Public Comments for: HB1524 - Assault firearms; carrying in public areas prohibited, penalty.
I write in stark opposition to the misguided and naive attempts at gun control Virginia legislators have advanced in this term. I’m deeply concerned with Virginia Democrats’ eagerness to immediately pass these sweeping gun bans, such as (but not limited to) HB217 and SB749. These bills, as written, are deeply flawed for many reasons, ranging from the ideological to the practical. First, the practical. The way these bills define “assault weapons” is certainly unconstitutional. They would ban virtually every firearm from private ownership. This will make its way quickly to the Supreme Court, and we all know how that will end. There is precious little evidence supporting the idea that bans like these reduce crime. They are based more on banning what looks scary, rather than what is actually dangerous. It is plain to see that you are passing these laws to score points with your base. Well, I am your base, and I am here to tell you that the opposite is happening. I also want to speak to the ideological side of this. In my time as a community organizer, working with grassroots organizations to do things like defend drag story hours and organize community meals, I have met a broad spectrum of left-wing activists in the DMV community, most of them from marginalized populations. What you may not see or hear is that these people want to learn how to defend themselves. The Liberal Gun Club is overwhelmed with requests for training. Several organizations have been organizing queer-friendly range days, which are also totally overwhelmed with interest. Mainstream firearms training is often unwelcoming and unsafe for these populations, so they rely on the meager capacity of progressive people like me to learn safe and responsible gun ownership. It’s in this environment that we witnessed the cold-blooded murder of Alex Pretti, a man who wanted to protect his community and was summarily executed for exercising his constitutional rights. Interest from marginalized folks in learning to defend themselves has spiked even higher than it already was. A recent free range day offered to members of the queer community filled up signups in 3 minutes. In this time, we cannot be passing laws to deprive our most oppressed populations of the means to defend themselves. Even if you believe that law enforcement is not a threat to us - an idea many I know would firmly reject - it is well known that groups like Patriot Front and the Proud Boys count a large number of NoVa residents amongst their ranks. Beyond HB217/SB749, the other gun control bills that have been advanced (except the one that removes mandatory minimum sentences, which I wholeheartedly support) would increase the rate at which people of color would have to interact with law enforcement, which WILL lead to more incidents like Alex Pretti and Renee Good, and Philando Castile before them. What we need from our legislators in this moment is steadfast PROTECTION of our constitutional rights and of our right to defend ourselves, after four long years of constant bigoted assaults by the Youngkin regime. I urge you to stand up for marginalized communities and what we actually want, which is the protection and preservation of our civil and constitutional rights. Focus your efforts on stopping ICE in our streets, protecting free & fair elections in 2026, and dismantling right wing extremism, not on stripping us of the means to protect ourselves, in a time when we need it most.
I stand with the Virginia Citizens Defense League on these bills.
Every one of you have taken an oath to defend the constitution of the United States of America. You also took an oath to uphold the constitution of Virginia. By passing these bills, you have broken your oath. The people of the great state of Virginia will remember this.
To whom ItMay Concern, I, as a law abiding citizen of the great state of Virginia. I strongly oppose HB 1524. David A. Bissett
I am opposed to HB1524's ban on carrying of firearms in general, and in particular the lack of an exemption for concealed carry holders. According to FBI statistics, individuals with a concealed carry permit are 100 times LESS likely to commit a crime than the general public and even 6 times LESS likely to commit a crime than police officers. Concealed carry holders are not a threat to society and, in fact, are you best citizens. An exemption should be permitted.
I firmly oppose this bill, as it will criminalize the carry of some of the most popular and widespread firearms currently in common use among law-abiding firearm owners in the commonwealth, to include those citizens who have gone through the training necessary to obtain a concealed carry license. Criminalizing the innocent for a victimless crime will have no positive impact on public safety, and may well be to its detriment.
This is absurd and not a bill created out of the reality our state faces.
Citizens of all races bought there firearms in a legal manner.Now with a stroke of a pen possibly made illegal..Oppressing and infringement laws are a racist act..The legislators are infringing on rights of different ethnicities, color,culture.The majority of the authors who wrote the bills are white..Some have come from other countries where there rights were oppressed. Now in turn they are the oppressors of American citizens..Citizens are brothers and sisters..And you decide Are the legislators racist in writing these bills..? Sad to see..This will be in record for future generations to see..Let's hope they learn from history and not repeat it .
As written this bill is too aggressive and will criminalize most firearm owners. This bill criminalizes the transportation of firearms that match this criteria (most sporting rifles and pistols) on public roads and sidewalks. On face value that sounds reasonable, however there are several lack of carve outs that would criminalize reasonable and lawful activity. For example the only exemption for this law is transporting these sorts of firearms to shooting ranges and for hunting. In addition, there is no clarification if the firearm can be transported in a case or container making the term “carry in person” too broad. Therefore, since there is no exemption for transporting a firearm in a case to a gunsmith for repairs, even if unloaded taking a firearm to be repaired would be criminalized. In addition this will criminalize anyone transporting home a firearm in this category to and from private property even if unloaded meaning you cannot shoot a firearm of this category at a friend’s property. Going one step further, transporting a firearm to a new residence when moving is also not exempted even while unloaded. Any reasonable person would NOT consider these circumstances to be a threat to public safety but due to the aggressive language used in this bill would criminalize regular people for benign activity. This bill should not pass due to the unclear and overly prescriptive wording.
I strongly oppose this bill. We have laws against brandishing and other inappropriate actions already. Given what is going on around the country, I am expecting that people will need to stand, visibly armed, on the sidewalks to protect their neighbors. Let's not create regulations that will make it harder to protect ourselves.
HB 1524 Now simply carrying a firearm that is arbitrarily labeled “assault” is a criminal offense. Maybe someone missed the part of the US Constitution where it says “…bear arms”. Simply transporting or carrying a firearm can hardly imply criminal intent. I’m certain that we have no crime statistics that would support transportation of a firearm as problem to be solved. This should be an easy “NO”.
Greetings Delegates, The U.S. Supreme Court has already ruled that citizens have the right to carry firearms outside of their homes and in public, so this bill is unconstitutional on its face. De-regulation, decreasing taxation, and focusing on tangible, data-driven, and constitutionally inspired law-making will unite us as Virginians. Do these things, and you'll have my vote.
Delegate McGuire, the manufacturer of my Tr-Star C100 does not make a magazine that only holds 10 rounds. They sell 15 round magazines. The passage of this bill as written means I can no longer carry my self defense weapon. I would have to purchase a new firearm which I don’t need or want. I have had my CC permit for 9 years and thank the Lord Jesus Christ I have never had to use my firearm and hopefully never will. Thank you.
I oppose this bill as a left democrat, I believe that with the death of Alex Pretti, tyrannical governments, increase in hate crimes, and increase in the left seeking fire arms self defense trainings many of these bills are incredibly tone deaf. In general, I find it offensive that everytown happen is writing these bills and imposing there values on our state as they do others. They do not represent all of the left or everyone in the community. With our 1st, 4th , 14th amendment's currently under attack restricting our 2nd amendments further is not something I feel comfortable with regarding how our rights are less as citizens then then the oligarchy, govt officials, and law enforcement. As a mental health therapist I want to see bills that address cause mitigation, improving mental health services, economic growth, class equality , more opportunities for affordable training and safety for those who want to protect themselves. Not punitive gotcha bills. I do not feel more safe with these bills, law enforcement will not protect me from tyrannical govts, ICE, criminals, and the rise of neo nazis extremism. We should take more to combat hate are regulate disinformation. Our govt has been working against us not for us on behalf of the oligarchy. I have heard absurd statements such as tax bills on ammo can save lives, shooting is for fun instead of training, which tells me this is only give the 2nd amendment as a privilege to law enforcement and the wealthy not as a right. This bill in particular does not address that carrying your fire arm Rifle cased on public grounds going to ranges, competitions, and other shooting locations would not also be a violation. Please amend this bill to cased. Thank you
I urge you to OPPOSE HB 1524, Delegate McGuire, which severely restricts where a broad category of commonly owned firearms can be carried. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in New York State Rife and Pistol Association v. Bruen that states cannot have sweeping prohibitions on the carry of firearms in public areas, which is exactly what HB 1524 does.
HB1524 A friendly amendment, please add an exemption for any FFL. They may be going through a public area and they will have there licesense on them
This bill is unconstitutional and unnecessary, and it curtails the rights of law abiding people to unreasonable degrees. I oppose it thoroughly.
A friendly amendment, please add an exemption for any FFL. They may be going through a public area and they will have there licesense on them
I oppose this bill. Constituents of Virginia should be allowed to conceal carry a firearm. Criminals will not give up their firearms, don’t take them away from law abiding citizens that have legally acquired their firearms and passed a background check.
Open carry of firearms (even "assault firearms") is permitted in the Virginia Constitution. Moreover, it is unclear if this bill even allows for the transport of unloaded and cased firearms on public roads and streets to/from the range, shooting events, and other sorts of lawful activities.
I oppose HB1527, SB27, SB38, SB173, SB272, and SB323.
I would like to provide some context as to who I am because It provides important context to my opinions and statements below. I have been a Virginia resident for 28 years in Fairfax and Arlington counties, and a public servant for 23 years. I am an independent voter and believe that no party adequately represents the full spectrum of my beliefs. I believe that it is the diversity of thought and experience in the different communities in Virginia what keeps VA purple AND What keeps it strong. We are blessed to have people we disagree with as our neighbors because it keeps our minds open and agile, and reinforces empathy for our fellow citizens. Our country and our neighbors are suffering deeply right now because the political pendulum is swinging so hard that it cannot be tolerated by our neighbors, and then when it swings in the other direction it cannot be tolerated by us. Pushing this pendulum to swing harder and faster and farther is what will tear our society apart. I voted for Governor Spanberger and Representative Walkinshaw in the last election because I wanted to defend the diversity that strengthens us as a country and also protect my family members in marginalized minority groups. I hoped I wasn’t voting for another extremist, or another person who was take the pendulum and swing it as hard as they could in the other direction. I definitely didn’t vote for nor do I support the more extreme elements of the proposed firearms legislation. Tax of anywhere near $500 on suppressors is inherently discriminatory to low income individuals. The absurdly restrictive terms on the transfer or sale of grandfathered firearms leaves no options for them to liquidate their collection before their death when they would those funds for their continued care through aging and then it puts an undue burden on the estate of the firearms owner after their death. Allowing for in-state transfer and sale without further import of the restricted items seems a much more balanced and reasonable approach. Capacity of up to 20 rounds is extremely common. Those extra rounds do not markedly decrease the lethality of a pistol or a rifle. It does not change a firearm from semiautomatic to a automatic. If someone had malicious intent to use a firearm, it takes less than one second to swap a magazine. This legislation significantly impacts the large sport shooting community in Virginia. In order to be competitive in national competitions you need to train with higher capacity magazines or you will not be nearly as competitive. It also makes it impossible to obtain new firearms to stay competitive as the sport advances. Many of the characteristics that have been deamed “assault-style” are extremely common in hunting scenarios, keep the hunter safe in dangerous conditions, and protect their hearing and the peacefulness of the area in which they’re hunting. I firmly believe in the fallibility of humans and their propensity towards greed and power. The Second Amendment was given to us by our forefathers to ensure the consent of the governed. This amendment goes too far to neuter the balance of power between governing forces and the people that are governed. This legislation will also further polarize the conservative constituents of Virginia. Do not legislate against something they deeply value unless you wish for them to legislate against something that you deeply value. I do not support this legislation.
This bill is so broad that it's unconstitutional. The lawsuits will be legion and VA taxpayers will pay to defend this should it pass. Pass it by.
The U.S. Supreme Court has already ruled that citizens have the right to carry firearms outside of their homes and in public, so this bill is unconstitutional on its face. These unconstitutional bills need to be shut down.
How does removing my ability to protect myself or my family or other people in a public place improve safety? There are more good, law abiding Virginia citizens carrying protection than there are criminals. Why should any legislation make these citizens the criminals?
How does removing my ability to protect myself or my family or other people in a public place improve safety? There are more good, law abiding Virginia citizens carrying protection than there are criminals. Why should any legislation make these citizens the criminals?
This bill does nothing but restrict the capability for law abiding citizens defend themselves and their families. I carry a pistol every chance I get to defend myself and my wife and two children. Politicians or police aren’t going to be the ones who save you when thugs try to rob you, fentanyl tweakers try to attack you, or when someone decides to act upon road rage in a violent way. It’s only on you to defend yourself appropriately in that moment. By the time the police get there (if they even do) you and/or your family could be seriously injured or dead. Additionally, this bill would prevent my wife from carrying her pistols to defend herself and our children when I’m not around. She depends on a capable pistol to give her the power to defend herself. This bill would prohibit her from carrying anything she currently owned and make her an easy target for predators. This bill puts so many Virginians at risk, especially Women and Mothers.
Our constitution under the 2nd amendment gives us the right carry and bear arms. This will end up in court and will be defeated. Please save everyone money and time and defeat this bill. Thank you. Michael C. Pickwoad
There are approximately three quarters of a million active concealed permit holders in Virginia. HB 1524 bill prevents anyone with a permit that carries a semi-automatic pistol with a detachable magazine and a threaded barrel from being able to carry their pistol. Semiautomatic pistols with threaded barrels are quite common even when their owners have not equipped them with a silencer. This bill will require many thousands of people who carry concealed to purchase new pistols, where all else will be equal except the newly purchased pistols will not have threaded barrels. In addition, line 56-57 of the bill states ”Except for the exemption in subdivision C 2 of § 18.2-308, the exemptions set forth in § 18.2-308 shall apply, mutatis mutandis, to the provisions of this section.” Section C 2 refers to LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS and RETIRED LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS! Off duty and retired law enforcement officers will not be able to carry a pistol if it has a threaded barrel! The anti-gun bills that have been introduced in Virginia this legislative session show me that the supporters of these bills have zero regard for the Constitution, my rights as a lawful citizen and my rights to be able to defend myself and others from violent crime. The supporters of these bills have lost all sense of who the good guys are and who the bad guys are. I see this when early release is granted to hundreds of violent felons, many of which then go on to reoffend and violently prey on the very people you are supposed to protect, all for nothing more than some misdirected attempt at virtue signaling. I see this when prosecutors do not pursue charges against violent offenders in a misdirected attempt at virtue signaling. I see this when legislative efforts focus on the law-abiding and do nothing to violent felons who will not bother to be hindered by any gun laws. I see this when legislators talk about “gun violence” and do nothing about the underlying problem of “violence” and how to reduce it. I see this when I see news stories of repeat violent offenders who have been arrested for dozens of violent crimes, including murder, who end up killing someone yet again due to some form of “catch and release”. AND I SEE THIS WHEN THE DEMOCRATS TO A MAN/WOMAN VOTED TO DEFEAT SB 78 which would Increase from five to 10 years for a second or subsequent offense the mandatory minimum sentence for use or display of a firearm during the commission of certain felonies. I recently heard one of the Virginia legislators say that long sentences do not stop people from committing crime, the fear of getting caught does. I disagree, the fear of getting caught does nothing to stop violent felons from committing crime – they always get caught. Maybe not for every violent crime, but eventually they will get caught (and then inexplicably get released to reoffend). The laws are in place to remove violent felons, whether or not they use firearms, from society and prevent them from preying on your law-abiding constituents. Please use and strengthen them. I urge opposition to HB1524 in its entirety.
VOTE to RESTRICT Assault Rifles and Weapons that Can Fire Quickly Many Rounds. We keep hearing from gun enthusiasts two things: 1). Any reasonable restriction SOMEHOW impinges on the Second Amendment. Yet, our history, experience, and research has shown that REASONABLE restrictions, near or in schools, places of worship, public buildings like courthouses, make a great deal of sense. 2). That the Second Amendment allows us to have as many weapons as we want to put down any insurrection. Yet, Constitutional scholars do not interpret the Second as anything close to this. allowed weapons for a 'well-regulated militia." And some of these gun-toting freedom-lover folks WERE the insurrection on Jan. 6. Unfortunately, our corrupt U.S. Supreme Ct seems to think that the Second should be open to a broader interpretation than the First and the Fourth. I grew up in rural Minnesota. I shot plenty of rifles. Please continue to place reasonable restrictions on guns for all of us who have no need to brandish firearms wherever we go.
I oppose HB 1524.
Good morning, My name is Andrew B, a GWOT veteran and federal contractor. I am deeply disappointed in the legislation proposed by delegates. The Constitution is not a suggestion; it guides our nation. The Second Amendment protects the First and serves all citizens, Democrats and Republicans alike. This should not be partisan. HB1524 is unconstitutional. You cannot arbitrarily prevent citizens from carrying firearms in public. Bruen established that restrictions require historical precedent, which this bill lacks. As written: “A well regulated Militia… the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” SB 27 creates vague liability standards for firearm manufacturers and dealers through undefined “reasonable controls,” allowing lawsuits based on subjective interpretations. Lawful businesses already comply with extensive federal and state regulations governing sales, record keeping, and background checks. This bill risks penalizing companies even when compliant. It could expose lawful businesses to costly litigation for criminal misuse by third parties, something they cannot realistically control. This may reduce lawful access to firearms and harm Virginia businesses without demonstrably improving public safety. Public safety efforts should focus on enforcing existing laws rather than creating new liability burdens on lawful commerce. SB 272 would restrict lawful citizens, including concealed handgun permit holders, from carrying firearms inside public college buildings, removing self-defense options where police response may still leave individuals vulnerable. Those intent on violence will ignore restrictions, leaving law-abiding citizens disarmed while doing little to deter crime. Virginia should improve campus security and enforcement rather than restrict lawful carry. SB 323 risks criminalizing citizens who legally manufactured or possess firearms or components previously permitted under state and federal law. The bill imposes serious penalties on responsible owners while criminals are unlikely to comply with serialization or manufacturing restrictions. Criminal misuse should be addressed by enforcing laws against violent offenders rather than creating new crimes that primarily affect law-abiding citizens and hobbyist builders. Legislation should target criminal behavior directly, not burden lawful ownership. For these reasons, I respectfully ask you to oppose SB 323. — Sic Semper Tyrannis —
Good morning, My name is Andrew B, a GWOT veteran and federal contractor. I am deeply disappointed in the legislation proposed by delegates. The Constitution is not a suggestion; it guides our nation. The Second Amendment protects the First and serves all citizens, Democrats and Republicans alike. This should not be partisan. HB1524 is unconstitutional. You cannot arbitrarily prevent citizens from carrying firearms in public. Bruen established that restrictions require historical precedent, which this bill lacks. As written: “A well regulated Militia… the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” SB 27 creates vague liability standards for firearm manufacturers and dealers through undefined “reasonable controls,” allowing lawsuits based on subjective interpretations. Lawful businesses already comply with extensive federal and state regulations governing sales, record keeping, and background checks. This bill risks penalizing companies even when compliant. It could expose lawful businesses to costly litigation for criminal misuse by third parties, something they cannot realistically control. This may reduce lawful access to firearms and harm Virginia businesses without demonstrably improving public safety. Public safety efforts should focus on enforcing existing laws rather than creating new liability burdens on lawful commerce. SB 272 would restrict lawful citizens, including concealed handgun permit holders, from carrying firearms inside public college buildings, removing self-defense options where police response may still leave individuals vulnerable. Those intent on violence will ignore restrictions, leaving law-abiding citizens disarmed while doing little to deter crime. Virginia should improve campus security and enforcement rather than restrict lawful carry. SB 323 risks criminalizing citizens who legally manufactured or possess firearms or components previously permitted under state and federal law. The bill imposes serious penalties on responsible owners while criminals are unlikely to comply with serialization or manufacturing restrictions. Criminal misuse should be addressed by enforcing laws against violent offenders rather than creating new crimes that primarily affect law-abiding citizens and hobbyist builders. Legislation should target criminal behavior directly, not burden lawful ownership. For these reasons, I respectfully ask you to oppose SB 323. — Sic Semper Tyrannis —
Members of the Committee on Public Safety: HB1524 would make it unlawful for otherwise law-abiding and well-intentioned Virginians from carrying commonly owned firearms in public spaces, to include sidewalks, streets, and any other place "open to the public." The firearms described in the bill are not atypical, nor are they extraordinarily dangerous. They are some of the most commonly owned and carried firearms across the US. The language in this bill would make it legally perilous for ordinary citizens to responsibly engage in lawful training and self-defense, which is counterproductive to the stated goals of such legislation: Training and practicing with equipment significantly increases safety. Many Virginians across the political spectrum are deeply concerned about the efforts at the federal level to suppress or remove their rights: bodily autonomy, speech, freedom from religious persecution, and equal protection under the law are all openly being targeted. By chipping away at other rights, such as keeping and bearing arms, protected by both the Constitution of Virginia and the Constitution of the United States, further erosion of the foundational principles of our society is even more likely. I urge you to reject HB 1524 and expend your political capital elsewhere to protect women's rights, trans rights, and our vulnerable neighbors while you have the opportunity to. This moment will not last forever. Thank you for taking the time to consider this testimony.
Dear Mr. Wilt, Please oppose Bill 1524 as it is written. Try to convince our other Delegates that not all semi-automatic firearms are assault weapons. There need to be exceptions in this bill that exclude for example, holders of Concealed Handgun permits, the number of rounds of ammunition the firearm will hold, etc. For example, a .380 caliber semi-auto pistol that holds 10 rounds or less is certainly not an assault weapon. Also, just because a firearm may resemble in appearance an assult type weapon does not make it an assult weapon. I fully agree that a true assault weapon has no business outside military or law enforcement use. I know you support our 2nd Amendment rights and thank you for that. Thank you for all your work and dedication to us. Sincerely and God Bless, Art Scott 540-578-3253
Oh hell no Oppose HB1524 It violates the 2A
This violates the 2A Oppose this bs bill
I oppose HB1524, SB27, SB38, SB173, SB272 and SB323.
I oppose HB1524, SB27, SB272, and SB323 as they violate constitutionally protected rights, both federally and for the state of Virginia.
I opposed the following bills
HB1459: SUPPORT HB1524: OPPOSE, both the VA and US constitutions protect the right to carry any legally owned firearms. Both the VA and US constitutions protect the right to own center-fire rifles, center-fire pistols, and shotguns that accept a magazine of greater than 10 rounds SB27: OPPOSE, this unconstitutionally, unfairly, and unjustly empowers anyone to hold the firearms industry responsible for actions of others outsides of the industry's control. SB38: OPPOSE, the language prohibiting persons under 21 is unconstitutional. The language prohibiting a cohabitant is also unconstitutional. SB86: SUPPORT SB173: OPPOSE, this violates Virginians' constitutional rights. Virginians have the right to carry a firearm for their personal protection anywhere that lacks sufficient security to assume responsibility for the safety of any disarmed persons and that lacks safe storage of firearms carried to and from such location. SB272: OPPOSE, this violates Virginians' constitutional rights. Virginians have the right to carry a firearm for their personal protection anywhere that lacks sufficient security that assumes responsibility for the safety of any disarmed persons and that lacks safe storage of firearms carried to and from such location. SB323: OPPOSE, Virginians should be free to build or customize personally owned firearms without serial numbers. SB337: OPPOSE, this language seems to attempt to legislate based only the current circumstances surrounding national guard deployments in the US. This could hinder an Adjutant General from acting responsibly and prudently under possible future circumstances currently unforeseen.
I oppose HB1524, SB27, SB38, SB173, SB272 and SB323.
These proposed bills do not address the root causes of violence. They do not stop criminals, who by definition ignore the law, and they do not deter those who already intend to do harm. Instead, they place new burdens on the very people who follow the rules. Law-abiding citizens become the target of regulation, while criminal behavior remains unchanged. This approach mistakes control for safety. It assumes that restricting the rights of responsible people will somehow restrain those who have no regard for the law in the first place. History and common sense both show otherwise. When rights are limited in the name of protection, what is actually reduced is trust between citizens and their government. These measures also expand the power of the state in ways that deserve serious concern. Broad authority, vague enforcement, and increased penalties aimed at ordinary people create opportunities for abuse rather than justice. Liberty is not preserved by weakening it in the hope that criminals will suddenly obey it. If the goal is public safety, then the focus should be on violent offenders, mental health, and meaningful enforcement of existing laws. These bills do none of that. They erode constitutional rights, punish compliance, and leave the real problem untouched.
I oppose HB1524, SB27, SB38, SB173, SB272 and SB323. These do not provide safety to the community at all.
I oppose hb1524, sb27, sb38, sb173, sb272, and sb323!
I oppose HB1524, SB27, SB38, SB173, SB272, and SB323.
I oppose HB1524, SB27, SB38, SB173, SB272 and SB323
Please stop the charade. We "the people" have an obligation to protect ourselves from tyranny (you.) Our family's lives are at stake from Radical politicians that seek to destroy our values, morals, dignity, way of life, Our Commonwealth, and Nation who is about to celebrate 250 years. Please do not let this coubtry fall short of being prosperous, safe and self governing. You all still have Apache Attack Helicopters. We dont. Yet.
Oppose HB1525 As a retired Servicemeber, that swore an oath to support and defend the U.S. Constitution. I am watching the passing of Unconstitutional firearms legislations being filed that appalls me to the core. Oppose HB1525, HB 217, and SB643: Consider the fact that 18,19- and 20-year-old men and women are eligible to serve our country, they are actually serving our country. Denying them the right to own firearms of any type while expecting them to carry, employ and secure them in the service of our country and potentially being kill, being severely injured is not about safety. We ask these young 18,19- and 20-year-old men and women to serve and potentially die or get injured in service of our nation and you strip their constitutional rights under the guise of public safety. I served with and led 18-, 19-, and 20-year-old young men and women. I saw their flag draped coffins and I see cemeteries and military cemeteries filled with them. Don't call it public safety when you violate their constitutional rights and demand sacrifice from these men and women. These legislations, dishonor and disregard the sacrifice of all servicemembers that have fought, bled, died and been injured in service of this nation for 250 years. Including the sacrifice of18-, 19-, and 20-year-old young men and women. We have first responders, and upstanding productive members of society that are 18-, 19-, and 20-year-old young men and women. Legislations denying the legal rights of young men and women under the age of 21 is an affront to those young men and women that serve our nation, are first responders and that work for a living in areas that are not secure facilities or that has a fully staffed law enforcement agency that has a strong presence in high crime areas were seconds count and the victim is the first line of defense. It is hypocrisy and asinine to ask 18-, 19- and 20-year-old men and women to serve their country, serve as first responders, and become productive working-class people and then turn around and tell them they cannot own, possess, transport, use, or purchase firearms. Further hypocrisy is that an 18-, 19-, and 20-year-old can legally vote and yet can't smoke, drink or if these legislations pass cannnot own, possess or transport a firearm. And yet, you all will seek their votes and pander to them for votes and hope they forget that you took their rights to self-defense and capability for them to defend themselves away. How many 18-, 19- and 20-year-old men and women Active Duty Servicemembers, National Guardsmen are serving in Virginia? How many legal gun owning women and men working and traveling in high crime areas or odd shifts that having a firearm may be the difference between being raped, abducted, assaulted or being killed or robbed are you willing to allow becoming victims of these violent crimes? This is an assault on the Constitutional rights of all law-abiding, legal gun owners, first responders, servicemembers and military aged civilians between the ages of 18 and 20. These are the Constitutional violations as well. Virginia Constitution: Article 1 Bill of Rights Sections 1,2,3,7,8,9,10,11 & 13 U.S. Constitution: Amendments: 2,10,14 These legislations are NOT about Public Safety. They are a rights infringement. And, again you all will seek their votes and pander to them for votes in hopes they forget that infringement.
I oppose HB1524, SB27, SB38, SB173, SB272 and SB323
HB1524 is written with the intent to prevent individuals with ill intent from open carrying firearms to intimidate, but is written so broadly that it will ban possession of modern firearms outside the home. How is a legal owner supposed to bring a ‘assault weapon’ to the range, to a competition, or any other lawful activity? If it can not be carried on or about your person, then it can’t be brought outside the home. There is no exception for unloaded guns, no exception for cased firearms. This poorly written bill should be tabled and rewritten. SB27 is intended to allow individuals to sue gun companies for the illegal actions of others. This essentially makes SLAPP suits legal against gun companies in particular. Suing a business for the actions of a third party is a terrible precedent to set. If it is acceptable to do here, why is it not acceptable to sue other companies when their products are misused?
I oppose!
I oppose HB1524, SB27, SB38, SB173, SB272, and SB323. Please represent your constituents by voting against these bills.
I oppose hb1527, sb 27,sb38, sb173, sb272,sb323.
I oppose HB1524, SB27, SB38, SB173, SB272 and SB323 as they infringe upon my Second Amendment rights.
I oppose HB1524, SB27, SB38, SB173, SB272 and SB323. I oppose HB1524 because it interferes with church security teams. It does not make any exception for concealed weapons or conceal carry permit holders. Also because this law does not propose anything that would stop criminals. Someone okay with committing murder isn't going to care about a misdemeanor. This law will just jam up lawful gun owners who otherwise have not committed any crime if they decide to stop by the grocery store after the range on the way home. I oppose SB38. I oppose SB173. During testimony in the Senate we heard from nurses and doctors about all the dangerous people they have to deal with and violence that can happen at the hospital. Law abiding citizens who have conceal carry permits should not be prohibited from being able to protect themselves at these places. I oppose SB272. More gun free zones is not going to solve anything. Virginia Tech and the Government building in Virginia Beach were gun free zones until deranged gunmen decided they weren't. Mass shooters specifically target these areas because they know nobody will be able to fight back. Mass shooters are only stopped when they are met with force. All this law does is stop victims of mass shootings from being able to protect themselves while incentivizing mass shooters to attack these places. I oppose SB323 because it bans possession of legally owned firearms that people have already. Also the whole "Ghost Gun" thing is way overblown. "Ghost Guns" include guns people make at home without serial numbers yes, but also it includes guns with destroyed or defaced serial numbers. Criminals have been destroying serial numbers on firearms for forever but the "Ghost Gun" paranoia is new thing and now law enforcement reports the combined total of which privately made firearms are a small fraction as they always have been. Nothing in this law is going to stop a criminal making their own gun and committing crimes with it. This is only going to harm lawful gun owners who wish to make their own guns at home.
I vehemently oppose HB1524, SB27, SB38, SB173, SB272 and SB323. I am a law abiding gun owner, and these bills place extreme burdens on me and my constituents, making us into criminals overnight. I urge you to kill these unconstitutional bills.
As a law abiding citizen of the Commonwealth of Virginia, I oppose any law infringing upon my right to keep and bear arms. The laws listed above as well as previous laws already passed in the Senate/House are in direct conflict of public safety and only serves as a means to disadvantage law abiding citizens from their right to not only personnel protection but also the foundation of a citizen’s responsibility to gatekeep and deter government overreach.
I strongly oppose HB1524, SB27, SB38, SB173, SB272, and SB323.
I oppose HB1524, SB27, SB38, SB173, SB272 and SB323
I am opposed to HB1524,SB27,SB38,SB173,SB272, and SB323. I’m sure none of you care what your constituents think, but I offer my disapproval of these unconstitutional proposals.
I oppose HB1524, SB27, SB38, SB173, SB272 and SB323
I oppose HB1524, SB27, SB38, SB173, SB272 and SB323.
I. Constitutional Concerns The primary issue with HB 1524 is its tension with the Second Amendment, as articulated in *District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008)*, *McDonald v. City of Chicago, 561 U.S. 742 (2010)*, and *New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, 597 U.S. ___ (2022)*. In *Heller*, the Supreme Court held that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right to keep and bear arms for lawful purposes, including self-defense. *McDonald* extended that protection to state regulation, and *Bruen* explicitly held that the right to “bear” arms extends beyond the home and into public spaces.[1] Applying *Bruen*’s historical-tradition test, the government must show a regulation is consistent with the Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation before such a restriction may be upheld. HB 1524’s sweeping categorical ban on the carriage of commonly owned semiautomatic rifles, pistols, and shotguns in broad public spaces—including streets and parks—lacks any meaningful historical analogue. Historically, firearm restrictions were limited to narrowly defined sensitive places—such as legislative assemblies or courthouses—not entire categories of public space. Therefore, HB 1524 would likely fail under *Bruen*’s constitutional standard. **II. Overbreadth and Vagueness** The bill’s sweeping definitions of “assault firearms” are both overbroad and vague. Many of the listed characteristics, such as a “thumbhole stock” or “threaded barrel,” are cosmetic features that do not affect a firearm’s lethality. By criminalizing possession based on arbitrary features, HB 1524 risks ensnaring lawful citizens—including competitive shooters, hunters traveling to ranges, and firearm instructors—who have no intent to misuse their firearms. **III. Disparate Impact and Enforcement Concerns** Limiting where lawful gun owners may carry firearms while exempting only small categories of officials (law enforcement, cadet corps, etc.) creates unequal treatment under the law. It further invites discretionary enforcement that could disproportionately affect racial and economic minorities. Empirical research, including by scholars such as Joseph Blocher and Darrell Miller, underscores the tension between public safety aspirations and constitutional liberties when broad laws disproportionately restrict lawful possession rather than target misuse.[2] **IV. Policy Alternatives** Rather than categorical bans, policymakers could strengthen safety through narrowly tailored measures such as better enforcement of existing laws, voluntary self-restriction programs, and education on responsible firearm ownership. As outlined by Ayres and Vars in *Weapon of Choice*, voluntary gun-free commitments respect both liberty and safety without infringing constitutional rights.[2] **Conclusion** HB 1524, while motivated by legitimate safety goals, is constitutionally impermissible under *Bruen*, overly broad in scope, and vulnerable to arbitrary enforcement. A more effective and lawful approach would target misuse, not mere possession. The General Assembly should reject HB 1524 and seek firearm policy that aligns with constitutional principles and practical public safety outcomes. --- [1] *Heller*, *McDonald*, *Bruen*, summarized in CRS Report, LSB11108. [2] Joseph Blocher, “Two Concepts of Gun Liberty,” Duke Center for Firearms Law (2020).
This bill is very obviously contrary to rulings by the Supreme Court of The United States and suit will be filed the same week the Governor signs it. It will be an unnecessary expense to the taxpayer when the Commonwealth defends a case it must lose. Passing a bill just to pay back big out of state donors is not something you should participate in.
HB1524 - I most strongly oppose this proposal. As a middle-aged woman, I rely on concealed carry of a pistol for my personal and family's safety. The bill's removal of a concealed carry holder's exemption puts honest, tax-paying voters at risk. Where is the problem? Concealed carry licensees are among the most law-abiding populations. While I vote Democratic, the anti-gun legislation being proposed by my party has convinced me that I cannot continue to vote for a party that will place my personal safety at risk. While I support many gun control efforts to keep firearms away from dangerous people, removing firearms from the general population is not what I voted for. Do not make a criminal out of me. SB27 - I strongly oppose this legislation. SCOTUS recently ruled that Mexico cannot sue Smith & Wesson for the actions of those who use the company's firearms for illegal activities. What makes the VA Assembly think it can overturn federal law and make businessmen and regular citizens engaged in a legal business or transaction civilly or criminally responsible for the criminal/negligent actions of others? Again, while I voted for the Democrats on my ballot last November, I did not vote for laws to restrict where firearms are available. My safety and my family's safety are obviously not the focus of this legislation and I will respond accordingly in November. I do not understand the attacks the Democrats are waging against their law-abiding, voting constituents. Thank you for the opportunity to express my strongest opposition to these two legislative proposals.
HB 1524 is 100% unconstitutional and does not pass the Bruen test of the Supreme Court. This bill will make me LESS SAFE! Law abiding citizens should NOT be restricted by magazine size. Criminals will NOT comply! You are passing a law to give criminals an advantage! That's what HB 1524 does. This is like taking cars away from all drivers because some drive under the influence - a ridiculous approach.
I do NOT support HB1524. Restriction to carry any firearm in a public setting is a direct infringement of the Second Amendment. SCOTUS has already ruled that citizens have a right to carry firearms outside of their home (New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen; 2022).
So a criminal shows up with a firearm that violates this proposed law and a law abiding citizen cannot show up with similar firearm to level the defense ability without violating the law. I am amazed by the stupidity being demonstrated by our representatives in VA. Please oppose this ridiculous unconstitutional legislation.
This is an egregious violation of the constitution. Plain and simple. If you open up that anything in the constitution can be changed on a whim I guess we might as well ban protests while we are at it. And women voters.
The Second Amendment isn’t about hunting and going to the shooting range. This bill is unconstitutional and an affront to the 2nd Amendment. This bill says it’s ok to take scary looking “assault firearms” hunting and to the range, but disarms concealed carry permit holders and everyone else when they go outside their home “into the public”. Do all CHP holders get their permit money back? This bill makes single shot lever action rifles that take magazines, pump action shotguns that take magazines, bolt action rifles (like 22 Rim fire) that take magazines … and yes there are even bolt action pistols that take magazines (the whole list is single shot firearms) … all as “Assault Firearms”! I have three words … “Bruen – common use.” The Germans created the worlds first “Assault Weapon” in 1943, the Sturmgewehr 44, that used an intermediate cartridge (more powerful than a pistol cartridge, but not as powerful as a military rifle or hunting rifle (fun fact, you can’t hunt in Virginia with an AR15 which is typically chambered in Remington .223 or NATO 5.56mm) cartridge like the Winchester .308) with controllable full automatic fire for their lightning warfare (Blitzkrieg) tactics. They did not create semi-auto rifles, pistols, or shotguns to do their lightning warfare. Words matter “assault firearms” are in the class of the Sturmgewehr 44 above, not what this bill would target. This only targets law abiding citizens depriving them of their God given Natural right to self defense and the Second Amendment and makes them more vulnerable to crime. This bill doesn’t do anything to stop crime because criminals don’t obey the law.
This is easily one of the most ridiculous bills presented. Nobody asked for this and is obviously just another attempt to disarm people. I will not be able to carry my legally-purchased twelve round PISTOL because it has more than 10 rounds? What sense does that make? NONE! Criminals will not abide by this and it does nothing for "safety" other than make law-abiding gun owners criminals.
I strongly oppose this bill. It's not only a clear violation of our constitutional right to keep and bear arms, but also nearly impossible to comply with as a person holding a permit to carry a concealed weapon. Literally every modern handgun that is worth carrying has a magazine larger than 10 rounds. It isn't 1875, revolvers are no longer viable carry weapons. It's positively outrageous to expect people to hope to heck whatever pistol they legally purchased and have been carrying for self defense will have magazines with substandard capacity available. Ludicrious to try forcing people to purchase said magazines. And flat out unconstitutional. For the love of all that is holy and right in this world STOP trying to turn law abiding citizens into criminals. This is not a left wing position. This is not a right wing position. This is an AMERICAN position.
Your bill 1524 is a joke, like all the rest have been and I passionately oppose it.
Why are you discriminating against people of different races and ethnicity. ,? And for a person who is poor? Imposing the bills will make it expensive ,less affordable for someone to purchase a firearm for self defense..
I would like you to vote against this bill. When I spoke with you on Lobby day you told me that you supported the 2nd amendment. This bill will make it impossible for someone to carry on of the most common firearms to defend themselves. Criminals will not follow this law. you are only making people less safe by voting yes. Please vote no.
Why discriminate against the constituency whom voted you into office? Vote against the bills..
Firearms were used to free slaves, And self defense..This mantra of self defense carries on ..A hundred years later..You would attempt to limit a constituents right to self defense.. Illegal discrimination ..Do the right thing Vote against the bills..
Yet another gun bill. Why??? Are there not already sufficient ways to punish those committing real crimes with guns? Why do you need to criminalize an act that harms no one? There are so many aspects of the Democrat platform with which I wholeheartedly agree. And then you start with guns and any support I'd otherwise give you is out the window. Stop shooting yourselves in the foot with law abiding gun owners.
This critique is true. Will one of you legislators have the courtesy to step out of the groupthink and vote against the gun bills ..? The challenge is to have the guts to do it..Firearms are used for self defense..Freeing citizens from slavery. Sport shooting creates tax revenue and jobs.
I urge members of the Assembly to vote down HB1524, a bill that is unconstitutional in every aspect. Its overly broad definition of "assault weapon," itself a deceptive term, the near-total prohibition of possessing a normal semi-auto firearm and/or standard capacity magazine off of one's own property, and the penalties for doing so are cruel and unusual and violate the Constitution and Virginia tradition.
I strongly oppose HB1524 by Delegate McGuire, which severely restricts where lawful carry of a firearm can occur, with no exception for concealed carry permit holders. The Constitution clearly states that the right to bear arms shall not be infringed. This is also unconstitutional per the recent Bruen ruling, with none of these areas recognized as "sensitive places" where restrictions could be considered.
The authors of the bills know they cannot ban guns outright..Create hardship bills so a constituent will not want to carry..Delegate, because you possibly do like firearms ..Is it your role ,to treat constituents in a discriminating way..? Against a class of citizens..? Liberals own gun too Not just conservatives..Vote against the bills.
No to Bill HB1524. I am constitutionally guaranteed fundament RIght To Keep and Bear Arms, period.
I respectfully oppose HB 1524. This bill prohibits the public carry of a broad category of semi-automatic firearms based on magazine configuration and listed features, regardless of whether the firearm is lawfully possessed or carried by a person who is otherwise eligible to do so. The prohibition applies to public streets, parks, sidewalks, and other places open to the public, with limited exceptions. Under current Supreme Court precedent, the right to keep and bear arms extends beyond the home and protects arms in common lawful use. Measures that broadly restrict the carry of commonly owned firearms in ordinary public settings raise serious constitutional concerns. HB 1524 regulates lawful possession based on configuration rather than criminal conduct, which creates significant litigation risk for the Commonwealth. From a practical standpoint, this bill creates enforcement ambiguity. Law enforcement officers would be required to evaluate technical firearm characteristics in public settings, increasing the likelihood of inconsistent application. It also removes longstanding exemptions for concealed handgun permit holders and licensed security personnel, despite no demonstrated record of misuse under existing law. If the objective is to reduce violent crime, policies that prioritize enforcement of existing laws against violent offenders are more directly aligned with measurable public-safety outcomes. Expanding categorical carry prohibitions for law abiding citizens on commonly owned firearms risks constitutional challenge without any evidence of improved safety. For these reasons, I respectfully urge the Committee to vote no on HB 1524. Respectfully submitted, Waller Perrow
To the Members of the Committee on Public Safety: My name is Debra Yamanaka and I submit this testimony as a Virginia woman, a voter, and a law-abiding firearm owner. For women, discussions about self-defense are not abstract. They are practical and personal. There is a persistent narrative that a woman with a firearm is more likely to be harmed by it. That belief may guide some individual decisions. But in Virginia, women are not required to organize their lives around generalized assumptions about what is “best” for them. We choose where we work. We choose whether and when to have children. We choose how to move through the world. The decision to actively participate in one’s own self-defense should be no different. HB 1524 would make it unlawful to carry certain commonly owned semi-automatic firearms in public spaces including streets, sidewalks, parks, and “any other place… open to the public.” These are not rare or unusual weapons. They are among the most commonly owned and carried firearms in the United States. For many Virginians, including women who live in apartments or multi-family housing, this means that walking from one’s front door across a public sidewalk to a vehicle while carrying a lawfully owned firearm could constitute a criminal offense. It means that transporting such a firearm to a range for instruction or practice, to ensure responsible handling and proficiency, becomes legally precarious depending on configuration. The line between lawful ownership and criminal liability becomes thin and easily crossed. This bill regulates features, magazine capacity thresholds, stock configurations, threaded barrels - not misconduct. Many of these features are standard. Some, such as adjustable stocks, are particularly important for smaller-framed shooters to achieve safe and proper fit. Limiting commonly used configurations does not target violent behavior; it constrains ordinary citizens engaged in lawful self-defense and training. Virginia has long recognized open carry. Article I, Section 13 of the Constitution of Virginia states that “the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” The ability to bear arms in public spaces is the functional component of that right. Ownership without the ability to carry, particularly in transitional spaces such as sidewalks and parking areas, reduces the right to something symbolic rather than practical. There is also a broader consideration. At a time when many Virginians — across political affiliations — are already concerned about the erosion of rights at the federal level, it would be prudent for state policymakers to avoid expending political capital in ways that alienate large constituencies of otherwise engaged voters. Millions of Virginians lawfully own firearms. Many of them are women. Many do not fit neatly into partisan categories. Rendering ordinary citizens criminals for peacefully carrying commonly owned firearms in public is unlikely to build public trust. It risks reinforcing a perception that compliance with the law offers diminishing protection against ever-shifting restrictions. As a woman, I do not ask the Commonwealth to guarantee my safety. I ask that it not criminalize my choice to participate in it. For these reasons, I respectfully urge you to reject HB 1524.
The so called “gun safety” bills are not about reducing “gun violence” or any violence. Their purpose is to “lawfully” harm or criminalize gun owners across the commonwealth who have never been a problem. For that reason, I oppose these bills.
Proposed Bill 1524 infringes on our Constitutionally protected right to 'bear Arms' per the 2nd Amendment of the US Constitution. The US Supreme Court has affirmed this right repeatedly.
HB1524 is completely unconstitutional and should be voted down. Virginians should be able to carry their own firearms publicly without government overreach. Virginia gun owners have a long established history that they can do this safely.
The NRA-ILA respectfully urges this Subcommittee to oppose House Bill 1524, legislation that would prohibit the carry of so-called "assault firearms" in numerous public locations in specified localities—including streets, sidewalks, public rights-of-way, parks, and other places open to the public While the bill provides an exemption for individuals holding a valid Virginia concealed handgun permit, it nonetheless poses significant concerns for law-abiding citizens who rely on semi-automatic handguns for lawful self-defense. HB1524's expanded definition of "assault firearm" encompasses many common semi-automatic center-fire pistols equipped with features routinely found on modern defensive handguns. This vagueness invites confusion and honest mistakes among otherwise compliant citizens. A law-abiding resident might add a common accessory for improved safety or ergonomics—such as a threaded barrel for a legal compensator or a simple brace—without realizing it could trigger the prohibition. Carrying such a handgun openly or even in certain public contexts could unknowingly result in a Class 1 misdemeanor violation, punishable by up to one year in jail and substantial fines. Such uncertainty does not enhance public safety; it discourages responsible firearm ownership and carry, potentially leaving individuals less prepared to defend themselves or their families in unexpected situations. Criminals, who already disregard existing laws, remain unaffected. Moreover, while concealed handgun permit holders enjoy an exemption, the bill's restrictions on open carry and the risk of misinterpretation even for permittees undermine Virginia's longstanding recognition of the right to bear arms for self-defense. In light of the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, any restriction on public carry must align with the Nation's historical tradition. No such tradition supports prohibiting the carry of entire classes of commonly possessed handguns in public places accessible to the people.
I feel this bill is completely unnecessary and invalid. Law abiding citizens should have no restrictions on where or when they carry, any type of firearm. To and from their home, place of repair, how will a hunter who travels to hunting grounds outside of their own home which may be within city limits, to hunt? When do these restrictions stop?
As a future concealed carry permit holder, I feel this bill HB-1524- is extremely restrictive and dangerous for gun owners of all ages for generations to come. It’s such a broad ban and undefined bill on what assault weapons are, how is anyone supposed to know, if you yourself cannot define what one is.
HB 1524 is not “public safety.” It is a direct, blatant violation of both the Constitution of Virginia and the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. Article I, Section 13 of Virginia’s Constitution is crystal clear: “That a well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defense of a free state… the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” Not “regulated by geography.” Not “restricted to approved zones.” Not “allowed only when the government feels comfortable.” Shall not be infringed means shall not be infringed. HB 1524 criminalizes the carrying of commonly owned firearms in public spaces. That is not regulating misuse — it is prohibiting lawful carry by peaceable citizens. This committee would never consider banning citizens from practicing the first amendment or any other bill of rights liberty in public streets - what makes the sponsor think that banning the second amendment is acceptable? Courts have repeatedly held that arms “in common use” are protected. The rifles they label “assault firearms” are among the most common civilian firearms in America. You cannot ban what millions of ordinary citizens legally own and call it constitutional. This bill flips the presumption of liberty on its head. In Virginia, rights come first and government power comes second. HB 1524 treats citizens as suspects by default and forces them to ask permission to exercise an enumerated right. That is exactly the kind of tyranny the Bill of Rights exists to prevent. Worse, it creates “gun-free zones,” which history and data show only disarm the law-abiding while criminals ignore the law entirely. Criminals don’t obey carry restrictions. Only victims do. So what does this bill actually accomplish? • It disarms lawful citizens • It creates soft targets • It punishes the innocent • It ignores criminals • It violates two constitutions simultaneously Virginia’s founders didn’t write Article I, Section 13 for hunting or sport. They wrote it so citizens could bear arms in public as the “proper, natural, and safe defense of a free state.” A right you can’t carry in public is a right you don’t actually have. HB 1524 isn’t safety policy. It’s unconstitutional control dressed up as safety theater. Legislators don’t get to nullify fundamental rights because they dislike modern rifles or fear political pressure. Their oath is to the Constitution — not to headlines. If they pass this, they aren’t protecting Virginians. They’re violating the very document that gives them authority to serve. Reject HB 1524. Defend the Constitution.
No disrespect, but the Virginia General Assembly has not been granted the authority to dictate where and with what I use to protect myself and my loved ones. If guns were the problem and saving lives was important, the democrats would not have voted down SB78 which doubled the mandatory minimum for a second offense displaying a gun during the commission of a Felony. If you are assuming to authority over how to protect myself, How will each of you ensure my personal safety in all of these “public” places? You really think this law and punishment of a misdemeanor will discourage someone out to commit evil/murder, which is already against the law with much higher penalties. I strongly oppose.
I oppose HB 1524
This bill violates Article 1 Section 13 of the Virginia Constitution clearly and simply states “…..therefore, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed….” It should never have been submitted based upon the unconstitutionality of the bill.
I am opposed to HB1524. This bill essentially bans legal gun owners from being able to take many types of firearms off their own property! This is Unconstitutional, via Virginia's Constitution and the U.S. Constitution, on it's face. Please see: Bruen, Caetano, Heller, Miller, McDonald, etc. You are not even allowing Concealed Handgun Permit Holders or average gun owners to carry most firearms off their property to their vehicle. Not to go to the range, not to go to a friend's or family member's place, not to go hunting, not for self defense, nowhere. This bill, like the others, is going way too far... We are still a state in the United States of America.
As a resident of Virginia, I strongly oppose this bill. It removes any exception for concealed handgun permit holders in lines 49 and 50. This bill will make the most common handgun in America, a Glock 19, illegal to carry in public. If this bill becomes laws thousands of concealed carry permit holders will become criminals overnight and be exposed to up to a year in jail for a Class 1 Misdemeanor conviction.
I oppose this bill. Please do not vote in favor of passing this.
HB 1524 unconstitutionally restricts the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens by banning the public carry of commonly owned firearms and eliminating proven exemptions for permit holders. This legislation creates a double standard that prioritizes government over the people; therefore, I strongly oppose this bill and urge you to vote against its passage.
I oppose HB 1524.
This is unconstitutional and should not stand!!!
To restrict the legal carrying of firearms in public places like this bill aims to restrict is an infringement of our rights as lawful American citizens. We have a right to safely carry arms to defend ourselves guaranteed by the second amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Do not restrict our rights to defend ourselves or our loved ones, instead create laws that punish criminal acts of force and violence. Criminalizing our ability to ensure we are equipped to provide for our self defense and preservation is wrong.
Delegate McQuinn, As your constituent, I urge you to oppose HB 1524. At the very least, an exception should be made for concealed carry permit holders. This bill is unconstitutional on its face, as the Supreme Court has already ruled that citizens are allowed to carry firearms in public places. In over a decade, there have been no legal issues with concealed carry holders carrying lawfully in Virginia. Any bill to make carrying firearms by law abiding citizens illegal would not reduce crime and would create a considerable burden on lawful gun owners in the exercise of their Second Amendment rights. Thank you, James E. Beggs Henrico, Va.
Please do not complicate the VA code for lawful concealed or open carry. This will penalize citizens not intending to do any harm , simply for being in the wrong place with an otherwise legally borne firearm.
I oppose all of these bills
To whom it may concern, HB1524 prohibits the carrying of any commonly-owned self defense firearm in virtually any public space, making it a class 1 misdemeanor if convicted. The term "assault weapon" in the text of this bill targets an immensely broad category of arms that are overwhelmingly carried for the legal purposes of self-defense. Denying Virginians the right to defend themselves against violence is inherently unconstitutional and violates some of the most basic aspects of human rights. Putting that aside for a moment, what this bill is proposing is in direct opposition of the outcome of New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen in 2022. The 6-3 ruling that the Supreme Court passed down in this case recognizes that a person who is legally permitted to own a firearm, and possesses a permit in accordance with state laws, has the right to carry arms for self defense outside the home. There is no historical analogue for sweeping bans on the otherwise lawful carrying of arms in public for self defense. In addition to that, the Bruen decision makes very clear that it is a flagrant violation of the Second Amendment to pass a ban on firearms that are in common use for lawful purposes (i.e. self defense). While this particular bill does not seek to outright ban these arms, it does seek to prevent their aforementioned use for the lawful right of Virginians to defend themselves. This is again a flagrant violation of the Bruen decision. Bruen also makes clear that restrictions on the lawful, public carrying of firearms must be analogous to historical laws in kind. There is no historical parallel for blanket "no carrying anywhere in public" laws, such as this one, representing another violation of the Supreme Court decision this bill poses. The punishment of a Class 1 Misdemeanor lacks any historical basis and certainly represents a violation of the Bruen case as well as the Second Amendment, as public carry of arms is very clearly protected in the text analysis of that decision. There is no reality in which the text of this bill prescribes a punishment upon law-abiding gun owners that is appropriate and/or congruent with the Constitution of the United States. To impose a criminal offense on anyone who seeks to lawfully defend him or herself from violence or harm lacks any historical basis, and only represents a desire of the Commonwealth to heavily restrict firearm ownership while increasing revenue from criminal penalties. In summary, this bill represents a hilariously weak attempt to subvert the founding documents of the United States of America, as well as the legal decisions of the highest court in this land. It has no basis in historical, logical, or legal precedent, and I look forward to seeing it crash and burn. Sic Semper Tyrannis
Bill HB-1524 is not only unconstitutional, but arbitrarily singles out one object with no meaning behind it. If what is classified as an "assault firearm" to be banned from public places, then baseball bats and cars should be banned too. In 2024, over 39,000 deaths were caused by car accidents and only 600 or 700 were caused from being shot from any rifle, including "assault firearms". Therefore, following the logic of bill HB-1524, to save lives, cars should be banned from public places before "assault firearms" are banned. In fact, the number 1 cause of death in the United States is heart disease. Combined with stroke, they account for over 28% or over 850,000 deaths and both are caused, among other things, by unhealthy fast food. Compared to 600-700 "assault weapons" deaths, fast food definitely should be the first one to be banned from public places, according to the spirit of this bill. Therefore, I strongly urge you to reject this bill.
This bill makes no sense people with permits to carry concealed firearms have been thoroughly investigated by the state police and its our constitutional rights to carry firearms without being subject to any kind of legal action but if you pass it even democrats will vote against you and we will turn the state red the two clubs I belong to have two thousand citizens that are registered to vote and we will vote Republican and there a lot of democrats that are with us and are clubs members to so you’re future is in your hands
As a part of the LGBTQ community, I ask you to vote against this. I carry concealed and this would make me a criminal. This law is unethical and I feel it targets me personally. VOTE NO!
I firmly oppose House Bill 1524, which seeks to broadly prohibit the public carrying of “assault firearms” in public spaces across our Commonwealth as currently drafted. Under this proposal, the definition of prohibited firearms is so vague and expansive that it could effectively criminalize the lawful carry of many common semi-automatic firearms by law-abiding Virginians in public places such as streets, sidewalks, parks, and other open areas. While I share concerns about public safety, this bill’s sweeping restrictions raise serious constitutional concerns and would undermine the rights of responsible gun owners without addressing the underlying causes of violent crime in our communities. Instead of targeting law-abiding citizens and limiting their ability to defend themselves, we should focus on policies that strengthen enforcement of existing laws, improve mental health resources, and support community-based violence prevention strategies. We have a duty to protect both public safety and individual rights. HB 1524, as written, stakes too much of that balance on overly broad prohibitions that could impact countless Virginians who abide by the law every day. For these reasons, I respectfully urge you to oppose HB 1524. Thank you.
This bill goes against everything the Constitution stands for. How can a right, guaranteed by the Constitution, be only allowable in my home or on my property. The idea is repellent to liberty and a free people and unlawful on its face. Please vote against this bill.
This bill is an atrocious and unconstitutional overreach on the right to self-defense within the state of Virginia. By restricting the right to self-defense and making it illegal to possess a firearm for lawful purposes in public spaces in Virginia, you are placing citizens in danger and refusing them the right to any self-defense measures to protect themselves or their loved ones. While the politicians enacting this may request security details for themselves, no such protective measure exists for the common citizen who is apparently considered second-class by the delegate who proposed this bill. There is no duty for police to protect individuals in Virginia, so what is the common citizen expected to do when they or their family are in immediate and tangible danger? Just die? The delegate proposing this bill is demanding ceding any right to self-defense in public spaces in Virginia, however the carve out for themselves in the form of allowing law enforcement engaged in their personal security provides them a benefit they will not allow their constituents and is particularly egregious. I urge the delegate to retract this bill and for elected officials to remove this bill from consideration. The right to self-defense is inherent in a free and fair society and limiting it only supports and enables the predations of the lawless and criminal. The committee should refuse any further such restrictions on law-abiding citizens in the pursuit of their own self-defense, and restrict furtherance of bills that aim only to stomp on the constitutional rights of US citizens.
As a resident of Virginia, I request you OPPOSE HB 1524, Delegate McGuire, which severely restricts where a broad category of commonly owned firearms can be carried. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in New York State Rife and Pistol Association v. Bruen that states cannot have sweeping prohibitions on the carry of firearms in public areas, which is exactly what HB 1524 does. I respectfully request that you oppose all restrictions on 2nd amendment rights of law-abiding citizens of Virginia and focus on the crimes committed instead.
I think we're beyond the point of no return at this point, we should not have to ask, to have our constitutional right upheld yet they get endlessly violated by people who take an Oath of office and then turn around and break that oath. I want ALL that continue this perpetuation of constant infringement on clearly ruled issues of the Supreme Court of the United States, MUST BE "both dangerous and exotic in nature to be held accountable for violation of Us 18 241 and 2422 18 US 2381 and 2384. The creation of spacial limitation and locations creates an encumbered perspective to one's such rights. It's quite clear to me and many others that you don't want us to be able to protect ourselves but want us in harms way, I accuse those of you that continue to push for such measures as acting in bad faith and WILLFULLY engaging in the creation of such legislation that deliberately endangers those of us that act civil in society while at the same time lower Minimum mandatory sentencing for violent offenders. I accuse those representatives of eroding and undermining the Common Wealth of Virginia, it's citizens, the Virginia Constitution and the United States Constitution and by doing so are aiding the enemy. I warned you all in prior emails that you are breaking your oath, so no one gets qualified immunity, Owens V City of Independence 445 US 622 1980. Violations of US 5 137 Maybury V Madison 1803 and 118 US 425 Norton V Shelby County 1886. Article 6.2 Supremacy Clause. 9 and 10 Amendment apply only to the states attempt to create laws that fall outside of the Constitution of the United States and are not limited to it's enumeration aspects alone as Citizens have rights that also fall outside the textual scope of the Bill of Rights. In conclusion, I am apposed to this bill as it only hurts me and helps criminals.
This is yet another unnecessary attack on the law abiding, and a waste of our legislators' time. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in New York State Rife and Pistol Association v. Bruen that states cannot have sweeping prohibitions on the carry of firearms in public areas, which is exactly what HB 1524 does. Table this unconstitutional mess of a bill, and punish criminal offenders, not the law abiding!
HB 1524 - Honestly, I don't even know where to begin with this anti-Constitutional bill. First, the definition of "assault weapon" is arbitrary. According to Democrats, it's anything that's not a revolver, goes bang, and looks scary. Second, the bill defines "public space" as "any other place of whatever nature that is open to the public." Is that not . . . everywhere?! The sweeping and indiscriminate nature of this bill prevents citizens, even those in lawful possession of a CCP, from carrying a firearm outside of their own property in the state of Virginia. Normally, this is where I'd say something like, "This bill does nothing to prevent violent crime, because violent criminals will ignore it anyway." But I think we can stop the charade. None of these anti-Constitutional, anti-self-defense bills are "common sense." They're nonsense. Their goal is not to prevent crime. Their goal is to disarm a group of people with whom Democrats disagree, because Democrats are afraid those people are as violent as the Democrat party (which they're not). Remember, Democrats elected a chief law enforcement officer who stated he wanted to shoot a political opponent in the head and hoped his children would die. And I'm the scary one, because I believe in our Constitution? Ya'll are sick. George Mason (who wrote our state Constitution) said it best. "To disarm the people . . .[i]s the most effectual way to enslave them."
This bill is yet another totally unnecessary attack on law abiding citizens for no other reason than to appease someone's feelings. When did a law abiding Virginia citizen ever use one of these mythical 'assault weapons' to harm the public? There are tens of millions of these firearms in common use for sport shooting, self defense and hunting so severally restricting where they can be carried flies in the face of the SCOTUS Bruen ruling.
I am imploring this committee to OPPOSE the passage of this horrible bill. It is an unconstitutional infringement on our rights. The US Supreme Court has already ruled that law-abiding citizens have the right to carry firearms outside of their homes and in public. Concealed handgun permit holders and licensed security guards are no longer exempt from this code section, even though neither one has caused any legal issues by carrying such loaded firearms publicly for over a decade. Of course, the government, our servant, exempts itself from all this nonsense.
I oppose this bill as a Virginian that holds to the constitution of the United States and exercise my right to carry my protection "tool" with me in public places.
The second amendment is a right not a privilege that can be taken away or will be taken away. Our right or sovereign under the constitution second amendment shall not be in French. Why don’t y’all work on making punishments more harsh for the criminals that rape people moles, children murder, and so on. Instead of trying to make hard-working, taxpaying citizens criminals
Concealed handgun permit holders and licensed security guards are no longer exempt from this code section, even though neither one has caused any legal issues by carrying such loaded firearms publicly for over a decade. Of course, the government, our servant, exempts itself from all this nonsense. The U.S. Supreme Court has already ruled that citizens have the right to carry firearms outside of their homes and in public, so this bill is unconstitutional on its face.
Please vote NO on HB 1524 from Delegate McGuire, which bans the carry of 1) a semi-automatic centerfire rifle or pistol that has a fixed magazine that holds more than 10 rounds or 2) a semi-automatic centerfire rifle or pistol that accepts a detachable magazine of any size and has any of a variety of cosmetic features or 3) a semi-automatic shotgun with a fixed magazine that holds more than 7 rounds of the longest ammunition for which it is chambered or has a detachable magazine of any size, with any of a variety of cosmetic features, on or about a person on a public street, road, alley, sidewalk, public right-of-way, in a park, or in any place open to the public. There is an exception for carrying to/from a place of purchase or repair. Concealed handgun permit holders and licensed security guards are no longer exempt from this code section, even though neither one has caused any legal issues by carrying such loaded firearms publicly for over a decade. Of course, the government, our servant, exempts itself from all this nonsense. The U.S. Supreme Court has already ruled that citizens have the right to carry firearms outside of their homes and in public, so this bill is unconstitutional to begin with according to both the US Constitution and the State of Virginia Constitution. This bill would deny the basic human right of self defense and self perseverance to the citizens of Virginia. It was established in the Public Duty Doctrine and reinforced by the US Supreme Court ( South v. Maryland (1856) & Castle Rock v. Gonzales (2005) & Warren v. District of Columbia (1981) ) that police do not have a specific duty to protect individuals. This bill removes the only protection individuals have, (self) defense truly is a public / private partnership, and the private citizens require un-infringed rights to firearms to perform and be safe.
It is exceptionally rare to discover anyone carrying a sporting rifle in public. This is a nonsensical issue searching for a solution through mindless legislation. Any restriction directed at any firearm only illustrates corrupt ideology attempting to criminalize lawful firearms owners. Which part of the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution do you not understand?
Good morning, As a lifelong Virginia resident I can’t believe what bills are even being considered. My name is Chandler Cobb and I currently reside in Isle of Wight County in Smithfield, VA. I’m a Christian, a disabled Veteran, a husband, and I am against any bills that take away our God-given, govt protected, Second Amendment rights. I’ve been a concealed weapons licensee for over 20 years and have never had to fire my weapon in defense of myself or another. That is the story with 99% of Virginian concealed weapons license holders. We also prevent harm without having to fire a single round. The recent Supreme Court precedent set in Bruen and Heller, makes every anti-second amendment bill written UNCONSTITUTIONAL and will eventually be overturned by SCOTUS. Please do not support any bills that take away our rights. These bills will do absolutely nothing nothing to make VA safer and will actually make us less safe. Legal gun owners in this country and this state follow the laws, but criminals don’t care what laws you write banning firearms as they don’t follow laws. These bills only hurt us law abiding concealed weapons license holders and gun owners in VA. Furthermore, there are millions of standard capacity magazines and AR15 sporting rifles and handguns that carry standard capacity magazines. You all are making instant criminals out of not only every Virginian, but anyone driving through our great state. I ask you all to vote NO on EVERY gun bill that infringes on our rights and that’s any bill adding regulations and restrictions on the firearms millions of us own. Thank you and God bless, Chandler Cobb Soli Deo Gloria~ Sic Semper Tyranis~
I am a paralyzed veteran living in Fairfax County. I also have a home in the Shenandoah Valley near Edinburg. I strongly believe in the second amendment and the right to keep and arms. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that modern day firearms in common use for lawful purposes, including self-defense, may not be banned. This proposed legislation is in direct conflict with Supreme Court precedent, and the second amendment. Limiting the choice of weapon to use in self-defense and restricting the number of rounds that a law abiding citizen can use places that citizen at a disadvantage when confronted by an attacker or a group of attackers who are not bound by such limitations nor care about violating said law. In addition, there’s no guarantee that 10 rounds or even 15 rounds will be sufficient to prevent or stop a crime person or family. Often it has taken several rounds to stop an unlawful attack in some defensive cases. Attackers have foreknowledge of their plans, whereas the defender has no such knowledge. This Bill could have devastating consequences for a person‘s ability to fend off and attacker or attackers. It only will affect the law abiding citizens and doesn’t solve anything. This is nothing more than a gun grab by gun haters. Don’t tread on my constitutional rights or those of other law abiding citizens This bill needs to be defeated and placed in a trash bin.
I stand with the VCDL's position on the firearms related bills. I oppose all Gun Control.
I AM OPPOSED
Please oppose HB1524, Concealed handgun permit holders and licensed security guards are no longer exempt from this code section, even though neither one has caused any legal issues by carrying such loaded firearms publicly for over a decade. It's interesting that the government, exempts itself from this terrible bill. The U.S. Supreme Court has already ruled that citizens have the right to carry firearms outside of their homes and in public, so this bill is unconstitutional on its face.
I STRONGLY OPPOSE this bill
As a law abiding citizen and a retired Corrections Officer of 36 years I strongly object to this bill. It is only designed to infringe upon my 2nd Amendment rights and does nothing to keep the citizens of the Commonwealth safe from gun violence. I learned one thing from my time as a C. O. Criminals don’t let laws stop them. Only law abiding citizens obey the laws. Please focus on criminals and not law abiding citizens. Vote no on this bill!
As a law abiding citizen and a retired Corrections Officer of 36 years I strongly object to this bill. It is only designed to infringe upon my 2nd Amendment rights and does nothing to keep the citizens of the Commonwealth safe from gun violence. I learned one thing from my time as a C. O. Criminals don’t let laws stop them. Only law abiding citizens obey the laws. Please focus on criminals and not law abiding citizens. Vote no on this bill!
As a constituent, I urge you to OPPOSE HB 1524, Delegate McGuire, which severely restricts where a broad category of commonly owned firearms can be carried. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in New York State Rife and Pistol Association v. Bruen that states cannot have sweeping prohibitions on the carry of firearms in public areas, which is exactly what HB 1524 does. The U.S. Supreme Court has already ruled that citizens have the right to carry firearms outside of their homes and in public, so this bill is unconstitutional on its face.
I encourage you all to oppose this bill. It does nothing to promote public safety or control criminal actors. The bill is a backward-looking and punishes law-abiding citizens. It is a clear violation of the the US Constitution (both Article 1, Section 8, para "To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;" as well as the 2nd Amendment). Thank you for y our consideration in this issue.
This bill would criminalize carrying perfectly ordinary firearms that countless peaceful Virginians have legally purchased, trained with, and have come to rely upon for for personal protection. In effect, this bill would turn those otherwise law-abiding Virginians into criminals for the "crime" of continuing to carry those firearms. Finally, this bill would particularly hurt those Virginians who lack the means to purchase additional, alternative firearms.
Do not support this HB1524. It does nothing to reduce crime, it merely burdens the law abiding.
I urge you to OPPOSE House Bill 1524 in your committee. House Bill 1524 prohibits carrying "assault firearms" in public places, including streets, sidewalks, and parks. Because of vague definitions, HB 1524 effectively criminalizes carrying any center-fire semi-automatic firearm in the Commonwealth. This bill does nothing to address crime in Commonwealth, and only jeopardizes law-abiding gun owners. Again, I urge you to OPPOSE HB 1524. Many members of my family, both male and female, have Virginia Concealed Handgun Permits and frequently carry handguns. If this bill becomes law, protecting ourselves and our loved ones will become much more challenging since we would not to be able to lawfully carry in the public places that we have to travel through as we move between locations where we would be legally allowed to carry. This would effectively end our ability to carry handguns in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Respectfully, Thomas S. Williams III
I work in Lynchburg at Lynchburg general and we see more drug-related deaths and alcohol related deaths more than firearm related deaths. I've also been doing some reading and listening to some of y'all talk about gun related deaths with young people those are gum related deaths that involve pistols / handguns due to the fact they are not properly locked up. I'm a proud Jewish American born and raised in the Commonwealth and have lived in Lynchburg my whole life. I asked you all to please not to outlaw or ban firearms y'all consider our assault weapons or high capacity magazines, I voted Democrat this time for more affordable cost of living here in Virginia and to push ICE ut as well but I did not vote for Spamberger and her team so they could outlaw something that I enjoy using for recreational activities and hunting, I probably put 40 rounds down range with my rifle that's two boxes of rifle ammunition and if I take my pistol out I'm probably going through 50 rounds. I would ask y'all to stay true to your word from what I was hearing in the beginning and requiring people to take a safety and educational course in order to own an "assault style rifle". The other reason I'm reaching out is I don't feel comfortable in today's world where there's so much hate discrimination against the Jewish community I don't feel as if I can trust local law enforcement nor our government with our current leadership in Washington I prefer to be able to protect myself and my family and I feel more comfortable with firearms that are easier to use like the AR-15 or shotguns that have a pistol grip intake a magazine. So I asked you all today please please do not pass on the assault weapons bill and do not outlaw high capacity magazine. Make it to where if people want to own an assault-style firearm they need to first take a safety and educational course that would require you to pass a background check just in order to take the class. And in doing so have its where if they take this class they also be able to apply for a hunting permit. For example here in Virginia if you take the hunter safety course you automatically are able to apply for your concealed carry without taking the concealed carry course, and if you take the concealed carry course you don't have to take the hunter safety course. I'm taking time out of my day for what is going to be a 20 hour shift day probably to send this message to you all today, please please reconsider. Thank you all and have a blessed day Dr. Rowland 24502 Lynchburg VA.
This bill would put individuals that carry their firearm to a lawful firing range in legal jeopardy.
I believe that the actual text of HB1524 is at odds with the intended goal of blocking the open carry of assault firearms. The broad language on lines 14-16 and the looseness of the "actually engaged" terminology on line 53 suggest that this bill would criminalize lawful transportation of firearms for example through a public parking lot between a person's vehicle and a shooting range, or from their home to their vehicle. I ask that our legislators consider the actual ramifications of HB1524 as it is currently drafted and amend it to add exceptions such as allowing firearms to be transported inside soft cases or freely when unloaded.
I am against these proposed bills to impededany sort of restriction on the carry of firearms, banning any sort of accessory, type or feature of a firearm, or any law that adds additional penalties, burdens, fees, or taxes on firearms. The punishment the law abiding citizen with burdensome laws and infringe upon their constitutional rights. The 2nd ammendment is very clear in "shall not be infringed," yet these bills infringe on the freedom of people to bear arms. The propososers of these bills know they're illegal bills and are not constitutional. Virginia has long been a beacon of freedom, and was instrumental in in the American Revolution to secure that freedom. It is disguisting seeing its politicians try to forcibly take that freedom away from its people. I am opposed to these bills and urge the legislature to throw them out, with prejudice.
As a pediatrician I have long been appalled that firearms are the number one cause of death of our children- and having lived thru both mass shootings in Pittsburgh and Buffalo, I immersed myself in the data to understand the problem- we know FIrearm licensing , and concealed carry licensing that incorporates safe storage training saves lives. We know that the access to assault weapons so easily , especially in people with prior threats or concerning obsessions is a reason for most of our mass shootings in America. We know that in domestic violence access to firearms , even in dating relationships , is why women continue to die even with protective orders in place. As a physician I strongly feel concealed carry , especially assault weapons has no place in hospitals , colleges , schools and public buildings. In Virginia we can have laws that really protect people without infringing on the right of sane citizens to own guns. Brief waiting periods, safe storage education for all gun owners, safe storage requirements for all gun owners and a strong emergency protective order system will save many lives and I urge you to support them.
U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1791 as part of the Bill of Rights, protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms. It states: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed". These are a slap to the face of law abiding gun owners of the state of Virginia. I'm atonished at the blatan ignorance of a firearm and my rights, who voted for these idiots?
I am writing to you as a concerned constituent of Senate District 13 to express my firm opposition to the package of firearm-related legislation currently moving through the General Assembly. These proposed laws represent a significant departure from our constitutional traditions and, in my view, constitute an impermissible infringement upon the fundamental rights of Virginians. As you cast your votes on these bills, I would like to respectfully remind you of the oath you took upon assuming your office: "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge all the duties incumbent upon me as a Senator... according to the best of my ability, so help me God." This oath is not a mere formality; it is a binding promise to protect the framework of liberty that governs our society. Central to that framework is Article I, Section 13 of the Constitution of Virginia, which explicitly states: "That a well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defense of a free state, therefore, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; that standing armies, in time of peace, should be avoided as dangerous to liberty; and that in all cases the military should be under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power." Furthermore, the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution makes it clear that the right to keep and bear arms is an individual right that "shall not be infringed." Through the Fourteenth Amendment, this protection is applied to the states, ensuring that: "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law..." The legal landscape regarding these rights has been further clarified by the United States Supreme Court in NYSRPA v. Bruen. The Court’s decision established that the government must demonstrate that any firearm regulation is consistent with this Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation. Crucially, the Court has long held that firearms "in common use" for lawful purposes are protected. The AR-15, as the most popular rifle in America, is undeniably in "common use" by millions of law-abiding citizens for self-defense, competition, and hunting. To vote for a ban on such a platform would be a direct violation of the standard set by the highest court in the land. Beyond these legal mandates, I urge you to consider the practical impact on your constituents in Petersburg. These measures do not target criminal intent; instead, they criminalize peaceable citizens for possessing hardware legally acquired and used safely every day. If the goal is to address gun-related violence, I recommend a return to the proven success of Project Exile. In the first year of its implementation in Richmond, homicides dropped by 33% and armed robberies dropped by 30%, according to the Department of Justice. As a legislator, you have the power to prioritize the certainty of prosecution over the administrative restriction of hardware. I urge you to honor your oath and the constitutional protections of all Virginians by voting against these overreaching measures and focusing instead on holding criminals accountable. Sincerely, John G Chaney