Hi, LeadsFly is a lead provider for companies all over the world. We provide high quality fresh leads for all business types, we are collecting new leads for all interested parties daily. Leave us a request or check out the data we have on hand for instant delivery. Visit us here: http://hodspeak.leadsfly.biz

Good morning I am Courtney Farrar (spell last name), a resident of the East End here in Richmond and a daily bus patron. I am reminded often of the inequities within our transit system while observing the lack of decent and safe places to stand or sit while waiting for said buses. Next time you’re moving about our beautiful Commonwealth, remember not only those deemed to be your average constituents but, remember those living with disabilities, mothers with small children, and others sitting on flipped shopping carts in proximity to the street. An influx of shelters allows these usually cash-strapped constituents to prevent taxi and ride share costs due to the inability to stand or hazardous conditions. Without the passage of House Bill 285, this body will force these vulnerable populations into dangerous and expensive situations to simply get to work, do errands, or participate in other activities.

Comments Document

The Virginia League of Conservation Voters encourages you to SUPPORT HB285 (McQuinn) Uniform Statewide Building Code; bus shelters. This Legislation Would: --Streamline the bus stop improvement process and eliminate unnecessary delays. --Accelerate deployment of Transit Ridership Incentive Program (TRIP) funds to improve the accessibility and safety of our bust transit system’s bus stops and last-foot infrastructure.

My name is Michael Gordon. I am a recovering addict. My clean date is 06/06/2008. I writing this letter because it my duty as a health professional to bring to the table how important it is that we change the barrier crime law. I have spent countless hours and days working with other addicts who trying to find their pathway into recovery. The frontlines are thin because the people whom society deemed unworthy because of some past mistakes cannot work in the field that they could do the greatest good. I did not know when I received my sentence in 1990 for distribution of crack cocaine. I would be serving a life time sentence. Luck for me I don’t have a barrier crime, yet today after getting my GED, going to college and graduating with honors. I still can live in certain areas or have certain jobs. I went from the crack house to the White House and still that not enough for Virginia to forgive me of my past mistakes. We need more people who has made a deep commitment to change to share their experiences with others who are suffering!!

My name is Teri Morgan and I am the Executive Director for the Virginia Board for People with Disabilities (VBPD). I write to you this afternoon to provide public comment on HB 327 dealing with the State Rental Assistance Program for the Settlement Agreement Population. The Virginia Board for People with Disabilities is in support of this bill. Legislation such as this will have a positive impact on individuals with disabilities. The State Rental Assistance Program assists in providing opportunities to individuals within the settlement agreement population to find rental housing that meets their individual needs. The program allows individuals the ability to choose where they live, whom they live with, and who supports them providing needed independence. VBPD is in support of HB 327.

Dear, I hope this message finds you well. I represent motor-import.com, a trusted and reliable partner for individuals and businesses seeking cost-effective solutions for importing both used and new cars from around the world. We specialize in offering comprehensive services, including shipping, customs clearance, and delivery, to make global car buying a hassle-free and economical experience. Why Choose Motor-Import? Competitive Pricing: At Motor-Import, we are committed to helping our customers save money. We understand that purchasing a car locally can often come with a hefty price tag. Our services are designed to provide a cost-effective alternative, making it possible for you to acquire your dream vehicle for less. Global Network: With our extensive network of contacts and partners worldwide, we can source vehicles from a variety of locations, ensuring you have access to a wide range of options. Whether you're interested in a specific make and model or hunting for unique vehicles, we have you covered. Expertise in Customs: Navigating the complexities of international customs regulations can be a daunting task. Our experienced team specializes in customs clearance, ensuring that your vehicle is imported legally and without any unexpected delays or costs. Secure Shipping: We prioritize the safety of your investment. Our shipping solutions are designed to protect your vehicle during transit, ensuring it arrives in the same condition it left its origin. Reliable Delivery: We pride ourselves on timely and secure deliveries. You can trust us to get your car to your doorstep or preferred location promptly. Visit our website at Motor-Import Website to learn more about our services and explore the testimonials from our satisfied customers. If you have any questions or are interested in starting the process of importing your desired vehicle, please don't hesitate to reach out to us at contact@motor-import.com. Our team is ready to assist you in finding the best car import solution to suit your needs and budget. Say goodbye to overpriced local car dealerships and hello to affordable and convenient global car sourcing with Motor-Import. We look forward to helping you import your dream car at a price that's both competitive and satisfying. Best regards,

I’m Tushar Kansal, Director of the Housing Policy Initiative at The Pew Charitable Trusts. The foremost issue affecting housing costs is a national shortage of 4-7 million homes, including a shortfall of more than 105,000 in Virginia. To address this shortage and improve affordability, some states, like California, Oregon and Washington, have passed laws requiring studies on whether they can safely legalize small apartment buildings of 4-6 stories with one staircase. Being able to build with one staircase instead of using bulkier, two-staircase models means small apartment buildings of those heights can fit on small lots and include family-sized apartments of three or more bedrooms. Wide, deep building layouts that include two staircases and a long corridor prevent apartments from having cross-ventilation or fitting buildings into existing cities and towns with only small lots available. Though the requirement for two staircases and a long corridor stems from concerns about fire safety during an earlier era with more primitive building technology, evidence shows that safety outcomes are no better in places with two-staircase mandates than those without. Countries like Austria, France, and Japan that allow one staircase generally have lower rates of fire death than the U.S. New York City and Seattle allow one staircase for buildings up to six stories, yet New York and Washington states have fewer fire deaths than average, suggesting modern fire-safety measures can make small buildings with one staircase safe. Thank you, and I welcome any questions.

Comments Document

✅ Virginia LCV Bill Positions SUPPORT HB19, HB33, HB357, HB368 OPPOSE HB1363 HB 19 (Ware) - SUPPORT Directs the Virginia Institute of Marine Science (VIMS) to conduct a three-year study of the ecology, fishery impacts, and economic importance of the Atlantic menhaden population in Virginia’s waters. -- Menhaden are a critical species to provide nourishment for other fish targeted by commercial and recreational fishing industries. -- The General Assembly passed SB1388 during the 2023 legislative session, which developed plans for studying menhaden in Virginia’s waters. HB19 would direct VIMS to follow through on conducting the study HB 33 (Clark) - SUPPORT Directs the Commissioner of Health to convene a work group to study the occurrence of microplastics in the Commonwealth's public drinking water. -- As plastic breaks down over thousands of years, it does not go away but rather becomes microplastics–small plastic particles less than five millimeters in size. -- Microplastics are being found in our blood, lungs. Humans consume about a credit card worth of plastic every week. HB 357 (Simonds) - SUPPORT Establishes a work group to evaluate existing approaches to wetland conservation strategies, identify wetlands adaptation areas where tidal wetlands can persist in the landscape, and explore climate’s impact on wetlands’ health and survival. -- Wetlands are among the most productive, diverse, and important ecosystems in Virginia. Both tidal and nontidal wetlands improve water quality, reduce storm damage and flooding, control erosion, provide vital wildlife habitat, and help fight climate change. -- Virginia has already half the wetlands that existed in the 1780s due to development. According to a 2021 report by Climate Central, sea level rise threatens to cause Virginai to lose 42% of existing tidal wetlands by 2100. HB 368 (McClure) - SUPPORT This legislation would convene a stakeholder advisory group to recommend revisions to the Uniform Statewide Building Code regarding allowing multifamily buildings up to 6 stories to be served by a single staircase. -- Changing current regulations to allow single-stair buildings will empower construction of family size apartments and condos more easily and more affordably. -- Single stair construction is used in NYC, Seattle, and across Europe for buildings with a single staircase up to six stories in height. Modern fire safety measures such as fire resistant building materials, sprinkler systems, and secondary fire escapes mitigate fire risk. HB 1363 (O’Quinn) - OPPOSE -- This 2024 legislation is the “study version” of failed attempts in 2022 and 2023 to ban localities from electrifying new building construction–using the same broad language aimed at preventing any local action that “limits, prohibits or has the effect of prohibiting” natural gas service. -- The parameters of the study imply that Virginia’s clean energy transition threatens jobs, revenue, and our national security. -- This study seeks only to measure access to “fuels” methane (natural gas), or propane. It fails to consider whether banks, schools, state and local buildings, transit or telecommunications providers can use non-gas sources to meet their future energy needs. -- Prohibiting building electrification can leave high-density zones vulnerable to gas leaks, result in worsened indoor air quality, and prevent localities from meeting local emissions reductions targets.

HB19 - Vote YES https://vcnva.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/HB19-support.docx.pdf HB28 - Vote YES https://vcnva.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Support-HB28.pdf HB33 - Vote YES https://vcnva.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/HB33-support.pdf HB357 - Vote YES https://vcnva.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/HB357-VCN-support.docx.pdf HB368 - Vote YES https://vcnva.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/HB368-SB195-VCN-support.pdf HB809 - Vote YES https://vcnva.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/HB809-support-Leverage-of-Federal-Funding.docx.pdf HB1363 - Vote NO https://vcnva.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/OPPOSE-HB-1363-OQuinn-1.pdf

HB405 Please leave the decision on Solar Farms to the locality it’s proposed to be placed. The loss of agriculture and trees is a danger to the environment and fiscal health of the location and therefore the residents should have the final say. Studies of long term land pollution should be made available to all citizens in a manner that reaches a large portion of the state

The City of Portsmouth has reviewed and supports this bill, although it's only an optional inclusion, However, we do not think it should not still include a density requirement.

Oppose bill: The last thing we need is electric vehicles. -batteries are mined in Africa that promotes child labor -Unaffordable and dangerous fire hazard -Do not stand the cold weather

Please support HB644

HB567 provides a common-sense solution to ensure that Virginia has a sustainable future. EV charging stations in large residential or commercial settings would encourage EV usage and provide Virginians a convenient place to charge where they live and shop.

Please support HB567. Electric vehicles are a way forward for our communities, and we will all need to be able to charge them. This would allow a simpler transition and far less confusion. It is perfectly reasonable for the density proposed to assume a fleet of vehicles could more easily serve commercial needs as well. Thank you--such planning is best done ahead.

Hi, LeadsFly is a lead provider for companies all over the world. We provide high quality fresh leads for all business types, we are collecting new leads for all interested parties daily. Leave us a request or check out the data we have on hand for instant delivery. Visit us here: http://hodspeak.leadsfly.biz

OPPOSE: PLEASE GO TO PAGE 9 AND READ THE LAST COMMENT. PLEASE GO TO PAGE 27 AND READ THE THIRD COMMENT. LINK: Please go to https://go.boarddocs.com/vsba/henrico/Board.nsf/Public https://go.boarddocs.com/vsba/henrico/Board.nsf/files/D3CJHX4D404E/$file/Written%20Comments%203-14-24.pdf

OPPOSE THE BILLS THAT HAVE TO DO WITH MARIJUANA USE-RECREATIONAL USE. WHY ARE DEMOCRATS PROGRESSIVES AND SOME REPUBLICANS WANTING TO DESTROY VIRGINIA? Oregon switches up on drug leniency amid overdose surge: The ‘experiment’ is over: https://youtu.be/FN1DSR4vRgI?si=xeuBM_MpxmyDbCJx

Don’t bane our vapes

I object!

N/A

After reading through both of these bills, they are truly one sided, In favor of banishing vaping as a whole. 1069 is much like most bill enacted politically, where you have to weed through the nonsense in order to get to the actual reasoning. Working for a well established vape shop in the Hampton roads area this bill does nothing but eliminate those finding a safer alternative to smoking. The PMTA when enacted federally was a large was of time for vape juice manufactures since those that submitted there paid out millions all for their product to sit in the FDA waiting status with no movement since 2016. Nearly 10 years later those same manufacturers are still waiting for a denial or an approval from the Fda. 1509 is a joke as to the wording, out right banni.g the sale of nicotine product if it is a vapor related product not smoking, vapor or hemp related. Never mind the fact that your fine with personal choice as long as it's benefits you pockets with financial gain (big tobacco) since for both of these bills so far the only ones allowed in virginia are owned and backed by Philip Morris and R.J Reynolds respectively. Hb 790 literally, tax the people more. My lord let's get one thing straight among the taxes the the virginians are already supposed to pay let's add one more to the Tab. Since that sounds alot like double/triple taxation, which doubled taxation is already frowned upon sound like greedy politician wanting more money to fund project that are unnecessary and unwanted. My lord, all of these bill go against the rights of the free people of the commonwealth, hindering the right to choose how the people work and live, taking their hard earned money to give to your pockets to find you campaign/s. In short good luck running for office the fall and years to come we vape we vote. Take the rights of freedom to do as we please we make sure your not in office much longer by voting you out and voting in better people that only look at the small picture of the harm (which is less than %1) instead of the larger picture the people that have used vaping to get of cigarettes and leading healthier live thank to vaping. I oppose all bill against vaping thank you.

Taking away the ability for people who have tried to quit smoking and have a safer alternative is terrible.

I oppose. Blame the parents.

i am against banning vabing and there should be able to still do it.

Shouldn’t be banned

We don’t want vapes to be band

Please do not ban vapes and juices

Don’t ban vaping

Keep vaping

Please don’t Ban Vaping!

Don’t ban vapes help military with stress

Please don’t ban vaping

Adults of age should be allowed to make their choices on whatever if it effects their bodies.

I stand against any ban on vaping. I work at a vape shop and any bill restricting vaping more or completely banning it based on arbitrary FDA rulings would cause me a loss of my job, as well as hundreds maybe even thousands of others across Virginia.

Hey I’m against banning vaping

Don't do it

I believe it would be very detrimental to the United States military personnel to limit the sale of nicotine products in the state of Virginia For a lot it’s a relief from work and a lot of the traumatic stuff we have done on deployments. To expand on that point a lot of people are using caping to stop chain smoking cigarettes which are worse for us military members , a lot of us are known to be soo stressed that military members will smoke a whole carton of cigarettes a Day which is very bad long term then just inhaling nicotine. The VA offices already don’t do very well with the mental health of most veterans like me and others that I’ve served with and I think it would be a bad idea all around.

Vaping has improved my quality of life. I refuse to give up capimg to support the big tobacco and caner industries

Don’t do it.

I wish to vote against. Everyone uses these for relaxation and would be a huge disappointment to have this happen to us

The County of Accomack requests the insertion of the following language: The appointment of more than two members of a public body to another public body does not constitute a meeting of the first body.

I am writing to support the passage of HB955 by the General Assembly. Everyone is so desperate for shelter that leases are signed without property managers or landlords explaining the details of the lease. In my 8 years of administering homeless prevention funds, there have been so many times I have had to explain the details of a lease agreement. Sometimes those provisions are so vague as to defy explanation. A summary page of the most pertinent terms would be beneficial to both parties. I have seen leases that do not meet even the most basic requirements of VLTRA and yet people sign these in the midst of desperation. This is important legislation and I hope it passes thru the General Assembly this session.

I am writing on behalf of the VSC NAACP Housing Committee to express our strong support for the bills highlighted below that aim to enhance tenant protections and rights within our community. These proposed measures are crucial steps toward addressing the existing power imbalance between renters and landlords, which places renters at an elevated risk of housing instability, harassment, and homelessness. As you are aware, the disparity in power between renters and landlords is a significant concern that has far-reaching implications, particularly for marginalized communities. This power imbalance not only jeopardizes housing stability but also perpetuates racial inequity. Numerous studies have shown that communities of color are disproportionately affected by eviction and housing instability, exacerbating existing disparities. Tenant protections, when enacted into law, serve as a fundamental tool in preventing evictions and ensuring that renters can maintain stable housing. We firmly believe that these proposed bills, with their emphasis on enhancing tenant rights, will contribute significantly to rectifying the current imbalances and fostering a more equitable housing landscape. By supporting and advancing these bills, we collectively acknowledge the importance of safeguarding vulnerable renters, promoting housing stability, and working towards a more just and inclusive society. We urge you to consider the broader impact that these legislative measures can have on our community and to cast your support in favor of their passage. Thank you for your attention to this matter. We appreciate your dedication to serving the interests of our community and trust that you will carefully consider the positive impact that these bills can have on the lives of countless individuals and pass them accordingly. Sincerely, Tracey Hardney Scott Housing Committee Chair VSC NAACP Housing Committee

Please allow home grown outdoor in this bill. The lobbyist are trying to ruin for all the little mom and pop shops in Virginia. It’s so greedy and needs less regulation and less restrictions.

Don’t bane our vapes

I object!

N/A

After reading through both of these bills, they are truly one sided, In favor of banishing vaping as a whole. 1069 is much like most bill enacted politically, where you have to weed through the nonsense in order to get to the actual reasoning. Working for a well established vape shop in the Hampton roads area this bill does nothing but eliminate those finding a safer alternative to smoking. The PMTA when enacted federally was a large was of time for vape juice manufactures since those that submitted there paid out millions all for their product to sit in the FDA waiting status with no movement since 2016. Nearly 10 years later those same manufacturers are still waiting for a denial or an approval from the Fda. 1509 is a joke as to the wording, out right banni.g the sale of nicotine product if it is a vapor related product not smoking, vapor or hemp related. Never mind the fact that your fine with personal choice as long as it's benefits you pockets with financial gain (big tobacco) since for both of these bills so far the only ones allowed in virginia are owned and backed by Philip Morris and R.J Reynolds respectively. Hb 790 literally, tax the people more. My lord let's get one thing straight among the taxes the the virginians are already supposed to pay let's add one more to the Tab. Since that sounds alot like double/triple taxation, which doubled taxation is already frowned upon sound like greedy politician wanting more money to fund project that are unnecessary and unwanted. My lord, all of these bill go against the rights of the free people of the commonwealth, hindering the right to choose how the people work and live, taking their hard earned money to give to your pockets to find you campaign/s. In short good luck running for office the fall and years to come we vape we vote. Take the rights of freedom to do as we please we make sure your not in office much longer by voting you out and voting in better people that only look at the small picture of the harm (which is less than %1) instead of the larger picture the people that have used vaping to get of cigarettes and leading healthier live thank to vaping. I oppose all bill against vaping thank you.

I oppose. Blame the parents.

I oppose this vape ban

Shouldn’t be banned

N/A

We don’t want vapes to be band

Please do not ban vapes and juices

Don’t ban vaping

Keep vaping

Please don’t Ban Vaping!

Don’t ban vapes help military with stress

Please don’t ban vaping

Adults of age should be allowed to make their choices on whatever if it effects their bodies.

I stand against any ban on vaping. I work at a vape shop and any bill restricting vaping more or completely banning it based on arbitrary FDA rulings would cause me a loss of my job, as well as hundreds maybe even thousands of others across Virginia.

Hey I’m against banning vaping

Don't do it

I believe it would be very detrimental to the United States military personnel to limit the sale of nicotine products in the state of Virginia For a lot it’s a relief from work and a lot of the traumatic stuff we have done on deployments. To expand on that point a lot of people are using caping to stop chain smoking cigarettes which are worse for us military members , a lot of us are known to be soo stressed that military members will smoke a whole carton of cigarettes a Day which is very bad long term then just inhaling nicotine. The VA offices already don’t do very well with the mental health of most veterans like me and others that I’ve served with and I think it would be a bad idea all around.

Vaping has improved my quality of life. I refuse to give up capimg to support the big tobacco and caner industries

Don’t do it.

I wish to vote against. Everyone uses these for relaxation and would be a huge disappointment to have this happen to us

Hi there, I'm Natalie from Social Busy Bee, your partner in the exciting world of Instagram growth. I've discovered something phenomenal for skyrocketing your Instagram popularity and I'm thrilled to share it with you! Social Growth Engine introduces a groundbreaking service that takes your Instagram engagement to new heights. It's effortless: - Zero in on producing unforgettable content. - Extremely budget-friendly at a mere $36/month. - Completely safe (no password needed), incredibly powerful, and Instagram's best friend. I've experienced remarkable results firsthand, and I'm sure you will too! Amplify your Instagram presence right now: http://get.socialbuzzzy.com/instagram_booster Best wishes, Natalie at Social Busy Bee"

Hi I am writing to you on behalf of The Well Connection UK, a media and publishing company. We could easily get virginia.gov featured in various publications such as magazines, online blogs and news sites. This would undoubtedly help virginia.gov with publicity, reputation, domain authority and organic search engine rankings. We have a wide range of options including completely free collaborations, sponsored posts, guest posts and banner ads. If this sounds of interest, please reach out to the senior business development manager, Anita at info@thewellconnection.co.uk and whatsapp +447395206515 (GMT) Kind regards Clifton Junior Outreach Assistant

Alexandria is a vibrant city based on history, culture, a waterfront and lots of tourism. If Virginia has money and space to build an arena then you have money and space to build new schools. Our school system is deplorable. It’s overcrowded. Think of your citizens before thinking about your quick money grab that eventually leads to an inevitable loss. We don’t want or need an arena. This is pure greed.

As Senior Plant Manager of Mohawk Industries' Commercial Carpet Tile manufacturing facility in Glasgow, Va., I would like to voice my support for HB1361. As a large manufacturing facility in a small community in Rockbridge County, Mohawk employs roughly 450 people at this plant and produces carpet tile for multiple commercial applications including the following segments: Education, Workplace, Senior Living, Healthcare, Government and the Retail sectors. This legislation is very important to Mohawk Industries and the Glasgow Plant; giving preference to goods produced in Virginia and the option to match out-of-state bids would be a significant boost to our business and enhance the job security of hundreds of Mohawk employees working in Rockbridge County. We strongly support this legislation. Thanks for allowing me the opportunity to share my support on behalf of Mohawk Industries and the Glasgow facility. Doug Carter - Senior Plant Manager, Mohawk Industries - Glasgow Plant

The Portsmouth Public Schools M/WBE Program - Procurement Office strongly supports these bills: HB 341- Benefits seniors, and it is a preference bill that postively impacts SWaMs. HB1108 - provides transparency in the State procurement contracting program. HB1191 - transfers authority fro the DGS to the Division of Engineering and Buildings to evaluate the use of construction management or desigh-build by state public bodies and requires decision approval at a public meeting. HB 1361 - allows Virginia business owners to match the price of the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, and it is a preference bill. Please support these important initiatives that help support M/WBEs and SM/WBEs. Thank you

Good afternoon, Chairman Carr, Subcommittee Members, and Chairman Bulova. Thank you for your public service and leadership. I am writing to endorse HB 1371, the "Local Procurement Transparency Act." For returning Subcommittee members, Delegate Simon’s may look familiar. In 2021, this Subcommittee and the full General Laws Committee approved the same language, as SB 1384, which was then patroned by Senator Surovell. We were one vote short of ultimate enactment, ending with a 4-4 vote in the Civil Subcommittee of Courts of Justice. Delegate Simon’s legislative efforts are supported by a diverse group of organizations including the Virginia Poverty Law Center, Virginia National Organization for Women, Virginia Employment Lawyers Association, Public Justice, and the National Employment Law Project. HB 1371 will allow participating localities to ask bidders or offerors if they use forced arbitration in employment and civil rights disputes and certain online payment systems. Forced arbitration is when companies require employees or customers to submit to secretive, pre-dispute arbitration as a condition of using a product or keeping a job—before a dispute arises. Companies using forced arbitration might appear to be good candidates for a contract on paper but may be rife with unknown problems—like sexual harassment, discrimination, labor abuses, and service failures—that would undermine their contract performance. As more and more companies adopt forced arbitration clauses that require disputes to be resolved by a secret tribunal, public bodies in Virginia receive less and less information about potential contractors. HB 1371 will provide transparency for making the best contracting decisions using taxpayer dollars. Not only are sexual harassment, discrimination, wage theft, and other illegal practices contrary to state values and harmful to Virginians but there also is a wealth of evidence that businesses that violate the law also provide substandard work—often at a higher cost. According to NELP’s 2020 ground-breaking study, forced arbitration has enabled Virginia employers to steal $296 million in wages from workers in low-wage jobs. Finally, I want to emphasize that HB 1371 is (1) optional and (2) does not ban forced arbitration. This bill provides transparency in contracting and falls fully within the market participant exception to any federal preemption of state law by the Federal Arbitration Act. Thank you for your consideration.

HB1397 Statement by Mary Paden, Chair, South County Task Force, a group that advocates for social justice on the Route 1 Corridor in Fairfax County. I speak in favor of HB 1397 Along Fairfax County’s 9-mile Route 1 corridor north of Ft Belvoir there are five thriving mobile home communities that offer unsubsidized affordable housing to about 1,200 hardworking families. This corridor, one of the poorest areas of the county, is planned for dense development that threatens to displace these families. A coalition of mobile home owners has advocated with the county for better conditions and even joined with the county and a nonprofit to make an offer to purchase one of the mobile home parks using the current Manufactured Housing Lot Lease Act. But that state law failed them and an equity company bought the park for a lower bid because of a preexisting sales contract with a penalty clause. We want to amend that law to make it easier for mobile home owners to purchase their parks. Tenant and nonprofit ownership of Mobile Home Parks is growing nationally because it offers security and many benefits of homeownership. The Department of Housing and Urban Development and other federal agencies recognize mobile homes as affordable housing and have been changing regulations to make it easier to get mortgages. Examples of parks owned and run by resident associations, some in combination with nonprofits or local governments, include ROCUSA, Southwood in Charlottsville Va, and Bermuda Estates in Chesterfield Va. If a park’s location makes it too expensive to purchase, tenants and their allies will advocate for the county to create funds and use proffers to make sure home owners are compensated for their property and engaged in relocation plans. This committee must remove language that limits the capacity of localities during the re-zoning process. Thank you for your time and attention.

Good afternoon, I am Keren Croasdaile. I’ve lived my adolescence in Penn-Dawn with both my mother, step-father and my pet, it is my home. The sense of housing instability I experienced was very stressful growing up, it was difficult to live with the fear of the rug being pulled from under our feet. By the time I was reaching my adolescence; my parents saved enough to purchase a moving home. This was a very big step for us. When my parents moved to Penn-Dawn, this was the first time I had truly felt a sense of stability in terms of housing. These homes are accessible to many who struggle not only with housing insecurity but also financial instability. They are more than what most may see them as, for example transient or low quality homes. It is vital that not only we erase the stigma around this type of housing but also invest and protect mobile homes and those that call them their homes. We are around 90 families in the midst of a fast developing area and fear a developer will purchase our park. Afraid of the 60 days’ notice of sale and eviction, even if we work hard with our community, a non-profit and local government; our counter-offer won’t be taken into consideration. Please review and consider to pass bill 1397, which will give us an opportunity to own our park. Give us an opportunity towards home stability and protect us from displacement. Thank you.

Good Afternoon, I am Marinaela Funes, a Community Organizer with Tenants and Workers United. I have been working with The Mobile Home Coalition in South Fairfax for over three years. In the past three years I have seen how families have been displaced and how even though community members have been making huge efforts to get financial support from the local government, the community has not been taken into consideration when a Park is for sale by the property owner. I can recall some examples of this complex situation. 1- In December 2022 Harmony Place was one of the mobile homes In south Fairfax. Community residents got a 60 day notice about the sale of the property. It took them by surprise since the property owner denied many times that the park was for sale: In 60 days the residents formed a tenants association, looked for nonprofits to partner up with, and met with the local government and housing authorities to get their support. After so much work, the county and a nonprofit offered half a million more than the first buyer, but it wasn't enough to overcome the cost of the penalty clause. I remember that cold night when the park was sold, many community members and myself were crying. We felt so close and so far to making our dreams come true. To run the park by ourselves and preserve it as affordable. 2- At another Fairfax County park the seller refused to even consider an offer from the tenants because he had a contract with a buyer. Rays and Engleside Parks were sold in 2022 for $24.2 million. The situation was similar, residents got a 60 days notice of sale. In this time, the community created the Tenants association and found a nonprofit to support them. In this case the county was willing to support financially. However, the short notice and the overvalue of the property played against us. The assessed value of this park was only $8.1 million but the out of state company bought it for almost 25 million. It was impossible for the community to match this price. Current law says the park seller must make a public notice that the park is for sale, with any reasonable offers received, with the state DHCD, the locality, and the park residents. However, Owners do not publicize the sale until after they have signed a contract with a buyer that includes a penalty clause. HB1397 would eliminate the penalty amount from the match and would require the seller to negotiate in good faith with a tenant offer. HB1397 will make a huge impact for mobile home residents. This bill will give a chance to members to keep their homes affordable and protect them from displacement due to redevelopment or rent hikes. Thank you.

OPPOSE Equity, CRT, DEI, ESG, eg that divides, judges human beings based on race, gender, religion, education status, social status, political and ...This is not what Jesus, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Gandhi stood for. You all need to listen to Professor Glenn Loury and Pastor Corey Brooks: Website: https://youtu.be/HfAw9DT9-Ic?si=Va6Id0UTAT9oN13G

Northampton County is opposed to HB 1461. Short term rentals are a serious issue in the County and we feel it is an issue which is best dealt with by the locality. Thank you. Charles Kolakowski Northampton County Administrator

While the bill offers opportunities for economic growth and flexibility in property use, the town of Cape Charles has significant concerns about the specific language being proposed, particularly regarding its potential to create loopholes that undermine local rental duration requirements. The provision allowing third parties to lease properties long-term and then sublease them as short-term rentals could effectively circumvent established local regulations designed to maintain the balance between short-term tourism and long-term residential stability. This loophole not only threatens to negate legitimate local efforts to manage the character and dynamics of our neighborhoods but also poses a risk to the long-term housing market, potentially reducing the availability of long-term rentals needed by residents. Such an outcome would be contrary to the interests of the Cape Charles community, which relies on thoughtful and locally tailored regulations to ensure that growth and development are both sustainable and beneficial to all residents. Given these concerns, the town of Cape Charles strongly opposes the new language proposed in the bill. We believe it is essential to maintain local authority to enforce rental duration requirements and manage short-term rentals in a way that respects the needs and character of our community. We urge lawmakers to reconsider this aspect of the bill to prevent unintended consequences that could undermine the well-being of towns and cities across Virginia.

Attaching a letter in support of HB 1461, which would update Virginia’s existing code to give tenants equal access to short-term rental opportunities.

I oppose the wording of this proposed bill. Cape Charles restricts ADUs from being rented as STRs. With the proposed wording I can see where a homeowner renting long term an ADU in accordance with our ordinances, and the renter can turn around and rent as STRs which can reduce long-term rental stock in our community. This would happen in a tourism environment such as Cape Charles. We cannot afford to convert our by-right ADUs into STRs.

Good afternoon. I submitted an email in support of this legislation on January 16, 2024 (copied below). The only thing I would add is to suggest extending the period at the other end to November 1. Thank you, Joseph Azar From: Joseph Azar jazar2@icloud.com Subject: Support - Re: temperature data for April and May 2018-2023, Richmond Date: January 16, 2024 at 5:30 PM To: DelKKeys-Gamarra@house.virginia.gov Cc: Sheila Casey sheilakc@verizon.net Dear Delegate Keys-Gamarra, I understand from Sheila Casey (email thread below) that you may introduce a bill to require landlords to turn on the A/C in their buildings two weeks earlier—on May 1 instead of May 15. Please accept this email as my enthusiastic support for such a measure, even though I’m not a constituent. I rent an apartment on the top floor of a old 10-story brick building in Arlington. My unit is just beneath the roof, so that when the afternoon sun beats down on a warm day during that two-week shoulder period, the temperature inside builds up quickly, often topping 90 degrees. Nor does it drop below a few degrees overnight, even with the windows open. This has happened on quite a few occasions over the past several years and can be confirmed by the other tenants on my floor. I live alone, and at age 73, I’m concerned that this could a!ect my health. As Sheila wrote, it’s much easier to put on more clothing if it’s cold, or to use a $20 space heater. Portable A/C units, on the other hand, are much more expensive—and may not be allowed under our lease. I hope my personal experience can help support your bill. Please let me know if I can provide any more information. Many thanks for your initiative on this issue! Sincerely, Joseph Azar 1220 N. Pierce Street #904 Arlington, VA 22209 (703) 527-1443

Hello, I wanted to write to express my discontent with the current law requiring landlords to provide heat until May 1, and giving them until May 15 to turn on the AC. This new proposed bill by Del. Karen Keys-Gamarra is a welcome relief to my family and neighbors! I am in huge support of seeing a bill pass that would allow cooling (Air conditioning) starting on April 1, instead of the current May 15. As a renter in Reston, VA, (Reston resident for 4 years now) I DREAD the month of April and May each year. With our apartment complex being unable to turn on the AC until May 15, we sometimes have an entire month of temperatures above 80 degrees. I work from home so this means, all day and night, I get no relief from the heat for weeks at a time. It would mean a great deal to me to see HB1475 pass and put into law before the 80 degree days hit us in just a few short months. Thank you kindly for your time and consideration.