My name is Anthony Gomez, and I lead PATH Reentry, a nonprofit organization that provides transitional services to individuals returning to the community. I was formerly incarcerated for 24 years, and I am bilingual in English and Spanish. I support this bill because I have seen firsthand how people who do not speak English are often denied or unable to access essential services simply because they cannot understand the process or advocate for themselves. Language access is not a convenience—it is a necessity for fairness, dignity, and successful reentry.

HB173 and HB296 represent common sense and humane visitation policies. Strong connections to the outside world are demonstrably vital to reentry success. HB1041 is another obvious gain for everyone concerned, returning citizens, their loved ones, and tax paying citizens of the Commonwealth. HB553 is another no brainer that deserves full support.

Good Morning, the House Of Delegates, I am a member of the Valley Justice Coalition and we support these four (4) bills : HB173, HB296, HB533 and HB1041. These bills are well needed in the Department of Correction for the detained individuals and families in order to maintain a productive re entry to the communities. Please, vote yes. Thank you. Ms Stover

As an ELL teacher and a member of the Valley Justice Coalition, I am strongly in support of this bill. Please vote Yes for HB553.

I am writing to oppose the current slate of firearm restriction bills before the General Assembly. While these proposals are framed as public safety measures, in practice they disproportionately harm marginalized Virginians — including racial minorities, LGBTQ+ individuals (especially trans people), immigrants, and low-income residents — who often face higher risks of targeted violence and slower or unequal police response. These bills add costs, delays, and bureaucratic hurdles to exercising a fundamental right. Increased fees, mandatory waiting periods, feature bans, and expanded disqualifications fall hardest on people with limited financial resources, unstable work schedules, or justified concerns about their personal safety. For many vulnerable individuals, the ability to lawfully and promptly acquire a firearm is not about ideology, but about self-defense. History shows that restrictive gun laws are most aggressively enforced in minority communities, amplifying disparities in arrests, prosecution, and legal exposure — even when no harm has occurred. Expanding civil liability, criminal penalties, and subjective risk standards increases that risk. Public safety should not come at the expense of civil rights or equal access to self-protection. Policies that price people out of their rights or delay lawful self-defense do not address the root causes of violence and instead leave the most vulnerable less safe. I respectfully urge you to oppose these bills and support approaches that protect both public safety and the rights of all Virginians, regardless of income, identity, or background. Thank you for your time and consideration.

I am writing in support of Virginia House Bill 361. My perspective comes from personal experience. My loved one has been incarcerated within the Virginia Department of Corrections for 17 years. During that time, he has spent long periods confined under conditions and policies that offered no opportunity to earn sentence credits — despite consistent effort, good behavior, and personal growth. HB 361 is not about excusing past mistakes. It is about fairness. Time served is time lived, and individuals should not be denied earned sentence credits simply because of when their incarceration occurred or circumstances beyond their control. After 17 years, I have seen how denying earned credits deepens hopelessness while recognizing effort encourages accountability and rehabilitation. I respectfully urge you to support HB 361 and help ensure Virginia’s sentencing system reflects fairness, humanity, and modern justice principles.

Commenting on HB296 visitation, Dress Code First time visitors at a new facility always ask the FB groups what they can wear at the new facility because they really don't know. It can be very different from one facility to another.. Im sure many have had the frightening and frustraating experience ofrefusal and was sent out in search of the local Dollar General. I have worn the same pants to visitation for years afraid to try other pants because I might be refused. No wonder visitation has dropped by 92%. Valley Justice Coalition Supports this bill. Please vote Yes!