Public Comments for: HB726 - Credit for time spent in confinement while awaiting trial; extradition or fugitive warrant.
My brother personally spent over three years in a county jail awaiting trial and transfer to the Virginia Department of Corrections, and he currently receives no credit toward his earned sentence for that time served. This is deeply unfair. Time spent in confinement—whether for months or for years—is time served, and it should count toward sentence calculations, including good time credits. Under current law, some individuals who await trial may spend only a few months in jail, while others, like my brother, spend years. HB 726 would ensure that all qualifying pretrial confinement is recognized, including time spent awaiting extradition or transfer, so that sentences are applied equitably. This reform is about fairness, proportionality, and ensuring that individuals do not serve more time than their sentence legally requires. I respectfully urge you to vote in favor of HB726. It is a commonsense measure that corrects an inequity in Virginia’s sentencing system and ensures that time served is properly acknowledged.
I am writing in support of Virginia House Bill 361. My perspective comes from personal experience. My loved one has been incarcerated within the Virginia Department of Corrections for 17 years. During that time, he has spent long periods confined under conditions and policies that offered no opportunity to earn sentence credits — despite consistent effort, good behavior, and personal growth. HB 361 is not about excusing past mistakes. It is about fairness. Time served is time lived, and individuals should not be denied earned sentence credits simply because of when their incarceration occurred or circumstances beyond their control. After 17 years, I have seen how denying earned credits deepens hopelessness while recognizing effort encourages accountability and rehabilitation. I respectfully urge you to support HB 361 and help ensure Virginia’s sentencing system reflects fairness, humanity, and modern justice principles.
I am writing to oppose the current slate of firearm restriction bills before the General Assembly. While these proposals are framed as public safety measures, in practice they disproportionately harm marginalized Virginians — including racial minorities, LGBTQ+ individuals (especially trans people), immigrants, and low-income residents — who often face higher risks of targeted violence and slower or unequal police response. These bills add costs, delays, and bureaucratic hurdles to exercising a fundamental right. Increased fees, mandatory waiting periods, feature bans, and expanded disqualifications fall hardest on people with limited financial resources, unstable work schedules, or justified concerns about their personal safety. For many vulnerable individuals, the ability to lawfully and promptly acquire a firearm is not about ideology, but about self-defense. History shows that restrictive gun laws are most aggressively enforced in minority communities, amplifying disparities in arrests, prosecution, and legal exposure — even when no harm has occurred. Expanding civil liability, criminal penalties, and subjective risk standards increases that risk. Public safety should not come at the expense of civil rights or equal access to self-protection. Policies that price people out of their rights or delay lawful self-defense do not address the root causes of violence and instead leave the most vulnerable less safe. I respectfully urge you to oppose these bills and support approaches that protect both public safety and the rights of all Virginians, regardless of income, identity, or background. Thank you for your time and consideration.