Public Comments for: HJ9 - Constitutional amendment; marriage between two individuals.
VOTE SICKLES OUT OF OFFICE RE: HJ9! I DO NOT CONSENT to proposition HJ9 - NO! I DO NOT CONSENT to amend the Constitution of Virginia regarding marriage between "individuals". Marriage is the union between one man and one woman...PERIOD!
I urge you to work to affirm the life and dignity of EVERY child and Mother! I ask…how can we call ourselves civilized as a people and a society when considering “legalized” abortion?? Marriage: The union of 1 man and 1 woman. This definition predates ANY nation, religion, or law. It is written on our hearts as it comes from God.
Is the VCC really a “Catholic “ Organization???? WHY the question regarding pronouns? Sounds woke to me; part of our SICK culture! I am VERY DISAPPOINTED!
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. This is a no brainer. Marriage - the union of 1 man and 1 woman - matters to a healthy society. All other unions, no matter how legal they may be, are not marriage as seen through the lens of history; they are unions, but not foundational to a healthy society. In the 1 man, 1 woman original design, there are many purposes - chief among them are the begetting and raising of children - future citizens, contributors, and taxpayers of our community. Marriage matters to the individuals involved, and the State and nation at large. When you say that any union can be a marriage, you are saying, in effect, that nothing is really a marriage. One man - One woman Marriage exists for a reason and it matters for us all - even those in other types of unions. Don't mess with marriage. One man - One woman.
I strongly oppose all three bills. Please vote against them.
Please Protect Virginian's rights to Same Sex Marriage (HJ9-Sickles) and Reproductive Freedoms for Women (HJ1-Herring)
Regarding the hasty proposed amendments to the Virginia Constitution, I, Heather Hornick, strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. REJECT HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. Sincerely, Heather Hornick Williamsburg, VA
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
pro life all life life marriage family human identity defined by CREATOR thank you
Virginia’s marriage equality ban no longer reflects the beliefs of its citizens. A 2021 poll showed 71% of Virginians support same-sex marriage, up from just 47% in 2006, highlighting a major shift in public opinion. Given this change, it’s time to remove the outdated ban from Virginia’s constitution. With the rollback of Roe v. Wade, national marriage equality could also be at risk, and Virginia should lead in protecting all citizens' rights. If the state truly is “for lovers,” it must affirm that love is love for everyone.
Please do not make a constitutional amendment to be able to kill a child in an inhospitable womb . This is infanticide . It is still a child and many babies can live well even after 20 weeks . My grandsons is testimony to this. Our great common wealth will suffer for this error and you who sign this will be remembered like the evil thoughts of politicians who agreed with enslaved humans ! No one wants to admit it but quietly folks said no to Kamala because she thought this abortion until birth was cool ! It isn’t and never will be . We are all brothers and sisters and don’t want innocent babies killed , Democratic's and Republicans As You are pondering signing that amendment . Know God your creator and mine and all those babies creator is watching how we treat the least of our citizens. . Help women .. really … get OBGYN care free ! This reactionary constitutional amendment is extreme and infanticide!!! We didn’t elect you all for this !!! This was unpopular with Kamala and will be unpopular for you too!!
I strongly oppose enshrining a so-called "right" to abortion in the state Constitution. The right to life is a fundamental and inalienable right for all human beings. Governments are, at the most basic level, tasked with protecting this right to life. I strongly oppose changing the definition of marriage from the natural and normal union of one man and one woman. These efforts to undermine the traditional and God-given order of society can only have catastrophic effects to our state and our country.
I am writing to express my support for HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9
I am writing to express my strong support for HJ9, a resolution to amend the Virginia Constitution to protect marriage equality for all. Every person deserves the right to love and marry freely. LGBTQ+ people have been historically disenfranchised in this country, and now we have an opportunity in Virginia to ensure that LGBTQ+ rights are protected, even in the face of potential changes to federal policy. As your constituent, I urge you to support HJ9 and make this amendment a priority. The time to protect ALL Virginians is now, and I hope you will stand with us by supporting this critical amendment. Thank you for your attention to this essential issue.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. “ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment • I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. • HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. • HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. • A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. • Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights • I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage • I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. • Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. If we pass this measure, can we also pass the equivalent of the right to murder postborn children, adults and elderly? HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. These are humans life forms, whether you believe they are ensouled or not. Do you really want to permit the killing of human life forms? Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I am curious what you are going to say to God upon your death that will explain *your* actions. I pray daily for all those who approve elective abortions, but God is equally Just as He is Merciful. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. "All that evil needs to triumph is for good men to do nothing"
I strongly oppose HJ1. Children are our greatest gift. I oppose a right to abortion. The great people of Virginia can do better for women than kill their babies. Help the mothers, but do not hurt them with abortion. I strongly oppose HJ9. Marriage is between 1 man and 1 woman. We need to reread the story about the Emperor who had no clothes. No one wants to speak the truth anymore, but the truth is only a man and woman can marry.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Concerning HJ1 & Hj9 We do not want any amendment to current Va code that would violate Constitutional protections of even the tiniest Human. His/her has the choice to indulge in breeding or creating a new human life. Buyers remorse is not an ok option if it means snuffing out another person.
All, please ratify the Virginia Constitution and protect Virginian’s rights to same-sex marriage (HJ9 - Sickles) and reproductive freedoms for women (HJ1 - Herring). Thank you for working to protect those who are vulnerable! Sincerely, William Frear
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1-I strongly oppose enshrining a "right" to abortion in Virginia's constitution. HJ2-I support Hu 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ9-I oppose Hu 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
Please add these three amendments to protect the civil rights of Virginians, especially during these uncertain federal times.
I am writing in support of this bill. It frankly frustrates me that this is still an issue not only in Virginia but also in the country as a whole. Marriage between two consenting and loving adults should not be denied regardless of the gender of those wishing to do so. My daughter was born on 6/26/2015 and is proud to share her birthday with the day that gay marriage was legalized in the US. It would be a shame to tell her that it was no longer the case.
“right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I am a woman, wife, and mother. I learned that when this amazing country was founded on the principles of separation of church and state, religious freedom, and pursuit of individual happiness. No one has the right to impose religious beliefs on others; that is wrong. To weaponize laws to put women's lives in danger because they miscarried, were raped, or made personal decisions goes against their rights as human beings. Only women who have gone through pregnancy, breastfeeding, and child rearing know how difficult and challenging it is to be responsible for another life financially and emotionally. I couldn’t impose that on another woman that does not choose to; that is their choice. Women have rights over their bodies. I support the legal union between individuals regardless of gender and who they choose to marry and share their life with. In no way, shape, or form does that choice affect anyone. Laws are put in place to protect everyone, and they should be equitable for all. I know many couples of the same sex live in fear; it is extremely sad and scary to live in uncertainty.
Separation of church and state is a fundamental cornerstone of the United States. However, prevailing powers lie with who enshrine their Judeo-Christian beliefs into law, forcing others to live in ways that go against their natures and beliefs, taking away the freedoms we all hope to have living in this country. Who I marry (being of legal age and consenting to the marriage) shouldn't matter to the courts, regardless of their sex OR RACE. HJ9 is not only enshrining the equality of same sex marriages, but also interracial marriage, which many choose to ignore when voting against, to their detriment. If a church chooses not to marry same sex couples, that's the religions choice, and fully allowable given religious freedom. For the civil government to regulate based on religious beliefs (stemming from mistranslations and blatant misinterpreting of the various holy texts words) should not be allowed. To deny marriage based on race is to take us back to the dark ages that would truly signal the downfall of freedom, but without this bill, would not be codified and would be a permissible reason to deny a marriage. I am fully in favor of HJ9.
HJ1 -- There should never be any right to terminate an innocent human life. Period. The life of an unborn human is inherently innocent -- in terms of both natural and governmental laws -- as is with any human life. Any attempt to legalize the termination of an innocent human life at any stage of its existence is not only morally indefensible, but is especially so constitutionally. If it is enacted in Virginia, it must be legally overturned before it is ever enacted. Protecting innocent human life is never negotiable HJ2 -- All citizens of the Virginia Commonwealth, who have fully and satisfactorily served out duly authorized sentences as the result of a valid criminal conviction should have all legal and civil rights restored to them, including the right to fully participate in local, state and federal elections. HJ93 -- Both prior to, and throughout the history of Western Civilization, the essential meaning of marriage has always been -- and should always remain -- a legal prerequisite for facilitating the creation of a human family. Its legal essence has always been the between one male and one female in anticipation that they would become the joint and parents of human offspring with the shared legal responsibility of raising their common offspring to adulthood. These joint and share roles can never be optimally shared by same-sex or multiple partners because doing so would degrade both the essential meaning and innate objective of legal marriage. Moreover, it would make a mockery of the establish common and statutory laws related to inheritance divorce and family trusteeships.
HJ1 is a blatant attack on the dignity of the human person. Every child in the womb is a unique individual, with the right to "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness." There is no scientific question that the baby, at any stage of pregnancy, is unique and separate from the mother. A woman's "choice" is to either nurture and protect natural life or to kill an innocent person. Every single person started as an embryo and small child in the womb. Who are we to take away the life that God has given? As explained in the story of previous Planned Parenthood clinic director Abby Johnson, the abortion takes away the baby but does not take away the mother's memory of the baby. I support HJ2. Once people have complete their sentence, they should be allowed to vote again. I oppose HJ9, which attacks the institution of marriage. In the book of Genesis it does not say that God gave Adam a man as his partner, it says that God gave Adam a woman as his partner. While the creation story is not to be taken literally, the point is that man and woman are literally made for each other, they complement each other and have the gift of procreating children. While man and man and woman and woman are certainly meant for friendship with each other, the marriage bond is a mysterious and life giving institution that is unique to man and woman. Only a man and a woman can truly become one, both physically and spiritually. Society today blurs the lines about true masculinity and femininity and that these can even be fluid. Countries in Europe such as Sweden and in the UK have discovered that gender fluidity is actually extremely harmful and dangerous. The role of a man and the role of a woman is unique to each sex. Same sex marriage does not fulfill what marriage is meant for, which is union and procreation.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Protect equal marriage (same sex, interracial, etc.), protect transgender rights (gender affirming care, equal opportunity for sports, mental health care, etc.), women's health care rights (abortion access, right to choose, rights to own body, etc.), protection for special education, and protection to marginalized groups.
I’m writing today in response to the Virginia state constitutional amendments HJ1 and HJ9. HJ1 mentions reproductive freedom. This has nothing to do with reproductive freedom. This is reproductive anarchy. Freedom is not the ability to do anything that a person wants to do. It is the freedom to do what’s right. In a free country you’re not free to kill other people. True liberty and freedom has limits and those limits are set by God’s laws. We are not free to kill unborn children, mutilate our bodies, or try to change the sexual design that God gave each person. The marriage amendment H9 allows for marriage between any two parties undefined. This means a man could marry a six-year-old. This reckless amendment will legalize, pedophilia, homosexuality and bestiality. I fear for the souls of those who have drafted and promoted such legislation that is an abomination to God. “ And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.” Matt. 10:28
With regard to HJ1 and HJ9, ammending the constitution of the Commonwealth of Virginia to enshrine these current ideological positions prohibits the state from representing the choice of it's citizens, should a majority, now or in the future, oppose such issues. Please do not support the suppression of future democratic process. With regard to SB270, ranked choice voting is a poor organization system for voting. Please oppose it.
I strongly oppose HJ1 which would enshrine abortion on demand in the Va. constitution and remove all attempts to protect unborn infants. I favor HJ2 I strongly oppose HJ9 because marriage always was ,is and will remain a lifetime union between a man and a woman. God planned marriage to be so from the beginning of creation. Pierre Deslauriers
America was built on separation of church and state. It is not wrong to marry an individual of the same sex. No one is hurting anyone. Love is love and it is important! Isn’t America land of the free? Do not move forward and repeal same sex marriage.
To Whom It May Concern at the House Privileges and Election Meeting, Thank you for the opportunity to share, in writing, my thoughts and opinions on these three bills before you today, this 13th day of November, 2024. We live in a democracy and the freedom to speak and be heard is a constitutional right. Thank you for this format to do so. As to HJ 1: I strongly oppose this constitutional amendment. It violates my religious beliefs to support a bill that calls abortion a reproductive right. I became a mother through adoption and there is not a day that goes by that I am not grateful that my sons’ birth mothers chose life for them. While I fundamentally believe that life begins at conception, this proposed amendment has no limits on when an abortion can take place even into the 9th month when a baby is viable outside the womb and has fully developed pain receptors. This is just wrong on every level. As to HJ 2: I also oppose this constitutional amendment. If a felon has lost the right to vote due to being incarcerated for a felony level crime, I support the current law requiring said person to take action to apply to regain that right to vote. I also believe that should not happen until they have fulfilled all the requirements of their sentencing which extend beyond incarceration. As to HJ 9: I also oppose this constitutional amendment. Repealing this ban on same sec marriage would violate my religious beliefs.
OPPOSE HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. SUPPORT HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. OPPOSE HJ 9 – marriage definition change I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman (a provision regarding marriage that Virginia voters approved in 2006). Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Protect same-sex marriage!
Why are you introducing bills in secret? In fact, why are you so anti-life? These 3 bills are an outlandish attack on the dignity of and respect for human life and ignore the importance of the traditional family as the cornerstone of our American society. Today's world needs to honor and protect all human life, backed by the science of such, and get back to relying on the truths of science. All humans deserve a chance at life and redemption.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
I oppose HJ-9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms that marriage is the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. Marriage, when between one man and one woman, creates a wholesome bond that helps to uphold the moral fiber of our country.
Please pass all 3 of these bills. They are important to me and my family.
Block 1 Legislation continued from the 2024 Regular Session, per House Rule 22 HJ1 Constitutional amendment; fundamental right to reproductive freedom (first reference). HJ2 Constitutional amendment; qualifications of voters, right to vote, persons not entitled to vote. HJ9 Constitutional amendment; Marriage between two individuals should not be determined by their gender.
Please repeal the ban on same-sex marriages, please! I am a lifelong queer mother, who has adopted children through foster care for the last several years. My husband and I are lucky to be a cis/straight couple, but there are so many of our community members, family, and friends who are not afforded this. And why? This is 2024. Repeal this ban NOW!
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has always been between men and women, with the hope that they will have children to carry on our society. Two men or two women can never produce a biological child. If the want to live together fine, but don't call it marriage.
"I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent Virginian's from passing any laws that will protect unborn children. Unborn American children have the same rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness that born Americans have. This amendment's passage could mean that current pro-life laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. Don't enable Virginia to legalize infanticide. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians."
I STRONGLY support these three amendments to our state constitution. Protecting my children's reproductive freedom, restoring voting rights to people convicted of felonies, and ensuring marriage equality are all deeply important to me and the people I love. I want to protect and support all Virginians', rights, regardless of their political affiliation, with these three constitutional amendments!
Please vote no on HJ9. This should not be part of the constitution. This should be up for public debate.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
These three bills have been introduced secretly. There is no provision to comment on them on either LIS or Richmond Sunlight. I urge you to withdraw all three and reintroduce them (if you must) when the GA convenes in January. In the meantime, please consider withdrawing them permanently. The amendments, especially HB1 and HB9 strike at the heart of what it means to be alive as a human person (HB1) and destroy the function of the traditional family as the cornerstone of our American society (HB9).
The majority of Virginians believe that all qualified citizens should have access to the ballot, including those who have served their time for felony convictions and people with disabilities who want to participate in the democratic process. I support an amendment to the Virginia Constitution to guarantee that people who have been disenfranchised due to a felony conviction will have their rights automatically restored upon completion of their sentences, without additional steps or paperwork after they are no longer incarcerated, and to ensure people with disabilities never lose their rights without an appropriate judicial finding. This has never been a partisan issue. Both Democratic and Republican governors have chosen to restore voting rights to thousands of citizens; however, Virginia's current governor has reversed the trend. People should not be permanently defined by their past mistakes. Virginians who have successfully served their time should be able to fully rejoin civic life. It is time for Virginians to act to amend our Constitution to create a routine restoration process that reflects fair accountability and encourages civic engagement.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman
HJ1 SUPPORT- Every Virginian should have access to affordable, quality health care, including abortion, birth control, and the privacy to make reproductive choices. HJ9 SUPPORT- In addition, I believe that individuals have a fundamental right to marry and that the Commonwealth and its political subdivisions should be prevented from denying the issuance of a marriage license to two parties contemplating a lawful marriage on the basis of the sex, gender, or race of such parties.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment • I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. • HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. • HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. • A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. • Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights • I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage • I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. • Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1 — OPPOSED: Abortion is a medical procedure which has no place in the Constitution of Virginia. Adding it would not only be inappropriate, but it would jeopardize even modest protections for unborn children, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 2 — SUPPORT: I absolutely support the restoration of voting rights for people who have completed their sentences and have been released. This is automatically done in most states, and it is one way to help people reintegrate into society and feel that they have a chance to be contributing citizens. HJ9 — OPPOSED: Marriage predates any nation, religion or law, and as the union of one man and one woman, it has an existential purpose and meaning. It is possible to have a bonding ceremony without the joining of one man and one woman, but it would not be marriage.
HJ 1 -- Abortion: Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 9 – Marriage: Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I believe we should repeal the constitutional provision defining marriage as only a union between one man and one woman as well as the related provisions that are no longer valid as a result of the United States Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015). The right to marry is a fundamental right inherent in the liberty of persons and to constrict such a right is in direct opposition to the inherent rights of life, liberty, and happiness. As long as marriage dictates my tax status, my ability to see my partner in the hospital, and the ability for my partner to make legal and medical decisions on my behalf it is in part a legal status and one that comes with a great deal of privilege. As such, it shouldn't be able to be limited on the basis of sex as doing so is an infringement on my legal civil rights. The government doesn't get to dictate my what my family looks like. Get out of my bedroom.
I am opposed to the passage of this amendment. Marriage is between a man and a woman. What consenting adults do on their own time is their own business. Let us not let a group dictate what we cherish as a community.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. At conception, there comes about a living organism with a unique genetic code of human DNA. Every fetus at any stage is a human person. Abortion both destroys a child's life and wreaks havoc on a mother's heart. We need to support children and their mothers through financial assistance, communal support, and encouragement, not cause further wounds to those who are already in dire straights. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage is not merely a romantic, care-giving relationship. It is a specific kind of friendship, one that this 1) permanent, 2) faithful, and 3) open to life. Only the relationship between one man and one woman has these qualities. Only the relationship between one man and one woman can create the building block on which societies are founded and flourish. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1 "right to reproductive freedom" comment: I oppose on the grounds of distorting of the concept of "fundamental rights". The choice to engage in conduct that might result in the creation of humankind is not something to be protected in a constitution; therefore, the potential outcome of such a choice is not a constitutional subject. I would toss this proposed resolution. HJ2 "Qualifications of voters" comment: I accept this proposed resolution. HJ9 "Marriage" comment: I would not distort the core underlying principle of marriage by tilting at variations. Rather add a separate proposed resolution that addresses the wishes of some to engage in civil unions would allow for the benefits that laws allow for married persons but not the distraction of contorting the fundamental of marriage.
Please vote no to abortion amendment, and the reversal of the one man one woman marriage legislation. These family and life issue determine the way I vote.
Every Virginian should have access to affordable, quality health care, including abortion, birth control, and the privacy to make reproductive choices. In addition, I believe that individuals have a fundamental right to marry and that the Commonwealth and its political subdivisions should be prevented from denying the issuance of a marriage license to two parties contemplating a lawful marriage on the basis of the sex, gender, or race of such parties.
I strongly oppose enshrining a right to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ1 would severely jeopardize even the few small protections for unborn babies currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. I urge you to reject HJ1 which expands abortion and instead work for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and child. I also oppose HJ 9 which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. This definition of marriage has its foundation in natural law. Thank you, Mary Mc Laughlin
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment The delayed regret that women commonly wake up to later in life - that they have killed one of their children - is not spoken about nearly enough. It is cognitive dissonance - even within our own legal system - to believe that you can ethically remove a "fetus" yet, if the child is wanted, then murdering a pregnant woman is counted also as murdering an unborn child. I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Please Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I know people incarcerated and not having voting rights is just another way of making them permanently second-class citizens. Restoring voting rights would give hope that there is restoration from bad mistakes in life. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
In 2004, as a 17-year-old high school senior, I wrote a letter to the editor about same-sex marriage, specifically in response to an opinion piece published by a former member of this body. In that article, I urged the former Delegate to realize that people who were coming of age at the time were largely in support of same-sex marriage. I said the voices of the minority (at the time) would grow and be heard. In the spring of 2015, as a 28-year-old woman, I excused myself to the bathroom in my office to cry in joy when gay marriage was legalized across the nation through the Supreme Court decision of Obergefell vs. Hodges. My sister and I toasted on the steps of the Supreme Court that afternoon. As a 38-year-old woman today, I am proud that Virginia codified marriage equality through HB 174 during last year’s General Assembly session. I will be proud to exercise my right to marry regardless of race when I wed my fiancé in the near future. To truly protect this right from future repeal, and to be sure that Virginia is no longer synonymous with anti-miscegenation laws and other discriminatory practices, I enthusiastically support HJ9.
As a resident of chesapeake virginia i support this.
This ban does not reflect the attitudes and beliefs of Virginians in 2023. A 2021 poll from the Public Religion Research Institute found that 71% of Virginians support the right of same-sex couples to marry. This percentage has only increased since the question began being asked of voters. In 2006, 53% of voters supported the marriage ban. This huge swing shows the massive shift in public opinion on the issue of marriage, and it is clear evidence that the antiquated ban should no longer be a part of Virginia’s constitution. It’s only fair to revisit a political question that has shown such a vast change since it was first broached. With the removal of women’s protections with the destruction of Roe v. Wade, it is possible that marriage equality will be destroyed on a national level as well. Virginia must take the lead to protect all citizens. If Virginia really is “for lovers,” it should recognize that love is love and grant all citizens the right to live their lives in peace.
I strongly oppose all three bills - HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 as they are currently drafted.
I agree with all three bills each have their importance and relevancy to human rights and protection of those rights. We need to keep Virginia a safe place for women and the lgbtq community.
HJ1 = I oppose HJ 1 which takes the life of an unborn child and injures mentally, spiritually and sometimes physically the mother as well. I've held hundreds of women in my arms who deeply regretted this decision in my work as a post-abortion counselor. It's a lie that this is good for women - the only so called "medical procedure" that harms women. Government should protect all her citizens especially the most innocent and vulnerable among us. Please reconsider this course of action. HJ2 = I support this. HJ9 = I oppose this because marriage between one man and one woman predates any nation, religion or law. Why make a mockery of marriage, when civil unions are available?
I am in favor of all three bills. Abortion is healthcare and saves lives, and consenting adults have the right to marry.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment We strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 9 – marriage We oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I agree that adults should be able to marry whom they chose. I don't want government to mess with that.
as a mother who had an abortion to remove nonviable twins that would have continued to grow without heartbeats in my body, it is imperative that women continue to have reproductive rights and bodily autonomy. as a woman who went through early menopause at 35, it is imperative that people have the right to gender, affirming care. as a mother of a child that identifies as queer and a friend to many married LGBTQ parents, it is imperative that they keep their rights as well.
I strongly support HJ1, and believe that the right to make reproductive decisions lies in the hands of each individual. It is their body, and their own decisions to make these choices, along with their medical professional and the deity of their choice. At no time should a woman be restricted from medical care by their government. Simply put, if your religion prohibits you from getting an abortion, it is your prerogative not to get one. However, you cannot oppress your religious beliefs on other people, preventing them from making these difficult decisions. As someone who has had to have abortion care as a lifesaving measure, I strongly support this amendment. I cannot imagine the added trauma if I had been required to appear in a court to argue for my life, and possibly have been denied and not be here today. The decision to have an abortion is usually as a backup or last resort due to birth control failure. Abortion care also includes procedures and care necessary for those experiencing complications and miscarriages around pregnancies. There are also multiple instances where incest, rape, or sexual assault have occurred, and a woman is in need of abortion care without having to add to the trauma by being forced to birth a child that was a result of the crime. In regards to HJ9, I strongly support this amendment. It is in our inherent rights in the constitution to our pursuit of happiness. This means loving who you choose, whether it's same sex or opposite sex. This falls back to the same reasoning for HJ1. If your religious beliefs prohibit you from marrying same sex, then don't marry the same sex. But don't oppress that religious belief on others in their pursuit of happiness and liberty.l
"Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness", these three unalienable rights delivered by one of the great founders of this nation and of this Commonwealth has been ingrained into generations of Americans since 1776. That we as people deserve to chase our dreams, love, foster community, and truly build a life worth living without fear. These days fear has become a strong tool to knock us off this path that was set forth in the birth of this nation. But with these three resolutions today, we can reconfirm our foundational commitment to being committed to freedom, to love, to expression, and to many other wonderful aspects of this country. For anyone that does read this, my sincere hope is that you choose freedom and hope over fear. That with these resolutions that we recommit to the work the founders started, of bringing freedom to all walks of life. Passing and codifying these resolutions for reproductive rights, voting rights, and marriage rights are quintessential to the concept of true freedom. That we the people can chase down our own pursuits of happiness and build a stronger Virginia at the same time. So I urge that as our representation, you choose freedom for all and not a select few.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I believe marriage is between one man and one woman. I oppose redefining this traditional and sacred union-institution. Catherine Heffley
HJ1: I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ2 I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ9 I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
“Love is Love” is not just a saying on a tshirt, it’s truth. Legislation impeding the ability of two persons to commit to another through the act of marriage, no matter their personal identity or distinctions, is unethical and inhumane. And legislation that still exists to oppress people should be dissolved immediately. It is not just the right thing to do, but good for business and the state. Support and pass HJ9.
I strongly support all of these amendments. They are all important for Virginia citizens.
Life is the first inalienable right. Let’s put a priority on the right of a baby to LIVE! Marriage is ordained to be between a man and a woman. There is no moral substitute. Voting rights must be for citizens only. The most accurate process is hand counted paper ballots.
I support having respect for marriage by ensuring all couples are allowed to marry no matter sexual orientation or preference! Marriage is a right we should all have access too!
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1 I oppose enshrining a right to abortion. I oppose jeopardizing the few protections for the unborn that we have in the state of Virginia. I feel it is wrong to destroy life in the womb no matter what the stage of development or the circumstances of the conception. Catherine Heffley
I hereby implore the Virginia House of Delegates to ratify the Constitution of Virginia and grant: HJ1 - Herring: The right to reproductive freedom HJ9 - Sickles: The right to lawful marriage between consenting adults regardless of the sex, gender, race, or religion of such parties
I am in favor of all three bills.
HJ1: I strongly oppose this measure. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ2: I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ9: I vehemently reject this measure! oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I am commenting in favor of protecting reproductive rights and the rights of consenting adults to marry. As seen in other states, if reproductive rights are not protected women will die. I am in favor of all three bills.
I disagree with hj1, we don't need a constitution amendment for abortion. We need to protect women and preborn children. I support hj2, restoration of voting rights. I am against hj9,,. We can protect same sex couple unions with out redefining marriage, which is a union of one man and one woman.
I strongly oppose HJ1. Abortion is murder of a helpless unborn child. How can Virginia purposely condone this action. A person is created at the moment of conception as at that instant a new, different organism and soul is created. I support HJ2. Once a person has paid his/her debt to society, there full citizenship should be restored. I strongly oppose HJ9. Marriage is between one man and one woman. How else is our race propagated. For thousands of years this view of marriage has existed, and we are here because of it. The legal and societal advantages of being married are consistent with with raising a family (having children). It's grossly arrogant to even consider this amendment.
Unlimited abortion is criminal. 2 humans are involved. 1. the mother. 2. the baby. The mother is not aborting herself but rather her baby. Exceptions are warranted for rape ,incest, and the life of the mother. The reproductive rights of the infants being murdered must also be protected. A time limit, like the 15 week period endorsed by Governor Youngkin, has to be respected except for cases of the physical life of the mother and miscarriages. No one has the right to murder a viable baby except for the physical life and safety of the mother. Marriage is between one man and one woman. Men and women bring different qualities to a marriage. God did not create a super gender where one sex can do everything. Men in general are stronger , but women provide other qualities that compensate. A good man and a good woman is a combination that can't be beat.
Looking for more information
As a citizen of Henrico, I firmly believe in and support the rights of same-sex marriages.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Please reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – Please support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – Please oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose the passage of HJ9 as this amendment goes against the Word of God, which is clear that marriage is between a man and a woman; “He answered, “Have you not read that he who created them from the beginning made them male and female, and said, ‘Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh’? So they are no longer two but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let not man separate.” (Matthew 19:4-6) The Bible describes marriage as a God-ordained, lifelong, exclusive covenant relationship between a man and a woman, so I cannot in good conscience be in favor of something that so clearly violates scripture. Virginia was founded by godly people and I desire to see Virginia return to its godly roots and uphold the infallible Word of God.”
HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Don’t want to speak but want to voice my support to keep all marriage legal. Love is love!
HJ1 - Abortion is Murder. We must protect mothers and the unborn. What will our state be if HJ1 is allowed in our constitution? Abortion is always wrong. There are people and places to help mothers and protect the unborn. HJ2 - I support all who have completed their sentences and can vote. HJ9 - I oppose HJ9-God made us Male and Female , and marriage is the union between one man and one woman (period).
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I am commenting in favor of protecting reproductive rights and the rights of consenting adults to marry. As seen in other states, if reproductive rights are not protected women will die. The United States has one of the highest maternal death rates in the developed world. The focus should be on expanding access to reproductive health care, not reducing them.
I strongly support the passing of all three of these bills. Ensuring equal rights, voting rights, and reproductive rights is important to me and my family.
I support HJ9. Let's align the Constitution with VA Code and the US Supreme Court ruling. Marriage between two people - regardless of sex or gender - should be based on love.
I support HJ9. Love is love. Any condition set forth by law to suggest otherwise, does direct harm to those impacted. Arguably, by passing HJ9, there is absolutely NO harm to those who oppose same-sex marriage. Opposing this bill reflects a blatant attempt to impose religious belief at a state level, implementing control over communities already marginalized.
Unfortunately time limits me from a robust input. Simply put marriage has it's orgin as an institute given by God, and is a covenant between a man and woman. That includes having and disciplining children to be godly, productive men and women who cultivate virtue. When a marriage is destroyed or distorted or marred, so goes the family, and so goes the nation. Repent and believe the gospel. Thank you.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1 -Abortion I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
In support of HJ9
I strongly oppose the right to abortion within Virginia as science is very clear that abortion ends a human life. No legislator or any person has the right to terminate a human life, especially an extreme measure allowing abortion throughout pregnancy!! I This is reckless and unrestricted. All human life is precious and should be protected! I am in favor of restoring voting rights to those who have completed their sentences. I am strongly opposed to any measure that attempts to change the definition of marriage. Marriage is between a man and woman as its natural purpose is procreation. All other lifestyles are partnerships that cannot nor should ever be deemed “marriage.” Thank you for listening to my voice! Michelle H Grau
HJ 1 – I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1: Freedom of religion also means freedom *from* religion. Other people's religious beliefs should have no power over a woman's ability to make choices that directly impact her life. With that in mind, I urge you to amend the Virginia state constitution to guarantee access to birth control, abortion and other aspects of reproductive health. Whether someone chooses to use those services is a personal health decision that they should be able to make as needed. Abortion up to viability, when the fetus can sustain its own life, is reasonable and should be the norm. Protecting women means enabling them to access the healthcare they require, when they require it. To ban abortion is to invite death to Virginia. We will see women, like the teenager in Texas and the two women in Georgia, who die because they aren't able to access the healthcare they need. We will see a serious decline in healthcare providers choosing to come to Virginia. There will be economic consequences to banning abortion and reproductive healthcare access in Virginia. It must be enshrined as a right. HJ2: Restore the right to vote once felons have completed their sentence. Their sentence is their debt to society, and they should be enabled and empowered to re-enter society once that debt has been paid. Convicted felons are citizens like any others and should have the right to have their voices heard, which includes being able to choose who represents them after their sentence has been served. HJ9: Any two people should be allowed to marry, regardless of their genders and/or sexes. There is absolutely no reason to deny two people the right to marry. There are many legal, non-religious reasons why same-sex couples would marry, and there's no reason not to extend the same legal protections that heterosexual couples would have. Anyone who says marriage is between a man and a woman only is speaking from a religious point of view, which is their right. However, freedom of religion also means freedom *from* religion, and religious viewpoints should not dictate the law, which is applied to all citizens, regardless of religion.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Reproductive Health Every Virginian should have access to affordable, quality healthcare, including abortion and birth control, with the freedom to make private reproductive choices. Abortion must remain safe, legal, and guided by medical professionals. Protecting reproductive rights safeguards other freedoms, such as marriage equality, contraception access, and privacy in personal decisions. The right to choose also supports racial and economic equality, as marginalized communities face greater barriers to adequate healthcare. Reproductive decisions affect overall well-being, including financial stability, housing, employment, and family support. Voting Rights Restoration Most Virginians believe all qualified citizens deserve voting rights, including those who’ve served felony sentences and people with disabilities who wish to vote. I support a constitutional amendment for automatic rights restoration upon sentence completion, with no extra steps, and to protect the voting rights of people with disabilities unless a court rules otherwise. Voting rights should not be permanently lost due to past mistakes. Virginia should amend its Constitution to ensure fair restoration and foster civic participation. Marriage Equality Virginia’s marriage equality ban no longer reflects the beliefs of its citizens. A 2021 poll showed 71% of Virginians support same-sex marriage, up from just 47% in 2006, highlighting a major shift in public opinion. Given this change, it’s time to remove the outdated ban from Virginia’s constitution. With the rollback of Roe v. Wade, national marriage equality could also be at risk, and Virginia should lead in protecting all citizens' rights. If the state truly is “for lovers,” it must affirm that love is love for everyone.
HJ9 should be passed because it is time to do away with archaic legislation that discriminates against people for who they love. Everyone deserves the legal benefits of marriage!
HJ1: Please vote to amend the Virginia state constitution to guarantee access to birth control, abortion and other aspects of reproductive health. This is what Virginians clearly want, and a fanatical minority should not be able to take our rights away based on their own religious beliefs. HJ2: Please vote to establish routine restoration of voting rights for felons. Once a person's time has been served, they are ready to re-enter society and should have the same rights as any other citizen. HJ3: Please vote to establish the right of same sex individuals to marry. Again, this is what Virginians want, and a fanatical minority should not be able to impose their religious beliefs on the rest of us. Thank you.
As a citizen of this great Commonwealth, I am writing to ask the House to vote FOR HJ 1, HJ2, and HJ 9. No one should make decisions for a woman’s health other than the woman herself. Women will die if this bill is passed, as we have seen in other states where this has been voted into law. Please support HJ2, as everyone deserves to vote in the state where they live and work. Please support HJ9, as everyone has the right to marriage, regardless of who they love. Virginia is for LOVERS, not backward bigots.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1 - I strongly oppose enshrining a "right" to abortion in Virginia's constitution and, instead of expanding abortion urge you to work for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ2 - all people who have completed their sentences should have the voting rights restored HJ9 - marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. As a result, I oppose HJ9 which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
As a concerned citizen of Virginia, I am writing to express my strong support for protecting women's reproductive rights and advancing same-sex marriage. These issues are fundamental to the values of equality, autonomy, and dignity that our great Commonwealth stands for. Women's reproductive rights enable individuals to make informed decisions about their health and future. Virginia must continue to uphold and protect the right of women to access safe and legal reproductive healthcare, including contraception and abortion services. Denying these rights not only endangers the health and well-being of women but also undermines their ability to participate fully in society. Every person should have the autonomy to make decisions regarding their own body without interference from governmental restrictions or societal judgment. Similarly, the right to marry is a cornerstone of personal freedom and equality. Same-sex couples deserve the same legal recognition and protections afforded to heterosexual couples. Love is love, and denying this fundamental right to same-sex couples is a violation of basic human rights. The Virginia House of Delegates has the opportunity to lead by example, championing inclusivity and ensuring that all families in our state are treated equally under the law. Both of these issues are about protecting individual freedoms and fostering a compassionate and progressive society. As we move forward, we must create an environment where all individuals can live authentically and pursue their dreams without fear of discrimination or judgment. I urge you to stand firmly in support of protecting women's reproductive rights and advancing the rights of same-sex couples. Your leadership on these matters will send a powerful message that Virginia is committed to equality, justice, and respect for all citizens. Thank you for your attention to these critical issues. I appreciate your service to our community and look forward to seeing positive progress in the Virginia House of Delegates.
I oppose this amendment. Marriage is a Christian institution. Established by God, this holy covenant is defined as a 3-part union between one man, one woman, and God Almighty. Do not pass this amendment.
I oppose HJ9
I strongly support all three of these bills. Please pass HJ1 and support womens' rights to choose the healthcare that is best for them. Please pass HJ2 and protect voting rights. Please pass HJ9 and protect marriage equality.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I hereby implore the Virginia House of Delegates to ratify the Constitution of Virginia and grant: HJ1 - Herring: The right to reproductive freedom HJ9 - Sickles: The right to lawful marriage between consenting adults regardless of the sex, gender, race, or religion of such parties
I oppose any legislation advancing the murder misguidedly called abortion as well as legislation defining or weakening marriage as anything other than between one man and one woman. I oppose restoring voting rights to convicted felons unless pardoned by the governor or legislature.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Hello House Privileges and Elections Committee, I am writing to voice my support for HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Let’s get these Constitutional Amendments on the ballot to secure our individual freedoms. Thank you,
HJ1 Please do not make abortion a constitutional right. Please protect unborn children and their parents. We should be working to help parents and their children, not kill the most defenseless in the womb. HJ2. Please restore voting rights to persons who have completed their sentences. HJ9. Marriage is a union of one man and one woman. It has been so before the beginnings of government and organized society. Please do not try to make so called "same-sex" marriage a constitutional right.
In support of all Virginians across the commonwealth, we must repeal the current constitution’s ban on same sex marriage. All adults in VA should be empowered and safe to marry who they love, regardless of whether that adult identifies as a man, woman, or beyond the binary
It is easy to say you are against reproductive healthcare for women when you ignore the far reaching issues that occur AFTER that "life" arrives in the world. As someone who was in and out of the VA foster care system as a child, who lived in horrible conditions, who was abused, I can say that I would never wish for another child to end up going through the things I have. And the unfortunate reality is that when you FORCE women to have babies they are not mentally, physically, financially able to provide for you are condeming those children to grow up in poverty, in abusive homes, being placed in an overburdened foster care system, etc. Just because a woman is FORCED to have that child, it doesn't mean they will put it up for adoption (that is the least likely outcome when considering you are forcing someone to put their body through one of the most risky, stressful, painful, traumatic experiences... they aren't going through all that just to hand over that child... and we also know most people wanting to adopt are looking for WHITE healthy babies, not babies with severe health issues or deformities, or babies with different skin colors/nationalities). It is easy to scream about how it is murder when YOU aren't the one taking on the risk to your own health/life, when you aren't the one taking on the huge medical debt for prenatal care and delivery, when you don't have to worry about your income being cut off if you are unable to work or as you recover from delivering a child, when you don't have to worry about paying for all of that child's needs, when you don't have to find or pay for the insanely expensive childcare. Those screaming about these "babies" are the same ones complaining about those who are on state assistance programs because they can't financially take care of the kids they have. If it was actually about caring about "life" there would be more effort put into increasing financial supports for medical care, paid maternity leave, housing assistance, food assistance, childcare assistance, etc. And if those "babies" end up being part of the LGBTQ+ community later on, well the same people screaming about being pro-life will be demanding that their ability to exist be taken away. It's only about pro-life until those babies are born, then they move onto complaining about the burden those babies are putting on our federal and state budgets. And all those in the comments who have talked about needing to replenish our population for our economy, well that right there shows it isn't about the well-being of a baby, but about controlling /forcing women to pop out future workers!!! It reduces the value of a woman's life to being nothing more than an incubator, like livestock used for breeding. If men were the ones that could get pregnant this wouldn't even be up for negotiation because no one has ever tried to regulate a man's body or their ability to make medical decisions for themselves. A non-viable fetus should not be given more consideration than a living breathing human being. No one can be forced to donate their organs to sustain someone else's life, well a woman should not be forced against her will to give their body to sustain another life. And every human being should have the right to love who they want, to marry who they want, regardless of what some religions believe. Our constitution and founding fathers clearly state that our nation shall not impose religion on anyone.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. It could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. Justice requires it. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. Furthermore, I do support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. Finally, I oppose HJ9 which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. I appreciate your time to read my letter and for working for the common good of the Commonwealth of Virginia.
HJ1: language should be added that defines and safeguards parental rights - requiring their informed consent and permission, and notification where their minor children are concerned with anything "reproductive" related and distinguishes between adults and minors, especially where "medical ender affirming care" or abortion are concerned with regard to minors - children under 18. HJ9: Marriage should be defined as between TWO ADULT human beings/homo-sapiens and what the nature of that contract is. It's a sad state we have come to where one must insist on these definitions, but based on the trends, we must insist. HJ2: Qualifications of voters - Why is there any necessity for this amendment? The ability to vote in Virginia should be restricted (as it currently is) to ONLY verifiable Citizens of the United States of America AND Virginians - to Citizens of Virginia - adults - 18 yrs and older. We should require a government issued photo ID , reduce the days of voting perhaps down to several days (not what it currently is) and return to physical paper ballots, hand counted. We can still make voting easy for qualified, verifiable Citizens AND secure the election process by making it difficult to engage in fraudulent election activities. I've attached a thoughtful article on considerations for all three proposed amendments - written by Dr. Sheila Furey of the Virginia Medical Freedom Alliance. I think these are important aspects to consider with each of the above. Thank you.
A 2021 found that 71% of Virginians support the right of same-sex couples to marry. This is clear evidence that the antiquated ban on same sex marriage should no longer be a part of Virginia’s constitution. Most Virginians recognize that same sex marriage is not a threat to traditional marriage. Virginia must take the lead to protect all citizens.
Dear House Privileges and Elections Committee Members, I am writing to express my strong support for HJ9, a resolution to amend the Virginia Constitution to protect marriage equality for all. Every person deserves the right to love and marry freely. LGBTQ+ people have been historically disenfranchised in this country, and now we have an opportunity in Virginia to ensure that LGBTQ+ rights are protected, even in the face of potential changes to federal policy. As your constituent, I urge you to support HJ9 and make this amendment a priority. The time to protect ALL Virginians is now, and I hope you will stand with us by supporting this critical amendment. Thank you for your attention to this essential issue. Sincerely, Kyle Gunderson
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2 and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I OPPOSE the passage of HJ9 as this amendment goes against the Word of God, which is clear that marriage is between a man and a woman. The Bible describes marriage as a God-ordained, lifelong, exclusive covenant relationship between a man and a woman. I cannot in good conscience be in favor of something that so clearly violates scripture.
I support HJ1 as it protects the right to make individual choices with limited interference from government while also allowing for responsible legislation when there is a compelling state interest. Furthermore, it allows women to protect their own right to life, something that legislators in other states have recently demonstrated they are poorly equipped to protect, as evidenced by the deaths of women in Texas due to miscarriage and delayed care as well as the deaths of women in Georgia. As a woman that has suffered severe pregnancy complications which could have resulted in death, I know just how complicated pregnancy can be and how it can forever change you. Trust in the medical system and trust that doctors have a patient's best interest at heart is vital for the best outcomes. In my own case, had I not had this trust, I never would have risked another pregnancy knowing that my risk for complication and death were higher. Knowing I had the freedom to make my own health care choices and trusting my doctor enabled me to take that risk and grow my family. This amendment helps to maintain the trust between patients and their doctors. Pregnancy and "right to life" are complex and are not black and white issues. They should not be treated as such. While some pregnant individuals may make a choice others don't agree with, the greater harm comes through taking away a woman's own free will by taking away her bodily autonomy, which is inhumane. Rather legislators and communities could better spend their energy on addressing the root causes of the choices they don't agree with, such as poverty and healthcare, and strive to improve community conditions which better serve us all. I also support HJ9 because government interference in the personal lives of people should be limited and only allowed within reason. Government interference based on personal religious beliefs in a country that believes in religious freedom goes against the principles of what our country was founded upon. I also support HJ2.
I, as a Virginia constituent, am voicing my support for continuing reproductive healthcare AND marriage equality. As a parent and or relative of loving families currently living as a blended and or nonbinary People , I support keeping their rights as equal human beings .
I, as a Virginia constituent, am voicing my support for continuing reproductive healthcare AND marriage equality. As a parent and or relative of loving families currently living as a blended and or nonbinary People , I support keeping their rights as equal human beings .
Marriage Equality must be protected under VA constitutional law. It is not only of a moral and social importance, but an economic issue as well. VA must continue to be a place where non-heterosexual couples can continue to live and work without risk of harassment or loss of rights.
I oppose this bill. Words form ideas and ideas have consequences. Marriage is a Biblical concept not a secular one. Same-sex "marriage" is not congruent with the Biblical construct and, for Christians, is a violation of their religious beliefs. If the idea is to provide persons of the same sex legal legitimacy rather than moral legitimacy, give their status a different name, like was done for "common law marriage" and extend property rights and other legal rights to that group. Same sex marriage is not "marriage" and should not be conflated with it in order to make a moral equivalency.
I urge you to pass both of these items. Women deserve bodily autonomy, & same sex couples should have the same right to marry as heterosexual couples... all living, breathing human beings deserve equal rights. There are no laws that tell a man what he can do with his body. Men can receive PREVENTATIVE medical care BEFORE a serious complication occurs. Women deserve the same right. Religion has no place in our laws when those beliefs are not shared by ALL. Most abortions occur within the 1st trimester. Just because a state FORCES a woman to carry an unwanted pregnancy (one that was a result of rape/insest, failed birth control, etc.) it doesn't mean they will agree to give up a child for adoption after they have to carry for 9 months & endure the trauma/ pain of birth. These babies are likely to be brought into financially unstable homes or abusive homes, where they will live in poverty or have their life put into danger. The foster care system is already overflowing with children pulled from these situations & with funding likely to be cut for financial assistance programs it's not fair to expect women to bring a child into the world that they won't have the capability of providing a good life for. Many times, these women already have children at home, & they can't afford another mouth to feed or the additional medical bills, or the time off for any possible complications or time off to recover after delivery. It is easy for pro-life advocates to scream about the "innocent life" when they aren't the ones that have to potentially endanger their own life, take on an additional financial strain, or worry about losing their job/income. Not to mention, there's already a lack of quality, affordable childcare in our state. When you ignore these other factors, you aren't truly concerned about the "life" of a child. The only late-term procedures done are for complications that could endanger a mother's life or for fetal anomalies discovered during an ultrasound. Doctors used to be able to immediately provide preventive care when there was even a possibility of a serious complication that could endanger the mother's life/health, but now in many states these doctor's have to ignore their oath to "first do no harm" to their living breathing patient & wait until a life threatening infection actually occurs before they can provide care, causing unnecessary pain/suffering for their patient, increasing risks for long-term harm to the patients health, & increasing the chance of death. The false propaganda of "after birth" abortions is referring to parents who chose neonatal palliative care, which means they know their child is not viable for sustaining life on its own due to fatal abnormalities These parents make the choice to provide comfort care without prolonging the child's suffering by allowing additional medical intervention that would only delay the child's death while increasing their suffering and pain. No law should be able to interfere in someone's right to decide what is best for their own health. A dead body has more rights than a woman in many states. Restrictive laws aren't going to encourage people to have babies, it's going to encourage women to not even start families because it's no longer worth risking that a complication will happen & having their own life put at risk/less valued than a non-viable fetus.
"I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians."
Please please please support HJ9! The right to marry is a fundamental right inherent in the liberty of persons and prohibits the Commonwealth and its political subdivisions from denying the issuance of a marriage license to two parties contemplating a lawful marriage on the basis of the sex, gender, or race of such parties! The future is uncertain and the right to marry is one to protect no matter what. Thank you
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose the passage of HJ1. This amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children.
Protecting the freedom of marriage equality, voting and reproductive freedom should be an American fundamental right. Bans as we can see throughout the country, have wreaked havoc on families, individuals, clinics, hospitals and livelihoods. They have created OBGYN deserts throughout the south and Midwest and now doctors and hospital staff are refusing to treat women and people who are pregnant with any type of pregnancy complication and miscarriage management. I have personally lost a friend in Alabama cause they refused to treat her pregnancy complication. She leaves two children behind after something that was treatable. It is absolutely barbaric for anyone getting involved other than the only people who need to be involved. It is not our concern on such matters that are not simple. Enshrining the right to Reproductive Freedom ensures that state politicians are OUT of these decisions. Whether it be IVF, to use or not use birth control, birth plans, abortion, testing and so forth, Women’s health etc the government should not be concerned. I support abortion and the critical healthcare necessity it plays in an array of roles. It is not murder because if it was, more than half of the country would be imprisoned both women, young women, men, young men, doctors, healthcare workers and so forth. Life is taking your first Breath and not having to rely on another humans being internal organs to survive. Nor, do most would care to help the Trans and queer kids that have been ridiculed throughout these communities across Virginia. Only supporting some kids and not all is the basis for respecting all of humanity and the differing peoples religion's, perspectives, culture and so on. Doctors who have sworn an oath to protect patients are having to break this oath everyday in states where families, Women, girls and people who can become pregnant are not protected nor will ever be truly free so long as we keep debating about this issue. This should be left to the families and healthcare teams. As for right marriage, denying anyone regardless of Race, Gender, Class, Ability and so forth Constitutionally discriminatory from every different perspective that tries to undermine this right. Everyone should love who they want and plan their families accordingly. If this is not enshrined, we open the door bigotry, racism, sexism and shutting commonwealth that refuses to see these people for the humans they are. As for the right to vote it should be an absolute fundamental Right. Taking this right away that is in our Federal Constitution is to control the outcomes of every elected office from local districts to federal lands. All three of these should be enshrined for All Virginians. Denying this would deny Virginians to live their lives in the way that’s best for them with no interventions or restrictions to hinder and complicate our ways of life.
I, as a Virginia constituent, am voicing my support for continuing reproductive healthcare AND marriage equality.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law
I support all three constitutional amendments: HJ1, HJ2 and HJ9. HJ1: The issue of reproduction freedom is more complicated than the simple choice of weather an unborn person lives or dies. Reproduction has consequence that affects the pregnant person's health during gestation, decisive action must be absolutely allowed in order to make decisions that places the pregnant person's mental and physical health at highest priority. Reproduction also has consequence post birth which all involved parties in reproduction must be ready to face. The pregnant person must be allowed to realize this and make an informed decision based on facts about their life and the situation they find themselves in that can ensure the best outcome for all parties involved, other people are simply unaware of the nuance or facts that may influence their decision and have no right to force them to make a decision against their own interest. HJ2: The purpose of the criminal justice system is to penalize people who break the law and preserve order, with the ultimate goal of rehabilitating those within it, to re-enter society. Blanket removal of fundamental rights and a voice in society is too harsh a punishment for any crime. What motivation is there to become an upstanding citizen and rejoin society if they are forever divorced from it? Opportunities for positive change must be left open. There is an added benefit of reducing judicial burden in the majority of cases. HJ9: From the perspective of government, the morality of marriage between anyone should not be considered in such a case as government is concerned with the fair administration of the legal consequences of marriage in order to recognize family units. The question of morality should be left up to the individuals, religious organizations, and clergy to decide for themselves and should not affect state policy. Not recognizing marriage simply results in a legal grey areas and denial of basic rights and protections all people are entitled to.
Please continue to support same-sex marriage.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Please reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I also oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly side with HJ1 & HJ9, because regardless of any religious belief, I still believe that this state and country is one of freedom. When it comes to reproductive care, that is between a patient and doctor. In no instance, should a government limit healthcare for any individual. Not only does restricting abortion rights infringe on individual liberties, but it causes an increase in the maternal mortality rate. I side with HJ9 on the same basis. The government has no place inside our marriages. If someone believes that same sex marriage is sinful because of their belief, they have the right to think that, but they have no right to restrict marriage between other consenting adults. If you don’t support same sex marriage, don’t get married to someone of the same sex. We are a country of freedom and liberty. If you find someone (a consenting adult!) that you truly love, that you want to marry, we should all be so lucky. We should have the freedom to do so. Separation of church and state.
My name is Sanu Dieng-Cooper, I am the new Policy Director for the Virginia Sexual and Domestic Violence Action Alliance, representing over 70 sexual and domestic violence agencies across Virginia. On behalf of survivors and the agencies within our membership, we want to express our strong support for marriage equality (HJ9) and reproductive rights (HJ1) for all Virginians. At the Alliance, we believe that every individual has the right to safe, healthy, and respectful relationships, regardless of sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression. Because sexual and domestic violence affects all communities, our response must also be inclusive. Policies that restrict marriage equality or reproductive rights isolate and harm vulnerable communities, particularly LGBTQ+ survivors, making it more difficult for them to access safety, services, and respect. Just as everyone should have the freedom to choose who they love, they should also have access to reproductive options that are equitable, inclusive, and responsive to their needs, regardless of income, gender identity, sexual orientation, race, ethnicity, religion, ability, or age. Victims of sexual and domestic violence already bear the heavy burdens of addressing health issues such as sexually transmitted infections, unintended pregnancies, infertility, and other complications resulting from trauma. Comprehensive sexual and reproductive healthcare is essential to their recovery. We all expect the right to make personal health decisions—whether that means choosing our doctor, selecting a treatment, or deciding to undergo surgery. Reproductive health choices should be no different; they must remain personal, allowing individuals to make the best decisions for themselves based on accurate information and supportive care. Supporting reproductive rights means ensuring that everyone has this autonomy, free from external pressures or barriers. We urge the subcommittee to support measures that promote equity, dignity, and safety for all Virginians, especially the most vulnerable, such as survivors of sexual and domestic violence. Again, we urge you to support HJ1 and HJ9. Thank you for your commitment to advancing justice in our Commonwealth.
Marriage is the original social institution, providing for the care and education of children until they are able to succeed on their own. Historically, marriages between one man and one woman are normative across all cultures, even those which permit other types of marriage. Further, history has shown that cultures which limit marriage to one man and one woman have been more successful in establishing stable societies which better promote the care and education of children, the rights of both spouses, and economic prosperity, while minimizing interpersonal conflict. Since the 1960s, marriage between one man and one woman has been under attack, and society has suffered as a result. The promotion of the individual at the expense of society has contributed to the destruction of marriages to the point that less than half of American households are composed of what used to be normative, i.e. a mother, a father, and their children, all living together. The argument is made that, since the US Supreme Court has ruled that two people of the same sex can, for purposes of law, marry, the Commonwealth’s constitutional definition is obsolete and so should be changed. What purpose would this serve, other than to say that the Commonwealth is unconcerned with the problems that the decline of marriage has produced? Better to leave the definition alone. True, given the US Supreme Court’s decision, it now has no practical effect, but, it can still serve as an expression of the aspiration that in the future society can move toward healing some of the ills that currently afflict us.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Please vote NO to HJ9. It is unnecessary and will be used as a legal basis to attack and silence the voice of anyone who disagrees. So called exemptions for clergy and religious organizations do not protect ordinary citizens who may be targeted because they support marriage as the union of one man and one woman. This has happened in other countries and other states – we must NOT let it happen in Virginia.
Do Not approve either of these - HJ1 or HJ9 . You are not God!
HJ 1 and HJ 9 should not be passed
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment -I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. -HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. -HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. -Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights -I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage -I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. -Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution.HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent.HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born.A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right.Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
This is an antiquated ban and should be dropped from the Virginia Constitution. It no longer represents Virginia voters’ attitudes, because research shows attitudes have shifted in the Commonwealth, and Virginians support the right of same-sex couples to marry. I agree with them. Please protect the rights of all Virginians and allow same-sex couples to marry in our state. Thank you.
Honorable House Committee Members, As a registered voter in the Commonwealth of Virginia, Please see blow as to my thoughts and wishes for the Commonwealth of Virginia. There is no reason to waste time with "feel good" legislation from either party. Please consider ONLY Amendments that will not be used to bolster election results. Recent national election results indicate more voters want current protections upheld, rather than legislating on issues to campaign on or increase voter rolls. HJ-1 - Amendment should mirror CURRENT VA Abortion laws ONLY. This includes limitations on 26 weeks without threat to health of baby or mother, AND review by TWO certified OBGYN/MDs to perform afterwards HJ2 - Amendment should include each to be reviewed on a case-by-case basis HJ9 - Is not needed. This is protected by Supremacy Clause Thank you for taking the time to read and consider my opinions. Respectfully, Mark Logan
Please support the right to choose and pass HJ 1. We should all have the power to choose for ourselves. Women must be able to make real time decisions about their bodies. Reproductive health is personal and PRIVATE between a patient and their chosen health care provider. No one is pro abortion, we are pro choice. Please support the right to marriage by passing HJ 9. We should have the right to love and marry who we wish - to create a family. This is a private matter between 2 people, it doesn't involve or hurt anyone else. Religious values do not have a place in these decisions, which are about human rights for everyone in our Commonwealth.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I support rights to abortion, marriage equality and women’s right to choose. This is a vital time in America where we must protect the people that are here and prevent burdens due to unwanted pregnancies. We need to prevent deaths due to complications of miscarriage. We must protect health of all our citizens.
No legislative body has the authority to add or subtract actual human rights. Lawmakers may only codify, recognize and enumerate rights which exist from the original authority. The authority over life and death originate with the life-giver.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 to protect these freedoms through inclusion in the Commonwealth's constitution. Thank you.
No legislative body has the authority to add or subtract actual human rights. Lawmakers may only codify, recognize and enumerate rights which exist from the original authority. The authority over life and death originate with the life-giver.
When I was 21, I had just left college and my cousin got married to her then-boyfriend, now-husband. My tradition-minded aunt approached me at a family reunion to question why I hadn't dated any girls yet. Like most young gay guys, I made up the excuse that I was too busy studying and paying attention to books to notice anyone romantically. She kept asking about if I would disappoint my parents by not making any kids for them. She scolded me about how it is my duty to get married, produce many kids, and uphold the sanctity of marriage. After five minutes of this, I explained that the sanctity of marriage had already been violated enough. Of all my relatives, 8 aunts, my own parents, and 2 uncles had all followed the same traditional path: all of them got married at a young age, had multiple kids, and then divorced within a few years of their youngest being born. The only positive role model I have had in my family to uphold the "sanctity of marriage" has been my one lesbian aunt and her wife, who have stayed committed to each other now for decades. Please reaffirm marriage equality, and do not give in to any bogus arguments about the "sanctity of marriage" being destroyed by gay people. From my own anecdotal experience, the LGBTQ+ community respects marriage more than the straight community. Let's protect marriage for all!
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2 and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth's constitution. Thank you.
Please ratify marriage equality into the VA constitution, this is a matter of protecting the pre-existing rights of individuals, not one of personal, moral, or religious decision. Government should serve to protect the rights of their citizens, not make judgments on what they should or shouldn’t live their life. As an active member of my local church and a lesbian, I ask you to protect the right of individuals to live their lives how they wish, the rights this country was founded to protect. LGBT+ Virginians deserve to feel welcomed in their own state. Thank you.
I strongly encourage and support HJ1 and the passing of this bill. Every person in this country should have bodily autonomy and the ability to make this incredibly person choice for themselves. Women need to have access to safe reproductive care. Abortions will happen no matter what, it is up to us to decide whether we want those to be safe and sanitary, or if we would rather watch both women, and consequently children, suffer because of our moral objections. I ask you to keep in mind one of the founding principles of this nation - The separation of church and state. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but these opinions can not infringe on public health and women's rights. HJ1 is a matter of community health and safety, and its passing would ensure more secure reproductive healthcare of Virginia's women AND children. Abortion has been a civil right since 1979, only now are we seeing this new wave of regressive rhetoric and action. I ask you to allow our state, and our women, to continue to progress, not regress into a male dominated past. Reproductive rights SAVE LIVES and are a staple of any modern nation that seeks to view women as equal. Please view us as equal!! I am a 21-year-old woman, and I fear for my safety, as well as the safety of my young nieces and cousins every day. I want them to know that they live in a state that values their bodies, their lives, their choices, and understands that abortions are lifesaving care, NOT birth control. No one wants to get an abortion. It is a difficult and harrowing decision, but one that should be between a woman, her doctor, and her god, not a decision of a faceless government. Women have already died because of abortion restrictions and bans in other states. Please don't let Virginia be the same. Young women in this state are scared, and they deserve reassurance that their lawmakers care about their civil rights. Young women deserve to know that people care just as much about our futures, as that of an insentient, unborn, fetus. We deserve the right to make our own choices over our own bodies. I am also in support of HJ2. Voting is a constitutional right and the foundation of our democracy. It is crucial that every eligible person, excluding those convicted of felonies, have the access and freedom to vote. I believe that voting is what allows us to have a relatively fair and just system, so supporting the ability of all eligible persons to express this freedom is crucial to maintaining a lawful, equal democracy. I am also strongly in support of HJ9. Again, marriage is between the two individuals, their religious leaders, and God. The LGBTQ+ community has been historically targeted and systemically disenfranchised, and we have an opportunity to oppose this continued, irrational targeting of individuals on the basis of religious or moral obligation. Again, everyone is entitled to opinions in their personal lives, but these opinions cannot limit the freedoms and rights of others. Queer people have always and will always exist. They are your neighbors, friends, family members. Taking away their right to marry, trying to suppress queer people, historically, have NEVER worked. We are proud of who we are, and no law will change that. It is not a choice to be gay, or trans, or queer, the same way it is not a choice to be straight. I support the right of all people to actualize who they are. Every person deserves the right to love who they love and marry who they would like.
Please support the right to choose and pass HJ 1. We should all have the power to choose for ourselves. Please support the right to vote by passing HJ 2. Once time is served, punishment should be over. Please support the right to marriage by passing HJ 9. We all deserve a family. Religious values do not have a place in these decisions, which are about human rights for everyone in our Commonwealth (not just the radical Christian right).
I find it very disheartening that it's 2024 and we're still deciding what defines a marriage based on sex/gender. Marriage is a commitment that two adult people make to each other. That's it. Any details around sex, gender, or race are none of our business. Want to give an opinion? How about just declaring happiness that two people found each other and want to spend their lives together. Absolutely repeal same-sex marriage prohibition. The LGBTQ+ community deserve equal rights. (Again, I cannot believe this is still up for debate in 2024.)
I am writing to express my strong support for Virginia House Joint Resolutions 1, 2, and 3. These amendments are essential to ensuring the fundamental rights and freedoms of all Virginians. HJ1: Reproductive Rights: This amendment would explicitly protect the right to reproductive freedom, including access to abortion and contraception. It is crucial to safeguard these rights, particularly in light of recent challenges to reproductive healthcare at the national level. HJ2: Right to Vote: This amendment would strengthen voting rights protections in Virginia. It would expand early voting, automatic voter registration, and other measures to ensure that all eligible citizens can exercise their right to vote. HJ3: Same-Sex Marriage Equality: This amendment would enshrine the right to same-sex marriage in the Virginia Constitution. It would provide additional legal protections for same-sex couples and their families. These amendments reflect the values of equality, liberty, and justice that are at the heart of our democracy. They will help to create a more inclusive and equitable Virginia for all. I urge you to support these important amendments.
Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose HJ1 - abortion should not be enshrined in Virginia as a constitutional right. On the contrary abortion should be banned except in cases where the life of the mother is threatened. Our Constitution protects the life of an individual and the fetus IS an individual. At that moment of conception that fetus has a God-given soul; it already has human life and is an individual that should have the protection of our Constitution to LIFE. I oppose HJ9 - marriage is between one man and one woman. It is the complementarity of the sexes ordained for the procreation of life. It has always been defined that way and we should not change the essential character of marriage. Call same-sex unions a civil partnership not a marriage. I support HJ2 if the inmate has served their term and remains in good standing within the community upon their release.
I am not in favor of these amendments. Abortion for anyone including the mother is extremely damaging to her and the family members around them. Please reconsider and spare these lives.
Enshrining a right to kill innocent children in their mother’s womb is something we should all resist. Thanks, Stephen Hertz
I fervently support of HJ9, a vital resolution that will affirm marriage equality for all individuals, irrespective of gender or sexual orientation. This legislation is not merely a matter of legal recognition; it embodies the fundamental human rights of love, choice, and dignity. In a society that prides itself on the principles of liberty and justice for all, it is imperative that we extend these values to every citizen. Marriage is a sacred bond that should be accessible to all, and by passing HJ9, we will take a monumental step towards a more inclusive and equitable Virginia, where every family can thrive without discrimination.
Reproductive freedom is critical to basic freedom for both women and men. Please preserve choice for Virginia in the face of the Supreme Court's overturning of Roe v Wade. Voting rights are critical for democracy. Please support the right to marry for LGBTQ and trans citizens of Virginia. This is a large percentage of voters and must be protected at the state level.
I oppose to all 3 amendments.
I support HJ1 and HJ9 and hope to see them passed.
I strongly oppose removing or altering the constitutional language defining marriage as the union of one woman and one man, an understanding that has been fundamental to human civiliation for centuries.
Hello, I whole heartedly support HJ1 and HJ9, as these are VITAL RIGHTS for woman and humans in general. The right to our own bodily health, safety and well being. The right to marry no matter your sexual orientation should be a right for everyone no matter their sexual orientation. How can we decide what others should be aloud to do in their own lives and still be considered the land of “freedom & rights”? Please pass these life-saving bills that will affirm marriage equality for all individuals, irrespective of gender or sexual orientation as well as womans rights to her own body. People are dying all over the world due to the lack of care they so desperately need. This legislation is not merely a matter of legal recognition; it embodies the fundamental human rights of love, choice, and dignity. In a society that prides itself on the principles of liberty and justice for all, it is imperative that we extend these values to every citizen. Marriage is a sacred bond that should be accessible to all, and by passing HJ9, we will take a monumental step towards a more inclusive and equitable Virginia, where every family can thrive without discrimination. We cannot take steps back, we have come this far in the world for a reason and rights should never be given then taken so carelessly from anyone. We must remember that what we want for ourselves is not what is healthy for all, we must let every individual have the rights to their own bodies and lives. Thank you.
I strongly support bill HJ 9 and marriage equality. My wife and I just celebrated our first wedding anniversary - a celebration of love and equality. To have this taken would be taking a huge step backwards given that this right has been federally protected for the last decade. My wife and I deserve to have our marriage continue to be legally recognized - Protecting this right would allow for future stability of our family. Everyone has the right to love who they love. Passing this bill would allow respect for the lives of all Virginians.
Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I choose to live here, and pay taxes here, because I have equal rights in Virginia. If this changes, I will take my tax dollars elsewhere, and encourage others to do the same. Virginia should continue to protect its constituents and work to be progressive. Allow the voters to decide.
I support these joint resolutions. They advance freedom, and we should work towards enshrining these important principles in the Constitution of Virginia.
I oppose HJ 9. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I fervently support HJ9, a crucial resolution affirming marriage equality for all individuals, regardless of gender or sexual orientation. This legislation transcends legal recognition; it embodies fundamental human rights, including love, choice, and dignity. In a society that prides itself on liberty and justice for all, it is imperative to extend these values to every citizen. Marriage is a sacred bond that should be accessible to all. By passing HJ9, we will take a monumental step towards a more inclusive and equitable Virginia, where every family can thrive without discrimination.
I fervently support HJ9, a crucial resolution affirming marriage equality for all individuals, regardless of gender or sexual orientation. This legislation transcends legal recognition; it embodies fundamental human rights, including love, choice, and dignity. In a society that prides itself on liberty and justice for all, it is imperative to extend these values to every citizen. Marriage is a sacred bond that should be accessible to all. By passing HJ9, we will take a monumental step towards a more inclusive and equitable Virginia, where every family can thrive without discrimination.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strogly believe it is a womens right to make decisions about her own body and support legislation to that effect. I support the right of felons who have served their time in prison to vote. However, if a person released commits a felony crime axsecond or more times, I support revoking the right to vote. I strongly support same sex marriage. Please ensure/maintain this right of individuals who have same sex partners.
HB375 - I strongly agree with joining the National Popular Vote compact. It gives more power to us as individuals and aligns with democratic norms. This also strengthens Virginia as presidential hopefuls will have to speak to each state and person as opposed to a handful of swing states. HB658 - Ranked choice voting is a better system for voting and is determined by the candidate with the strongest support. It doesn't affect your 1st choice, lower choices will only be considered if the 1st choice doesn't win. This encourages more civil and policy driven campaigns. HJ1 - I strongly agree with individuals having the right to reproductive freedom. HJ2 - People should not be permanently defined by their past mistakes. HJ9 - Marriage is between two people, it should not be defined as between one man and one woman.
As a Chinese American who grew up in Fairfax, I recognize the diversity of beliefs that make us a dynamic and vibrant place to raise a family and do business. We must protect this rare environment by taking a stand against those who would try to monopolize their belief system For abortion to be decided by the state, and not by the individual, is an unprecedented amount of power wielded over medical procedures. The State does not force people to donate their organs, so it should not have an extraneous limits on this other medical procedure, especially since the proponents for abortion limitations are not basing their arguments on health reasons but religious ones. Even less needs to be said on any attempts to limit LGBTQ identities or their marriages between adults. We cannot claim to have freedom of religion when one religion gets to make policy over others. Please, support HJ1 and HJ9
Thank you for consideration of this constitutional change. As the fear among Virginia same sex marriages increases due to a likely overturn of marriage equality, having our commonwealth say your love matters means so much. Virginia is for all lovers and this change will ensure that many decide to stay here in our wonderful state. I fear that if we do not change the antiquated constitution many will not feel safe or cared for to stay and our population and diversity will begin to drop. If we don’t act now so many at risk couples will feel abandoned by the home they love. Please cross the aisle and work together in support I’d love and equality for all.
I hereby implore the House of Delegates to ratify the Constitution of Virginia and grant: 1. The fundamental right to reproductive freedom to all Virginians (HJ1 - Herring) 2. Automatic restoration of the rights of a convicted individual to vote upon completion of the terms of their sentencing and release from incarceration (HJ2 - Bennett-Parker) 3. Legal rights and protections for two consenting adult persons to marry regardless of sex, gender, race, or religion. (HJ9 - Sickles)
I am urging a NO vote on each one!!
I am writing today in support all proposed amendments. HJ1 protection of reproductive health care is extremely important and essential to ensure the health and safety of women across the state of Virginia. I’ve had family and friends suffer miscarriages and I can’t imagine people being put on a registry or jailed for something completely out of their control. The pain of those medical emergencies was excruciating and our job as a society is to support those people not punish them or worse sentence them to certain death. Reproductive rights go beyond miscarriages and medical emergencies; bodily autonomy is and should remain an indelible freedom. Threats of violence towards women have already increased since the election and I am afraid. It is my right to make my health care decisions and the rights of all women and people. I implore and demand elected officials enshrine this right into the state constitution. HJ2 to reinstate voting rights also has my support. Once debts to society have been paid, folks should be granted the freedom to participate in our democracy. If we want to be a healthy, functioning system, we need all voices that want to be heard to be listened to. Finally, HJ9 protects same-sex marriage. Partnership, love, marriage are all deeply personal things that should be a guaranteed personal freedom. Why does the government even care who is in a partnership with who? Standing in opposition of this is antiquated and unnecessary. Our country is supposed to stand for freedom and liberty for all; why are we denying that freedom? What purpose does it serve besides punching others down? Members of the LGBTQ+ community are entitled to the same rights and benefits and heterosexual couples- full stop. If we are to uphold the tenants we ascribe to we must enshrine same sex marriage.
H1: Please oppose enshrining a "right to abortion" in our Virginia constitution. As a citizen of Virginia, a mother and a counselor, I know that abortion is a tragedy and has lifelong negative effects for the mother and obviously the baby. Abortion is the ending of a life and the more that our government justifies it, the more that our human rights are diminished. The right to life is primary. Having abortion legal up to 9 months is especially harmful as we know that babies have survived living outside of the womb as early as 6 months. Please think of the consequences of this bill and don't allow our state to become one that discards the right to life. H2: I support voting rights being returned to a citizen after completing their prison sentence because I believe that people can change and have seen people change and make their lives better. We should reward their effort to improve their life and choices. People who have made mistakes (all of us) and learned from them are valuable citizens. H9: I oppose H9 which would remove the provision that marriage is between one man and one woman. Thank you.
I am writing to express my strong opposition to HJ9, which would remove the Constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Undermining traditional marriage threatens healthy family life, the very foundation of society. We have already experienced major societal harm as a result of family dissolution in our time. Legislation such as HJ9 would advance this dissolution, to our great peril.
I am writing to express my strong opposition to HJ9, which would remove the Constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Undermining traditional marriage threatens healthy family life, the very foundation of society. We have already experienced major societal harm as a result of family dissolution in our time. Legislation such as HJ9 would advance this dissolution, to our great peril.
Regarding HJ1 - Herring I strongly OPPOSE enshrining a "right" to abortion in Virginia's constitution. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm, protect and support the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ2- I SUPPORT HJ2 All people who have served their sentences should have their voting rights restored. HJ9- I strongly OPPOSE HJ9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
It's time to pass HJ9 and amend Virginia's constitution and repeal the ban on same-sex marriage!
This ban does not reflect the attitudes and beliefs of Virginians in 2023. A 2021 poll from the Public Religion Research Institute found that 71% of Virginians support the right of same-sex couples to marry. This percentage has only increased since the question began being asked of voters. In 2006, 53% of voters supported the marriage ban. This huge swing shows the massive shift in public opinion on the issue of marriage, and it is clear evidence that the antiquated ban should no longer be a part of Virginia’s constitution. It’s only fair to revisit a political question that has shown such a vast change since it was first broached. With the removal of women’s protections with the destruction of Roe v. Wade, it is possible that marriage equality will be destroyed on a national level as well. Virginia must take the lead to protect all citizens.
Who can marry, and whether those marriages are recognized, should also not be at the whims of whoever may be in office at the time. It is imperative that we enshrine this access in our Constitution. Everyone should have the right to love, marry, and pay taxes with the consenting adult of their choice.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
The people of Virginia deserve the full extent of the Constitution and Declaration of Independence! “The people themselves must be the ultimate makers of their own Constitution.” - Teddy Roosevelt 1912 Keep Virginia amazing! I’m
Our family strongly supports the inclusion of these basic universal human rights in the Constitution of Virginia. Please listen to residents of Virginia and legislatively make explicit and permanent our full human rights to reproductive autonomy, to the vote for returning citizens, and to equal marriage rights for all. Thank you.
HJ 1- Virginia is the only remaining state in the south that allows women to make decisions about their bodies with their families and their doctors. It’s critical that we ensure this right remains by enshrining it into our constitution. HJ 2- Healthy democracies rely on voter participation. Individuals who have served their sentences should be allowed to rejoin society with their rights intact without jumping through additional hoops. Individuals with disabilities are full members of society and should never be denied their right to vote without sufficient judicial oversight. HJ 9 - The right to chose who you love while still enjoying the privileges and protections a marriage can provide has been the law of the land for nearly a decade. It’s time for our constitution to reflect that reality.
I urge you to reject both the HJ1 and HJ9 bills. Residents of the state of Virginia can not feel proud of a state that approves murdering their unborn children (and calling it a "right") and allowing the basic family unit of society to be undermined.
Please vote no.
I strongly support all three proposed amendments. Members of my family are at risk here. Taxpayers, loving, caring members of our community. Their rights to happiness and security MUST be guaranteed. I strongly support the rights of two adults to marry and form families. Anything else seems absurd. Reproductive health is a matter solely between a woman and her physician. The State must make this very clear and must resist attempts by others to control decisions that are not theirs to make. I vote.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
My family and I are in favor of HJ2. There is simply no need for Virginian's to have to go through Governor's permission to restore their voting rights. It is vital that all eligible Virginians should be allowed to exercise their right to vote. All couples deserve to have their marriages legally acknowledged, upheld, and protected regardless of gender, sex, or race. HJ9 would accomplish that. I have left a separate comment regarding the right to reproductive healthcare. I encourage you to accept all three constitutional amendments.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Please support HJ9 to affirm the right to marry for all Virginians. All should be treated equally and fairly in this process. Affirming the right to marry ensures stability for all families to thrive in the commonwealth and contribute toward its well-being and strength. We also contribute to our communities, schools, and the common good and should be afforded the same rights as fellow citizens.
I OPPOSE HJ9 which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman,
HJ1 Reproductive Freedom Do I recall the last time that as a man I was unable to health care decisions about my own body? No, because that’s never happened. I fail to see why women should not enjoy the same rights to bodily autonomy and if we are to be a beacon of light in the commonwealth for ALL citizens, we must endeavor to enshrine the right to reproductive freedoms here in Virginia. Today’s reality is that even with a national abortion ban, the women in my family will be able to choose to safely end a pregnancy because ours is a family of means who can if necessary travel anywhere on the planet for reproductive or other health care. I write today to ensure that such rights aren’t limited to those with means but are freely available within Virginia. Abortion should be legal, safe, and the decision left to those who are pregnant with guidance from medical professionals. True democracy depends on equal rights for all people. Losing our right to reproductive choice opens the door to the loss of other freedoms including other healthcare choices, marriage equality, access to contraception, and the right to engage in private, consensual intimacy without government interference. Not only is the right to a safe and legal abortion a matter of personal freedom, it’s also a major factor in the movements for racial and economic equality. Black individuals, and all underserved communities, already experience unfair barriers and limited access to adequate healthcare services. HJ2 Restoration of Voting Rights If we are nation that is free to elect a recently convicted felon, why should it be the case that a convicted person who has completed their sentence not be allowed to vote? I support an amendment to the Virginia Constitution to guarantee that people who have been disenfranchised due to a felony conviction will have their rights automatically restored upon completion of their sentences, without additional steps or paperwork after they are no longer incarcerated, and to ensure people with disabilities never lose their rights without an appropriate judicial finding. This has never been a partisan issue. Both Democratic and Republican governors have chosen to restore voting rights to thousands of citizens; however, Virginia's current governor has reversed the trend. People should not be permanently defined by their past mistakes. Virginians who have successfully served their time should be able to fully rejoin civic life. It is time for Virginians to act to amend our Constitution to create a routine restoration process that reflects fair accountability and encourages civic engagement. HJ9 Marriage Equality Why should only heterosexual couples suffer the trials, tribulation and absolute insanity that comes with married life? Given risks at the national level to marriage rights, it’s important to properly enshrine the right to marry in Virginia to best protect the rights of all citizens.
Support for Right to Reproductive Freedom Amendment I strongly support the proposed amendment to the Virginia Constitution establishing reproductive freedom as a fundamental right. This amendment ensures that individuals can make autonomous choices about their own reproductive health, free from government interference, except when a compelling state interest in protecting health is demonstrated. By safeguarding personal decision-making and aligning with evidence-based medical standards, this amendment promotes both health and justice. Additionally, it protects individuals and those who assist them from penalization, ensuring reproductive freedom is accessible to all Virginians. Support for Right to Vote Amendment I fully support this amendment, which strengthens our democracy by recognizing voting as a fundamental right for all eligible Virginians. Restoring voting rights automatically upon release from incarceration reflects our belief in rehabilitation and the importance of civic engagement. By simplifying the process, this amendment ensures that citizens reentering society can fully participate in our democracy without unnecessary barriers. Additionally, the clarification on mental capacity respects voters' autonomy while providing a thoughtful safeguard. Support for Right to Marry Amendment This amendment is a vital step toward equality, affirming that marriage is a fundamental right, regardless of gender, sex, or race. By removing outdated and discriminatory language, Virginia's Constitution will better reflect our commitment to equal rights and the recognition of all lawful marriages. Ensuring that every couple is treated equally under the law honors the dignity of all Virginians and upholds the Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell v. Hodges. This amendment aligns our laws with contemporary values of inclusivity and respect.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
Marriage is a right and should be allowed to anyone who wants to do so. This includes LGBTQ+ and same sex marriage. The government should not have a say in who a person loves
There is no good reason for you to be meeting outside of the legislative session. I do not support any of these amendments. Our current laws & the SC ruling have made it clear that non-citizens may not vote. The citizens of VA do not want abortion up to birth leaving the baby to die. It's abhorrent! Felons' voting rights upon release should be judged individually. Reciprocity or some other consideration may be required.
As a constituent, I’m urging you to vote yes on all three amendments. Reproductive care, as protected by HJ1, is health care and needs to be universally accessible. Decisions about what types of care are necessary should be made at the discretion of a doctor and a patient, not by the government. No person or healthcare provider should fear for repercussions from exercising that right. I am in favor of HJ2. Virginian's should not need a Governor's permission to restore their voting rights. It is vital that all eligible Virginians should be allowed to exercise their right to vote in a democracy. Couples deserve to have their marriages legally acknowledged, upheld, and protected no matter their gender, sex, or race. HJ9 would accomplish that. I encourage you to accept all three constitutional amendments.
I do not support any of the three amendments. I think the current committees are rushing these bills through. Every abortion takes a human life and this citizen of the Commonwealth will raise my voice for those who have no voice.
I fervently support of HJ9, a vital resolution that will affirm marriage equality for all individuals, irrespective of gender or sexual orientation. This legislation is not merely a matter of legal recognition; it embodies the fundamental human rights of love, choice, and dignity. In a society that prides itself on the principles of liberty and justice for all, it is imperative that we extend these values to every citizen. Marriage is a sacred bond that should be accessible to all, and by passing HJ9, we will take a monumental step towards a more inclusive and equitable Virginia, where every family can thrive without discrimination.
HJ1: We've seen the medical disasters that can occur when doctors are afraid to treat pregnancy complications due to abortion restrictions. The answer is to get government interference out of the matter as much as feasible. As someone who could become pregnant, I find it terrifying that I might have to navigate complex legal situations just to obtain appropriate healthcare. For these reasons, I support HJ1. HJ2: I believe voting is a fundamental right, not just a privilege or luxury. For this reason I support HJ2, which would expand the right to vote to more adults who have been unjustly stripped of it. HJ9: If someday I am in a committed relationship with someone of my own sex/gender, I hope that it can be recognized by the government in order to make our legal status clear and stable. All same-gender couples deserve that opportunity. Let's put the prejudices of the past behind us.
HJ 1- Virginia is the only remaining state in the south that allows women to make decisions about their bodies with their families and their doctors. It’s critical that we ensure this right remains by enshrining it into our constitution. HJ 2- Healthy democracies rely on voter participation. Individuals who have served their sentences should be allowed to rejoin society with their rights intact without jumping through additional hoops. Individuals with disabilities are full members of society and should never be denied their right to vote without sufficient judicial oversight. HJ 9 - The right to chose who you love while still enjoying the privileges and protections a marriage can provide has been the law of the land for nearly a decade. It’s time for our constitution to reflect that reality. As we watch the Supreme Court, ruling after ruling, we’ve seen rights that a majority of voters support rolled back. Now it’s more important than ever that Virginia take state action to protect its residents.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I am a resident of Henrico, VA, and am writing as a very concerned citizen of Virginia, and as a woman, in SUPPORT of ALL THREE of these constitutional amendments - worried that my rights, and those of fellow Virginians, are under attack and are soon be threatened further. I am concerned for fellow citizens, for our future citizens, and our collective freedom. These Amendments will serve to guide lawmakers to protect these fundamental freedoms in future deliberations and decision-making. Our voices deserve, and need to be heard, and should continue to be fundamentally involved in decisions made about our bodies, our lives, and our representation in our representative democracy. I ask that all of these three constitutional amendments be added to the Virginia State Constitution today. It is the right thing to do, and time is of the essence to ensure the protection and the rights of all of our Citizens. Thank you.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
Ref. HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ1 ignores the fact that modern science is clearly showing that "life" in a mother's womb starts earlier than we understood in 1972 and the negative effects of an abortion on a mother extend years past the abortion date. What more will science unveil in the coming years. You should wait and see. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 is bad politics. You have seen in the most recent election that pandering to an extremist wing of the Democrat Party is suicidal politics. Do you really want to repeat the mistakes of Elizabeth Guzman? Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that address the demand side of abortion. We need robust support to help expecting mothers, and aggressive accountability existed for fathers, not a misguided policy that hits the wrong target. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. This effort to change the constitution is out of step with the public and you will pay a cost for this "initiative" in the election in 2025.
HJ 1 – Herring I strongly oppose adding a "right" to abortion to Virginia's constitution. There are few protections in place for unborn children, such as requiring parental consent and a ban on partial-birth abortions, and HJ1 would endanger even those. It would also endanger future legislation protecting unborn babies. Babies are people before, during, and after birth and HJ1's policy of unlimited abortion up until birth would be a tragedy and devastation for our state. Instead, I urge that you put policies in place that protect and affirm the dignity and life of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – Bennett-Parker I support HJ 2. As in most states, if someone has completed their sentences that person should have voting rights restored. HJ 9 – Sickles I oppose HJ 9. Marriage came before any nation, religion, or law in its design and purpose and should not be changed.
HU1-I reject HJ1. Virginia is a land of freedom going back to our inception. Virginia had to fight its way into being. Much is the same with these unborn babies-the only difference is that they are not heard. We need to give them the freedom of birth to be heard. HU9 I oppose HJ9. In marriage, two bodies are joined to become one. This one body is being messed with in this constitutional proposal with ideas and rhetoric that will deliberately cost Virginians spoils from this over-popularized, temporary, contemporary thought. Stop the continuation of this illogical proposal. HJ2 Yes, I support HJ 2. Prisoners are people. When they have completed their sentences they can vote.
I say no to abortion at anytime I say marriage is between a man and a woman
Adults should be able to marry who they please. It is for no one to decide besides the people involved. The “union of a man and woman” is an archaic religious viewpoint and has no place in policy and politics.
There are 2 sexes. Man and woman. Marriage is for 1 man and 1 woman. There is no need to have a Constitutional Amendment stating otherwise.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I am opposed to HJ1 on reproductive freedom because it fails to take into account the rights of an unborn baby whose life would be terminated by an abortion. I am opposed to HJ on same-sex marriage, as it violates the traditional and proper definition of marriage.
I support
I support
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose HJ1 and HJ9
We love who we love Gay Marriage is legal in VA WE WANT IT It needs to be protected We cannot keep rolling back rights and protections Again The government needs to stay OUT of the personal lives of it’s citizens Want for others what you want for yourself The need to control others needs to STOP
I vehemently oppose HJ 1. There is no freedom in being allowed to take someone else's life.. At the moment of conception, another person's life begins - another person with their own bodies and their own freedoms. They have a right to LIVE! Please consider ways to support women, children and families instead - as Virginians, we should support and protect the life and the dignity of every human being, no matter how small. I vehemently oppose HJ 9 - marriage should not be redefined. Marriage is the union of one man and one woman and other unions are NOT the same.
Dear House of Delegates. I am a new voter and as a new voter I ask that you hear my voice. Everyday thousands of women are dying due to the fact that they are not receiving the proper reproductive care they need. Why should rape victims be forced to carry the child of their attacker, some of these victims just twelve years old? Why should a twelve year old girl be a mother when she could be a kid instead? Why should women have to carry a pregnancy that could in danger their lives? Why should women have to carry a fetus that wouldn’t live long after birth or be disabled? Why? Women deserve the right to proper health care. Some people cannot afford to raise a child or give a disabled child the care they might need, therefore they should be able to choose if they want to continue with the pregnancy. Women shouldn’t even have to explain why they want an abortion to people. It is their right and theirs only, no anyone else’s. I’m also addressing the marriage equality act. As a member of the LGBTQ community myself I wake up everyday scared. I’m scared of being attacked and harassed in the streets purely because of my sexuality. I should be able to love who I want no matter the public’s opinion. Gay marriage became legal in Virginia in 2014, that’s just ten years ago, and suddenly the government wants to revoke it? Just imagine how many lives that effects if revoked. What will happen to those already married? Are they going to be forced to divorce because they don’t fit the imagine of a proper marriage. LGBTQ community suicide rates are on the rise. It’s awful that people would rather die then live because of the hate they receive. Why do this? Because the Bible says so? With all do respect I fully support freedom to religion, but the government is not a church and should not be treated as one. Why do this? Because it’s not natural? Many animals exhibit homosexual behavior, and no “woke agenda” is confusing them. You can’t just take away our rights and say “them’s the breaks” if this bill is passed then you’re allowing discrimination. I should not have think “I’ll be better off dead” almost day because I’m terrified. We are heading towards a dystopian future. Without your help delegates people will suffer. If you care about democracy and care about your citizens, you will help us fight this discrimination. You will help us fight for love.
I support HJ1, as a mother and currently pregnant with my second child I believe ALL women should have access to reproductive freedoms. I do not want to have to fear if I will receive proper care in my state or how far my life has to be at risk for my doctors to perform life saving care. I want to live and be able to raise the children the country is so set on women having with little to no support. I want to continue to go to my doctors appointments and feel safe and know my doctor is not fearful they will be arrested if they give me care. I support HJ9 and protecting marriage equality. Every Virginian should have the right to love who they love and have the same rights under law as I do in my marriage. I believe in loving your neighbor as yourself, which means believing they deserve the same rights you have.
I reject HJ 1 Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
I oppose all abortions with only exceptions for tape and incest
I strongly support these amendments. Everyone should be allowed the Healthcare they need to live a healthy life. We should have complete control over our bodies and our lives. We should be free to marry who we love. Thank you.
People should be able to marry who they choose. The ONLY and I mean the ONLY thing the government should have any say so and interference with that is if there is a minor being married. Same sex marriage effects no one other than the folks that stand behind the title of something in government and hide behind the name of "Christianity". Government and politics are not supposed to cross each other but here we are year after year facing issues because of YOUR religions. Keep marriage OPEN to all who want to be married!
I oppose HJ9- marriage and families need to be prioritized in our state for the raising of our children. The union of a man and a woman is different than a same sex union.
I oppose HJ9. Marriage is to be between one man and one woman and the provisions in Virginia law we have now need to be kept.
I oppose HJ1. We do not need more abortions in Virginia. Abortion harms women and kills children. I have seen my own dead child at 10 weeks old. I oppose HJ9. Marriage is between a man and a woman. It is the building block of society.
HJ1- A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. HJ2-I support all people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored. HJ9-I oppose HJ9- Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I support these amendments.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman
I strongly support passing 1&3 - I honestly can’t believe we are even STILL talking about the right to bodily autonomy and marriage. 🙄 2 - I support this, but would suggest removing the exception to felons voting from the language. Everyone deserves the right to vote, regardless of decisions they have made or been forced to make. That said, if a felon can sit in the WH, why in the world would we think it’s right to withhold the right to vote from the rest of them?!
I vehemently oppose HJ 1. There is no freedom in being allowed to take someone else's life.. At the moment of conception, another person's life begins - another person with their own bodies and their own freedoms. They have a right to LIVE! Please consider ways to support women, children and families instead - as Virginians, we should support and protect the life and the dignity of every human being, no matter how small. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored. Voting is a privilege! I vehemently oppose HJ 9 - marriage should not be redefined. Marriage is the union of one man and one woman and other unions are NOT the same.
I am opposed to HJ-9. Please vote No on HJ-9.
I support this amendment on marriage rights
Please support the right to choose and pass HJ 1. Please support the right to vote by passing HJ 2. Just because someone made a mistake, they should not have a life sentence preventing them from voting after they have served their sentence. Please support love and the right to marriage by passing HJ 9.
I strongly support passing 1&3 - I honestly can’t believe we are even STILL talking about the right to bodily autonomy and marriage. 🙄 2 - I support this, but would suggest removing the exception to felons voting from the language. Everyone deserves the right to vote, regardless of decisions they have made or been forced to make. That said, if a felon can sit in the WH, why in the world would we think it’s right to withhold the right to vote from the rest of them?!
As a Catholic; as a single, childless woman; and as a member of Generation Z, I gratefully take this opportunity to comment on the proposed amendments. First, I implore you to reject HJ1 – Herring. Unless there is a strong commitment to protecting human life at all stages of development, starting at conception, our Commonwealth cannot truly achieve safety for all, equality of opportunity for all, an encouraging future for the next generation, or the sense that everyone is unreservedly valued. So please oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s Constitution and endangering what safeguards there do exist for the youngest and smallest in our Commonwealth (such as the partial birth abortion ban and the parental consent law). Instead, choose to craft policies that lift up and support the lives of mother and child as both endowed with dignity. Second, I encourage you to move ahead with HJ2 – Bennett-Parker. If our Commonwealth should be a champion of the life and dignity of each and every person, it should also practice a justice that is fundamentally and thoroughly humanistic. This includes restoring voting rights after an individual finishes out his or her sentence. Third and finally, I urge you to reject HJ9 – Sickles and its removal of the definition of marriage as between one man and one woman from Virginia’s Constitution. Defining marriage as between one man and one woman affirms the important and distinctive purpose proper to this institution, a purpose which “predates any nation, religion, or law” (Virginia Catholic Conference). Simultaneously, here as in the other responses to the proposed amendments, the dignity and worth that belong unconditionally to all persons by nature should be strongly and repeatedly emphasized. Thank you so much for this opportunity to comment.
The state has no authority to define marriage. It can only acknowledge the reality of marriage as a covenant between one man and one woman. Obergefell was an unlawful court decision and our state has no obligation or authority to legislate its judgements. HJ9 profanes marriage as a God-given institution by attempting to equate marriage with sexually perverse relationships. By proposing to grant the latter the same rights and privileges afforded to truly married couple, this bill would facilitate further perversion of law and justice. For example, it threatens to infringe on the rights of Speech and Religion for those opposed to homosexual unions. It also enables the harm of children subject to adoption and upbringing by same-sex parents. At its core, this proposed amendment is a violation of God's law and created order. Reject HJ9 and repent.
Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Reject HJ9- Civilized societies, particularly those from which this nation has it roots, have, from ancient times, recognized marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage, as such, is a bedrock of civilization, for it is this family unit (male-father/female-mother, uniting and bringing forth children) which provides the best opportunity for a stable atmosphere for nurturing the growth of a healthy moral society. Redefining marriage, which is what HJ9 intends, in effect diminishes and obfuscates the importance of this sacred unit. Rejecting HJ9 will not prevent other types of human cohabitation, but it will help preserve what is arguably the most vital pillar of American society. Reject HJ9.
Reject HJ9- Civilized societies, particularly those from which this nation has it roots, have, from ancient times, recognized marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage, as such, is a bedrock of civilization, for it is this family unit (male-father/female-mother, uniting and bringing forth children) which provides the best opportunity for a stable atmosphere for nurturing the growth of a healthy moral society. Redefining marriage, which is what HJ9 intends, in effect diminishes and obfuscates the importance of this sacred unit. Rejecting HJ9 will not prevent other types of human cohabitation, but it will help preserve what is arguably the most vital pillar of American society. Reject HJ9.
Reject HJ9- Civilized societies, particularly those from which this nation has it roots, have, from ancient times, recognized marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage, as such, is a bedrock of civilization, for it is this family unit (male-father/female-mother, uniting and bringing forth children) which provides the best opportunity for a stable atmosphere for nurturing the growth of a healthy moral society. Redefining marriage, which is what HJ9 intends, in effect diminishes and obfuscates the importance of this sacred unit. Rejecting HJ9 will not prevent other types of human cohabitation, but it will help preserve what is arguably the most vital pillar of American society. Reject HJ9.
Marriage equality is a basic human right, tantamount to the phrasing found in our Declaration of Independence; “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” As the proud parent of a gay son and his husband, our wonderful son-in law, as well as being lifelong friends of multiple same sex couples who’ve celebrated their personal love with legally sanctioned marital sacraments, I stand unequivocally as their ally. No one should be denied their basic human rights to love whomever they behold as a sacred lifelong partner, enjoying all the legal benefits therein such lawfully established relationships provide for all men and women, be it under local, state or federal jurisdiction. I submit herewith my unequivocal solid support for HJ9~Gordon A MacArthur
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 and enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
These proposals do not promote the common good. Abortion does grave injustice to innocent life. Once a debt to society has been paid a person should have their rights and duties as a citizen restored. Marriage of one man and one woman is the building block of a society with a strong future. Keep Virginia’s future strong!
Dear House Privileges and Elections Committee Members, I am writing to express my strong support for HJ9, a resolution to amend the Virginia Constitution to protect marriage equality for all. Every person deserves the right to love and marry freely. I remember, not so long ago, when that right was not yet protected by US law, and my gay friends had no right to marry the ones they loved. I remember, in 2015, when the US Supreme Court decision Obergefell v. Hodges finally decided that gay people have an equal right to marriage, as the 14th Amendment grants citizens the equal protection of the laws. However, as the recent Dobbs decision has shown, even landmark Supreme Court cases that protect citizens' rights, and whose protection millions of Americans rely upon, can be suddenly overturned. Indeed, when writing his opinion on the Dobbs v. Jackson decision, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas wrote that he would further call into question Obergefell v. Hodges. Since then, I and many other Virginians have been rightly concerned that the Obergefell decision may be overturned in the coming years. If that should come to pass, the Virginia Constitution, as it is currently written, would strip away gay people's right to marry those they love. I find this unacceptable. Now is the time to amend our state Constitution so that equal rights will be protected. Virginia is for lovers; let it remain so! We now have an opportunity in Virginia to ensure that the right to marriage equality, regardless of gender, sex, or race, will be protected, even in the face of potential changes to federal policy. As your constituent, I urge you to support HJ9 and make this amendment a priority. The time to protect ALL Virginians is now, and I hope you will stand with us by supporting this critical amendment. Thank you for your attention to this essential issue. Most Sincerely, Ms. Berkin, a voter in Norfolk, VA
HJ1 - keep abortion and pregnancy care legal and safe. HJ2 - these people have served their time and deserve the right to vote again without any approval or authorizations needed HJ9 - all families are valid in the state of Virginia. Everyone has a right to marry and create a family with whomever they choose. Virginia is for Lovers.
Matthew 19:4-6 LSB — “Have you not read that He who created them from the beginning MADE THEM MALE AND FEMALE, and said, ‘FOR THIS REASON A MAN SHALL LEAVE HIS FATHER AND MOTHER AND BE JOINED TO HIS WIFE, AND THE TWO SHALL BECOME ONE FLESH’? “So they are no longer two, but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let no man separate.” I ask you, have you not read? Rebellion against God's creational order will not lead to the flourishing of this great state of Virginia. Rebellion will lead to the judgements that befalls all places that do not submit to God - Sodom, Gomorrah, Tyre, Assyria, Babylon, Sidon, Edom, Moab, Rome. It is the Lord that determines the rise and fall of nations and He has, and can again, bring about decline over the failure to hold the marriage bed in high esteem. Reject all efforts to rebel against God's design for marriage- a male and a female. Reject HJ9. Obedience to God's design is GOOD for a people that wants to flourish. It is GOOD for men. It is GOOD for women. It is GOOD for children. It is GOOD for families. It is GOOD for society. It is GOOD for leaders.
I am the proud mother of a gay son. He is happily married. I view the right to marriage is a basic and fundamental human right. No single human, body of government or other has the right to deny this. To do so, makes the person less than human. Denial of this human right is a hallmark of authoritarian government and theocracies. Denial does not belong in a democracy
Beginning with the term: “Reproduction” includes birth control, sterilization, pregnancy, abortion, menstrual regulation (abortion vacuum procedure without a pregnancy test), sex or gender changes, surrogate pregnancy, creating and destroying developing human embryos, and cloning currently illegal, see VA Code, 32.1-12,21-22. The words, “every individual,” apply to all adult males, females, as well as minors under 18 because these words are not restricted, modified or qualified by the Amendment authors. Therefore, no means of reproductive freedom behavior is excluded legal protection because of age or sex by the authors of the Reproductive Freedom Amendment, RFA. Additionally, the Supreme Court ruled, “neither the Fourteenth Amendment nor the Bill of Rights is for adults alone.” [In re Gault, (1967)] The RFA states, “The Commonwealth shall not discriminate in the protection or enforcement of this fundamental right.” But treating males or females under 18 differently than males or females over 18 is a textbook example of discrimination. Attorneys Carrie Severino and Frank Scaturro noted points of the Ohio Abortion Referendum language (2023), which are strikingly similar to the Virginia counterparts that: “The proposed Ohio constitutional amendment would make the state … become a likely jurisdiction to harbor a future Kermit Gosnell, whether he is a practitioner of abortion, sex-change surgery, or other procedures under the umbrella of reproductive care. Complete strangers who assist children in obtaining life-altering procedures would find themselves on the right side of the law, while parents who try to protect their children would be deemed to have run afoul of the law.” “Any individual who tries to assist a minor in pursuing such procedures would be protected by law, while a parent who objects would be cut out of the decision-making process, perhaps even penalized.” “It appears that the amendment … would even offer a level of protection to nonphysicians in their performance of covered procedures — whether abortion, sex-change surgery, or something else. … the language extends to any “person or entity” who provides assistance with the procedure at issue.” [National Review online, March 13, 2023, “Ohio’s Disastrous Abortion Ballot Proposal”]
I care deeply about reproductive rights and marriage equality. I support these amendments.
I support all 3 amendments and look forward to Virginia enshrining restoration of voting rights, marriage equality, and reproductive freedom into our constitution
I fully support HJ1, HJ2 and HJ9. In a time when women's rights and LGBTQ+ rights are being taken away Virginia needs to be forward thinking and solidify those rights. I want my daughters to grow up in a state where they are respected and valued and able to make informed decisions about their own bodies and have the autonomy to make decisions about their lives without fear of government intervention. Please pass these amendments!!
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Honorable Committee: I oppose HJ1-Herring bill, the enshrining of abortion due to no restrictions up to 9 months and after. I can see if there is a danger to the mother's life and the baby, but at 12 weeks of age, the BABY has a heartbeat and is a human being. The Baby's civil rights must be taken into consideration for it is not the Baby's fault that it was created. What about the Baby's Right to Choose? Those who have sex need to have more accountability for there is birth control other than abortion pill available to prevent pregnancy. I find it disgusting that there are certain individuals who celebrate the killing of an unborn child or the killing of a baby after full term. In abortion, a BABY is mutilated, broken apart and pulled out in pieces. The BABY is a living being that did not choose to be created. It is not the Baby's fault. There need to be benefits available for those who are unable to conceive to adopt babies created by accident. It is inhumane to want to kill a baby for no reason after 12 weeks of gestation and also uncivilized to enjoy the killing of said baby for profit which Planned Parenthood sell the parts of the baby! DO NONE OF YOU HAVE A HEART OF ANY KIND TO THINK OF THE UNBORN BABY AND IT'S RIGHT TO LIFE? I also Oppose HJ2 Bill Bennett Parker I also Oppose HJ9 Bill Sickles Thank you for your time and attention. Kristin Holte
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I do not support HJ1. It does not protect innocent children in the womb. Life begins at conception and babies deserve a chance to live. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
HJ1, the right to reproductive freedom. All Virginians should have accessible, quality healthcare that they can afford. This includes all aspects of reproductive care for women - ongoing reproductive health checks, birth control, post-natal care, and abortion - to be determined by the woman and her health care providers. Abortion should be a safe, legal decision made without government interference or penalties for anyone who offers aid or assistance in the process. Virginians have shown their support for reproductive freedom without intrusion from the government. HJ2, the right to vote, restoration of rights. Voting rights should be restored automatically once a person convicted of a felony successfully completes their sentence. Their participation in the democratic process should not be dependent on a vague, arbitrary process decided by the Governor without full explanation of decisions. The Virginia Constitution should be amended to provide the automatic restoration of rights once the sentence for a felony conviction is completed. HJ3, marriage equality. Virginians deserve the opportunity to love and live peacefully with the person of their choice. Just as laws regarding mixed race marriages were changed as citizens attitudes and understanding evolved, the current ban against same-sex marriage should not be part of the Virginia constitution. Virginians' support of same-sex marriage has increased to about 70% in 2021 (Public Religion Research Institute). The current level of support is evidence that the ban should be removed from the constitution. I hope that these bills will be thoughtfully considered for the improved quality of life for all Virginians.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect unborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians.
HJ1, a proposed amendment to the Virginia Constitution that would enshrine extremist no-limits abortion. They do not do this in Europe. OPPOSE This Dem abortion amendment to the Virginia Constitution has got to be the most extreme in the country. No parental consent for minor girls. No protections for a fully-formed viable baby from elective late-term abortions up to the 9th month. This sort of extremism is not what Virginians want.
I am writing to loudly support all three of these bills. I’m excited to see Virginia embrace policy that makes us more equitable and safer during such scary times. I hope we can do what’s right and get these bills through.
I am Dr. Michael Huffman, Executive Director with the Virginia Assembly of Independent Baptists. I represent the voices of over 500+ Baptist Churches scattered throughout the Commonwealth and we oppose HJ9, and urge all representative to vote no. Please see my brief in the attachment below. Thank you.
I strongly support these three amendments to our state constitution. I want to protect and support the rights of all Virginia's.
I support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. In regards to HJ1, as many said before me, reproductive rights are human rights. A person should be able to make the decision about carrying or terminating a pregnancy without say from the government or religious organizations. Enshrining the right to abortion will ensure that we do not see the unnecessary death of pregnant people due to being denied care, especially during emergency situations. We have seen so many stories coming out of states where this right has been revoked, which has led to the deaths of many unnecessarily. We need to remember that when woman are seeking late term abortions, this is typically a life saving procedure for the mother who is carrying a fetus that is no longer viable. We cannot force a person to suffer through the death of their child and then potentially lose their own life as well due to lack of legal care. Virginia is at the forefront of the southern states in making sure reproductive care is available and it should stay that way. HJ2 - I believe that this is a step in the right direction and support reformed felons being able to regain their civil right to vote and participate in our democracy. HJ9 - All people deserve to marry the person they love, regardless of gender or race. Marriage is a contract where two people are joining their lives. Any adult couple deserves to be able to enter into these contracts. It does not infringe on the rights of others and will ensure that they are able to advocate for their spouse in situations where this is necessary. Many objections to marriage equality stem from a religious viewpoint. In a government where there should be a separation of church and state, this should not be allowed to affect the law. Thank you for your time!
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and its purpose has been put into practice before any nation, religion, or law. Marriage is the fundamental fabric of society - and without it - families would be worse off.
I strongly oppose the proposed amendment to change the definition of marriage as a union between one biological man and one biological woman.
Bill HJ9 should be rejected as marriage is the union of one man and one woman.
I am in support of all three bills - HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. No one other than a person with a uterus and their doctor should be involved decisions for their wellbeing and health. Women should inately hold autonomy over their own body. It is embarrassing that we are still fighting for this. Marriage equality was decided by the federal government, our state should solidify that right to protect its people from possible attacks from the next administration. If you don't like gay marriage, don't have one.
Dear Honorable Delegates of this Committee, I strongly oppose the constitutional amendments proposed by HJ1 and HJ9. Please oppose those amendments. Let us acknowledge the obvious fact that every individual has a fundamental right to life (including the unborn) and to a family. The so called "right to reproductive freedom" appears alive, well and unrestricted in the Commonwealth and our nation. How can we know this? Well, because of the result -- the woman's pregnancy. Human life begins at conception, which is a scientific fact. At that point, the man and woman have already reproduced. Therefore, the "right" actually being sought is the power to legally take a human life, the very human life that is the result of a man's and a women's unrestricted exercise of their right to reproduce. The time "to make and effectuate one's own decisions about all matters related to one's pregnancy" is what men and woman should do prior to intercourse and before reproducing. The protection of human life is, and always has been, a compelling state interest. What is not justifiable is the taking of an innocent human life. With respect to the conduct of committee meetings, the public should have the ability to physically appear and to testify in person before this committee on these proposed amendments. The public is entitled to and should have been given earlier notice, well in advance of such a meeting, in order to allow citizens adequate time to read the proposed amendments and to prepare comments and/or testimony thereon. Therefore, I request that the meeting be adjourned and continued at a later date to allow for greater public participation in the committee's deliberations. Thank you for your kind consideration of my comments.
I oppose the HJ1 and HJ9 amendments. These amendments enshrine the murder of children and defy sacred biblical definition of marriage.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose HJ9 as it seems to disrupt the Christian principles this state was built on. It seems to make sin common and approved.
To all parties concerned, thank you for reviewing this important piece of legislature. After this presidential election, many of us in the lgbt+ community feel that our needs will not continue to be met in this country. Please consider how upset you would be on an individual level if you were told that the person that you loved was not deemed the correct choice by a third party denying the right to marriage. Should we not all be entitled to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness? I beseech you to listen to what our community has to say, we are taxpayers too.
I strongly OPPOSE HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 Legislation. This nation is supposed to protect life, not destroy it as stated in the HJ1 proposal. Every life is valuable from the moment of conception to natural death. The greatest shame be on any legislator who undermines this right.
As a wife and mother, I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has a natural design and purpose that cannot and should not be changed.
I oppose passage of HJ1 because this amendment will prevent the people of Virginia from passing any laws that will protect preborn children and could mean that current prolife laws in Virginia will be overturned as they have been in other states that have passed similar amendments. I want Virginia to be able to pass protective laws that respect the lives of all Virginians. Please use your God- given voice and stand up for the most vulnerable.
It’s important for Virginia to protect people’s freedom from government overreach. If 2 consenting adults want to get married, regardless of who they like, they should be allowed to get married. Freedom reigns. Any restrictions on constitutional freedoms would make America look like Iran and North Korea. Protecting women’s rights to abortion is equally important.
I strongly oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. Sincerely, Susan Bond Burke, VA
Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
It is high time that we enshrine the right for all Virginia citizens to be married regardless of sexual orientation. Ours is a land of equality where every person should be free to pursue happiness in partnership with any consenting adult. Thank you for your commitment to doing the right thing for all who dwell in our great commonwealth.
- I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. - HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. - HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. - A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. - REJECT HJ 1. Instead, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. - Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose bill HJ1 and ask the delegates to represent me and many unborn children. We can not always legislate issues of the heart such as caring for the unborn; but laws offer a restraint to unbridled killing of the unborn and psychological harm to the mother in crisis. We do the mothers a disservice in allowing abortions up til birth. It is cruel and will scare her soul. The memory of silencing the human life lives on long after the procedure is finished. The least we can do is to amend this bill to place the 24-hour waiting period and the presence of the ultra -sound images. The fact that these two considerations provide a slight hinderance would only be opposed by those striving to make money from the abortion industry. Giving he unborn a chance at life and the mother a reflective window to not make a hasty decision is a safe and reasonable thing to do. I oppose bill HJ2. Virginia already has laws on the books to help those who have served their time be reissued their voting rights. My concern is this may be providing a loop hole for non-citizens to vote. I oppose bill HJ9. My concern is the wording of "individuals" instead of adults. Are we leaving it open for the marriage of minors. We must safe guard children in this increasingly immoral society. Please take time to reword this bill.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I firmly support the passage of HJ 1, HJ 2, and HJ 9 amendments. For HJ1, abortion can be necessary for both healthcare and economic reasons. It should be a mother's decision to determine what is best for her health, especially in scenarios when it could be fatal without the abortion. Without the safety net of H1, maternal mortality rates could increase even more than they already have compared to pre-pandemic levels. We can not afford to let more mothers die from not receiving the care they need. Additionally, there is our economic incentive to abortion by allowing a woman to choose when to become a mother. Most women who seek an abortion are already low-income. When these women are blocked from ending their pregnancy, they wind up worse off than they would if they could choose to have a child when they are more financially secure. It would be a detriment to Virginia to punish women by making them give up their stability or even their own lives. For HJ 9, equality is a fundamental civil right and there is no legal reason a person shouldn't be able to choose who they love and marry. With 4% of Virginia's population being a part of the LGBT community, it is discriminatory and unfair to not allow them equal rights for marriage. There is, again, an economic incentive, as this also helps retain high-skilled workers from the LGBT community in the state of Virginia where they can settle down and have kids of their own if they want. Without this protection, more Virginians would move out of state and cause a loss to our communities and economy.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1 - Reproductive freedom is mandatory to keep the wellbeing of families secure. The only refusal of this is on basis of religion, which should NOT interfere with the state. Reproductive freedom stimulates the economy and takes a large off burden off the welfare system. Not to mention it is morally just, defending victims of sexual violence. HJ2 - Right to vote for ALL is nothing but just. Felons can be rehabilitated. Being a felon does not deny your place as a citizen of the United States. If a felon can run for president and win, a felon should be able to vote. HJ9 - Guaranteeing same sex couples have the right to marry has many benefits: Stimulates the economy, protects same sex families from financial burden, enables same sex families to provide their children a stable home life. The majority of dissenters are on the basis of religion, which cannot be involved in politics.
If it’s not baby, then what is it? A hamburger? A five year old is not as developed as a 20 year old. Nor is a 3 week old as developed as a 9 month old. And yet we wouldn’t call the 5 year old less human. Calling people fetuses is just a way to dehumanize the killing of humans by not calling them humans. End abortion. Allow people to vote and restore their voting powers. They are people too. Marriage is between a man and a woman. Homosexual marriage is contrary to natural design. It doesn’t even make sense from an evolutionary standpoint.
In regards to bill HJ1, we need to ensure that Virginia is ready to protect its citizens in the case of larger abortion restrictions at the federal level. This bill highlights what is not considered in many states and at a federal level which is that as Americans we have a right to bodily autonomy. Reproductive freedom is a right to privacy. Enshrining this right in our state constitution will ensure that women, men, and individuals of any gender feel safe and welcome in Virginia. For HJ2, individuals with felons will never be able to reintegrate into society if they lack the right to vote. A right which makes them American. This is one of the simplest steps Virginia can take to properly rehabilitate formerly incarcerated peoples. Regarding HJ9, repealing and replacing the existing constitutional provision which defines union as only between a man and a woman is necessary both to abide by federal court decisions and to ensure all Virginia residents are treated equally. With the inserted cavet of religious entities being allowed to refuse to conduct a marriage if they choose, there is no reason for anyone of any religious belief to reject this constitutional amendment. It allows them to maintain their freedom of religion while guaranteeing basic freedom to all Virginia residents. Virginia is not Virginia without the LGBTQ community or the black and PoC communities who simply wish to love. As a lifelong resident of Virginia who has lived in numerous locations in our state, I hope you will read these comments and accept all the amendments above as it is in the best interests of the citizens of Virginia whom you represent.
Please don't let this state fall further into decay. Instead stick with truth - that marriage was designed for man and women. Families are already under attack, and lying to future generations about marriage will only further weaken our society. Those of the same gender seeking a state recognized partnership are welcome to participate in civil unions, just please don't dilute the sanctity of marriage.
HJ1 - I firmly believe that every person should be responsible for their own health. Especially reproductive health. The government should not have a say in the medical decisions I make regarding myself. HJ2 - I believe felons should have the right to vote. If felons become the president of the united states, why can't felons also choose who they want to run this country? If a felon is registered as a citizen of the U.S. they should be allowed to vote. HJ9 - People should be allowed to marry the person they love, even if they are both men or both women. It's baffling to me that there is even debate surrounding it. It should not be illegal for same sex couples to be married.
HJ1- it is not moral to have legal exceptions for murdering children, born or unborn at any time. When will people wake up and provide equal protection under the law, US Constitution 14 Amendment. These human children do not deserve the death penalty for any reason and we need to write Just laws and not evil laws. Abolish human abortion without exception and repeal or supersede any laws that immorally allow or excuse murdering children for any reason without just cause. HJ9 - Marriage is ordained by GOD and by one l biological man and one biological woman which is good for the state to recognize and even encourage as a key and necessary component of our society. It is wrong to attempt to change to meaning of the word marriage or to recognize anything not marriage and or support it as if it were. This is destroying our state and nation, and is a waste of resources to prop up every whim of society that refuses to recognize GOD's plan, His direction to us regarding family and society and procreation and the natural law and order that support a healthy and prosperous and well governed society.
I support these bills to protect the rights of women and their doctors to make healthcare decisions themselves. In states where women have lost their rights to reproductive freedom, women are DYING needlessly. This is inexcusable in the United States of America in 2024. As a woman who suffered 4 miscarriages, or what my insurance provider at the time called “spontaneous abortions,” I have nightmares thinking about the multitude ways “friends/spies” might have turned my pain and anguish into a crime by involving themselves in my personal healthcare decisions. An ectopic pregnancy which resulted in the loss of two wanted fetuses and a fallopian tube might have also resulted in the loss of my life due to denial of care. Protect the rights of women’s access to healthcare. The government has no role here. What a conflict with HIPPA.
I am writing in support of HJ1 and HJ9 respectively. I believe each, in their own right, provides agency to Virginians; agency over one’s body, and one’s most personal relationship (with a partner). Protection of these rights, as they should be seen, is paramount in providing for a democratic and free republic. These choices should stay personal, as they were always meant to be.
Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. Abortion is NOT birth control. Educate women on their natural biology, provide support for mothers - especially mothers in the workforce, focus energies on affordable childcare. Do not make preborn children suffer for the failings of this society. Do not end the lives who could very well be what this state, country, and world needs. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
I strongly oppose HJ1. I agree that individuals, both men and women, have the right to decide if and when to have children. However, once those children are already in existence, no one has the right, not even their parents to get rid of them. All life is sacred, and we have a civic duty to protect the most vulnerable, which are the unborn. Abortion up to the moment of birth is unthinkable. This is NOT a healthcare right. I also oppose the idea of minors being able to get an abortion without parental consent. A teen does not have the neurodevelopment to make decisions on a major life event such as pregnancy alone. The American College of Pediatrics agrees with this stance in its position statement Parental Involvement and Consent for Minor's Abortion Federico C. de Miranda, MD, FCP I strongly oppose HJ9 and believe that the original design and purpose of marriage, which predates any nation, religion or law supports Natural Law, that marriage is between one man and one woman and ask that you respect the wishes of your constituents. I do support HJ2 so that voting rights can be restored to all people having completed their sentences.
I support same-sex marriage. This antiquated ban should no longer be a part of Virginia’s constitution.
I oppose HJ9 , which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion, or law.
What in the hell is this "select a pronoun" and one of the choices is "they". Are you people complete lunatics? Don't you know simple English grammar? Concerning HJ9, the government should not be involved in marriage at all. There should be no laws at all concerning marriage. There should be no such thing as a government-approved marriage, marriage license, etc. Get the government out of the marriage business altogether.
HJ 1 - abortion I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. Expanding abortion does nothing to solve the problems that bring mothers to the place where they think it is better to kill their child rather than birth it. Poverty, lack of support, unhealthy relationships, and abuse all continue when resources aren’t toward abortion rather than the support networks that help women (and men) be more stable and successful. Trafficking and sex abuse can continue when abortion is less regulated and more available, making women victims again. Furthermore, by endorsing the idea that the government (or any citizen) can “choose” the value of another human, at any level of vulnerability, and prioritize their own life over a more vulnerable individual, creates a dangerous precedent for how citizens can interact with people who cannot equally advocate and defend themselves. This destabilizes women, men, and families, and creates a rift of hyper-individualism, selfishness, and distrust where cooperation and unity should be a priority. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Studies repeatedly show that marriage is a leading indicator of stability, success, and happiness in adults. Studies also show that children need a mother and a father by repeatedly demonstrating that lacking one has detrimental effects and is an obstacle to future wellbeing and success. If the government truly has the stabilization and success of its people in mind, it will protect and encourage the most stabilizing and success-indicating relationship that is the foundation of future generations: marriage between one man and one woman. Furthermore, marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose enshrining a "right" to abortion in Virginia's constitution. HJ1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial birth abortion, and the law requiring parental consent. Abortion up until the moment of birth is an appalling tragedy, NOT a health care right.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
These are all important issues to me, we should honor all marriages equally, once felons sentences are complete they should be allowed to vote and be involved in civics with their community,
I fully support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9, as each of these proposed amendments reflects our state’s commitment to individual rights and justice. HJ1 is crucial for safeguarding reproductive freedom by enshrining the right to an abortion. HJ2 rightly restores voting rights for convicted felons upon their release, reinforcing the importance of civic participation and second chances. Finally, HJ9 protects the right to same-sex marriage, ensuring equal rights and dignity for all couples. I urge the committee to advance these bills to help build a fairer, more inclusive state.
HJ 1 – I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – I oppose HJ 9 Marriage is the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
My name is Samuel M Willinger, MD and I live in Lynchburg, Va . HJ-1 : a fundamental right to reproductive freedom : I support this bill... If a woman needs a termination of pregnancy, it is her decision ( and the father's) , not the government's decision .. I understand it is ending a life; however, here is America, we have so little respect for life with our gun violence, mistreatment of women, the Israeli bombing of Gazans with weapons provided by us, etc, that I do not feel I have any right to tell someone else what to do or how they should live their lives.. Prevention of pregnancy would be ideal, so let us provide women with good birth control as well, good health care, and a proper social environment in which to grow up with no drugs, alcohol or guns and teach them how to make good decisions so they avoid unwanted pregnancies.. A Republican would say " the government should not be in my personal business". Well then, why are they trying to tell women what they can and can't do? ...HJ-2 - restoration of voting rights... This is simple.. if a criminal has done his time in prison and he is released, then he is a citizen again with full rights.. he is expected to work, pay taxes, and uphold the law.. Why should he not have the right to vote if he is law abiding? HJ-3 - marriage equality -- this is extremely simple .. of COURSE there should be marriage equality !! Duhh !! .. if two people love each other and want to marry, then there is a little more happiness in the world. What should it matter to the other 8 billion people ? Nobody is telling them who they should love and marry? Whether they are two men, two women or a man and a woman , what does it matter? Homosexuality has been around for thousands of years .. The ancient Greeks had a lot of homosexuality , especially the very warlike Spartans - check your history , people... no matter what the Bible says, does the Bible apply to Hindus? to Bhuddists, to Japanese ( Shinto religion) ? They don't care about a Christian Bible... and people who think homosexuality is abnormal, well , nobody is trying to convince them to be homosexual .... Thank you for this opportunity to offer my opinion .. best regards, Samuel Willinger, MD
HJ1- I support this bill. Women are in charge of their own bodies and it is a fundamental right they can choose whether to have an abortion or not. HJ2 - I support this bill to guarantee voting rights to eligible voters. This just goes without saying. HJ9 - I support this bill to allow two individuals to marry regardless of gender. This has been a right since June 26th 2015. Why are we going back in time? Only to hurt people and take away their given rights? Jesus loves everyone regardless of their gender identity. 1 John 4:8 Anyone who does not love does not know God, because God is love. Leviticus 19:18 You shall not take vengeance or bear a grudge against the sons of your own people, but you shall love your neighbor as yourself.
I strongly support these three proposed amendments to the Virginia Constitution. Ensuring reproductive freedom is crucial for bodily autonomy and healthcare equity (HJ1). Safeguarding the right to vote and removing discriminatory barriers is vital to a healthy democracy (HJ2). Repealing the outdated prohibition on same-sex marriage and affirming the right to marry regardless of gender (HJ9) promotes equality and protects fundamental civil rights. These amendments will bring Virginia’s laws in line with modern values of freedom, equality, and justice for all citizens.
As a practicing Roman Catholic, who follows the 10 Commandments, I strongly object to you trying to make a "right" to abortion in Virginia's constitution. A policy/law of unlimited abortion up until birth is a mockery of God's gift of life and it goes against the constitution of the U.S.A. I would like to know why you are so intent on killing an innocent child. Do you not think of how you are going to answer to God when you see Him face to face? We have already killed more babies than, Hilter, Stalin, and ancient pagan societies. Regarding HJ2 I support HJ2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as in the case in the vast majority of states. Virginia doesn't need to be know for not giving people a second chance. I oppose HJ9, which makes a mockery of marriage. Since the beginning of time, marriage has always been between one man and one woman. Why don't you follow the science, to propagate you need the reproductive systems of a male and female. It is scientifically impossible for two men or two women to produce a child. If you won't listen to the science then please use what little common sense you have for some good. You obviously want to continue to do the work of the devil, by rushing these actions through. I will pray for your soul and may God show His mercy on you.
As a Virginia resident, I urge my delegates to pass all three bills to enshrine reproductive, voting, and marriage rights in our state Constitution. Convicted felons have already served their time within prison walls. Without the right to cast their vote, they remain disenfranchised upon release for the rest of their lives. As a queer AFAB (assigned female at birth) constituent, I worry about the rollbacks and potential repeals by the US Supreme Court on established federally-granted rights. My right to access abortion, birth control, and other family planning services should be protected within the state Constitution. My right to get married to my future partner should be protected as well. I love Virginia, and I plan to spend much of my life here. I can’t imagine a future in which these rights are not permanently guaranteed within my state’s Constitution. Thank you.
I strongly support these three proposed amendments to the Virginia Constitution. Ensuring reproductive freedom is crucial for bodily autonomy and healthcare equity (HJ1). Safeguarding the right to vote and removing discriminatory barriers is vital to a healthy democracy (HJ2). Repealing the outdated prohibition on same-sex marriage and affirming the right to marry regardless of gender (HJ9) promotes equality and protects fundamental civil rights. These amendments will bring Virginia’s laws in line with modern values of freedom, equality, and justice for all citizens.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 and urge the committee to advance these proposed constitutional amendments. HJ1 is essential to safeguarding reproductive rights and ensuring individuals have autonomy over their healthcare decisions. HJ2’s restoration of voting rights for individuals who have completed their incarceration is a necessary step toward justice and reintegration. Lastly, HJ9’s protection of the right to same-sex marriage is crucial to upholding equality and dignity for all families in our state. These measures collectively reflect our commitment to fairness, individual rights, and a more inclusive society.
My comments are as followis. Regarding HU1: A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. For NJ2: I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. As for HU9: I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Plus, marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. Regards, Steve Amato
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent.Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1- I support this bill to ensure that women have choice in regards to reproduction. HJ2 - I support this bill to guarantee voting rights to eligible voters. HJ9 - I support this bill to allow two individuals to marry regardless in of gender or biological sex.
I am writing in support of repealing the constitutional provision defining marriage as between one man and one woman. The marriage of same-sex couples should be protected by our state constitution! They should have that right fully protected. Repealing this provision causes no harm, but only benefits our state by allowing such freedom to its citizens. The amendment states that religious organizations and clergy can refuse to perform any marriage, and that is their right as well.
Good Afternoon, My name is Roxanne Collins. I'm writing to encourage you to vote "YES' on HJ9. I can't describe the fear this causes LGBT families in Virginia. The time to act is NOW. Please prioritize this so that all Virginia families could be protected under state law. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Roxanne
I support these amendments because in a nation that values and prioritizes freedom, I believe that individuals should have autonomy over all their decisions. If we are to truly have our unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the government cannot restrict our autonomy in any way. Furthermore our government has a responsibility to protect our rights and by amending our state constitution we are solidifying that protection in the event that there are challenges to these rights federally.
I urge you to oppose HJ 1 and HJ 9. They are both unnecessary and extreme. Thank you for your consideration.
Marriage Equality This ban does not reflect the attitudes and beliefs of Virginians in 2023. A 2021 poll from the Public Religion Research Institute found that 71% of Virginians support the right of same-sex couples to marry. This percentage has only increased since the question began being asked of voters. In 2006, 53% of voters supported the marriage ban. This huge swing shows the massive shift in public opinion on the issue of marriage, and it is clear evidence that the antiquated ban should no longer be a part of Virginia’s constitution. It’s only fair to revisit a political question that has shown such a vast change since it was first broached. With the removal of women’s protections with the destruction of Roe v. Wade, it is possible that marriage equality will be destroyed on a national level as well. Virginia must take the lead to protect all citizens. If Virginia really is “for lovers,” it should recognize that love is love and grant all citizens the right to live their lives in peace. Furthermore, as a queer person in VA, I want to feel safe, treated justly, and welcomed to access the same rights as anyone else.
HJ1-Access to reproductive freedom should be an essential right for all Virginians. Women and their doctors are fully capable of making the best decisions for themselves and their circumstances. The government should not be placing restrictions on what people can do with their own bodies. Even corpses are afforded bodily autonomy! HJ2-Individuals should automatically have their voting rights restored when their sentence is complete. HJ9- LGBTQ+ people should have their right to marry fully protected and upheld by the state of Virginia.
HJ1 - I strongly oppose enshrining a "right" to abortion in Virginia's constitution. HJ1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. REJECT HJ1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ2 - All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ9 - I oppose HJ9 . Marriage is the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Separation of church and state. Keep one person’s church out of the rights and freedoms of every American. I strongly support these three proposed amendments protecting human rights.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I support the three proposed amendments HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 Legal bans on reproductive decisions in other states already show that they are restricting health care to those who are pregnant resulting in unnecessary harm and death of citizens. Government overreach should not prevent citizens from making healthcare decisions with their families, medical practitioners and their clergy. Most states allow felons to regain their voting rights once released. This is important to allow those who have completed their punishment and are no longer incarcerated to regain all the rights of citizenship. I don't see any compelling interest of the state in preventing people who have developed and committed and loving relationship with each other to be prevented from being denied the legal privileges that civil marriage provides. It is in the best interest of the state to ensure these privileges to consenting adults.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child, such as universal maternal healthcare, comprehensive paid family leave funding policies, affordable housing and childcare options. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – right to abortion amendment • I strongly agree with and support enshrining a right to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. • HJ 1 would protect countless pregnant persons across the state and allow them bodily autonomy and the choices to make medical decisions with their doctors and healthcare providers. • A policy of unrestricted abortion access should be a fundamental right. Each instance of required or desired abortion care should be treated as the medically complex and personally nuanced situations that they are without concern for cumbersome and dangerous legislative restriction. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights • I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage • I support HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
Regarding HJ 1, I strongly OPPOSE enshrining a so-called “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. Murder is a WRONG, not a right. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. REJECT HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I OPPOSE HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Dear Delegate Sickles and Members of the Committee, Please do not change section 15-A of Article 1 of the Bill of Rights of the Virginia Constitution. The one man, one woman Marriage Amendment was approved by the citizens of Virginia in 2006. You do not have the authority to change the definition of marriage and the laws of God. Sincerely, Deirdre Pennefather
I oppose HJ 9. Families are designed by God to be of a man and a woman for the purpose of having children. Children raised in homes of other “family” structures suffer and society suffers in turn. “As the family goes, so goes society” and ours is going down the tubes. Respect natural law.
* HJ 1 - I strongly oppose enshrining a "right" to abortion in Virginia's constitution. * HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. *A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. *REJECT HJ1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and child. * HJ 2 - All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. *HJ 9 - I oppose HJ 9 Marriage is the union of one man and one woman. * Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 I strongly oppose enshrining a 'right' to abortion in Virginia's Constitution. HJ1 Would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. Please reject enshrining the barbarity and violence of abortion in the Virginia Constitution. We should be defending the right to life not cruelly blotting it out. HJ 2 - restoring voting rights. I support HJ 2 All people who have paid their debt to society by completing their sentences ought to have their right to vote restored. It is only just. HJ 9 The state didn't create marriage, it is a human institution arising from natural law.. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. Do not remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman
NO TO AMERICAN TALIBAN. I strongly support these three proposed amendments to the Virginia Constitution. Ensuring reproductive freedom is crucial for bodily autonomy and healthcare equity (HJ1). Safeguarding the right to vote and removing discriminatory barriers is vital to a healthy democracy (HJ2). Repealing the outdated prohibition on same-sex marriage and affirming the right to marry regardless of gender (HJ9) promotes equality and protects fundamental civil rights. These amendments will bring Virginia’s laws in line with modern values of freedom, equality, and justice for all citizens.
HJ 1 – right to abortion amendment • I strongly agree with and support enshrining a right to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. • HJ 1 would protect countless pregnant persons across the state and allow them bodily autonomy and the choices to make medical decisions with their doctors and healthcare providers. • A policy of unrestricted abortion access should be a fundamental right. Each instance of required or desired abortion care should be treated as the medically complex and personally nuanced situations that they are without concern for cumbersome and dangerous legislative restriction. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights • I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage • I support HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
I am opposed to the secretive and rushed process to get these Bills voted on and the intent seems very suspicious. Please vote NO to HJ1 and HJ9 to protect the sanctity of life as well as the values of the Commonwealth. I strongly oppose enshrining the "right" to abortion in to the Virginia Constitution. In addition, I strongly oppose HJ9, and believe that the original design and purpose of marriage, which predates any nation, religion or law supports Natural Law, that marriage is between one man and one woman and ask that you respect the wishes of your constituents. I support HJ2 so that voting rights can be restored to all people having completed their sentences. Thank you for your consideration
I support strongly the passage of HJ1 , Hj2 and HJ9 because these amendments will prevent the people of Virginia from reverting to the dark ages. I want Virginia to remain a beacon of light and safety for reproductive rights and the rights of all of her citizens
I support all 3 bills: the right to reproductive freedom, the right to vote, and the right to marriage equality.
I oppose enshrining abortion rights into our state constitution because modern science and technology prove that what is present within the womb at the earliest stage is a human being. To uphold abortion on demand is tantamount to taking human life. There is no right to take the life of an innocent , vulnerable and innocent human being. I oppose marriage between two persons of the same sex. Marriage from the natural law involves a man and a woman who in the act of two becoming one create new human life, at least the openness is present.
It would put VA on the wrong side of history to reject any of these bills. I thought this was the land of the free? It's embarassing how many so-called "patriots" will vehemently oppose anyone's freedom and right to choose what healthcare they seek and who they engage in holy matrimony with, as well as whether or not someone's past (which has been atoned for) can prevent them from participating in democracy. Opposing these bills will put governmental restrictions in our bodies, our families, and the ability for EVERYONE to make their voices heard. True Americans will support these bills.
Please vote YES for HJ9. Every person has a right to marry who they love whether it’s a man or woman. We have come a long way since this was first introduced. Please change the language to read man OR woman. Thank you, Sydney Morgan 18390 Fairway Oaks Square Leesburg Va. 20176
I support all 3 bill !! Stay Blue Virginia
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation or law.
HJ1-I vehemently oppose a “right “ to abortion in the Virginia Constitution and reject it. We need life- affirming and protective measures for mother and child not murderous measures HJ2-I support restoration of voting rights for individuals who have completed their sentences HJ9-I oppose removal of constitutional protection of marriage between one man and one woman
HJ1 - I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ2 - I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ3 - I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law
I strongly urge you to support all three bills. As a woman, I deserve the right to vote as well as the right to reproductive health just like every other women in our state and in our country and world. These bills are very serious and having them written into our state constitution will keep Virginians feeling safe and supported during a very dark time. Marriage Equality is also so important to me and should be supported. How can Virginia be for lovers if it's not for all lovers? Time to make big, meaningful changes!
I support HJ9, a resolution to amend the Virginia Constitution to protect marriage equality for all. All people deserve love and the right to marriage. LGBTQ+ people have been historically disenfranchised in this country, however we have an opportunity now in Virginia to ensure LGBTQ+ people are protected should there be changes to federal policy.
I support HJ1 and implore the committee members to allow this bill to move forward. It is lost on no one that this is a contentious issue and will undoubtedly remain such for quite some time. Ten states have extended the decision of whether to solidify abortion access to its citizens through ballot measures. Virginia should be no different. I see little possibility of a collective, philosophical agreement. As such, democracy should play its course and Virginians should be permitted to vote on this amendment at the ballot box. I support HJ9 and echo other Virginians sentiments that this is merely aligning our state constitution with a right that is already set by Obergefell. Outdated implied prohibitions should be corrected, as we have done for other areas involving racist laws that were set in our state constitution. Many will cite biblical ideology as a reason for halting this bill. I respectfully remind committee members that Christians previously cited their religion while blocking the union between individuals of different races. Many of us today see this belief, which existed for centuries, as a perversion of the text. Not only should religion and state remain separate in regards to respect for our chosen families, the religion that is being pressed upon us is one that twists over time. In a state that championed Loving and has coined "Virginia is for Lovers" in its honor, please correct our misalignment and move this bill forward to protect Virginian citizens whose love deserves equal celebration and protection. I support HJ2 and respectfully press the committee to move the bill forward. Once a citizen repays their debt to society, their rights should be fully restored. These citizens who reintegrate into our cities and towns are impacted by the policies that pass and should have a voice. Residents must be invested in their communities and this will reduce recidivism. It is no secret that individuals from disenfranchised communities often lack resources for proper legal representation and are pressed at a higher rate to accept plea deals. Denying these individuals the restoration of their rights after their punishment only perpetuates the inequitable effects of a jilted justice system. It is also an undeniable irony that a convicted felon was just elected president, and yet, Virginian felons are unable to vote unless individually approved. There should not be such a blanket disenfranchisement. This bill and proposed amendment provides the necessary guardrails. It should move forward.
Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I am in strong support of allowing Virginians to live their lives as they see fit in regards to their reproductive freedoms (HJ1) and whom they choose to love (HJ9). Additionally, those who have served their time should have their voting right restored, without additional hurdles put in their way (HJ2).
HJ 1 – I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – I oppose HJ 9 Marriage is the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Radicalism of every kind in Government is bad for all of us -- regardless of which side of the aisle we sit on. Please stop this nonsense now!
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. By what standard is the GA consider establishing the "right?" The Supreme Court does not see it as a constitutional right. Many Virginians would consider this a wrong - just as much as abortion is wrong, terminating the life of the unborn child and health care providers participating in death rather than giving life. Shame. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, and fundamental wrong, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I urge you to pass all three of these bills. It is unacceptable that someone else's religion can dictate someone else's life and choices. Abortion is healthcare and should be to the discretion of the individual and their medical provider. Criminalizing abortion creates a disgusting precedent for the government to impose it's will over your own bodily autonomy. If you don't believe in abortions, don't get one, it's as simple as that. If you don't support gay marriage, don't get one. It is frankly un-American to support legislation that forces your beliefs onto someone else. Virginia is for lovers, ALL lovers, not just the ones that you personally think are acceptable. Separation of Church and state is important for a reason. Your religion and beliefs do not and will never supercede an individuals right to self determination. If we give the government the power to decide what we can do with our body's and our lives, we will not get that back. These issues might not effect you personally or yet, but they will. The leopards will come for you next.
I strongly support this amendment 100%! Every Virginia resident should have access to affordable, quality health care, including abortion, birth control, and the privacy to make reproductive choices. Virginians made their reproductive opinions clear when they chose to elect representatives who vowed to protect reproductive rights.
This ban does not reflect the attitudes and beliefs of Virginians in 2023. A 2021 poll from the Public Religion Research Institute found that 71% of Virginians support the right of same-sex couples to marry. This percentage has only increased since the question began being asked of voters. In 2006, 53% of voters supported the marriage ban. If Virginia really is “for lovers,” it should recognize that love is love and grant all citizens the right to live their lives in peace. I support this amendment.
I am in support of all 3 bills. Regarding reproductive freedom, the government does not have any say in any other medical intervention so why does it need to intervene in a woman’s rights to choose how she handles her body and pregnancy. Furthermore, if we dictate a women’s right to choose, are we going to one day dictate hospice care, how a person is treated for cancer or their right to a well informed medical procedure? Regarding the voting rights of a convicted felon, my thoughts are simple. So long as they are a citizen of the US and governed under the laws of the U.S. they should have the right to vote. So long as they have completed their sentence/punishment for their crime. Regarding marriage equality, I believe marriage is a personal and mutual decision between 2 consenting adults! The government should not dictate who can marry who based upon sexual orientation. If so, we are only creating another vehicle for falsification of records or manipulation of the system. The government doesn’t dictate which sex can live together or sleep together or buy common property together. Why does the government need to meddle in marriage and only allow heterosexual couples to marry? The government needs to get out of the business of micromanaging peoples lives and do what it was elected to do which is to govern and not micromanage. All that being said if you want to bring in the religious aspect of reproductive rights and marriage equality. The basis of almost all religious beliefs is to not judge. Who gave the government the right to judge and dictate how a pregnant woman or human beings regardless of sexual orientation get to marry? What if your child or grandchild was raped or abused and became pregnant and she is forced to carry to term only traumatized by the sole thing the government made her carry through to term. This puts a further strain on the welfare system and heavily affects mental health which is already a major problem. What if your child or grandchild was living in shame and also lying to you about their happiness as a person and couldn’t marry the person they loved? That is an absolute personal choice and not a government choice! Please support all of the bills and vote yes on them. And please please begin to think with your conscious and put what you “think” will get you re elected or more money aside. You were elected to vote on issues based upon facts and laws and not re election or money.
With the removal of women’s protections with the destruction of Roe v. Wade, it is possible that marriage equality will be destroyed on a national level as well. Virginia must take the lead to protect all citizens. If Virginia really is “for lovers,” it should recognize that love is love and grant all citizens the right to live their lives in peace. I support this amendment.
I write in support of these amendments. Reproductive care should be with a woman, her loved ones and her health care provider - Not the government. Instead let’s invest in maternal care and programs that help families stay healthy. Let Virginia move Forward w safeguarding our right to marry whom we love.
To the committee: I write in strong support for approval of all three proposed Constitutional Amendments HJ1, HJ2 and HJ9. With regard to HJ1, It is past time to enshrine the personal right to reproductive freedom with protections from penalty and/or prosecution by the state. HJ2 would ensure that every Virginian who meets qualifications is given political rights including the right to vote. As for HJ9, marriage between two individuals is a fundamental right, and should be free of an antiquated and restrictive version of "marriage" that is no longer valid because of the Obergefell v. Hodges case. Thanks to the committee for consideration of all of these Constitutional Amendments. " Let freedom ring" across Virginia. Thank you, Brenda Bengtson
Virginia should enshrine that every individual has the fundamental right to reproductive freedom and that the right to make and effectuate one's own decisions about all matters related to one's pregnancy cannot be denied, burdened, or otherwise infringed upon by the Commonwealth. It is not the commonwealth's place to be a middleman for medical decisions. Virginia should enshrine that every person who meets the qualifications of voters set forth in the Constitution of Virginia shall have the fundamental right to vote in the Commonwealth and that such right shall not be abridged by law. There is no need to have additional hoops to jump through and require that the Governor or other appropriate authority to have the ability to deny the fundamental right to vote. Virginia must repeals the constitutional provision defining marriage as only a union between one man and one woman and provide protection and equality for it's people. The Commonwealth and its political subdivisions must be required to recognize any lawful marriage between two parties and to treat such marriages equally under the law, regardless of the sex, gender, race, or disability of such parties; to do any less denies humanity to the commonwealth's people. It is vital for Virginia to protect the dignity and humanity of it's citizens and by amending the Commonwealth's Constitution to enshrine and protect it's citizen's rights.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in Virginia's Constitution.
I am writing to oppose the law of abortion at 9 months . I do not believe or support abortion at all but especially a full term baby. Please consider my request to vote NO for this bill .
I strongly support these three bills to protect our freedoms.
This ban does not reflect the attitudes and beliefs of Virginians in 2023. A 2021 poll from the Public Religion Research Institute found that 71% of Virginians support the right of same-sex couples to marry. This percentage has only increased since the question began being asked of voters. In 2006, 53% of voters supported the marriage ban. This huge swing shows the massive shift in public opinion on the issue of marriage, and it is clear evidence that the antiquated ban should no longer be a part of Virginia’s constitution. It’s only fair to revisit a political question that has shown such a vast change since it was first broached. With the removal of women’s protections with the destruction of Roe v. Wade, it is possible that marriage equality will be destroyed on a national level as well. Virginia must take the lead to protect all citizens. If Virginia really is “for lovers,” it should recognize that love is love and grant all citizens the right to live their lives in peace.
It is important that women in Virginia are protected in their bodily autonomy (HJ1), that the state expands voting rights for citizens of the state (HJ2), and that individuals are allowed to marry regardless of their sexual orientation (HJ9).
I strongly support these three proposed amendments to the Virginia Constitution. Ensuring reproductive freedom is crucial for bodily autonomy and healthcare equity (HJ1). Safeguarding the right to vote and removing discriminatory barriers is vital to a healthy democracy (HJ2). Repealing the outdated prohibition on same-sex marriage and affirming the right to marry regardless of gender (HJ9) promotes equality and protects fundamental civil rights. These amendments will bring Virginia’s laws in line with modern values of freedom, equality, and justice for all citizens.
Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. Oppose HJ 9. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly support these three proposed amendments to the Virginia Constitution. Ensuring reproductive freedom is crucial for bodily autonomy and healthcare equity (HJ1). Safeguarding the right to vote and removing discriminatory barriers is vital to a healthy democracy (HJ2). Repealing the outdated prohibition on same-sex marriage and affirming the right to marry regardless of gender (HJ9) promotes equality and protects fundamental civil rights. These amendments will bring Virginia’s laws in line with modern values of freedom, equality, and justice for all citizens.
Hello House Privileges & Elections Committee, I am writing to voice my support for HJ1, HJ2, & HJ9. I wish for these Constitutional Amendments to be included on the ballot in order to secure our individual freedoms. My medical decisions should only be mine to give, not anyone else. I should be able to have autonomy over my body as an American citizen. To restrict reproductive freedom for women is to admit that America has become comparable to the Taliban. This also applies to marriage. No one has the right to force their personal opinions on love onto strangers & their relations through the government. As someone in an interracial marriage, where would the policing end? Will my marriage be next? Sincerely, Nelliel Azrael Herrera Knoefler
I strongly urge support for HJ1 to amend the Constitution to support the right of same-sex couples to marry and enjoy all the rights and responsibilities of that state. I also urge support for HJ9 to enshrine reproductive freedom in Virginia's constitution, allowing women to make decisions regarding their reproductive health with their doctors without interference from the government.
Obergefell v. Hodges provides that the right to marry is a fundamental right, regardless of sex or gender. Virginia must follow. I support repealing the constitutional provision as it is no longer valid under Obergefell. Of course all marriages should be treated equally under the law.
I support the right of two individuals to marry regardless of sex, race, color, or creed.
I am in favor of HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. The people of Virginia deserve the right to bodily autonomy and access to reproductive medical care. They deserve the right to marry the person they love. They also deserve to have their right to vote restored once they are released from incarceration. As another individual said here, Virginia is one of the best states in the continental US and with these changes, we can make it even better.
Marriage is a fundamental right between two consenting adults regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity, etc. No one, especially strangers, have any right to be in someone else's relationship. Consenting adults deserve to marry the person they choose to marry regardless of someone else's beliefs. A stranger's beliefs have no basis in someone else's relationship. Simply because someone does not understand or are uncomfortable with something does not inherently make it negative. My daughter has every right to marry her girlfriend. My friends have every right be together. Strangers on the street have every right to be with the person they choose to be with because that is their life, their choice, and minding my own business is not that hard. Protect marriage equality.
HJ This bill should be passed without any discussion. The government needs to remain out of women's doctors' offices. There is nothing else to be said. HJ9 This bill should be passed without any discussion. Marriage needs to remain legal regardless of gender. No one should have the right to dictate who someone loves and who they commit legally to.
I support these amendments because in a nation that values and prioritizes freedom, I believe that individuals should have autonomy over all their decisions. If we are to truly have our unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the government cannot restrict our autonomy in any way. Furthermore our government has a responsibility to protect our rights and by amending our state constitution we are solidifying that protection in the event that there are challenges to these rights federally.
Pass HJ1! All people have the right to reproductive freedom and choice. Pass HJ2! The right to vote should be restored. Pass HJ9! Marriage equality should be a constitutional right!
You have no idea the relief and security it brings me to know that our elected officials are working to ensure our freedoms. Thank you for your work to protect reproductive rights, voting rights, and marriage rights. Thank you for doing what's right for your constituents. Please vote yes to HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 to protect everyone whose voice may not be heard.
I have an 18 year old daughter telling me she’s afraid to have children one day. She fears if she’s in a life threatening condition, she will be left to die. As a therapist in Herndon Va, her sentiment is felt by ALL of my clients. College aged and young adult women are AFRAID to start a family. They also feel at a loss that they may lose the right to make medical decisions, including access to birth control. Support bill HJ1!!! Also support HJ2- people with disabilities and individuals that have served their time in prison deserve to have a voice. Restore their rights. Support HJ9- how dare anyone we elect feel they can determine who we love and who we marry. This is a right. Love is love.
Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
HJ 1 - I strongly oppose enshrining a "right" to abortion in Virginia's constitution. A policy of unlimited abortion should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 - I support HJ2. All who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 3 - I oppose HJ3, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
I fully support all 3 of these amendments in the pursuit of keeping Virginia a place where people of all kinds are honored and respected. This is the appropriate application of the power of states' rights and what we should want to be known for.
I am writing in support of HJ1 and HJ9. As a mother of three children and a Pediatric Nurse Practitioner, I have seen that all children should have equal access to love and create a family with whomever they choose. Our job as parents, healthcare providers, and leaders, is to love them and keep them safe. I believe that HJ1 and HJ9 would protect the children and adult residents of our Commonwealth from limitations on their freedom to marry and start a family with the person they love. Our job is to love and support our children as they grow, not limit their rights and make them feel like second-class citizens. This is especially important to me as a parent and healthcare provider for a very diverse patient population. Please help protect the freedoms of all residents of the Commonwealth of Virginia by supporting HJ1 and HJ9.
HJ1 - I oppose the so called right to an abortion. It degrades all human life. HJ2 - I support the restoration of rights. HJ9 - I oppose the changing of marriage. It is from the beginning between a man and a woman. All are not made to be married.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. HJ 1 also paves the way for future legislation threatening the choice of doctors, nurses, and other medical professionals in providing care that protects both women and the unborn. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1 : I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ2: I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
All of these bills reflect the importance of Virginians being able to exercise their agency in all areas of their lives. HJ1 speaks to the enshrined principle of doctor/patient confidentiality, which needs to be preserved for all persons but especially for women of childbearing age. HJ2 ensures the guarantee of one person/one vote on which our democracy was based - having expanded to recognize many more than male property holders. HJ9 ensures that "family" is not defined by law as specific to gender or earnings capability or household roles or any other false construct but, rather, by those who are in the relationship and dedicate themselves to this family in a public and purposeful way. For all these reasons, please vote to ensure that these bills pass.
I am in support of HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9, because I strongly believe that individuals deserve to choose if they get an abortion, vote, and who they marry. These rights should not be taken away.
I married my husband in 2017 after the supreme court decision. I was prepared to leave Virginia before then. Marriage Equality builds community and economy. Any state should be interested in creating laws that support the building and protecting of he community and economy. Mobile and affluent residents will leave the state in search of welcoming states where they can build their family and community. You don't have to be a democrat to want a state to be prosperous and welcoming.
This ban does not reflect the attitudes and beliefs of Virginians in 2024. Over 71% of Virginians support the right of same-sex couples to marry. The massive shift in public opinion on the issue of marriage in the past 20 years is clear evidence that the antiquated ban should no longer be a part of Virginia’s constitution. It’s only fair to revisit a political question that has shown such a vast change since it was first broached. I recently attended a wedding for two men. The traditional Episcopal service and massive outpouring of love by friends and family were so powerful that they drove one father to reconcile with his son over this issue. He recognized that this much love could not be bad. If Virginia really is “for lovers,” it should recognize that love is love and grant all citizens the right to live their lives in peace.
Speaking of HJ1, and HJ9. We need to return to our Christian roots and honor God in this state. Protect the unborn and respect that God instituted marriage to be between one man and one woman.
Marriage Equality This ban does not reflect the attitudes and beliefs of Virginians in 2023. A 2021 poll from the Public Religion Research Institute found that 71% of Virginians support the right of same-sex couples to marry. This percentage has only increased since the question began being asked of voters. In 2006, 53% of voters supported the marriage ban. This huge swing shows the massive shift in public opinion on the issue of marriage, and it is clear evidence that the antiquated ban should no longer be a part of Virginia’s constitution. It’s only fair to revisit a political question that has shown such a vast change since it was first broached. With the removal of women’s protections with the destruction of Roe v. Wade, it is possible that marriage equality will be destroyed on a national level as well. Virginia must take the lead to protect all citizens. If Virginia really is “for lovers,” it should recognize that love is love and grant all citizens the right to live their lives in peace.
HJ 1 – I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored. HJ 9 – I oppose HJ 9 Marriage is the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly support all three constitutional amendments. "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." HJ1 - Reproductive rights are human rights. Deciding whether to have a child and when to have a child is deeply personal and fundamentally tied to bodily autonomy and personal liberty. Human dignity demands that these decisions be at the sole discretion of each individual. Both pregnancy and childbirth have potential health risks, including death. Every person has a constitutional right to life, and to protect that right, must be empowered to choose whether to be subjected to that risk. This amendment will protect against violation of this right by government interference with personal decisions about pregnancy and medical care. On a practical level, reproductive freedoms have a positive effect on the health and economic well being of communities. Reproductive freedoms allow for prospective parents to family plan with intention, including bringing a child into the world when they are financially, emotionally, and physically ready to provide a good life for that child. Pregnancy can be dangerous, and robust medical care, including access to the full spectrum of reproductive care, is essential to protect those who choose to try to carry a child to term in the hopes of starting a family. We are already seeing how restrictions on reproductive freedoms exacerbate these dangers play out in real time as maternal mortality rates rise in states with restrictions on reproductive rights. I wholeheartedly support Virginia setting the example in protecting reproductive freedoms with this amendment. HJ2 - Chandra Bozelko said it well: “Voting is a right that belongs to all citizens, not just good or reformed ones. Denying citizens their rights isn’t an appropriate form of accountability because citizen status can’t be punished out of someone. [I]t’s not punishment. It’s power-stripping.” I support the important step forward this amendment takes in removing an unnecessary barrier to voting rights imposed upon felons. HJ9 - All people deserve the right to marry who they love; this right is inherent in the principle of personal liberty. There is no valid argument for government restriction of marriage rights on the basis of race or gender. The only arguments put forth by those who oppose marriage equality are rooted in religion; separation of church and state requires these arguments be cast aside. It is imperative that freedom of choice in marriage is protected. I unequivocally support this amendment.
I would like to declare my support for HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. HJ1 would ensure that everyone in Virginia would have the right to reproductive freedom and would allow for abortion to be used as one of the life-saving options should something go wrong during the nine months of pregnancy and that's because in order for a baby to be born healthy, the mother must be healthy throughout the process. Also, people who have completed their prison sentences should have their voting rights reinstated, especially if they have completely reformed as citizens since their imprisonment. And lastly, people in the LBGTQ+ community should also have the right to marry and marriage is for everyone of all genders, sexes and races.
I strongly support all three amendments: HJ1 - Fundamental right to reproductive freedom HJ2 - Right to vote - restoration of rights HJ9 - Marriage equality I realize this is the first step in a multi-year process to pass these amendments. I respectfully ask that you do all you can to move them forward. We need to make sure Virginia protects our rights and freedoms!
I support these amendments because in a nation that values and prioritizes freedom, I believe that individuals should have autonomy over all their decisions. If we are to truly have our unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the government cannot restrict our autonomy in any way. Furthermore our government has a responsibility to protect our rights and by amending our state constitution we are solidifying that protection in the event that there are challenges to these rights federally.
2025 SESSION INTRODUCED 24101382D HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 9 Offered January 10, 2024 Prefiled January 3, 2024 Proposing an amendment to Section 15-A of Article I of the Constitution of Virginia, relating to marriage between two individuals; repeal of same-sex marriage prohibition; affirmative right to marry. ————— Please keep Article I Bill of Rights as originally written. Section 15-A. Marriage Fundamental right to marry. Only a union between one man and one woman may be a marriage valid in or recognized by this Commonwealth and its political subdivisions. The right to marry is a fundamental right inherent in the liberty of persons, and marriage is one of the vital personal rights essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness. This Commonwealth and its political subdivisions shall not create or recognize a legal status for relationships of unmarried individuals that intends to approximate the design, qualities, significance, or effects of marriage and deny the issuance of a marriage license to two parties contemplating a lawful marriage based on the sex, gender, or race of such parties. Nor shall this Commonwealth or its political subdivisions create or recognize another union, partnership, or other legal status to which it is assigned the rights, benefits, obligations, qualities, or effects of marriage. This Commonwealth and its political subdivisions shall recognize any lawful marriage between two parties and treat such marriages equally under the law, regardless of the sex, gender, or race of such parties. Religious organizations and clergy acting in their religious capacity shall have the right to refuse to perform any marriage.
This testimony is in opposition to the proposed constitutional amendment in HJ1, that is most definitely not constitutional at all, nor represents the right to life we should all have as human beings, including the right to life for the littlest guy that’s in the womb. Child sacrifice is the most abhorrent practice, and it should never be legalized in a nation such as ours, or anywhere for that matter. We’re not supposed to take innocent life, but to protect, and uphold it, especially when it comes to children. We should be ashamed as a society that the idea of this would even enter into our very minds. The hands that are swift to shed blood should be restrained from doing this evil, and shouldn’t have the approval of others. Anyone that would murder their own child deserves the greatest form of punishment imaginable. Thankfully, God does have mercy on those who will repent and place their faith in Jesus Christ’s finished work on the cross. He rose again, so you could have eternal life, but you must turn from this wickedness, and trust in the only One that can save you from the wrath of God with His perfect righteousness you can never obtain for yourself. It’s a free gift you can’t earn, and you don’t deserve it, but it can be given to you today if you repent, and place your faith in His death, and sacrifice on the cross for sin. You will have to answer for this on the day of judgment if you pass this, but I plead with you that you would step back and think about what you’re doing if there is anything left of your conscience that isn’t seared by sin. I also testify against HJ9 because God created marriage to be between one man and one woman. If you can’t even define what a man or a woman is, then it truly shows that sin has caused your very common sense to be pushed aside, so you can act on desires that are contrary to God, and His Law. If there’s any ounce of human decency left in you, then I urge you to consider not pushing this forward. If you do this, the ramifications of your actions are going to have a ripple effect on so many lives, families, and the very foundation of our society. You will be held responsible for your actions, even if for a time you believe you will get away with it. God sees all things, even the very intentions of your own hearts. You will have to look at your own face in the mirror every single day knowing that you did this, because you’d rather please man than please God, the One that created you, and gave you life to begin with. Please ponder on this, and give it real thought, and care, because the very fabric of our society depends on it, and God is watching.
HJ1: I support this bill and reproductive freedom because it doesn’t make sense to restrict a medical procedure that can save a person’s life and it doesn’t make sense to have a child born to a parent who doesn’t want them or to overburden the adoption or foster care system even more in the case that child born from an unwanted pregnancy is put up for adoption—for both the quality of life of parents and the unborn child, abortion must stay legal. HJ2: I support this bill because a person who pays taxes to a government—regardless of previous felonies which they’ve already paid for in fines or incarceration—should be able to vote and return to being active members of society if they so wish. HJ9: I support this bill because the right to lawful marriage is a liberty that should not be restricted based on the sex, gender, or race of the individuals involved.
Please include these items to continue basic protections for all individuals as equals under the constitution and the law.
Herring “right to abortion” amendment – HJ1 • I strongly oppose HJ1 which enshrinses a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. • HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. • HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. • A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. • Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. Parker – restoring voting rights – HJ2 • I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. Sickles – marriage – HJ9 • I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. • Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
The HJ2 bill is a very important bill in my opinion. People who are incarcerated are disproportionately disadvantaged due to race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, or other compounding social factors. This leads to what amounts to voter suppression in my eyes for people who have previously been incarcerated. A good example of this in my eyes is past drug charge offenders that have recovered, which is a group of people I have interacted a good amount with over the past year. A lot of these people are focused on truly providing good to their community, and I feel that if they already served their time they deserve to have a voice that counts in public elections. The HJ9 bill is also incredibly important for the civil rights of citizens of Virginia. Allowing marriage between two women or two men, and validating the marriages that exist already, is an important step towards freedom for the people of this state. Not allowing same sex marriage would be not only bigoted, but extremely disheartening and invalidating for people that love someone of the same sex.
With gratitude to the Virginia Catholic Conference and as a born-and-raised Virginian, I would like to join my support to their stances on the three proposed bills: HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment - I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. - HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. - HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. - A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. - Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights - I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage - I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. - Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. Sincerely, Mary Clare Durel
I strongly support the HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 amendments to the Virginia Constitution. America should be a place that guarantees the fundamental rights and choices of women, celebrates and encourages love in all forms, and protects the act of voting for all qualified citizens. If the nation as a whole can't ensure these rights, I hope that my state at least can.
Abortion is a right that every American should have. Early in the pregnancy, the fetus is not a sentient being like the person carrying it, and it's rights should not be prioritized over the rights of the sentient, conscious individual carrying the fetus. Young girls have been forced to bear the child of their rapist. That is not something anybody should have to do. In instances where the fetus will harm or kill the person carrying it, that person should be allowed to get an abortion. In instances where the person carrying it was raped, they should be allowed to get an abortion. If somebody cannot care for this child, they should be allowed to get an abortion. Attempting to remove this basic bodily right is illogical at best and cruel at worst. All people deserve to vote. It is an obligation and right as an American citizen. Does committing a crime remove your citizenship? Are you no longer an American because you committed a felony? What about the context, what if you were extremely young and you are now a changed person? Should people not be allowed any say in their leader because of an action taken in their past? Marriage is not between a man and a woman. Queer people have spent so many years oppressed because of who they love and it is ridiculous that in 2024 there are still people who believe it is immoral and wrong. It's natural (many animals are gay) and as long as it is between two consenting individuals, what goes on in their love life is no ones business but theirs. Are there really not any bigger issues to be worried about?
I support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Choices about an individual's body belong in the hands of that individual. There should be no involvement of the government, or religious institutions, in decisions that are best made between an individual and their medical providers. No one should be put in a situation where they could be forced to make harmful and difficult choices about their reproductive health for fear of legal repercussions. Voting rights should be guaranteed for every Virginia citizen. If a convicted felon is allowed to run for federal office, then someone released from incarceration should be able to vote, without having to be confirmed by the Governor. All citizens should have the right to have their voice heard and their vote counted. Legal marriage should not be restricted or discriminated against because of race, sex, or gender.
HJ-1: Abortion is murder. Amending the constitution to enshrine a right to murder is evil and absurd. The fact that I need to write an online comment to a committee that is asking the question should murder be protected in our constitution? blows my mind. NO! Absolutely not! As civil magistrates you are assigned by God with the role of executing justice on evil doers, as seen in Romans 13. Declaring open season on pre born humans is not in your job description. Stay in your lane! There is a very real God, who you are accountable to. You are not God, you do not have the authority to decide that certain persons have no right to live based on your arbitrary standards of location and development. God has already spoken, the 6th commandment states you shall not murder. Passing HJ-1 is a blatant violation of God's law. And you will be held accountable before His judgement seat. If you wish to be spared Gods wrath. I suggest that this motion be dismissed, that you never again assume the Godlike authority to decide which of His image bearers have value, and you repent of your sins and put your trust fully in Jesus Christ who gave His Life so that we would no longer need to face the judgement we deserve. God saw His sacrifice and His wrath was satisfied, no other sacrifice is necessary, by His stripes we are healed. False God's will always demand more blood, and this is on full display here. Knock it off. HJ 9 – I strongly oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. God created the institution of marriage to be between one man and one woman. Man does not have the right to attempt to redefine it.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I wish to let you know of my strong support for all three: HJ1 - Fundamental right to reproductive freedom HJ2 - Right to vote - restoration of rights HJ9 - Marriage equality I realize this is the first step in a multi-year process to pass these amendments. I respectfully ask that you do all you can to move them forward. We need to make sure Virginia protects our rights and freedoms! Thank you!
The right to reproductive freedom in HJ1 is paramount to the health and welfare of all people in the state of Virginia. This bill would ensure that a mother is not forced to endure any pregnancy without their consent. It would also prevent the cruel treatment of having to endure delivering a stillborn child that could have been removed months prior to delivery. Forcing anyone to undergo such a fate is cruel and inhumane. It is also worth noting that disallowing family planning measures would place an undue burden on Virginia taxpayers. Not only would we be compensating for the healthcare of a child being placed into the adoption system, but also the associated costs of placing a child up for adoption. This process is also cruel for the person who would be placed up for adoption as it does not take consideration as to whether this decision would lead to a life of pain and misery. In summary, abortion is a fundamental right because of the suffering that is prevented from this procedure. I support HJ2 from a more commonsense perspective. This bill ensures that no person is disenfranchised from voting in the state of Virginia. It is only fair to allow those who have been incarcerated to have a voice in the operation of this state. Finally, I also support HJ3 for the unalienable right of any people to marry each other. There is no framework for who is or is not allowed to marry in the United States Constitution. This being said, there is also a predominant LGBTQ+ community here in the state of Virginia. To deny the right to marry for people in this community would also deny their right to the pursuit of happiness as well as the unenumerated rights outlined by the ninth amendment of the US Constitution. Even with this said, there is no harm and only public welfare to be gained by passing this bill. Each and every one of us has the freedom to our own spiritual beliefs and as such the right to mary any consenting adult follows in line with said beliefs.
I strongly support HJ1, and the fundamental right of reproductive freedom for all individuals. I believe that all decisions concerning pregnancy should be between a woman and her health care provider. I support HJ2 - I believe that once an individual has completed serving a sentence for a felony and has paid his or her debt to society, that voting rights should be restored without requiring action by the governor or other state officials to restore his or her civil rights. I also support the provisions regarding persons who lack the capacity to understand the act of voting. I strongly support HJ9 and the affirmative right to marry of two parties regardless of sex, gender, or race , and the requirement that the Commonwealth shall recognize all such marriages and treat them equally under the law
H1- "Right to Abortion" I am a Roman Catholic who strongly opposes HJ1--"Right to Abortion" m Virginia's Constitution, significantly because an unborn baby is not a component of his/her mother's body, but instead is a separate human being with his/her own unique spiritual soul given that baby at the moment of conception. In this day and age, a prospective mother has sufficient resources to decide not to conceive a child--through medical methods, Natural Family Planning (NFP), or abstainance--all very effective and inexpensive and effective means to remain childless if one takes the time to purchase the (of-the-shelf) preventitives; the willingness to study and utilize ones=;s fertility schedule or lack thereof; or the self-control to remain celebate . There are also "day-after" pills that can effective in immediately used in the case of rape which block fertilization of the prospective mother's ovum. There are also a plethera of organizations willing to place unwanted babies and children of all ages, with adopters desirous of providing children with good and safe homes. HJ2: Resoring Voting Rights: I will only support HJ2 for those individuals who have completed their sentences and wish to have their voting rights restored IF they have shown a firm resolve to become lawful citizen of both the Commonwealth of Virginia, as well as the US Government and especially accept the US Constitution & Amendments as our one form of Government. HJ9-Marriage: I oppose HJ9 which wold remove the Constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Not onlyi does marriage have an original designand urpose that predates any nation, religion or law; it especially protects and supports its primary mission to create and bring up children who will use their gifts and talents to improve this world with their good works. A marriage, whether natural (based on common law), judicial (independent of specific faith systems), and spiritual (faith-based) all improve the lives of our citizens because a formal, life-time (if possible), committment is both psychologically sound, as well as a healthy way to, live minimizing the number of often fatal veneral diseases, including AIDS, some types of cancer. I thank you, in advance, considering seriously the opinions I have here stated. Very Respectfully Yours, Tracy MacGovern McCauley, Stanardsville, VA
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. A person's right to reproductive freedom and bodily autonomy is a fundamental to a free society and restriction of such rights in other states is causing a rise in maternal mortality rates. Healthcare providers should not be penalized for protecting the rights of their patients. A person's right to vote should be reinstated upon completion of their incarceration and should not be left to the whims of whomever is in office. Marriage should not be restricted because of race, sex, or gender and the language in the Constitution should be amended to reflect this.
I am in support of HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. These amendments will allow for for people to have autonomy in all their decisions.
I am strongly in support of HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Reproductive rights are human rights. Without women having autonomy over their bodies, many women will die from health complications, not to mention bring babies into non-ideal situations. The parents suffer and the children suffer. Additionally, I am strongly in support of the right for lgbtq+ people to marry. There is no scientific basis for the opposition to gay marriage rights, the only opposition comes from certain interpretations of religion or pure emotion. These religious perspectives and emotions should not be forced onto the choices of other people.
I strongly oppose HJ1 please vote to reject this amendment. I support HJ2 please vote FOR this amendment. I oppose HJ9 please vote to reject this amendment. Thank you!
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I truly feel this is wrong , and it shouldn’t happen because lives are at stack not only the child but the mother also and giving people the right to end pregnancy that late is completely wrong and I stand against it . It shouldn’t be an option for someone to make that choice unless the child has passed in the wound and is mo longer living.
One man one woman Marriage is between one man and one woman. I completely oppose anything that does not keep the bond of marriage between one man and one woman.
Yes to HJ2 (voting rights), no to HJ1 and HJ9. I.e., NO to killing babies, and NO to defining marriage as anything other than what it is.
I strongly oppose enshrining any presumed right to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. Abortion ends an innocent human life, a life that should be protected regardless of the hardships the baby’s might mother face. I oppose removing the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion, or law.
I support bill HJ1. Abortion is a term used medically regardless of whether the act was intentional or not. Impeding reproductive freedom impedes access to appropriate care for both the mother and the fetus. I support bill HJ2. I believe felons should have the right to vote once they have served their sentences. I support bill HJ9. I believe the right to marry should be available to all humans regardless of sex, gender, or race.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 as I believe each of these amendments are integral to upholding the American values of: liberty and the pursuit of happiness. To revoke these rights from people, to treat them as other and undeserving of these freedoms, is completely unethical under The Declaration of Independence and the values of America as a whole. Not to mention basic morality. I believe it is imperative to protect our citizens liberty and rights to bodily autonomy--in both marriage and a person's pregnancy. As well as allowing citizens, regardless of transgressions, to have the right to vote as they live within and participate in our society and community as well. Virginia is one of the best states in the continental US. I believe with these amendments we will be even better. It shows love, care, and respect to all our citizens. I believe in the good heartedness of our representatives and hope that these amendments will inspire other states to follow suit in the goal of creating a better world for every persons.
I STRONGLY oppose HJ9 which grants marriage status to 2 (and perhaps 3 or 4 in days to come) "parties". Where is the state protecting children from potential pedophilia. The perversion of homosexuality is not the same as the path to sanctity created by God. Marriage is between one man and one woman. (<-- PERIOD)
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. Thank you for your time and consideration.
Because of the rushed nature and secrecy of this meeting, in addition to not allowing any In person testimony, as a citizen of Virginia, I am most concerned and sense a sinister nature to these proceedings. You have been elected by the citizens of Virginia and, by keeping us in the dark, is NOT what you were hired by us to do. We demand to have a voice! I implore you to listen to the citizens before changing language and/or rushing through Bills that are not in line with what the majority of Virginia citizens support. That is unethical and you will be held accountable, hopefully by the citizens of Virginia when you next come up for re-election but certainly by God, our creator, whether you choose to acknowledge Him or not.
HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 all address important individual rights. Reproductive freedom is essential to women’s ability to think and act for themselves, keep themselves safe, and made decisions to govern their own lives like any other adult. It is also essential to protect the rights of LGBTQ people, who deserve to marry like anyone else. Any threat to their rights is a threat to us all. Finally, in a time when there are regular threats to people’s access to the polls, we must protect their voting rights. The Commonwealth of Virginia must not bow to pressure from the federal government and must instead protect the rights of ALL its citizens.
I wholeheartedly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Bodily autonomy is a fundamental freedom that every person should wish to protect; voting rights should not be left to the whims of whomever is in office; and marriage should not be restricted because of race, sex, or gender. These are basic tenets of a truly free nation.
Please support these 3 constitutional amendments that work to enshrine the rights of every day citizens. People should have the right to determine what is best for their healthcare with trained medical professionals, not politicians. Persons who have fulfilled their debt to society through incarceration should be able to vote once released; they pay taxes and should be able to have a voice. Adults should have the right to marry and receive the same protections and rights that have been bestowed upon heterosexual couples. Government should be protecting and uplifting its citizens, not tearing them down. Please be a positive example to the rest of the country.
HJ1(support)-government have no saying in ANY reproductive rights on individuals AT ALL, no state no province no federal not even the slightest. HJ2(against)-criminals are still human as long as they are citizens they should be able to vote HJ9(support)-and people should marry who ever they want, imagine you love this person and they love you back and government tell you you're wrong because they quote some random book.
I oppose HJ9 which grants marriage status to 2 (and perhaps 3 or 4 in days to come) "parties". Where is the state protecting children from potential pedophilia. If committee members and Virginians disagree with marriage being between one man and one woman, he/she should discuss it with the Creator of marriage!
HJ 1 - I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 - I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 - I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I STRONGLY support these three amendments to our state constitution. Protecting women’s reproductive freedom, restoring voting rights to people convicted of felonies, and ensuring marriage equality are all deeply important to me and the people I love. I want to protect and support all Virginians', rights, regardless of their political affiliation, with these three constitutional amendments!
I support marriage equality and I hope that our elected officials in Virginia will honor that and honor my marriage.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I support all three bills.
HJ1 - Herring: I support that all individuals should have access to the fundamental right to reproductive freedom. Not all situations are black and white. What benefit is there if we deny or restrict access to a potentially life saving solution for said person? Such a heavy decision needs to stay between patient and provider. HJ2 - Bennett-Parker: If an individual continues to pay State and Federal taxes after being reformed/released, then I believe the right to vote should be able to be reestablished as well. HJ9 - Sickles: I support that marriage between individuals should extend to LGBTQ+ residents. Pursuing happiness should extend to all.
I support all 3 bills to amend Virginia's constitution to protect civil rights and personal liberty.
Abortion is murder and should in no way be permitted. Killing another human is not anyone's "right". Marriage was ordained by God to be between 1 man and 1 women and should not be deviated from.
I support the right to abortion and same sex marriage
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
In addition to HJ1, I also support HJ2 and HJ9. If a convicted felon is able to win an election and hold office, any Virginian and American should be able to vote in an election. In regards to marriage, every Virginian should have the right to choose who they want to marry regardless of gender.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I urge you to move HJ9 forward on the path to amending the Virginia constitution to affirm the right to marry. The year after Virginia passed the one man-one woman amendment, my husband transitioned to live as a woman. We are now getting close to our 50th anniversary, still married, still happy. Our same-sex marriage harms no one any more than our marriage did before my spouse's gender became public. As a member of PFLAG, I've gotten to know families with a child who is transgender. Both parents and transgender children worry and wonder whether there will be a loving relationship in their future. They need to know that the government will not erect artificial, unnecessary barriers to their future happiness. As PFLAG likes to say, vote with love.
HJ1 I am opposed to enshrining a right to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. It severely jeopardizes the few protections for unborn children ;such as ban on partial birth abortion and parental consent )this is wrong and must be stopped), abortion until birth should not be allowed. I urge you to work on policies that uphold the dignity of every mother and child. HJ2 I support All people who have served their punishment should have their rights restored. I oppose HJ9 that removes the constitutional provision of marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any government or law.
- Ranked choice voting weakens the democratic process by opening the door for one party rule in a state. - Reproductive freedom is a euphemism for abortion access and the fact that the term is being used proves that it is a scandal. An individual does not have the right to kill a person they find inconvenient. To enshrine this as a constitutionally protected right would be to invite the continued judgment of God upon our state. Magistrates have the duty to restrain evil not establish it in law. - Marriage is pre-political and it is the duty of any sane society to honor and protect it. It is a permanent covenant between a man and a woman to establish a family (God willing) which in turn builds healthy communities. To merely reduce it to some kind of relationship between any two individuals is a detriment to our society and an offense against God. We’ve already seen the devastation wrought by divorce, adultery, and sodomy by judicial decree and statute. Why make it even more ingrained in our legal system?
I strongly support the HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 amendments to the Virginia Constitution. America should be a place that guarantees the fundamental rights and choices of women, celebrates and encourages love in all forms, and protects the act of voting for all qualified citizens. If the nation as a whole can't ensure these rights, I hope that my state at least can.
I am writing to express my strong support for HJ9, a resolution to amend the Virginia Constitution to protect marriage equality for all. Every person deserves the right to love and marry freely. As your constituent, I urge you to support HJ9 and make this amendment a priority. The time to protect ALL Virginians is now, and I hope you will stand with us by supporting this critical amendment.
I am writing to express my strong support for the proposed constitutional amendments concerning marriage equality, voting rights, and reproductive freedom. These amendments are vital steps toward ensuring that all people in our state are treated with dignity, respect, and fairness under the law. 1. Marriage Equality Amendment: I fully support the repeal of the constitutional provision that defines marriage as between one man and one woman. Marriage is a fundamental human right, and every individual, regardless of their gender or sexual orientation, should have the ability to marry the person they love without discrimination. This amendment brings our state into alignment with the Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell v. Hodges and reaffirms the core values of liberty and equality for all citizens. 2. Voting Rights Amendment: I wholeheartedly support the provision that ensures the right to vote is not abridged for any person who has completed their incarceration for a felony. Our democracy is strongest when every citizen has an equal opportunity to participate in the electoral process. By allowing those who have served their time and re-entered society to regain their voting rights automatically, we are taking an important step toward restorative justice and ensuring that all voices are heard. 3. Reproductive Freedom Amendment: The right to make personal decisions about one’s reproductive health is a fundamental human right. This amendment is crucial in protecting individuals from government interference in their personal choices regarding pregnancy. I strongly believe that every person should have the autonomy to make decisions about their body and their future, without fear of prosecution or discrimination. This amendment safeguards the health and well-being of individuals, and it is imperative that we ensure these rights remain protected in our state. In conclusion, these amendments are critical to securing a more just and equitable future for all Virginians. I urge our lawmakers to pass these amendments and to continue working toward a state where every individual, regardless of gender, race, sexual orientation, or background, is treated with the respect and dignity they deserve. Thank you for your consideration.
AAUW Virginia supports the right of all Virginians to have the fundamental right inherent in the liberty of an individual to marry whom they wish. 71% of Virginians, as of 2021, support this right. This deeply personal decision should not be limited or delineated by government exerting unnecessary control, except in matters of importance to the state. like age minority. Virginia led in creating the Bill of Rights and Virginia must lead in creating personal marital freedom for all of its citizens. AAUW VA urges the passing of HJ 9.
HJ1 - For decades, the Democratic Party has urged us to support them, suggesting that voting for them is essential to protect Roe v. Wade rather than fully codifying it into law, which would ensure abortion access as a legal right. Women in Texas are facing serious risks due to inadequate medical care while doctors are constrained in their ability to help. We must ensure that Virginia does not follow this troubling path. HJ2 - If an individual with 34 felony convictions can become president, why do we continue to behave as though those with felony records do not deserve the restoration of their voting rights? Individuals who have been released from prison have fulfilled their sentences and deserve the opportunity to reintegrate into society. HJ 9 Gay marriage is the law of the land. These families deserve the same ongoing protections afforded to married families in the Commonwealth of Virginia.
• I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. • Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Please support HJ1, HJ2 and HJ9. Being able to commit to the person you love, having authority over your own body, and being able to exercise your voting rights once imprisonment is over should forever be inalienable rights in our great state.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
PLEASE OPPOSE HJ1 I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2 All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ9 Marriage is the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1 Reproductive Health Every Virginia resident should have access to affordable, quality health care, including abortion, birth control and the privacy to make reproductive choices. Abortion is not always the ending of ending a pregnancy it it also a medical procedure that terminates a nonviable pregnancy and saves a women's life. Abortion should be legal, safe, and the decision left to those who are pregnant with guidance from medical professionals. True democracy depends on equal rights for all people. Not only is the right to a safe and legal abortion a matter of personal freedom, it’s also a major factor in the movements for racial and economic equality. Black individuals, and all underserved communities, already experience unfair barriers and limited access to adequate healthcare services. HJ2 Voting Rights The majority of Virginians believe that all qualified citizens should have access to the ballot, including those who have served their time for felony convictions and people with disabilities who want to participate in the democratic process. I support an amendment to the Virginia Constitution to guarantee that people who have been disenfranchised due to a felony conviction will have their rights automatically restored upon completion of their sentences, without additional steps or paperwork, and to ensure people with disabilities never lose their rights without an appropriate judicial finding. HJ9 Marriage Equality The 2021 polls from the Public Religion Research Institute found that 71% of Virginians support the right of same-sex couples to marry. In 2006, 53% of voters supported the ban of same-sex couple marriage. This huge swing shows the massive shift in public opinion on this issue of marriage, and it is clear evidence that the antiquated ban should no longer be a part of Virginia’s constitution. It’s only fair to revisit a political question that has shown such a vast change since it was first broached. With the removal of women’s protections with the destruction of Roe v. Wade, it is possible that marriage equality will be destroyed on a national level as well. Virginia must take the lead to protect all citizens. Thank you. Anne Alston CD11
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly support these bills. This is about freedom.
I support this amendment to remove the outdated constitutional amendment restricting same sex marriage. The United States of America is a secular society and representative democracy. Marriage is a civil institution and while individuals are welcome to adhere to their own religious beliefs, the state should offer the civil benefits of marriage to all its citizens equally without imposing one group's religion on all its citizens.
I would like to strongly express my support for all three bills, each of which greatly enhance the rights and dignity of the people of the Commonwealth.
• I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. • Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
MARRIAGE IS BETWEEN A MAN AND A WOMEN AS STATED IN THE BIBLE. NO OTHER FORM OF INDIVIDUALS SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO GET MARRIED. LETS DO THE RIGHT THING. THIS WILL MEAN BENEFITS AND COSTS. LETS KEEP THE AMENDMENT AS IS. THIS NEEDS TO HAPPEN TO KEEP MY VOTES.
No restrictions on abortions. No liability for abortions. No criminality for abortions. Marriage is a human right between amongst consenting adults. Population in prisons and jail is counted for the purposes of population for redistricting, no human should be denied the right to vote.
HJ 1 – I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution because no such right exists. There is no right to murder an innocent human. HJ 1 violates the constitution, specifically the 14th amendment ("no State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law"), the 6th commandment of God ("Thou shall not murder"). It is disgusting and abhorrent that delegates from the state of VA would seek to violate their own oath to uphold the constitution of the United States and seek to enshrine a right to deny equal human rights to certain Virginian citizens by dehumanizing them based on their level of development and location. I urge you to work instead for policies that protect the life and dignity of every human being, to do justice on behalf of the fatherless instead of making them your prey. In fact, God commands you to do as much. HJ 9 – I strongly oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. God created the institution of marriage to be between one man and one woman. Man does not have the right to attempt to redefine it.
Please repeal the constitutional provision defining marriage as only a union between one man and one woman as well as the related provisions that are no longer valid as a result of the United States Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges. This one is long overdue.
The intention of my comment is to express my support of marriage equality. The Supreme Court granted same-sex couples the right to marry nationwide in 2015. This decision should be honored and protected in the state of Virginia.
I am not opposed to granting the same benefits of as committed relationship based on sexual orientation. In order to end the controversy in our culture, I propose we eliminate the word marriage and its related forms (e.g., married, marry, etc.) be replaced in the legal lexicon with something similar to civil union, relationship contract, etc. Term marriage can be used in a religious context, but legally it will not be used as a type of license, any tax clause/status, any aspect of estate distribution, communal property rights, etc.
Marriage was created by God for the good of man and woman and society. This is a Win-Win-Win situation. Don't mess with it. I oppose HJ-9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Let's keep intact marriage's original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Virginia’s marriage equality ban no longer reflects the beliefs of its citizens. A 2021 poll showed 71% of Virginians support same-sex marriage, up from just 47% in 2006, highlighting a major shift in public opinion. Given this change, it’s time to remove the outdated ban from Virginia’s constitution. With the rollback of Roe v. Wade, national marriage equality could also be at risk, and Virginia should lead in protecting all citizens' rights. If the state truly is “for lovers,” it must affirm that love is love for everyone.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution. Without them, my husband and I are choosing to not to have children due to the risk. Women should have control of their bodies. These decisions should be made between a woman and her doctor no one else. These rights must be protected.
Today I would like to address critical issues that affect our society and the fundamental rights of individuals. We must protect marriage equality and ensure the preservation of same-sex marriage. This is not merely a matter of legal recognition; it is about upholding the dignity and rights of all individuals to love and marry who they choose without fear of discrimination. Additionally, we must prioritize access to affordable healthcare, including necessary services such as abortion. This is a matter of bodily autonomy—our bodies, our choices. Every individual must have the right to make informed decisions regarding their own health and well-being, free from judgement or limitation. As we consider amendments to legislation, let us not forget the importance of these issues. It is imperative that we advocate for policies that protect these rights and ensure equitable access to healthcare for every member of our community. Thank you for considering these vital amendments.
As to all three fast-tracking proposed amendments: You are aiming to skirt a deliberative process with robust discussion among all Virginians. You are doing this because you KNOW that your desire to harm and eliminate unborn children when you deem a child inconvenient (despite having been a child yourself!) and to alter what is true marriage which creates families where children are raised with one mother and one father are not popular measures and thus you act as surreptitiously as you can. How underhanded! I oppose HJ 9 and you should reject HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. I demand that you reject HJ 1. Abortion kills children and those children are the future of Virginia. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child and raises those children in families with one father and one mother.
I don’t want any change to the Virginia constitution enshrining the death of unborn babies.
HJ1-Herring: I strongly support the right of every individual to have the fundamental right to reproductive freedom and that the right to make and effectuate one’s own decisions about all matters related to one’s pregnancy cannot be denied, burdened, or otherwise infringed upon by the Commonwealth. The right to bodily autonomy lives within the person and not at the state, and affects all freedoms and overlaps with so many other institutions including that of the economy, healthcare, poverty, education, and safety from partner violence. I have worked personally as a citizen advocate in the GA for this for 15 years. HJ9-Sickles: I support : Repeals the constitutional provision defining marriage as only a union between one man and one woman as well as the related provisions that are no longer valid as a result of the United States Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015). The amendment provides that the right to marry is a fundamental right inherent in the liberty of persons. I have worked on this issue for 15 years as a citizen activist and mobilizer of others at the GA to share about their personal stories and how the right to marriage and equal citizenship is a right for LGBTQ+ residents.
Please oppose those bills!!
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in most states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion, or law.
I support HJ1 and HJ9. Women should have control over their own bodies. I cannot believe this is even an issue: how is it possible in this day and age that we are discussing whether someone else can decide whether we carry a child or not? This should be a private decision made between a woman and her doctor. Likewise, marriage should be between two people who love each other, and it matters not one whit what gender they are.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution. Please secure the fundamental human rights for all Virginians. I fully support reproductive freedom, restoration of voting rights, and marriage equality.
HJ1: I OPPOSE. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. It could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2: All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ9: I OPPOSE HJ 9. Marriage has been defined as the union of one man and one woman since before definitions were needed. Our current state constitution reflects this truth passed down through millenia. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law, and is proven to be the best possible medium for raising healthy children.
An old addive states: my right to swing my hand stops at your nose. The right for a woman to terminate the life of an unborn person, stops at the child’s unique DNA, heart beat and brain waves. No one has the right to kill a healthy human being. I adamantly oppose granting any such right that grants a parent to kill their offspring as a means of family planning.
HJ1: I support the right of every individual to have reproductive freedom HJ2: I support the restoration of voting rights to those who have completed the terms of their punishment for crimes HJ9: I support marriage equality for every consenting adult human beings
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution. As a practicing psychiatrist, I believe these rights are incredibly important to supporting the mental health of the citizens of Virginia.
HJ 9 – Marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. I know you are trying to ram these bills through due to the results of the election. You obviously have learned nothing from the people speaking their voice. You should be ashamed of yourselves. One day you will stand before Our Lord and Judge. May God have mercy on your souls.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I oppose HJ1 because it is harmful to families: men, women , children, and our society. Abortion should never be offered as an option to women because it does so much harm to them and it’s shrouded in lies of the evil it causes. We do not have the right to harm an innocent person nor should we ever want to. I support restoring voting rights to reformed persons. HJ2 I oppose redefining marriage which we also have no power to do so and we would be lying if we pretended to. Our society can support those unable to marry in more helpful ways. HJ9
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
RE: HJ1: I support the right of women to have access to all services which support their private choices in matters of reproductive health. RE: HJ2: I support the restoration of voting rights to those who have completed the terms of their punishment for crimes RE: HJ9: I support marriage equality for all adult citizens.
HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 are essential to securing fundamental human rights for all Virginians. As an active and consistent voter I fully support reproductive freedom, restoration of voting rights, and marriage equality. My vote will always be for candidates who stand for and defend these rights
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I am against HJ1. A "Right to Abortion" should not be cemented into our constitution. It would take away the ability to make any future adjustment and in one action take away existing laws without examination. It would be more unifying and better for everyone to give needed help to both mother and child. I am for HJ2 to restore voting rights to those who have completed their sentences. I am against HJ3 since we must do all we can to ensure the health and well being of future Virginia citizens. There have been many studies done that show that an intact family with a mother and father is the way to do this
• I oppose HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. • I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. • I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1 It is my religious belief and my legal belief that the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution and its Virginia corollary confirms that an unborn child at the moment of conception is a person with the right to life. Thus, I oppose HJ1. Labelling abortion as a "right" is simply contrary to reality and natural law. HJ 2 I support the restoration of voting rights for those persons whose voting rights have been lost due to criminal convictions once their incarceration has been completed. HJ 9 I oppose HJ 9 as it, too, contradicts reality and natural law. What is "up" is "up" and what is "down" is "down" and legislation cannot say otherwise. 1984 is alive and well if this Resolution results in an amendment to the Constitution of Virginia.
HJ1 OPPOSE • I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. • HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. • A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. • Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. Women in crisis pregnancies need encouragement, counseling, resources and support -- not abortion. HJ 19 - OPPOSE • I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. • Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. Every child deserves a mother and father in a marriage that is freely entered into with an enduring commitment of love, sacrifice, and service toward each other and their children. As the federal government has discovered, a one-man one-woman marriage is the naturally designed, foundation for family life. It may not always be possible in practice, but it essential for human flourishing, public health, and economic opportunity. The courtesy of a written reply is requested.
I support All three bills
• I oppose HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. • I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. • I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I adamantly oppose HJ1,HJ2, and HJ9 into the Virginia Constitution. The stance of all 3 proposals is MUCH too extreme and abhorrent for society as well as the VA Constitution. As a retired Mental Health RN I have seen the results of women who have had abortions to include inpatient hospitalization due to the after affects. Women deserve better than this. Abortion delivers one dead baby and one wounded woman!
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for ensuring these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose HJ 1 enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states.
HJ1. Support ALL life from conception to natural death. Vote no on HJ1. HJ9. Protect real marriage - the union of 1 man & 1 woman only. Vote no on HJ9.
Please protect our rights and freedoms. We want body autonomy and the freedom to marry as we see fit. Religion does not belong in politics. You have a duty to defend our rights against religious ideals that marginalize the people you represent.
I oppose HJ9. Marriage as the union of one man and one woman is in conformity with natural law and predates any nation, religion, or law.
I support these amendments because in a nation that values and prioritizes freedom, I believe that individuals should have autonomy over all their decisions. If we are to truly have our unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the government cannot restrict our autonomy in any way. Furthermore our government has a responsibility to protect our rights and by amending our state constitution we are solidifying that protection in the event that there are challenges to these rights federally.
HJ1: I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ2: I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ9: I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I support HJ1 under the basis of women should have the right to decide what happens with their bodies. I support HJ2 under the basis of mistakes should not render a human unable to participate in democracy. I support HJ9 under the basis of no outside force should be able to stop two consenting adults from getting married.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
1. Every Virginian should have access to affordable, quality healthcare, including abortion and birth control, with the freedom to make private reproductive choices. Abortion must remain safe, legal, and guided by medical professionals. Protecting reproductive rights safeguards other freedoms, such as marriage equality, contraception access, and privacy in personal decisions. 2. Most Virginians believe all qualified citizens deserve voting rights, including those who’ve served felony sentences and people with disabilities who wish to vote. I support a constitutional amendment for automatic rights restoration upon sentence completion, with no extra steps, and to protect the voting rights of people with disabilities unless a court rules otherwise. Voting rights should not be permanently lost due to past mistakes. Virginia should amend its Constitution to ensure fair restoration and foster civic participation. 3.Virginia’s marriage equality ban no longer reflects the beliefs of its citizens. A 2021 poll showed 71% of Virginians support same-sex marriage, up from just 47% in 2006, highlighting a major shift in public opinion. Given this change, it’s time to remove the outdated ban from Virginia’s constitution. With the rollback of Roe v. Wade, national marriage equality could also be at risk, and Virginia should lead in protecting all citizens' rights. If the state truly is “for lovers,” it must affirm that love is love for everyone.
I support these amendments because in a nation that values and prioritizes freedom, I believe that individuals should have autonomy over all their decisions. If we are to truly have our unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the government cannot restrict our autonomy in any way. Furthermore our government has a responsibility to protect our rights and by amending our state constitution we are solidifying that protection in the event that there are challenges to these rights federally.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
HJ 9 – marriage • I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. • Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose HJ 1 and HJ 9. Rather than seeking to allow the extermination of unborn children at any time for any reason, let this state promote their rights and find solutions that allow life to thrive. In an age of demographic decline and relativism, let this state affirm that marriage serves specific biological and social purposes that are only possible between members of the opposite sex.
“I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.”
Good afternoon: I am writing to request representation of my views in Virginia. Regarding HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment: I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. Babies should be protected before they're born--not killed. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Please reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. Regarding HJ 2 – restoring voting rights: I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. Regarding HJ 9 – marriage: I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. God established marriage as a sacred relationship between a man and a woman.
HJ 1 I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Respected House Privileges and Elections Committee Members and associated Delegates: I submit the following points for urgent consideration in your final deliberations concerning HJ(s) 1; 2; and 9: HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment: - I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. - HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. - HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. - A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Strongly urge Rejection of HJ 1. In place of expanding abortion, I respectfully urge you to work instead for non-abortion oriented policies that affirm the life and dignity of every Virginian mother and child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights: I support passage of HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored. Complimentary to the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage - At it's core would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. - Marriage has an original design and purpose, founded not by Humanity alone, that predates any nation, religion or law. Strongly urge Rejection of HJ 9. As a fellow citizen and veteran, I am sincerely appreciative of both the opportunity to submit this written statement and; your professional review/consideration/action based upon them regarding the HJ(s) under your responsibility. Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions/comment/etc.. Respectfully, Edward James Stanton, Jr. edwardstantonjr@gmail.com (703) 780-0661
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, oand HJ9. Enshrining reproductive health protections for women and protecting their physicians is personally important to me. I shudder to think how my life might have been endangered when I required medical treatment for three miscarriages if I had needed to have them in a state like Texas in the current legal climate. My son might have grown without a mother if I hadn’t had the required healthcare in a timely manner. Delays can injure or kill a woman. Ultimately, I believe reproductive health decisions are between a woman and her health care providers. Regarding HJ9, I support it because I believe firmly the decision to be joined in marriage is up to the parties involved, regardless of their gender/. gender identification. If people don’t approve of such unions, then they should decide only for themselves not to engage in such a union .
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ1, and HJ9. Every Virginian and human being should have access to safe reproductive healthcare, the right to vote, and the right to marry whomever they love. How can we even call ourselves Americans if we are trying to restrict the freedoms of our peers? This is about empowering people to make the best decisions for their own lives. I strongly urge committee members to pass all three bills.
HJ1 Herring I am reaching out as a concerned Virginia citizen about the recent proposal to enshrine a right to reproductive freedom in Virginia's constitution. This will open the door to abortion through all nine months of pregnancy. Virginia has never allowed abortion up until birth and of the people who support abortion, only 22% of them support third trimester abortions. This stance is too extreme for Virginia. This proposal will block protection from minors undergoing abortion and other harmful reproductive practices by removing parental knowledge and consent. It will make abortion practices even more dangerous by limiting clinical safety standards and informed consent for women and minors. If you care about your citizens PLEASE do not support this proposal.
I am opposed to HJ1 on reproductive freedom because it fails to take into account the rights of an unborn baby whose life would be terminated by an abortion. I am opposed to HJ on same-sex marriage, as it violates the traditional an proper definition of marriage.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose hj 9. A marriage is only ...can only be between a man & a woman. God is the architect for this, well y documented in the Bible. A man & woman compliment each other, ultimately becoming a " one flesh" Union. Natural law upholds this naturally complimentary Union. Reason dictates. Scotty Cypher
As a professional who works in the field of mental health, I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Regarding HJ1: Keep church and state separate. Many are stating their opposition to a constitutional right to abortion on moral grounds. I'm supporting a constitutional right to abortion based on scientific grounds. Science is not up for interpretation the same way religion is, so to say that abortion is "wrong" lacks evidence to support the claim. Babies are not being murdered as they are horrifically portrayed to be, however women who are unable to seek a safe abortion or have complications that may require an abortion are dying unfairly and in inhumane ways. Abortion is a medical procedure. Women deserve to have access to any and all medical procedures they may need. To deny abortions in Virginia will place many women at risk and they may attempt to seek an abortion in another state or in unsafe ways. If "abortion trafficking" laws are put into place, travel would be restricted for those seeking this medical procedure and possibly lead to punitive criminal charges and further place strain on jails that are not equipped to manage overpopulation, medical issues, or inmates requiring mental health care. Regarding HJ2: Everyone should have the right to vote in a democracy. Many criminals have mental health issues that contributed to their crimes. Not allowing them to exercise their right to vote is discriminatory. Regarding HJ9: This bares repeating - keep church and state separate in Virginia. Since 1888 the US Supreme Court has declared at least 14 times that marriage is a fundamental right for all. Article 16 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights guarantees “men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion… the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.” Not allowing LGBTQ+ people to marry the person of their choosing is cruel and will lead to increase in crisis response as this population encounters higher rates of suicide attempts.To deny the LGBTQ+ population the ability to marry their partner also strips them of rights in medical emergencies. Since election day, there has been a 700% increase of crisis calls within the LGBTQ+ community according to the Trevor Project. This is a vulnerable population that already experiences shunning from family for being who they are, please do not make them feel shunned by their state as well. I will end with the golden rule: "treat others the way you want to be treated." Thank you for taking time to consider my input.
HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
I strongly support all 3 bills: HJ1, HJ2, & HJ9. As a citizen of the United States, to maintain our individual freedoms includes and not limited to: rights to vote and freedom of speech, freedom to love who and how your heart knows best, and to have bodily autonomy over your own health care (private relationship between doctors and patients/individuals). Thank you, respectfully. <3
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. For the dignity of humanity innate in the recognition of marriage as the full gift self between of ONE man and ONE woman as natural law attests, please oppose HJ 9. Thank you!
Why is this being fast-tracked? What are you trying to do literally behind our backs without any concern of what your constituents see as reasonable. The citizens of the Commonwealth of VA are watching this underhanded maneuever. HJ1 -OPPOSE -This should NOT be enshrined in the VA Constition, and I am tired of state representatives not listening to their consitutents. The right is for life, not a consitiutional right to abortion at any stage. This is a horrible bill that promotes murder. The abortion conversation needs to be kept open and we need to work towards policies that are not so radical but rather take a common sense approach to each situations and affirms dignity and life of mother and child. Our state should be protecting all of its citizens, even those unborn, and the abortion issue should not be taken as lightly and as cavalierly as this bill clearly does . HJ9 - OPPOSE- Marriage is a union bewteen a man and a woman for the purposes of building a life and having a family, which cannot be done by two people of the same sex. If you want equal rights for people of the same sex that want to be together, draft something else, but don't bastardize the definition of marriage. To redefine marriage, is clearly against, God's design. PLEASE NOTE, that we are watching how those who represent us and how they vote.
These three bills are common sense legislation that should flow across party lines. As a conservative, I can fully support all three of these items. They all support a freedom to choose. Freedom to choose your own fertility decisions, freedom to vote, and freedom to live and marry who you choose within the boundaries of the law. This is a no brainer, vote yes.
All persons have fundamental rights. All persons should have the right to marry who they choose. All women should have the absolute right to determine what is right for their health and their bodies.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1. I urge you to protect Mothers and Babies from the horrors of Abortion. I STRONGLY Oppose a "right" to abortion. I SUPPORT a right to Life for the Baby and freedom from the psychological torture for a Mother knowing she participated in the killing of her own flesh and blood. HJ9. Marriage is the union of one man and one woman. I OPPOSE any change in the definition of marriage. It predates any nation. It is the best solution for raising healthy children. Messing with the definition of marriage opens a can of worms such that anything can be marriage and therefore marriage is of no value destroying its purpose.
The ban in the Virginia Constitution does not reflect the attitudes and beliefs of Virginians in 2023. A 2021 poll from the Public Religion Research Institute found that 71% of Virginians support the right of same-sex couples to marry. This percentage has only increased since the question began being asked of voters. In 2006, 53% of voters supported the marriage ban. This huge swing shows the massive shift in public opinion on the issue of marriage, and it is clear evidence that the antiquated ban should no longer be a part of Virginia’s constitution. It’s only fair to revisit a political question that has shown such a vast change since it was first broached. With the removal of women’s protections with the destruction of Roe v. Wade, it is possible that marriage equality will be destroyed on a national level as well. Virginia must take the lead to protect all citizens. If Virginia really is “for lovers,” it should recognize that love is love and grant all citizens the right to live their lives in peace.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
- HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment. -- I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. -- HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. -- HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. -- Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights. - I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting -- rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage. - I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. -- Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ1, and HJ9 and urge committee members to pass all three bills. Every Virginian and every American deserves access to safe reproductive healthcare, the right to vote, and the right to marry whomever they love.
HJ1: I strongly oppose HJ1, a "right to abortion" amendment, into Virginia's constitution. HJ1 would jeopardize parental consent and the ban on partial-birth abortion, which is inhuman. Unlimited abortion until birth is a tragedy for both babies and mothers. Please work for policies that support mothers and their children, like supporting pregnancy resource centers, instead of expanding abortion. HJ9: I strongly oppose HJ9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. God designed marriage and it is between one man and one woman.
HJ1 - I strongly oppose enshrining a "right" to abortion in Virginia's constitution as it would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect unborn children before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion until birth is a fundamental tragedy and not a fundamental right. While I support a woman's right to do whatever she wants with her own body, I don't believe she has the right to do whatever she wants with someone else's body - in this case, the baby whose composition is a genetically unique and living human being. Instead of expanding abortion, I encourage you to work instead to affirm the life and dignity of every mother and child. HJ 2 - I support HJ 2 as all people who have completed their sentence should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 - I strongly oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage is the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion, or law and should not be manipulated for political gain.
Dear Members of the Virginia House of Delegates Committee, I am writing today in strong support of the proposed constitutional amendment affirming the right of marriage between two individuals regardless of gender. The Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell v. Hodges made it clear that same-sex couples have the same right to marry as opposite-sex couples. However, codifying this right in our state constitution will ensure that it is protected regardless of future changes in judicial interpretation. Growing up, the ability to be able to marry someone that I love was not even an option unless they were a man. It was only as an adult that marriage equality became federally protected, a long-overdue recognition of the basic rights of LGBTQ+ people like myself. This amendment provides the Commonwealth with the opportunity to further protect and legally uphold the freedoms and dignity of all its citizens, while also respecting religious freedom by allowing religious organizations to refuse to perform marriages as a matter of their doctrine. It is time to update our state constitution to protect the same rights for all Virginians, ensuring they are recognized and protected under state law. This amendment goes beyond correcting outdated provisions that no longer reflect the values or legal realities in our country. It explicitly acknowledges marriage as a fundamental right, inherent in the liberty of all people. By protecting the right to marry without regard to sex, gender, or race, this amendment aligns with our most essential commitments to equality and justice. Recognizing all lawful marriages equally under state law is essential. It is a statement of our shared belief in equal treatment and respect for all families, which strengthens our communities and our society. I urge the committee to move forward with this amendment, knowing it will honor both my rights as an American and a Virginian, as well as the rights of future generations. Thank you for considering my comments.
This ban does not reflect the attitudes and beliefs of Virginians in 2023. A 2021 poll from the Public Religion Research Institute found that 71% of Virginians support the right of same-sex couples to marry. This percentage has only increased since the question began being asked of voters. In 2006, 53% of voters supported the marriage ban. This huge swing shows the massive shift in public opinion on the issue of marriage, and it is clear evidence that the antiquated ban should no longer be a part of Virginia’s constitution. It’s only fair to revisit a political question that has shown such a vast change since it was first broached. With the removal of women’s protections with the destruction of Roe v. Wade, it is possible that marriage equality will be destroyed on a national level as well. Virginia must take the lead to protect all citizens. If Virginia really is “for lovers,” it should recognize that love is love and grant all citizens the right to live their lives in peace.
I am writing to express my strong support for HJ9, a resolution to amend the Virginia Constitution to protect marriage equality for all. Every person deserves the right to love and marry freely. LGBTQ+ people have been historically disenfranchised in this country, and now we have an opportunity in Virginia to ensure that LGBTQ+ rights are protected, even in the face of potential changes to federal policy. As your constituent, I urge you to support HJ9 and make this amendment a priority. The time to protect ALL Virginians is now, and I hope you will stand with us by supporting this critical amendment. Thank you for your attention to this essential issue.
I write to strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. All three of these actions would stand in strong defiance against those who would seek to deprive Virginians of the rights and freedoms they have enjoyed for many years. HJ1 works to ensure that all medical decisions are between a patient and their doctor, and are not to be subject to public inspection and court of public opinion. HJ2 stands to guard the constitutionally guaranteed right to participate in our democracy against those who would try to unjustly silence others as a way to illegally and immorally influence our democracy. HJ9 stands to guard freedoms long enjoyed by many Virginians from those who seek to indefensibly impose their own religious or social views upon the lives of others.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I support HJ9 and urge the committee to pass HJ9. The right to marry should not be limited by race or gender. It has been found to be unconstitutional to do so and should not be in the state constitution. The language defining marriage as a union between a man and a woman should be removed and it should be amended to provide the right regardless of gender and race.
HJ1 - Herring: OPPOSE. HJ1 I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights: OPPOSE I strongly oppose HJ2. Convicted Felons should not vote. HJ 9 – marriage: OPPOSE I most strongly oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation nto protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental rig Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child.I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
I strongly oppose HJ 1 abortion is not a constitutional right and should not be enshrined. You should work instead on making the places where abortions are performed adhere to the same rules and regulations as outpatient surgical centers and urgent cares. Underage women should have to have the consent of an adult, since it is a legal requirement for all surgical procedures if underage to have a parent or guardian sign. Abortion can result in hemorrhage, infection, and loss of fertility, Do more for helping women who are pregnant and want to keep their babies by providing services. We voted a state on the marriage amendment several years ago so it should be put to the people again if that is to be redefined and not voted on by one individual making a decision for the rest of us. I appose HJ9
Please OPPOSE the HJ1 amendment as abortion or killing of infants is inhumane. Birth control should not be allowed to be conducted by taking the life of a baby. It is not a "right" but a "slaughter." Restoring Voting rights, HJ2 is to be supported since people have completed their required prison sentences. I also so OPPOSE HJ9 amendment that would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose. Stop calling something "marriage" when it goes against natural law.
I write in support of HJ9 to amend the Virginia constitution to repeal the same-sex marriage prohibition and affirm the right any two individuals, regardless of sex, gender, orientation or race, to marry. The right to marry is a fundamental liberty consistent with Virginia’s long-standing tradition of individual freedoms and protection from governmental intrusion. This amendment would bring the Virginia constitution in line with decision of the United States Supreme Court in Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015). I strongly urge you to support it. Respectfully, Dr. Harold V Hartley III Chesterfield, Virginia
I strongly oppose the HJ1 amendment and its pretense of protecting "women's rights." Murder is not the right of any individual, male or female, to exercise upon any other individual, whether young or old, fully or under developed. "Reproductive rights" is just sterilized wording of an evil practice. I also strongly oppose HJ9, marriage is between one man and one woman for the lifetime of one or both of the parties. Any other combination is not marriage.
Once conceived a life should never be aborted. Once a convict has served their sentence they should regain voting rights. Leave the one man one women law intact !
I urge my representative to Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. This is a blatant overreach by fear-mongering politics and only seeks to further divide us. Life is human and should be respected whether at the beginning or end of life. Please support policies that give women and children protection, not more rules. I also urge you also to stop working to change the definition of marriage. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. There is nothing that prevents people from living together--many don't even bother with marriage these days and for those of us who believe in the sanctity of marriage, this is a misguided attempt to cater to a very small and unique subset of citizens.
Hello House Privileges and Elections Committee, I am writing to voice my support for HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. I wish for these Constitutional Amendments to be included on the ballot in order to secure our individual freedoms. Thank you and Sincerely, Doc-Marten Knoefler
(1). In pursuit of your right to have an abortion should not mean that I have to pay for it. The moral objection being paramount, the idea that I have to pay for this procedure is totally absurd and unacceptable (2). Marriage is between One man and One woman. Society has already made many variables to this basic truth and making it financially rewarding, will continue to degenerate our moral values.
I support HJ1 and HJ9 for enshrining these essential freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I strongly advocate against HJ1; it is important to rally for the support of human rights to LIFE rather than to methods of destroying it. How can any human being in good conscience support the right to kill another innocent child just because it might be an inconvenience? HJ2. I support the right of incarcerated persons to regain the right to vote after completing their sentences. HJ9 There is a fundamental difference between men and women, and an unwritten law that has sustained the world for centuries that marriage should be between one man and one woman--anything else could lead to a marriage between a person and a bridge or an animal or anything else. What a travesty for humanity!!!!
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. Other people may engage in some contractual or civil union, but marriage is the union of a man and a woman for the purpose of having children. Please preserve the family. Destroying the family will destroy the communities, the society and the country.
I support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for including these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I support all three bills
Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. There should be some limits for the mother who miscarries, and freedom to be counceled by doctors. Also A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 9 – Marriage I strongly oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. My reasons are listed below: Marriage has historically been a union between a man and a woman, and this amendment would undermine this longstanding cultural and religious institution. Child-Rearing: children benefit from both a mother and a father -- this is the ideal family structure for raising children. Social Stability: Traditional marriages contribute to stable family units, which create stronger communities. Population Growth: Heterosexual marriage supports natural reproduction, which is essential for demographic and economic stability. Clear Legal Definition: Defining marriage as heterosexual reduces legal complexities and avoids potential conflicts over ever expanding marriage definitions. Religious Beliefs: Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. ALL major faith groups view marriage as sacred between a man and a woman. These values must be protected from from legal conflicts. Respecting Popular Will: Majorities in most societies support traditional marriage.
HJ1 - Herring - I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in VA’s constitution. HJ2 - Bennett- Parker - I support HJ2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ9 - Sickles - I oppose HJ9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as a union of one man and one woman.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
As a man married to another man with a young daughter, HJ 1 and 9 are both intertwined with my and my family’s lives. In terms of HJ 9, while I understand the protections of the Obergefell decision and the Respect for Marriage Act, Congress has shown that the individual states have power and the authority to further provide these fundamental protections to its citizens. By additionally repealing the provision of recognizing marriage as between a man and woman, it further validates and strengthens the authority of my marriage to my husband. It would make me, as a resident of this Commonwealth, feel safe, secure, and proud. I am also fully in support of the provision that any religious person to be exempt from performing same sex marriages if it goes against their beliefs. I would also add that I hope to see arguments against this bill that rely on the basis of religious choice be unacknowledged to uphold the separation of church and state. In terms of HJ 1, this country had a precedent with Roe v Wade for over half a century. The current SCOTUS has shown that precedent does not matter in their personal decisions, so it is again up to the individual states and commonwealths to enact laws that provide equal protections and rights to all of its citizens. Knowing that my daughter was born into a world post-Roe and never knowing that she had those rights before she was born, she will grow up seeing that as a woman, she is less than. That men do not have laws governing what they can and cannot do with their bodies or personal reproductive choices. Men, after all, are able to get vasectomies to prevent getting women pregnant, yet women now have no choice if they do become pregnant, if that pregnancy endangers their lives, if it was through rape, incest, or deceit. I will do all in my power to fight in her behalf to make choices regarding her own body.
HJ1 - Herring: I strongly oppose amending the Virginia constitution to enshrine the so-called right to abortion. Life is a fundamental right of all human beings, and it is our first and primary right. No human being may have his or her right to life infringed upon. This is most especially true for human lives that are most vulnerable. It's our duty as men and women who seek the common good to protect the lives of pre-born children. Our efforts should be directed towards supporting pregnant women and helping them obtain the resources and the support to bring life into this world. Every human being has dignity, and we must lift up that dignity. HJ2 - Bennett-Parker: Once an individual has completed a sentence, he or she should undoubtedly have voting rights restored. We would be joining most states in our country by restoring the right to vote to those who have faced the consequences of their actions and have re-entered society. HJ9 - Sickles: Marriage and family is the most fundamental unit of any human society. It has existed well before governments and states. It has existed before any system of laws. It stands to reason then that marriage is not a human invention. Consequently it is not up to us as humans to define marriage. Men and women were made, complimentary, by our Creator, God Almighty. His design is set up for human beings to flourish. If we desire to flourish, we must maintain His desing of marriage as between one man and one woman. Anything different will further dimish human ability to live life to its fullest intent.
I believe that relationships can take many forms and all deserve respect, however, I support marriage as the legal status between one man and one woman.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I wholeheartedly agree with, and support, the words and sentiments to which this my comment is attached. EHT.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. Thank you
The Commonwealth has taken steps to ensure that the right to life is protected for even the worst offenders after being tried and convicted. So too, our youngest and most vulnerable Virginian’s deserve the right to life and protection against any individual, including their mother, who would put them to death. In addition, the protection of marriage between one man and one women is a fundamental building block of society and must be safeguarded. Regarding, HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
These bills are an affront to the majority of Virginians. They are the product of an elite out of touch with reality.
To Virginia House Delegates, I live in HD 12 (and am proud to have voted for my Delegate- Holly Seibold) and want to express my strong support for all three of the Constitutional Amendments listed below but especially HJ1. Virginia needs to be an example for all the States of how we protect our citizens rights. Hopefully you will all support these Amendments as well and I know I will be volunteering and doing all I can to make sure these are passed. Thanks, Robin K. Tingley Reproductive Health - Every Virginian should have access to affordable, quality healthcare, including abortion and birth control, with the freedom to make private reproductive choices. Abortion must remain safe, legal, and guided by medical professionals. Protecting reproductive rights safeguards other freedoms, such as marriage equality, contraception access, and privacy in personal decisions. The right to choose also supports racial and economic equality, as marginalized communities face greater barriers to adequate healthcare. Reproductive decisions affect overall well-being, including financial stability, housing, employment, and family support. Voting Rights Restoration - Most Virginians believe all qualified citizens deserve voting rights, including those who’ve served felony sentences and people with disabilities who wish to vote. I support a constitutional amendment for automatic rights restoration upon sentence completion, with no extra steps, and to protect the voting rights of people with disabilities unless a court rules otherwise. Voting rights should not be permanently lost due to past mistakes. Virginia should amend its Constitution to ensure fair restoration and foster civic participation. Marriage Equality - Virginia’s marriage equality ban no longer reflects the beliefs of its citizens. A 2021 poll showed 71% of Virginians support same-sex marriage, up from just 47% in 2006, highlighting a major shift in public opinion. Given this change, it’s time to remove the outdated ban from Virginia’s constitution. With the rollback of Roe v. Wade, national marriage equality could also be at risk, and Virginia should lead in protecting all citizens' rights. If the state truly is “for lovers,” it must affirm that love is love for everyone.
I strongly oppose and strongly urge you to oppose the Bill known as HJ-1. I support, and urge you to support, the Bill known as HJ-2. I strongly oppose, and strongly urge you to oppose, the Bill known as HJ-9. Jeff Fortman 240.660.8956
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution imposes on each state a duty to provide the equal protections of the law to all persons within its jurisdiction. Prenatal persons in Virginia are persons within the jurisdiction of Virginia. The proposed amendment violates the 14th Amendment's prohibiting against deny the equal protection of the laws to a class of persons in Virginia. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. The Supreme Court's decision in Obergefell v. Hodges was wrongly decided, as explained in the cogent dissenting opinions in that case.
I support the bill proposed by HJ1-Herring to amend the VA State Constitution to codify reproductive rights. I support the bill proposed by HJ9-Sickles to amend the VA State Constitution to grant the right to marry to any two individuals regardless of gender. Both of these bills are paramount to marginalized citizens of VA. Women should have the right to reproductive freedom without interference from the government. Individuals should be free to marry without interference from the government.
I am writing in full support of all three bills. HJ1: The state has no business interfering in the decisions made between a woman and her healthcare professionals. A constitutional amendment to protect abortion rights is essential for ensuring long-term reproductive freedom. Enshrining these rights provides a stable safeguard against future political shifts, offering citizens a clear and durable guarantee of bodily autonomy. By embedding these protections in the state constitution, lawmakers uphold individuals' ability to make personal medical decisions without interference. Constitutional protection also addresses public health concerns, ensuring safe access to care and reducing the risk of dangerous, unregulated alternatives. Above all, enshrining abortion rights affirms a commitment to individual rights and supports the health and well-being of all residents. HJ2: Individuals previously convicted of a felony who have completed their sentence should have the chance to be reintegrated into society, and not disenfranchised from the opportunity to vote on their representation. HJ9: Any two individuals who love each other should share the right to have their marriage recognized by the state. As decided by the US Supreme Court in Obergefell v. Hodges, the existing law is unconstitutional. This law must be amended to be in compliance with the United States constitution.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 strongly oppose HJ 2 agree HJ 3 oppose
My daughter-in-law's birth mother got pregnant in high school. She gave her child up for adoption. Because she chose life, our family has three beautiful grandchildren. HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment • I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. • HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. • HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. • A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. • Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights • I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. Marriage and the family are the central institutions of social life. HJ 9 – marriage • I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. • Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I believe all people have the right to determine what happens to their own bodies. As an AFAB (assigned female at birth), my girlfriend and I both suffer from hormonal imbalances that would render pregnancy dangerous for both ourselves and any potential fetus. Between my girlfriend's removed ovary, my polycystic ovarian syndrome, and my prolactinoma (tumor), our reproductive systems aren't even likely to be fertile. To know that despite all this, we could still be forced to carry children is a scary thought. It's a scary thought not only because of our health conditions that could render potential pregnancies inviable or dangerous, but also because of the implications of what a possible pregnancy would mean for my girlfriend and I. We don't want to raise children, so we'd never be caught dead applying for a surrogate. If either of us were to become pregnant, it could only be a result of sexual assault. It is sad that these are the hypothetical extremes I have to spell out for you in order to make you understand why your laws have no place in my womb. Please protect our reproductive rights. We want to get married and old, not pregnant and forced to carry.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation or law. The state has an interest in the stability of a true marriage of one man and one woman, for from that beginning all of society springs. Supporting any other arrangement is not only against the natural law, over time it will undermine civil society.
I strongly support HJ1 and HJ2 and HJ9. Every Virginian has a fundamental right to reproductive healthcare, the right to vote if qualifications are met, and the right to marry who they love, regardless of gender.
Please protect the right to life for the unborn and the dignity of life-bearing marriages between a man and a woman. HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment **I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. **HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. **HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. **A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. **Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights **I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage **I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. **Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose H1J as abortion is a tragedy, not a right, that remains a blight on our state. I oppose HJ 9, since the purpose of marriage is to have and raise children in a secure environment, which is of direct concern to the state. I strongly support HJ 2, as all people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored. Our justice system should be restorative, not punitive, and restoring voting rights is part of the reintegration process.
HJ1 - Please reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. Abortion is not a "right" because murder is not a right, and abortion is murder. HJ2 - I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ9 - I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. Undermining marriage undermines the fabric of our society. Studies have shown that children raised in households with their married mother and father are far more successful than children raised by single parents or homosexual guardians. It is your duty to promote laws that promote the welfare of Virginia's citizens rather than harming Virginia's citizens, whether they be pre-born or older. Please reject HJ1 and HJ9. Please approve HJ2.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I fully support these bills, HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Every citizen of Virginia deserves the right to reproductive healthcare, the right to vote if they meet the qualifications, and the right to marry who they love.
With regards to HJ 1 which is the “right to abortion” amendment, I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. This bill would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law including the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. It would also preclude any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. This would be a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. The whole practice of abortion is barbaric and not the actions of a civilized and caring society! please reject this bill and work towards affirming the life and dignity of every mother and every child. As to HJ 9 , which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman, I ask that you strongly oppose this as well. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion, or law and should, therefore, be protected for the good of the society, the protection of children, and the raising of the next generation of citizens.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
As a constituent currently in a mixed-race marriage, I support the affirmation of the fundamental right to marry regardless of race, sex, or gender in HJ9. My marriage a couple generations ago was just as illegal as same-sex marriage was more recently. It was even a crime, as you all know. I believe adding protection for same-sex and mixed-race marriages explicitly to the Virginia constitution can only strengthen Virginia families and reaffirm how far we have come from being the state famous for opposing interracial marriage in Loving v. Virginia. A same-sex marriage is just as valid as my own, and I support removing backwards laws that disallow it and instead proactively affirming our fundamental rights as citizens to marry as we choose.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I am strongly opposed to HJ 1: the "right to abortion amendment" that would enshrine the right to abortion to VA's Constitution. It would jeopardize the ban on partial birth abortion and parental consent which is just plain WRONG. It could also stop any future legislation to protect innocent babies before they are born. Unlimited abortion up until birth is barbaric and should be stopped immediately. Please work to provide policies that affirm the dignity of every mother and child. Please protect women and children from this awful scourge on our citizens and nation. I strongly support HJ 2: and believe all people who have served their sentences should have their voting rights restored. I strongly oppose HJ 9: that would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage between one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. It's time to stop the madness!
Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Protect women and their children from abortion. What a sad state that Virginia wants to enshrine this "right" to kill one's unborn children. We can and should be better than this. When a person's sentence is over, their voting rights should be restored. A marriage is and always be between one man and one woman. Since the beginning of time. Why do we allow others to attempt to re-define this basic fact?
It is past time for Virginia to repeal the same-sex marriage prohibition; affirmative right to marry. The right to marry who you love should be a fundamental right for every Virginian.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
We so not need this,
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose HJ-1. I support HJ-2. I oppose HJ-9. Thank you for your attention.
Good Afternoon, I would like to weigh in on HJ9 which would codify the right to marriage for two people regardless of sex, gender, or race. Please consider the ramifications of a scenario where OvH is overturned by the Supreme Court, as we saw with RvW, but HJ9 is not passed in Virginia. Many people, myself included, married a spouse of the same sex since 2015 - legally and equally to everyone else. We have since bought homes together, started families, and all other milestones that heterosexual couples take, all while under legal marriage by law. If we were suddenly not protected by national law, our families could be at risk which now includes children who have been born to (or adopted by), raised by, and loved by their parents during this time. This would be harmful to the children to learn that their parents are no longer allowed to be married. Furthermore, any legal action we would need to take to protect ourselves would then be an emotional and financial burden on our families, when we are just trying to get by like everyone else no matter the political affiliation. I strongly urge the Virginia legislators not to put families like ours in harms way, as we work, pay taxes, and contribute to our wonderful state as much as anyone else. Please protect us and our children justly by instating the proper laws. Thank You, From a mother and a proud lifelong Virginian
HJ 1 – Herring I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 –Bennett-Parker I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – Sickles I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment: I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. Reject HJ 1. I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights: I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage: I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
My wife and I oppose all three house proposals. Abortion is murder, plain and simple. Murder is a crime, not a "right". What about the "right" of the child to live? We need to focus on the child, not the mother. Even after a convicted criminal has served his sentence, he needs to show that he has learned his lesson and will not commit a crime again. I would propose a five-year period after completing his sentence that he be crime free before his voting rights are restored. As far as HJ9 is concerned, marriage is a sacrament, ordained by God, and it is to be between a man and a woman, period.
HJ1 - opposed HJ2 - support HJ9 - opposed
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ1 - As a woman, this is extremely important to me. I believe that everyone woman deserves the right to bodily autonomy and to make our own informed decisions regarding medical care. It is TERRIFYING that women could have that right taken away after already fighting so hard (and winning) to have that freedom. I don't want to live in a state or country where I don't feel safe. Knowing that my rights could be taken away makes me feel the opposite of safe. Please - for myself and every other woman - help protect this human right. HJ9 - As a lesbian and member of the LGBTQ community, this is also personal for me. I met my partner 5 years ago and we have been engaged for almost 1 year. I want and deserve the right to marry the person I love, just like everyone else. This shouldn't even be up for debate anymore. Love is love.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. Marriage defined any other way is not fitting with the natural law concept of complimentarity. When Natural Law is denied, civilization will suffer. Please vote no on this amendment. Thank you.
1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I fully support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. It is imperative that these rights be enshrined and protected. Never, in the history of our nation and the human race, have we ever regretted protecting all human rights.
• Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. • I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. • I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
With respect to HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Please Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. With respect to HJ 9 – marriage I strongly oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. Thank you sincerely for attention to these issues, Dr. Evelyn Clingerman Fredericksburg, VA 22406
A House committee is fast-tracking proposed amendments on abortion, marriage and voting rights! In an unusual fast-tracking move, the House Privileges and Elections Committee will be hearing, and presumably voting on, three constitutional amendment proposals tomorrow morning at 11:00am: an extreme “right to abortion” amendment, an amendment to repeal the one-man/one-woman marriage provision, and an amendment to restore voting rights. Committee approval of these resolutions would advance them to the House floor, for a vote early in the 2025 session. The process to amend Virginia’s constitution is multi-year and involves a number of steps, but this latest action must be met with a high volume of voices. We urge you to submit written comments by clicking here and using the form provided. Here are some suggested talking points: HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has purpose and positive good that design that is not subject to nation's law.
HJ1 - I 100% support this bill. HJ1 marks a significant step forward for women's rights in Virginia. This law reinforces the fundamental right of women to make personal choices about their reproductive health, ensuring freedom and autonomy for all. Supporting reproductive freedom means upholding equality, respect, and individual agency for every woman across the Commonwealth. HJ2 - I 100% support this bill. HJ2 represents a powerful commitment to the democratic principles of Virginia by ensuring that every eligible citizen has the fundamental right to vote without unnecessary barriers. By allowing citizens who have served their sentences to regain their voting rights automatically, this measure reinforces the belief in second chances and the right to participate in shaping our communities. It also thoughtfully addresses concerns around mental capacity, allowing only those who are currently able to understand the act of voting to participate, while providing a clear path for restoring rights if capacity is regained. This is a forward-thinking step toward an inclusive and fair electoral process in the Commonwealth. HJ9 - I 100% support the passing of this bill. As an LGBTQ+ individual serving the Commonwealth, this amendment represents more than policy—it’s about safeguarding the hopes and dreams that many of us hold for a future where our relationships are respected and our rights are secure. In times of political uncertainty, especially with a new administration that could bring shifting priorities, it’s easy to feel fear for what lies ahead. This amendment provides a sense of stability and assurance, reinforcing that our rights and our families are valued, protected, and legally recognized. It’s a vital step toward a future where we can continue to serve and contribute with confidence, knowing that Virginia stands for equality and inclusion.
I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion, or law.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution. As a mother there is nothing more important than my daughter having control of her body. These decisions should be made between a woman and her doctor no one else. These rights must be protected.
• I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I support HJ 9. Lawful marriage is a right between two parties that exemplifies the freedom our country is founded on. People should not be discriminated against and not allowed marriage based on their sex, gender, or race.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment - I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. - HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. - A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. - Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights - I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage - I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. - Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I believe that the right to vote, the right to marriage, and the right to women’s healthcare are essential and so important to the well being of our city and our state. I am writing this to support those values.
HJ1: I believe that reproductive freedom should be memorialized in the Virginia Constitution. The choice to have an abortion is a deeply personal one and to possibly face punishment for taking actions to protect yourself during a dangerous pregnancy should never happen. Additionally, the treatment for miscarriages is often "abortion", so this also allows for those who have suffered a miscarriage to seek and receive the proper treatment. HJ9: Marriage is a contract between two consenting people. Their gender should be irrelevant, as long as they are of contracting age and able to effectually enter into said contract.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I do not believe a “right” to abortion should be a part of VA’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in VA law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I strongly oppose a right to abortion law. The unborn must be protected. Abortion on demand at any stage of pregnancy goes against our decency as human beings. Marriage should be between a man and a woman. This marital arrangement has its roots in our biblical history and the natural order.
I strongly oppose HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment, enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment • I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. • HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. • HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. • A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. • Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights • I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage • I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. • Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I, as a veteran born and raised in this beautiful Commonwealth, I fully support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. It is imperative that these rights be enshrined and protected. Never, in the history of our nation and the human race, have we ever regretted protecting all human rights.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law. As a voting Virginia resident, I want to know my voice is heard!
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
HJ1 I oppose abortion as life begins from the moment of conception and ends at natural death. Please do not legalize abortion at anytime in Virginia. HJ2 - Once someone has served out their sentence and are released from prison, I support restoring their right to vote. H9 Please recognize marriage as between only a man and a woman and not same sexes.
HJ1 - I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ2 - I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ9 -I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
HJ 1 – “right to abortion” amendment I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. HJ 2 – restoring voting rights I support HJ 2. All people who have completed their sentences should have their voting rights restored, as is the case in the vast majority of states. HJ 9 – marriage I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
I simply want to express my support for bills HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9, constitutional amendments providing (1) a fundamental right to reproductive freedom; (2) qualifications of voters/right to vote; and (3) marriage between two individuals, respectively.
If you want me to support you, then do this.
I strongly oppose enshrining a “right” to abortion in Virginia’s constitution. HJ 1 would severely jeopardize even the few modest protections for unborn children currently in Virginia law, such as the ban on partial-birth abortion and the law requiring parental consent. HJ 1 could also pre-empt any future legislation to protect babies before they are born. A policy of unlimited abortion up until birth should be seen as a fundamental tragedy, not a fundamental right. Reject HJ 1. Instead of expanding abortion, I urge you to work instead for policies that affirm the life and dignity of every mother and every child. I oppose HJ 9, which would remove the constitutional provision that affirms marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Marriage has an original design and purpose that predates any nation, religion or law.
Block 1 - HJ1: Firstly, I'm appalled that women's reproductive rights are on the chopping block once again as if we didn't already do this 50 years ago. The fact that women have to beg for these basic rights while rapists get a slap on the wrist and men are not legally bound from day one for child support & healthcare to the child in utero and after birth is madder than the hatter. Secondly, women should be able to choose their life and what that life will look like 20 years from that moment in their life. Letting women die because the child is no longer viable and will kill the mother if they continue well after the ridiculous 6-weeks, to which you would have to be a phsycic to know by the way, is beyond the measure of any sane thought. Women's lives matter, their sanity matters, their health matters, their overall well-being MATTERS! Finally, Should this madness continue, men should be punished just as harshly be it vasectomy or castration. You may think or find that extreme, but that is the very same boat you are placing women in my humble opinion. There is no room for religion here and especially not personal opinion--the only voice that matters is the woman single-handedly experiencing a pregnancy and the drastic changes either option entails. Block 1 - HJ2: IF Trump, a convicted felon, can run for Presidency, then absolutely a reformed/released inmate should have a say in how this country is led and who they choose to lead them. How can we say prisons were created to reform &and guide prisoners to a better path forward on their way out, but take away their voice, their choices for employment, and their overall life being reduced to a person they don't even recognize anymore in the worst of ways. Let them vote, give them every opportunity to do better, be better, and know better. Block 1 - HJ3: Human is human & life is life. Two consenting adults who deeply love one another should absolutely be able to marry one another, be it man to woman, woman to woman, or man to man. It's no one else business who they decide to spend their time and life with because the last time I checked my neighbors, mayor, senators, and congressmen/congresswomen were not paying my bills, sending my children to school, putting food on my table, or paying my taxes. Let them get married, have shared marital assets, and have the ability to pay their taxes with the filing status MARRIED. Could we stop being hypocrites cherry-picking bible verses and stop thinking our personal opinions and beliefs should affect the people that don't even share the same roof over their heads?
I fully support HJ1, J2, and HJ9 as amendments to the VA Constitution. The protection of the rights of our citizens should be front of mind for all of our electeds, and a priority for our General Assembly to take action. HJ1 -- Women have a fundamental right to reproductive freedom, to have agency over their own bodies. While is should be obvious to ALL, it isn't, so we need to have that right enshrined in our Commonwealth's Constitution. HJ2 -- The right to vote is just that, a right to vote. One's ability to vote should only be interrupted after a conviction, and only until they are freed. Persons who have committed crimes, have been adjudicated, and have satisfied their obligations to the Commonwealth should have their right to vote restored automatically -- not by any "case by case" consideration. Notice of such restoration should be provided to the person, both by the releasing institution and the law enforcement entity charged with following up after their release. HJ9 -- The right for two people to marry is a fundamental right, one that is indifferent to the sex, gender or race of the individuals. While religious institutions can refuse to perform a marriage, the political subdivisions, i.e. the Commonwealth cannot. While these three proposed amendments may seem superfluous to some, or offensive to others, to codify these rights for the protectees of the Consititution of the Commonwealth of Virginia is appropriate and necessary. Sarah E. Sussan Midlothian VA c
As the country transitions to a new administration , Virginia must enshrine these rights into our state constitution in order to protect the rights of its citizens. I support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9.
I am commenting on behalf of The Justice & Witness Action Network – Virginia of the United Church of Christ. As followers of Christ, we affirm and celebrate human expressions of love and partnership, and we support equal marriage rights for couples regardless of gender. The government should not interfere with couples regardless of gender who choose to marry. Prohibition of same sex marriage has no place in the Constitution of Virginia, and we support passage of HJ9 to repeal the constitutional provision defining marriage as only a union between one man and one woman.
I support ALL of these bills passing. As a mother who cannot afford and (for health reasons) should not have another pregnancy, reproductive freedom is CRITICALLY important for my family. I am also in an interracial marriage and with the concern for supreme court repeals, I want it in law that anyone of any gender, race, or sexuality can get married. Marriage equality had harmed no one and should be our RIGHT. The government should not get to dictate who we share property and tax returns with.
Given the changing administration, we must enshrine these rights into our state constitution. These are the very rights at risk at a national level.
I would like to voice my strong support for both of these amendments. HJ2 - Once an individual has completed his or her sentence they need to be reintegrated into society and encouraged to maintain productive, law-abiding citizenship. Restoring their right to participate in our electoral process is an important step in that reintegration, and demonstrates that they have resumed both the rights and the responsibilities of citizenship. HJ9 - As long as the two individuals involved are consenting adults, the state has no basis for determining that a particular marriage is invalid due to the respective race, gender, sex, or any other personal characteristics of the individuals involved. There is no benefit to the state or our society for discrimination, and very real harm is done to the individuals discriminated against.
I strongly support these bills, and I hope you will as well. Reproductive freedom should already be the law. No woman is an incubator. Every woman is a human being! If marriage is a religious union between 2 parties, then the government should have no say-so in the matter. If marriage is a governmental contract between 2 parties, then religious beliefs should have no bearing on it. Let people marry who they love! LOVE IS LOVE and boy, do we need some love these days. Felons who have served their sentence should be forgiven and allowed to restore their voting privileges to normal. ESPECIALLY since we will now have a felon running the highest office in our country.
As a city of Tichmond resident in the light of recent national and state policy changes I strongly support all 3 ammendments enshrining basic human rights to bodily autonomy, participation in the democratic process, and right to legal marriage. If Virginia truly is for lovers we must love all of our citizens equally and grant them the same rights
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution. Reproductive health is not murder. People should be able to be and marry who they wish.
I support YES to all three bills. Outlawing abortions does not get rid of them. It outlaws SAFE abortions.
I strongly support all three of these amendments. It is vital that we continue moving forward and keep Virginia feeling safe and welcoming to ALL.
I support all three bills and ask that they be passed. The rights to reproductive freedom, marriage between consenting adults, and the right to vote should not be denied to anyone.
These amendments have not been properly discussed or voted on by constituents. Unlimited murder of unborn babies is not a right. Convicted felons have never had the right to vote so it's unclear why you want them to. The marriage law is unnecessary. This entire session and vote is completely illegitimate and voting to pass these will prove you do not represent the will of Virginians.
I strongly support each of these three constitutional amendments. They are essential to the dignity and well-being of the citizens of the Commonwealth of Virginia. In order to be a thriving, successful community, economically and personally, individuals must be free to pursue their own happiness, make decisions about their own health care, and have their voices heard through the Democratic electoral process. The stronger the individuals in our communities, the better our communities and our Commonwealth will do as a whole. Therefore, I strongly support these constitutional amendments. Thank you for your work in bringing them to the public to vote on.
I am writing to express my support for HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution
I am writing to express my support for HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9.
My comment: I STRONGLY support these three amendments to our state constitution. Protecting my children's reproductive freedom, restoring voting rights to people convicted of felonies, and ensuring marriage equality are all deeply important to me and the people I love. I want to protect and support all Virginians', rights, regardless of their political affiliation, with these three constitutional amendments!
Please protect women’s and LGTBQ+ rights in Virginia. And voting rights should be reinstated to people who have served their time.
There should not be a ban on who someone chooses to marry--that is a decision between two people who best understand what they want and what is best for them, both as individuals and as a couple. Leave the government out of this essentially personal decision.
I firmly believe that marriage should now and always be defined between one man and one woman, not subject to unhealthy and fleshly lusts that men or women come up with. I do not support this bill.
I am writing in support of all three, HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9, to be enshrined in the Commonwealth's constitution. In particular for HJ1, reproductive healthcare should be available to all women. This should not even be a question. As someone who works in women's health, those decisions should be made between the woman and her provider. So many complications can occur in every pregnancy. Denying the appropriate healthcare would be unconscionable.
I strongly support the passage of HJ1,HJ2 and HJ9 in order to enshrine these freedoms and protections in the Commonwealth of Virginia's constitution. Thank you
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth's constitution.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I support all three proposals. Women have should have a constitutional right to make their reproductive decisions, a person who has been released from prison has already paid their debt to society and should have their voting rights automatically restored, and I support being able to marry the person you love
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 as they are important for safeguarding the rights of citizens of the Commonwealth.
I strongly support every Virginian’s right to marry who they love and govern our own bodies. It is important that these rights stay in the constitution of our commonwealth otherwise we’re more like a country governed by a dictator than the United States of America.
I support rights of those wishing to marry and these rights should not be restricted by government. Gender should not restrict marriage relationships
I support these bills. These rights should not be subject to the whims of the public or the will of some of the public to force their religious beliefs on members of the Commonwealth who do not share them.
I vote YES on all of these bills. Everyone deserves life, liberty and pursuit to happiness. That includes consenting adults of the same sex to get married, the right to medical choice of your body (if men have the right and were all equal. Then women deserve the right to choose what happens to their bodies) and for citizens to have a viice electorally. I find it saddening that our country has came to the point that opposing protecting others rights is something they support. AMERICA IS ABOUT FREEDOM. NOT CONTROL. We should protect eachother and not attack one another because we "dont agree". Everyone deserves the choice even if it's not the one you would make. No human has the right to infringe on another humans rights. Period.
HJ1 Abortion should be legal, safe, and the decision left to those who are pregnant with guidance from medical professionals. True democracy depends on equal rights for all people. Losing our right to reproductive choice opens the door to the loss of other freedoms including other healthcare choices, marriage equality, access to contraception, and the right to engage in private, consensual intimacy without government interference. Not only is the right to a safe and legal abortion a matter of personal freedom, it’s also a major factor in the movements for racial and economic equality. Black individuals, and all underserved communities, already experience unfair barriers and limited access to adequate healthcare services. Our reproductive choices impact our physical and psychological well-being, including the foods we eat, where we live, our financial resources, and our capacity to gain and maintain employment and provide for ourselves and our families. Hj2 I support an amendment to the Virginia Constitution to guarantee that people who have been disenfranchised due to a felony conviction will have their rights automatically restored upon completion of their sentences, without additional steps or paperwork after they are no longer incarcerated, and to ensure people with disabilities never lose their rights without an appropriate judicial finding. This has never been a partisan issue. Both Democratic and Republican governors have chosen to restore voting rights to thousands of citizens; however, Virginia's current governor has reversed the trend. People should not be permanently defined by their past mistakes. Virginians who have successfully served their time should be able to fully rejoin civic life. It is time for Virginians to act to amend our Constitution to create a routine restoration process that reflects fair accountability and encourages civic engagement. HJ 9: A 2021 poll from the Public Religion Research Institute found that 71% of Virginians support the right of same-sex couples to marry. Virginia's Constitution and Laws should reflect the views of the majority of Virginians presently living under them, not the views of passed generations. If Virginia really is “for lovers,” it should recognize that love is love and grant all citizens the right to live their lives in peace.
Hello, I am writing to express my support for all three of these common sense amendments protecting and enshrining these basic civil rights for our citizens. A surge of backwards thinking is coming, fueled by ignorance, bigotry, and the false mandate that robbing our citizens of these rights is desired by any more than a small but vocal minority of Americans. The only way to protect against such unethical uprisings is to codify laws against them. Do not lose sight of what is right and just in the face of hatred or fanaticism, no matter how loud or fervent. Sincerely, Michael Baughan
The proposed Amendment HJ1 - Herring would allow people who can become pregnant to make the appropriate decisions for themselves and their families. This would allow people to navigate life without fear of becoming trapped in a relationship, being responsible for someone they cannot provide for, or being in enormous medical debt. This is extremely necessary for the safety and freedom of the people of Virginia. The amendment HJ2 - Bennett-Parker would allow the people the governing bodies make decisions on behalf of a say in who represents them. Everyone should have the ability to vote in favor of who represents their interests, regardless of criminal record. They exist within these systems upon release and their well-being should be included in the decisions made by their representatives. The proposed amendment HJ9 - Sickles would allow it to be written in law that any two people who want to enter into marriage may do so. While this is already the practice and has been legitimized by the Supreme Court, it would be a good faith move from our government to reinforce that decision by reflecting it in Virginia law. Everyone should be able to engage with marriage if they choose to do so, and laws that reflect otherwise are outdated and damaging to our society.
I STRONGLY support these three amendments to our state constitution. Protecting my children's reproductive freedom, restoring voting rights to people convicted of felonies, and ensuring marriage equality are all deeply important to me and the people I love. I want to protect and support all Virginians', rights, regardless of their political affiliation, with these three constitutional amendments!
Reproductive Health. HJ1 I believe that every Virginia resident should have access to affordable, quality health care, including abortion, birth control and the privacy to make reproductive choices. Virginians made their reproductive opinions clear when they chose to elect representatives who vowed to protect reproductive rights. Abortion should be legal, safe, and the decision left to those who are pregnant with guidance from medical professionals. True democracy depends on equal rights for all people. Losing our right to reproductive choice opens the door to the loss of other freedoms including other healthcare choices, marriage equality, access to contraception, and the right to engage in private, consensual intimacy without government interference. Not only is the right to a safe and legal abortion a matter of personal freedom, it’s also a major factor in the movements for racial and economic equality. Black individuals, and all underserved communities, already experience unfair barriers and limited access to adequate healthcare services. Our reproductive choices impact our physical and psychological well-being, including the foods we eat, where we live, our financial resources, and our capacity to gain and maintain employment and provide for ourselves and our families. Voting Rights Restoration HJ2 Data shows that the majority of Virginians believe that all qualified citizens should have access to the ballot, including those who have served their time for felony convictions and people with disabilities who want to participate in the democratic process. I support an amendment to the Virginia Constitution to guarantee that people who have been disenfranchised due to a felony conviction will have their rights automatically restored upon completion of their sentences, without additional steps or paperwork after they are no longer incarcerated, and to ensure people with disabilities never lose their rights without an appropriate judicial finding. This has never been a partisan issue. Both Democratic and Republican governors have chosen to restore voting rights to thousands of citizens; however, Virginia's current governor has reversed the trend. People should not be permanently defined by their past mistakes. Virginians who have successfully served their time should be able to fully rejoin civic life. It is time for Virginians to act to amend our Constitution to create a routine restoration process that reflects fair accountability and encourages civic engagement. Marriage Equality HJ9 This ban does not reflect the attitudes and beliefs of Virginians in 2023. A 2021 poll from the Public Religion Research Institute found that 71% of Virginians support the right of same-sex couples to marry. This percentage has only increased since the question began being asked of voters. In 2006, 53% of voters supported the marriage ban. This huge swing shows the massive shift in public opinion on the issue of marriage, and it is clear evidence that the antiquated ban should no longer be a part of Virginia’s constitution. It’s only fair to revisit a political question that has shown such a vast change since it was first broached. With the removal of women’s protections with the destruction of Roe v. Wade, it is possible that marriage equality will be destroyed on a national level as well. Virginia must take the lead to protect all citizens.
I think it's very important that as a state we enshrine the right for a person to marry another person regardless of sex, gender, or race.
I support this amendment.
Let’s take the lead and repeal the constitutional provision defining marriage as only a union between one man and one woman & related provisions. I do NOT want to hear any arguments that this isn’t needed because of Obergefell v. Hodges. We all know what happened with Roe. Churches can’t complain because they are not required to perform any of these marriages. Life is hard enough already – it is NOT the state’s job to make it harder. Love is love. Let the people vote!
As a long time resident of Virginia and former medical professional, I strongly stand with the passing of HJ1 as essential medical access for Virginians. Removal of the codification and protections of individuals and medical professionals to essential reproductive procedures would be incredibly detrimental to our community. I support HJ2 as well, voting and having a voice in our elections process is a right and there should be a pathway for formerly incarcerated individuals to earn back that right. Additionally, I am strongly in support of HJ9. Virginia cannot be "for lovers" if we do not protect the rights of LGBTQIA families and individuals. By not codifying marriage protections we also open up a slippery slope to removal of protections for interracial marriages. If we as a Commonwealth do not pass HJ9, we can no longer say we are for lovers or for our people. So I implore you to pass these essential protections and pathway to restoration of rights. I love Virginia and I would love for it to be a safe place for myself and my family.
Dear Sub-Committee Members, As a concerned voter, I am writing to express my *strong support* for the three proposed constitutional amendments: HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. HJ1: This amendment is vital for safeguarding reproductive freedom in Virginia. It ensures individuals have the right to make personal healthcare decisions without government interference, reflecting our state’s commitment to personal liberty and privacy. HJ2: Protecting and expanding voting rights is fundamental to our democracy. This amendment will help ensure that all eligible Virginians can participate in the electoral process, reinforcing the integrity and inclusiveness of our elections. HJ9: Enshrining marriage equality in our constitution is essential for guaranteeing that all couples have the right to marry, regardless of gender. This amendment affirms Virginia’s commitment to equality and non-discrimination. I urge you to support these amendments, which are crucial for protecting the rights and freedoms of all Virginians. Thank you for considering my views. Sincerely, Dr. King
These three bills speak to the freedom of choice for Virginia residents. Our forefathers fought to preserve these freedoms. Now it is up to you, the elected officials, to make sure all of your constituents have those freedoms. Please pass all three bills.
As our representative, I urge you to protect our reproductive rights, restore voting rights automatically after being released from prison, and protect same-sex marriage.
I am 72 years old. I have lived and worked in Virginia since 1978. In my career, my volunteer work, and my recreational, educational, and civic activities, I have had the opportunity to serve side-by-side with people who identify as LGBTQ persons. Over several generations, my family has included uncles, cousins, nephews, and nieces who identify as LGBTQ. These persons are not lesser persons than people who do not identify as LGBTQ persons. They are valuable human beings, valuable citizens of the Commonwealth, of our nation, and of our world. They deserve the right to love whom they choose. It is wrong for our Virginia Constitution to try to deprive them of the right to marry whom they love. I have been proud to be a Virginian and to be able to appreciate the rights that are recognized in the the landmark case Obergefell v. Hodges. We are a better society and a healthier society because of this ruling under the common law. It is time to make common law marriage equality rights for LGBTQ persons CONSTITUTIONAL rights for LGBTQ persons in Virginia. Please take action in support of the constitutional amendment for Marriage Equality.
Hello House Privileges and Elections Committee, I am writing to voice my support for HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Let’s get these Constitutional Amendments on the ballot to secure our individual freedoms. Thank you, Emily Casebolt-Simon
Good afternoon, I am called to write to you about our freedoms. “I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.” Thank you for your serious consideration. Let’s not remove freedom from our foundation. We should not try to regulate morality such as beliefs about when life begins (i have never believed life began at conception). Let’s not regulate mother’s health out of the reproductive health issue. Let’s not regulate wwhich humans can love one another. This over reach is tearing the country apart and making us a worldwide laughing stock. Let freedom ring, Mary Leffler Glen Allen, Va
I fully and adamantly support HJ1 - Herring, HJ2 - Bennett-Parker, & HJ9 - Sickles. I am of the opinion that these bills should absolutely be passed without question.
I cannot believe it is 2024 and we're discussing the validity of marriages between two consenting adult. Please, in the interest of humiliating me and other constituents 1000% less, eliminate prohibitions to same-sex marriage and enshrine this fundamental right in the state constitution.
All of these are important issues and need to be protected. As a woman, I fear for my reprodutcive rights and ability to get services should I need them. Everyone should have a right to vote and be heard. I have a good number of friends in same sex relationships and marriages that I feel deserve the protection of their status. All of these bills should be passed as they protect marginal groups who are often overlooked or fought against.
Only legal taxpayers should be allowed to vote!
I'm writing to show my support for HJ1 and HJ9. HJ1 protects our right to make our own decisions about our bodies and reproductive health, which is essential for personal freedom. HJ9 ensures that everyone has the right to marry the person they love, regardless of sex, gender, or race. By supporting these amendments, we're standing up for individual liberty and equality in our community. Let's make our state a better place for all by backing these measures!
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Women’s medical care needs to be protected. Religious beliefs should have no bearing on other people’s medical care. Medical autonomy needs to remain with the individual and should not be dictated by others’ personal/religious beliefs.
I support the fundamental right to reproductive freedom, which allows individuals to make personal healthcare decisions along with their physician - without unnecessary legal barriers or delays that could endanger their life or health. Laws should not be based on religious definitions of life, especially given the diversity of beliefs in our state. I believe that individuals who have served their time deserve the right to participate fully in our democracy, including the right to vote. As they rejoin the workforce and pay taxes, they should have a voice in shaping the laws that govern our communities. Rehabilitation should include reintegration, and that includes not only allowing but encouraging civic engagement. I also stand firmly in favor of marriage equality. Just as society has overwhelmingly supported interracial marriage, the freedom to marry should extend to all consenting adults, regardless of gender or race. These unions bring no harm and deserve legal recognition as well as equal protection under the law.
I strongly support marriage equality. As long as a marriage is between two consenting adults, they should be allowed to marry regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity. It literally has no effect on my life or on others. There's is no need for the government to overstretched its reach so deeply into people's personal lives.
I strongly support and request you vote YES on HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for inclusion in Virginia's Constitution.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Women’s medical care needs to be protected. Religious beliefs should have no bearing on other people’s medical care. Medical autonomy needs to remain with the individual and should not be dictated by others’ personal/religious beliefs.
As a woman in my 80s who has lived through repressive periods and periods of expanded freedoms, I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I strongly support House Joint Resolution 9 (HJ9), which seeks to amend the Virginia Constitution to affirm the fundamental right to marry for all individuals, regardless of sex, gender, or race. This amendment is crucial for couples like my husband and me, whose marriage, while recognized under federal law, faces an uncertain future due to shifting political dynamics. Currently, our marriage relies on federal protections, which are vulnerable to change. By amending our state constitution, we can safeguard marriage equality at the state level, ensuring that all Virginians have the right to marry, free from discrimination. This amendment not only repeals outdated provisions defining marriage solely as a union between one man and one woman—provisions invalidated by the Supreme Court's decision in *Obergefell v. Hodges* (2015)—but also affirms the Commonwealth’s commitment to equal rights and justice for all residents. Acting swiftly is essential to protect the progress we've made toward a more inclusive Virginia. The amendment respects religious freedoms, allowing organizations and clergy to make their own choices about performing marriages while ensuring civil marriage rights for all. I commend Delegate Mark D. Sickles and the co-patrons of HJ9 for their leadership on this vital issue and urge the General Assembly to pass this amendment. This will allow Virginians to uphold marriage equality in our foundational laws, creating a safer, more equitable future for all families in Virginia.
I strongly support the amendments as they are important to protecting the rights of all Virginia residents
I FULLY SUPPORT ALL OF THESE BILLS. PLEASE MAKE THIS HAPPEN!!
I oppose all efforts to increase or secure the right to the direct and intentional killing of humans by private persons as in the case of abortion. I oppose any and all efforts to allow marriage between persons other than one man and one woman who have not previously been married unless the other person in that previous marriage is deceased. I oppose the use of ranked choice voting as contrary to our legal tradition, excessively complicated and likely to lead to delays in determining election winners.
I strongly support bills HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Please vote to approve these bills. Thank you.
Good afternoon, I am writing to express my support for HJ1, rights to reproductive freedom, HJ2, voting rights, specifically for previously incarcerated persons, and HJ9, marriage equality. I support HJ1 in order to preserve and maintain the mental and physical health of women all throughout Virginia, ensuring their continued participation in society. My support for HJ2 comes from my belief that every United States citizen should be allowed to participate in the democratic process that this country was built upon. If a person has been convicted of a crime, been held accountable, and served their allotted time, their rights to vote should be restored, equal to that of the average Virginia citizen. Finally, HJ9 will guarantee the fundamental right to marry to every person, regardless of their gender, race, or sex.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I strongly support these 3 bills to have these rights enshrined in our constitution! Please vote to approve these bills. Thank you.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution. It is the primary function of a government to protect the people, not deny them rights or voice.
I am in full support of HJ1, HJ2 and HJ9 for enshrining freedoms in the Commonwealth's Constitution . HJ1 is paramount importance to renew the hopes and dreams of Virginia women and families about reproductive freedom and control over our bodies and family planning. I work with women who have lost much wanted pregnancies and fear the repercussions of a federal abortion ban or state limitations. Please make women feel safe again! HJ2 is a basic American value and the right to vote should be safeguarded and enshrined by the Commonwealth . HJ9 also supports a Virginian's right to love who they choose. Please help Virginians to have the freedoms to love and commit. Thank you ! Karen Coyner, LCSW, DCSW and mom
I am for all of these bills to be passed
I am a progressive constituent in the state of Virginia and I strongly support the constitutional amendments HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9.
Please vote yes on these measures. Women’s rights have been put under attack from a federal level and we must do our part in this commonwealth to do what we can to restore them. Medical decisions are to be made between the care provider and their patient, it is not the business of any other party. Religious obligations have no place inside politics which govern their neighbors. Our founding fathers were quite explicit about this. We cannot trust the right for all to get married will not be challenged on a federal level soon. A marriage, while often performed inside a place of worship, is not relegated to being a Christian ordeal. It is a civil contract between two parties. As brought up above one person’s religion is not to govern the conduct of another. Please vote yes to preserve both marriages that have already been established and future marriages to come. These are core basic human rights we are discussing and it is our duty to preserve them. Please keep our Commonwealth of Virginia a place of freedom, liberty, and protection for all people. Thank you for your time.
Dear Committee Members, I am writing as a constituent to express my support for HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Our community thrives when each person is endowed with the rights and liberties to make their own choices so that we all may, in the words of our founders, pursue happiness. Thank you for your work. Warm regards, Anna Ritter
I very strongly support the enshrinement of HJ1, HJ2 and HJ9 into our Commonwealth's Constitution. These are all fundamental rights that absolutely deserve to be protected for the sake of our citizens, and for future generations. Given it is likely that each of these may not be protected federally in the future, we must ensure that our Commonwealth's Constitution sets them in stone.
I urge you to support these amendments that protect and ensure fundamental rights, including reproductive freedom (HJ1), marriage equality (HJ9), and the right to vote (HJ2). I am deeply concerned about the importance of codifying these rights which are essential to individual autonomy and equality on a state level because I feel they are under threat on the national level. Reproductive Freedom: Every person should have the autonomy to make personal health decisions without government interference. By supporting reproductive rights, you affirm the belief that individuals have the right to decide on matters affecting their own bodies and lives. Marriage Equality: Supporting marriage equality acknowledges and protects the diverse forms of family and partnership in our society. Ensuring the right to marry regardless of gender or sexual orientation is a matter of dignity, fairness, and respect for individual freedoms. Right to Vote: Voting is the cornerstone of democracy. By protecting the right to vote, you uphold the integrity of our democratic process and ensure that all citizens have an equal voice in shaping our nation’s future. I respectfully urge you to support any amendments that solidify these essential freedoms for all Americans. Thank you for your leadership and for your commitment to protecting the rights of all your constituents.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms into the commonwealth constitution
I am strongly in favor of HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 being enshrined in the Constitution of the Commonwealth or Virginia.
We strongly support the enshrinement of HJ1, HJ2 and HJ9 in the Commonwealth's Constitution, all sacred, fundamental rights which deserve to be both protected and guaranteed. Thank you for your service & dedication to the citizens of Virginia.
I strongly support the proposed amendments to the Constitution - Bills HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9.
“I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.”
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution. These are all important in ensuring the rights I feel are important to protect all our citizens
I am writing to urge you to support amendments that protect and ensure fundamental rights, including reproductive freedom (HJ1), marriage equality (HJ9), and the right to vote (HJ2). I am deeply concerned about the importance of safeguarding these freedoms, which are essential to individual autonomy and equality. Reproductive Freedom: Every person should have the autonomy to make personal health decisions without government interference. By supporting reproductive rights, you affirm the belief that individuals have the right to decide on matters affecting their own bodies and lives. Marriage Equality: Supporting marriage equality acknowledges and protects the diverse forms of family and partnership in our society. Ensuring the right to marry regardless of gender or sexual orientation is a matter of dignity, fairness, and respect for individual freedoms. Right to Vote: Voting is the cornerstone of democracy. By protecting the right to vote, you uphold the integrity of our democratic process and ensure that all citizens have an equal voice in shaping our nation’s future. I respectfully urge you to support any amendments that solidify these essential freedoms for all Americans. Thank you for your leadership and for your commitment to protecting the rights of all your constituents.
As a Christian, I am against the amendment to allow same sex marriages. It is contrary to the Bible's design for marriage which defines marriage as a union between one man and one woman. Any other definition of marriage is an abomination.
House of Delegates I am writing in support of HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. America was founded on freedom of religion but was not founded as a Christian nation. Jefferson wrote "It does me no injury for my neighbor to believe in twenty gods or no God. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.” The Constitution does not mention God, Jesus, or Christianity. Our nation was founded on the rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Jefferson further stated in our Declaration of Independence, "The purpose of government is to protect these rights, and that if a government fails to do so, the people have the right to alter or abolish it." Jefferson believed that "the pursuit of happiness" was about making decisions that would lead to the best life possible for a human being. With all this in mind, I urge you to vote yes to these bills as they fundamentally protect our human rights and our rights as American citizens based on the stances our diverse nation was founded on. If we fail at this and instead bring back laws based solely on the religion of the few then we fail as a nation. Thank you.
As a woman and a mother, I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I support these amendments. HJ1 is so important because without bodily autonomy, women are no longer free or equal. HJ2- voting should be made easier, not harder. It is every citizen's right. HJ9 is imperative in protecting everyone's right to.marry the person they love. Nobody else should have a say.
HJ1 – fundamental right to reproductive freedom The choice to bear children is a basic right. If a person has any reason to believe it is the wrong choice for them due to any economic, health, or personal pressures, they should be free to consult with a healthcare provider and stop the pregnancy as early as possible. HJ2 – right to vote – restoration of rights Once a person has fulfilled their required sentence under the law, their right to vote should be restored. HJ9 – marriage equality Marriage is such a large and personal commitment made between two people there is no reasonable argument to interfere or try to stop this joyful union between consenting adults.
I strongly support every Virginian’s right to marry the person they love and control their own body. It is important that the commonwealth enshrine these rights into our state constitution.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9 for enshrining these freedoms in the Commonwealth’s constitution.
I’m commenting on all three. All three should be passed. The government should never make medical decisions for another person. Women are already dying in states with abortion bans due to complications with their pregnancies with doctors unable to help due to these bans. Marriage between same sex-couples is legal in all 50 states. The outdated language in our constitution needs to go. Lastly, voting is an American right. If you’ve done your time, you should be able to vote.
I am writing to support reproductive freedom - the healthcare decisions made around childbirth should be between a woman and her doctor without undue influence from the government. I also believe that prior to fetus viability, the woman who has become pregnant should be the one who chooses if she is emotionally, physically, and financially able to care for the child after it has been born. The right to life - for me - extends to the woman first. I believe it is HER life that has value and should bear the weight of autonomy. Remember that it wasn't too long ago that the Virginia assembly voted FOR the ERA. Keep that momentum going!!! I am writing to support voters' rights. There are those who are rising to power in the government sector that would create a dictatorship and authoritarian rule and seek to severely limit the right to vote - which is overwhelmingly how we have voice in our democracy. Keep this essential tool in the hands of Virginia citizens to participate in our governance as a Commonwealth. I am writing to support marriage equality. Human beings should have the freedom and it is a FREEDOM to marry the partner that they choose. Anything other than that is to validate a prejudice that has no scientific and dare I say no moral grounding. I am also in support of all our LGBTQ siblings and believe that transgender rights also need protecting.
Marriage Equality This ban does not reflect the attitudes and beliefs of Virginians in 2023. A 2021 poll from the Public Religion Research Institute found that 71% of Virginians support the right of same-sex couples to marry. This percentage has only increased since the question began being asked of voters. In 2006, 53% of voters supported the marriage ban. This huge swing shows the massive shift in public opinion on the issue of marriage, and it is clear evidence that the antiquated ban should no longer be a part of Virginia’s constitution. It’s only fair to revisit a political question that has shown such a vast change since it was first broached. With the removal of women’s protections with the destruction of Roe v. Wade, it is possible that marriage equality will be destroyed on a national level as well. Virginia must take the lead to protect all citizens. If Virginia really is “for lovers,” it should recognize that love is love and grant all citizens the right to live their lives in peace.
Dear Members of the Virginia House of Delegates, I am writing to express my profound opposition to the proposed Constitutional amendment establishing a so-called “fundamental right to reproductive freedom” and the proposed Constitutional amendment legalizing same-sex marriage. Such an amendment is a dangerous departure from both biblical values and the core principles that underpin our nation: the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. This amendment, rather than providing genuine liberty, undermines the sanctity of life and compromises the values upon which our society stands. Biblically, life is a divine gift, and each human being, crafted in God’s image from conception, holds intrinsic worth and purpose (Psalm 139:13-16). Our Founding Fathers recognized life as the foundation upon which liberty and happiness rest. To disregard this in favor of a subjective notion of "reproductive freedom" is morally misguided and betrays the essential protection of life our Constitution seeks to guarantee. The damage, however, goes beyond the individual. Enshrining a policy of unrestrained reproductive rights has proven to be devastating to our poorer communities, disproportionately affecting marginalized and vulnerable populations. This “freedom of choice” has, in practice, only exacerbated cycles of poverty and instability by incentivizing practices that strip families of their integrity and strength. This is not the promise of liberty but a corrosive force that erodes the foundations of family and community. The breakdown of the nuclear family is central to the deterioration of our society’s core. This so-called “freedom” fosters a culture of unaccountable and destructive behavior that threatens the stability of the home and dismantles the fabric of our communities. In struggling neighborhoods, where support systems are already stretched thin, this policy only encourages unrestrained and often careless practices that destabilize homes, contribute to generational poverty, and fuel cycles of emotional and financial hardship. When we devalue life in the womb, we teach future generations that life itself holds little meaning. Our nation’s health and future prosperity depend on a renewed commitment to the values that foster strong families, stable homes, and resilient communities. If we continue down this path—embracing what is not liberty but, rather, a harmful moral relativism—our nation itself faces the real and present danger of self-destruction. What has been marketed as “freedom of choice” is, in reality, a covert enemy within, unraveling the social fabric, corroding the sanctity of life, and weakening the very pillars upon which our country was founded. I know that each of you seeks to do good for the people of Virginia, to uplift the most vulnerable, and to promote a just society. However, only when God’s principles define what is “good” can we claim to be truly serving the people. Protecting the unborn and honoring the sanctity of life is an essential part of upholding true justice and compassion. I urge you to reject this amendment, reaffirm our commitment to life, and help rebuild the ethical framework that has made America a beacon of freedom and hope. Sincerely, Marylynn Harvey
I oppose all three bills.
I am writing to voice my opposition to both of these bills. HJ1 has zero restrictions for an abortion. To normalize killing a baby simply because you don't want it at anytime of the pregnancy and call it a "right" is absurd. HJ9 the state has no authority to redefine marriage. God created marriage between a man and a woman. If homosexuals want to be notified if their partner is in a crisis, and have those kinds of rights, make a law that allows that. Whatever you want to call it. But it's not marriage.
Constitutionally, there has never been mention of abortion or marriage at the federal level. At the state level, abortion wasn't regulated until 1950, at the height of religious intolerance in this country, and marriage wasn't regulated until 2007. It is clear that the founding fathers did not believe these issues warranted legal regulation. The only reason to prohibit marriage freedom between two or more consenting adults is religious intolerance of other people's rights, which is unconstitutional. Abortion is a more complex issue as the determination of life extends beyond religious beliefs, however the push against abortion is done from a religious perspective of what human life is, which again is unconstitutional. The constitution does not recognize science any more than it does religion however, but the concept of abortion isn't new now and it wasn't new when the constitution was written. Given that, we must look at how the founding fathers worded the constitution concerning the rights of individuals. Few people would argue that people born here or are naturalized aren't protected by all the rights of the constitution except when incapacitated, obligated to complete civic or military duty, or through poor choices resulting in criminal punishment. But the constitution only says born or naturalized, it makes no statement explicitly stating or even implying that the unborn are US citizens protected by the constitution. From a legal perspective, the unborn are not promised the rights and freedoms under the constitution that the rest of us are, even if one views that as human life. As inconvenient of a truth as that may be for religious individuals, the constitution does not offer the ability to restrict the freedom of constitutionally-protected people's from determining what to do with their bodies, even if they have another living body inside of them, because that other living body not only doesn't have constitutional protections; it isn't even recognized as life by the Constitution. In summary, both the freedom to medical choice and the freedom of consenting choice in marriage must be protected, therefore these bills should pass.
We need to protect women's right to healthcare. Medical care should be a basic right in any educated nation. We need to protect marriage equality. Marriage is a legal contract, not a religious concept. No two consenting adults should be barred this right. If we fail to protect the freedoms of women and the queer communities, then we will continue to fail as a nation. We cannot and will not go back.
I strongly support HJ1, HJ2, and HJ9. Let’s amend our constitution to ensure lasting freedoms.
Fully support passing these bills they are greatly needed
What is often lost in the conversation of marriage equality is legal privilege when it comes to medical events. Unfortunately things happen and our loved ones end up hospitalized and unable to make medical decisions, imagine your partner of decades, years, the love of your life is sitting in a bed, and you have no say on how to carry out medical plans that honor their wishes and their goals, simply because the law said since you have matching genitalia, you can't be married.
I am in support of all 3 bills, women should have a say over their own body. Those are important life changing decisions made with the help of a medical professional and are no one else’s business. Not someone who has no medical background whatsoever, or can comprehend what that woman is going through physically and mentally, or is ignorant to what reproductive care really is because their narrow-mindedness just thinks it’s killing babies but will be the first to support cuts to things like Head Start and SNAP. The governor shouldn’t have the decision to determine if someone who has served their time can vote or not. What’s the saying, there’s no hate quite like Christian love, that doesn’t include all Christian’s but you know who are judging other people and filled with hate because someone isn’t like you. You should be able to love and marry whoever you want to, those are basic human rights.
I am writing for each of these Bills. Marriage is between one man and one woman. Life is to be PROTECTED, not extinguished, and Only CITIZENS should be allowed to vote. We , in Virginia, are NOT interested in becoming California. Thank you so much for reading my concerns. I would like to hear back from you your logic in proposing these issues. Sincerely, Mary Cresswell Marywell123@yahoo.com
As a woman faithfully married to my wonderful partner, another woman, the idea that my marriage is lesser is offensive. As a mother raising two wonderful and healthy children with another woman, the idea that our children are lessened by our parenting is untruthful and bigoted. Our rights are no less and no more than any other couple or parents and that should be enshrined in law.
I support these amendments because in a nation that values and prioritizes freedom, I believe that individuals should be free to make their own decisions. If we are to truly have our unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the government cannot restrict our autonomy in any way. Furthermore our government has a responsibility to protect all of our rights and by amending our state constitution we are solidifying that protection in the event that there are challenges to these rights federally.
Pass all 3
Pass all 3
All 3 should be passed
I oppose HJ9 as one who believes in God and that HE defined marriage. As our representatives I implore you NOT to approve HJ9. Approval invites the judgement and wrath of God individually and corporately. I am praying for you to have wisdom as you make your decisions. Thank you!!!
Pass all 3
Pass all 3 bills
All citizens of Virginia deserve to have all 3 bills passed.
Pass all 3 bills for all Virginians
Please pass all 3 bills.
All 3 bills must be passed!
I support all three of these bills. People should never be told what to do with their bodies. It is a violation of freedom. The ones opposing abortion cannot even agree as to when life begins, therefore you cannot argue that it is taking a human life. Others that use religion as an excuse for their positions have never read their bible: Genesis 2:7 The LORD God formed the man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being. Hence, even according to their doctrine, life begins at first breath which happens outside the womb.
I fully support all 3 bills
I believe, as a native Virginian and a Marine Corps veteran who grew up mostly in Fieldale, Virginia and over 35 years has lived in Brookneal, Phenix, Blairs, Martinsville, Vinton, Norfolk, Newport News, and now Portsmouth, these amendments are greatly important to every Virginian whether it will directly or indirectly affect them. I am in complete support of these amendments and believe they are vital to ensure our freedoms. Being a commonwealth, we have a history of looking out for our fellow Virginians and doing what is best for our citizens no matter what other states choose and in many ways it is liberating. This can be a liberating moment for all Virginians. Regarding HJ1, I think about my sister, my sister-in-law, and the future of my nieces, as well as, so many others in my life that I know this amendment will positively affect. What more could a Virginian ask than freedom? Regarding HJ2, I think of compassion. People who have been imprisoned and released have completed their time of punishment and rehabilitation back into society. Part of that rehabilitation back into society is the fundamental right to vote and be heard through said vote. Also, allowing those to have their competency “reestablished as prescribed by law” makes their freedom to vote much easier to re-attain than the current wording of our constitution. Regarding HJ9, since the first state made a change regarding equal marriage in 2003 to when it became law of the land in 2015, our freedoms as Americans only grew. It’s time for our state constitution to reflect that. All three of these amendments reflect the most positive sides of Virginia and all Virginians, whether we grew up here or moved here from a state some might consider less free than Virginia. When I see our state flag, I see Virginia’s interpretation of Lady Liberty. It is welcoming knowing that our version is one depicting what we, as Virginians, think of tyrants, as it states on our very own flag, Sic Semper Tyrannis. I also know that with it being comparable to Lady Liberty, we too “yearn to breathe free.” Lastly, as our state motto says, “Virginia is for Lovers.” With love comes compassion and empathy. Let us prove our flag, our motto, and our national symbol of freedom to be correct.
I support all three amendments I believe that individuals should have autonomy over all their decisions. If we are to truly have our rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the government cannot restrict our autonomy in any way. Our government has a responsibility to protect our rights and by amending our state constitution we are solidifying that protection in the event that there are challenges to these rights federally.
I support all 3 of these bills. The right to bodily autonomy is fundamental to all other rights. The government affirms the right to bodily autonomy of deceased persons, disallowing organ donations without the consent of the deceased prior to their death. We need to affirm the right of all persons to make decisions related to their bodies, including those related to reproduction. This includes the right to terminate a pregnancy throughout the gestation period. We cannot put the lives of pregnant persons at risk by valuing potential persons over actual persons. We must protect the right of citizens to vote. This is an imperative! It is the government's responsibility to protect individuals' rights, not to take them away. Religion has no place in government, and taking individuals' rights to marry based on the religious beliefs of a minority (or even the majority) is antithetical to the spirit and the letter of the 1st Amendment to the US Constitution.
I am in favor of HJ1. Reproductive care needs to be universally accessible, and decisions about what types of care are necessary should be made solely by a Virginian and their doctor. No person or doctor should fear for repercussions from exercising that right. I am in favor of HJ2. Virginian's should not need a Governor's permission to be restored their voting rights. It is vital that all eligible Virginians should be enfranchised to exercise their right to vote. I am in favor of HJ 9. Couples deserve to have their marriages legally acknowledged and upheld no matter their gender, sex, or race. This protects both the rights of Virginians who marry legally and of religious institution to not perform marriages against their beliefs.
I support this amendment
I understand the necessity for these bills and I want to throw my support behind all of them. I hope that you will vote in favor of the amendments.
I am writing my support, as I am for these amendments. Virginia has a responsibility to protect our rights, and by amending our state constitution, we are solidifying that protection in the event that there are challenges to these rights federally.
I support all 3 bills.
Reproductive rights are extremely important. It's basic healthcare!! It is not "killing babies", it's giving a woman a right to make decisions for her own body. Opposing this bill is denying woman the right to decide between life & death! Why would you oppose that? By passing this bill you are saying woman are not entitled to make decisions on their own. We fought too long and hard for the rights we have! I totally support the decisions to limit voting to those who are legally entitled to do so. Please support the right for 2 individuals to marry! It's a sad state on our state (country) that children (girls) as young as 9 can be forced to marry but 2 individuals who are committed to each other in love & life would be denied that!
I support these amendments because, in a nation that values and prioritizes freedom, I believe that individuals should have autonomy over all their decisions. If we are to truly have our unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the government cannot restrict our autonomy in any way. Furthermore, our government has a responsibility to protect our rights and by amending our state constitution we are solidifying that protection in the event that there are challenges to these rights federally. Don't let the federal government tread on us!
To the Virginia House of Delegates: I urge you to support H1, H2, and H9 to affirm the fundamental rights to reproductive freedom, voting, and marriage for all Virginians. These rights are foundational to personal autonomy, dignity, and equality. The preservation of these rights ensures that our community remains a place where every individual has the freedom to make personal choices without interference from the state, honoring the principle that these decisions are best left to individuals than governing bodies.
I support this ammendment
I am writing to provide support to these amendments! We need our rights enshrined in the states constitution.
I wholeheartedly support these amendments and believe that they are in the best interest of all Virginians.
I am writing to support the passing of HJ 9 - repeal the same-sex marriage ban in the Virginia Constitution. While same-sex marriage is currently the law of the land under the Obergefell decision, we are at risk of it being overturned. Protect those that identify as LGBTQ+ in the state of Virginia. Repeal the same-sex marriage ban before anything happens to marriage equality at the national level. Be proactive.
I fully support HJ9, the proposed constitutional amendment that affirms the right to marriage equality in Virginia. This amendment is a crucial step toward ensuring that our state’s laws reflect the values of equality, freedom, and justice for all individuals. By repealing outdated constitutional provisions that define marriage strictly as a union between one man and one woman, HJ9 brings Virginia’s Constitution in line with the landmark *Obergefell v. Hodges* Supreme Court decision, which recognized the right to marriage for same-sex couples. The amendment affirms that marriage is a fundamental right inherent in the liberty of individuals, regardless of their sex, gender, or race, thereby prohibiting any discriminatory barriers to marriage licenses. Importantly, this amendment ensures that all lawful marriages are recognized and treated equally under Virginia law, providing same-sex couples with the same legal protections, rights, and recognition as opposite-sex couples. This is a vital step toward eliminating discrimination and promoting inclusivity within the Commonwealth. At the same time, it respects religious freedoms by explicitly allowing religious organizations and clergy to refuse to perform marriages that conflict with their beliefs, thus balancing the protection of civil rights with religious liberty. Passing HJ9 would send a powerful message that Virginia stands for equality and respects the rights of all its residents to love and marry whomever they choose, free from discrimination. It would affirm the dignity of all couples, promote stronger, more inclusive communities, and help Virginia remain a welcoming and forward-thinking state. This amendment is not just about correcting the wrongs of the past; it is about securing a future where every Virginian is treated with fairness and respect under the law.
I support these amendments because in a nation that values and prioritizes freedom, I believe that individuals should have autonomy over all their decisions. If we are to truly have our unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the government cannot restrict our autonomy in any way. Furthermore our government has a responsibility to protect our rights and by amending our state constitution we are solidifying that protection in the event that there are challenges to these rights federally.
I am writing to express my strong support for a state constitutional amendment to protect same-sex marriages. This amendment is essential to ensure that all couples, regardless of gender, have the right to marry and enjoy the legal benefits and social recognition that come with marriage. Marriage equality is a fundamental issue of civil rights and social justice. By protecting same-sex marriages in our state constitution, we affirm the dignity and equality of all individuals. This amendment will help to eliminate discrimination and promote inclusivity, ensuring that all families are treated with the respect and fairness they deserve. Furthermore, protecting same-sex marriages strengthens our communities. It allows couples to build stable, loving homes and provides children with the security of legally recognized parents. Marriage equality also contributes to the mental and emotional well-being of LGBTQ+ individuals by affirming their relationships and identities. It is crucial that we take this step to safeguard the rights of same-sex couples, especially in a time when these rights are under threat in various parts of the country. By enshrining marriage equality in our state constitution, we send a powerful message that love and commitment are valued and protected, regardless of gender. I urge lawmakers to support this amendment and to stand up for the rights and dignity of all individuals in our state. Sincerely, Jen Sheldon
We must protect the right for marriage equality. The only argument they make against it is a fictional text (the bible) which has absolutely no bearing in law or government in this nation. We must continue to honor and uphold this right which is already enshrined in law.
I support these amendments because in a nation that values and prioritizes freedom, I believe that individuals should have autonomy over all their decisions. If we are to truly have our unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the government cannot restrict our autonomy in any way. Furthermore our government has a responsibility to protect our rights and by amending our state constitution we are solidifying that protection in the event that there are challenges to these rights federally.
Abortion is never medically necessary. No state in the Union prohibits doing what is necessary to save the lives of mothers in danger, and none of those things are abortions (the intentional killing of the child in the womb). If there was actual interest in mothers' health, in office examinations and ultrasounds would be required before dispensing abortion pills. It is hard to understand how the same crowd saying "my body my choice" was all in for mask, vaccine, and stay-at-home mandates. Equally fascinating are people with yard signs that read "We believe science is real" who apparently also believe that despite every cell in one's body having either XX or XY chromosomes, somehow lifelong prescription pharmaceuticals can change things. I pray you find yourselves on the righteous side of the following observation: "Hell does not appear to the faithless; it is clear and obvious to the faithful." - St. John Chrysostom
-Voting is a constitutional right. If a person has fulfilled their debt to society, then they should have the right to vote. It’s also a great part of rehabilitation and ones stake in community is important to reentry. Voting gives one a sense of community. -Women are dying in this country because of highly restricted reproductive rights. It will only get worse as more data comes out about women put in impossible situations in states with draconian abortion laws. Virginia has to set a standard as a bastion of freedom for women and trust them and healthcare professionals to make their own decisions. It would be abhorrent to restrict women’s healthcare rights. Virginia cannot be one of the states that robs women of their choice and healthcare freedoms. -the right to same sex marriage should be protected. And has been by the US Supreme Court. Restricting anyone’s right to marrying who they wish is immoral and constitutes government overreach
Everyone has the right to be with who they want. Virginia must protect the rights of all people, when it comes to marriage. This is a right for everyone and must not be taken away.
As a woman, psychologist, and family member of a someone in the LGBTQIA+ community, I support these bills and urge you to pass them. Thank you!
I support reproductive freedom in Virginia and support marriage equality. I also support trans rights in Virginia.
Remarks to follow on both measures.
I am for marriage being defined as a union between one man and one woman. God created humanity male and female in God's image. No human being should attempt to change this. Male and female unions, however imperfect, are the only good design for human society and a chance at healthy family structures. Other relationships are undefined in the Bible in terms of male and female. All relationships are defined by God to be governed by loving God and loving one's neighbor, in the way that we now have see Jesus love others. I am opposed to this amendment.