I believe children should not be judged by age groups, each is a unique individual. Therefore, the parents are the ones who know their children best. Certainly not a teacher that may see a group of 25+ a day for 5 day a week for8 months. I feel, that sexual information should be handled by the parents.

I'm concerned that a bill allowing the censorship of "explicit materials" will quickly be misappropriated to censor sex education and other important learning. This kind of censorship is unnecessary.

I oppose banning any books. Parents should have the right to say what their kids can read, but they should not take away my child's choice to read said book. All books have value. I taught in the public school system for 10 years and I have worked in the public library. Please stop banning books. A child who can not talk to someone maybe able to find themselves in a book.

I oppose HB 1009. I understand the need for parents to oversee what their children read, even if it overrides what is in the school curriculum. However, this bill gives too much general power to parents to determine what they think is best for everyone's children, not just their own. This bill puts already-beleaguered teachers in an impossible position and is an affront to intellectual freedom.

I oppose this proposed interference with local control of public schools.

Greetings, I am the parent of a self-identified LGBTQ student in the Fairfax County School system. When I head about book that reflect LGBT student experiences I was extraordinarily disheartened. As an LGBTQ student with very few "out" school leaders it is exceedingly important that my kid see herself reflected in literature, as I did as a kid. Certainly, when I was a kid we had all sorts of books that talked about sexuality ranging from Judy Blume to "Go Ask Alice" which was a book about a girl who runs away from home, does drugs and gets into a lot of dangerous relationships. We needed these books to answer our questions, as cautionary tales, to understand what came next etc. We didn't use them as guidebooks on how to do drugs and engage in risky sexual behavior but used them to explore and understand ourselves better. Frankly, teens are engaged in sexual behavior and literature mirrors real life experience. What's to gain from pulling books from the library? Who wins? Kids who don't have parents to rely on need peers who understand and need literature to reflect their personal experiences- all of it, not just the pretty PG parts. Don't ban books. It's un-American and frankly, goes against everything school libraries should stand for: openness, honesty and a love of literature of all types. Thank you

How in the world does a bill use the word “feel” in defining a law. Everything that is taught at school invokes feelings. The idea that something can be banned because of how it makes them feel is crazy. So black history month should be banned because it make someone “feel” a certain way. The holocaust should be banned from being taught because it makes someone “feel” a certain way. Science has been under fire these days, so now we can ban that too because it make someone “feel” a certain way. If we run our education solely on feelings, we better just end all education. As defined by Webster, education is “an opinion arrived at through a process of reasoning.” In order to reach that process of reasoning, we must provide all perspectives, even if they may make some people “feel” like they are decisive. Doing this could open teachers to choose that they will not teach about very important historical events because they feel like it is too divisive. If this passes, I am going to request that the confederacy be banned from being taught at my child’s school. I will request that Jefferson Davis and Robert E Lee will never be taught at school because it makes me feel like this country is divisive. I will request that we never teach about elections, because they are divisive. Please stop with this ridiculous bills, and get to work on our state’s economy. Work on bills that bring in jobs to the state. Work on bills that help with infrastructure. Work on things that matter and not bills that are designed to be decisive. If we want this country to move forward, start focusing on the whole and not the parts.

If anyone has paid close attention to national news, these board meetings have been very volatile. During these board meetings, students come to speak and they need to be protected from potential outbursts that could result in their safety being compromised. Passing this bill would reduce the safety at these meetings and could prevent students from speaking up at the meetings.

It is ridiculous to think that students who are upset about anything that’s taught in the classroom won’t go home and tell their parents it is not necessary to pass a law to demand this. This is about banning. I do not support this law

I am writing in opposition to HB 1009. I understand the impulse to allow parents to control what their children read, and I wish I could share your optimism that parents' hearts will always be in the right place. But it is naive to think that they always will be. I grew up queer in Virginia. I was not out to my parents. I'm lucky that my parents were open-minded, and probably would not have restricted my reading. But books from the VA library system were where I found the information I needed to understand myself and my feelings. Books were where I found a community, before I ever met any other queer people. Many of the books that have and will be flagged as "sexually explicit" are being flagged solely because they're about LGBTQ issues. Parents may mean well, but it is naive to think that they will always act in the best interests of their children. Some parents will block their queer children from accessing the vital info they need to survive their confusing adolescent years, either because they are unaware of their child's queer identity, or out of ignorance, or out of outright bigotry. This bill hurts queer kids. Whether you all like or not, we're here, we're queer, we're Virginians, and these are *our* libraries and schools too.

I respectfully oppose this bill. It is unnecessary to create a state law for this purpose as decisions regarding content should be made at the individual, school, and local levels. This is tantamount to censorship. Who decides what is sexually explicit? What may be to one person isn't to another. Should a student or parent object to the material then allow them to work with the teacher to come to an alternate arrangement. That is typically what already occurs. There is no need to create a law that wouldn't allow for any nuance or difference of opinion. Parents should have a say in their children's education, but that does not mean that one parent's objections should allow them to decide for all parents. Once again, I believe this is an unnecessary law and is a form of censorship.

This bill in incredibly vague and will clearly be used as a political tool to interfere with teachers doing their jobs. Virginia students deserve the best education, not "alternative facts". Just because subjects can be considered divisive doesn't mean they shouldn't be taught; quite the opposite. Learning from hard topics is what teaches them to think critically and helps develop their moral compass. I do not want my kids to be ignorant adults

Please OPPOSE this legislation in light of the 3 article of the United States Constitution. I immensely disappointed by the actions of elected officials to attempt to suppress knowledge and fact in public education.

"Divisive concepts" = This country has a history; this is what it is. I hope people of good character and intellect help this poor fellow not go down in history as completely unable to look around a corner intellectually to understand what this means for our society. Legislators, especially Republicans, please help avoid this!

Delegates, I appreciate the genuine concern of those of you wanting to keep Virginia's children safe. I appreciate the genuine concern of parents across the Commonwealth who want to take an active role in monitoring the content their children have access to. I am not sure how this bill accomplishes either of these goals. Teachers already devote so much time and energy to parental engagement. As a parent of children in a Virginia public school I can assure you that there is no end to the communication from my children's teachers. On any given day I can easily find out what materials my boys will be learning. Furthermore, parents already have the option to opt their child out of certain lessons or request alternate materials. What I do think this bill will result in is teachers facing punitive action should they inadvertently fail to disclose any form of romance or typical human interaction that a parent later finds objectionable. Is hand holding sexually explicit? What about a protagonist with same-sex parents? Please think about the example of tv shows and movies. I can use the same rating guide as my neighbor next door and yet, we may each come to a different conclusion about whether the media is appropriate for our children. No one can guess what I deem appropriate, I need to do the research myself and not rely upon someone else to do the work for me. Let parents choose what is best, yes, but we do not need this legislation. Do more to encourage parents to communicate with their child's school.

Who determines what content is "divisive" If a white person objects to learning about slavery and a person of color wants to learn about it-who is the arbitrator? Teaching of History should include slavery, the Civil War, Japanese Internment Camps, the Holocaust, the Civil Rights Movement, etc. I was taught these things in school and nobody felt "bad" No feelings were hurt. Stop trying to suppress/white wash our history. How are we supposed to grow and learn and become more inclusive if we do not teach about the mistakes of the past. Those Who Do Not Learn History Are Doomed To Repeat It.

This country was founded on liberty and freedom. And yet we divided and slaughtered the people who were here already and then divided and enslaved the people who physically built this country. And then we divided them again by telling them they were less than. The only way to grow as a country is to teach truthful history, which isn’t pretty but is real and indisputable. To not teach history that may “hurt people’s feelings” is a sure-fire way to raise a generation of ignorant citizens. We are not cowards. We are Americans. So tell the truth as it happened. As it was. As it still is.

OPPOSE: This bill is a veiled effort to control curriculum and liken it to book banning. We have seen, in past history, the danger of government over reach into public school curriculum. School Boards have served public education by having experts in the field of study provide curriculum for students. Parents can be members of their local School Board. When that decision is taken over by any politician, it becomes indoctrination and not education. Parents have a choice in where they want their children educated, therefore, we do not need any laws passed to restrict curriculum in public schools to favor any one group. Home schooling is a viable alternative where parents can make all decisions on curriculum. I strongly urge opposition to this bill.

As a Librarian I completely disagree with censoring material in any library. Our job is to provide material of all genres, subjects, cultures, religion, etc. Information is the most important tool we have to educating society and the government making the decision on what people can read is not the responsibility of our government and limits our freedoms.

There is absolutely no place for firearms at school or school-adjacent facilities and/activities. Period. Bringing a firearm into a meeting space is threatening and intimidating. Please reject his bill. Thank you.

Honor Delegates, My name is Joseph Deluna and I am a resident of Virginia. I am submitting a comment to oppose proposed bill HB787. As this bill describes the prohibition of teaching divisive concepts, I implore to reconsider and oppose the passing of HB787 as it would censor, whitewash, and prohibit true learning of future generations of children within this country surrounding topics of racism, sexism, and oppression. The passing of this bill would be truly vile and would continue to strengthen and perpetuate systems of oppression that this country is built upon, further marginalizing the less privileged. I hope you all make the right decision to not pass this bill.

This bill is narrow, reactionary, preferential and infeasible. A person’s thoughts and/feelings cannot be legislated and cannot be judged by another since, by nature, thoughts and feelings are subjective. History and facts do not have emotion or intention, only people do. So what is your intention? History is made and shared by all of us and is vital to our future generations in order to inform them of our great progress and the lengths we have yet to go. Please vote no on this bill! It’s passage will only serve to stifle the necessary truths that are required to build a greater commonwealth and a stronger country. Vote NO. Thank you.

Esteemed members of the House of Delegates, I write to you to oppose House Bill 787 regarding the teaching of divisive content. My issues with the proposal are three-fold. First, I am not convinced that this is a practice that is occurring. Instead, this appears, on the face of it, to be an appeal to the so-called culture wars. It is an example of the very divisiveness that your text purports to eliminate as a threat to our children. Second, "divisive content" is an ambiguous notion. How exactly would you determine what is considered divisive? Would the founding of our country not be divisive? After all, it offends the sensibilities of anglophiles and recent British immigrants to the commonwealth? Would it be divisive because it excludes the voices of women and people of color and therefore puts advocates for further marginalization by example? Would it not be divisive because it relied on the genocide of our nation's indigenous peoples and serves as an example of the ends justifying the means, even if those means are killing? Third, even if we were to accept some agreed-upon definition of divisive, how on earth would you enforce this? Would it not require a surveillance state apparatus? Or would this just be another opportunity for helicopter parents to make baseless reports to the tattle-tale tip line? As a concluding thought, I would like to remind you all that teachers are not the enemy. These are trained professionals who are following established learning objectives. Our public school teachers are leaving in droves. It is time to reward their work and recognize their skills. Stop vilifying them in the hopes of dividends at the ballot box during the next election cycle.

I oppose this bill. If parents do not want their child “exposed” to literature they deem unacceptable , they already have options to prevent that. They should not, however, be given the power to prevent others access to it. The government should not be involved in the business of legislating/enforcing book bans based upon the opinions of a vocal minority. Intellectual freedom is a right and it’s pursuit is something that everyone should be able to determine for themselves.

The first principle of the American Library Association’s Freedom to Read statement is that “It is in the public interest for publishers and librarians to make available the widest diversity of views and expressions, including those that are unorthodox, unpopular, or considered dangerous by the majority.” This is a concept going back long before its 1953 adoption—it’s part of the founding principles of the US--the freedom to read is essential to our democracy. Even in a school library, there are and must be a wide variety of materials available. This is important for critical thinking. Age appropriate? Yes, but what is appropriate for the student population, whose members come from a wide variety of backgrounds, family structures, and belief systems, should be decerned by professional librarians. Then parents, working with teachers and librarians, can decide what is right for their own individual child. As a law, this can create a chilling effect for educators who may avoid having students read challenging and important works because of a single passage or two that could be defined as “sexually explicit” by someone. When I was in high school three decades ago, the book “Catcher in the Rye” was assigned for an English class. It’s a classic. And frequently challenged. This time by a parent and her minister. Not content with her own child reading an alternative, the parent didn’t want it taught to any student. It was not banned, but it was dropped from the lesson. The chilling effect meant that the young and engaging teacher left the system the next year and high school students were “protected” from lessons that included allegedly dangerous books—no teacher wanted to endure the publicity of fighting the good fight after that. Every book isn’t for every child, even if age appropriate. But professional librarians are there to help students chose well and work through understanding literature that may either reflect their own world and dealing with reality or serve as a window into new worlds, new ideas, and foster empathetic understanding.

This proposed bill is a dangerous infringement to the ability for teachers to teach young people how to think for themselves after learning about the context of historical and contemporary events. If approved, bill 787 is a slippery slope that may lead to more controversy rather than less. Our children deserve to learn so called "divisive concepts" in order to determine how to become productive and caring citizens within their communities. I vehemently oppose this bill.

This proposed bill is a dangerous infringement to the ability for teachers to teach young people how to think for themselves after learning about the context of historical and contemporary events. If approved, bill 787 is a slippery slope that may lead to more controversy rather than less. Our children deserve to learn so called "divisive concepts" in order to determine how to become productive and caring citizens within their communities. I vehemently oppose this bill.

I am writing in opposition to HB 1009. As a mother of a middle schooler and high schooler, I find it abhorrent that the state thinks it is a better judge of what my children should be reading than their teachers and I am. Questions about what should be read in schools is best left up to parents, students, and teachers. Legislating this at the state level is a disturbing overreach of authority. In addition, I have seen from the many challenges to books across this commonwealth that the titles that are under review are written by and about LGBTQ+ people and people of color. This is a thinly-veiled attempt to control what white children read, so that they are not exposed to the beautiful variety of literature, and to suppress diverse voices among our students by suppressing the authors who show them what is possible.

I support maintaining the gun-free zone on school board property.

I fully support this bill. School Board buildings are not places where students typically meet, and should not be a defense free zone. We've seen repeatedly where advertised defense free zones become criminal empowerment zones and are targeted BECAUSE of this. We've had no issues in the past, let's not set ourselves up to attract those who seek to do harm.

If education is left to the whims of school boards, our students will not be graduating as critical thinkers. Students need exposures to a variety of systems of thoughts in order to become critical thinkers. Please do not support this bill for the future of our students!

As a librarian in a Virginia public school I oppose this bill. To restrict teachers and librarians in the manner in which this bill proposes is, in and of itself, divisive. I stand for intellectual freedom and defend my students' free access to information. Additionally parts of this bill, such as the posting by July 1 all resources to be used in the upcoming year is absurd. Please kill this bill and protect the students and staff of Virginia from the DIVISIVENESS that this law would perpetuate.

I am writing in opposition to HB787. I'm from a family of educators and believe strongly that we need to trust professional educators to develop appropriate curriculum for our children. This should not be legislated. "Divisive concepts" are necessary to be taught with care if our children are to learn the real lessons our history has to offer. Do children learn about the origins of Thanksgiving at an early age? This indeed is a "divisive concept." Are you suggesting that elementary students should not begin to learn these lessons? Black children, immigrant children and many other children learn "divisive concepts" in their day-to-day existence. I believe racism is the underpinning of this ill-advised legislation. As such, it should be killed immediately.

Regarding HB391, it is dangerous and non-sensical to repeal gun restrictions around schools. Gun violence is an epidemic in this country, with increases in gun-related deaths in 2021, and yet this bill would remove key protections for our student population by allowing guns in school zones. It would also strip local school boards of their right to regulate local school districts, which goes against principles of local control. I strongly oppose this proposed legislation. Regarding HB787, this bill would strip schools of the ability to teach a fair and balanced version of history for fear of making anyone feel "discomfort." Such restrictions on education are inherently ridiculous, as there are significant episodes in history that are uncomfortable that we as a society must learn from. Our own civil rights movement and the Holocaust are two critical examples of history that should not be avoided or whitewashed, else we will not be able teach how to avoid the mistakes of history. I strongly oppose this legislation. Lastly, HB1036 again attempts to supercede local control of local schools in protecting the health and safety of our students. If conservative principles are against "big government" and government control, why is it that conservatives are using the heavy hand of government to restrict local oversight? Not to mention, removing mask mandates ignores the science that masks prevent the spread of COVID in a significant way. I strongly oppose this legislation.

As a state struggling to increase student literacy rates, standardized testing scores, and teacher retention, HB 787 will hinder educational growth. Who benefits from such censorship and fear tactics? Big testing corporations and software companies, that’s who.

I am a middle school English teacher. The word divisive is too broad and certainly captures in its definition murder and love. Therefore to pass this you willingly throw out classic authors like Poe, whom resides in Virginia, and Shakespeare who’s divisive concepts are universal. I beg you, do not do this to our children.

I am a Virginia public school teacher and I am urging this body to strongly vote NO against HB787. Despite being a bill against the teaching of "divisive" topics, this bill creates division, but I suspect that's the point. Recently in my class, my students were learning about Susie King Taylor, who was a woman that was born into slavery in Georgia, learned how to read and write in a clandestine school for enslaved children, and later became a Union nurse and published the first account of an African American woman during the civil war. Is that divisive? I asked my students why they thought slaveholders didn't want people who were enslaved to go to school. One of their responses struck me. A student told me that they didn't want them to learn in school for the same reason they're banning the books today- "they don't want us to know the truth". The youth are so much wiser, and just "get it" so much more than politicians that actually try to divide us. Vote no against it this bill, students already know what you're up to.

Dear Delegates, Thank you for your time and the opportunity to reach out regarding bills before you that impact the quality of education and the safety of my children and community. The past two years have shown us how critical it is for students to be in school for their education and mental health. After so much loss, our goal is to keep kids in school in person. School boards must have the ability to mandate masking when recommended by the medical and scientific community for mitigation to enable continuation of in person education. School boards should have the pulse of their community and be able to make the best determination for their needs as a whole. In regards to teaching, please allow teachers to do their job without "Big Brother" hovering over their shoulders. This is what they were trained to do and why they were hired. Educators have years of formal higher education, specialized professional development, experience and an interest in helping our children learn and grow. We want our children to learn facts about the world and develop critical thinking skills. To hear, at times, uncomfortable truths and develop empathy and problem solving skills is what we need for our future leaders. There are channels in place to deal with concerns with a particular teacher or lesson and those should be pursued as needed on an individual basis. We don't need to add this restraint and fear to teachers across Virginia who are showing up to lovingly and professionally do their job of educating our kids. I would like to express my strong desire for the school boards to have the ability to establish gun-free zones in their places of business. I will assume you have seen video of school board meetings such as ones in Loudoun County where I live. Having attended several in person, I can attest to the intensity, anger, and nasty verbal attacks in the room, in addition to the group gatherings to rally beforehand. Guns have no business in our school business. No one should feel intimidated or threatened and feel the need to remain silent and absent at a public meeting. Students, parents and community members attend for a multitude of reasons and should have a peaceful place to do so. In addition, our school board members have received multiple threats against them and their families and they deserve to feel and be safe. It is just common sense and for the greater good of all. It seems very strange to have to email to express my desire for pandemic mitigation, allowing teachers to do their jobs, and to not have deadly weapons in school board business. These all seem common sense, especially given the world we've been living in. But I realize everything is upside down right now. Please consider the greater good of all when voting on these bills. Most everyone just wants good health, safety, and peace. I wish that for each of you as well. Thank you for your time and for all you do. Kerry Kidwell

In contradistinction to the critics of the policies or curriculum that the originators of this bill seek to remove, there are palpable benefits from teaching these so-called divisive topics. The argument is that subjects like Critical Race Theory causes division by pitting white persons against black persons, but this is a fallacy. Critical Race Theory and other so-called topics that supposedly cause division truly only call for a reckoning on those topics. This is not about blaming those in the present for the sins of the past or making those in the present to feel some sort of guilt from advantages they received from the oppressive tactics and practices of the past. We all stand on the shoulders of our ancestors - for good or for bad. This type of curriculum therefore only calls for everyone to have a conversation and come to the table based upon the truth of what happened in the past. What happened in the past regarding slavery and Jim Crow etc. cannot be denied or refuted. The advantages that some received as a result are undeniable. However, one could choose to look at so-called divisive topics another way. Instead of viewing them as a threat to the status-quo or happiness of those in the present, it actually encourages healing and reconciliation. It invites everyone to the table to have difficult conversations while maintaining the idea that we are not responsible for the sins of those of yesteryear. I remember hearing a white brother and fellow preacher say that in order to fix it, you've got to face it. Let us face what happened in the past and the inherent disadvantages/advantages that such practices produced so that we can move forward united to work for the equality of all human beings. Why is it that around the day where we celebrate the birth of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. we only want to remember the dream without first acknowledging the nightmare that he highlighted - how this country wrote a check to people of color which was returned or bounced due to insufficient funds? We want to remember the hope but try to turn a blind eye to the despair of King and others. To appreciate the light you need to acknowledge that darkness exists and existed. Failing to reckon with the past will perpetuate the same spirits in the present. So-called divisive topics can actually bring more healing than proponents of this bill realize. I hope that before seeking to prevent the teaching and discussion of these so-called divisive topics, that lawmakers truly pause and consider. Is teaching about the Holocaust divisive for students of German origin? Is teaching about Pearl Harbor or the atomic bombs in World War 2 divisive? Is teaching about apartheid to persons of South African descent divisive? Is teaching about Tiananmen Square to persons of Chinese descent divisive? Is teaching about slavery, Jim Crow, and all that black people endured in this country divisive or is it just a reckoning with history? If you consider these questions honestly, you will arrive at the inevitable conclusion that the only thing capable of keeping us divided is a refusal to come to the table honestly and discuss the past so that its effects in the present are minimized.

HB391 and HB787 are connected, and both bills need to drop dead on the floor. HB 787 bans critical THINKING in the name of banning an epistemology and conceptual framework designed for researchers and academics. When we don't teach our children to be critical thinkers, and when we don't educate the whole child, we end up in situations where divided communities and schools bolster unaddressed mental health issues (another flaw in our broken system) leading to school shootings. You're trying to tell us that by repealing the gun prohibition on school board property, no unhinged parent is going to show up, waving a gun, making demands? A woman made national news for *threatening* to bring a gun at a school board meeting. Why are we making it easier to harm one another? At the root of both of these bills is an evil need to do harm to others. Drop them both.

I am strongly opposed to HB1009 for a multitude of reasons: Labeling books is a form of censorship and an infringement on the freedom of speech. Teaching materials and books used should be decisions made by the individual school systems and teachers. Our teachers are already heavily burdened and this bill would add unneeded stress to our classroom professionals. The term "sexually explicit" is vague and narrow. Parents already may request alternate reading materials for their children if they feel an assigned book is not appropriate. This bill can also target books to which our young people in the LGBTQIA+ community can relate and thus be harmful.

Good morning. I am a teacher, a mother of 2 school aged children and a voter here in the state of Virginia. The purpose of public education, historically speaking, is not to indoctrinate or youth, but to educate them on concepts for the betterment of the WHOLE of society. To understand the world we are living in and create humans who can actively interact in our society, sometimes concepts must be taught that may make some uncomfortable. Change and growth can, at times, be uncomfortable. If they were not, we would be stagnant. We would be the same. Growth is uncomfortable. We need the growth to better our own ever changing society. For our children, our teachers and our Virginia, please vote no on bill hb787. Thank you.

Good morning committee members, I oppose HB 391. It clearly would put school board members in potential danger from any individual carrying a firearm (legally or otherwise) in any non school locations they are performing their official duties. It is also yet another attempt to undermine the authority of local school boards. Thank you.

I am writing in opposition to HB 1009. As a believer in limited government, I believe that parents, students, and teachers can work together when disagreements arise to best choose what is appropriate for individual students. Using the legislative system bypasses local policies and initiatives and amounts to the state attempting to dictate for others, removing all “offensive materials” as defined by individual parents relying on the state. As a librarian, I have witnessed that book challenges and laws often target authors of color and representatives of other marginalized groups, and are stories including such characters. Six books on the American Library Association’s 2020 Top 10 Most Challenged list were written by authors of color. Increasingly, challenges target material dealing with racial inequality and LGBTQIA+ issues. These include the books referenced in regard to "sexually explicit" material. Finally, as a researcher, I know that bibliotherapy research has demonstrated that books often serve to identify harmful behavior that students might otherwise categorize as “normal.” Removing books deemed “sexually explicit” (such as The Color Purple) denies students an important opportunity to identify sexual assault. Through the bibliotherapy that exposure to these materials provides, students can be given language to address the criminal behaviors they’ve experienced that would otherwise remain hidden. Please consider those reasons, and oppose this bill. It will not help children, and it will likely harm them.

I'm asking you to reject HB787. The Bill remains unclear about exactly what would constitute an inherently divisive concept. Moreover, denying Virginia students the opportunity to learn about and navigate complex issues in the classroom leaves them woefully unprepared to navigate the world outside the classroom. They will be losing the opportunity to become critical thinkers and informed, engaged citizens. They will face uncomfortable moments and difficult decisions throughout their lives. Our job is to prepare them for that. Children learn every day, not just in classrooms, bit beyond, by watching our words and our deeds. Passing legislation that prevents them from dealing with complex issues in fully informed ways, or fully and completely understanding their history and how it had shaped and continues to shape the world on which they live does not prepare them to do so ethically. It also teaches them that being informed, making long-lasting decisions based on information and facts is less important than acting on impulse and emotions. It teaches them refusing to engage with the difficult, the complex, the scary is appropriate and denies them the opportunity to be empathetic and engaged citizens. Virginia public schools should be a point of pride in Virginia, a reason people live here, move here, stay here. A Virginia that bans essential elements of rhe curriculum (like a robust knowledge of history), and this denies children opportunities to develop key skills necessary for successful adult of the future (critical thinking, problem solving, and more, hurts Virginia. It hurts our schools, our children, and our future in so many ways. To legislate a curriculum that is based on vague terms and ideologies not fully articulated is hardly worth this risk.

The effort to remove "divisive concepts" is unclear and leaves room for broad censorship and unspecified alteration of our education system without clear justification or benefit. This bill should not move forward.

It’s shameful and dangerous to vilify teaching history because it may cause discomfort. We learn valuable lessons from the past. It is important to teach our students accurate history, including the painful parts so that we can reflect, grow, and learn. Hopefully parents are raising children to identify with the moral actors in history, how to stand up to injustice, and build better communities. We shouldn’t need to fear teaching history because it may hurt some peoples feelings.

I strongly oppose HB391. Citizens of Virginia should be able to petition their government entities in a civil manner. As a Loudoun resident, I have already seen the results of the breakdown in civility at our school board meetings. We have had physical altercations, repeated disruptions, and threats of violence both against our school board members and private citizens. One of our own students was verbally attacked during the meeting while fulfilling their role as the representative for their high school. I have personally spoken to residents who would like to attend meetings to speak and show their support for policies, but do not wish to be on the receiving end of the anger and uncivil behavior. A reasonable person should not have use for a firearm at a school board meeting. Both the meeting and the building have security personnel, and our local law enforcement has been monitoring situations. A responsible firearm owner would recognize the anger and unrest in the situation, and the potential physical injury to innocent people in trying to use a firearm in that situation, even as self-defense. An educated, responsible firearm owner would see it as a prime example of a situation in which the indication or brandishing of a firearm alone would escalate tensions and create a more dangerous situation for all involved. It is clear from recent events at school board meetings from across the state that tensions run high, and citizens are not behaving civilly toward one another. Given the rhetoric of those with opposing viewpoints being "evil," "child abusers," "stupid," and a myriad of other colorful words, it is doubtful that the presence of a firearm in the possession of a citizen with an opposing view would be met with a calm, rational reaction. For the safety of our citizens, and in consideration of their 1st Amendment rights, we should be making every effort to ensure they are not deterred from their opportunity to participate in our school board meetings in person. I urge you to oppose HB391.

Dear Delegates, As a constituent and taxpayer of the Commonwealth of Virginia, I am writing to urge you to oppose HB787. I believe that Virginia students deserve the very best education, which should include opportunities for thoughtful dialogue and the ability to learn about a variety of perspectives, beliefs, and experiences. By seeking to legislate what content is or is not allowed in public schools, this bill reflects a deeply disturbing attempt at censorship. Additionally, to suggest that racism, sexism, and other forms of oppression are “divisive concepts” disregards crucial moments throughout U.S. and Virginia history, moments that were undeniably impacted by these concepts. Censoring discussion of the many lessons we have learned throughout our history takes away the opportunity for Virginia students to reflect on the past and to forge a unified future for everyone. I urge proponents of this bill to reconsider how censorship is what, truly, would sow division in our Commonwealth. Again, please oppose HB787. Sincerely, Cameron Shaw Hampton VA

I strongly oppose HB787. As a Loudoun resident, I have heard repeated claims on both local community social media accounts, and in our school board meetings, of "CRT" being taught in our schools. To date, there has been no evidence provided as proof that these claims have merit, despite multiple requests of anti-"CRT" proponents to share evidence. No copies of assignments, presentations, or recordings of these occurrences in our schools. The repeated response is that this is happening clandestinely, but still reaching our students. The truth is that until conservative media started presenting this boogeyman of "CRT," the majority of people in VA, and the US, had never heard of it. Our curriculum has not changed significantly in the years that I have had children in the K-12 school system, so if this were to exist, we would surely have plenty of evidence to reference. Last week, I received a note from my child's 9th grade Honors English teacher informing parents that students would be starting their next literary unit. The students will be reading "To Kill a Mockingbird" by Harper Lee, a book I also read in high school English many years ago, and "Just Mercy (Young Adult Version)" by Bryan Stevenson. The former is a celebrated, Pulitzer-prize winning work examining the roots of human behavior, and the latter is a true story of a lawyer's experiences dealing with the machinations of the criminal justice system. Both books focus on a man accused of crimes he did not commit. The announcement of both books also came with a reassurance from my child's amazing teacher that "CRT concepts" would not be taught. I personally found the need for that reassurance disgusting. I truly cannot comprehend support for a bill that promotes the idea that condemning injustice against our nation's citizens is somehow "divisive," or that feeling "discomfort" when learning about these injustices is somehow problematic. The goal of a K-12 education is to prepare children to enter university-level studies and/or begin their careers. It is critical that our students have the skills to analyze a situation from multiple viewpoints in order to have a more complete understanding. "Feelings" are not objective, nor can they be extrapolated to anyone beyond the individual themselves. The idea that all students would be robbed of educational opportunities based on one individual's feelings, or a politically motivated activist group's opinion on the instructor's motivations in teaching a book or concept, is an embarrassment to the state of Virginia. I ask that you oppose HB787, and continue to allow our children the freedom to experience a complete education that will result in the development of the critical thinking skills needed in the future. The citizens of this state are richly diverse, and all should be able to contribute to the education of our children without fear of government retaliation. This bill would violate the 1st Amendment rights of every citizen of VA, and should not be allowed to proceed further.

I strongly oppose HB787. This is an absolute violation of rights to be so broadly controlling what can and cannot be taught in public schools. You can't pick and choose what parts of history and life our children learn about. You can't decide what points if view are taught and which are not just based on your own personal politics. That's not giving the full picture and not giving children the opportunity to learn and form their own perspectives. This bill is outrageous to even be proposed and must be stopped.

HB787: I am a Loudoun County resident and I am writing against HB787. I am outraged and disgusted by the proposal of this bill. This proposed bill is in response to what some lawmakers think is critical race theory being taught in our schools, which is absolutely untrue. Talking about race and sex is not racist or sexist, but ignoring these topics is. This proposed bill limits students’ academic freedom, is a violation of free speech, and is an attempt at thought policing. I am a history and political science major and I can’t stress enough the importance of teaching the history of our nation in its entirety. Not all topics in our nation’s history are pretty. It includes historic unfair treatment for Americans of different race and sex and these are not topics that should be glossed over or avoided. I don’t understand how these grown adult lawmakers are so afraid of these topics. It is because they are cowards, and I am ashamed that representatives of my state would propose such legislation. Our students deserve to learn the truth of our nation’s history so that they can understand the American experience from all sides and have a richer understanding of the past because of it. I strongly oppose this proposed bill and I hope that our state representatives make their constituents proud and do the same. HB391: I am a Loudoun County resident and I am writing against HB391. Schools should retain the authority to deem their non-school zone property as a “gun-free zone.” The current statue does not apply to law enforcement officers, therefore they are not prohibited from carrying firearms and they are the only individuals that should be permitted to do so. There is no need for individuals on school board owned, non-school property to (as the current statue states) “purchase, possess, transfer, carry, store, or transport firearms, ammunition, or components of combination thereof while an individual is on such property”. In 2020, (the most recent year for which complete data is available) 45,222 people died from gun-related injuries in the U.S., according to the CDC. Our country has one of the highest rates of gun related deaths among developed nations. With an increase in mass shootings, especially tied to schools, more firearms are not the answer. As a tax payer who provides funding for these buildings, I want my local school board to retain the authority to set the policy on guns that they deem appropriate for our area.

Comments Document

Dear Delegate LaRock and K-12 Education Committee, My name is Dr. Sabrina Dent. I write these comments responding to HB787 as the parent of an African American school-aged child; and, as a public scholar whose research and work is dependent on the truths about American history. ALL of American history. Whereas, I have made several attempts to submit my comments that were under the character count requirement but were accepted; I have attached them as a file. Please read my attached statement in its entirety along which include citations from the National Council for the Social Studies C3 Framework guidelines about historical inquiry and historical thinking for students' learning experience. Sincerely, Dr. Sabrina E. Dent

As a public middle school teacher, I write to urge you to OPPOSE HB787. We are highly trained professionals who know how to lead discussion in our classroom. This bill only furthers the false messaging that public educators indoctrinate our students to believe what we believe. On the contrary, we teach our students to engage in critical thinking on countless topics, so they may form their own opinions based on evidence. NO ONE who supports this bill can claim to be supportive of public education. If you were, you would be spending your time in Virginia schools to see what we actually teach, what our amazing students can achieve, and what massive needs we have for your productive attention. If you truly knew anything about public education, you would know that this bill is wholly unnecessary. This does nothing but continue to sow devisiveness, which is the very thing it is supposedly going to ban. Just because history is uncomfortable, does not make it devisive. If you actually trust and respect the trained professionals who have been hired in public schools all over the Commonwealth, you will stop wasting your time, and the time of the people of Virginia, with this incredibly insulting bill. Instead, direct your attention toward further funding our schools so that we can continue to give our students the education they deserve.

Delegates, I am writing to urge you to vote no on HB787. A law that prohibits the instruction of "divisive concepts" is overly broad and subject to the interpretation of political influences. To secure the future of this commonwealth, we need to ensure that our education systems can adapt to societal changes. It is clear that this law aims to make the teaching of Critical Race Theory illegal. It is also painfully evident to anyone who has paid attention to national events over the last few years that racism will not disappear if we refuse to acknowledge its existence. We have a responsibility to give future generations the tools they will need to call out racism where they see it. Our kids deserve to understand discrimination and recognize it so they can effectively fight it better than we have. I want all children to learn what I didn't realize until I was nearly grown. That racism didn't end with slavery or with the Civil Rights Act. This bill will stop that from happening. This bill will keep the status quo. This bill will allow for the political weaponization of our children's education. HB787 is a disservice to our children and to Virginia I call upon all of you to vote no.

It is vital to have as much of an objective and realistic representation of history and facts that the country is built on and the mistakes we are learning from as possible. We should not be omitting or manipulating the facts to make them seem less atrocious or terrifying (though of course they should be presented in age appropriate ways in the classroom). We need to ensure we learn and heal from history, not turn a blind eye to it or put on rose colored glasses. To make vague, blanket rules or ways of restricting how educators present an already objective, accurate curriculum in an effort to be "less divisive" is so very dangerous and frankly unacceptable. Some things unequivocally need to be argued against, and repeating or even simply denying a horrific history is something we cannot do as a whole. We all lose when we don't have the power to hear both sides without biases being allowed to manipulate the message in a way that silences a side that has repeatedly been oppressed. This is a slippery slope, and I hope you will consider the gravity of allowing such a bill to pass without more defined parameters.

It is vital to have as much of an objective and realistic representation of history and facts that the country is built on and the mistakes we are learning from as possible. We should not be omitting or manipulating the facts to make them seem less atrocious or terrifying (though of course they should be presented in age appropriate ways in the classroom). We need to ensure we learn and heal from history, not turn a blind eye to it or put on rose colored glasses. To make vague, blanket rules or ways of restricting how educators present an already objective, accurate curriculum in an effort to be "less divisive" is so very dangerous and frankly unacceptable. Some things unequivocally need to be argued against, and repeating or even simply denying a horrific history is something we cannot do as a whole. We all lose when we don't have the power to hear both sides without biases being allowed to manipulate the message in a way that silences a side that has repeatedly been oppressed. This is a slippery slope, and I hope you will consider the gravity of allowing such a bill to pass without more defined parameters.

What in the world do representatives think is happening in school classrooms to warrant a bill such as this?? I teach middle school in Virginia and I’ve been made to feel like an enemy of the state with this language. What is it , specifically, that this bill aims to prevent? Does it intend to end culturally responsive teaching? Learning about students’ realities and how faculty/staff can better include their culture in schools? Celebrating the rainbow of diversity within student bodies and communities? Maybe supporters of this bill would prefer to pretend Black musicians didn’t have to consult the green book before going on tour or that enslavers loved the people they enslaved. Maybe they would prefer to gaslight children of color, making them believe they’re imagining things when they wonder about racial injustice seen with their own eyes and in their own lives. I don’t assign guilt to my white students for the injustices of this country. Yet I surely teach the nation’s ugly history along with its proud history so the future doesn’t mirror the past. This assignment of guilt is something that’s being projected; it is not something manifesting in school classrooms. Kathy Allen Live in Goochland Teach in Louisa

I and my family and community of active educator voters oppose this proposal because it offends our values. Teachers are public citizens and deserve respect. They ensure all children succeed and promote growth and compassion and empathy. Do not censure educators!

I and my family and community of active voters oppose this proposal because it offends our values. Medical professionals and health departments are charged with community health-not politicians. Keep mask mandates on as long as health advisors recommend communities to do so! Also, encourage more people to get vaccinated and bolstered to keep our communities safe.

I and my family and community of active voters oppose this proposal because it offends our values. Do not allow guns on school property during school board meetings or any other time. Schools should be safe and free from guns.

Censorship does not belong in schools, let alone politically based censorship. Refusing to teach history accurately is a well known play in the fascist handbook, and I ask legislators to stop this now. School is exactly where minds should be expanded, not narrow beliefs reinforced. The refusal to teach “decisive concepts” is both vague and dangerous and will be used to silence both students and educators. If your beliefs can only stand in an artificially created echo chamber, then you do not truly believe them. This is plain and simple censorship in the service of white supremacy. Please vote no on this bill.

Please do not support this bill. I have attended numerous school board meetings over the past 2 years. Many of the people who attend are enraged and volatile. Adding firearms to this kind of unpredictable, heated environment would be dangerous. There are student council members from 2 high schools that attend each meeting and sit with the board. In addition, parents attending these meetings often bring their younger children. Firearms are not allowed in our schools and should not be in any building that is part of Loudoun County Public Schools.

CRT is not taught in our schools. However, this bill would deter efforts to ban the teaching of the true but not always pretty history of our country. I do not support this bill.

Guns do not belong on school property. I do not support repealing the ban.

I oppose this bill because school policy like this is better set locally. If parents don’t like the assigned books, they can ask for substitutes but never should a group of parents or the state be able to decide for others who may want more freedom of choice for their children.

The bill set forth by Del. LaRock (HB 787) should not be passed. It is an affront to people of intelligence everywhere to try and limit the pursuit of knowledge.

This country was founded on liberty and freedom. And yet we divided and slaughtered the people who were here already and then divided and enslaved the people who physically built this country. And then we divided them again by telling they were less than. The only way to grow as a country is to teach the truthful history, which isn’t pretty, but is real and indisputable. To not teach history that may “hurt people’s feelings” is a sure fire way to raise a generation of ignorant citizens. We are not cowards. We are Americans. So tell the truth as it happened. As it was. As it still is.

This is a bill that will increase divisiveness rather than address it. First, it does not lay out any description, definition or examples of what is meant by "divisive" so how will this bill be implemented without metrics defining meaning or practice. Second, and more importantly, this bill is a set up to attack teachers with subjective, biased and unfounded claims. School administrators and teachers were drowning in demands on their time, skills and hearts before COVID, which has made those demands enough to drive them out of their professions. Talent we can ill afford to lose if we truly care about our children. Just like the Governor's spying, tattle tail education hotline, this is just one more attempt to destroy public education. This bill should experience a quick death in committee.

I still can’t believe this is even being considered an issue. While our history is not pretty (most peoples aren’t unfortunately), but just because it makes people uncomfortable doesn’t mean it didn’t happen and we shouldn’t teach it. It SHOULD make you uncomfortable, it NEEDS to make you uncomfortable! It’s uncomfortable because we have to look back, own up, and accept the fact that our country as a people have committed horrible atrocities on those they deemed different or less than, many of our own. The only way to grow and move forward as a country is to teach the truthful history, which isn’t pretty, but is real and indisputable. To not teach history that may “hurt people’s feelings” is a sure way to raise a generation of ignorant citizens, doomed to repeat the past. If we’re going to claim all the glory that comes with calling ourselves Americans, then we have to claim the shame of our past as well. So tell the truth as it happened. As it was. As it still is.

There is no reason for a person to bring a gun with them to a school board meeting. As we very recently saw, angry parents have already made threats about guns while at meetings. Imagine how much more dangerous that could have become if that parent had brought a gun with her.

I am writing to encourage the subcommittee to vote against HB787. This wrong-headed and dangerous legislation flies in the face of all that is sacred in public education. This ill-considered bill smacks of censorship and authoritarianism. Its language regarding what constitutes a "divisive concept" is purposely vague, making it all the more dangerous. Knowledge and information coupled with sound critical thinking skills are the bedrock of our public education system. Intellectual discomfort and challenges to rote thinking can be precursors to growth and greater understanding, individually and among people. We do not need to hide factual information or difficult concepts from our children. On the contrary, they need and want to experience such things in an age-appropriate and safe manner, like a classroom, to begin to develop their own abilities to evaluate and assess information and come to reasoned, supportable conclusions. This bill does not seek to solve a problem in public education. This bill seeks to inject partisan ideology into our classrooms. Young people want factual, honest information from which they can learn and grow. Adults pushing their politics into the classroom are doing great harm to students. Please reject HB787.

School curriculum should be determined by school board and should be open to FACTS and history. We cannot avoid topics that make some people uncomfortable. The point of teaching history is to help people avoid mistakes of the past. We cannot do that if we make stories of the past more palatable. As a parent, I want my children educated with the truth.

"Divisive" topics is vague and EverWing the territory of propaganda instead of education. If petite don't want their children to learn certain topics, then they can homeschool their children. We need to teach actual American history which will include issues that people find divisive for some reason, like the KKK was bad, slavery was bad, land was illegally stolen from Native Americans, etc. These aren't issues that need to be "hidden" from elementary schoolers and even less so from those in middle school. Many children learn about these "divisive" topics firsthand due to the inequality/inequity our country still shows to half of its citizens in elementary school. Stop pretending you're trying to "protect children" because these bills don't do that, it just spreads propaganda pretending we have some immaculate history in this country while having no issue pointing out the faults of others. America is and should be better than this. It's 2022, not 1964, and especially not 1864. Anyone supporting this bill needs to grow up and accept the reality of our history and how things still need to change instead of pretending we're some testament to democracy access growth, because bills like this price exactly the opposite. It's a disgusting request and it should be immediately denied as unnecessary and dangerous to society to pretend certain topics don't exist. Children are smart and hate is taught by glossing over indignities, not by teaching what happened to learn how to avoid it from continuing to happen. The writers and supporters of this bill should be ashamed of themselves.

I ask that you not support this bill. Our local school board meetings have been incredibly divisive and with this heated environment the last thing we need in our school administration building are firearms. We know firearms can turn a simple disagreement into a deadly incident. There is no need to be armed when entering any school building. Firearms are not allowed in schools and we need to be consistent by not allowing firearms in any school building. Also, students do attend these meetings. High school students frequently represent their schools by serving on the board during meetings. Firearms do not belong in these buildings. Thank you.

To whom it may concern: I am opposed to any bill that infringes on the freedom of speech and the freedom to read. Labeling of books and material (by policy or law) is a form of censorship, and places the weight of responsibility wrongly on teachers to judge what different parents may deem “sexually explicit.” Legal definitions of the term “sexually explicit” have been intended to prohibit criminal conduct, not reading. We do believe in parents’ rights to oversee what their children read; we don’t believe some parents should unilaterally decide for others. The bill can create a chilling effect for educators, who may avoid having students read challenging and important works because of a single passage or two that could be defined as “sexually explicit” by someone. Parents, students, and teachers can work together when disagreements arise to best choose what is appropriate for individual students. Using the legislative system bypasses local policies and initiatives and amounts to the state attempting to dictate for others, removing all “offensive materials” as defined by individual parents relying on the state. Parents only have the right to determine what their child should read, not what all children should read. Who determines what is sexually explicit? That definition is different from family to family. Every school board has the right to determine the policy for challenging a book, not the state. Do not go down the slippery slope of censorship.

How in the world is Virginia even legitimately considering this racist bill? This document is suggested by delegate who participated in the insurrection of our government, spreads conspiracy theories, and whose his resignation has been called for - how is Virginia even considering any legislation from a from a known toxic, racist, delusional white supremacist?

I oppose this bill.

You can't just say divisive you need to be explicit. History teachers have to cover some uncomfortable topics so everyone understands what is at stake if we don't learn from the past.

This bill is astoundingly arrogant. Who decides what is divisive? Will we stop teaching math? Particularly division? It is a natural phenomenon. Do members of this Body never disagree with a spouse? Do members of the party that Mr. LaRock declares ever disagree? Or is the General Assembly trying to achieve cult culture? How do children learn to cope with difficult subjects or problems if never taught to reason through them? How do you teach critical thinking skills if students are never presented with problems? What is the point of education? When a student graduates from this "cult" academy, how will they problem solve on a job? How will they creatively suggest multiple solutions to a problem? Perhaps the book "The Giver" might instruct one as to why censoring schools is a very bad idea. This bill is outlandish and insulting. I encourage the members of this body to vote no on HB787.

As a citizen of Virginia and a registered voter, I want to express my opposition to HB787, which seeks to ban the teaching of "divisive concepts" to kids in elementary & middle schools. I do not want my elected representatives voting to enact a law that has been created with intentionally vague terms, which are dangerous and problematic in the fact that they will inevitably lead to restricting educators from being able to teach historic truths, including the dangers of long term systemic racism that has been woven into our stare's and nation's history and continues to affect every part of our society. Students cannot become critical thinkers and productive citizens when swaths of history are ignored, and furthermore, being able to examine and identify systemic wrongs is not divisive, but rather unifying in that it will lead to young people of all backgrounds to become aware that the problems in our society can only be changed when we all work together to change the system instead of trying to blame individuals .

In looking at the websites of many of the patrons of HB1009, I am struck by how many mention that issues are best decided at the local level. Yet this bill makes a statewide issue out of discussions that are had at the local level between educators and parents. Who makes the decision about what books should be labeled "sexually explicit?" Why would we label books, when labeling is censorship? This bill (and others like it) are an attempt to control information and experiences, and cause an unreasonable amount of extra work for educators. You have many bills you are considering during this legislative session. I ask you to think deeply about the long-term impact of this bill. Research what has happened to communities that have attempted to censor reading materials. Learn from the past. Understand that the reason bills like this have not passed before is that they are unsustainable, unfair and suppress a variety of voices. Recognize that you may not have all the information you need about intellectual freedom to make an informed decision on this bill, in the short time you have had access to it. Thank you for your time.

Both I (a FCPS teacher) and the Virginia Education Association OPPOSE HB 1009 due to how the bill is currently written. This bill depends on how the board defines sexually explicit content, and since this definition is not included in the language of the bill, I think it is inappropriate to pass the bill as it.

The Virginia Education Association and I (a public school teacher in Fairfax County) OPPOSE HB 787, because it is a close-minded, unnecessarily restrictive demand of public educators.

Both I, a public school teacher in Fairfax County, and the Virginia Education Association OPPOSE HB 391. I am strictly against any bill that lessens or eliminates requirements for school-adjacent / school-related properties to be gun-free. Gun-free policies are in place for the safety of all individuals.

This is a blatant piece of pandering to those Virginia citizens who have been duped into fear of "critical race theory." It is an unpatriotic and cynical attempt to reinforce fear-mongering lies Virginians have been told alleging the teaching of critical race theory in public elementary and secondary schools. This legislation should be rejected because: 1) Critical race theory is not being taught. 2) The definition of "divisive concept" is outrageously broad and could be used to intimidate public school teachers and other employees into avoiding important topics in history or civics. History is an absolutely critical subject matter for our students, and not just the pleasant parts of it. Our nation isn't perfect. To understand it, to love it, to contribute to its betterment requires honest, full examination. We need to focus on encouraging rigorous examination rather than narrowing what parts of history and the American experience can be discussed in our schools. 3) In particular, this bill may prevent teachers from examining the full view of our nation's history, which must include an examination of slavery and racial discrimination. True patriotism requires us all to look honestly at our country, to appreciate the both the great achievements of our people AND the injustice that has undermined this nation and prevented us from reaching our full potential. This country can be greater, but to improve, we have to examine our nation considering the many different experiences of our people and seeking to ensure true equality and opportunity for all. I urge all legislators who truly love Virginia and the United States to reject this ridiculous and dangerous legislation. It was not produced in service of the citizens of this state, but in service of con men trying to increase their own power and fill their coffers by tricking citizens into shortchanging our students and the future of this great state and country.

I oppose this bill as this is an issue that should be handled locally and not by the state. Labeling is the start of censorship and has no place in libraries, academic or public. If this bill is passed it would apply yet another pressure to teachers who already are dealing with issues way above the scope of teaching or kids.

This bill is laden with problems. I think most people would agree that education policy should be set locally rather than be dictated by the state. Labeling is a gateway to out-and-out censorship, and stands in opposition to the First Amendment of the US Constitution. Additionally, labeling pressures teachers to self-censor as they fear repercussions for choosing books that may be deemed appropriate by the vast majority of parents but by others thought to be "sexually explicit." Parents may already, at any time, ask for substitute material if they do not approve of that which is assigned, and never should any one parent or group of parents or the state be allowed to determine what is available to be read by others' children. Thinking otherwise denies the right of families to determine things for themselves, and ignores the diversity of students being taught in Virginia schools.

Way too vague. This is a disguised attempt to banned CRT which is not part of the current curriculum. Section vii is so vague that if any student feel ANY discomfort, this would mean it is unlawful. This vaguely written sub section would open the flood gates for almost anything. Stop controlling and trying to regulate thoughts and progress.

This country was founded on liberty and freedom. And yet we divided and slaughtered the people who were here already and then divided and enslaved the people who physically built this country. And then we divided them again by telling they were less than. The only way to grow as a country is to teach the truthful history, which isn’t pretty, but is real and indisputable. To not teach history that may “hurt people’s feelings” is a sure fire way to raise a generation of ignorant citizens. We are not cowards. We are Americans. So tell the truth as it happened. As it was. As it still is.

The proposal of this is ridiculous. VA students should be taught *all* history, good & bad. Wow, talk about your snowflakes. Only those who fear real history being learned to keep power will vote for this.....or by some who are so simple they have no idea they're being duped. We will never grown as a nation without the pain of development.

HB1036 proposes to strip a school board of the ability to protect its student and staff population. Its motivation is clear and repercussions could be very dangerous. The use of layered mitigation strategies, including masking, must be available for school boards to employ in their district schools without having to jump through extra hoops of proving the need (which is obvious and apparent) in times of a contagious disease. I oppose this bill and ask that you do as well.

This house bill sounds like an attempt to enforce the removal of mask mandates in order to fulfill a campaign promise by casting as much doubt as possible against such measures. Why should they have to prove that a mitigation measure, recommended by the scientific community at large, is a good idea? The section "(ii) no reasonable alternatives to such requirement exist in light of the impact on quality of life and economic well-being" leaves open a way of questioning every possible alternative regardless of the effectiveness. This would create an undue burden on the school boards to have to defend against every option, even after the much more qualified scientific community have already determined the best option. Please vote against this bill.

Our children need to be taught broad scale perspectives on every topic. Do not censure and limit what our children can learn. That is a grave disservice to the children of Virginia. It’s also blatantly classist, racist, discriminatory, and oppressive.

I am requesting that you vote no on this bill. Although the level of censorship seems innocuous and beneficial at first glance, the phrasing allows for the subjective interpretation of what is objectionable. We must discourage any opportunity for controlling so broadly the accessibility of literature. Let's continue to protect our rights as citizens to read, to think, and to speak our ideas. Thank you.

This bill is blatant racism, plain and simple. Aren’t we better people than to hide behind trying to protect children from feeling uncomfortable when you really mean white parents who feel uncomfortable with their children learning that racism and prejudice still happen today. Clearly there is no concern for Black and Latinx parents and children who feel uncomfortable. When I attended a private high school in Fairfax, VA from 1975-1979. There were 1500 students and 18 were Black. Teachers turned a blind eye when students called us “n****r” and taped pictures of cross burnings to our lockers. My first job was at a public library, none of the Black staff was allowed to work on the main floor. I taught for thirty-eight years in Prince William County at a public school named after a man who fought to not be a part of the United States. In 2015, a coworker told her largely Latinx class that after the election most of them would not be allowed to stay in this country. If I tell you this and your response is that it’s okay because talking about it makes you uncomfortable then you are neither a good person or an honest public servant. I never thought I would live in a fascist country but inch by inch that is the direction we seem to be going. Please do better for all of the citizens of this commonwealth, especially the non-white citizens, who deserve laws that respect them and their lived experiences.

HB787 is a particularly troubling bill. This bill reads like, and appears to be intended to encourage, embolden, and further entrench systemic racism. As such, it amounts to an attack on education. What could have been a bill to enhance education and deal w/ the nuances of teaching about our countries history on the subject of racism is instead taking a hatchet to the entire notion of teaching about it. The bill is so broad and open that it would likely be very difficult to apply in practice and lead to quite a few lawsuits I imagine. I suspect that the bill would further weaken public education as it would require teachers to follow an extremely vague and broad set of guidelines that are at odds with teaching history. Virginia's students are capable of learning and understanding difficult concepts like racism and they deserve far better education than this bill would allow.

I encourage the committee not to approve the bill HB1009 which bans sexually explicit language from instructional materials as a matter of statewide policy. While parents are the primary line of nurture for Virginia's children, there are many trained and concerned professionals that are part of the village that raises every child. Many parents sit on school boards of the state's districts and have direct responsibility to oversee the suitability of instructional materials used in that district's classrooms. Unlike measure guarding public health and safety, the selection of instructional materials should be left up to local schools and their libraries. as guided by local parents, teachers, librarians, and other informed participants in the selection decisions. Banning books has long been a disputatious concern for local leaders. Experience has shown again and again that on closer examination of the instructional materials being considered for prohibition, reviewers realize that material with sexually explicit language has socially redeeming value. Please do not approve this bill.

There are currently many ways to review and provide feedback on curricula/instruction and instructional materials in our public schools. There are meetings, information sessions, posted instructional material, PTA/PTO, etc. What we emphatically do not need is a bill banning the teaching of "divisive concepts." Teachers' instructional material is already reviewed in advance; what more does Del. LaRock want them to do? Adding additional hoops to jump through with absolutely no benefit is a ridiculous overreach and demand on teachers' and administrators' time. Implying repercussions for not teaching from both sides of a "divisive" issue is extremely harmful. As a parent of public school students I have no desire for my children to learn that Nazis maybe weren't all bad and that Jim Crow wasn't necessarily meant as a way to extend slavery in a slightly different form. These topics should be addressed with the expertise of educators in their field, not dictated by a whitewashed view of history, contemporary culture, and politics. Furthermore, the language encouraging local school boards to "adopt policies.... more comprehensive" is a dangerous, slippery slope for board members to ban difficult topics altogether and silence educators. I wholeheartedly oppose this bill and ask all those who believe in an accurate, thought provoking, and thorough education for Virginia's children do the same. Thank you.

I want to voice my concern about and opposition to HB1036. To my mind this bill is constructed in overreaction to a normal and necessary history and cultural curriculum. I think we need to tamp down the rumors and emotional reaction to what we think may be divisive concepts. Our teachers are working hard to give our children a well rounded education and we should support them. This bill puts educators under fire who already have a stressful job. Please vote against it.

LaRock's HB 787 is, frankly, un-American. The attack on free speech and academic freedom is predicated on the biased judgement of the charging party--so they can make teaching an actual crime. As an educator (former elementary and high, current university), parent, and American, I am abhorred this is even entertained this far. What is the criteria for charging a "divisive" concept? How can you measure "damage" done to children's psyche by learning a new perspective? What examples does LaRock have of children being harmed by being exposed to "divisive" concepts? What the heck IS a "divisive" concept, and who gets to define that? It is a relative term and, like the Supreme Court knocked out Youngkin's EO on "divisive" concepts, that precedent should be followed in considering 787. This is an opening salvo on education that leaves the door open for burning books that have "divisive" ideas, and an attack on our already-embattled public school teachers. My grandfathers both nearly lost their lives fighting an enemy who had this philosophy towards knowledge, ideas, and free thought in the Second World War. The fact that a public official would think this appropriate is disconcerting.

As a concerned citizen of Virginia I am opposed to repealing VA school boards' ability to create gun free zones where school business is being conducted. It only makes sense to de-escalate interactions, especially at school board meetings. Allowing firearms to be present at a meeting where tempers are likely to flare is dangerous and would create a threatening environment to board members and educators. Please vote against this bill.

This bill is absolutely atrocious. Please do not pass this. Teachers are not teaching divisive things to children. Please trust teachers to continue doing what they can for our students.

I am writing about HB1009. It is absolutely ludicrous to ban books. We, as a state, are better than this. I have been making it a point to read all proposed banned books. While I don’t think all belong in a classroom’s lending library, I think nobody should be banning books in school libraries. This is how Hitler came into power. Let’s not be like Nazi Germany!

As a teacher of 14 years, this bill is offensive and belittling of the profession. Teachers are trained and licensed professionals, not leftist talking boxes. There is a teacher shortage and bills like this will cause many to leave the profession and dissuade others from entering. This is an outright attempt to white wash history and prevent students from becoming critical thinkers.

Comments Document

Please see the attached letter from Arlington Special Education PTA communicating our concerns about HB 1272.

I am writing to express my opposition to HB 787. It is too vague in wording and overreaching and excessively restrictive in intent. Please let teachers teach. Respectfully, Alicia Peycelon

Please give school boards on the local level the ability to require mask wearing. Different sections of the state experience different COVID spikes in the population. In order to keep our schools open we have stop the spread. Masks are effective in stopping the spread, and also keep children and others in the community with autoimmune diseases and other health issues safe. We also are able to keep our hospital beds free, and keep going to work.

As a professional Librarian in both a school and public setting, I feel the freedom of an individual to determine what they should read is of utmost importance. I am the parent of 2 children, one of whom is non-binary. They have found information and solace from books from the library to help them with who they feel they are. When students are unable to see themselves in the world, they do not feel that they have a place here. I respect a parents right to determine what is best for their own child but not for everyone else's and certainly not for my child. • The American Library Association’s Freedom to Read Statement (originally written in 1953) provides some helpful starting points. https://www.ala.org/advocacy/intfreedom/freedomreadstatement • Labeling of books and material (by policy or law) is a form of censorship, and places the weight of responsibility wrongly on teachers to judge what different parents may deem “sexually explicit.” Legal definitions of the term “sexually explicit” have been intended to prohibit criminal conduct, not reading. We do believe in parents’ rights to oversee what their children read; we don’t believe some parents should unilaterally decide for others. The bill can create a chilling effect for educators, who may avoid having students read challenging and important works because of a single passage or two that could be defined as “sexually explicit” by someone. • Parents, students, and teachers can work together when disagreements arise to best choose what is appropriate for individual students. Using the legislative system bypasses local policies and initiatives and amounts to the state attempting to dictate for others, removing all “offensive materials” as defined by individual parents relying on the state. • Book challenges and laws often target authors of color and representatives of other marginalized groups, and are stories including such characters. Six books on the American Library Association’s 2020 Top 10 Most Challenged list were written by authors of color. Increasingly, challenges target material dealing with racial inequality and LGBTQIA+ issues. • Bibliotherapy research has shown that books often serve to identify harmful behavior that students might otherwise categorize as “normal.”. Removing books deemed “sexually explicit” (such as The Color Purple or Speak,) denies students an important opportunity to identify sexual assault. Through the Bibliotherapy that exposure to these materials provides, students are given language to address the criminal behaviors they’ve experienced that would otherwise remain hidden. Thank you.

This proposed bill is shameful - and frankly embarrassing. It is clearly pandering to people who don't understand the purpose of education, and don't appreciate the value of education. There are so many things wrong with this, beginning with the ridiculously vague and dangerous idea of "divisive concepts." I assume that this would include any discussion of religion? Please, Virginia is often the laughing stock of the country and the world... this is a perfect example of why we are ridiculed on a regular basis.

Good day, We live in a country that prides itself on the concept of free speech. Most people forget that free speech exists only as long as said speech is not directly harmful to others - unfortunately, people on all sides of every spectrum imaginable are guilty of this oversight. Even when the best of intentions are being considered, personal views and beliefs oftentimes interfere with decisions and cause situations that could easily have been avoided. This bill is a shining example that mistake. The concept, in its most base form, is simple - some parents may not want their child to be aware of "sexually explicit" material. This likely stems from not only a feeling of protectiveness, but also an unconscious realization of just how much unfettered access to information has permeated our everyday life. But the bill puts too much power into too many hands; power that is not clearly defined in any scope or fashion. The main crux of the issue is this: there is no specific answer to the question "What is sexually explicit material?". Requiring a policy that centers around a question that could have a thousand different answers from a thousand different people is a terrible way to handle education. Furthermore, what happens when a parent decides that their definition of "sexually explicit" material clashes with a teacher's? As an example, consider a work of literature that remains one of the most widely-taught across the county: William Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet. Several passages throughout the work have characters taunting Romeo with various body parts of his romantic interest at the time, and yet that pales in sight of the fact that the two title characters, both grown but far from adults, spend a night together in bed. Does this constitute "sexually explicit" material? Many libraries maintain a collection of periodicals for referential use, including copies of the magazine National Geographic. Some issues contain nude or near-nude humans, with various portions of their bodies exposed. I do not believe that anyone could reasonably argue that National Geographic portrays "sexually explicit" content, but what happens when a parent challenges that based on the images contained within? Even middle and high school Biology textbooks contain information that is designed to educate students, not only about their bodies (and the changes happening within them), but the very real social pressure and expectations that revolve around sexual activity. Would this information be labeled as "sexually explicit"? If so, would we then be creating a situation where teenagers and young adults are unprepared for life's circumstances, thereby endangering themselves and those around them? Any form of censorship of the written word, regardless of intentions, is not the way to properly educate anyone. Almost any material can be used for the purposes of education, even if said material is an example of how things should NOT be done. Restricting viewpoints to a single line eliminates critical thinking and will help create a society where adults cannot think for themselves, but instead follow the "popular" opinion so as to not stand out as being "different". We do not need sheep in the classrooms. We need smart, educated people who will grow to be our leaders. Do not pass this bill.

The bill is Unlawful and Discriminatory. This is Fascism.

Please do not repeal the gun-free zones. This is an apparent step to arming teachers with guns to stop the shootings in school. I fail to understand how anyone can think that more guns leads to less gun violence. Aside from the obvious reasons, there are many statistics and studies that show that fewer guns means less gun violence. Furthermore, to properly teach teachers how to handle such a situation requires extensive training... which I doubt they would receive or even want. The only reason why school shootings still occur is because of the ease of which guns can be obtained. Until we have effective gun control measures, the gun-free zones may not be able to stop a determined killer but it does reduce the instances of gun related accidents by not having the guns on premise to begin with. If safety really is the priority, then do not repeal the gun-free zones.

I strongly oppose this bill as an unnecessary layer of government interference, dressed up as protecting parental authority. Disagreement or even disgust isn't an excuse for censorship, even in the schools. I am more concerned about moral parameters being put in place by politicians and mob rule than I am about sex--in any form. There is only so much a human body can do but a governing body can wreak immeasurable havoc! Parents can't protect kids from learning and thank God for that. I'm a parent. There is only so much you can do to guide young people and leave the rest to their own decisions, prayer, and abiding faith that you've done the best you can. Control doesn't work.

Delegate Batten apparently thinks that school systems viewed remote learning as some kind of opportunity to ditch their responsibility to teach. Nothing could be farther from the truth. It's easy to look back and say, "COVID wasn't as big a deal as the medical establishment claimed," even though it was and policies such as remote learning potentially saved the lives of thousands of Virginia children. It wasn't easy on teachers, either. In the scramble to find ways to most effectively instruct their students, teachers had to learn multiple software packages and talk their students through them. They had to come up with new lessons and spend hours of additional time creating visual and interactive teaching moments. They also had to carve out space in their own homes and in many cases buy new equipment like lights and sound equipment to make those lessons work. If this legislation goes through, it mandates that children be present in schools even if another variant or pandemic worse than that we've experienced comes along. Don't tie the hands of the medical and education communities who are trying to do their best to balance safety and learning. And certainly don't use this disruptive time to play games with our children's lives. Please oppose HB1272.

Giving authority to the state as to what material students may access prohibits learning and critical thinking. Parents have the right to judge what material they wish to expose their child to but that does not give them the right to decide for others. Books that are regularly targeted for banning often are written by minorities and other disenfranchised demographics. Removing their voices removes diversity in education and reinforces the belief that these groups are "wrong" or "unacceptable." Removing representation for these groups has a large negative effect on students belonging to those demographics. Censorship is unacceptable and against the very core values of the United States. The diverse population of the country must not be silenced and censored by a very tiny vocal group of individuals with malicious agendas.

I do not support this bill. I believe this legislation as proposed places the weight of responsibility wrongly on teachers to judge what different parents may deem “sexually explicit.” Legal definitions of the term “sexually explicit” have been intended to prohibit criminal conduct, not reading. As a parent myself, I do believe in parents’ rights to oversee what their children read; however, I do not think it fair that some parents should unilaterally decide for others. The bill can create a chilling effect for educators, who may avoid having students read challenging and important works because of a single passage or two that could be defined as “sexually explicit” by someone. Unfortunately, we are seeing some groups target certain book and authors they deem controversial such as authors of color and representatives of other marginalized groups, and are stories including such characters. Six books on the American Library Association’s 2020 Top 10 Most Challenged list were written by authors of color. Increasingly, challenges target material dealing with racial inequality and LGBTQIA+ issues. I trust teachers to provide a caring and challenging environment to support all students. This bill will hinder them.

HB 1009 addresses an important educational consideration. What reasonable person would want a child exposed to sexually explicit material? Also, parents should have a say in their children's educations. That said, I have concerns about HB 1009. When one group of people labels content in a context where others are subjected to the results of that labeling, then the opinions of the defining group are being enforced on people who hold other points of view. If the concern is that parents do not want their children exposed to certain topics, then there are ways besides a law that serve this purpose. HB 1009 would remove the choice of parents who do want their children educated in the vocabulary and contexts that would allow them to identify and report sexual abuse. It would remove the choice of parents who define "sexually explicit" differently from those who may label a book as such. One parent may want a book labeled and another may believe the book offers an essential part of education or not consider it sexual at all. No matter how thoroughly defined a term, the application is still a matter of judgement. When opinions on application vary, who is right? How do we know? Is a law the right way to answer these questions? In short, I see this bill as an attack on the rights of individuals to make choices for themselves and their families. HB 1009 is an attack on the values of individual choice and freedom from oppressive government. Protecting children is good. The methods in HB 1009 used by individuals may have benefit. The methods in HB 1009 used as law are not good.

Respectfully, please do not pass this bill. This is dangerously vague, and has a chilling effect on our teachers. Please trust them. They have the education, training, and experience to know what and how to teach our children, and when difficult conversations and topics are appropriate. I'm a parent of a child in public school; the last thing that I want is another piece of bureaucracy getting between our children and what our teachers do best: teach. I want my child to grow up learning how to grapple with difficult concepts and ideas, not coddled into a stupor by pretending that "everything is awesome." Thank you for your time.

Between 25 and 30 years ago, a Stafford-based religious group puffed themselves up by accusing Disney of injecting pornographic material into their animated films. The minister performing the wedding in Little Mermaid getting an erection. Simba laying down in a dust cloud that spells S-E-X in The Lion King. Aladdin in that movie saying "Good teenagers take off your clothes." All of these required dedicated and repeated watching to find microseconds of offensive material that no one else can see, or would even look for. That's the kind of thing you get when you say people should look for pornographic material in their children's instructional materials. There are responsible and professional committees of people who search for the best in age-appropriate material to introduce students to new ideas and situations. Books build empathy, help young people articulate concepts they understand but don't have the words for, maybe even help them understand themselves, and certainly show them the great potentials of their native language. Allowing the loudest people to deny that enrichment is the first step to emotional illiteracy, and that's what this bill aims to do. Please oppose HB1009.

I am a writing as a parent of three school age children in Virginia, please keep our school zones gun free. Teachers and administrators should not have to be trained to keep our children safe and be armed in classes. The answer to keep our kids safe is not brining guns into classrooms. As a former teacher, I know a lot of teachers will leave teaching if there is no gun free zone. Also, visitors and students 18 years and older should not be allowed in school zones with guns. Increase the number of trained School Resource Officers in the schools, and increase the level of security.

I am writing to voice my strong opposition to Bill 1009 on sexually explicit instructional material. This authoritarian legislation robs each locality the opportunity to establish its own method for dealing with sensitive content that works best for their own students, teachers, and parents. Establishing a state-wide law for this will no doubt negatively impact books by marginalized authors and make it so students are confined to a greatly diminished perspective in their reading materials. Our world is filled with complexity. One way to deal with that complexity is by simply reading about the world around you so that one may better understand it. This legislation seems to believe that limiting viewpoints in literature due to their potential for profanity, uncomfortable themes, or so-called "sexually explicit" content will keep our students safe from ever having to deal with them. In fact, it inhibits the chance for the next generation to process and understand the following: -That gender identity operates on a spectrum and those who fall outside of the male/female binary or who do not identify with their birth-assigned gender deserve to see themselves represented and accepted just as much as anyone else does. -That it is beneficial for an individual to read a book with an opposing viewpoint, or to identify with a character who may have a different background or perspective from their own. -That those who may have been through a traumatic experience or have been a victim of abuse would undoubtedly benefit from reading about a character that has been through similar circumstances, allowing the reader to see themselves represented and in turn validating and legitimizing their own experience. I attended public school in Spotsylvania County for all of my lower education add I am incredibly concerned with the recent rhetoric used by Spotsylvania School Board members Rabih Abuismail and Kirk Twigg. These individuals both suggested that certain titles (which they did not read) in school libraries (not even part of any curriculum but simply there as a resource) should be burned. Simply put, these individuals do not have the best interest of their students or community in mind and should resign immediately. I can assure you that my public school experience was enlightened by the encouragement of teachers who understood their curriculum and identified texts that allowed me to develop a love of reading, critical thinking skills, and empathy. Some of those books could easily be flagged and due to the vague nature of this bill. It is my belief that the passage of this legislation from the state will result in the unnecessary removal of worthy materials due to its top-down "one size fits all" approach. Please do not go down the slippery slope of censorship. Leave it up to the individual school system to determine what works best for their students and their families.

Respectfully writing AGAINST this bill. As both a parent and as a professional librarian, I trust in my fellow librarians and teachers to provide a wide range of suitable content that will support both my child and others for their academic, social, and emotional growth. There are already processes and procedures in place should a parent have concerns with a specific book or other material. Do not place another layer of bureaucracy on this. This bill would have a chilling effect on teachers and librarians and a detrimental impact on our students and communities. "Labeling of books and material (by policy or law) is a form of censorship, and places the weight of responsibility wrongly on teachers to judge what different parents may deem “sexually explicit.” Legal definitions of the term “sexually explicit” have been intended to prohibit criminal conduct, not reading. We do believe in parents’ rights to oversee what their children read; we don’t believe some parents should unilaterally decide for others. The bill can create a chilling effect for educators, who may avoid having students read challenging and important works because of a single passage or two that could be defined as “sexually explicit” by someone." Many of the book challenges target marginalized voices - thus a student who is a racial minority may not easily find themselves represented in the literature. This is problematic for a lot of reasons. And I want my child, who is White, to be exposed to a wide range of voices and backgrounds, to build his empathy and understanding. Children need challenging books to be able to interact with difficult concepts in a safe space; "removing books deemed “sexually explicit” (such as The Color Purple or Speak,) denies students an important opportunity to identify sexual assault. Through the Bibliotherapy that exposure to these materials provides, students are given language to address the criminal behaviors they’ve experienced that would otherwise remain hidden." Please do not pass this bill. Thank you for your time.

As a parent of children in Virginia public schools and a children's librarian in a Virginia public library, I oppose HB 1009. If passed, this bill would create incentives for teachers to self-censor in their selection of materials for their classes rather than selecting the best books for their curricula. It would have a chilling effect on students' freedom to read. Some parents would gladly label as "sexually explicit" any book with LGBT+ characters. We've recently seen the critically acclaimed Maus, a fictionalized graphic memoir of the Holocaust written by a Holocaust survived, labeled "sexually explicit" on the thinnest of pretexts and banned in a Tennessee school district. No parent has the right to decide what other people's children should be allowed to read. The selection of books for classroom use should be left to education experts, not a vocal minority of parents or those who use "parents' rights" as cover for their desire to push marginalized voices out of classrooms and out of the public discourse. I urge Virginia's legislators to stand against the rising tide of censorship and the systematic exclusion of marginalized voices in this country.

You don't know me, but I attended and graduated from Henrico County Public schools. My life has been deeply enriched by quality teaching of literature and history involving "divisive topics." They fostered critical thinking and a reverence for facts and truth in a world where everything seems to be nothing but spin. I'm deeply disappointed that Virginia legislators would even think to create this bill. It's straight out of Orwell's "1984," a book I read as a public school student that taught me a vivid lesson about trying to hide or rewrite history, which seems to be the point of this bill.

The avenues of learning are numerous. Being adequately informed is an essential element of freedom. Libraries throughout history have served as a reservoir of means to meet these issues. Today's libraries are equal to the task; however, this status is delicate. In any threatened society throughout history, the first element of freedom to be challenged is access to information. Let this not happen in the Commonwealth of Virginia in 2022.

I am writing in opposition to this bill. The term "sexually explicit" is too vague to be useful. I stand with the American Medical Association; the American Academy of Pediatrics; the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; the American Public Health Association; the Health and Medicine Division of the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (formerly the Institute of Medicine); the American School Health Association and the Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine in my support of comprehensive sex education. Research has found that comprehensive sexual education improves a myriad of outcomes and many studies have found that sex ed does not result in higher sexual risk-taking.

Opposing the ban of any literature is crucial to the social-emotional development of children of all ages. Exposure to themes that can be difficult to swallow or that challenge morality must be explored in a safe space by children so that they can form a better understanding of these concepts and right and wrong. Understanding and identifying racism, sexism, sexual assault, and other tough topics forms a foundation of awareness that these issues exist in the real world and children will be confronted with them at some point. Banning literature that involves these topics would be an error because it shelters children and does not help them prepare to enter the real world outside of school. These books help prepare children in a safe way. The discussion of these books and tough topics helps children put a name to complicated issues and emotions that occur and allows children to discuss their thoughts and feelings in a safe environment. As a survivor of sexual assault, I was only able to identify what happened to me because I had the awareness of such trauma, learned through reading literature and having discussions about it with my teachers and friends. School and libraries are safe spaces for children to explore all topics with trusted adults. We need to provide them with support so they can develop into fully functional adults. Please reconsider passing bill HB 1009. The positive development of our children depends on it.

This proposed bill, and bills like it, terrify me. As someone who works with children every day and who has nothing but their well being at heart, I cannot speak loudly enough about the harm that censoring learning causes. Parents need to learn how to trust that teacher's know what they are doing. The biggest with this bill is that parents can then dictate what THEY deem sexually explicit. So, if you have parent who is against the LGBTQA community, they can use this bill to demand that material not be taught. I'm sorry, but that is WRONG. We cannot allow our own political or religious views to color what our children learn.

Please vote NO HB787, which seeks to ban the teaching of "divisive concepts" (a dangerously vague term). I’ve watched several committees meetings and I haven’t heard of an example of it being taught here or a actual definition of it. Thanks

This idea that our schools are teaching divisive concepts, therefore using indoctrination is absurd. I’ve had 2 students recently go through LCPS (one 2021 graduate and one is currently a senior). CRT is NOT being taught to these students, and they are certainly not being indoctrinated. Define “divisive concept”. If it’s anything that makes a person uncomfortable, I challenge you to listen to a family member of a Holocaust survivor or slave. These topics ARE uncomfortable, and they should be. They are a dark cloud over our history. But that doesn’t mean students should not learn that history. It’s how we grow and how we do better. Our history wasn’t always unicorns and rainbows, and it shouldn’t be painted as such. Teach these kids age appropriate but ACCURATE history, and stop pretending these historical events didn’t occur.

“Without Freedom of Thought, there can be no such thing as Wisdom; and no such thing as public liberty, without Freedom of Speech.” - Benjamin Franklin These bills are vague, unnecessary, and potentially massively harmful. Teachers have enough tightropes to walk on, and are underpaid and underappreciated to boot. They've stepped up massively during this pandemic, and this is what we think they need from their legislature? This censoring of freedom of spiritual and intellectual inquiry is harmful, and while potentially coming from a good place morally, is fundamentally wrong-headed. What happens when children grow up and are confronted with these or any other challenging concepts in the wild of their everyday lives? They'll be all the more blindsided by it, and will be more vulnerable to bad actors acting in bad faith. Not allowing exploration of these or any other concepts into the classroom, where a healthy discussion can occur guided by capable professionals, will hamper the development of young minds. Young minds can gain wisdom by discussing these concepts in a safe setting, and can prepare them to decide for themselves how they'd like to live. These bills, in their current iterations, would do children harm in their efforts to protect them. The first amendment is fundamental to American political and intellectual life. Bills that seek to limit it do not belong in our laws. "I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves; and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise their control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them but to inform their discretion." - Thomas Jefferson

A huge part of protecting children, is giving them the tools they need to be able to communicate sexual assault, sexual harassment, abuse, sexual identity, and to recognize when they are being preyed upon. Whether we like it, media is the way of the world and children are being influenced by it everyday. This influence includes the ability to see themselves within characters and stores. This bill sets a standard that I, as a librarian, believe is dangerous. It is sending the message to children that things that happen to them are explicit and sexual, and instead of being addressed, they should be suppressed. It is giving more power to abusers by suppressing the stories of survivors. It is sending the message that they are less than, especially when exploring something as complex as sexual identity. The rate of suicide in teens is already exponentially high, and it becomes even higher in LGBTQ+ youth. In a perfect world, all parents would be having these discussions with their children, but the fact of the matter is they are not. This fact is further proven by the support behind this bill. This bill represents a group of parents who would rather their child be abused and quiet than be able to recognize that abuse and speak out. How can we expect children to have the correct words to talk about their bodies when we don't allow them to read or learn about it? How can we expect children to report abuse when they don't know what abuse looks like? There is a reason why sexual abuse is less reported in schools, churches, and homes, because children are going to listen to authority figures. This is made worse when they have nothing to compare that abuse to. I am all for protecting children, but part of protecting them is giving them the tools to protect themselves when their parents are not around. It is unrealistic to believe that parents should have a had in every part of their child's life. Furthermore, slapping a label on a book and pulling it from a shelf is censorship, which goes against the foundation of our democracy. Children are citizens of this country, as are educators, and they have the right to learn and teach, which boundaries set upon them as strict as these. There are already rules in place to prevent age inappropriate books to get into the hands of elementary age students, based on stipulations placed on school libraries, they do not need more placed on them by the government. If we want to continue to be a free Commonwealth, we need to vote against this bill. Our democracy depends on it.

I am writing to express my concerns about some of the language and sentiments contained in HB1009. Requiring teachers to determine what every parent or child in their classes may deem "sexually explicit" seems to be overly burdensome and may cause them to shy away from content that could enrich their students' education and/or understanding of sensitive subjects such as sexual abuse, gender identity, sexual orientation, etc. I am a parent of two school aged children and take the responsibility upon myself to engage with them and their teachers about the content they are taught in school. I am fine with allowing parents to request alternative materials, if they decide that they are uncomfortable with something that is being used by teachers. However, to require that teachers should preemptively warn parents about potentially "sexually explicit" content and then produce alternative materials in all such cases seems to be asking too much of already overburdened and underpaid educators. Such requirements, while often coming from a place of good intentions, can easily become a slippery slope that leads to the restriction of a wide range of language, subject matter, etc. that was not originally intended. Let teachers teach, let parents parent, and don't impose bills to tell either of them how to do it.

Stop these divisive and ignorant bills regarding what concepts teachers my teach. Our teachers work in a learning environment and our children deserve the truth. Stop being ashamed of our history. We will not move forward as a Nation by not understanding history, all of it, the good with the bad. Allow teachers to teach and support them accordingly. Our children and future depend on it.

This bill will amount to nothing more than overreaching censorship on the part of people with axes to grind and hatred for viewpoints with which they disagree. The phrase "sexually explicit" as used in this bill is so vague that anyone can object to just about anything they want, and that is very obviously driving this bill; the authors want anything remotely suggestive of anything beyond their strict and regressive values kept in the dark. Under this bill, so much is in danger. Virginia cannot let this bill pass. It will lead to misunderstanding, grief, fear, hatred, and a new generation of children growing up out of touch with their own bodies and identities. It is the most disgusting, hateful kind of bill out there because of what is at the core of it: mandated ignorance.

Putting the onus on teachers to predict what each individual parent could consider covered by such a subjective term as "sexual content" is unfair and disrespectful to the teachers and the schools who have the best interests of all students at their core. Materials selected to be used in schools have already been vetted and met schools' selection policies. Parents are welcome and invited to work with teachers individually to express concern about their individual child. They are not adversaries. This bill creates an adversarial set up, which is not helpful for parents OR teachers. Parents should talk to their own children and keep interest in what is happening with their particular child. Teachers teach.

To the House Education K-12 Subcommittee RE Proposed HB1036 VOTE NO! The passage of HB1036 would circumvent all CDC and Virginia County Public Health initiatives to prevent the spread of highly communicable fatal diseases, such as COVID19, although in the future it could be something that's even more deadly and disfiguring. It's important that the state of Virginia remain strong and vigilant in this regard, and that it listen to health professionals to make the call, not politicians. Therefore, quit the slippery slope, JUST SAY NO TO HB1036. Thank you!

Critical race theory is not taught in grades K-12 in Virginia schools. Teachers need to teach topics that tell the whole truth of our history and the world’s history, and not just from the perspective of the American point of view, the colonizer point of view, or the hidden whitewashed point of view many of us grew up with. To understand history and not be doomed to repeat, students need to be taught the real truth of history.

The language in this bill is too vague to be useful and it also actually endangers children. Allowing local boards to define what is "sexually explicit" may seem useful in allowing autonomy to localities, but it invites all sorts of absurd interpretations. If any school board majority decides that "genitals" or any proper scientific terms for them are sexually explicit, then not only do students need permission to learn about human sexuality (a legitimate educational subject that with appropriate modification can be taught to a child of any age), but they would also need permission to learn about where common animals in farm and nature come from. Furthermore, children who do not learn appropriately about sexuality are more at risk of abuse because that is where concepts like "consent" and "bad touch" are often taught.

Read the history of the Third Reich and of Stalin's USSR. You'll find that they, too, did not permit "divisive" material. See "Stasi" if that doesn't help. We pay taxes to fund public education in order for children to *learn*.... not to be programmed like robots. This bill is a disgrace to the Commonwealth, and the Constitution of the United States.

Once again, thank you for offering the public the opportunity to comment on proposed legislation. The bill's attempts to define "divisive" only open up an endless can of worms of problematic terminology: "fundamentally," "inherently," " should be discriminated against or receive adverse treatment solely or partly because of the individual's race or sex," (this last clause so clearly has affirmative action and opposition to diversity initiatives in employment in mind), "bears responsibility for actions committed in the past by other members of the same race or sex." Rather than try and conceal any critical teaching about significant historical and social problems in American society stemming from the institution of slavery and systems of discrimination, it should be recognized that these problems must be understood as clearly as possible, discussed, and dealt with. This legislation will desperately try to sweep problems under the rug.

I am writing in opposition to this bill. Firstly, the definition of "sexually explicit" can vary widely depending on the opinions of the viewer. If some parents are allowed to set standards for what is sexually explicit, it will take away the rights of parents who disagree. If parents are concerned about what their child is reading, they can discuss the content with their student, read the book themselves, and discuss it with the teacher or other parents. There's no reason for the government to get involved in dictating what can and can't be taught, based on some vague and undefined morality. Don't legislate morality, do not pass this bill.

Guns have no place on school grounds. Do not pass HB1036. With all of the school shootings that have occurred, there is zero need to invite guns onto school property. Please follow the science and not pass HB1036. Masks provide protection against the spread of Covid-19. Schools have been able to keep the spread low in Loudoun County. We do not need to make it worse for the second half of the school year. Our kids need to be in school to learn properly; masks allow this to continue to the best extent possible. Let the younger kids have the chance to get some protection through vaccination before masks come off. We need to protect our community and keep community spread low as well. Let’s protect our heath care workers, first responders, teachers, the immunocompromised, and our school teachers and staff.

I strongly oppose HB 1009 because it will censor instructional materials. The phrase "sexually explicit" is intentionally vague and open to interpretation, which will lead to books and materials being banned in a moral panic. Parents have the right to manage their own children, but the censorship in this bill would lead to a small number of parents having the ability to remove materials they don't like and limit what other people's children have access to.

This bill will undercut the ability of teachers to perform their jobs to the best of their abilities. There is no other reason required to oppose it. Children are exposed to sexually explicit content in all aspects of life. Banning it from schools lest a parent have a fainting fit will not somehow purify society. Solid, science-based instruction can provide a child with better tools to deal with the reality around them. Parents should be providing those tools, but as they won't or can't, that leaves the burden on teachers. So let them teach!

Labeling of books and material (by policy or law) is a form of censorship, and places the weight of responsibility wrongly on teachers to judge what different parents may deem “sexually explicit.” Legal definitions of the term “sexually explicit” have been intended to prohibit criminal conduct, not reading. We do believe in parents’ rights to oversee what their children read; we don’t believe some parents should unilaterally decide for others. The bill can create a chilling effect for educators, who may avoid having students read challenging and important works because of a single passage or two that could be defined as “sexually explicit” by someone. Parents, students, and teachers can work together when disagreements arise to best choose what is appropriate for individual students. Using the legislative system bypasses local policies and initiatives and amounts to the state attempting to dictate for others, removing all “offensive materials” as defined by individual parents relying on the state. Book challenges and laws often target authors of color and representatives of other marginalized groups, and are stories including such characters. Six books on the American Library Association’s 2020 Top 10 Most Challenged list were written by authors of color. Increasingly, challenges target material dealing with racial inequality and LGBTQIA+ issues.

“Divisive concepts” is so nebulous and meaningless that it opens a Pandora’s box of what is and isn’t illegal. Leave teachers alone.

This bill will cause our teachers to have to walk such a tightrope as to make their work impossible, and it should not be passed into law. There are many hard truths in this world, and teachers should be free to talk about them with students - there is no indoctrination going on in our public schools. This bill will run even more teachers out of our public school system, which perhaps is the point. But I believe in strong, thorough, honest public schools. Do not pass this bill.

School jurisdictions should be permitted to implement safety measures such as mask mandates in their communities as needed. Local control is key on this issue.

I ask that you not support this bill. It is another attempt to remove mask mandates even though public health experts still tell us that masks are needed. We need these decisions to be made by public health experts, not by politicians, and adding additional barriers to protecting public health is damaging.

Guns have no place at School Board meetings. It is intimidating enough that speakers in Loudoun are heckled with words as they come to speak before their elected officials. Emotions are strong on both sides, and adding any farther risk is unacceptable.

Please support this important bill. My own daughter has been on a school field trip where her teacher did not bring her epi-pen from the clinic, and my daughter had an alergic reaction. We need to make sure that epi-pens are always available, especially since new allergies can develop at any time. I myself had a life threatenign allergic reaction at college.

Those who do not learn from history, are doomed to repeat it. We need to be teaching real history, including difficult concepts. That isn't being divisive, it is being honest. These attempts to ban divisive concepts are nothing more than an attempt to prevent teaching true history and they are rooted in racism. Please oppose this racist bill.

Guns do not belong on school buildings, including admin buidlings. Especially given the current political situation, with out of control school board meetings. Adding guns to the mix will prove fatal.

To House Education K-12 Subcommittee, RE: HB 391 VOTE NO! The Republican GOP has decided to target Virginia schools, particularly Loudoun County Public Schools, in order to create media buzz that schools are taking over the responsibilities of parents. THE STATE MUST STAND FIRM NOW MORE THAN EVER TO ACT REASONABLY AND WITH ITS EYES WIDE OPEN. If one was to listen to the evening news, you would think that our students run wild in a critical race, learning how to not be so white, and that there is raping going on in transgender bathrooms. Well, let's add guns on school property. NO. NOT. NEVER. I stand OPPOSED to HB 391. EVEN A KINDERGARTNER KNOWS THAT. Go ahead and ask kindergartners, "Should angry school parents be allowed to bring guns and other weapons to school board meetings?" Just DON'T ask my Rep. Dave LaRock, he is an irresponsible, rumor spreading, sad example of a state representative. Quite frankly, he is an embarrassment to humankind, with some of the things he says and WRITES...which is even worse, as it commits his strange way of thinking to paper. LaRock does not represent my views. I have confidence in the Virginia Department of Education to set the record straight.

Dear Committee Members: When I moved up here from rural South Carolina it never occurred to me that I was moving to an area that is even more regressive and reactionary. The Republicans seem to believe in children's inherent rights (right to life) except when they don't (restricting them from their right to any and all information; CONTROLLING what they learn.) The same people seem to believe in local control (don't like the state or federal telling them what to do) except when they don't (new GOP administration nixes masks, locals want them). Make up your minds, folks, you can't have it both ways. Thoughts: 1. Give your kids some credit. They are a whole lot brighter than you give them credit for. They are perfectly capable of being exposed to all points of view on any subject, sifting through it, and deciding what is CREDIBLE and what is not. I.e., they are not your chattel and are not yours to brainwash. You have no right to restrict their exposure to information and/or ideas. (this covers un-whitewashed history, different religions, sexual content, etc, etc.) I am a retired high school history teacher, and I would suggest to you that most of you know as much about what the true essence and academic origin of CRT is as I do about plumbing. It's origins are part of the history of legal scholarship. Not exactly K-12 material. 2. Science is science is science. While you are busy being reactionary, people are dying. Most of the kids do fine and don't mind the masks. YOU JUST DO NOT LIKE BEING TOLD WHAT TO DO. Grow up. You know that's true. Besides being a retired history teacher, I am a mother, a grandmother, and a pragmatist. In case you haven't been following the (real) credible news (that leaves out FOX and Facebook), our nation is in an educational crisis. We are hemorrhaging teachers and those enrolling in teacher education. Why? Recent surveys indicate: they feel restricted in what they can teach, they don't feel safe (guns), and because of the pandemic and increased screen time, the students have ever shorter attention spans and are hard to teach. The biggest reason, though, is the parents. Parents want complete control over what their kids are allowed to learn, and they are litigious. If they don't get what they want, they sue or initiate re-calls. I.e., they are insecure and threatened 'little' people. Threatened that their own kids might be brighter or aspire to be more educated than they are. If we can't fill the teaching gaps, we will be left with private schools (not available to all) and homeschooling. I would suggest that very few people are fully equipped to homeschool. How many of us are qualified to teach the higher maths, the sciences, the languages, and performing arts, that will prepare our kids for college? And where will our next generation of doctors, engineers, college professors, thinkers, inventors, come from? Public school teachers, administrators, superintendents, librarians, are well trained and know the law. The kids are eager to learn, even when it's the cold, hard, unvarnished facts. I had black kids in the same classes with Klan kids. No topic was off limits. They did fine. We had two rules: be civil and LISTEN to each other. Joan Henry Leesburg

Good afternoon. Thank you for allowing citizens the opportunity to comment. It is not necessary to create legislation requiring teachers to notify parents in advance of their intent to use a book with "sexually explicit material." Legal definitions of the term “sexually explicit” have been intended to prohibit criminal conduct, not reading. Parents already have the opportunity to request alternative reading assignments for their children. Such legislation can have a chilling effect on educators, and cause them not to assign difficult, but important reading material--wrongly requiring teachers to judge what different parents may deem “sexually explicit.” Increasingly, challenges target material dealing with racial inequality and LGBTQIA+ issues. The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn has often been challenged in the past and has (rightly) not provoked calls for legislation because students are expected to understand that the often triggering use of "the n-word" in the book does not prevent it from being an important work of literature. Why should a book like Toni Morrison's "Beloved" suddenly require legislation for the entire state because one parent found some passages objectionable? Sincerely, Keith Weimer

People who are trained as educators spend years getting their teaching certification as well as attending ongoing professional development every year. Educators, not politicians, are qualified to create and implement curriculum. A good teacher welcomes discussion among students with differing views, as it encourages critical thinking skills. HB787 is NOT good for Virginia education.

Schools have a responsibility to use every measure possible to keep students safe and healthy. This includes requiring masks to reduce transmission of infections, especially when it is recommended by the CDC.

For the safety of the staff, members of the public and students who attend school board meetings, the school board should continue to have the right to prohibit guns. Guns do not belong in any public meeting, especially where children might be present. School properties exist for the education of students and should always be a SAFE space.

A plethora of experts are now stating that school mask mandates either never have been or in the face of the omicron variant of Covid-19 now are not a useful mitigation method, while children desperately need normal. The following are a sampling of these viewpoints: https://www.urgencyofnormal.com/our-statement https://www.npr.org/2022/01/28/1075842341/growing-calls-to-take-masks-off-children-in-school https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/the-case-against-masks-at-school/ar-AATa64K https://time.com/6145291/end-mandatory-masks-schools/ https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2021/12/mask-guidelines-cdc-walensky/621035/ https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/09/school-mask-mandates-downside/619952/ https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/28/opinion/masks-covid-children.html https://www.nbcnews.com/nightly-news/video/growing-push-to-end-covid-19-restrictions-around-the-country-132566597888 https://www.michigan.gov/documents/coronavirus/20211214_Data_and_modeling_update_vMEDIA_743631_7.pdf#page=51 https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/07/nyregion/nj-school-mask-mandate-murphy.html https://www.nationalreview.com/2022/02/the-educational-consequences-of-masking-children/ Meanwhile the UK recently published their finding that immunocompromised children are actually, blessedly, generally NOT at increased risk from Covid-19: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016344532100548X#bib0016 It is also true that prior to Covid-19 for every other respiratory virus our public health agencies found mask mandates (which is requiring everyone to wear masks, vs. letting people wear them if they want to) to be ineffective, which means they don't have a place in controlling damaging childhood diseases like RSV or the flu. For example: https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article In Virginia because of 2021's SB 1303's reference to the CDC guidelines, many counties believe they have a requirement to keep mask mandates in place. Intervention from the general assembly is needed to provide normal for our children. Please help all of Virginia's children, not just some, to see smiles at school again.

I am writing in opposition to HB 1036. School boards are in the best position to determine if masks should be worn in schools. They deal with the medical professionals and follow CDC guidelines--there is no other way--follow the Science---

This bill would impose the opinion of a political faction on the schools, overriding the considered judgement of professional educators. It would pave the way for more arbitrary political interference in teaching. It should be rejected completely.

I am writing to oppose HB 391 which would allow loaded weapons to be at school board meetings. To what end? Why does anyone need a loaded weapon at a school board meeting?-- are you afraid of the members of the school board? The only reason I can think of is to intimidate the members of the school board. It can't be for protection since there are already security personnel at these meeting. So please do not pass HB 391 thank you

This bill would put our children, teachers, and school employees in danger of infection. It would do so by imposing the beliefs of an outside political faction on the judgement of school officials. It should be rejected with no compromise.

School offices, like the schools themselves, should be safe places. This bill would make them unsafe It would invite threats of gun violence against school employees and officials. It would make it easier for criminals to commit actual gun violence. It should be absolutely rejected.

I've been a gun owner most of my life but guns at school or volatile school board meetings is a very, very bad idea. House Bill 391 should be soundly defeated. I have grandkids in Loudoun County schools.

I'm writing to object to passage of HB787. This bill is an attempt to restrict educators ability to teach any number of subjects including history, philosophy, anthropology, political science and comparative religions, just to name a few. It could be construed to limit the teaching of other subjects such as science and mathematics should any concept within those subjects be deemed a "divisive concept" Recall that during the Roman Inquisition of 1615 it was deemed that Galileo's theory of heliocentrism was deemed heretical, and Galileo deemed suspect of heresy. History shows the error of such acts and laws, are we now to assume that the teaching of the history of Galileo might also be deemed "divisive"? This bill should also be considered as unconstitutionally broad and vague. It gives far too much power to a government to regulate thought which is a concept of freedom that this country should never surrender. Respectfully, J. Paravecchio

Please vote no on guns in school (HB 391)- we've already had a threat to our schools this year and with school shootings on the rise again, we do not need access to weapons on school grounds. I have children in schools and appreciate that schools are a safe, gun-free zone. Please vote no to HB787- teachers are trained professionals following an approved education curriculum. This bill is government overreach especially as the author has no educational background, just a fear of teaching real history. Please vote no to HB1036 - school districts should be able to assess (with health department and medical recommendations) and decide for their own districts if masks need to be mandated. My kids are able to safely attend in-person school this year 5 days a week during peek Covid numbers because the students and staff are masked and vaccinated. Many immuno-compromised students or students with medically vulnerable families are able to attend because masking provides a barrier to disease particles. School boards should be able to assess and mandate safety protocols without government overreach. Thank you, Huyen MacMichael, Parent and Virginia Constituent

Loaded handguns shouldn’t be permitted on airplanes where an errant gunshot could lead to tragedy. Right? The same can be said about bringing a gun into a school board meeting, where adults and student representatives gather in what should be a safe space. Unfortunately in my county the school board meetings have already become hostile. Gun owners agree there is a time and a place to carry your weapon, this space is not one of them. Please oppose HB391. (HB1036) is written in an effort to defy science: “make it harder for local school boards to do mask mandates”. State officials do not know what is best for each county. Each county should have the authority to respond to public health emergencies in a way that best suits their community and follows guidelines set by the public health agencies. If theses agencies are not reputable then why are they funded by your same government? Stop playing games with our health and safety, we should be relying on expert health and public safety officials. Please oppose this bill HB1036 and continue to allow each county the power to decide what is best for their communities. And finally, I urge you to oppose HB787 which seeks to advance ignorance in education. The intention of this is to make sure that “teachers can’t teach divisive concepts" even though there is no evidence that CRT is being taught in ANY VA school. Where is the evidence that this is needed? VA is ranked nationally as one of the top 10 states with a solid education system. We should not be "dumbing it down" because it hurts a handful of people's feelings or because it is on our Governors agenda who has no idea about the realities of daily public school systems. The same people who want a say in their child's curriculum, likely aren't even aware they already have access to their child's curriculum. Have they ever looked? No. Has the Governor? Stop trying to change what isn't broken. Focus your efforts on attracting good teachers to VA, increasing their pay, ensuring every child can read, providing mental health resources, increasing special needs awareness, and give the teachers some paper for heavens sake. Many times they have to pay for their own paper to teach a lesson. That is the real problem.

HB1024 (not listed above): Please do not divert any funds for public school systems in Virginia to parents who want to use the proposed account's funds to pay for private school expenses. Virginia's public school system needs all its currently appropriated monies. Thanks for the work you do and the consideration of this request.

Guns shouldn’t be allowed at school board meetings

These latest bills introduced by LaRock, Freitas and Durant are ridiculous to the point of embarrassment and deserving of as little consideration as possible. To that end, I'll keep my comment intentionally brief. School systems can and should dictate student safety. School systems can and should control access to "Sexually explicit" reading material in schools. School systems can and should teach our children about things that are divisive, despite Dave LaRock's feigned fragility. Guns should, of course, not be anywhere in the vicinity of a school, a School Board meeting, a church, an airport, a restaurant, a shoe store, etc. What kind of absurdity is this bill?

HB 391 should never see the light of day. I have been to school board meetings and watched online. Allowing guns into a school board meeting is asking for a shootout. Ask the majority of police officers if they would like to see guns brought into a school board meeting? They will tell you, no. You are asking for more deaths in the Commonwealth by seeing this bill pass. As a taxpayer, I am asking that this dangerous bill be removed. Thanks, Dr. Todd Cimino-Johnson Leesburg

To the Education K-12 Subcommittee: I'm from Loudoun County (Aldie) and I'm writing to reinforce the view that I'm sure most of you hold, that the delegate we sent to Richmond (Dave LaRock) is plum crazy. His views on K-12 education, and the needs of an informed populace are so far out in right field that if you grant him his wish to ban the teaching of any concept that might appear to some ignoramus as "divisive", NOTHING will be taught in our schools .... least of all anything that has a grain of truth to it. For Pete's sake, ignore the man and stand up for the purpose for which we sent you to Richmond - to foster the development of an informed populace capable of critical thought. As for guns at school board meetings .... yeah, right. Just what we need. O.K. Corral at the School Board. One side brings a Sig-Sauer 9mm; the other shows up with an AR-15. Great. And we expect the kids to be O.K.? WTF.

This should be called The Advancement of Ignorance bill. This legislation must be defeated if we want history and education to have any real meaning. We don't have to be proud of everything our ancestors did -- but we MUST learn from what they did.

These bills are OPPOSED by the Virginia Education Association and myself, a public school teacher in Fairfax County.

Garrey W. Curry, Jr., County Administrator for Rappahannock County. Thank you for the opportunity to provide input to your informed decision-making process. Rappahannock County has supported changes to the LCI formula for years in ways that are similar to those proposed in HB1164. We understand that changes to the formula are far reaching and that it is very difficult to build consensus. We would like the subcommittee to understand how the incorporation of the True Market Value of land rather than the “Land Use” value of land (upon which local taxes are levied) into the LCI formula is very particularly detrimental to Rappahannock County and similar rural/agrarian communities. Our community has studied this topic with great detail and will be formally releasing a study report on the date of your hearing. Land Use taxation is a local option tool that helps rural localities like Rappahannock County preserve our open lands. Levying property taxes at a lower “use” value based on agriculture, horticulture, or forestry (as compared to the True Market Value that would be derived from an arm’s-length sale) does two important things, i) it aligns the tax burden with a property’s need for services (cows and trees do not go to school or call law enforcement), and ii) it reduces the driver for a landowner (who must pay property taxes) to find other ways to monetize their large property holdings to pay taxes based on the true market value, which the prime way that is done is subdivision of land and selling parcels. Our community vision as outlined in our comprehensive plan is one of preservation, not growth. We have worked very hard to keep the northern Virginia development from invading our community. We are proud that our 2020 census count is exactly the same as out 2010 census count (7,373). The implementation of Land Use taxation is integral to this preservation vision. Our preservation vision has saved the state millions of dollars over the decade as compared to school districts that have rapidly increasing school populations (more students = more state funding). With that foundation, the incorporation of True Market Value of land rather than Land Use value of land (again upon which local property taxes are levied) in the LCI formula causes our calculated LCI to max out and be capped at 0.8000. The fact that the land could be sold at an arm’s length transaction for the true market value has no bearing on our ability to provide local funding through our locally levied property tax. Our county is particularly hard hit by the inclusion of true market value of land because 26.6% of all land in the county is in the land use program. Add that to the 20+ percent that is located within the Shenandoah National Park and the 20+ percent in conservation easement. If the goal of the LCI formula is to estimate a locality’s “ability to pay” as it relates to property value, it should mimic how a locality levies tax on property values. Rappahannock County has implemented land use taxation, which has saved the commonwealth millions of dollars in unrealized student growth, and in exchange for that savings we are told that we must pay 80% of all SOQ education costs.