to uphold the constitution and work to solve problems. These bills due neither.
Please do not vote for or advance any anti gun bills. Each one limits a citizens 2nd Amendment rights... I.E. banning commonly owned and used semi automatic rifles, which is unconstitutional under Bruen... Raising the age to purchase firearms. If one can serve in the military, one can purchase a firearm. Plus, its unconstitutional under Bruen AND a Virginia court ruled against it as well. Limiting where one can carry. This only creates more soft targets which criminals will not obey anyway. Banning unserialized firearms . Unconstitutional since some were made before 1968, when numbers were not required. Also, people have the right to build unserialized firearms in their homes for personal use. This has never been an issue, but decriminalization of crimes is causing an increase in violent crimes. THAT is a problem. Limiting how many firearms one can purchase in a given period is unfair. These are just a few . Please understand all the anti gun bills are unconstitutional, especially in light of the Bruen decision. I do urge you to vote for any pro gun bills. The right to keep and bear arms is a constitutional right. The Heller, McDonald, and Bruen decisions reinforce that right. The only limits on this right should be for criminals, illegal aliens, and anyone who has been mentally adjudicated/ forced into an institution. The issue we face should be how to repair our broken mental health infrastructure, not to limit the constitutional rights of law abiding citizens. Thank you Mr Raymond Pezzoli
Our freedom was won with illegal and unregistered firearms. Please look to the G.O. A. And VCDL for guidance on Second Amendment issues. Freedom first, safety second.
I support these bills!
Hello, My name is Sameet Singh, I was born in Punjab, India and moved to Northern Virginia when I was 1 year old. Since then, I’veattended some great K-12 schools in the NOVA area, graduated from George Mason University in 2020, and now work in the Cyber Security field, serving one of our largest US Government Departments. My message to you today is not regarding any single bill in particular, but more of a mindset. I’m sure everyone here has a family that they would do anything for. We work hard everyday to provide for and to protect our families. And a big part in being able to protect, is having the right tool to protect yourself and your family members. This is why the best tool to have at your disposal is a firearm, a gun. Because if you or your family were attacked by someone in your home or out and about in public, a firearm, would be the best tool to have to save yourself and them from an attacker. Even if you’re able to call the police, it’ll at least take a few minutes for them to arrive, and sadly, within those minutes, only a few seconds are needed to completely change your world. Therefore, you are always your OWN first responser, before any other help arrives. This is why, anything, that would hinder your ability to protect yourself or your family with the best tool that you could use, a firearm, should really be re-thought. Unfortunately our society is not at the point where crime dosen’t happen, there’s no supernatural being or superhero that will swoop in to protect us in our times of need, there’s no Spider-Man or Superman who will save the day for us. However, the next best thing we have, is an responsibly armed citizen. A citizen who who is able to be gentle and loving with their kids and partner, but at the same time, prepared and alert at a moments notice when danger reveals itself. Thank you for listening, and thank you for your service to your communities, I wish you all a prosperous new year. Best, Sameet Singh
The Supreme Court has ruled that localities do not have the authority to declare broad swaths of spaces as "gun-free zones" and if private property managers wish to forbid firearms and weapons from their property they already have that right. Voting on such an unconstitutional bill is simply a waste of time where clear court rulings already apply. Many of these other bills have already been ruled unconstitutional under Bruen. And some of these bills such as making a BB gun a felony when on school grounds is simply idiotic. The House needs to stop wasting time on idiotic and frivolous bills that are simply nothing less than virtue signaling. There is real work to be done and you should attend to that business and not such tripe.
HB12 - Jones . I not not support . All firearms dealers currently offer a Firearm locking device on the sale or transfer of handguns. All new firearm come with a locking device and warning labels. child safety warning required. This doesn't change the current practice by dealers in offering for free locking devices. HB 23 Weapons; possession or transportation into facility that provides mental health services, etc. I do not support,. This bill does not exempt ems medical services or the fire service which many carry concealed when transporting patients to an emergency room or mental health facility on the duty. HB158 - McClure I do not support . All firearms dealers currently offer a Firearm locking device on the sale or transfer of handguns. All new firearm come with a locking device and warning labels. child safety warning required. This doesn't change the current practice by dealers in offering for free locking devices. HB183 - Simon HB289 - Wiley I support carrying a concealed handgun with a permit into public parking lots and storing there gun makes sense and do not unarm the citizen while in their personal vehicle. HB351 - Clark I not not support . All firearms dealers currently offer a Firearm locking device on the sale or transfer of handguns. All new firearm come with a locking device and warning labels. child safety warning required. This doesn't change the current practice by dealers in offering for free locking devices. most police departments give away free locking devices. HB585 - Mundon King I do not support this bill changes little firearms transactions which must be performed at a already approved ATF dealer location. 1.5miles is overreach by the state. HB756 - Walker I do not support. This limits gun rights. Not protection for EMS or fire personnel HB791 - Henson I do not support. This bill eliminates the number of programs that have pneumatic bb gun competition for 4 H at private or religious schools. HB861 - Hernandez I do not support,. This bill does not exempt ems medical services or the fire service which many carry concealed when transporting patients to an emergency room or mental health facility in the duty. HB872 - Earley I support . Always a lawful citizen to store a lawfully possessed firearm and ammunition in a locked private motor vehicle parked at any parking area owned or controlled by the Commonwealth. HB1141 - Cordoza I support HB1174 - Sickles I do not support changing the definition of an assault weapon widely and increasing the age which will make little difference. HB1198 - Scott, P.A. I support in reducing the fee
Vietnam Veteran - Retired Special Agent & LEO ( military 19 yrs & Federal 10 plus years) - that is me. Please consider the Bill of Rights; law abiding citizens rights to freedoms and rights of self protection. Criminals don’t follow laws against violence and criminal acts. Thank you
Seems to me the General Assembly needs to pay attention to the Supreme Court rulings. Most of these bills if not all ignore what the Court has ruled on. Does the Gov. of Virginia think they are above the highest court in the land? Also, do not think for a Nano second that I believe these bills are about crime control. They are all about people control PERIOD. A Tyrannical state. I will fight this!!
I am submitting comments in opposition to these anti-gun rights bills. These bills do nothing to increase actual safety of Virginians. They serve only to further infringe upon our Second Amendment rights and those rights enshrined in our Virginia Constitution. Instead of focusing on the root causes of violent crimes, Democrats have chosen to target lawful Virginians' firearms rights. Most of these bills are a false solution for non-existent problems. Some of these bills would flagrantly be un-Constitutional and in opposition to prior U.S. Supreme Court decisions to include the Heller and Bruen decisions. In the 2023 Virginia elections, no candidate ran on a pro-gun control platform, therefore no mandate was handed to the House to implement such infringements. Virginians made our pro-Second Amendment stance clear in RIchmond in January 2020 when 40,000 people rallied against similar bills during that session and over 95% of Virginia counties' Board of Supervisors passed Second Amendment Sanctuary statuses. I urge the Committee Members to vote No on these bills. Thank you.
As a constituent, I urge you to OPPOSE the following bills: HB 12, Jones, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon, requires all firearms in a home be secured if there is a minor in the home. Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, prevents home-based gun dealers from operating within 1.5 miles of a school. Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, makes it illegal for anyone under 21 to purchase any kind of firearm. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen.
Regarding HB183: It's a shame that we the people have to keep up with all the ways our government wants to restrict us from living out our rights. The government has no business telling me how to handle my firearms in my own home. Regarding HB791: BB guns? Are you kidding? Get a real job.
NOT ONE OF THESE BILLS ARE CONSTITUTIONAL &/OR NECESSARY! THEY'RE SIMPLY SOLUTIONS IN SEARCH OF NONEXISTENT PROBLEMS! HB 12: Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23: Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158: Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183: Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585: Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791: Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861: Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174: A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen. Thank you.
HB 12, Jones - requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. These requirements represent an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under the Supreme Court's Bruen decision and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon, requires all firearms in a home be secured if there is a minor in the home. Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, prevents home-based gun dealers from operating within 1.5 miles of a school. Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, makes it illegal for anyone under 21 to purchase any kind of firearm. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen.
This is just a solution in search of a problem. Don't make laws we do not need. Thank you!
So there is nothing as important in and for Virginia other then Supporting Communist Legislation against the Constitution of VA and the US Constitution that all this effort must be the first thing on the agenda when a Demo-rat Majority is fraudulently elected to the House and Senate. You fools must make the people that pay you off very happy to have you ear and sell yourself to the Communist Party. Demo-rats are an embarrassment to Freedom and Good Government. Patrick Henry, you may have heard of him? Show me that age and country where the rights and liberties of the people were placed on the sole chance of their rulers being good men, without a consequent loss of liberty? ********************************** The eternal difference between right and wrong does not fluctuate, it is immutable. ********************************** The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government - lest it come to dominate our lives and interests. ********************************** Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? ********************************** Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined.... The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun.
*** Is this an attempt to get rid of the Potomac High School Rile League (PHRSL) in Northern Virginia that 13 public schools currently compete in? It is THE ONLY HIGH SCHOOL SPORT WITH ZERO INJURIES. This program has a number of honor society members and has many national match champions and even Olympic gold medalists! THIS IS A TRAVESTY! https://afc-iwla-sillsairrange.org/air-rifle/ ***
HB 791, Henson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist.
I urge you to OPPOSE the following bills: HB 12, HB 23, HB 158, HB 183, HB 585, HB 791, HB 1174 For some of these bills... they are meaningless, as they are already covered by Federal Law... the committee and legislature should not be wasting time on bills and laws that are already on the books! For some of the other bills... they are already deemed UNCONSTITUTIONAL under the 2nd Amendment and existing Supreme Court decisions. If these become law, they have a high probably of being voided/vacated within a year or two. Aside from taking away existing rights of Virginia citizens in that time... you will ensure lawyers on both sides of the issue will make a lot of money so they can drive fancy cars and send their kids to expensive schools. Stop indirectly putting money (half of which are paid with tax dollars) in lawyers’ pockets. I'd rather our courts address real crime and issues... not laws already deemed unconstitutional. Many of these bills attempt to create a tactical "solution"... except that the specific problem the "solution" addresses doesn't or never existed or occurred in the Commonwealth. I request that my elected officials address meaningful solutions, and ensure existing rights of law-abiding citizens are not infringed upon. Thank you for your time.
These proposals are solutions in search of problems. Many of these violate the Bruen decision. I would love for us to eliminate sovereign immunity. These politicians must be able to be sued personally, held both criminally and civilly liable for any vote in favor of a law, if they knew or should have known it violates or God given rights.
I feel violated. This legislation scares me and I'm a constituent. Show me the evidence that the legislation you are proposing will actually reduce crime and violence. There is none. These are "do something" acts that restrict my right as a good, sane, sober, moral and prudent citizen to keep and bear arms. If there were a violent criminal act for which I was now unprepared, restricted in my ability to defend innocent life, who will bear responsibility for that?
Good afternoon Delegates, I stand in opposition to all of these unconstitutional bills that will not do anything to curb and only demonize legal, lawful Virginians. Also, many of these bill are redundant to either existing commonwealth law or federal regulations. Lawful firearm owners are the back bone of this great commonwealth and country. I urge you all to recognize that Virginia is one of the safest states in the nation and that all of these proposed laws are violations of the Constitution and should not moved forward to a vote. Thank you for your time and consideration on this very important matter D Scott Burns
As a born and bred Virginian; a father and husband; a disabled veteran and active member in the community; I cannot understand why individuals who are elected, willingly do what they can to violate both the Virginia and United States Constitutions to penalize law-abiding citizens such as myself. I have spent a life of duty and dedication in service and occupations to protect our State and Country from those who wish to subjecgate its citizens or worse. Not only do all of these restrictions seek a perspective only solution, they do so at the cost of innocent citizens. Law-abiding citizens do not commit drug gang offenses, home invasions, mass shootings. These are the acts of career criminals or mentally disturbed individuals. None of these proposed bills addresses those issues or the deeper problem of why people are so quick to commit these acts. Murder is murder, whether a gun is used or a cane, it is still wrong. I'm more concerned about why, instead of the tool. Obviously, certain politicians are only worried about the tools. These proposed bills are all clearly agenda focused without factual information to support true results that may be gained by violating state and federal laws to enact. The Supreme Court very clearly defined the right to arms and most of these bills would violate those freedoms. Nor is it legislators purview to dictate what citizens do with what they have within the confines if their own home. THAT, is yet another violation. It is also disturbing that legislators seem to be focused on separating Virginia from reciprocity, thus affecting relations with other states, which ultimately led to a civil war last time. They are also creating more areas where people who mean to harm can do so without fear of being stopped such as adding a new gun free zone. This is a very bad and ill-conceived premise. If the point has not been made yet, then perhaps citizens need to start holding legislators civilly responsible for lives lost as a result of such zones. Clearly they are not effective. I ask that you stop operating under partisan politics and quid pro quo agendas which only serve to penalize and subjegate our citizenry. This is not what servicemembers and veterans served, sacrificed and vowed to defend. Freedom has a cost, and it is difficult to understand, especially through the fear and pain. There is NO such thing as safety. There never was, and never will be. America has MANY enemies out there in the world, and it's citizens; it's armed citizens; are the LAST line of defense. Continuing to attempt to disarm law-abiding citizens only further prompts the question by citizens for the legislators... "Whose side are you truly on?" Please repeal these bills and focus more on actual crime, deterrence for early release, stiffer penalties for existing criminals who continue to commit them and stop bringing in more and more illegal immigrants. Thank you for your attention. Lessons of the Past, Lost to Actions of the Present, Will Forever Damn the Future. -Sean Flippin - 1989
Please stop wasting our money, as a taxpayer, on initiatives and regulation that are at best ineffective and at worst making things safer for Criminals. Creating areas that are gun-free makes safe areas for Criminals as they know that their victims will not have the tools necessary to defend themselves. Stop trying to make us, the public, less safe. Stop releasing criminals, especially repeat-offenders, Releasing criminals causes us to acquire tools to keep ourselves and our families safe.
As a constituent, I urge you to OPPOSE the following bills: HB 12, Jones, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon, requires all firearms in a home be secured if there is a minor in the home. Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, prevents home-based gun dealers from operating within 1.5 miles of a school. Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, makes it illegal for anyone under 21 to purchase any kind of firearm. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen. I thank you. Mr. & Mrs Lon Horiuchi
Everyone of these bills further restricting the rights of the law abiding citizen should be voted down.
This bill must be OPPOSED. These bills do NOTHING to prevent/reduce crime. In fact, these types of bills will eventually ENABLE and allow MORE crime (just look at crime in Maryland and DC) by reducing Virginian's ability to adequately and easily protect themselves. This bill is immoral, unjust, unconstitutional and racist as it will HARM black and brown people, other minorities, women, the elderly, and children who will be the eventual victims as a result of laws like this. Using these types of bills to slowly deny the public's human right of self defense will NOT save lives or keep people safe. This has been proven again and again. As lawmakers, you have an obligation to ensure that the laws you enact *protect* our God-given, human right of self defense -- you should *not* be disenfranchising us and making us MORE vulnerable to crime and injustices with these ignorant bills. Thank you.
As a voting resident and veteran I strongly OPPOSE the following bills: HB 12, Jones, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon, requires all firearms in a home be secured if there is a minor in the home. Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, prevents home-based gun dealers from operating within 1.5 miles of a school. Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, makes it illegal for anyone under 21 to purchase any kind of firearm. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen. This bills have gone beyond the scope of "safety" and are clearly an attempt to strip the constitutional rights of law abiding citizens of this great Commonwealth. The majority of these bills have already been struck down my the SCOTUS. Remember your oath: I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God. v/r Thomas Speich
I do not support any proposed gun restriction bills. I have been a resident of VA for 40 years and have never been in trouble with the law. I do not think the bills that are being proposed will deter gun violence. The issue is not guns. It is mental health.
Dear Democrats proposing duplicative and unconstitutional bills: It is apparent that you seek to propose bills that ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL based on the US Supreme Court. Please reference the Heller and Bruen decisions. It would appear you are taking that as a mere suggestion? Further, the "catch me if you can" approach to lawmaking is ridiculous. Yes, we know the strategy made famous by Obama...pass laws you know are unconstitutional knowing it will take ~5 years and millions of dollars to undo them. In the interim, the damage is done. This is the stuff of tyrants. HB 12: DUPLICATIVE OF FEDERAL LAW. HB 23: UNCONSTITUTIONAL UNDER BRUEN. HB 158: DUPLICATIVE OF FEDERAL LAW. HB 183: DUPLICATIVE. 14 and under is covered. There are many cases were 15, 16, 17 year olds defending themselves and family from crime using firearms. HB 585: UNCONSTITUTIONAL. HB 791: a solution looking for a problem. Most normal people grew up playing with BB guns. Cite all the crime associated with BB guns? HB 861: UNCONSTITUTIONAL UNDER BRUEN. HB 1174: UNCONSTITUTIONAL UNDER BRUEN. already heard and struck down in other states. The disarmament agenda is tiresome. If you spent half the energy in Richmond, Hampton, Norfolk, and Petersburg, 95%+ of "gun violence" would be taken care of. Your main perpetrator group is black men killing black men, 18-34. Don't you read the Virginia Crime Commission's reports? if you were serious, you'd be going after ACTUAL criminals vs. passing meaningless laws that only impact the law abiding.
HB 12, Jones, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure - Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon - Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, is Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, is not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen.
We are encouraging our state politicians to work on meaningful solutions that will actually help reduce gun violence, violence in general, theft, and improve the quality of our lives. Let's start enforcing current laws that are reasonable and remove those that aren't. Work on quickly improving the number of quality jobs in VA. Through good local educational services that focus on the required skills, people can improve their own lives, the lives of their family, and have more hope for the future. Childcare assistance can help families that are working. It's time to create a new playbook and stop passing additional restrictive laws that only burden our citizens and families. Start improving our lives which leads to less violence, good jobs, and strong families that can raise our children better.
Why is it that you want to continue to go against your sworn oath to office and institute further gun restrictions and control on law biding citizens? With control of the senate and house why don't you focus on the root of the problem which is more to improve the socio-economic issues regions face which should in turn lower drug and gang related problems which in turn is the true reason behind your "gun violence" issue you continue to speak on. WE DO NOT HAVE A GUN VIOLENCE ISSUE, we have violence issue that you need to address not through more gun restrictions. Enough with the gun control bills, it is the first thing the democratic party pushes when they get control of the majority. Use this time to better the communities or is that just tok difficult for you? As all you want to do is make it so criminals have more power over law biding citizens, pull our children into gang and drug culture and go easy on crime so they know there is no accountability for their actions.
I wish congress would treat firearms and firearms owners in Virginia like they do illegal aliens. Turn a blind eye to them and just let them be free. Never make rules about securing access or entry to them. Ensure that none of them need paperwork or if they do, wait so long before you check to make sure any of it is accurate, you never find the illegals and in this case, firearms. That would be swell.
"The right to keepand bear arms shall not be infringed..." Those who carry firearms should not leave them in vehicles. Many guns used in crimes are stolen, often from vehicles. Hospitals and other places people gather are where trained armed civilians can thwart a crime or mass shooting. The AR-15 is a civilian multi-purpose rifle -- easy to operate, inexpensive, accurate, low recoil, low cost ammo, and potentially lethal when necessary. It is the best rifle ever invented for U.S. civilian use...hunting, self and home defense, and target shooting. Resources in VA should be used for law enforcement, crime prevention and mental health. Take ILLEGAL guns off the streets.
Given the second amendment of the constitution, there shall be no laws that prevent me from being able to protect myself. I am a conceal carry holder and have been for almost 10 years now. We vehemently oppose any laws that would prevent Conceal Carry Holders from carrying our weapon. Our goal is to have protection and not need it rather than needing protection, and not being able to have it. We will not comply.
When will misguided legislators learn that infringing the right of law abiding citizens to exercise our Second Amendment liberties does nothing to make the public safe? In fact, it makes us all less safe because criminals love restrictions on lawful firearm ownership. Wake up! Follow the Constitution. “The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed!” Bishop E.W. Jackson STAND Virginia PAC
First, SCOTUS has addressed gun rights; access to magazines & ammo multiple times. Multiple times, SCOTUS' decision has sided with law abiding gun owners. I am curious as to why you continue to suppress our God given constitutionally protected right to bear arms? I can only assume one of two reasons. Either (A) you are completely uneducated as to the writers of the constitution, as well as their separate and several memoirs on the right to keep and bear arms; and furthermore ignorant of the right of the People to keep and bear arms as a result of the People having fought against tyranny using NOT federally provided military arms and ammunition - rather, PRIVATELY owned arms and ammunition. Below are just a few examples of historically accurate statements on said RIGHTS : “No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.” – Thomas Jefferson, Virginia Constitution, Draft 1, 1776 “A strong body makes the mind strong. As to the species of exercises, I advise the gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it gives boldness, enterprise and independence to the mind. Games played with the ball, and others of that nature, are too violent for the body and stamp no character on the mind. Let your gun therefore be your constant companion of your walks.” – Thomas Jefferson, letter to Peter Carr, August 19, 1785 “Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops.” – Noah Webster, An Examination of the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution, October 10, 1787 “To disarm the people…[i]s the most effectual way to enslave them.” – George Mason, The Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution, June 14, 1788 “I ask who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers.” – George Mason, Address to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 4, 1788 My questions are simply these, who do you expect to follow these laws that you put forth? Criminals? Why would you expect someone who is a CRIMINAL to obey the law? Maybe you should take some time and learn the definition? Which brings me to part (B) as to why I think you are trying to bar citizens from owning semi-auto rifles & there average magazines - you fear us to the point where you want to disarm us in much the same way HITLER disarmed HIS constituency. Clearly Thomas Jefferson had it correct - when he said “The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes…. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.” – Thomas Jefferson, Commonplace Book (quoting 18th century criminologist Cesare Beccaria), 1774-1776. Tyranny is the only reasonable explanation for your efforts because the lies spread by the US Government regarding death tolls, etc., is a complete fallacy. All you have to do is a little independent research regarding 'mass shootings.' And yes, private citizens did in fact have legal ownership of canons all the way through the Civil War era. Only an idiot would believe the lies that they did not.
In Caetano v. Massachusetts (2016), the Supreme Court reiterated its earlier rulings that "the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding" and that its protection is not limited to "only those weapons useful in warfare". New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen (2022) is a landmark: [ In a 6–3 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that New York's law was unconstitutional and that the ability to carry a pistol in public was a constitutional right guaranteed by the Second Amendment. — A 2022 poll found that 64% of Americans were in favor of the ruling in contrast with 35% of Americans that say they oppose the decision.[50] Additionally, 36%, the largest single share, said they strongly support the Court's ruling in contrast with 16% who said they strongly oppose it. The Legal Aid Society said the decision "may be an affirmative step toward ending arbitrary licensing standards that have inhibited lawful Black and Brown gun ownership in New York."[46] Former house minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R‑CA) supported the ruling, saying it "rightfully ensures the right of all law-abiding Americans to defend themselves without unnecessary government interference."[47] Law professor Steve Vladeck said the decision will "have monumental ramifications far beyond carrying firearms in public" and predicts there will be a "slew of litigation challenging any and every gun-control measure". Tread AROUND the 2nd amendment to our Constitution of the United States of America. Around it. Not on it; not lightly upon it! Carefully consider your vote! (Attachment: Photo of one night of a dangerous riot in a public place.)
Please leave law abiding citizens alone and focus the Commonwealth’s limited resources on the arrest, conviction, and incarceration of violent individuals. Paul Trible Blue Grass, VA
Suggest instead of Firearms Safety Subcommittee... Crimes Safety Subcommittee. greatly more effective! THE REAL ISSUE!
None of these proposals will impact the behavior of a criminal - only making law abiding citizens vulnerable as a new "gun free" zone attracts people seeking to make a statement with a gun and want time to do so before someone with a gun shows up. Additionally, most of these targeted problems are not currently problems or represent a growing trend that needs additional protections enacted to address. In my view, these bills have limited to no chance to provide additional protections or impact criminal behavior but DO further strip your constituents God give rights to provide the illusion of protection.
As a constituent, I urge you to OPPOSE the following bills: HB 12, Jones, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon, requires all firearms in a home be secured if there is a minor in the home. Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, prevents home-based gun dealers from operating within 1.5 miles of a school. Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, makes it illegal for anyone under 21 to purchase any kind of firearm. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support the following bills: HB1174, HB1181, HB1195, HB12, HB1424, HB1462, HB158, HB175, HB183, HB23, HB270, HB318, HB319, HB351, HB362, HB585, HB602, HB637, HB791, HB797, HB798, HB799, HB861, HB916, & HB945 I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I oppose these bills: HB1030, HB1141, HB1198, HB1230, HB1235, HB1321, HB1325, HB1386, HB289, HB389, HB756, & HB872 Innocent children are dying on our watch. Please do something.
My fellow Virginia’s I write today to comment on the bills before you. I am a retired Army veterans. I grew up in Virginia, went to ODU and instead of seeking residency in other states, stayed a Virginian and paid taxes while on active duty. I fought in war and lost good Soldiers and friends defending this nation, you and our Constitution. I retired in Virginia because I love this state. Your body will decide, with its vote, to either infringe on our rights or defend them. I ask you to defend them like those friends and Soldiers that also did. I am a responsible gun owner who raised his children to be responsible gun owners (all three are serving or served). I am also a CCP holder who is willing to defend his fellow citizens. If you vote for any of these bills to limit our rights it will impact my ability to defend myself and my family. Please do the right thing and defend the 2nd Amd. My wife and I already decided to leave the state if you enact these measures to limit our rights. Thank you Oliver Rose
HB 12, Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen.
The selected bills are unconstitutional! They must be voted down!
This proposed legislation is blatantly unconstitutional and, if passed, it will, no doubt, be challenged in court. The taxpayers of Virginia will then be obligated to defend these unconstitutional measures, and those defenses will almost certainly lose. This will result in costly, meaningless court costs for all Virginia taxpayers. Those tax dollars could be spent on more meaningful and productive activities that benefit all citizens.
All of these anti 2nd amendment bills DO NOT represent the vast majority of the citizenry of Virginia. All of these anti-gun bills will do absolutely nothing to impact crime, and are only a form of punishment to responsible gun owners in the commonwealth. These bills are meant to only meant to elicit “feel-good” emotions for those sensing they are impacting gun crime. Stop letting criminals go free early and do not focus the legislatures efforts on infringing on the rights of the people to legally defend themselves from those who mean to do grievous harm.
It is outrageous that the General Assembly is using our 2nd Amendment right to punish law abiding citizens who have done nothing wrong other then to defend themselves. It’s clear that Democrats pander to their bases without a thought about the citizens of this Commonwealth or this nation. This issue amongst others, galvanize the voters to get out and vote for the party that does not seek to encroach our rights under the State and Federal Constitution. There is zero proof that We The People are deranged killers, a mob or even the radical right that the Democrat who currently occupies the White House has said. He’d called us Nazis and portrayed honest, hardworking and law abiding citizens as the problem. We are not. Opens border, out of control spending, child indoctrination and parroting the DNC is the problem that is self inflicted and deserves nothing less then our disgust and rebuke come November 2024. The General Assembly reflects the divide between Northern Virginia to Richmond and the difference in South Eastern, Western Virginia. The Democrat party and Legislature know full well that gun control laws if enacted, will not reduce violence but increase victimhood that they’ll blame on Republicans and the cycle continues. Pathetic fools and they wonder why I’ve stopped contributing to candidates who never deliver to fools who govern us.
Please, NO more gun control. You all KNOW that criminals do not follow your laws. All your gun control does is limit my and my family's rights to self defense and peaceful enjoyment of the shooting sports. Instead, put, and keep, actual violent offenders in jail. It really is that simple.
As a woman and a 30 plus year Emergency Department nurse I ask you to reject these onerous gun control laws. Laws like these discourage women who are most at risk from being able to obtain the means to defend themselves. I worked many a late night shift in Northern Virginia and walked through empty parking lots and garages worried about my safety. Women should not have to suffer this and should have ready access to the means to defend themselves. You aren't disarming criminals your are disarming women.
The bills under consideration will do nothing to increase the safety of Virginians while infringing on our right to defend ourselves. They are designed to make it more difficult to obtain a firearm, possess a firearm, or use a firearm to defend oneself or others. Meanwhile criminals will continue unabated. Moreover, most of these unconstitutional laws have been rendered moot as they have been struck down by state and federal courts. As a former police officer and detective I implore you to reject these useless and unconstitutional laws. Thank you
No more gun control legislation. It's not the gun that's the issue. It's the mentally ill folks that obtained a gun.
I strongly oppose these bills as they are direct infringements on the 2nd Amendment of The Constitution. Most of these have already been found to be unconstitutional by various courts yet they are still being presented as bills. I am completely against these and any other such bills that infringe on the constitutional and inalienable rights of the Citizens of the United States of America and of the Commonwealth of Virginia.
No more unconstitutional gun control.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support these bills. I expect to see more gun violence prevention legislation *actually pass* since there is so much nonpartisan alignment on this topic. The status quo is unacceptable. Our pro-gun culture is a threat to our children, and a slap in the face to every person who has lost their lives to gun violence. Enough is enough - policy over prayers.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support this bill.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support this bill. Gun violence in our communities and in our state is heartbreaking and changes need to be made to protect the citizens of Virginia.
I am a member of Virginia moms for change and I support these bills.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change and I support these bills. To all responsible gun owners: you shouldn't be afraid of these common sense bills. These bills are directed at people who are not handling their firearms as the deadly weapons that they can be. Instead of thinking your rights are being taken away, consider instead how safe storage, permits and waiting periods could help the daily gun violence in our country. Keep your guns, we are not trying to take them away. These bills are an opportunity for you, as a responsible gun owner, to be a part of the solution to help cut down on needless violence.
Remember Delegates...you took an Oath to 'Support and Defend the Constitution of the Unites States of America' which includes the 2nd Amendment!
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change and I support the selected bills. I believe they will make our communities safer and that gun violence is a critical issue we must address with such legislation and more.
I am a member of Virginia Mom's for Change, a group working towards gun violence prevention. We support the bills indicated above.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group. I support bills HB1174 HB1181 HB1195 HB12 HB1424 HB1462 HB158 HB175 HB183 HB23 HB270 HB318 HB319 HB351 HB362 HB585 HB602 HB637 HB791 HB798 HB799 HB861 HB916 HB945
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group. I support bills HB1174 HB1181 HB1195 HB12 HB1424 HB1462 HB158 HB175 HB183 HB23 HB270 HB318 HB319 HB351 HB362 HB585 HB602 HB637 HB791 HB798 HB799 HB861 HB916 HB945
and I support these bills. The bills we support are: HB1174, HB1181, HB1195, HB12, HB1424, HB1462, HB158, HB175, HB183, HB23, HB270, HB318, HB319, HB351, HB362, HB585, HB602, HB637, HB791, HB797, HB798, HB799, HB861, HB916, & HB945
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support these bills. The bills we support are: HB1174, HB1181, HB1195, HB12, HB1424, HB1462, HB 158, HB175, HB183, HB23, HB270, HB318, HB319, HB351, HB362, HB585, HB602, HB637, HB791, HB797, HB798, HB799, HB861, HB916, & HB945
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support these bills. The bills we support are: HB1174, HB1181, HB1195, HB12, HB1424, HB1462, HB158, HB175, HB183, HB23, HB270, HB318, HB319, HB351, HB362, HB585, HB602, HB637, HB791, HB797, HB798, HB799, HB861, HB916, & HB945
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support this bill.
The end of solitary confinement must be done My son was murdered in solitary confinement at Red Onion Prison in Pound Va on 1/3/22.
Our Constitution does not provide citizens with privileges. It establishes a government with checks and balances and specifically limits the governments ability to remove the rights of its people. In regards to the matter at hand, it specifically says the the government cannot place limitations on the right of a citizen to keep and bear arms. Before I get the typical response, I know you are already aware that the phrase "well regulated" specifically refers to an being trained and ready to bear said arms. The language at the time did not use the term "regulated" as we do with modern regulations. It has been proven in the courts repeatedly that the laws you are currently considering are unconstitutional. Of this I am sure you are already aware. By spending time and tax dollars discussing laws that you know to be unconstitutional, you are in fact wasting time and tax dollars that could be spent on productive issues. I can only assume your intent is to intentionally waste time, and force members of the firearms industry to waste money on legal fees defending the constitution you have sworn to uphold. Please consider actual data and actual facts when considering gun legislation. No data supports the claim the "assault weapon" bans actually reduce gun related crime. More guns are being purchased now than ever before, yet now that the latest FBI data has been released, we can see that gun related crimes have not increased. Also, like every year that the FBI has released data, so called "assault weapons" make up a very small portion of all gun crimes. For your general knowledge the term "assault weapon" was first coined by Adolf Hitler. He renamed one of their new automatic firearms, the Sturmgewehr, because he felt that the name "assault weapon" would strike fear in allied forces. This is also the exact reason the gun control community uses this term as well. The fact is that these firearms are not fully automatic and cannot be made so without a high degree of machining skills and mechanical knowhow. Plus doing so is already illegal. The fact is the Biden's latest gun control act has not been equally enforced. It was supposed to provide additional support for school security and mental health services. It was supposed to provide stronger punishments for those cought breaking existing gun laws. It was supposed to allow FFL's to use the NICS system to check employees. It was supposed to allow FFL's to be able to instantly check inventory or potential purchase/trades by their serial number to determine if the firearm has been stolen or used in any crimes. None of these provisions have been acted upon or enforced. Please drop these latest gun control bills. They are unconstitutional and will never pass. Please do not waste your time and our tax dollars on these wasted efforts. Regards, Jonathan Goodman
HB801 - Electronic communication systems within state correctional facilities; telephone calls.
Hi there, I'm Natalie from Social Busy Bee, your partner in the exciting world of Instagram growth. I've discovered something phenomenal for skyrocketing your Instagram popularity and I'm thrilled to share it with you! Social Growth Engine introduces a groundbreaking service that takes your Instagram engagement to new heights. It's effortless: - Zero in on producing unforgettable content. - Extremely budget-friendly at a mere $36/month. - Completely safe (no password needed), incredibly powerful, and Instagram's best friend. I've experienced remarkable results firsthand, and I'm sure you will too! Amplify your Instagram presence right now: http://get.socialbuzzzy.com/instagram_booster Best wishes, Natalie at Social Busy Bee"
Hi I am writing to you on behalf of The Well Connection UK, a media and publishing company. We could easily get virginia.gov featured in various publications such as magazines, online blogs and news sites. This would undoubtedly help virginia.gov with publicity, reputation, domain authority and organic search engine rankings. We have a wide range of options including completely free collaborations, sponsored posts, guest posts and banner ads. If this sounds of interest, please reach out to the senior business development manager, Anita at info@thewellconnection.co.uk and whatsapp +447395206515 (GMT) Kind regards Clifton Junior Outreach Assistant
I oppose all these unconstitutional, dangerous, and pointless laws.
Alexandria is a vibrant city based on history, culture, a waterfront and lots of tourism. If Virginia has money and space to build an arena then you have money and space to build new schools. Our school system is deplorable. It’s overcrowded. Think of your citizens before thinking about your quick money grab that eventually leads to an inevitable loss. We don’t want or need an arena. This is pure greed.
Dear Sir or Madame. Last year in Newport News I was assaulted by a 27 year old black man from Chesapeake because of his road rage.. This was at my local bank 11;30 in the morning. This young man almost lost his life at my hand because you cannot reel in your problem young men. His words feet from me were ' im going to kick your ass and then kill you'. My pistol changed his mind. I saw for myself the woke judges and a woke system that perpetuates the problem. The criminal justice system has been flung far far left which IS causing a public safety hazzard. No new gun control is needed. More jail time for the trash that i dealt with is. My Congressman Bobby Scott and Delegate Cia Price do not represent me.
As a single income mother and wife who provides financial support to my husband that is incarcerated, I fully support this bill. While thankfully I've not had to miss other utility bills to fund the phone account so that I can remain in contact with my husband; it is a debt and a burden each month to have to account for the $300-$400 dollars it costs me to communicate with them. I do think that constant communication with my husband has contributed greatly to their rehabilitation. I also feel that because of our communication, he has become a better men who has accepted and are remorseful of his actions that landed him in prison. I just don't know how much longer I will be able to afford this bill given the increase in prices for rent and other utilities. I hope you would pass this legislation so that I can continue to communicate with them . Thank you for your support for HB801.
This debate over guns was settled in 1791. We have all the laws we need to cover the action of a criminal. Murder is illegal no matter the tool used. Assualt is illegal no matter the tool used. Your ridiculous attack on the rights of all Virginians is just another chapter in the failure our our legislature to deal with the true issues that plague our state. Restore our rights and work to better the state and stop with the petty and vindictive law making that only hurts the innocent. Every day our governing bodies from congress to you become less relevant as a part of our lives, since all you ever manage to do is destroy and steal.
In Ohio one year after constitution carry passed gun crimes went down
Please vote YES in support of HB801. Connection to the outside world allows men & women to remain relevant in their families’ lives, it allows them to be more than just a person behind prison walls and gives them a purpose when there seems to be none. Ensuring that ALL families can remain in contact with their loved ones who are incarcerated is PROVEN to be effective in their reintegration into society. The current cost of the most basic of communications with loved ones inside can make or break most people’s budgets on any given day/week- BUT it doesn’t have to be this way!
I've commend prior on these issue but would like to reemphasize that more laws of these nature only impose on those of us that already obey the law and I think that you could explain this to your constituents demanding more gun control. I always find it ironic and dubious that those wanting more gun control either don't own a gun, have never fired a gun or don't want to purchase one but wish to infringe upon those of us who are responsible gun owners. Many of these bills on gun control shouldn't even be proposed and if you are supporting these bills you're being dishonest to your own base in tell them that this will reduce crime. It can't reduce crime and never has since other cities such as Chicago ,crime ALWAYS increases with more gun control and Always goes down with less in most situations. I have friend who lives in Chicago and had to sue because they outlawed all firearms several years back. The citizens won that case and were allowed to own AR-15's and all various forms of semi automatic fire arms pistol and rifle. According to him and the data CRIME WENT DOWN. The exception to gun laws which are already on the book as always is proper back ground checks so criminals cannot exploit the legal process by purchasing as a felon. As for removing someone's rights to own a gun under a DUI or DWI I fail to see any relevance or correlation and causation to the issue of guns in general. I am apposed to all these gun control bills and support the two pro guns bills being proposed.
As a single income mother and wife who provides financial support to my son and husband that is incarcerated, I fully support this bill. While thankfully I've not had to miss other utility bills to fund the phone account so that I can remain in contact with my son and husband; it is a debt and a burden each month to have to account for the $300-$400 dollars it costs me to communicate with them. I do think that constant communication with my son and husband has contributed greatly to their rehabilitation. I also feel that because of our communication, they have become better men who has accepted and are remorseful of their actions that landed them in prison. I just don't know how much longer I will be able to afford this bill given the increase in prices for rent and other utilities. I hope you would pass this legislation so that I can continue to communicate with them . Thank you for your support for HB801.
The price of communication in prisons and jails are ridiculous. Even though someone made a mistake they should still be able to afford communication with their loved ones. I know personally I spend well over $200 a month just on phone calls and emails. This money could be used on other bills in my home or even help with me spending more money at stores in my local community increasing the local revenue rather than a huge communications company that does absolutely NOTHING for Virginia say YES to HB 801 free phone calls
I'm in support of this bill. My Loved One at Keen Mountain would greatly benefit from this bill. The rising prices living a normal life is very difficult for everyone both incarcerated and those that are walking free. Also, this would help with the rehabilitation of inmates and allow more Loved ones to call and visit bringing stability to those that are incarcerated. This is a good bill!
As a special education teacher, I spend countless hours providing individualized instruction and crafting personal plans for educational success. I should not then also have to work as a tutor and adjunct professor just to ensure my beloved husband can call our family. This is especially important for his young child, so I work extra to ensure he can be an active parent. Being able to tell his father about his school day and sporting events and get stories and advice in return is fundamental to his development. Every child deserves to hear their parents say, “I love you,” and the cost of a call should never be the reason they can’t. That is why I am asking you to please support bill HB801. Saying I love you shouldn’t cost a thing!
This practice is so detrimental to the well-being of all people. It has been studied and confirmed to cause more harm than good and it is well past time to discontinue. We need oversight of the jails and prisons to assure it stops.
This practice is so detrimental to the well-being of all people. It has been studied and confirmed to cause more harm than good and it is well past time to discontinue. We need oversight of the jails and prisons to assure it stops.
The end of solitary confinement must be done My son was murdered in solitary confinement at Red Onion Prison in Pound Va on 1/3/22.
HB912 - Correctional facilities, local; stores and telephone systems, fees.
I oppose all these unconstitutional, dangerous, and pointless laws.
Dear Sir or Madame. Last year in Newport News I was assaulted by a 27 year old black man from Chesapeake because of his road rage.. This was at my local bank 11;30 in the morning. This young man almost lost his life at my hand because you cannot reel in your problem young men. His words feet from me were ' im going to kick your ass and then kill you'. My pistol changed his mind. I saw for myself the woke judges and a woke system that perpetuates the problem. The criminal justice system has been flung far far left which IS causing a public safety hazzard. No new gun control is needed. More jail time for the trash that i dealt with is. My Congressman Bobby Scott and Delegate Cia Price do not represent me.
This debate over guns was settled in 1791. We have all the laws we need to cover the action of a criminal. Murder is illegal no matter the tool used. Assualt is illegal no matter the tool used. Your ridiculous attack on the rights of all Virginians is just another chapter in the failure our our legislature to deal with the true issues that plague our state. Restore our rights and work to better the state and stop with the petty and vindictive law making that only hurts the innocent. Every day our governing bodies from congress to you become less relevant as a part of our lives, since all you ever manage to do is destroy and steal.
In Ohio one year after constitution carry passed gun crimes went down
I've commend prior on these issue but would like to reemphasize that more laws of these nature only impose on those of us that already obey the law and I think that you could explain this to your constituents demanding more gun control. I always find it ironic and dubious that those wanting more gun control either don't own a gun, have never fired a gun or don't want to purchase one but wish to infringe upon those of us who are responsible gun owners. Many of these bills on gun control shouldn't even be proposed and if you are supporting these bills you're being dishonest to your own base in tell them that this will reduce crime. It can't reduce crime and never has since other cities such as Chicago ,crime ALWAYS increases with more gun control and Always goes down with less in most situations. I have friend who lives in Chicago and had to sue because they outlawed all firearms several years back. The citizens won that case and were allowed to own AR-15's and all various forms of semi automatic fire arms pistol and rifle. According to him and the data CRIME WENT DOWN. The exception to gun laws which are already on the book as always is proper back ground checks so criminals cannot exploit the legal process by purchasing as a felon. As for removing someone's rights to own a gun under a DUI or DWI I fail to see any relevance or correlation and causation to the issue of guns in general. I am apposed to all these gun control bills and support the two pro guns bills being proposed.
We support HB 912 &913. Incarcerated individuals should not go into debt in prison and if they have balances owed to them upon release that money should go to them . Also it is irresponsible to delay a hearing or release bc the parole board cannot get it together . If they do not have the amount of people on the board then they have to vote with who they have .
The end of solitary confinement must be done My son was murdered in solitary confinement at Red Onion Prison in Pound Va on 1/3/22.
These prisons especially red onion and Wallens ridge need serious help! All the way around
HB913 - Parole Board; voting requirements.
I oppose all these unconstitutional, dangerous, and pointless laws.
Dear Sir or Madame. Last year in Newport News I was assaulted by a 27 year old black man from Chesapeake because of his road rage.. This was at my local bank 11;30 in the morning. This young man almost lost his life at my hand because you cannot reel in your problem young men. His words feet from me were ' im going to kick your ass and then kill you'. My pistol changed his mind. I saw for myself the woke judges and a woke system that perpetuates the problem. The criminal justice system has been flung far far left which IS causing a public safety hazzard. No new gun control is needed. More jail time for the trash that i dealt with is. My Congressman Bobby Scott and Delegate Cia Price do not represent me.
This debate over guns was settled in 1791. We have all the laws we need to cover the action of a criminal. Murder is illegal no matter the tool used. Assualt is illegal no matter the tool used. Your ridiculous attack on the rights of all Virginians is just another chapter in the failure our our legislature to deal with the true issues that plague our state. Restore our rights and work to better the state and stop with the petty and vindictive law making that only hurts the innocent. Every day our governing bodies from congress to you become less relevant as a part of our lives, since all you ever manage to do is destroy and steal.
In Ohio one year after constitution carry passed gun crimes went down
I've commend prior on these issue but would like to reemphasize that more laws of these nature only impose on those of us that already obey the law and I think that you could explain this to your constituents demanding more gun control. I always find it ironic and dubious that those wanting more gun control either don't own a gun, have never fired a gun or don't want to purchase one but wish to infringe upon those of us who are responsible gun owners. Many of these bills on gun control shouldn't even be proposed and if you are supporting these bills you're being dishonest to your own base in tell them that this will reduce crime. It can't reduce crime and never has since other cities such as Chicago ,crime ALWAYS increases with more gun control and Always goes down with less in most situations. I have friend who lives in Chicago and had to sue because they outlawed all firearms several years back. The citizens won that case and were allowed to own AR-15's and all various forms of semi automatic fire arms pistol and rifle. According to him and the data CRIME WENT DOWN. The exception to gun laws which are already on the book as always is proper back ground checks so criminals cannot exploit the legal process by purchasing as a felon. As for removing someone's rights to own a gun under a DUI or DWI I fail to see any relevance or correlation and causation to the issue of guns in general. I am apposed to all these gun control bills and support the two pro guns bills being proposed.
We support HB 912 &913. Incarcerated individuals should not go into debt in prison and if they have balances owed to them upon release that money should go to them . Also it is irresponsible to delay a hearing or release bc the parole board cannot get it together . If they do not have the amount of people on the board then they have to vote with who they have .
I fully support HB913. I believe every state agency and board that falls under that agency should continue it's work and fulfill it's commitment to the people that rely on their services. To have an individual miss an opportunity to have a parole board hearing because the lack of members seems unfair to that person. I hope you would pass this legislation to allow the parole board to continue to do it's job regardless of how many individuals are on the board.
The end of solitary confinement must be done My son was murdered in solitary confinement at Red Onion Prison in Pound Va on 1/3/22.
I support HB913!!! Since our current Governor is dragging his butt to install the fifth person on the Parole Board, why should our loved ones have to wait since he feels four (4) members are enough? If they can be fully functional with four board members, then those who only need the typical 4/5 votes to be granted parole should only be required to have 3/4 votes. He caused such a fuss when he came into office and now we have the most unstable Parole Board in history! This is a PAROLE board.....so it is only obvious that everyone coming before it has a criminal past. Why should a person have to keep proving that they've rehabilitated themselves after being incarcerated for 20, 30, even 40 plus years? When you have clear indicators that someone is no longer of a juvenile mindset and they have paid for education (out of their own pocket), and have the support of the community, job references and good reports from the facility they are housed in, why is the parole board acting like they have to be perfect saints to gain their freedom? Again, this is a parole board and the one we have is failing us. For one, if you can place people on the board who have been a victim of a crime, then why don't we also have someone on the board who supports criminal justice reform? Let's not be one sided here. So for that, and many other reasons, I support this bill. Hopefully we will have at least 4 members on the board who are confirmed. We can clearly see that Glen Youngkin is in favor of the instability because as long as we don't retain board members, no one will be granted parole. Virginia has the lowest rate of parole, so please don't toot your horn about the 'good job' we're doing. This economy is stressful and expensive and homes require two incomes just to survive. Stop holding men and women in prison when they could be home working and helping their families. I could go on and on.......so sick of the mess going on. Clean it up, Virginia!
HB1030 - Concealed handgun; carrying without a permit.
I am a Henrico County resident and I oppose these bills. Guns are the #1 killer of children under the age of 18 and the United States has a gun homicide rate 26 times higher than that of peer nations. A recent Fox News poll found that the majority of Americans want more gun safety laws, including background checks, red flag laws, and waiting periods for gun purchases. Let's use common sense regulations to help protect our children. I oppose these bills. Thank you for your time.
I agree with this bill. Why should we need a permit for what is a Constitutionally protected action?
I support this bill. Americans have a constitutional right to posses firearms. Elected politicians have a responsibility to protect this constitutional right. It is essential for personal safety, liberty, and as a deterrent against tyranny.
HB1030. No one should be able to carry a gun without a permit. Each gun owner should also have training on how to use it and how to store it. This is not taking away the right to have a gun; it is a safety measure. We have to have a permit to drive a car - why is carrying a lethal weapon any different. Thank you.
I support this bill. Beyond the Constitutional Right outlined in the 2nd Amendment, I support this bill because it allows the average, law-abiding, citizen to defend themselves. Criminals, by definition, will not obey laws. This gives them a huge advantage when committing crimes, specifically crimes of violence, as the vast majority of firearms restrictions limit the ability of lawful citizens to defend themselves. Virginia citizens deserve to be able to protect themselves at least as well as criminals are able to arm themselves. I ask that you all allow Virginia citizens, especially the most vulnerable to violent crimes, to arm and protect themselves appropriately. Please pass this bill. This bill will allow those demographics most targeted by violent criminals: women, elderly, infirmed, physically handicapped, and disabled to defend themselves.
The extent to which the government has infringed on the rights of American citizens is staggering. With each right restored as the ATF and anti-freedom states lose in court over and over again, the gun controllers sound the alarm about expanding gun rights and the associated dangers. Yet, there is no data to back up concealed carry permit holders committing crime with their firearms. If there were, it would already be all over the media and embedded in every gun control argument. Grossly manipulated data is already routinely cited by gun controllers to mislead the public. The fact that there is nothing for these same dishonest individuals to spin about constitutional carry shows the utter lack of evidence. Dangerous people who commit crime already carry weapons without permits. Many politicians today support policies that favor criminals over free citizens. Anyone who votes against these bills is squarely in that oppressive body of politicians who do not belong in office. These bills must be passed now.
Dear Sir or Madame. Last year in Newport News I was assaulted by a 27 year old black man from Chesapeake because of his road rage.. This was at my local bank 11;30 in the morning. This young man almost lost his life at my hand because you cannot reel in your problem young men. His words feet from me were ' im going to kick your ass and then kill you'. My pistol changed his mind. I saw for myself the woke judges and a woke system that perpetuates the problem. The criminal justice system has been flung far far left which IS causing a public safety hazzard. No new gun control is needed. More jail time for the trash that i dealt with is. My Congressman Bobby Scott and Delegate Cia Price do not represent me.
I am a member of VA Moms For Change, a gun violence prevention group and I oppose these bills
For the Delegates and witnesses who took offense to VCDL speaking for all races, please know that we have members of all races. We speak for all of our members. Racism is unconscionable, and laws founded on racist principles should be repealed. It doesn't matter who repeals them, what matters is that affirmative action is taken to strike down all forms of racism and recognize that we are one race, human. In addition, we take offense to the accusation that we do not promote safety. As an organization, and as individuals, we have routinely and consistently promoted safety and education. We recognize that creating defense free zones advertises to criminals that they will have the ability to inflict massive carnage before someone arrives with the proper tools to stop their assault. We look at real data that shows a.) gun free zones attract crime, not discourage it, and b.) violent crimes are routinely and frequently stopped by an armed civilian, many times without shots being fired and without loss of life. In the cases of mass murders, in 2022, 41.3% were stopped by armed civilians. If you exclude so-called gun free zones from the data, the rate goes up to 63.5%. This, again, supports the statement that gun free zones are a lie, and are really killing zones. Finally, I would wager that if there were a fee, a test, and a permit required in order to vote, this body would reject that concept soundly. Yes, we do have voter registration as a means of ensuring that each person votes in the correct precinct and only votes once. However, it is accepted that a poll tax is unconstitutional, and rightly so. In addition, there is no civics exam or IQ test required before a person is allowed to vote. Nor is there any impediment for an individual to voice their opinion, worship as they see fit (or not), or be secure in their personal effects. I would submit to you that a $50 fee in order to exercise a natural right...one that is so important that it is constitutionally protected...places the exercising of that right out of the reach of underprivileged communities. This affects over 10% of the population of Virginia, which is a significant number of people. These people typically live in areas with higher crime rate and conceivable have a higher need for tools of self defense. You are denying them the ability to do so discreetly.
As a woman I urge you to stand up for fellow women's right to defend themselves in our state. The ability to carry frees women to go about day to day business without constant fear of violence against them. I travel alone throughout this state and neighboring states. Most of the people I am in contact with on these trips are also women traveling alone in campers or staying alone in hotels. It is vital we are able to carry as free people and not be always reliant on the old fashioned practice of carrying a man with us. Please don't continue rolling us back in the dark ages! Give rights to women to protect ourselves.....by ourselves.
As a constituent I urge you to support my right to self-defense by SUPPORTING both HB 389, Delegate Griffin, and HB 1030, Delegate Freitas. These bills are identical and allow a person to carry a concealed handgun without a permit anywhere they could openly carry that handgun, as long as they are not disqualified for getting a concealed handgun permit. It's the same person and same gun, whether they are openly carrying or put on a coat. The concealed handgun permits would continue to be available and would provide extra benefits over carrying without a permit. 27 states have carry without a permit currently and more are expected this year. A recent study in Ohio shows crime dropped after the state adopted carry without a permit. No state that has adopted it has repealed it. Neighboring Kentucky, Tennessee and West Virginia are all states that don't require a permit to carry a concealed handgun. Let me know how you are going to vote on these important bills.
I urge you to vote yes for both HB1030 and HB389. Constitutional carry should already be in place. There are already laws on the books to be applied to those criminals who make an intentional decision to harm other law abiding citizens. These bills will enable law abiding citizens to have the freedom of choice to decide if they want to carry a concealed firearm in order to be prepared to protect their, their families, or their community in self defense. Ironically those who have made the choice to become a criminal are already not following the current law of getting a conceal carry permit before they conceal a weapon in their daily lives to commit criminal activity. Criminals will start thinking twice before commiting violent or potentially deadly crimes when they know it is more likely that a potential victim will have the means to defend themselves. Voting YES for HB389 and HB1030 will allow law abiding citizens (far majority of citizens) to be able to defend themselves.
I urge you to support my right to self-defense by SUPPORTING HB 1030, Delegate Freitas. This bill allows a person to carry a concealed handgun without a permit anywhere they could openly carry that handgun, as long as they are not disqualified for getting a concealed handgun permit. It's the same person and same gun, whether they are openly carrying or put on a coat. The concealed handgun permits would continue to be available and would provide extra benefits over carrying without a permit. 27 states have carry without a permit currently and more are expected this year. A recent study in Ohio shows crime dropped after the state adopted carry without a permit. No state that has adopted it has repealed it. Neighboring Kentucky, Tennessee and West Virginia are all states that don't require a permit to carry a concealed handgun.
This should be the law of the land already. Not only is it the right thing to do, it positively affirms the rights protected in Article I Section 13 of our own state constitution. We can also see a drop in crime when these bills are enacted, such as with Ohio. The current system just makes it difficult for the poor and disadvantaged to protect their life and leaves them vulnerable to predation. When you examine mass shoot incidents and eliminate locations where carry is not allowed you will find the majority of those cases see stopped by armed citizens. This will also benefit us in reducing administration costs of the permits and will keep poorer and less educated people from running afoul of all the current complicated laws. Is the commonwealth really benefitted from putting non violent persons in jail because they forgot to renew a form or were confused by concealed carry reciprocity nuances?
Please support constitutional carry. When a victim is being stalked and harassed, they are faced with hiding in their home for defense until a permit comes in weeks later. Those with criminal records already cannot legally possess a weapon. Please don't punish victims in the false belief this will keep them safer from the criminals. It won't. Provide the people an actual means of safety. If you're on the left, please know this will help women and the poor in rural areas with long response times. If you truly care for them as you claim, give them the means to defend themselves when they need it.
I encourage all to vote yes on both of these bills so that the community can come together and have the most effective means do their part and assist law enforcement in protecting their communities and loved ones. Crime has been on the rise and a very reasonable response to battling such unfortunate incidents is to educate and remove the amount of potential victims there are by acknowledging our god given right to bear arms in its fullest capacity as the 2nd amendment guarantees.
Hello, I would urge the members of the House Public Safety Committee to vote YES on HB389 - Griffin and HB1030 - Freitas. Over the past two decades, more than 50 percent of U.S. states have passed laws allowing for constitutional carry or permitless carry. Most recently in 2023, Florida and Nebraska passed Constitutional Carry laws. In 2022, Alabama, Ohio, Indiana, and Georgia all passed Constitutional Carry legislation. As a valid Chesterfield County Concealed Carry citizen, I strongly urge the passing of this legislation as it would allow citizens the right to conceal carry without requiring the lengthy training class requirements, paperwork, fee's, and court/judicial backlog/waiting period associated with obtaining a permit. Further these bills would allow law abiding citizens the right to self protection measures in an every increasingly dangerous world. The facts are simple, criminals don't legally obtain firearms nor do they file the appropriate paperwork to conceal carry, they simply show up and cause havoc and often take lives in the process. These bills would allow everyday citizens the opportunity to protect themselves, their loved ones, and their fellow neighbors/community in the event of a violent crime taking place. Thank you, William
Please pass HB389 and HB1030. It is our God-given right, as per the 2nd Amendment of the United States Constitution, to bear arms, which will not be infringed by the government. No innocent, law abiding citizen should have to suffer taking time off from work or school and spend money going to the county courthouse to apply for a CHP, in order to be able to go about in public, outside the safety of one's home, with his/her firearm concealed from plain sight, ready to protect his/her own life or the lives of others.
Hello, I’m am writing today to make my voice heard for the first time as a newly informed citizen about matters such as these that goes on within our government. I wish to display my support for both HB1030, and HB389 at this time. As a member of this community and as an armed security officer myself I believe that law abiding citizens shouldn’t have to take extra steps in order to exercise rights they already possess. I encourage all to vote yes on these two bills and make self defense more accessible to the community so that criminals think twice about snatching grandmas purse!!!
I have a right to protect myself, family, and property from any threat, perceived or real. I will continue to exercise this right and I expect my public servants to protect my rights as they themselves desire to have their rights protected.
I have a right to protect myself, family, and property from any threat, perceived or real. I will continue to exercise this right and I expect my public servants to protect my rights as they themselves desire to have their rights protected.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments. As a lifelong 26 year old citizen of the commonwealth of Virginia I would like to take a moment to discuss these Bills. These bills intend to allow concealed carry of firearms without a permit in places open carry would be legal. I strongly urge you all to support this bill. Virginia is a state of significant historic importance. From Washington's Virginia minutemen in the revolutionary War to the many presidents born in this fine state Virginia is a state built by the blood and sweat of patriots. Carrying firearms is a constitutionally ensured God given right of which the government must protect. A permit being necessary to conceal carry firearms is itself an infringement of that right. No one would seriously suggest an application process for a license to be able to practice our right of free speech. Therefore it is of the utmost importance to pass these bills to protect our rights which hang with such fragility in the balance. I would like to also add the benefit of an armed populous given the right to freely exercise their firearm rights. States which have passed constitutional carry laws have had their crime decrease sometimes by significant amounts this is because the first line of defense against wouldbe criminals is the American citizen. The American citizen is always the first responder and must be given the right to protect themselves and their family with whatever tool they see fit. I would also like to add that gun free zones which have unfortunately grown in the past decade have been consistently targeted due to the ease of which attacks can be made without anyone being able to actively fight back to defend themselves. It is hypocritical in my opinion of lawmakers who enjoy the protection of constant armed security to restrict the freedoms of the citizens to be able to defend themselves with the same tools your very lives are protected with. Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback I hope you make the right decision by the people who elected you and who want you to uphold our gun rights.
This debate over guns was settled in 1791. We have all the laws we need to cover the action of a criminal. Murder is illegal no matter the tool used. Assualt is illegal no matter the tool used. Your ridiculous attack on the rights of all Virginians is just another chapter in the failure our our legislature to deal with the true issues that plague our state. Restore our rights and work to better the state and stop with the petty and vindictive law making that only hurts the innocent. Every day our governing bodies from congress to you become less relevant as a part of our lives, since all you ever manage to do is destroy and steal.
Please do not let 'common sense" gun laws unconstitutionally infringe on our rights. Law abiding citizens have the right to self defense and private firearm ownership.
I have written to committee in the past requesting you not vote to pass on gun control bills of any kind. I would like to encourage you to vote for HB1030 and HB389. Virginia was founded on concepts of liberty, independence and responsibility. We have a long and proud tradition of safe and proper gun use here. I am asking that you consider this, the law abiding outnumber the criminals, shouldn't we legally have the same rights that are enjoyed in 27 other states? Stop treating gun owners in Virginia as if they are committing crimes no matter what they do. Start treating us as citizens and neighbors who are good and decent people. Please don't fall for propaganda and the hate filled messages anti-constitution people carry. We don't need to be turned into another horrible failed demonstration of overreach and oligarchy by a governmental body. Allow 'constitutional carry' within the Commonwealth can only strengthen our sense of safety as proven in other places, criminals fear to tread where their so called 'victims' can fight back. Remember, when Virginia first went to 'Shall Issue' permits, and all around they denied that right, Virginia was the safest of the 'DMV' region. We must continue to protect all, ensure the safety of Virginians is protected and enhanced. Do not try and turn us into another place rife with crime like other states that deny it's residents basic constitutional rights. A beginning for this would be a vote of 'Yes' on HB389 and HB1030. Thank you.
In Ohio one year after constitution carry passed gun crimes went down
The great Commonwealth of Virginia should be proud to pass these two bills. They are the will of the people and solidify our rights as guaranteed by the federal and state constitutions. Please pass these bills.
As a resident of the great Commonwealth and disabled veteran, I hold dearly and fully support the right to self-defense by all law abiding citizens no matter race, creed, or color and these bills, HB 389, Delegate Griffin, and HB 1030, Delegate Freitas, will ensure just that. Both bills are identical and allow a person to carry a concealed handgun without a permit anywhere they could openly carry that handgun, as long as they are not disqualified for getting a concealed handgun permit. It's the same person and same gun, whether they are openly carrying or put on a coat. The concealed handgun permits would continue to be available and would provide extra benefits over carrying without a permit. 27 states have carry without a permit currently and more are expected this year. A recent study in Ohio shows crime dropped after the state adopted carry without a permit. No state that has adopted it has repealed it. Neighboring Kentucky, Tennessee and West Virginia are all states that don't require a permit to carry a concealed handgun. v/r Thomas Speich
I've commend prior on these issue but would like to reemphasize that more laws of these nature only impose on those of us that already obey the law and I think that you could explain this to your constituents demanding more gun control. I always find it ironic and dubious that those wanting more gun control either don't own a gun, have never fired a gun or don't want to purchase one but wish to infringe upon those of us who are responsible gun owners. Many of these bills on gun control shouldn't even be proposed and if you are supporting these bills you're being dishonest to your own base in tell them that this will reduce crime. It can't reduce crime and never has since other cities such as Chicago ,crime ALWAYS increases with more gun control and Always goes down with less in most situations. I have friend who lives in Chicago and had to sue because they outlawed all firearms several years back. The citizens won that case and were allowed to own AR-15's and all various forms of semi automatic fire arms pistol and rifle. According to him and the data CRIME WENT DOWN. The exception to gun laws which are already on the book as always is proper back ground checks so criminals cannot exploit the legal process by purchasing as a felon. As for removing someone's rights to own a gun under a DUI or DWI I fail to see any relevance or correlation and causation to the issue of guns in general. I am apposed to all these gun control bills and support the two pro guns bills being proposed.
Criminals already have a defacto Constitutuional Carry ability in that they disregard laws that prohibit carrying guns in general. You cannot prevent someone from carrying a gun, and allowing law abiding citizens to carry guns without paying a fee for a CHP just evens the playing field. Good guys carrying guns makes everyone safer, as criminals would think twice before committing a crime knowing their victim may be armed. Make VA Constitutuional carry like many other states have done.
Please vote yes on: HB 389, Delegate Griffin and HB 1030, Delegate Freitas Thanks. Brian Johnson
Criminals can do whatever they want to. It's time we stop punishing everyone else and let law-abiding, good people have the freedom to protect themselves if they choose.
All gun control laws are repugnant to the 2nd Amendment of the United States Constitution, and as United States Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall found in Marbury vs. Madison, such laws are void. Unfortunately, there are those in our halls of government that only recognize acts of law established by their contemporaries. As such, it is imperative that these bills be passed, as written, in order to employ the force of law as means to compel the historically and legally ignorant to recognize what should be universally understood as a natural right.
"Constitutional carry" is common sense. Constitutional carry normalizes the right to exercise our Constitutional Rights. Currently, there is a popular, and misguided, idea that only criminals and zealots carry a firearm -- that misconception is reinforced by the artificial barriers placed in the way of lawfully carrying a firearm. In the current situation, it would seem that only the most motivated "gun nut" would go out of their way to go through all the obstacles currently restricting the exercise this Constitutionally granted right -- or a criminal who does not care what the law, and "normal society" says. Let's dull and tarnish the "outlaw" status criminals get from being illegally armed. Constitutional Carry would remove the barriers for "normal people" to exercise their rights. We need more "normal people" to tarnish the glamour criminals feel about their status symbol illegal handguns. Let's make guns boring.
I support passing both HB389 and HB1030. In keeping with the recent US Supreme Court decision New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. Bruen, every person in Virginia, who meets the current CHP requirement, should be able to carry a concealed weapon. With wide open borders, fewer police officers, it is imperative that individuals be able to defend themselves, their family, and others in dire need. Sincerely yours, Terrence J Finazzo
Good evening Delegates, I am writing in support of a Constitutional Carry bill for this great commonwealth. This bill will only further empower our fellow citizens and, as proven in other states, actually reduces crime! These are great things and what your fellow Virginians want. I urge you to vote, Yes, on this bill. Thank you for your time
Constitutional Carry in Virginia will allow law abiding citizens to fully exercise their Natural Right of self defense as protected by the Constitution. It result in reduced crime as well. This has be demonstrated in EVERY state that has adopted it.
Honorable Delegates The simple fact is that in every state where it has been enacted Constitutional Carry has reduced crime or helped it to remain low. The proof is in the results. Thank you
Please support HB 389 and 1030 ref Constitutional Carry. Victor Calaman Jr. Richmond
As a constituent I urge you to support my right to self-defense by SUPPORTING both HB 389, Delegate Griffin, and HB 1030, Delegate Freitas. These bills are identical and allow a person to carry a concealed handgun without a permit anywhere they could openly carry that handgun, as long as they are not disqualified for getting a concealed handgun permit. It's the same person and same gun, whether they are openly carrying or put on a coat. The concealed handgun permits would continue to be available and would provide extra benefits over carrying without a permit. 27 states have carry without a permit currently and more are expected this year. A recent study in Ohio shows crime dropped after the state adopted carry without a permit. No state that has adopted it has repealed it. Neighboring Kentucky, Tennessee and West Virginia are all states that don't require a permit to carry a concealed handgun.
I support this bill and encourage all the elected representatives in the Commonwealth of VA to pass it. As outlined in the Constitution of Virginia, Article I. Bill of Rights Section 13, “Militia; standing armies; military subordinate to civil power. That a well-regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defense of a free state, therefore, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; that standing armies, in time of peace, should be avoided as dangerous to liberty; and that in all cases the military should be under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power.” (emphasis added) The PEOPLE is a very important word in this section as the constitution of Virginia outlines in Article I. Bill of Rights: Section 2, “People the source of power: That all power is vested in, and consequently derived from, the people, that magistrates are their trustees and servants, and at all times amenable to them.” While people have the right to exercise their freedom of speech in opposition to this bill, it does not trump the right of the people to exercise this right to keep and bear arms. Given this is a right, the people should not have to pay to exercise it. Furthermore, recent data from Ohio, which most recently adopted a similar bill, shows that “Six of Ohio’s eight largest cities saw less gun crime after the state’s ‘constitutional carry’ law took effect”. This bill would also make it easier for single-income households or those struggling to make ends meet to protect themselves. Conceal carry permits not only take up government resources but can cost up to $50, not including time and money to fill out and drop the application off at Police departments and Sheriff’s offices during business hours. Lastly, with the universal background check laws passed in Virginia in 2020, no law-abiding citizen should be able to buy guns without a background check; therefore, the background check required to be completed for the carry permit is redundant and unnecessary. Thank you for your consideration and attention.
I support this bill and encourage all the elected representatives in the Commonwealth of VA to pass it. As outlined in the Constitution of Virginia, Article I. Bill of Rights Section 13, “Militia; standing armies; military subordinate to civil power. That a well-regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defense of a free state, therefore, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; that standing armies, in time of peace, should be avoided as dangerous to liberty; and that in all cases the military should be under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power.” (emphasis added) The PEOPLE is a very important word in this section as the Constitution of Virginia outlines in Article I. Bill of Rights: Section 2, “People the source of power: That all power is vested in, and consequently derived from, the people, that magistrates are their trustees and servants, and at all times amenable to them.” While people have the right to exercise their freedom of speech in opposition to this bill, it does not trump the right of the people to exercise this right to keep and bear arms. Given this is a right, the people should not have to pay to exercise it. Furthermore, recent data from Ohio, which most recently adopted a similar bill, shows that “Six of Ohio’s eight largest cities saw less gun crime after the state’s ‘constitutional carry’ law took effect”. This bill would also make it easier for single-income households or those struggling to make ends meet to protect themselves. Conceal carry permits not only take up government resources but can cost citizens up to $50, not including time and money to fill out and drop the applications off at Police departments and Sheriff’s offices during business hours. Lastly, with the universal background check laws passed in Virginia in 2020, no law-abiding citizen should be able to buy guns without a background check; therefore, the background check required to be completed for the carry permit is redundant and unnecessary. Thank you for your consideration and attention.
Support this bill. States that have passed laws similar to this have seen a drop in crimes involving guns. This bill specifically states those that are eligible to obtain a concealed handgun permit would be allowed to carry without a permit. There would be no change to the status quo other than not carrying a card.
I oppose these bills.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support the following bills: HB1174, HB1181, HB1195, HB12, HB1424, HB1462, HB158, HB175, HB183, HB23, HB270, HB318, HB319, HB351, HB362, HB585, HB602, HB637, HB791, HB797, HB798, HB799, HB861, HB916, & HB945 I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I oppose these bills: HB1030, HB1141, HB1198, HB1230, HB1235, HB1321, HB1325, HB1386, HB289, HB389, HB756, & HB872 Innocent children are dying on our watch. Please do something.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I oppose this bill.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change and I oppose these bills
I am with Virginia Moms for Change. I am a mother of 3 and a grandmother of 1. I STRONGLY oppose these bills.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I oppose these bills.
Remember Delegates...you took an Oath to 'Support and Defend the Constitution of the Unites States of America' which includes the 2nd Amendment!
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change and I oppose these bills.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I oppose this bill.
The courts have already established that we have a right to carry personal firearms, and it's protected under the Constitution of the United States of America. Numerous states have already updated their laws to acknowledge this reality, and shown great progress in liberating people from restrictive and unnecessary regulations. It's time Virginia shows the same progress, and update our laws to repeal CCW requirements.
HB1030 and other attempts to implement Constitutional Carry are ACTUAL common sense. It is absurd that we "allow" government entities to gatekeep the legal ability of its citizens to defend themselves.
I fully support this bill. The public should not have to be subject to a permitting process to exercise our constitutional rights.
This bill should be allowed to pass. A majority of the states have some version of this law in effect. Constitutional carry should be the normal, not the exception. Virginia should join the other states that have constitutional carry. States that have passed then have seen a drop in violent crimes throughout theirnstatesm
The end of solitary confinement must be done My son was murdered in solitary confinement at Red Onion Prison in Pound Va on 1/3/22.
Our Constitution does not provide citizens with privileges. It establishes a government with checks and balances and specifically limits the governments ability to remove the rights of its people. In regards to the matter at hand, it specifically says the the government cannot place limitations on the right of a citizen to keep and bear arms. Before I get the typical response, I know you are already aware that the phrase "well regulated" specifically refers to an being trained and ready to bear said arms. The language at the time did not use the term "regulated" as we do with modern regulations. It has been proven in the courts repeatedly that the laws you are currently considering are unconstitutional. Of this I am sure you are already aware. By spending time and tax dollars discussing laws that you know to be unconstitutional, you are in fact wasting time and tax dollars that could be spent on productive issues. I can only assume your intent is to intentionally waste time, and force members of the firearms industry to waste money on legal fees defending the constitution you have sworn to uphold. Please consider actual data and actual facts when considering gun legislation. No data supports the claim the "assault weapon" bans actually reduce gun related crime. More guns are being purchased now than ever before, yet now that the latest FBI data has been released, we can see that gun related crimes have not increased. Also, like every year that the FBI has released data, so called "assault weapons" make up a very small portion of all gun crimes. For your general knowledge the term "assault weapon" was first coined by Adolf Hitler. He renamed one of their new automatic firearms, the Sturmgewehr, because he felt that the name "assault weapon" would strike fear in allied forces. This is also the exact reason the gun control community uses this term as well. The fact is that these firearms are not fully automatic and cannot be made so without a high degree of machining skills and mechanical knowhow. Plus doing so is already illegal. The fact is the Biden's latest gun control act has not been equally enforced. It was supposed to provide additional support for school security and mental health services. It was supposed to provide stronger punishments for those cought breaking existing gun laws. It was supposed to allow FFL's to use the NICS system to check employees. It was supposed to allow FFL's to be able to instantly check inventory or potential purchase/trades by their serial number to determine if the firearm has been stolen or used in any crimes. None of these provisions have been acted upon or enforced. Please drop these latest gun control bills. They are unconstitutional and will never pass. Please do not waste your time and our tax dollars on these wasted efforts. Regards, Jonathan Goodman
HB1174 - Assault firearms; age requirement for purchase, penalty.
Hi there, I'm Natalie from Social Busy Bee, your partner in the exciting world of Instagram growth. I've discovered something phenomenal for skyrocketing your Instagram popularity and I'm thrilled to share it with you! Social Growth Engine introduces a groundbreaking service that takes your Instagram engagement to new heights. It's effortless: - Zero in on producing unforgettable content. - Extremely budget-friendly at a mere $36/month. - Completely safe (no password needed), incredibly powerful, and Instagram's best friend. I've experienced remarkable results firsthand, and I'm sure you will too! Amplify your Instagram presence right now: http://get.socialbuzzzy.com/instagram_booster Best wishes, Natalie at Social Busy Bee"
Hi I am writing to you on behalf of The Well Connection UK, a media and publishing company. We could easily get virginia.gov featured in various publications such as magazines, online blogs and news sites. This would undoubtedly help virginia.gov with publicity, reputation, domain authority and organic search engine rankings. We have a wide range of options including completely free collaborations, sponsored posts, guest posts and banner ads. If this sounds of interest, please reach out to the senior business development manager, Anita at info@thewellconnection.co.uk and whatsapp +447395206515 (GMT) Kind regards Clifton Junior Outreach Assistant
My name is Laura, and I’m your constituent. Gun violence prevention is my top priority. Please support hi. Safety legislation that is brought up for a vote. These are the bills I support. Thank you for your time.
As Mr. Sage said, "Law abiding citizens should not be punished for exercising their constitutional rights. Bill HB2 causes half of the state to become felons, just for exercising their rights to own firearms. HB1424 is unconstitutional because nothing in the second amendment says anything about having to have a license to own a gun. SB522 , similarly to HB1424 , is unconstitutional. The second amendment states that the right to bear arms shall not be infringed. People shouldn’t have to take a training course to own a gun. It’s your right to bear arms without government approval, or having to take a training course. It forces you to give up your ability to exercise your own rights. SB57 causes law abiding people to be in danger of criminals coming into a restaurant with a gun and not being able to defend themselves. SB327 once again is unconstitutional. The second amendment says nothing about an age restriction on any type of firearm. SB273 is unconstitutional because nothing states that you have to wait a certain amount of time to own a firearm. SB2 , just like HB2, shouldn’t cause law abiding people to not be able to own an “Assault weapon” or ammunition for an “Assault weapon”; because the second amendment doesn’t prohibit any style of firearm or ammunition from being sold or possessed." I'd like to make the point that any and all form of firearm banning is directly unconstitutional to the second amendment considering its reason for creation. If I cannot have the means to fight back against a tyrannical government, the founding fathers fought for nothing. The fact that these laws are even able to get this far in the first place tells me all I need to know about how tyrannical our government is already becoming. This is a disgrace to the people of Virginia, and a step backwards in the future of our country.
Law abiding citizens should not be punished for exercising their constitutional rights. Bill HB2 causes half of the state to become felons, just for exercising their rights to own firearms. HB1424 is unconstitutional because nothing in the second amendment says anything about having to have a license to own a gun. SB522 , similarly to HB1424 , is unconstitutional. The second amendment states that the right to bear arms shall not be infringed. People shouldn’t have to take a training course to own a gun. It’s your right to bear arms without government approval, or having to take a training course. It forces you to give up your ability to exercise your own rights. SB57 causes law abiding people to be in danger of criminals coming into a restaurant with a gun and not being able to defend themselves. SB327 once again is unconstitutional. The second amendment says nothing about an age restriction on any type of firearm. SB273 is unconstitutional because nothing states that you have to wait a certain amount of time to own a firearm. SB2 , just like HB2, shouldn’t cause law abiding people to not be able to own an “Assault weapon” or ammunition for an “Assault weapon”; because the second amendment doesn’t prohibit any style of firearm or ammunition from being sold or possessed.
I am opposed to all of these unconstitutional and anit-american gun laws and regulations. There is no room for more gun laws and regulations in this state.
Contrary to how certain government officials treat it, the second amendment is written using plain, easy to understand language, and insists that government has no right to take away the right for ordinary people like us to defend ourselves, as the constitution and bill of rights do not simply give people rights, but protects them from government manipulation and control. It’s incredibly disappointing and a tragedy that people choose to commit acts of violence with these rights, but restricting those who wish to exercise their rights peaceably due to those who wouldn’t follow these rules in the first place is incredibly naive. I, as well as every other person in the United States, deserve to protect my family with the best technology available. While some people look at certain defense weapon setups as a “why do you need that” situation, 1) I have the right to defend myself with the best tool available, and so I will choose that every time, 2) why do you “need” anything other than basic necessities (fast car, Gucci clothes, etc)? The government has no place in deciding what I “need”, 3) people with the intent to harm will not care what laws govern peaceful people, so what would limiting the victim’s access to proper tools do? You may think that by “banning” or otherwise restricting access to a certain thing would mean that all of the “bad” things would magically go away, but they will not. Evil has always and will always exist, and I have every right to defend myself from it using the best tool available wherever I, or my family, choose to go. Restricting access on certain properties (the government isn’t actively protecting me everywhere), requiring certain training (who is paying for this?), limiting certain types of firearms (go ahead and define “assault weapon” in plain language please), and restricting ammo purchasing (I thought you wanted us to train; how does this help then?) are all means that end up hurting the average person and helping those who wish to hurt others, as the rest of us will be left in a position to insufficiently defend ourselves. I urge you to understand that while, yes, it is awful that evil people commit horrific acts, this right ultimately allows me to protect myself and my family from these evil people as well and as evil will always exist (we certainly like to delusion ourselves into believing that we live in a utopia, but we do not), I will protect my family accordingly. The government has no right to restrict this. Leave the peaceful citizens alone, more firmly punish those who hurt others, and help communities where this is an issue to prevent the upbringing of more evil people.
I oppose these bills that are attacking the rights of law-abiding gun owners.
Please stop trying to make criminals of law abiding citizens who just want to protect themselves. Me and my partner have recently become firearm owners because of situations that have arisen in our day to day lives, such as harassment of my wife almost to the point of altercation, sketchy characters waiting in front of our door/ducking in and out of our bushes at all times of the night, people breaking into cars in the neighborhood etc (many times the police/security were called only to arrive 45mins to an hour later). with many of these nonsensical bills you condemn us to allowing any possible violence to happen to us without a chance of defending our selves. Instead of helping fix the problem, you seek to make criminals out of any Virginian who has followed the law and legal purchased a firearm. Shame on you. I am Virginian native and since I was 18 I voted leaning blue in local and state elections you all are making me think this was a mistake. I am not proud of Virginia “progressives” who would rather strip my wife of her chance and right to defend her self rather than try to address the root of crime. Don’t make law abiding people criminals. Do some actual work and address the criminals! 2 of the proposed bills would make in illegal to bring your concealed firearm into a restaurant and another makes it a crime to have the firearm in your vehicle…. Like really? This is literally just to fill jails and strip people of their rights.
Many of these gun laws are unfair to law abiding citizens and do not affect criminals. These gun laws should be vetoed.
Leave law abiding citizens alone.
The number of bills that the Virginia legislature is attempting to pass that will infringe on the constitutional rights of its citizenry is appalling. We as law abiding citizens are afforded the right to defend ourselves and families. None of these laws will reduce crime as it is purported to do. Crimes are committed by individuals not the firearm. Start placing the blame where it should be which is the person committing the crime. Instead these laws will only punish and limit the rights of law abiding citizens.
State Legislature members, A right delayed is a right denied. Quoting the 2022 NYSRPA v. Bruen Supreme Court Case: 'The constitutional right to bear arms in public for self-defense is not “a second-class right, subject to an entirely different body of rules than the other Bill of Rights guarantees.” McDonald, 561 U. S., at 780 (plurality opinion). The exercise of other constitutional rights does not require individuals to demonstrate to government officers some special need. The Second Amendment right to carry arms in public for self defense is no different.' The recent NYSRPA v. Bruen case highlighted the significance of individual self-defense, and it's crucial to consider the rights of law-abiding citizens in crafting firearm legislation. While the goal of enhancing public safety is commendable, an outright ban on certain firearms and magazines will disproportionately impact responsible gun owners who use these tools for legitimate purposes, such as self-defense and sport. It is essential to strike a balance between public safety and the preservation of individual rights. Instead of blanket bans, and bureaucratic obstacles that only harass lawful firearm owners, we should focus on comprehensive measures that address the root causes of gun violence. This approach respects the constitutional rights of citizens while fostering a safer society. Criminals are not deterred by restrictions on lawful purchase at federally-licensed FFL Dealers. They do not bother going through the process of applying for a concealed carry permit, because they do not intend to carry lawfully. People who want to use weapons to hurt innocent citizens of Virginia will not be impeded by these House and Senate Bills. Instead, the only individuals who will have their behavior modified are lawful men and women who are unable to defend themselves against those who will commit crimes regardless of what is written into law this Legislative Session. If you pass the above laws, it will only serve to waste hard-working Taxpayers' money fighting them in Federal Court. California and New York have lost their cases seeking to uphold unconstitutional gun laws, and the sponsors of these bills will lose too. Do the right thing - the hard thing - enforce the laws we already have, get the small minority of violent criminals off the streets of Virginia, and uphold the constitutional rights of your polity.
These bills infringe on the rights of the United States citizens given to us by the second amendment. The only thing these bills will accomplish will take the firearms out of the hands of law abiding citizens, while criminals will still have access.
I do not support any bill that removes any right from law abiding citizens to protect themselves from those who WILL NOT abide by these laws. These laws ONLY give CRIMINALS the upper hand.
There are approximately 47 bills regarding gun control between the House and Senate. Rather than fix issues that actually protect and enhance the lives of Virginians, many of these bills seek to disenfranchise and reduce the safety of the citizens in this great Commonwealth. Firearms are so fundamental to the founding and continued existence of our free society that they are listed just second to the freedom of speech in amendments to the constitution. It is plainly clear to all that countries and states who have banned or severely restricted firearms that violence does not end with their banning. Unjust deaths are not prevented. It simply ensures that law abiding citizens are left defenseless from those that wish to harm them, whether that be individuals or an organization. I write this knowing that it will be completely disregarded by the bills authors, but in hopes that others feel galvanized to speak up against unjust actions made in the name of progress. To those who wish to protect themselves with firearms while simultaneously stripping them from the common man, may you take heed of the Virginia state motto.
A lot of these laws contradict one another. I can’t support them. Both of our parties have failed us.
Stop trying to strip 2nd Amendment rights from law abiding citizens with a constitutional right to own and carry firearms. Not a single one of these laws/bills you’re trying to enact would have stopped any of the mass shootings we’ve seen.
I oppose all of these blatantly unconstitutional bills and wish our elected officials would actually get to work on fixing things that matter to Virginians.
It is obvious these elected officials want you to die at the behest of an anarcho tyrannical state where violent perpetual offenders are off with a slap on the wrist, while YOU tax payer are criminalized for not wanting to be a victim to these perpetual perpetrators. The elected officials funded by big Pro-Death lobby of Giffords and Bloomberg sit in their cushy NOVA HOAd mansions behind security while you plebs go to work everyday to pay their salary. These same officials effectively bribe the police state by giving them a way to pay off a mortgage and boat in exchange for your oppression. YOU citizen must morally oppose these pro-Death bills. Democracy has fallen and its only driven by money hungry Babylonians who swim in excess and delicacy while YOU PLEBS cant even afford milk, eggs or pampers. Remember these people do not hold dominion over you. Call your congressman/woman and CHRIST IS KING!
Time and time again it has been proven that criminals do not care about or follow restrictive firearm laws. Virginia already has some of the most restrictive firearms laws in the country ("B+" rating from Giffords), more unconstitutional infringements upon law abiding citizens is not the answer. We need to address the root causes (access to mental health resources for example) and not throw bandaids at it by punishing responsible, law abiding, gun owners. I oppose these bills and urge you to do the same.
This law is, in addition to the many other attempts to prevent law abiding citizens from buying, owning, or carrying firearms while doing nothing to prevent those who wish harm onto others from gaining access to firearm, solves none of the problems we see in our communities. We continue to allow people who have done harm out into our communities. We have done nothing in conjunction with our DC and Maryland partners to combat interstate crime, you insist us normal people give up what we are entitled to. I hope you all find your sense and see that no one wishes to have these law go into effect. Every restriction placed on citizens should be place on those who protect you at our capital building and on our streets.
As a fellow Democrat, it’s important to acknowledge the complexities surrounding gun ownership and the Second Amendment. 1. Self-Defense: Firearms can be a crucial tool for individuals to protect themselves, especially in high-crime areas or situations where law enforcement response times are slow. 2. Sport and Recreation: Many Americans enjoy shooting sports like hunting, skeet shooting, and target practice as a recreational activity, fostering a sense of community and skill-building. 3. Cultural Tradition: Gun ownership is deeply ingrained in American culture, with a rich history of hunting and marksmanship passed down through generations. 4. Economic Impact: The firearms industry contributes significantly to the economy, generating jobs and revenue through manufacturing, sales, and related services. 5. Civil Liberties: Upholding the right to bear arms is fundamental to preserving individual freedoms and safeguarding against government overreach. 6. Empowerment of Marginalized Communities: For historically marginalized groups, owning firearms can serve as a means of empowerment and protection against hate crimes or discriminatory violence. 7. Emergency Preparedness: In times of natural disasters or civil unrest, responsible gun owners can help maintain order and protect their families and communities. 8. Deterrence of Crime: Research suggests that the presence of armed civilians can deter potential criminals and reduce overall crime rates in certain contexts. 9. Veterans and Law Enforcement: Many veterans and law enforcement officers transition to civilian life with a continued appreciation for firearms, utilizing their expertise for civilian defense and security. 10. Balanced Approach: Instead of blanket gun control measures, we can advocate for comprehensive solutions that address root causes of violence, such as mental health support, poverty reduction, and community intervention programs.
I oppose the proposed firearms legislation put forward by this legislature and any legislation that violates the 1st, 2nd, and 4th, amendment rights of any Virginian. The desire for safer communities, a more united nation, and healing for our public health is something that we all can share in but these bills do not achieve that. Rather, they regulate and penalize. They unconstitutionally restrict the rights of the many in the name of safety and serve only to harm our rights. I would be doing a disservice to our state and my fellow citizens if I did not also provide potential solutions or remedies to the violence we face. First, we as communities need to promote voluntary storage facilities for those who are experiencing hardship and are concerned about suicide. Ideally making it easier to put firearms safely out of reach when suicide risks are greater. To do this it would need to be a system at the lowest level with minimum government involvement besides funding and partnership with local ranges. We would also need to reach out to those in our lives who are in a bad place and encourage the use of these facilities. Second, we should promote a culture of safe handling and respect for firearms through school courses and community organizations because assault weapons or not suicide, or accidents only take one bullet from a single action firearm. Lastly and more broadly we should focus on the issues surrounding the violence. Whether it is drugs and organized criminal activity or the mental health crisis as it has become known we should be working to fix these issues first. I.e. legalize weed, adapt police training, and push to root out organized crime, promote common social values and family cohesion, increase freedom, physical activity, and discipline in the school system.
These firearms bill are either redundant or unless in any meaningful way. If you care about reducing violence, please focus on criminals. Please stop trying to disarm families and law abiding citizen from protecting themselves.
I am a liberal through and through, I believe in individual rights and the opportunity for prosperity for all. I vote democrat because I care about my community, the rights of minorities, and women’s rights. The proposed legislation limiting the ability of free, law abiding citizens to purchase firearms, carry, and general use should not be limited further. I have witnessed violence at the hands of criminals, some later caught and it was shown that they did not legally acquire these firearms. The proposed legislation will effectively stop those who abide by the laws of Virginia from being able to properly protect themselves. It is known that police will not protect you, and they have no legal obligation to do so. This puts us at a dilemma, it’s either blindly trust the police to protect us and our families or have the ability to protect ourselves. I am not advocated for looser gun laws by any means, but I am advocating for more common sense gun laws. What do I mean by this you may ask? Well I mean background checks are a must and proper certification to conceal carry. I am a former Marine, I was a firefighter, and am a current student at a great university in our nations capital. I like to think I am reasonable in my thinking, but after looking and reading the propositions I checked above, I can’t help but feel betrayed by my own party. There is more than 5 guns for every American in this country. Gun control must target the people who do not follow the law and try to prevent violence from occurring, and the proposed legislation above does not help in that manner. I am hopeful that you will read this and reconsider the language in the legislation and I am even more hopeful that I can protect my family as necessary. I will always vote for progress but that’s not to say that I will always vote against my interests. Locally, crime has been on the rise and I have had to deal with it directly with little to no help from the police. I will (to the fullest extent of the law) protect myself as necessary from anyone who wishes to inflict harm on myself or family, and I hope you see that the average citizen in Virginia can not afford a security detail or rely on our police for protection. Thank you and have a great day.
Please stop infringing on our god given right, protected by the constitution of the United States (which you all have sworn to uphold and protect), to keep and bear arms. Responsible gun owners are not the problem in America’s gun violence epidemic. We follow the law. Criminals don’t. We use our firearms to protect ourselves, loved ones, and community. Chipping away at this right we have makes us more vulnerable to becoming victims of gun violence, not protect us from it. These laws only serve to empower those with evil intentions. Rather, might I suggest harsher penalties for those who commit senseless acts of violence with firearms instead of going after the good men and women of the commonwealth who wish only to use their firearms for lawful purposes.
Dear House of Delegates, I'm writing to you today as a concerned citizen. The introduction of bills aimed at heavily regulating firearms, is not warranted or wanted by the people of Virginia. Our nation stands at a crossroads, where the desire to address gun violence intersects with the constitutional rights affirmed by the Supreme Court. The Second Amendment's protection of the right to bear arms is not just a legal directive but a reflection of our commitment to individual freedom. In this context, the proposed regulations, while motivated by a commendable desire to reduce violence, raise significant concerns about their effectiveness and the potential consequences for law-abiding citizens. Research, including findings published in the Journal of Quantitative Criminology, suggests that the relationship between strict gun laws and the reduction of gun violence is not as straightforward as one might hope. Cities with stringent gun regulations continue to face challenges with gun-related crimes, indicating that those intent on violence often find ways to circumvent the law. This reality prompts us to question whether new restrictions will achieve their intended goal or merely place additional burdens on those who seek firearms for legitimate purposes, including self-defense. Moreover, the abundance of firearms in the United States presents a logistical challenge to the enforcement of such regulations. With more guns than people in the country, the task of significantly reducing the availability of firearms to criminals, without infringing on the rights of law-abiding citizens, is daunting. It is within this complex landscape that I urge you to consider the broader implications of the proposed gun control measures. The parallels drawn with other contentious issues, such as the regulation of women's healthcare, highlight the potential for policy decisions to inadvertently infringe upon individual freedoms and deepen societal divisions. Such outcomes not only detract from the intended goals of enhancing public safety but also risk alienating segments of the population whose support is essential for the advancement of our collective well-being. I respectfully ask that you consider the potential consequences of the proposed gun control measures, not just for the immediate future but for the legacy we leave for generations to come. It is my hope that, together, we can find a way to address the challenges of gun violence in a manner that honors our values, respects our freedoms, and genuinely enhances the safety and well-being of our communities.
STOP INFRINGING OUR RIGHTS. Get rid of every single gun control bill that is here and START ENFORCING THE LAWS WE ALREADY HAVE. Stop trying to turn law abiding citizens into criminals. I am disgusted that all of these nonsense bills have even made it this far. You can have these laws in Northern Virginia where everyone hates guns but don’t force this garbage into the rest of the state. GET RID OF ALL OF THIS GARBAGE and keep your noses out of everyone’s business. More government is not the answer.
Please stop attempting to infringe on my 2nd amendment rights. Responsible gun owners are not behind any gun violence. Maybe focus on bills that will actually keep guns out of the hands of those that should not have them rather than stripping the rights away of law-abiding citizens. Not a single one of those bills will stop criminals from breaking the law, all they will do is prevent me from being able to effectively defend myself and my family against said criminal.
Virginia already has some of the strictest gun laws in the nation. We can all agree violence is an issue but making more unconstitutional, on a national and state level, gun laws will not help with the rates of violent crimes and property crimes as we see from states with stricter gun laws. We need to increase access to mental health and community resources to address the root causes of issues rather than criminalizing responsible gun owners. I am opposed to this attack on the second amendment which is the fundamental backbone that protects the other freedoms guranteed in the constitution.
The second amendment is very clear in its intent that these rights “shall not be infringed”. Removing/ restricting law abiding citizens right to self defense and protection against unwitting organizations and persons is not only more harmful, but a clear violation of the rights this country was founded on.
Dear Honorable Members of the House of Delegates, I write to you today as a concerned citizen, deeply invested in the well-being and safety of our communities, and as someone who values the principles upon which our nation was founded. The issue at hand, the introduction of bills aimed at heavily regulating firearms, is one that I believe warrants a thoughtful reconsideration in light of its broader implications. Our nation stands at a crossroads, where the desire to address gun violence intersects with the constitutional rights affirmed by the Supreme Court. The Second Amendment's protection of the right to bear arms is not just a legal directive but a reflection of our commitment to individual freedom. In this context, the proposed regulations, while motivated by a commendable desire to reduce violence, raise significant concerns about their effectiveness and the potential consequences for law-abiding citizens. Research, including findings published in the Journal of Quantitative Criminology, suggests that the relationship between strict gun laws and the reduction of gun violence is not as straightforward as one might hope. Cities with stringent gun regulations continue to face challenges with gun-related crimes, indicating that those intent on violence often find ways to circumvent the law. This reality prompts us to question whether new restrictions will achieve their intended goal or merely place additional burdens on those who seek firearms for legitimate purposes, including self-defense. Moreover, the abundance of firearms in the United States presents a logistical challenge to the enforcement of such regulations. With more guns than people in the country, the task of significantly reducing the availability of firearms to criminals, without infringing on the rights of law-abiding citizens, is daunting. It is within this complex landscape that I urge you to consider the broader implications of the proposed gun control measures. The parallels drawn with other contentious issues, such as the regulation of women's healthcare, highlight the potential for policy decisions to inadvertently infringe upon individual freedoms and deepen societal divisions. Such outcomes not only detract from the intended goals of enhancing public safety but also ***risk alienating segments of the population whose support is essential for the advancement of our collective well-being.*** Constituents see this robust effort to "see what sticks" as a weakness within our party. Comparatively imbalanced with the diverse range of issues and concerns that we face everyday. A waste. As we move forward, I encourage you to approach this issue with a balanced perspective, one that recognizes the need for effective strategies to combat gun violence while also safeguarding the constitutional rights and freedoms that define our nation. The path to meaningful change is complex, requiring a nuanced understanding of the issues at hand and a commitment to policies that truly serve the best interests of all our citizens. In closing, I respectfully ask that you consider the potential consequences of the proposed gun control measures, not just for the immediate future but for the legacy we leave for generations to come. It is my hope that, together, we can find a way to address the challenges of gun violence in a manner that honors our values, respects our freedoms, and genuinely enhances the safety and well-being of our communities.
You guys need to stop attacking our 2nd amendment and get help for these kids growing up with identity crisis’s . You coming after law abiding citizens is appalling and the fact that your leaning towards becoming the despicable state of California is saddening. If the president can have security which uses firearms that even the normal civilian can’t have this raises the issue of how can a civilian defend against a tyrannical government with a featureless 10 round ar-15 ? Keep this up and we know exactly what your end goal is.
As a left leaning voter and citizen of Virginia, these new restrictions on our right to bear arms are sickening. Stop proposing so many bans and limits, and maybe a realistic bill, like the safe credit, won’t be universally protested. If you actually want to quell gun violence, keep focused on affordable mental and physical healthcare, improving the education system, and reducing income inequality. While the right may not support these real improvements, I cannot in good faith support or vote for any politician who supports banning or restricting the rights of law abiding citizens in our beautiful commonwealth. Thank you.
The 2nd amendment states "shall not be infringed". All of these bills are infringement and are therefore unconstitutional. Should we pass laws that people must pass a test before they can have freedom of speech? What about pass a test before you can vote? What about if someone does not have training they will be slaves again? Name one other right outlined in the constitution where a citizen has to jump through hoops before they can use that right? I oppose all of these bills as they will do more harm than good. I can understand wanting to keep people safe but gun control does the opposite. These bills will only make it harder for law abiding citizens to exercise their rights while criminals will still ignore the law. Criminals will still get illegal guns or weapons and will commit more crimes since they know the public is unable to defend themselves. Benjamin Franklin once said: "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." You writing bills saying "give up your rights and guns and we will protect you". Well ask the Native Americans how that worked out for them. Ask a Jewish person who was under Nazi control how that worked out for them. Well Hitler's first step was to take away the guns from the public so they could not protect themselves and over 6 million people lost their lives. Since you do not know history you are writing bills which will doom us to repeat it. You know 75 years ago when you could just buy a gun in a catalog and it was shipped to your house we did not have this issue. In the 60s and 70s when people would have a gun in their truck at school or take one in for show and tell we did not have a gun issue. This is a mental health issue. Deal with mental health and you will fix the public safety issue. Zero of my guns have killed people because guns do not kill people. People kill people. Look at Ukraine and Israel for just one form of example why we need LESS gun control. All of these gun laws are unconstitutional and should be thrown out. Do the right thing and let us law abiding citizens have their rights as outlined in the constitution. Do not pass laws which infringe on our rights. If the 2nd amendment falls, the 1st will follow . When the 1st and 2nd fall the 13th will fall and our country will be lost and we will be back in chains.
I am very opposed to the vast majority of these bills. I am a legal gun owner with my CHP. Many of these bills heavily restrict my right to bear arms in a legal capacity. I don’t understand why I should be punished for doing everything legally and correctly only to become a felon in the coming months through these legislations
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Whether or not a person chooses to exercise this right is up to them. Otherwise, it shall not be infringed.
I can not, and nobody should, support these unconstitutional laws. THROW THEM ALL OUT.
You guys make it harder and harder to vote Democrat every single cycle. Complete ban on Semi Automatics more or less making the state even stricter towards guns then states like Maryland? I oppose all these even the "herp common sense derp" ones because the states party has made it clear they don't give a crap about anything but putting hollow wins for politicians because hhheeeyyy punishing law abiding gun owners is a whole lot easier then creating jobs or reducing crime. If these bills die before getting to the governors desk, especially the bans, then I will gladly continue to vote DNC. But if Youngkin has to veto these and you make me say something I never thought I would "Thank god Youngkin won" then I look forward to blindly going down the ticket in 2024 and checking "R" on everyone. Thank you for taking the time to read this.
I do not support more legislation infringing on my 2nd Ammendment rights. Please fund more enforcement for the proactive enforcement of existing laws and regulations pertaining to firearms.
I oppose this legislation.
The litany of gun control measures under consideration will do nothing to effectively reduce crime and violence, and will only further restrict the rights of law abiding firearms owners. Not to mention the countless examples from other locales across the country where these same measure have been put into place and the result is more violent crime as criminals can now feel safe that the general population is not armed. Strongly oppose all proposed bills.
The ridiculous litany of gun control measures under consideration will do nothing to effectively reduce crime and violence, and will only further restrict the rights of law abiding firearms owners.
We dont need MORE laws regarding firearms, we need to enforce the laws that are already on the books. If enforcement is done then these laws are redundant and not necessary. Don't pass more laws just for the sake of passing laws. They do nothing but make law abiding citizens confused and they dont do anything to stop problems.
I am writing to express my great concern, to the legislatures that continue to ignore their oath of swearing to protect and uphold the rights of the citizens as protected by the United States Constitution and the Virginian Constitution. "The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED". You beaurcrats do not grant that right to he people, it is God given. While you grandstand and ateemlt to make laws to hurt the everydayaw abiding American citizen, you turn a way and do nothing in these bills to punish criminals committing crimes. It is already illegal to murder people. To grandstand and think that any of these bills would stop someone from murdering or harming another person is laughable. Quite literally. You pander screaming about these firearm safety bills while you walk around with security and people with "guns" to keep you safe. Start enforcing the existing laws against criminals who commit crimes vs trying to turn law abiding people, who take training, are serious about protection of family, themselves and others, and trying to disarm them and make them criminals. Or we will vote you out! Uphold your Oath or be prepared for the consequences your actions lead to by the American people. Regards Mr. Harris
I know most modern politicians aren’t historians but the Bill of Rights is really simple. If you read that, you’ll also read the 2nd Amendment which is really simple as well. In the same docket you’re trying to give more benefits to police and take away more rights from citizens. You ought to be ashamed. What a farce freedom is anymore.
These anti gun laws are an infringement on all Virginian's 2A rights.
I am opposed to additional new laws or further regulations placed on firearms or other means of self defense, or which limit the ability to conduct commerce or carry such items. Not only does the constitution make it clear this is a violation of my rights, it does nothing to address or reduce the actions of criminals.
I am against all of these blatantly unconstitutional firearms restrictions. I'm strongly against: SB2| Deeds | Assault firearms certain ammunition, etc.; purchase, possession, sale, transfer, etc., prohibited. This tries to ban things that are in common use, which has never worked well for the government, remember Prohibition? Remember the war on drugs? Just like the last assault weapons ban, this will literally just make AR-15s more popular and easier to get illegally. And I am against: HB585 | Mundon King | Home-based firearms dealers; prohibited near schools, penalties. That specifically targets home-based FFLs whose house is somewhere near a school. This would put hundreds of Virginia residents out of business just because of where they live.
I strongly oppose any bill, law or ordinance that infringes on the undeniable constitutional right to keep and bear arms. These include any ban, any further age restrictions, if a person (18) is old enough to join the military and use real "assault weapons" then they should be fully capable to purchase a semi automatic firearm of their choice. I oppose any law or ordinance that restricts my ability to defend my family and myself as I see fit, this includes bans on where I can carry my lawful firearm, what type of firearm and the magazine size of my choice. How about we make laws that are tougher on criminals and stop punishing law abiding people who actually care and follow the law.
All infringements on the second amendment are acts of treason and should be treated as such. Acting in favor of such infringements makes you a traitor to this nation and th commonwealth.
All Virginians want our families to be safe from gun violence. However, passing such broad restrictions on firearms commonly used for self defense is not the answer. The updated definition of assault weapons and the associated prohibitions do little to nothing to stop criminals who are willing to illegally buy or steal firearms. There are plenty of firearms out there for criminals to access, with well over 400 million guns in civilian ownership in the United States. It is too late to round them all up. These bills will disproportionately affect those citizens who go out of their way to follow our commonwealth's laws; the people who are unlikely to commit a violent crime in the first place. The solutions to gun violence that stand a chance at working are community-oriented interventions that decrease poverty, drug use, gang activity, combat mental illness, and advocate for the safe storage of firearms. Sociologists know these factors correlate strongly with ALL types of violence. On average, two-thirds of firearms deaths are suicides, an assault weapons ban won't do a thing about those. Of the remaining 1/3 of firearms homicides, more than half are drug, gang, or domestic violence related. Let's pass bipartisan legislation that addresses these underlying problems, instead of preventing average Virginians from protecting themselves with firearms that are already ubiquitous.
I am Opposed to any limitations on the Second Amendment and any restrictive firearm laws. We have adequate, if not already overbearing, laws on the books now and should not be creating more laws restricting all the aspects of firearm use, sales, and any other aspects of the right to bear arms.
These firearm laws are mostly reactionary to the media response on firearms. This is a major infringement on the 2nd amendment and needs to be stopped.
An inordinate focus on the control of firearms only serves to infringe the rights of the law-abiding citizen in defense of his life and property. The State should instead focus on the apprehension and incarceration of individuals engaging in criminal behavior and associated misuse of firearms.
A solution without a problem, HB 2 and SB 70 do nothing except criminalize the innocent Neither the House passed HB 2, nor Senate-amended SB 70 address the largest source of illegal guns, namely: straw purchases, which continue to occur despite the legal requirements of background checks, and the felony penalties for violating the law. A 2013 memo from the U.S. Justice Department’s National Institute of Justice stated that out of the universe of all guns in the United States, of the very small percent of firearms ever used in crimes, 47% were obtained through straw purchases, 20% from unregulated private sales, 13% from Gun shows/flea markets and 8% from retail sales. The National Institute of Justice memo also stated, “A perfect universal background check system can address the gun shows and might deter many unregulated private sellers. However, this does not address the largest sources (straw purchasers and theft), which would most likely become larger if background checks at gun shows and private sellers were addressed.” While the Senate Amended SB 70 has fewer problems than the draconian House passed HB 2, neither can fix the problem of straw purchases of guns by criminals. Obviously, criminals are undeterred by gun laws which they disobey even when faced with a felony prosecution threat. I agree with Gun Owners of America; either bill impacts only law-abiding citizens, not those intent on harming their neighbor. Please vote NO on both SB 70 and HB 2 and advise me how you vote. Thank you.
Any law that infringes on my Gods-given right to own and bear arms is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Any law passed that infringes this right will be answered with a lawsuit.
I'm against any unconstitutional law and any law that strips Americans of their rights. These laws are an attack on the 2nd amendment and hold NO facts in stopping crime. They are a punishment for law-abiding people and will not make Virginia safer.
Hello. There are a plethora of bills that were proposed, which would clearly violate the second amendment rights of many law abiding citizens. First of all, considering concealed carry should be permit-less carry, it is counterproductive to increase the requirements for concealed carry. Restrictions on where law abiding citizens can lawfully carry their now “permitted” firearms is asinine, as well as the proposition of a bill that would make it a penalty to leave a firearm in your car. You would essentially be disarming a large number of people who wish to follow these unlawful order in a day and age where the democratic agenda is to act like there are mass shootings on a daily basis. Effectively disarming the majority and increasing the requirements and legal loopholes to carry is such a vulnerable state to be in and I hope we’re smart enough to avoid that. Restrictions on “Plastic firearms and unfinished frames etc” is not only terrible literature that does nothing to explain, but it is a direct violation of the 2nd amendment considering you have a federal right to make firearms for personal use, which would include additively manufactured parts. Wait periods are also a horrifying thing to think of, considering how many times it has been proven to be a terrible idea, keeping guns out of the hands that need them most to protect themselves and their families. “Assault firearms” and anything to do with them is nonsense considering the blatant inability to define said “assault weapon”. People who don’t understand guns, shouldn’t be making laws on guns. A shorter barrel does not make it more lethal, in fact it lowers the muzzle velocity, causing less force on impact and penetration, in turn causing less collateral damage. Any sort of “assault weapons” bills are targeting law abiding citizens who have every right to use the modern advances in firearm technology just as police officers and military. The only people these bills are effecting are the already law abiding citizens. The criminals who got their hands on said weapons illegally aren’t going to be making sure that their ALREADY ILLEGAL WEAPONS are fully compliant with state laws and regulations before they go commit another crime. In no way shape or form should someone need to disadvantage themselves in a life or death situation because political members with an armed security detail don’t feel the need for a gun. Why would I want to limit myself to a firearm that is going to be inadequate in home defense, or one that does not have a high enough capacity to protect myself from the ever growing threat of home invasion and the increased trend of multiple home invaders breaking in armed. If it was you alone in your house with 6 armed intruders who most definitely must have checked their local laws and firearm regulations and made sure their firearms aren’t violating any rules before they break into your house, would you want to limit yourself to a low capacity firearm that is going to be extremely difficult to use effectively in a high stress situation, or are you taking a rifle which for reasons that don’t make sense, must have a 16 inch barrel, with a larger capacity magazine, and a stock that you can use to safely brace the firearm to prevent stray shots and provide more accurate fire. Personally I’m going to take anything and everything I can get in a situation that means life or death for me and my loved ones EVERY SINGLE DAY OF THE WEEK. Focus on the mental health crisis.
Gun laws do not prevent firearm homicides, based upon gun control organization's own data (Giffords) •No correlation between strict gun laws and firearm homicide incidents •.07 coefficient of determination (AKA R2) where .90 is a strong association •There likely would be a weak association showing gun laws driving the firearm homicide rate higher if Washington, DC was given a score and ranked by Giffords.
Hello, The right to own and bear firearms is intrinsic in the very nature of the founding of the United States. We must remember the spirit of the 2nd Amendment and the right of all civilians to own and bear arms. Firearms are the great equalizer and can allow and individual to defend themselves when they previously could not. Gun violence and the mental health epidemic are closely interlinked and one cannot pass restrictive firearm laws and expect gun violence to go away. Gun bans and the use of restrictive purchasing requirements, magazine limits, waiting periods, and red flag laws have been shown not to be effective in stemming gun violence. I urge anybody reading this message to say "NO" to 2nd Amendment restrictions.
I strongly, along with many fellow Virginians oppose any villainous disarmament bills disguised as "public safety". The second amendment clearly states "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" and out of touch elitist politicians who enjoy the luxury of armed security are choosing to ignore the constitution and force us to rely on sub-par police protection. The same people who want to defund the police want to disarm us. Embracing the second amendment is what is keeping our crime rates low compared to New York and California. We have seen the blatant disregard that criminals have for these so-called laws; emboldened criminals who are not afraid of the consequences and innocent law-abiding people who are forced to live in fear because a bunch of tyrants are letting power corrupt them. I do not want to live in fear and neither do the rest of us. In addition; a lot of counties and cities have declared themselves as second amendment sanctuaries to protect the rights of free individuals from the overreach of tyrannical politicians. These bills are a Trojan horse that will lead to more crime. You anti-gun politicians should be ashamed of yourselves; give up your private security and train yourselves. Then you will change your minds; because in the end, nobody is coming to save you. I would rather have a fighting chance against armed assailants than die waiting for help to arrive. These bills are pure evil
I oppose all of these selected bills since I firmly believe they are in conflict with the Second Amendment of the US Constitution. The Second Amendment clearly states that it shall not be infringed upon. Any and all proposed legislation that would place limits on how, where, and when responsible citizens arm themselves runs afoul of that. Our founding fathers correctly held the belief that all people have a natural born right to arm and protect themselves and that the government has no authority to interfere with that. While I agree with the sentiment of reducing violence among our society, gun laws only harm the law abiding citizen and leave criminals who already have a disregard for the law to still be armed. If our elected officials who proposed these bills actually cared about addressing our violence problem, they would focus more on addressing the root causes of violence and crime. More worthwhile pursuits in my opinion would be focused on addressing socio-economic problems that plague disadvantaged communities, creating a more robust and well-equipped mental healthcare system, and overhauling our educational systems to setup our children for better success in life. Thank you all for your time.
I'm against any unconstitutional law, and any law that strips Americans of their rights. These laws are an attack on the 2nd ammendment and hold NO facts in stopping crime. They are a punishment on law abiding people and in no way will make virginia a safer place.
I oppose all these unconstitutional, dangerous, and pointless laws.
I oppose all useless firearm changes. Criminals will not obey
HB113 | Sullivan | Handguns; possession, purchase, or transportation by persons convicted of certain drug offenses. HB1174 | Sickles | Assault firearms; age requirement for purchase, penalty. HB1195 | Hayes | Firearms; waiting period for purchases, penalty. HB12 | Jones | Handguns; firearm locking device required for sale or transfer, child safety warning required. HB1235 | Zehr | Concealed handguns; protective orders. HB1424 | Hope | Firearms; valid permit to purchase, penalties. HB1462 | Laufer | Firearm in unattended motor vehicle; civil penalty. HB158 | McClure | Firearm locking device; required for sale or transfer of firearm. HB16 | Garrett | Firearm or explosive material; carrying within Capitol Square and the surrounding area, etc. HB173 | Simon | Plastic firearms and unfinished frames, etc.; manufacture, import, etc. prohibited, penalties. HB175 | Simon | Assault firearms; carrying in public areas prohibited, penalty. HB183 | Simon | Firearms; storage in residence where minor or person prohibited from possessing is present, penalty. HB2 | Helmer | Assault firearms & certain ammunition, etc.; purchase, sales, transfers, etc., prohibited. HB22 | Jones | Auto sears; definition, prohibition on manufacture, importation, sale, etc., penalty. HB270 | Reid | Commonwealth Comprehensive Gun Safety Program; established, etc. HB319 | Helmer | Firearms instructors & safety prog.; removes reference to NRA & U.S. Concealed Carry Assoc. in Code. HB35 | Clark | Firearm safety device; expands definition of device. HB351 | Clark | Firearm; locking device required for purchase, households where minor resides, penalty. HB362 | McClure | Firearms; purchase, etc., following an assault and battery against an intimate or dating partner. HB454 | Callsen | Firearm/explosive material; carrying w/in Capitol Square or bldg. owned or leased by Commonwealth. HB46 | Bennett-Parker | Firearm; transfers to another person from a prohibited person. HB466 | Helmer | Concealed handgun permits; reciprocity with other states. HB791 | Henson | Pneumatic guns; Class 6 felony to possess. HB797 | Hope | Concealed handguns; demonstrated competence for a permit, firearms instructors and safety programs. HB798 | Hope | Firearms; purchase, possession, etc., following an assault and battery or stalking violation. HB799 | Hope | Concealed handgun permit applications; fingerprints required by local governments. HB861 | Hernandez | Weapons; carrying into hospital that provides mental health services. HB945 | Lopez | Firearm safety device; expands definition of device. SB100 | Ebbin | Plastic firearms and unfinished frames, etc.; manufacture, import, etc. prohibited, penalties. SB2 | Deeds | Assault firearms & certain ammunition, etc.; purchase, possession, sale, transfer, etc., prohibited. SB210 | Perry | Auto sears; prohibition on manufacture, importation, sale, etc., penalty. SB273 | Subramanyam | Firearms; waiting period for purchases, penalty. I oppose all these bills.
I oppose this bill as it seeks to infringe on the Consitutionally proctected rights of lawabiding citizens to protect themselves from criminals, criminals who do not follow the law. This bill makes it harder for someone to keep themselves safe and is primarily a solution in search of problems to fix. Virginia has one of the lowest crime rates in the country and even less gun related crimes being committed year over year. This is not due to gun control laws, in fact as gun control laws increase, s o does the rate of violent crimes. Criminals are not afraid of police, they are afraid of armed citizens. The subject of this bill has already been defeated in courts, passing this into law will only subject the Commonwealth to more lawsuits to have it repealed costing us more in taxes. Enough of our taxpayers money has been wasted in politicians attempting to pass "feel good" bills to try and prove they are doing their job. I urge the legistature to focus on enforcing and imposing stricter penalties for those that break our exsiting laws over creating new laws that only serve to pe nalize the law abiding citizens.
I was born in Henrico county and vote in every election. Guns are currently the #1 killer of our children under the age of 18. I am writing to show my support for these bills because gun violence prevention is my top priority. Please support gun safety legislation that is brought up for a vote! Thank you so much for your time.
My name is Laura Sledge and I am your constituent. Guns are currently the #1 killer of our children under the age of 18, and gun violence prevention is my top priority. Please support gun safety legislation that is brought up for a vote. Here are the bills I support. Thank you for your time.
Hello, My name is Hayley Redmond Cilley. Guns are currently the #1 killer of our children under age 18, and I am calling because gun violence prevention is my top priority. Please support gun safety legislation that is brought up for a vote! We need safer communities for all, but especially for our children.
HB 1174. I support a waiting period. Suicides are one of the biggest problems with ready access to guns; often a waiting period will provide the time needed for a person to either change his mind about suicide or talk to someone who can help. This does not take away the right to own a gun.
I am in opposition to these bills as a long time concealed carry permit holder who has lived in Virginia for. 30 years and has voted in Virginian elections since I was 18. These bills make it harder for someone to keep themselves safe while are primarily solutions in search of problems to fix. Virginia has one of the lowest crime rates in the country and even less gun related crimes being committed year over year. This is not a success of the gun control lobby but they would certainly have you believe it is. They are often unconstitutional limits on a persons 2nd amendment rights and do not serve to make Virginians safer. The ban on assault firearms is written in such a way that it would ban most modern defensive handguns carried by men and women across the commonwealth. These are law abiding concealed carry holders or regular citizens who have purchased regular firearms with regular features. Much akin to wanting a car with leather seats or GPS. These are not features only found on “scary” guns they are features that assist those with hearing or sight issues to use a handgun safely. We already have laws preventing firearms usage in crimes but these would simply disempower lawful citizens from having features on their guns that are normal and regular modern features. These bills would do nothing to prevent actual criminals from obtaining or using prohibited firearms in crime but would disenfranchise law abiding citizens from enjoying a Virginian hobby that has a history older than the state itself.
I am in complete objection of this bill. It is completely immoral to expect 18 to 20 year olds to want to volunteer for either the federal armed services or the states National Guard and treat them as "less than a citizen" on one hand, but the government will allow them to go to war with a select fire firearm, which is already illegal for most Americans to possess. Coming up with the term "assault weapon" and then redefining it is like saying because someone isn't 21 all of a sudden they can't own a car that looks like a Corvette (pick your favorite car) because it goes too fast, but when you look under the hood, there is only a four cilinder engine with a max speed of 70 miles per hour. To top this illustration off, there is no Constitutional Right that says "your right to a car or a horse may not be infringed" yet no one is trying to restrict a citizens' ability to purchase a car or horse or operate a car or a type of car between 18 and 20. I strongly urge the Virginia legislature to vote "No" on HB1174 - Sickles
Dear Sir or Madame. Last year in Newport News I was assaulted by a 27 year old black man from Chesapeake because of his road rage.. This was at my local bank 11;30 in the morning. This young man almost lost his life at my hand because you cannot reel in your problem young men. His words feet from me were ' im going to kick your ass and then kill you'. My pistol changed his mind. I saw for myself the woke judges and a woke system that perpetuates the problem. The criminal justice system has been flung far far left which IS causing a public safety hazzard. No new gun control is needed. More jail time for the trash that i dealt with is. My Congressman Bobby Scott and Delegate Cia Price do not represent me.
I am a member of VA Moms For Change, a gun violence prevention group and I support these bills
When Democrats violate the Covenant between the PEOPLE and the US Constitution as well as the VA Constitution they are acting lawlessly and undermining the commitment toward good Government agreed on for over 200 + years. Seems Democrats didn't learn anything from the Civil war. The mentality of the "Tyrant" and the "Slave Holder" still exists among the Demo-rat Party, removing statues and trying to hide and rewrite history is not good government. Oaths, integrity, and Good Government, mean nothing to this Cabal of Evil minded men and women. We the PEOPLE need and demand good government not a patch work or illegal laws we are expected to "obey" while the "perps" that pass them have no consequence for breaking Constitutional law or good Government. The Demo-rat Party needs to be dismantled and the "ignorant" ejected from the Virginia legislature at once and for all. Peter Buckingham Crozet, VA 22932
OPPOSITION to HB12 - Jones OPPOSITION to HB23 - Laufer OPPOSITION to HB158 - McClure OPPOSITION to HB183 - Simon SUPPORT of HB289 - Wiley OPPOSITION to HB351 - Clark OPPOSITION to HB585 – Mundon King SUPPORT of HB756 - Walker OPPOSITION to HB791 - Henson OPPOSITION to HB861 - Hernandez SUPPORT of HB872 - Earley SUPPORT of HB1141 - Cordoza OPPOSITION to HB1174 - Sickles SUPPORT of HB1198 - Scott
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
I am writing in support of HB 12, 23, 158, 183, 351, 585, 791 and 861. I also write in opposition to HB 289, 756, 872, 1141 and 1198. There is ample evidence that minimal restrictions on firearms has resulted in countless deaths and injuries. Sensible restrictions on access to lethal weapons are sorely needed at this time. In fact, the Supreme Court, in deciding on the right to bear arms, has also stated that “Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited. [It is] not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.” If, unfortunately, assault-style weapons continue to be manufactured and owned, their access must be limited by age. In that case I would support HB 1174. Thank you for your attention to these comments.
I am a member of the Charlottesville Coalition for Gun Violence Prevention and the Charlottesville Center for Peace and Justice. I support all the gun safety bills: 12 23 158 183 351 585 791 861 1141 1174 I oppose these bills: 289 756 872 1198
. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen.
Please stop wasting your time and my money on bills that have proven to be have zero impact on public safety, Please refer to Maryland, California, and the other states that already have these laws
Good afternoon, I am writing to implore you to STOP with all of the gun control bills. You are punishing law abiding citizens, who now have their RIGHTS THAT SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED, infringed. And the criminals who do NOT follow these laws but who they are directed at, are not affected. Please enforce ALL of the laws that are presently in the books and prosecute those people breaking the laws and stop letting them out on bail and bond through the Soros DA’s.
HB23 and HB861 Law abiding concealed carry individual are not the problem, and criminals who do not obtain guns legally will not follow this law either. HB12 and HB158 Already exist on the federal level why waste time and money on these bills HB791 who in their right mind would make a child or teenager a felon for bringing a BB-gun into a school, how often does this even happen for this to be considered. HB1174 This bill is unconstitutional at best! How can a man or woman b considered an adult at the age of 18, join the military at the age of 18, and not be allowed to purchase a weapon at the age of 18. Not to mention all other irreversible life changes that are allowed from birth to age 18. Please vote no to all of theses bills and any other unconstitutional gun control bills that come in front of the committee. Concerned constituent.
In reference to all of the above proposed house bills…. In short there is NO need for any more restrictions of any type on the purchase (to include locations of ffls in reference to schools and forcing purchasers to buy locks when they already safely store their firearms), carry, storage, and use of any type of firearms. It is extremely clear that more restrictions do not do anything to stem the flow of violent crimes which may or may not involve firearms (using DC, Chicago, NYC etc as examples, where very strict firearms laws have done nothing to lower violent crime). Instead, we need to focus on allowing law enforcement to aggressively enforce the numerous existing laws, demand commonwealth attorneys offices hold criminals responsible and ensure long prison sentences on offenders. As a citizen of the commonwealth for my entire life, and a local law enforcement officer for over 2 decades I can tell you from personal experience simply adding restrictions and more laws is worthless and simply slows down the system. As they say when seconds count, the police are only minutes away…. Do not place any more restrictions on residents of the commonwealth who are forced to live in increasingly dangerous localities due to the legal changes of the past 5 years, which allow offenders to go unpunished or under punished. Simply because you do not like firearms does not mean that others should not have lessened access to purchase, use, and carry the firearms of their choice. Thank you for your consideration
I would like for the Commonwealth of Virginia to have Constitutional Carry as the law of the entire state , our right as stated in the constitution of the united states and the constitution of the Commonwealth of virginia as written by our founders gives each citizen the right to keep and bear arms with no exclusions, to be secure in their persons, unless that right has been forfeited,. Exercising this right should never lead to forfeiture of this right.
I would like for the Commonwealth of Virginia to have Constitutional Carry as the law of the entire state , our right as stated in the constitution of the united states and the constitution of the Commonwealth of virginia as written by our founders gives each citizen the right to keep and bear arms with no exclusions, to be secure in their persons, unless that right has been forfeited,. Exercising this right should never lead to forfeiture of this right.
For HB12 and HB158: Already covered by federal law, no additional expense should be put on the FFL or the consumer. For HB23 and HB861: You are adding restrictions on personal protection and safety while not ensuring my safety and that of my family. I have been to hospitals in the commonwealth over the last few years, the security provided couldn't stop a squirrel from running through the hospital, much less someone with mal-intent. If you want the citizens to rely on the government for safety, then provide, otherwise don't restrict it. For HB585: You want to prevent FFLs from being within 1.5 mile radius of a school, yet smoke shops or other convenience stores that have vaping products are allowed, with the latter being a much bigger problem in our schools, yet no restrictions. It is silly to assume an FFL poses any danger to a school and I have yet to hear of any incident involving an FFL and a school. Most home based FFLs do not have long term storage. Please educate yourself before trying to implement "feel good" laws. We have other major issues with our schools that need to be addressed, i.e. teach retention, giving teachers more power for discipline, parental involvement/non-involvement, allowing for greater choice of subjects and stopping teaching to a test where our children learn nothing. For HB183: Another "Feel good" law. There have been multiple examples of minors protecting their family over the last several years. But, how would this law have stopped someone like the Sandyhook shooter, who killed his mother and took her safe keys? It wouldn't have. Just like it wouldn't stop a home invade killing the owner and using their safe key/finger print to access a firearm. For HB1174: At the outset this is unconstitutional, but if you want to effect real change in regard to this, open it up to an expanded background, where the applicant/purchaser that is under the age of 21 must consent to a check of their juvenile record in order to purchase, specifically looking for violent crimes. If this were in place, it may thwart some from attempting to buy, while those that continue and consent it would flag in the system, like it does when a felon attempts to buy a firearm at a gunshow. There is much more that needs to go into this, i.e. at what point when the applicant has an established adult history can they purchase after having violent crimes on their juvenile record, 25? 21? I implore every law maker to due their due diligence when it comes to rights stated in both the Virginia Constitution and the US Constitution. Do not be beholden to your donors and ram "feel good" laws through our legislature. When someone spouts statistics to you, take a moment and do you own research, look at the source material, anyone can make states lean in their favor by changing a few words or omitting parts of a study. You must work for the all the people, those you agree with and disagree with and look at all the information, not just what your donors give you. Thank you for your time.
This is absolutely egregious. A home-based FFL is an enterprise that is cleared at a higher level of proficiency and familiarity with firearms issues than any authority VA - the FFL holders are cleared and backed by the ATF. Further, an FFL, home-based or otherwise, is an enterprise in the business of safe transfer of weapons to individuals after doing criminal checks on the prospective buyer. The location near a school is irrelevant - it does not constitute a threat to a school simply because an FFL is nearby. This is a bad faith argument, and false equivalence. It’s a thin veneer. Simply put, it’s been proposed by people who do not like private ownership of firearms, and schools were picked because (deceptively) because they are evenly districted and spread through the state - after all, they’re supposed to be, to allow children access to education without having to travel unreasonably far. This also means that selecting schools as the criteria for a “no home FFL bubble” means you effectively throw a blanket over the industry. This has nothing to do with the safety of children. I find this frankly offensive and dishonest. Show me evidence where an FFL near a school has caused a problem? More than that, show me a single instance where the location was any sort of relevant. You cannot. Because it’s not true. It’s false equivalence. Let me be clear. I am a liberal person. But part of being liberal means remembering that fear mongering and bad faith, secretive agendas hurt progress. They turn people against it. Drop this frivolous nonsense. Stop making us look like idiots, please. Your crusade against portions of the bill of rights (because come on folks, we know what it is, it’s misguided) opens up very dangerous precedents for other bad faith actors to whittle down the contents of the other amendments. Read a history book. Please.
I do not support these bills. I request you vote NO on them. HB 12, Jones, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon, requires all firearms in a home be secured if there is a minor in the home. Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, prevents home-based gun dealers from operating within 1.5 miles of a school. Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, makes it illegal for anyone under 21 to purchase any kind of firearm. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen.
Constitutional issues when made political do no justice to representatives or their constituents. Dishonesty to the public erodes any ability for trust and assumptions based on party affiliation close down civil discussion. Some representatives run for office for gun control matters and get voted in but are you being honest with your constituents. I can quote statistics as could those supporting gun control but there are logical truths being ignored. We should change our terminology from gun control, to gun control over law biding citizens because each law that is passed in most situation only further restricts law biding citizens. Most gun laws only increase the ability to become a victim to criminal actions because in order to abide by laws implemented it puts the citizen at a considerable disadvantage . Gun free zones only mean unarmed citizens open to criminal behavior due to the inability to defend one's self. Law enforcement only enforce the laws, and cannot be there to prevent the actual crimes in most situations. Criminals intent on malfeasance will not abide by any laws put in place but exploit any such laws that allow for an advantage against an unarmed individual. This is not to say that I am apposed to back ground checks even at gun shows to avoid loop holes as I support such measures but to restrict carrying at locations or gun free zones only makes for sitting ducks. Restricting common circulation of rifles or any similar type to the AR-15 platform again only further limits the citizen from criminals AND tyrannical infrastructures within the state and federal levels. We can never assume that our representatives are in power for support of the people and our constitution I am not in support of any of the current gun control bills, I am in support of all the pro gun bills. In light of whatever is voted into law ,if it further restricts my constitutional rights and civil rights I simply cannot and will not comply. Thank you for your time on this matter.
As a fellow resident of Virginia, I urge you to OPPOSE the multiple anti-gun bills being heard today (1/25/24) in the House Public Safety Subcommittee on Firearms, including: HB 12 HB 158 HB 183 HB 351 HB 23 HB 861 HB 585 HB 1174 Please focus more on protecting lawful gun owners and enforcing the laws that career criminals routinely disregard. Thank you.
What is an assault firearm? How could you legislate something and not be able to define it ! ?
Dear Delegates of the House Public Safety- Firearms subcommittee, The selected bills are flagrantly and utterly unconstitutional and they stand as a direct violation on the sovereignty and liberties of the citizenry of the Commonwealth. Plainly stated they violate the United States Constitution ( the Supreme Law of the Land) and the God given rights of the people which the Commonwealth purports to “protect”. Such legislation is also preposterous factually as firearms are not the “problem” , they are merely tools and as such they are inert objects that are incapable of exerting will without an evil individual wielding them for malevolent purposes. Criminality is the problem , as criminals do not have any regard for the law or the well being of their fellow man, hence the definition of criminal. Therefore all of the selected legislation put hence forth only seeks to disarm law abiding citizens, those that are neither inclined nor committed to violating the law. Law abiding citizens possess firearms to defend our lives, the lives of our families, and to ensure that our sovereignty and liberty is not stripped away from us by tyrannical Marxist ideologues masquerading as “compassionate” and “caring” legislators. This is not Washington, Illinois, or even Maryland, this is the great Commonwealth of Virginia. That Virginia which led the American revolution under George Washington and in the defense of liberty against the tyrannical crown of England that once sought to oppress and yoke the citizens of the American colonies. The motto that adorns the seal of Virginia and our great state flag is “Sic Semper Tyrannis”, which means “Death to Tyrants”. Such a motto is more apropos in the tumultuous political climate of modernity than ever before, perhaps even more so than during the revolution in which it was founded. Being elected to represent the people does not confer upon any individual the power to strip the people of their inalienable rights, those rights that were enshrined by our great founders in the Constitution. To violate the United States Constitution in an effort to subjugate the people of the republic is by definition treason. The citizenry of the Commonwealth has spoken, we demand that you cease attempting to violate the rights of the people and do the actual job that you were elected to do . If such malevolently contrived shibboleth manages to pass out of the House of Delegates and Senate without veto from Governor Youngkin we will not abide by, adhere to, or sanction unconstitutional mandates in any way. Mass noncompliance will be the response to such attempts to strip the people of their Liberty. Thank you for your attention and your time, vote no to this abhorrent legislation. L.S. McClung RN, PMH-BC, CARN
I am writing to oppose these anti-gun, anti-self-defense, anti-rights, bills. Having previously lived for nearly 20 years in another state with many of them and more, the experience of that state was that, contrary to crime dropping nationally to historic lows, their crime increased after restrictions were added. Unsurprisingly, criminals don't obey laws. They seek to exploit those who do. These laws taking away liberty and presumption of innocence of people who seek to obey laws, do nothing but create a maze of rules that ensnare unsuspecting good people who are unaware of the litany of restrictions, their nuance and ever-changing interpretation in the future. At best, people are forced to forgo their rights to self-defense entirely because they have one or more stops on their daily travels in a restricted area. Worse, otherwise law abiding people unaware of these many restrictions, find themselves in violation having no intention, history or desire to violate the law, much less hurt anyone. These are not the people with whom our criminal code and law enforcement resources should concern themselves. Even beyond that, if faced with a violent threat in these "sensitive places", those law abiding people will now be at an even greater disadvantage as we, the people, do not enjoy an armed and dedicated police force traveling with and around us as many politicians do. I noticed sniper teams on the roofs in the surrounding area during this past VCDL Lobby Day ensuring your safely against some hypothetical threat. We are not so fortunate as we go out in the world to have such resources protecting us. Worse yet, we had been been required to disarm prior to expressing our first amendment rights that day both outside and inside the building. Whether storage, locality of carry, age of an adult required to purchase or restrictions otherwise, law abiding people are not and never were the problem. Stop punishing them collectively for the actions of violent individuals. Respect and protect their rights and presumption of innocence as the US and Virginia Constitutions require of you. When you regulate firearms, it is not the machine of a firearm you are regulating. It is the people you are regulating. It is the rights of the people you are taking away. With all the supposed progress we have made, how is it that we are less deserving of liberty now than we were in the past?
Every single one of these proposed laws are blatantly unconstitutional under the plain text of both the Virginia and US constitutions. The SCOTUS has ruled multiple times, must recently in June 2022, that the 2A prohibits these types of attacks on free citizens. Voting for any of these bills is a waste of tax payer dollars, morally and ethically wrong, and, by definition of the courts already having ruled on these or similar laws as unconstitutional, an act of treason against the USA and by extension an insurrection.
I urge you to OPPOSE each of the following bills: HB 12 Federal law already covers this and additional state enforcement will create unnecessary expense. We don’t need more bills that could create negative financial impact on our community. HB 23 This is not constitutional under the Supreme Court Decision made in 2022: New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen. This bill prevents visitors, family, and staff from their right to self defense. Is it right to prevent an abused single mother from carrying her most effective tool of defense because she has to take her child to the ER? Wouldn’t this give anyone with nefarious intentions an easy location? Note: Cornell Law has published a clear summary of the Bruen Decision, easily accessed with an online search. I mention this case further below. HB 158 Federal law already covers this and additional State enforcement will create unnecessary expense. HB 183 Current law already covers 14 and under. increasing the scope of the law to apply to 15, 16, and 17-year-olds is an overreach. Minors in this age group have used firearms to save their own life and protect the lives of their families by stopping home invasions and violent attacks on their households. This bill is an overreach. HB 585 What problem is this bill trying to solve? What’s the difference between driving 1.5 miles or 5 or 10? This bill is unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Furthermore, home-based gun dealers don't usually have signs outside of their home. Buyers have to be invited in for a purchase and FFL transfer. Also, convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products (not legal for minors to purchase) are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791 BB guns, and other pneumatic projectile devices, are specifically designed as hobbyist or sporting equipment. Making the possession of these on school grounds a felony is a complete overreach. Are we going to outlaw sticks, or stones, or archery, or baseball bats? These are all similarly dangerous. If BB guns have been used for violence at a school, please inform me. Otherwise, this is a “fix” to a problem that doesn’t exist. HB 861 This is not constitutional under Bruen and prevents visitors, family, and staff from their right to self defense. Is it right to prevent an abused single mother from carrying her most effective tool of defense because she has to take her child to the ER? Wouldn’t this give anyone with nefarious intentions an easy location? HB 1174 This bill is not constitutional. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen. People in this age group are not minors. They are included in the same Second Amendment rights as older adults.
I'm a law abiding citizen, retired law enforcement officer, and responding Public Safety 1st Responder Chaplain. I have been called out, responding to or serving at a number of violent acts, anf times, often in dangerous areas. I believe in these violent times, and knowing that criminals don't and won't obey the laws, that I have a need and right to be able to defend and protect myself, and be able to continue carrying, as I have for many years. Our drivers permit is for all 50 states, and we don't have to stop at a state border. I believe a concealed carry permit should be the same, recognized in all 50 states. To have to leave my firearm inside my car, to go into a public building or rest area on the highway, can put me in needless danger. If I have to take off a d put my firearm in my trunk, it let's a criminal see where it is and I don't have it. That can let them steal the firearm and/or harm me. Please allow our law abiding citizens use their 2nd Amendment Right To Keep and Bear (bear = to carry) arms. We need to fully prosecuted existing gun laws snd crimes, Not Add More Gun Controls that criminals won't obey any way. Murder has been against the law for centuries, but increasingly still going on, sometimes unpunished.
Please keep your gun grabbing hands off legally owned guns.Why not enforce the laws already on the books. Tell D.A. To do their jobs, go after the illegal guns. It is not legal guns that is the problem, it is the illegal guns. If more people carried legally crime could go down because the bad guys won’t know whose packing and could respond to crime. Thank you for reading my response. Alexander G. Morris IV.
The attack on the right to keep and bear arms has only increased over the past 18 months since the Supreme Court clarified in the Bruen decision the standard to which modern gun control legislation must be held. Many politicians around the country know that the bills put forth since that time are unconstitutional, but they also know it usually takes years to throw out their unconstitutional bills through court, and by then they have already cost time, money, and lives of American citizens. Rather than confront the underlying issues of our nation that lead to violence, they choose to take the easy way out and simply blame inanimate objects to deflect from their own political incompetency. Virginia representatives need to be better than that. The bills proposed are either duplicative of federal law, pointless, or dangerous. All are unconstitutional. All are a reflection of a disregard for commonsense safety measures like taking criminals off the streets. These bills must not be passed. Not because they will be signed into law, but because its the duty of Virginia state representatives to uphold the constitution and work to solve problems. These bills due neither.
Please do not vote for or advance any anti gun bills. Each one limits a citizens 2nd Amendment rights... I.E. banning commonly owned and used semi automatic rifles, which is unconstitutional under Bruen... Raising the age to purchase firearms. If one can serve in the military, one can purchase a firearm. Plus, its unconstitutional under Bruen AND a Virginia court ruled against it as well. Limiting where one can carry. This only creates more soft targets which criminals will not obey anyway. Banning unserialized firearms . Unconstitutional since some were made before 1968, when numbers were not required. Also, people have the right to build unserialized firearms in their homes for personal use. This has never been an issue, but decriminalization of crimes is causing an increase in violent crimes. THAT is a problem. Limiting how many firearms one can purchase in a given period is unfair. These are just a few . Please understand all the anti gun bills are unconstitutional, especially in light of the Bruen decision. I do urge you to vote for any pro gun bills. The right to keep and bear arms is a constitutional right. The Heller, McDonald, and Bruen decisions reinforce that right. The only limits on this right should be for criminals, illegal aliens, and anyone who has been mentally adjudicated/ forced into an institution. The issue we face should be how to repair our broken mental health infrastructure, not to limit the constitutional rights of law abiding citizens. Thank you Mr Raymond Pezzoli
Our freedom was won with illegal and unregistered firearms. Please look to the G.O. A. And VCDL for guidance on Second Amendment issues. Freedom first, safety second.
Rights afforded to us by God recognized by the Constitution start at the age we become adults. If those same adults can be sent to jail for their crimes, protect our country from enemies foreign and domestic, and vote for the good of our nation. Then they should be able to defend themselves however they see fit from people who would do them harm. This bill is unconstitutional and any politician who supports it is violating their oath of office and violating their duty to the citizens of the commonwealth.
I support these bills!
Hello, My name is Sameet Singh, I was born in Punjab, India and moved to Northern Virginia when I was 1 year old. Since then, I’veattended some great K-12 schools in the NOVA area, graduated from George Mason University in 2020, and now work in the Cyber Security field, serving one of our largest US Government Departments. My message to you today is not regarding any single bill in particular, but more of a mindset. I’m sure everyone here has a family that they would do anything for. We work hard everyday to provide for and to protect our families. And a big part in being able to protect, is having the right tool to protect yourself and your family members. This is why the best tool to have at your disposal is a firearm, a gun. Because if you or your family were attacked by someone in your home or out and about in public, a firearm, would be the best tool to have to save yourself and them from an attacker. Even if you’re able to call the police, it’ll at least take a few minutes for them to arrive, and sadly, within those minutes, only a few seconds are needed to completely change your world. Therefore, you are always your OWN first responser, before any other help arrives. This is why, anything, that would hinder your ability to protect yourself or your family with the best tool that you could use, a firearm, should really be re-thought. Unfortunately our society is not at the point where crime dosen’t happen, there’s no supernatural being or superhero that will swoop in to protect us in our times of need, there’s no Spider-Man or Superman who will save the day for us. However, the next best thing we have, is an responsibly armed citizen. A citizen who who is able to be gentle and loving with their kids and partner, but at the same time, prepared and alert at a moments notice when danger reveals itself. Thank you for listening, and thank you for your service to your communities, I wish you all a prosperous new year. Best, Sameet Singh
The Supreme Court has ruled that localities do not have the authority to declare broad swaths of spaces as "gun-free zones" and if private property managers wish to forbid firearms and weapons from their property they already have that right. Voting on such an unconstitutional bill is simply a waste of time where clear court rulings already apply. Many of these other bills have already been ruled unconstitutional under Bruen. And some of these bills such as making a BB gun a felony when on school grounds is simply idiotic. The House needs to stop wasting time on idiotic and frivolous bills that are simply nothing less than virtue signaling. There is real work to be done and you should attend to that business and not such tripe.
HB12 - Jones . I not not support . All firearms dealers currently offer a Firearm locking device on the sale or transfer of handguns. All new firearm come with a locking device and warning labels. child safety warning required. This doesn't change the current practice by dealers in offering for free locking devices. HB 23 Weapons; possession or transportation into facility that provides mental health services, etc. I do not support,. This bill does not exempt ems medical services or the fire service which many carry concealed when transporting patients to an emergency room or mental health facility on the duty. HB158 - McClure I do not support . All firearms dealers currently offer a Firearm locking device on the sale or transfer of handguns. All new firearm come with a locking device and warning labels. child safety warning required. This doesn't change the current practice by dealers in offering for free locking devices. HB183 - Simon HB289 - Wiley I support carrying a concealed handgun with a permit into public parking lots and storing there gun makes sense and do not unarm the citizen while in their personal vehicle. HB351 - Clark I not not support . All firearms dealers currently offer a Firearm locking device on the sale or transfer of handguns. All new firearm come with a locking device and warning labels. child safety warning required. This doesn't change the current practice by dealers in offering for free locking devices. most police departments give away free locking devices. HB585 - Mundon King I do not support this bill changes little firearms transactions which must be performed at a already approved ATF dealer location. 1.5miles is overreach by the state. HB756 - Walker I do not support. This limits gun rights. Not protection for EMS or fire personnel HB791 - Henson I do not support. This bill eliminates the number of programs that have pneumatic bb gun competition for 4 H at private or religious schools. HB861 - Hernandez I do not support,. This bill does not exempt ems medical services or the fire service which many carry concealed when transporting patients to an emergency room or mental health facility in the duty. HB872 - Earley I support . Always a lawful citizen to store a lawfully possessed firearm and ammunition in a locked private motor vehicle parked at any parking area owned or controlled by the Commonwealth. HB1141 - Cordoza I support HB1174 - Sickles I do not support changing the definition of an assault weapon widely and increasing the age which will make little difference. HB1198 - Scott, P.A. I support in reducing the fee
Vietnam Veteran - Retired Special Agent & LEO ( military 19 yrs & Federal 10 plus years) - that is me. Please consider the Bill of Rights; law abiding citizens rights to freedoms and rights of self protection. Criminals don’t follow laws against violence and criminal acts. Thank you
I oppose all of the gun control measures proposed in this session. I support Mr. Freitas' proposal for permitless carry.
Seems to me the General Assembly needs to pay attention to the Supreme Court rulings. Most of these bills if not all ignore what the Court has ruled on. Does the Gov. of Virginia think they are above the highest court in the land? Also, do not think for a Nano second that I believe these bills are about crime control. They are all about people control PERIOD. A Tyrannical state. I will fight this!!
I am submitting comments in opposition to these anti-gun rights bills. These bills do nothing to increase actual safety of Virginians. They serve only to further infringe upon our Second Amendment rights and those rights enshrined in our Virginia Constitution. Instead of focusing on the root causes of violent crimes, Democrats have chosen to target lawful Virginians' firearms rights. Most of these bills are a false solution for non-existent problems. Some of these bills would flagrantly be un-Constitutional and in opposition to prior U.S. Supreme Court decisions to include the Heller and Bruen decisions. In the 2023 Virginia elections, no candidate ran on a pro-gun control platform, therefore no mandate was handed to the House to implement such infringements. Virginians made our pro-Second Amendment stance clear in RIchmond in January 2020 when 40,000 people rallied against similar bills during that session and over 95% of Virginia counties' Board of Supervisors passed Second Amendment Sanctuary statuses. I urge the Committee Members to vote No on these bills. Thank you.
As a constituent, I urge you to OPPOSE the following bills: HB 12, Jones, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon, requires all firearms in a home be secured if there is a minor in the home. Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, prevents home-based gun dealers from operating within 1.5 miles of a school. Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, makes it illegal for anyone under 21 to purchase any kind of firearm. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen.
NOT ONE OF THESE BILLS ARE CONSTITUTIONAL &/OR NECESSARY! THEY'RE SIMPLY SOLUTIONS IN SEARCH OF NONEXISTENT PROBLEMS! HB 12: Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23: Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158: Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183: Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585: Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791: Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861: Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174: A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen. Thank you.
HB 12, Jones - requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. These requirements represent an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under the Supreme Court's Bruen decision and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon, requires all firearms in a home be secured if there is a minor in the home. Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, prevents home-based gun dealers from operating within 1.5 miles of a school. Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, makes it illegal for anyone under 21 to purchase any kind of firearm. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen.
This is just a solution in search of a problem. Don't make laws we do not need. Thank you!
So there is nothing as important in and for Virginia other then Supporting Communist Legislation against the Constitution of VA and the US Constitution that all this effort must be the first thing on the agenda when a Demo-rat Majority is fraudulently elected to the House and Senate. You fools must make the people that pay you off very happy to have you ear and sell yourself to the Communist Party. Demo-rats are an embarrassment to Freedom and Good Government. Patrick Henry, you may have heard of him? Show me that age and country where the rights and liberties of the people were placed on the sole chance of their rulers being good men, without a consequent loss of liberty? ********************************** The eternal difference between right and wrong does not fluctuate, it is immutable. ********************************** The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government - lest it come to dominate our lives and interests. ********************************** Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? ********************************** Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined.... The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun.
I strongly support House bills 12, 23, 158, 183, 351, 861 and 585, These bills will make our communities safer by requiring safe storage of firearms, banning the sales of assault weapons to people under 21 years of age, and restricting the public places where people can carry firearms, including mental health facilities. Safe storage will protect children and teens from inadvertent shootings and school shootings, and everyone from suicide. Waiting periods for purchase can prevent impulsive misuse. I oppose bills 389, 872, 1141, and 1198. Allowing more guns into more places will not make us safer. Every shooter is a law-abiding citizen with 2nd amendment rights, until they open fire on other people. I don't trust a "good guy" with a gun to have the current training or expertise to shoot down a criminal without accidentally hitting innocent people, or themselves. There is always the threat that a criminal will grab a gun from the "good guy" and turn it on him/her. As a diplomat representing the United States in foreign countries during my 33 years in the U.S. State Department, my heart bled every time we had another mass shooting. People there would ask me, "What is wrong with your society?" The first seven gun safety bills passed in 2020 made Virginia a leader in gun safety legislation. Subsequent shootings, such as six-year old shooting his teacher with his mother's gun, demonstrate the need for evidence-driven initiatives that will reduce gun death and injuries in our Commonwealth.
HB 1174, Sickles, makes it illegal for anyone under 21 to purchase any kind of firearm. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen.
I urge you to OPPOSE the following bills: HB 12, HB 23, HB 158, HB 183, HB 585, HB 791, HB 1174 For some of these bills... they are meaningless, as they are already covered by Federal Law... the committee and legislature should not be wasting time on bills and laws that are already on the books! For some of the other bills... they are already deemed UNCONSTITUTIONAL under the 2nd Amendment and existing Supreme Court decisions. If these become law, they have a high probably of being voided/vacated within a year or two. Aside from taking away existing rights of Virginia citizens in that time... you will ensure lawyers on both sides of the issue will make a lot of money so they can drive fancy cars and send their kids to expensive schools. Stop indirectly putting money (half of which are paid with tax dollars) in lawyers’ pockets. I'd rather our courts address real crime and issues... not laws already deemed unconstitutional. Many of these bills attempt to create a tactical "solution"... except that the specific problem the "solution" addresses doesn't or never existed or occurred in the Commonwealth. I request that my elected officials address meaningful solutions, and ensure existing rights of law-abiding citizens are not infringed upon. Thank you for your time.
These proposals are solutions in search of problems. Many of these violate the Bruen decision. I would love for us to eliminate sovereign immunity. These politicians must be able to be sued personally, held both criminally and civilly liable for any vote in favor of a law, if they knew or should have known it violates or God given rights.
I feel violated. This legislation scares me and I'm a constituent. Show me the evidence that the legislation you are proposing will actually reduce crime and violence. There is none. These are "do something" acts that restrict my right as a good, sane, sober, moral and prudent citizen to keep and bear arms. If there were a violent criminal act for which I was now unprepared, restricted in my ability to defend innocent life, who will bear responsibility for that?
Good afternoon Delegates, I stand in opposition to all of these unconstitutional bills that will not do anything to curb and only demonize legal, lawful Virginians. Also, many of these bill are redundant to either existing commonwealth law or federal regulations. Lawful firearm owners are the back bone of this great commonwealth and country. I urge you all to recognize that Virginia is one of the safest states in the nation and that all of these proposed laws are violations of the Constitution and should not moved forward to a vote. Thank you for your time and consideration on this very important matter D Scott Burns
As a born and bred Virginian; a father and husband; a disabled veteran and active member in the community; I cannot understand why individuals who are elected, willingly do what they can to violate both the Virginia and United States Constitutions to penalize law-abiding citizens such as myself. I have spent a life of duty and dedication in service and occupations to protect our State and Country from those who wish to subjecgate its citizens or worse. Not only do all of these restrictions seek a perspective only solution, they do so at the cost of innocent citizens. Law-abiding citizens do not commit drug gang offenses, home invasions, mass shootings. These are the acts of career criminals or mentally disturbed individuals. None of these proposed bills addresses those issues or the deeper problem of why people are so quick to commit these acts. Murder is murder, whether a gun is used or a cane, it is still wrong. I'm more concerned about why, instead of the tool. Obviously, certain politicians are only worried about the tools. These proposed bills are all clearly agenda focused without factual information to support true results that may be gained by violating state and federal laws to enact. The Supreme Court very clearly defined the right to arms and most of these bills would violate those freedoms. Nor is it legislators purview to dictate what citizens do with what they have within the confines if their own home. THAT, is yet another violation. It is also disturbing that legislators seem to be focused on separating Virginia from reciprocity, thus affecting relations with other states, which ultimately led to a civil war last time. They are also creating more areas where people who mean to harm can do so without fear of being stopped such as adding a new gun free zone. This is a very bad and ill-conceived premise. If the point has not been made yet, then perhaps citizens need to start holding legislators civilly responsible for lives lost as a result of such zones. Clearly they are not effective. I ask that you stop operating under partisan politics and quid pro quo agendas which only serve to penalize and subjegate our citizenry. This is not what servicemembers and veterans served, sacrificed and vowed to defend. Freedom has a cost, and it is difficult to understand, especially through the fear and pain. There is NO such thing as safety. There never was, and never will be. America has MANY enemies out there in the world, and it's citizens; it's armed citizens; are the LAST line of defense. Continuing to attempt to disarm law-abiding citizens only further prompts the question by citizens for the legislators... "Whose side are you truly on?" Please repeal these bills and focus more on actual crime, deterrence for early release, stiffer penalties for existing criminals who continue to commit them and stop bringing in more and more illegal immigrants. Thank you for your attention. Lessons of the Past, Lost to Actions of the Present, Will Forever Damn the Future. -Sean Flippin - 1989
Please stop wasting our money, as a taxpayer, on initiatives and regulation that are at best ineffective and at worst making things safer for Criminals. Creating areas that are gun-free makes safe areas for Criminals as they know that their victims will not have the tools necessary to defend themselves. Stop trying to make us, the public, less safe. Stop releasing criminals, especially repeat-offenders, Releasing criminals causes us to acquire tools to keep ourselves and our families safe.
As a constituent, I urge you to OPPOSE the following bills: HB 12, Jones, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon, requires all firearms in a home be secured if there is a minor in the home. Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, prevents home-based gun dealers from operating within 1.5 miles of a school. Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, makes it illegal for anyone under 21 to purchase any kind of firearm. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen. I thank you. Mr. & Mrs Lon Horiuchi
Everyone of these bills further restricting the rights of the law abiding citizen should be voted down.
This bill must be OPPOSED. These bills do NOTHING to prevent/reduce crime. In fact, these types of bills will eventually ENABLE and allow MORE crime (just look at crime in Maryland and DC) by reducing Virginian's ability to adequately and easily protect themselves. This bill is immoral, unjust, unconstitutional and racist as it will HARM black and brown people, other minorities, women, the elderly, and children who will be the eventual victims as a result of laws like this. Using these types of bills to slowly deny the public's human right of self defense will NOT save lives or keep people safe. This has been proven again and again. As lawmakers, you have an obligation to ensure that the laws you enact *protect* our God-given, human right of self defense -- you should *not* be disenfranchising us and making us MORE vulnerable to crime and injustices with these ignorant bills. Thank you.
You don't want 18 to 20 yearolds to buy guns but it's OK to send them overseas with rifles, grenades, pistols, etc. and risk their lives? If they can pass the background check they should be allowed to buy a gun. Didn't the Bruen case settle this??
As a voting resident and veteran I strongly OPPOSE the following bills: HB 12, Jones, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon, requires all firearms in a home be secured if there is a minor in the home. Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, prevents home-based gun dealers from operating within 1.5 miles of a school. Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, makes it illegal for anyone under 21 to purchase any kind of firearm. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen. This bills have gone beyond the scope of "safety" and are clearly an attempt to strip the constitutional rights of law abiding citizens of this great Commonwealth. The majority of these bills have already been struck down my the SCOTUS. Remember your oath: I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God. v/r Thomas Speich
I do not support any proposed gun restriction bills. I have been a resident of VA for 40 years and have never been in trouble with the law. I do not think the bills that are being proposed will deter gun violence. The issue is not guns. It is mental health.
Dear Democrats proposing duplicative and unconstitutional bills: It is apparent that you seek to propose bills that ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL based on the US Supreme Court. Please reference the Heller and Bruen decisions. It would appear you are taking that as a mere suggestion? Further, the "catch me if you can" approach to lawmaking is ridiculous. Yes, we know the strategy made famous by Obama...pass laws you know are unconstitutional knowing it will take ~5 years and millions of dollars to undo them. In the interim, the damage is done. This is the stuff of tyrants. HB 12: DUPLICATIVE OF FEDERAL LAW. HB 23: UNCONSTITUTIONAL UNDER BRUEN. HB 158: DUPLICATIVE OF FEDERAL LAW. HB 183: DUPLICATIVE. 14 and under is covered. There are many cases were 15, 16, 17 year olds defending themselves and family from crime using firearms. HB 585: UNCONSTITUTIONAL. HB 791: a solution looking for a problem. Most normal people grew up playing with BB guns. Cite all the crime associated with BB guns? HB 861: UNCONSTITUTIONAL UNDER BRUEN. HB 1174: UNCONSTITUTIONAL UNDER BRUEN. already heard and struck down in other states. The disarmament agenda is tiresome. If you spent half the energy in Richmond, Hampton, Norfolk, and Petersburg, 95%+ of "gun violence" would be taken care of. Your main perpetrator group is black men killing black men, 18-34. Don't you read the Virginia Crime Commission's reports? if you were serious, you'd be going after ACTUAL criminals vs. passing meaningless laws that only impact the law abiding.
HB 12, Jones, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure - Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon - Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, is Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, is not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen.
We are encouraging our state politicians to work on meaningful solutions that will actually help reduce gun violence, violence in general, theft, and improve the quality of our lives. Let's start enforcing current laws that are reasonable and remove those that aren't. Work on quickly improving the number of quality jobs in VA. Through good local educational services that focus on the required skills, people can improve their own lives, the lives of their family, and have more hope for the future. Childcare assistance can help families that are working. It's time to create a new playbook and stop passing additional restrictive laws that only burden our citizens and families. Start improving our lives which leads to less violence, good jobs, and strong families that can raise our children better.
Why is it that you want to continue to go against your sworn oath to office and institute further gun restrictions and control on law biding citizens? With control of the senate and house why don't you focus on the root of the problem which is more to improve the socio-economic issues regions face which should in turn lower drug and gang related problems which in turn is the true reason behind your "gun violence" issue you continue to speak on. WE DO NOT HAVE A GUN VIOLENCE ISSUE, we have violence issue that you need to address not through more gun restrictions. Enough with the gun control bills, it is the first thing the democratic party pushes when they get control of the majority. Use this time to better the communities or is that just tok difficult for you? As all you want to do is make it so criminals have more power over law biding citizens, pull our children into gang and drug culture and go easy on crime so they know there is no accountability for their actions.
I wish congress would treat firearms and firearms owners in Virginia like they do illegal aliens. Turn a blind eye to them and just let them be free. Never make rules about securing access or entry to them. Ensure that none of them need paperwork or if they do, wait so long before you check to make sure any of it is accurate, you never find the illegals and in this case, firearms. That would be swell.
"The right to keepand bear arms shall not be infringed..." Those who carry firearms should not leave them in vehicles. Many guns used in crimes are stolen, often from vehicles. Hospitals and other places people gather are where trained armed civilians can thwart a crime or mass shooting. The AR-15 is a civilian multi-purpose rifle -- easy to operate, inexpensive, accurate, low recoil, low cost ammo, and potentially lethal when necessary. It is the best rifle ever invented for U.S. civilian use...hunting, self and home defense, and target shooting. Resources in VA should be used for law enforcement, crime prevention and mental health. Take ILLEGAL guns off the streets.
Given the second amendment of the constitution, there shall be no laws that prevent me from being able to protect myself. I am a conceal carry holder and have been for almost 10 years now. We vehemently oppose any laws that would prevent Conceal Carry Holders from carrying our weapon. Our goal is to have protection and not need it rather than needing protection, and not being able to have it. We will not comply.
When will misguided legislators learn that infringing the right of law abiding citizens to exercise our Second Amendment liberties does nothing to make the public safe? In fact, it makes us all less safe because criminals love restrictions on lawful firearm ownership. Wake up! Follow the Constitution. “The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed!” Bishop E.W. Jackson STAND Virginia PAC
First, SCOTUS has addressed gun rights; access to magazines & ammo multiple times. Multiple times, SCOTUS' decision has sided with law abiding gun owners. I am curious as to why you continue to suppress our God given constitutionally protected right to bear arms? I can only assume one of two reasons. Either (A) you are completely uneducated as to the writers of the constitution, as well as their separate and several memoirs on the right to keep and bear arms; and furthermore ignorant of the right of the People to keep and bear arms as a result of the People having fought against tyranny using NOT federally provided military arms and ammunition - rather, PRIVATELY owned arms and ammunition. Below are just a few examples of historically accurate statements on said RIGHTS : “No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.” – Thomas Jefferson, Virginia Constitution, Draft 1, 1776 “A strong body makes the mind strong. As to the species of exercises, I advise the gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it gives boldness, enterprise and independence to the mind. Games played with the ball, and others of that nature, are too violent for the body and stamp no character on the mind. Let your gun therefore be your constant companion of your walks.” – Thomas Jefferson, letter to Peter Carr, August 19, 1785 “Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops.” – Noah Webster, An Examination of the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution, October 10, 1787 “To disarm the people…[i]s the most effectual way to enslave them.” – George Mason, The Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution, June 14, 1788 “I ask who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers.” – George Mason, Address to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 4, 1788 My questions are simply these, who do you expect to follow these laws that you put forth? Criminals? Why would you expect someone who is a CRIMINAL to obey the law? Maybe you should take some time and learn the definition? Which brings me to part (B) as to why I think you are trying to bar citizens from owning semi-auto rifles & there average magazines - you fear us to the point where you want to disarm us in much the same way HITLER disarmed HIS constituency. Clearly Thomas Jefferson had it correct - when he said “The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes…. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.” – Thomas Jefferson, Commonplace Book (quoting 18th century criminologist Cesare Beccaria), 1774-1776. Tyranny is the only reasonable explanation for your efforts because the lies spread by the US Government regarding death tolls, etc., is a complete fallacy. All you have to do is a little independent research regarding 'mass shootings.' And yes, private citizens did in fact have legal ownership of canons all the way through the Civil War era. Only an idiot would believe the lies that they did not.
In Caetano v. Massachusetts (2016), the Supreme Court reiterated its earlier rulings that "the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding" and that its protection is not limited to "only those weapons useful in warfare". New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen (2022) is a landmark: [ In a 6–3 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that New York's law was unconstitutional and that the ability to carry a pistol in public was a constitutional right guaranteed by the Second Amendment. — A 2022 poll found that 64% of Americans were in favor of the ruling in contrast with 35% of Americans that say they oppose the decision.[50] Additionally, 36%, the largest single share, said they strongly support the Court's ruling in contrast with 16% who said they strongly oppose it. The Legal Aid Society said the decision "may be an affirmative step toward ending arbitrary licensing standards that have inhibited lawful Black and Brown gun ownership in New York."[46] Former house minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R‑CA) supported the ruling, saying it "rightfully ensures the right of all law-abiding Americans to defend themselves without unnecessary government interference."[47] Law professor Steve Vladeck said the decision will "have monumental ramifications far beyond carrying firearms in public" and predicts there will be a "slew of litigation challenging any and every gun-control measure". Tread AROUND the 2nd amendment to our Constitution of the United States of America. Around it. Not on it; not lightly upon it! Carefully consider your vote! (Attachment: Photo of one night of a dangerous riot in a public place.)
Please leave law abiding citizens alone and focus the Commonwealth’s limited resources on the arrest, conviction, and incarceration of violent individuals. Paul Trible Blue Grass, VA
Suggest instead of Firearms Safety Subcommittee... Crimes Safety Subcommittee. greatly more effective! THE REAL ISSUE!
None of these proposals will impact the behavior of a criminal - only making law abiding citizens vulnerable as a new "gun free" zone attracts people seeking to make a statement with a gun and want time to do so before someone with a gun shows up. Additionally, most of these targeted problems are not currently problems or represent a growing trend that needs additional protections enacted to address. In my view, these bills have limited to no chance to provide additional protections or impact criminal behavior but DO further strip your constituents God give rights to provide the illusion of protection.
As a constituent, I urge you to OPPOSE the following bills: HB 12, Jones, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon, requires all firearms in a home be secured if there is a minor in the home. Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, prevents home-based gun dealers from operating within 1.5 miles of a school. Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, makes it illegal for anyone under 21 to purchase any kind of firearm. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen.
I'm a volunteer with Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America, and I support this bill.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support the following bills: HB1174, HB1181, HB1195, HB12, HB1424, HB1462, HB158, HB175, HB183, HB23, HB270, HB318, HB319, HB351, HB362, HB585, HB602, HB637, HB791, HB797, HB798, HB799, HB861, HB916, & HB945 I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I oppose these bills: HB1030, HB1141, HB1198, HB1230, HB1235, HB1321, HB1325, HB1386, HB289, HB389, HB756, & HB872 Innocent children are dying on our watch. Please do something.
My fellow Virginia’s I write today to comment on the bills before you. I am a retired Army veterans. I grew up in Virginia, went to ODU and instead of seeking residency in other states, stayed a Virginian and paid taxes while on active duty. I fought in war and lost good Soldiers and friends defending this nation, you and our Constitution. I retired in Virginia because I love this state. Your body will decide, with its vote, to either infringe on our rights or defend them. I ask you to defend them like those friends and Soldiers that also did. I am a responsible gun owner who raised his children to be responsible gun owners (all three are serving or served). I am also a CCP holder who is willing to defend his fellow citizens. If you vote for any of these bills to limit our rights it will impact my ability to defend myself and my family. Please do the right thing and defend the 2nd Amd. My wife and I already decided to leave the state if you enact these measures to limit our rights. Thank you Oliver Rose
HB 12, Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen.
The selected bills are unconstitutional! They must be voted down!
This proposed legislation is blatantly unconstitutional and, if passed, it will, no doubt, be challenged in court. The taxpayers of Virginia will then be obligated to defend these unconstitutional measures, and those defenses will almost certainly lose. This will result in costly, meaningless court costs for all Virginia taxpayers. Those tax dollars could be spent on more meaningful and productive activities that benefit all citizens.
HB 23 above disarms legally armed citizens while doing nothing to prevent crime. It makes another "self defense free" zone where criminals will ignore it.
All of these anti 2nd amendment bills DO NOT represent the vast majority of the citizenry of Virginia. All of these anti-gun bills will do absolutely nothing to impact crime, and are only a form of punishment to responsible gun owners in the commonwealth. These bills are meant to only meant to elicit “feel-good” emotions for those sensing they are impacting gun crime. Stop letting criminals go free early and do not focus the legislatures efforts on infringing on the rights of the people to legally defend themselves from those who mean to do grievous harm.
It is outrageous that the General Assembly is using our 2nd Amendment right to punish law abiding citizens who have done nothing wrong other then to defend themselves. It’s clear that Democrats pander to their bases without a thought about the citizens of this Commonwealth or this nation. This issue amongst others, galvanize the voters to get out and vote for the party that does not seek to encroach our rights under the State and Federal Constitution. There is zero proof that We The People are deranged killers, a mob or even the radical right that the Democrat who currently occupies the White House has said. He’d called us Nazis and portrayed honest, hardworking and law abiding citizens as the problem. We are not. Opens border, out of control spending, child indoctrination and parroting the DNC is the problem that is self inflicted and deserves nothing less then our disgust and rebuke come November 2024. The General Assembly reflects the divide between Northern Virginia to Richmond and the difference in South Eastern, Western Virginia. The Democrat party and Legislature know full well that gun control laws if enacted, will not reduce violence but increase victimhood that they’ll blame on Republicans and the cycle continues. Pathetic fools and they wonder why I’ve stopped contributing to candidates who never deliver to fools who govern us.
Please, NO more gun control. You all KNOW that criminals do not follow your laws. All your gun control does is limit my and my family's rights to self defense and peaceful enjoyment of the shooting sports. Instead, put, and keep, actual violent offenders in jail. It really is that simple.
As a woman and a 30 plus year Emergency Department nurse I ask you to reject these onerous gun control laws. Laws like these discourage women who are most at risk from being able to obtain the means to defend themselves. I worked many a late night shift in Northern Virginia and walked through empty parking lots and garages worried about my safety. Women should not have to suffer this and should have ready access to the means to defend themselves. You aren't disarming criminals your are disarming women.
The bills under consideration will do nothing to increase the safety of Virginians while infringing on our right to defend ourselves. They are designed to make it more difficult to obtain a firearm, possess a firearm, or use a firearm to defend oneself or others. Meanwhile criminals will continue unabated. Moreover, most of these unconstitutional laws have been rendered moot as they have been struck down by state and federal courts. As a former police officer and detective I implore you to reject these useless and unconstitutional laws. Thank you
No more gun control legislation. It's not the gun that's the issue. It's the mentally ill folks that obtained a gun.
I strongly oppose these bills as they are direct infringements on the 2nd Amendment of The Constitution. Most of these have already been found to be unconstitutional by various courts yet they are still being presented as bills. I am completely against these and any other such bills that infringe on the constitutional and inalienable rights of the Citizens of the United States of America and of the Commonwealth of Virginia.
No more unconstitutional gun control.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support these bills. I expect to see more gun violence prevention legislation *actually pass* since there is so much nonpartisan alignment on this topic. The status quo is unacceptable. Our pro-gun culture is a threat to our children, and a slap in the face to every person who has lost their lives to gun violence. Enough is enough - policy over prayers.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support this bill.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support this bill. Gun violence in our communities and in our state is heartbreaking and changes need to be made to protect the citizens of Virginia.
I am a member of Virginia moms for change and I support these bills.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change and I support these bills. To all responsible gun owners: you shouldn't be afraid of these common sense bills. These bills are directed at people who are not handling their firearms as the deadly weapons that they can be. Instead of thinking your rights are being taken away, consider instead how safe storage, permits and waiting periods could help the daily gun violence in our country. Keep your guns, we are not trying to take them away. These bills are an opportunity for you, as a responsible gun owner, to be a part of the solution to help cut down on needless violence.
Remember Delegates...you took an Oath to 'Support and Defend the Constitution of the Unites States of America' which includes the 2nd Amendment!
I oppose this bill. If we expect 18 year-olds to sign up for Selective Service and become eligible for the draft, then they should be able to purchase any kind of firearm they want. If an 18 year-old can be drafted into, or enlist in, the military and utilize firearms on behalf of our Country, then they should be able to purchase whatever firearms they so choose. If our society does not trust anyone under the age of 21 with specific types of firearms, then I suggest we look at raising the draft age to 21. Alternatively, if someone is younger than 21, but they are serving in the military, work in law enforcement, or are a first responder....they should be added in as exceptions to this bill. If our society trusts specific people under the age of 21 to put their lives on the line and act in a mature manner to protect us, then we should display that same level of trust and confidence in them & allow them to purchase "assault weapons" or any other type of firearm.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change and I support the selected bills. I believe they will make our communities safer and that gun violence is a critical issue we must address with such legislation and more.
I am a member of Virginia Mom's for Change, a group working towards gun violence prevention. We support the bills indicated above.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group. I support bills HB1174 HB1181 HB1195 HB12 HB1424 HB1462 HB158 HB175 HB183 HB23 HB270 HB318 HB319 HB351 HB362 HB585 HB602 HB637 HB791 HB798 HB799 HB861 HB916 HB945
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group. I support bills HB1174 HB1181 HB1195 HB12 HB1424 HB1462 HB158 HB175 HB183 HB23 HB270 HB318 HB319 HB351 HB362 HB585 HB602 HB637 HB791 HB798 HB799 HB861 HB916 HB945
and I support these bills. The bills we support are: HB1174, HB1181, HB1195, HB12, HB1424, HB1462, HB158, HB175, HB183, HB23, HB270, HB318, HB319, HB351, HB362, HB585, HB602, HB637, HB791, HB797, HB798, HB799, HB861, HB916, & HB945
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support these bills. The bills we support are: HB1174, HB1181, HB1195, HB12, HB1424, HB1462, HB 158, HB175, HB183, HB23, HB270, HB318, HB319, HB351, HB362, HB585, HB602, HB637, HB791, HB797, HB798, HB799, HB861, HB916, & HB945
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support these bills. The bills we support are: HB1174, HB1181, HB1195, HB12, HB1424, HB1462, HB158, HB175, HB183, HB23, HB270, HB318, HB319, HB351, HB362, HB585, HB602, HB637, HB791, HB797, HB798, HB799, HB861, HB916, & HB945
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support this bill.
SCOTUS and other numerous federal court rulings have consistently been striking down so called "assault weapon" (a partisan, disgusting lie) bans and magazine capacity restrictions because of them being unconstitutional. Additionally, these laws do absolutely nothing to enhance public safety, and the statistics demonstrate this time and time again. Place this bill in the shredder where it belongs.
"Assault weapons" is a made up term designed to scare people into submission and it is constantly morphing to fit the narrative being pushed. One day it is fully automatic "military style" rifles, next day it is any semi automatic handgun, next day its anything including certain scary "features," etc. Implementing unconstitutional restrictions based on an ambiguous definition is problematic on its own. Adding in further unconstitutional restrictions based on age is another problem. How can someone be old enough to vote, join the military, enter into contracts, etc but not be old enough to own common use firearms?
I oppose this bill. Judge Robert Payne already ruled this unconstitutional in an opinion written early in 2023. 18 to 20 year olds should not have their legal and constructional rights stripped or be treated as second class citizens. Additionally, "assault firearms" is not a real time and is a scare tactic used to confuse the general public. If this bill is passed, the definitions of what is prohibited are so poorly defined we the people will be subjected to the whims of a select few in state government.
18 to 20 year olds are not second class citizens. 18 year olds were required to bring their own firearms to muster for training at the founding of our country. So they were able to purchase firearms. Several court cases have rules that a ban on 18 to 20 years olds was unconstitutional.
The end of solitary confinement must be done My son was murdered in solitary confinement at Red Onion Prison in Pound Va on 1/3/22.
Our Constitution does not provide citizens with privileges. It establishes a government with checks and balances and specifically limits the governments ability to remove the rights of its people. In regards to the matter at hand, it specifically says the the government cannot place limitations on the right of a citizen to keep and bear arms. Before I get the typical response, I know you are already aware that the phrase "well regulated" specifically refers to an being trained and ready to bear said arms. The language at the time did not use the term "regulated" as we do with modern regulations. It has been proven in the courts repeatedly that the laws you are currently considering are unconstitutional. Of this I am sure you are already aware. By spending time and tax dollars discussing laws that you know to be unconstitutional, you are in fact wasting time and tax dollars that could be spent on productive issues. I can only assume your intent is to intentionally waste time, and force members of the firearms industry to waste money on legal fees defending the constitution you have sworn to uphold. Please consider actual data and actual facts when considering gun legislation. No data supports the claim the "assault weapon" bans actually reduce gun related crime. More guns are being purchased now than ever before, yet now that the latest FBI data has been released, we can see that gun related crimes have not increased. Also, like every year that the FBI has released data, so called "assault weapons" make up a very small portion of all gun crimes. For your general knowledge the term "assault weapon" was first coined by Adolf Hitler. He renamed one of their new automatic firearms, the Sturmgewehr, because he felt that the name "assault weapon" would strike fear in allied forces. This is also the exact reason the gun control community uses this term as well. The fact is that these firearms are not fully automatic and cannot be made so without a high degree of machining skills and mechanical knowhow. Plus doing so is already illegal. The fact is the Biden's latest gun control act has not been equally enforced. It was supposed to provide additional support for school security and mental health services. It was supposed to provide stronger punishments for those cought breaking existing gun laws. It was supposed to allow FFL's to use the NICS system to check employees. It was supposed to allow FFL's to be able to instantly check inventory or potential purchase/trades by their serial number to determine if the firearm has been stolen or used in any crimes. None of these provisions have been acted upon or enforced. Please drop these latest gun control bills. They are unconstitutional and will never pass. Please do not waste your time and our tax dollars on these wasted efforts. Regards, Jonathan Goodman
HB1416 - Deputy sheriffs; minimum number funded by Compensation Board.
I oppose all these unconstitutional, dangerous, and pointless laws.
Dear Sir or Madame. Last year in Newport News I was assaulted by a 27 year old black man from Chesapeake because of his road rage.. This was at my local bank 11;30 in the morning. This young man almost lost his life at my hand because you cannot reel in your problem young men. His words feet from me were ' im going to kick your ass and then kill you'. My pistol changed his mind. I saw for myself the woke judges and a woke system that perpetuates the problem. The criminal justice system has been flung far far left which IS causing a public safety hazzard. No new gun control is needed. More jail time for the trash that i dealt with is. My Congressman Bobby Scott and Delegate Cia Price do not represent me.
This debate over guns was settled in 1791. We have all the laws we need to cover the action of a criminal. Murder is illegal no matter the tool used. Assualt is illegal no matter the tool used. Your ridiculous attack on the rights of all Virginians is just another chapter in the failure our our legislature to deal with the true issues that plague our state. Restore our rights and work to better the state and stop with the petty and vindictive law making that only hurts the innocent. Every day our governing bodies from congress to you become less relevant as a part of our lives, since all you ever manage to do is destroy and steal.
In Ohio one year after constitution carry passed gun crimes went down
I've commend prior on these issue but would like to reemphasize that more laws of these nature only impose on those of us that already obey the law and I think that you could explain this to your constituents demanding more gun control. I always find it ironic and dubious that those wanting more gun control either don't own a gun, have never fired a gun or don't want to purchase one but wish to infringe upon those of us who are responsible gun owners. Many of these bills on gun control shouldn't even be proposed and if you are supporting these bills you're being dishonest to your own base in tell them that this will reduce crime. It can't reduce crime and never has since other cities such as Chicago ,crime ALWAYS increases with more gun control and Always goes down with less in most situations. I have friend who lives in Chicago and had to sue because they outlawed all firearms several years back. The citizens won that case and were allowed to own AR-15's and all various forms of semi automatic fire arms pistol and rifle. According to him and the data CRIME WENT DOWN. The exception to gun laws which are already on the book as always is proper back ground checks so criminals cannot exploit the legal process by purchasing as a felon. As for removing someone's rights to own a gun under a DUI or DWI I fail to see any relevance or correlation and causation to the issue of guns in general. I am apposed to all these gun control bills and support the two pro guns bills being proposed.
HB12 - Handguns; firearm locking device required for sale or transfer, child safety warning required.
My name is Laura, and I’m your constituent. Gun violence prevention is my top priority. Please support hi. Safety legislation that is brought up for a vote. These are the bills I support. Thank you for your time.
I am opposed to all of these unconstitutional and anit-american gun laws and regulations. There is no room for more gun laws and regulations in this state.
Contrary to how certain government officials treat it, the second amendment is written using plain, easy to understand language, and insists that government has no right to take away the right for ordinary people like us to defend ourselves, as the constitution and bill of rights do not simply give people rights, but protects them from government manipulation and control. It’s incredibly disappointing and a tragedy that people choose to commit acts of violence with these rights, but restricting those who wish to exercise their rights peaceably due to those who wouldn’t follow these rules in the first place is incredibly naive. I, as well as every other person in the United States, deserve to protect my family with the best technology available. While some people look at certain defense weapon setups as a “why do you need that” situation, 1) I have the right to defend myself with the best tool available, and so I will choose that every time, 2) why do you “need” anything other than basic necessities (fast car, Gucci clothes, etc)? The government has no place in deciding what I “need”, 3) people with the intent to harm will not care what laws govern peaceful people, so what would limiting the victim’s access to proper tools do? You may think that by “banning” or otherwise restricting access to a certain thing would mean that all of the “bad” things would magically go away, but they will not. Evil has always and will always exist, and I have every right to defend myself from it using the best tool available wherever I, or my family, choose to go. Restricting access on certain properties (the government isn’t actively protecting me everywhere), requiring certain training (who is paying for this?), limiting certain types of firearms (go ahead and define “assault weapon” in plain language please), and restricting ammo purchasing (I thought you wanted us to train; how does this help then?) are all means that end up hurting the average person and helping those who wish to hurt others, as the rest of us will be left in a position to insufficiently defend ourselves. I urge you to understand that while, yes, it is awful that evil people commit horrific acts, this right ultimately allows me to protect myself and my family from these evil people as well and as evil will always exist (we certainly like to delusion ourselves into believing that we live in a utopia, but we do not), I will protect my family accordingly. The government has no right to restrict this. Leave the peaceful citizens alone, more firmly punish those who hurt others, and help communities where this is an issue to prevent the upbringing of more evil people.
I oppose these bills that are attacking the rights of law-abiding gun owners.
Please stop trying to make criminals of law abiding citizens who just want to protect themselves. Me and my partner have recently become firearm owners because of situations that have arisen in our day to day lives, such as harassment of my wife almost to the point of altercation, sketchy characters waiting in front of our door/ducking in and out of our bushes at all times of the night, people breaking into cars in the neighborhood etc (many times the police/security were called only to arrive 45mins to an hour later). with many of these nonsensical bills you condemn us to allowing any possible violence to happen to us without a chance of defending our selves. Instead of helping fix the problem, you seek to make criminals out of any Virginian who has followed the law and legal purchased a firearm. Shame on you. I am Virginian native and since I was 18 I voted leaning blue in local and state elections you all are making me think this was a mistake. I am not proud of Virginia “progressives” who would rather strip my wife of her chance and right to defend her self rather than try to address the root of crime. Don’t make law abiding people criminals. Do some actual work and address the criminals! 2 of the proposed bills would make in illegal to bring your concealed firearm into a restaurant and another makes it a crime to have the firearm in your vehicle…. Like really? This is literally just to fill jails and strip people of their rights.
Many of these gun laws are unfair to law abiding citizens and do not affect criminals. These gun laws should be vetoed.
Leave law abiding citizens alone.
State Legislature members, A right delayed is a right denied. Quoting the 2022 NYSRPA v. Bruen Supreme Court Case: 'The constitutional right to bear arms in public for self-defense is not “a second-class right, subject to an entirely different body of rules than the other Bill of Rights guarantees.” McDonald, 561 U. S., at 780 (plurality opinion). The exercise of other constitutional rights does not require individuals to demonstrate to government officers some special need. The Second Amendment right to carry arms in public for self defense is no different.' The recent NYSRPA v. Bruen case highlighted the significance of individual self-defense, and it's crucial to consider the rights of law-abiding citizens in crafting firearm legislation. While the goal of enhancing public safety is commendable, an outright ban on certain firearms and magazines will disproportionately impact responsible gun owners who use these tools for legitimate purposes, such as self-defense and sport. It is essential to strike a balance between public safety and the preservation of individual rights. Instead of blanket bans, and bureaucratic obstacles that only harass lawful firearm owners, we should focus on comprehensive measures that address the root causes of gun violence. This approach respects the constitutional rights of citizens while fostering a safer society. Criminals are not deterred by restrictions on lawful purchase at federally-licensed FFL Dealers. They do not bother going through the process of applying for a concealed carry permit, because they do not intend to carry lawfully. People who want to use weapons to hurt innocent citizens of Virginia will not be impeded by these House and Senate Bills. Instead, the only individuals who will have their behavior modified are lawful men and women who are unable to defend themselves against those who will commit crimes regardless of what is written into law this Legislative Session. If you pass the above laws, it will only serve to waste hard-working Taxpayers' money fighting them in Federal Court. California and New York have lost their cases seeking to uphold unconstitutional gun laws, and the sponsors of these bills will lose too. Do the right thing - the hard thing - enforce the laws we already have, get the small minority of violent criminals off the streets of Virginia, and uphold the constitutional rights of your polity.
These bills infringe on the rights of the United States citizens given to us by the second amendment. The only thing these bills will accomplish will take the firearms out of the hands of law abiding citizens, while criminals will still have access.
I do not support any bill that removes any right from law abiding citizens to protect themselves from those who WILL NOT abide by these laws. These laws ONLY give CRIMINALS the upper hand.
There are approximately 47 bills regarding gun control between the House and Senate. Rather than fix issues that actually protect and enhance the lives of Virginians, many of these bills seek to disenfranchise and reduce the safety of the citizens in this great Commonwealth. Firearms are so fundamental to the founding and continued existence of our free society that they are listed just second to the freedom of speech in amendments to the constitution. It is plainly clear to all that countries and states who have banned or severely restricted firearms that violence does not end with their banning. Unjust deaths are not prevented. It simply ensures that law abiding citizens are left defenseless from those that wish to harm them, whether that be individuals or an organization. I write this knowing that it will be completely disregarded by the bills authors, but in hopes that others feel galvanized to speak up against unjust actions made in the name of progress. To those who wish to protect themselves with firearms while simultaneously stripping them from the common man, may you take heed of the Virginia state motto.
A lot of these laws contradict one another. I can’t support them. Both of our parties have failed us.
Stop trying to strip 2nd Amendment rights from law abiding citizens with a constitutional right to own and carry firearms. Not a single one of these laws/bills you’re trying to enact would have stopped any of the mass shootings we’ve seen.
I oppose all of these blatantly unconstitutional bills and wish our elected officials would actually get to work on fixing things that matter to Virginians.
It is obvious these elected officials want you to die at the behest of an anarcho tyrannical state where violent perpetual offenders are off with a slap on the wrist, while YOU tax payer are criminalized for not wanting to be a victim to these perpetual perpetrators. The elected officials funded by big Pro-Death lobby of Giffords and Bloomberg sit in their cushy NOVA HOAd mansions behind security while you plebs go to work everyday to pay their salary. These same officials effectively bribe the police state by giving them a way to pay off a mortgage and boat in exchange for your oppression. YOU citizen must morally oppose these pro-Death bills. Democracy has fallen and its only driven by money hungry Babylonians who swim in excess and delicacy while YOU PLEBS cant even afford milk, eggs or pampers. Remember these people do not hold dominion over you. Call your congressman/woman and CHRIST IS KING!
Time and time again it has been proven that criminals do not care about or follow restrictive firearm laws. Virginia already has some of the most restrictive firearms laws in the country ("B+" rating from Giffords), more unconstitutional infringements upon law abiding citizens is not the answer. We need to address the root causes (access to mental health resources for example) and not throw bandaids at it by punishing responsible, law abiding, gun owners. I oppose these bills and urge you to do the same.
As a fellow Democrat, it’s important to acknowledge the complexities surrounding gun ownership and the Second Amendment. 1. Self-Defense: Firearms can be a crucial tool for individuals to protect themselves, especially in high-crime areas or situations where law enforcement response times are slow. 2. Sport and Recreation: Many Americans enjoy shooting sports like hunting, skeet shooting, and target practice as a recreational activity, fostering a sense of community and skill-building. 3. Cultural Tradition: Gun ownership is deeply ingrained in American culture, with a rich history of hunting and marksmanship passed down through generations. 4. Economic Impact: The firearms industry contributes significantly to the economy, generating jobs and revenue through manufacturing, sales, and related services. 5. Civil Liberties: Upholding the right to bear arms is fundamental to preserving individual freedoms and safeguarding against government overreach. 6. Empowerment of Marginalized Communities: For historically marginalized groups, owning firearms can serve as a means of empowerment and protection against hate crimes or discriminatory violence. 7. Emergency Preparedness: In times of natural disasters or civil unrest, responsible gun owners can help maintain order and protect their families and communities. 8. Deterrence of Crime: Research suggests that the presence of armed civilians can deter potential criminals and reduce overall crime rates in certain contexts. 9. Veterans and Law Enforcement: Many veterans and law enforcement officers transition to civilian life with a continued appreciation for firearms, utilizing their expertise for civilian defense and security. 10. Balanced Approach: Instead of blanket gun control measures, we can advocate for comprehensive solutions that address root causes of violence, such as mental health support, poverty reduction, and community intervention programs.
I oppose the proposed firearms legislation put forward by this legislature and any legislation that violates the 1st, 2nd, and 4th, amendment rights of any Virginian. The desire for safer communities, a more united nation, and healing for our public health is something that we all can share in but these bills do not achieve that. Rather, they regulate and penalize. They unconstitutionally restrict the rights of the many in the name of safety and serve only to harm our rights. I would be doing a disservice to our state and my fellow citizens if I did not also provide potential solutions or remedies to the violence we face. First, we as communities need to promote voluntary storage facilities for those who are experiencing hardship and are concerned about suicide. Ideally making it easier to put firearms safely out of reach when suicide risks are greater. To do this it would need to be a system at the lowest level with minimum government involvement besides funding and partnership with local ranges. We would also need to reach out to those in our lives who are in a bad place and encourage the use of these facilities. Second, we should promote a culture of safe handling and respect for firearms through school courses and community organizations because assault weapons or not suicide, or accidents only take one bullet from a single action firearm. Lastly and more broadly we should focus on the issues surrounding the violence. Whether it is drugs and organized criminal activity or the mental health crisis as it has become known we should be working to fix these issues first. I.e. legalize weed, adapt police training, and push to root out organized crime, promote common social values and family cohesion, increase freedom, physical activity, and discipline in the school system.
These firearms bill are either redundant or unless in any meaningful way. If you care about reducing violence, please focus on criminals. Please stop trying to disarm families and law abiding citizen from protecting themselves.
I am a liberal through and through, I believe in individual rights and the opportunity for prosperity for all. I vote democrat because I care about my community, the rights of minorities, and women’s rights. The proposed legislation limiting the ability of free, law abiding citizens to purchase firearms, carry, and general use should not be limited further. I have witnessed violence at the hands of criminals, some later caught and it was shown that they did not legally acquire these firearms. The proposed legislation will effectively stop those who abide by the laws of Virginia from being able to properly protect themselves. It is known that police will not protect you, and they have no legal obligation to do so. This puts us at a dilemma, it’s either blindly trust the police to protect us and our families or have the ability to protect ourselves. I am not advocated for looser gun laws by any means, but I am advocating for more common sense gun laws. What do I mean by this you may ask? Well I mean background checks are a must and proper certification to conceal carry. I am a former Marine, I was a firefighter, and am a current student at a great university in our nations capital. I like to think I am reasonable in my thinking, but after looking and reading the propositions I checked above, I can’t help but feel betrayed by my own party. There is more than 5 guns for every American in this country. Gun control must target the people who do not follow the law and try to prevent violence from occurring, and the proposed legislation above does not help in that manner. I am hopeful that you will read this and reconsider the language in the legislation and I am even more hopeful that I can protect my family as necessary. I will always vote for progress but that’s not to say that I will always vote against my interests. Locally, crime has been on the rise and I have had to deal with it directly with little to no help from the police. I will (to the fullest extent of the law) protect myself as necessary from anyone who wishes to inflict harm on myself or family, and I hope you see that the average citizen in Virginia can not afford a security detail or rely on our police for protection. Thank you and have a great day.
Please stop infringing on our god given right, protected by the constitution of the United States (which you all have sworn to uphold and protect), to keep and bear arms. Responsible gun owners are not the problem in America’s gun violence epidemic. We follow the law. Criminals don’t. We use our firearms to protect ourselves, loved ones, and community. Chipping away at this right we have makes us more vulnerable to becoming victims of gun violence, not protect us from it. These laws only serve to empower those with evil intentions. Rather, might I suggest harsher penalties for those who commit senseless acts of violence with firearms instead of going after the good men and women of the commonwealth who wish only to use their firearms for lawful purposes.
Dear House of Delegates, I'm writing to you today as a concerned citizen. The introduction of bills aimed at heavily regulating firearms, is not warranted or wanted by the people of Virginia. Our nation stands at a crossroads, where the desire to address gun violence intersects with the constitutional rights affirmed by the Supreme Court. The Second Amendment's protection of the right to bear arms is not just a legal directive but a reflection of our commitment to individual freedom. In this context, the proposed regulations, while motivated by a commendable desire to reduce violence, raise significant concerns about their effectiveness and the potential consequences for law-abiding citizens. Research, including findings published in the Journal of Quantitative Criminology, suggests that the relationship between strict gun laws and the reduction of gun violence is not as straightforward as one might hope. Cities with stringent gun regulations continue to face challenges with gun-related crimes, indicating that those intent on violence often find ways to circumvent the law. This reality prompts us to question whether new restrictions will achieve their intended goal or merely place additional burdens on those who seek firearms for legitimate purposes, including self-defense. Moreover, the abundance of firearms in the United States presents a logistical challenge to the enforcement of such regulations. With more guns than people in the country, the task of significantly reducing the availability of firearms to criminals, without infringing on the rights of law-abiding citizens, is daunting. It is within this complex landscape that I urge you to consider the broader implications of the proposed gun control measures. The parallels drawn with other contentious issues, such as the regulation of women's healthcare, highlight the potential for policy decisions to inadvertently infringe upon individual freedoms and deepen societal divisions. Such outcomes not only detract from the intended goals of enhancing public safety but also risk alienating segments of the population whose support is essential for the advancement of our collective well-being. I respectfully ask that you consider the potential consequences of the proposed gun control measures, not just for the immediate future but for the legacy we leave for generations to come. It is my hope that, together, we can find a way to address the challenges of gun violence in a manner that honors our values, respects our freedoms, and genuinely enhances the safety and well-being of our communities.
STOP INFRINGING OUR RIGHTS. Get rid of every single gun control bill that is here and START ENFORCING THE LAWS WE ALREADY HAVE. Stop trying to turn law abiding citizens into criminals. I am disgusted that all of these nonsense bills have even made it this far. You can have these laws in Northern Virginia where everyone hates guns but don’t force this garbage into the rest of the state. GET RID OF ALL OF THIS GARBAGE and keep your noses out of everyone’s business. More government is not the answer.
Please stop attempting to infringe on my 2nd amendment rights. Responsible gun owners are not behind any gun violence. Maybe focus on bills that will actually keep guns out of the hands of those that should not have them rather than stripping the rights away of law-abiding citizens. Not a single one of those bills will stop criminals from breaking the law, all they will do is prevent me from being able to effectively defend myself and my family against said criminal.
Virginia already has some of the strictest gun laws in the nation. We can all agree violence is an issue but making more unconstitutional, on a national and state level, gun laws will not help with the rates of violent crimes and property crimes as we see from states with stricter gun laws. We need to increase access to mental health and community resources to address the root causes of issues rather than criminalizing responsible gun owners. I am opposed to this attack on the second amendment which is the fundamental backbone that protects the other freedoms guranteed in the constitution.
The second amendment is very clear in its intent that these rights “shall not be infringed”. Removing/ restricting law abiding citizens right to self defense and protection against unwitting organizations and persons is not only more harmful, but a clear violation of the rights this country was founded on.
Dear Honorable Members of the House of Delegates, I write to you today as a concerned citizen, deeply invested in the well-being and safety of our communities, and as someone who values the principles upon which our nation was founded. The issue at hand, the introduction of bills aimed at heavily regulating firearms, is one that I believe warrants a thoughtful reconsideration in light of its broader implications. Our nation stands at a crossroads, where the desire to address gun violence intersects with the constitutional rights affirmed by the Supreme Court. The Second Amendment's protection of the right to bear arms is not just a legal directive but a reflection of our commitment to individual freedom. In this context, the proposed regulations, while motivated by a commendable desire to reduce violence, raise significant concerns about their effectiveness and the potential consequences for law-abiding citizens. Research, including findings published in the Journal of Quantitative Criminology, suggests that the relationship between strict gun laws and the reduction of gun violence is not as straightforward as one might hope. Cities with stringent gun regulations continue to face challenges with gun-related crimes, indicating that those intent on violence often find ways to circumvent the law. This reality prompts us to question whether new restrictions will achieve their intended goal or merely place additional burdens on those who seek firearms for legitimate purposes, including self-defense. Moreover, the abundance of firearms in the United States presents a logistical challenge to the enforcement of such regulations. With more guns than people in the country, the task of significantly reducing the availability of firearms to criminals, without infringing on the rights of law-abiding citizens, is daunting. It is within this complex landscape that I urge you to consider the broader implications of the proposed gun control measures. The parallels drawn with other contentious issues, such as the regulation of women's healthcare, highlight the potential for policy decisions to inadvertently infringe upon individual freedoms and deepen societal divisions. Such outcomes not only detract from the intended goals of enhancing public safety but also ***risk alienating segments of the population whose support is essential for the advancement of our collective well-being.*** Constituents see this robust effort to "see what sticks" as a weakness within our party. Comparatively imbalanced with the diverse range of issues and concerns that we face everyday. A waste. As we move forward, I encourage you to approach this issue with a balanced perspective, one that recognizes the need for effective strategies to combat gun violence while also safeguarding the constitutional rights and freedoms that define our nation. The path to meaningful change is complex, requiring a nuanced understanding of the issues at hand and a commitment to policies that truly serve the best interests of all our citizens. In closing, I respectfully ask that you consider the potential consequences of the proposed gun control measures, not just for the immediate future but for the legacy we leave for generations to come. It is my hope that, together, we can find a way to address the challenges of gun violence in a manner that honors our values, respects our freedoms, and genuinely enhances the safety and well-being of our communities.
You guys need to stop attacking our 2nd amendment and get help for these kids growing up with identity crisis’s . You coming after law abiding citizens is appalling and the fact that your leaning towards becoming the despicable state of California is saddening. If the president can have security which uses firearms that even the normal civilian can’t have this raises the issue of how can a civilian defend against a tyrannical government with a featureless 10 round ar-15 ? Keep this up and we know exactly what your end goal is.
As a left leaning voter and citizen of Virginia, these new restrictions on our right to bear arms are sickening. Stop proposing so many bans and limits, and maybe a realistic bill, like the safe credit, won’t be universally protested. If you actually want to quell gun violence, keep focused on affordable mental and physical healthcare, improving the education system, and reducing income inequality. While the right may not support these real improvements, I cannot in good faith support or vote for any politician who supports banning or restricting the rights of law abiding citizens in our beautiful commonwealth. Thank you.
The 2nd amendment states "shall not be infringed". All of these bills are infringement and are therefore unconstitutional. Should we pass laws that people must pass a test before they can have freedom of speech? What about pass a test before you can vote? What about if someone does not have training they will be slaves again? Name one other right outlined in the constitution where a citizen has to jump through hoops before they can use that right? I oppose all of these bills as they will do more harm than good. I can understand wanting to keep people safe but gun control does the opposite. These bills will only make it harder for law abiding citizens to exercise their rights while criminals will still ignore the law. Criminals will still get illegal guns or weapons and will commit more crimes since they know the public is unable to defend themselves. Benjamin Franklin once said: "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." You writing bills saying "give up your rights and guns and we will protect you". Well ask the Native Americans how that worked out for them. Ask a Jewish person who was under Nazi control how that worked out for them. Well Hitler's first step was to take away the guns from the public so they could not protect themselves and over 6 million people lost their lives. Since you do not know history you are writing bills which will doom us to repeat it. You know 75 years ago when you could just buy a gun in a catalog and it was shipped to your house we did not have this issue. In the 60s and 70s when people would have a gun in their truck at school or take one in for show and tell we did not have a gun issue. This is a mental health issue. Deal with mental health and you will fix the public safety issue. Zero of my guns have killed people because guns do not kill people. People kill people. Look at Ukraine and Israel for just one form of example why we need LESS gun control. All of these gun laws are unconstitutional and should be thrown out. Do the right thing and let us law abiding citizens have their rights as outlined in the constitution. Do not pass laws which infringe on our rights. If the 2nd amendment falls, the 1st will follow . When the 1st and 2nd fall the 13th will fall and our country will be lost and we will be back in chains.
I am very opposed to the vast majority of these bills. I am a legal gun owner with my CHP. Many of these bills heavily restrict my right to bear arms in a legal capacity. I don’t understand why I should be punished for doing everything legally and correctly only to become a felon in the coming months through these legislations
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Whether or not a person chooses to exercise this right is up to them. Otherwise, it shall not be infringed.
I can not, and nobody should, support these unconstitutional laws. THROW THEM ALL OUT.
You guys make it harder and harder to vote Democrat every single cycle. Complete ban on Semi Automatics more or less making the state even stricter towards guns then states like Maryland? I oppose all these even the "herp common sense derp" ones because the states party has made it clear they don't give a crap about anything but putting hollow wins for politicians because hhheeeyyy punishing law abiding gun owners is a whole lot easier then creating jobs or reducing crime. If these bills die before getting to the governors desk, especially the bans, then I will gladly continue to vote DNC. But if Youngkin has to veto these and you make me say something I never thought I would "Thank god Youngkin won" then I look forward to blindly going down the ticket in 2024 and checking "R" on everyone. Thank you for taking the time to read this.
I do not support more legislation infringing on my 2nd Ammendment rights. Please fund more enforcement for the proactive enforcement of existing laws and regulations pertaining to firearms.
I oppose this legislation.
First off, knives are a basic tool with myriad uses and have been around since ancient history. Any limitation on them is so insulting, and insane. We are not children. It is infuriating that money was spent to even write that down. The fact that I would need a right to carry a knife spelled out is not something our forefathers could have possibly anticipated, since it’s a simple tool. A screwdriver is exactly as deadly as any knife. I would know, I’ve been an ICU nurse for nearly a decade and I have seen people stabbed with both. Matter of fact, a hammer would be a superior concealed weapon with more lethality than either. Second, many of these new gun laws make sense. Many of them do not. I do not want stalkers, domestic abusers, or drug dealers buying guns. A waiting period and proficiency training is fine, although I believe it to be unconstitutional I would comply. However it appears we are going to make it illegal to purchase specific parts for guns, to build your own serialized and registered firearm, and to concealed carry in many public spaces. I also see a poorly defined and overly restrictive “assault weapons” ban. The most insane is the ban on parents having firearms in the home at all. That is unacceptable. The latter group of laws are an infringement based on the opinions of the woefully uninformed. I should not lose my right to responsible ownership, maintenance and concealed carry with a permit due to the lobbying of a group that has failed to due the due diligence to learn about the rights they wish to throw away for all of us. I have a concealed carry permit. It has saved my life of nearly saved my life multiple times. The police can be great, but they are minutes away when seconds count. For instance, as I was leaving a restaurant in the city I was targeted by 2 men with illegal guns. I did not know them, we had never interacted, but suddenly there was a gun pointing at me from a car circling around me in the parking lot. Without escape available, I drew my pistol in response. The car stopped circling and left, giving me time to alert law enforcement before there were any holes in me. If I come face to face with a mass shooter, as so many do, I prefer to be armed. The organization of mothers pushing for these laws can define the law of their household. But not mine. Learn from the past for gods sake. We do not need and will eventually not accept increasing restrictions and price hikes allowing only the wealthy and connected to be armed. Governor, I ask that you veto these laws which only restrict law abiding citizens. You are the person elected in part because you are the option on the ballot who would not let this stand. So don’t. To those in support of these laws: every right you surrender is one you can never recover without 10 times the struggle it took to get to the place where you were able to throw it away. Learning from your mistakes is not viable when you codify them into law. You are making several mistakes. You can’t restrict and underfund the police department and make personal defense harder at the same time. That is advantageous to no one. It is not how things work in this world where evil people exist, no matter how deep in the sand your head is. And the next time you’re grunting and sweating, tearing a box open like a fucking caveman you might want to try a knife before adding more legislation An armed society is a polite society, let’s keep it that way.
The litany of gun control measures under consideration will do nothing to effectively reduce crime and violence, and will only further restrict the rights of law abiding firearms owners. Not to mention the countless examples from other locales across the country where these same measure have been put into place and the result is more violent crime as criminals can now feel safe that the general population is not armed. Strongly oppose all proposed bills.
The ridiculous litany of gun control measures under consideration will do nothing to effectively reduce crime and violence, and will only further restrict the rights of law abiding firearms owners.
We dont need MORE laws regarding firearms, we need to enforce the laws that are already on the books. If enforcement is done then these laws are redundant and not necessary. Don't pass more laws just for the sake of passing laws. They do nothing but make law abiding citizens confused and they dont do anything to stop problems.
I am writing to express my great concern, to the legislatures that continue to ignore their oath of swearing to protect and uphold the rights of the citizens as protected by the United States Constitution and the Virginian Constitution. "The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED". You beaurcrats do not grant that right to he people, it is God given. While you grandstand and ateemlt to make laws to hurt the everydayaw abiding American citizen, you turn a way and do nothing in these bills to punish criminals committing crimes. It is already illegal to murder people. To grandstand and think that any of these bills would stop someone from murdering or harming another person is laughable. Quite literally. You pander screaming about these firearm safety bills while you walk around with security and people with "guns" to keep you safe. Start enforcing the existing laws against criminals who commit crimes vs trying to turn law abiding people, who take training, are serious about protection of family, themselves and others, and trying to disarm them and make them criminals. Or we will vote you out! Uphold your Oath or be prepared for the consequences your actions lead to by the American people. Regards Mr. Harris
I know most modern politicians aren’t historians but the Bill of Rights is really simple. If you read that, you’ll also read the 2nd Amendment which is really simple as well. In the same docket you’re trying to give more benefits to police and take away more rights from citizens. You ought to be ashamed. What a farce freedom is anymore.
These anti gun laws are an infringement on all Virginian's 2A rights.
I am opposed to additional new laws or further regulations placed on firearms or other means of self defense, or which limit the ability to conduct commerce or carry such items. Not only does the constitution make it clear this is a violation of my rights, it does nothing to address or reduce the actions of criminals.
I am against all of these blatantly unconstitutional firearms restrictions. I'm strongly against: SB2| Deeds | Assault firearms certain ammunition, etc.; purchase, possession, sale, transfer, etc., prohibited. This tries to ban things that are in common use, which has never worked well for the government, remember Prohibition? Remember the war on drugs? Just like the last assault weapons ban, this will literally just make AR-15s more popular and easier to get illegally. And I am against: HB585 | Mundon King | Home-based firearms dealers; prohibited near schools, penalties. That specifically targets home-based FFLs whose house is somewhere near a school. This would put hundreds of Virginia residents out of business just because of where they live.
All infringements on the second amendment are acts of treason and should be treated as such. Acting in favor of such infringements makes you a traitor to this nation and th commonwealth.
All Virginians want our families to be safe from gun violence. However, passing such broad restrictions on firearms commonly used for self defense is not the answer. The updated definition of assault weapons and the associated prohibitions do little to nothing to stop criminals who are willing to illegally buy or steal firearms. There are plenty of firearms out there for criminals to access, with well over 400 million guns in civilian ownership in the United States. It is too late to round them all up. These bills will disproportionately affect those citizens who go out of their way to follow our commonwealth's laws; the people who are unlikely to commit a violent crime in the first place. The solutions to gun violence that stand a chance at working are community-oriented interventions that decrease poverty, drug use, gang activity, combat mental illness, and advocate for the safe storage of firearms. Sociologists know these factors correlate strongly with ALL types of violence. On average, two-thirds of firearms deaths are suicides, an assault weapons ban won't do a thing about those. Of the remaining 1/3 of firearms homicides, more than half are drug, gang, or domestic violence related. Let's pass bipartisan legislation that addresses these underlying problems, instead of preventing average Virginians from protecting themselves with firearms that are already ubiquitous.
I am Opposed to any limitations on the Second Amendment and any restrictive firearm laws. We have adequate, if not already overbearing, laws on the books now and should not be creating more laws restricting all the aspects of firearm use, sales, and any other aspects of the right to bear arms.
These firearm laws are mostly reactionary to the media response on firearms. This is a major infringement on the 2nd amendment and needs to be stopped.
An inordinate focus on the control of firearms only serves to infringe the rights of the law-abiding citizen in defense of his life and property. The State should instead focus on the apprehension and incarceration of individuals engaging in criminal behavior and associated misuse of firearms.
Any law that infringes on my Gods-given right to own and bear arms is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Any law passed that infringes this right will be answered with a lawsuit.
I'm against any unconstitutional law and any law that strips Americans of their rights. These laws are an attack on the 2nd amendment and hold NO facts in stopping crime. They are a punishment for law-abiding people and will not make Virginia safer.
Hello. There are a plethora of bills that were proposed, which would clearly violate the second amendment rights of many law abiding citizens. First of all, considering concealed carry should be permit-less carry, it is counterproductive to increase the requirements for concealed carry. Restrictions on where law abiding citizens can lawfully carry their now “permitted” firearms is asinine, as well as the proposition of a bill that would make it a penalty to leave a firearm in your car. You would essentially be disarming a large number of people who wish to follow these unlawful order in a day and age where the democratic agenda is to act like there are mass shootings on a daily basis. Effectively disarming the majority and increasing the requirements and legal loopholes to carry is such a vulnerable state to be in and I hope we’re smart enough to avoid that. Restrictions on “Plastic firearms and unfinished frames etc” is not only terrible literature that does nothing to explain, but it is a direct violation of the 2nd amendment considering you have a federal right to make firearms for personal use, which would include additively manufactured parts. Wait periods are also a horrifying thing to think of, considering how many times it has been proven to be a terrible idea, keeping guns out of the hands that need them most to protect themselves and their families. “Assault firearms” and anything to do with them is nonsense considering the blatant inability to define said “assault weapon”. People who don’t understand guns, shouldn’t be making laws on guns. A shorter barrel does not make it more lethal, in fact it lowers the muzzle velocity, causing less force on impact and penetration, in turn causing less collateral damage. Any sort of “assault weapons” bills are targeting law abiding citizens who have every right to use the modern advances in firearm technology just as police officers and military. The only people these bills are effecting are the already law abiding citizens. The criminals who got their hands on said weapons illegally aren’t going to be making sure that their ALREADY ILLEGAL WEAPONS are fully compliant with state laws and regulations before they go commit another crime. In no way shape or form should someone need to disadvantage themselves in a life or death situation because political members with an armed security detail don’t feel the need for a gun. Why would I want to limit myself to a firearm that is going to be inadequate in home defense, or one that does not have a high enough capacity to protect myself from the ever growing threat of home invasion and the increased trend of multiple home invaders breaking in armed. If it was you alone in your house with 6 armed intruders who most definitely must have checked their local laws and firearm regulations and made sure their firearms aren’t violating any rules before they break into your house, would you want to limit yourself to a low capacity firearm that is going to be extremely difficult to use effectively in a high stress situation, or are you taking a rifle which for reasons that don’t make sense, must have a 16 inch barrel, with a larger capacity magazine, and a stock that you can use to safely brace the firearm to prevent stray shots and provide more accurate fire. Personally I’m going to take anything and everything I can get in a situation that means life or death for me and my loved ones EVERY SINGLE DAY OF THE WEEK. Focus on the mental health crisis.
Gun laws do not prevent firearm homicides, based upon gun control organization's own data (Giffords) •No correlation between strict gun laws and firearm homicide incidents •.07 coefficient of determination (AKA R2) where .90 is a strong association •There likely would be a weak association showing gun laws driving the firearm homicide rate higher if Washington, DC was given a score and ranked by Giffords.
Hello, The right to own and bear firearms is intrinsic in the very nature of the founding of the United States. We must remember the spirit of the 2nd Amendment and the right of all civilians to own and bear arms. Firearms are the great equalizer and can allow and individual to defend themselves when they previously could not. Gun violence and the mental health epidemic are closely interlinked and one cannot pass restrictive firearm laws and expect gun violence to go away. Gun bans and the use of restrictive purchasing requirements, magazine limits, waiting periods, and red flag laws have been shown not to be effective in stemming gun violence. I urge anybody reading this message to say "NO" to 2nd Amendment restrictions.
I strongly, along with many fellow Virginians oppose any villainous disarmament bills disguised as "public safety". The second amendment clearly states "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" and out of touch elitist politicians who enjoy the luxury of armed security are choosing to ignore the constitution and force us to rely on sub-par police protection. The same people who want to defund the police want to disarm us. Embracing the second amendment is what is keeping our crime rates low compared to New York and California. We have seen the blatant disregard that criminals have for these so-called laws; emboldened criminals who are not afraid of the consequences and innocent law-abiding people who are forced to live in fear because a bunch of tyrants are letting power corrupt them. I do not want to live in fear and neither do the rest of us. In addition; a lot of counties and cities have declared themselves as second amendment sanctuaries to protect the rights of free individuals from the overreach of tyrannical politicians. These bills are a Trojan horse that will lead to more crime. You anti-gun politicians should be ashamed of yourselves; give up your private security and train yourselves. Then you will change your minds; because in the end, nobody is coming to save you. I would rather have a fighting chance against armed assailants than die waiting for help to arrive. These bills are pure evil
These all seem like infringements that will do nothing to curb any crime. Further they will only create criminals out of everyday law abiding folk. These are laws that seem to be targeting victimless crimes.
I oppose all these unconstitutional, dangerous, and pointless laws.
I oppose all useless firearm changes. Criminals will not obey
HB113 | Sullivan | Handguns; possession, purchase, or transportation by persons convicted of certain drug offenses. HB1174 | Sickles | Assault firearms; age requirement for purchase, penalty. HB1195 | Hayes | Firearms; waiting period for purchases, penalty. HB12 | Jones | Handguns; firearm locking device required for sale or transfer, child safety warning required. HB1235 | Zehr | Concealed handguns; protective orders. HB1424 | Hope | Firearms; valid permit to purchase, penalties. HB1462 | Laufer | Firearm in unattended motor vehicle; civil penalty. HB158 | McClure | Firearm locking device; required for sale or transfer of firearm. HB16 | Garrett | Firearm or explosive material; carrying within Capitol Square and the surrounding area, etc. HB173 | Simon | Plastic firearms and unfinished frames, etc.; manufacture, import, etc. prohibited, penalties. HB175 | Simon | Assault firearms; carrying in public areas prohibited, penalty. HB183 | Simon | Firearms; storage in residence where minor or person prohibited from possessing is present, penalty. HB2 | Helmer | Assault firearms & certain ammunition, etc.; purchase, sales, transfers, etc., prohibited. HB22 | Jones | Auto sears; definition, prohibition on manufacture, importation, sale, etc., penalty. HB270 | Reid | Commonwealth Comprehensive Gun Safety Program; established, etc. HB319 | Helmer | Firearms instructors & safety prog.; removes reference to NRA & U.S. Concealed Carry Assoc. in Code. HB35 | Clark | Firearm safety device; expands definition of device. HB351 | Clark | Firearm; locking device required for purchase, households where minor resides, penalty. HB362 | McClure | Firearms; purchase, etc., following an assault and battery against an intimate or dating partner. HB454 | Callsen | Firearm/explosive material; carrying w/in Capitol Square or bldg. owned or leased by Commonwealth. HB46 | Bennett-Parker | Firearm; transfers to another person from a prohibited person. HB466 | Helmer | Concealed handgun permits; reciprocity with other states. HB791 | Henson | Pneumatic guns; Class 6 felony to possess. HB797 | Hope | Concealed handguns; demonstrated competence for a permit, firearms instructors and safety programs. HB798 | Hope | Firearms; purchase, possession, etc., following an assault and battery or stalking violation. HB799 | Hope | Concealed handgun permit applications; fingerprints required by local governments. HB861 | Hernandez | Weapons; carrying into hospital that provides mental health services. HB945 | Lopez | Firearm safety device; expands definition of device. SB100 | Ebbin | Plastic firearms and unfinished frames, etc.; manufacture, import, etc. prohibited, penalties. SB2 | Deeds | Assault firearms & certain ammunition, etc.; purchase, possession, sale, transfer, etc., prohibited. SB210 | Perry | Auto sears; prohibition on manufacture, importation, sale, etc., penalty. SB273 | Subramanyam | Firearms; waiting period for purchases, penalty. I oppose all these bills.
I oppose this bill as it seeks to infringe on the Consitutionally proctected rights of lawabiding citizens to protect themselves from criminals, criminals who do not follow the law. This bill makes it harder for someone to keep themselves safe and is primarily a solution in search of problems to fix. Virginia has one of the lowest crime rates in the country and even less gun related crimes being committed year over year. This is not due to gun control laws, in fact as gun control laws increase, s o does the rate of violent crimes. Criminals are not afraid of police, they are afraid of armed citizens. The subject of this bill has already been defeated in courts, passing this into law will only subject the Commonwealth to more lawsuits to have it repealed costing us more in taxes. Enough of our taxpayers money has been wasted in politicians attempting to pass "feel good" bills to try and prove they are doing their job. I urge the legistature to focus on enforcing and imposing stricter penalties for those that break our exsiting laws over creating new laws that only serve to pe nalize the law abiding citizens.
I was born in Henrico county and vote in every election. Guns are currently the #1 killer of our children under the age of 18. I am writing to show my support for these bills because gun violence prevention is my top priority. Please support gun safety legislation that is brought up for a vote! Thank you so much for your time.
My name is Laura Sledge and I am your constituent. Guns are currently the #1 killer of our children under the age of 18, and gun violence prevention is my top priority. Please support gun safety legislation that is brought up for a vote. Here are the bills I support. Thank you for your time.
I support common sense bills HB 1181, 1195, 12, 1424, 1462, 158, 175, 183,23, 270. Safe storage and training make sense! Let's keep everyone safe.
Hello, My name is Hayley Redmond Cilley. Guns are currently the #1 killer of our children under age 18, and I am calling because gun violence prevention is my top priority. Please support gun safety legislation that is brought up for a vote! We need safer communities for all, but especially for our children.
I am writing in opposition to both HB 12 and HB 158. It is obvious elected legislators are not paying attention to the obvious details, but only looking to throw everything at the wall to see what sticks and what they can get away with. Why would two people submit the exact same bill, when they could show their support to the one bill. Firearms already included locking devices when purchased from an FFL and warning papers are already included. Citizens with common sense already know that they Will be held liable criminally and/or civilly. There are existing laws that cover intentional acts negligence. This is being repetitive and targeting the wrong people. I strongly oppose repetitive legislation that will not do anything to help with the root cause where people don't value lives in general. I urge the legislature to vote No.
Dear Sir or Madame. Last year in Newport News I was assaulted by a 27 year old black man from Chesapeake because of his road rage.. This was at my local bank 11;30 in the morning. This young man almost lost his life at my hand because you cannot reel in your problem young men. His words feet from me were ' im going to kick your ass and then kill you'. My pistol changed his mind. I saw for myself the woke judges and a woke system that perpetuates the problem. The criminal justice system has been flung far far left which IS causing a public safety hazzard. No new gun control is needed. More jail time for the trash that i dealt with is. My Congressman Bobby Scott and Delegate Cia Price do not represent me.
When Democrats violate the Covenant between the PEOPLE and the US Constitution as well as the VA Constitution they are acting lawlessly and undermining the commitment toward good Government agreed on for over 200 + years. Seems Democrats didn't learn anything from the Civil war. The mentality of the "Tyrant" and the "Slave Holder" still exists among the Demo-rat Party, removing statues and trying to hide and rewrite history is not good government. Oaths, integrity, and Good Government, mean nothing to this Cabal of Evil minded men and women. We the PEOPLE need and demand good government not a patch work or illegal laws we are expected to "obey" while the "perps" that pass them have no consequence for breaking Constitutional law or good Government. The Demo-rat Party needs to be dismantled and the "ignorant" ejected from the Virginia legislature at once and for all. Peter Buckingham Crozet, VA 22932
Comments Document
OPPOSITION to HB12 - Jones OPPOSITION to HB23 - Laufer OPPOSITION to HB158 - McClure OPPOSITION to HB183 - Simon SUPPORT of HB289 - Wiley OPPOSITION to HB351 - Clark OPPOSITION to HB585 – Mundon King SUPPORT of HB756 - Walker OPPOSITION to HB791 - Henson OPPOSITION to HB861 - Hernandez SUPPORT of HB872 - Earley SUPPORT of HB1141 - Cordoza OPPOSITION to HB1174 - Sickles SUPPORT of HB1198 - Scott
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
I am writing in support of HB 12, 23, 158, 183, 351, 585, 791 and 861. I also write in opposition to HB 289, 756, 872, 1141 and 1198. There is ample evidence that minimal restrictions on firearms has resulted in countless deaths and injuries. Sensible restrictions on access to lethal weapons are sorely needed at this time. In fact, the Supreme Court, in deciding on the right to bear arms, has also stated that “Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited. [It is] not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.” If, unfortunately, assault-style weapons continue to be manufactured and owned, their access must be limited by age. In that case I would support HB 1174. Thank you for your attention to these comments.
I am a member of the Charlottesville Coalition for Gun Violence Prevention and the Charlottesville Center for Peace and Justice. I support all the gun safety bills: 12 23 158 183 351 585 791 861 1141 1174 I oppose these bills: 289 756 872 1198
. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. I oppose unnecessary.
Please stop wasting your time and my money on bills that have proven to be have zero impact on public safety, Please refer to Maryland, California, and the other states that already have these laws
Good afternoon, I am writing to implore you to STOP with all of the gun control bills. You are punishing law abiding citizens, who now have their RIGHTS THAT SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED, infringed. And the criminals who do NOT follow these laws but who they are directed at, are not affected. Please enforce ALL of the laws that are presently in the books and prosecute those people breaking the laws and stop letting them out on bail and bond through the Soros DA’s.
HB23 and HB861 Law abiding concealed carry individual are not the problem, and criminals who do not obtain guns legally will not follow this law either. HB12 and HB158 Already exist on the federal level why waste time and money on these bills HB791 who in their right mind would make a child or teenager a felon for bringing a BB-gun into a school, how often does this even happen for this to be considered. HB1174 This bill is unconstitutional at best! How can a man or woman b considered an adult at the age of 18, join the military at the age of 18, and not be allowed to purchase a weapon at the age of 18. Not to mention all other irreversible life changes that are allowed from birth to age 18. Please vote no to all of theses bills and any other unconstitutional gun control bills that come in front of the committee. Concerned constituent.
Oppose this bill. It is unnecessary as federal law already requires a locking device to be supplied and a safety brochure to be available for purchasers.
In reference to all of the above proposed house bills…. In short there is NO need for any more restrictions of any type on the purchase (to include locations of ffls in reference to schools and forcing purchasers to buy locks when they already safely store their firearms), carry, storage, and use of any type of firearms. It is extremely clear that more restrictions do not do anything to stem the flow of violent crimes which may or may not involve firearms (using DC, Chicago, NYC etc as examples, where very strict firearms laws have done nothing to lower violent crime). Instead, we need to focus on allowing law enforcement to aggressively enforce the numerous existing laws, demand commonwealth attorneys offices hold criminals responsible and ensure long prison sentences on offenders. As a citizen of the commonwealth for my entire life, and a local law enforcement officer for over 2 decades I can tell you from personal experience simply adding restrictions and more laws is worthless and simply slows down the system. As they say when seconds count, the police are only minutes away…. Do not place any more restrictions on residents of the commonwealth who are forced to live in increasingly dangerous localities due to the legal changes of the past 5 years, which allow offenders to go unpunished or under punished. Simply because you do not like firearms does not mean that others should not have lessened access to purchase, use, and carry the firearms of their choice. Thank you for your consideration
Comments Document
I would like for the Commonwealth of Virginia to have Constitutional Carry as the law of the entire state , our right as stated in the constitution of the united states and the constitution of the Commonwealth of virginia as written by our founders gives each citizen the right to keep and bear arms with no exclusions, to be secure in their persons, unless that right has been forfeited,. Exercising this right should never lead to forfeiture of this right.
Comments Document
I would like for the Commonwealth of Virginia to have Constitutional Carry as the law of the entire state , our right as stated in the constitution of the united states and the constitution of the Commonwealth of virginia as written by our founders gives each citizen the right to keep and bear arms with no exclusions, to be secure in their persons, unless that right has been forfeited,. Exercising this right should never lead to forfeiture of this right.
For HB12 and HB158: Already covered by federal law, no additional expense should be put on the FFL or the consumer. For HB23 and HB861: You are adding restrictions on personal protection and safety while not ensuring my safety and that of my family. I have been to hospitals in the commonwealth over the last few years, the security provided couldn't stop a squirrel from running through the hospital, much less someone with mal-intent. If you want the citizens to rely on the government for safety, then provide, otherwise don't restrict it. For HB585: You want to prevent FFLs from being within 1.5 mile radius of a school, yet smoke shops or other convenience stores that have vaping products are allowed, with the latter being a much bigger problem in our schools, yet no restrictions. It is silly to assume an FFL poses any danger to a school and I have yet to hear of any incident involving an FFL and a school. Most home based FFLs do not have long term storage. Please educate yourself before trying to implement "feel good" laws. We have other major issues with our schools that need to be addressed, i.e. teach retention, giving teachers more power for discipline, parental involvement/non-involvement, allowing for greater choice of subjects and stopping teaching to a test where our children learn nothing. For HB183: Another "Feel good" law. There have been multiple examples of minors protecting their family over the last several years. But, how would this law have stopped someone like the Sandyhook shooter, who killed his mother and took her safe keys? It wouldn't have. Just like it wouldn't stop a home invade killing the owner and using their safe key/finger print to access a firearm. For HB1174: At the outset this is unconstitutional, but if you want to effect real change in regard to this, open it up to an expanded background, where the applicant/purchaser that is under the age of 21 must consent to a check of their juvenile record in order to purchase, specifically looking for violent crimes. If this were in place, it may thwart some from attempting to buy, while those that continue and consent it would flag in the system, like it does when a felon attempts to buy a firearm at a gunshow. There is much more that needs to go into this, i.e. at what point when the applicant has an established adult history can they purchase after having violent crimes on their juvenile record, 25? 21? I implore every law maker to due their due diligence when it comes to rights stated in both the Virginia Constitution and the US Constitution. Do not be beholden to your donors and ram "feel good" laws through our legislature. When someone spouts statistics to you, take a moment and do you own research, look at the source material, anyone can make states lean in their favor by changing a few words or omitting parts of a study. You must work for the all the people, those you agree with and disagree with and look at all the information, not just what your donors give you. Thank you for your time.
This is absolutely egregious. A home-based FFL is an enterprise that is cleared at a higher level of proficiency and familiarity with firearms issues than any authority VA - the FFL holders are cleared and backed by the ATF. Further, an FFL, home-based or otherwise, is an enterprise in the business of safe transfer of weapons to individuals after doing criminal checks on the prospective buyer. The location near a school is irrelevant - it does not constitute a threat to a school simply because an FFL is nearby. This is a bad faith argument, and false equivalence. It’s a thin veneer. Simply put, it’s been proposed by people who do not like private ownership of firearms, and schools were picked because (deceptively) because they are evenly districted and spread through the state - after all, they’re supposed to be, to allow children access to education without having to travel unreasonably far. This also means that selecting schools as the criteria for a “no home FFL bubble” means you effectively throw a blanket over the industry. This has nothing to do with the safety of children. I find this frankly offensive and dishonest. Show me evidence where an FFL near a school has caused a problem? More than that, show me a single instance where the location was any sort of relevant. You cannot. Because it’s not true. It’s false equivalence. Let me be clear. I am a liberal person. But part of being liberal means remembering that fear mongering and bad faith, secretive agendas hurt progress. They turn people against it. Drop this frivolous nonsense. Stop making us look like idiots, please. Your crusade against portions of the bill of rights (because come on folks, we know what it is, it’s misguided) opens up very dangerous precedents for other bad faith actors to whittle down the contents of the other amendments. Read a history book. Please.
I do not support these bills. I request you vote NO on them. HB 12, Jones, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon, requires all firearms in a home be secured if there is a minor in the home. Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, prevents home-based gun dealers from operating within 1.5 miles of a school. Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, makes it illegal for anyone under 21 to purchase any kind of firearm. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen.
Constitutional issues when made political do no justice to representatives or their constituents. Dishonesty to the public erodes any ability for trust and assumptions based on party affiliation close down civil discussion. Some representatives run for office for gun control matters and get voted in but are you being honest with your constituents. I can quote statistics as could those supporting gun control but there are logical truths being ignored. We should change our terminology from gun control, to gun control over law biding citizens because each law that is passed in most situation only further restricts law biding citizens. Most gun laws only increase the ability to become a victim to criminal actions because in order to abide by laws implemented it puts the citizen at a considerable disadvantage . Gun free zones only mean unarmed citizens open to criminal behavior due to the inability to defend one's self. Law enforcement only enforce the laws, and cannot be there to prevent the actual crimes in most situations. Criminals intent on malfeasance will not abide by any laws put in place but exploit any such laws that allow for an advantage against an unarmed individual. This is not to say that I am apposed to back ground checks even at gun shows to avoid loop holes as I support such measures but to restrict carrying at locations or gun free zones only makes for sitting ducks. Restricting common circulation of rifles or any similar type to the AR-15 platform again only further limits the citizen from criminals AND tyrannical infrastructures within the state and federal levels. We can never assume that our representatives are in power for support of the people and our constitution I am not in support of any of the current gun control bills, I am in support of all the pro gun bills. In light of whatever is voted into law ,if it further restricts my constitutional rights and civil rights I simply cannot and will not comply. Thank you for your time on this matter.
As a fellow resident of Virginia, I urge you to OPPOSE the multiple anti-gun bills being heard today (1/25/24) in the House Public Safety Subcommittee on Firearms, including: HB 12 HB 158 HB 183 HB 351 HB 23 HB 861 HB 585 HB 1174 Please focus more on protecting lawful gun owners and enforcing the laws that career criminals routinely disregard. Thank you.
Dear Delegates of the House Public Safety- Firearms subcommittee, The selected bills are flagrantly and utterly unconstitutional and they stand as a direct violation on the sovereignty and liberties of the citizenry of the Commonwealth. Plainly stated they violate the United States Constitution ( the Supreme Law of the Land) and the God given rights of the people which the Commonwealth purports to “protect”. Such legislation is also preposterous factually as firearms are not the “problem” , they are merely tools and as such they are inert objects that are incapable of exerting will without an evil individual wielding them for malevolent purposes. Criminality is the problem , as criminals do not have any regard for the law or the well being of their fellow man, hence the definition of criminal. Therefore all of the selected legislation put hence forth only seeks to disarm law abiding citizens, those that are neither inclined nor committed to violating the law. Law abiding citizens possess firearms to defend our lives, the lives of our families, and to ensure that our sovereignty and liberty is not stripped away from us by tyrannical Marxist ideologues masquerading as “compassionate” and “caring” legislators. This is not Washington, Illinois, or even Maryland, this is the great Commonwealth of Virginia. That Virginia which led the American revolution under George Washington and in the defense of liberty against the tyrannical crown of England that once sought to oppress and yoke the citizens of the American colonies. The motto that adorns the seal of Virginia and our great state flag is “Sic Semper Tyrannis”, which means “Death to Tyrants”. Such a motto is more apropos in the tumultuous political climate of modernity than ever before, perhaps even more so than during the revolution in which it was founded. Being elected to represent the people does not confer upon any individual the power to strip the people of their inalienable rights, those rights that were enshrined by our great founders in the Constitution. To violate the United States Constitution in an effort to subjugate the people of the republic is by definition treason. The citizenry of the Commonwealth has spoken, we demand that you cease attempting to violate the rights of the people and do the actual job that you were elected to do . If such malevolently contrived shibboleth manages to pass out of the House of Delegates and Senate without veto from Governor Youngkin we will not abide by, adhere to, or sanction unconstitutional mandates in any way. Mass noncompliance will be the response to such attempts to strip the people of their Liberty. Thank you for your attention and your time, vote no to this abhorrent legislation. L.S. McClung RN, PMH-BC, CARN
Hello there, I know this makes no difference. But please all of the democrats at the meeting room please dont vote for gun control bills. Thanks
Every single one of these proposed laws are blatantly unconstitutional under the plain text of both the Virginia and US constitutions. The SCOTUS has ruled multiple times, must recently in June 2022, that the 2A prohibits these types of attacks on free citizens. Voting for any of these bills is a waste of tax payer dollars, morally and ethically wrong, and, by definition of the courts already having ruled on these or similar laws as unconstitutional, an act of treason against the USA and by extension an insurrection.
I urge you to OPPOSE each of the following bills: HB 12 Federal law already covers this and additional state enforcement will create unnecessary expense. We don’t need more bills that could create negative financial impact on our community. HB 23 This is not constitutional under the Supreme Court Decision made in 2022: New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen. This bill prevents visitors, family, and staff from their right to self defense. Is it right to prevent an abused single mother from carrying her most effective tool of defense because she has to take her child to the ER? Wouldn’t this give anyone with nefarious intentions an easy location? Note: Cornell Law has published a clear summary of the Bruen Decision, easily accessed with an online search. I mention this case further below. HB 158 Federal law already covers this and additional State enforcement will create unnecessary expense. HB 183 Current law already covers 14 and under. increasing the scope of the law to apply to 15, 16, and 17-year-olds is an overreach. Minors in this age group have used firearms to save their own life and protect the lives of their families by stopping home invasions and violent attacks on their households. This bill is an overreach. HB 585 What problem is this bill trying to solve? What’s the difference between driving 1.5 miles or 5 or 10? This bill is unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Furthermore, home-based gun dealers don't usually have signs outside of their home. Buyers have to be invited in for a purchase and FFL transfer. Also, convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products (not legal for minors to purchase) are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791 BB guns, and other pneumatic projectile devices, are specifically designed as hobbyist or sporting equipment. Making the possession of these on school grounds a felony is a complete overreach. Are we going to outlaw sticks, or stones, or archery, or baseball bats? These are all similarly dangerous. If BB guns have been used for violence at a school, please inform me. Otherwise, this is a “fix” to a problem that doesn’t exist. HB 861 This is not constitutional under Bruen and prevents visitors, family, and staff from their right to self defense. Is it right to prevent an abused single mother from carrying her most effective tool of defense because she has to take her child to the ER? Wouldn’t this give anyone with nefarious intentions an easy location? HB 1174 This bill is not constitutional. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen. People in this age group are not minors. They are included in the same Second Amendment rights as older adults.
I'm a law abiding citizen, retired law enforcement officer, and responding Public Safety 1st Responder Chaplain. I have been called out, responding to or serving at a number of violent acts, anf times, often in dangerous areas. I believe in these violent times, and knowing that criminals don't and won't obey the laws, that I have a need and right to be able to defend and protect myself, and be able to continue carrying, as I have for many years. Our drivers permit is for all 50 states, and we don't have to stop at a state border. I believe a concealed carry permit should be the same, recognized in all 50 states. To have to leave my firearm inside my car, to go into a public building or rest area on the highway, can put me in needless danger. If I have to take off a d put my firearm in my trunk, it let's a criminal see where it is and I don't have it. That can let them steal the firearm and/or harm me. Please allow our law abiding citizens use their 2nd Amendment Right To Keep and Bear (bear = to carry) arms. We need to fully prosecuted existing gun laws snd crimes, Not Add More Gun Controls that criminals won't obey any way. Murder has been against the law for centuries, but increasingly still going on, sometimes unpunished.
Please keep your gun grabbing hands off legally owned guns.Why not enforce the laws already on the books. Tell D.A. To do their jobs, go after the illegal guns. It is not legal guns that is the problem, it is the illegal guns. If more people carried legally crime could go down because the bad guys won’t know whose packing and could respond to crime. Thank you for reading my response. Alexander G. Morris IV.
The attack on the right to keep and bear arms has only increased over the past 18 months since the Supreme Court clarified in the Bruen decision the standard to which modern gun control legislation must be held. Many politicians around the country know that the bills put forth since that time are unconstitutional, but they also know it usually takes years to throw out their unconstitutional bills through court, and by then they have already cost time, money, and lives of American citizens. Rather than confront the underlying issues of our nation that lead to violence, they choose to take the easy way out and simply blame inanimate objects to deflect from their own political incompetency. Virginia representatives need to be better than that. The bills proposed are either duplicative of federal law, pointless, or dangerous. All are unconstitutional. All are a reflection of a disregard for commonsense safety measures like taking criminals off the streets. These bills must not be passed. Not because they will be signed into law, but because its the duty of Virginia state representatives to uphold the constitution and work to solve problems. These bills due neither.
Please do not vote for or advance any anti gun bills. Each one limits a citizens 2nd Amendment rights... I.E. banning commonly owned and used semi automatic rifles, which is unconstitutional under Bruen... Raising the age to purchase firearms. If one can serve in the military, one can purchase a firearm. Plus, its unconstitutional under Bruen AND a Virginia court ruled against it as well. Limiting where one can carry. This only creates more soft targets which criminals will not obey anyway. Banning unserialized firearms . Unconstitutional since some were made before 1968, when numbers were not required. Also, people have the right to build unserialized firearms in their homes for personal use. This has never been an issue, but decriminalization of crimes is causing an increase in violent crimes. THAT is a problem. Limiting how many firearms one can purchase in a given period is unfair. These are just a few . Please understand all the anti gun bills are unconstitutional, especially in light of the Bruen decision. I do urge you to vote for any pro gun bills. The right to keep and bear arms is a constitutional right. The Heller, McDonald, and Bruen decisions reinforce that right. The only limits on this right should be for criminals, illegal aliens, and anyone who has been mentally adjudicated/ forced into an institution. The issue we face should be how to repair our broken mental health infrastructure, not to limit the constitutional rights of law abiding citizens. Thank you Mr Raymond Pezzoli
Our freedom was won with illegal and unregistered firearms. Please look to the G.O. A. And VCDL for guidance on Second Amendment issues. Freedom first, safety second.
I support these bills!
Hello, I am providing my written statement in opposition to the following bills. I strongly feel these bills will undermine constitutional liberties to carry and possess firearms by law abiding citizens and in fact many of these bills are an attempts to fix a problem that doesn't exist. HB 12 Jones - requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. Do criminals purchase guns from dealers through a legal process? No, they don't. So providing a locking device and a "warning" sticker won't serve to curb any gun violence, only be one more thing for legal law abiding citizens to have to contend with when purchasing legally. HB 23, HB158, HB861 - prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. Have you been to Chippenham or MVC hospitals lately? In the last 90 days there have been multiple shootings inside these facilities by criminals and people intent on doing harm to those in need. I am a law abiding citizen who holds a concealed weapons permit in Chesterfield County, I attend frequent gun safety and training courses. Simply put, if you ban Concealed carry in these facilities, a good guy with a gun could never stop a bad guy with a gun, you would in effect be leaving the door open for criminals to commit mass casualty incidents against unarmed citizens. And are we supposed to rely on police response in these facilities? The mean time to respond by police forces across the country is 5-6 minutes. HB 585, Mundon King, prevents home-based gun dealers from operating within 1.5 miles of a school. This is unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. What data do you have and who thought there was such a "need" to fix this issue? How many home based gun dealers actually live within 1.5 miles of a school in Virginia? HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a Felony. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. What data was pulled to show the number of BB Gun incidents in schools in Virginia? This is a solution to a non-problem. How about you pass legislation that increases school resource officers funding, or better yet pass legislation that allows teachers to conceal carry with proper training in classrooms so god forbid there is another shooter incident, they can properly neutralize the situation without waiting on police response of 5-6 minutes. Less criminals would try to harm school children with the proper deterrence in place. This bill achieves very little in terms of moving the needle for safety in schools. HB 1174, Sickles, makes it illegal for anyone under 21 to purchase any kind of firearm. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen. Thanks for your time in these matters.
Hello, My name is Sameet Singh, I was born in Punjab, India and moved to Northern Virginia when I was 1 year old. Since then, I’veattended some great K-12 schools in the NOVA area, graduated from George Mason University in 2020, and now work in the Cyber Security field, serving one of our largest US Government Departments. My message to you today is not regarding any single bill in particular, but more of a mindset. I’m sure everyone here has a family that they would do anything for. We work hard everyday to provide for and to protect our families. And a big part in being able to protect, is having the right tool to protect yourself and your family members. This is why the best tool to have at your disposal is a firearm, a gun. Because if you or your family were attacked by someone in your home or out and about in public, a firearm, would be the best tool to have to save yourself and them from an attacker. Even if you’re able to call the police, it’ll at least take a few minutes for them to arrive, and sadly, within those minutes, only a few seconds are needed to completely change your world. Therefore, you are always your OWN first responser, before any other help arrives. This is why, anything, that would hinder your ability to protect yourself or your family with the best tool that you could use, a firearm, should really be re-thought. Unfortunately our society is not at the point where crime dosen’t happen, there’s no supernatural being or superhero that will swoop in to protect us in our times of need, there’s no Spider-Man or Superman who will save the day for us. However, the next best thing we have, is an responsibly armed citizen. A citizen who who is able to be gentle and loving with their kids and partner, but at the same time, prepared and alert at a moments notice when danger reveals itself. Thank you for listening, and thank you for your service to your communities, I wish you all a prosperous new year. Best, Sameet Singh
HB12 - Jones . I not not support . All firearms dealers currently offer a Firearm locking device on the sale or transfer of handguns. All new firearm come with a locking device and warning labels. child safety warning required. This doesn't change the current practice by dealers in offering for free locking devices. HB 23 Weapons; possession or transportation into facility that provides mental health services, etc. I do not support,. This bill does not exempt ems medical services or the fire service which many carry concealed when transporting patients to an emergency room or mental health facility on the duty. HB158 - McClure I do not support . All firearms dealers currently offer a Firearm locking device on the sale or transfer of handguns. All new firearm come with a locking device and warning labels. child safety warning required. This doesn't change the current practice by dealers in offering for free locking devices. HB183 - Simon HB289 - Wiley I support carrying a concealed handgun with a permit into public parking lots and storing there gun makes sense and do not unarm the citizen while in their personal vehicle. HB351 - Clark I not not support . All firearms dealers currently offer a Firearm locking device on the sale or transfer of handguns. All new firearm come with a locking device and warning labels. child safety warning required. This doesn't change the current practice by dealers in offering for free locking devices. most police departments give away free locking devices. HB585 - Mundon King I do not support this bill changes little firearms transactions which must be performed at a already approved ATF dealer location. 1.5miles is overreach by the state. HB756 - Walker I do not support. This limits gun rights. Not protection for EMS or fire personnel HB791 - Henson I do not support. This bill eliminates the number of programs that have pneumatic bb gun competition for 4 H at private or religious schools. HB861 - Hernandez I do not support,. This bill does not exempt ems medical services or the fire service which many carry concealed when transporting patients to an emergency room or mental health facility in the duty. HB872 - Earley I support . Always a lawful citizen to store a lawfully possessed firearm and ammunition in a locked private motor vehicle parked at any parking area owned or controlled by the Commonwealth. HB1141 - Cordoza I support HB1174 - Sickles I do not support changing the definition of an assault weapon widely and increasing the age which will make little difference. HB1198 - Scott, P.A. I support in reducing the fee
Vietnam Veteran - Retired Special Agent & LEO ( military 19 yrs & Federal 10 plus years) - that is me. Please consider the Bill of Rights; law abiding citizens rights to freedoms and rights of self protection. Criminals don’t follow laws against violence and criminal acts. Thank you
I oppose all of the gun control measures proposed in this session. I support Mr. Freitas' proposal for permitless carry.
Seems to me the General Assembly needs to pay attention to the Supreme Court rulings. Most of these bills if not all ignore what the Court has ruled on. Does the Gov. of Virginia think they are above the highest court in the land? Also, do not think for a Nano second that I believe these bills are about crime control. They are all about people control PERIOD. A Tyrannical state. I will fight this!!
I am submitting comments in opposition to these anti-gun rights bills. These bills do nothing to increase actual safety of Virginians. They serve only to further infringe upon our Second Amendment rights and those rights enshrined in our Virginia Constitution. Instead of focusing on the root causes of violent crimes, Democrats have chosen to target lawful Virginians' firearms rights. Most of these bills are a false solution for non-existent problems. Some of these bills would flagrantly be un-Constitutional and in opposition to prior U.S. Supreme Court decisions to include the Heller and Bruen decisions. In the 2023 Virginia elections, no candidate ran on a pro-gun control platform, therefore no mandate was handed to the House to implement such infringements. Virginians made our pro-Second Amendment stance clear in RIchmond in January 2020 when 40,000 people rallied against similar bills during that session and over 95% of Virginia counties' Board of Supervisors passed Second Amendment Sanctuary statuses. I urge the Committee Members to vote No on these bills. Thank you.
As a constituent, I urge you to OPPOSE the following bills: HB 12, Jones, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon, requires all firearms in a home be secured if there is a minor in the home. Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, prevents home-based gun dealers from operating within 1.5 miles of a school. Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, makes it illegal for anyone under 21 to purchase any kind of firearm. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen.
NOT ONE OF THESE BILLS ARE CONSTITUTIONAL &/OR NECESSARY! THEY'RE SIMPLY SOLUTIONS IN SEARCH OF NONEXISTENT PROBLEMS! HB 12: Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23: Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158: Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183: Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585: Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791: Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861: Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174: A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen. Thank you.
HB 12, Jones - requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. These requirements represent an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under the Supreme Court's Bruen decision and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon, requires all firearms in a home be secured if there is a minor in the home. Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, prevents home-based gun dealers from operating within 1.5 miles of a school. Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, makes it illegal for anyone under 21 to purchase any kind of firearm. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen.
This is just a solution in search of a problem. Don't make laws we do not need. Thank you!
So there is nothing as important in and for Virginia other then Supporting Communist Legislation against the Constitution of VA and the US Constitution that all this effort must be the first thing on the agenda when a Demo-rat Majority is fraudulently elected to the House and Senate. You fools must make the people that pay you off very happy to have you ear and sell yourself to the Communist Party. Demo-rats are an embarrassment to Freedom and Good Government. Patrick Henry, you may have heard of him? Show me that age and country where the rights and liberties of the people were placed on the sole chance of their rulers being good men, without a consequent loss of liberty? ********************************** The eternal difference between right and wrong does not fluctuate, it is immutable. ********************************** The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government - lest it come to dominate our lives and interests. ********************************** Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? ********************************** Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined.... The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun.
I strongly support House bills 12, 23, 158, 183, 351, 861 and 585, These bills will make our communities safer by requiring safe storage of firearms, banning the sales of assault weapons to people under 21 years of age, and restricting the public places where people can carry firearms, including mental health facilities. Safe storage will protect children and teens from inadvertent shootings and school shootings, and everyone from suicide. Waiting periods for purchase can prevent impulsive misuse. I oppose bills 389, 872, 1141, and 1198. Allowing more guns into more places will not make us safer. Every shooter is a law-abiding citizen with 2nd amendment rights, until they open fire on other people. I don't trust a "good guy" with a gun to have the current training or expertise to shoot down a criminal without accidentally hitting innocent people, or themselves. There is always the threat that a criminal will grab a gun from the "good guy" and turn it on him/her. As a diplomat representing the United States in foreign countries during my 33 years in the U.S. State Department, my heart bled every time we had another mass shooting. People there would ask me, "What is wrong with your society?" The first seven gun safety bills passed in 2020 made Virginia a leader in gun safety legislation. Subsequent shootings, such as six-year old shooting his teacher with his mother's gun, demonstrate the need for evidence-driven initiatives that will reduce gun death and injuries in our Commonwealth.
HB 12, Jones, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers.
We already have enough gun laws on the books enforce the ones we have there is no such thing as GUN VIOLENCE. A gun is an inanimate object it takes someone to operate it.
I urge you to OPPOSE the following bills: HB 12, HB 23, HB 158, HB 183, HB 585, HB 791, HB 1174 For some of these bills... they are meaningless, as they are already covered by Federal Law... the committee and legislature should not be wasting time on bills and laws that are already on the books! For some of the other bills... they are already deemed UNCONSTITUTIONAL under the 2nd Amendment and existing Supreme Court decisions. If these become law, they have a high probably of being voided/vacated within a year or two. Aside from taking away existing rights of Virginia citizens in that time... you will ensure lawyers on both sides of the issue will make a lot of money so they can drive fancy cars and send their kids to expensive schools. Stop indirectly putting money (half of which are paid with tax dollars) in lawyers’ pockets. I'd rather our courts address real crime and issues... not laws already deemed unconstitutional. Many of these bills attempt to create a tactical "solution"... except that the specific problem the "solution" addresses doesn't or never existed or occurred in the Commonwealth. I request that my elected officials address meaningful solutions, and ensure existing rights of law-abiding citizens are not infringed upon. Thank you for your time.
These proposals are solutions in search of problems. Many of these violate the Bruen decision. I would love for us to eliminate sovereign immunity. These politicians must be able to be sued personally, held both criminally and civilly liable for any vote in favor of a law, if they knew or should have known it violates or God given rights.
I feel violated. This legislation scares me and I'm a constituent. Show me the evidence that the legislation you are proposing will actually reduce crime and violence. There is none. These are "do something" acts that restrict my right as a good, sane, sober, moral and prudent citizen to keep and bear arms. If there were a violent criminal act for which I was now unprepared, restricted in my ability to defend innocent life, who will bear responsibility for that?
Good afternoon Delegates, I stand in opposition to all of these unconstitutional bills that will not do anything to curb and only demonize legal, lawful Virginians. Also, many of these bill are redundant to either existing commonwealth law or federal regulations. Lawful firearm owners are the back bone of this great commonwealth and country. I urge you all to recognize that Virginia is one of the safest states in the nation and that all of these proposed laws are violations of the Constitution and should not moved forward to a vote. Thank you for your time and consideration on this very important matter D Scott Burns
As a born and bred Virginian; a father and husband; a disabled veteran and active member in the community; I cannot understand why individuals who are elected, willingly do what they can to violate both the Virginia and United States Constitutions to penalize law-abiding citizens such as myself. I have spent a life of duty and dedication in service and occupations to protect our State and Country from those who wish to subjecgate its citizens or worse. Not only do all of these restrictions seek a perspective only solution, they do so at the cost of innocent citizens. Law-abiding citizens do not commit drug gang offenses, home invasions, mass shootings. These are the acts of career criminals or mentally disturbed individuals. None of these proposed bills addresses those issues or the deeper problem of why people are so quick to commit these acts. Murder is murder, whether a gun is used or a cane, it is still wrong. I'm more concerned about why, instead of the tool. Obviously, certain politicians are only worried about the tools. These proposed bills are all clearly agenda focused without factual information to support true results that may be gained by violating state and federal laws to enact. The Supreme Court very clearly defined the right to arms and most of these bills would violate those freedoms. Nor is it legislators purview to dictate what citizens do with what they have within the confines if their own home. THAT, is yet another violation. It is also disturbing that legislators seem to be focused on separating Virginia from reciprocity, thus affecting relations with other states, which ultimately led to a civil war last time. They are also creating more areas where people who mean to harm can do so without fear of being stopped such as adding a new gun free zone. This is a very bad and ill-conceived premise. If the point has not been made yet, then perhaps citizens need to start holding legislators civilly responsible for lives lost as a result of such zones. Clearly they are not effective. I ask that you stop operating under partisan politics and quid pro quo agendas which only serve to penalize and subjegate our citizenry. This is not what servicemembers and veterans served, sacrificed and vowed to defend. Freedom has a cost, and it is difficult to understand, especially through the fear and pain. There is NO such thing as safety. There never was, and never will be. America has MANY enemies out there in the world, and it's citizens; it's armed citizens; are the LAST line of defense. Continuing to attempt to disarm law-abiding citizens only further prompts the question by citizens for the legislators... "Whose side are you truly on?" Please repeal these bills and focus more on actual crime, deterrence for early release, stiffer penalties for existing criminals who continue to commit them and stop bringing in more and more illegal immigrants. Thank you for your attention. Lessons of the Past, Lost to Actions of the Present, Will Forever Damn the Future. -Sean Flippin - 1989
Please stop wasting our money, as a taxpayer, on initiatives and regulation that are at best ineffective and at worst making things safer for Criminals. Creating areas that are gun-free makes safe areas for Criminals as they know that their victims will not have the tools necessary to defend themselves. Stop trying to make us, the public, less safe. Stop releasing criminals, especially repeat-offenders, Releasing criminals causes us to acquire tools to keep ourselves and our families safe.
As a constituent, I urge you to OPPOSE the following bills: HB 12, Jones, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon, requires all firearms in a home be secured if there is a minor in the home. Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, prevents home-based gun dealers from operating within 1.5 miles of a school. Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, makes it illegal for anyone under 21 to purchase any kind of firearm. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen. I thank you. Mr. & Mrs Lon Horiuchi
Everyone of these bills further restricting the rights of the law abiding citizen should be voted down.
This bill must be OPPOSED. These bills do NOTHING to prevent/reduce crime. In fact, these types of bills will eventually ENABLE and allow MORE crime (just look at crime in Maryland and DC) by reducing Virginian's ability to adequately and easily protect themselves. This bill is immoral, unjust, unconstitutional and racist as it will HARM black and brown people, other minorities, women, the elderly, and children who will be the eventual victims as a result of laws like this. Using these types of bills to slowly deny the public's human right of self defense will NOT save lives or keep people safe. This has been proven again and again. As lawmakers, you have an obligation to ensure that the laws you enact *protect* our God-given, human right of self defense -- you should *not* be disenfranchising us and making us MORE vulnerable to crime and injustices with these ignorant bills. Thank you.
As a voting resident and veteran I strongly OPPOSE the following bills: HB 12, Jones, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon, requires all firearms in a home be secured if there is a minor in the home. Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, prevents home-based gun dealers from operating within 1.5 miles of a school. Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, makes it illegal for anyone under 21 to purchase any kind of firearm. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen. This bills have gone beyond the scope of "safety" and are clearly an attempt to strip the constitutional rights of law abiding citizens of this great Commonwealth. The majority of these bills have already been struck down my the SCOTUS. Remember your oath: I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God. v/r Thomas Speich
I do not support any proposed gun restriction bills. I have been a resident of VA for 40 years and have never been in trouble with the law. I do not think the bills that are being proposed will deter gun violence. The issue is not guns. It is mental health.
Dear Democrats proposing duplicative and unconstitutional bills: It is apparent that you seek to propose bills that ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL based on the US Supreme Court. Please reference the Heller and Bruen decisions. It would appear you are taking that as a mere suggestion? Further, the "catch me if you can" approach to lawmaking is ridiculous. Yes, we know the strategy made famous by Obama...pass laws you know are unconstitutional knowing it will take ~5 years and millions of dollars to undo them. In the interim, the damage is done. This is the stuff of tyrants. HB 12: DUPLICATIVE OF FEDERAL LAW. HB 23: UNCONSTITUTIONAL UNDER BRUEN. HB 158: DUPLICATIVE OF FEDERAL LAW. HB 183: DUPLICATIVE. 14 and under is covered. There are many cases were 15, 16, 17 year olds defending themselves and family from crime using firearms. HB 585: UNCONSTITUTIONAL. HB 791: a solution looking for a problem. Most normal people grew up playing with BB guns. Cite all the crime associated with BB guns? HB 861: UNCONSTITUTIONAL UNDER BRUEN. HB 1174: UNCONSTITUTIONAL UNDER BRUEN. already heard and struck down in other states. The disarmament agenda is tiresome. If you spent half the energy in Richmond, Hampton, Norfolk, and Petersburg, 95%+ of "gun violence" would be taken care of. Your main perpetrator group is black men killing black men, 18-34. Don't you read the Virginia Crime Commission's reports? if you were serious, you'd be going after ACTUAL criminals vs. passing meaningless laws that only impact the law abiding.
HB 12, Jones, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure - Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon - Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, is Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, is not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen.
We are encouraging our state politicians to work on meaningful solutions that will actually help reduce gun violence, violence in general, theft, and improve the quality of our lives. Let's start enforcing current laws that are reasonable and remove those that aren't. Work on quickly improving the number of quality jobs in VA. Through good local educational services that focus on the required skills, people can improve their own lives, the lives of their family, and have more hope for the future. Childcare assistance can help families that are working. It's time to create a new playbook and stop passing additional restrictive laws that only burden our citizens and families. Start improving our lives which leads to less violence, good jobs, and strong families that can raise our children better.
Why is it that you want to continue to go against your sworn oath to office and institute further gun restrictions and control on law biding citizens? With control of the senate and house why don't you focus on the root of the problem which is more to improve the socio-economic issues regions face which should in turn lower drug and gang related problems which in turn is the true reason behind your "gun violence" issue you continue to speak on. WE DO NOT HAVE A GUN VIOLENCE ISSUE, we have violence issue that you need to address not through more gun restrictions. Enough with the gun control bills, it is the first thing the democratic party pushes when they get control of the majority. Use this time to better the communities or is that just tok difficult for you? As all you want to do is make it so criminals have more power over law biding citizens, pull our children into gang and drug culture and go easy on crime so they know there is no accountability for their actions.
I wish congress would treat firearms and firearms owners in Virginia like they do illegal aliens. Turn a blind eye to them and just let them be free. Never make rules about securing access or entry to them. Ensure that none of them need paperwork or if they do, wait so long before you check to make sure any of it is accurate, you never find the illegals and in this case, firearms. That would be swell.
"The right to keepand bear arms shall not be infringed..." Those who carry firearms should not leave them in vehicles. Many guns used in crimes are stolen, often from vehicles. Hospitals and other places people gather are where trained armed civilians can thwart a crime or mass shooting. The AR-15 is a civilian multi-purpose rifle -- easy to operate, inexpensive, accurate, low recoil, low cost ammo, and potentially lethal when necessary. It is the best rifle ever invented for U.S. civilian use...hunting, self and home defense, and target shooting. Resources in VA should be used for law enforcement, crime prevention and mental health. Take ILLEGAL guns off the streets.
Given the second amendment of the constitution, there shall be no laws that prevent me from being able to protect myself. I am a conceal carry holder and have been for almost 10 years now. We vehemently oppose any laws that would prevent Conceal Carry Holders from carrying our weapon. Our goal is to have protection and not need it rather than needing protection, and not being able to have it. We will not comply.
When will misguided legislators learn that infringing the right of law abiding citizens to exercise our Second Amendment liberties does nothing to make the public safe? In fact, it makes us all less safe because criminals love restrictions on lawful firearm ownership. Wake up! Follow the Constitution. “The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed!” Bishop E.W. Jackson STAND Virginia PAC
First, SCOTUS has addressed gun rights; access to magazines & ammo multiple times. Multiple times, SCOTUS' decision has sided with law abiding gun owners. I am curious as to why you continue to suppress our God given constitutionally protected right to bear arms? I can only assume one of two reasons. Either (A) you are completely uneducated as to the writers of the constitution, as well as their separate and several memoirs on the right to keep and bear arms; and furthermore ignorant of the right of the People to keep and bear arms as a result of the People having fought against tyranny using NOT federally provided military arms and ammunition - rather, PRIVATELY owned arms and ammunition. Below are just a few examples of historically accurate statements on said RIGHTS : “No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.” – Thomas Jefferson, Virginia Constitution, Draft 1, 1776 “A strong body makes the mind strong. As to the species of exercises, I advise the gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it gives boldness, enterprise and independence to the mind. Games played with the ball, and others of that nature, are too violent for the body and stamp no character on the mind. Let your gun therefore be your constant companion of your walks.” – Thomas Jefferson, letter to Peter Carr, August 19, 1785 “Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops.” – Noah Webster, An Examination of the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution, October 10, 1787 “To disarm the people…[i]s the most effectual way to enslave them.” – George Mason, The Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution, June 14, 1788 “I ask who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers.” – George Mason, Address to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 4, 1788 My questions are simply these, who do you expect to follow these laws that you put forth? Criminals? Why would you expect someone who is a CRIMINAL to obey the law? Maybe you should take some time and learn the definition? Which brings me to part (B) as to why I think you are trying to bar citizens from owning semi-auto rifles & there average magazines - you fear us to the point where you want to disarm us in much the same way HITLER disarmed HIS constituency. Clearly Thomas Jefferson had it correct - when he said “The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes…. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.” – Thomas Jefferson, Commonplace Book (quoting 18th century criminologist Cesare Beccaria), 1774-1776. Tyranny is the only reasonable explanation for your efforts because the lies spread by the US Government regarding death tolls, etc., is a complete fallacy. All you have to do is a little independent research regarding 'mass shootings.' And yes, private citizens did in fact have legal ownership of canons all the way through the Civil War era. Only an idiot would believe the lies that they did not.
Comments Document
In Caetano v. Massachusetts (2016), the Supreme Court reiterated its earlier rulings that "the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding" and that its protection is not limited to "only those weapons useful in warfare". New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen (2022) is a landmark: [ In a 6–3 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that New York's law was unconstitutional and that the ability to carry a pistol in public was a constitutional right guaranteed by the Second Amendment. — A 2022 poll found that 64% of Americans were in favor of the ruling in contrast with 35% of Americans that say they oppose the decision.[50] Additionally, 36%, the largest single share, said they strongly support the Court's ruling in contrast with 16% who said they strongly oppose it. The Legal Aid Society said the decision "may be an affirmative step toward ending arbitrary licensing standards that have inhibited lawful Black and Brown gun ownership in New York."[46] Former house minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R‑CA) supported the ruling, saying it "rightfully ensures the right of all law-abiding Americans to defend themselves without unnecessary government interference."[47] Law professor Steve Vladeck said the decision will "have monumental ramifications far beyond carrying firearms in public" and predicts there will be a "slew of litigation challenging any and every gun-control measure". Tread AROUND the 2nd amendment to our Constitution of the United States of America. Around it. Not on it; not lightly upon it! Carefully consider your vote! (Attachment: Photo of one night of a dangerous riot in a public place.)
Please leave law abiding citizens alone and focus the Commonwealth’s limited resources on the arrest, conviction, and incarceration of violent individuals. Paul Trible Blue Grass, VA
Suggest instead of Firearms Safety Subcommittee... Crimes Safety Subcommittee. greatly more effective! THE REAL ISSUE!
None of these proposals will impact the behavior of a criminal - only making law abiding citizens vulnerable as a new "gun free" zone attracts people seeking to make a statement with a gun and want time to do so before someone with a gun shows up. Additionally, most of these targeted problems are not currently problems or represent a growing trend that needs additional protections enacted to address. In my view, these bills have limited to no chance to provide additional protections or impact criminal behavior but DO further strip your constituents God give rights to provide the illusion of protection.
As a constituent, I urge you to OPPOSE the following bills: HB 12, Jones, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Laufer, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, McClure, requires a locking device and informational stickers to be included with every handgun sold. Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Simon, requires all firearms in a home be secured if there is a minor in the home. Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Mundon King, prevents home-based gun dealers from operating within 1.5 miles of a school. Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Hernandez, prohibits guns in hospitals and emergency rooms. Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, Sickles, makes it illegal for anyone under 21 to purchase any kind of firearm. A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen.
I'm a volunteer with Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America, and I support this bill.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support the following bills: HB1174, HB1181, HB1195, HB12, HB1424, HB1462, HB158, HB175, HB183, HB23, HB270, HB318, HB319, HB351, HB362, HB585, HB602, HB637, HB791, HB797, HB798, HB799, HB861, HB916, & HB945 I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I oppose these bills: HB1030, HB1141, HB1198, HB1230, HB1235, HB1321, HB1325, HB1386, HB289, HB389, HB756, & HB872 Innocent children are dying on our watch. Please do something.
My fellow Virginia’s I write today to comment on the bills before you. I am a retired Army veterans. I grew up in Virginia, went to ODU and instead of seeking residency in other states, stayed a Virginian and paid taxes while on active duty. I fought in war and lost good Soldiers and friends defending this nation, you and our Constitution. I retired in Virginia because I love this state. Your body will decide, with its vote, to either infringe on our rights or defend them. I ask you to defend them like those friends and Soldiers that also did. I am a responsible gun owner who raised his children to be responsible gun owners (all three are serving or served). I am also a CCP holder who is willing to defend his fellow citizens. If you vote for any of these bills to limit our rights it will impact my ability to defend myself and my family. Please do the right thing and defend the 2nd Amd. My wife and I already decided to leave the state if you enact these measures to limit our rights. Thank you Oliver Rose
HB 12, Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 23, Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 158, Federal law already covers this and it is an unnecessary expense for gun dealers. HB 183, Current law already covers 14 and under. 15, 16, and 17-year-olds have used guns to save lives by stopping home invasions or violent attacks on family members. HB 585, Unconstitutional and a solution to a non-existent problem. Home-based gun dealers don't have signs outside of their home generally. The customer has to be invited in. Convenience stores that have liquor, tobacco products, and vaping products are open to the public and within 1.5 miles of schools, yet there is no concern about that. HB 791, Hanson, makes BB gun possession on school groups a FELONY. Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist. HB 861, Not constitutional under Bruen and disarms visitors, family, and staff. HB 1174, A Virginia court has struck down part of the Universal Background Check law because it made it impossible for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds to purchase a handgun. Other states have also struck down such prohibitions under Bruen.
The selected bills are unconstitutional! They must be voted down!
This proposed legislation is blatantly unconstitutional and, if passed, it will, no doubt, be challenged in court. The taxpayers of Virginia will then be obligated to defend these unconstitutional measures, and those defenses will almost certainly lose. This will result in costly, meaningless court costs for all Virginia taxpayers. Those tax dollars could be spent on more meaningful and productive activities that benefit all citizens.
It is outrageous that the General Assembly is using our 2nd Amendment right to punish law abiding citizens who have done nothing wrong other then to defend themselves. It’s clear that Democrats pander to their bases without a thought about the citizens of this Commonwealth or this nation. This issue amongst others, galvanize the voters to get out and vote for the party that does not seek to encroach our rights under the State and Federal Constitution. There is zero proof that We The People are deranged killers, a mob or even the radical right that the Democrat who currently occupies the White House has said. He’d called us Nazis and portrayed honest, hardworking and law abiding citizens as the problem. We are not. Opens border, out of control spending, child indoctrination and parroting the DNC is the problem that is self inflicted and deserves nothing less then our disgust and rebuke come November 2024. The General Assembly reflects the divide between Northern Virginia to Richmond and the difference in South Eastern, Western Virginia. The Democrat party and Legislature know full well that gun control laws if enacted, will not reduce violence but increase victimhood that they’ll blame on Republicans and the cycle continues. Pathetic fools and they wonder why I’ve stopped contributing to candidates who never deliver to fools who govern us.
Please, NO more gun control. You all KNOW that criminals do not follow your laws. All your gun control does is limit my and my family's rights to self defense and peaceful enjoyment of the shooting sports. Instead, put, and keep, actual violent offenders in jail. It really is that simple.
As a woman and a 30 plus year Emergency Department nurse I ask you to reject these onerous gun control laws. Laws like these discourage women who are most at risk from being able to obtain the means to defend themselves. I worked many a late night shift in Northern Virginia and walked through empty parking lots and garages worried about my safety. Women should not have to suffer this and should have ready access to the means to defend themselves. You aren't disarming criminals your are disarming women.
The bills under consideration will do nothing to increase the safety of Virginians while infringing on our right to defend ourselves. They are designed to make it more difficult to obtain a firearm, possess a firearm, or use a firearm to defend oneself or others. Meanwhile criminals will continue unabated. Moreover, most of these unconstitutional laws have been rendered moot as they have been struck down by state and federal courts. As a former police officer and detective I implore you to reject these useless and unconstitutional laws. Thank you
No more gun control legislation. It's not the gun that's the issue. It's the mentally ill folks that obtained a gun.
I strongly oppose these bills as they are direct infringements on the 2nd Amendment of The Constitution. Most of these have already been found to be unconstitutional by various courts yet they are still being presented as bills. I am completely against these and any other such bills that infringe on the constitutional and inalienable rights of the Citizens of the United States of America and of the Commonwealth of Virginia.
No more unconstitutional gun control.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support these bills. I expect to see more gun violence prevention legislation *actually pass* since there is so much nonpartisan alignment on this topic. The status quo is unacceptable. Our pro-gun culture is a threat to our children, and a slap in the face to every person who has lost their lives to gun violence. Enough is enough - policy over prayers.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support this bill.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support this bill. Gun violence in our communities and in our state is heartbreaking and changes need to be made to protect the citizens of Virginia.
I am a member of Virginia moms for change and I support these bills.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change and I support these bills. To all responsible gun owners: you shouldn't be afraid of these common sense bills. These bills are directed at people who are not handling their firearms as the deadly weapons that they can be. Instead of thinking your rights are being taken away, consider instead how safe storage, permits and waiting periods could help the daily gun violence in our country. Keep your guns, we are not trying to take them away. These bills are an opportunity for you, as a responsible gun owner, to be a part of the solution to help cut down on needless violence.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change and I support the selected bills. I believe they will make our communities safer and that gun violence is a critical issue we must address with such legislation and more.
I am a member of Virginia Mom's for Change, a group working towards gun violence prevention. We support the bills indicated above.
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group. I support bills HB1174 HB1181 HB1195 HB12 HB1424 HB1462 HB158 HB175 HB183 HB23 HB270 HB318 HB319 HB351 HB362 HB585 HB602 HB637 HB791 HB798 HB799 HB861 HB916 HB945
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group. I support bills HB1174 HB1181 HB1195 HB12 HB1424 HB1462 HB158 HB175 HB183 HB23 HB270 HB318 HB319 HB351 HB362 HB585 HB602 HB637 HB791 HB798 HB799 HB861 HB916 HB945
and I support these bills. The bills we support are: HB1174, HB1181, HB1195, HB12, HB1424, HB1462, HB158, HB175, HB183, HB23, HB270, HB318, HB319, HB351, HB362, HB585, HB602, HB637, HB791, HB797, HB798, HB799, HB861, HB916, & HB945
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support these bills. The bills we support are: HB1174, HB1181, HB1195, HB12, HB1424, HB1462, HB 158, HB175, HB183, HB23, HB270, HB318, HB319, HB351, HB362, HB585, HB602, HB637, HB791, HB797, HB798, HB799, HB861, HB916, & HB945
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support these bills. The bills we support are: HB1174, HB1181, HB1195, HB12, HB1424, HB1462, HB158, HB175, HB183, HB23, HB270, HB318, HB319, HB351, HB362, HB585, HB602, HB637, HB791, HB797, HB798, HB799, HB861, HB916, & HB945
I am a member of Virginia Moms for Change, a gun violence prevention group, and I support this bill.
The Virginia NAACP supports this bill. We support common sense gun legislation that will have a significant impact on reducing gun violence and saving lives; this includes comprehensive background checks on the sale of firearms, limitations on purchasing firearms and prohibition of selling and transporting assault weapons - this is necessary legislation to keep Virginians safe.
The end of solitary confinement must be done My son was murdered in solitary confinement at Red Onion Prison in Pound Va on 1/3/22.
The Virginia NAACP supports this bill. We support common sense gun legislation that will have a significant impact on reducing gun violence and saving lives; this includes comprehensive background checks on the sale of firearms, limitations on purchasing firearms and prohibition of selling and transporting assault weapons - this is necessary legislation to keep Virginians safe.
requires gun dealers to provide a handgun locking-device for handgun sales, along with a warning message in the box and on a warning label affixed to the handgun. None of this is necessary as federal law already requires a locking device be supplied by dealers for handgun purchases. The federal government also provides a safety brochure that is required to be available to purchasers. Is the State going to provide the stickers and warning papers to dealers, so they don’t have to bear the additional cost for those items? Should the taxpayer have to bear this unnecessary expense? This bill would also add an additional cost for a locking device to those doing a private sale under the current Universal Background Check requirement. Oddly, the bill exempts sales to law enforcement. Since this bill is supposed to be about safety, are law enforcement families not worthy of being protected, too? Cannot Support
Our Constitution does not provide citizens with privileges. It establishes a government with checks and balances and specifically limits the governments ability to remove the rights of its people. In regards to the matter at hand, it specifically says the the government cannot place limitations on the right of a citizen to keep and bear arms. Before I get the typical response, I know you are already aware that the phrase "well regulated" specifically refers to an being trained and ready to bear said arms. The language at the time did not use the term "regulated" as we do with modern regulations. It has been proven in the courts repeatedly that the laws you are currently considering are unconstitutional. Of this I am sure you are already aware. By spending time and tax dollars discussing laws that you know to be unconstitutional, you are in fact wasting time and tax dollars that could be spent on productive issues. I can only assume your intent is to intentionally waste time, and force members of the firearms industry to waste money on legal fees defending the constitution you have sworn to uphold. Please consider actual data and actual facts when considering gun legislation. No data supports the claim the "assault weapon" bans actually reduce gun related crime. More guns are being purchased now than ever before, yet now that the latest FBI data has been released, we can see that gun related crimes have not increased. Also, like every year that the FBI has released data, so called "assault weapons" make up a very small portion of all gun crimes. For your general knowledge the term "assault weapon" was first coined by Adolf Hitler. He renamed one of their new automatic firearms, the Sturmgewehr, because he felt that the name "assault weapon" would strike fear in allied forces. This is also the exact reason the gun control community uses this term as well. The fact is that these firearms are not fully automatic and cannot be made so without a high degree of machining skills and mechanical knowhow. Plus doing so is already illegal. The fact is the Biden's latest gun control act has not been equally enforced. It was supposed to provide additional support for school security and mental health services. It was supposed to provide stronger punishments for those cought breaking existing gun laws. It was supposed to allow FFL's to use the NICS system to check employees. It was supposed to allow FFL's to be able to instantly check inventory or potential purchase/trades by their serial number to determine if the firearm has been stolen or used in any crimes. None of these provisions have been acted upon or enforced. Please drop these latest gun control bills. They are unconstitutional and will never pass. Please do not waste your time and our tax dollars on these wasted efforts. Regards, Jonathan Goodman
THe Virginia NAACP supports this bill. We support common sense gun legislation that will have a significant impact on reducing gun violence and saving lives; this includes comprehensive background checks on the sale of firearms, limitations on purchasing firearms and prohibition of selling and transporting assault weapons - this is necessary legislation to keep Virginians safe.
The Virginia NAACP supports this bill. We support common sense gun legislation that will have a significant impact on reducing gun violence and saving lives; this includes comprehensive background checks on the sale of firearms, limitations on purchasing firearms and prohibition of selling and transporting assault weapons - this is necessary legislation to keep Virginians safe.
The Virginia NAACP supports this bill. We support common sense gun legislation that will have a significant impact on reducing gun violence and saving lives; this includes comprehensive background checks on the sale of firearms, limitations on purchasing firearms and prohibition of selling and transporting assault weapons - this is necessary legislation to keep Virginians safe.
THe Virginia NAACP supports this bill. We support common sense gun legislation that will have a significant impact on reducing gun violence and saving lives; this includes comprehensive background checks on the sale of firearms, limitations on purchasing firearms and prohibition of selling and transporting assault weapons - this is necessary legislation to keep Virginians safe.
The Virginia NAACP supports this bill. We support common sense gun legislation that will have a significant impact on reducing gun violence and saving lives; this includes comprehensive background checks on the sale of firearms, limitations on purchasing firearms and prohibition of selling and transporting assault weapons - this is necessary legislation to keep Virginians safe.
Every gun law is an infringement. I'm a parent and I oppose HB12.
I'm a volunteer with Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America, and I support this bill.